|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 6, 4239-4243, February 11, 2000
Interaction of Xenopus Cdc2·Cyclin A1 with the
Origin Recognition Complex*
Piotr
Romanowski ,
Jackie
Marr ,
Mark A.
Madine ,
Alison
Rowles§**,
J. Julian
Blow§**,
Jean
Gautier¶, and
Ronald A.
Laskey
From the Wellcome/Cancer Research Campaign Institute,
Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, United Kingdom and Department of
Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ,
United Kingdom, the § Imperial Cancer Research Fund,
Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Hertfordshire EN6 3LD, United
Kingdom, and the ¶ Department of Dermatology and Genetics,
Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
 |
ABSTRACT |
The initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotes
is regulated in a minimum of at least two ways. First, several
proteins, including origin recognition complex (ORC), Cdc6 protein, and
the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) protein complex, need to be
assembled on chromatin before initiation. Second,
cyclin-dependent kinases regulate DNA replication in both a
positive and a negative way by inducing the initiation of DNA
replication at G1/S transition and preventing further
rounds of origin firing within the same cell cycle. Here we
characterize a link between the two levels. Immunoprecipitation of
Xenopus origin recognition complex with anti-XOrc1 or
anti-XOrc2 antibodies specifically co-immunoprecipitates a histone H1
kinase activity. The kinase activity is sensitive to several inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases including 6-dimethylaminopurine
(6-DMAP), olomoucine, and p21Cip1. This kinase activity
also copurifies with ORC over several fractionation steps and was
identified as a complex of the Cdc2 catalytic subunit and cyclin A1.
Neither Cdk2 nor cyclin E could be detected in ORC
immunoprecipitations. Reciprocal immunoprecipitations with anti-Xenopus Cdc2 or anti-Xenopus cyclin A1
antibodies specifically co-precipitate XOrc1 and XOrc2. Our results
indicate that Xenopus ORC and Cdc2·cyclin A1 physically
interact and demonstrate a physical link between an active
cyclin-dependent kinase and proteins involved in the
initiation of DNA replication.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotic cell cycles is
tightly regulated so that every fragment of genomic DNA is replicated
exactly once (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Many experiments have
indicated that the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication requires at
least two components: replication-competent chromatin and protein
kinases that exert both positive and negative effects (1-3). Recent
studies in yeast and Xenopus have characterized several
protein assemblies that are components of replication competent
chromatin. The origin recognition complex
(ORC)1 was initially
identified in budding yeast as a protein complex which binds to
origins of replication and is essential for the initiation of
replication (4-8). ORC homologues are present throughout eukaryotes.
In Xenopus, Drosophila, and fission yeast they
have been shown to be essential for DNA replication (9-16). Additional proteins: the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) protein complex (reviewed in Ref. 17) and Cdc6p, bind to ORC, or next to ORC, during
the pre-replicative period of the cell cycle. Both are essential for
the initiation of DNA replication; they are displaced from chromatin as
replication proceeds and are absent from post-replicative chromatin
(reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). In Xenopus, ORC is bound to
origins during both the pre-replicative and post-replicative period and
the binding of Cdc6 and MCMs to chromatin is dependent on the presence
of ORC (14, 15, 18). Indeed, a hierarchy of binding exists; ORC binds
first, followed by ORC-dependent Cdc6 binding and
Cdc6-dependent MCM binding.
A wealth of experimental data points to the involvement of protein
kinases in the initiation of replication. In yeast, genetic studies
have identified the cdc2/CDC28 genes encoding
protein kinases necessary for entry into S phase and M phase (19, 20). In Xenopus, both Cdc2·cyclin A and Cdk2·cyclin E
complexes have been implicated in triggering initiation of DNA
replication (21-27). It is important to note that protein kinases of
the Cdk family appear to exert both positive and negative effects on
DNA replication; kinase activities present during S and G2
phases of the cell cycle prevent a second round of replication
(reviewed in Ref. 28) and specifically inhibit rebinding of MCM
proteins (27-31). Thus, a complex network of protein phosphorylation
is likely to converge at the origins of replication to induce a single
round of replication during S phase and prevent further initiations
within the same cell cycle.
Although the nature of replication competent chromatin and
cyclin-dependent kinases have been elucidated separately, a
crucial gap in our understanding lies between them. In fission yeast, Orp2, a subunit of fission yeast ORC has been demonstrated to interact
with Cdc2 kinase, which serves two functions performed by both Cdc2 and
Cdk2 in higher eukaryotes (32). However, the kinase was not shown to be
active and no cyclin partner was reported. Here, we show that
Xenopus ORC co-purifies and co-immunoprecipitates with an
active cyclin-dependent kinase, which we identify as
Cdc2·cyclin A1. This is particularly interesting, as Cdc2 is more
likely to be involved in the negative regulation discussed above,
rather than in positive regulation of initiation at the onset of S
phase. Therefore, the Cdc2·cyclin A1 complex becomes a strong
candidate for the kinase that prevents MCM rebinding (27-31) and thus
re-initiation of DNA replication within a single cell cycle.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Antibodies--
The following antibodies were used in this
study: anti-XOrc1 (15), anti-XOrc2 (15), anti-XMcm3 (33), anti-XMcm7
(34); mouse anti-XCdc2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA), mouse anti-XCdc2 (Ref. 35; a kind gift from Drs. T. Hunt and J. Gannon), rabbit anti-XCdk2 (36), rabbit anti-XCdk2 (a kind gift from
Drs. T. Hunt and J. Gannon), rabbit anti-XCdk2 (a kind gift from Dr. M. Doree), mouse anti-PSTAIR (37), sheep anti-cyclin E (Ref. 38; kind gift
from Dr. J. Maller), mouse anti-cyclin E (a kind gift from Drs. T. Hunt
and J. Gannon), rabbit anti-cyclin A1 (a gift from Dr. M. Doree),
rabbit anti-cyclin A1 (a gift from Dr. A. Philpott), mouse anti-cyclin
A1 (Ref. 39; a kind gift from Drs. T. Hunt and J. Gannon), rabbit
anti-cyclin A1 and anti-cyclin A2 (kind gifts from Dr. U. Strausfeld),
mouse anti-cyclin B1 and anti-cyclin B2 (kind gifts from Drs. T. Hunt
and J. Gannon), and sheep anti-cyclin B1 and anti-cyclin B2 (kind gifts
from Dr. J. Maller). Immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting were
performed as described (33, 34).
ORC Purification--
Xenopus ORC was purified from
egg extract high speed supernatant (40) using a modified purification
procedure broadly based on published protocols (4, 11, 14, 41). Egg
extract was diluted 5-fold in buffer B/50 (buffer B is 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, 1 µg/ml each of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin; B/50 is 50 mM KCl in
buffer B) and ammonium sulfate was added to 20% saturation.
Precipitated material was pelleted by centrifugation, and the resulting
supernatant was transferred to a new tube. Ammonium sulfate was added
to the supernatant up to 35% saturation, and precipitated material was pelleted by centrifugation. The pellet was dissolved in buffer B/0 and
loaded on heparin-Sepharose CL6B column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
The column was washed in buffer B/200 (200 mM KCl) and eluted in a single step with buffer B/500. The eluate was diluted 4-fold in buffer B to bring the concentration of KCl down to 125 mM and applied to a 1-ml MonoQ column equilibrated in
buffer B/125 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was washed with
buffer B/125 and eluted with a 10-ml linear gradient of KCl (125-600 mM) in buffer B. XOrc1 and XOrc2-containing fractions
(210-320 mM KCl) were pooled, diluted with buffer B to
achieve KCl concentration of 100 mM, and applied to a 1-ml
MonoS column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was eluted in
exactly the same way as MonoQ except that ORC eluted at approximately
230-320 mM KCl. ORC-containing fractions were pooled,
diluted with buffer B to achieve a final KCl concentration of 200 mM, and concentrated to 500 µl in a Vivaspin concentrator
(approximately 10-fold). The concentrated material was applied to
Superose 6 column equilibrated in buffer B/200.
H1 Kinase Assays--
Reactions for co-immunoprecipitating and
copurifying kinase activities were performed in 50 mM Tris,
pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 12 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 50 µM ATP, for 30 min at
37 °C in the presence of 1 µg of histone H1 (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) and 10 µCi of [ -33P]ATP as substrates.
Samples were electrophoresed on a 12% denaturing gel; gels were dried
and exposed in a PhosphorImager cassette (Molecular Dynamics).
Recombinant Cdc2·cyclin B and Cdk2·cyclin E complexes were
expressed in Sf9 cells from viruses kindly supplied by W. Harper
and purified as described (42); baculovirally expressed Cdc2·cyclin A
and Cdk2·cyclin A were kind gifts from Drs. Mark Jackman and Jonathon Pines.
 |
RESULTS |
Histone H1 Kinase Activity Co-immunoprecipitates with Xenopus
ORC--
A histone H1 kinase activity co-immunoprecipitates with
Xenopus origin recognition complex from the egg extract
(Fig. 1A). This activity is
co-immunoprecipitated with two different antibodies against XOrc1, as
well as with two different antibodies against XOrc2. H1 kinase activity
is not immunoprecipitated when egg extract has been immunodepleted of
ORC before immunoprecipitation (compare ORC and
complete). This suggests that the presence of H1 kinase activity in the immunoprecipitates is due to its interaction with ORC
rather than nonspecific binding to the antibodies or protein A-Sepharose beads. To address the specificity of interaction further, we performed immunoprecipitations with several control antibodies: anti-XMcm3 (M3), anti-XMcm7 (M7), anti-goat IgG
(GIgG), and anti-sheep IgG (SIgG). None of these
antibodies co-immunoprecipitated substantial amounts of H1 kinase
activity from Xenopus egg extract. Thus, we conclude that an
H1 kinase activity is specifically associated with the
Xenopus origin recognition complex.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
An H1 kinase activity specifically
co-immunoprecipitates with Xenopus ORC.
A, 100-µl aliquots of complete or ORC-depleted
( ORC) egg extracts were immunoprecipitated with two
different anti-XOrc1 or two different anti-XOrc2 antibodies. Separate
aliquots of complete egg extracts were also precipitated with
antibodies against XMcm3 (M3), XMcm7 (M7), sheep
IgG (SIgG), or goat IgG (GIgG).
Immunoprecipitated material was in each case assayed for H1 kinase
activity. B, an H1 kinase activity present in anti-XOrc1
immunoprecipitates (P) was assayed for its sensitivity to a
variety of inhibitors: 1 and 3 mM 6-DMAP; 50 µM and 1 mM olomoucine (OLO); 1 mM inhibitory subunit of protein kinase A (PKI);
and 0.6, 6, and 60 nM p21Cip1
(CIP1).
|
|
To characterize the coimmunoprecipitating kinase further, we have
assayed several Cdk protein kinase inhibitors for their ability to
inhibit the kinase activity (Fig. 1B). Both
6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP) and olomoucine inhibited the activity at
approximately the same concentrations as those required for inhibition
of the initiation of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts
(43, 44). Both 6-DMAP and olomoucine inhibit a whole range of kinases,
while showing only a relative preference for Cdks (44). Therefore, we
asked whether the ORC-associated kinase activity was inhibited by
p21Cip1, a specific inhibitor of Cdk kinases
(45-47). As shown in Fig. 1B, the effect of
p21Cip1 was evident at concentrations equal to
or lower than those reported to inhibit replication in egg extracts
(23, 24). Therefore, the sensitivity profile of the ORC-associated
kinase to a range of inhibitors strongly suggests a Cdk family kinase.
Xenopus Cdc2 Kinase and Cyclin A1 Copurify and Co-immunoprecipitate
with ORC--
Xenopus, like yeast, have several
Cdk·cyclin complexes which have been implicated in the regulation of
DNA replication (21-27). Immunodepletion of Cdc2 and Cdk2 from
Xenopus egg extract using p13suc1
beads or immunodepletion of Cdk2 using anti-Cdk2 antibodies inhibits DNA replication (21, 22). Addition of the Cdk2 kinase inhibitor p21Cip1 also has a similar effect (27-30). The
replication capacity of the extract can be rescued by re-addition of
Cdk2·cyclin E, Cdk2·cyclin A, or Cdc2·cyclin A, as well as cyclin
A or cyclin E alone (26). In the Xenopus egg, cyclin A is
predominantly associated with p34Cdc2 rather
than p33Cdk2 (48). Furthermore, ablation of
cyclin A mRNA (49) or immunodepletion of Cdc2 (22) do not block DNA
synthesis in Xenopus egg extract. These results argue that
Cdk2·cyclin E appears to be a better candidate for the Cdk·cyclin
complex required for the initiation of DNA replication. However, as
Cdc2·cyclin A or Cdk2·cyclin A can rescue replication capacity of
egg extracts immunodepleted of Cdks (21, 26), other Cdk·cyclin
complexes can clearly substitute for Cdk2·cyclin E. In addition to
inducing initiation, Cdk·cyclin complexes are likely mediators of
other regulatory functions in DNA replication. Ablation of cyclin A
mRNA from Xenopus egg extracts has been demonstrated to
abolish the dependence of mitosis on completion of DNA replication (49)
and cyclin A has been shown to inhibit the activity of the replication
licensing factor (43). Furthermore, addition of Cdc2·cyclin a to
Xenopus egg extracts selectively induces the release of ORC
but not MCMs from pre-replicative chromatin (27). Kinases that induce
initiation of DNA replication or prevent further initiation events
within the same cell cycle would be expected to interact with proteins
present at replication origins before initiation. ORC, the eukaryotic
initiator protein, is a prime candidate for such an interaction.
Therefore, we have asked if the kinase that co-immunoprecipitates with
ORC is any of those implicated in the regulation of DNA replication in
Xenopus egg extracts.
Our attempts to identify the ORC-associated kinase by Western blotting
of the immunoprecipitated material failed, presumably due to
insufficient amounts of protein obtained by this method. Therefore, we
resorted to larger scale biochemical purification of ORC from the egg
extract and followed XOrc1, XOrc2, candidate cyclins, and Cdks
throughout the purification by Western blotting. ORC was partially
purified by ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by
heparin-Sepharose, MonoQ, and MonoS chromatography columns as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The partially purified ORC was
concentrated and loaded on a Superose 6 gel filtration column. Fig.
2 shows immunoblots across the
ORC-containing fractions from this column. Examination of XOrc1 and
XOrc2 elution profiles suggests that only a part of XOrc2 is present in
a complex with XOrc1, whereas significant amounts of XOrc2 appear to be
present in a slightly smaller complex lacking XOrc1. This observation agrees with previously published data demonstrating that
immunodepletion of ORC with anti-XOrc1 antibodies failed to
immunodeplete XOrc2 completely (15). However, as XOrc1 immunodepletion
abolished the ability of egg extract to support DNA replication, the
complex lacking XOrc1 cannot perform all the functions required for
initiation (14, 15).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Xenopus Cdc2·cyclin A1 complex
co-fractionates with ORC. Partially purified Xenopus
ORC (see "Experimental Procedures") was applied to a Superose 6 gel
filtration column. Consecutive fractions were collected immunoblotted
with antibodies against XOrc1, XOrc2, PSTAIR peptide, Xcyclin A1,
Xcyclin B, and Xcyclin E and assayed for H1 kinase activity.
|
|
We have used anti-PSTAIR antibody to detect both Cdc2 and Cdk2 with
similar affinity and to allow quantitation of their relative abundance
(35). A 34-kDa PSTAIR-reactive band could be detected in the
ORC-containing fractions. In addition, small amounts of a 33-kDa
PSTAIR-reactive protein could also be detected. Independent immunoblotting with antibodies specific to
p34Cdc2 or p33Cdk2
confirmed that the 34-kDa band corresponds to the Cdc2 kinase catalytic
subunit (data not shown). Careful examination of the immunoblots
indicates that, whereas Cdc2 elutes identically to XOrc1, Cdk2 elutes
later, overlapping with the broad XOrc2 peak but not the narrow XOrc1
peak. As shown in Fig. 2, Cdc2 elutes at exactly the same position as
XOrc1, whereas very little Cdk2 can be detected in XOrc1-containing
fractions. Using an antibody that is specific for Xenopus
cyclin A1, an immunoblot revealed a peak of cyclin A1 overlapping the
peak of XOrc1 and Cdc2. No cyclin B could be detected in XOrc1- or
XOrc2-containing fractions. An anti-cyclin E immunoblot revealed a weak
peak of cyclin E overlapping the peaks of Cdk2 kinase and XOrc2 but not
coincident with Cdc2 or XOrc1. All fractions were independently assayed
for H1 kinase activity. The elution profile of histone H1 kinase
activity corresponded well with the presence of Cdc2 and Cdk2 kinases
detected by Western blotting. We conclude that two kinase complexes,
Cdc2·cyclin A1 and Cdk2·cyclin E, cofractionate with XOrc2.
However, only one of these, Cdc2·cyclin A1, exactly co-elutes with
fractions containing both XOrc1 and XOrc2, whereas the other,
Cdk2·cyclin E, is absent from fractions containing XOrc1. Cyclin A2
is not expressed in Xenopus embryos until stage 10 (50). The
absence of cyclin A2 from egg extracts and ORC-containing fractions was
confirmed by immunoblotting with cyclin A2-specific antibodies (kind
gift of Dr. Uli Strausfeld; data not shown).
To obtain further evidence for interaction between ORC and Cdc2 or
Cdk2, we performed immunoprecipitations from the individual Superose 6 fractions with anti-XOrc1 and anti-XOrc2 antibodies and assayed the
immunoprecipitated material for the presence of H1 kinase activity,
Cdc2 and Cdk2 (Fig. 3). Both antibodies
co-immunoprecipitated XOrc1, XOrc2, and Cdc2 kinase but not detectable
Cdk2 kinase. The pattern of bands obtained with anti-PSTAIR antibody
was identical to that on anti-Cdc2 immunoblots, ruling out the
possibility that failure to detect Cdk2 was due to different
sensitivities of anti-Cdc2 and anti-Cdk2 antibodies. In agreement with
immunoblotting results, the peak of H1 kinase activity overlapped
exactly with the presence of Cdc2 kinase (Fig. 3). Thus, Cdc2 kinase
rather than Cdk2 kinase is tightly associated with Xenopus
origin recognition complex in the egg extract.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Xenopus Cdc2 kinase is associated
with the XOrc1-containing complex. Xenopus ORC was
partially purified and loaded on a Superose 6 column. Consecutive
fractions from the Superose 6 column were immunoprecipitated with
either anti-XOrc1 or anti-XOrc2 antibodies. Immunoprecipitated material
was immunoblotted with antibodies against XOrc1, XOrc2, XCdc2, XCdk2,
and PSTAIR peptide. Each immunoprecipitate was also assayed for histone
H1 activity.
|
|
Independent evidence for this interaction was obtained from reciprocal
immunoprecipitations with antibodies directed against Xenopus Cdc2 and cyclin A1. As shown in Fig.
