Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M007907200 on September 19, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 50, 39727-39733, December 15, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/50/39727    most recent
M007907200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, B. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Activation of Transcription Factor SAF Involves Its Phosphorylation by Protein Kinase C*

Alpana RayDagger , Alan P. Fields§, and Bimal K. RayDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 and the § Department of Pharmacology and the Sealy Center for Cancer Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555

Received for publication, August 29, 2000, and in revised form, September 18, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The transcription factor serum amyloid A (SAA)-activating factor (SAF), a family of zinc finger proteins, plays a significant role in the induced expression of the SAA gene. Activity of SAF is regulated by a phosphorylation event involving serine/threonine protein kinase (Ray, A., Schatten, H., and Ray, B. K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4300-4308; Ray, A., and Ray, B. K. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 7327-7335). However, the identity of the protein kinase has so far remained unknown. Induction of SAA by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, a known agonist of protein kinase C (PKC), suggested a potential role of the PKC signaling pathway in the activation process. The DNA binding activity of endogenous SAF was increased by agonists of PKC. In vitro phosphorylation of SAF-1 by PKC-beta markedly increased its DNA binding ability. Consistent with these findings, treatment of cells with activators of PKC or overexpression of PKC-beta II in transfected cells increased expression of an SAF-regulated promoter. Further analysis with a GAL4 reporter system indicated that PKC-mediated phosphorylation mostly increases the DNA binding activity of SAF-1. Together these data indicated that the PKC signaling pathway plays a major role in controlling expression of SAF-regulated genes by increasing the interaction between promoter DNA and phosphorylated SAF.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Serum amyloid A (SAA),1 an inflammation-responsive gene, is highly induced (100-1000-fold) by extracellular signals generated during periods of inflammation (1, 2). A higher level of plasma SAA is linked to the pathophysiology of many chronic inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and secondary amyloidosis. In rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, autocrine induction of collagenase by SAA is shown to be critical for the destruction of connective tissues in the affected area (3-5). SAA is also identified as the precursor of amyloid A protein, one of the chief constituents of amyloid fibrils found in secondary and experimental amyloidosis (6). Induction of SAA is primarily regulated via transcriptional induction of this gene (7). Several different cytokines, IL-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha alone or in combination, and inflammatory mediators like phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) can increase transcription of the SAA gene (2, 6, 8). In addition, corticosteroids have been shown to synergize the effects of IL-1 and IL-6 (9-11). Studies on the mechanism of SAA gene induction have shown that activation of SAA in many tissue types is regulated by the transcription factor SAF (12, 13). Many inflammatory agents that activate SAA, including interleukin-1 and -6, bacterial lipopolysaccharide, and minimally modified low density lipoprotein, also activate SAF and increase its transactivation potential (12-16). These studies also indicated that phosphorylation of SAF, by a serine/threonine protein kinase pathway, may be a critical step in regulating this process. For insight into mechanisms by which SAF is activated and thus regulates expression of SAA, analysis of its activation mechanism was undertaken.

Induction of SAA by PMA, a known agonist of protein kinase C (PKC), raises the possibility that a PKC-mediated phosphorylation event(s) may play an important role in activating SAF. PKCs play a crucial role in regulating many cellular functions including cell transformation, growth, and differentiation by modulating the activity of cellular target proteins and transcription factors (for reviews, see Refs. 17-19). Phosphorylation of many transcription factors by PKC is a crucial signal transduction event that results in an altered expression pattern of many genes. In the present study, we show that agonists of the PKC signaling pathway, including PMA, can increase expression of an SAF-dependent promoter as well as the DNA binding ability of endogenous SAF. Overexpression of PKC-beta II in transfected cells without the addition of PKC-inducing agents produces a similar result. Taken together, these observations indicate, for the first time, a role for activated PKC in modulating the function of transcription factor SAF and expression of its target genes.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture and Transfection-- Rabbit synoviocyte (HIG82) cells, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, were derived from the interarticular soft tissue of the knee joint of a normal female New Zealand White rabbit. These cells maintain many of the features of normal rabbit synoviocytes and are activated by phorbol myristic acid and interleukin-1 (20). HIG82 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing high glucose (4.5 g/liter) supplemented with 7% fetal calf serum. For induction, HIG82 cells were stimulated with 100 nM PMA, 4alpha -phorbol-12,13-didecanoate (4alpha -PDD), 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG), and 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol (DOG). In some experiments, different concentrations of PMA and 4alpha -PDD, as indicated in the figure legends, were used. Myristoylated protein kinase inhibitor 19-27, a cell-permeable PKC-inhibitory peptide (PKC-I, 19-27), was added at concentrations of 10 and 50 µM as indicated in the figure legends. Calphostin C (21) and bisindolylmaleimide I (22), specific inhibitors of PKC, were added at a 100 nM concentration in the culture medium of HIG82 cells. These agents were obtained from Calbiochem.

Transient transfections of HIG82 cells were carried out by the calcium phosphate precipitation method (23) using a mixture of plasmid DNAs containing 1 µg of reporter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) plasmid, 1 µg of pSV-beta -gal (Promega) as a control for measuring transfection efficiency, and carrier DNA so that the total amount of DNA in each transfection assay remained constant. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were harvested, and cell extracts were prepared by freeze-thaw lysis in 0.25 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0. beta -Galactosidase activity was assayed with the substrate o-nitrophenyl-beta -D-galactopyranoside as described previously (23). To normalize for any variation in transfection efficiency, CAT assays were performed (23) with cell extracts containing an equivalent amount of beta -galactosidase activity. Prior to the CAT assay, each cell extract was heated at 60 °C for 10 min to inactivate endogenous acetylase activity. Different agents that were used in the transfection assay had no effect on beta -galactosidase expression. All transfection experiments were performed at least three times.

Plasmid Constructs-- The CAT reporter plasmid, wt SAF-CAT was constructed by ligating three copies of the SAF DNA-binding element, base pairs -254 to -226 of the SAA promoter (13), into the pBLCAT2 plasmid vector (24). The sequence of the wild type element was 5'-CCCTTCCTCTCCACCCACAGCCCCC-3'. A mutant plasmid, mt SAF-CAT, was constructed by ligating three copies of the mutated SAF DNA-binding element into the pBLCAT2 vector. The sequence of mutated oligonucleotide was 5'-CCATTACTGTCGACTGACAGCTACC-3'. Underlined bases represent altered sequences. SAF expression plasmid pCMV-SAF1 contained a cDNA encoding SAF1 (14) subcloned into the pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) plasmid. A full-length cDNA encoding the human PKC-beta II gene (25) cloned in sense orientation into the pREP episomal expression vector (Invitrogen) was used for expression of the kinase in HIG82 cells.

Oligonucleotides-- The sequences of double-stranded oligonucleotides synthesized for the use as competitors were as follows: SAF-wt, 5'-CTTCCTCTCCACCCACAGCCCCC-3'; SAF-mt, 5'-CCATTACTGTCGACTGACAGCTACC-3' (underlined bases represent altered sequences); Oct-1, 5'-TGTCGAATGCAAATCACTAGAA-3' (Promega Corp.).

Construction of GAL4-SAF1 Plasmid-- Plasmid RSV-GAL4DBD (26), encoding the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 driven by the RSV promoter and followed by a BamHI site was used to prepare the GAL4-SAF1 construct. A full-length SAF-1 cDNA was fused in frame C-terminal to GAL4 amino acids 1-147 at the BamHI site. The resulting RSVGAL4DBD-SAF1 clone contained two synthetic amino acids at the junction and was verified by DNA sequencing. To assay activation, a reporter CAT gene with minimum basal activity and three GAL4-binding sites, pGAL4-CAT (26), was chosen.

Bacterial Expression of SAF-1 (FLAG-SAF1)-- A cDNA encoding full-length SAF1 sequence was subcloned into pAR(Delta RI)59/60 (27), a FLAG-tagged vector kindly provided by Dr. Michael Blanar. Escherichia coli BL21(DE3/pLysS) cells transformed with this plasmid were grown to an optical density of 0.6 (A600), and expression of FLAG-SAF1 protein was induced with 1.0 mM isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside for 3 h. FLAG-SAF1 protein was purified by affinity chromatography on anti-FLAG-agarose (Sigma) following the manufacturer's protocol.

Nuclear Extracts and Electromobility Shift Assay (EMSA)-- Nuclear extracts were prepared, following a method described earlier (13), from HIG82 cells that were treated with various agents as described throughout. EMSA was performed with equal protein amounts of nuclear extracts according to the methods described previously (14). Protein concentrations were measured by following Bradford's method (28). Bacterially expressed FLAG-SAF1 was used in some EMSAs as the source of DNA-binding factor. For antibody interaction studies, anti-SAF1 antiserum (14) and anti-FLAG antiserum (Sigma) were added to the reaction mixture during a preincubation period of 30 min on ice. Radiolabeled probes, SAF and Oct-1, were prepared by incorporating 32P at the termini of double-stranded oligonucleotides whose sequences are described under "Oligonucleotides."

In Vitro Phosphorylation of SAF1 by PKC-beta -- Bacterially expressed and affinity-purified FLAG-SAF1 protein was phosphorylated in vitro by incubating 0.1 µg of SAF1 protein with 1.0 unit of PKC-beta (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) in a buffer system containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mg/ml benzamidine, 10 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP in a 20-µl reaction mixture for 45 min at 25 °C. Immunoprecipitation of phosphorylated proteins was conducted by incubating with an anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma) at 4 °C for 14-16 h in the immunoprecipitation buffer, containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 2.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mg/ml benzamidine. Next, 50 µl of protein G-agarose slurry was added to the reaction mixture and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with gentle shaking in a rotary shaker. After centrifugation, the pellet was washed five times with the immunoprecipitation buffer (5 min each) to remove any unbound radioactivity. The pellet was resuspended in 20 µl of buffer containing 2% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 5% beta -mercaptoethanol and heated at 100 °C for 10 min. These mixtures were fractionated in an SDS-11% polyacrylamide gel, and phosphorylated proteins were detected by autoradiography.

For use in DNA-binding assays, purified FLAG-SAF1 protein was incubated with 1.0 unit of PKC-beta (Upstate Biotechnology) in a buffer system containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 60 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 50 µg/ml poly(dI-dC), 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mg/ml benzamidine, and 1 mM ATP in a 10-µl reaction mixture. Phosphorylated SAF-1 protein was further incubated with a radioactive SAF DNA-binding element and electrophoresed in a 6% native polyacrylamide gel. In some reactions, FLAG-SAF1 protein was preincubated with 1 µM of PKC 19-31 inhibitor peptide (Calbiochem) prior to the addition of PKC-beta . Dephosphorylation of FLAG-SAF1 protein was conducted by including 4 units of calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase during in vitro phosphorylation of FLAG-SAF1 protein. As a control, some reaction mixtures contained, in addition to calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase, an additional amount of phosphatase inhibitors (50 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 5 µM okadaic acid). For antibody interaction studies in EMSA, FLAG-SAF1 protein was incubated with anti-FLAG and anti-SAF antibodies (1.5 µl of undiluted stock) for 30 min on ice prior to the addition of PKC enzyme or the radioactive probe.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Induction of SAA mRNA by PMA in HIG82 Synoviocyte Cells-- PMA is involved in many cellular processes including growth, differentiation, and development (reviewed in Refs. 29-32). These biological potentials of PMA are realized by its ability to activate multiple protein kinase cascades facilitating many cellular events. The underlying mechanism of these cellular events is the regulation of many transcription factors via phosphorylation triggered by PMA-stimulated protein kinases. The consequence of this action is the induction of expression of genes responsive to these transcription factors. SAA is one such gene shown to be activated by PMA (3-5, 33). To determine whether PMA treatment cause induction of SAA in rabbit synoviocyte HIG82 cells (ATCC) under the present culturing condition, HIG82 cells were cultured with PMA (100 nM) for 24 h, and the level of SAA mRNA was measured by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 1). PMA treatment caused marked induction of SAA mRNA level (compare lanes 1 and 2). The same blot was probed with an actin cDNA to measure the quantity and quality of input mRNA. These results showed that under our culturing condition, in HIG82 synoviocyte cells, the SAA gene is induced by PMA. Since PMA is a known agonist of protein kinase C, these data suggested the possibility of the involvement of PKC in SAA gene induction. Previous studies showed that induction of SAA in nonhepatic cells, including synoviocyte cells, is primarily regulated by the SAF transcription factor (12-14). We therefore investigated whether SAF is involved in the regulation of SAA induction in response to PMA treatment.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Induction of SAA mRNA by PMA. Rabbit synoviocyte HIG82 cells were grown in the presence of PMA (100 nM) for 24 h. Total RNA was prepared, and equal amounts (50 µg) were fractionated in formaldehyde-agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized to SAA cDNA probe (top panel). Lane 1, RNA prepared from untreated cells; lane 2, RNA prepared from PMA-treated cells. For quantitative and qualitative evaluation, the membrane was reprobed with actin cDNA (bottom panel).

Increase of DNA Binding Activity in PMA-stimulated Cells-- HIG82 cells were incubated in the presence of various concentrations of PMA for 30 min. Nuclear extracts prepared from these PMA-treated cells were subjected to a DNA-binding assay using a radiolabeled SAF DNA-binding element of the SAA promoter (-254 to -226) as the probe. While untreated cell nuclear extract (Fig. 2A, lane 1) formed several DNA-protein complexes (c-e), PMA treatment (Fig. 2A, lanes 2-4), led to the appearance of some additional complexes (a and b) in a concentrationdependent manner. At a higher concentration of PMA (lane 4), the levels of complexes c and d were also increased. These results indicated induction of some nuclear proteins by PMA that can interact with the SAF DNA-binding element. To determine if induction of DNA binding activity is specific to PMA action, HIG82 cells were treated with inactive phorbol ester 4alpha -PDD. In contrast to PMA, there was no change in the DNA binding activity in 4alpha -PDD-treated cells (Fig. 2A, lanes 5-7). Next, we determined the kinetics of induction of DNA-protein complexes by treating HIG82 cells with 100 nM PMA for different lengths of time. Time course studies showed that PMA treatment causes a rapid induction, within 30 min, of several complexes including a, b, and c (Fig. 2B, lanes 1-4). However, the intensity of these inducible complexes declined considerably at the 90-min time point (lane 4). Prolonged incubation, up to 24 h (data not shown) exhibited a pattern similar to the level seen at the 90-min time point. These results indicated that PMA rapidly induces activities of some nuclear protein that can interact with the SAF DNA-binding element. The specificity of PMA action was verified by monitoring the DNA binding activity of an unrelated transcription factor. Oct-1 DNA binding activity was assayed in various PMA-treated cells. Members of the Oct family of transcription factors specifically interact with an octamer motif, ATGCAAAT, a regulatory element important for tissue- and cell-specific transcription as well as for transcription of many housekeeping genes (34). No significant change in the level of Oct-1 DNA binding activity was noted in these PMA-treated cells (Fig. 2C, lanes 1-4). The kinetics of PMA action on these nuclear proteins is consistent with the mode of action of PMA in many other cell types. The accumulation of SAA mRNA begins early, but build up of a considerable pool of the mRNA that can be detected by Northern analysis employed in the present study (Fig. 1) takes at least several hours of treatment, and a large amount of accumulated SAA mRNA was detected at 24 h of treatment.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   PMA treatment causes activation of some nuclear proteins that bind to the SAF DNA-binding element of SAA promoter. A, HIG82 cells were incubated in the presence of various concentrations (as indicated) of PMA (lanes 2-4) and 4alpha -PDD (lanes 5-7) for 30 min. Nuclear extracts (10 µg of protein) prepared from these cells were incubated with a 32P-labeled SAF DNA-binding element (-254/-226) present in the SAA promoter. The reaction mixtures were fractionated in a native 6% polyacrylamide gel. Lane 1, equal amount of nuclear extract (10 µg of protein) prepared from untreated cells. B, HIG82 cells were incubated in the presence of 100 nM PMA for various lengths of time (as indicated in the figure). Nuclear extracts (10 µg) prepared from these cells were subjected to a DNA-binding assay with radiolabeled SAF DNA-binding element described above. Different DNA-protein complexes are designated as complexes a-e. C, nuclear extracts (10 µg) prepared from various PMA-treated cells (lanes 1-4) as used in B were subjected to a DNA-binding assay with a radiolabeled Oct-1 DNA-binding element as the probe. The Oct1-DNA complex is designated as Oct1.

Characterization of the DNA-Protein Complexes-- PMA-induced DNA-protein complexes were characterized by using wild type SAF DNA-binding oligonucleotide, nonspecific unrelated oligonucleotide, and a mutant SAF DNA-binding oligonucleotide (Fig. 3A, lanes 1-5). Competition with the molar excess of homologous SAF oligonucleotide inhibited all complexes but the complex c (lanes 2 and 3). No change in the DNA-protein complex formation was observed during competition with mutant SAF DNA-binding oligonucleotide (lane 4) or an unrelated nonspecific oligonucleotide (lane 5). An anti-SAF antibody (Fig. 3B, lanes 2 and 3) inhibited all complexes except the complex c. The anti-SAF antibody interacts with the zinc finger domain of the SAF family of proteins and thereby can neutralize multiple members of this family. From these results, we conclude that complexes a, b, d, and e are formed by SAF-related proteins. The identity of complex c, which is also slightly induced by PMA, presently is not very clear. Since complex c was not inhibited by a molar excess of competing homologous probe (Fig. 3A, lanes 2 and 3), we believe that this complex is formed by a nuclear factor unrelated to SAF and has a very low affinity toward the SAF DNA-binding element. Furthermore, when SAF-specific DNA binding was completely inhibited by the addition of higher levels of SAF antibody, there was a slight increase in the binding of this unrelated factor, which increased the level of complex c (Fig. 3B, lane 3). Taken together, these results showed that treatment of cells with PMA causes induction of some SAF-like DNA binding activity in HIG82 synovial cells.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Characterization of DNA-protein complexes. A, nuclear extracts (10 µg) prepared from HIG82 cells treated with 100 nM of PMA for 30 min were subjected to a DNA-binding assay with radiolabeled SAF DNA-binding element (lanes 1-5). Lane 2, 50-fold molar excess of double-stranded wild type (wt) SAF DNA-binding oligonucleotide; lane 3, 100-fold molar excess of wild type SAF DNA-binding oligonucleotide; lane 4, 100-fold molar excess of mutant (mt) SAF DNA-binding element; lane 5, 100-fold molar excess of an unrelated (ur) oligonucleotide, Oct-1. B, nuclear extracts (10 µg) prepared from HIG82 cells treated with 100 nM PMA for 30 min were subjected to a DNA-binding assay with the radiolabeled SAF DNA-binding element described above. In addition to nuclear extract, lanes 2 and 3 contain 1 and 2 µl of anti-SAF antibody, respectively, and lane 4 contains 2 µl of preimmune serum. Different DNA-protein complexes are designated as complexes a-e.

Regulators of Protein Kinase C Induce SAF Activity-- Since PMA is a potent activator of the PKC signaling pathway, we investigated whether PKC acts as a physiological regulator of SAF. If during PMA treatment SAF was activated by PKC, then other cellular activators of PKC should also activate SAF. OAG and DOG are known as potent stimulators of cellular PKC activity. As shown in Fig. 4A, like PMA, both OAG and DOG stimulated the DNA binding ability of SAF (lanes 2 and 3). Calphostin C is a highly specific inhibitor of PKC (21), which interacts with the protein's regulatory domain by competing at the binding site of diacylglycerol and phorbol esters. Calphostin C inhibited the PMA-mediated increase of SAF DNA binding activity (lane 4). A similar result (lane 5) was obtained with a more specific, cell-permeable PKC inhibitor peptide 19-27 that inhibits PKC function by acting as a pseudosubstrate. From these findings, we conclude that PKC may be involved in a major way in the PMA-induced activation of SAF, which subsequently increases SAA expression.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Inducers of PKC can increase SAF DNA binding activity and expression of a SAF-regulated promoter. A, HIG82 cells were incubated for 30 min in the presence of various activators and inhibitors of PKC activity. Nuclear extracts (10 µg) prepared from these cells were subjected to a DNA-binding assay with a 32P-labeled SAF DNA-binding element (-254/-226) of the SAA promoter. Lane 1, untreated cells; lanes 2-4, cells treated with OAG, DOG, and PMA plus calphostin C, respectively. Lane 5, PMA plus cell-permeable inhibitor peptide (PKC-I 19-27)-treated cells. Lane 6, PMA-treated cells. PMA, OAG, DOG, and calphostin C were added at 100 nM, and PKC-I 19-27 was added at 50 µM. B, HIG82 cells were transfected with 1.0 µg of either wild type (wt) or mutant (mt) SAF-CAT reporter construct. In some transfection assay mixture, SAF1 expression plasmid, pCMV-SAF1 (1.0 µg), was included. Following transfection, cells were incubated with either PMA, OAG, calphostin C, or bisindolylmaleimide I. These PKC regulators were added at 100 nM concentrations of each. The CAT assay was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results represent averages of three separate experiments.

We next asked whether inducers of PKC increase functional activity of SAF. To test this possibility, HIG82 cells were cotransfected with a reporter gene (SAF-CAT), containing three copies of SAF DNA-binding elements present in the SAA promoter, and an expression vector containing a full-length cDNA of SAF1. The cells cotransfected with the reporter plasmid and pCMV-SAF1 exhibited an approximately 4-fold higher level of CAT activity than cells transfected with the reporter gene itself (Fig. 4B). However, the transactivating potential of pCMV-SAF1 was markedly higher in the presence of agonists of PKC, such as PMA or OAG, and substantially lower in the presence of inhibitors of PKC, namely bisindolylmaleimide I (22) or calphostin C (21). The increase of reporter gene expression by pCMV-SAF1 in the absence of any agonists of PKC, we believe, is due to the activation of SAF1 by low basal levels of endogenous active PKCs that are present in the transfected cells. The specificity of pCMV-SAF1-mediated transactivation was verified by using a mutant reporter gene that contained three copies of mutated SAF DNA-binding elements. The mutant reporter did not respond to any of these agents. Together, these data indicate that agonists of PKC increase the expression of SAF-regulated genes in HIG82 synovial cells.

PKC-mediated Phosphorylation Increases the DNA Binding Activity of Bacterially Expressed SAF Protein-- In determining the role of PKC in SAF regulation, we first examined whether PKC can phosphorylate SAF. A full-length, bacterially expressed FLAG-SAF1 protein was affinity-purified over an anti-FLAG Sepharose column and in vitro phosphorylated, using purified PKC-beta enzyme (Upstate Biotechnology) and [gamma -32P]ATP. Phosphorylated radioactive SAF was readily detected before (Fig. 5A, lane 2) and after immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibody (Fig. 5A, lane 4). These results showed that PKC-beta can phosphorylate purified FLAG-SAF1 protein.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   In vitro phosphorylation by PKC-beta increases the DNA binding activity of SAF-1. A, purified FLAG-SAF1 protein either alone (lane 1) or with PKC-beta (lanes 2-4) was used in a phosphorylation assay with [gamma -32P]ATP, separated on 11% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and autoradiographed. Details of phosphorylation and immunoprecipitation (IP) reactions are described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 1, FLAG-SAF1 protein alone; lane 2, FLAG-SAF1 protein plus PKC-beta . Some reaction mixtures were immunoprecipitated with preimmune serum (lane 3) or with anti-FLAG antibody (lane 4). Molecular masses of marker proteins in kilodaltons are indicated. B, phosphorylation of SAF1 by PKC-beta increases its DNA binding ability. Purified full-length FLAG-SAF1 protein was subjected to a phosphorylation reaction using purified PKC-beta enzyme prior to its use in the DNA-binding assays (lanes 2-5). Lane 1, FLAG-SAF1 protein alone; lanes 2-5, FLAG-SAF1 protein plus 1.0 units of PKC-beta . In lane 3, 1 µM PKC inhibitor peptide 19-31 was added during phosphorylation of FLAG-SAF1 protein with PKC-beta . In lanes 4 and 5, anti-FLAG and anti-SAF antibodies were added in the reaction mixture during phosphorylation of FLAG-SAF1 protein with PKC-beta . The arrow indicates the migration position of supershifted complex in lane 4. C, purified full-length FLAG-SAF1 protein was subjected to a phosphorylation reaction using purified PKC-beta enzyme prior to its use in the DNA-binding assays as described for B (lanes 2-4). Lane 1, unphosphorylated FLAG-SAF1 protein. In lanes 3 and 4, calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIP) was added during phosphorylation of FLAG-SAF1 protein. The incubation mixture in lane 3 also contained inhibitors of phosphatase (NaF (50 mM), okadaic acid (5 µM), and sodium orthovanadate (1 mM)) during calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase treatment.

Next, we tested the effect of PKC-mediated phosphorylation on the DNA binding ability of SAF. Bacterially expressed FLAG-SAF1 protein was first in vitro phosphorylated with purified PKC-beta enzyme and nonradioactive ATP and used in a DNA-binding assay. As seen in Fig. 5B, untreated FLAG-SAF1 protein interacted poorly with radiolabeled SAF DNA-binding element (lane 1), but upon phosphorylation with PKC-beta , the same protein interacted at a markedly higher level (lane 2). Prolonged exposure of the gel showed a band in lane 1 comigrating with the prominent band present in lane 2. No significant level of binding occurred when an inhibitor peptide was included in the phosphorylation reaction mixture (lane 3). The DNA-protein complex formed by PKC-phosphorylated SAF was supershifted by an anti-FLAG antibody (lane 4) and inhibited by an anti-SAF antibody (lane 5). In a reciprocal experiment, we monitored the effect of phosphatase and inhibitors of phosphatase on the DNA binding activity of in vitro phosphorylated SAF (Fig. 5C, lanes 1-4). The addition of phosphatase severely reduced the DNA binding potential of in vitro phosphorylated SAF protein (lane 3), while phosphatase inhibitors neutralized the action of phosphatase and restored its DNA binding ability (lane 4). Together, these results demonstrated that phosphorylation of SAF-1 by PKC-beta is necessary for efficient DNA binding activity of SAF.

Overexpression of PKC-beta II Can Enhance Expression of an SAF-regulated Promoter-- We next asked whether overexpression of PKC-beta in the absence of an inducer of PKC could increase expression of SAF-regulated genes. HIG82 cells were cotransfected with the SAF-CAT reporter gene and pCMV-SAF1 expression plasmid in the presence or absence of a PKC-beta II expression plasmid (Fig. 6). The addition of increasing concentrations of expression plasmid carrying PKC-beta II in the transfected cells increased the transactivation potential of SAF1 in a dose-dependent manner. PKC-beta II expression was monitored by Western immunoblot analysis and found to be higher as the amount of PKC-beta II plasmid DNA was increased (data not shown). The empty vector had no enhancing effect, indicating the direct consequence of expressed PKC-beta II in the transfected cells. The addition of the PKC inhibitor 19-27 peptide lowered PKC-stimulated SAF-1 transactivating ability.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Overexpression of PKC-beta II increases expression of SAF-regulated promoters. HIG82 cells were transfected with 1.0 µg of SAF-CAT reporter gene with or without pCMV-SAF1 (1.0 µg) plasmid DNA, as indicated. In some transfection assays, an expression plasmid containing PKC-beta II cDNA was included at amounts of 1, 2, and 3 µg, respectively. In the last two lanes, 3 µg of PKC-beta II cDNA was used. As a negative control, empty vector (3 µg) lacking PKC cDNA sequences was used. Myristoylated PKC inhibitor peptide 19-27 (PKC-I 19-27) was added in some transfection assays at concentrations of 10 and 50 µM, respectively. These results represent an average of three separate experiments ± S.D.

PKC-mediated Phosphorylation Does Not Affect the Transactivation Potential of SAF-- To define if PKC-mediated phosphorylation directly affects the transactivating potential of SAF, a full-length SAF-1 cDNA was fused in frame to the DNA-binding domain of yeast transcription factor GAL4 encoding amino acids 1-147. The resulting chimera, RSVGAL4DBD-SAF1, was tested for the its ability to transactivate a reporter containing three GAL4 binding sites in front of a CAT gene. The RSVGAL4DBD-SAF1 construct considerably activated transcription of the GAL4-CAT reporter gene (Fig. 7, bar B). Interestingly, in contrast to results presented in Fig. 6, the addition of increasing concentrations of PKC-beta II together with a constant amount of RSVGAL4DBD-SAF1 plasmid displayed virtually no additional effect on the expression of GAL4-CAT reporter gene (Fig. 7, bars C-E). As a control, we cotransfected the cells with GAL4-CAT and pCMVSAF-1 (bar I) or GAL4-CAT and RSVGAL4DBD (bar A) plasmid DNAs. In the absence of a transactivating domain, RSVGAL4DBD plasmid exhibited very little stimulating effect on the expression of the GAL4-CAT reporter gene. Likewise, in the absence of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, pCMVSAF-1 had no effect on GAL4-CAT reporter gene expression. These results confirmed that the DNA-binding domains of SAF-1 and yeast GAL4 protein are different and that activation of GAL4-CAT reporter gene by RSVGAL4DBD-SAF1 is due to a combined effect of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and the transactivating domain of SAF-1. Together, these data show that PKC-mediated phosphorylation increases only the DNA-binding potential of SAF-1 and has minimum effect on the transactivating domain of this protein.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   PKC-beta II does not alter the activation potential of SAF-1. In the vector RSVGAL4DBD, GAL4 amino acids 1-147 encoding the DNA-binding domain and nuclear localization sequence of yeast transcription factor GAL4 are under the control of the RSV promoter. A full-length SAF-1 cDNA was fused in frame C-terminal to the DNA-binding domain (at the BamHI site) of GAL4 to prepare RSVGAL4DBD-SAF1 plasmid. HIG82 cells were transiently transfected with 1.0 µg of GAL4-CAT reporter DNA, which contains three copies of the GAL4 binding site. In some transfection mixtures, as indicated in the figure, RSVGAL4DBD plasmid DNA (1.0 µg) or RSVGAL4DBD-SAF1 DNA (1.0 µg) and increasing amounts (1, 2, and 3 µg) of an expression plasmid of PKC-beta II were used. The results represent an average of three independent transfection experiments ± S.D.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this paper, we have provided direct evidence for the activation of SAF by the PKC signaling pathway. The following novel findings were obtained: (i) agonists of PKC activation pathway or overexpression of PKC-beta II can increase expression of a SAF-regulated promoter; (ii) in vitro phosphorylation of bacterially expressed SAF-1 by PKC-beta markedly increases its DNA binding ability; and (iii) PKC-mediated phosphorylation increases the DNA binding ability of SAF-1 without affecting its transactivating potential.

SAF family of transcription factors was initially identified as a regulator of the SAA gene, and three members of this family were characterized by structural analysis (14). Multiple DNA-protein complexes in PMA-treated HIG82 cells that were detected by EMSA (Fig. 2) most likely are formed due to homomeric and heteromeric interaction of these different SAF isoforms. Among the known SAF family members, SAF1 has been detected in most cell types, including HIG82 cells. For detailed analysis, we have therefore used SAF1 in the present investigation. The cloned cDNA of SAF1 exhibited considerable homology with human MAZ (35) and mouse Pur-1 (36) transcription factor cDNA, indicating that SAF1 is a member of this group of transcription factors. The SAF/MAZ/Pur-1 family of transcription factors function as regulators of SAA (12), c-myc (35), insulin (36), CD4 (37), and serotonin 1A receptor (38) genes. The c-myc proto-oncogene is an important factor in controlling both cellular proliferation and apoptosis, insulin is involved in stimulating cellular metabolism and proliferation, serotonin 1A receptor functions as a regulator of neuroendocrine function, CD4 protein is an important molecule in T-cell development and activation, and serum amyloid A is an inflammation-responsive protein. Understanding the induction mechanism of the SAF family of transcription factors thus has broad biological implications.

Protein kinase C family members are known to play important roles in mediating signal transduction, cellular differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. The PKC-mediated signaling pathway also regulates the inflammatory response mechanism initiated by many inflammatory agents. To date, there are at least 12 PKC members (reviewed in Refs. 17-19) that are classified into three groups: calcium-dependent or classic conventional PKC isoforms (alpha , beta I, beta II, gamma ); calcium-independent novel PKC isoforms (delta , epsilon , eta , theta ); and calcium- and diacylglycerol-independent, phosphatidylserine-dependent atypical PKC isoforms (zeta , iota , lambda , µ). It is believed that selected members may be involved in mediating diverse cellular responses. We found that phosphorylation of SAF-1 protein by PKC markedly increases its DNA binding activity (Fig. 5, B and C). The transactivating potential of pCMVSAF-1 in the presence of agonists of PKC (Fig. 4B) or during overexpression of PKC-beta was also significantly higher (Fig. 6). However, the effect of PKC-mediated phosphorylation on SAF appears to be limited to increasing only its DNA binding activity. A GAL4-SAF1 construct, in which a full-length SAF-1 cDNA is fused in frame to the C-terminal of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, considerably increased expression of a GAL-CAT reporter gene, indicating that SAF-1 can confer transcriptional activation on a heterologous DNA-binding protein. The transactivating potential of GAL4-SAF1 was not altered when transfected cells were allowed to overexpress PKC-beta protein (Fig. 7). These results suggested that PKC-mediated phosphorylation has little effect on the transactivating domains of SAF-1.

There are several consensus PKC phosphorylation sites in the SAF1 coding sequence. Some PKC sites are present at the amino-terminal region, and one potential PKC site is present within the fifth zinc finger domain, located at the carboxyl-terminal region of SAF1 protein. Although exact DNA-binding domains of SAF-1 are yet to be defined, it can be speculated that PKC-induced phosphorylation at the fifth zinc finger domain or at the other PKC phosphorylation sites may induce some conformational changes that facilitate the DNA binding ability of SAF1. The importance of individual PKC phosphorylation sites, however, remains to be determined via mutagenesis studies of all possible PKC phosphorylation sites. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that SAF1 protein, a member of the SAF/MAZ/Pur-1 family of transcription factors, becomes phosphorylated and activated by agonists of the PKC signaling pathway.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Drs. Michael Blanar and Erik Flemington for providing pAR(Delta RI)59/60 and RSVGAL4DBD plus GAL4-CAT plasmid DNAs.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK49205 (to A. R. and B. K. R.) and CA56869 (to A. P. F.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Veterinary Pathobiology, 124 Connaway Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. Tel.: 573-882-4461; Fax: 573-884-5414; E-mail: rayb@missouri.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 19, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M007907200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SAA, serum amyloid A; SAF, SAA-activating factor; PKC, protein kinase C; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; 4alpha -PDD, 4alpha -phorbol-12,13-didecanoate; OAG, 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol; DOG, 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol; RSV, Rous sarcoma virus; IL, interleukin.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Kushner, I. (1982) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 389, 39-48
2. Sipe, J. D. (1994) Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 31, 325-354
3. Strissel, K. J., Girard, M. T., West-Mays, J. A., Rinehart, W. B., Cook, J. R., Brinckerhoff, C. E., and Fini, M. E. (1997) Exp. Cell. Res. 237, 275-287
4. Brinckerhoff, C. E., Mitchell, T. I., Karmilowicz, M. J., Kluve-Beckerman, B., and Benson, M. D. (1989) Science 243, 655-657
5. Mitchell, T. I., Coon, C. I., and Brinckerhoff, C. E. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 87, 1177-1185
6. Husebekk, A. B., Skogen, B., Husby, G., and Marhaug, G. (1985) Scand. J. Immunol. 21, 283-287
7. Lowell, C A., Stearman, R. S., and Morrow, J. F. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 8453-8461
8. Mackiewicz, A., Ganapathi, M. K., Scultz, D., Samols, D., Reese, J., and Kushner, I. (1988) Biochem. J. 253, 851-857
9. Urieli-Shoval, S., Meek, R. L., Hanson, R. H., Eriksen, N., and Benditt, E. P. (1994) Am. J. Pathol. 145, 650-660
10. Ganapathi, M. K., Rzewnicki, D., Samols, D., Jiang, S. L., and Kushner, I. (1991) J. Immunol. 147, 1261-1265
11. Ghezzi, P., and Sipe, J. D. (1988) Lymphokine Res. 7, 157-166
12. Ray, A., and Ray, B. K. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1584-1594
13. Ray, B. K., and Ray, A. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 4662-4668
14. Ray, A., and Ray, B. K. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 7327-7335
15. Ray, B. K., Chatterjee, S., and Ray, A. (1999) DNA Cell Biol. 18, 65-73
16. Ray, A., Schatten, H., and Ray, B. K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4300-4308
17. Newton, A. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28495-28498
18. Murray, N. R., Thompson, L. J., and Fields, A. P. (1997) in Protein Kinase C: Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit (Parker, P. J. , and Dekker, L., eds) , pp. 97-120, R. G. Landis Co., Austin, TX
19. Liu, W. S., and Hechman, C. A. (1998) Calcium Signal. 10, 529-542
20. Kolomytkin, O. V., Marino, A. A., Sadasivan, K. K., Wolf, R. A., and Albright, J. A. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C9-C15
21. Jarvis, W. D., Turner, A. J., Povrik, L. F., Traylor, R. S., and Grant, S. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 1704-1714
22. Gekeler, V., Boer, R., Uberall, F., Ise, W., Schubert, C., Utz, I., Hoffman, J., Sanders, K. H., Schachtele, C., Klemm, K., and Grunicke, H. (1996) Br. J. Cancer 74, 897-905
23. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
24. Luckow, B., and Schutz, G. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 5490
25. Murray, N. R., Baumgardner, G. P., Burns, D. J., and Fields, A. P. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15847-15853
26. Flemington, E. K., Speck, S. H., and Kaelin, W. G., Jr. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6914-6918
27. Blanar, M. A., and Rutter, W. J. (1992) Science 256, 1014-1018
28. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254
29. Huberman, E., and Jones, C. A. (1985) Carcinog. Compr. Surv. 10, 263-273
30. Vandenbark, G. R., and Niedel, J. E. (1984) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 73, 1013-1019
31. Mastro, A.M. (1983) Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 7, 881-893
32. Pelicci, P. G., Tabilio, A., Vainchenker, W., and Testa, V. (1983) Haematologica 68, 411-426
33. Edbrooke, M. R., Burt, D. W., Cheshire, J. K., and Woo, P. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 1908-1916
34. Sturm, R. A., Das, G., and Herr, W. (1988) Genes Dev. 2, 1582-1599
35. Bossone, S. A., Asselin, C., Patel, A. J., and Marcu, K. B (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7452-7456
36. Kennedy, G. C., and Rutter, W. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11498-11502
37. Duncan, D. D., Stupakoff, A. J., Hedrick, S. M., Marcu, K. B., and Siu, G. (1995) Mol. cell. Biol. 15, 3179-3186
38. Parks, C. L., and Shenk, T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4417-4430


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Kumar, A. Ray, and B. K. Ray
Transcriptional Synergy Mediated by SAF-1 and AP-1: CRITICAL ROLE OF N-TERMINAL POLYALANINE AND TWO ZINC FINGER DOMAINS OF SAF-1
J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2009; 284(3): 1853 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Ray, D. Kumar, P. Ray, and B. K. Ray
Transcriptional Activity of Serum Amyloid A-activating Factor-1 Is Regulated by Distinct Functional Modules
J. Biol. Chem., December 24, 2004; 279(52): 54637 - 54646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
B. K. Ray, A. Shakya, J. R. Turk, S. S. Apte, and A. Ray
Induction of the MMP-14 Gene in Macrophages of the Atherosclerotic Plaque: Role of SAF-1 in the Induction Process
Circ. Res., November 26, 2004; 95(11): 1082 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. K. Ray, R. Murphy, P. Ray, and A. Ray
SAF-2, a Splice Variant of SAF-1, Acts as a Negative Regulator of Transcription
J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2002; 277(48): 46822 - 46830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Ray, G.-Y. Yu, and B. K. Ray
Cytokine-Responsive Induction of SAF-1 Activity Is Mediated by a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2002; 22(4): 1027 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. LaRochelle, V. Gagne, J. Charron, J.-W. Soh, and C. Seguin
Phosphorylation Is Involved in the Activation of Metal-regulatory Transcription Factor 1 in Response to Metal Ions
J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2001; 276(45): 41879 - 41888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. K. Ray, J. Chen, and A. Ray
Catalytic Subunit of Protein Kinase A Is an Interacting Partner of the Inflammation-Responsive Transcription Factor Serum Amyloid A-Activating Factor-1
J. Immunol., August 15, 2001; 167(4): 2343 - 2348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/50/39727    most recent
M007907200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, B. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement