|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M007434200 on September 26, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 52, 41458-41468, December 29, 2000
A General Approach for Identification of RNA-Protein
Cross-linking Sites within Native Human Spliceosomal Small Nuclear
Ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs)
ANALYSIS OF RNA-PROTEIN CONTACTS IN NATIVE U1 AND
U4/U6.U5 snRNPs*
Henning
Urlaub ,
Klaus
Hartmuth ,
Susanne
Kostka§,
Gerlinde
Grelle§, and
Reinhard
Lührmann ¶
From the Abteilung Zelluläre Biochemie,
Max-Planck-Institut für Biopysikalische Chemie, Am Faßberg 11, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany and the § Abteilung
Proteinchemie, Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare
Medizin, Robert-Rössle-Straße 10, D-13125 Berlin, Germany
Received for publication, August 15, 2000, and in revised form, September 20, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We describe a novel approach to identify
RNA-protein cross-linking sites within native small nuclear
ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) particles from HeLa cells. It combines
immunoprecipitation of the UV-irradiated particles under
semi-denaturing conditions with primer extension analysis of the
cross-linked RNA moiety. In a feasibility study, we initially
identified the exact cross-linking sites of the U1 70-kDa (70K) protein
in stem-loop I of U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) within purified
U1 snRNPs and then confirmed the results by a large-scale preparation
that allowed N-terminal sequencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization mass spectrometry of purified cross-linked
peptide-oligonucleotide complexes. We identified
Tyr112 and Leu175 within the RNA-binding
domain of the U1 70K protein to be cross-linked to G28 and
U30 in stem-loop I, respectively. We further applied our
immunoprecipitation approach to HeLa U5 snRNP, as part of purified 25 S
U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNPs. Cross-linking sites between the U5-specific
220-kDa protein (human homologue of Prp8p) and the U5
snRNA were located at multiple nucleotides within the highly conserved
loop 1 and at one site in internal loop 1 of U5 snRNA. The
cross-linking of four adjacent nucleotides indicates an extended
interaction surface between loop 1 and the 220-kDa protein. In summary,
our approach provides a rapid method for identification of RNA-protein
contact sites within native snRNP particles as well as other
ribonucleoprotein particles.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The spliceosome catalyzes the two-step
trans-esterification reaction that occurs during splicing of
nuclear pre-mRNA, i.e. excision of the introns and
ligation of the exons. Assembly of the spliceosome is an ordered
process and involves the interaction of U1, U2, and U4/U6.U5 small
nuclear ribonucleoprotein
(snRNP)1 particles with the
intron-containing pre-mRNA and a multitude of additional
spliceosomal factors (for review, see Refs. 1-5). Although catalysis
in the spliceosome appears to be RNA-based, both protein-protein and
RNA-protein interactions contribute to the formation of its catalytic
core (1-5).
The structures of the spliceosomal components are largely solved at the
levels of primary structure and RNA secondary structures (3, 5). Much
attention is currently being devoted to the issues of protein and RNP
tertiary structures (6) and to the quaternary arrangement both of the
individual macromolecules in the U snRNP particles and of these
particles in the functioning spliceosome (7).
The U1 snRNP particle from HeLa cells has been extensively investigated
in terms of RNA-protein and protein-protein interactions, as it is only
of moderate complexity. Thus, a relatively detailed picture of its
morphology and tertiary structure (in comparison with other
spliceosomal RNPs) has emerged (3, 7, 8). The seven common spliceosomal
Sm proteins (G, E, F, D1, D2, D3, and B) assemble on the Sm site
of the U1 snRNA to form a doughnut-like structure (9, 10). The
U1-specific proteins U1 70K and A specifically interact via their
N-terminal RNA-binding domains and flanking amino acids with stem-loops
I and II, respectively, of U1 snRNA (11-16). The U1 C protein does not
bind directly to U1 snRNA; its interaction with the RNP is probably
mediated by protein-protein interactions (17). Except for the U1 A
protein (18), the snRNA contact sites at the molecular level of all the
other U1 snRNPs remain elusive.
Much less is known about RNA-protein interactions within the other
spliceosomal snRNPs. Studies have so far focused on the interaction of
only a few U snRNP-specific proteins with their cognate U snRNAs,
e.g. the A' and B" proteins with U2 snRNA (19-21), the
15.5-kDa protein with U4 snRNA (22), and the like-Sm (LSm) proteins with the 3'-end of U6 snRNA (23-25). In the absence of co-crystals or binding studies with purified components, cross-linking studies add valuable information about contacts between specific snRNPs
and snRNAs in assembled particles. To date, most cross-linking studies
have involved the 32P labeling of the corresponding RNA,
either in a random or site-specific manner. For example, the U1 70K and
Sm G proteins were first identified to contact directly U1 snRNA by UV
cross-linking of 32P-labeled U1 snRNP from HeLa cells (26,
27). Within other snRNP particles, site-specific cross-linking also
provided the first insights into the snRNA-protein contacts. In this
manner, the highly conserved U5 snRNP-specific protein Prp8p
(yeast homologue of the human U5 220-kDa protein) has been shown
to contact several nucleotides of U5 snRNA and at least one position of
U6 snRNA in reconstituted yeast U5 and tri-snRNP particles (28,
29).
However, no method has yet been described that allows the localization
of direct RNA-protein contact sites in purified native particles. Here,
we present a general approach that allows the rapid identification of
RNA-protein contact sites in purified native human U snRNP particles
subsequent to UV cross-linking. It combines immunoprecipitation of
cross-linked proteins under semi-denaturing conditions, followed by
primer extension analysis of the cross-linked RNA moiety. We initially
chose native 12 S U1 snRNP isolated from HeLa cells to test the
feasibility of our method since this particle is well characterized
(see above). In this manner, we identified the exact cross-linking
sites between the U1 70K protein and stem-loop I of U1 snRNA at the
molecular level. The approach was then extended to the less well
characterized 25 S U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP particles purified from HeLa
cells. We show a direct interaction of the 220-kDa protein with the
four adjacent uridines of the conserved loop 1 of U5 snRNA, suggesting an extended interaction surface between these two components. An
additional cross-linking site of the 220-kDa protein in the 3'-half of
internal loop (IL) 1 indicates that this protein spans the entire
5'-stem of U5 snRNA.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Sample Preparation--
U1, U2, and U5 snRNPs and U4/U6.U5
tri-snRNP particles were prepared from HeLa cell nuclear extracts
(Computer Cell Culture Co., Mons, Belgium) by immunoaffinity
chromatography using the H20 monoclonal antibody as described
previously (30). 12 S U1 snRNPs were separated from contaminating U2
snRNPs by Mono Q anion-exchange chromatography (31) and stored at a
concentration of 2 mg/ml in Mono Q elution buffer. 25 S U4/U6.U5
tri-snRNP particles were obtained from the total snRNP mixture by
gradient centrifugation (30), and peak fractions were pelleted for
6 h at 70,000 rpm (TLA 100.3 rotor, Beckman Instruments). The
tri-snRNP pellet was initially redissolved in 20 mM
HEPES-KOH (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithioerythritol, and 250 mM NaCl (buffer A) at a concentration of 1 mg/ml.
UV Cross-linking of Native U snRNPs and Isolated U
snRNAs--
Two 25-µl droplets each containing 2.5 µg of 12 S U1
snRNP or 25 S U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP particles were irradiated on glass
dishes at 254 nm with four 8-watt germicidal lamps (G8T5, Herolab,
Wiesloch, Germany) in parallel at a distance of 4 cm for 2 min on ice.
50 µl cross-linked samples were then incubated with 1 mg/ml
proteinase K in the presence of 1% (w/v) SDS for 30 min at 37 °C.
The snRNAs were extracted twice with phenol/chloroform, precipitated
with ethanol in the presence of 20 µg of glycogen, and finally
dissolved in 6.5 µl of CE buffer (20 mM cacodylate-KOH
(pH 7.0) and 0.2 mM EDTA). For cross-linking experiments
using isolated naked snRNAs derived from native 12 S U1 snRNP or 25 S
U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP particles, 5 µg of the corresponding particles
were treated with proteinase K, and the snRNAs were extracted and
precipitated as described above. The snRNAs were dissolved in the same
volume of buffer as described for the intact particles. UV
cross-linking was performed as described above, and cross-linked snRNAs
were again precipitated in the presence of 20 µg of glycogen and
dissolved in 6.5 µl of CE buffer.
Large-scale Cross-linking of U1 snRNP--
Prior to UV
cross-linking, 0.8-1 mg of Mono Q-purified U1 snRNPs was diluted with
12.5 ml of C buffer (32) without glycerol. UV cross-linking was carried
out in glass dishes with an inner diameter of 12.5 cm on ice for 2 min
at 254 nm at a distance of 3-4 cm from the lamps. The snRNP solutions
had a depth of ~1 mm in the glass dishes.
Immunoprecipitation of RNA-Protein Cross-links--
5 µg of
cross-linked or non-cross-linked 12 S U1 snRNPs and 25 S U4/U6.U5
tri-snRNP particles were incubated with 1% (w/v) SDS for 5 min at
70 °C. After cooling to room temperature, Triton X-100 was added to
a final concentration of 5% (v/v), and the volume was adjusted to 350 µl with phosphate-buffered saline (NaCl (pH 8.0)). The samples were
then incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with different antibodies
against U1 or U5 snRNP-specific proteins bound to 10 µl of protein
A-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). After extensively washing
with phosphate-buffered saline, the beads were incubated with
proteinase K at a concentration of 1 mg/ml in 100 µl of buffer A
containing 1% (w/v) SDS for 1 h at 37 °C. Cross-linked snRNA
was extracted with phenol/chloroform, precipitated with ethanol as
described above, and finally dissolved in 3.5 µl of CE buffer.
The successful identification of specific cross-linking sites (see
below) was strictly dependent on the denaturing conditions prior to
immunoprecipitation. Changing the immunoprecipitation conditions,
e.g. dissociation of the particles in the presence of 1%
SDS and then dilution to a final concentration of 0.05% SDS, does not
allow the detection of specific RNA-protein interactions in cases where
the protein itself is involved in strong protein-protein interactions
(for example, the U5 220- and 116-kDa proteins; see "Results").
Accordingly, immunoprecipitation with an antibody against the U5
116-kDa protein under such conditions coprecipitates the U5 220-kDa
proteins (data not shown).
Primer Extension Analysis of Cross-linked U1 and U5
snRNAs--
Primer extension analysis of U1 and U5 snRNAs derived from
cross-linked 12 S U1 snRNP and 25 S U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP particles, respectively, or obtained after immunoprecipitation was performed with
a 5'-32P-labeled oligonucleotide complementary to
nucleotides 63-77 of U1 snRNA and nucleotides 83-103 of U5 snRNA.
Primer extension analysis using 2 units of avian myeloblastosis virus
reverse transcriptase (Seikagaku) per reaction was carried out as
essentially described (33). The reaction was stopped by adding loading
buffer (50% (w/v) urea, 0.5× Tris borate/EDTA (pH 8.3),
0.025% (w/v) bromphenol blue, and 0.025% (w/v) xylene cyanol) and
boiling for 3 min. Sequencing ladders were generated from in
vitro U1 and U5 snRNA transcripts (Ribomax, Promega) using 0.5 mM dideoxy-NTPs under identical conditions. Transcripts
were separated on a 50% (w/v) urea and 9.6% polyacrylamide (20:1)
sequencing gel in 1× Tris borate/EDTA (pH 8.3) and exposed to Biomax
film (Eastman Kodak Co.) with two intensifying screens for 1 day (for
Figs. 2A and 8A) or 6 days (for Figs.
2B and 8B).
Isolation and Sequence Determination of Cross-linked
Peptide-Oligonucleotide Complexes--
UV-irradiated U1 snRNPs were
precipitated with 3 volumes of ethanol in Corex tubes (Sorvall) and
washed with 80% ethanol, and the pellet was briefly air-dried. U1
snRNPs were dissolved in 8 M urea, 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 5 mM dithioerythritol; heated for 5 min at 90 °C; and allowed to cool to room temperature. The U1 snRNP
solution was diluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 1 mM CaCl2 until the urea concentration was below
1 M. Endoproteolytic cleavage of spliceosomal proteins
within the U1 snRNP solution was carried out with trypsin (EC 3.4.21.4;
Promega) or chymotrypsin (EC 3.4.21.1; Roche Molecular Biochemicals)
with an enzyme/substrate ratio of 1:20 for 16 h at 37 °C. The
U1 snRNP particles were then precipitated with 3 volumes of ethanol;
washed with 80% ethanol; air-dried; and dissolved in an appropriate
volume of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 150 mM NaCl,
and 5 mM EDTA containing 8 M urea. The samples
were injected onto a Superose 12 size-exclusion column (10/30, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) running with the same buffer conditions at a flow
rate of 400 µl/min. The absorbance was monitored at 254 nm. An
aliquot of each fraction was precipitated with 5 volumes of acetone and
analyzed by 13% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subsequent
silver staining. snRNA-containing fractions were pooled and
precipitated with 3 volumes of ethanol, washed with 80% ethanol, and
dissolved in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8) and 2.5 mM
EDTA. snRNAs were digested with 10 µg of RNase A or 10 µg of RNase
T1 (Ambion, Inc.) for 2 h at 50 °C. The snRNA oligonucleotide pool was subjected to a second incubation with 1 µg of the respective endoproteinases for 16 h at 37 °C. Digestion was stopped by
injection onto an RP-HPLC C18 column (Vydac, Hesperia, CA)
running at 5% solvent B. Solvent A was water and 0.1% trifluoroacetic
acid, and solvent B was acetonitrile and 0.085% trifluoroacetic acid. Isolation of the cross-linked peptide-oligonucleotide heteromers was
achieved at a flow rate of 100 µl/min with the following gradients: first, isocratic elution at 5% solvent B for 30 min, then 5-45% solvent B for 120 min, and finally 45-90% solvent B for 20 min. An
additional isocratic step that varied in time was performed at 10%
solvent B until the base line was reached. The absorbance was monitored
at 220 and 260 nm. Fractions with absorbances at both 220 and 260 nm
were dried under vacuum and subjected to automated N-terminal sequence
analysis in a PROCISETM protein sequencer (Applied
Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA) and to MALDI-MS analysis. MALDI-MS of
the cross-linked peptide-oligonucleotide complexes was performed
essentially under conditions described previously (34, 35), but without
an ion-exchange procedure before measurement.
 |
RESULTS |
Cross-link Identification Strategy--
Our method for the
identification of RNA-protein contact sites in native snRNP particles
from HeLa cell nuclear extracts combines (i) UV cross-linking, (ii)
immunoprecipitation of cross-linked proteins under semi-denaturing
conditions, and (iii) primer extension analysis of the cross-linked
snRNA moiety in the precipitate. The overall strategy is
schematically outlined in Fig. 1 for U1 snRNP. UV cross-linking at 254 nm of an RNP particle generates a direct
cross-link between a specific protein and an RNA base whenever the two
components occupy favorable relative positions. In the first experiment
(Fig. 1A), dissociation of the cross-linked particle and
subsequent digestion with proteinase K are followed by identification
of the exact cross-linking site by primer extension analysis.
Cross-linked nucleotides are detected as discrete reverse transcriptase
stops because a few amino acid residues of the cross-linked protein
always remain covalently attached to the base of the RNA. The actual
cross-linking site is interpreted as occurring one nucleotide upstream
from the stop site of the reverse transcriptase. As an initial approach
to distinguish between stops due to intra- and inter-RNA cross-links or
UV-induced RNA strand breaks and those stops that are due to a
cross-linked protein, cross-linking experiments were carried out with
naked RNAs isolated from purified RNP particles. Comparison of the
reverse transcriptase patterns of the two experiments allowed the
identification of putative RNA-protein cross-linking sites on the RNA.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, primer extension analysis for
detection of RNA-protein cross-links in RNP particles as illustrated
for U1 snRNPs. UV-cross-linked snRNPs were dissociated; the protein
moiety was digested with proteinase K; and snRNAs were extracted.
RNA-protein cross-linking sites were then identified by primer
extension, as a few amino acids remain covalently attached to the
cross-linked bases on the RNA. The actual cross-linking site is located
one nucleotide upstream from the site of the stop of the reverse
transcriptase. See "Experimental Procedures" and "Results" for
further details. B, overall strategy for the identification
of a single RNA-protein cross-linking site in UV-irradiated RNP
particles as illustrated for U1 snRNPs. Immunoprecipitation with
antibodies against U1 snRNP-specific proteins (e.g. the U1
70K protein) performed under such conditions where the UV-cross-linked
particle was completely dissociated (1% SDS and 5% Triton X-100; see
"Experimental Procedures") led to the isolation of a single protein
together with its cross-linked RNA component. Following digestion of
the precipitated protein moiety with proteinase K, the RNA was
extracted; and subsequently, a primer extension analysis should reveal
the exact cross-link site on the RNA corresponding to the precipitated
protein. See "Experimental Procedures" and "Results" for
further details.
|
|
To identify the snRNP-specific proteins cross-linked to the nucleotides
identified in the first experiment, we combined immunoprecipitation of
a single denatured cross-linked RNA-protein product with primer extension analysis of the cross-linked RNA moiety. The approach is
outlined schematically in Fig. 1B. After UV irradiation at 254 nm, the snRNP particles were dissociated in the presence of 1% SDS
at 70 °C and cooled to room temperature, and then Triton X-100 was
added to a final concentration of 5% (36). Under such conditions,
where the protein-protein interactions are completely disrupted, the
antibody should precipitate only a single snRNP-specific protein with
the cross-linked snRNA. After digestion of the immunoprecipitated protein with proteinase K, the RNA was analyzed by primer extension analysis as described above to identify the exact cross-linking sites
on the RNA corresponding to the precipitated protein. Non-cross-linked RNA as well as other proteins should not be coprecipitated (Fig. 1).
Ideally, in the primer extension analysis of the immunoprecipitated sample, no full-length RNA should be detected. However, in practice, the bands due to the stops at the cross-linking sites of the
precipitated protein have intensities significantly greater than that
of the background.
Identification of Cross-linking Sites in Stem-loop I of U1 snRNA
for the U1 70K Protein by Immunoprecipitation Combined with Primer
Extension Analysis--
We used HeLa U1 snRNPs as a test system for
investigating the RNA-protein interactions in native snRNPs. This HeLa
snRNP was chosen for the following reasons. (i) U1 snRNP is the best
characterized particle in terms of RNA-protein interactions among all
human snRNPs. For example, the U1 70K protein can be cross-linked to U1
snRNA with high yield (26, 27). (ii) Although binding studies have
shown that the U1 70K protein specifically interacts with stem-loop I
of U1 snRNA (11, 12), the exact cross-linking sites have not yet been
identified. Our approach thus provides an opportunity to identify these
sites exactly and to test the results by seeing whether the U1 70K
protein cross-linking site(s) are congruent with the interaction site
in stem-loop I. Therefore, we chose a cDNA primer complementary to
positions on the 3'-side of a putative cross-linking site, namely
positions 63-87 of stem-loop II.
Fig. 2A shows the primer
extension analysis of UV-irradiated naked U1 snRNA isolated from U1
snRNP by phenol extraction (lanes 1 and 2) in
comparison with U1 snRNA isolated from UV-cross-linked U1 snRNP after
treatment with proteinase K (lanes 3 and 4).
Natural, strong reverse transcriptase stops on U1 snRNA occur at
U45 to G38 within stem-loop I, as these stops
are present irrespective of irradiation (compare lanes
1-4). These stops were not investigated in detail. Strong reverse
transcriptase stops at C31 to A26 in stem-loop
I were observed only on U1 snRNA isolated from UV-cross-linked U1
snRNPs, but not on irradiated naked U1 snRNA (Fig. 2A,
compare lane 4 with lane 2), indicating that
nucleotides one position 5' to the stop sites (see above) must be
cross-linked to a U1 snRNP in native particles.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A, primer extension analysis of U1 snRNA
derived from UV-cross-linked U1 snRNPs (lanes 3 and
4) compared with UV-irradiated naked U1 snRNA (lanes
1 and 2). The cDNA primer used was complementary to
nucleotides 63-77 in stem-loop II of U1 snRNA (indicated in
C). Lanes 1 and 3, no UV irradiation
(control (Ctr)); lanes 2 and 4, 2 min
of UV irradiation at 254 nm. C, U, A,
and G indicate dideoxy sequence markers. Stops of the
reverse transcriptase during primer extension analysis are denoted on
the right (U45 to G38 and C31 to
A26). The black bar on the left indicates
stem-loop I of U1 snRNA. B, primer extension analysis of
cross-linked U1 snRNA after immunoprecipitation of cross-linked U1
snRNPs with anti-70K protein antibody ( -70K).
Prior to immunoprecipitation, cross-linked U1 snRNPs were dissociated
with the SDS/Triton X-100 procedure (see "Experimental
Procedures"). Lane 1, no UV irradiation (Ctr);
lane 2, 2 min of UV irradiation at 254 nm. Nucleotide positions of reverse transcriptase stops
(A29 and C31) are given on the right.
C, secondary structure of the U1 snRNA. Arrows
depict nucleotides that are identified to be cross-linked to the U1 70K
protein (U30 and G28). Note that the positions
of cross-linked nucleotides are one position upstream of the stops
caused by the reverse transcriptase (A29 and
C31; see B). The position of the cDNA primer
used for primer extension analysis is indicated by the solid
line in stem-loop II.
|
|
To determine whether the reverse transcriptase stops observed in the
initial experiment (Fig. 2A, lane 4) were
indeed due to a cross-link with the U1 70K protein (as expected for
those reasons stated above), we employed the immunoprecipitation
procedure outlined above using a monoclonal antibody (H111) (8) against the U1 70K protein. Fig. 2B shows the primer extension
analysis of U1 snRNA after UV cross-linking of the U1 snRNP particles
and immunoprecipitation with the anti-70K protein antibody in the presence of SDS/Triton X-100. Strikingly, strong reverse transcriptase stops were observed only at A29 and C31 of
stem-loop I of U1 snRNA in the UV-irradiated sample. Both stops are
significantly enriched (Fig. 2, compare A (lane
4) with B (lane 2)) and are located at
positions of U1 snRNA at which RNA-protein cross-links were detected in
the initial experiment (C31 to A26) (Fig.
2A). In control experiments carried out with antibodies specific for other U1 snRNPs such as the U1 C protein or the Sm proteins, no reverse transcriptase stops in stem-loop I were detected (data not shown). We thus conclude that G28 and
U30, located one nucleotide on the 5'-side of the stops at
A29 and C31, respectively, are two independent
cross-linking sites for the U1 70K protein (Fig. 2C).
N-terminal Sequencing and MALDI-MS Analysis of U1 70K Peptides
Cross-linked to Stem-loop I of U1 snRNA--
The relatively large
amount of U1 snRNP purified by anion-exchange chromatography (31)
enabled us to verify our immunoprecipitation results by an independent
method, i.e. by isolation and sequencing of cross-linked U1
70K peptide-oligonucleotide complexes. A similar approach was recently
described for several ribosomal proteins isolated from UV-irradiated
ribosomal subunits (34, 35, 37). Fig. 3
shows the purification strategy for the isolation of cross-linked peptides from U1 snRNPs. Purified 12 S U1 snRNPs were UV-irradiated at
254 nm, dissociated in the presence of 8 M urea, and
digested with various endoproteinases (see "Experimental
Procedures"). Cross-linked peptide-snRNA complexes were enriched by
size-exclusion chromatography, and the snRNA thus isolated was digested
with ribonucleases T1 and/or A. Cross-linked peptide-oligonucleotide complexes were then separated by RP-HPLC. Peak fractions eluting from
the RP-HPLC column that showed a strong absorbance at both 220 and 260 nm are good candidates for peptides (220 nm) cross-linked to
oligonucleotides (260 nm) (37). Each peak was collected and subjected
to automated N-terminal sequencing and MALDI-MS. N-terminal sequencing
revealed the cross-linked amino acid residue of the peptide moiety
because a gap is expected to occur at the position of the cross-linked
amino acid during analysis of the Edman degradation products (37-39).
In addition, MALDI-MS analysis of the cross-linked peptide-oligonucleotide complex allows the identification of the cross-linked oligonucleotide (34, 35).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
General strategy for N-terminal sequencing
and MALDI-MS analysis of cross-linked peptide-oligonucleotide complexes
isolated from UV-irradiated U1 snRNPs. 0.8-1.0 mg of
UV-cross-linked U1 snRNPs was dissociated in the presence of 8 M urea and diluted to a final urea concentration of 1
M, and the protein moiety was digested with various
endoproteinases (see "Experimental Procedures"). Size-exclusion
chromatography separated snRNAs and snRNAs that carry cross-linked
peptides from the non-cross-linked peptide moiety. Cross-link-enriched
snRNAs were digested with endoproteinase T1 or A, and cross-linked
peptide-oligonucleotide complexes were then separated by RP-HPLC.
RP-HPLC fractions with absorbances at 220 and 260 nm were collected and
analyzed by automated N-terminal sequencing and MALDI-MS analysis.
N-terminal sequence analysis revealed the cross-linked amino acid
because a gap in the analysis of the Edman degradation products occurs
at the site of the cross-linked amino acid (37-39). MALDI-MS of the
cross-linked peptide-oligonucleotide complex identified the
oligonucleotide part. The mass difference between the complex and the
sequenced peptide reveals the composition of the cross-linked
oligonucleotide (34, 35).
|
|
In this manner, we identified two different peptide stretches of the U1
70K protein cross-linked to U1 snRNA oligonucleotides after digestion
of the native UV-irradiated U1 snRNPs with trypsin and ribonuclease T1.
The two peptides coeluted within the same fractions upon RP-HPLC (data
not shown). The analysis of the Edman degradation products of the
tryptic fragments is shown in Fig. 4. The
major sequence was identified as RVXVDVER (where
X is an unknown amino acid) and corresponds to a tryptic
fragment of the U1 70K protein spanning positions 173-180, RVLVDVER.
The minor sequence is read as VNXDTTESKLR,
corresponding to a tryptic fragment of the U1 70K protein from
positions 110 to 120, i.e. VNYDTTESKLR. Importantly,
Leu175 of the major sequence and Tyr112 of the
minor sequence were absent in cycle 3 of the analysis (denoted as
X in Fig. 4), thus confirming that both amino acid residues
are cross-linked to the U1 snRNA within the U1 70K tryptic peptides.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
N-terminal sequence analysis of the isolated
U1 70K tryptic fragments cross-linked to U1 snRNA
oligonucleotides. Both tryptic fragments eluted within the same
fraction from the RP-HPLC column and hence were sequenced
concomitantly. The analysis and identification of the Edman degradation
products of cycles 1-11 of both peptides are shown. The first
panel shows the elution profile of the
phenylthiohydantoin-derivative standards (each 10 pmol) given in
one-letter amino acid code. dptu is diphenylthiourea, which
is an Edman degradation by-product. Amino acids corresponding to
residues 1-11 are in boldface. The C-terminal arginine of
the minor sequence could not be unambiguously identified and is
therefore shown in parentheses. The N-terminal sequences of
both peptides and their positions within the U1 70K protein sequence
are listed. The phenylthiohydantoin-derivatives of residue 3 (Leu175 and Tyr112, respectively) are missing
(designated as X), confirming these residues as amino acids
cross-linked to the U1 snRNA (see "Results" for
details).
|
|
An aliquot of this fraction was subjected to MALDI-MS (Fig.
5) to determine the mass of the
cross-linked peptide-oligonucleotide complex. The difference between
the mass of the cross-linked peptide-oligonucleotide complex and that
of the peptide alone (RVLVDVER, [M + H]+ = 985.6, and
VNYDTTESKLR, [M + H]+ = 1325.7; cross-linked amino acids
are underlined) allows the determination of the composition of the cross-linked oligonucleotide (34, 35). MALDI-MS analysis of the
fraction showed a mass peak of 3020.2 (Fig. 5A), but a mass difference of either 2034.6 or 1694.5, respectively, does not correspond to any T1 fragment of U1 snRNA sequence. However, it is well
known from MALDI-MS analysis of oligonucleotides that a variety of
metal counterions interact with the phosphate backbone, causing
multiple or "false" mass peaks of cross-linked complexes with
increasing numbers of nucleotides (40). In fact, the exact mass of a
large cross-linked complex could previously be determined only after
performing an ion-exchange procedure (34, 40). Taking this into
account, the mass of 3020.2 corresponds to a T1 oligonucleotide of U1
snRNA with the nucleotide composition G1A2Y3 (where Y is pyrimidine since
C and U differ by only 1 mass unit) with four Mg2+ ions
attached, cross-linked to the major tryptic fragment of the U1 70K
protein, RVLVDVER (Fig. 5C; see figure legend for further details). Only one T1 fragment matches this calculated composition, namely 5'-AUCACG-3' from positions 29 to 34 of stem-loop I. This was
verified by further MALDI-MS analysis of the fraction after partial
hydrolysis (Fig. 5B). The spectrum shows multiple mass peaks
(designated b-f), which are analyzed in Fig. 5C.
They correspond to the hydrolysis products of the U1 snRNA
oligonucleotide still cross-linked to the
173RVLVDVER180 U1 70K tryptic peptide. The
cross-linked oligonucleotide composition perfectly matches the
composition of the U1 snRNA T1 fragment from positions 29 to 34 of stem-loop I (5'-AUCACG-3') (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, the
mass analysis revealed that the actual cross-linking site must be
located at the 5'-end of the fragment (5'-AUCACG-3') (Fig. 5,
B and C, mass peak a/b). This is
consistent with the identification of U30 being one of the
cross-linking sites for the U1 70K protein as detected by
immunoprecipitation combined with primer extension analysis (Fig.
2, B and C; see above). Although the
fraction analyzed contained the minor second tryptic peptide of the U1
70K protein (110VNYDTTESKLR120) cross-linked to
U1 snRNA (see above), the corresponding cross-linked oligonucleotide
could not be identified in this experiment because the major
cross-linked complex in this fraction (RVLVDVER cross-linked to
5'-AUCACG-3') obscured the minor complex in the mass spectrum.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
MALDI-MS analysis of the U1 70K tryptic
peptide (173RVLVDVER180) cross-linked via
Leu175 to an RNase T1 fragment
(29AUCACG34) in stem-loop I of U1 snRNA.
A, mass spectrum of the RP-HPLC-purified fraction containing
two U1 70K tryptic fragments (173RVLVDVER180
and 107VARVNYDTTESKL119) cross-linked to U1
snRNA T1 oligonucleotides. B, mass spectrum of the fraction
after partial hydrolysis of the cross-linked oligonucleotide. C,
nucleotide composition of the U1 snRNA T1 oligonucleotide cross-linked
to the U1 70K tryptic fragment
(173RVLVDVER180). The nucleotide composition
(fourth column) was determined from mass peaks
a-f as shown in A and B. The cross-linked
U1 70K peptide sequence (fragment 173-180) and its mass ([M + H]+) are also listed (third column). The
cross-link site within the peptide (Leu175) as identified
by Edman degradation is underlined (see Fig. 3).
Y denotes pyrimidines C and U. Note that C and U differ by
only 1 mass unit (323 and 324, respectively). Since MALDI-MS in the
linear mode does not allow the unambiguous differentiation between C
and U, different compositions of the cross-linked oligonucleotide were
considered. Hence, the calculated mass (second column) is
given as the average of all possible combinations of C and U residues
within the oligonucleotide concerned. The mass of the cross-linked T1
oligonucleotide was calculated as 1937.5 ± 1.5. The mass
difference of 97.1 ± 1.5 between the measured mass of peak
a (A; 3020.2) and the calculated mass of 2923.1 ± 1.5 (985.6 + (1937.5 ± 1.5) = 2923.1 ± 1.5) is due to
the interaction of four Mg2+ ions with the complex
(fourth column). The calculated mass of the total complex
(second column) therefore includes the masses of four
Mg2+ ions ((2923.1 ± 1.5) + 97.2 = 3020.3 ± 1.5). Furthermore, the partial hydrolysis of the cross-linked
complex resulted in fragments that have 2',3'-cyclic phosphate termini
(mass peaks b, d, and f), which is
indicated as H2O in the
fourth column. D, sequence of the U1 snRNA T1
oligonucleotide cross-linked to Leu175 in the U1 70K
protein. Positions on the U1 snRNA are shown as subscript
numbers. Brackets indicate either the mass of the total
complex (mass peak a) or of fragments obtained after partial
hydrolysis (mass peaks b-f). Designation of the
bars correspond to the peaks in A and
B and the first column in C.
|
|
In a similar experiment using chymotrypsin and RNase A for the
generation of cross-linked peptide-oligonucleotide complexes, we could
isolate and sequence an RP-HPLC fraction containing a predominant
chymotryptic fragment of the U1 70K protein,
107VARVNYDTTESKL119 (data not shown). In
absolute agreement with the data derived from the tryptic fragment,
Tyr112 was found by Edman degradation to be the actual site
of cross-linking to the U1 snRNA in the chymotryptic fragment (data not
shown). Fig. 6A shows the
MALDI-MS analysis of the fraction. The mass peak designated as
a (2492.7) corresponds to the mass of the peptide (VARVNYDTTESKL, [M + H]+ = 1495.8) cross-linked to a 3-mer
oligonucleotide with the composition
G1A1Y1 (Fig. 6B). The
other mass peaks could not be assigned, but most probably correspond to
contaminating minor peptides within the fraction already apparent in
the Edman degradation. Mass peaks of cross-linked
peptide-oligonucleotide complexes shows a reduced intensity in
comparison with non-cross-linked peptides when measured under standard
conditions for peptides.2
HeLa U1 snRNA contains four RNase A fragments with the determined nucleotide composition (28GAU30,
84GAC86, 93GAU95, and
135AGU137). The GAU 3-mer from positions 28 to
30 is located in stem-loop I of the U1 snRNA and encompasses the second
cross-linking site for the U1 70K protein (G28) as
identified independently by our immunoprecipitation and primer extension analysis (Fig. 2B; see above). Our sequencing
results with the cross-linked U1 70K peptide-oligonucleotide complexes clearly confirm our interpretation of the immunoprecipitation experiment, i.e. that the U1 70K protein is cross-linked via
two independent sites to U30 and G28 in
stem-loop I. We conclude that Tyr112 of the U1 70K protein
is cross-linked to G28 and Leu175 to
U30. In summary, immunoprecipitation combined with primer
extension analysis is shown to be a reliable method for the detection
of RNA-protein cross-linking sites on the RNA in native UV-irradiated snRNP particles.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A, MALDI-MS spectrum of the
RP-HPLC-purified fraction containing mainly the U1 70K chymotryptic
fragment (107VARVNYDTTESKL119) cross-linked via
Tyr112 to an RNase A fragment of U1 snRNA. B,
nucleotide composition of the RNase A fragment of U1 snRNA cross-linked
to the U1 70K chymotryptic fragment
(107VARVNYDTTESKL119). The nucleotide
composition is listed in the forth column and was determined
from mass peak a in A. The cross-linked U1 70K
peptide sequence (fragment 107-119) and its mass ([M + H]+) are also listed (third column). The
cross-linked amino acid within the peptide (Tyr112) as
identified by Edman degradation is underlined (see Fig. 3).
See "Results" and the legend to Fig. 5 for further
details.
|
|
U5 snRNA-Protein Cross-linking Sites within Native 25 S U4/U6.U5
Tri-snRNPs--
We used our primer extension approach to investigate
the U5 snRNA-protein interaction within native 25 S U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP particles isolated from HeLa cells. Fig.
7A shows the primer extension analysis of U5 snRNA derived from cross-linked tri-snRNP particles (lanes 3 and 4) and of UV-irradiated naked U5
snRNA (lanes 1 and 2). In comparison with the
irradiated naked U snRNAs, primer extension analysis of U5 snRNA
derived from UV-irradiated tri-snRNP particles shows additional strong
reverse transcriptase stops at U41 to A44 (Fig.
7A, lane 4), corresponding to U40 to
U43 within the highly conserved loop 1 being cross-linked
(Fig. 7B). Although stops at these nucleotides, in
particular at U40 and U41, were also present in
the irradiated naked U5 snRNA, they were significantly increased
(~50-fold) in the irradiated tri-snRNP sample (Fig. 7A,
compare lanes 2 and 4). This suggests that
U40 to U43 are targets for RNA-protein
cross-links within loop 1 of U5 snRNA. In addition, less strong
RNA-protein cross-linking sites were observed at A70 and
U72 in the 3'-half of IL1 (Fig. 7A; see also
Fig. 7C for U5 snRNA sequence), corresponding to reverse
transcriptase stops at C71 and C73 (Fig.
7A). Weak stops were also observed at A47 and in
the 5'-half of IL2 (Fig. 7A). At these sites, no stops were
detectable on the irradiated naked U5 snRNA (Fig. 7A,
compare lanes 2 and 4), demonstrating that they
are also due to RNA-protein cross-linking events.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
A, primer extension analysis of U5 snRNA
derived from UV-cross-linked 25 S U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP (lanes
3 and 4) compared with UV-irradiated naked U5 snRNA
(lanes 1 and 2). Lanes 1 and
3, no UV irradiation (control (Ctr)); lanes
2 and 4, 2 min of UV irradiation at 254 nm
(UV). C, U, A, and
G indicate dideoxy sequence markers. The cDNA primer
used in this experiment is complementary to positions 83-103
(indicated as a solid line in C). The in
vitro U5 snRNA transcript used for generation of marker lanes has
five additional nucleotides on the 5'-end. Reverse transcriptase stops
at U41 to A44, C71, and
C73 and weak stops at nucleotides within the 5'-half of IL2
are denoted on the right. Black bars on the left indicate
loop 1 and the 3'-half of IL1 of U5 snRNA. B, primer
extension analysis of cross-linked U5 snRNA after immunoprecipitation
of cross-linked 25 S U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNPs with anti-220-kDa protein
( -220) or anti-116-kDa protein
( -116) antibody. Prior to immunoprecipitation,
cross-linked 25 S U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNPs were dissociated with the SDS/Triton X-100 procedure (see
"Experimental Procedures"). Lanes 1 and 3, no
UV irradiation; lanes 2 and 4, 2 min of UV
irradiation at 254 nm. See Fig. 1 for details. Nucleotide positions of
reverse transcriptase stops (C73 and U41 to
A44) are given on the right. Black bars on the
left indicate loop 1 and the 3'-half of IL1 of U5 snRNA. C,
secondary structure of the U5 snRNA. Arrows depict
nucleotides that were identified to be cross-linked to the 220-kDa
protein (U40 to U43 and U72). Note
that the positions of cross-linked nucleotides are one position
upstream of the stops caused by the reverse transcriptase
(C73 and U41 to A44; see
A and B). The gray arrow indicates the
weaker cross-link at U42. The position of the cDNA
primer used for primer extension analysis is indicated by the
solid line.
|
|
To identify the U5-specific proteins cross-linked to these nucleotides
within U5 snRNA, we applied our procedure of immunoprecipitation and
primer extension to the UV-cross-linked tri-snRNP particles using
antibodies specific for the 220-, 200-, 116-, and 40-kDa proteins
(41-43). These four proteins form a remarkably stable heteromeric
protein complex in the absence of U5 snRNA (43). Fig. 7B
shows the results of the primer extension analysis of U5 snRNA after
cross-linking of the tri-snRNP particles and immunoprecipitation of the
220- and 116-kDa proteins. Reverse transcriptase stops were exclusively
detected in the UV-light irradiated sample that was subjected to
immunoprecipitation with anti-220-kDa protein antibody (Fig.
7B, lane 2). The stops observed after
immunoprecipitation with the anti-220-kDa protein antibody are located
at U41 to A44 (Fig. 7B),
corresponding to cross-links to U40 to U43
within the highly conserved loop 1 of U5 snRNA. In addition, a
weaker reverse transcriptase stop was observed at C73,
corresponding to a cross-link to U72 within the 3'-half of
IL1 of U5 snRNA. No stops were detected within loop 1 and IL1 of U5
snRNA with anti-116-kDa protein antibody (Fig. 7B,
lane 4) or anti-200- and anti-40-kDa protein antibodies (data not shown). This clearly demonstrates that within native tri-snRNP particles, only the U5-specific 220-kDa protein is
cross-linked to the four adjacent nucleotides within loop 1 as well as
to U72 within the 3'-half if IL1 of U5 snRNA (Fig.
7C). The absence of any detectable full-length U5 snRNA
transcript in either the irradiated (Fig. 7B, lanes
2 and 4) or non-cross-linked (lanes 1 and
3) samples shows that non-cross-linked U5 snRNA was not coprecipitated. After UV irradiation, only those U5 snRNAs were coprecipitated that were covalently attached to the 220-kDa protein via
cross-links to nucleotides in either loop 1 or IL1 (Fig.
7C). The low overall level of cross-linking yield argues
against multiple cross-links occurring in one U5 snRNA molecule.
Therefore, every nucleotide that causes a reverse transcriptase stop in
this experiment represents an authentic cross-linking site for the
220-kDa protein. This situation is similar to that observed in the case
of the U1 70K protein (Fig. 2; see above), where independent sites
within the protein became cross-linked to neighboring nucleotides of stem-loop I of U1 snRNA, thus causing apparently multiple reverse transcriptase stops.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have employed a novel method involving UV
cross-linking to investigate direct snRNA-protein interactions within
native HeLa snRNP. To identify the exact sites of cross-linking of the
proteins to the RNA, we developed an approach that combines immunoprecipitation of cross-linked proteins with primer extension analysis of the cross-linked RNA moiety.
To test the feasibility of our approach, we chose native U1 snRNP and
tri-snRNP particles purified from HeLa cells. The primer extension
analysis subsequent to immunoprecipitation identified multiple
cross-linking sites of the U1 70K protein in U1 snRNA (G28
and U30) and of the U5 snRNP-specific 220-kDa protein in
the U5 snRNA (U40 to U43 and U72).
The fact that the U1 70K protein amino acids Tyr112 and
Leu175 were found to be cross-linked to G28 and
U30, respectively, by N-terminal sequencing and MALDI-MS of
purified U1 70K peptide-oligonucleotide cross-links (Figs. 4-6)
provides an independent confirmation that each strong reverse
transcriptase stop observed after immunoprecipitation is an authentic
cross-linking site. Our approach can therefore be considered as a
general approach suitable for the detection of single and/or multiple
RNA-protein contact sites in a variety of different native
UV-irradiated RNP particles.
Since no label for either the RNA or the protein moiety can be used in
native particles, it is clear that our approach is not as sensitive as
when labeled components are used; and therefore, more material is
required. Despite the lower sensitivity, our approach has advantages
over those that use reconstituted particles. First, purified native
particles are stable and fully assembled and thus more homogeneous.
Reconstitution of particles has been successfully used to increase the
cross-linking yield by incorporation of site-specific cross-links.
However, cross-linking of such particles depends on the efficiency of
reconstitution, and incomplete or incorrect assembly can result in
different subpopulations or false positives, which in turn complicate
the interpretation of the complex cross-linking pattern. Second, primer
extension analysis of the cross-linked RNAs subsequent to
immunoprecipitation can reveal multiple contact sites between one
protein and the RNA within one experiment. Thus, our approach allows
the rapid and exact identification of RNA-protein cross-links.
In addition to its methodological importance, this work also
contributes valuable information that helps in our understanding of the
molecular organization of the U1 particle as well as that of U5 snRNP
within the context of tri-snRNP. Previous deletion and mutation
analyses demonstrated that the U1 70K protein directly and specifically
interacts with stem-loop I of U1 snRNA via its RNA-binding domain (RBD)
(11) (Fig. 8A), requiring 8 of
10 bases (positions 28-37) of the loop for binding (12, 13). Our U1 70K protein cross-linking results (cross-linking of Tyr112
and Leu175 to G28 and U30 within
stem-loop I, respectively) complement the previous studies and allow us
to formulate a structural model to explain the U1 70K RBD interaction
with stem-loop I of U1 snRNA. Based on a combination of a secondary
structure prediction of the U1 70K RBD (11, 44) (Fig. 8A)
and crystallographic data of other RBD-containing proteins complexed
with RNA (U1 A (18), U2 A'/U2 B" (21), and Sxl (45)), we modeled
a three-dimensional structure of the U1 70K RBD (SWISS-MODEL) (46). In
this model, the cross-linked amino acids are located in loop 1 (Tyr112) and -strand 4 (Leu175) adjacent to
the octamer consensus sequence motif present in -strand 3 (11) (Fig.
8, A and B). The side chains of the amino acids
directly interact with nucleotides in U1 stem-loop I separated by 1 base (Fig. 8B). This site-specific interaction found in the U1 70K RNP is highly reminiscent of that observed in crystal structures of other RBD-containing proteins complexed with RNA. Thus, amino acids
located in loop 1 and -strand 4 of RBD-1 from the U1 A (18) and Sxl
(45) proteins contact nucleotides separated by 1 base in their cognate
RNAs (of U1 snRNA stem-loop II and the transformer
polypyrimidine tract, respectively) (18, 45). Our results therefore
provide further evidence for the highly conserved nature of the RBD-RNA
interactions.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
A, sequence of part of the human U1 70K
protein. The position of the U1 70K RBD (11) is indicated by the
shaded box. Black boxed amino acids belong to the
RNP octamer consensus motif. Amino acids within white boxes
that are marked by arrows (Tyr112 and
Leu175) are the cross-linking sites to U1 snRNA. Secondary
structure elements are given within the sequence. The secondary
structure prediction was performed according to Ref. 44. B,
schematic representation of the RNA-binding domain of the U1 70K
protein cross-linked to stem-loop I of U1 snRNA. The three-dimensional
structure of the U1 70K RBD was modeled using SWISS-MODEL (46) and
secondary structure prediction analysis (PHDsec) (44). Cross-linked
amino acids (Tyr112 and Leu175) are shown
within the structure of the protein. Cross-linked amino acids and
nucleotides are connected by arrows.
|
|
In UV-irradiated tri-snRNP particles, we demonstrated that the
predominant UV-induced cross-links occur between the U5 snRNP-specific 220-kDa protein and several nucleotides within the highly conserved loop 1 of U5 snRNA. In addition, we observed a weaker site of cross-linking of the 220-kDa protein to U72 in the 3'-half
of IL1 (Fig. 7).
Our cross-linking results from HeLa tri-snRNP complement and extend
previous cross-linking studies of U5 snRNPs reconstituted in
vitro within yeast nuclear extracts (28). In these studies, the
220-kDa yeast homologue Prp8p was found to be cross-linked mainly to
loop 1 of U5 snRNA. Additional site-specific cross-linking sites for
Prp8p were also identified in the 3'-half of IL1 (corresponding to IL2
in the yeast nomenclature) and for nucleotides in the 5'- and 3'-halves
of IL2 (corresponding to yeast IL1). In our studies, we further
observed RNA-protein cross-linking sites within the 5'-half of IL2 of
U5 snRNA. Due to their low abundance, we were not able to identify the
U5 or tri-snRNP(s) involved in these or the other weak RNA-protein
cross-linking sites observed (to U46 and A70;
see "Results"). In yeast, the U5 snRNP-specific Snu114p was found
to be cross-linked to the 5'-half of IL2 (yeast IL1) (28). We did not
identify the Snu114p human homologue, the U5 116-kDa protein, within
any cross-linked products. A possible explanation for the different
116-kDa protein/Snu114p cross-linking pattern may be that yeast U5
snRNP assumes a different RNP conformation than HeLa U5 snRNP, possibly
due to the additional variable stem-loop in yeast that is located close
to the cross-linking site of Snu114p.
Taken together, our 220-kDa protein cross-linking data suggest that,
similar to the situation in yeast, multiple 220-kDa protein regions
directly contact U5 snRNA and that the human 220-kDa protein spans the
entire 5'-stem-loop of U5 snRNA. Thus, not only is the 220-kDa protein
evolutionarily highly conserved between yeast and man, but also its
interactions with the U5 snRNA within U5 snRNPs.
The fact that the highly conserved loop 1 of U5 snRNA extensively
contacts the 220-kDa protein (with U40 to U43
being cross-linked to this protein (see Fig. 7)) deserves special attention for the following reasons. First, it has been shown within
both the yeast and mammalian in vitro splicing systems that
deletion of loop 1 has no effect on the first catalytic step of
splicing (47, 48). Additionally, loop 1 is dispensable for the second
catalytic step of splicing within the mammalian splicing system (48).
These results suggest that, under certain conditions, loop 1 is not
absolutely required for splicing and that other spliceosomal factors
can compensate for it when it is absent. The extended interaction
surface between loop 1 and the 220-kDa protein, observed in our
experiments, reinforces the idea that the 220-kDa protein substitutes
for the function of loop 1 in exon alignment prior to the second
catalytic step of splicing when loop 1 is deleted (48). Second, since
loop 1 and the 220-kDa protein/Prp8p can be cross-linked to equivalent
positions at the 5'- and 3'-splice sites in HeLa cells as well as in
the yeast system (49-51), it has been hypothesized that one role of the protein is the stabilization of the loop 1-pre-mRNA interaction throughout the splicing reaction (50). The fact that at least two of
the nucleotides that we identified here as cross-linking sites for the
220-kDa protein, namely U40 and U41, are
identical to those found cross-linked to the 5'-splice site and
adjacent to the 3'-splice site in both splicing systems (52, 53) lends
support to the proposed function of the protein in exon alignment.
Cross-linking and genetic studies of the 220-kDa protein and its yeast
homologue indicate a functional interaction of the carboxyl-terminal
region of the protein and the 5'-splice site as well as the 3'-splice
site in the catalytic center (54-56). Accordingly, the exact
localization of the region of the 220-kDa protein that is involved in
the observed extended interaction with loop 1 of U5 snRNA
(e.g. according to the methods outlined above for the U1 70K
protein) will be important, as it allows us to gain further insight
into the functional and/or structural domains of the protein that are
close to or within the catalytic center of the spliceosome. As it has
recently been shown that Prp8p also directly interacts with U6 snRNA
(29) and seems to stabilize tertiary interactions of the 5'-splice
site, the 3'-splice site, and U6 snRNA prior to the second step of
splicing (57), it would thus be interesting to see whether distinct
protein regions or domains might have distinct functional features.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Veronica Raker, Nick Watkins, and
Cindy Will for critically reading the manuscript. We are grateful to
Axel Badouin for preparation of spliceosomal snRNPs and Ivan Vidovic
for help in modeling the U1 70K protein structure.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Program and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants SFB 286 and SFB 397 (to R. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-551-201-1407; Fax: 49-551-1196; E-mail:
reinhard.luehrmann@mpi-bpc.mpg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 26, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M007434200
2
B. Thiede and H. Urlaub, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
snRNP, small nuclear
ribonucleoprotein;
snRNA, small nuclear RNA;
70K, 70-kDa;
IL, internal
loop;
RP-HPLC, reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography;
MALDI-MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass
spectrometry;
RBD, RNA-binding domain.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Krämer, A.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
367-409
|
| 2.
|
Will, C. L.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
320-328
|
| 3.
|
Will, C. L.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1997)
in
Eukaryotic mRNA Processing
(Krainer, A. R., ed)
, pp. 130-173, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
| 4.
|
Staley, J. P.,
and Guthrie, C.
(1998)
Cell
92,
315-326
|
| 5.
|
Burge, C. B.,
Tuschl, T.,
and Sharp, P. A.
(1999)
in
The RNA World
(Gesteland, R. F.
, Cech, T. R.
, and Atkins, J. E., eds), 2nd Ed.
, pp. 525-560, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 6.
|
Kambach, C.,
Walke, S.,
and Nagai, K.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
9,
222-230
|
| 7.
|
Kastner, B.
(1998)
in
RNP Particles, Splicing and Autoimmune Diseases
(Schenkel, J., ed)
, pp. 95-140, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
|
| 8.
|
Kastner, B.,
Kornstadt, U.,
Bach, M.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
839-849
|
| 9.
|
Raker, V. A.,
Plessel, G.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2256-2269
|
| 10.
|
Kambach, C.,
Walke, S.,
Young, R.,
Avis, J. M.,
de la Fortelle, E.,
Raker, V. A.,
Lührmann, R.,
Li, J.,
and Nagai, K.
(1999)
Cell
96,
375-387
|
| 11.
|
Query, C. C.,
Bentley, R. C.,
and Keene, J. D.
(1989)
Cell
57,
89-101
|
| 12.
|
Surowy, C. S.,
van Santen, V. L.,
Scheib-Wixted, S. M.,
and Spritz, R. A.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
4179-4186
|
| 13.
|
Query, C. C.,
Bentley, R. C.,
and Keene, J. D.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
4872-4881
|
| 14.
|
Lutz-Freyermuth, C.,
and Keene, J. D.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
2975-2982
|
| 15.
|
Scherly, D.,
Boelens, W.,
van Venrooij, W. J.,
Dathan, N. A.,
Hamm, J.,
and Mattaj, I. W.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
4163-4170
|
| 16.
|
Jessen, T. H.,
Oubridge, C.,
Teo, C. H.,
Pritchard, C.,
and Nagai, K.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
3447-3456
|
| 17.
|
Nelissen, R. L.,
Will, C. L.,
van Venrooij, W. J.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4113-4125
|
| 18.
|
Oubridge, C.,
Ito, N.,
Evans, P. R.,
Teo, C. H.,
and Nagai, K.
(1994)
Nature
372,
432-438
|
| 19.
|
Scherly, D.,
Boelens, W.,
Dathan, N. A.,
van Venrooij, W. J.,
and Mattaj, I. W.
(1990)
Nature
345,
502-506
|
| 20.
|
Scherly, D.,
Dathan, N. A.,
Boelens, W.,
van Venrooij, W. J.,
and Mattaj, I. W.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
3675-3681
|
| 21.
|
Price, S. R.,
Evans, P. R.,
and Nagai, K.
(1998)
Nature
394,
645-650
|
| 22.
|
Nottrott, S.,
Hartmuth, K.,
Fabrizio, P.,
Urlaub, H.,
Vidovic, I.,
Ficner, R.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6119-6133
|
| 23.
|
Achsel, T.,
Brahms, H.,
Kastner, B.,
Bachi, A.,
Wilm, M.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5789-5802
|
| 24.
|
Mayes, A. E.,
Verdone, L.,
Legrain, P.,
and Beggs, J. D.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
4321-4331
|
| 25.
|
Salgado-Garrido, J.,
Bragado-Nilsson, E.,
Kandels-Lewis, S.,
and Séraphin, B.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
3451-3462
|
| 26.
|
Woppmann, A.,
Rinke, J.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
10985-11004
|
| 27.
|
Heinrichs, V.,
Hackl, W.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
227,
15-28
|
| 28.
|
Dix, I.,
Russell, C. S.,
O'Keefe, R. T.,
Newman, A. J.,
and Beggs, J. D.
(1998)
RNA
4,
1675-1686
|
| 29.
|
Vidal, V. P.,
Verdone, L.,
Mayes, A. E.,
and Beggs, J. D.
(1999)
RNA
5,
1470-1481
|
| 30.
|
Laggerbauer, B.,
Lauber, J.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
868-875
|
| 31.
|
Bach, M.,
Krol, A.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
449-457
|
| 32.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
Lebovitz, R. M.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
1475-1489
|
| 33.
|
Hartmuth, K.,
Raker, V. A.,
Huber, J.,
Branlant, C.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
285,
133-147
|
| 34.
|
Urlaub, H.,
Thiede, B.,
Müller, E. C.,
Brimacombe, R.,
and Wittmann-Liebold, B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14547-14555
|
| 35.
|
Thiede, B.,
Urlaub, H.,
Neubauer, H.,
and Wittmann-Liebold, B.
(1999)
Methods Mol. Biol.
118,
63-72
|
| 36.
|
Chiara, M. D.,
Palandjian, L.,
Feld Kramer, R.,
and Reed, R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4746-4759
|
| 37.
|
Urlaub, H.,
Kruft, V.,
Bischof, O.,
Müller, E. C.,
and Wittmann-Liebold, B.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
4578-4588
|
| 38.
|
Metz-Boutigue, M. H.,
Reinbolt, J.,
Ebel, J. P.,
Ehresmann, C.,
and Ehresmann, B.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
245,
194-200
|
| 39.
|
Willis, M. C.,
LeCuyer, K. A.,
Meisenheimer, K. M.,
Uhlenbeck, O. C.,
and Koch, T. H.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4947-4952
|
| 40.
|
Nordhoff, E.,
Cramer, R.,
Karas, M.,
Hillenkamp, F.,
Kirpekar, F.,
Kristiansen, K.,
and Roepstorff, P.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3347-3357
|
| 41.
|
Lauber, J.,
Fabrizio, P.,
Teigelkamp, S.,
Lane, W. S.,
Hartmann, E.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
4001-4015
|
| 42.
|
Fabrizio, P.,
Laggerbauer, B.,
Lauber, J.,
Lane, W. S.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4092-4106
|
| 43.
|
Achsel, T.,
Ahrens, K.,
Brahms, H.,
Teigelkamp, S.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6756-6766
|
| 44.
|
Rost, B.,
and Sander, C.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
232,
584-599
|
| 45.
|
Handa, N.,
Nureki, O.,
Kurimoto, K.,
Kim, I.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Shimura, Y.,
Muto, Y.,
and Yokoyama, S.
(1999)
Nature
398,
579-585
|
| 46.
|
Guex, N.,
Diemand, A.,
and Peitsch, M. C.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
364-367
|
| 47.
|
O'Keefe, R. T.,
Norman, C.,
and Newman, A. J.
(1996)
Cell
86,
679-689
|
| 48.
|
Ségault, V.,
Will, C. L.,
Polycarpou-Schwarz, M.,
Mattaj, I. W.,
Branlant, C.,
and Lührmann, R.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2782-2790
|
| 49.
|
Umen, J. G.,
and Guthrie, C.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
855-868
|
| 50.
|
Teigelkamp, S.,
Newman, A. J.,
and Beggs, J. D.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2602-2612
|
| 51.
|
Reyes, J. L.,
Kois, P.,
Konforti, B. B.,
and Konarska, M. M.
(1996)
RNA
2,
213-225
|
| 52.
|
Sontheimer, E. J.,
and Steitz, J. A.
(1993)
Science
262,
1989-1996
|
| 53.
|
Newman, A. J.,
Teigelkamp, S.,
and Beggs, J. D.
(1995)
RNA
1,
968-980
|
| 54.
|
Umen, J. G.,
and Guthrie, C.
(1996)
Genetics
143,
723-739
|
| 55.
|
Reyes, J. L.,
Gustafson, E. H.,
Luo, H. R.,
Moore, M. J.,
and Konarska, M. M.
(1999)
RNA
5,
167-179
|
| 56.
|
Siatecka, M.,
Reyes, J. L.,
and Konarska, M. M.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1983-1993
|
| 57.
|
Collins, C. A.,
and Guthrie, C.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1970-1982
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Granneman, G. Kudla, E. Petfalski, and D. Tollervey
Identification of protein binding sites on U3 snoRNA and pre-rRNA by UV cross-linking and high-throughput analysis of cDNAs
PNAS,
June 16, 2009;
106(24):
9613 - 9618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Scofield and M. Lynch
Evolutionary Diversification of the Sm Family of RNA-Associated Proteins
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
November 1, 2008;
25(11):
2255 - 2267.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Samanta, D. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chowdhury, J. Ghosh, S. Pal, A. Basu, A. Bhattacharya, A. Das, D. Das, and C. DasGupta
Protein Folding by Domain V of Escherichia coli 23S rRNA: Specificity of RNA-Protein Interactions
J. Bacteriol.,
May 1, 2008;
190(9):
3344 - 3352.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. M. Mitrovich and C. Guthrie
Evolution of small nuclear RNAs in S. cerevisiae, C. albicans, and other hemiascomycetous yeasts
RNA,
December 1, 2007;
13(12):
2066 - 2080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Kuhn-Holsken, O. Dybkov, B. Sander, R. Luhrmann, and H. Urlaub
Improved identification of enriched peptide RNA cross-links from ribonucleoprotein particles (RNPs) by mass spectrometry
Nucleic Acids Res.,
August 1, 2007;
35(15):
e95 - e95.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Dybkov, C. L. Will, J. Deckert, N. Behzadnia, K. Hartmuth, and R. Luhrmann
U2 snRNA-Protein Contacts in Purified Human 17S U2 snRNPs and in Spliceosomal A and B Complexes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 1, 2006;
26(7):
2803 - 2816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. KUHN-HOLSKEN, C. LENZ, B. SANDER, R. LUHRMANN, and H. URLAUB
Complete MALDI-ToF MS analysis of cross-linked peptide-RNA oligonucleotides derived from nonlabeled UV-irradiated ribonucleoprotein particles
RNA,
December 1, 2005;
11(12):
1915 - 1930.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. GRAINGER and J. D. BEGGS
Prp8 protein: At the heart of the spliceosome
RNA,
May 1, 2005;
11(5):
533 - 557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. MACMORRIS, C. BROCKER, and T. BLUMENTHAL
UAP56 levels affect viability and mRNA export in Caenorhabditis elegans
RNA,
July 1, 2003;
9(7):
847 - 857.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. O'Keefe
Mutations in U5 snRNA loop 1 influence the splicing of different genes in vivo
Nucleic Acids Res.,
December 15, 2002;
30(24):
5476 - 5484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Comolli, N. B. Ulyanov, A. M. Soto, L. A. Marky, T. L. James, and W. H. Gmeiner
NMR structure of the 3' stem-loop from human U4 snRNA
Nucleic Acids Res.,
October 15, 2002;
30(20):
4371 - 4379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|