J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 6, 4183-4191, February 11, 2000
Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans as Extracellular Docking
Molecules for Matrilysin (Matrix Metalloproteinase 7)*
Wei-Hsuan
Yu
and
J. Frederick
Woessner Jr.§
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101
 |
ABSTRACT |
Many matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are tightly
bound to tissues; matrilysin (MMP-7), although the smallest of the
MMPs, is one of the most tightly bound. The most likely docking
molecules for MMP-7 are heparan sulfate proteoglycans on or around
epithelial cells and in the underlying basement membrane. This is
established by extraction experiments and confocal microscopy. The
enzyme is extracted from homogenates of postpartum rat uterus by
heparin/heparan sulfate and by heparinase III treatment. The enzyme is
colocalized with heparan sulfate in the apical region of uterine
glandular epithelial cells and can be released by heparinase digestion. Heparan sulfate and MMP-7 are expressed at similar stages of the rat
estrous cycle. The strength of heparin binding by recombinant rat
proMMP-7 was examined by affinity chromatography, affinity coelectrophoresis, and homogeneous enzyme-based binding assay; the
KD is 5-10 nM. Zymographic measurement
of MMP-7 activity is greatly enhanced by heparin. Two putative
heparin-binding peptides have been identified near the C- and
N-terminal regions of proMMP-7; however, molecular modeling suggests a
more extensive binding track or cradle crossing multiple peptide
strands. Evidence is also found for the binding of MMP-2, -9, and -13. Binding of MMP-7 and other MMPs to heparan sulfate in the extracellular
space could prevent loss of secreted enzyme, provide a reservoir of
latent enzyme, and facilitate cellular sensing and regulation of enzyme levels. Binding to the cell surface could position the enzyme for
directed proteolytic attack, for activation of or by other MMPs and for
regulation of other cell surface proteins. Dislodging MMPs by treatment
with compounds such as heparin might be beneficial in attenuating
excessive tissue breakdown such as occurs in cancer metastasis,
arthritis, and angiogenesis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Remodeling of the extracellular matrix is critical in many
physiological processes such as embryonic development, bone growth, nerve outgrowth, ovulation, uterine involution, and wound healing; the
family of matrix metalloproteinases
(MMPs)1 plays a major role in
such remodeling (1, 2). These proteases also have a prominent role in
pathological processes such as cancer invasion and metastasis (3),
arthritis (4), and atherosclerosis (5). The matrixin family comprises
20 members that differ in domain structure and specificity (6). Much is
known about the regulation of these enzymes at the level of
transcription (7), activation of proenzyme (8), and inhibition by
natural inhibitors such as the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases
(9). However, an important aspect of these enzymes has generally been
overlooked, namely, how they are anchored outside the cell.
An instructive example is found in articular cartilage: compression
drives out fluid into the synovial space, and release of pressure leads
to fluid imbibition. This tissue contains MMP-1 (collagenase 1), MMP-2
(gelatinase A), MMP-3 (stromelysin), MMP-8 (collagenase 2), and MMP-13
(collagenase 3) (4), yet the continual slow movement of fluid does not
dislodge or wash away the bulk of these enzyme activities. MMPs are
commonly studied by tissue culture methods, a situation in which there
is a vast overproduction of enzyme and a paucity of matrix; here the
MMPs appear to be readily soluble. However, early workers tried to
extract MMPs from various tissues such as skin, cartilage, and uterus
but had success only with chaotropic agents such as 5 M
urea (10) or 2 M guanidine HCl (11). It was thought that
MMP-1 bound to its substrate (12), but subsequent studies showed that
the proMMP-1 could not bind collagen (13) but was still difficult to extract.
Anchoring MMPs to the cell surface or extracellular matrix would not
only prevent them from rapidly diffusing away but would also enable the
cell to keep them under close regulatory control. If there were
specific binding sites, the cell could monitor these sites by receptors
or integrins and respond by altering the synthesis of MMP. If the MMPs
bind to the matrix, this could provide a reservoir for subsequent rapid
tissue degradation. If they bind to the cell surface, they could be
positioned for activation as in the case of gelatinase A (8), for
interaction with cell surface adhesion molecules or receptors, for
regulating the turnover of these molecules by shedding activity, or for
a directed attack on the matrix as illustrated by MMP-14 bound on
invadopodia (14).
To explore the binding of MMPs to cells or matrix, we have selected the
smallest member of the family, matrilysin (MMP-7), which has only two
domains: the propeptide (9 kDa) and the catalytic domain (19 kDa). This
enzyme is greatly elevated in the postpartum rat uterus but is quite
difficult to extract; it requires the use of 0.1 M calcium
salt and 60 °C heat (15). This method was originally developed for
rat uterine collagenase 3 (16), an enzyme that was shown to bind
tightly to heparin-Sepharose (17). This suggested that sulfated
glycosaminoglycans might provide anchoring sites for MMP-7. Our present
findings indicate that heparan sulfates on the cell surface and/or in
the matrix may be the major binding site of MMP-7 and may also bind
other MMPs such as MMP-1, -2, -9 (gelatinase B), and -13.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Extraction of MMPs from Postpartum Rat Uterus--
Pregnant
Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Harlan. Uteri were collected 1 day postpartum when MMP-7 levels are highest, weighed (~2 g), washed
three times with cold 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.03% sodium
azide, and homogenized in 20 ml of this buffer containing 0.1% Triton
X-100 with a Polytron for 6 min at 4 °C. The mixture was centrifuged
at 11,000 rpm for 20 min. The pellet was washed twice, resuspended in
the same volume of cold 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.03% sodium
azide, 50 µM ZPCK, 50 µM
4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride. This was divided at 0.5 ml/tube. Extractants (Sigma) were added, held at 4 °C for 30 min,
and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. For heat extraction, see
Ref. 16.
Substrate Zymography--
Bovine carboxymethylated-transferrin
substrate was prepared (18). Pig gelatin type A (Sigma, 0.5 mg/ml) was
embedded in 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and CM-transferrin (0.3 mg/ml)
in 12.5% gel. Samples were treated with sample buffer without
dithiothreitol at room temperature and electrophoresed. The gel was
washed twice with 2.5% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 4 °C, 20 min each, to remove SDS and then washed twice with buffer
plus 5 mM CaCl2. The gel was washed three times
with incubation buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM CaCl2) and then incubated in this buffer
with added protease inhibitors (50 µM each of ZPCK, TPCK,
TLCK, and 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride (Calbiochem)) for
18 h, 37 °C, with gentle shaking. Gels were stained with 0.1%
Coomassie Blue in 40% MeOH, 10% acetic acid, for 45 min, and
destained with 7% acetic acid.
