Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romanowski, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romanowski, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 6, 4239-4243, February 11, 2000


Interaction of Xenopus Cdc2·Cyclin A1 with the Origin Recognition Complex*

Piotr RomanowskiDagger , Jackie MarrDagger , Mark A. MadineDagger , Alison Rowles§**, J. Julian Blow§**, Jean Gautier, and Ronald A. LaskeyDagger ||

From the Dagger  Wellcome/Cancer Research Campaign Institute, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, United Kingdom and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom, the § Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Hertfordshire EN6 3LD, United Kingdom, and the  Department of Dermatology and Genetics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotes is regulated in a minimum of at least two ways. First, several proteins, including origin recognition complex (ORC), Cdc6 protein, and the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) protein complex, need to be assembled on chromatin before initiation. Second, cyclin-dependent kinases regulate DNA replication in both a positive and a negative way by inducing the initiation of DNA replication at G1/S transition and preventing further rounds of origin firing within the same cell cycle. Here we characterize a link between the two levels. Immunoprecipitation of Xenopus origin recognition complex with anti-XOrc1 or anti-XOrc2 antibodies specifically co-immunoprecipitates a histone H1 kinase activity. The kinase activity is sensitive to several inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases including 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP), olomoucine, and p21Cip1. This kinase activity also copurifies with ORC over several fractionation steps and was identified as a complex of the Cdc2 catalytic subunit and cyclin A1. Neither Cdk2 nor cyclin E could be detected in ORC immunoprecipitations. Reciprocal immunoprecipitations with anti-Xenopus Cdc2 or anti-Xenopus cyclin A1 antibodies specifically co-precipitate XOrc1 and XOrc2. Our results indicate that Xenopus ORC and Cdc2·cyclin A1 physically interact and demonstrate a physical link between an active cyclin-dependent kinase and proteins involved in the initiation of DNA replication.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotic cell cycles is tightly regulated so that every fragment of genomic DNA is replicated exactly once (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Many experiments have indicated that the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication requires at least two components: replication-competent chromatin and protein kinases that exert both positive and negative effects (1-3). Recent studies in yeast and Xenopus have characterized several protein assemblies that are components of replication competent chromatin. The origin recognition complex (ORC)1 was initially identified in budding yeast as a protein complex which binds to origins of replication and is essential for the initiation of replication (4-8). ORC homologues are present throughout eukaryotes. In Xenopus, Drosophila, and fission yeast they have been shown to be essential for DNA replication (9-16). Additional proteins: the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) protein complex (reviewed in Ref. 17) and Cdc6p, bind to ORC, or next to ORC, during the pre-replicative period of the cell cycle. Both are essential for the initiation of DNA replication; they are displaced from chromatin as replication proceeds and are absent from post-replicative chromatin (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). In Xenopus, ORC is bound to origins during both the pre-replicative and post-replicative period and the binding of Cdc6 and MCMs to chromatin is dependent on the presence of ORC (14, 15, 18). Indeed, a hierarchy of binding exists; ORC binds first, followed by ORC-dependent Cdc6 binding and Cdc6-dependent MCM binding.

A wealth of experimental data points to the involvement of protein kinases in the initiation of replication. In yeast, genetic studies have identified the cdc2/CDC28 genes encoding protein kinases necessary for entry into S phase and M phase (19, 20). In Xenopus, both Cdc2·cyclin A and Cdk2·cyclin E complexes have been implicated in triggering initiation of DNA replication (21-27). It is important to note that protein kinases of the Cdk family appear to exert both positive and negative effects on DNA replication; kinase activities present during S and G2 phases of the cell cycle prevent a second round of replication (reviewed in Ref. 28) and specifically inhibit rebinding of MCM proteins (27-31). Thus, a complex network of protein phosphorylation is likely to converge at the origins of replication to induce a single round of replication during S phase and prevent further initiations within the same cell cycle.

Although the nature of replication competent chromatin and cyclin-dependent kinases have been elucidated separately, a crucial gap in our understanding lies between them. In fission yeast, Orp2, a subunit of fission yeast ORC has been demonstrated to interact with Cdc2 kinase, which serves two functions performed by both Cdc2 and Cdk2 in higher eukaryotes (32). However, the kinase was not shown to be active and no cyclin partner was reported. Here, we show that Xenopus ORC co-purifies and co-immunoprecipitates with an active cyclin-dependent kinase, which we identify as Cdc2·cyclin A1. This is particularly interesting, as Cdc2 is more likely to be involved in the negative regulation discussed above, rather than in positive regulation of initiation at the onset of S phase. Therefore, the Cdc2·cyclin A1 complex becomes a strong candidate for the kinase that prevents MCM rebinding (27-31) and thus re-initiation of DNA replication within a single cell cycle.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Antibodies-- The following antibodies were used in this study: anti-XOrc1 (15), anti-XOrc2 (15), anti-XMcm3 (33), anti-XMcm7 (34); mouse anti-XCdc2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA), mouse anti-XCdc2 (Ref. 35; a kind gift from Drs. T. Hunt and J. Gannon), rabbit anti-XCdk2 (36), rabbit anti-XCdk2 (a kind gift from Drs. T. Hunt and J. Gannon), rabbit anti-XCdk2 (a kind gift from Dr. M. Doree), mouse anti-PSTAIR (37), sheep anti-cyclin E (Ref. 38; kind gift from Dr. J. Maller), mouse anti-cyclin E (a kind gift from Drs. T. Hunt and J. Gannon), rabbit anti-cyclin A1 (a gift from Dr. M. Doree), rabbit anti-cyclin A1 (a gift from Dr. A. Philpott), mouse anti-cyclin A1 (Ref. 39; a kind gift from Drs. T. Hunt and J. Gannon), rabbit anti-cyclin A1 and anti-cyclin A2 (kind gifts from Dr. U. Strausfeld), mouse anti-cyclin B1 and anti-cyclin B2 (kind gifts from Drs. T. Hunt and J. Gannon), and sheep anti-cyclin B1 and anti-cyclin B2 (kind gifts from Dr. J. Maller). Immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting were performed as described (33, 34).

ORC Purification-- Xenopus ORC was purified from egg extract high speed supernatant (40) using a modified purification procedure broadly based on published protocols (4, 11, 14, 41). Egg extract was diluted 5-fold in buffer B/50 (buffer B is 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, 1 µg/ml each of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin; B/50 is 50 mM KCl in buffer B) and ammonium sulfate was added to 20% saturation. Precipitated material was pelleted by centrifugation, and the resulting supernatant was transferred to a new tube. Ammonium sulfate was added to the supernatant up to 35% saturation, and precipitated material was pelleted by centrifugation. The pellet was dissolved in buffer B/0 and loaded on heparin-Sepharose CL6B column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was washed in buffer B/200 (200 mM KCl) and eluted in a single step with buffer B/500. The eluate was diluted 4-fold in buffer B to bring the concentration of KCl down to 125 mM and applied to a 1-ml MonoQ column equilibrated in buffer B/125 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was washed with buffer B/125 and eluted with a 10-ml linear gradient of KCl (125-600 mM) in buffer B. XOrc1 and XOrc2-containing fractions (210-320 mM KCl) were pooled, diluted with buffer B to achieve KCl concentration of 100 mM, and applied to a 1-ml MonoS column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was eluted in exactly the same way as MonoQ except that ORC eluted at approximately 230-320 mM KCl. ORC-containing fractions were pooled, diluted with buffer B to achieve a final KCl concentration of 200 mM, and concentrated to 500 µl in a Vivaspin concentrator (approximately 10-fold). The concentrated material was applied to Superose 6 column equilibrated in buffer B/200.

H1 Kinase Assays-- Reactions for co-immunoprecipitating and copurifying kinase activities were performed in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 12 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 50 µM ATP, for 30 min at 37 °C in the presence of 1 µg of histone H1 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and 10 µCi of [gamma -33P]ATP as substrates. Samples were electrophoresed on a 12% denaturing gel; gels were dried and exposed in a PhosphorImager cassette (Molecular Dynamics). Recombinant Cdc2·cyclin B and Cdk2·cyclin E complexes were expressed in Sf9 cells from viruses kindly supplied by W. Harper and purified as described (42); baculovirally expressed Cdc2·cyclin A and Cdk2·cyclin A were kind gifts from Drs. Mark Jackman and Jonathon Pines.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Histone H1 Kinase Activity Co-immunoprecipitates with Xenopus ORC-- A histone H1 kinase activity co-immunoprecipitates with Xenopus origin recognition complex from the egg extract (Fig. 1A). This activity is co-immunoprecipitated with two different antibodies against XOrc1, as well as with two different antibodies against XOrc2. H1 kinase activity is not immunoprecipitated when egg extract has been immunodepleted of ORC before immunoprecipitation (compare -ORC and complete). This suggests that the presence of H1 kinase activity in the immunoprecipitates is due to its interaction with ORC rather than nonspecific binding to the antibodies or protein A-Sepharose beads. To address the specificity of interaction further, we performed immunoprecipitations with several control antibodies: anti-XMcm3 (M3), anti-XMcm7 (M7), anti-goat IgG (GIgG), and anti-sheep IgG (SIgG). None of these antibodies co-immunoprecipitated substantial amounts of H1 kinase activity from Xenopus egg extract. Thus, we conclude that an H1 kinase activity is specifically associated with the Xenopus origin recognition complex.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   An H1 kinase activity specifically co-immunoprecipitates with Xenopus ORC. A, 100-µl aliquots of complete or ORC-depleted (-ORC) egg extracts were immunoprecipitated with two different anti-XOrc1 or two different anti-XOrc2 antibodies. Separate aliquots of complete egg extracts were also precipitated with antibodies against XMcm3 (M3), XMcm7 (M7), sheep IgG (SIgG), or goat IgG (GIgG). Immunoprecipitated material was in each case assayed for H1 kinase activity. B, an H1 kinase activity present in anti-XOrc1 immunoprecipitates (P) was assayed for its sensitivity to a variety of inhibitors: 1 and 3 mM 6-DMAP; 50 µM and 1 mM olomoucine (OLO); 1 mM inhibitory subunit of protein kinase A (PKI); and 0.6, 6, and 60 nM p21Cip1 (CIP1).

To characterize the coimmunoprecipitating kinase further, we have assayed several Cdk protein kinase inhibitors for their ability to inhibit the kinase activity (Fig. 1B). Both 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP) and olomoucine inhibited the activity at approximately the same concentrations as those required for inhibition of the initiation of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts (43, 44). Both 6-DMAP and olomoucine inhibit a whole range of kinases, while showing only a relative preference for Cdks (44). Therefore, we asked whether the ORC-associated kinase activity was inhibited by p21Cip1, a specific inhibitor of Cdk kinases (45-47). As shown in Fig. 1B, the effect of p21Cip1 was evident at concentrations equal to or lower than those reported to inhibit replication in egg extracts (23, 24). Therefore, the sensitivity profile of the ORC-associated kinase to a range of inhibitors strongly suggests a Cdk family kinase.

Xenopus Cdc2 Kinase and Cyclin A1 Copurify and Co-immunoprecipitate with ORC-- Xenopus, like yeast, have several Cdk·cyclin complexes which have been implicated in the regulation of DNA replication (21-27). Immunodepletion of Cdc2 and Cdk2 from Xenopus egg extract using p13suc1 beads or immunodepletion of Cdk2 using anti-Cdk2 antibodies inhibits DNA replication (21, 22). Addition of the Cdk2 kinase inhibitor p21Cip1 also has a similar effect (27-30). The replication capacity of the extract can be rescued by re-addition of Cdk2·cyclin E, Cdk2·cyclin A, or Cdc2·cyclin A, as well as cyclin A or cyclin E alone (26). In the Xenopus egg, cyclin A is predominantly associated with p34Cdc2 rather than p33Cdk2 (48). Furthermore, ablation of cyclin A mRNA (49) or immunodepletion of Cdc2 (22) do not block DNA synthesis in Xenopus egg extract. These results argue that Cdk2·cyclin E appears to be a better candidate for the Cdk·cyclin complex required for the initiation of DNA replication. However, as Cdc2·cyclin A or Cdk2·cyclin A can rescue replication capacity of egg extracts immunodepleted of Cdks (21, 26), other Cdk·cyclin complexes can clearly substitute for Cdk2·cyclin E. In addition to inducing initiation, Cdk·cyclin complexes are likely mediators of other regulatory functions in DNA replication. Ablation of cyclin A mRNA from Xenopus egg extracts has been demonstrated to abolish the dependence of mitosis on completion of DNA replication (49) and cyclin A has been shown to inhibit the activity of the replication licensing factor (43). Furthermore, addition of Cdc2·cyclin a to Xenopus egg extracts selectively induces the release of ORC but not MCMs from pre-replicative chromatin (27). Kinases that induce initiation of DNA replication or prevent further initiation events within the same cell cycle would be expected to interact with proteins present at replication origins before initiation. ORC, the eukaryotic initiator protein, is a prime candidate for such an interaction. Therefore, we have asked if the kinase that co-immunoprecipitates with ORC is any of those implicated in the regulation of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts.

Our attempts to identify the ORC-associated kinase by Western blotting of the immunoprecipitated material failed, presumably due to insufficient amounts of protein obtained by this method. Therefore, we resorted to larger scale biochemical purification of ORC from the egg extract and followed XOrc1, XOrc2, candidate cyclins, and Cdks throughout the purification by Western blotting. ORC was partially purified by ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by heparin-Sepharose, MonoQ, and MonoS chromatography columns as described under "Experimental Procedures." The partially purified ORC was concentrated and loaded on a Superose 6 gel filtration column. Fig. 2 shows immunoblots across the ORC-containing fractions from this column. Examination of XOrc1 and XOrc2 elution profiles suggests that only a part of XOrc2 is present in a complex with XOrc1, whereas significant amounts of XOrc2 appear to be present in a slightly smaller complex lacking XOrc1. This observation agrees with previously published data demonstrating that immunodepletion of ORC with anti-XOrc1 antibodies failed to immunodeplete XOrc2 completely (15). However, as XOrc1 immunodepletion abolished the ability of egg extract to support DNA replication, the complex lacking XOrc1 cannot perform all the functions required for initiation (14, 15).


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Xenopus Cdc2·cyclin A1 complex co-fractionates with ORC. Partially purified Xenopus ORC (see "Experimental Procedures") was applied to a Superose 6 gel filtration column. Consecutive fractions were collected immunoblotted with antibodies against XOrc1, XOrc2, PSTAIR peptide, Xcyclin A1, Xcyclin B, and Xcyclin E and assayed for H1 kinase activity.

We have used anti-PSTAIR antibody to detect both Cdc2 and Cdk2 with similar affinity and to allow quantitation of their relative abundance (35). A 34-kDa PSTAIR-reactive band could be detected in the ORC-containing fractions. In addition, small amounts of a 33-kDa PSTAIR-reactive protein could also be detected. Independent immunoblotting with antibodies specific to p34Cdc2 or p33Cdk2 confirmed that the 34-kDa band corresponds to the Cdc2 kinase catalytic subunit (data not shown). Careful examination of the immunoblots indicates that, whereas Cdc2 elutes identically to XOrc1, Cdk2 elutes later, overlapping with the broad XOrc2 peak but not the narrow XOrc1 peak. As shown in Fig. 2, Cdc2 elutes at exactly the same position as XOrc1, whereas very little Cdk2 can be detected in XOrc1-containing fractions. Using an antibody that is specific for Xenopus cyclin A1, an immunoblot revealed a peak of cyclin A1 overlapping the peak of XOrc1 and Cdc2. No cyclin B could be detected in XOrc1- or XOrc2-containing fractions. An anti-cyclin E immunoblot revealed a weak peak of cyclin E overlapping the peaks of Cdk2 kinase and XOrc2 but not coincident with Cdc2 or XOrc1. All fractions were independently assayed for H1 kinase activity. The elution profile of histone H1 kinase activity corresponded well with the presence of Cdc2 and Cdk2 kinases detected by Western blotting. We conclude that two kinase complexes, Cdc2·cyclin A1 and Cdk2·cyclin E, cofractionate with XOrc2. However, only one of these, Cdc2·cyclin A1, exactly co-elutes with fractions containing both XOrc1 and XOrc2, whereas the other, Cdk2·cyclin E, is absent from fractions containing XOrc1. Cyclin A2 is not expressed in Xenopus embryos until stage 10 (50). The absence of cyclin A2 from egg extracts and ORC-containing fractions was confirmed by immunoblotting with cyclin A2-specific antibodies (kind gift of Dr. Uli Strausfeld; data not shown).

To obtain further evidence for interaction between ORC and Cdc2 or Cdk2, we performed immunoprecipitations from the individual Superose 6 fractions with anti-XOrc1 and anti-XOrc2 antibodies and assayed the immunoprecipitated material for the presence of H1 kinase activity, Cdc2 and Cdk2 (Fig. 3). Both antibodies co-immunoprecipitated XOrc1, XOrc2, and Cdc2 kinase but not detectable Cdk2 kinase. The pattern of bands obtained with anti-PSTAIR antibody was identical to that on anti-Cdc2 immunoblots, ruling out the possibility that failure to detect Cdk2 was due to different sensitivities of anti-Cdc2 and anti-Cdk2 antibodies. In agreement with immunoblotting results, the peak of H1 kinase activity overlapped exactly with the presence of Cdc2 kinase (Fig. 3). Thus, Cdc2 kinase rather than Cdk2 kinase is tightly associated with Xenopus origin recognition complex in the egg extract.


