|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M006524200 on September 26, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 51, 40576-40587, December 22, 2000
The AROM Gene, Spliced mRNAs Encoding New
DNA/RNA-binding Proteins Are Transcribed from the Opposite Strand of
the Melanin-concentrating Hormone Gene in Mammals*
Laetitia
Borsu ,
Françoise
Presse, and
Jean-Louis
Nahon§
From the Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et
Cellulaire-CNRS UPR 411, 660 Route des Lucioles-Sophia-Antipolis,
06560 Valbonne, France
Received for publication, July 21, 2000, and in revised form, September 22, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) mRNA
expression is induced by nerve growth factor and lithium in PC12 cells,
whereas three large MCH RNA species are found in untreated cells. In
this study, we investigated the structures, regulations of expression,
and putative functions of these transcripts. Northern blot, rapid amplification of cDNA ends-polymerase chain reaction, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, and sequencing experiments demonstrated that they are antisense RNAs complementary to the MCH gene. Two classes of antisense RNAs could be
discriminated as follows: 1) non-coding unspliced RNAs that overlap
mainly the coding part of the MCH gene; 2) spliced variant
mRNAs complementary to the 3'-flanking end of the MCH
gene and that encode putative proteins containing DNA/RNA binding
domains. We named this new transcriptional unit AROM for
antisense-RNA-overlapping-MCH
gene. Spliced variant AROM mRNAs are expressed in a broad range of
rat organs. Western blot and immunohistochemistry experiments revealed several proteins with cytoplasmic but also nuclear localization in PC12
cells. Time course studies during nerve growth factor and lithium
treatment of PC12 cells indicated a reciprocal regulation of the
MCH and AROM gene transcripts, reflected also
at the level of AROM proteins. The major translational product is a
64-kDa protein (AROM-p64). Recombinant AROM-p64 displayed high binding to single-stranded DNA and poly(A) homopolymers suggesting that this
protein could play a role in mRNA maturation/metabolism.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Melanin-concentrating hormone
(MCH)1 is a cyclic peptide,
first isolated from salmon pituitary glands on the basis of its skin paling property (1), then purified from rat hypothalami, and sequenced
(2). Synthesis of MCH was localized almost exclusively in a large
population of neurons present in the zona incerta and lateral
hypothalamus area of the mammalian brain (3-5). The MCH axonal network
projected widely throughout the brain and posterior pituitary but
innervated poorly the external part of the median eminence in resting
animals (5). This particular cellular and axonal distribution argued in
favor of a neurotransmitter/neuromodulator role for MCH in a large
spectrum of functions in the central nervous system (reviewed in Refs.
6 and 7). Recently, several laboratories have demonstrated changes in
different behaviors following intracerebroventricular injection of MCH
in the rat brain. In particular, MCH plays a particularly important
role in the regulation of feeding behavior and associated pathologies
such as obesity (8-11). Given the important biological functions of
MCH, it is of great interest to define the mechanisms that regulate the
expression of its cognate gene.
A single MCH-encoding gene has been identified in both rat
and mouse (12, 13), and two distinct MCH gene systems have been found in primates (14, 15). The regulation of MCH gene expression has been most extensively investigated with in
vivo models (reviewed in Ref. 7). However, we established recently that production of mature MCH mRNA (0.95 kb in length) can be induced in PC12 cells following treatment with nerve growth factor (NGF) and lithium (16, 17). Interestingly, we identified MCH RNA
species of high molecular weight (1.4, 3.5, and 4.0 kb in length) in
unstimulated PC12 cells; those transcripts transiently disappearing
after a short term treatment with NGF and lithium. Because the increase
in MCH mRNA content was not apparently associated with
transcriptional activation, we hypothesized that some of the large
MCH gene-related transcripts could be involved in the regulation of the processing or degradation of the MCH mRNA (16, 17).
In the present study, we described the isolation and characterization
of the high molecular weight MCH RNAs in PC12 cells and in rat tissues.
Interestingly, they are derived from a new gene located on the opposite
DNA strand to the MCH gene, with extensive overlap existing
between the 3' end of this gene and the MCH transcriptional unit. Some
of the antisense MCH RNAs display alternative splicing and encode new
DNA/RNA-binding proteins, whereas other putative transcripts lack
extensive open reading frames suggesting different functions for the
two classes of antisense MCH RNAs.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
PC12 cells were grown in Dulbecco's minimal
essential medium or RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated horse serum, 5% fetal calf serum, and 50 µg/ml
gentamicin as described elsewhere (16). The cells were maintained in a
humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were
plated in 100-mm dishes and used at about 107 cells/dish on
the day of the experiments. Inducers were added to the culture medium
at the final concentration of 50 ng/ml NGF (laboratory-made
preparation) and 20 mM LiCl. At the end of the treatments,
cells were washed twice with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
solution and directly used for RNA or protein extraction.
Rat Tissues--
Adult (3 months; 180-250 g) male Wistar rats
(Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire-CNRS,
Valbonne, France) were maintained in a 12-h light-dark cycle with food
and water given ad libitum. Hypothalamus and different
peripheral tissues (colon, jejunum, ileum, spleen, lung, liver, testis,
thymus, kidney, muscle, heart, stomach, and hypophysis) were carefully
dissected, immediately frozen in dry ice, and stored at 80 °C
until required.
Isolation of RNA and Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA was
extracted by a phenol-guanidinium isothiocyanate method (18). RNA
samples were electrophoresed through a 1.2% agarose-gel containing 2.2 M formaldehyde, transferred to Hybond (N) nylon membrane
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and UV-cross-linked with a Stratagene
apparatus. The RNA blot was incubated at 42 °C for 5 h in a
prehybridization buffer containing 50% (v/v) formamide as described
previously (Presse et al. (16)). Hybridization was
performed overnight in the same buffer with 32P-labeled
cDNA or oligoprobes (see DNA probes below). Washing was performed
successively twice in 5× SSPE (1× SSPE is 0.18 M NaCl,
0.01 M NAH2PO4), (pH 7.4), 0.1%
SDS, and 2× SSPE, 0.1% SDS at 50-60 °C. Filters were visualized
by exposing them against X-Omat AR film at 70 °C with intensifying
screens for 3-10 days). The levels of expression of specific mRNAs
were quantified by using a computerized image analysis system
(bioimaging analyzer, BAS-1500, Fujifilm).
DNA Probes--
The rat MCH cDNA probe was pRMCH 11 cDNA
(19). The rat tyrosine hydroxylase cDNA probe was a fragment of
pT51 cDNA (20). The GAPDH cDNA probe was a partial clone (pH
GAPDH-4) cDNA (21). Genomic probes covering the 5'- and 3'-flanking
region and the coding part of the MCH gene (see Fig.
1A) were generated as described elsewhere (17) with primers
listed in Table I. These probes were labeled with
[32P]dCTP by the random-priming method using a commercial
kit (Appligene, France). The specific activity of the probes was
0.5-2 × 109 dpm/µg. Oligonucleotide primers were
labeled using [ -32P]dCTP and terminal transferase as
described previously (16).
Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE)-PCR
Experiments--
RACE reactions were performed according to the user
manual of Marathon cDNA amplification kit
(CLONTECH Laboratories) with 1 µg of total RNAs
isolated from PC12 cells grown in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium
in the absence of NGF and lithium. Oligoprimers used for the first PCR
were RMCH6/AP1 and RMCH20/AP1 for identification of the 5' and 3' ends
of the antisense MCH RNAs, respectively (see Table I). Composition of
RACE-PCR buffer and added components were as described previously (15).
The PCR profile was 94 °C, 1 min, followed by 5 cycles, with 30 s at 94 °C, 4 min at 72 °C, then 5 cycles with 30 s at
94 °C, 4 min at 70 °C and finally 25 cycles with 20 s at
94 °C and 4 min at 68 °C. To improve specificity, secondary PCRs
were performed using 5-µl aliquots of a 1:50 dilution of the primary
PCR solution with oligoprimers ARMCH2/AP2 and RMCH2/AP2 for the 5' and
3' ends, respectively (see Fig. 3B), using the same PCR
profiles as described above except that only 20 cycles were performed
at the last step. Specific fragments were identified by Southern
blotting analysis with genomic probes.
RT-PCR Experiments--
Total RNAs from tissues were
reverse-transcribed with oligo(dT) or the specific primer 9, and the
subsequent PCRs were performed under conditions described elsewhere
(16) with primers shown in Table I and Fig. 5A. The reaction
products were analyzed on a 0.8% agarose gel, blotted onto nylon
membrane (Hybond N, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), probed with MCH
genomic probes (see Fig. 1A), and autoradiographed.
cDNA Cloning and Sequencing--
Bands of interest
corresponding to RACE or RT-PCR products were excised from 0.8%
agarose gels, purified using Wizard PCR Peps DNA purification (Promega,
France), and sub-cloned in pGEM-T easy vector (Promega).