Preparation of Rabbit Polyclonal Antibodies against Rat
Recombinant MMP-7 and Its Synthetic Peptides--
Two peptides of the
sequences, (Cys)LRKFYLHDSKTKK (22-34) and (Cys)QKLYGKRNKL (238-247),
corresponding to two putative heparin-binding sequences of rat MMP-7 in
the propeptide and C-terminal region were synthesized and high pressure
liquid chromatography-purified (Genemed). They were disulfide-linked to
maleimide-activated keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Pierce). The conjugates
(1 mg) or recombinant proMMP-7 (200 µg) emulsified with Freund's
complete adjuvant were used to immunize New Zealand female rabbits.
Antibody titers were monitored by proMMP-7 dot blot assay. Antibody
specificities were characterized by immunoblotting (see next section).
Antibodies were designated RM7-P (to propeptide 22-34),
RM7-C (to peptide 238-247 near the C terminus), and RM7-W
(to whole recombinant rat matrilysin). RM7-W did not
cross-react with human MMP-1, -2, -3, -7, -8, -9, or -13 zymogen or
active forms. RM7-P reacts only with the proform of at MMP-7 and not
with the active form. RM7-C reacts with both proform and active rat
MMP-7 but not any other species tested from the MMP family. MMP-1 and
-3 were kindly provided by Dr. H. Nagase (Kansas City, MO); MMP-8 was
provided by Dr. H. Tschesche (Bielefeld, Germany); MMP-7 was provided
by Dr. S. Shapiro (St. Louis, MO); and rat MMP-13 was provided by Dr.
J. Jeffrey (Albany, NY).
Western Immunoblotting--
The protein samples were separated
by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to
nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Then 0.1% Tween-20 (TTBS)
containing 5% nonfat milk was used to block the membrane for 3 h
at 24 °C. The first antibody (e.g. RM7-P) was applied at
4 °C overnight. After washing three times with TTBS/milk, the second
antibody (e.g. goat anti-rabbit IgG-alkaline phosphatase)
was applied for 2 h. Then the transblot was washed three times
with TTBS/milk and stained with NBT/BCIP (Pierce). If horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was used, the transblot was
visualized by chemiluminescence (DuPont Renaissance kit)
Rat Uterus Tissue Section Preparation--
Pieces of mature rat
uterus at various points in the estrous cycles (staged by cervical
smears) were fixed in paraformaldhyde and embedded. Sections 0.5 µm
thick were cut, dewaxed in xylene for 5 min, and fixed in 100%
methanol for 20 min. Sections were washed with PBS three times and then
submitted to directly immunofluorescence staining or pretreatment of
sections for glycosaminoglycan digestion. Digestion conditions were 0.2 units/ml of heparinase III (bacterial, Sigma) and/or chondroitin ABC
lyase (Sigma) in buffer containing 0.05% sodium azide 100 µM zinc chloride, 5 mM
CaCl2/MgCl2, 10 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1 mM ZPCK/TPCK/TLCK, 50 µM BB94 (British Biotech), 0.1 mM antipain
0.15 M NaCl acetate buffer (pH 6.5) at 37 °C for 18 h. Controls were incubated with buffer only. Samples were gently washed
twice in PBS, then post-fixed with 2% formaldehyde in PBS with 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2
for 10 min, and washed twice with PBS for 10 min.
Immunofluorescence Double Staining and Confocal
Microscopy--
The tissue sections were blocked with 3% bovine serum
albumin and 10% goat serum at room temperature in PBS for 40 min and subsequently exposed to first antibodies: rabbit polyclonal antibodies (IgG) to rat MMP-7 (RM7-C) and mouse monoclonal antibodies (IgM) to
heparan sulfate (Sagaku) for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were washed three times in PBS for 45 min. Primary antibodies were
detected by using goat polyclonal antibodies to rabbit IgG and mouse
IgM conjugated to either fluorescein isothiocyanate or Texas Red,
respectively (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs., Inc.). Sections were washed
three times in PBS for 45 min. The samples were mounted on slides and
analyzed by confocal microscopy (inverted Nikon with Multiprobe 2001, Molecular Dynamics). Excitation was at 488 nm, and emission was at 530 and 590 nm, for fluorescein isothiocyanate and Texas Red, respectively.
Images were captured at 0.6 nm increments along the z axis
and converted to composite images by ImageSpace 3.10 software
(Molecular Dynamics).
Expression, Purification, and Folding of Recombinant Rat proMMP-7
from Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)--
The full-length rat proMMP-7
coding region (19) was cloned into the NdeI and
BamHI sites of PET3a vector (Novagen). The cDNA insert
of the proMMP-7 expression construct was completely sequenced by using
the Sequenase version 2.0 kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp.). The
expression plasmid was transfected into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells (Novagen). Cells were cultured for 6 h
(A600 = 0.2~0.4) followed by 2 h with
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside. Cells were
collected, passed through a French press, and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm
for 20 min. The pellets were washed three times with 10 ml of inclusion
body wash solution (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM
dithiothreitol, 1% Triton X-100). The pellets suspended in 8 M urea, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.02% sodium
azide. After 48 h at 4 °C, the sample was centrifuged. The
soluble fraction was passed through a PD10 column (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) to remove dithiothreitol and then applied to a zinc
chelate-Sepharose 6LB column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The bound
proMMP-7 was eluted by stepwise decreasing pH. The product had a purity
greater than 95%. The proMMP-7, still in 8 M urea, was
diluted dropwise 10-fold in ice-cold refolding buffer (20 mM acetate, pH 5.6, 10 mM CaCl2, 1 µM ZnCl2, and 0.05% Triton X-100). After 30 min it was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min to remove the insoluble
portion. Storage was at
70 °C in 18% glycerol. Proper folding was
shown by aminophenyl mercuric acetate activation of latent form,
specific activity, and specificity of bond cleavage in gelatin and transferrin.
The E198Q mutant of proMMP-7 was prepared by the Quick Change
site-directed mutagenesis method (Stratagene). The PET3a.proMMP-7 expression vector (above) was used with the inserts of rat proMMP-7 as
templates and a pair of synthetic oligonucleotide primers containing the desired mutation site (GAA to CAA), the 3'-oligonucleotide primer (
)-strand) 5'-ACCCAGAGAGTGGCCAAGTTGATGAGTGGC-3'
and 5'-oligonucleotide primer (+)-strand)
5'-GCCACTCATCAACTTGGCCACTCTCTGGGT-3' for PCR amplification. The PCR product was digested with DpnI
endonuclease. This PCR extended nicked vector was then transformed into
E. coli, Epicurian Coli XL1-Blue supercompetent cells
(Stratagene). The ampicillin resistant colonies were screened by PCR
and NdeI/BamHI digestion, and the positive
plasmids were purified and transformed into the expression host
BL21(DE3) strain. The total sequence including the desired mutation
site was confirmed by DNA sequencing. Purification and folding was as
described above.
Heparin-Agarose Chromatography--
rproMMP-7 in 8 M
urea was diluted 1:10 in refolding buffer (20 mM acetate
buffer, pH 5.6, 10 mM CaCl2, 1 µM
ZnCl2, and 0.05% Triton X-100). Heparin-agarose beads
(Sigma, H0402) were suspended in 50 mM Tris, 5 mM CaCl2, pH 7.8. A mixture of 1 ml of enzyme plus 4-ml beads (0.5 mg) was stirred at room temperature for 4 h.
The mixture at pH 7.5 was poured into a small column and then washed
with 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, plus 0.15 M NaCl.
Elution was then carried out in steps of 0.5 ml with increasing
concentrations of NaCl or heparin in Tris buffer. The enzyme did not
bind to agarose beads lacking heparin.
Affinity Coelectrophoresis--
Using the method of Smith and
Knauer (20), heparin (Grade I, porcine intestinal mucosa,
Mr 5,000~ 16,000, Sigma) was modified with
0.07 mol fluoresceinamine/uronic acid residue. This corresponds to
about 3.8 fluoresceinamines:1 heparin of Mr
12,000. Fluoresceinamine-heparin (F-heparin) was stored at
70 °C.
This F-heparin was radioiodinated using the IODO-BEADSTM
Iodination Reagent (Pierce). The specific activity was approximately 100,000 cpm/ng uronic acid. Affinity coelectrophoresis was carried out
as previously documented (21) with F-heparin migrating through lanes
containing varying concentrations of rproMMP-7(E198Q).
Homogeneous DNase II-based Binding Assay--
This assay system
is based on the method of Guo et al. (22). The binding of
compounds to heparin was assessed by using fresh standard solutions of
these substances in pH 4.8 acetate buffer + 5 mM
dithiothreitol. The concentrations of enzyme and substrate were
monitored at 280 and 405 nm, respectively. Heparin concentration was
adjusted to inhibit 1.1 µM DNase II by 90%; compounds
binding heparin reversed this inhibition. The percentage of inhibition observed in the presence of both the test species and heparin was
plotted versus log concentration to yield the dose-response curve for the given species.
 |
RESULTS |
Heparin, Heparan Sulfate, Sulfated Compounds, and Heparinase III
Can Release Bound MMP-7 from Rat Uterus--
Various sulfated
compounds were tested to see whether they could extract MMP-7 from the
rat uterus at 1 day postpartum (a rich source of enzyme). Fig.
1A illustrates that heparin
and heparan sulfates are effective extractants at 0.2 mg/ml, but
chondroitin and dermatan sulfates are less effective. Sulfated
compounds such as pentosan polysulfate and suramin also liberate MMP-7,
but higher concentrations (2 mg/ml) are required (Fig. 1A,
lanes 7 and 8). The heparin antagonist,
protamine, which is highly positively charged, can also extract MMP-7
from tissues (lane 9). Blotting with a polyclonal antibody
specific for a segment of the propeptide (RM7-P, see "Experimental
Procedures") established that the zymogram bands correspond to
proMMP-7 (data not shown). The major forms of MMP-7 that appear are the
28-kDa proform and a partially activated form of about 25 kDa. Active
enzyme did not appear where expected (18 kDa), but there is evidence,
obtained by use of antibody RM7-W to the whole enzyme, that it
aggregates to produce some of the upper bands on the zymogram. Pro- and
active MMP-2, proMMP-9, and proMMP-13 were released by the same
extractants as for MMP-7 and could be detected by gelatin zymography
(data not shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Release of proMMP-7 bound to uterine tissue
by heparin/heparan sulfate, heparinase III, and heparin analogs.
A, CM-transferrin zymographic analysis of MMP-7 extracts
from rat uterus. Equal volumes (10 µl) of the extracts obtained by
using glycosaminoglycans (lanes 1-6; 0.2 mg/ml) or heparin
analogs and antagonist (lanes 7-9; 2 mg/ml) were applied to
zymographic analysis (see "Experiment Procedures"). Lane
1, chondroitin sulfate A; lane 2, chondroitin sulfate
B; lane 3, chondroitin sulfate C; lane 4, heparan
sulfate; lane 5, heparin; lane 6, heparan sulfate + chondroitin sulfate A, chondroitin sulfate B, and chondroitin sulfate
C; lane 7, pentosan polysulfate; lane 8, suramin;
lane 9, protamine; lane 10, extraction in 0.1 M CaCl2 at 60 °C for 6 min.
Mr, Marker 12TM protein standards
(Novex); rM7, rat recombinant proMMP-7 (10 ng). Left
axis, Mr values × 10 3;
pM7, proMMP-7; M7, active MMP-7. B, heparin
extracts proMMP-7 in a dose-dependent manner. Left
panel, CM-transferrin zymogram. Right panel, Western
blot. The numbers at the top indicate the
concentration (mg/ml) of heparin used for extraction of rat uterus. 10 µl of each extract was mixed with sample buffer and applied to
CM-transferrin zymographic gels and Western blot. The higher
concentration extracts were first diluted to give a final concentration
of 1 mg/ml before the 10-µl aliquot was taken. The rabbit antibody
RM7-P was used for the Western blot. C, scheme for
extraction of proMMP-7 from rat uterus. Seven rat uteri were pooled and
homogenized in Triton X-100; quadruplicate samples were carried through
the following steps. The homogenates were centrifuged, and the pellet
was washed with Tris buffer (see "Experimental Procedures") and
divided into five portions. Heparinase III (0.4 unit/ml, Sigma) and
chondroitinase ABC were incubated 18 h 37 °C (controls were
incubated with buffer alone); heparin (5 mg/ml), EDTA (10 mM), and SDS (2%) were kept on ice for 30 min.
Centrifugation gave supernatants that were applied to transferrin
zymography after adjusting their heparin contents to 1 mg/ml (heparin
enhances activity on the zymogram). The gels were scanned and analyzed
by UVP/Gelbase program, and the results are in arbitrary density
units ± S.E. (n = 4).
|
|
Next, the effect of heparin concentration on MMP-7 extraction was
studied. Because high levels of heparin (>2 mg/ml or 20 µg/gel lane)
affect the resolution and enzyme activity on the subsequent
CM-transferrin zymography, samples above 1 mg/ml were diluted to that
final concentration. The optimum extraction of proMMP-7 from the uterus
is with 2-4 mg heparin/ml based on the dilution factor multiplied by
band intensity measured by UVP image analysis of Fig. 1B
(left panel). The polyclonal antibody RM7-P confirmed that
the 28-kDa band in Fig. 1B (right panel) was due to proMMP-7. The levels of heparin (0.2 mg/ml) used in Fig.
1A were suboptimal but were chosen to emphasize the
differences among the various compounds tested.
Heparin (5 mg/ml) and EDTA (10 mM) extracted maximum
amounts of proMMP-7 and direct extraction with SDS also released most of the enzyme (Fig. 1C). EDTA presumably leads to enzyme
unfolding because of removal of stabilizing calcium and zinc. SDS will
unfold the enzyme and also swamp out positive charges that might bind heparin. SDS treatment following heparin extraction did not release any
further enzyme. Heparinase III (heparitinase I) digestion released
80-85% of the enzyme, but 15-20% was also released by chondroitin
lyase ABC (Sigma), similar to results with chondroitin sulfates (Fig.
1A). During digestion, serine protease inhibitors, ZPCK,
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.1 mM), and 1 mM Zn2+ (to inhibit MMPs) were used to inhibit
proteolytic release of enzymes, and also blanks were incubated without
heparinase III or chondroitinase (not shown). The results of the five
treatments are consistent with the hypothesis that native proMMP-7
binds to sulfated proteoglycans, particularly to heparan sulfate.
Coexpression and Colocalization of MMP-7 and Heparan Sulfate on the
Apical Surface of the Epithelial Layer of the Rat Uterus in Estrous
Stage II--
The physiological relevance of the extraction data was
investigated by studying the expression and localization of heparan sulfate and MMP-7 in the hormonally regulated tissue of the rat uterus.
The expression of MMP-7 in the estrous cycle was most prominent in the
early proliferative (estrous II) and late secretory (dioestrous) stages
and was restricted to the endometrial glandular and lining epithelial
cells (Fig. 2). Its secretion is
bidirectional, apical and basolateral, but is predominant on the apical
surface and some appears to be in the lumen. Interestingly, the
epithelial surface heparan sulfate appears predominantly in the same
estrous stages as MMP-7 does (Fig. 2). MMP-7 and heparan sulfate are
colocalized at the apical surface of epithelial cells lining the lumen
(Fig. 3C). The hypothesis that
heparan sulfate and MMP-7 are directly interacting was tested by
washing tissue sections with heparin sulfate or digesting with
heparinase III or chondroitinase ABC. Heparin sulfate completely washed
MMP-7 from tissue sections (Fig. 3E), consistent with the
tissue extraction experiments (Fig. 1C), but did not
displace heparan sulfate as shown by the remaining positive stain (Fig.
3D). Greater than 80% of MMP-7 in tissue sections was
released by heparinase III treatment (Fig. 3I); however, chondroitinase did not release appreciable amounts of MMP-7 from tissue
sections (Fig. 3G). The combined action of the two enzymes completely removed MMP-7 (Fig. 3K). The results support the
hypothesis of binding of MMP-7 to proteoglycans containing heparan
sulfate chains, with a possible small contribution from chondroitin
sulfate chains.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The expression and localization of rat MMP-7
and heparan sulfate in rat uterus estrous cycle. Tissue sections
were double stained with antibodies against MMP-7 (red) and
heparan sulfate (green) as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Immunocolocalization of heparan sulfate and
MMP-7 on the endometrial epithelium of rat uterus in estrous stage
II. Sections were stained as in Fig. 2. Enzyme digestion is as
described under "Experimental Procedures." A, heparan
sulfate. B, MMP-7. C, colocalization of MMP-7 and
heparan sulfate (yellow). D and E,
effect of heparin wash (2 mg/ml) on heparan sulfate (D) and
MMP-7 staining (E). F and G, effect of
chondroitinase ABC digestion on heparan sulfate (F) and
MMP-7 staining (G). H and I, effect of
heparinase III digestion on heparan sulfate (H) and MMP-7
staining (I). J and K, combined
treatment with heparinase III and chondroitinase ABC on heparan sulfate
(J) and MMP-7 staining (K).
|
|
Rat Recombinant proMMP-7 and Human Active MMP-7 Bind to
Heparin-Agarose with High Affinity--
Further investigation of the
binding of rat proMMP-7 to heparin was facilitated by using recombinant
methods to obtain large amounts of enzyme from E. coli (see
"Experimental Procedures"). Human active MMP-7 lacking the
propeptide (clone from Dr. S. Shapiro, St. Louis) was also expressed in
E. coli BL21(DE3) cells, purified, and refolded. Rat
rproMMP-7 was bound (>95%) to heparin-agarose beads as described
under "Experimental Procedures" and then washed with Tris buffer to
remove unbound material. Stepwise increasing salt concentration from
0.2 to 2.0 M NaCl failed to elute the bound enzyme (Fig.
4A). Heparin (20 mg/ml) gave
complete elution (Fig. 4A, lane 14); 2 mg/ml
(lane 11) did not release all enzyme. The active form of rat
rMMP-7 can be eluted by 0.6-0.8 M NaCl and the human
active form, by 0.4-0.5 M (data not shown). EDTA also
elutes rproMMP-7 efficiently but in a state that forms dimers and
aggregates on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (data not
shown).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
In vitro binding of recombinant
rat proMMP-7 to heparin. A, rat rproMMP-7 was bound to
heparin-agarose beads and eluted as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Left gel, SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and silver stain. Lane 1, Marker
12TM; lane 2, starting enzyme solution;
lane 3, fall through; lane 4, wash; lanes
5-10, stepwise increasing salt in Tris and 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 2.0 M NaCl; lane 11, heparin 2 mg/ml;
lane 12, SDS 2%; lane 13, repeat SDS wash;
lane 14, separate column as in lanes 1-10 but
then eluted with 20 mg/ml heparin rather than 2 mg/ml. Right
gel, the same fractions applied to CM-transferrin zymography.