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Xenopus Cdc2 kinase is associated with the XOrc1-containing complex. Xenopus ORC was partially purified and loaded on a Superose 6 column. Consecutive fractions from the Superose 6 column were immunoprecipitated with either anti-XOrc1 or anti-XOrc2 antibodies. Immunoprecipitated material was immunoblotted with antibodies against XOrc1, XOrc2, XCdc2, XCdk2, and PSTAIR peptide. Each immunoprecipitate was also assayed for histone H1 activity.

Independent evidence for this interaction was obtained from reciprocal immunoprecipitations with antibodies directed against Xenopus Cdc2 and cyclin A1. As shown in Fig. 4, both anti-Cdc2 and anti-cyclin A1 antibodies, but not control antibodies, co-immunoprecipitated significant amounts of XOrc1 and XOrc2 from the pool of ORC-containing fractions from the MonoS column (see "Experimental Procedures"). In summary, these results provide evidence that a soluble complex between ORC and Cdc2·cyclin A1 exists in Xenopus egg extracts.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Reciprocal immunoprecipitation of XOrc1 and XOrc2 by antibodies against Xenopus Cdc2 and cyclin A1. Peak ORC-containing fractions from the MonoS column were pooled (MonoS) and immunoprecipitated with mock antibodies (rabbit anti-rat IgG), antibodies against XCdc2 or antibodies against Xcyclin A1. A sample of the starting material and immunoprecipitated proteins were immunoblotted simultaneously with antibodies against XOrc1 and XOrc2.

Several recombinant Cdk·cyclin complexes were tested for their ability to phosphorylate recombinant XOrc2 in vitro. As shown in Fig. 5A, all Cdc2- and Cdk2-containing complexes tested were able to phosphorylate XOrc2. However, XOrc2 was phosphorylated by Cdc2·cyclin A with approximately 4-fold higher efficiency than by Cdc2·cyclin B or Cdk2-containing complexes (Fig. 5B), and of course, this is the same complex that interacts with ORC in Xenopus egg extracts (Figs. 2 and 4). The H1 kinase activity co-immunoprecipitating with ORC is sensitive to p21Cip1. p21Cip1 is known to inhibit efficiently Cdk4·cyclin D, Cdk2·cyclin A, and Cdk2·cyclin E complexes and weakly Cdc2·cyclin B, but its activity against Cdc2·cyclin A has not been reported so far (44-47). As shown in Fig. 5C, p21Cip1 efficiently inhibits the kinase activity of recombinant Cdc2·cyclin A toward histone H1 and XOrc2 used as substrates.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   XOrc2 is preferentially phosphorylated by Cdc2·cyclin A. A, 1 µg of XOrc2 was incubated in the presence of equal amounts of different Cdk·cyclin complexes and [gamma -33P]ATP. The activity of Cdk·cyclin complexes was normalized against histone H1. The amounts of different Cdk·cyclin complexes used for XOrc2 phosphorylation experiments catalyzed identical levels of 33P incorporation with histone H1 used as a substrate. At indicated time points, aliquots of the reaction mix were collected and electrophoresed and the amount of radioactivity incorporated into XOrc2 was quantified. B, equal amounts of different Cdk·cyclin complexes were incubated with 1 µg of XOrc2 for 20 min and the incorporation of radioactivity into XOrc2 was quantified as in panel A. C, histone H1 or XOrc2 were incubated in the presence of Cdc2·cyclin A and buffer alone or with 6 or 60 nM p21Cip1 for 20 min and the amount of 33P transferred to XOrc2 was quantified.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this report, we have used three different approaches to identify a direct physical interaction between the Xenopus origin recognition complex and Cdc2·cyclin A1. First, immunoprecipitations of Xenopus ORC with highly specific antibodies against XOrc1 or XOrc2 co-precipitates Cdc2·cyclin A1. Likewise, anti- Xenopus Cdc2 or anti- Xenopus cyclin A1 antibodies specifically co-precipitate XOrc1 and XOrc2. In contrast, antibodies against XMcm3, XMcm7, sheep IgG, or goat IgG fail to co-precipitate Cdc2·cyclin A1. In the second approach, Cdc2·cyclin A1 co-fractionates with ORC over several fractionation steps including ion exchange and gel filtration. Finally, in the third approach, XOrc2 is shown to be phosphorylated most efficiently by recombinant Cdc2·cyclin A1 in comparison to recombinant Cdc2·cyclin B and Cdk2 complexes. These results argue that the interaction between Xenopus ORC and Cdc2·cyclin A1 is highly specific.

We also report that histone H1 kinase activity is associated with the ORC -Cdc2·cyclin A1 complex following both fractionation and co-immunoprecipitation. This kinase activity is sensitive to the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors 6-DMAP, olomoucine, and p21Cip1. Interestingly, antibodies against Cdk2, cyclin E, and cyclin B show an absence of these proteins from the ORC·Cdc2·cyclin A1 complex. From these results it can be concluded Cdc2·cyclin A1 accounts for the majority of the H1 kinase activity that both co-immunoprecipitates and co-fractionates with ORC.

We have not directly identified the function of the ORC-associated kinase, but it is a very strong candidate for one specific role. As outlined in the Introduction, two major roles are known for protein kinases in the control of DNA replication. The first is S phase promoting activity. However, the fact that cyclin A ablation does not inhibit DNA replication in the extract (49) appears to point to the Cdk2·cyclin E complex as the prime candidate for an S phase promoting activity. It also appears to argue against the possibility that ORC-associated kinase identified in this paper triggers the initiation of DNA replication by phosphorylating proteins associated with ORC or ORC itself. The second known major role of a protein kinase in controlling DNA replication is the prevention of re-initiation of replication within a single cell cycle. Conditional mutations of cdc2 and deletion of cdc13, the B-type cyclin in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, promote over-replication (51, 52). Similarly, inhibition of protein kinases in G2 in mammalian cells makes them competent to replicate again (53, 54) and causes MCM proteins to rebind to replicating chromatin (29). In Xenopus egg extracts, the rebinding of MCM proteins to chromatin is actively prevented by the accumulation of cyclin A or E in sperm nuclei (30). Therefore, the continuous presence of an active cyclin-dependent kinase throughout S and G2 appears to be essential for keeping MCMs off chromatin and preventing re-replication within the same cell cycle (55). The association of Cdc2·cyclin A with ORC makes it an attractive candidate for this function. Whether ORC-Cdc2·cyclin A regulates ORC binding to DNA or instead regulates Cdc6 binding to DNA remains to be determined. Asking if the ORC-Cdc2·cyclin A complex is bound to DNA, and in particular in a cell cycle-regulated manner, should help answer this question.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Drs. M. Doree, J. Gannon, T. Hunt, J. Maller, A. Philpott, U. Strausfeld, and M. Yamashita for generous gifts of antibodies; and Drs. Mark Jackman and Jonathon Pines for recombinant Cdk2·cyclin A and Cdc2·cyclin A complexes and p21Cip1. We are also grateful to Tim Hunt for critical comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-1223-334106; Fax: 44-1223-334089; E-mail: ral19@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk.

** Present address: Cancer Research Campaign, Chromosome Replication Research Group, Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, United Kingdom.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ORC, origin recognition complex; MCM, minichromosome maintenance; 6-DMAP, 6-dimethylaminopurine.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Stillman, B. (1996) Science 274, 1659-1664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Diffley, J. F. X. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 2819-2830[Free Full Text]
3. Rao, P. N., and Johnson, R. T. (1970) Nature 225, 159-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Bell, S. P., Kobayashi, R., and Stillman, B. (1993) Science 262, 1844-1849[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Foss, M., McNally, F. J., Laurenson, P., and Rine, J. (1993) Science 262, 1838-1844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Hardy, C. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1832-1841[Abstract]
7. Li, J. J., and Herskowitz, I. (1993) Science 262, 1870-1874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Micklem, G., Rowley, A., Harwood, J., Nasmyth, K., and Diffley, J. F. X. (1993) Nature 366, 87-89[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Muzi-Falconi, M., and Kelly, T. J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92, 12475-12479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Grallert, B., and Nurse, P. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 2644-2654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Gossen, M., Pak, D. T. S., Hansen, S. K., Acharya, J. K., and Botchan, M. R. (1995) Science 270, 1674-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Takahara, K., Bong, M., Brevard, R., Eddy, R. L., Haley, L. L., Sait, S. J., Shows, T. B., Hoffman, G. G., and Greenspan, D. S. (1996) Genomics 31, 119-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Carpenter, P. B., Mueller, P. R., and Dunphy, W. G. (1996) Nature 379, 357-360[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Rowles, A., Chong, J. P. J., Brown, L., Howell, M., Evan, G. I., and Blow, J. J. (1996) Cell 87, 287-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Romanowski, P., Madine, M. A., Rowles, A., Blow, J. J., and Laskey, R. A. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 1416-1425[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Gavin, K. A., Hidaka, M., and Stillman, B. (1995) Science 270, 1667-1671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Tye, B. K. (1999) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 68, 649-686[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Coleman, T. R., Carpenter, P. B., and Dunphy, W. G. (1996) Cell 87, 53-63[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Nurse, P., and Bissett, Y. (1981) Nature 292, 558-560[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Hartwell, L., Culotti, J., Pringle, J. R., and Reid, B. J. (1974) Science 183, 46-51[Free Full Text]
21. Blow, J. J., and Nurse, P. (1990) Cell 62, 855-862[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Fang, F., and Newport, J. W. (1991) Cell 66, 731-742[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Strausfeld, U. P., Howell, M., Rempel, R., Maller, J. L., Hunt, T., and Blow, J. J. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 876-883[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Jackson, P. K., Chevalier, S., Philippe, M., and Kirschner, M. W. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 130, 755-769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Chevalier, S., Couturier, A., Chartrain, I., Le Guellec, R., Beckhelling, C., Le Guellec, K., Philippe, M., and Ford, C. C. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 1173-1184[Abstract]
26. Strausfeld, U., Howell, M., Descombes, P., Chevalier, S., Rempel, R. E., Adamczewski, J., Maller, J. L., Hunt, T., and Blow, J. J. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 1555-1563[Abstract]
27. Hua, X. H., and Newport, J. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 140, 271-281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Romanowski, P., and Madine, M. A. (1996) Trends Cell Biol 6, 184-188
29. Coverley, D, Wilkinson, H., Madine, M. A., Mills, A., and Laskey, R. A. (1998) Exp. Cell Res 238, 63-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Hua, X. H., Yan, H., and Newport, J. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 183-192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Tanaka, T., Knapp, D., and Nasmyth, K. (1997) Cell 90, 649-660[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Leatherwood, J., Lopez-Girona, A., and Russell, P. (1996) Nature 379, 361-363
33. Madine, M. A., Khoo, C.-Y., Mills, A. D., and Laskey, R. A. (1995) Nature 375, 421-424[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Romanowski, P., Madine, M. A., and Laskey, R. A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 10189-10194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Goodger, N. M., Gannon, J., Hunt, T., and Morgan, P. R. (1996) J. Pathol. 178, 422-428[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Gabrielli, B. G., Roy, L. M., Gautier, J., Philippe, M., and Maller, J. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1969-1975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Yamashita, M., Yoshikuni, M., Hirai, T., Fakada, S., and Hagahama, Y. (1991) Dev. Growth Differ. 33, 617-624[CrossRef]