Escherichia coli XL1 bacteria were transformed by high
voltage electroporation (1500 V, 282 ohms, 40 microfarads) with a
2-µl aliquot of the ligation mixture. Plasmids from individualized colonies were prepared and sequenced as described elsewhere (16).
Preparation of Affinity Purified Antibodies--
Antisera were
raised against glutathione S-transferase (GST)-AROM fusion
proteins and prepared as described below. DNA sequences encoding rat
AROM-p50 and AROM-p17 proteins were amplified and subcloned into the
pGEX3X vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in frame with the sequence
of GST. Constructs were checked by sequencing. Fusion protein
expression was induced by adding 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside for 4 h at
37 °C. After 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis separation
and copper staining, GST-AROM-p50 and GST-AROM-p17 fusion proteins were
excised from acrylamide gels and lyophilized. New Zealand female
rabbits were immunized with 400 µg of fusion protein in the presence
of complete Freund's adjuvant and boosted 1 month later with 200 µg
of the immunogen and incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Rabbits were bled
15 days after the last boost. Crude antiserum was sequentially incubated 16 h at 4 °C with 500 µg of GST and with 500 µg
of fusion protein previously transferred to Hybond C-extra
nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Specific
antibodies were recovered by a 2-min elution with 0.1 M
glycine, 5.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Immediately after elution,
purified antibodies were brought to pH 7.6 with 1 M Tris-Cl
(pH 8.0), 0.5% BSA.
Baculovirus Expression System--
A PCR product encoding mouse
AROM-p64 was obtained by amplifying a cDNA clone
(GenBankTM accession number AA139022) and subcloned
initially in the pGEM-T easy vector. A DNA fragment encoding rat
AROM-p50 was purified after amplification by RT-PCR of total RNA from
unstimulated PC12 cells. Sequence was checked before the fragment
encompassing AROM-p64 or AROM-p50 was introduced into a pVL1392 vector
(PharMingen). pVL-AROM-p64 or pVL-AROM-p50 vector was co-transfected
with linearized baculovirus DNA (BaculoGold, PharMingen) into
Sf9 cells following the manufacturer's recommendations.
Supernatant containing recombinant viruses was harvested 72 h
after transfection. Expression of AROM-p64 or AROM-p50 in infected
Sf9 cells was checked by immunoblot analysis of total proteins
as described below.
Protein Preparation for Western Blot Analysis--
Baculovirus
infected Sf9 cells were harvested 72 h after infection,
washed with PBS solution, and lysed at 4 °C with a buffer consisting
of 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1%
sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and 0.1 mM iodoacetamide. The cell suspension was
homogenized and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. Pellet and supernatant were stored at 20 °C until use.
Total proteins extracts from PC12 cells were prepared after washing the
cells twice with PBS 1× and putting them in a lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol,
1% Triton, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium
pyrophosphate, 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1% aprotinin) with
0.3% Nonidet P-40 and complete inhibitor protease (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals). Proteins were isolated from the nucleus and cytoplasm
according to a method derived from Greenberg and Ziff (22). Cell
extracts were sonicated, and proteins were stored as described above.
Rat tissues were homogenized using a Potter apparatus in buffer
containing 15 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 60 mM KCl,
15 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA (pH 7.5), 2 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM spermidine, 0.25 M
sucrose, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% Triton X-100. The suspension was
then centrifuged at 1000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min.
The supernatant was retained for further studies.
Immunoblotting--
Protein samples were denatured with 2%
-mercaptoethanol in Laemmli's sample buffer, separated on a
10% SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto a Hybond C-extra membrane (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). Non-fat dry milk (5% in TBS) was used as blocking
agent (1 h at room temperature) and for antibody dilutions. Primary
antibodies were incubated 16 h at 4 °C. Dilutions of the
primary antibodies are indicated in the figure legends, and the
secondary antibody (Immunotech F(ab')2) was used at 1:2500 dilution.
Blots were washed after incubation with either primary or secondary
antibodies, with a solution of TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20. Antibody
complexes were revealed by chemiluminescence (ECL +, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Immunohistochemistry--
PC12 cells (passage 16-17) were
placed on coverslips precoated with 0.25 mg/ml polylysine (Sigma) and
grown for 24 h as described above. The cells were washed with PBS
solution and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room
temperature. The slides were incubated for 20 min with 3% normal goat
serum, 0.1 M Tris-buffered saline (TBS solution) in
0.5% BSA. Then primary antiserum was applied for 45-90 min at room
temperature in 1× TBS containing 0.05% Triton X-100 (Ol 72 Ab, Ha 43 Ab a preimmune serum at 1/500 final; anti-mouse tyrosine hydroxylase
(Chemicon) at 1/400 final). After two washings in TBS solution,
anti-IgG from sheep or mouse coupled to peroxidase (AEC substrate;
Sigma) was used to reveal AROM immunoreactivity and tyrosine
hydroxylase immunoreactivity, respectively. Controls to ensure
non-cross-reactivity of secondary antisera with inappropriate antigens
were carried out and were negative.
DNA and RNA Binding Assays--
DNA/RNA affinity
chromatographies were performed essentially as described by Kadonaga
(23). Briefly, baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells that produced
mouse AROM-p64 or rat AROM-p50 were lysed either with a solution
containing 25 mM Hepes (pH 7.6), 100 mM KCl,
0.2 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 20%
glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and complete inhibitor protease (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) (solution A) or in the same buffer where 12.5 mM MgCl2 replaced 0.2 mM EDTA
(solution B). Sf9 cell sonicate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min, and the pellet and supernatants were
stored at 20 °C. Denatured calf thymus DNA-conjugated to agarose
or cellulose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used for DNA binding reactions. Ribonucleotide polymers (poly(A) and poly(U) from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech and poly(C) and poly(G) from Sigma) were
used for RNA binding reactions. 200 µl of pellet containing AROM
proteins was incubated at 4 °C for 1-3 h with RNA- or
DNA-conjugated agarose/cellulose-Sepharose beads. After a brief spin in
a microcentrifuge, the beads were pelleted, and the supernatant
(BT) was stored. The beads were washed four times with 150 µl of
binding buffer (solution A or B) to remove unspecific protein binding.
Generally, bound protein was eluted from DNA/RNA resins by successive
washings with increased ionic strengths (150 µl of solution A or B
containing from 0.2 to 1.0 M KCl). Finally, the beads were
washed once with 40 µl of the solution A or B and denatured with 2%
-mercaptoethanol Laemmli's sample buffer. Proteins were
analyzed by Western blots as described below.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of Antisense MCH RNAs in PC12 Cells--
We
determined first the degree of overlapping with the MCH gene
of the large transcripts identified in PC12 cells. Identical Northern
blots containing two RNA samples (lanes A and B;
Fig. 1B) isolated from
untreated control cells (C), or treated with NGF/lithium for
12 h (T12), were hybridized either with a MCH cDNA
probe, different MCH PCR fragments covering the flanking regions of the
MCH gene (probes A-D), or sense oligoprobes
RPCR4 and RMCH6 (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Expression of the MCH
gene-related transcripts in PC12 cells. A,
schematic representation of the rat MCH gene. The three
exons are boxed in black. Locations and lengths
of the cDNA, oligoprobes, and genomic DNA probes are indicated. The
PstI/PstI fragment has been fully sequenced (17).
B, Northern blot analysis of MCH mRNA and high molecular
weight RNAs in control PC12 cells (C) and 12 h
NGF/lithium-treated cells (T12). Fifteen microgram samples
(in duplicate; lanes A and B) of whole cell RNA
were hybridized to 32P-labeled MCH genomic probes
(A-D), MCH cDNA, or sense oligoprobes. The lengths of
the MCH gene-related transcripts are indicated on the
right. Mature MCH mRNA is noted by an
arrowhead.
|
|
Hybridization with 32P-labeled MCH cDNA probe confirmed
the expression of large MCH transcripts of 4.0, 3.5, and 1.4 kb in
unstimulated PC12 cells (C samples) and revealed the absence of the
largest transcripts in 12 h-treated cells (T12 samples) (Fig. 1B,
top right panel). As expected (16), the 0.95-kb band, which
corresponds to mature MCH mRNA, was identified by using the MCH
cDNA probe only in the NGF/lithium-treated PC12 cells (T12
samples). The 4.0-kb transcript was identified with genomic probes B-D
as well as MCH cDNA probe demonstrating that this transcript
overlaps the coding region of the MCH gene and extends into
both the 5'- and 3'-flanking regions. However, probe A did not display
hybridization to the 4.0-kb RNA in the C samples suggesting that it
does not extend far upstream from the 5' end of the MCH
gene. Interestingly, the 3.5-kb RNA species was clearly detected with
probes C and D but not with probes A and B suggesting that this
transcript contains essentially sequences of the 3'-flanking region of
the MCH gene. In sharp contrast, the 1.4-kb RNA species was
visualized with probe B but not with probes A, C, and D indicating that
this RNA overlaps essentially with the immediate 5'-flanking region of
the MCH gene. Finally, hybridization with oligoprobes RPCR4 and RMCH6 revealed a pattern similar to this found with probe B,
suggesting that at least the 4.0- and 1.4-kb RNA species must be
transcribed in the opposite direction to that encoding the MCH
mRNA. By using additional Northern blot analysis, antisense RNAs
corresponding to the 1.4-kb transcripts were further demonstrated with
single-stranded MCH RNA probe (data not shown).
Structural Analysis of the AROM Gene and Spliced
Transcripts--
We used a RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends)
protocol to characterize the antisense MCH RNAs. By using primer RMCH2, we found only cDNAs ending with a stretch of dT residues in
untreated PC12 cells, confirming the synthesis of antisense MCH
mRNA (Fig. 2B). Further
evidence that this was the true orientation was the presence of
canonical poly(A) addition sites at the expected distances from the A
regions in these RACE-PCR products (bracket in Fig. 3). In contrast, extension of the
cDNAs using primers oriented in the opposite direction (including
ARMCH2) produced numerous RACE products lacking a poly(dT). Bands
corresponding to a broad range in length of RACE products were
purified, subcloned into a PGEM-T cloning vector, and sequenced (Fig.
2B). All the RACE products overlapped the coding part and
large portions of the 3'-flanking region of the MCH gene but
differed markedly in their 5' end and exhibited internal heterogeneity.
These observations indicate that a gene extending past the 3'-flanking
region of the MCH gene but on the opposite DNA strand
generates several transcripts through alternative promoter use or/and
alternative splicing. We named this new gene AROM
forantisense-RNA-overlapping-MCH gene (Fig. 2A, GenBankTM accession number
nkit 356009; AF303035).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Schematic representation of the
MCH and AROM genes
(A) and AROM gene transcripts and
proteins (B). A, exons are numbered in
roman numerals for the MCH gene and in
arabic numerals for the AROM gene. Black
heavy lines indicated introns of defined lengths.
Arrows and arrowheads correspond to cap sites
(CS) and polyadenylation sites (poly(A)), respectively.
B, structure of various AROM mRNAs and corresponding
proteins. Orientation of the AROM gene is the same as in
A. The structure of the different AROM mRNAs has been
deduced from sequencing of the RACE-PCR products. The structures of the
AROM-p64 mRNAs were drawn by combining sequence data of multiple
RACE-PCR and RT-PCR experiments. White and black
arrowheads indicate, respectively, the putative initiation codons
and the stop codons; ARMCH2 and RMCH2 are the oligoprimers used to
obtain, respectively, the 5' end RACE-PCR and the 3' end RACE-PCR
products.
|
|

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid
sequence of the AROM-p64 and AROM-p50 mRNAs. AROM-p64 and
AROM-p50 sequences were established from RACE-PCR products. Coding
sequences are indicated in capital letters. Note the
frameshift in AROM-p50 where exon 11 is missing. Black
arrowheads delineate the intron locations. Polyadenylation
sequence signals and sites are boxed and indicated by
arrows, respectively. Large white arrowhead
indicates exon 3 skipping in AROM mRNAs. Small white
arrowhead corresponds to the putative CS2. Position of the CAG
codon (aa 420) deleted in some AROM mRNAs is indicated by a
large inversed triangle. Serine/arginine (SR) or
serine/lysine (SK) doublets are noted in large
letters. Cysteine residues are circled.
|
|
We screened one gene data base (GenBankTM) and an EST data
base (Merck-washed EST project). We identified EST sequences
corresponding to the human (EST, AA251058) and mouse (EST, AA139022)
counterparts of the rat AROM gene. BAC clones bearing
sequences of the human AROM gene were also spotted.
Individual cDNA or genomic clones were queried and
sequenced.2 Exon-intron
junctions of the AROM gene were sequenced and found at
similar positions in rat, mouse, and human genomic DNAs. By combining
all these sequence data, a map of the exon-intron organization of the
AROM gene can be proposed. The rat AROM gene
illustrated in Fig. 2A spans about 34 kb, contains at least
12 exons, and encodes a large spectrum of RNA molecules, some with
putative protein-coding portions and others likely uncoding transcripts (Fig. 2B). Two putative cap sites based on RACE experiments
were located in the 5' end of the AROM gene upstream of the
largest open reading frame, and they were designated CS1 and CS2.
Transcription of short uncoding RNAs may be initiated at the potential
internal cap sites named CS3, CS4, and CS5, respectively. Three
polyadenylation sites were mapped in exon 12 of the AROM
gene, i.e. in the opposite part of intron A and of the
regulatory sequences of the MCH gene.
Alternative splicing of exons of the AROM gene produces at
least four distinct RNA species that may potentially encode proteins. An exon 3-spliced transcript of about 4.0 kb in length encodes a
putative protein of 573 amino acids (aa) designated AROM-p64 which
corresponds to the largest protein that could be generated from the
AROM gene according to our present data (Figs. 2B
and 3). The ATG initiation codon of AROM-p64 fits perfectly with the consensus motif (24). Further RT-PCR analyses indicated that polyadenylation site 3 of the AROM gene was associated with
the AROM-p64 transcript. Skipping of exons 3 and 11 results in a
truncated version of AROM-p64, named AROM-p50, with a different C
terminus due to an open reading frameshift (Figs. 2B and
3). Insertion of exon 3 in one AROM gene transcript
introduces a stop codon shortly after the initiation codon of AROM-p64
and leads to the production of a potential 7-kDa protein (Fig.
2B). However, several translational initiation codons, with
favorable Kozak's sequence context, are found in the same reading
frame as AROM-p64. Therefore, a putative protein named AROM-p54
may initiate at a downstream ATG codon then the one used to produce the
AROM-p64 and appears identical to AROM-p64 for the remaining part (Fig.
2B). Finally, transcripts that initiate at the putative CS2
would allow the synthesis of a protein named AROM-p17, identical to the
C terminus of AROM-p64 (Fig. 2B). Sequence analysis of rare
RACE products revealed also the sporadic deletion of codon CAG at
position 1357 in some AROM-p64 mRNA due to alternative splicing
(inversed open arrowhead, Fig. 3). It was not possible to
assign precise polyadenylation sites to AROM-p50 mRNA, AROM-p54
mRNA, and AROM-p17 mRNA.
In addition to the coding AROM mRNAs, we found a class of three
putative antisense RNAs overlapping mainly the coding portion of the
MCH gene and starting at cap sites CS3, CS4, and CS5,
respectively (Fig. 2B). It is worth noting that the overt
expression of these unspliced and uncoding transcripts remains at this
stage hypothetical. Indeed, we cannot exclude artifactual pausing of
the reverse transcriptases during synthesis of the large cDNA
products that share with the short unspliced RNA the same sequences in
their 3' end parts. It was also not possible to assign a precise
polyadenylation site to these individual RNAs.
The AROM p64 and Related Proteins Displayed Sequence Similarities
with DNA/RNA-binding Proteins--
Sequence analyses, using the
PS0RTII computer program, indicate that AROM-p64 lacks a peptide signal
and/or transmembrane domain but is likely to be a nuclear protein
(prediction at 52.2% in the k-NN test). Consistent with this
hypothesis, a leucine zipper-like motif was found conserved among
mouse, rat, and human AROM-p64 at residues 240-272 (Fig.
4, A and C). This
segment of the AROM-p64 could exist in an -helical conformation.
According to the leucine-zipper model (25), one side of the
hypothetical helix is composed of hydrophobic residues (three leucines
and one isoleucine), and the other appears rich in amino acids with charged and uncharged polar side chains (data not shown).

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Representation of the domain
organization of AROM-p64 and sequence comparisons. A,
exons are noted as in Fig. 3, A and B. Domains
and structural features sharing homology with known proteins are
indicated in the N-terminal and C-terminal parts. B,
comparison of human (h) AROM-p64 and rat (r)
AROM-p64 with the core of the consensus RRM (28). X, any
residue; U, uncharged residues; Z, U + S,
T. The positions of conserved residues are highlighted
by gray shading. Black shading corresponds to strongly
conserved residues in SR proteins. The RNP-1 and RNP-2 submotifs are
indicated. Brackets for loop 2 and loop 4 underlined the absence of consensus using a Chou and
Fasman's secondary structure model. C, partial alignment of
human (h) AROM-p64, mouse (m) AROM-p64 and rat
(r) AROM-p64 sequences and selected bacterial helicases.
Full identities are indicated in dark shading. Gray
shading represents conservative substitutions. The consensus
leucine-like motif is indicated by asterisks on AROM-p64,
and it is shown below the alignment. , gaps.
|
|
Another intriguing aspect in the N terminus sequence of AROM-p64 was
the presence of an RNA recognition motif (RRM). This RRM consists of a
1- 1- 2- 3- 2- 4 structure with two submotifs designated
RNP-1 and RNP-2, highly conserved among RNA-binding proteins (26, 27)
(Fig. 4B). The sequence between aa 188-290 of rat or human
AROM-p64 fitted quite well with the consensus RRM structural core
sequence. In particular, the most obvious signature for canonical RRM,
i.e. the RNP-1 submotif, was fairly well conserved in
AROM-p64 (Fig. 4B). However, sequence alignments displayed
major differences with other RRM in the 1 and loop 3 domains which
appeared longest in AROM-p64 and in loop 2 and loop 4 which were not
identified based on Chou and Fasman analysis (not shown).
Interestingly, several charged (lysine or arginine) and serine residues
were located at the C terminus. In particular 9 SK/SR doublets were
found between residues 390 and 510 (large letters in
bold, Fig. 3). The presence of a C-terminal RS-like domain together with an N-terminal RRM suggest that AROM-p64 and related proteins may be new members of the splicing factor family (28).
Finally, we revealed 30% sequence identities (58% sequence
similarities) between a central portion of the mammalian AROM-p64 with
a domain of bacterial helicases (Fig. 4C). Highly
conserved motifs "U(S/A)YLXLUUNX2(N/D)D(L/A)AU" and
"(I/V)(L/V)N(T/I)PXRG(L/I)G" (U = uncharged residues) were found in
AROM-p64 and helicases. However, comparison of the AROM-p64 sequence
with the bacterial or mammalian helicase family did not reveal other
regions of homology. In particular, AROM-p64 failed to possess the
seven amino acid motifs that are shared by all DNA/RNA helicases
(reviewed in Refs. 29 and 30).
Tissue-specific Expression of the Rat AROM Gene--
Distribution
of AROM mRNAs in adult rat organs was examined first by RT-PCR,
using oligo(dT) for reverse transcription and primer 26 or 24 as a
forward primer and primer 16 as a reward primer (Fig.
5, A and B and
Table I). The highest levels of
AROM gene transcripts were found in testis and then in the
gastrointestinal tract (jejunum, ileum, and colon) and immune tissues
(spleen and thymus). Weak expression was also found in the lung,
kidney, pituitary gland, and muscle. In sharp contrast, AROM mRNAs
were apparently missing in the rat hypothalamus, where the
MCH gene is actively expressed (31), and in peripheral
tissues such as the heart and liver. By using the specific primer RMCH
9 to perform reverse transcription and 16/26 primers for the PCR (Fig.
5A), we observed a pattern identical to this shown in Fig.
5B (bottom panel), demonstrating that we
characterized overt antisense MCH RNAs (not shown). Sequence analysis
revealed that the major RT-PCR product of 1300 bp found with the 16/26
primers corresponded to AROM-p64
mRNA.3

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Expression pattern of AROM mRNAs in rat
tissues. A, schematic representation of the
MCH and AROM genes with oligonucleotides used in
RT-PCR experiments. B, tissue-specific expression of AROM
mRNAs. RNA samples from various adult rat organs and PC12 cells (as
control) were reverse-transcribed with oligo(dT) or RMCH9 primer and
amplified with primers 16 and 24 or 26. The amplified products were
separated electrophoretically, bound to Hybond N membrane, and
hybridized with an AROM cDNA probe. ,
non-reverse-transcribed sample; +, reverse-transcribed
sample. The lengths of the major RT-PCR products are noted on the
left. C, comparison of the AROM mRNA transcript
expression in PC12 and adult rat testis. Amplifications were performed
as in A with sets of primers as indicated.
|
|
The patterns of expression of the AROM mRNAs was compared next in
the rat testis and PC12 cells using primer 24 as a forward primer and a
set of primers selected at different locations in exon 12 of the
AROM gene (see Fig. 5A). As shown in Fig.
5C, the expression of AROM gene transcripts
appeared quite similar in PC12 cells and rat testis. However, when
primers located downstream from polyadenylation sites 1 and 2 were
used, the pattern was clearly distinct, and the lengths of RT-PCR
products indicate multiple processing events between exon 11 and the 3'
end of exon 12 of the AROM gene (right panel,
Fig. 5C). This suggests a differential regulation of poly(A)
3-site-containing AROM mRNA synthesis/splicing in the PC12 cells
and rat testis.
Expression of AROM Proteins in Baculovirus-infected Sf9
Cells, Adult Rat Testis, and PC12 or HeLa Cells--
To obtain
antibodies that allowed selective recognition of the N- and C-terminal
parts of AROM-p64 and related proteins, PCR products encoding predicted
rat AROM-p50 and AROM-p17 (see Fig. 2B) were individually
subcloned into the E. coli expression vector pGEX-3, and the
fusion proteins were injected in rabbits for immunization. The
resulting polyclonal antisera were named Ol 72 for Ab specific to
AROM-p50 (sharing the same N terminus with AROM-p64) and Ha 43 for Ab
detecting AROM-p17 (identical to the C-terminal part of AROM-p64 but
not AROM-p50).
PCR products encoding the predicted mouse AROM-p64 and rat AROM-p50
were subcloned into the baculovirus expression vector pVL, and
Sf9 cells were infected with the recombinant virus. Protein extracts from the infected Sf9 cells were analyzed by Western blotting using Ol 72 Ab or Ha 43 Ab (Fig.
6A). Ol 72 Ab recognized a
major band of 50 kDa and a weak band of 64 kDa (black
arrowheads) in Sf9 cells expressing, respectively, AROM-p50
(lane p-50) and AROM-p64 (lane p64). Two minor
bands were also identified in the lane p64 (white
arrowheads in Fig. 6, A-D) and could either represent degradation products of AROM-p64, translational products of the AROM-p64 initiated at downstream initiation sites, or unrelated proteins carrying epitopes recognized by Ol 72 Ab. Ha 43 Ab detected also the 64-kDa protein in infected Sf9 cells. As expected,
AROM-p50 was not revealed with Ha 43 Ab (left panel, lane
p50), but multiple proteins were detected in both protein extracts
(lanes p64 and p50), indicating that epitopes
recognized by Ha 43 Ab are shared by proteins expressed by infected
Sf9 cells.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Western blot analysis of AROM proteins.
A, antisera raised against AROM-p50 (Ol 72 Ab; 1:1000 final)
and AROM-p17 (Ha 43 Ab; 1:500 final) were used to probe Western blots
containing 4 µg of protein extract from AROM-p64 (lane
p64) or AROM-p50 (lane p50) expressing Sf9
cells. B, 10 µg of AROM-p64 expressed in Sf9 cells
and 40 µg of proteins extracted from adult rat testis (lane
testis) or PC12 cells (PC12T) were analyzed by
Western blotting. C, subcellular distribution of AROM
proteins in PC12 cells. Immunoblotting with Ol 72 Ab or Ha 43 Ab was
performed as in A with 40 µg of protein extracts.
PC12N, nuclear proteins; PC12C,
cytoplasmic proteins. D, nuclear localization of AROM
proteins in HeLa cells. 10 µg of AROM-p64 extracted from Sf9
cells and 50 µg of nuclear extract of HeLa cells were loaded, and
Western blot analysis was carried out like in A. The
black arrowheads indicate the 64- and 50-kDa protein.
The white arrowheads correspond to proteins found with Ol 72 Ab in cellular models and tissues expressing AROM-p64 protein.
|
|
Western blot analysis was performed with whole cell extracts of
unstimulated PC12 cells or adult rat testis (Fig. 6B). Ol 72 Ab identified the same 64-kDa protein in AROM-p64 expressing Sf9
cells (lane p64), rat testis (lane testis), and
PC12 cells (lane PC12T). Minor bands were revealed
in AROM-p64 expressing Sf9 cells and PC12 cells (white
arrowheads, Fig. 6B). Ha 43 Ab revealed the 64-kDa
protein in PC12 cells and, at a lowest level, in the rat testis.
Additional bands in the range of 50-120 kDa were found with this
antiserum in the rat testis, some of them being present in Sf9
cellular extract (lane p64).
Intracellular analysis of AROM protein expression in PC12 cells is
illustrated in Fig. 6C and Fig.
7. The Ol 72 Ab detected the 64-kDa
protein in majority in the cytoplasmic extract (lane PC12C). This protein was also found weakly expressed in a
nuclear extract (PC12N). The two minor bands found in
AROM-p64-expressed Sf9 cells were found in the nucleus
(lane PC12N).The same proteins were barely visible
with the Ha 43 Ab in a nuclear extract of PC12 cells (lane
PC12N, left panel). In agreement with the
Western blot data, predominant cytoplasmic staining was found by
immunohistochemistry analysis of PC12 cells with Ha 43 Ab (Fig.
7A) and Ol 72 Ab (Fig. 7C). As controls,
background signal was revealed with the preimmune serum (Fig.
7B) and strong expression of the tyrosine hydroxylase was
confined to the cytoplasm (Fig. 8D).

View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Subcellular localization of AROM
proteins. Unstimulated PC12 cells were grown on coverslips, and
immunostaining was performed with Ha43 Ab (A), a
preimmune serum (Pre-IS, B), Ol72 Ab
(C), and an anti-tyrosine hydroxylase Ab (TH Ab,
D). Note the staining of cytoplasms in A, C, and
D. Magnification, × 20.
|
|

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Time course of MCH and AROM mRNA
expression during NGF and lithium treatment. A,
Northern blot analysis. Two RNA samples (A and B,
20 µg/lane) from various times after NGF/lithium addition to PC12
cells were separated electrophoretically, bound to Hybond N filter, and
hybridized successively with MCH and GAPDH 32P-labeled
cDNA probes. Mature MCH mRNA and AROM gene
transcripts are indicated as in Fig. 1. B, RT-PCR analysis.
Total RNA samples (n = 4; two are shown in A
and B) were extracted from PC12 cells treated with
NGF/lithium, reverse-transcribed with oligo(dT), and amplified with the
primers noted on the left of the panels. The amplified
products were revealed with an MCH cDNA probe (upper
panel) or an AROM-specific cDNA probe (middle and
bottom panels). The lengths of the RT-PCR products are
indicated on the right. The non-reverse-transcribed samples
were all negative (not shown). C, Western blot analysis.
Protein extracts (n = 4; two are shown in A
and B) were isolated from PC12 cells treated with
NGF/lithium for the indicated times and loaded (40 µg/lane) on a 10%
SDS-PAGE gel. Immunoblot was carried out with Ol 72 Ab and then probed
again with MAPK Ab (K23 Ab, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Positions of
AROM proteins are indicated as in Fig. 6.
|
|
S100 nuclear extracts from HeLa cells provide a widely used system for
studying RNA-binding proteins and particularly SR-splicing proteins. To
characterize further AROM proteins in mammalian cells, we performed
immunoblot of a HeLa cell nuclear extract. The Ol 72 Ab identified two
bands of 64 (black arrowhead) and 55 kDa (white
arrowhead) in AROM-p64-expressing Sf9 cells (lane
p64) and in a nuclear extract of HeLa cells (lane
HeLaN, Fig. 7D). The same proteins as well as many
others were recognized by Ha 43 Ab. This demonstrate that AROM proteins
could be identified in the nucleus of HeLa cells.
Time Course of AROM and MCH Gene Expression in PC12
Cells--
Northern blot analysis with total RNAs of PC12 cells grown
for 0.5 to 24 h in the presence of NGF and lithium revealed a
reciprocal regulation of the 4.0-, 3.5-, and 1.4-kb antisense
MCH gene transcripts and MCH mRNA during the first
6 h of treatment (Fig. 8A). The 4.0/3.5-kb mRNAs
were transiently up-regulated at 1 h, became undetectable at
6 h (and 12 h; Fig. 1), and reached about the same levels as
in untreated cells at 24 h. The content of the 1.4-kb mRNA
decreased slightly during the first 6 h of NGF/lithium treatment
and was similar to this of control cells at 12 and 24 h.
Conversely, mature MCH mRNA was absent up to 3 h, clearly
visible at 6 h, and strongly expressed at 12 and 24 h. A
difference in the length of the poly(A) tail could account for the
higher size of MCH mRNA found at 6 h.4 As a control, GAPDH
mRNA level remains nearly the same during the time course treatment.
The expression of MCH and AROM mRNA was further examined by RT-PCR
using total RNA isolated from PC12 cells. These cells were different
than those used for Northern blot analysis but grown under the same NGF
and lithium conditions. The content of MCH mRNA was determined
using the RPCR4 and RPCR3 oligo primers (Fig. 5A).
AROM gene transcript levels were monitored using either 16 and 24 primers to identify all the spliced variant AROM mRNAs and
16 and 26 primers to reveal the mRNAs initiated before CS2, including these encoding AROM-p64 (Fig. 5A). As shown in
Fig. 8B, mature MCH mRNA (0.7 kb in length after RT-PCR)
was absent in untreated cells, and after 1 h it became clearly
expressed at 3 h, and the highest levels were found after 24 h. Conversely, AROM mRNA detected with 16/24 primers was found
highly expressed in untreated cells, decreased progressively to reach a
nadir at 6 h, and then increased at 24 h. After amplification
with the 16/26 primers, the AROM-p64 mRNA (band of 1.3 kb) and
AROM-p50 mRNA (band of 1.1 kb) displayed a pattern of expression
(Fig. 8B) quite similar to that observed for the 4.0- and
3.5-kb mRNA species identified on Northern blot (Fig.
8A). Indeed, these AROM mRNA were clearly found in
untreated cells, increased sharply at 1 h, decreased to become
undetectable (at 3 h) or sporadically expressed (at 6 h), and
rose at 24 h to levels similar to those found in untreated cells.
Western blot experiments were also performed with proteins extracted
from PC12 cells grown as those used for the RT-PCR analysis (Fig.
8C). Ol 72 Ab detected a major band corresponding to a
protein of apparent molecular mass 55 kDa, i.e. this was
predominantly found in nuclear extracts of PC12 cells or HeLa cells
(Fig. 6, C and D). The same band was also
recognized by Ha 43 Ab (data not shown) indicating that both N and C
terminus domains were carried by this protein. Interestingly, the
pattern of expression of this protein is consistent with that of the
AROM-p64/p50 mRNAs as follows: a rise at 1 h, a decrease at
3 h, and a high expression at 24 h. By using longer exposure
times, the band corresponding to AROM-p64 was barely visible in protein
extracts from unstimulated and 1 h-treated cells only (not shown). As a
control, ubiquitous mitogen-activated protein kinases (ERK1 and ERK2)
were found at similar levels during NGF/lithium stimulation of PC12
cells (Fig. 8C; MAPK Ab).
Taken together our results indicate a marked down-regulation of
AROM gene transcripts at the time of MCH mRNA induction
after NGF and lithium stimulation in PC12 cells. This apparent opposite regulation may also be associated with variation in the pattern of
expression of AROM proteins and/or intracellular distribution.
AROM-p64 Have Single Strand Nucleic Acid-binding
Properties--
To test first the hypothesis that AROM-p64 is a
DNA-binding protein, we performed binding assays with denatured calf
thymus ssDNA coupled to agarose or cellulose resin. Mouse AROM-p64 was produced in Sf9 cells using baculovirus infection. Crude pellet extracts were incubated at low ionic strength in two different buffers
(A and B; "Experimental Procedures") with ssDNA-coupled resin;
bound proteins were eluted with increasing KCl concentrations (0.2 to 1 M) to assess the binding strength, and AROM-p64 was revealed by SDS-PAGE using Ol 72 antiserum. About 65% of AROM-p64 binds strongly to ssDNA-cellulose (Fig.
9A, upper panel) or
ssDNA-agarose (Fig. 9B, middle panel) with either of binding
conditions (buffer A or B) used. AROM-p64 was found only by adding
0.2-0.8 M KCl to the cellulose resin and up to 1 M KCl to the DNA-agarose. The protein was still eluted
between 0.4 and 1 M KCl after up to four washing steps with
0.1 M KCl (Fig. 9A). Furthermore, BT solution was applied to a new DNA-agarose column, and elution was performed with
washing steps (bottom panel). The pattern was identical to that found with the initial binding solution (upper panel),
suggesting that active AROM-p64 was still present in the BT solution
and that binding of AROM-p64 to the DNA-agarose reached an
equilibrium.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
ssDNA-cellulose/agarose chromatography of
AROM-p64. A, AROM-p64 binds to ssDNA in a
salt-resistant manner. Recombinant mouse AROM-p64 was produced in
baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells and extracted as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The protein extract was applied to the
ssDNA resin beads at 100 mM KCl and eluted stepwise with
increasing KCl concentrations (0.2-1 M). AROM-p64 was
detected by Western blot with Ol 72 Ab. 1:10 of the supernatant before
elution is shown in the lane marked BT. 1:7.5 of the eluted
material was loaded. The binding experiment shown on the 3rd
panel included four 0.1 KCl wash steps before elution (+ washes). BT sample shown in this experiment was applied to
ssDNA-agarose column and DNA-binding assay was performed (2nd binding).
B, specific binding of AROM-p64 to ssDNA resins. Competition
with denatured calf thymus DNA was performed with AROM-p64 (top
panel), AROM-p50 (middle panel), or MGOP (bottom
panel) expressed in baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells. The
binding assay and salt elution were performed as described in
A. Western blots were carried out with Ol 72 Ab (to detect
AROM-p64 and AROM-p50) or KM125 antiserum (to detect MGOP (32).
|
|
Binding specificity was assessed by performing the binding reaction in
the presence of calf thymus DNA competitor. Under this condition
AROM-p64 was not detected at any KCl elution steps nor in the final
protein extraction from beads, indicating full competition with the
calf thymus DNA (upper panel, Fig. 9B).
Surprisingly, AROM-p50 produced in Sf9 cells did not display any
binding activity to ssDNA-agarose resin (middle panel, Fig.
9B). Unfortunately, AROM-p17 could not be synthesized in the
Sf9 cellular model. As a negative control, a secreted protein
named MGOP (32) was produced in Sf9 cells, extracted, and tested
under the same conditions as AROM proteins. This protein did not bind
to ssDNA-agarose (Fig. 9B, bottom panel). These results
supported the view that AROM-p64 selectively recognized single-stranded
DNA in vitro.
To characterize further the nucleic acid-binding properties of
AROM-p64, we tested the bindings of recombinant proteins produced by
Sf9 cells to ribonucleotide homopolymers conjugated to agarose or Sepharose beads. As shown in Fig.
10A, AROM-p64 binds to RNA homopolymers with various affinities showing a relative selectivity for
poly(A). The resistance of AROM-p64-poly(A) interaction up to 0.6-0.8
M KCl concentration (Fig. 10, A and
B) and association of AROM-p64 to poly(A), poly(G), and to a
lesser extend to poly(C) beads suggested that hydrophobic contacts
could be involved in this complex formation. Furthermore, heparin at 1 mg/ml was a full competitor for binding of AROM-p64 to poly(A), whereas
tRNA was not. This suggests that retention of AROM-p64 to poly(A)
results also to interactions to the polyphosphate backbone.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
RNA binding activity of AROM-p64.
(A) AROM-p64 produced by baculovirus systems was
incubated with each ribonucleotide homopolymers in buffer containing
100 mM KCl and eluted under increasing KCl concentrations
(0.2-1 M) after a four washing step in binding
buffer. The eluted proteins were analyzed by Western blot as
described in Fig. 9. B, effect of ionic strength on
AROM-p64/poly(A) homopolymer interactions. The binding assay and
immunoblotting were performed as in A. C, competition
experiments. Recombinant AROM-p64 was mixed with poly(A)-agarose beads
in presence of heparin or tRNA (1 mg/ml) and elution was carried with
0.8 M KCl. Western blot analysis as in A.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have identified a new gene named AROM that appears
to be encoded by the opposite strand at the same locus as the
MCH gene. In PC12 cells, two classes of AROM gene
transcripts can be distinguished on the basis of the RACE-PCR
experiments as follows: 1) potential unspliced RNAs complementary to
the exonic-intronic regions of the MCH gene, but RNase
protection analyses are required to confirm the locations of the
corresponding putative cap sites; 2) multiple spliced variant RNAs,
mainly complementary to the 3'-flanking part of the MCH gene
and encoding new DNA/RNA-binding proteins. Antisense transcription of
the MCH gene was originally reported in rat gut (33) and
human hypothalamus (34). However, in both cases only spliced RNAs
complementary to the coding regions of the MCH gene were
reported. This suggests that additional antisense MCH RNAs may be
produced in vivo and remain to be characterized.
The results showing that the large transcripts hybridizing to MCH
cDNA probe correspond to antisense MCH RNAs supported our previous
data (16) suggesting a post-transcriptional regulation of the
MCH gene following a NGF/lithium treatment of PC12 cells. Indeed, an unexpected rise in MCH mRNA content was observed when a
transcriptional inhibitor was applied to PC12 cells treated with
NGF/lithium for 24 h, i.e. at a time when MCH mRNA
begun to decrease and AROM 4.0/3.5-kb RNAs reciprocally increased (16, 17). Functional relationship between the MCH and the
AROM genes is strengthened by the time course studies of the
NGF/lithium treatment in PC12 cells which demonstrated a reciprocal
relationship between MCH/AROM mRNA (and protein) expressions at the
time of MCH mRNA induction (Fig. 8). Interestingly, the largest
AROM gene transcripts were totally absent at the time of
induction and maximum expression of the MCH mRNA, i.e. 3 and 12 h, respectively, after NGF/lithium stimulation of PC12
cells (Figs. 1B and 8B). Therefore, it is
tempting to speculate that transcriptional shut down of antisense MCH
RNA synthesis may lead to an increase in MCH mRNA stability.
Alternatively, the ratio of sense to antisense RNA may be the
"sensing indicator," and transcriptional activation of the
MCH gene upon NGF/lithium stimulation would overcome the inhibitory effects of antisense RNAs. Formation of sense/antisense RNA
complexes may induce base modifications and subsequent degradation as
illustrated in the case of the basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)
transcript during maturation of the Xenopus oocytes (35) or
as recently suggested for the human PCNA gene (36). However, we do not yet have any evidence of the interaction of the sense and
antisense MCH RNAs. Alternatively, the translation products of the
AROM gene may be involved in the regulations of production and/or stability of the MCH mRNA.
The most striking aspect of our work is the demonstration that some of
the AROM RNAs encoded a family of new proteins generated by alternative
splicing. It is worth noting that the coding part of the
AROM gene identified so far does not overlap with the coding part of the MCH gene (see Fig. 3A). However, both
genes are physically linked on human chromosome 12q23,2
indicating that the protein-encoding AROM gene mRNAs are
not generated by a trans-splicing mechanism. Based on the RACE-PCR and
RT-PCR experiments, at least four transcripts that may encode AROM-p64,
AROM-p54, AROM-p50 and AROM-p17, respectively, were found in PC12 cells
and in the rat tissues (see Figs. 2 and 5B). The
translational capabilities of AROM-p64 and AROM-p50 mRNAs were
further confirmed by translation experiments using recombinant baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells and in cell-free
systems.4
The AROM proteins convey, or not according to the extent of overlapping
with AROM-p64, two distinct putative domains as follows: a putative
RNA/DNA binding domain located at the N terminus and an SR/SK-rich
domain located at the C terminus. The SR/SK-rich domain was rather
suggestive that AROM-p64 and derived AROM proteins sharing this domain
could belong to the superfamily of splicing or spliceosome-associated
factors (28, 37). AROM-p64 and other putative AROM proteins were found
in HeLa cell nuclear extracts (see Fig. 6D). Preliminary
experiments using these extracts immuno-depleted with Ol 72 Ab or Ha 43 Ab did not reveal any effects on in vitro splicing of
-globin RNA precursor.5
This suggests that AROM proteins found in the nucleus of HeLa cells are
not essential for constitutive splicing. However, this does not
preclude a role for these proteins in splicing of restricted pre-mRNA substrates. Interestingly, SR motifs were also found in
the C-terminal domain of AROM-p50 but embedded within a distinct C
terminus (see Fig. 3). Divergence of the SR/SK domain between AROM-p64
and AROM-p50 might modify the protein-protein interaction properties
with other factors containing the same motifs as documented previously
(37). It is worth noting that the number of the canonical SR pairs of
amino acids remains low in AROM-p64 or AROM-p50 (3 out of 9 serine/basic residues repeats) and are rather scattered along the
C-terminal part. Accordingly, none of these proteins produced in
baculovirus systems were detected by monoclonal antibody 104 on Western
blots (data not shown). This antiserum cross-reacts with the
phosphorylated forms of the SR proteins (38), excepted the ones that
carry few SR repeats (39).
Another notable feature of SR proteins is the N-terminal RNP-type RRM
(26). A region reminiscent of that domain was identified between
residues 188 and 290 of AROM-p64 and spliced product homologues (Fig.
4B). The residues critical for structure (in general buried hydrophobic amino acids) were highly conserved in RNP-1 and RNP-2 motifs. Strong conservation was also noted at the RRM Phe56
residues in RNP-1 (counterpart of the Phe254 of AROM-p64)
which appears essential for RNA binding (26). On the contrary, other
exposed residues important for the functional specificity of the SR
proteins were rather divergent (for instance, aromatic residues present
in RNP-2). These and other differences in the lengths of the
-helices and -turns of the AROM proteins might be crucial for the
RNA binding or protein-protein interaction selectivity.
In addition to structural relationship with RNA-binding proteins,
a conserved pattern identified in bacterial DNA/RNA helicases and a
putative leucine-zipper motif were found adjacent to the central region
of AROM-p64 (see Fig. 4, A and C). The region of sequence identity with the helicases falls in a space of variable length between motifs IV and V of bacterial superfamily II helicases (reviewed in Ref. 40). The functional importance of this helicase domain is not currently known. The effect of point amino acid substitutions in the sequence
403DDAAFER409 of the bacterial helicase
UvrD (see Fig. 4C) leads to modification in the unwinding
activity (41). However, AROM-p64 and derived proteins lack the seven
conserved motifs shared by all helicases and particularly the A and B
motifs of the Walker-type NTP-binding pattern required for NTPase
activity (40). Therefore, it is unlikely that the AROM proteins
function as genuine helicases. Conceivably, structural similarity may
be related to the RNA/DNA-binding properties of helicases.
Therefore, AROM-p64 contains some of the typical features of DNA/RNA
binding factors. In agreement with this hypothesis, we showed that
AROM-p64 produced in infected Sf9 cells may interact with ssDNA
and RNA homopolymers with some selectivity for poly(A). Ionic contacts
at the base level (dissociation from ssDNA and poly(A) columns at
0.6-0.8 M KCl) as well as hydrophobic interactions (resistance of protein/RNA interactions at high ionic strength) and
electrostatic interactions (sensitivity to heparin competitor) with the
polyphosphate backbone participate with the AROM-p64/ssDNA/RNA binding.
However, we cannot completely rule out that AROM-p64 is retained on the
ssDNA and RNA column indirectly because of strong interaction with a
true nucleic acid-binding protein present in the infected Sf9
cells. This should be solved by using NorthWestern analysis with
purified AROM-p64. Furthermore, recombinant AROM-p50 did not bind to
either ssDNA (Fig. 9C) or RNA homopolymer
columns.2 In addition, co-incubation of AROM-p64 and
AROM-p50 did not modify the binding of AROM-p64 to poly(A) column (not
shown). This indicates that the putative RRM/DNA binding domain shared
by AROM-p64 and AROM-p50 is not essential for binding activity and that
the highly charged C-terminal part of AROM-p64 could be responsible for
the protein-nucleic acid interactions. This needs to be addressed now
using AROM-p64 deletion constructs.
Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry demonstrated that
AROM-p64 and other AROM proteins are mainly localized into the
cytoplasm of unstimulated PC12 cells. However, these proteins could be
also found in the nucleus of PC12 cells and HeLa cells. Although
canonical nuclear localization or export motifs were not identified in
AROM-p64, a very basic sequence in the C-terminal part (aa 494-525)
and a hydrophobic leucine-rich sequence in the N-terminal part (aa
70-80) could function as nuclear localization and nuclear export
signal, respectively. Interestingly, a shift between two
isoforms of AROM proteins, AROM-p64 and a putative nuclear-specific
AROM protein, was found in PC12 cells following NGF/lithium treatment
(see Fig. 8C). It is tempting to speculate that a balance
between AROM protein variants, differentially distributed in the
nucleus or cytoplasm, could direct changes in RNA metabolism, transport, or stability associated with differentiation of PC12 cells.
There are now a number of examples of bidirectionally transcribed
eukaryotic genes for which a function has been proposed (42). Different
classes of antisense RNAs can be defined. 1) Antisense RNAs that
regulate the level of the complementary RNA in forming hybrid and
inducing RNA editing and degradation processes. The most studied models
are the antisense bFGF gene in Xenopus (35) and the rat bFGF
antisense gene which encoded also a novel protein with sequence
identity to the MutT gene products (43). 2) Non-coding antisense RNAs
that may inhibit splicing of the complementary DNA by base pairing, as
illustrated by the rat erb 65 locus (44) and as
proposed for the short antisense RNA overlapping the exon 1-intron 1 junction of the human PCNA gene (36). 3) Antisense RNAs may
compose coding sequences that apparently are unrelated to the proteins
encoded by the sense gene transcripts. Indeed, a pupal cuticle protein
is located within the intron of the Gart gene, encoding
purine pathway enzymes in Drosophila melanogaster (45). 4)
Antisense RNAs may encode proteins, with structural or functional
relationships with the polypeptide coded by the sense transcripts. For
instance, the N-cym gene can produce a basic helix-loop
helix transcriptional factor like the complementary N-myc
gene (46). Another example is the PR264/SC35 splicing factor that could
participate in the trans-splicing of its complementary exon of
thymic RNA sequence and the c-myb mRNA in avian thymic cells (47).
To our knowledge, the simultaneous expression of non-coding unspliced
RNA complementary to a coding gene and coding spliced variant RNAs
partially overlapping the sense gene has not been described previously.
In addition the MCH/AROM gene system represents a
rather rare example of overt reciprocal expression in a cellular model
(see Fig. 8) and also in developing
tissues.3 Formation of a
double-stranded structure by the complementary MCH RNAs could inhibit
the MCH mRNA production at the level of RNA processing and/or
stability. Furthermore, we proposed that AROM proteins could control
gene transcript production (including MCH mRNA) either at the level
of transcription if AROM-p64 and derivatives are DNA-binding proteins
or at the level of post-transcriptional processing, transport, and
stability if these proteins are mRNA-binding factors as suggested
by our presented data.
Recently, MCH-deficient (MCH / ) mice were produced by
homologous recombination and exhibited striking reduction of body
weight due to hypophagia and increased metabolic rate (11). The
phenotypes of MCH / mice were attributed to the absence
of the orexigenic MCH peptide. However, these mice carried a
PGK-neor cassette instead of the region encompassing the
exons I-III of the MCH gene. It is now of obvious interest
to determine whether the presence of the PGK-neor and/or
deletion in the putative 3' end-untranslated region of the AROM
mRNAs results in any changes of AROM gene expression associated with modifications of feeding behavior (and other functions) in the MCH / mice.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. J. Marie (Centre de
Génétique Moléculaire, Gif-sur-Yvette, France), W. Ferlin (Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire,
Valbonne, France), and E. Lalli (Institut de Génétique et
de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Strasbourg, France) for
helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We also
thank J. Spinardi (Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et
Cellulaire, Valbonne, France) for providing help in RT-PCR and
Western blot experiments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the MENRT Grant 95G0099,
the "Association Française Contre les Myopathies" (AFM) Grant ASI 1996-1998, and by the CNRS.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF303035.
Recipient of a "Ministère de l'Education Nationale"
Fellowship Allocation 1996-1999 and is presently supported by the
"Association pour la Recherche Contre le Cancer" (ARC 2000).
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33 493 95 77 53;
Fax: 33 493 95 77 08; E-mail: nahonjl@ipmc.cnrs.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 26, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006524200
2
L. Borsu , A. Courseaux, J. Grosgeorge,
and J.-L. Nahon, manuscript in preparation.
3
F. Presse, L. Borsu, and J.-L. Nahon, manuscript
in preparation.
4
L. Borsu, F. Presse, and J.-L. Nahon,
unpublished data.
5
L. Borsu and J. Marie, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MCH, melanin-concentrating hormone;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA
ends;
RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction;
ssDNA, single-stranded DNA;
AROM, antisense-RNA-overlapping-MCH gene;
kb, kilobase pair;
NGF, nerve growth factor;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
TBS, Tris-buffered
saline;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
EST, expressed
sequence tag;
aa, amino acid(s);
Ab, antibody;
Ha, hemagglutinin;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
RRM, RNA recognition motif;
RNP, ribonucleoprotein;
bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kawauchi, H.,
Kawazoe, I.,
Tsubokawa, M.,
Kishida, M.,
and Baker, B. I.
(1983)
Nature
305,
321-323
|
| 2.
|
Vaughan, J. M.,
Fischer, W. H.,
Hoeger, C.,
Rivier, J.,
and Vale, W.
(1989)
Endocrinology
125,
1660-1665
|
| 3.
|
Skofitsch, G.,
Jacobowitz, D. M.,
and Zamir, N.
(1985)
Brain Res. Bull.
15,
635-649
|
| 4.
|
Bresson, J. L.,
Clavequin, M. C.,
Fellmann, D.,
and Bugnon, C.
(1989)
Neurosci. Lett.
102,
39-43
|
| 5.
|
Bittencourt, J. C.,
Presse, F.,
Arias, C.,
Peto, C.,
Vaughan, J.,
Nahon, J. L.,
Vale, W.,
and Sawchenko, P. E.
(1992)
J. Comp. Neurol.
319,
218-245
|
| 6.
|
Baker, B. B.
(1994)
Trends Endocrinol. Metab.
5,
120-126
|
| 7.
|
Nahon, J. L.
(1994)
Crit. Rev. Neurobiol.
8,
221-262
|
| 8.
|
Presse, F.,
Sorokovsky, I.,
Max, J. P.,
Nicolaidis, S.,
and Nahon, J. L.
(1996)
Neuroscience
71,
735-745
|
| 9.
|
Qu, D.,
Ludwig, D. S.,
Gammeltoft, S.,
Piper, M.,
Pelleymounter, M. A.,
Cullen, M. J.,
Mathes, W. F.,
Przupek, J.,
Kanarek, R.,
and Maratos-Flier, E.
(1996)
Nature
380,
243-247
|
| 10.
|
Rossi, M.,
Choi, S. J.,
O'Shea, D.,
Miyoshi, T.,
Ghatei, M. A.,
and Bloom, S. R.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
351-355
|
| 11.
|
Shimada, M.,
Tritos, N. A.,
Lowell, B. B.,
Flier, J. S.,
and Maratos-Flier, E.
(1998)
Nature
396,
670-674
|
| 12.
|
Thompson, R. C.,
and Watson, S. J.
(1990)
DNA Cell Biol.
9,
637-645
|
| 13.
|
Breton, C.,
Presse, F.,
Hervieu, G.,
and Nahon, J. L.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
4,
271-284
|
| 14.
|
Breton, C.,
Schorpp, M.,
and Nahon, J. L.
(1993)
Mol. Brain. Res.
18,
297-310
|
| 15.
|
Viale, A.,
Ortola, C.,
Richard, F.,
Vernier, P.,
Presse, F.,
Schilling, S.,
Dutrillaux, B.,
and Nahon, J. L.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
15,
196-214
|
| 16.
|
Presse, F.,
Cardona, B.,
Borsu, L.,
and Nahon, J. L.
(1997)
Mol. Brain Res.
52,
270-283
|
| 17.
|
Presse, F.,
Borsu, L.,
Cardona, B.,
and Nahon, J. L.
(1997)
in
MCH and Seizures: Neuromolecular and Neuroendocrine Aspects
(Pretel, S., ed)
, pp. 31-42, Research Signpost, Trivandrum, India
|
| 18.
|
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159
|
| 19.
|
Nahon, J. L.,
Presse, F.,
Bittencourt, J. C.,
Sawchenko, P.,
and Vale, W.
(1989)
Endocrinology
125,
2056-2065
|
| 20.
|
Grima, B.,
Lamouroux, A.,
Blanot, F.,
Faucon Biguet, N.,
and Mallet, J.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
617-621
|
| 21.
|
Dani, C.,
Blanchard, J. M.,
Piechaczyk, M.,
Sabouty, S. E.,
Marty, L.,
and Jeanteur, P.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
7046-7050
|
| 22.
|
Greenberg, M. E.,
and Ziff, E. B.
(1984)
Nature
311,
433-438
|
| 23.
|
Kadonaga, J. T.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
208,
10-23
|
| 24.
|
Kozak, M.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
887-903
|
| 25.
|
Landschulz, W. H.,
Johnson, P. F.,
and McKnight, S. L.
(1998)
Science
240,
1759-1764
|
| 26.
|
Kenan, D. J.,
Query, C. C.,
and Keene, J. D.
(1991)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
16,
214-220
|
| 27.
|
Burd, C. G.,
and Dreyfuss, G.
(1994)
Science
265,
615-621
|
| 28.
|
Birney, E.,
Kumar, S.,
and Krainer, A. R.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
5803-5816
|
| 29.
|
Ellis, N. A.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Genet. & Dev.
7,
354-363
|
| 30.
|
Schmid, S. R.,
and Linder, P.
(1992)
Mol. Microbiol.
6,
283-292
|
| 31.
|
Presse, F.,
and Nahon, J. L.
(1991)
in
Horizons in Endocrinology
(Maggi, M.
, and Geenen, V., eds), Vol. II
, pp. 241-250, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
|
| 32.
|
Toumaniantz, G.,
Bittencourt, J. C.,
and Nahon, J. L.
(1996)
Endocrinology
137,
4518-4521
|
| 33.
|
Hervieu, G.,
and Nahon, J. L.
(1995)
Neuroendocrinology
61,
348-364
|
| 34.
|
Miller, C. L.,
Burmeister, M.,
and Thompson, R. C.
(1998)
Brain Res.
803,
86-94
|
| 35.
|
Kimelman, D.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1989)
Cell
59,
687-696
|
| 36.
|
Tommasi, S.,
and Pfeifer, G. P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27829-27838
|
| 37.
|
Manley, J. L.,
and Tacke, R.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1569-1579
|
| 38.
|
Roth, M. B.,
Murphy, C.,
and Gall, J. G.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
2217-2223
|
| 39.
|
Soret, J.,
Gattoni, R.,
Guyon, C.,
Sureau, A.,
Popielarz, M.,
Le Rouzic, E.,
Dumon, S.,
Apiou, F.,
Dutrillaux, B.,
Voss, H.,
Ansorge, W.,
Stévenin, J.,
and Perbal, B.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4924-4934
|
| 40.
|
Gorbalenya, A. E.,
and Koonin, E. V.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
3,
419-429
|
| 41.
|
Zhang, G.,
Deng, E.,
Baugh, L.,
and Kushner, S. R.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
377-387
|
| 42.
|
Krystal, G. W.
(1992)
in
Gene Regulation: Biology of Antisense RNA and DNA
(Erickson, R. P.
, and Izant, J. G., eds)
, pp. 11-20, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
|
| 43.
|
Knee, R.,
Li, A. W.,
and Murphy, P. R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4943-4947
|
| 44.
|
Munroe, S. H.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22083-22086
|
| 45.
|
Henikoff, S.,
Keene, M. A.,
Fechtel, K.,
and Fristrom, J. W.
(1986)
Cell
44,
33-42
|
| 46.
|
Armstrong, B. C.,
and Krystal, G. W.
(1992)
Cell Growth Differ.
3,
385-390
|
| 47.
|
Vellard, M.,
Sureau, A.,
Soret, J.,
Martinerie, C.,
and Perbal, B.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
2511-2515
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Pissios, R. L. Bradley, and E. Maratos-Flier
Expanding the Scales: The Multiple Roles of MCH in Regulating Energy Balance and Other Biological Functions
Endocr. Rev.,
October 1, 2006;
27(6):
606 - 620.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Alon and J. M. Friedman
Late-Onset Leanness in Mice with Targeted Ablation of Melanin Concentrating Hormone Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
January 11, 2006;
26(2):
389 - 397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zhao, K. E. Pearson, D. A. Stephan, and P. Russell
Effects of Prostaglandin Analogues on Human Ciliary Muscle and Trabecular Meshwork Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
May 1, 2003;
44(5):
1945 - 1952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Marsh, D. T. Weingarth, D. E. Novi, H. Y. Chen, M. E. Trumbauer, A. S. Chen, X.-M. Guan, M. M. Jiang, Y. Feng, R. E. Camacho, et al.
Melanin-concentrating hormone 1 receptor-deficient mice are lean, hyperactive, and hyperphagic and have altered metabolism
PNAS,
February 20, 2002;
(2002)
52706899.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Courseaux and J.-L. Nahon
Birth of Two Chimeric Genes in the Hominidae Lineage
Science,
February 16, 2001;
291(5507):
1293 - 1297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Marsh, D. T. Weingarth, D. E. Novi, H. Y. Chen, M. E. Trumbauer, A. S. Chen, X.-M. Guan, M. M. Jiang, Y. Feng, R. E. Camacho, et al.
Melanin-concentrating hormone 1 receptor-deficient mice are lean, hyperactive, and hyperphagic and have altered metabolism
PNAS,
March 5, 2002;
99(5):
3240 - 3245.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|