B, E198Q mutant of rat proMMP-7 was expressed and purified
as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lanes 1 and 2, zymography on CM-transferrin gel showing negligible
digestion. Lane 1, nonreduced (monomer (M), dimer
(D), and aggregate (A) seen by Coomassie Blue
stain); lane 2, reduced (only monomer seen); lane
3, wild type refolded proMMP-7 as control; lanes 4 and
5, Western blot, using polyclonal antibody RM7-C, of reduced
and nonreduced mutant enzyme, respectively. C, affinity
coelectrophoresis for measuring KD. Mutant proMMP-7
was embedded in 1% low melting agarose gel cast in separate lanes at
the indicated concentration in nM. Then
125I-F-heparin was applied to a slot spanning all the lanes
and electrophoresed as described under "Experimental Procedures." A
radiographic image was obtained by 3 days of exposure.
|
|
KD Determined by Affinity Coelectrophoresis--
Because
rproMMP-7 undergoes spontaneous autoactivation at high concentrations,
we prepared the E198Q mutant by the same methods described for wild
type rproMMP-7. This mutation is known to reduce activity of the active
form of the enzyme by 400-fold (23) and should retard self-activation.
The purified enzyme showed no significant autolysis in 8 h at
24 °C as shown by Western blot with the polyclonal antibody RM7-W,
which reacts with all fragments of the enzyme (Fig. 4B,
lanes 4 and 5). Zymography at the usual enzyme
levels showed no activity (Fig. 4B, lanes 1 and
2). When this mutant enzyme was embedded at various
concentrations in gel slabs and a radioiodinated heparin probe was
electrophoresed through the gel, retardation of heparin by the enzyme
was visualized by radiography (Fig. 4C).
KD can be estimated from the protein concentration at which the heparin is half-shifted from being fully mobile to being
maximally retarded. The KD is approximately 5-10 nM; at 10 nM rproMMP-7, the heparin is 80%
retarded, and at 5 nM, heparin is fully mobile. Because of
heterogeneity of the heparin, the migration front in Fig. 4C
is fractionated into two populations: one binds tightly to MMP-7 and is
retarded at the top of the gel, and the other appears half way down the
lane; the excess unbound heparin migrates to the bottom half of the
gel. All of these affinity retardation effects were eliminated by
adding 500 µg/ml of cold heparin as a competitor (data not shown).
Characterization of Putative Heparin-binding Sequences by
Homogeneous Enzyme-based Binding Assay--
The heparin affinity of
two potential heparin-binding peptides from MMP-7 was determined by the
homogeneous enzyme-based binding assay (Fig.
5): peptide22-34
(C)LRKFYLHDSKTKK and peptide238-247 (C)QKLYGKRNKL (Cys was
added to permit coupling to hemocyanin for antibody production). The
numbering of MMP-7 begins with the first residue of the propeptide
(19). The ED50 for peptide22-34 is 25 µg/ml
(14 µM), and for peptide238-247 it is 165 µg/ml (122 µM), whereas the ED50 for
promatrilysin is 34 µg/ml (Fig. 5; 1.2 µM MMP-7 based
on
280 = 33,000; Ref. 23). The control bovine serum
albumin shows no affinity for heparin. The collagen control binds
tightly and the control peptide RHAMM401-411 (KQKIKHVVKLK,
a heparin-binding sequence in the hyaluronan receptor; Ref. 24) has an
ED50 of 42 µg/ml (30 µM). The binding of
the randomly scrambled peptide22-34 (C)KLKDHSKYKFTLR is
about 10-fold less than that of the ordered peptide.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
DNase II-based homogeneous heparin-binding
assay. Heparin (0.8 µg/ml) inhibited the assay of 1.2 µM DNase II as described under "Experimental
Procedures." This inhibition of DNase II was then reversed by adding
proMMP-7 (E198Q) and related peptides (listed in box) as
competitors for heparin. Type I collagen and RHAMM401-411
(Genemed) are positive controls; bovine serum albumin is a negative
control. All points were determined in triplicate in a single
experiment, and the averages are shown.
|
|
Heparin and Related Compounds, but Not Protamine, Enhance
Matrilysin Activity in CM-Transferrin Zymography--
With the
exception of chondroitin sulfate A and keratan sulfate, most
glycosaminoglycans and sulfated compounds enhance rproMMP-7 activity (5 ng/lane) in dose-dependent manner in CM-transferrin zymograms (Fig. 6A). The
zymograms were analyzed by UVP image analyzer (Fig. 6B).
Heparin (3 µg/lane) can enhance rat proMMP-7 (5 ng) activity at least
15-fold (Fig. 6B), and pentosan, suramin, and chondroitin
sulfate B enhance by 3-4-fold. Interestingly, the heparin antagonist,
protamine did not enhance enzyme activity (not shown), suggesting that
it does not bind MMP-7 and that it releases MMP-7 from tissue by
competing for sulfated binding sites. Heparin might enhance MMP-7
activity by effecting a conformation change, facilitating refolding,
reducing autolysis, or helping to retain the enzyme in the gel.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Heparin and its relatives enhance zymographic
activity of MMP-7. A, recombinant proMMP-7 was mixed
with sulfated compounds and sample buffer, and then 10 µl was applied
to each lane of CM-transferrin zymography. Each lane contains 2 ng of
MMP-7 and 0, 3, or 6 µg of sulfated compound. B, buffer
plus 6 µg of heparin but no enzyme. B, arbitrary density
units of transferrin zymography bands plotted against amount of
glycosaminoglycans/lane containing 2 ng of rproMMP-7.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
MMP-7 is not readily released from tissues by membrane-disrupting
detergents or buffers of low ionic strength (15). Here we show by two
approaches, extraction of enzyme from tissue homogenates and
localization by confocal microscopy, that heparan sulfate proteoglycan
molecules are the most likely docking molecules for MMP-7 in uterine tissue.
First, various sulfated compounds can release the enzyme from
homogenates of postpartum rat uterus; the most potent agents are
heparin and heparan sulfate. Heparin is more effective, probably because of its higher degree of sulfation, and its action is comparable with direct solubilization of enzyme in 2% SDS. Heparin does not extract MMP-7 by competing for positively charged binding sites in the
tissue because treatment with bacterial heparinase III, which can
specifically degrade heparan sulfate, also releases the enzyme.
Positively charged protamine supports this conclusion, it appears to
release MMP-7 by competing for negatively charged binding sites as in
the case of acetylcholinesterase release (25).
Second, confocal microscopy with immunofluorescence staining for
heparan sulfate and MMP-7 in rat uterus shows colocalization of heparan
sulfate proteoglycans and MMP-7, which is most pronounced at the apical
ends of epithelial cells (Fig. 3C). The enzyme is released
to the extent of 80% or more by heparinase III treatment and is
completely released by a heparin wash of tissue sections. Matrilysin is
typically expressed in glandular epithelial cells and carcinoma cells
of epithelial origin (26) and in phagocytic monocytes (27). A possible
candidate for MMP-7 docking is the GPI-anchored glypican (28) commonly
found on the apical surfaces of epithelial cells. Other possibilities
are epican or syndecan on the basolateral surface (29) and perlecan in
the underlying basement membrane (30).
The staining for MMP-7 and for heparan sulfate was examined as a
function of the rat estrous cycle. MMP-7 showed maximal staining at
estrous, which compares with the maximal concentration of mRNA for
MMP-7 at the same stage in the mouse (31). It is interesting that
heparan sulfate staining is also maximal at estrous, where it appears
concentrated in the basal lamina. There is also heavy diffuse staining
at dioestrous. The only previous literature study of heparan sulfate
proteoglycan changes in the cycling uterus showed that syndecan
staining was strong at the basal side of mouse epithelial cells at
estrous and basolaterally at proestrous (32). Our stain would detect
any heparan sulfate chains regardless of the type of protein core.
Rat matrilysin zymogen form binds more tightly to heparin than the
active form as shown by the elution of active MMP-7 from a heparin
column at 0.7-0.8 M NaCl and the failure to elute proMMP-7 from the column even at 2 M NaCl (Fig. 4A).
Binding to tissue sites requires the correct three-dimensional form of
the enzyme: EDTA removes calcium, and possibly zinc, from the enzyme
structure, releasing it from the tissue (Fig. 1C). Binding
of proMMP-7 was quantified by affinity coelectrophoresis and the DNase
II homogeneous binding assay. The former indicated a
KD of 5-10 nM (Fig. 4C). The
binding assay (Fig. 5) gave a 50% reversal of DNase II inhibition by
heparin at a concentration of 1 µM proMMP-7. Collagen binds even tighter, although the reason is not clear because literature values for collagen KD are 60-80 nM
(33). Perhaps collagen also interacts directly with DNase II to
interfere with its heparin binding. Two putative binding peptides were
identified based on the analysis of the rat MMP-7 sequence by use of
the 18-residue amphipathic helical wheel diagram (34). These peptides,
one each from near the C and N termini of proMMP-7, bound to heparin, but with 10 and 100 times less avidity than proMMP-7. This indicates that the strength of binding of proMMP-7 to heparin is not explained by
the Arg/Lys residues in these two segments considered separately.
The zymogen forms of rat MMP-2, -9, and -13 and active MMP-2 were also
extracted from the uterus by heparin, although none bound as tightly as
proMMP-7 (data not shown). It was noted long ago (35) that heparin and
dextran sulfate could extract MMP-13 from rat bone.
Heparin-SepharoseTM has frequently been used to purify
MMPs. Active enzyme can be eluted with NaCl as follows: MMP-1, 0.7 M (36); MMP-3, <0.1 M (36); human MMP-7, 0.5 M (37); and rat MMP-13, 0.8 M (38). Results for
zymogen forms are: proMMP-2, 0.3 M (39); proMMP-8, 0.2 M (40); and proMMP-9, 0.12 M (41). No one has
studied both forms of one enzyme. There is a wide variation in affinity for heparin, and not all MMPs can bind. It is further known that MMP-1,
-2, and -9 bind heparin through their hemopexin domains (42-44), and
this promotes interactions between two MMPs during proenzyme
activation. Therefore, the docking to heparan glycosaminoglycans is not
restricted to MMP-7, but rat proMMP-7 is one of the most tightly
binding MMPs.
Molecular modeling was used to examine how the distribution of positive
residues might account for the tight binding of rat active MMP-7 and
why it binds tighter than human MMP-7. X-ray structure is available
only for the active human form, so the model sheds no light on the
contribution of the rat propeptide to binding. As seen in Fig.
7 human active MMP-7 shows Arg and Lys
residues only at the periphery of the enzyme when viewed with the
active site at the center (Fig. 7A). However, the reverse side (Fig. 7, B and C) shows a double track of
Arg/Lys residues that resembles the cradle for heparin binding seen
with fibronectin module III-13 (45). There is a further cluster of
three Arg residues to the "north" of this track. The rat enzyme has
a similar number of positive residues, but the distribution is somewhat different; there is a long continuous line of positive residues involving Lys260, Lys264, Arg139,
Lys135, Arg127, Lys199, and
Arg165, plus additional residues to the right side that produce
a partial double track (Fig. 7, E and F; note
that residue numbers are adjusted to match the human collagen sequence
(46)). The x-ray picture stops at residue 264 because the remaining
seven residues are not fixed, but the next residue in the rat is
Arg265 and is likely to fall between 264 and 139. These
anionic residues involve many different strands of the folded molecule
rather than a single amphipathic helical motif found in many
heparin-binding proteins (34). A surprisingly similar distribution
of basic residues is found in the primary sequence of cobra cardiotoxin M3, which binds heparin with KD = 20 nM;
these basic residues are distributed over a number of
strands (47).
The similarity extends over 57 residues:
KX2KX6KX16KKX13KX15K
for M3 and
KX3RX4RX17 KRX13KX15R
for rat MMP-7 residues 108-165 (Browner numbering); there are
additional basic residues within each sequence that do not match. Fig.
7 does not illustrate the Asp and Glu residues; however, in the tracks
discussed here there is only one Asp residue (131) lying to the left of
Lys151 and potentially forming a salt bridge. The rat MMP-7
propeptide, which is expected to lie on the "front" of the molecule
overlying the active center, has a further 12 Arg/Lys residues, some of which probably interact with heparin (as in Fig. 5), so that it is much
more difficult to dislodge the proenzyme than the active enzyme.

View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Computer modeling of the active form of human
and rat matrilysin. The 1.8 Å coordinates for human MMP-7
catalytic domain from the Protein Data Bank were viewed with the Rasmol
program. The rat enzyme is 70% identical to the human; it was modeled
by inserting its Arg and Lys residues in place of human residues of the
same number and by replacing any human Arg or Lys residues not found in
rat with Ala. The numbering of residues starts from Met-1 of the signal
peptide and is further adjusted by adding 2 to the residue number to
match the collagen structure (46); thus the N-terminal
Tyr98 of the active enzyme becomes 100. The rat numbering
used elsewhere in this paper numbers the corresponding rat Tyr residue
78. A, human matrilysin: viewed with active center
HEXXHXXXXXH at the center of the field.
B, opposite face of molecule turned 180° around vertical
axis and up 30° about the horizontal axis. C, opposite
face but rotated down 90° from B about the horizontal
axis. D F, corresponding views of the model of rat MMP-7.
Yellow, Arg or Lys; Purple, His; Red,
Glu at active center. Blue numbers, human sequence position
of Arg and Lys and rat residues corresponding to the human in position
and charge. Red numbers, positively charged residues in rat
that do not correspond exactly to the human sequence (five residues,
typically displaced by three or four positions). In addition, there are
three (human) or two (rat) positively charged residues in the
C-terminal peptide that cannot be visualized by x-ray
crystallography.
|
|
The x-ray structures (not shown) of the catalytic domains of human
MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-13 show similar putative heparin-binding cradles,
but none is so well organized as that of MMP-7. Jeffrey (48) comments
on the high affinity of both active and latent rat MMP-13 for heparin,
in the absence of obvious binding motifs. However, we note that MMP-13
has a similar number of Lys/Arg residues as MMP-7 and that 7 of 11 in
the catalytic domain and 6 of 12 in the propeptide are exact positional
matches (49).
Does heparin binding have further effects on MMP-7 in addition to
anchoring it in the extracellular space? Several enzymological roles
might be postulated. Modeling suggests that heparan sulfate chains
might wrap around the proenzyme. This could protect the enzyme from
exposure to activating proteases, or it might exert a force on the
propeptide that would tend to pull it away from the active center,
favoring activation. Heparin greatly enhances the activity of proMMP-7
in zymography (Fig. 6). This could be due to facilitating refolding
after SDS removal, enhancing enzyme activity, or helping to anchor the
protein in the gel so that it is not eluted during overnight
incubation. We find that adding heparin to refolded rproMMP-7 enhances
stability during prolonged storage. We suggest that heparin may have an
important effect on MMP-7 stability, activation, and enzymatic activity
in vivo, but this point remains to be tested.
Confocal microscopy indicates that MMP-7 is anchored to heparan
sulfates on cell surfaces and possibly in the basement membrane in vivo. Such anchoring of proMMP-7 to either cell surface
or nearby basement membrane would retain the enzyme near the cell while
it awaits proteolytic activation and the binding of the pro- and active
forms would prevent loss of enzyme by diffusion and permit continuing
control by the cell. Elaboration of these points is presented in the Introduction.
More importantly, if the enzyme is anchored to the cell surface, this
will permit the cell to focus proteolysis on a particular region next
to the cell. The role of pericellular proteolysis has been reviewed
(50). Proteolysis of the extracellular matrix and the cell surface
molecules is a critical requirement in processes such as morphogenesis,
alteration of cell function, migration of cells, tissue repair,
tumorigenesis, and cell death. These processes are best controlled if
the proteases are on the cell surface. One function of binding MMPs to
heparan sulfate might be the formation of invadopodia, specialized
extensions used by the cell to move in a specified direction through
the matrix (51). By bringing together proenzymes and their activators
in an organized fashion and in high concentration, proteolysis at the
cell surface can proceed even in the presence of high concentrations of inhibitors.
MMP-7 may have specialized functions in its main location, the apical
region of glandular epithelial cells. Here it may serve to maintain
patency of the glandular lumen, to provide host defense, and to
activate or turn over cell surface proteins. On the other hand, in
matrix remodeling, cell turnover, and injury response MMP-7 secretion
may be basal (26). In either case, anchoring of the enzyme to the
appropriate surface of the cell or to the underlying basement membrane
may be critical in controlling these processes.
If MMPs such as MMP-1, -2, -7, -9, and -13 are bound to heparan sulfate
in the matrix or on the cell surface, this could have important
therapeutic implications; dislodging enzyme from cells or matrix could
attenuate destruction of tissue. The sulfated compounds pentosan
polysulfate and suramin have been used to treat osteoarthritis and
cancer in animals (52, 53). Their activity has been attributed to
various effects, in particular to reducing MMP activity or blocking
cell surface proteases such as guanidinobenzoatase. However, the
present study suggests that dislodging enzymes from the tissue might be
a mechanism of action. One should not be misled by the high
concentrations of heparin used in the present study (2-4 mg/ml)
because only 30 min was allowed for elution in the cold. In the study
of MMP-13 binding to heparin columns, it was possible to get good
elution with prolonged washing using only 5 nM dextran
sulfate (17). In conclusion, this study emphasizes the importance of
considering MMP anchoring in the regulation of processes of tissue remodeling.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Shuan-su Yu, Carolyn Taplin, and
Nebila Idris for competent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant AR-16940.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Molecular Pathology Unit, Dept. of Pathology,
MGH, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th St., 7th
Floor, Charlestown, MA 02129.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, University of Miami School of Medicine R-127,
P.O. Box 106960, Miami, FL 33101. Tel.: 305-243-6510; Fax: 305-243-3955; E-mail: fwoessne@med.miami.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MMP, matrix
metalloproteinase;
PBS, phosphate-buffer saline;
rproMMP-7, recombinant
rat proMMP-7;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
ZPK, Z-Phe-chloromethylketone;
TLCK, Tosyl-Lys-chloromethylketone;
TPCK, Tosyl-Phe-chloromethylketone.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Woessner, J. F., Jr.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
2145-2154[Abstract]
|
| 2.
|
Birkedal-Hansen, H.,
Moore, W. G.,
Bodden, M. K.,
Windsor, L. J.,
Birkedal-Hansen, B.,
DeCarlo, A.,
and Engler, J. A.
(1993)
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.
4,
197-250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Chambers, A. F.,
and Matrisian, L. M.
(1997)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
89,
1260-1270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Cawston, T.
(1998)
Mol. Med. Today
4,
130-137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Celentano, D. C.,
and Frishman, W. H.
(1997)
J. Clin. Pharmacol.
37,
991-1000[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
Nagase, H.,
and Woessner, J. F., Jr.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
21491-21494[Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Borden, P.,
and Heller, R. A.
(1997)
Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr.
7,
159-178[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Nagase, H.
(1997)
Biol. Chem.
378,
151-160
|
| 9.
|
Gomez, D. E.,
Alonso, D. F.,
Yoshiji, H.,
and Thorgeirsson, U. P.
(1997)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
74,
111-122[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Wirl, G.
(1977)
Connect. Tissue Res.
5,
171-178[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Dean, D. D,
Martel-Pelletier, J.,
Pelletier, J.-P.,
Howell, D. S.,
and Woessner, J. F., Jr.
(1989)
J. Clin. Invest.
84,
678-685
|
| 12.
|
Vater, C. A.,
Mainardi, C. L.,
and Harris, E. D., Jr.
(1978)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
539,
238-247[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Welgus, H. G.,
Jeffrey, J. J.,
Stricklin, G. P.,
Roswit, W. T.,
and Eisen, A. Z.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
6806-6813[Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Nakahara, H.,
Howard, L.,
Thompson, E. W.,
Sato, H.,
Seiki, M.,
Yeh, Y. Y.,
and Chen, W. T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7959-7964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Sellers, A.,
and Woessner, J. F., Jr.
(1980)
Biochem. J.
189,
521-531[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Weeks, J. G.,
Halme, J.,
and Woessner, J. F., Jr.
(1976)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
445,
205-214[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Roswit, W. T.,
Halme, J.,
and Jeffrey, J. J.
(1983)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
225,
285-295[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Nagase, H.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
248,
449-470[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Abramson, S. R.,
Conner, G. E.,
Nagase, H.,
Neuhaus, I.,
and Woessner, J. F., Jr.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16016-16022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Smith, J. W.,
and Knauer, D. J.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
160,
105-114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Lee, M. K.,
and Lander, A. D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
2768-2772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Guo, X.,
Han, I. S.,
Yang, V. C.,
and Meyerhoff, M. E.
(1996)
Anal. Biochem.
235,
153-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Cha, J.,
and Auld, D. S.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
16019-16024[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Yang, B.,
Zhang, L.,
and Turley, E. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
8617-8623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Deprez, P. N.,
Signorelli, J.,
and Inestrosa, N. C.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1252,
53-58[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
| Wilson, C. L., Matrisian, and L. M. (1998) in Matrix
Metalloproteinases (Parks, W. C., and Mecham, R. P.,
eds) pp. 149-184, Academic Press, San Diego
|
| 27.
|
Busiek, D. F.,
Baragi, V.,
Nehring, L. C.,
Parks, W. C.,
and Welgus, H. G.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
6484-6491[Abstract]
|
| 28.
|
Mertens, G.,
Van der Scheuren, B.,
van den Berghe, H.,
and David, G.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
4887-4897
|
| 29.
|
Milstone, L. M.,
Hough-Monroe, L.,
Kugelman, L. C.,
Bender, J. R.,
and Haggerty, J. G.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
3183-3190[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Iozzo, R. V.,
Cohen, I. R.,
Grässel, S.,
and Murdoch, A. D.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
302,
625-639
|
| 31.
|
Rudolph-Owen, L. A.,
Hulboy, D. L.,
Wilson, C. L.,
Mudgett, J.,
and Matrisian, L. M.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
4902-4911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Potter, S. W.,
and Morris, J. E.
(1992)
Anat. Rec.
234,
383-390[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
San Antonio, J. D.,
Lander, A. D.,
Karnovsky, M. J.,
and Slayter, H. S.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
1179-1188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Cardin, A. D.,
and Weintraub, H. J. R.
(1989)
Arteriosclerosis
9,
21-32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Sakamoto, S.,
Goldhaber, P.,
and Glimcher, M. J.
(1973)
Calcif. Tissue Res.
12,
247-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Gadher, S. J.,
Eyre, D. R.,
Wotton, S. F.,
Schmid, T. M.,
and Woolley, D. E.
(1990)
Matrix
10,
154-163[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Cha, J.,
Pedersen, M. V.,
and Auld, D. S.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
15831-15838[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Sakamoto, S.,
Sakamoto, M.,
Goldhaber, P.,
and Glimcher, M. J.
(1975)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
385,
41-50[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Crabbe, T.,
Ioannou, C.,
and Docherty, A. J. P.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
218,
431-438[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Kao, W. W. Y.,
Ebert, J.,
Kao, C. W. C.,
Covington, H.,
and Cintron, C.
(1986)
Curr. Eye Res.
5,
801-815[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Kolkenbrock, H.,
Hecker-Kia, A.,
Orgel, D.,
Kinawi, A.,
and Ulbrich, N.
(1996)
Biol. Chem.
377,
529-533[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Butler, G. S.,
Butler, M. J.,
Atkinson, S. J.,
Will, H.,
Tamura, T.,
Schade van Westrum, S.,
Crabbe, T.,
Clements, J.,
d'Ortho, M. P.,
and Murphy, G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
871-880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Crabbe, T.,
O'Connell, J. P.,
Smith, B. J.,
and Docherty, A. J. P.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
14419-14425[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Wallon, U. M.,
and Overall, C. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7473-7481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Busby, T. F.,
Argraves, W. S.,
Brew, S. A.,
Pechik, I.,
Gilliland, G. L.,
and Ingham, K. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18558-18562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Browner, M. F.,
Smith, W. W.,
and Castelhano, A. L.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
6602-6610[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Vyas, A. A.,
Pan, J.-J.,
Patel, H. V.,
Vyas, K. A.,
Chiang, C.-M.,
Sheu, Y.-C.,
Kwang, J.-K.,
and Wu, W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9661-9670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Jeffrey, J. J.
(1998)
in
Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes
(Barrett, A. J.
, Rawlings, N. D.
, and Woessner, J. F., eds)
, pp. 1167-1179, Academic Press, London
|
| 49.
|
Quinn, C. O.,
Scott, D. K.,
Brinckerhoff, C. E.,
Matrisian, L. M.,
Jeffrey, J. J.,
and Partridge, N. C.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
22342-22347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Basbaum, C. B.,
and Werb, Z.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
731-738[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Chen, W. T.
(1996)
Enzyme Protein
49,
59-71[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Rogachefsky, R. A.,
Dean, D. D.,
Howell, D. S.,
and Altman, R. D.
(1993)
Osteoarth. Cartilage
1,
105-114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Anees, M.
(1996)
J. Enzyme Inhib.
10,
203-214[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Malla, E. Berg, L. Uhlin-Hansen, and J.-O. Winberg
Interaction of Pro-matrix Metalloproteinase-9/Proteoglycan Heteromer with Gelatin and Collagen
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 16, 2008;
283(20):
13652 - 13665.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Koyama, H. Naruo, Y. Yoshitomi, S. Munesue, S. Kiyono, Y. Kusano, K. Hashimoto, T. Yokoi, H. Nakanishi, S. Shimizu, et al.
Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Associated with Heparan Sulphate Chains of GPI-Anchored Cell Surface Proteoglycans Mediates Motility of Murine Colon Adenocarcinoma Cells
J. Biochem.,
May 1, 2008;
1 |