38. Rempel, R. E., Sleight, S. B., and Maller, J. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6843-6855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Kobayashi, H., Stewart, E., Poon, R. Y. C., and Hunt, T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29153-29160[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Blow, J. J., and Laskey, R. A. (1986) Cell 47, 577-587[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Rowley, A., Cocker, J. H., Harwood, J., and Diffley, J. F. X. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2631-2641[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Hendrickson, M., Madine, M. A., Dalton, S., and Gautier, J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 12223-12228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Blow, J. J. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 993-1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Vesely, J., Havlicek, L., Strnad, M., Blow, J. J., Donella-Deana, A., Pinna, L., Letham, D. S., Kato, J., Dativaud, L., Leclerc, S., and Meijer, L. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 224, 771-786[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Harper, J. W., Adami, G. R., Wei, N., Keyomarsi, K., and Elledge, S. J. (1993) Cell 75, 805-816[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Xiong, Y., Hannon, G. J., Zhang, H., Casso, D., Kobayashi, R., and Beach, D. (1993) Nature 366, 701-704[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Gu, Y., Turck, C. W., and Morgan, D. O. (1993) Nature 366, 707-710[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Minshull, J., Golsteyn, R., Hill, C. S., and Hunt, T. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 2865-2875[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Walker, D. H., and Maller, J. L. (1991) Nature 354, 314-317[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Howe, J. A., Howell, M., Hunt, T., and Newport, J. W. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1164-1176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Broek, D., Bartlett, R., Crawford, K., and Nurse, P. (1991) Nature 349, 388-393[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Hayles, J., Fisher, D., Woollard, A., and Nurse, P. (1994) Cell 78, 813-822[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Coverley, D., Wilkinson, H. R., and Downes, C. S. (1996) Exp. Cell Res. 225, 294-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Usui, T., Yoshida, M., Abe, K., Osada, H., Isono, K., and Beppu, T. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 115, 1275-1282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Walter, J., Sun, L., and Newport, J. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 519-529[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Katsuno, A. Suzuki, K. Sugimura, K. Okumura, D. H. Zineldeen, M. Shimada, H. Niida, T. Mizuno, F. Hanaoka, and M. Nakanishi
Cyclin A-Cdk1 regulates the origin firing program in mammalian cells
PNAS, March 3, 2009; 106(9): 3184 - 3189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Zellner, T. Herrmann, C. Schulz, and F. Grummt
Site-specific interaction of the murine pre-replicative complex with origin DNA: assembly and disassembly during cell cycle transit and differentiation
Nucleic Acids Res., November 29, 2007; 35(20): 6701 - 6713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
W. Y. Tsang, L. Wang, Z. Chen, I. Sanchez, and B. D. Dynlacht
SCAPER, a novel cyclin A interacting protein that regulates cell cycle progression
J. Cell Biol., August 9, 2007; 178(4): 621 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Remus, M. Blanchette, D. C. Rio, and M. R. Botchan
CDK Phosphorylation Inhibits the DNA-binding and ATP-hydrolysis Activities of the Drosophila Origin Recognition Complex
J. Biol. Chem., December 2, 2005; 280(48): 39740 - 39751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C.-j. Li, A. Vassilev, and M. L. DePamphilis
Role for Cdk1 (Cdc2)/Cyclin A in Preventing the Mammalian Origin Recognition Complex's Largest Subunit (Orc1) from Binding to Chromatin during Mitosis
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(13): 5875 - 5886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
G. M. Wilmes, V. Archambault, R. J. Austin, M. D. Jacobson, S. P. Bell, and F. R. Cross
Interaction of the S-phase cyclin Clb5 with an 'RXL' docking sequence in the initiator protein Orc6 provides an origin-localized replication control switch
Genes & Dev., May 1, 2004; 18(9): 981 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. D. Coletta, K. Christensen, K. J. Reichenberger, J. Lamb, D. Micomonaco, L. Huang, D. M. Wolf, C. Muller-Tidow, T. R. Golub, K. Kawakami, et al.
The Six1 homeoprotein stimulates tumorigenesis by reactivation of cyclin A1
PNAS, April 27, 2004; 101(17): 6478 - 6483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Tatsumi, S. Ohta, H. Kimura, T. Tsurimoto, and C. Obuse
The ORC1 Cycle in Human Cells: I. CELL CYCLE-REGULATED OSCILLATION OF HUMAN ORC1
J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 41528 - 41534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Ritzi, K. Tillack, J. Gerhardt, E. Ott, S. Humme, E. Kremmer, W. Hammerschmidt, and A. Schepers
Complex protein-DNA dynamics at the latent origin of DNA replication of Epstein-Barr virus
J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2003; 116(19): 3971 - 3984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Jackman, Y. Kubota, N. den Elzen, A. Hagting, and J. Pines
Cyclin A- and Cyclin E-Cdk Complexes Shuttle between the Nucleus and the Cytoplasm
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2002; 13(3): 1030 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Vas, W. Mok, and J. Leatherwood
Control of DNA Rereplication via Cdc2 Phosphorylation Sites in the Origin Recognition Complex
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2001; 21(17): 5767 - 5777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
K. Stoeber, T. D. Tlsty, L. Happerfield, G. A. Thomas, S. Romanov, L. Bobrow, E. D. Williams, and G. H. Williams
DNA replication licensing and human cell proliferation
J. Cell Sci., January 6, 2001; 114(11): 2027 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. P. Blaydes, M. G. Luciani, S. Pospisilova, H. M.-L. Ball, B. Vojtesek, and T. R. Hupp
Stoichiometric Phosphorylation of Human p53 at Ser315 Stimulates p53-dependent Transcription
J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2001; 276(7): 4699 - 4708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Goda, M. Funakoshi, H. Suhara, T. Nishimoto, and H. Kobayashi
The N-terminal Helix of Xenopus Cyclins A and B Contributes to Binding Specificity of the Cyclin-CDK Complex
J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2001; 276(18): 15415 - 15422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romanowski, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romanowski, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement