Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003191200 on September 28, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 51, 40028-40035, December 22, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/51/40028    most recent
M003191200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Involvement of Phospholipid Hydroperoxide Glutathione Peroxidase in the Modulation of Prostaglandin D2 Synthesis*

Hikaru Sakamoto, Hirotaka Imai, and Yasuhito NakagawaDagger

From the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan

Received for publication, April 14, 2000, and in revised form, September 27, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Antigenic cross-linking of the high affinity IgE receptors on mast cells induced the synthesis of prostaglandin D2 (PGD2). The production of PGD2 in L9 cells, which overexpressed non-mitochondrial phospholipid glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx), was only one-third that in the control line of cells (S1 cells). The reduction in the formation of PGD2 in L9 cells was reversed upon inhibition of PHGPx activity by buthionine sulfoximine. Experiments with inhibitors demonstrated that prostaglandin H synthase-2 (PGHS-2) was the isozyme responsible for the production of PGD2 upon cross-linking of IgE receptors. The conversion of radiolabeled arachidonic acid to prostaglandin H2 (PGH2) was strongly inhibited in L9 cells, whereas the rate of conversion of PGH2 to PGD2 was the same in L9 cells and S1 cells, indicating that PGHS was inactivated in L9 cells. The PGHS activity in L9 cells was about half that in S1 cells. However, PGHS activity in L9 cells increased to the level in S1 cells upon the addition of the hydroperoxide 15-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid or of 3-chloroperoxybenzoic acid. These results suggest that non-mitochondrial PHGPx might be involved in the inactivation of PGHS-2 in nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum via reductions in levels of the hydroperoxides that are required for full activation of PGHS. Therefore, it appears that PHGPx might function as a modulator of the production of prostanoids, in addition to its role as an antioxidant enzyme.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reactive oxygen species (ROS),1 such as the superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxy radicals, are constantly formed in aerobic cells as a result of mitochondrial respiration and reactions catalyzed by enzymes such as NADH/NADPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase, monooxidases, and cyclooxygenase (1-4). Thus, cellular DNA, proteins, and membrane lipids are continually exposed to ROS and suffer from damage, such as DNA cleavage, protein denaturation, and lipid peroxidation. The ROS-mediated damage to intracellular molecules is limited by cellular antioxidant enzymes, such as phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx), classical glutathione peroxidase (cGPx), superoxide dismutase, and catalase (5).

Prostaglandins are important mediators both in host defense mechanisms and in inflammation. Their production is stimulated by low levels of ROS via the activation of prostaglandin H synthase (PGHS) and/or phospholipase A2 in intact cells (6-9). Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) is one of the major products formed in mast cells from arachidonic acid by PGHS in response to pharmacological or physiological stimulation, such as treatment with a calcium ionophore, oxidative stress, or cross-linking of IgE receptors (10-14). The biosynthesis of PGD2 is initiated by the release of arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids. The liberated arachidonic acid is oxidized to an unstable hydroperoxide intermediate, prostaglandin G2 (PGG2), by cyclooxygenase reaction, and subsequent reduction of C-15 hydroperoxide moiety of PGG2 yields PGH2. These sequential reactions are catalyzed by PGHS, the enzyme that is the primary enzymatic regulator of the biosynthesis of prostanoids (15). The cyclooxygenase activity of PGHS requires reaction of PGHS peroxidase with hydroperoxide to generate a tyrosyl radical species, which is the active form of PGHS (16-18). Thus, it has been proposed that the cellular synthesis of prostaglandin is regulated in part by intracellular levels of hydroperoxide (26). Intracellular levels of hydroperoxides can be regulated by enzymes such as glutathione peroxidases (GPx).

Two types of GPx, cGPx and PHGPx, are distributed in various tissues and cells. cGPx is present predominantly in the cytosol and some is located in mitochondria (19). cGPx catalyzes the reduction of fatty acid hydroperoxides and hydrogen peroxide using glutathione as a cofactor. PHGPx is present in cytosolic, nuclear, and mitochondrial fractions (19-21) and is the only known antioxidative enzyme that can directly reduce peroxidized phospholipids (22), fatty acids (23), and cholesterol (24) in membranes and lipoproteins. Although direct evidence for the involvement of GPx in reduction of the hydroperoxide, which is required for activation of the cyclooxygenase activity of PGHS, is still lacking, it has been shown that elevation of glutathione levels inhibits the production of prostaglandin in peritoneal macrophages (25). Furthermore, the selenoorganic compound ebselen, which reduces intracellular peroxides, decreases PGHS activity in NIH3T3 fibroblasts (26). These results suggest that GPx might regulate the activity of PGHS in the cellular level. Therefore, we wondered whether cGPx or PHGPx might be responsible for the regulation of the formation of prostaglandins. We are interested in the possible role of PHGPx in the regulation of prostanoid synthesis since PHGPx can interact with biomembrane, in which the synthesis of prostaglandins occurs.

We previously established stable transformants of rat basophile leukemia 2H3 (RBL-2H3) cells, in which a short 20-kDa (non-mitochondrial type) or a long 23-kDa form (mitochondrial type) of PHGPx was overexpressed (19, 27). The amount of PHGPx in L9 cells, which overexpressed the short 20-kDa form of PHGPx, was significantly elevated in the cytosol, microsomal, and nuclear fractions as compared with that in mock-transfected cells (S1 cells), but the amounts of PHGPx in mitochondrial fractions from L9 and S1 cells were similar. The amount of PHGPx in the mitochondrial fraction of M15 cells, which overexpressed the long 23-kDa form of PHGPx, was twice that in the same fraction from L9 cells. These three lines of cells provide a useful model system with which to attempt to clarify the ability of PHGPx to modulate the synthesis of prostaglandin. Cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx were resistant to cell death due to oxidative damage (27). Moreover, production of leukotrienes, catalyzed by 5-lipoxygenase, was markedly inhibited as a result of decreased levels of intracellular hydroperoxides (21). By contrast, in cells that overexpressed mitochondrial PHGPx, the generation of intracellular hydroperoxides induced by mitochondrial damage was suppressed, and the cells were more resistant than cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx to cell death caused by direct damage to mitochondria, to oxidative stress (19), and also to a mediator of apoptosis that induced the liberation of cytochrome c (28).

In the present study, we used RBL-2H3 cells that overexpressed either non-mitochondrial or mitochondrial PHGPx to examine the functional roles of two types of PHGPx in the formation of prostaglandins. RBL-2H3 cells produce PGD2 predominantly in response to stimulation by antigenic cross-linking of the high affinity immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptors or to calcium ionophores (29, 30). We show here that non-mitochondrial PHGPx significantly suppressed the production of PGD2 via prevention of increases in levels of hydroperoxides in the nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagents-- Antibodies, raised in rabbit, against PGHS-1 from rat were a kind gift from Dr. M. Murakami (Showa University, Tokyo, Japan). PGHS-2-specific mouse monoclonal antibodies, 5,6-carboxy-2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) and PGD2-MOX Enzyme Immunoassay Kit were obtained from Funakoshi Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). [1-14C]Arachidonic acid (2.22 GBq/mmol) was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Dinitrophenyl-human serum albumin (DNP-hSA), BSO, and A23187 were obtained from Sigma. IgE against dinitrophenyl (IgE-DNP) was obtained from Seikagaku Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). PGH2 (>98%) was obtained from Wako Pure Chemical (Tokyo, Japan).

Cell Culture-- We used the previously established control line of cells (S1 cells), L9 and L28 cells, which overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx (27), and M15 cells, which overexpressed mitochondrial PHGPx (19). These lines of rat basophile leukemia (RBL-2H3) cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. S1-Se(+) cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 250 nM sodium selenite, 5% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin for 2 weeks. Aliquots of 1 × 106 cells/ml were transferred to fresh medium when cells had reached semi-confluence.

Quantitation of PGD2 by Enzyme Immunosorbent Assay-- RBL-2H3 cells were seeded at a density of 4 × 105 cells/ml into 6-cm diameter dishes and cultured for 2 days. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells were primed with IgE-DNP at a concentration of 1 µg/106 cells in 2 ml of DMEM that contained 5% FCS for 2 h at 37 °C. After three washes with PBS, receptor cross-linking was effected by incubation with 10 µg/ml DNP-hSA for 1 h at 37 °C. The incubation medium were collected and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C to pellet small numbers of dislodged cells. Supernatants were prepared for quantitation of PGD2 with the PGD2-MOX Enzyme Immunoassay Kit.

Cells were treated with A23187 as described previously (13, 21). RBL-2H3 cells (5 × 106 cells) were incubated in PBS that contained 1 mM CaCl2 and 0.5 mM MgSO4 for 10 min at 37 °C and then treated with 5 µM A23187 for 5 min. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, supernatants were prepared for enzyme immunosorbent assay.

Immunoblotting Analysis-- RBL-2H3 cells (5 × 106 cells) were activated by cross-linking their IgE receptors, as described above, by sequential treatment with IgE-DNP and DNP-hSA. Cells were incubated for 2 h with IgE-DNP (1 µg/106 cells), washed, and treated with DNP-hSA (10 µg/ml) for 1 h. The cells were harvested, washed with PBS, and sonicated in PBS with a sonicator (20 s, 50 watts, model 5202; Ohtaka Works, Tokyo). Proteins (30 µg) from sonicated cells were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 10% polyacrylamide gel, as described by Laemmli (31), and they were transferred electrophoretically to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane filter (Atto Instruments, Tokyo) at 2 mA/cm2 for 1 h in 100 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 5% (v/v) methanol in a protein transfer system (Atto Instruments), as described previously (13). The PVDF membrane with the blotted proteins was blocked for 2 h by incubation with 3% (w/v) defatted milk in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) that contained 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T). The membrane was then incubated for 1.5 h with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against PGHS-1 or mouse monoclonal antibodies against PGHS-2 that had been diluted with TBS-T to an appropriate concentration. After the PVDF membrane had been washed twice with TBS-T, it was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antibodies against rabbit IgG or against mouse IgG (Zymed Laboratories Inc., South San Francisco, CA). The binding of antibodies to antigens on the PVDF membrane was detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting analysis system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Subcellular Fractionation of Cells-- RBL-2H3 cells (3 × 107 cells) were activated by cross-linking their IgE receptors by sequential treatment with IgE-DNP and DNP-hSA. Cells were washed twice with PBS and harvested. Cells were centrifuged at 700 × g for 5 min at room temperature. The obtained pellets were suspended in 2 ml of sucrose buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 3 mM imidazole, and 0.1% (v/v) ethanol that contained 10 µM leupeptin, 10 µM pepstatin A, 10 µM antipain, 10 µM chymostatin, and 100 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.2) and homogenized in a Teflon/glass Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer. Nuclear and microsomal fractions were obtained by differential centrifugation according to the previous method (19). Proteins (30 µg) from these fractions were used for immunoblotting analysis.

The Formation of PGD2 from [1-14C]Arachidonic Acid-- RBL-2H3 cells (2.5 × 106 cells) were incubated with 0.3 µM [1-14C]arachidonic acid (3.7 kBq; 2.22 GBq/mmol) for 24 h at 37 °C. Labeled cells were washed three times with PBS that contained 1 mg/ml fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin. The cells were primed with IgE-DNP at a concentration of 1 µg/106 cells, and then receptors were cross-linked by the addition of DNP-hSA. After incubation, all cells were placed on ice, and the incubation medium was separated by centrifugation. Three volumes of ethyl acetate (pH 3.0), supplemented with 0.1 ml of 0.1 M HCl, were added to the incubation medium for extraction of metabolites. Each extract was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in a small amount of a mixture of chloroform and methanol (2:1, v/v) and applied to a TLC plate (Silica Gel 60 F254; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The plate was developed with organic layer of a mixture of ethyl acetate, 2,2,4-trimethylpentane, acetic acid, and H2O (110:50:20:100, v/v), as described by Green and Samuelsson (32). The rate of production of each metabolite was calculated from results of scanning densitometry after autoradiography with a Bio-Imaging analyzer (BAS2000; Fuji Film, Tokyo).

The Formation of PGD2 from Exogenously Added Substrates-- RBL-2H3 cells (5 × 106 cells) were incubated with IgE-DNP for 2 h and then treated with DNP-hSA for 1 h. After removal of the medium, cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated in PBS that contained 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgSO4, and 20 µM [1-14C]arachidonic acid (3.7 kBq; 170.7 MBq/mmol) for 30 min. The supernatant was collected and supplemented with 3 volumes of ethyl acetate (pH 3.0). The metabolites of labeled arachidonic acid were extracted in the ethyl acetate layer. The extract was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in a small amount of a mixture of chloroform and methanol (2:1, v/v) and applied to a TLC plate. The plate was developed as described by Green and Samuelsson (32). The rate of production of each metabolite was calculated from results of scanning densitometry after autoradiography with the Bio-Imaging analyzer. The rate of production of PGD2 from exogenously added prostaglandin H2 was determined as follows. RBL-2H3 cells, which had been stimulated by cross-linking of IgE receptors, were incubated in PBS that contained 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgSO4, and 10 µM prostaglandin H2 for 30 min. The incubation medium was collected, and the level of PGD2 was determined by enzyme immunosorbent assay.

Assay of PGHS Activity-- RBL-2H3 cells (5 × 106 cells) were activated by cross-linking their IgE receptors by sequential treatment with IgE-DNP and DNP-hSA. Then cells (5 × 106 cells) were washed three times with PBS and harvested with a cell scraper. The cells were suspended in sucrose buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 3 mM imidazole, and 0.1% (v/v) ethanol that contained 10 µM leupeptin, 10 µM pepstatin A, and 100 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.2) and homogenized in a Teflon/glass Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer. The enzymatic reaction was performed in 100 µl of 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) that contained 5 mM tryptophan, 20 µM hematin, 1 mM p-chloromercuriphenylsulfonic acid, and 30 µg of protein in a cell homogenate at 24 °C for 2 min after addition of 40 µM [1-14C]arachidonic acid (0.654 GBq/mmol), unless otherwise stated. The reaction was terminated by addition of a mixture of diethyl ether, methanol, and 1 M citric acid (30:4:1, v/v), with centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The diethyl ether layer was applied to a TLC plate. The plate was developed with a mixture of diethyl ether, methanol, and acetic acid (90:2:0.1, v/v). The products were identified by comparison with chromatographic standards. Enzyme activities were calculated from results of scanning densitometry after autoradiography with the Bio-Imaging analyzer.

Assay of PHGPx Activity-- Cells (1.5 × 107 cells) were sonicated in 1 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 5 mg/ml leupeptin and 17 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was used for assay. PHGPx activity was determined by using phosphatidylcholine hydroperoxide (PCOOH) as the substrate according to our previous paper (21).

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Intracellular Peroxides-- We used an oxidant-sensitive fluorescent probe, 5,6-carboxy-2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), to assess levels of intracellular peroxides. After sequential treatment with IgE-DNP and DNP-hSA, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 5 µM DCFH-DA in PBS for 15 min. DCFH-DA was deacylated to the non-fluorescent compound 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCFH) within the cells, and DCFH was oxidized to the fluorescent compound 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein by peroxides. The fluorescent intensity of dichlorofluorescein in cells was analyzed with a flow cytometer (EPICS® Elite Flow Cytometer; Coulter, Hialeah, FL).

Quantitation of Proteins-- Concentrations of proteins were determined with Protein Assay Reagent (Bio-Rad) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Production of Prostaglandin D2 in PHGPx-overexpressing RBL-2H3 Cells-- The production of prostaglandins was examined in mock-transfected cells (S1 cells) and in cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx (L9 cells) by autoradiography after prior labeling with radioactive arachidonic acid (Fig. 1A). S1 cells predominantly produced prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) upon activation with IgE-DNP, whereas production of other types of prostaglandin was not observed. Levels of PGD2 were determined by enzyme immunosorbent assays after treatment of cells with IgE-DNP (Fig. 1B). Quiescent RBL-2H3 cells continuously produced PGD2 to yield a level of approximately 100 pg/106 cells. The level of PGD2 in S1 cells activated by IgE-DNP was approximately three times that in non-stimulated cells. The production of PGD2 was markedly inhibited by the overexpression of non-mitochondrial PHGPx (in L9 and L28 cells) (Fig. 1, A and B). Kinetic analysis of IgE-DNP-activated S1 cells revealed that the level of PGD2 reached a maximum within 1 h, and then the level of PGD2 declined gradually (Fig. 2). By contrast, synthesis of PGD2 in L9 cells was suppressed during culture for 18 h with IgE-DNP. These results indicated that non-mitochondrial PHGPx might be involved in regulation of the formation of PGD2 by RBL-2H3 cells in response to IgE-DNP.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Production of prostaglandin D2 in the control line of cells and in cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx. A, autoradiogram of prostanoid products. Control cells (S1) and cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx (L9) were labeled with [1-14C]arachidonic acid for 24 h and then activated by cross-linking their IgE receptors, by sequential treatment with IgE-DNP and DNP-hSA. Labeled cells were primed with IgE-DNP at a concentration of 1 µg/106 cells. Two hours later, cells were washed, and then receptor cross-linking was effected by incubation with 10 µg/ml DNP-hSA for 1 h at 37 °C in culture medium. Culture media were collected and supplemented with ethyl acetate-HCl (pH 3.0) for extraction of labeled metabolites. Extracts were concentrated and applied to a TLC plate. After the plate had been developed, the radioactivity of products was determined by autoradiography with a Bio-Imaging analyzer. The products are indicated on the left. AA, arachidonic acid. B, rates of production of PGD2 in cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx (L9 and L28 cells). S1, L9, and L28 cells were activated by cross-linking the IgE receptors as described in A. Culture media were collected, and PGD2 was quantitated with enzyme immunosorbent assay kit. Open bars represent non-activated cells, and hatched bars represent cells activated by cross-linking of IgE receptors. Values given are means ± S.D. of results from three independent experiments.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Time course of the generation of prostaglandin D2 by a control line of cells and by cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx. Control cells (S1) and L9 cells were activated by cross-linking their IgE receptors and by sequential treatment with IgE-DNP and DNP-hSA. S1 cells (open circles) and L9 cells (closed circles) were incubated for 2 h with IgE-DNP (1 µg/106 cells), washed, and treated with DNP-hSA (10 µg/ml) for the indicated periods. Culture media were collected, and PGD2 was quantitated. For details, see legend to Fig. 1.

We examined the effects of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) on the production of PGD2 in order to determine whether or not suppression of the production of PGD2 was due to the overexpression of PHGPx (Table I). BSO reduces the activity of GPx by lowering the level of glutathione in cells. BSO decreases the level of glutathione to about 2% of that in non-treated RBL-2H3 cells under our present conditions (13). The production of PGD2 in S1 cells was moderately enhanced by treatment with BSO. However, treatment with BSO caused a marked increase in the production of PGD2 in L9 cells in response to activation by IgE-DNP. The suppression of formation of PGD2 in L9 cells was abolished upon inhibition of PHGPx activity, and the level of PGD2 recovered to 92% that in S1 cells. These results indicated that the reduction in the rate of production of PGD2 was indeed due to the induction of PHGPx activity in RBL-2H3 cells.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Effects of buthionine sulfoximine on the production of prostaglandin D2 by a control line of cells and by cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx
Control cells (S1) and L9 cells were incubated for 18 h at 37 °C with (+) or without (-) 0.5 mM buthionine sulfoximine (BSO). Then they were incubated with IgE-DNP (1 µg/106 cells) for 2 h, washed, and treated with DNP-hSA for 1 h. Amounts of PGD2 released into the supernatant were quantitated. See legend to Fig. 1 for details.

S1 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 250 nM sodium selenite for 2 weeks (S1-Se(+) cells). The activity of endogenous PHGPx in S1-Se(+) cells was significantly increased by the incubation with selenite. Specific activities of PHGPx in cell lysate of S1 and S1-Se(+) cells were 0.11 ± 0.02 and 0.38 ± 0.05 nmol PCOOH/min/mg, respectively. The production of PGD2 in S1-Se(+) cells after stimulation with IgE-DNP was 119.4 ± 50.1 pg PGD2/106 cells, one-third of that in S1 cells.

Effects of Inhibitors of PGHS on Production of PGD2 in RBL-2H3 Cells-- We attempted to identify the PGHS isozyme responsible for production of PGD2 in IgE-DNP-stimulated RBL-2H3 cells using inhibitors of PGHS (Fig. 3). The production of PGD2 in response to IgE-DNP was abolished by treatment with NS-398, a PGHS-2-specific inhibitor (Fig. 3A). Inhibition of production of PGD2 was also observed after treatment with aspirin (acetyl salicylate), which is a common inhibitor of both PGHS-1 and PGHS-2. No significant difference in the release of arachidonic acid was observed between IgE-DNP-stimulated cells and cells treated with the individual inhibitors (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Dependence of the production of prostaglandin D2 on a specific isozyme of PGHS in cells with cross-linked IgE receptors. Control cells (S1) were labeled with [1-14C]arachidonic acid for 24 h and activated by cross-linking their IgE receptors, as described in the legend to Fig. 1. 1st column, labeled cells were cultured with no additions. 2nd column, labeled cells were incubated with IgE-DNP (1 µg/106 cells) for 2 h, washed, and then incubated with DNP-hSA for 1 h to activate the cells. 3rd column, labeled cells were incubated for 2 h with IgE-DNP and for 1 h with 100 µM aspirin, washed, and then they were treated for 1 h with DNP-hSA plus aspirin (aspirin irreversibly inactivates PGHS-1 and PGHS-2). 4th column, labeled cells were incubated for 2 h with IgE-DNP and for 15 min with 1 µM NS-398, washed, and then they were treated for 1 h with DNP-hSA plus NS-398 (NS-398 blocks PGHS-2-dependent production of PGD2). Culture media were collected and mixed with ethyl acetate-HCl (pH 3.0) for extraction of labeled metabolites. Extracts were concentrated and applied to a TLC plate. After the plate had been developed, rates of production of PGD2 (A) and release of arachidonic acid (B) were calculated from results of scanning densitometry after autoradiography with the Bio-Imaging analyzer.

Expression of PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 was monitored by immunoblotting analysis with PGHS-1-specific polyclonal antibodies and PGHS-2-specific monoclonal antibodies, respectively (Fig. 4A). Both forms of PGHS in L9 cells were expressed at the same respective levels as those in S1 cells. Although expression of PGHS-1 was unchanged both in S1 and L9 cells after stimulation by IgE-DNP, the expression of PGHS-2 was apparently enhanced in both S1 and L9 cells within 1 h by the stimulation with IgE-DNP. There was no difference in the extent of the increase in the level of expression between S1 and L9 cells. Expression of PGHS-2 in response to activation by IgE-DNP was not sensitive to depletion of intracellular glutathione by prior treatment with BSO (Fig. 4B). These results indicated that inducible PGHS-2 was responsible for the production of PGD2 in RBL-2H3 cells that had been activated by cross-linking of IgE receptors. Furthermore, we examined the subcellular localization of PGHS-1 and PGHS-2. PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 were in both microsomal and nuclear fractions. PGHS-2 was predominantly localized in nuclear fraction as compared with microsomal fraction, whereas expression of PGHS-1 in nuclear fraction was similar to that in microsomal fraction (Fig. 4C).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Cellular levels of PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 in a control line of cells and in cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx. A, cellular levels of PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 in RBL-2H3 cells stimulated by cross-linking of IgE receptors. Control cells (S1) and L9 cells were incubated for 2 h with IgE-DNP (1 µg/106 cells), washed, and treated with DNP-hSA. One hour later, cells were collected and sonicated. The proteins in sonicates were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and then proteins were blotted onto a PVDF membrane. Immunoblotting was performed using polyclonal antibodies against PGHS-1 and monoclonal antibodies against PGHS-2 as described in the text. B, effects of BSO on cellular levels of PGHS-2 in RBL-2H3 cells. S1 cells were pretreated with 0.5 mM BSO for 18 h and then incubated with IgE-DNP for 2 h. After washing, cells were treated with DNP-hSA for 1 h. Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and then the proteins were blotted onto a PVDF membrane. Immunoblotting was performed with monoclonal antibodies against PGHS-2 as described in the text. C, localization of PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 in RBL-2H3 cells. After S1 cells were stimulated by cross-linking of IgE receptors, nuclear and microsomal fractions were prepared as described in the text. The proteins in fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and then proteins were blotted onto a PVDF membrane. Immunoblotting was performed as described in A. The cell fractions are indicated on the top. Nuc, nuclear fraction; Mic, microsomal fraction.

Suppression of PGHS Activity by Overexpression of PHGPx-- The production of PGD2 was examined after addition of exogenous arachidonic acid or prostaglandin H2 (PGH2) to the incubation medium in an attempt to identify the step in the synthesis of PGD2 in L9 cells where inhibition occurred (Fig. 5). The rate of formation of PGD2 from exogenously added [1-14C]arachidonic acid was determined (Fig. 5A). Formation of PGD2 from arachidonic acid was enhanced in S1 cells after the challenge with IgE-DNP, but no enhancement of the production of PGD2 was observed in L9 cells under the same conditions. Prior treatment with BSO allowed L9 cells to produce as much PGD2 as S1 cells. By contrast, conversion of exogenously added PGH2 to PGD2, catalyzed by PGD2 synthase, was not enhanced in S1 or in L9 cells after stimulation with IgE-DNP, and no difference in terms of the extent of the conversion was observed between S1 and L9 cells (Fig. 5B). These results indicated that the activity of PGD2 synthase was similar in L9 cells and S1 cells. Moreover, since PGHS-2 activity was susceptible to the overexpression of PHGPx, the insufficient activation of PGHS-2 resulted in the suppression of production of PGD2 in L9 cells. To clarify the effects of overexpression of PHGPx on PGHS activity, we measured the activity of PGHS in a cell-free system (Table II). Cell lysates prepared from quiescent cells and from IgE-DNP-stimulated cells were incubated with radioactive arachidonic acid, and the amount of radioactive PGH2 produced was determined. In lysates of quiescent cell, we detected no significant difference in terms of PGHS activity between S1 cells and L9 cells. Stimulation by IgE-DNP caused an increase in PGHS activity in the lysate prepared from S1 cells, but no such activation of PGHS was observed in the lysate prepared from IgE-DNP-stimulated L9 cells. We next examined the effects of hydroperoxides on the activity of PGHS in an attempt to estimate whether inhibition of the activity of PGHS might have been due to insufficient levels of hydroperoxides in PHGPx-overexpressing cells (Fig. 6). We determined PGHS activity in lysates, prepared from IgE-DNP-stimulated cells, in the presence of various concentrations of the fatty acid hydroperoxide 15-HpETE or of 3-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (3-CPBA), both of which have been used as activators (33, 34). Concentrations of reduced form of GSH in cell lysate prepared from S1 and L9 cells were 2.06 ± 0.39 and 1.81 ± 0.69 nmol/mg, respectively. However, when cell lysate was added to the assay system of PGHS activity, which contained p-chloromercuriphenylsulfonic acid, the reduced form of GSH and other non-protein thiol compounds was not detected (data not shown). These results indicated that the level of GSH in lysate would not influence to the activity of PGHS by the peroxides. The cell lysates supplemented with 15-HpETE or 3-CPBA revealed differences in the dependence on hydroperoxides between L9 cells and S1 cells. In the lysate of S1 cells, the PGHS activity increased rapidly with increase in the concentration of 15-HpETE and then it decreased above 0.05 µM 15-HpETE. By contrast, in the lysate of L9 cells, PGHS was activated as the level of 15-HpETE was raised, with maximum activity at 5 µM (Fig. 6B). These results indicated that L9 cells required 100 times more 15-HpETE than did S1 cells for maximum activation of PGHS. In lysate supplemented with 3-CPBA, the observed PGHS activity increased with increases in the concentration of 3-CPBA, indicating that the peroxide activated PGHS. The observed activity leveled off above 0.5 and 50 µM 3-CPBA in S1 and L9 cells, respectively.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Production of prostaglandin D2 from exogenously added substrates in a control line of cells and in cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx. A, production of PGD2 from exogenously added arachidonic acid. Control cells (S1, open bars) and L9 cells (hatched bars) were incubated with IgE-DNP for 2 h, washed, and then treated with DNP-hSA for 1 h. After removal of the medium, cells were incubated in phosphate-buffered saline that contained 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgSO4, and 3.7 kBq of [1-14C]arachidonic acid (170.7 MBq/mmol) for 30 min. Supernatants were collected, and mixed with 3 volumes of ethyl acetate (pH 3.0). The metabolites of labeled arachidonic acid, which were extracted in the ethyl acetate layer, were separated by TLC, and rates of production of metabolites were calculated from results of scanning densitometry after autoradiography with the Bio-Imaging analyzer. B, production of PGD2 from exogenously added prostaglandin H2. Control cells (S1, open bars) and L9 cells (hatched bars), which had been stimulated by cross-linking of IgE receptors, were incubated in phosphate-buffered saline that contained 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgSO4, and 10 µM prostaglandin H2 for 30 min. Incubation media were collected, and PGD2 was quantitated. See legend to Fig. 1 for details.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
PGHS activity in a control line of cells and in cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx
Homogenates were prepared from control cells (S1) and L9 cells that had been treated with IgE-DNP for 2 h and then with DNP-hSA for 1 h. The homogenates were examined for PGHS activity as described in the text. Data are expressed as percentages relative to the value for unstimulated S1 cells and are given as means ± S.D. of results from three independent experiments.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of peroxides on PGHS activity in IgE-DNP-stimulated cells. Control cells (S1, open circles) and L9 cells (closed circles) were treated with IgE-DNP for 2 h and then with DNP-hSA for 1 h. Cells were washed with PBS, harvested with a cell scraper, and homogenized. The PGHS activity in the homogenates was determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of 3-CPBA (A) and 15-HpETE (B).

The levels of peroxides were determined in S1 and L9 cells by flow cytometric analysis using the oxidant-sensitive fluorescent dye 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (Fig. 7). After stimulating with IgE-DNP, fluorescent intensity in S1 cells was larger than that in similarly stimulated L9 cells. These results indicated that the levels of peroxides in L9 cells were lower than those in S1 cells after stimulation with IgE-DNP. The intensity of fluorescence after stimulation with antigen of sensitized L9 cells that had been treated with 3-CPBA was the same as that in S1 cells after stimulation with IgE-DNP. These results indicated that the exposure of L9 cells to peroxide 3-CPBA had increased the level of intracellular peroxides.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular peroxides in a control line of cells and in cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx. S1 cells (fine line) and L9 cells (bold line) were incubated for 2 h with IgE-DNP (1 µg/106 cells), washed, and treated with DNP-hSA (10 µg/ml) for 30 min. L9 cells sensitized with IgE-DNP were incubated with 50 µM 3-CPBA for 10 min at 37 °C and then treated with DNP-hSA (10 µg/ml) for 30 min (dotted line). Stimulated cells were incubated with 5 µM DCFH-DA for 15 min. The intensity of fluorescence from DCFH of cells was quantified by flow cytometry and is plotted on a logarithmic scale, in arbitrary units, against the number of cells.

Effects of the Overexpression of Mitochondrial PHGPx on the Production of PGD2-- PHGPx is selectively overexpressed in the mitochondria of RBL-2H3 cells (M15 cells), as a result of transfection with a plasmid that encodes mitochondrial-type PHGPx (19). We monitored the production of PGD2 in M15 cells in order to clarify the influence of mitochondrial PHGPx on the production of PGD2 (Fig. 8). By contrast to that in L9 cells, the formation of PGD2 was only slightly suppressed in M15 cells that had been activated with IgE-DNP (compare Figs. 1B and 8A). A23187 strongly induced the production of PGD2 in S1 cells (Fig. 8B), whereas production of PGD2 was considerably suppressed in L9 cells but not in M15 cells. The overexpression of non-mitochondrial PHGPx inhibited the production of PGD2 in response to A23187 more strongly than did that of mitochondrial PHGPx. These results indicated that PHGPx in mitochondria did not participate in regulation of the synthesis of PGD2.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Production of prostaglandin D2 in a control line of cells and in cells that overexpressed mitochondrial PHGPx. A, production of PGD2 in RBL-2H3 cells stimulated by cross-linking of IgE receptors. Control cells (S1) and cells that overexpressed mitochondrial PHGPx (M15) were either untreated (open bars) or treated (hatched bars) with IgE-DNP for 2 h and then with DNP-hSA for 1 h. The amounts of PGD2 released into the media were determined. See legend to Fig. 1 for details. B, production of PGD2 in RBL-2H3 cells stimulated with 5 µM A23187 for 5 min at 37 °C. Control cells (S1), L9 cells, and M15 cells were either untreated (open bars) or treated (hatched bars) with A23187, and the amounts of PGD2 in media were determined as above.

Effects of PHGPx on Production of Leukotriene C-- RBL-2H3 cells have potent 5-lipoxygenase activity and they release significant amounts of leukotriene C (LTC4) upon activation by A23187. We previously monitored the production of LTC4 by L9 cells after a challenge with A23187 and found that the production of LTC4 was dramatically suppressed in L9 cells. However, the production of LTC4 by M15 cells was similar to that by S1 cells (Fig. 9). These results indicated that mitochondrial PHGPx was involved neither in the regulation of prostaglandin synthesis nor in the regulation of leukotriene synthesis.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Production of leukotriene C4 in a control line of cells and in cells that overexpressed mitochondrial PHGPx. Control cells (S1) and M15 cells were either untreated (open bars) or treated (hatched bars) with 5 µM A23187 for 5 min at 37 °C. The amounts of LTC4 in media were determined by an enzyme immunosorbent assay. Data are expressed as means ± S.D. of results from three independent experiments.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the present study, we examined the effect of overexpression of non-mitochondrial PHGPx in RBL-2H3 cells, which generated PGD2 predominantly, together with small amounts of other prostanoid products such as PGE2, 6-keto-PGF1alpha , and thromboxane B2 in response to IgE-DNP or A23187 (30). The overexpression of non-mitochondrial PHGPx in RBL-2H3 cells caused the dramatic suppression of the production of PGD2 in response to stimulation by IgE antigen (Fig. 1). Two isoforms of PGHS are known. PGHS-1 is expressed constitutively in nearly all mammalian cells. PGHS-2, although normally absent from most cells, is synthesized in many types of cell upon treatment with a variety of cytokines, growth factors, and tumor promoters (35). The RBL-2H3 cells used in the present experiments expressed PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 constitutively. No apparent differences were observed in terms of the levels of expression of PGHS-1 and induced PGHS-2 between the control line of cells (S1 cells) and cells that overexpressed non-mitochondrial PHGPx, namely L9 cells (Fig. 4A). It is known that aspirin (acetyl salicylate) inhibits both PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 by acetylation of specific serine residues, Ser-530 in human PGHS-1 and Ser-516 in human PGHS-2 (36, 37). Our finding that the production of PGD2 was completely suppressed both by aspirin and by an inhibitor of PGHS-2, NS-398, which reacts selectively with the active site of PGHS-2 but not with that of PGHS-1 (38), indicated that PGHS-2 was responsible for the production of PGD2 in RBL-2H3 cells upon stimulation by IgE-DNP (Fig. 3). In RBL-2H3 cells, PGH2 is converted to PGD2 by the hematopoietic form of PGD2 synthase, which requires glutathione as a coenzyme for its activity. Exogenously added PGH2 was transformed to PGD2 at almost the same rate in both S1 and L9 cells (Fig. 5B), but the production of PGD2 from exogenously added arachidonic acid was suppressed in L9 cells (Fig. 5A). Moreover, the activity of PGHS was suppressed in L9 cells after stimulation with IgE-DNP (Table II). These results indicated that inhibition of the synthesis of PGD2 was not due to inhibition of the isomerization of PGH2 to PGD2 but, rather, was due to inhibition of the production of PGH2 from arachidonic acid by PGHS-2. A change in phospholipase A2 activity was not involved in the suppression of PGD2 production, since, under our conditions, the rates of release of arachidonic acid by S1 cells and L9 cells were the same (data not shown).

There is a considerable evidence that the cyclooxygenase activity of PGHS requires reaction of the peroxidase with hydroperoxide (16, 39). Half-maximal activity was found to require about 2 nM hydroperoxide in the case of PGHS-2 and 21 nM in the case of PGHS-1 (40). Peroxidase reduces hydroperoxides by two electrons to generate the corresponding alcohol and a higher oxidation state, which is consistent with the Fe(IV) protoporphyrin IX radical, from the resting state of heme, Fe(III) protoporphyrin IX. A secondary oxidized species, a tyrosyl radical generated from the Fe(IV) protoporphyrin IX radical, is envisioned as the active species that removes hydrogen from arachidonic acid to initiate the cyclooxygenase reaction (17, 18). Therefore, we examined the effects of hydroperoxides on the production of prostaglandins in an attempt to determine whether inhibition of the activity of PGHS was due to insufficient levels of hydroperoxides in PHGPx-overexpressing cells. The low level activity of PGHS in L9 cells after IgE-DNP stimulation was increased upon treatment of cells with the peroxides 3-CPBA, 15-HpETE (Fig. 6), and 12-HpETE (data not shown). The maximum activity of PGHS was observed at 0.05 and 5 µM 15-HpETE in S1 cells and L9 cells, respectively, and the specific activity was almost the same in the two cell lines. Furthermore, 3-CPBA activated PGHS, and enzymatic activity reached a plateau value at 0.5 and 50 µM 3-CPBA in S1 cells and L9 cells, respectively. L9 cells needed 100 times more 15-HpETE or 3-CPBA than did S1 cells for maximum PGHS activity, indicating that the intracellular level of hydroperoxides was significantly depressed in PHGPx-overexpressing cells. A low level of hydroperoxides in activated cells was also demonstrated in L9 cells, as compared with S1 cells, when intracellular hydroperoxides were estimated by flow cytometric analysis (21). We also observed stimulation with IgE-DNP to increase in levels of intracellular peroxides with flow cytometric analysis (data not shown). The increase in the levels of intracellular peroxides induced by IgE-DNP was suppressed by overexpression of non-mitochondrial PHGPx. This effect by PHGPx was abolished by the addition of 3-CPBA (Fig. 7). Our results indicated that non-mitochondrial PHGPx was primarily responsible for the reduction of lipid hydroperoxides and thereby caused suppression of the activity of PGHS in RBL-2H3 cells.

We can assume that levels of intracellular hydroperoxides are controlled by two kinds of intracellular isozymes of GPx. In previous studies, we determined the specific activities and levels of PHGPx and cGPx in S1 and L9 cells (19, 21). The levels of cGPx in S1 and L9 cells were similar, but the ratio of cGPx content to PHGPx content was 4.6 in S1 cells and only 1.1 in L9 cells (19).

PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 localize in the nuclear envelope and endoplasmic reticulum (41), and these isozymes are distributed in the inner and outer nuclear membranes (42). PGHS-2 localized in the nuclear fraction more than the microsomal fraction. This result suggests that the synthesis of PGH2 upon stimulation by IgE-DNP predominantly occurs at the nuclear envelope, to which cytosolic phospholipase A2 and 5-lipoxygenase have been translocated from the cytosol (43, 44), although PGHS in endoplasmic reticulum partially provides PGH2 in stimulated cells. Mitochondria are a major physiological source of ROS, which can be generated during mitochondrial respiration. The ROS produced in mitochondria can cause peroxidation of membrane lipids and, possibly, induce the liberation of hydroperoxides, such as fatty acid hydroperoxides and hydrogen peroxide. PHGPx is specifically localized in nuclear and mitochondrial fractions of rat testis (45). In a previous study, we demonstrated that overexpression of mitochondrial PHGPx, but not of non-mitochondrial PHGPx, suppressed apoptotic cell death that occurs via the mitochondrial death pathway. M15 cells were resistant to the induction of apoptosis by deprivation of glucose or by treatment with etoposide, staurosporine, UV irradiation, actinomycin D, or cycloheximide (28). However, overexpression of PHGPx in the mitochondrial fraction induced slight suppression of the production of PGD2 in RBL-2H3 cells that had been stimulated by either IgE-DNP (Fig. 8A) or A23187 (Fig. 8B). The amount of PHGPx in the nuclear fraction from L9 cells was six and three times higher than that from S1 and M15 cells, respectively, but the amounts of PHGPx in the mitochondrial fractions from L9 and from S1 cells were similar. However, the amount of PHGPx in the mitochondrial fraction from M15 cells was twice that from S1 and L9 cells, and the amounts of PHGPx in the microsomal fractions from L9 and M15 cells were approximately the same level (19). Mitochondrial PHGPx that has a targeting signal sequence should be exclusively imported into mitochondria. Therefore, it is supposed that PHGPx in nuclear, microsomal, and cytosolic fractions of M15 cells would be partially degraded and lose the ability to penetrate into mitochondria and to possess full activity of PHGPx. These results indicate that inactivation of PGHS-2 was due to high level expression of PHGPx in the nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum. Subcellular distribution of non-mitochondrial PHGPx in nuclear, microsome, and cytosol of L9 cells was almost same as that in S1 cells (19). The activity of endogenous PHGPx in S1-Se(+) cells that cultured in selenite-supplemented medium was three times higher than that in S1 cells, and production of PGD2 after stimulation with IgE-DNP in S1-Se(+) cells was one-third of that in S1 cells. These data suggest that the endogenous PHGPx could modulate the production of PGD2.

5-Lipoxygenase catalyzes the formation of leukotrienes from arachidonic acid at the nuclear envelope (44, 46). This conversion requires expression of 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP), which is exclusively localized to the nuclear envelope and probably delivers arachidonic acid to 5-lipoxygenase (47). The overexpression of non-mitochondrial PHGPx suppressed the production of LTC4 in RBL-2H3 cells that had been stimulated with A23187 (21), but overexpression of mitochondrial PHGPx had no effect on the rate of production of LTC4 (Fig. 9). Thus, PHGPx in the nucleus, but not in mitochondria, might be critical for modulation of the level of hydroperoxides required for the activation of 5-lipoxygenase.

Our results suggest that PHGPx in the nucleus might play an important role in regulation of the metabolism of arachidonic acid, the synthesis of leukotrienes, and the synthesis of prostanoids via the reduction of lipid hydroperoxides around nucleus. A recent report indicates that PGJ, derived from PGD2, reduces mitochondrial activity and induces apoptosis (48). Thus, metabolites of arachidonic acid generated by PGHS appear to have biological activities in addition to their functions as chemical mediators. The present study suggests that non-mitochondrial PHGPx might be involved in the regulation of cellular functions and signal transduction via modulation of the production of prostaglandins.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Junko Matsubara, Tomomi Hoshino, and Reiko Nagakawa for their expert technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel./Fax: 81-3-3444-4943; E-mail: nakagaway@pharm.kitasato-u.ac.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 28, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003191200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ROS, reactive oxygen species; PHGPx, phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase; cGPx, classical glutathione peroxidase; PG, prostaglandin; PGHS, prostaglandin H synthase; PLA2, phospholipase A2; RBL, rat basophile leukemia cells; Ig, immunoglobulin; LT, leukotriene; DNP, dinitrophenyl; hSA, human serum albumin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FCS, fetal calf serum; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; TBS-T, Tris-buffered saline plus Tween 20; TLC, thin-layer chromatography; BSO, buthionine sulfoximine; HpETE, hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid; 3-CPBA, 3-chloroperoxybenzoic acid; DCFH-DA, 5,6-carboxy-2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate; PCOOH, phosphatidylcholine hydroperoxide; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Cerutti, P. A. (1985) Science 227, 375-381
2. Fridovich, I. (1978) Science 201, 875-880
3. Jolly, S. R., Kane, W. J., Bailie, M. B., Abrams, G. D., and Lucchesi, B. R. (1984) Circ. Res. 54, 277-285
4. Guarnieri, C., Muscari, C., and Calderera, C. M. (1992) in Free Radicals and Aging (Emerit, I. , and Chance, B., eds) , pp. 73-77, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland
5. Hayes, J. D., and McLellan, L. I. (1999) Free Radical Res. 31, 273-300
6. Harlan, J. M., and Callahan, K. S. (1984) J. Clin. Invest. 74, 442-448
7. Marshall, P. J., and Lands, W. E. (1986) J. Lab. Clin. Med. 108, 525-534
8. Sporn, P. H., Peters, G. M., and Simon, R. H. (1988) Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 137, 49-56
9. Taylor, L., Menconi, M. J., and Polgar, P. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 6855-6857
10. Lewis, R. A., Soter, N. A., Diamond, P. T., Austen, K. F., Oates, J. A., and Roberts, L. (1982) J. Immunol. 129, 1627-1631
11. Holgate, S. T., Burns, G. B., Robinson, C., and Church, M. K. (1984) J. Immunol. 133, 2138-2144
12. Peters, S. P., MacGlashan, D. J., Schulman, E. S., Schleimer, R. P., Hayes, E. C., Rokach, J., Adkinson, N. J., and Lichtenstein, L. M. (1984) J. Immunol. 132, 1972-1979
13. Sakamoto, H., Kitahara, J., and Nakagawa, Y. (1999) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 125, 90-95
14. Kawata, R., Reddy, S. T., Wolner, B., and Herschman, H. R. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 818-825
15. Vane, J. (1994) Nature 367, 215-216
16. Wei, C., Kulmacz, R. J., and Tsai, A. L. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 8499-8512
17. Tsai, A. L., Wu, G., Palmer, G., Bambai, B., Koehn, J. A., Marshall, P. J., and Kulmacz, R. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21695-21700
18. Xiao, G., Tsai, A. L., Palmer, G., Boyar, W. C., Marshall, P. J., and Kulmacz, R. J. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 1836-1845
19. Arai, M., Imai, H., Koumura, T., Yoshida, M., Emoto, K., Umeda, M., Chiba, N., and Nakagawa, Y. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4924-4933
20. Roveni, A., Maiorino, M., and Ursini, F. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 143, 307-313
21. Imai, H., Narashima, K., Arai, M., Sakamoto, H., Chiba, N., and Nakagawa, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1990-1997
22. Ursini, F., Maiorino, M., and Gregolin, C. (1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 839, 62-70
23. Schnurr, K., Belkner, J., Ursini, F., Schewe, T., and Kuhn, H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4653-4658
24. Thomas, J. P., Maiorino, M., Ursini, F., and Girotti, A. W. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 454-461
25. Margalit, A., Hauser, S. D., Zweifel, B. S., Anderson, M. A., and Isakson, P. C. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, R294-R302
26. Shitashige, M., Morita, I., and Murota, S. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1389, 57-66
27. Imai, H., Sumi, D., Sakamoto, H., Hanamoto, A., Arai, M., Chiba, N., and Nakagawa, Y. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 222, 432-438
28. Nomura, K., Imai, H., Koumura, T., Arai, M., and Nakagawa, Y. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29294-29302
29. Peden, D. B., and Dailey, L. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 268, L902-L910
30. Westcott, J. Y., Wenzel, S. E., and Dreskin, S. C. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1303, 74-81
31. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
32. Green, K., and Samuelsson, B. (1964) J. Lipid Res. 5, 117-120
33. Lu, G., Tsai, A. L., Van, W. H., and Kulmacz, R. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16162-16167
34. Chen, W., Pawelek, T. R., and Kulmacz, R. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20301-20306
35. Herschman, H. R. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1299, 125-140
36. Lecomte, M., Laneuville, O., Ji, C., DeWitt, D. L., and Smith, W. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13207-13215
37. Wennogle, L. P., Liang, H., Quintavalla, J. C., Bowen, B. R., Wasvary, J., Miller, D. B., Allentoff, A., Boyer, W., Kelly, M., and Marshall, P. (1995) FEBS Lett. 371, 315-320
38. Futaki, N., Takahashi, S., Yokoyama, M., Arai, I., Higuchi, S., and Otomo, S. (1994) Prostaglandins 47, 55-59
39. Smith, W. L., and Marnett, L. J. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1083, 1-17
40. Kulmacz, R. J., and Wang, L. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24019-24023
41. Morita, I., Schindler, M., Regier, M. K., Otto, J. C., Hori, T., DeWitt, D. L., and Smith, W. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10902-10908
42. Spencer, A. G., Woods, J. W., Arakawa, T., Singer, I. I., and Smith, W. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9886-9893
43. Glover, S., Bayburt, T., Jonas, M., Chi, E., and Gelb, M. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15359-15367
44. Malaviya, R., Malaviya, R., and Jakschik, B. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 4939-4944
45. Godeas, C., Tramer, F., Micali, F., Roveri, A., Maiorino, M., Nisii, C., Sandri, G., and Panfili, E. (1996) Biochem. Mol. Med. 59, 118-124
46. Brock, T. G., McNish, R. W., and Peters, G. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21652-21658
47. Dixon, R. A., Diehl, R. E., Opas, E., Rands, E., Vickers, P. J., Evans, J. F., Gillard, J. W., and Miller, D. K. (1990) Nature 343, 282-284
48. Keelan, J. A., Sato, T. A., Marvin, K. W., Lander, J., Gilmour, R. S., and Mitchell, M. D. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 262, 579-585


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. J. Swindle, J. W. Coleman, F. R. DeLeo, and D. D. Metcalfe
Fc{epsilon}RI- and Fc{gamma} Receptor-Mediated Production of Reactive Oxygen Species by Mast Cells Is Lipoxygenase- and Cyclooxygenase-Dependent and NADPH Oxidase-Independent
J. Immunol., November 15, 2007; 179(10): 7059 - 7071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
H. Imai, M. Saito, N. Kirai, J. Hasegawa, K. Konishi, H. Hattori, M. Nishimura, S. Naito, and Y. Nakagawa
Identification of the Positive Regulatory and Distinct Core Regions of Promoters, and Transcriptional Regulation in Three Types of Mouse Phospholipid Hydroperoxide Glutathione Peroxidase
J. Biochem., October 1, 2006; 140(4): 573 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
W. Liu, D. Cao, S. F. Oh, C. N. Serhan, and R. J. Kulmacz
Divergent cyclooxygenase responses to fatty acid structure and peroxide level in fish and mammalian prostaglandin H synthases
FASEB J, June 1, 2006; 20(8): 1097 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Q. Ran, H. Liang, M. Gu, W. Qi, C. A. Walter, L. J. Roberts II, B. Herman, A. Richardson, and H. Van Remmen
Transgenic Mice Overexpressing Glutathione Peroxidase 4 Are Protected against Oxidative Stress-induced Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55137 - 55146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. A. Rouzer, P. J. Kingsley, H. Wang, H. Zhang, J. D. Morrow, S. K. Dey, and L. J. Marnett
Cyclooxygenase-1-dependent Prostaglandin Synthesis Modulates Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Secretion in Lipopolysaccharide-challenged Murine Resident Peritoneal Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34256 - 34268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Bambai, C. E. Rogge, B. Stec, and R. J. Kulmacz
Role of Asn-382 and Thr-383 in Activation and Inactivation of Human Prostaglandin H Synthase Cyclooxygenase Catalysis
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 4084 - 4092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Sakamoto, T. Tosaki, and Y. Nakagawa
Overexpression of Phospholipid Hydroperoxide Glutathione Peroxidase Modulates Acetyl-CoA, 1-O-Alkyl-2-lyso-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine Acetyltransferase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., December 20, 2002; 277(52): 50431 - 50438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/51/40028    most recent
M003191200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement