Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001073200 on September 12, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 52, 40757-40764, December 29, 2000
Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER)-associated Degradation of
Misfolded N-Linked Glycoproteins Is Suppressed upon
Inhibition of ER Mannosidase I*
Fuminori
Tokunaga
,
Charles
Brostrom§,
Takehiko
Koide
, and
Peter
Arvan¶
From the
Department of Life Science, Himeji Institute
of Technology, Harima Science Garden City, Hyogo 678-1277, Japan, the § Department of Pharmacology, University of
Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey
08854, and the ¶ Division of Endocrinology, Department of
Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of
Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
Received for publication, February 9, 2000, and in revised form, September 6, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
To examine the role of early carbohydrate
recognition/trimming reactions in targeting endoplasmic reticulum
(ER)-retained, misfolded glycoproteins for ER-associated degradation
(ERAD), we have stably expressed the cog
thyroglobulin (Tg) mutant cDNA in Chinese hamster ovary cells. We
found that inhibitors of ER mannosidase I (but not other glycosidases)
acutely suppressed Cog Tg degradation and also perturbed the ERAD
process for Tg reduced with dithiothreitol as well as for
-carboxylation-deficient protein C expressed in
warfarin-treated baby hamster kidney cells. Kifunensine inhibition of
ER mannosidase I also suppressed ERAD in castanospermine-treated cells;
thus, suppression of ERAD does not require lectin-like binding of ER
chaperones calnexin and calreticulin to monoglucosylated
oligosaccharides. Notably, the undegraded protein fraction remained
completely microsome-associated. In pulse-chase studies,
kifunensine-sensitive degradation was still inhibitable even 1 h
after Tg synthesis. Intriguingly, chronic treatment with kifunensine
caused a 3-fold accumulation of Cog Tg in Chinese hamster ovary cells
and did not lead to significant induction of the ER unfolded protein
response. We hypothesize that, in a manner not requiring lectin-like
activity of calnexin/calreticulin, the recognition or processing of a
specific branched N-linked mannose structure enhances the
efficiency of glycoprotein retrotranslocation from the ER lumen.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Whether genetic or acquired, endoplasmic reticulum
(ER)1 storage diseases begin
with the synthesis of misfolded versions of exportable proteins within
the ER compartment (1). Generally, these proteins are retained in the
ER (2) pending targeting for ER-associated degradation (ERAD) (3), at
which point they are retrotranslocated to the cytosol (4, 5) and
degraded via the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway (6-8). For many
secretory proteins, the misfolded versions may enter the ER lumen
completely before a final cellular disposition is made (9-11). Thus,
it is not surprising that molecular chaperones acting in the ER lumen have been implicated as participants in the retention and ERAD processes. Of the ER chaperones proposed to function in targeting for
retrotranslocation and ERAD, calnexin has been the most often implicated (12-17). Other studies, however, have suggested that ERAD
is independent of calnexin or that association with calnexin actually
prevents ERAD (18-24).
The binding of calnexin (and calreticulin) to most exportable
substrates occurs via a lectin interaction that requires exposure of
monoglucosylated oligosaccharide side chains (25, 26). In normal
mammalian cells, this association is prevented by pretreatment with
castanospermine (CAS), an inhibitor of glucosidases I and II (21, 27,
28). By contrast, the calnexin interaction is enhanced in cells
pretreated with 1-deoxymannojirimycin (DMM), the general
-mannosidase inhibitor that prevents the formation of
Man5-7 glycans, which are less efficient substrates for monoglucosylation (29, 30) and may exhibit diminished calnexin-binding affinity (31). Using these inhibitors as well as other approaches, several groups have begun to explore the role of early carbohydrate trimming reactions in the targeting of ER-retained glycoproteins for
the ERAD process.
In particular, reports indicate that for yeast prepro-
-factor
expressed in mammalian cells (32), the Hong Kong null form of
1-antitrypsin (33), or the
-subunit of the T-cell
antigen receptor (34), treatment of cells with DMM results in marked inhibition of the ERAD process. In detailed studies of the Hong Kong
null form of
1-antitrypsin, when ERAD was inhibited by
cycloheximide treatment, calnexin dissociation and post-translational
oligosaccharide trimming were blocked; by contrast, when ERAD was
inhibited by DMM, the fraction of antitrypsin dissociated from calnexin
appeared normal, whereas mannose trimming was nevertheless blocked
(33). One simple interpretation of these data might be that ERAD
proceeds by a pathway (blocked at different points by different
inhibitors) that may involve calnexin dissociation, followed by
additional steps that include trimming to Man8. In such a
case, the ultimate targeting for retrotranslocation might be expected
to involve ER residents other than calnexin. However, in subsequent
provocative experiments using a C-terminally truncated mutant form of
1-antitrypsin, it was argued that a monoglucosylated
Man8 calnexin-bound form is the immediate precursor for
ERAD (35). Indeed, pretreatment of cells with CAS to prevent the
lectin-like calnexin association was reported to result in an ERAD
process for mutant antitrypsin that cannot be inhibited by DMM (33)
(nor even the proteasome inhibitor lactacystin (35)). This has led to a
hypothesis that rebinding to calnexin might be an essential step for
targeting misfolded N-linked glycoproteins for proteasomal proteolysis.
To test this hypothesis, we have now examined cell culture expression
of the cog thyroglobulin (Tg) mutant (a L2263P substitution in Tg that causes congenital goiter in homozygous mice) and
-carboxylation-deficient protein C, two misfolded
glycoproteins that serve as models of genetic and acquired ER storage
diseases, respectively (36, 37). As with mutant antitrypsin (38),
ERAD of both proteins is significantly impaired upon specific
inhibition of ER mannosidase I. However, in cells pretreated with CAS
so that lectin-like binding of calnexin is blocked, the ERAD process is
still proteasomal; moreover, it is still largely blocked upon
inhibition of ER mannosidase I. Although the data do not exclude
enhanced calnexin binding under specified experimental circumstances,
they signify a more general role for recognition and trimming of
specific N-linked mannose residues in the ERAD process for
at least a subset of glycoproteins.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Lactacystin was the generous gift of Dr. S. Omura
(Kitasato Institute, Tokyo, Japan). CAS, chloroquine, DMM, tunicamycin, N-acetyl-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-norleucinal,
and cycloheximide were from Sigma.
Benzyloxycarbonyl-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-leucinal
and E-64d
((L-3-trans-ethoxycarbonyloxirane-2-carbonyl)-L-leucine (3-methylbutyl)amide) were from The Peptide Institute (Osaka, Japan).
Kifunensine (KIF) was from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto,
Canada). 1,4-Dideoxy-1,4-imino-D-mannitol hydrochloride was
purchased from Oxford GlycoSciences (Abingdon, United Kingdom). Endoglycosidase H was from New England Biolabs Inc. (Beverly, MA).
Polyclonal rabbit antiserum against rat Tg was from Dr. P. R. Larsen (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA). Polyclonal antiserum against human protein C was developed as described previously (37). Polyclonal antisera to BiP, calnexin, ERp72, calreticulin, and
GRP94 were kindly provided by Dr. P. Kim (University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH). Polyclonal antibodies to protein-disulfide isomerase and ER60 were the kind gift of Dr. T. Wileman (Pirbright Laboratories, Surrey, United Kingdom). Polyclonal antiserum to
UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase was graciously provided by
Dr. A. Parodi (Fundacion Campomar, Buenos Aires, Argentina). Zysorbin
was from Zymed Laboratories Inc. (South San Francisco,
CA). [35S]Methionine/cysteine
(Expre35S35S) was from NEN Life Science
Products. Methionine/cysteine-deficient DMEM and other tissue culture
reagents, protease inhibitors, and stock chemicals were from Sigma.
Cell Culture, Cog Tg Transfection, and Selection of Stable
Tg-expressing Clones--
CHO and BHK cells were maintained in DMEM
containing 10% fetal bovine serum. The parental CHO cells employed
were the W5 line generously provided by Dr. P. Stanley (Albert Einstein
College of Medicine, Bronx, NY). The Cog Tg (L2263P)
cDNA (36) was subcloned into the pCB6 vector encoding neomycin
resistance and in which Tg expression is driven by the cytomegalovirus
immediate early promoter. CHO cells were transfected using calcium
phosphate precipitation. Transfectants were selected by growth in G418,
and clonal expression of Tg was screened by using
35S labeling, followed by Tg immunoprecipitation. The
stably transfected BHK cells expressing protein C have been described
previously (37).
Metabolic Labeling, Immunoprecipitation, and Gel
Electrophoresis--
For pulse-chase experiments, cells were starved
for 30 min in Met/Cys-free DMEM and 10% dialyzed fetal calf serum and
labeled with Expre35S35S at a concentration of
100-250 µCi/ml. At the end of the pulse-labeling period, the cells
were washed and chased with complete DMEM supplemented with Met/Cys.
Unless otherwise indicated, inhibitors of glycoprotein processing or
proteolysis were added 30 min before pulse labeling and
throughout the labeling and chase period. For long-term labeling to approach steady state, the cells were labeled for 2 or 3 days in
complete growth medium. In this case, when the cells were treated with
labeling medium containing a drug, the medium was changed each day, and
the same was done for control samples. At the end of each experiment,
the medium was collected, and cells were lysed in 0.1% SDS and 1%
Nonidet P-40 plus an anti-protease mixture (39). Samples were
immunoprecipitated using rabbit anti-rat Tg or anti-human protein C
antiserum, followed by 30 µl of Zysorbin. After washing, the
immunoprecipitates were dissociated by heating in SDS gel sample
buffer. After SDS-PAGE, radioactive band intensity was measured using a
Storm 850 PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.). In some instances,
autoradiographic exposures were made using Kodak XAR films at
80 °C.
Microsomal Sedimentation Assay--
CHO cells expressing Cog Tg
in 35-mm dishes were pulse-labeled and chased for 6 h. Then, the
cells were scraped into 400 µl of 50 mM Hepes buffer, pH
7.4, containing 0.25 M sucrose and protease inhibitors and
homogenized by 15 passages through a 27-gauge needle. Nuclei and
unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 1100 × g for 10 min, and post-nuclear supernatants were further
centrifuged at 50,000 rpm for 1 h in a Beckman TL-100 centrifuge.
Precipitates (representing the microsomal fraction) and supernatants
(representing the cytosolic fraction) were analyzed by
immunoprecipitation, SDS-PAGE, and phosphorimaging.
 |
RESULTS |
Degradation of Cog Tg by CHO Cells--
To further explore the
ERAD process, we stably expressed the cog Tg cDNA, which
encodes the mouse Tg L2263P mutant, in CHO cells. As in COS cells (36),
the Cog Tg protein was not secreted into the medium (Fig.
1A). Instead, after a 30-min
pulse labeling with 35S-labeled amino acids, following a
lag time of ~2 h during which no degradation was apparent, newly
synthesized Cog Tg thereafter was degraded with a subsequent half-time
of 2-3 h (Fig. 1B). Based on this, recovery of Cog Tg at
the 1-h chase time was generally taken as a reference point for most
subsequent experiments. At all chase times, the undegraded
intracellular Tg remaining was sensitive to digestion with
endoglycosidase H (data not shown). Notably, the degradation was
blocked by
N-acetyl-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-norleucinal and, more specifically, by
benzyloxycarbonyl-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-leucinal (MG-132) and lactacystin, indicating a fate of proteasomal proteolysis (Fig. 2). Thus, Cog Tg degradation in CHO
cells displayed the classic hallmarks of ERAD (3). Moreover, in initial
studies (data not shown), we found that, in common with several other N-linked glycoproteins (32-34), degradation of newly
synthesized Cog Tg was inhibited by DMM. For these reasons, we examined
KIF, a specific inhibitor of mannosidase I activity (40) in the ER (35,
41).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Intracellular degradation of Cog Tg in CHO
cells. A, stably transfected CHO cells expressing Cog
Tg were pulse-labeled for 30 min with 100 µCi/ml
Expre35S35S and chased for the times indicated.
Cell extracts and media were immunoprecipitated with anti-rat Tg
antiserum and analyzed by SDS-4% PAGE under reducing conditions.
B, shown is the quantitation of radioactive band intensities
from A. Immunoreactive Tg in the pulse-labeled cell extracts
was taken as 100%; the relative radioactivities of cell extracts ( )
and media ( ) are shown.
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Proteasome-mediated degradation of Cog Tg in
CHO. CHO cells expressing Cog Tg were pulse-labeled as described
in the legend Fig. 1 and chased for 8 h in the absence or presence
of various inhibitors. Upper panel, the cell extracts were
immunoprecipitated for Tg and analyzed by SDS-4% PAGE and
phosphorimaging. Lane 1 is a 1-h chased sample with no
inhibitor. Lanes 2-8 were chased for 8 h in the
presence of the following: no inhibitor (lane 2), 100 µM chloroquine (lane 3), 30 mM
NH4Cl (lane 4), 100 µM E-64d
(lane 5), 100 µM
N-acetyl-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-norleucinal
(ALLN; lane 6), 20 µM
benzyloxycarbonyl-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-leucinal
(LLL; lane 7), or 20 µM lactacystin
(lane 8). Secretion of Cog Tg into the medium was not
detected in the presence of any of these inhibitors (not shown).
Lower panel, shown is the quantitation of radioactive band
intensities from the upper panel, taking Tg radioactivity at
the 1-h time (lane 1) as 100%.
|
|
By 16 h of chase in control CHO cells, newly synthesized Cog Tg
was degraded completely (Fig.
3A, lane 2).
However, this was substantially prevented in the presence of 200 µM KIF (Fig. 3A, lane 3).
Furthermore, substantial suppression of Cog Tg degradation could be
obtained with concentrations of KIF as small as 5 µM (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Pathway of proteasomal degradation of Cog Tg
is inhibited by KIF, yet does not require lectin-like binding of
calnexin. A, CHO cells stably expressing Cog Tg were
pulse-labeled as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Lane
1 is a pulse-labeled sample with no inhibitor (control
(Con)), and lanes 2-5 were chased for 16 h
in the presence of no inhibitor (lane 2), 0.2 mM
KIF (lane 3), 1 mM CAS (lane 4), or
the combined addition of 0.2 mM KIF and 1 mM
CAS (lane 5). Cells were pretreated with the inhibitors for
30 min before labeling, and treatment was continued throughout the
chase. The cell extracts (left panel) and media (right
panel) were immunoprecipitated for Tg and analyzed by SDS-4% PAGE
and phosphorimaging. B, using the same labeling conditions
as described for A, a dose response to KIF was
performed. C, a protocol similar to that described for
A was performed in the presence or absence of CAS plus no
inhibitor (Con), a cysteine protease inhibitor (E-64d), or a
proteasome-specific inhibitor (lactacystin).
|
|
Continuous treatment with CAS (which blocks glucosidases I and II and
thereby prevents lectin-like binding of calnexin to newly synthesized
glycoproteins) did not suppress the ERAD process for Cog Tg (Fig.
3A, lane 4), in agreement with previous reports (18, 20, 21, 23). Inhibition of glucose trimming after CAS treatment
was confirmed by Cog Tg retardation upon SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3C,
first two lanes) (42). In contrast with the behavior of
truncated
1-antitrypsin (35), lactacystin (and other
proteasomal inhibitors not shown) stabilized Cog Tg regardless of CAS
treatment (Fig. 3C, last two lanes). More
importantly, unlike for mutant
1-antitrypsin (33),
suppression of glycoprotein ERAD with KIF was dominant over the ERAD
that accompanied CAS treatment (Fig. 3A, lane 5).
In these cells (treated with CAS in the presence or absence of KIF),
SDS-PAGE mobility of Cog Tg was analyzed on 20-cm-long slab gels to
look for small mobility differences between different glyco forms. At
2 h of chase, a small but definite KIF-mediated retardation of
SDS-PAGE mobility was observed (Fig. 4,
compare lanes 2 and 3), which preceded the
suppression of Cog Tg degradation that became apparent only at later
chase times (Fig. 3A, compare lanes 4 and
5). This shift in Cog Tg electrophoretic mobility must
reflect inhibition of mannose trimming because no difference in
mobility between KIF-treated and KIF-untreated samples persisted after
digestion with jack bean mannosidase (Fig. 4, lanes 4 and 5). Thus, the data strongly indicate that after KIF
treatment, Cog Tg protected from ERAD had failed to undergo trimming
from Man9 to Man8.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
SDS-PAGE mobility of Cog Tg after treatment
with 1 mM castanospermine ± 0.2 mM
kifunensine. CHO cells were pretreated with the indicated
sugar-processing inhibitors and pulse-labeled as described in the
legend to Fig. 1. After a 2-h chase, the cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated for Tg, and some were digested further with peptide
N-glycosidase F (P) or jack bean mannosidase
(J). The samples were finally analyzed by 4% SDS-PAGE in a
long (20 cm) slab gel format to discriminate small mobility
differences.
|
|
Neither KIF alone nor KIF + CAS treatment was toxic to CHO cells, as
neither treatment prevented the secretory trafficking of non-mutant Tg
(Fig. 5). Moreover, following CAS
treatment in the presence or absence of KIF, coprecipitation of Cog Tg
with calnexin was undetectable (data not shown). It has been
demonstrated for mutant
1-antitrypsin that enhanced
calnexin binding to monoglucosylated Man9 oligosaccharides
occurs following post-pulse protein synthesis inhibition with
cycloheximide, and this correlates with protection from ERAD (33).
Although cycloheximide (20 µM) treatment also had a
stabilizing effect on Cog Tg, this effect was quite modest and tended
to be limited to early chase times (see Fig. 8). Taken together, these
data suggest that, for Cog Tg, the lectin-like binding of calnexin is
not a major determinant for ERAD and that KIF inhibits a
calnexin-independent step in targeting the misfolded glycoprotein for
proteasomal degradation.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mannose and/or glucose trimming does not
affect the secretion of wild-type Tg. A, CHO cells
expressing wild-type (Wt) Tg were labeled as described in
the legend to Fig. 1 and chased for 16 h in the absence or
presence of inhibitors. The cell extracts (left panel) and
media (right panel) were immunoprecipitated for Tg and
analyzed by SDS-4% PAGE and phosphorimaging. Lane 1 is a
1-h chased sample with no inhibitor. Lanes 2-4 are 16-h
chased samples with no inhibitor (lane 2), 0.2 mM KIF (lane 3), and 0.2 mM KIF plus
1 mM CAS (lane 4). B, the relative
radioactivities in the cells (black bars) and media
(white bars) from A are shown.
|
|
Undegraded Cog Tg Is Not Liberated into the Free
Cytosol--
Wiertz et al. (43) have suggested that
oligosaccharide processing may occur in the cytosol at a step preceding
proteasomal proteolysis, as evidenced by the fact that lactacystin
treatment leads to accumulation of an undegraded cytosolic
intermediate that can be detected in soluble supernatants after
microsomal sedimentation. We therefore performed similar experiments at
several chase times for Cog Tg in control CHO cells or in cells treated with lactacystin, CAS, or CAS + KIF. As shown in Fig.
