|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M006837200 on September 11, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 51, 39900-39906, December 22, 2000
Release of the Neocarzinostatin Chromophore from the Holoprotein
Does Not Require Major Conformational Change of the Tertiary and
Secondary Structures Induced by Trifluoroethanol*
G.
Christopher,
P.
Sudhahar,
Krishnaswamy
Balamurugan, and
Der-Hang
Chin
From the Department of Chemistry, National Changhua University of
Education, Changhua 50058, Taiwan, Republic of China
Received for publication, July 31, 2000, and in revised form, September 11, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Neocarzinostatin is a potent enediyne antitumor
antibiotic complex in which a chromophore is noncovalently bound to a
carrier protein. The protein regulates availability of the drug by
proper release of the biologically active chromophore. To understand the physiological mechanism of the drug delivery system, we have examined the trifluoroethanol (TFE)-induced conformational changes of
the protein with special emphasis on their relation to the release of
the chromophore from holoneocarzinostatin. The effect of the helix-inducing agent, TFE, on all the -sheet neocarzinostatin proteins was studied by circular dichroism, fluorescence, and 1H NMR studies. By using binding of
anilinonaphthalene sulfonic acid as a probe, we observed that the
protein exists in a stable, partially structured intermediate state
around 45-50% TFE, which is consistent with the results from
tryptophan fluorescence and circular dichroism studies. The native
state is stable until 20% TFE and is half-converted into the
intermediate state at 30% TFE, which starts to collapse beyond 50%.
High pressure liquid chromatographic analysis of the release of the
chromophore caused by TFE treatment at 0 °C suggests that the
release process, which occurs below 20% TFE, does not result from an
observable conformational change in the protein. Kinetic measurements
of the release of chromophore at 25 °C reveal that TFE does
stimulate the rate of release, which increases sharply at 15% and
reaches a maximum at 20% TFE, although no major secondary or tertiary
structural change of the carrier protein is observed under these same
conditions. Our data suggest that chromophore release results from a
fluctuation of the protein structure that is stimulated by TFE.
Complete release of the chromophore occurs at TFE concentrations where
no overall observable unfolding of the apoprotein is seen. Thus, the
results suggest that denaturation of the protein by TFE is not a
necessary step for release of the tightly bound chromophore.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The biological function of the carrier apoprotein of the enediyne
chromoprotein, which is a recently discovered naturally occurring
antitumor antibiotic, has gained interest lately (1-3). One important
pharmacological function is that the protein regulates availability of
the drug by proper release of its biologically potent chromophore. To
understand the physiological mechanism of the natural drug delivery
system, it is interesting and essential to study how the protein
releases the tightly bound chromophore.
The release of some small ligands such as dinitrophenyl (4) or NADH (5,
6) has been well studied. The results show that the physiological
mechanism of releasing a noncovalently bound cofactor from a protein
complex can be triggered by a specific contact with some agent in the
cell, for example, the anion-mediated iron release mechanism of
transferrins (7). Alternatively, dissociation can also be caused by a
spontaneous fluctuation of the protein conformation. The release of
heme from myoglobin provides a good example (8, 9). Currently, the
molecular mechanism by which
holoNCS1 releases its
chromophore is unclear. Initially, we wished to determine whether the
protein needs to be unfolded for the release process.
Neocarzinostatin (NCS) is the first enediyne chromoprotein; it consists
of a labile chromophore (NCS-Chr) (Mr = 659, Fig. 1) (10, 11) that is tightly and
noncovalently bound to an apoprotein (apoNCS) (113 amino acids) (12).
The chromophore, with an unusual bicyclic dienediyne structure, is very
potent in causing DNA damage. Upon cycloaromatization to a reactive
radical intermediate, it abstracts hydrogens from the sugar moiety of DNA. Although apoNCS itself is inactive in inducing cleavage of DNA, it
plays an important role in the drug action by protecting and storing
the labile chromophore and by releasing the chromophore to the target
DNA. It is of particular interest that NCS protein does not bind to DNA
(13, 14). There is evidence showing that release of the chromophore
occurs before NCS interacts with DNA (14); DNA cleavage is believed to
occur when the chromophore becomes activated after it is already
intercalated into the DNA (12). HoloNCS thus regulates the availability
of the drug by properly controlling the release of its bound
chromophore. The biologically active chromophore has a very high
affinity for its apoNCS (Kd
~10 10 M) (12). How holoNCS
regulates the release of the tightly bound chromophore is completely
unknown. It has been reported earlier that DNA cleavage induced by
native NCS can be greatly stimulated by organic solvents and
denaturants in vitro (14-16). This effect might well result
from a denaturation process that releases the active chromophore.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The chemical structure of NCS-Chr and the
primary structure of apoNCS. The amino acid residues at the
binding site (- - -) and disulfide bridges (---) are marked.
|
|
The primary structure of apoNCS (Fig. 1) was first proposed in the
early 70s (17, 18), and later was revised several times (19-22). The
three-dimensional structure is almost superimposable on that of
holoprotein, as determined by x-ray crystallography (23-25) and NMR
(26-37) studies. The only noteworthy difference between holo- and
apoprotein is the position of the aromatic ring of the side chain of
certain aromatic residues such as Phe78. The protein has
two disulfide bridges and is kidney-shaped with two domains that hold a
well defined binding cavity. The larger domain forms a seven-stranded
antiparallel -barrel, and the smaller domain consists of two
antiparallel strands of -sheet that are perpendicular to each other.
Early chemical studies indicate that the first 20 amino acids do not
associate with the active chromophore (38). The amino acid residues
that form the hydrophobic binding pocket were assigned later by
three-dimensional structural studies (23-37, 39).
Owing to its labile nature, after the chromophore molecule is released
it quickly becomes inactivated, and only a few percent reach and cleave
the target DNA (40). Although adding apoNCS can prevent inactivation,
it also inhibits the release of the active chromophore (16).
Apparently, a proper physiological timing of the releasing process
plays an important role in the drug efficacy. On the other hand,
although NCS is very potent against tumor cells, it damages normal
cells as well (41). Understanding the release process of NCS could help
to find a more selective delivery system that would facilitate the
release of NCS-Chr only in specified conditions, as suggested by
Ehrlich's idea of turning potential drugs into "magic bullets"
(42).
To perform its biological activity, the chromophore needs to be
released by somehow perturbing its strong affinity for the binding
cavity that is formed by the all- -sheet apoNCS. Hydrophobic molecules may play a perturbing role in regulating the release of
NCS-Chr. The penetration of [14C]NCS into cell nuclei
based on autoradiography was demonstrated in 1975 (13), which is before
the discovery of the chromophore. The active chromophore is probably
released either inside the cell nucleus or on the nuclear membrane.
Simple organic co-solvents such as alcohols might effectively mimic the
nonpolar cellular environment of the nuclear membrane. The
-helicogenic solvent, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE), is a useful
hydrophobic solvent, which mixes readily with water, and it might be
effective in inducing a conformational change of the all -sheet
apoNCS. Therefore, we determine whether TFE induces a conformational
change in apoNCS, and if so, whether the conformational change is
correlated with chromophore release.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
NCS powder was obtained from Kayaku Laboratories Ltd. (Tokyo,
Japan). The stock solution in water (0.87 mM) was stored in aliquots at 80 °C in the dark. The apoNCS stock solution (0.13 mM) was prepared in a mixed buffer of 2.67 mM
ammonium acetate (pH 5) and 20 mM sodium acetate (pH 5).
TFE and 1-anilino-8-naphthalene sulfonic acid (ANS) were obtained from
Merck and Sigma, respectively. 2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol-d3 was purchased from
Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. All solutions were prepared in 18.2 ohm
of Milli-Q water, and the concentration of TFE was expressed as
percentage of volume to volume.
Circular Dichroism--
All CD measurements were carried out on
a Jasco J715 spectropolarimeter. The instrument was calibrated with
ammonium d-10-camphor sulfonate. The results are
expressed as mean residue ellipticity, [ ], which is defined as
[ ] = obs/(113 × l × c), where obs is the observed ellipticity in
degrees; c is the concentration in dmol per liter;
l is the length of the light path in cm, and the constant
113 is the number of residues in apoNCS. The scan speed was 200 nm/min.
The CD spectra, which are averaged from more than three scans, were
measured with 10 µM (final concentration) apoNCS
containing requisite amounts (v/v) of TFE. A 1-mm quartz cell (about
300 µl) was used for far-UV region (190-250 nm) and 10-mm micro cell
(about 70 µl) for near-UV (240 to 320 nm) measurements. All spectra
were recorded at 25 ± 2 °C and corrected for solvent and
buffer blanks.
Fluorescence Spectroscopy--
A Hitachi model F-4500
fluorescence spectrofluorimeter was used for measuring the effect of
TFE on the fluorescence of NCS. A set of solutions (total volume, 250 µl) containing the requisite amounts (v/v) of TFE was mixed with
5-10 µM (final concentration) apoNCS. A rectangular
micro cell (4 × 10 mm) was used for measurements. The fluorescent
emission spectra were recorded at the light path of 10 mm between 290 and 500 nm with an excitation wavelength of 280 nm. All spectra were
corrected with solvent and buffer backgrounds. The resolution was 1.0 nm, and wavelength accuracy was within ± 2 nm.
Anilinonaphthalene Sulfonic Acid Binding Studies--
ANS
binding studies were also carried out by Hitachi F-4500
spectrofluorimeter. A set of solutions was prepared as described previously except that apoNCS concentration was increased to 10-50 µM due to lower sensitivity. ANS was added at 10:1 molar
ratio to apoNCS, and the total volume was 300 µl. The fluorescent
emission spectra were recorded between 375 and 625 nm with an
excitation wavelength of 355 nm. All spectra were corrected with ANS,
solvent, and buffer backgrounds.
1H NMR Spectroscopy--
1H NMR spectra
were recorded at 25 °C on a Varian 600 MHz NMR spectrometer. About 2 mg of apoNCS was dialyzed against pure water and lyophilized to dryness
before dissolving it into a mixture of H2O/D2O
(9:1) containing requisite amounts (v/v) of
TFE-d3. The pH of the unbuffered solution was at 5.
HPLC Analyses--
Cycloaromatization reactions were assayed by
Waters Millennium multisystems including model 600E solvent delivery
system, model 996 photodiode array detector, and a model 474 fluorescence detector. The rate of multiwavelength measurement of
photodiode array detector was 0.25 spectrum/s with 1.2 nm of
resolution. The fluorescent excitation was 340 nm, and emission was
detected at 440 nm with bandwidth of 40 nm. Separations were performed by a Waters µ-Bondapak reverse phase C18 column (particle size, 10 µm; pore size, 125 Å; 0.39 × 30 cm) with a 0.4-cm long guard column. The gradient was composed of 5 mM ammonium acetate,
pH 4, in H2O/CH3OH with increasing
concentrations of methanol at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The typical
gradient started from a sharp increase 0-48% of methanol in 3 min and
then a shallow linear increase to 80% in 62 min. A set of 10 µM (final concentration) holoNCS solutions in 5 mM (final concentration) of ammonium acetate (pH 4) was
mixed with 5 mM (final concentration) of GSH and Tris-HCl (100 mM, pH 7.0). Requisite percentage of TFE was added
(final volume, 100 µl) to facilitate the release of the chromophore. After 5 min of incubation at 0 °C, the remaining intact chromophore that had been bound to the protein was analyzed by HPLC. The elution of
NCS-Chr was detected at 45 ± 2 min. Injections were done manually to ensure that the full amount of each solution was completely loaded.
Kinetic Study--
The rate of release of NCS-Chr from holoNCS
was monitored by fluorescent changes measured with a Hitachi-F 4500 spectrofluorimeter. A set of solutions of 2.5-5 µM
(final concentration) of holoNCS in 100 mM (final
concentration) of Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) was mixed with 5 mM
(final concentration) of GSH. The release of NCS-Chr was initiated by
adding the requisite amount of TFE to the mixture (total volume, 300 µl) in a rectangular micro cell (4 × 10 mm). The sample
temperature was controlled by a thermostatic cell holder equipped with
a thermostatic circulator. Excitation was set at 340 nm at the 4-mm
light path, and emission was recorded at 440 nm at the 10-mm light
path. Because Time Scan Mode does not provide light shutter control
function, which can lead to the light-induced degradation of NCS-Chr, a
repetitive Wavelength Scan Mode with the shutter closed between each
run was used. The wavelength interval was set at the minimum (10 nm,
from 434 to 444 nm) with a scan rate of 1000 nm per min. The total
light exposure time to the light-sensitive NCS sample was thus
minimized to 36 s for an experiment that recorded data per min and
monitored in 1 h. Measurement continued until the change of
emission at 440 nm reached a plateau, which indicates that the reaction
of the released chromophore has gone to completion.
The change in [holoNCS] with time was determined by increases of the
fluorescent emission resulting from the thiol-induced drug product.
Because the calibration curve shows a linear relation in the drug
concentration range studied, the measured fluorescent emission in mV
was directly converted into the concentration of the remaining intact
chromophore that was bound to the protein by Equation 1:
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where Ft is the measured fluorescent emission
in mV at 440 nm at time t; Fo is the
initial reading after TFE was added; and F is
the plateau reading after the reaction was completed.
 |
RESULTS |
Circular Dichroism--
CD spectra were recorded at both near- and
far-UV to monitor the conformational changes induced by titration
of TFE. Within reasonable experimental errors, the CD spectrum of the
native apoNCS (data not shown) is essentially consistent with one
published recently (3). It shows a broad negative signal from 300 to 250 nm ([ ]280 0.6 × 103)
followed by a positive peak around 225 nm ([ ]225 0.2 × 103) and a negative one centered at 212 nm
([ ]212 1 × 103), indicative of
the secondary structure being predominantly -sheet.
The near-UV CD signal in proteins is believed to stem from aromatic
side chains in the protein that have restricted motions, because of
interactions with neighboring residues in the tertiary structure of the
protein. In the case of apoNCS, the near-UV CD signal is centered on
280 nm. Fig. 2a shows the
change in [ ] at 280 nm with TFE. Below 20% TFE, very little
change of the tertiary structure is observed. As the TFE concentration
increases above 20%, the mean residue ellipticity gradually increases
with increase of the TFE concentration. The signals beyond 50% TFE are
randomly scattered, because of the inherent nature of the relatively
low intensity. The results suggest that considerable loss of the
tertiary structural interactions in the protein occurs only above 20%
TFE.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The changes in the mean residue ellipticity
of apoNCS with additions of TFE at near-UV (280 nm)
(a) and far-UV (215 nm)
(b).
|
|
For the CD spectra in the far-UV region, addition of TFE up to 30%
(v/v) appears to have no significant effect on the characteristic line
features of apoNCS, although both [ ]225 and
[ ]212 start to drop beyond 25% TFE to become less
positive and more negative. Beyond 30%, the CD spectrum in the far-UV
region, which monitors secondary structural transitions in proteins,
shows a steep decrease in negative ellipticity in the region around
206-222 nm. A large negative signal centered at 206 nm becomes obvious
([ ]206 4 × 103) in 35% of
TFE. Its intensity increases sharply with the increase of TFE content.
Whereas it becomes about doubly intense at 45% TFE (compared with
35%) ([ ]206 8 × 103), a broad
negative shoulder also appears around 222 nm ([ ]222 5 × 103). Such TFE-induced changes in spectra,
which are close to helical spectra, are rather typical. Fig.
2b shows the change in [ ] at 215 nm, which is
correlated with the conformational change of -pleated backbone
structure of apoNCS. The ellipticity value shows no significant change
up to 25% TFE. Comparing the change at 215-280 nm, this result
implies that the loss of tertiary structure may precede the
transformation of the secondary structure induced by TFE. It is
noteworthy to point out that an interesting shoulder appears around
45-50% TFE, suggesting that a stable intermediate or partially
structured state forms on the way to unfolding. Presumably it is a
chiefly helical state, based on its CD spectrum.
Fluorescence Spectroscopy--
The change in tryptophan emission
of apoNCS upon addition of TFE was studied by fluorescence
spectroscopy. When excited at 280 nm, the emission maximum occurs at
346 nm with a slight red shift at higher TFE concentration (348 nm in
60% of TFE). Fig. 3a
illustrates the change in the intensity of the fluorescence emission
maximum with TFE. It is evident that the TFE treatment of NCS results
in a marked loss of its fluorescence properties. Unlike CD spectra,
which show no significant change until the amount of TFE is greater
than 20% (near-UV) or 25% (far-UV), the TFE-induced fluorescent
change becomes obvious at low concentrations (<20%). This result
implies that the steric orientation of the aromatic side chain of the
tryptophan residues may have changed, possibly because of hydrophobic
interaction with TFE even at low TFE concentrations, although both the
global and backbone skeleton of apoNCS still remain intact, based on CD
data. It is very interesting to observe marginal but very clear
increases of the fluorescence, starting from 30% TFE and reaching a
maximum around 45-50%. These changes correspond very well with the
observed shoulder in the change of the ellipticity at 215 nm. This
result further supports the possible formation of a partially
structured state induced by TFE.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
a, the changes in the intensity of the
maximum fluorescent emission from tryptophan of apoNCS (excited at 280 nm) with addition of TFE; b, the changes with addition of
TFE in the intensity ( ) and wavelength ( ) of the maximum
fluorescent emission from 10:1 ANS/apoNCS solutions (excited at 355 nm). All emission data are normalized to per µM of
apoNCS.
|
|
ANS Binding Studies--
It has been shown that ANS, a fluorescent
hydrophobic probe, has a stronger affinity for the molten globule
intermediate than for the native protein or fully unfolded state (43).
We carried out ANS binding studies with TFE-treated and -untreated NCS
protein. Fig. 3b illustrates the TFE-induced changes of the
intensity and the wavelength at the maximum emission of the
fluorescence from ANS. Both changes are closely correlated with each
other. The wavelength of maximum emission ( max) of ANS
exhibits a significant blue shift beyond 20% TFE (~10 nm apart from
20 to 80% TFE). Beyond 20% TFE, the fluorescence also markedly
increases to its maximum value at around 45-50% TFE, which
corresponds to the shoulder region in the change of the wavelength of
maximum intensity. Above 50% TFE the fluorescence gradually drops back
to the initial values beyond 80% TFE. This result suggests that the
tightly folded hydrophobic binding site of apoNCS can remain
inaccessible to ANS molecules until 20% TFE, which is consistent with
the observed tertiary structural changes analyzed from the ellipticity
changes at 280 nm. Higher concentrations of TFE (20-50%) relax the
closely packed binding pocket into a stable partial structure. The
partially opened structure increases the accessibility of hydrophobic
sites for ANS binding. Excess TFE (50-80%) unfolds the hydrophobic
binding cavity completely, and the protein loses the ability to bind
ANS. The stable partial structure with high ANS binding affinity is a
characteristic feature of the molten globule state. It is noteworthy that a molten globule-like state is observed from the study of ANS
binding in 45-50% TFE, which is consistent with the stable intermediate observed from the ellipticity change at 215 nm, as well as
from the fluorescence change of tryptophan emission.
1H NMR Spectroscopy--
ApoNCS has been studied by
sequential one-dimensional NMR spectroscopy in solvents that contain
requisite amounts of TFE-d3. Fig.
4 illustrates the spectra. For the native
form of apoNCS, the NMR lines are relatively narrow and show relatively
good dispersion, which reflects the specific inter-residue interactions
within the compact folded protein structure. Some line broadening is observed as the TFE concentration increases. The chemical shift changes
induced by TFE are particularly evident in the aromatic region
(6.5-7.5 ppm). Compared with the native state, the change induced by
10% TFE is already evident. This result is consistent with the
observation from a fluorescence study using tryptophan emission.
Apparently, the hydrophobic effect from even a small quantity of TFE is
powerful enough to disturb the interaction or steric orientation of the
aromatic side chain of nonpolar residues, whereas no major effect is
observed on the secondary or tertiary structure of the protein under
the same condition. Up to 20% TFE, the changes in NMR resonance
signals can be monitored. Beyond that, large changes are observed. The
spectrum of apoNCS in 40% TFE is drastically different from the one in
native state and in 80%, in which the NMR spectrum shows that the
protein is totally denatured.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
One-dimensional NMR spectra of apoNCS at
20 °C in native state in 90% H2O/D2O
(a); 10%
TFE-d3/H2O (v/v)
(b); 20%
TFE-d3/H2O (v/v)
(c); 40%
TFE-d3/H2O (v/v)
(d); and 80%
TFE-d3/H2O (v/v)
(e).
|
|
HPLC Analyses for the Release of NCS-Chr--
Once NCS-Chr is
released from its protector protein, it becomes very labile and can
barely be detected by aqueous chromatographic analysis. Furthermore,
because the carrier protein can easily be denatured by a hydrophobic
mobile phase such as methanol or acetonitrile in conventional reverse
phase HPLC, it is technically difficult to distinguish whether or not
the detected NCS-Chr has been released form TFE treatment. We have
previously used GSH to distinguish qualitatively the bound NCS-Chr from
the released form (44, 45). GSH fails to interact with the bound form
because of negative charge repulsion from the NCS protein, but it can effectively induce cycloaromatization of the enediyne nucleus of the
unbound NCS-Chr to form an adduct (40). By adding GSH, all released
NCS-Chr induced by TFE is inactivated by GSH, whereas the intact bound
NCS-Chr can be detected by the established reverse phase
chromatographic and spectroscopic methods (46). Fig.
5 demonstrates the analyzed percentage of
the remaining bound NCS-Chr by HPLC from 1 nmol of holoNCS that was
incubated with 5 mM GSH at 0 °C. The incubation time was
set at 5 min to facilitate the chromophore release, which is about the
required minimum time for running a single spectroscopic spectrum to
observe any conformational change of apoNCS. The results reveal that
the percentage of chromophore release increases with TFE concentration
until about 40% TFE. The nonlinear behavior at higher TFE
concentrations probably occurs because of hydrophobic protection of the
labile NCS-Chr, which reduces the rate of inactivation by GSH.
Comparing the efficiency of TFE in causing chromophore release with
that in causing the protein conformational change, it is apparent that
the effect of TFE on the release of the chromophore is not correlated
with the change of the backbone or tertiary structures of the protein. At 20% TFE, about 40% NCS-Chr is released within 5 min at 0 °C, whereas the tightly folded protein structure remains stable in the same
amount of TFE at a higher temperature, 25 °C. In general, HPLC
analyses suggest that TFE acts more efficiently in releasing the
chromophore than in denaturing the tightly packed protein structure.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
HPLC analyses for the remaining percentage of
the bound NCS-Chr after adding TFE. The solution contained holoNCS
(10 µM) with 5 mM GSH and was incubated at
0 °C for 5 min before HPLC analysis.
|
|
Kinetic Study of the Release of NCS-Chr from Holoprotein Induced by
TFE--
Because the release of NCS-Chr from holoprotein induced by
TFE is a rapid and dynamic process, it is difficult to obtain any precise and quantitative information at room temperature simply by HPLC
analyses. We therefore used a more sensitive fluorescence spectroscopic
method to carry out a kinetic study at 25 °C, for the purpose of
obtaining a more accurate and direct comparison. It is known that GSH
quickly reacts with the unbound NCS-Chr to form a stable
tetrahydroindacene type of adduct, which generates about 60-fold
stronger fluorescence signal than that of the native epoxide form of
NCS-Chr (46). We utilize GSH in excess to transform the released labile
NCS-Chr into this highly fluorescent stable product, and we monitor the
increase of the fluorescence with time. To avoid the degradation of
NCS-Chr by excessive exposure to the excitation light source, the
recording method is specifically designed so that the shutter is closed
between measurements.
The release of chromophore can be expressed by Equations 2 and 3,
|
(Eq. 2)
|
|
(Eq. 3)
|
where [holoNCS]0 is the initial or total
concentration of NCS, and k1 is the rate of
release. The released NCS-Chr is quickly and irreversibly converted by
GSH into the highly fluorescent drug-thiol adduct as shown in Equation 4.
|
(Eq. 4)
|
The second-order rate of the reaction of GSH with NCS-Chr in the
presence of DNA has been reported to be 14-28
M 1 s 1
(47). Although much less efficient than apoNCS, it is known that DNA
can effectively protect the labile NCS-Chr as well. The degradation of
the unbound NCS-Chr has been estimated to be about 30 times slower
under the protection of calf thymus DNA (48). We therefore estimate
that the second-order rate constant, k2, for the
reaction of GSH with the unprotected NCS-Chr is about 30 times faster
than the reported values measured with DNA, i.e. 420-840
M 1 s 1.
Because GSH (5 mM) is about 1000-2000-fold in excess over
holoNCS, the estimated lifetime is about 0.25-0.5 s, which is much
faster than the chromophore release process. The [NCS-Chr] can
therefore be kept very small, and the release of chromophore becomes
the rate-determining step. The approximation of ignoring the second term of the Equation 3 simplifies the observed rate in the change of
[holoNCS] to be equivalent to a first-order rate of release that
depends on the concentration of holoNCS as shown in Equation 5,
|
(Eq. 5)
|
where kobs and n are the
observed rate constant and reaction order for the measured rate of
disappearance of holoNCS.
The change in [holoNCS] with time was experimentally determined by
the increase of fluorescence emission resulting from the thiol-induced
drug product. The calibration curve of fluorescence emission
versus concentration shows a linear relation in the drug concentration range studied (0-10 µM) (data not shown).
Fig. 6a shows the logarithmic
plot of [holoNCS], measured by fluorescence, versus time
in 15% TFE. The data from the progressive release of the chromophore
induced by TFE can be described by a linear fit. This result suggests
that first-order kinetics represent well the release process. Fig.
6b shows the change of the observed kinetic constant,
kobs, with concentration of TFE measured at 25 °C. The rate constant at 0% TFE, which is nearly zero, is
estimated by the reported lifetime of the degradation of holoNCS in
aqueous solution (48). The results demonstrate that the observed rate, which is approximately equivalent to the rate of chromophore release, increases sharply with the percentage of TFE and reaches a maximum at
about 20% TFE. However, instead of keeping the maximum plateau rate at
higher TFE concentrations, the observed rate actually drops, a result
that is similar to the HPLC analyses of chromophore release. It is
known that an organic solvent can stabilize the isolated NCS-Chr,
possibly by means of hydrophobic protection. As little as 3 M isopropyl alcohol can slow down the degradation of
NCS-Chr about 6-fold (48). The reaction rate for the GSH-induced inactivation of NCS-Chr is expected to be slower at higher TFE concentrations. The protective effect results in an increase of [NCS-Chr] and makes the second term of Equation 3 too significant to
be ignored. Under those circumstances, kobs is
no longer dominated by the rate of release,
k1.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
a, the logarithmic plot of the
concentration changes with time in a 5 µM holoNCS that
contained 5 mM GSH. The concentration change, which was
monitored by fluorescence at 25 °C, was initiated by an addition of
15% TFE. b, the changes of the observed kinetic constant,
kobs, for the TFE induced chromophore release.
The rate constants were measured at 25 °C.
|
|
In addition to the main study at 25 °C, we have also investigated
the rate of TFE-induced release at different temperatures (5-25 °C), to correlate the chromophore release with properties of
the transition intermediate in the TFE-induced dissociation process.
The results show that at lower temperatures the rate of release
decreases, and the maximum release rate occurs at a slightly higher
percentage of TFE.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Since direct binding of NCS protein to DNA has not been observed
(13, 14), release of the active chromophore has to be the first step in
its pharmacological action of cleaving DNA. NCS chromoprotein can be
considered as a natural model of a drug delivery system. To study the
release of NCS-Chr from its natural carrier protein is useful not only
as a model for other biologically important chromoproteins but also for
clinical applications. We initially use TFE, an helix-inducing
agent, as an effective inducer for conformational change of the all
-NCS. The purpose is to study whether release of the chromophore
results from a conformational change in its carrier protein.
Conformational Changes of NCS Protein--
Because both components
of holoNCS, the chromophore and the apoprotein, exhibit noticeable UV,
CD, fluorescence, and NMR spectroscopic signals that extensively
overlap each other, spectroscopic changes of holoNCS are difficult to
interpret. We therefore rely on studies of apoNCS, whose compact
structure is almost indistinguishable from that of holoNCS, to acquire
information about TFE-induced conformational change in the holoprotein.
Because NCS is basically an all- -sheet protein, the conformational
change induced by TFE, which induces helix formation, is expected to be
evident. The experimental results from CD, tryptophan fluorescence, ANS
binding, and 1H NMR studies, on the effect of TFE over a
wide range of concentration (0-90%), are in good agreement. The
specific interaction of the aromatic side chains can be disturbed at a
low percentage of TFE (<20%), before any significant change occurs in
the secondary or tertiary structure of the tightly folded, hydrophobic
binding site. The all- -sheet native state, N, remains in its compact folded state until about 20% TFE. The tertiary structure is disrupted before the secondary structure, which remains unchanged until about
25% TFE. Beyond 20% TFE the native state, N, changes into the
intermediate state, I. In 45-50% TFE, the molten globule-like intermediate (I) is a well populated species, as observed by ANS binding. The molten globule-like intermediate can also be observed by
other spectroscopic methods. Beyond 50%, I starts to collapse and is
transformed into the denatured state, D, in 80% TFE.
Scheme I depicts the equilibrium changes
in conformation determined from the spectroscopic observations,
i.e. above 20% TFE, an N I equilibrium is observed; in
45-50% TFE, the maximum concentration of I is observed, and all
molecules are apparently transformed into the molten globule-like
intermediate, and above 50% TFE, an I D equilibrium is
observed.
Fig. 7 shows the free energy change of
transforming the native protein, N, into the molten globule-like state,
I. The free energy of transforming N into I,
GI, is estimated from the ellipticity changes
at 280 and 215 nm and from the fluorescence emission change of the
hydrophobic probe, ANS, by assuming that in 50% TFE the equilibrium
from N to I is nearly complete and the change from I to D is
negligible. For a two-state process, N I, the fraction of I,
FI, can be estimated by
FI = (XC XN)/(XI XN), where XC,
XN, and XI are the
spectroscopic data at specified TFE percentages, 0 and 50% TFE. The
free energy, GI, is related to
FI by the equilibrium constant
KI, where KI = FI/(1 FI) and GI = RTlnKI. It is clear that
GI estimated by different spectroscopic methods is nearly the same within reasonable experimental error. The
concentration of TFE needed to obtain 50:50 N:I is about 30% TFE,
where GI = 0.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The changes of the free energy at 25 °C
for transforming of N to I state of apoNCS,
GI, which are calculated
from [ ] of 215 ( ) and 280 nm (+), and
fluorescence of ANS binding ( ).
|
|
Chromophore Release from NCS Protein--
Our main focus here is
not to characterize the structure of the molten globule-like state of
apoNCS but rather to determine whether release of the chromophore
requires a major conformational change in the NCS protein. The kinetic
results at 25 °C show that the release of chromophore is half-way to
the maximum rate in 15% TFE and reaches the maximum at 20%. On the
other hand, the CD spectroscopic studies show that the close-packed NCS
protein structure remains almost unchanged in these conditions. Because there is no extensive change in ellipticity value and accessibility for
ANS binding below 20% TFE, release of the chromophore can be induced
before any significant backbone or global conformational change occurs.
ANS does not bind to native apoNCS, but whether or not the channel to
the hydrophobic binding cavity is open is not known. TFE-induced
dislocation of the side chains of some aromatic residues, which is
observed by tryptophan fluorescence and NMR studies, could be
sufficient to facilitate the release of the chromophore.
It is obvious that the N I reaction, which occurs beyond 20% TFE,
does not correspond to the chromophore release process, which reaches a
maximum rate around 20% TFE. The results suggest that formation of the
molten globule-like intermediate is not related to the chromophore
release. These results also show that, when the chromophore release
path reaches its maximum activity, the carrier protein retains its
compact folded state. The release of NCS-Chr apparently does not
require any major permanent change of the secondary or tertiary
structure of the protein. It is important that TFE stimulates the
release of the chromophore, which is consistent with the earlier report
that the DNA cleavage induced by holoNCS can be stimulated by an
organic solvent such as isopropyl alcohol (14-16). The TFE stimulation
of release may indicate that chromophore release results from a
fluctuation of the protein structure, even though no major secondary or
tertiary structural change is required. In the cell, such a fluctuation
of the protein structure (which occurs spontaneously in
vitro) might be caused by a contact with some cellular agent, such
as a membrane.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Prof. C. Yu and Dr. T. K. S. Kumar for their generous help and providing the initiation ideas.
NMR experiments were carried out at the Regional Instrumentation Center
at Taichung supported by National Science Council. We thank the Kayaku
Co., Ltd., for the supply of NCS powder. Assistance from K. Jayachithra is acknowledged. We thank Dr. Robert L. Baldwin for the valuable suggestions and help in proofreading the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Laboratory Grant DOH88-HR-807
from National Health Research Institutes and Individual Grant NSC 88-2113-M-018-001 from the National Science Council, The Executive Yuan, Republic of China.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry,
National Changhua University of Education, Changhua 50058, Taiwan,
Republic of China. Fax: 886-4-7211178 or 886-4-7211190; E-mail:
chdhchin@cc.ncue.edu.tw.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006837200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
holoNCS, the
chromoprotein of neocarzinostatin;
NCS, neocarzinostatin;
NCS-Chr, neocarzinostatin chromophore;
apoNCS, the apoprotein component of
neocarzinostatin;
TFE, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol;
ANS, 1-anilino-8-naphthalene sulfonic acid;
HPLC, high performance liquid
chromatography;
GSH, glutathione.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Thorson, J. S.,
Shen, B.,
Whitwam, R. E.,
Liu, W.,
Li, Y.,
and Ahlert, J.
(1999)
Bioorg. Chem.
27,
172-188
|
| 2.
|
Okuno, Y.,
Iwashita, T.,
and Sugiura, Y.
(2000)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
122,
6848-6854
|
| 3.
|
Heyd, B.,
Lerat, G.,
Adjadj, E.,
Minard, P.,
and Desmadril, M.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
1812-1818
|
| 4.
|
Posner, R. G.,
Lee, B.,
Conrad, D. H.,
Holowka, D.,
Baird, B.,
and Goldstein, B.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
5350-5356
|
| 5.
|
Blackwell, L. F.,
Motion, R. L.,
MacGibbon, A. K. H.,
Hardman, M. J.,
and Buckley, P. D.
(1987)
Biochem. J.
242,
803-808
|
| 6.
|
Digits, J. A.,
and Hedstrom, L.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
2295-2306
|
| 7.
|
Mizutani, K.,
Yamashita, H.,
Mikami, B.,
and Hirose, M.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
3258-3265
|
| 8.
|
La Mar, G. N.,
Davis, N. L.,
Parish, D. W.,
and Smith, K. M.
(1983)
J. Mol. Biol.
168,
887-896
|
| 9.
|
Lecomte, J. T. J.,
Johnson, R. D.,
and La Mar, G. N.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
829,
268-274
|
| 10.
|
Ishida, N.,
Miyazaki, K.,
Kumagai, K.,
and Rikimaru, M.
(1965)
J. Antibiot. (Tokyo)
18,
68-76
|
| 11.
|
Edo, K.,
Mizugaki, M.,
Koide, Y.,
Seto, H.,
Furihata, K.,
Otake, N.,
and Ishida, N.
(1985)
Tetrahedron Lett.
26,
331-334
|
| 12.
|
Goldberg, I. H.
(1991)
Acc. Chem. Res.
24,
191-198, and references therein
|
| 13.
|
Maeda, H.,
Aikawa, S.,
and Yamashita, A.
(1975)
Cancer Res.
35,
554-559
|
| 14.
|
Jung, G.,
and Kohnlein, W.
(1981)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
98,
176-183
|
| 15.
|
Kappen, L. S.,
and Goldberg, I. H.
(1978)
Nucleic Acids Res.
5,
2959-2967
|
| 16.
|
Kappen, L. S.,
and Goldberg, I. H.
(1979)
Biochemistry
18,
5647-5653
|
| 17.
|
Meienhofer, J.,
Maeda, H.,
Glaser, C. B.,
Czombos, J.,
and Kuromizu, K.
(1972)
Science
178,
875-876
|
| 18.
|
Maeda, H.,
Glaser, C. B.,
Kuromizu, K.,
and Meienhofer, J.
(1974)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
164,
379-385
|
| 19.
|
Gibson, B. W.,
Herlihy, W. C.,
Samy, T. S. A.,
Hahm, K. S.,
Maeda, H.,
Meienhofer, J.,
and Biemann, K. A
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
10801-10806
|
| 20.
|
Kuromizu, K.,
Tsunasawa, S.,
Maeda, H.,
Abe, O.,
and Sakiyama, F.
(1986)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
246,
199-205
|
| 21.
|
Hirayama, K.,
Ando, T.,
Takahashi, R.,
and Murai, A.
(1986)
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
59,
1371-1378
|
| 22.
|
Sakata, N.,
Minamitani, S.,
Kanbe, T.,
Hori, M.,
Hamada, M.,
and Edo, K.
(1993)
Biol. & Pharm. Bull.
16,
26-28
|
| 23.
|
Sieker, L. C.,
Jensen, L. H.,
and Samy, T. S. A.
(1976)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
68,
358-362
|
| 24.
|
Teplyakov, A.,
Obmolova, G.,
Wilson, K.,
and Kuromizu, K.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
213,
737-741
|
| 25.
|
Kim, K. H.,
Kwon, B. M.,
Myers, A. G.,
and Rees, D. C.
(1993)
Science
262,
1042-1046
|
| 26.
|
Remerowski, M. L.,
Glaser, S. J.,
Sieker, L. C.,
Samy, T. S.,
and Drobny, G. P.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
8401-8409
|
| 27.
|
Adjadj, E.,
Mispelter, J.,
Quiniou, E.,
Dimicoli, J. L.,
Favaudon, V.,
and Lhoste, J. M.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
190,
263-271
|
| 28.
|
Takashima, H.,
Amiya, S.,
and Kobayashi, Y.
(1991)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
109,
807-810
|
| 29.
|
Tanaka, T.,
Hirama, M.,
Ueno, M.,
Imajo, S.,
Ishiguro, M.,
Mizugaki, M.,
Edo, K.,
and Komatsu, H.
(1991)
Tetrahedron Lett.
32,
3175-3178
|
| 30.
|
Gao, X. L.,
and Burkhart, W.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
7730-7739
|
| 31.
|
Adjadj, E.,
Quiniou, E.,
Mispelter, J.,
Favaudon, V.,
and Lhoste, J. M.
(1992)
Biochimie (Paris)
74,
853-858
|
| 32.
|
Gao, X. L.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
225,
125-135
|
| 33.
|
Adjadj, E.,
Quiniou, E.,
Mispelter, J.,
Favaudon, V.,
and Lhoste, J. M.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
203,
505-511
|
| 34.
|
Tanaka, T.,
Hirama, M.,
Fujita, K.,
Imajo, S.,
and Ishiguro, M.
(1993)
J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.
15,
1205-1207
|
| 35.
|
Lefevre, C.,
Adjadj, E.,
Quiniou, E.,
and Mispelter, J.
(1994)
J. Biomol. NMR
4,
689-702
|
| 36.
|
Imajo, S.,
Ishiguro, M.,
Tanaka, T.,
Hirama, M.,
and Teplyakov, A.
(1995)
Bioorg. Med. Chem.
3,
429-436
|
| 37.
|
Mispelter, J.,
Lefevre, C.,
Adjadj, E.,
Quiniou, E.,
and Favaudon, V.
(1995)
J. Biomol. NMR
5,
233-244
|
| 38.
|
Samy, T. S. A.
(1977)
Biochemistry
16,
5573-5578
|
| 39.
|
Hirama, M.,
and Tanaka, T.
(1994)
Pure Appl. Chem.
66,
791-796
|
| 40.
|
Chin, D.-H.,
and Goldberg, I. H.
(1993)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
115,
9341-9342
|
| 41.
|
Goldberg, I. H.,
Povirk, L. F.,
Kappen, L. S.,
and Chin, D.-H.
(1985)
in
Cellular Regulation and Malignant Growth
(Ebashi, S., ed)
, pp. 483-492, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
|
| 42.
|
Johnson, J. P.,
and Dippold, W. G.
(1989)
J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.
115,
494-495
|
| 43.
|
Ptitsyn, O. B.
(1992)
in
Protein Folding
(Creighton, T. E., ed)
, pp. 243-300, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York
|
| 44.
|
Chin, D.-H.,
and Tseng, M.-C.
(1997)
Tetrahedron Lett.
38,
2891-2894
|
| 45.
|
Chin, D.-H.
(1999)
Chem. Eur. J.
5,
1084-1090
|
| 46.
|
Chin, D.-H.,
Tseng, M.-C.,
Chuang, T.-C.,
and Hong, M.-C.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1336,
43-50
|
| 47.
|
Dedon, P. C.,
and Goldberg, I. H.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
1909-1971
|
| 48.
|
Povirk, L. F.,
and Goldberg, I. H.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
4773-4080
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Hariharan, W. Liang, S.-H. Chou, and D.-H. Chin
A New Model for Ligand Release: ROLE OF SIDE CHAIN IN GATING THE ENEDIYNE ANTIBIOTIC
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 9, 2006;
281(23):
16025 - 16033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Takashima, T. Yoshida, T. Ishino, K. Hasuda, T. Ohkubo, and Y. Kobayashi
Solution NMR Structure Investigation for Releasing Mechanism of Neocarzinostatin Chromophore from the Holoprotein
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 25, 2005;
280(12):
11340 - 11346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Valerio-Lepiniec, M. Nicaise, E. Adjadj, P. Minard, and M. Desmadril
Key interactions in neocarzinostatin, a protein of the immunoglobulin fold family
Protein Eng. Des. Sel.,
November 1, 2002;
15(11):
861 - 869.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|