4, both anti-Cdc2 and anti-cyclin A1
antibodies, but not control antibodies, co-immunoprecipitated significant amounts of XOrc1 and XOrc2 from the pool of ORC-containing fractions from the MonoS column (see "Experimental Procedures"). In
summary, these results provide evidence that a soluble complex between
ORC and Cdc2·cyclin A1 exists in Xenopus egg extracts.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Reciprocal immunoprecipitation of XOrc1 and
XOrc2 by antibodies against Xenopus Cdc2 and cyclin
A1. Peak ORC-containing fractions from the MonoS column were
pooled (MonoS) and immunoprecipitated with mock antibodies
(rabbit anti-rat IgG), antibodies against XCdc2 or antibodies against
Xcyclin A1. A sample of the starting material and immunoprecipitated
proteins were immunoblotted simultaneously with antibodies against
XOrc1 and XOrc2.
|
|
Several recombinant Cdk·cyclin complexes were tested for their
ability to phosphorylate recombinant XOrc2 in vitro. As
shown in Fig. 5A, all Cdc2-
and Cdk2-containing complexes tested were able to phosphorylate XOrc2.
However, XOrc2 was phosphorylated by Cdc2·cyclin A with approximately
4-fold higher efficiency than by Cdc2·cyclin B or Cdk2-containing
complexes (Fig. 5B), and of course, this is the same complex
that interacts with ORC in Xenopus egg extracts (Figs. 2 and
4). The H1 kinase activity co-immunoprecipitating with ORC is sensitive
to p21Cip1. p21Cip1 is
known to inhibit efficiently Cdk4·cyclin D, Cdk2·cyclin A, and
Cdk2·cyclin E complexes and weakly Cdc2·cyclin B, but its activity
against Cdc2·cyclin A has not been reported so far (44-47). As shown
in Fig. 5C, p21Cip1 efficiently
inhibits the kinase activity of recombinant Cdc2·cyclin A toward
histone H1 and XOrc2 used as substrates.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
XOrc2 is preferentially phosphorylated by
Cdc2·cyclin A. A, 1 µg of XOrc2 was incubated in
the presence of equal amounts of different Cdk·cyclin complexes and
[ -33P]ATP. The activity of Cdk·cyclin complexes was
normalized against histone H1. The amounts of different Cdk·cyclin
complexes used for XOrc2 phosphorylation experiments catalyzed
identical levels of 33P incorporation with histone H1 used
as a substrate. At indicated time points, aliquots of the reaction mix
were collected and electrophoresed and the amount of radioactivity
incorporated into XOrc2 was quantified. B, equal amounts of
different Cdk·cyclin complexes were incubated with 1 µg of XOrc2
for 20 min and the incorporation of radioactivity into XOrc2 was
quantified as in panel A. C, histone
H1 or XOrc2 were incubated in the presence of Cdc2·cyclin A and
buffer alone or with 6 or 60 nM
p21Cip1 for 20 min and the amount of
33P transferred to XOrc2 was quantified.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report, we have used three different approaches to
identify a direct physical interaction between the Xenopus
origin recognition complex and Cdc2·cyclin A1. First,
immunoprecipitations of Xenopus ORC with highly specific
antibodies against XOrc1 or XOrc2 co-precipitates Cdc2·cyclin A1.
Likewise, anti- Xenopus Cdc2 or anti- Xenopus
cyclin A1 antibodies specifically co-precipitate XOrc1 and XOrc2. In
contrast, antibodies against XMcm3, XMcm7, sheep IgG, or goat IgG fail
to co-precipitate Cdc2·cyclin A1. In the second approach,
Cdc2·cyclin A1 co-fractionates with ORC over several fractionation
steps including ion exchange and gel filtration. Finally, in the third
approach, XOrc2 is shown to be phosphorylated most efficiently by
recombinant Cdc2·cyclin A1 in comparison to recombinant Cdc2·cyclin
B and Cdk2 complexes. These results argue that the interaction between
Xenopus ORC and Cdc2·cyclin A1 is highly specific.
We also report that histone H1 kinase activity is associated with the
ORC -Cdc2·cyclin A1 complex following both fractionation and
co-immunoprecipitation. This kinase activity is sensitive to the
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors 6-DMAP, olomoucine, and
p21Cip1. Interestingly, antibodies against Cdk2, cyclin E,
and cyclin B show an absence of these proteins from the
ORC·Cdc2·cyclin A1 complex. From these results it can be concluded
Cdc2·cyclin A1 accounts for the majority of the H1 kinase activity
that both co-immunoprecipitates and co-fractionates with ORC.
We have not directly identified the function of the ORC-associated
kinase, but it is a very strong candidate for one specific role. As
outlined in the Introduction, two major roles are known for protein
kinases in the control of DNA replication. The first is S phase
promoting activity. However, the fact that cyclin A ablation does not
inhibit DNA replication in the extract (49) appears to point to the
Cdk2·cyclin E complex as the prime candidate for an S phase promoting
activity. It also appears to argue against the possibility that
ORC-associated kinase identified in this paper triggers the initiation
of DNA replication by phosphorylating proteins associated with ORC or
ORC itself. The second known major role of a protein kinase in
controlling DNA replication is the prevention of re-initiation of
replication within a single cell cycle. Conditional mutations of
cdc2 and deletion of cdc13, the B-type cyclin in
Schizosaccharomyces pombe, promote over-replication (51,
52). Similarly, inhibition of protein kinases in G2 in mammalian cells makes them competent to replicate again (53, 54) and
causes MCM proteins to rebind to replicating chromatin (29). In
Xenopus egg extracts, the rebinding of MCM proteins to
chromatin is actively prevented by the accumulation of cyclin A or E in
sperm nuclei (30). Therefore, the continuous presence of an active
cyclin-dependent kinase throughout S and G2
appears to be essential for keeping MCMs off chromatin and preventing re-replication within the same cell cycle (55). The association of
Cdc2·cyclin A with ORC makes it an attractive candidate for this
function. Whether ORC-Cdc2·cyclin A regulates ORC binding to DNA or
instead regulates Cdc6 binding to DNA remains to be determined. Asking
if the ORC-Cdc2·cyclin A complex is bound to DNA, and in particular
in a cell cycle-regulated manner, should help answer this question.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Drs. M. Doree, J. Gannon,
T. Hunt, J. Maller, A. Philpott, U. Strausfeld, and M. Yamashita for
generous gifts of antibodies; and Drs. Mark Jackman and Jonathon Pines for recombinant Cdk2·cyclin A and Cdc2·cyclin A complexes and p21Cip1. We are also grateful to Tim Hunt for critical
comments on the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
44-1223-334106; Fax: 44-1223-334089; E-mail:
ral19@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk.
**
Present address: Cancer Research Campaign, Chromosome Replication
Research Group, Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1
5EH, United Kingdom.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ORC, origin
recognition complex;
MCM, minichromosome maintenance;
6-DMAP, 6-dimethylaminopurine.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Stillman, B.
(1996)
Science
274,
1659-1664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Diffley, J. F. X.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2819-2830[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Rao, P. N.,
and Johnson, R. T.
(1970)
Nature
225,
159-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Bell, S. P.,
Kobayashi, R.,
and Stillman, B.
(1993)
Science
262,
1844-1849[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Foss, M.,
McNally, F. J.,
Laurenson, P.,
and Rine, J.
(1993)
Science
262,
1838-1844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Hardy, C.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1832-1841[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Li, J. J.,
and Herskowitz, I.
(1993)
Science
262,
1870-1874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Micklem, G.,
Rowley, A.,
Harwood, J.,
Nasmyth, K.,
and Diffley, J. F. X.
(1993)
Nature
366,
87-89[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Muzi-Falconi, M.,
and Kelly, T. J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
92,
12475-12479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Grallert, B.,
and Nurse, P.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2644-2654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Gossen, M.,
Pak, D. T. S.,
Hansen, S. K.,
Acharya, J. K.,
and Botchan, M. R.
(1995)
Science
270,
1674-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Takahara, K.,
Bong, M.,
Brevard, R.,
Eddy, R. L.,
Haley, L. L.,
Sait, S. J.,
Shows, T. B.,
Hoffman, G. G.,
and Greenspan, D. S.
(1996)
Genomics
31,
119-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Carpenter, P. B.,
Mueller, P. R.,
and Dunphy, W. G.
(1996)
Nature
379,
357-360[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Rowles, A.,
Chong, J. P. J.,
Brown, L.,
Howell, M.,
Evan, G. I.,
and Blow, J. J.
(1996)
Cell
87,
287-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Romanowski, P.,
Madine, M. A.,
Rowles, A.,
Blow, J. J.,
and Laskey, R. A.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
1416-1425[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Gavin, K. A.,
Hidaka, M.,
and Stillman, B.
(1995)
Science
270,
1667-1671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Tye, B. K.
(1999)
Ann. Rev. Biochem.
68,
649-686[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Coleman, T. R.,
Carpenter, P. B.,
and Dunphy, W. G.
(1996)
Cell
87,
53-63[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Nurse, P.,
and Bissett, Y.
(1981)
Nature
292,
558-560[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Hartwell, L.,
Culotti, J.,
Pringle, J. R.,
and Reid, B. J.
(1974)
Science
183,
46-51[Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Blow, J. J.,
and Nurse, P.
(1990)
Cell
62,
855-862[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Fang, F.,
and Newport, J. W.
(1991)
Cell
66,
731-742[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Strausfeld, U. P.,
Howell, M.,
Rempel, R.,
Maller, J. L.,
Hunt, T.,
and Blow, J. J.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
4,
876-883[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Jackson, P. K.,
Chevalier, S.,
Philippe, M.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
755-769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Chevalier, S.,
Couturier, A.,
Chartrain, I.,
Le Guellec, R.,
Beckhelling, C.,
Le Guellec, K.,
Philippe, M.,
and Ford, C. C.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
1173-1184[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Strausfeld, U.,
Howell, M.,
Descombes, P.,
Chevalier, S.,
Rempel, R. E.,
Adamczewski, J.,
Maller, J. L.,
Hunt, T.,
and Blow, J. J.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
1555-1563[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Hua, X. H.,
and Newport, J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
271-281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Romanowski, P.,
and Madine, M. A.
(1996)
Trends Cell Biol
6,
184-188
|
| 29.
|
Coverley, D,
Wilkinson, H.,
Madine, M. A.,
Mills, A.,
and Laskey, R. A.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res
238,
63-69[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Hua, X. H.,
Yan, H.,
and Newport, J.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
183-192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Tanaka, T.,
Knapp, D.,
and Nasmyth, K.
(1997)
Cell
90,
649-660[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Leatherwood, J.,
Lopez-Girona, A.,
and Russell, P.
(1996)
Nature
379,
361-363
|
| 33.
|
Madine, M. A.,
Khoo, C.-Y.,
Mills, A. D.,
and Laskey, R. A.
(1995)
Nature
375,
421-424[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Romanowski, P.,
Madine, M. A.,
and Laskey, R. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
93,
10189-10194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Goodger, N. M.,
Gannon, J.,
Hunt, T.,
and Morgan, P. R.
(1996)
J. Pathol.
178,
422-428[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Gabrielli, B. G.,
Roy, L. M.,
Gautier, J.,
Philippe, M.,
and Maller, J. L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1969-1975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Yamashita, M.,
Yoshikuni, M.,
Hirai, T.,
Fakada, S.,
and Hagahama, Y.
(1991)
Dev. Growth Differ.
33,
617-624[CrossRef]
|
| 38.
|
Rempel, R. E.,
Sleight, S. B.,
and Maller, J. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
6843-6855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Kobayashi, H.,
Stewart, E.,
Poon, R. Y. C.,
and Hunt, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29153-29160[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Blow, J. J.,
and Laskey, R. A.
(1986)
Cell
47,
577-587[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Rowley, A.,
Cocker, J. H.,
Harwood, J.,
and Diffley, J. F. X.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2631-2641[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Hendrickson, M.,
Madine, M. A.,
Dalton, S.,
and Gautier, J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
93,
12223-12228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Blow, J. J.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
993-1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Vesely, J.,
Havlicek, L.,
Strnad, M.,
Blow, J. J.,
Donella-Deana, A.,
Pinna, L.,
Letham, D. S.,
Kato, J.,
Dativaud, L.,
Leclerc, S.,
and Meijer, L.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
224,
771-786[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Harper, J. W.,
Adami, G. R.,
Wei, N.,
Keyomarsi, K.,
and Elledge, S. J.
(1993)
Cell
75,
805-816[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Xiong, Y.,
Hannon, G. J.,
Zhang, H.,
Casso, D.,
Kobayashi, R.,
and Beach, D.
(1993)
Nature
366,
701-704[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Gu, Y.,
Turck, C. W.,
and Morgan, D. O.
(1993)
Nature
366,
707-710[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Minshull, J.,
Golsteyn, R.,
Hill, C. S.,
and Hunt, T.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
2865-2875[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Walker, D. H.,
and Maller, J. L.
(1991)
Nature
354,
314-317[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Howe, J. A.,
Howell, M.,
Hunt, T.,
and Newport, J. W.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1164-1176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Broek, D.,
Bartlett, R.,
Crawford, K.,
and Nurse, P.
(1991)
Nature
349,
388-393[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Hayles, J.,
Fisher, D.,
Woollard, A.,
and Nurse, P.
(1994)
Cell
78,
813-822[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Coverley, D.,
Wilkinson, H. R.,
and Downes, C. S.
(1996)
Exp. Cell Res.
225,
294-300[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Usui, T.,
Yoshida, M.,
Abe, K.,
Osada, H.,
Isono, K.,
and Beppu, T.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1275-1282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Walter, J.,
Sun, L.,
and Newport, J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
519-529[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Katsuno, A. Suzuki, K. Sugimura, K. Okumura, D. H. Zineldeen, M. Shimada, H. Niida, T. Mizuno, F. Hanaoka, and M. Nakanishi
Cyclin A-Cdk1 regulates the origin firing program in mammalian cells
PNAS,
March 3, 2009;
106(9):
3184 - 3189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Zellner, T. Herrmann, C. Schulz, and F. Grummt
Site-specific interaction of the murine pre-replicative complex with origin DNA: assembly and disassembly during cell cycle transit and differentiation
Nucleic Acids Res.,
November 29, 2007;
35(20):
6701 - 6713.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Y. Tsang, L. Wang, Z. Chen, I. Sanchez, and B. D. Dynlacht
SCAPER, a novel cyclin A interacting protein that regulates cell cycle progression
J. Cell Biol.,
August 9, 2007;
178(4):
621 - 633.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Remus, M. Blanchette, D. C. Rio, and M. R. Botchan
CDK Phosphorylation Inhibits the DNA-binding and ATP-hydrolysis Activities of the Drosophila Origin Recognition Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 2, 2005;
280(48):
39740 - 39751.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-j. Li, A. Vassilev, and M. L. DePamphilis
Role for Cdk1 (Cdc2)/Cyclin A in Preventing the Mammalian Origin Recognition Complex's Largest Subunit (Orc1) from Binding to Chromatin during Mitosis
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 1, 2004;
24(13):
5875 - 5886.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Wilmes, V. Archambault, R. J. Austin, M. D. Jacobson, S. P. Bell, and F. R. Cross
Interaction of the S-phase cyclin Clb5 with an 'RXL' docking sequence in the initiator protein Orc6 provides an origin-localized replication control switch
Genes & Dev.,
May 1, 2004;
18(9):
981 - 991.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Coletta, K. Christensen, K. J. Reichenberger, J. Lamb, D. Micomonaco, L. Huang, D. M. Wolf, C. Muller-Tidow, T. R. Golub, K. Kawakami, et al.
The Six1 homeoprotein stimulates tumorigenesis by reactivation of cyclin A1
PNAS,
April 27, 2004;
101(17):
6478 - 6483.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Tatsumi, S. Ohta, H. Kimura, T. Tsurimoto, and C. Obuse
The ORC1 Cycle in Human Cells: I. CELL CYCLE-REGULATED OSCILLATION OF HUMAN ORC1
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2003;
278(42):
41528 - 41534.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ritzi, K. Tillack, J. Gerhardt, E. Ott, S. Humme, E. Kremmer, W. Hammerschmidt, and A. Schepers
Complex protein-DNA dynamics at the latent origin of DNA replication of Epstein-Barr virus
J. Cell Sci.,
October 1, 2003;
116(19):
3971 - 3984.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Jackman, Y. Kubota, N. den Elzen, A. Hagting, and J. Pines
Cyclin A- and Cyclin E-Cdk Complexes Shuttle between the Nucleus and the Cytoplasm
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2002;
13(3):
1030 - 1045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Vas, W. Mok, and J. Leatherwood
Control of DNA Rereplication via Cdc2 Phosphorylation Sites in the Origin Recognition Complex
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 1, 2001;
21(17):
5767 - 5777.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Stoeber, T. D. Tlsty, L. Happerfield, G. A. Thomas, S. Romanov, L. Bobrow, E. D. Williams, and G. H. Williams
DNA replication licensing and human cell proliferation
J. Cell Sci.,
January 6, 2001;
114(11):
2027 - 2041.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Blaydes, M. G. Luciani, S. Pospisilova, H. M.-L. Ball, B. Vojtesek, and T. R. Hupp
Stoichiometric Phosphorylation of Human p53 at Ser315 Stimulates p53-dependent Transcription
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 9, 2001;
276(7):
4699 - 4708.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Goda, M. Funakoshi, H. Suhara, T. Nishimoto, and H. Kobayashi
The N-terminal Helix of Xenopus Cyclins A and B Contributes to Binding Specificity of the Cyclin-CDK Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 27, 2001;
276(18):
15415 - 15422.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|