6, lactacystin and CAS + KIF treatments
led to Cog Tg stability (Cell lysate panels). However, at no
time could any detectable Cog Tg intermediate be found liberated into
the free cytosolic fraction. In additional trypsin protection
experiments (data not shown), we found that Cog Tg and wild-type Tg
were equally protected in microsomal fractions. Moreover, following the
protocol described by Johnston et al. (44), we did not
detect the presence of insoluble complexes (aggresomes) of newly
synthesized Cog Tg accumulated after 10 h of chase in the presence
of proteasomal inhibition (Fig. 7). Thus,
it appears that a bottleneck for Cog Tg degradation occurs at or prior
to the retrotranslocation process (see "Discussion").

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Microsomal sedimentation assay for Cog
Tg. Stably transfected CHO cells expressing Cog Tg were
pulse-labeled for 30 min with 250 µCi/ml
Expre35S35S and chased for up to 6 h in
the absence or presence of 20 mM lactacystin, 1 mM CAS, or 1 mM CAS plus 0.2 mM
KIF. KIF and/or CAS was added first 30 min before pulse labeling,
whereas lactacystin was added only during the chase. To detect Cog Tg
in whole cell lysates, a set of parallel samples were lysed and
immunoprecipitated for Tg. Microsomal sedimentation was performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Microsomal pellets
(P) and cytosolic supernatant (S) fractions were
each immunoprecipitated for Tg. All samples were finally analyzed by
SDS-4% PAGE and phosphorimaging. Note that under all conditions, no
cytosolic Tg was recovered at any chase time.
|
|

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Cog Tg is not detected in detergent-insoluble
aggregates. Stably transfected CHO cells expressing Cog Tg cells
were pulse-labeled for 30 min with 200 µCi/ml
Expre35S35S and either lysed without chase or
chased for 10 h in the presence of 20 µM
lactacystin. Cells were lysed in nondenaturing immunoprecipitation
buffer (N) containing 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate,
and a protease inhibitor mixture (see "Experimental Procedures")
for 30 min on ice. After centrifugation at 13,000 × g
for 15 min, the pellet was resolubilized by sonication in the presence
1% SDS (S). The SDS was then diluted to 0.05% with
immunoprecipitation buffer, and both soluble and resolubilized
fractions were immunoprecipitated with anti-Tg antiserum, followed by
reducing SDS-4% PAGE and phosphorimaging. The labeled bands seen below
the Tg position were not recovered in all experiments.
|
|
Generality of Kifunensine Effects--
So far, reports of
kifunensine inhibition of ERAD are limited to just a few glycoproteins
such as a C-terminally truncated version of
1-antitrypsin (35) that contains a primary structural defect confined to a discrete protein domain. By contrast, treatment of
cells with dithiothreitol at low concentrations (
1 mM)
prevents the formation of nascent disulfide bonds (45) and produces
massive misfolding of Tg by preventing formation of many of the 60 intrachain disulfide linkages spanning much of the polypeptide (46). In CHO cells treated with 600 µM dithiothreitol, Cog Tg was
reduced (Fig. 8B) and, during
an 8-h chase, was degraded to at least the same extent as in untreated
cells (Fig. 8A). Although post-pulse protein synthesis
inhibition provided no suppression of ERAD under reducing conditions,
KIF treatment effectively blocked the degradation of misfolded Tg (Fig.
8A, lower four panels).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effects of combined addition of
cycloheximide, dithiothreitol, and KIF on ERAD of Cog Tg.
A, CHO cells expressing Cog Tg were pulse-labeled for 30 min
with 100 µCi/ml Expre35S35S and chased for
the times indicated in the absence (Control) or presence of
inhibitors at the concentrations indicated. The cell extracts were
immunoprecipitated for Tg and analyzed by reducing SDS-4% PAGE and
autoradiography. B, CHO cells were pulse-labeled and
analyzed at the earliest time as described for A, except
that samples finally alkylated with 10 mM iodoacetamide
were analyzed by SDS-4% PAGE under nonreducing conditions.
CHX, cycloheximide; DTT, dithiothreitol.
|
|
To gain an independent assessment of the effect of mannosidase
inhibition on ERAD, we examined recombinant protein C expressed in BHK
cells.
-Glutamyl carboxylation is a post-translational modification
that promotes proper folding of protein C and other vitamin
K-dependent clotting factors in the ER, whereas warfarin inhibition of
-carboxylation results in misfolding and degradation of
-carboxylation-deficient protein C (37) via a proteasomal mechanism (47). As for Cog Tg, a block in glucosidase activity (by CAS)
did not stabilize the misfolded glycoprotein, but
-carboxylation-deficient protein C was significantly stabilized in
cells treated with DMM (data not shown) and, more specifically, with
KIF (Fig. 9). KIF-mediated suppression of
ERAD was also observed in CAS-treated BHK cells, indicating (as for Cog
Tg) a dominant effect of the mannosidase I inhibitor (Fig. 9).
Essentially identical observations were made in stably transfected CHO
cells expressing protein C (data not shown).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Kifunensine also suppresses the intracellular
degradation of -carboxylation-deficient
protein C. BHK cells expressing protein C, cultured in the
presence of 10 µM warfarin, were pulse-labeled for 30 min
with 100 µCi/ml Expre35S35S (upper
panel) or chased for 8 h in the absence (control
(Con)) or presence of 1 mM CAS, 0.2 mM KIF, or 1 mM CAS plus 0.2 mM
KIF. Cells were pretreated with the inhibitors for 30 min before
labeling, and treatment was continued throughout the chase. At 8 h
of chase, newly synthesized protein C in cell extracts (middle
panel) and media (lower panel) was detected by
immunoprecipitation, followed by SDS-9% PAGE and phosphorimaging. Of
note, 1 mM DMM suppressed ERAD of
-carboxylation-deficient protein C similarly to KIF, whereas 1 mM 1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-D-mannitol
hydrochloride had no effect (not show).
|
|
In cells treated with tunicamycin, unglycosylated Cog Tg and
-carboxylation-deficient protein C misfold and are degraded intracellularly with severely impaired anterograde transport through the secretory pathway (48, 49). However, as shown in Fig. 10, treatment with KIF had no
protective effect on the intracellular degradation of these
unglycosylated secretory proteins. These data are consistent with the
hypothesis that KIF-mediated suppression of degradation is selective
for glycoprotein substrates.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Kifunensine does not suppress ERAD of
unglycosylated Cog Tg or
-carboxylation-deficient protein C. CHO cells
stably expressing Cog Tg (upper panels) or BHK cells stably
expressing protein C and cultured in the presence of 10 µM warfarin (lower panels) were pretreated
with tunicamycin (TUN; 10 µg/ml) before and during pulse
labeling. When kifunensine was employed, cells were pretreated with 0.2 mM KIF, and the treatment was continued throughout the
chase. Cells were either pulse-labeled only (control (Con)
and lane 1) or chased (lanes 2 and 3)
for 16 h (upper panels) or 8 h (lower
panels), and the lysates were immunoprecipitated for Tg or protein
C and analyzed by reducing SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging. The first lane
is a control showing the N-glycosylated form of each protein
as a comparison for gel mobility. The panels on the right quantify (in
arbitrary units) the recovery of the unglycosylated proteins in
lanes 1-3 from the gel images shown on the left.
cdPC, -carboxylation-deficient protein C.
|
|
Mannosidase I Processing Is a Relatively Slow Step in the ERAD
Pathway--
It has been argued that since degradation intermediates
do not routinely accumulate in the cytosol during ERAD, steps leading to retrotranslocation are likely to be rate-limiting for proteolytic cleavage (50). Although it is not clear if ER mannosidase I activity is
rate-limiting in glycoprotein degradation, we note that KIF addition to
CHO cells stabilized Cog Tg even when added 1 h after synthesis of
the mutant glycoprotein (Fig. 11), at a time before any loss of Cog Tg could yet be detected (Fig.
1B). Protection from ERAD after delayed KIF addition
suggested that for a significant fraction of Cog Tg molecules, the
KIF-inhibitable step had not yet occurred even 1 h after
synthesis. Similar protection from ERAD was obtained by delayed KIF
addition to cells pretreated with CAS (data not shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Mannose trimming of Cog Tg is a relatively
slow step. A, CHO cells expressing Cog Tg were
pretreated and pulse-labeled as described in the legend to Fig. 3 and
chased for 1 h (lane 1) or 16 h (lanes
2-5) in the absence (lanes 1 and 2) or
presence of 0.2 mM KIF (lane 3), 0.2 mM KIF plus 1 mM CAS (lane 4), or
0.2 mM KIF only after a 1-h chase delay (lane
5). The cells (left panel) and media (right
panel) were immunoprecipitated for Tg and analyzed by reducing
SDS-4% PAGE and phosphorimaging. B, shown are the relative
radioactivities of the 16-h chased samples from four independent
experiments (mean ± S.D.) In addition, Tg recovery after
pretreatment with 1 mM CAS is shown. Con,
control.
|
|
In 10 µM warfarin-treated BHK cells,
-carboxylation-deficient protein C was degraded with a half-time of
~2.5 h (Fig. 12). When DMM was added
up to 1 h after pulse labeling, suppression of ERAD approached
that observed in cells pretreated with the mannosidase inhibitor (Fig.
13). Thus, similar to Cog Tg, the step in the ERAD pathway blocked by mannosidase inhibition had not yet
occurred for most molecules even 1 h after synthesis. Longer chase
times prior to DMM addition led to a declining ability to suppress ERAD
(Fig. 13). Similar results were obtained with KIF treatment (data not
shown). These results suggest that mannosidase I processing is a
relatively slow step after misfolded glycoprotein synthesis. We note
that even when DMM was used in pretreatment and throughout the chase,
some degradation of
-carboxylation-deficient protein C still
occurred (see "Discussion").

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 12.
Kinetics of intracellular disposal of
-carboxylation-deficient protein C. A, stably transfected BHK cells cultured in the presence of
10 µM warfarin were pulse-labeled as described in the
legend to Fig. 9 and chased for the indicated times. Protein C in the
cell extracts and media was immunoprecipitated with anti-protein C
antiserum and analyzed by SDS-9%-PAGE under reducing (for cells) or
nonreducing (for media) conditions. B, taking the
radioactivity in the pulse-labeled cell extracts as 100%, the relative
radioactivities of cells ( ) and media ( ) are shown.
cdPC, -carboxylation-deficient protein C.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 13.
Effects of delayed addition of DMM on ERAD
of -carboxylation-deficient protein C. BHK cells expressing protein C, cultured in the presence of 10 µM warfarin, were pulse-labeled and chased for 8 h.
1 mM DMM was added at the various times of chase shown on
the y axis. In the sample marked
Control, DMM was never added. Samples were analyzed as
described in the legend to Fig. 9; the relative radioactivities of
cells (black bars) and media (white bars) are
shown. cdPC, -carboxylation-deficient protein C.
|
|
Chronic Mannosidase I Inhibition Causes ER Accumulation of Cog
Tg--
Since acute KIF treatment caused a profound slowing of
glycoprotein ERAD, we predicted that the misfolded protein would begin to accumulate in the ER. Therefore, normal CHO cells or CHO cells expressing Cog Tg were treated for 3 days with KIF (which was added to
the medium each day). During this period, the cells were labeled
continuously with 35S-labeled amino acids at a constant low
specific radioactivity. At the end of the treatment period, cells were
examined by specific immunoprecipitation for their levels of Tg and a
number of ER resident proteins. As shown in Fig.
14A, after daily addition of KIF for 3 days, Cog Tg showed some accumulation in the stably transfected CHO cells, and all of the accumulated Tg was sensitive to
digestion with endoglycosidase H (data not shown). Quantitation showed
that Cog Tg abundance after chronic KIF treatment rose ~3-fold. In
control CHO cells, chronic KIF treatment itself had no significant
effect on the levels of any of the ER resident proteins measured (Fig.
14A, first two lanes); more importantly, in
stably transfected CHO cells, the accumulation of misfolded Cog Tg
accompanying chronic KIF treatment also did not lead to a significant
elevation of ER resident proteins (Fig. 14A, last two
lanes). Similar results were obtained by routine Western blotting (data not shown). When pulse-chase experiments were performed to
examine the fate of newly synthesized Cog Tg after 16 h in cells
chronically treated daily with KIF for 3 days (Fig. 14B), a
small (
20%) increase in Tg degradation was observed, which involved
proteasomal degradation as it was still sensitive to lactacystin (Fig.
14C). Together, the data raise the possibility of some form
of adaptation to chronic mannosidase I inhibition that is associated
with only modest steady-state accumulation of misfolded Tg that does
not elevate ER chaperone levels.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 14.
Chronic kifunensine treatment causes
accumulation of Cog Tg, but does not induce ER chaperone
expression. A, parental CHO cells (Mock) or
CHO cells expressing Cog Tg were metabolically labeled for 3 days
(3d) with 100 µCi/ml Expre35S35S
in complete DMEM in the absence or presence of 0.2 mM KIF.
Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated for Tg and the various ER resident
proteins indicated. Immunoprecipitations were analyzed by SDS-4% PAGE
(for Tg) or SDS-8% PAGE (for the others) under reducing conditions.
B, CHO cells expressing Cog Tg were either treated or
untreated daily with 0.2 mM KIF for 3 days. At the end of
this period, the cells were pulse-labeled and then either chased for
1 h and lysed as an estimate of the amount of Tg synthesized
(P) or chased for 16 h in the presence of 0.2 mM KIF to examine the stability of Cog Tg (C).
C, shown is the effect of lactacystin (+L;
last lane), added during a 16-h chase, on the stability of
Cog Tg in cells treated chronically with KIF as described for
B. UGGT, UDP-glucose:glycoprotein
glucosyltransferase.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Early carbohydrate trimming reactions have become a subject of
increasing interest not only with respect to the folding of normal
exportable glycoproteins and their exit from the ER (51), but also in
the targeting of misfolded glycoproteins for ERAD. At the time of
initial reports that ER mannosidase activity might function at an early
step in the degradation of retained versions of exportable
glycoproteins (32), a conceptual framework accounting for ERAD had not
yet emerged. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae brought
forward the suggestion that calnexin might facilitate retrotranslocation to the cytosol (14). It should be noted, however,
that this observation was made for unglycosylated pro-
-factor, for
which it is unclear how the lectin-only model of calnexin activity (25,
26) would apply. At the same time, cells devoid of Mns1p (ER
mannosidase I) were found to exhibit abnormally diminished degradation
of a mutant form of carboxypeptidase Y (52); these results have
recently been confirmed and extended to show that such degradation does
not require the formation of glucosylated oligosaccharides (53). Taken
together, these findings in S. cerevisiae indicate
suppressive effects of ERAD as a consequence of decreased ER
mannosidase I activity without an evident requirement for the
lectin-like activity of calnexin.
Since the role of calnexin in S. cerevisiae may be unique to
that organism (54), it is of interest to know how the foregoing reports
compare with the situation for glycoprotein ERAD in higher eukaryotes.
Specifically, although several groups have now found that inhibition of
ER mannosidase activity can also suppress ERAD in mammalian cells (24,
32-34, 38), study of a C-terminally truncated
1-antitrypsin expressed in mouse hepatoma cells led to
the recent suggestion that ER mannosidase I specifically targets misfolded glycoproteins for disposal using a lectin-mediated process dependent upon binding monoglucosylated Man8
oligosaccharides to calnexin (35). We therefore wished to confirm a
role for early carbohydrate processing and calnexin binding in the ERAD process for Cog Tg and
-carboxylation-deficient protein C, which cause inherited and acquired ER storage diseases, respectively (36,
37).
After synthesis, both misfolded glycoproteins were extensively degraded
(Figs. 1 and 12) via a proteasomal mechanism. Confirming the work of
Sifers and co-workers (35), we found that KIF, an inhibitor of ER
mannosidase I (41), selectively suppressed ERAD of both misfolded
glycoproteins (Figs. 3 and 9). More specifically, the data suggested
that Cog Tg protected from ERAD failed to undergo trimming from
Man9 to Man8 (Fig. 4). KIF treatment did not
impair the anterograde traffic of native Tg or protein C from the ER (Fig. 5) (data not shown), nor did it affect the degradation of misfolded Tg or protein C that was unglycosylated after tunicamycin treatment (Fig. 10). However, KIF did appear to impair
retrotranslocation of the misfolded glycoproteins to the cytosol, based
upon microsomal sedimentation data (Fig. 6) and our unpublished
observations that native and misfolded forms showed no difference in
trypsin sensitivity in microsomal protease protection assays. However,
we cannot exclude the possibility of a limited degree of
retrotranslocation to the cytosol in the presence of lactacystin that
is below the detection limits of our assays (23), although we could
find no evidence for accumulation of insoluble Tg aggregates (Fig. 7)
in cytosolic aggresomes (44). Suppressed Tg degradation was also
observed in dithiothreitol-treated cells (Fig. 8); together, these data suggest that the effects of mannosidase I are not limited to specific protein domains, but seem to represent a more general feature in the
ERAD process for at least a subset of glycoproteins.
Unlike for
1-antitrypsin, suppression of ERAD with
inhibitors of ER mannosidase I occurred efficiently even in cells
continuously treated with CAS (Figs. 3 and 9). Under these conditions,
the lectin-like binding of calnexin to monoglucosylated
oligosaccharides cannot be initiated (18, 27, 28, 55); moreover, these conditions also interfere with glycoprotein association of calreticulin (56) as well as ER60/ERp57 (57). Thus, although data implicating lectin-like calnexin association have been presented in some cases (13,
35, 58), an important conclusion from this study (in conjunction with
previous results (18-23)) is that a lectin-mediated association of the
calnexin/calreticulin-ERp57 complex is not a general requirement for
retrotranslocation of misfolded glycoproteins to the ERAD machinery.
However, since ER chaperones are likely to be associated in a network
(59) and since different ERAD substrates exhibit different patterns of
chaperone binding (42), it is most probable that multiple ER chaperones
have the potential to participate in the targeting of different
misfolded protein substrates for retrotranslocation and ERAD.
Current reports suggest plasticity in the mechanisms leading to ER
targeting for proteolysis. For example, ERAD occurs also for
unglycosylated (misfolded) exportable proteins (Fig. 10) (14). Additionally, there is one N-linked glycoprotein (the T-cell
receptor
-subunit) for which inhibition of mannosidase activity does
not significantly suppress the ERAD process (34).
