![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 6, 4532-4536, February 11, 2000
From the Inheritance of a mutant allele of the breast
cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 confers increased risk of
developing breast and ovarian cancers. Likewise, inheritance of a
mutant allele of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene
(RB1) results in the development of retinoblastoma and/or
osteosarcoma, and both alleles are often mutated or inactivated in
sporadic forms of these and other cancers. We now demonstrate that the
product of the RB1 gene, Rb, regulates the expression of
the murine Brca1 and human BRCA1 genes through
its ability to modulate E2F transcriptional activity. The
Brca1 gene is identified as an in vivo target
of E2F1 in a transgenic mouse model. The Brca1 promoter
contains E2F DNA-binding sites that mediate transcriptional activation by E2F1 and repression by Rb. Moreover, ectopic expression of cyclin D1
and Cdk4 can stimulate the Brca1 promoter in an
E2F-dependent manner, and this is inhibited by coexpression
of the p16INK4a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor.
The human BRCA1 promoter also contains a conserved E2F site
and is similarly regulated by E2F1 and Rb. This functional link between
the BRCA1 and Rb tumor suppressors may provide insight into the
mechanism by which BRCA1 inactivation contributes to cancer development.
The mechanism by which loss of BRCA1 function leads to breast and
ovarian cancer is unclear. A general role for BRCA1 in cell growth
control is suggested by BRCA1's growth-regulated and
ubiquitous expression pattern (1-4). Involvement of BRCA1 in DNA
repair, replication, and transcriptional regulation have all been
suggested. The BRCA1 protein associates with the RAD51 DNA repair
factor as well as the BRCA2 and BARD1 proteins (5, 6). These proteins colocalize in nuclear foci, termed "dots," that dissipate upon DNA
damage and may reappear at replication structures containing PCNA (7).
BRCA1 is also found in complexes containing RNA polymerase II and has a
carboxyl-terminal acidic region that can function as a transcriptional
activation domain (8-10). Several recent reports have demonstrated
that BRCA1 physically associates with the p53 tumor suppressor protein
and functions as a transcriptional coactivator for p53 (11, 12). BRCA1
can induce apoptosis and this activity is enhanced by coexpression of
p53 (11, 13, 14). This correlates with the ability of BRCA1 to
significantly augment transcriptional activation of the bax gene by p53
(11). BRCA1 can also induce apoptosis through the p53-independent
stimulation of GADD45 expression and the activation of the c-Jun
N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK) pathway
(14).
Inactivation of the Rb tumor suppressor, through mutation of the
RB1 gene or deregulation of cyclin D-associated kinase
activity, is a common event in many cancers (15). Recent data suggests that the resultant activation of E2F transcription factors contributes to tumor development (16-18). The Rb-E2F pathway regulates the expression of many genes whose products are required for DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression. Transcriptional activation of at least some
of these genes, such as cyclin E, is associated with the loss of
proliferation control as a consequence of Rb inactivation (19-21). In
addition to unchecked proliferation, inactivation of Rb can also lead
to p53-dependent and -independent apoptosis (22, 23). This
also appears to involve deregulation of E2F-dependent transcription. At least one member of the E2F family, E2F1, can induce
both p53-dependent and -independent apoptosis when
overexpressed (24-28). It has been suggested that the ability of E2F1
to transcriptionally activate the
p19ARF/p14ARF tumor suppressor
gene may be involved in E2F1's ability to induce apoptosis (25,
29). The p19ARF/p14ARF protein activates p53 by
inhibiting the action of Mdm2 (30, 31). Although it is likely that E2F1
regulates the expression of additional pro-apoptotic genes, these
targets remain to be identified.
As a model to study the role of deregulated E2F activity in cancer, we
have developed a transgenic mouse model in which E2F1 expression is
targeted to squamous epithelial tissue by a keratin 5 (K5) promoter.
Increased E2F1 activity results in hyperplasia, hyperproliferation, and
p53-dependent apoptosis in the epidermis of K5 E2F1
transgenic mice (16, 17). Dependent on the experimental context, K5
E2F1 transgenic mice are found to be either predisposed or resistant to
tumor development (16, 17, 32). To determine the molecular mechanisms
underlying these effects, we analyzed alterations in gene expression in
transgenic epidermis and primary keratinocytes. We found that the
murine homologue of BRCA1 is up-regulated in K5 E2F1
transgenic cells and tissue. Analysis of the murine Brca1
promoter demonstrates that this is a direct effect and that cell cycle
regulatory factors such as Rb, cyclin D1, and p16INK4a control
Brca1 gene expression through modulation of E2F
transcriptional activity. The human BRCA1 gene promoter is
also found to be regulated by E2F1 and Rb.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Primary keratinocytes were cultured
from newborn K5 E2F1 transgenic and wild type sibling mice as described
previously (16). Total RNA was isolated from keratinocytes using Tri
Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) per the
manufacturer's protocol, separated by gel electrophoresis, and
transferred to nylon membrane. Epidermal RNA was isolated from dorsal
skin by submerging skin in
DEPC1-treated H20
at 55 °C for 30 s and transferring skin to DEPC-treated H20 at 4 °C for 30 s. Skin was then placed in Tri
Reagent on ice, secured by a glass slide, and the epidermis was
scrapped off using a scalpel. Epidermis scrapes in Tri Reagent were
transferred to corex tubes and extracted per the manufacturer's
protocol. Epidermal RNA was poly(A)-selected using the Fast Track kit
(Invitrogen) per manufacturer's instructions. Murine cDNA probes
were received from ATCC (c-myc and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays
(EMSA)--
Double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to wild
type Brca1 promoter sequences or a version containing a
mutated E2F binding site were generated and end-labeled for use as
probe. The E2F binding site in the Brca1 promoter
oligonucleotide is underlined and the mutated nucleotides are shown in
bold: Brca1 wt, 5'-TCTATCTAAAATTCCCGCGCTCTCCGT-3'; Brca1
E2F
Alternatively, an end-labeled, 100-base pair DNA fragment derived from
the adenovirus E2 gene promoter was used as probe and unlabeled
Brca1 oligonucleotides used as competitors. The E2 promoter contains two classical E2F sites (TTTCGCGC) in inverse orientation 17 base pairs apart. NIH3T3 nuclear extract or recombinant E2F1/DP1 (containing equal amounts of GST-E2F1 and GST-DP1) were incubated with
the radiolabeled probe in binding buffer (4 mM Tris-HCl, 12 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 60 mM KCl, 0.5 mM
EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 12% glycerol) containing about
0.2 ng of the radiolabeled DNA fragment and 0.5 µg of salmon sperm
DNA for 25 min at room temperature in a final volume of 20 µl.
Samples were fractionated on a 4% polyacrylamide gel in 0.25 × TBE (0.0225 M Tris borate, 0.0005 M EDTA) at
4 °C, the gel was dried, and autoradiography was performed.
Plasmids and Luciferase Reporter Assays--
Murine
Brca1 promoter sequences from +6 to
NIH3T3 and C33A cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine or
calf serum and replated 24 prior to transfection. NIH3T3 cells were
transfected using pfx-3 lipid (Invitrogen). The cells were starved for
24 during the transfection and another 24 following transfection with
DMEM containing 0.3% FBS. Cells were harvested with luciferase
reporter lysis buffer (Promega) and luciferase activity was measured in
a Turner TD-20e Luminometer. C33A cells were transfected using the
calcium phosphate method and incubated in media containing 10% FBS for
48 before harvesting and assaying luciferase activity.
Brca1 Is Overexpressed in K5 E2F1 Transgenic Cells--
Previously
we demonstrated that the cyclin E gene is overexpressed
approximately 6-fold in primary keratinocytes isolated from K5 E2F1
transgenic mice (17). In contrast, we find that several other genes
previously identified as E2F targets, such as cdc2 and
c-myc, are only minimally up-regulated in these transgenic cells (Fig. 1). The expression of several
control genes, including The Brca1 Gene Promoter Contains an E2F DNA-binding
Site--
Previous studies have demonstrated that Brca1
gene expression is highest in tissues containing rapidly proliferating
cells such as the testes, thymus, and epidermis (1, 4). The
transcription factors responsible for this proliferation-associated
expression of the Brca1 gene have not been identified.
Examination of the Brca1 gene promoter (36) identified two
potential E2F binding sites immediately upstream of exon 1 (ATTCCCGC at
Regulation of the Brca1 Gene Promoter by the Rb-E2F
Pathway--
To examine transcriptional regulation of the
Brca1 gene by E2F, we isolated sequences 5' to exon 1 of the
Brca1 gene from mouse genomic DNA using PCR and cloned the
Brca1 promoter region upstream of a luciferase reporter
gene. In serum-starved NIH3T3 cells, overexpression of E2F1, in
conjunction with its heterodimerization partner DP1, transcriptionally
activated the Brca1 promoter and this response was lost when
the E2F binding sites were mutated (Fig.
3A). The activity of the
mutant Brca1 promoter was approximately 5-fold higher than
the wild type promoter in these Rb-positive cells forced into
quiescence by serum withdrawal, indicating that the E2F sites can
function as negative regulatory elements. A similar type of regulation
has been shown for several other E2F target genes and is due to the
binding of E2F repressor complexes containing Rb or Rb family members
(34, 35, 38-40).
The repressive effect of Rb on the activity of the Brca1
promoter could be demonstrated more directly in the Rb-deficient cell
line C33A. Brca1 promoter activity was significantly
repressed by expression of wild type Rb but not by expression of a Rb
mutant defective in E2F binding (Fig. 3B). Mutation of the
E2F binding sites in the Brca1 promoter abolished repression
by Rb.
Regulators of Rb activity were also found to modulate expression of the
Brca1 promoter through the E2F sites. Cotransfection of
expression plasmids encoding cyclin D1 and Cdk4 caused a derepression of the wild type Brca1 promoter in quiescent NIH3T3 cells
but had only a modest effect on the E2F site mutant promoter (Fig. 3C). Coexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase
inhibitor p16INK4a blocked the ability of cyclin D1/Cdk4 to
stimulate Brca1 promoter activity (Fig. 3D).
Regulation of the Human BRCA1 Gene by E2F1 and Rb--
The human
BRCA1 gene has been shown to be growth-regulated with
kinetics consistent with it being a target for
E2F-dependent transcriptional control (2, 3, 41). Analysis
of the human BRCA1 promoter identified a region that is
highly homologous to a region in the murine Brca1 promoter
(Fig. 4A). Within this
conserved sequence is the proximal E2F site we demonstrated to bind E2F factors (see Fig. 2). To examine regulation of the human
BRCA1 gene by the Rb-E2F pathway, a BRCA1
promoter-luciferase plasmid (33) was used in similar cotransfection
experiments as presented in Fig. 3. The human BRCA1 promoter
was transactivated in a dose-dependent manner by
coexpression of E2F1 and DP1 much like the murine Brca1 promoter (Fig. 4B). At the highest concentration of E2F1
expression vector, BRCA1 promoter activity was induced
5-fold in these quiescent cells. Moreover, BRCA1 promoter
activity was repressed 15-fold by expression of wild type Rb, but not
by a mutated Rb unable to bind E2F transcription factors, in the
Rb-negative C33A cell line. These findings demonstrate that the Rb-E2F
pathway also regulates the human BRCA1 gene.
The data presented establish the Brca1/BRCA1 gene as a
target for E2F-dependent transcriptional regulation. The
Brca1 promoter behaves very similarly to several other
E2F-regulated promoters such as B-myb and E2F1
(34, 35, 38, 39). In quiescent cells, E2F is found in association with
Rb and Rb-related proteins and these complexes function as active
repressors of transcription (40, 42-45). This is likely why the wild
type Brca1 promoter has lower activity than the E2F site
mutant promoter in serum-starved NIH3T3 cells but not in C33A tumor
cells that lack Rb. This model is supported by the finding that
expression of cyclin D1/Cdk4, which phosphorylates Rb and releases E2F,
can stimulate expression from the Brca1 promoter in
quiescent cells and that this is inhibited by coexpression of
p16INK4a. The human BRCA1 gene appears to be similarly
regulated given the conserved E2F site in the BRCA1 promoter and its
responsiveness to E2F1 and Rb. Thus, these findings demonstrate that
the Brca1/BRCA1 gene is a downstream target for the
p16INK4a-cyclin D-Rb-E2F pathway that is frequently mutated in cancers.
What is the functional significance of Brca1/BRCA1
regulation by the Rb-E2F pathway? BRCA1 appears to be part of a
multimeric complex that colocalizes with PCNA to sites of DNA
replication following DNA damage (6, 7). E2F regulates a large number of genes involved in DNA synthesis, including genes encoding nucleotide biosynthesis enzymes and DNA replication factors (25, 46). If BRCA1 was
found to participate in DNA replication, BRCA1 would join
this category of E2F target genes. BRCA1 has also recently been shown
to associate with Rb and to suppress proliferation (47). E2F1
up-regulates the expression of Rb as a means to repress its own
activity (48). If BRCA1 is also involved in repressing E2F-dependent transcription in conjunction with Rb, than
stimulation of BRCA1 expression could be part of a negative
feedback mechanism to suppress E2F activity.
Other recent data demonstrate that BRCA1 is a potent inducer of
apoptosis through its ability to modulate transcription. BRCA1 directly
binds p53 and can stimulate the p53-dependent
transcriptional activation of pro-apoptotic genes such as bax (11, 12).
In addition, induction of BRCA1 expression results in the
transcriptional activation of GADD45 in a p53-independent manner (14).
This leads to the activation of JNK/SAPK and the rapid induction of apoptosis. Thus, the transcriptional activation of
Brca1/BRCA1 by E2F1 may result in the stimulation of both
p53-dependent and JNK/SAPK-dependent
apoptotic pathways. We have recently demonstrated up-regulation of
several genes in K5 E2F1 transgenic keratinocytes that are downstream
targets of p53, as well as other genes involved in apoptosis (49), in
agreement with this suggestion. If this is the case, then BRCA1 would
be an additional effector, along with p19ARF and perhaps
others, of the apoptotic response that occurs in cells that have lost
Rb function. Loss of BRCA1 function, as occurs in familial breast
cancer, may therefore increase the survival of cells that have acquired
mutations resulting in Rb inactivation. This role for BRCA1 does not
rule out additional functions for BRCA1, such as a role in the cellular
response to DNA damage. In fact, it is quite possible that BRCA1 is
induced and augments p53 and JNK/SAPK activities in response to both
cell cycle deregulation and DNA damage and that both functions are
important for BRCA1's tumor suppressive activity.
We thank Richard Baer, Ta-Jen Liu, and Kelly
Hunt for helpful discussions and comments. We also thank Shawnda
Sanders for the preparation of the manuscript, Judy Ing and Chris Yone
for artwork, and Jennifer Philhower and Jennifer Smith for technical assistance.
*
This work was supported by the Joanne Glass Cancer Research
Fund and American Cancer Society Grant RPG-96-001-03-CNE (to M. C. M.), National Institutes of Health Grant CA79648 (to D. G. J.), and NIEHS Center Grants ES07784 and CA16672.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
These authors contributed equally to the work.
¶
Current address: AMC Cancer Research Center, 1600 Pierce St.,
Lakewood, CO 80214-1897.
The abbreviations used are:
DEPC, diethyl
pyrocarbonate;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
EMSA, electrophoretic
mobility shift assay;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
PCNA, proliferating cell
nuclear antigen;
wt, wild type.
Regulation of BRCA1 Expression by the Rb-E2F Pathway*
§,
§,
¶,
, and
Department of Carcinogenesis, University of
Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, Texas 78957
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin),
Dr. Joe Nevins (cdc2), and Dr. Susan Fischer
(glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). The Brca1 probe (nucleotides 5913-6179) was generated using
reverse transcription-PCR and confirmed by sequencing.
, 5'-TCTATCTAAAATTCCAACGCTCTCCGT-3'.
1003 were isolated by
PCR and cloned into pGL3 vector (Promega) to create Brca1-luc (wt).
Brca1-luc (E2F
) was made by introducing mutations in the E2F sites at
27 and
62 by replacing a fragment from +6 to
74 with a
double-stranded oligonucleotide containing appropriate base changes.
Brca1-luc (+6 to
539) wild type and E2F
versions were made by
removing Brca1 sequences from
539 to
1003 from Brca1-luc (+6 to
1003). The human BRCA1 luciferase plasmid (
567) was a
kind gift from Bernard Futscher (Arizona Cancer Center) (33).
Cytomegalovirus expression vectors encoding E2F1, DP1, cyclin D1, Cdk4,
Rb, and p16INK4a have been described (34, 35).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin, is similar in primary keratinocytes
isolated from either K5 E2F1 transgenic mice or wild type siblings. On
the other hand, the murine homologue of the BRCA1 tumor
suppressor gene, Brca1, is expressed in K5 E2F1 transgenic
keratinocytes at a level at least 4-fold over that found in
nontransgenic cells (Fig. 1A). To verify that increased E2F1
activity can stimulate Brca1 expression in vivo,
Northern blot analysis was performed on poly(A)-selected RNA isolated
from the epidermis of K5 E2F1 mice (Fig. 1B). The steady-state level of Brca1 message in the epidermis of
transgenic mice was greater than 10-fold over that found in
nontransgenic control epidermis after correction using
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression as a control (data
not shown).

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Brca1 is overexpressed in K5 E2F1
transgenic keratinocytes and epidermis. A, Northern
blot analyses were performed using 20 µg of total RNA from wild type
(
) or K5 E2F1 transgenic (+) primary keratinocytes and probes
specific for murine Brca1, cdc2,
c-myc, or
-actin. Quantitative scanning of the
autoradiographs gave expression ratios (transgenic/wild type) of 4.3 for Brca1, 1.8 for cdc2, 1.3 for
c-myc, and 1.0 for
-actin. B,
Northern blot analysis was performed on 5 µg of poly(A)-selected RNA
isolated from the epidermis of K5 E2F1 transgenic (+) or wild type (
)
mice using a Brca1 probe.
27 and CTTCCCGC at
62) that closely match the consensus sequence
identified as optimal for E2F1 binding (37). To determine whether E2F
transcription factors could bind the Brca1 promoter, an EMSA
was performed using recombinant E2F1 and DP1 proteins and a
double-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding to the Brca1
promoter region containing the putative proximal E2F site as probe.
Recombinant E2F1/DP1 was found to bind the probe containing the wild
type Brca1 promoter sequences but not a similar probe
containing a mutated E2F site (Fig.
2A). An EMSA was also
performed using nuclear extract from NIH3T3 cells and a fragment from
the adenovirus E2 gene promoter. In this experiment the double-stranded
oligonucleotide containing the wild type Brca1 promoter
sequence was found to efficiently compete for cellular E2F DNA-binding
complexes, while the Brca1 oligonucleotide containing the
mutant E2F site did not compete (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
E2F complexes bind the Brca1
gene promoter. A, an EMSA was performed using
recombinant E2F1/DP1 protein (lanes 2, 3,
5, and 6) and end-labeled double-stranded
oligonucleotides (17 fmol) corresponding to the Brca1
promoter region (
21 to
43) containing either wild type sequence
(Brca1 wt, lanes 1-3) or a mutation in the
putative E2F site (Brca1 E2F
, lanes 4-6).
B, an EMSA was performed using the adenovirus E2 gene
promoter as probe and NIH3T3 nuclear extract (lanes 2-6).
Unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides (10 and 100 ng) containing
either wild type Brca1 promoter sequences (wt,
lanes 3 and 4) or a version containing a mutation
in the putative E2F site (mut, lanes 5 and
6) were used as competitors.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Regulation of the Brca1
promoter by the p16-cyclin D-Rb-E2F pathway. A, 2 µg of Brca1-luc (+6 to
1003) wt or E2F
was transfected into
NIH3T3 cells using pfx-3 reagent (Invitrogen) either alone or with 20 or 200 ng of expression plasmids encoding E2F1 and DP1 where indicated.
Cells were incubated in medium containing 0.3% FBS for 48 h
before harvesting and performing luciferase assays. The average
luciferase activity from triplicate plates is presented. B,
triplicate plates of C33A cells were transfected using the calcium
phosphate method with 5 µg of either Brca1-luc (+6 to
539) wt or
E2F
mutant plasmid and 10 µg of expression vector encoding wild
type or mutant (exon 22 deletion) Rb where indicated. Cells were
incubated in medium containing 10% FBS for 48 h, harvested, and
luciferase assays were performed. C, triplicate plates of
NIH3T3 cells were transfected with 2 µg of Brca1-luc (+6 to
1003)
wild type or E2F
mutant plasmid either alone or with expression
plasmids encoding cyclin D1 (1.5 µg) and Cdk4 (200 ng). Cells were
incubated in media containing 0.3% FBS 48 h prior to harvesting
extract for luciferase assays. D, transfections were
performed as in C using 2 µg of Brca1-luc (+6 to
1003)
wild type and either vector alone or cyclin D1 (1 µg) and Cdk4 (200 ng) with or without an expression plasmid encoding p16 (800 ng) as
indicated.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Regulation of the human BRCA1
promoter by E2F1 and Rb. A, a conserved E2F1
binding site is shared between the murine Brca1 and human
BRCA1 promoters. B, BRCA1-luc (2 µg) and
cytomegalovirus
-galactosidase (1 µg) were transfected into NIH3T3
cells using pfx-3 reagent with increasing amounts of expression
plasmids (0, 20, 100, or 200 ng) encoding E2F1 and DP1. Cells were
incubated in medium containing 0.3% calf serum for 48 h before
harvesting and performing luciferase assays. The average luciferase
activity after correcting with
-galactosidase activity from
triplicate plates is presented. C, triplicate plates of C33A
cells were transfected with BRCA1-luc (5 µg) and 10 µg of
expression plasmid encoding wild type Rb or mutant Rb where indicated.
Cells were incubated in medium containing 10% calf serum for 48 h, harvested, and luciferase assays performed.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Assistant
Professor of Carcinogenesis, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park Research Division, P. O. Box 389, Smithville, TX
78957. Tel.: 512-237-9511; Fax: 512-237-9566; E-mail:
djohnson@sprd1. mdacc.tmc.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Marquis, S. T.,
Rajan, J. V.,
Wynshaw-Boris, A.,
Xu, J.,
Yin, G. Y.,
Abel, K. J.,
Weber, B. L.,
and Chodosh, L. A.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
11,
17-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Vaughn, J. P.,
Davis, P. L.,
Jarboe, M. D.,
Huper, G.,
Evans, A. C.,
Wiseman, R. W.,
Berchuck, A.,
Iglehart, J. D.,
Futreal, P. A.,
and Marks, J. R.
(1996)
Cell Growth Differ.
7,
711-715[Abstract]
3.
Gudas, J. M.,
Li, T.,
Nguyen, H.,
Jensen, D.,
Rauscher, F. J., III,
and Cowan, K. H.
(1996)
Cell Growth Differ.
7,
717-723[Abstract]
4.
Lane, T. F.,
Deng, C.,
Elson, A.,
Lyu, M. S.,
Kozak, C. A.,
and Leder, P.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2712-2722 5.
Wu, L. C.,
Wang, Z. W.,
Tsan, J. T.,
Spillman, M. A.,
Phung, A.,
Xu, X. L.,
Yang, M. C.,
Hwang, L. Y.,
Bowcock, A. M.,
and Baer, R.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
14,
430-440[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Scully, R.,
Chen, J.,
Plug, A.,
Xiao, Y.,
Weaver, D.,
Feunteun, J.,
Ashley, T.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1997)
Cell
88,
265-275[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Scully, R.,
Chen, J.,
Ochs, R. L.,
Keegan, K.,
Hoekstra, M.,
Feunteun, J.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
425-435[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Scully, R.,
Anderson, S. F.,
Chao, D. M.,
Wei, W.,
Ye, L.,
Young, R. A.,
Livingston, D. M.,
and Parvin, J. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5605-5610 9.
Monteiro, A. N.,
August, A.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13595-13599 10.
Chapman, M. S.,
and Verma, I. M.
(1996)
Nature
382,
678-679[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Zhang, H.,
Somasundaram, K.,
Peng, Y.,
Tian, H.,
Bi, D.,
Weber, B. L.,
and El-Deiry, W. S.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1713-1721[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Ouchi, T.,
Monteiro, A. N.,
August, A.,
Aaronson, S. A.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
2302-2306 13.
Shao, N.,
Chai, Y. L.,
Shyam, E.,
Reddy, P.,
and Rao, V. N.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
1-7[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Harkin, D. P.,
Bean, J. M.,
Miklos, D.,
Song, Y. H.,
Truong, V. B.,
Englert, C.,
Christians, F. C.,
Ellisen, L. W.,
Maheswaran, S.,
Oliner, J. D.,
and Haber, D. A.
(1999)
Cell
97,
575-586[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Sherr, C. J.
(1996)
Science
274,
1672-1677 16.
Pierce, A. M.,
Fischer, S. M.,
Conti, C. J.,
and Johnson, D. G.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1267-1276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Pierce, A. M.,
Gimenez-Conti, I. B.,
Schneider-Broussard, R.,
Martinez, L. A.,
Conti, C. J.,
and Johnson, D. G.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8858-8863 18.
Yamasaki, L.,
Bronson, R.,
Williams, B. O.,
Dyson, N. J.,
Harlow, E.,
and Jacks, T.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
18,
360-364[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Almasan, A.,
Yin, Y.,
Kelly, R. E.,
Lee, E. Y.-H. P.,
Bradley, E.,
Li, W.,
Bertino, J. R.,
and Wahl, G. M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S. A.
92,
5436-5440 20.
Herrera, R. E.,
Sah, V. P.,
Williams, B. O.,
Makela, T. P.,
Winbert, R. A.,
and Jacks, T.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
2402-2407[Abstract]
21.
Hurford, R. K.,
Cobrinik, D.,
Lee, M. h.,
and Dyson, N.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1447-1463 22.
Morgenbesser, S. D.,
Williams, B. O.,
Jacks, T.,
and DePinho, R.
(1994)
Nature
371,
72-74[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Macleod, K. F.,
Hu, Y.,
and Jacks, T.
(1996)
EMBO J
15,
6178-6188[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Wu, X.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
3602-3606 25.
DeGregori, J.,
Leone, G.,
Miron, A.,
Jakoi, L.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7245-7250 26.
Hunt, K. K.,
Deng, J.,
Liu, T.-J.,
Wilson-Heiner, M.,
Swisher, S. G.,
Clayman, G.,
and Hung, M.-C.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
4722-4726 27.
Hsieh, J.-K.,
Fredersdorf, S.,
Kouzarides, T.,
Martin, K.,
and Lu, X.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1840-1852 28.
Phillips, A. C.,
Bates, S.,
Ryan, K. M.,
Helin, K.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1853-1863 29.
Bates, S.,
Phillips, A. C.,
Clark, P. A.,
Stott, F.,
Peters, G.,
Ludwig, R. L.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1998)
Nature
395,
124-125[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Zhang, Y.,
Xiong, Y.,
and Yarbrough, W. G.
(1998)
Cell
92,
725-734[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Pomerantz, J.,
Schreiber-Agus, N.,
Liegeois, N. J.,
Silverman, A.,
Alland, L.,
Chin, L.,
Potes, J.,
Chen, K.,
Orlow, I.,
Lee, H.-W.,
Cordon-Cardo, C.,
and DePinho, R. A.
(1998)
Cell
92,
713-723[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Pierce, A. M.,
Schneider-Broussard, R.,
Gimenez-Conti, I. B.,
Russell, J. L.,
Conti, C. J.,
and Johnson, D. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
6408-6414 33.
Rice, J. C.,
Massey-Brown, K. S.,
and Futscher, B. W.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
1807-1812[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Johnson, D. G.,
Ohtani, K.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1514-1525 35.
Johnson, D. G.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
1685-1692[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Chambers, J. A.,
and Solomon, E.
(1996)
Genomics
38,
305-313[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Tao, Y. X.,
Kassatly, R. F.,
Cress, W. D.,
and Horowitz, J. M.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6994-7007[Abstract]
38.
Lam, E. W.,
and Watson, R. J.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
2705-2713[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Hsiao, K. M.,
McMahon, S. L.,
and Farnham, P. J.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1526-1537 40.
Weintraub, S. J.,
Chow, K. N.,
Luo, R. X.,
Zhang, S. H.,
He, S.,
and Dean, D. C.
(1995)
Nature
375,
812-815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Xu, C.-F.,
Chambers, J. A.,
and Solomon, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20994-20997 42.
Weintraub, S. J.,
Prater, C. A.,
and Dean, D. C.
(1992)
Nature
358,
259-261[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Sellers, W. R.,
Rodgers, J. W.,
Kaelin, W. G.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11544-11548 44.
Ferreira, R.,
Magnaghi-Jaulin, L.,
Robin, P.,
Harel-Bellan, A.,
and Trouche, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10493-10498 45.
Chow, K. N.,
Starostik, P.,
and Dean, D. C.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
7173-7181[Abstract]
46.
Leone, G.,
DeGregori, J.,
Yan, Z.,
Jakoi, L.,
Ishida, S.,
Williams, R. S.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2120-2130 47.
Aprelikova, O. N.,
Fang, B. S.,
Meissner, E. G.,
Cotter, S.,
Campbell, M.,
Kuthiala, A.,
Bessho, M.,
Jensen, R. A.,
and Liu, E. T.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
11866-11871 48.
Shan, B.,
Chang, C. Y.,
Jones, D.,
and Lee, W. H.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
299-309 49.
Wang, A.,
Pierce, A. M.,
Judson-Kremer, K.,
Gaddis, S.,
Aldaz, C. M.,
Johnson, D. G.,
and MacLeod, M. C.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
4609-4618
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Kranz, C. Dohmesen, and M. Dobbelstein BRCA1 and Tip60 determine the cellular response to ultraviolet irradiation through distinct pathways J. Cell Biol., July 14, 2008; 182(1): 197 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kong, X.-P. Yu, X.-H. Bai, W.-F. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W.-M. Zhao, J.-H. Jia, W. Tang, Y.-B. Zhou, and C.-j. Liu RbAp48 Is a Critical Mediator Controlling the Transforming Activity of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 in Cervical Cancer J. Biol. Chem., September 7, 2007; 282(36): 26381 - 26391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Bindra, S. L. Gibson, A. Meng, U. Westermark, M. Jasin, A. J. Pierce, R. G. Bristow, M. K. Classon, and P. M. Glazer Hypoxia-Induced Down-regulation of BRCA1 Expression by E2Fs Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 65(24): 11597 - 11604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Berteaux, S. Lottin, D. Monte, S. Pinte, B. Quatannens, J. Coll, H. Hondermarck, J.-J. Curgy, T. Dugimont, and E. Adriaenssens H19 mRNA-like Noncoding RNA Promotes Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation through Positive Control by E2F1 J. Biol. Chem., August 19, 2005; 280(33): 29625 - 29636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Chunder, S. Mandal, A. Roy, S. Roychoudhury, and C. K. Panda Differential Association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes with Some Breast Cancer-Associated Genes in Early and Late Onset Breast Tumors Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2004; 11(12): 1045 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Choudhury, H. Xu, and R. Baer Ubiquitination and Proteasomal Degradation of the BRCA1 Tumor Suppressor Is Regulated during Cell Cycle Progression J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33909 - 33918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Oberley, D. R. Inman, and P. J. Farnham E2F6 Negatively Regulates BRCA1 in Human Cancer Cells without Methylation of Histone H3 on Lysine 9 J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 42466 - 42476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirota, T. Okano, K. Kokame, H. Shirotani-Ikejima, T. Miyata, and Y. Fukada Glucose Down-regulates Per1 and Per2 mRNA Levels and Induces Circadian Gene Expression in Cultured Rat-1 Fibroblasts J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 44244 - 44251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Foray, D. Marot, V. Randrianarison, N. D. Venezia, D. Picard, M. Perricaudet, V. Favaudon, and P. Jeggo Constitutive Association of BRCA1 and c-Abl and Its ATM-Dependent Disruption after Irradiation Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2002; 22(12): 4020 - 4032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Rounbehler, P. M. Rogers, C. J. Conti, and D. G. Johnson Inactivation of E2f1 Enhances Tumorigenesis in a Myc Transgenic Model Cancer Res., June 1, 2002; 62(11): 3276 - 3281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Welcsh and M.-C. King BRCA1 and BRCA2 and the genetics of breast and ovarian cancer Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2001; 10(7): 705 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Beger, L. N. Pierce, M. Kruger, E. G. Marcusson, J. M. Robbins, P. Welcsh, P. J. Welch, K. Welte, M.-C. King, J. R. Barber, et al. Identification of Id4 as a regulator of BRCA1 expression by using a ribozyme-library-based inverse genomics approach PNAS, January 2, 2001; 98(1): 130 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hilakivi-Clarke Estrogens, BRCA1, and Breast Cancer Cancer Res., September 1, 2000; 60(18): 4993 - 5001. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||