|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M909658199 on September 13, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 51, 40218-40225, December 22, 2000
In Vitro and in Vivo Ligation-mediated
Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of a
Polypurine/Polypyrimidine Sequence Upstream of the Mouse
metallothionein-I Gene*
Nicole A.
Becker,
Heather A.
O'Neill,
Jeff M.
Zimmerman, and
L.
James
Maher III
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo
Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
Received for publication, November 30, 1999, and in revised form, May 9, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The mouse metallothionein-I
homopurine/homopyrimidine (MT-I R/Y) sequence is a 128-base
pair element located ~1.2 kilobase pairs upstream of the
MT-I gene. Previous in vitro studies of this
sequence in purified plasmids indicated the formation of a non-B DNA
structure stabilized by acidic pH and negative supercoiling. We now
present a detailed in vitro and in vivo
analysis of the MT-I R/Y sequence using chemical probes of
DNA structure and ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction. In
vivo analysis suggests neither profound base unpairing nor
protein binding within the MT-I R/Y sequence before or
after metal induction of MT-I. We conclude for this element
that the propensity to adopt an unusual DNA structure in
vitro does not imply the occurrence of such a structure in vivo. We were able to show both in purified genomic DNA and
in vivo that only isolated thymines and the 3' terminal
thymine in strings of consecutive thymines are modified significantly
by KMnO4, indicating an altered thymine accessibility
pattern within the R/Y sequence. This KMnO4 reactivity
pattern is more consistent and predictable within the R/Y sequence when
compared with flanking sequences. We propose a simple steric
interference model to explain the observed pattern of KMnO4
modification of thymines.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The familiar DNA double helix typically exists in B-form when
studied as a purified molecule in solution. The extent to which DNA
adopts other, more exotic structures in vivo is a
fascinating question of continuing interest (reviewed in Ref. 1). For
example, during transcription and replication, DNA exists in a
partially unpaired configuration. These two enzymatic processes promote obvious non-B DNA structures that are transient and largely
sequence-independent.
Under specific in vitro conditions, unusual non-B DNA
structures have also been shown to exist at specific sequences
(reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). These structures include Z-DNA, cruciform DNA, and H-DNA. Z-DNA (2-5) is a left-handed DNA helix with a sequence
preference for alternating purine-pyrimidine repeats. Cruciform DNA (2,
6) is characterized by hairpin extrusions from both DNA strands with
the corresponding requirement for palindromic sequence symmetry, and a
preference for A/T-rich DNA. H-DNA (2, 7, 8) is characterized by an
intramolecular DNA triplex and accompanying regions of base unpairing
with a sequence requirement for homopurine/homopyrimidine mirror
repeats (7, 9). All three of the non-B structures described
above are stabilized by negative supercoiling (which favors base
unpairing) and typically require additional sequence-specific in
vitro conditions. For example, H-DNA isomers involving the
pyrimidine triple helix motif are strongly stabilized by protonation of
cytosines at acidic pH (7), and Z-DNA structures are stabilized at high
ionic strength (3). Z-DNA, cruciform DNA, and H-DNA have been detected
in isolated plasmids under specific in vitro conditions, and
in isolated nuclear preparations using antibodies thought to be
specific for these structures (10-12). Other structural transitions
involving base unpairing have been proposed in certain enhancer
elements (13-15).
The major non-B DNA structures described above all contain regions of
base unpairing. Detection of unpaired structures at single nucleotide
resolution typically requires treatment of large amounts (5-10 µg)
of purified plasmid with chemical probes that specifically modify
either unpaired or unstacked bases (16). Here we apply a different
approach involving the use of cell-permeable chemical probes together
with LMPCR1 to characterize
the in vitro and in vivo chemical reactivity of a
naturally occurring R/Y sequence. LMPCR has been shown to be an
excellent tool for in vivo footprinting of protein-DNA
interactions and methylation patterns (17, 18). We now apply LMPCR to
examine the possibility of unusual DNA structures or protein binding
within a long R/Y sequence in vivo. LMPCR permits the
analysis of specific gene sequences at nucleotide resolution using as
little as 10 pg of plasmid or 2 µg of total eukaryotic genomic DNA.
LMPCR relies on exponential amplification of a population of
gene-specific chemical degradation fragments to create a sequencing pattern.
The focus of our study is a peculiar R/Y sequence upstream of the mouse
MT-I gene (19, 20). We refer to this element as the
MT-I R/Y sequence (Fig. 1). The MT-I R/Y sequence
is of particular interest for three reasons. First, it is upstream of
the well characterized MT-I gene. Metallothioneins are
thought to play an important role in metal homeostasis (21-23).
MT-I gene expression is induced by heavy metals via
transcription factor binding to several copies of a 15-bp metal
responsive element (MRE) present in the promoter regions of MT genes
(24-28). The mouse MT-I proximal promoter contains six such
MREs mediating metal induction. Upon exposure to heavy metals, a rapid
5-20-fold increase in MT mRNA levels is typically detected in
cultured cells (24, 25). Second, the MT-I R/Y sequence is of
interest because of its unusual length and provocative location
(centered 1184 bp upstream of the MT-I gene). The element is
a 128-bp R/Y sequence containing a single pyrimidine interruption
within the homopurine strand. The MT-I R/Y sequence contains
no single plane of extensive mirror symmetry, but it contains several
imperfect homopurine/homopyrimidine mirror repeats. Third, this
sequence has been previously studied in purified plasmid in
vitro and shown to adopt a non-B DNA structure reminiscent of
H-DNA in vitro. Formation of this non-B DNA structure
requires negative superhelical strain and additional stabilization is
offered by low pH (19, 20). Our previous genetic studies have not detected a function for the MT-I R/Y sequence in the
regulation of MT-I gene expression after transient
transfection of reporter constructs into cultured cells (20).
We now use chemical probes of DNA structure together with LMPCR to
determine if the MT-I R/Y sequence adopts a discernable non-B DNA structure before or after metal induction of cultured cells.
We first show LMPCR data for plasmids studied in vitro. These data confirm and extend our published demonstration of a non-B
DNA structure that depends upon negative supercoiling and acidic pH
(20). In contrast, the results of in vivo probing with
KMnO4 and chloroacetaldehyde (CAA) do not indicate the
formation of either a profoundly unpaired DNA structure or protein
complexes within the MT-I R/Y sequence. Using
KMnO4 as a probe of thymine accessibility, we show both
in vivo and with purified genomic DNA that thymine residues
within the R/Y sequence react with KMnO4 in a predictable
pattern that is more consistent than for thymine residues outside the
R/Y sequence. These data suggest that although the R/Y sequence is not
forming an unpaired structure, its thymine bases have subtle
distinguishing characteristics. Possible explanations for the uniform
pattern of thymine reactivity within the MT-I R/Y sequence
are discussed.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmid Construct--
Plasmid pMTCAT (6300 bp (29)) contains
~1775 bp of the mouse MT-I promoter including the upstream
MT-I R/Y sequence. Plasmid pMTCAT at native superhelical
density was extracted from E. coli DH5 cells and purified
by CsCl equilibrium density gradient centrifugation in the presence of
ethidium bromide (30).
Oligonucleotides--
All oligonucleotides were synthesized by
standard phosphoramidite chemistry on an ABI 394 synthesizer. The
oligonucleotides were purified on 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gels,
eluted from gel slices, and desalted by Sep-Pak C18
cartridge chromatography (Waters).
Cell Culture, CdCl2 Induction, and Reverse
Transcription Analysis of MT-I RNA--
Mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts were
maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life
Technologies, Inc.). For metal induction and RNA isolation, NIH3T3
cells at 90% confluency were shifted to Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium with or without 2 µM CdCl2 for 4 h. Total cellular RNA was isolated from cells using Trizol Reagent
(Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically at 260 nm. In each 10-µl reverse transcription reaction, 15 µg of
total RNA was combined with 0.5 pmol of the MT-I mRNA
reverse primer
(5'-GCAG2AG2TGCACT2GCAGT2C)
and 0.5 pmol of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA
reverse primer
(5'-A3TG2 CAGC3TG2TGAC2)
in 200 mM KCl. The MT-I and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase primers yield reverse
transcripts of 159 and 110 nucleotides, respectively. Reverse primers
were annealed to total RNA by incubation at 80 °C for 5 min,
42 °C for 20 min, and 37 °C for 30 min. Each reaction was
supplemented with 25 µl of a reaction mixture containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.3 mM dNTPs, 10 pg/µl
actinomycin D, and 25 units of Moloney murine leukemia virus-reverse
transcriptase enzyme (Promega). Primer extension was carried out at
42 °C for 30 min. Each reaction was terminated by addition of 100 µl of room temperature stop buffer (0.3 M sodium
acetate, pH 5.2, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.5%
glycogen) followed by ethanol precipitation. Reverse transcripts were
analyzed by electrophoresis through a denaturing 5% polyacrylamide gel (19:1, acrylamide:bisacrylamide).
In Vitro Chemical Treatment of Plasmid and Genomic DNA
Samples--
Anhydrous hydrazine, dimethyl sulfate (DMS),
2,2'-bipyridyl, formic acid, osmium tetroxide (OT: 4% weight solution
in H2O), KMnO4, and piperidine were obtained
from Aldrich. CAA (45% weight solution in H2O) was
obtained from Fluka. All chemical reagents were used without further
purification. The chemical reactivities of pMTCAT DNA and naked genomic
DNA were analyzed using modifications of published procedures (31).
Briefly, supercoiled or HpaI-linearized pMTCAT DNA samples
(1 µg) were dissolved in 100 µl of buffer containing 15 µg of
sheared calf-thymus DNA as a carrier. For plasmid experiments at pH
4.5, the buffer contained 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.5, 4 mM MgCl2, and 100 mM NaCl. For
plasmid experiments at pH 7.1, the buffer contained 25 mM
MOPS, pH 7.1, 4 mM MgCl2, and 100 mM NaCl. For in vitro analysis of genomic DNA,
40 µg of purified NIH3T3 genomic DNA was dissolved in 300 µl of
buffer containing 25 mM MOPS, pH 7.1, 4 mM
MgCl2, and 100 mM NaCl. To monitor OT reactivity, samples were treated for 15 min at 37 °C by adding 7.6 µl (plasmid samples) or 15.2 µl (genomic samples) of a solution made by mixing 14.2 µl of 0.5% 2,2'-bipyridyl and 3 µl of OT
solution (final concentration of both OT and 2,2'-bipyridyl was 2 mM). OT reactions were terminated by adding 0.1 volume of
sodium acetate, pH 5.2, followed by two ethanol precipitations. To
monitor KMnO4 reactivity, samples were treated with 5 mM (final concentration) KMnO4 for 2 min at
24 °C. KMnO4 reactions were terminated by adding 0.1 volume of sodium acetate, pH 5.2, containing 1 M
-mercaptoethanol, followed by two ethanol precipitations. To monitor
DMS reactivity, samples were treated with a 5% aqueous DMS solution in
50 mM sodium cacodylate and 1 mM EDTA (0.5%
final DMS concentration) for 2 min at 24 °C. DMS reactions were
terminated by adding 0.1 volume of sodium acetate, pH 5.2, containing 1 M -mercaptoethanol, followed by two ethanol
precipitations. To monitor CAA reactivity, samples were treated with
2% (final concentration) CAA for 30 min at 37 °C. CAA reactions
were terminated by adding 50 mM (final concentration) NaCl
followed by two ethanol precipitations. CAA-treated samples were
resuspended in H2O and then incubated with either formic acid or hydrazine in high salt followed by two ethanol precipitations to superimpose the CAA data on Maxam and Gilbert reference ladders (32). Dried DNA samples were then resuspended in 1 M
piperidine, and base modifications were cleaved by incubation at
90 °C for 30 min. The samples were lyophilized extensively to remove
all traces of piperidine and resuspended in H2O. DNA
samples were then analyzed by LMPCR.
In Vivo Chemical Treatment--
Mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts were
seeded into 10-cm culture plates and maintained at 37 °C and 5%
CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum. For CdCl2 induction, NIH3T3
cells at 80-90% confluency were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium for 4 h with or without 2 µM
CdCl2. For chemical treatment, cells at 80-90% confluency
were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at ambient
temperature just prior to treatment. For KMnO4 treatment,
cells were exposed to 10 mM KMnO4 in PBS for 2 min at 24 °C. For DMS treatment, cells were exposed to 0.1% DMS in
PBS for 2 min at 24 °C. For CAA treatment, cells were exposed to 3%
CAA in PBS for 20 min at 37 °C. All reactions were terminated by
washing cells twice with ice-cold PBS. Cell lysis and DNA purification were by standard protocols (33). CAA-treated DNA was then processed as
described above for in vitro-treated DNA to superimpose
either G + A or C > T chemistry. Dried genomic DNA was cleaved
with piperidine and prepared for LMPCR as described for in
vitro genomic samples. The genomic DNA concentration was then
determined spectrophotometrically at 260 nm.
LMPCR Analysis--
Three gene-specific primer sets were
designed with the assistance of Oligo 4.0 software for LMPCR analysis
of the MT-I promoter (34). Primer set A was used to analyze
the pyrimidine strand of the MT-I R/Y sequence and included
gene-specific primers A1 (5'-C2A3TGA2G2T9G2ATC),
A2
(5'-G2ATCT2C3ACGCAGAG3TAT2GC),
and A3
(5'-G2TAT2GCTGTGT2GTCTC2TC2A2GAG).
Primer set B was used to analyze the TATA-proximal promoter
non-template strand and included gene-specific primers B1
(5'-C2AG3AGCTCTGCACTC), B2
(5'-TCTGCACTC2GC3GA4GTG), and B3
(5'-GTGCGCTCG2CTCTGC2A2G).
Primer set C was used to analyze the TATA-proximal promoter template
strand and included gene-specific primers C1
(5'-AGCAGT2G4T-C2AT2C),
C2
(5'-TC2AT2C2GAGATCTG2TGA2GCTG), and C3
(5'-G2TGA2GCTG2A-GCTACG2AGA2G).
The chemical reactivities of genomic and plasmid samples were
analyzed using standard LMPCR methods (17, 18). Briefly, chemically
treated and purified DNA samples (2 µg of genomic DNA or 10 pg of
plasmid DNA) were used at the start of LMPCR. Primer extension was
performed using Sequenase 2.0 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with the
first gene-specific primer. After ligation of a blunt unidirectional
linker duplex (17, 18), PCR was performed in the presence of
Taq DNA polymerase (Fisher Scientific), the second
gene-specific primer, and the unidirectional linker primer
(5'-GCG2TGAC3G3AGATCTGA2T2C)
for 20 cycles. The PCR products were separated on either a 6 or 8% denaturing polyacrylamide sequencing gel (19:1,
acrylamide:bisacrylamide). The sequencing gel was electroblotted to a
nylon membrane (PerkinElmer Life Sciences), prehybridized, and
hybridized with a radioactive probe created by single-sided PCR using
the third gene-specific primer. Sequencing markers were created by
standard Maxam and Gilbert (32) chemical modifications of genomic DNA
in vitro, together with standard LMPCR detection.
Radioactive signals were analyzed using a Molecular Dynamics Storm 840 PhosphorImager.
 |
RESULTS |
Strategy--
Chemical and enzymatic probes of non-B DNA
structures have previously been employed in vitro to
characterize the 128-bp MT-I R/Y sequence (Fig. 1) present
in purified plasmids (19, 20). Using both low and high resolution
probing techniques, these studies indicated that the
MT-I R/Y sequence forms a non-B DNA structure under
conditions of negative superhelical strain and low pH (19, 20). The
pattern of chemical reactivity suggested the possible formation of
multiple, concurrent H-DNA-like structures. Transient transfection
assays detected no effect of the R/Y sequence on promoter strength
(20). Thus, although the MT-I R/Y sequence is able to adopt
a non-B DNA structure under specific in vitro conditions, it
plays no demonstrable role in transcriptional regulation. These
previous data did not rule out the possibility that the R/Y sequence
adopts a non-B DNA structure in vivo, perhaps stabilized by
increased negative superhelical strain that might accompany metal-induced transcription of the MT-I gene (35). This
possibility is emphasized by a recent report of transcription-induced
cruciform extrusion within living Escherichia coli cells
(36). Assessment of chemical reactivity in the MT-I R/Y sequence before
and after induction of MT-I transcription by
exogenous metal thus provides an
excellent eukaryotic opportunity to explore the possibility of similar
phenomena.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Mouse MT-I promoter regions
studied by in vivo footprinting. Upper
sequence includes the 128-bp MT-I R/Y sequence and
flanking region. The pyrimidine strand (shaded) is studied
in this paper. The MT-I R/Y sequence is centered at position
1184 relative to the major MT-I transcription start point
(tsp). A single pyrimidine interruption (·) occurs within
the purine strand at position 1176. Lower sequence is the
TATA proximal promoter region of the MT-I gene. Shown are
three of the six metal responsive elements (MRE) and the
TATA box (shaded). The major MT-I tsp is
indicated by +1.
|
|
In the present study we sought to answer the following questions. Can
chemical probing and LMPCR be used to corroborate the presence of a
non-B DNA structure in plasmid DNA containing the MT-I R/Y
sequence? Is there evidence of protein binding to this element in
cultured cells either before or after metal induction? Is there
evidence for a non-B DNA structure within the R/Y sequence in
vivo either before or after metal induction?
Before LMPCR analysis of genomic DNA in cultured NIH3T3 cells, we
wished to confirm the metal responsiveness of the endogenous MT-I gene in these cells. Reverse transcription analysis was
employed to quantitate MT-I mRNA levels before
and after CdCl2 induction (Fig. 2). NIH3T3 cells induced with 2 µM
CdCl2 for 4 h showed a ~10-fold increase in
MT-I mRNA levels compared with uninduced cells (Fig. 2,
compare lanes 2 and 3).
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA was monitored as an
internal control. This result confirmed that our experimental metal
treatment significantly induced MT-I gene expression, and
suggested that metals might increase negative superhelical strain in
the vicinity of the MT-I R/Y sequence.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Reverse transcription analysis of
MT-I mRNA levels following metal induction.
NIH3T3 cells at 90% confluency were grown in media supplemented with
or without 2 µM CdCl2 for 4 h. Reverse
transcriptase analysis was performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The reverse transcriptase products were analyzed on a
5% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Marker (lane 1) is
radiolabeled 100-nucleotide ladder.
|
|
Chemical probes of DNA structure were used in combination with LMPCR to
analyze two regions of the MT-I promoter (Fig. 1). Chemical
reagents that react preferentially with unusual DNA structures (CAA,
OT, and KMnO4) or serve as footprinting agents (DMS) can be
valuable for detecting unusual non-B DNA structures and indicating regions of protection resulting from the binding of proteins or nucleic
acid strands (16, 31, 37). DMS modifies the N-7 position of guanine
within a DNA duplex. In contrast, guanine is protected from DMS
modification when a protein is bound to the DNA or when guanine is
involved in Hoogsteen (or reverse-Hoogsteen) hydrogen bonding
(e.g. within a C + G·C triplet) because the N-7 position
of guanine is made inaccessible to DMS. KMnO4 is thought to
react primarily with unstacked or unpaired thymine bases, and to a much
lower degree with unstacked or unpaired cytosine and guanine residues
(38). CAA reacts with the Watson-Crick base pairing face of unpaired
adenine and cytosine residues to form their respective etheno
derivatives. OT, in the presence of 2,2'-bipyridyl reacts primarily
with unpaired or unstacked thymine bases (38).
Chemical Probing of the Proximal MT-I Promoter in Vitro and in
Vivo--
To validate our chemical probing and LMPCR assay, we first
analyzed the TATA-proximal region of the MT-I promoter in
isolated genomic DNA and in cultured cells. Previous in vivo
studies of the MT-I promoter used DMS and a genomic primer
extension analysis to reveal subtle differences between the chemical
reactivity of promoter DNA sequences of uninduced and metal-induced
cells (24). Mueller et al. (24) noted differences between
DMS reactivities of samples treated in vitro
versus in vivo as well as differences between
samples treated in vivo before or after CdCl2
induction. We analyzed NIH3T3 cells before or after CdCl2
induction using either DMS or KMnO4 followed by DNA
extraction and LMPCR analysis. Reactivities were compared with those
observed for isolated genomic DNA treated with the same reagents.
KMnO4 has not previously been used to analyze the
MT-I promoter. Differences in KMnO4 reactivity
on both DNA strands of the promoter were noted when in vitro
and in vivo samples were compared (Fig.
3, A and B, compare
lanes 4 and 5). KMnO4 footprints were evident within the MREs on both non-template and template strands (Fig.
3, A and B, red bars and
circles). Curiously, only subtle increases in reactivity
were detected near the transcriptional start point (Fig. 3A,
compare lanes 1-3, red circle at +3), but these
differences indicated base unpairing in vivo. Metal
induction also resulted in subtle differences between uninduced and
CdCl2-induced samples (Fig. 3, A and
B, compare lanes 5 and 6, blue
circles). It was interesting and unexpected that many of the MRE
footprints detected in vivo by KMnO4 were
present prior to metal induction. We also noted that in strings of two
or more consecutive thymine residues, KMnO4 reacts only
with the 3' terminal thymine residue of the string. This curious
phenomenon has been previously reported and will be further discussed
below (38, 39).

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
LMPCR analysis of the non-template and
template strands of the TATA region in the MT-I
promoter. The same DNA samples were analyzed using different
primer sets to examine either the non-template (panel A) or
template (panel B) strands. The MREs and TATA box are
indicated (left of each panel). The positions relative to
the major MT-I tsp are labeled (right of each
panel). Lanes 4-6 indicate relative reactivities to KMnO4.
Lanes 7-9 indicate relative reactivities to DMS.
Lanes 4 and 7 display the results of in
vitro treatment of purified genomic DNA with the indicated
chemicals. Lanes 5 and 8 display the results of
in vivo treatment of uninduced NIH3T3 cells with the
indicated chemicals. Lanes 6 and 9 display the
results of in vivo treatment of CdCl2-induced
NIH3T3 cells with the indicated chemicals. Reference markers for both
panels are Maxam and Gilbert G + A (lane 1) and C > T
(lane 2) ladders. Lane 3 in both panels indicates
results for purified genomic DNA samples treated with piperidine alone.
Red bars and circles to the left of
lanes 4 and 7 in each panel indicate regions or
specific bases, respectively, that show variation between the in
vitro and in vivo treated samples. Blue
circles highlight differences between the in vivo
CdCl2-induced and uninduced samples. Samples were analyzed
on a 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel.
|
|
Differences in DMS reactivity on both DNA strands of the
MT-I promoter were also noted when in vitro and
in vivo samples were compared (Fig. 3, A and
B, compare lanes 7 and 8). Both
hyper-reactivities and protections were observed (Fig. 3, A
and B, red bars and circles). Metal induction
again resulted in subtle differences between samples probed before or
after CdCl2 induction (Fig. 3, A and
B, compare lanes 8 and 9, blue
circles). Importantly, the DMS reactivity patterns were consistent
with previous in vivo footprinting data for this region
(24). Taken together the data obtained using KMnO4 and DMS
probes reassured us that our in vivo footprinting protocol
was sensitive and reproducible.
Chemical Probing of the MT-I R/Y Sequence--
For analysis of the
pyrimidine strand of the MT-I R/Y sequence we first analyzed
plasmid pMTCAT with OT or KMnO4 in vitro (Fig.
4A). In these studies,
supercoiled or HpaI-linearized pMTCAT was chemically treated
at either acidic or neutral pH. We first wished to determine if LMPCR
analysis would confirm the presence of an unusual DNA structure at low
pH in supercoiled DNA as has been previously detected by chemical
treatment followed by radiolabeling of fragments (20). OT
hyper-reactivity was indeed observed when supercoiled pMTCAT DNA was
treated at pH 4.5 (Fig. 4A, lane 3, red bar). The OT
hyper-reactivity was greatly reduced at pH 7.1 (Fig. 4A, lane
5), and OT reactivity was lost when the plasmid was linearized
(Fig. 4A, lanes 4 and 6). Changes in
KMnO4 reactivity were also observed when pMTCAT was treated
under these different conditions. A region of hyper-reactivity was
observed between bases 1247 and 1205 when supercoiled pMTCAT was
treated at pH 4.5 (Fig. 4A, lane 7, blue bar). The
KMnO4 hyper-reactivity was reduced when the plasmid was
linearized and probed at pH 4.5 or when supercoiled plasmid was treated
at pH 7.1 (Fig. 4A, lanes 8 and 9). When
linearized pMTCAT DNA was treated with KMnO4 at pH 7.1 a more uniform pattern of thymine modification was observed over the
length of the R/Y sequence (Fig. 4A, lane 10).

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
LMPCR analysis of the pyrimidine strand of
the MT-I R/Y sequence. Samples were analyzed on a
6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. MT-I R/Y sequence
boundaries and positions relative to the major MT-I tsp are
labeled (left of panels A and B).
Reference markers are Maxam and Gilbert G + A and C > T ladders.
The single interruption in the R/Y sequence is indicated by a
"G" (left of panels A and
B). A, DNA reactivity to OT and
KMnO4 in vitro and in vivo.
Lanes 3-6 indicate relative reactivities to OT. Lanes
7-13 indicate relative reactivities to KMnO4. Plasmid
samples were treated as either supercoiled (S) or
HpaI-linearized (L) molecules at pH 4.5 or 7.1. Lanes 11-13 contain genomic DNA samples. Lane 11 displays the in vitro treatment of purified genomic DNA with
KMnO4. Lanes 12 and 13 display the
in vivo KMnO4 treatment of uninduced or
CdCl2-induced cells, respectively. The red bar
to the right of lane 3 indicates thymines
hyper-reactive to OT modification in supercoiled plasmid DNA at low pH.
The blue bar to the right of lane 7 indicates thymines hyper-reactive to KMnO4 modification
under the same conditions. Thymines within the R/Y sequence
(horizontal red ticks) and thymines upstream of the R/Y
sequence (horizontal blue ticks) are indicated
(right of lane 13). B, CAA
reactivities superimposed on Maxam and Gilbert G + A ladders.
Lanes 3-6 are in vitro treated pMTCAT plasmid
samples. Plasmid samples were treated as either supercoiled
(S) or HpaI-linearized (L) molecules
at pH 4.5 or 7.1. Lanes 7-9 contain genomic DNA samples.
Lane 7 displays the in vitro CAA treatment of
purified genomic DNA. Lanes 8 and 9 display the
in vivo CAA treatment of uninduced or
CdCl2-induced cells, respectively. The black bar
to the right of lane 3 indicates cytosines
slightly hyper-reactive to CAA modification in supercoiled plasmid at
low pH.
|
|
When genomic DNA samples were treated with KMnO4 in
vitro, a similar pattern of uniform thymine modification was
observed. Thus for KMnO4 treatment at pH 7.1, genomic DNA
treated in vitro and linearized pMTCAT plasmid samples
treated in vitro yielded similar patterns of reactivity
(Fig. 4A, lanes 10 and 11). KMnO4 probing of the MT-I R/Y sequence in cultured NIH3T3 cells
showed no changes upon metal induction (Fig. 4A, compare
lanes 12 and 13) and yielded a similar pattern of
thymine reactivity to genomic DNA samples treated in vitro
(Fig. 4A, lanes 11-13). In all cases, the KMnO4
reactivity pattern for thymine residues is quite consistent: KMnO4 reactivity is limited to isolated thymines and to the
3' terminal thymine of a string of consecutive thymines. This uniform pattern of thymine reactivity persisted throughout the R/Y sequence, whereas thymine residues upstream and downstream from the R/Y sequence
reacted with KMnO4 in a less uniform manner (Fig. 4A, lane 13, compare horizontal red ticks with
horizontal blue ticks).
Plasmid pMTCAT and genomic DNA samples were also analyzed by CAA
treatment followed by Maxam and Gilbert G+A chemistry (Fig. 4B,
lanes 3-9). When pMTCAT was analyzed after treatment with CAA at
pH 4.5 or 7.1, differences in reactivities were detected (Fig.
4B, compare lanes 3-6). CAA modifications were
reduced when pMTCAT was linearized (Fig. 4B, lanes 4 and
6). Hyper-reactivities (vertical bar near
lane 3 of Fig. 4B) include cytosines adjacent to
reactive thymines that had been identified by OT (Fig. 4A, lane
3). These CAA data from purified supercoiled plasmid DNA treated
at acidic pH again confirm the presence of an unpaired, non-B DNA
structure within the R/Y sequence. It is evident that OT (Fig.
4A, lane 3) is a better probe of base unpairing within the
element in vitro than CAA (Fig. 4B, lane 3),
confirming our previous observations (20). CAA in vivo
analysis suggested no regions of hyper-reactivity before (Fig.
4B, lane 8) or after (Fig. 4B, lane 9) metal
induction, further confirming that this sequence did not have an
unpaired configuration in living cells.
The chemical reactivities of thymines within the MT-I R/Y
sequence are compared quantitatively in
Fig. 5. Regions of hyper-reactivity were
noted within the 3' half of the R/Y sequence when pMTCAT was treated
with OT or KMnO4 at low pH (Fig. 5, red and
blue bars). In contrast, when NIH3T3 cells were treated with
KMnO4, a more uniform thymine reactivity was observed
across the R/Y sequence with no asymmetry (Fig. 5,
bottom).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Comparison of MT-I R/Y
sequence reactivity. Storage phosphor analysis of data in Fig.
4A, lane 3 (top scan), lane
7 (middle scan), and lane 12 (bottom
scan). Relative reactivity is indicated on the y axis.
The MT-I R/Y sequence boundary is indicated below
the x axis. The top scan depicts supercoiled
plasmid pMTCAT reactivity with OT at pH 4.5. The middle scan
depicts supercoiled plasmid pMTCAT reactivity with KMnO4 at
pH 4.5. The bottom scan depicts genomic DNA reactivity with
KMnO4 under uninduced in vivo conditions. The
red bar (top) corresponds to the bar
in Fig. 4A (lane 3). The blue bar
corresponds to the bar in Fig. 4A (lane
7).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Characteristics of the MT-I R/Y Sequence--
There are several
examples of H-DNA-like structures in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells
(40-44). In one case, E. coli cells containing plasmid DNA
with an inserted homopurine/homopyrimidine mirror repeats were grown
under acidic conditions and treated with cell-permeable chemicals that
react with distorted DNA. Extracted plasmid DNA indicated the formation
of a pyrimidine motif H-DNA structure (42). Kohwi and Panchenko (44)
showed that a G·G·C (purine motif) triplex formed in living
E. coli cells following transcriptional activation of a
downstream gene. In eukaryotic cells, isolated nuclei have been shown
to bind monoclonal antibodies thought to be specific for triplex DNA,
thus indicating the possible presence of such structures (40, 41).
While intriguing, these data also raise the question of whether such
examples are a true measure for the occurrence of such structures
within the genomic DNA of living cells. Studies with E. coli
often involve plasmid DNA under unusual conditions, and studies with
monoclonal antibodies involve isolated nuclei. The present study sought
to determine if a non-B DNA structure could be detected in living cells
at base pair resolution in an element previously shown to adopt a pyrimidine motif H-DNA structure in vitro (19, 20). Although the MT-I R/Y sequence showed a pH dependence in
vitro, we felt in vivo analysis was justified because
additional factors in vivo (e.g. high negative
supercoiling) might aid in the formation and stabilization of such a
structure. Such an effect has recently been reported for cruciform
extrusion (36).
The best studied examples of R/Y DNA sequences capable of adopting
H-DNA structures in vitro possess perfect mirror symmetry and are often repetitive in nature (8, 9, 45-50). In contrast, the
MT-I R/Y sequence is a 128-bp R/Y sequence composed of
multiple imperfect mirror repeats, but lacking any substantial region
of perfect mirror symmetry. The extreme length and interesting location of the R/Y sequence raise the possibility that the element did not
originate by a random process, and that the sequence may have some
biological function. When present in a supercoiled plasmid at acidic
pH, this R/Y sequence has been shown to adopt a non-B DNA structure
with unpaired bases (19, 20). Previous experiments have also shown that
the R/Y sequence displays no detectable activity as a
cis-acting transcriptional regulatory element (20). We examined whether base unpairing suggestive of a stable, non-B DNA
structure could be detected within the endogenous mouse MT-I R/Y sequence in cultured fibroblasts before or after metal induction.
Structural Analysis of the MT-I R/Y Sequence--
We began by
using chemical probing and LMPCR to characterize the in
vitro structure of purified plasmid containing the R/Y sequence.
The pattern of OT reactivity for purified supercoiled plasmid agrees
with previous results indicating the presence of base unpairing within
this sequence at acidic pH (Fig. 4). In vitro analysis with
KMnO4 also indicated a non-B DNA structure. However,
comparison of the OT and KMnO4 reactivities of supercoiled DNA at low pH reveal differences. Although the regions of
hyper-reactivity overlap, KMnO4 reacts with a greater
number of thymines than OT (Figs. 4 and 5, compare red and
blue bars). The broader pattern of KMnO4
reactivity relative to OT presumably reflects different reaction
mechanisms and/or preferences for slightly different structural
distortions (40, 51, 52). OT chelated by 2,2'-bipyridyl creates a
bulkier complex than the permanganate anion, but both reagents are
reportedly specific for single-stranded and/or unstacked thymines (38,
40, 51, 52). As previously reported (20), CAA reacts only slightly with
unpaired cytosines adjacent to unpaired thymines that are strongly
modified by OT and KMnO4 in supercoiled plasmids at low pH
(Fig. 4B, black bar to the right of lane
3).
In vivo analysis of the MT-I R/Y sequence with
KMnO4 and CAA provided no evidence of base unpairing as had
been observed with purified plasmids (Fig. 4). When the
KMnO4 and CAA reactivities of isolated genomic DNA samples
were compared with the reactivities observed in vivo, no
suppressions suggestive of protein footprints were detected, nor were
hyper-reactivities observed, arguing against base unpairing or H-DNA
formation. The KMnO4 and CAA reactivities of the
MT-I R/Y sequence did not change after metal induction. Because our initial LMPCR analysis of the TATA region of the
MT-I promoter confirmed the activity and specificity of the
relevant chemical probes, and because analysis of MT-I
mRNA levels indicated that the metal induction protocol was
effective, we believe that the failure to detect footprints or base
unpairing within the R/Y sequence was not the result of technical limitations.
KMnO4 Reactivity within an R/Y Sequence--
Although
stable unpairing of thymines in the R/Y sequence was not detected
in vivo, we were intrigued by the pattern of
KMnO4 reactivity of thymines in this element. When we
analyzed linearized plasmid DNA with KMnO4 at pH 7.1 we
expected the sequence to be resistant to KMnO4 modification
because the DNA was neither supercoiled nor protonated. In contrast, we
observed a consistent pattern of thymine reactivity across the entire
R/Y sequence (Fig. 4A, lane 10). This pattern did not
suggest base unpairing since it occurred in relaxed DNA and at neutral
pH. Furthermore, probing with the single-strand-specific reagent
CAA did not show evidence of overt base unpairing. The observed
KMnO4 reactivity pattern involves oxidation of isolated
thymines, and of only the 3' thymine residue in strings of consecutive
thymines. This peculiar pattern was also observed for genomic DNA
samples treated with KMnO4 in vitro or in
vivo, and suggests that the long R/Y sequence confers an unusually
uniform structure upon thymine residues. The observed pattern of
thymine reactivity to KMnO4 within the R/Y sequence presumably reflects subtle differences in thymine accessibility. The
greatest KMnO4 reactivity occurs when thymines are
immediately upstream from cytosines. In contrast, thymines upstream
from thymines are not modified by KMnO4. This reactivity
pattern is consistent throughout the R/Y sequence both in
vitro and in vivo. In contrast, the KMnO4
reactivities of thymines upstream of the R/Y sequence are more variable
and unpredictable: not all isolated thymines or 3' terminal thymines in
strings of consecutive thymines show uniform reactivity. Moreover,
differences in KMnO4 reactivity can be observed in
vitro versus in vivo upstream of the R/Y
sequence (Fig. 4A, compare lanes 11 and 13, horizontal blue ticks). These data imply that the local structure
of thymines in long R/Y sequences is more uniform than in mixed sequences.
KMnO4 is typically considered a chemical probe of unpaired
DNA, selectively oxidizing the C5-C6 double bond of thymines (52). Attack on the C5-C6 double bond is thought to require approach from
either above or below the plane of the base, and is therefore suppressed by base-stacking interactions (38, 51, 52). Although reactivity of the permanganate anion with DNA has been shown to be
dependent on the ionic strength, similar band intensities were observed
in vitro and in vivo (e.g. Fig. 4,
compares lanes 10-13). What then is the structural basis
for the very consistent context specificity of KMnO4
modification of thymines within the R/Y sequence? Two possible
explanations have previously been suggested. McCarthy et al.
(39) and Nejedly et al. (38) observed irregular
KMnO4 reactivity within strings of consecutive thymines,
such that only the 3' terminal thymine was attacked (39). These authors
concluded that A tracts within mixed DNA sequences induce a unique B'
helical structure and that the 3' junction of such an A tract is
accompanied by a distortion that promotes KMnO4 attack
(39). Although a plausible explanation for KMnO4 reactivity
in thymine strings, this reasoning fails to account for our observation
that isolated thymines are as reactive to KMnO4 as the 3'
terminal thymines in strings of consecutive thymines. Moreover, even in
TT dinucleotide sequences, KMnO4 modifies only the 3'
thymine despite the fact that one or two isolated thymines are not
thought to adopt B' helix structures.
Hunter and Lu (53) used theoretical calculations and x-ray crystal
structures to examine the role of base stacking interactions in local
DNA structure. These authors considered dinucleotide steps in terms of
step parameters (twist, rise, and tilt). They concluded that AA steps
are most like B-DNA and are very inflexible, AG and GG steps are
slightly untwisted relative to B-DNA, and GC steps are slightly
overtwisted compared with B-DNA (53). Because our data shows that
thymines in the GA step are most reactive to KMnO4, it
might be proposed that the slight overtwisting of GA base pair steps
promotes accessibility of the 5' thymine to KMnO4
modification. Suzuki et al. (54) also analyzed structural data bases to understand additional sequence-dependent
conformational aspects of DNA. These authors again noted that the GA
dinucleotide step is slightly overtwisted and suggested that the
overtwisting is a result of steric hindrance introduced by the thymine
methyl. This work concluded that an AA step is "locked" into B-form
due to repulsion between the methyl groups and the phosphate backbone (54).
Besides explanations involving A tract distortion or base pair twist,
we propose an alternative simple steric model to account for the
pattern of thymine reactivity to KMnO4 observed so
consistently in the MT-I R/Y sequence. Because attack on a
thymine C5 C6 double bond requires approach out of the plane of the
base, an incoming trajectory within the major groove from 3' side
of the thymine seems most favorable. The structural features of the
base 3' to the target thymine thus may be critical in determining the
exposure of the C5 C6 double bond. In particular, inspection of
molecular models shows that the methyl group at the C5 position of a 3' thymine substantially occludes access to the C5 C6 double bond of a 5'
thymine (Fig. 6, white arrow).
In contrast, the degree of occlusion due to the other possible 3' bases
is reduced (Fig. 6). These considerations suggest that the
hyper-reactivity of isolated thymines and 3' terminal thymines in
strings of consecutive thymines are due to C5 methyl footprinting of 3'
thymines on adjacent 5' thymines.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Base stacks and occlusion of
thymines. Consecutive stacked bases of dinucleotide steps
involving a 5' thymine in B-DNA (green), viewed from the 3'
side showing the overlap of the various possible 3' bases
(magenta) with the C5 C6 double bond of the 5' thymine
residue (orange). White arrow indicates occlusion
of the C-6 atom of a target thymine by the C-5 methyl group of a 3'
thymine. Models were generated using Insight II software (MSI) and
standard B-DNA parameters.
|
|
We conclude that despite the presence of a consistent pattern of
KMnO4 reactivity with the thymines in the MT-I
R/Y sequence in vitro and in vivo, there is no
evidence that the sequence adopts a stable, unpaired structure or
interacts with proteins in vivo. Together with our previous
genetic data (20), this result emphasizes the fact that although long
R/Y sequences may be statistically over-represented and provocatively
located in genomes, it cannot be assumed that they form unusual
structures in vivo. Indeed, their function, if any, remains elusive.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Gerd Pfeifer for generous expert
technical training in LMPCR and the staff of the Mayo Molecular Biology
Core Facility for assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Mayo Foundation and National
Institutes of Health Grants GM 47814 and GM 54411.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, Mayo Foundation, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905. Tel.: 507-284-9041; Fax: 507-284 -2053; E-mail: maher@mayo.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 13, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909658199
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LMPCR, ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction;
CAA, chloroacetaldehyde;
DMS, dimethyl sulfate;
KMnO4, potassium permanganate;
MRE, metal responsive element;
MT-I, metallothionein-I;
R/Y, homopurine/homopyrimidine;
bp, base pair(s);
OT, osmium tetroxide;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sinden, R. R.
(1994)
DNA Structure and Function
, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego
|
| 2.
|
Wells, R. D.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
1095-1098
|
| 3.
|
Kim, J.,
Yang, C.,
and DasSarma, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9340-9346
|
| 4.
|
Kim, J.,
and DasSarma, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19724-19731
|
| 5.
|
Wang, A. H.-J.,
Quigley, G. J.,
Kolpak, F. J.,
Crawford, J. L.,
van Boom, J. H.,
van der Marel, G.,
and Rich, A.
(1979)
Nature
282,
680-686
|
| 6.
|
Murchie, A. I.,
and Lilley, D. M.
(1992)
Methods Enzymol.
211,
158-180
|
| 7.
|
Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D.,
and Mirkin, S. M.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
64,
65-95
|
| 8.
|
Htun, H.,
and Dahlberg, J. E.
(1989)
Science
243,
1571-1576
|
| 9.
|
Lyamichev, V.,
Mirkin, S.,
and Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D.
(1986)
J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.
3,
667-669
|
| 10.
|
Agazie, Y. M.,
Burkholder, G. D.,
and Lee, J. S.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
316,
461-466
|
| 11.
|
Steinmetzer, K.,
Zannis-Hadjopoulos, M.,
and Price, G. B.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
254,
29-37
|
| 12.
|
Frappier, L.,
Price, G. B.,
Martin, R. G.,
and Zannis-Hadjopoulos, M.
(1987)
J. Mol. Biol.
193,
751-758
|
| 13.
|
Spiro, C.,
Bazett-Jones, D. P.,
Wu, X.,
and McMurray, C. T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27702-27710
|
| 14.
|
Kelm, R. J., Jr.,
Sun, S.,
Strauch, A. R.,
and Getz, M. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24278-24285
|
| 15.
|
Michelotti, G. A.,
Michelotti, E. F.,
Pullner, A.,
Duncan, R. C.,
Eick, D.,
and Levens, D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
2656-2669
|
| 16.
|
Wells, R. D.,
Collier, D. A.,
Hanvey, J. C.,
Shimizu, M.,
and Wohlrab, F.
(1988)
FASEB J.
2,
2939-2949
|
| 17.
|
Pfeifer, G. P.,
Steigerwald, S. D.,
Mueller, P. R.,
Wold, B.,
and Riggs, A. D.
(1989)
Science
246,
810-813
|
| 18.
|
Mueller, P. R.,
and Wold, B.
(1989)
Science
246,
780-786
|
| 19.
|
Bacolla, A.,
and Wu, F.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
1639-1647
|
| 20.
|
Becker, N. A.,
and Maher, L. J.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
1951-1958
|
| 21.
|
Anderson, R. D.,
Taplitz, S. J.,
Wong, S.,
Bristol, G.,
Larkin, B.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
3574-3581
|
| 22.
|
Thiele, D.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1183-1191
|
| 23.
|
Hamer, D. H.
(1986)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
55,
913-951
|
| 24.
|
Mueller, P. R.,
Salser, S. J.,
and Wold, B.
(1988)
Genes Dev.
2,
412-427
|
| 25.
|
Culotta, V. C.,
and Hamer, D. H.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
1376-1380
|
| 26.
|
Hamer, D. H.,
and Walling, M.
(1982)
J. Mol. Appl. Genet.
1,
273-288
|
| 27.
|
Stuart, G. W.,
Searle, P. F.,
Chen, H. Y.,
Brinster, R. L.,
and Palmiter, R. D.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
7318-7322
|
| 28.
|
Durnam, D. M.,
and Palmiter, R. D.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
5712-5716
|
| 29.
|
Maher, L. J.,
Wold, B.,
and Dervan, P. B.
(1989)
Science
245,
725-730
|
| 30.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 31.
|
Pestov, D.,
Dayn, A.,
Siyanova, E.,
George, D.,
and Mirkin, S.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
6527-6532
|
| 32.
|
Maxam, A. M.,
and Gilbert, W.
(1980)
Methods Enzymol.
65,
499-560
|
| 33.
|
Spiro, C.,
and McMurray, C. T.
(1999)
in
Transcription Factors, A Practical Approach
(Latchman, D. S., ed), 2 Ed.
, pp. 27-62, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
| 34.
|
Rychlik, W.,
and Rhoads, R. E.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
8543-8551
|
| 35.
|
Liu, L. F.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
7024-7027
|
| 36.
|
Krasilnikov, A. S.,
Podtelezhnikov, A.,
Vologodskii, A.,
and Mirkin, S. M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
292,
1149-1160
|
| 37.
|
Kohwi-Shigematsu, T.,
and Kohwi, Y.
(1992)
Methods Enzymol.
212,
155-180
|
| 38.
|
Nejedly, K.,
Sykorova, E.,
Diekmann, S.,
and Palecek, E.
(1998)
Biophys. Chem.
73,
205-216
|
| 39.
|
McCarthy, J. G.,
Williams, L. D.,
and Rich, A.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
6071-6081
|
| 40.
|
Palecek, E.,
Rasovska, E.,
and Boublikova, P.
(1988)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
150,
731-738
|
| 41.
|
Palecek, E.,
Robert-Nicoud, M.,
and Jovin, T. M.
(1993)
J. Cell Sci.
104,
653-661
|
| 42.
|
Karlovsky, P.,
Pecinka, P.,
Vojtiskova, M.,
Makaturova, E.,
and Palecek, E.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
274,
39-42
|
| 43.
|
Kohwi, Y.,
Malkhosyan, S.,
and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
223,
817-822
|
| 44.
|
Kohwi, Y.,
and Panchenko, Y.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1766-1778
|
| 45.
|
Johnston, B. H.
(1988)
Science
241,
1800-1804
|
| 46.
|
Kohwi, Y.,
and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
3781-3785
|
| 47.
|
Htun, H.,
and Dahlberg, J.
(1988)
Science
241,
1791-1795
|
| 48.
|
Collier, D. A.,
and Wells, R. D.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
10652-10658
|
| 49.
|
Hanvey, J.,
Klysik, J.,
and Wells, R.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
7386-7396
|
| 50.
|
Hanvey, J.,
Shimizu, M.,
and Wells, R.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
6292-6296
|
| 51.
|
Freeman, F.,
and Karchefski, E. M.
(1976)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
447,
238-245
|
| 52.
|
Iida, S.,
and Hayatsu, H.
(1970)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
213,
1-13
|
| 53.
|
Hunter, C. A.,
and Lu, X.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
265,
603-619
|
| 54.
|
Suzuki, M.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
274,
421-435
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|