Importantly, complete deglycosylation has been reported as an
intermediate stage in ERAD for several misfolded glycoprotein
substrates (43, 60-63) based on peptide N-glycosidase
activity that may be localized to the cytosol (64) or to the
ER (65, 66). Based on these observations, it is reasonable to propose
plasticity in the ERAD pathway involving the existence of distinct, and
perhaps parallel, initial targeting. In this case, a
Man8-GlcNAc2 oligosaccharide structure specific
to the "B-isoform" configuration (i.e. such that after
mannosidase cleavage, a terminal mannose remains in the
1,3-linkage
(41)) may directly or indirectly facilitate protein disposition via one
of these routes, and when this is blocked, undegraded intermediates
presumably accumulate until alternative degradative routes prevail. The
existence of such alternative routes presumably accounts for the fact
that eventual degradation of Cog Tg and
-carboxylation-deficient
protein C is observed even in the presence of KIF. Thus, two
alternative hypotheses that need to be tested are as follows. 1)
Although not absolutely required, mannose reCognition and trimming may be an important priming step in the pathway of deglycosylation preceding ERAD; alternatively, 2) the B-isoform of
Man8-GlcNAc2 oligosaccharides might facilitate
the presentation of misfolded glycoproteins (53) for
multi-ubiquitination (6, 22, 23, 34, 67). Either or both of these
activities might be associated (physically or kinetically) with
retrotranslocation through the Sec61 translocon (58).
With these thoughts in mind, we note that oligosaccharide trimming by
ER mannosidase I appears to be a relatively slow step in the processing
of Cog Tg and
-carboxylation-deficient protein C (Figs. 11 and 13).
We therefore expected that Cog Tg might massively accumulate in the ER
in the setting of chronic KIF treatment, which could trigger the
unfolded protein response (68). However, after 3 days of KIF treatment,
Cog Tg accumulated only moderately, and no clear increase in BiP,
GRP94, ERp72, calreticulin, or ER60 was observed (Fig. 14A).
Potentially, alternative routes directing Cog Tg to proteasomal
degradation could be induced under these conditions (which may be
consistent with the results of Fig. 14 (B and
C)). We do not yet know if cells may exhibit a compensatory response to chronic mannosidase I blockade, such as further induction of ER mannosidase I, endomannosidase (69, 70), or other activities. We
are currently pursuing these possibilities.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of
Drs. S. Omura, P. R. Larsen, P. Kim, T. Wileman, A. Parodi, and P. Stanley, who provided valuable reagents and antibodies. We thank
Young-Nam Park for providing the Cog Tg cDNA subcloned
into the pCB6 vector. We thank members of the Arvan laboratory, Drs.
R. G. Spiro (Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston), and A. Chang (Albert
Einstein College of Medicine) for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant DK40344 (to P. A.); Grant-in-aid 09276103 for Scientific
Research on Priority Areas (Molecular Chaperones) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan; and a research grant
from the Uehara Memorial Science Foundation (to F. T.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of
Endocrinology, Dept. of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Tel.: 718-430-8685; Fax: 718-430-8557; E-mail:
arvan@aecom.yu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 12, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001073200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
ERAD, endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation;
CAS, castanospermine;
DMM, 1-deoxymannojirimycin;
Tg, thyroglobulin;
KIF, kifunensine;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
CHO, Chinese
hamster ovary;
BHK, baby hamster kidney;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kim, P. S.,
and Arvan, P.
(1998)
Endocr. Rev.
19,
173-202
|
| 2.
|
Hammond, C.,
and Helenius, A.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
7,
523-529
|
| 3.
|
Brodsky, J. L.,
and McCraken, A. A.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
151-156
|
| 4.
|
Wiertz, E. J. H. J.,
Tortorella, D.,
Bogyo, M., Yu, J.,
Mothes, W.,
Jones, T. R.,
Rapoport, T. A.,
and Ploegh, H. L.
(1996)
Nature
384,
432-438
|
| 5.
|
Pilon, M.,
Schekman, R.,
and Romisch, K.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4540-4548
|
| 6.
|
Ward, C. L.,
Omura, S.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
121-127
|
| 7.
|
Hiller, M. M.,
Finger, A.,
Schweiger, M.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1996)
Science
273,
1725-1728
|
| 8.
|
Biederer, T.,
Volkwein, C.,
and Sommer, T.
(1997)
Science
278,
1806-1809
|
| 9.
|
Kowalski, J. M.,
Parekh, R. N.,
Mao, J.,
and Wittrup, K. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19453-19458
|
| 10.
| Bordallo, J., Plemper, R. K., Finger, A., and Wolf, D. H. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 209-222
|
| 11.
|
Plemper, R. K.,
Deak, P. M.,
Otto, R. T.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
443,
241-245
|
| 12.
|
Knittler, M. R.,
Dirks, S.,
and Haas, I. G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1764-1768
|
| 13.
|
Qu, D.,
Teckman, J. H.,
Omura, S.,
and Perlmutter, D. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22791-22795
|
| 14.
|
McCracken, A. A.,
and Brodsky, J. L.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
291-298
|
| 15.
|
Plemper, R. K.,
Böhmler, S.,
Bordallo, J.,
Sommer, T.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1997)
Nature
388,
891-893
|
| 16.
|
Pipe, S. W.,
Morris, J. A.,
Shah, J.,
and Kaufman, R. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8537-8544
|
| 17.
|
Brodsky, J. L.,
Werner, E. D.,
Dubas, M. E.,
Goeckeler, J. L.,
Kruse, K. B.,
and McCracken, A. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3453-3460
|
| 18.
|
Kearse, K. P.,
Williams, D. B.,
and Singer, A.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3678-3686
|
| 19.
|
Romagnoli, P.,
and Germain, R. N.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
2027-2036
|
| 20.
|
Hebert, D. N.,
Foellmer, B.,
and Helenius, A.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2961-2968
|
| 21.
|
Keller, S. H.,
Lindstrom, J.,
and Taylor, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17064-17072
|
| 22.
|
Schubert, U.,
Anton, L. C.,
Bacik, I.,
Cox, J. H.,
Bour, S.,
Bennink, J. R.,
Orlowski, M.,
Strebel, K.,
and Yewdell, J. W.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
2280-2288
|
| 23.
|
White, A. L.,
Guerra, B.,
Wang, J.,
and Lanford, R. E.
(1999)
J. Lipid Res.
40,
275-286
|
| 24.
| de Virgilio, M., Kitzmuller, C., Schwaiger, E., Klein, M., Kreibich,
G., and Ivessa, N. E. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell
4059-4073
|
| 25.
|
Rodan, A. R.,
Simons, J. F.,
Trombetta, E. S.,
and Helenius, A.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6921-6930
|
| 26.
|
Zapun, A.,
Petrescu, S. M.,
Rudd, P. M.,
Dwek, R. A.,
Thomas, D. Y.,
and Bergeron, J. J. M.
(1997)
Cell
88,
29-38
|
| 27.
|
Hammond, C.,
and Helenius, A.
(1994)
Science
266,
456-458
|
| 28.
|
Vassilakos, A.,
Cohen-Doyle, M. F.,
Peterson, P. A.,
Jackson, M. R.,
and Williams, D. B.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1495-1506
|
| 29.
|
Sousa, M. C.,
Ferrero-Garcia, M. A.,
and Parodi, A. J.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
97-105
|
| 30.
|
Van Leeuwen, J. E.,
and Kearse, K. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4179-4186
|
| 31.
|
Ware, F. E.,
Vassilakos, A.,
Peterson, P.,
Jackson, M.,
Lehrman, M.,
and Williams, D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4697-4704
|
| 32.
|
Su, K.,
Stoller, T.,
Rocco, J.,
Zemsky, J.,
and Green, R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14301-14309
|
| 33.
|
Liu, Y.,
Choudhury, P.,
Cabral, C. M.,
and Sifers, R. N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7946-7951
|
| 34.
|
Yang, M.,
Omura, S.,
Bonifacino, J. S.,
and Weissman, A. M.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
835-846
|
| 35.
|
Liu, Y.,
Choudhury, P.,
Cabral, C. M.,
and Sifers, R. N.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5861-5867
|
| 36.
|
Kim, P. S.,
Hossain, S. A.,
Park, Y.-N.,
Lee, I.,
Yoo, S.-E.,
and Arvan, P.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9909-9913
|
| 37.
|
Tokunaga, F.,
Wakabayashi, S.,
and Koide, T.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
1163-1170
|
| 38.
|
Marcus, N. Y.,
and Perlmutter, D. H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
1987-1992
|
| 39.
|
Kim, P.,
Bole, D.,
and Arvan, P.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
118,
541-549
|
| 40.
|
Elbein, A. D.,
Tropea, J. E.,
Mitchell, M.,
and Kaushal, G. P.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
15599-15605
|
| 41.
|
Weng, S.,
and Spiro, R. G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25656-25663
|
| 42.
|
Kim, P. S.,
Kwon, O.-Y.,
and Arvan, P.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
517-527
|
| 43.
|
Wiertz, E. J. H. J.,
Jones, T. R.,
Sun, L.,
Bogyo, M.,
Geuze, H. J.,
and Ploegh, H. L.
(1996)
Cell
84,
769-779
|
| 44.
|
Johnston, J. A.,
Ward, C. L.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1883-1898
|
| 45.
|
Lodish, H. F.,
and Kong, N.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
20598-20605
|
| 46.
|
Kim, P. S.,
and Arvan, P.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
29-38
|
| 47.
|
Tokunaga, F.,
Takeuchi, S.,
Omura, S.,
Arvan, P.,
and Koide, T.
(2000)
Thromb. Res.
99,
511-521
|
| 48.
|
Kim, P. S.,
and Arvan, P.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
12412-12418
|
| 49.
|
McClure, D. B.,
Walls, J. D.,
and Grinnell, B. W.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
19710-19717
|
| 50.
|
Plemper, R. K.,
Egner, R.,
Kuchler, K.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32848-32856
|
| 51.
|
Helenius, A.,
Trombetta, E. S.,
Hebert, D. N.,
and Simons, J. F.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
193-200
|
| 52.
|
Knop, M.,
Hauser, N.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1996)
Yeast
12,
1229-1238
|
| 53.
|
Jakob, C. A.,
Burda, P.,
Roth, J.,
and Aebi, M.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
1223-1233
|
| 54.
|
Parodi, A. J.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1426,
287-295
|
| 55.
|
Zhang, Q.,
Tector, M.,
and Salter, R. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
3944-3948
|
| 56.
|
Wada, I.,
Imai, S.,
Kai, M.,
Sakane, F.,
and Kanoh, H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20298-20304
|
| 57.
|
Oliver, J. D.,
van der Wal, F. J.,
Bulleid, N. J.,
and High, S.
(1997)
Science
275,
86-88
|
| 58.
|
de Virgilio, M.,
Weninger, H.,
and Ivessa, N. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9734-9743
|
| 59.
|
Tatu, U.,
and Helenius, A.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
555-565
|
| 60.
|
Hughes, E. A.,
Hammond, C.,
and Cresswell, P.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
1896-1901
|
| 61.
|
Huppa, J. B.,
and Ploegh, H. L.
(1997)
Immunity
7,
113-122
|
| 62.
|
Yu, H.,
Kaung, G.,
Kobayashi, S.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20800-20804
|
| 63.
|
Selby, M.,
Erickson, A.,
Dong, C.,
Cooper, S.,
Parham, P.,
Houghton, M.,
and Walker, C. M.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
669-676
|
| 64.
|
Romisch, K.,
and Ali, B. R. S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
6730-6734
|
| 65.
|
Weng, S.,
and Spiro, R. G.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
322,
655-661
|
| 66.
|
Suzuki, T.,
Yan, Q.,
and Lennarz, W. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10083-10086
|
| 67.
|
Chen, Y.,
Le Caherec, F.,
and Chuck, S. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11887-11894
|
| 68.
|
Travers, K. J.,
Patil, C. K.,
Wodicka, L.,
Lockhart, D. J.,
Weissman, J. S.,
and Walter, P.
(2000)
Cell
101,
249-258
|
| 69.
|
Weng, S.,
and Spiro, R. G.
(1996)
Glycobiology
6,
861-868
|
| 70.
|
Spiro, R. G.,
Zhu, Q.,
Bhoyroo, V.,
and Soling, H. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11588-11594
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles: