![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 50, 39779-39785, December 15, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Abteilung Molekulare Biologie, Max-Planck-Institut
für Infektionsbiologie, Schumannstrasse 21/22, 10117 Berlin,
Germany
Received for publication, August 21, 2000, and in revised form, September 29, 2000
Helicobacter pylori, the causative
agent of several human gastric diseases, induces activation of the
immediate early response transcription factor nuclear factor Exposure of cells to various stimuli results in
phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and subsequent degradation of
I We have studied the mechanism of NF- Cell Culture and H. pylori Infection--
Gastric epithelial
cells (AGS) and 293 or HeLa cells were grown in RPMI 1640 containing 4 mM glutamine (Life Technologies, Inc.), 100 units/ml
penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal calf serum (Life
Technologies, Inc.) in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
16 h before infection, the medium was replaced by fresh RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 0.1% fetal calf serum. The H. pylori P12 strain or the PAI strain (17) was cultured for 48-72 h
on agar plates containing 10% horse serum in a microaerophilic atmosphere (generated by Campy Gen, Oxoid) at 37 °C. For the
infection, the cell monolayer (50-70% confluence) was incubated with
the bacteria to the multiplicities of infection (MOI) of 50 for
different periods of time. Infection with H. pylori was
routinely monitored by light microscopy.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
Nuclear extracts were
prepared by using a nonionic detergent method as described previously
(18). Detection of NF- RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain
Reaction--
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Life
Technologies, Inc.) as recommended by the manufacturer's
instructions. Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed into
single-stranded cDNA with Superscript IIRT (Life Technologies,
Inc.) and oligo(dT) primers. Amplification of cytokine cDNAs
and Transient Transfections and Reporter Assays--
Transactivating
activity of NF- Immunoprecipitation and Protein Kinase Assays--
From the
radioimmune precipitation buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% Nonidet
P-40, 2.5% glycerol, 1 mM EGTA, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM
Na4P2O7, 100 µM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µM pepstatin A, and 4 µM aprotinin) lysed cell immunoprecipitations were
performed with anti- NF-
To address whether H. pylori-induced NF-
To analyze the ability of H. pylori to induce NF- PAK1 Activates NIK and the IKK Complex--
Several kinases
(e.g. NIK, mitogen-activated protein kinase
(MAPK)/extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) kinase kinase 1 (MEKK1), IKK-i, TANK-binding kinase 1/NF-
Our experimental evidence that the MAPK kinase kinase NIK represents a
crucial factor in H. pylori-directed activation of the IKK
complex led us to search for putative upstream regulators of NIK.
Colinear amino acid sequence alignment of the kinase domain in NIK
revealed homology to MEKK1 and Ste11 apart from other kinases, and
Ste11 represents a downstream kinase of Ste20, the yeast homologue of
mammalian PAK1 (27). Therefore, we examined whether PAK1, which is a
stress response kinase of the MAPK kinase kinase kinase level,
represents an upstream kinase for NIK. In AGS cells the activity of
PAK1 was induced severalfold in response to pathophysiological stress
raised by H. pylori infection. The kinase activity of
immunoprecipitated PAK1 was measured with myelin basic protein as a
substrate (Fig. 3b, lanes 1-4, upper
panel). TNF
To study the mechanism of NF-
To identify NIK as a potential downstream component of PAK1 in H. pylori infection, we studied the interaction of these kinases. AGS
or HeLa cells were transfected with Ha-tagged PAK1 constructs or
Flag-tagged NIK constructs. The kinases were then immunoprecipitated. The immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and analyzed in an
immunoblot with the indicated antibodies. We observed interaction of
Ha-PAK1(K299R) with Flag-NIK (Fig.
4a, lane 1), high
affinity interaction between Ha-PAK1(K299R) and
Flag-NIK(K429A,K430A) (lane 2), and interaction of
Ha-PAK1 with Flag-NIK(K429A,K430A) (lane 3). We also
performed these experiments with constitutive active Ha-PAK1(L107F),
which resulted in a detectable interaction with Flag-NIK(K429A,K430A) (lane 4). These results indicate
that kinase-active PAK1 could target the MAPK kinase kinase NIK. In
contrast to the PAK1/NIK interaction, we observed no direct interaction
between PAK1 and the IKK complex components IKK
To analyze endogenous PAK1/NIK interaction, we tried to derive HeLa
cells stably expressing an epitope-tagged version of NIK. Unfortunately, cells which had integrated the NIK wild type cDNA did not survive. To circumvent this problem we transiently transfected small amounts of kinase-inactive Flag-NIK(K429A,K430A) in a titration experiment and determined an amount that still allowed interaction with
activated PAK1 induced in H. pylori infection.
Interestingly, H. pylori infection caused an inducible
interaction of the endogenous PAK1 and the kinase-inactive
Flag-NIK(K429A,K430A) (Fig. 4d, lanes 2-4,
upper panel), whereas the non-stimulated or TNF
Our results raised the possibility that PAK1 could function as the
kinase that activates NIK in H. pylori infection. The
analysis of H. pylori-infected cells, which were transfected
with kinase-inactive NIK(K429A,K430A), resulted in the occurrence of an
additional NIK form with a slightly decreased mobility in SDS-PAGE as
detected in an immunoblot (Fig.
5a, lane 2). When
NIK(K429A,K430A) was expressed without H. pylori infection,
this slower migrating form of NIK was weakly visible (Fig.
5a, lane 1). Cells cotransfected with
constitutive active PAK1(L107F) caused an accumulation of the more
slowly migrating band of NIK(K429A,K430A) (Fig. 5b,
lane 4), whereas cotransfection with kinase-inactive
PAK1(K299R) suppressed this slower band (lane 3). The
upshifted band of NIK in H. pylori-infected cells was
eliminated by
To show that PAK1 is critical for H. pylori-induced
activation of the IKK complex, IKK In summary, our results identify PAK1 as an integral component of
the H. pylori-induced activation of NF- Because the integrity of the type IV secretion machinery is an absolute
requirement for NF- Based on their structure the PAK kinases in mammals can be
divided into two subfamilies: the PAK subfamily, containing an NH2-terminal catalytic p21-binding domain (also
known as cdc42/Rac1-interactive binding domain) and a
COOH-terminal kinase domain, and the germinal center
kinase-like subfamily, which contains an NH2-terminal
catalytic domain and lacks the p21-binding domain. In the first
description of PAK it was shown that the serine/threonine protein
kinase activity of PAK could be stimulated by the binding of activated
GTP-bound Rac1 and Cdc42. More recently, a variety of studies have
suggested that PAKs can participate in a broad range of
cellular events that include cytoskeletal responses as well as certain
signaling events (41). For example, PAKs can catalyze the
phosphorylation of the heavy chain in myosin 1 (42), in p47-phox (43),
and in LIM kinase (44). In our study we have shown for the first time
that PAK1 interacts with and phosphorylates NIK, which represents a
specific activating mechanism in NF- Gastric inflammation is a hallmark of H. pylori infection,
and our work contributes to the elucidation of the steps involved in
H. pylori-induced NF- We are grateful to Jonathan Chernoff, David
Wallach, Edward Manser, Alain Israel, and Claus Scheidereit for
cDNA constructs. We would like to thank Birte Wolff for critical
reading of the manuscript and Björn Wieland for excellent
technical assistance.
*
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Grant Na 292/5-1.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 2, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M007617200
The abbreviations used are:
NF-
p21-activated Kinase 1 Activates the Nuclear Factor
B
(NF-
B)-inducing Kinase-I
B Kinases NF-
B Pathway and
Proinflammatory Cytokines in Helicobacter pylori
Infection*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B
(NF-
B), which subsequently triggers release of proinflammatory
cytokines in colonized epithelial cells. Here we report that in
H. pylori infection p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) activates
NF-
B. Activated PAK1 associates with NF-
B-inducing kinase,
which upon activation directs the activity of I
B kinases to
I
B
. Our results indicate that in epithelial cells PAK1
participates in a unique pathway that links H. pylori-dependent effector molecules to the activation
of NF-
B and the induction of the innate immune response.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B molecules. The liberated nuclear factor
B
(NF-
B)1 dimers are
translocated to the nucleus, where they activate transcription of
target genes (1). Key components of the intracellular signal transduction pathways regulating NF-
B activation are represented by
NIK (2) and the I
B kinases (IKKs) (3). IKK
and IKK
are the
catalytic subunits of a protein kinase complex that
phosphorylates I
B molecules (4). IKK
(or NF-
B essential
modulator (NEMO)) represents the regulatory subunit (5, 6).
B activation in response to
human pathogenic Helicobacter pylori in epithelial cells where NF-
B, one of the main activators of the inflammatory response, triggers the induction of immune function including cytokine/chemokine production, growth control, and apoptosis (1). The epithelial cytokine/chemokine response is particularly important in the early stages of H. pylori-induced inflammation and is often
followed by diseases like gastritis, peptic ulcer (7), gastric cancer (rarely), and low grade B-cell mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue gastric lymphoma (8). The major disease-associated, genetic difference
in H. pylori strains is the presence or absence of a
pathogenicity island (PAI) containing 31 genes, which code for proteins
involved in a specialized type IV secretion machinery (9). H. pylori infection modulates the host cells by bacterial protein
translocation. Several groups have recently shown for the first time
that H. pylori translocates the CagA protein by a type IV
secretion system. Tyrosine phosphorylation of CagA induces changes in
the tyrosine phosphorylation state of proteins in the epithelial cell
(10-14). Knockouts of certain PAI genes (CagA, CagF, and CagN), which
are not necessary for the functional integrity of the type IV secretion
apparatus, suppress or reduce the activation of NF-
B (15) and affect
the secretion of cytokines/chemokines (16). Thus the integrity of the
type IV secretion machinery is an absolute requirement for NF-
B
activation in H. pylori infection. The identity of the
effector molecule(s) of H. pylori and the mechanism of
integration of the signals that induce NF-
B are not known so far.
Therefore, we examined the mechanism of the H. pylori-induced activation of proinflammatory cytokine genes in the
course of NF-
B activation in detail.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B was performed with a
[
-32P]dATP-labeled Ig
oligo probe containing the
NF-
B recognition site. The DNA binding reactions were performed with
20 µl of binding buffer (2 µg of poly(dI-dC), 1 µg of bovine
serum albumin, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM
HEPES, pH 8.4, 60 mM KCl, and 10% glycerol) for 20 min at
30 °C. For competition experiments, the cold oligonucleotide probe
was used, and supershift analysis was performed using antibodies against p65, p50, or c-Rel (18). The reaction products were analyzed
via 5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using 12.5 mM Tris, 12.5 mM boric acid, and 0.25 mM EDTA, pH 8.3. The gels were dried and exposed to
Amersham TM film (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at
70 °C
using an intensifying screen.
-actin cDNA as an internal control in each reaction was
carried out by polymerase chain reaction with the primers as described
previously (19). A subsaturating number of cycles allowed a
semi-quantitative analysis within the infection kinetics. For
inhibition of I
B
degradation by the 26 S proteasome, the
cells were preincubated for 60 min using 10 µM
lactacystin (Affiniti) before the bacteria were added. Polymerase chain
reaction products were visualized by ethidium bromide staining after
agarose gel electrophoresis.
B was analyzed in 293 or HeLa cells by cotransfection
of a luciferase expression plasmid (400 ng) containing three repeats of
the NF-
B human immunodeficiency virus-binding site and
expression constructs using cationic liposomes (DAC-30, Eurogentec).
16 h after transfection cells were infected with H. pylori, treated with 10 ng ml
1 tumor
necrosis factor
(TNF
) (Promega), or left untreated. Luciferase
assays were performed 3-4 h after treatment as recommended by the
manufacturer's instructions (Promega). The data presented are
representative of more than three independent experiments. A
pSV-
-galactosidase vector (Promega) was used for normalization of
transfection efficiency. The results were recorded on a Wallac 409
-counter (Berthold-Wallac) and given as fold induction or as percent
induction compared with the control.
-PAK (sc-881, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-IKK
(Pharmingen), anti-IKK
(BIOSOURCE),
anti-Ha (sc-805, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Vsv (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), anti-Myc (Pharmingen), or anti-Flag (Sigma)
antibodies. The immunoprecipitated and co-immunoprecipitated proteins
were separated via SDS-PAGE and blotted as described previously (18).
Immunodetection was achieved with antibodies as indicated
(anti-
-PAK1, sc-882 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti-I
B
,
sc-847 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti-NEMO
(BIOSOURCE), etc.). For in vitro kinase
reactions, immunocomplexes were recovered, washed, and incubated with
the kinase buffer (100 mM KCl, 0.1 mM
CaCl2, 6 mM MgCl2, 30 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.1 mM
Na3VO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP) using 2.5 µg of myelin basic
protein (Upstate Biotechnology) and 0.5 µg of I
B
(18) as
substrates for PAK1 and IKKs, respectively. The samples were separated
via SDS-PAGE and dried, and phosphorylation was visualized by
autoradiography. Equal amounts of the total lysates were analyzed in an
immunoblot to indicate equivalent protein amounts in all lanes.
In vitro translation was performed using a TNT kit
(Promega), and coimmunoprecipitation was performed with translation
reactions diluted in phosphate-buffered saline.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B Activation in H. pylori Infection Involves IKK
Activity--
AGS cells (neuroendocrine differentiated gastric
carcinoma cells) infected with H. pylori or treated with
TNF
for various periods of times, fractionated into cytoplasmic and
nuclear components, and subjected to electrophoretic mobility shift
assay show an equivalent increase of NF-
B DNA binding activity
within 90 and 10 min, respectively (Fig.
1a, lanes 1-9).
The H. pylori-induced binding activity was strongly reduced
and partially super-shifted when anti-p50 or anti-p65 antibodies were
used, whereas an anti-c-Rel antiserum or preimmune serum did not show a
reduction (Fig. 1a, lanes 10-13). The
specificity of the DNA binding activity was examined by adding
increasing amounts of the non-labeled double-stranded Ig
oligonucleotide for competition (Fig. 1a, lanes
14-16). In contrast to the wild type H. pylori strain,
an isogenic mutant strain (PAI, no expression of the type IV secretion
machinery) did not show NF-
B activation (Fig. 1a,
lanes 17-19). This experiment excludes a role for
lipopolysaccharide in H. pylori-induced NF-
B activation in epithelial cells. To determine whether NF-
B activation is sustained at later stages of the infection, we studied H. pylori infection up to 6 h after infection. Maximal DNA
binding of NF-
B was observed between 90 and 180 min after infection
and was not detectable later than 240 min after infection (Fig.
1a, lanes 20-22). De novo protein
synthesis was not required for H. pylori-induced NF-
B
activation (data not shown). Furthermore, H. pylori
infection or TNF
stimulation led to a rapid loss of I
B
as
analyzed in an immunoblot (Fig. 1b). To assess changes in
cytokine gene expression, AGS cells were challenged to infection with
H. pylori. Cytokine mRNA expression was determined at
different time points after infection by reverse
transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction of total RNA prepared
from infected cells. The cytokine mRNA levels were compared with
the constitutive
-actin mRNA in the same polymerase chain
reactions. Infection with H. pylori led to an increased synthesis of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, TNF
,
and interleukin-8 as soon as 45 min after infection (Fig. 1c, lanes 1-4). Treatment of the cells with the
proteasome inhibitor lactacystin prior to H. pylori
infection suppressed the cytokine mRNA expression (Fig.
1c, lanes 5-8). The correlation of NF-
B activation and I
B
degradation, which is blocked by a
proteasome inhibitor, demonstrates that cytokine/chemokine genes are
indeed subject to a coordinate cellular regulation in response to
H. pylori infection.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Induction of cytokine genes and activation of
NF-
B in H. pylori-colonized
AGS cells. a, NF-
B activation. Electrophoretic
mobility shift assay of AGS cells colonized by H. pylori
wild type or PAI strains (MOI 50) (lanes 1-6 and
17-22) or of TNF
-treated cells (10 ng
ml
1) (lanes 7-9) at the indicated
periods of time; antibody supershifting of the NF-
B DNA complex
(lanes 10-13) or cold oligonucleotide competition (5, 10, or 50 ng) (lanes 14-16). p.s., preimmune serum;
ns, nonspecific complex. b, I
B
degradation.
Immunoblot of H. pylori-infected AGS cells using
anti-I
B
antibody (sc-847, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
c, induction of cytokine mRNAs. Duplex reverse
transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction of the cytokine genes
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (upper
panel), interleukin-8 (middle panel), and TNF
(lower panel) in response to H. pylori in the
absence (lanes 1-4) or presence (lanes 5-8) of
10 µM lactacystin. Hp, H. pylori.
B activation and
I
B
degradation involves IKK activity, we tested the ability of H. pylori to induce phosphorylation of endogenous IKKs. AGS
cells were infected for the indicated periods of time. IKK
or IKK
(Fig. 2, a and b)
were immunoprecipitated from cell extracts with appropriate antibodies
and analyzed subsequently in an in vitro kinase assay using
I
B
as a substrate. H. pylori infection as well as
TNF
treatment of cells resulted in increased IKK
(Fig. 2a, lanes 1-8, upper panel) and
IKK
(Fig. 2b, lanes 1-8, upper panel) kinase activity on the substrate I
B
. Compared with
H. pylori-infected cells, TNF
-treated cells induced
IKK
and IKK
faster in the analyzed time course as expected.
Immunoblot analysis confirmed the presence of similar quantities of IKK
proteins in each of the extracts used for immunoprecipitation (Fig. 2,
a and b, lower panels).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
H. pylori-induced
NF-
B activation involves the IKK complex.
a and b, H. pylori induces IKK
and
IKK
. AGS cells were infected with H. pylori (MOI
50) or treated with TNF
for the indicated time periods. Endogenous
IKK
(a) or IKK
(b) was immunoprecipitated
from lysed cells, and their kinase activity was determined using
I
B
as substrate. Autoradiographs from SDS-PAGE are shown.
IP, immunoprecipitation; IB, immunoblot.
c and d, kinase-inactive IKK
blocks the
H. pylori-induced transcriptional activity of NF-
B.
Relative luciferase activity in 293 cells induced by H. pylori (MOI 50) or TNF
(10 ng ml
1)
(c) or co-transfected with Ig
reporter plasmid and
kinase-inactive IKK
(K44A) or MKK4(K116R) (d) and
expression vectors, as indicated. The results are representative of at
least three independent experiments. Data are expressed as
fold-activation compared with non-treated cells or as percent
induction. Hp, H. pylori.
B
transactivation activity, we tested the effects of activation of
H. pylori on the expression of an
NF-
B-dependent reporter gene in transiently transfected
293 cells. H. pylori infection (MOI 50) or TNF
treatment of cells increased transcription of the reporter gene (Fig.
2c). When we tested the effect of a kinase-inactive
IKK
(K44A) construct on the expression of an
NF-
B-dependent reporter gene in transiently transfected
and H. pylori-infected or TNF
-treated 293 cells, we
observed suppression of NF-
B activation. This indicates that H. pylori-induced NF-
B activation involves IKK
(Fig.
2d). For a control, we analyzed the effect of
kinase-inactive MAP kinase kinase (MKK4(K116R)) on the H. pylori-induced NF-
B activation, which was not affected.
B-activating kinase,
mixed-lineage kinase 3) have been shown to be signaling intermediates
that act as direct activators of the IKK complex (2, 20-24). The
cellular selection of the kinases might be dependent on cell type
specificity and distinct extracellular stimuli. To study the H. pylori-induced upstream kinase involved in activation of the IKK
complex, we analyzed the role of NIK and the MEKK1 in H. pylori-induced expression of an NF-
B-dependent
reporter gene in transiently transfected 293 cells. H. pylori- or TNF
-stimulated NF-
B-dependent
reporter gene activity was suppressed when kinase-inactive
mutants of NIK (NIK(624-947); NIK(K429A,K430A)) were expressed
(Fig. 3a). In contrast to
kinase-inactive NIK, the kinase-inactive MEKK1(K432M) did not
significantly block H. pylori-induced NF-
B activation (Fig. 3a), whereas phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate-induced NF-
B activation was affected by
MEKK1(K432M) (data not shown). These results suggest that H. pylori-induced NF-
B activation involves NIK but not MEKK1 in
this kinase cascade and exclude a functional cooperation between those
kinases in the activation of IKK activity. Compelling evidence that NIK
is involved in the activation of NF-
B has been shown in response to
CD40 and CD3/CD28 induction (25, 26).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
NIK and PAK1 direct H. pylori-induced activation of
NF-
B. a, kinase-inactive NIK
inhibits H. pylori-induced transcriptional activity of
NF-
B. Relative luciferase activity in 293 cells induced by H. pylori (MOI 50) or TNF
(10 ng ml
1) or
co-transfected with Ig
reporter plasmid and kinase-inactive NIK
((NIK(K429A,K430A) and NIK(624-947)) or MEKK1(K432M) and
expression vectors, as indicated. The results are representative of at
least three independent experiments. Data are expressed as
fold-activation compared with non-treated cells or as percent
induction. b, H. pylori infection induces PAK1.
Immunocomplex kinase activity of PAK1 immunoprecipitated with an
anti-
-PAK antibody from H. pylori-infected (MOI 50)
(lanes 1-4) or TNF
-stimulated (10 ng
ml
1) (lanes 5-7) AGS cells at the
indicated periods of time. PAK1 activity was determined by
phosphorylation of myelin basic protein as a substrate (upper
panel). The immunoblot of endogenous PAK1 shows similar protein
amounts in all lanes (lower panel). MBP, myelin
basic protein; IP, immunoprecipitation; IB,
immunoblot. c, PAK1 is involved in H. pylori-induced transcriptional activity of NF-
B. 293 cells were
co-transfected with an Ig
reporter plasmid and expression vectors
encoding different kinase-inactive PAK1s (as indicated). The relative
luciferase activity was determined in H. pylori-infected
(MOI 50) or TNF
-treated (10 ng ml
1) cells.
Data are expressed as percent induction. d, PAK1 is upstream
of NIK. HeLa cells were co-transfected with an Ig
reporter plasmid
and expression vectors encoding constitutive active PAK1(L107F) (500 ng) and kinase-inactive NIK(K429A,K430A) or NIK wild type (100 ng) and
different kinase-inactive PAK1 constructs (PAK1(K299R) and
PAK1(H83L,H86L,K299R)). The results are representative of at least
three independent experiments. Data are expressed as percent induction.
Hp, H. pylori.
weakly induced PAK1 (Fig. 3b, lanes 5-7, upper panel). Immunoblot analysis
confirmed the presence of similar quantities of PAK1 in each of the
extracts used for immunoprecipitation (Fig. 3b, lower
panel).
B activation, we analyzed whether PAK1
affects the H. pylori-induced NF-
B-dependent
transcriptional activity. Kinase-inactive PAK1(K299R) blocked the
expression of an NF-
B-dependent reporter gene in
transiently transfected and H. pylori-infected 293 cells in
a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3c). In contrast
to H. pylori infection, kinase-inactive PAK1(K299R) only
slightly affected the NF-
B transactivation activity in
TNF
-treated cells (Fig. 3c). To exclude possible effects
on the putative upstream components of PAK1 due to titration of
Rho-GTPases, we performed experiments with a PAK1(K299R) construct
mutated in histidine 83 and 86, which prevents the binding of
Rho-GTPases. This construct clearly blocked H. pylori-induced NF-
B activation. Furthermore, we used a PAK1
construct containing the residues 83-149. PAK1(83-149) has been
demonstrated to inhibit the autophosphorylation of PAK1 by blocking a
critical phosphoacceptor site that is required for its kinase activity
and does not bind to Rac1 (28). Overexpression of this construct
blocked H. pylori-induced activation of NF-
B in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3c). For a
control, we transiently transfected a PAK1(83-149) construct with
the leucine 107 to phenylalanine mutation (PAK1(83-149,L107F)), which
inactivates the autoinhibitory domain of PAK1. This construct did not
block H. pylori-induced NF-
B activation. To determine the
signaling pathways that couple PAK1 to NF-
B activation, we tested
whether kinase-inactive NIK(K429A,K430A) could block signaling from
constitutive active PAK1(L107F) in transiently transfected HeLa cells.
The inactive NIK mutant NIK(K429A,K430A) blocked the
activation of NF-
B-dependent gene expression by
PAK1(L107F), whereas overexpression of inactive PAK1 (PAK1(K299R) and
PAK1(H83L,H86L,K299R)) had little effect on NIK-induced activation of
NF-
B (Fig. 3d). Our results raise the possibility that
PAK1 may function as an activator of NIK to mediate NF-
B activation
in H. pylori infection.
, IKK
, or
NEMO/IKK
(Fig. 4, b and c). Appropriate
controls show that NIK interacted with IKK
(Fig. 4b) and
that IKK
interacted with NEMO/IKK
(Fig. 4c). Similar
to the kinase-inactive PAK1(K299R), the constitutively active
PAK1(L107F) did not interact with an IKK subunit (data not shown).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
PAK1 binds NIK but not IKKs.
a-c, PAK1 binds NIK. HeLa cells were transiently
transfected, and the tagged proteins (as indicated) were
immunoprecipitated from cell lysates. The immunoprecipitates were
subjected to SDS-PAGE and analyzed in an immunoblot with the indicated
antibodies. d, H. pylori induces the interaction
between PAK1 and NIK. To analyze endogenous PAK1/NIK interaction, we
transiently transfected in HeLa cells small amounts of kinase-inactive
Flag-NIK(K429A,K430A) and performed immunoprecipitations from cell
lysates of H. pylori-infected (MOI 50) (lanes
1-4, upper panel) or TNF
-treated cells (lanes
5 and 6, upper panel) with an anti-
-PAK1
antibody. Immunoblot analysis confirmed the presence of similar
quantities of Flag-NIK and endogenous PAK1 in each of the extracts used
for immunoprecipitation (middle and lower
panels). e, the interaction between PAK1 and NIK is
direct. Protein-protein interaction was carried out in an in
vitro analysis using 35S-labeled proteins translated
in wheat germ extracts (Promega). After translation of Flag-NIK
(lane 2) and HaPAK1 (lane 3) and co-translation
of both molecules (lane 1), we performed a
co-immunoprecipitation with an anti-Flag antibody (lanes
4-6). The position of proteins are indicated. IP,
immunoprecipitation; IB, immunoblot.
-treated cells exhibited no PAK1/NIK interaction (lanes 1,
5, and 6, upper panel). Immunoblot
analysis confirmed the presence of similar quantities of Flag-NIK and
endogenous PAK1 in each of the extracts used for immunoprecipitation
(Fig. 4d, middle and lower panels). To
study whether this interaction is direct, we carried out an in
vitro analysis using 35S-labeled proteins translated
in wheat germ extracts. After cotranslation of Flag-NIK and HaPAK1
(Fig. 4e, lane 1) followed by anti-Flag immunoprecipitation (lane 4), we detected PAK1 in the
immunoprecipitate. The converse experiment of immunoprecipitation with
an anti-Ha antibody allowed the detection of Flag-NIK in the
immunoprecipitate (data not shown).
phosphatase treatment (Fig. 5a, lane 5), suggesting that it represented phosphorylated NIK. These data suggest that, once activated, PAK1 binds and phosphorylates NIK.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
PAK1 phosphorylates NIK. a, effect
of PAK1 on phosphorylation of NIK. HeLa cells were transfected with
Flag-NIK(K429A,K430A) (lane 1) and infected with H. pylori (lane 2) or additionally co-transfected with
kinase-inactive HaPAK1(K299R) (lane 3) or co-transfected
with constitutive active PAK1(L107F) (lane 4). The identity
of the phosphoshift was determined by
phosphatase treatment of
H. pylori-infected cells (lane 5). The
phosphoshift is indicated with an arrow.
PP,
phosphatase. b, effect of
PAK1 on phosphorylation of IKK
. HeLa cells were transfected with
IKK
and stimulated with TNF
(lane 2), co-transfected
with PAK1(K299R) (lane 3); cells were also infected
with H. pylori (lane 4) or additionally
co-transfected with PAK1(K299R) (lane 5) or NIK(K429A,K430A)
(lane 6). The IKK
immunoprecipitations were performed
using an anti-Vsv antibody, and the immunocomplex kinase reactions were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. The phosphorylated IKK
(IKK
-P) is indicated (top panel).
The other panels show the immunoblot analysis, which confirms the
presence of similar quantities of Vsv-IKK
, Flag-NIK, and HaPAK1 in
each of the extracts used for immunoprecipitation. IP,
immunoprecipitation; IB, immunoblot.
was cotransfected with
kinase-inactive PAK1(K299R), and the cells were either infected with
H. pylori or stimulated with TNF
. Kinase assays of
immunoprecipitated IKK
were performed, and the effect of
kinase-inactive PAK1 on IKK
phosphorylation was analyzed
(Fig. 5b). Kinase-inactive PAK1(K299R) (Fig.
5b, lane 5) as well as NIK(K429A,K430A)
(lane 6) could efficiently block the H. pylori-induced IKK
phosphorylation (lane 4), whereas TNF
-induced IKK
phosphorylation (lane 2) was not
blocked by PAK1(K299R) (lane 3). These findings strongly
suggest that PAK1 and NIK represent crucial components in H. pylori-induced NF-
B activation. Thus, like Cot/TPL2,
TAK1(TAB1/TAB2), Raf, and PKC
(26, 29-34), the activation of PAK1
results in the activation of NF-
B by certain stimuli, but distinct
from pathways used by TNF
. The activation of the IKK complex by
these kinases is indirect and involves other kinases or adaptor
molecules, and not all signals proceed through IKK
. It has
been shown that PKC
-induced signaling targets IKK
(35) and that
the adaptor protein receptor-interacting protein targets
NEMO/IKK
to recruit the IKK complex to the TNF receptor (36), which
could involve TRAF2 (37).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B in epithelial cells. Activated PAK1 phosphorylates NIK and directs the
activity of IKKs to I
B
. This signaling causes NF-
B
activation and induction of proinflammatory cytokines in H. pylori-infected gastric epithelial cells (Fig.
6). Because PAK1 does not play an
important role in NF-
B activation by TNF
or phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate, this study corroborates the concept that different
NF-
B-activating stimuli use different signaling components.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Model for the role of PAK1 in the activation
of the NIK-IKK NF-
B pathway and the induction
of the innate immune response in H. pylori
infection. See "Results".
B activation in H. pylori infection (38), it is reasonable to speculate that the component(s) that induce(s) this transcription factor must either be injected into the
eucaryotic target cell or activate(s) contact-dependent
eucaryotic cell-surface receptors. This hypothesis is supported by the
notion that only those PAI factors (CagA, CagF, and CagN) that are not necessary for the functional integrity of the type IV secretion apparatus do not induce activation of NF-
B (15). Thus PAK1 functions
in gastric epithelial cells in a unique pathway that links H. pylori-dependent effector molecules to the activation of NF-
B and the induction of the innate immune response. The central
role of NF-
B in the innate immune response suggests that many
pathogenic microorganisms have evolved mechanisms to interfere with the
function of NF-
B or modulate the NF-
B signal transduction. In
contrast to H. pylori, the microbial pathogen
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis inhibits the activation
of NF-
B by active translocation of the virulence factor
yersinia outer protein J via a type III secretion system. The
yersinia outer protein J protein was shown to bind to IKK
and the
superfamily of mitogen-activated protein mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases and inhibits phosphorylation and subsequent activation of these kinases (39). Thus, by blocking IKK
and MKKs
Yersinia inhibits the release of cytokines and other
immunomodulatory factors during innate immune response. The identity of
the effector molecule(s) of H. pylori that induce(s) NF-
B
is not known so far. We speculate that PAK1 becomes targeted directly
or indirectly by H. pylori factor(s). The identification of
the H. pylori factor(s) in this process of NF-
B
activation will unravel the mechanism of the H. pylori-induced signaling in the future. Interestingly, the viral
protein negative regulatory factor from human simian immunodeficiency virus targets PAK1 and induces nuclear responses. The
negative regulatory factor-induced mechanism of PAK1 activation involves the simultaneous interaction of negative regulatory factor with the SH3 domain of Vav, which induces its guanine
nucleotide exchange factor activity for Cdc42 and Rac1. The activation
of Rac1 and Cdc42 leads to their subsequent dissociation from Vav and
strongly increases their affinity for PAK1 (40).
B regulation in H. pylori-infected epithelial cells. The recent observation that
PAK1-mediated NF-
B activation does not involve activation of the
IKKs could be explained by a different experimental approach (45). In
our future work we plan to analyze the whole process of H. pylori-induced NF-
B activation including the identification of
the microbial factors. Regarding the phosphorylation of NIK by PAK1,
further experiments will determine the phosphorylation sites. NIK
putatively contains a consensus site for phosphorylation by PAK (46).
Therefore, NIK phosphorylation could take place in the
NH2-terminal region, possibly activating NIK to
autophosphorylate and stimulate catalytic activity, as proposed for the
activation of NIK by TAK1 (29). Because PAK1 is known to activate the
JNK pathway in H. pylori infection (47), this finding
contributes to our understanding of how a given stimulus can
simultaneously activate JNK as well as NF-
B. Other kinases could
also act as dual activators of JNK and NF-
B, e.g. MEKK1
or mixed-lineage kinase 3 activate JNK via phosphorylation of
MKK4 (48, 49) and trigger NF-
B activation by direct phosphorylation
of IKKs (24, 35). Furthermore, dual activation of JNK and NF-
B
activities has been shown by ectopic expression of plenty of
SH3s, a Rac1-regulated protein, which consists of four SH3 domains
(50).
B signal transduction and activation of an innate host immune response. The understanding of the host cell
response mechanism may reveal potential targets for drug intervention
in the case of pathological activation of this transcription factor in
inflammatory diseases.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Abteilung Molekulare
Biologie, Max-Planck-Institut für Infektionsbiologie,
Schumannstr. 21/22, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: 49-30-28460-410; Fax:
49-30-28460-401; E-mail: naumann@mpiib-berlin.mpg.de.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
B, nuclear
factor
B;
NIK, NF-
B-inducing kinase;
IKK, I
B kinase;
NEMO, NF-
B essential modulator;
PAI, pathogenicity island;
MOI, multiplicities of infection;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
PAK, p21-activated kinase;
SDS-PAGE, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
MEKK1, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular regulated
kinase (ERK) kinase kinase 1;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal
kinase.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Hatada, E. N.,
Krappmann, D.,
and Scheidereit, C.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
12,
52-58
2.
Malinin, N. L.,
Boldin, M. P.,
Kovalenko, A. V.,
and Wallach, D.
(1997)
Nature
385,
540-544
3.
Delhase, M.,
Hayakawa, M.,
Chen, Y.,
and Karin, M.
(1999)
Science
284,
309-313
4.
Zandi, E.,
and Karin, M.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4547-4551
5.
Yamaoka, S.,
Courtois, G.,
Bessia, C.,
Whiteside, S. T.,
Weil, R.,
Agou, F.,
Kirk, H. E.,
Kay, R. J.,
and Israel, A.
(1998)
Cell
93,
1231-1240
6.
Rothwarf, D.,
Zandi, E.,
Natoli, G.,
and Karin, M.
(1998)
Nature
395,
297-300
7.
Blaser, M. J.
(1987)
Gastroenterology
93,
371-383
8.
Parsonnet, J.,
Hansen, S.,
Rodriguez, L.,
Gelb, A. B.,
Warnke, R. A.,
Jellum, E.,
Orentreich, N.,
Vogelman, J. H.,
and Friedman, G. D.
(1994)
N. Engl. J. Med.
330,
1267-1271
9.
Covacci, A.,
Telford, J. L.,
Del Giudice, G.,
Parsonnet, J.,
and Rappuoli, R.
(1999)
Science
284,
1328-1333
10.
Segal, E. D.,
Cha, J.,
Lo, J.,
Falkow, S.,
and Tompkins, L. S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
14559-14564
11.
Stein, M.,
Rappuoli, R.,
and Covacci, A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1263-1268
12.
Asahi, M.,
Azuma, T.,
Ito, S.,
Ito, Y.,
Suto, H.,
Nagai, Y.,
Tsubokawa, M.,
Tohyama, Y.,
Maeda, S.,
Omata, M.,
Suzuki, T.,
and Sasakawa, C.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
593-602
13.
Odenbreit, S.,
Püls, J.,
Sedlmaier, B.,
Gerland, E.,
Fischer, W.,
and Haas, R.
(2000)
Science
287,
1497-1500
14.
Backert, S.,
Ziska, E.,
Brinkmann, V.,
Zimny-Arndt, U.,
Fauconnier, A.,
Jungblut, P.,
Naumann, M.,
and Meyer, T. F.
(2000)
Cell. Microbiol.
2,
155-164
15.
Glocker, E.,
Lange, C.,
Covacci, A.,
Bereswill, S.,
Kist, M.,
and Pahl, H. L.
(1998)
Infect. Immun.
66,
2346-2348
16.
Bodger, K.,
and Crabtree, J. E.
(1998)
Br. Med. Bull.
54,
139-150
17.
Wessler, S.,
Höcker, M.,
Fischer, W.,
Wang, T.,
Rosewicz, S.,
Haas, R.,
Wiedenmann, B.,
Meyer, T.,
and Naumann, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3629-3636
18.
Naumann, M.,
and Scheidereit, C.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4597-4607
19.
Naumann, M.,
Wessler, S.,
Bartsch, C.,
Wieland, B.,
and Meyer, T. F.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
247-258
20.
Lee, F.,
Peters, R.,
Dang, L.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9319-9324
21.
Shimada, T.,
Kawai, T.,
Takeda, K.,
Matsumoto, M.,
Inoue, J.,
Tatsumi, Y.,
Kanamaru, A.,
and Akira, S.
(1999)
Int. Immunol.
11,
1357-1362
22.
Pommerantz, J.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6694-6704
23.
Tojima, Y.,
Fujimoto, A.,
Delhase, M.,
Chen, Y.,
Hatakeyama, S.,
Nakayama, K.,
Kaneko, Y.,
Nimura, Y.,
Motoyama, N.,
Ikeda, K.,
Karin, M.,
and Nakanishi, M.
(2000)
Nature
404,
778-782
24.
Hehner, S.,
Hofmann, T.,
Ushmorov, A.,
Dienz, O.,
Leung, I.,
Lassam, N.,
Scheidereit, C.,
Dröge, W.,
and Schmitz, M.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
2556-2568
25.
Garceau, N.,
Kosaka, Y.,
Masters, S.,
Hambor, J.,
Shinkura, R.,
Honjo, T.,
and Noelle, R.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
381-385
26.
Lin, X.,
Cunningham, E.,
Mu, Y.,
Geleziunas, R.,
and Greene, W.
(1999)
Immunity
10,
271-280
27.
Sells, M. A.,
and Chernoff, J.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
162-167
28.
Zhao, Z.,
Manser, E.,
Chen, X.,
Chong, C.,
Leung, T.,
and Lim, L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2153-2163
29.
Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.,
Kishimoto, K.,
Hiyama, A.,
Inoue, J.,
Cao, Z.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1999)
Nature
398,
252-256
30.
Takaesu, G.,
Kishida, S.,
Hiyama, A.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shibuya, H.,
Irie, K.,
Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
5,
649-658
31.
Baumann, B.,
Weber, C.,
Troppmair, J.,
Whiteside, S.,
Israel, A.,
Rapp, U.,
and Wirth, T.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4615-4620
32.
Lin, X.,
O'Mahony, A.,
Mu, Y.,
Geleziunas, R.,
and Greene, W.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
2933-2940
33.
Sun, Z.,
Arendt, C.,
Ellmeier, W.,
Schaeffer, E.,
Sunshine, M.,
Gandhi, L.,
Annes, J.,
Petrzilka, D.,
Kupfer, A.,
Schwartzber, P.,
and Littman, D.
(2000)
Nature
404,
402-407
34.
Coudronniere, N.,
Villalba, M.,
Englund, N.,
and Altman, A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
3394-3399
35.
O'Mahony, A.,
Lin, X.,
Geleziunas, R.,
and Greene, W.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1170-1178
36.
Zhang, S.,
Kovalenko, A.,
Cantarella, G.,
and Wallach, D.
(2000)
Immunity
12,
301-311
37.
Devin, A.,
Cook, A.,
Lin, Y.,
Rodriguez, Y.,
Kelliher, M.,
and Liu, Z.
(2000)
Immunity
12,
419-429
38.
Naumann, M.
(2000)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
60,
1109-1114
39.
Orth, K.,
Palmer, L. E.,
Bao, Z. Q.,
Stewart, S.,
Rudolph, A. E.,
Bliska, J. B.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1999)
Science
285,
1920-1923
40.
Fackler, O.,
Lu, X.,
Frost, J.,
Geyer, M.,
Jiang, B.,
Luo, W.,
Abo, A.,
Alberts, A.,
and Peterlin, B.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
2619-2627
41.
Bagrodia, S.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(1999)
Trends Cell Biol.
9,
350-355
42.
Wu, C.,
Lee, S. F.,
Furmaniak-Kaszmierczak, E.,
Cote, G. P.,
Thomas, D. Y.,
and Leberer, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31787-31790
43.
Knaus, U. G.,
Morris, S.,
Dong, H. J.,
Chernoff, J.,
and Bokoch, G. M.
(1995)
Science
269,
221-223
44.
Edwards, D. C.,
Sanders, L. C.,
Bokoch, G. M.,
and Gill, G. N.
(1999)
Nat. Cell Biol.
1,
253-259
45.
Frost, J. A.,
Swantek, J. L.,
Stippec, S.,
Yin, M. J.,
Gaynor, R.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
19693-19699
46.
Tuazon, P. T.,
Spanos, W. C.,
Gump, E. L.,
Monnig, C. A.,
and Traugh, J. A.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
36,
16059-16064
47.
Naumann, M.,
Wessler, S.,
Bartsch, C.,
Wieland, B.,
Covacci, A.,
Haas, R.,
and Meyer, T. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31655-31662
48.
Lin, A.,
Minden, A.,
Martinetto, H.,
Claret, F. X.,
Lange-Carter, C.,
Mercurio, F.,
Johnson, G. L.,
and Karin, M.
(1995)
Science
268,
286-290
49.
Tibbles, L. A.,
Ing, Y. L.,
Liefer, F.,
Chan, J.,
Iscove, N.,
Woodgett, J. R.,
and Lassam, N. J.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
7026-7035
50.
Tapon, N.,
Nagata, K.,
Lamarche, N.,
and Hall, A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1395-1404
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Tomimori, E. Uema, H. Teruya, C. Ishikawa, T. Okudaira, M. Senba, K. Yamamoto, T. Matsuyama, F. Kinjo, J. Fujita, et al. Helicobacter pylori Induces CCL20 Expression Infect. Immun., November 1, 2007; 75(11): 5223 - 5232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rider, A. Shatrova, E. P. Feener, L. Webb, and M. Diakonova JAK2 Tyrosine Kinase Phosphorylates PAK1 and Regulates PAK1 Activity and Functions J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2007; 282(42): 30985 - 30996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hirata, T. Ohmae, W. Shibata, S. Maeda, K. Ogura, H. Yoshida, T. Kawabe, and M. Omata MyD88 and TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6 Are Critical Signal Transducers in Helicobacter pylori-Infected Human Epithelial Cells J. Immunol., March 15, 2006; 176(6): 3796 - 3803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hirata, S. Maeda, T. Ohmae, W. Shibata, A. Yanai, K. Ogura, H. Yoshida, T. Kawabe, and M. Omata Helicobacter pylori Induces I{kappa}B Kinase {alpha} Nuclear Translocation and Chemokine Production in Gastric Epithelial Cells Infect. Immun., March 1, 2006; 74(3): 1452 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Correa and B. G. Schneider Etiology of Gastric Cancer: What Is New? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2005; 14(8): 1865 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |