JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Poole, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Poole, R. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 7, 4679-4686, February 18, 2000


Regulation of Cytochrome bd Expression in the Obligate Aerobe Azotobacter vinelandii by CydR (Fnr)
SENSITIVITY TO OXYGEN, REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES, AND NITRIC OXIDE*

Guanghui WuDagger , Hugo Cruz-RamosDagger , Susan Hill§, Jeff GreenDagger , Gary Sawers§, and Robert K. PooleDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Krebs Institute for Biomolecular Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN and the § Nitrogen Fixation Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Azotobacter vinelandii is an obligately aerobic bacterium in which aerotolerant nitrogen fixation requires cytochrome bd. Regulation of cytochrome bd expression is achieved by CydR (an Fnr homologue), which represses transcription of the oxidase genes cydAB. cydAB mRNA was mapped by primer extension; the transcriptional start site was determined, and putative -10 and -35 regions were deduced. Two "CydR boxes," one at the +1 site and one upstream of the -35 region, were identified. Transcriptionally inactive, purified CydR was converted, by adding NifS, cysteine, and Fe2+, into an active form possessing acid-labile sulfide and spectra suggesting a [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster. Reconstituted CydR specifically bound both CydR boxes cooperatively, with higher affinity for the nearer consensus +1 site. Low concentrations of O2 or NO ([O2]/[[CydR] or [NO]/[CydR] = 0.1-0.6) elicited loss of the 420 nm absorbance attributed to the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster, formation of a 315 nm species, and loss of ability to retard DNA migration. Retardation by reconstituted CydR was enhanced by superoxide dismutase and/or catalase, suggesting a role for reactive oxygen species in CydR inactivation. The role of CydR in regulating cydAB expression in the supposedly anoxic cytoplasm of A. vinelandii and similarities to cydAB regulation by Fnr in Escherichia coli are discussed.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Azotobacter vinelandii is an obligate aerobe that fixes nitrogen under a wide range of oxygen concentrations, even at air saturation (1). Nitrogen fixation is an energy-demanding process that consumes 16 mol of ATP to convert 1 mol of N2 to 2 mol of NH3 (2). This energy requirement can be met only by aerobic respiration, yet paradoxically, nitrogenase is notoriously sensitive to oxygen damage (3). One way to avoid this damage is "respiratory protection," i.e. the rapid utilization of oxygen to achieve subinhibitory levels of oxygen, thus allowing the coexistence in a cell of aerobic respiration and nitrogenase activity (1, 4). To scavenge traces of oxygen yet consume excess oxygen, A. vinelandii has a branched respiratory chain with at least two routes of electron transport to oxygen (1). One branch is terminated by an oxidase closely resembling the cytochrome bd-type oxidase of Escherichia coli and certain other bacteria (5, 6). The oxidase comprises a low-spin cytochrome b558 and two ligand-binding hemes, cytochromes d and b595 (previously called cytochrome a1 (8)) (7). Another respiratory branch is terminated by an oxidase of the heme-copper superfamily (9), which is probably the oxidase referred to previously as cytochrome o (8, 10). However, a gene fragment from A. vinelandii has been independently sequenced and shown to resemble fixN or ccoN encoding a cb-type cytochrome c oxidase (11). It is not clear whether cytochrome c oxidase and cytochrome o are distinct oxidases.

Direct evidence for the essential role of cytochrome bd in respiratory protection of nitrogenase and the first molecular genetic analysis of respiratory metabolism in A. vinelandii were provided by Kelly et al. (12), who obtained mutants with transposon insertions in and around that region of the genome homologous to the E. coli cydAB genes. One class of mutants had insertions within the cydAB operon, had no spectroscopically detectable cytochrome bd, and significantly, could not fix nitrogen in air. Sequencing of the entire cydAB operon (13) revealed striking similarities to the E. coli cytochrome bd-type oxidase, in accord with spectral studies (5-9, 14). Purification of  A. vinelandii cytochrome bd (15, 16) confirmed similarities in subunit composition, complement of redox centers, and reaction mechanisms in these bacteria. However, a remarkable difference between the E. coli and A. vinelandii oxidases is that the former is synthesized maximally microaerobically (17), whereas synthesis of the A. vinelandii oxidase increases with oxygen supply (1, 18). Furthermore, and consistent with the patterns of regulation, cytochrome bd in A. vinelandii has a surprisingly low affinity for oxygen (apparent Km ~ 4.5 µM) (14), unlike the oxidase in E. coli, which has the highest affinity yet recorded (Km as low as 5 nM) for a terminal oxidase (19).

An explanation of the different responses in these bacteria of oxidase expression to oxygen supply is now beginning to emerge. In E. coli, regulation of cytochrome bd expression is complex and coordinated by the ArcAB two-component system and by Fnr, major global regulators of the aerobic/anaerobic switch (20, 21). ArcA activates cydAB gene expression at low-oxygen tensions (22, 23). As oxygen tension falls farther, Fnr is activated and represses cydAB expression (24). Recent work has identified two cydAB promoters, but the roles played by Fnr and ArcA have not been fully elucidated. Lynch and Lin (25) found three sites for ArcA, one of which (site III) was located downstream of the previously identified cydAB promoter P1 (referred to hereafter as P1). A second promoter was found downstream of this site, but could not be detected by analysis of RNA extracted from aerobically grown cells, suggesting that cydAB P1 is used preferentially under such conditions. It was suggested that ArcA-P (i.e. the active phosphorylated form) bound at site III activates cydAB anoxically when Fnr prevents transcription from P1 (25). Subsequently, Cotter et al. (26) demonstrated that a single site for ArcA-P upstream of P1 was sufficient for activation of cydAB expression. Significantly, two sites for Fnr were found, one at the start of cydAB transcription at P1 and another centered 53.5 bp1 upstream of the +1 site of P1. Thus, collectively, ArcA and Fnr afford maximal cydAB expression in E. coli growing in microaerobic environments, consistent with the finding that this quinol oxidase has a remarkably high affinity for oxygen (19).

A simpler pattern of cydAB expression in response to oxygen availability is observed at the physiological level in A. vinelandii. In this strict aerobe, cydAB transcription is up-regulated as the oxygen tension, and thus danger of nitrogenase damage, increases (1, 3, 4, 14). Mutagenesis in the region of the A. vinelandii genome upstream of the cydAB genes revealed a region in which insertions resulted in marked overproduction of the cytochrome bd complex (12). These mutants failed to grow in a microaerobic atmosphere (1.5% O2) on defined medium either containing (BSN medium) or lacking (BS medium) a supply of fixed nitrogen in the form of ammonium ions (12). This region, separated from the downstream cydAB operon by ~1 kilobase pair, was sequenced by Wu et al. (27) and revealed a gene whose deduced product is highly similar to Fnr. The gene was named cydR (a) to indicate clearly its role in the regulation of the cyd operon (this being the only operon in A. vinelandii so far demonstrated to be CydR-regulated) and (b) because the term fnr appears inappropriate since neither fumarate nor nitrate respiration occurs in A. vinelandii (27). It was postulated that CydR is a repressor of cydAB transcription (27).

Fnr senses anaerobiosis via an oxygen-labile [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster that promotes dimerization of the protein and enhances site-specific DNA binding (20, 21, 28-31). Homologues of Fnr control a variety of physiological functions in a diverse range of phylogenetically distinct prokaryotes (21). They are characterized by the presence of four essential cysteine residues that act as ligands for the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster and the amino acid sequence EXXSR in the DNA-binding region, which confers specificity for the Fnr "box" or -binding site with the consensus sequence TTGAT . . . . . ATCAA. Both of these features are conserved in CydR.

In this paper, purified CydR is shown to be an oxygen-responsive, DNA-binding, Fnr-like protein that is exceptionally oxygen-labile. Furthermore, it is shown for the first time that this member of the Fnr family is also responsive to nitric oxide, with wide implications for regulation of gene expression by Fnr-like proteins and probably several other Fe-S proteins.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Strains and Plasmids-- The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table I. E. coli and A. vinelandii cultures were grown at 37 and 30 °C, respectively. The growth medium used for E. coli was 2× YT broth (32), and that for A. vinelandii was BSN (12).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Strains and plasmids used

General DNA Manipulations-- Standard procedures were used for DNA isolation and manipulation (32). Enzymes for DNA manipulation were obtained from Promega, Stratagene and MBI Fermentas. DNA end labeling was done with [alpha -32P]dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase for use in the DNase I footprinting and gel retardation assays (see below). DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI 373A sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Construction of Mutant Promoters-- Plasmid pMK4 contains the entire cydAB promoter (12, 27). Site-directed mutagenesis was done using the QuickChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis kit from Stratagene according to the manufacturer's instructions. Oligonucleotides RP30 (5'-CTTGATTTATTTAACCTGGATTAACGTGTTGCCCC-3') and RP31 (complementary to RP30) were used to change the +1 CydR box, and oligonucleotides RP32 (5'-GCAGGTTTCATTAACCTGCGTTAATTGGTCAC-3') and RP33 (complementary to RP32) were used to change the -50.5 CydR box. The resulting plasmids were pMK41 (mutated +1 site), pMK435 (mutated -50.5 site), and pMK4351 (both sites mutated). All mutations were confirmed by sequencing. Polymerase chain reaction fragments were generated from these plasmids with primers RP38 (5'-ATCGATGGATCCATGGTTTAGCAGCCTGCTACCCCTCC-3', incorporating the underlined site for BamHI) and RP39 (5'-CATATGATCACCCGGGCAGCTCCAAAAGGCTGGATGGC-3'). To prepare high-quality DNA for footprinting, the wild-type and mutated promoter sequences were finally cloned into the Promega pGEM-T-Easy vector according to the manufacturer's instructions. Plasmids pRKP1025 (wild-type), pRKP1026 (mutated +1 site), pRKP1028 (mutated -50.5 site), and pRKP1029 (both sites mutated) were thus obtained (Table I). The insert in pRKP1028 is in the opposite orientation from that in the other three. DNA fragments containing wild-type and mutated CydR-binding sites were isolated from plasmids pRKP1025, pRKP1026, and pRKP1029 after cutting with BamHI-ApaI and from pRKP1028 after cutting with BamHI-SacI.

Mapping of the cydAB Transcript-- The cydAB transcript was mapped by extracting total RNA by the hot phenol method (33) from a culture of A. vinelandii strain MK8. This strain carries a Tn5-B20 mutation in cydR and consequently overproduces cytochrome bd (12, 27); it was grown under conditions of high aeration (50 ml of culture in a 1-liter conical flask shaken at 200 rpm) for 7 h before harvest. Primer extension was performed according to Yagüe et al. (34). The primer used was purified by running a 15% sequencing gel, and the band was visualized using a "shadowing technique" against the background of a thin-layer chromatographic plate under UV light and isolated from the gel using standard procedures (32). Ten ng of 5'-end-labeled 34-mer oligonucleotide RP141 (5'-AAGATTGGGATGGTTTAGACATGTGGGCAGCTCCAA-3') were mixed with 5 µg of total RNA in 30 µl of primer extension buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM each dNTP, and 0.5 mM spermidine), heated at 75 °C for 3 min, and then cooled at room temperature for 10 min. Twenty units of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, RNase H-) containing sodium pyrophosphate (1.8 µl of a 125 mM solution) were added to the annealed primer/RNA. The mixture was incubated at 42 °C for 30 min, and the nucleic acids were precipitated with ethanol. The DNA was resuspended in formamide loading dye and resolved on a denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel. The sizes of the primer-extended products were determined by running a known sequence ladder (M13mp18 DNA sequenced with the M13 -40 primer; U. S. Biochemical Corp.) in parallel.

Subcloning of cydR in the Gene Fusion Vector pGEX-KG-- To clone cydR into the pGEX-KG vector, a NcoI site was introduced at the ATG initiation codon of cydR on plasmid pGW33 (Table I) using site-directed mutagenesis directed by oligonucleotides RP34 (5'-CAGAGAAAGTTGCCCATGGCGGATAAATCC-3') and RP35 (complementary to RP34). These primers additionally result in changes in the first two amino acid residues of CydR from Met-Ser to Met-Ala. The NcoI-HindIII fragment from pGW33 was then cloned into pGEX-KG to give plasmid pRKP1082.

Purification and Reconstitution of CydR-- CydR was purified from French press extracts of aerobic cultures of E. coli strain RKP3363 (DH5alpha containing plasmid pRKP1082) grown in 2× YT broth (32) plus ampicillin (200 mg/liter). Three h after inoculation with an overnight culture (1.6% of the final volume), the expression of GST-CydR was induced with isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside (0.1 mM final concentration) during the exponential phase of growth. Cells were harvested after a further 4 h of growth. Glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used to adsorb the GST-CydR fusion protein according to the manufacturer's instructions. The column was washed with Tris-buffered saline (25 mM Tris-HCl and 138 mM NaCl (pH 7.5)) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (10× the resin bed volume), and CydR was cleaved from GST by thrombin protease by incubation for 30 min at room temperature. For reconstitution of CydR (30), NifS (purified from A. vinelandii) and dithiothreitol (2.5 mM final concentration) were added to the purified CydR protein, and the mixture was flushed with O2-free nitrogen gas for 1 h. Cysteine (1 mM final concentration) and (NH4)2SO4·FeSO4·6H2O (10 mol of iron/mol of CydR monomer) were added to the mixture in an Mk3 Anaerobic Work station (Don Whitley Scientific Ltd, Shipley, England). The reconstitution was monitored spectrophotometrically. Upon completion, CydR was separated from excess cysteine, iron, dithiothreitol, and residual nucleic acid (see below) by passing through a column packed with Toyopearl ether-650M hydrophobic interaction resin, which was first washed with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) (low-salt buffer; 5-10× the resin bed volume) and then equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) plus 1.7 M (NH4)2SO4 (high-salt buffer). The reconstituted CydR protein containing 1.7 M (NH4)2SO4 was loaded on the column, which was washed with high-salt buffer (5× resin bed volume), and finally eluted with low-salt buffer (200 µl at a time). Acid-labile sulfur in denatured CydR samples was determined by the method of Beinert (35) in the anaerobic cabinet. Protein concentrations were estimated by the Bio-Rad dye binding procedure with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

Spectroscopy and Inactivation of CydR-- A Beckman DU Series 600 spectrophotometer or a Perkin-Elmer spectrophotometer with Winlab software was used for optical spectroscopy. CydR samples were transferred from the anaerobic cabinet in sealed cuvettes. Air-saturated H2O (~230 µM O2 at 23 °C) and freshly prepared NO solution (~1.9 mM in H2O at room temperature) prepared as described by Poole et al. (36) were added to the sample by injection in the anaerobic cabinet.

Gel Retardation Assays-- For determining CydR binding to the cydAB promoter, reconstituted CydR protein was diluted in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) and incubated anaerobically for 10 min with labeled promoter DNA (20-50 counts/min/µl), 150 ng of salmon sperm DNA, 2.5 µg of bovine serum albumin, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and band-shift buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5% glycerol, and 100 mM KCl) in a final volume of 5 µl. Sensitivity of CydR to O2 was studied by preincubation of 10 µM protein (monomer) for 20 min in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) in the presence of mixtures of anoxic water and air-saturated water to give final concentrations of up to 60 µM O2. Sensitivity of CydR to NO was studied similarly, but in anoxic aqueous solutions of NO or NaNO2 to give final concentrations of up to 60 µM NO or NaNO2. Superoxide dismutase (5 units; Sigma) and/or catalase (5 units; Sigma) was added to these reactions where indicated. O2 concentrations quoted refer to those in the preincubation mixture, not to the incubation with DNA. To allow CydR·DNA complex formation, 1-µl samples of the reactions were then incubated for 10 min as described above in a final volume of 5 µl. The loading of samples was performed at a voltage of 20 V after pre-running at 120 V for 5 min. Promoter DNA and purified CydR-protein interactions were visualized on 5% polyacrylamide gels (19:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) buffered with 25 mM Tris and 250 mM glycine (pH 8.3). The gel was run for ~1 h at 60 mA (for two gels). Quantitation of shifted and non-shifted bands was performed by determining density expressed as counts/mm2 using a Bio-Rad Model GS-S25 Molecular Imager® system.

DNase I Footprinting-- DNase I footprinting using purified CydR and DNA restriction fragments containing the cydAB promoter was performed according to Green et al. (28) and Rhodes (37), except that reactions were not extracted with phenol/chloroform. The details of the binding conditions are presented under "Results." The C lane was included as a sequence reference to determine the location of the binding sites.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mapping the Transcriptional Start Site by Primer Extension-- It has been reported (38) that the cydA and cydB genes are cotranscribed and that the transcriptional start site is ~275 bp upstream of the ATG initiation codon of cydA. An oligonucleotide (RP141) starting 188 bp upstream of the cydAB ATG initiation codon was therefore used for primer extension experiments. Fig. 1 shows that the transcriptional start site is actually 268-269 bp upstream of the ATG codon of cydA.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Mapping of the 5'-end of the cydAB transcript by primer extension. M13mp18 DNA sequenced with the -40 primer was used as a sequence ladder to determine the size of the extended product, which is indicated by the arrow. nt, nucleotides.

Putative -10 and -35 regions were sought. The sequence TTTATT (labeled "-10" in Fig. 4; see later) has four matches with the -10 motif (TATAAT) characteristic of E. coli promoters transcribed by the major sigma 70 complex of the RNA polymerase. On the basis of ribonuclease protection analysis, Moshiri et al. (38) identified the sequence GTAAAT as the probable -10 site, having three matches with the consensus sequence. These workers also tentatively identified a -35 sequence (TGGTCA) that also has four matches with the E. coli consensus sequence TTGACA. However, as shown in Fig. 4, the gap between our -10 sequence and the putative -35 sequence is 24 bp, considerably exceeding the usual distance in E. coli, for example, of 17 bp.

Two sequences similar to the E. coli Fnr boxes (TTGAT . . . . . ATCAA) were located in the promoter region of cydAB (see Fig. 4 below), which we designate here as the +1 CydR box (TTGAC . . . . . ATCAA) and the -50.5 CydR box (TTGAC. . . . . GTCAA), the latter being centered 50.5 bp away from the more upstream G marked in Fig. 4. The +1 site has one mismatch compared with the Fnr consensus sequence (39), whereas the -50.5 site has two mismatches, one in each half-site. From the beginning of one CydR box to that of the other, the distance is exactly five turns of the helix, which suggests that CydR molecules that bind to these two CydR boxes are located on the same face of the DNA and may therefore interact with each other. We obtained no evidence for a second promoter for the cydAB operon in A. vinelandii.

Overexpression and Purification of CydR-- Using a GST fusion vector, CydR was first expressed as a GST fusion protein (GST-CydR) at levels up to 15% of soluble cell protein (Fig. 2, lane 1). Purification was then achieved by glutathione-Sepharose 4B affinity chromatography. Most of the fusion protein in the supernatant was adsorbed by this column in 30 min (Fig. 2, lane 2). After washing with Tris-buffered saline, GST-CydR was purified to near-homogeneity (Fig. 2, lane 3). CydR was then completely cleaved from GST by thrombin protease in ~30 min at room temperature (Fig. 2, lane 4). Typically, growth in the 30-liter airlift fermentor produced ~120 g of cells (wet weight), from which ~100 mg of CydR could be obtained. The cleaved CydR protein contains 15 extra amino acids at its N terminus; these do not prevent demonstration of the aerobic/anaerobic transcription switch in vitro in the case of E. coli Fnr (30).


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Purification of CydR. Shown is a Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained gel of the SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis fractionation of samples from consecutive stages of CydR purification. Lane 1, cleared supernatant after sonication (10 µg of total protein); lane 2, supernatant after glutathione-Sepharose adsorption (10 µg of protein); lane 3, fraction from glutathione-Sepharose beads washed with Tris-buffered saline and then digested with thrombin protease (10 µg of protein); lane 4, purified CydR protein (10 µg of protein). Positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are shown to the right.

Reconstitution of the Fe-S Cluster in CydR-- Since apo-Fnr can be reconstituted to form an active protein containing two [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters/dimer (29, 30), the same procedure was used in an attempt to reconstitute CydR. Reconstitution of CydR could be achieved in ~3 h at room temperature, but since we found that CydR is very sensitive to high temperature and denatured instantly at 37 °C, CydR was routinely reconstituted at 4 °C overnight. Purified Fnr protein is reported to be contaminated with some nucleic acid (30), and the high absorbance of the CydR preparation at 260 nm (data not shown) suggested the same. However, after the reconstituted CydR protein was purified through a column packed with Toyopearl ether-650M hydrophobic interaction resin, it was a straw-brown color, and the absorbance at 260 nm was greatly reduced, indicating that contaminating nucleic acids that might inhibit promoter binding were largely eliminated.

Spectra recorded during a typical reconstitution experiment are shown in Fig. 3. The signal at 420 nm attributed to reconstitution of an Fe-S cluster increased in intensity with time. The model compound [Fe4S4(S-Et)4]2- has an epsilon 280 of 17,200 M-1 cm-1 and an A420/A280 ratio of ~0.7 in methylformamide, which shows only small variations with changes in solvent or thiol ligand (30). Assuming the presence of one [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster/monomer in the reconstituted CydR protein, as in Fnr, the absorbance of the 420 nm species corresponds to a concentration of [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters of ~60 µM, i.e. ~40% of the anticipated concentration of protein after reconstitution. However, the final spectrum in Fig. 3, taken at 2.5 h, does not reveal the full intensity of the signal, but analysis was frustrated after longer incubations by the formation of a fine black precipitate.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Absorbance spectra of CydR during reconstitution. All spectra were obtained with anaerobic samples (74 µM dimer) in sealed cuvettes. The bottom spectrum was taken before the reconstitution, and those above at 4, 12, 20, 37, 113, 136, and 145 min (top spectrum). Absorbance at 420 nm increased during the reconstitution.

The ratio A420/A280 can also serve as a useful index of the iron-sulfur cluster content of a protein. The CydR protein contains 14 phenylalanines (epsilon 257 = 220 M-1 cm-1) and one tyrosine (epsilon 274 = 1440 M-1 cm-1), which contribute to the absorbance at 280 nm, and no tryptophan. Based on studies with Fnr (11 phenylalanines and five tyrosines) (30), we estimate that epsilon 280 for CydR, with a much lower tyrosine content than Fnr, is on the order of 3000. Hence, it can be calculated that the A420/A280 ratio for CydR containing one [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster/monomer should be ~0.62. This value is close to that calculated for Fnr (0.56) because the Fe-S cluster makes a 4-8-fold larger contribution to the absorbance at 280 nm than does the protein. The highest ratio determined experimentally for CydR was ~0.5, although as for Fnr, determination was frustrated by the persistence of absorbance at 260 nm due to nucleic acids, which artifactually raises the protein assay, and by slow precipitation of material after reconstitution (see below), which contributes a turbidity "base line" to the uncorrected absorbance spectrum. Nevertheless, these values are 1.6-fold higher than the ratio measured for Fnr (30).

The reconstituted CydR protein contained ~7-8 atoms of acid-labile sulfur (mean = 7.7, S.D. = 1.9) per mol of CydR monomer, ~1.8-fold higher than measured for Fnr (30), which is thought to possess one [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster/Fnr monomer. The unreconstituted, inactive CydR protein contained only 0.4 atoms of acid-labile sulfur (S.D. = 0.1) per mol of CydR monomer.

Interaction of CydR with Wild-type and Mutant Target Sequences-- In Fnr, the paradigm for such protein-DNA binding site studies, Glu-209, Ser-212, and Arg-213 in the second helix of the helix-turn-helix motif have a significant role in the recognition of an Fnr box (39). These amino acid residues are conserved in CydR, suggesting that CydR and Fnr will recognize very similar DNA-binding sequences. To determine whether the putative CydR boxes are actually recognized by CydR, mutations were made (Fig. 4) in which the central G, which interacts with Glu-209, was mutated to A, and the corresponding C, in the second half of the box, was changed to T. The interaction of CydR with its target sequences was then analyzed by gel retardation. Fig. 5 shows that the specific retardation was seen only with the wild-type sequence at CydR concentrations as low as 0.5 × 10-7 and 0.5 × 10-6 M (monomer). Little retardation could be detected when the +1 CydR box, the -50.5 box, or both were mutated even at a CydR monomer concentration of 0.5 × 10-5 M. The unreconstituted CydR protein (up to 0.5 × 10-5 M) did not retard the same DNA fragment (data not shown).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The promoter region of cydAB showing putative wild-type and mutant sites for CydR binding. Plasmid pMK4 contains the wild-type sequence; pMK41 is mutated in the +1 CydR box; pMK435 is mutated in the -50.5 CydR box; and pMK4351 has mutations in both CydR boxes. The black circles indicate transcriptional start sites identified by primer extension analysis. The thick bar labeled "-10" shows the probable -10 motif, consistent with the experimentally determined start site (see "Results"); the thin bar labeled with a question mark shows the putative -35 site identified in Ref. 38.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Gel retardation assays with radiolabeled wild-type and mutant cydAB promoter DNAs. Four 203-bp fragments were amplified by polymerase chain reaction from corresponding plasmids with primers RP38 and RP39 (see "Experimental Procedures"). Plasmids were digested with NcoI and end-labeled. Lanes labeled A, B, C, and D were obtained using target DNAs from plasmids pMK4 (wild-type), pMK41 (mutations in the +1 CydR box), pMK435 (mutations in the -50.5 CydR box), and pMK4351 (mutations in both CydR boxes), respectively. Lanes labeled 0 show migration in the absence of CydR protein. Lanes labeled 9, 8, 7, 6, and 5 show migration in the presence of CydR protein at final concentrations of 0.5 × 10-9, 0.5 × 10-8, 0.5 × 10-7, 0.5 × 10-6, and 0.5 × 10-5 M (calculated as monomer), respectively.

DNase I footprint analysis confirmed that CydR protects the CydR boxes in the +1 and -50.5 regions (Fig. 6). The concentration necessary for protecting both the CydR boxes (pMK4) was ~2 × 10-7 M (monomer). DNA protection was lost when the G or C nucleotides were changed in the two half-sites of the CydR boxes (pMK4351). Interestingly, mutation of the +1 CydR box modified CydR protection at the -50.5 region. In pMK41, a higher CydR concentration (2 × 10-6 M (monomer)) was required to protect the -50.5 CydR box. In contrast, mutation of the -50.5 site (pMK435) did not change the CydR concentration required for protecting the +1 site. These results allow us to distinguish between a primary and a secondary binding site, with CydR showing a higher affinity for the +1 CydR box.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   DNase I footprint analysis of the cydAB promoter with CydR protein (coding strand labeled at the BamH1 site). The 250-bp DNA fragments isolated from the wild-type (pRKP1025) and mutated (pRKP1026, pRKP1028, and pRKP1029) promoter regions were digested with DNase I in the presence of various concentrations of purified CydR protein. The patterns shown were obtained with no CydR (- lanes); with 2 × 10-8 M (lanes 1), 2 × 10-7 M (lanes 2), 2 × 10-6 M (lanes 3), and 2 × 10-5 M (lanes 4) reconstituted CydR (all calculated as monomer); and with 2 × 10-5 M unreconstituted CydR (lanes 5). The C lanes were obtained by dimethyl sulfate/piperidine hydrolysis and provide a calibration for the GC base pairs in the wild-type CydR boxes of the cydAB promoter region. Sequences aligned vertically to the left correspond to the protected sequences indicated by the converging pairs of lines. Bases in the +1 and -50.5 CydR-binding sites are underlined. Asterisks indicated bases that were mutated.

Interaction of CydR with Oxygen-- In Fnr, reaction with oxygen of the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster in the reconstituted protein produces a non-DNA-binding, transcriptionally inactive form (31). Since A. vinelandii is an obligate aerobe that must maintain an effectively anoxic cytoplasm for nitrogenase function, it was of interest to compare the sensitivity of CydR and Fnr to oxygen. Sequential additions of O2 (as O2-saturated buffer) were made to the reconstituted CydR protein in a volume of 0.4 ml in a sealed cuvette and monitored by UV-visible electronic spectroscopy (Fig. 7A). The same samples were subsequently used for gel retardation experiments after suitable dilution. Slight precipitation of material during the titration caused absorbance at all wavelengths to rise, but particularly at lower wavelengths, consistent with the increased turbidity. Nevertheless, an obvious change superimposed upon the turbidity signals was the increase of a peak centered at ~315 nm and a decrease of the peak at 420 nm tentatively attributed to a [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster. To minimize the effect of the base-line shift, changes in absorbance at 315 nm were expressed as the absorbance difference between 315 and 295 nm, and the changes at 420 nm were expressed as the difference between 420 and 500 nm. Fig. 7A shows that nearly half of the absorbance change at 420 nm was lost on adding oxygen to give an [O2]/[CydR] ratio of ~0.03. Adding oxygen to give an [O2]/[CydR] ratio of ~0.1 almost eliminated the A420 signal. The absorbance at 315 nm increased as the preparation was exposed to small amounts of air, but was not seen when reconstituted CydR was fully exposed to air. The maximal absorbance was reached when the [O2]/[CydR] ratio was ~0.1.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Interaction of the reconstituted CydR protein (22 µM dimer) with O2 (A) or NO (B) monitored by electronic absorption spectroscopy. The insets show changes at wavelength pairs (420 minus 500 nm (solid lines) and 315 minus 295 nm (dotted lines)) appropriate for monitoring the disappearance of the 420 nm peak or the formation of the 315 nm signal. In each case, the bottom spectrum was taken before addition of O2 or NO. The spectra above represent the following: A, [O2]/[CydR] ratios of 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.5, and 1; and B, [NO]/[CydR] ratios of 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.

Interaction of CydR with NO and Reactive Oxygen Intermediates-- Redox-sensitive metal clusters of proteins are sensitive not only to O2, but may also be sensitive to degradation by radicals of biological significance such as NO (40). In light of this and considering that A. vinelandii, a soil bacterium, is likely to encounter NO produced by denitrifying bacteria, we studied the effects of NO on CydR. Successive additions of NO (as a strictly anoxic gas-saturated solution) and monitoring of spectral changes (Fig. 7B) showed that the effects of NO were very similar to those of oxygen, both with respect to the nature of the spectral changes and the [NO]/[CydR] ratio required for abolition of the 420 nm signal (Fig. 7B).

Parallel gel retardation experiments demonstrated the sensitivity of the DNA-binding properties of CydR to O2, NO, and partial reduction properties of O2. (Fig. 8). Reconstitution of CydR using the procedures described above gave a preparation that significantly retarded DNA migration (Fig. 8A, compare lane 2 with lanes 1 and 3). However, the presence of catalase (Fig. 8A, lane 4), superoxide dismutase (lane 5), or both (lane 6) significantly enhanced DNA retardation, suggesting a role for reactive oxygen intermediates in modulating CydR binding. Increasing concentrations of oxygen, introduced before protein-DNA interaction, progressively inhibited CydR-DNA interactions (Fig. 8, A, lanes 7, 9, and 11; and B, bars 7, 9, and 11). An [O2]/[CydR] ratio of ~0.6 (6.25 µM O2) was sufficient to prevent DNA retardation. Again, catalase and/or superoxide dismutase provided protection (Fig. 8, A, lanes 8, 10, and 12; and B, bars 8, 10, and 12). Intermediate [O2]/[CydR] ratios gave intermediate results (data not shown).


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Gel retardation with radiolabeled cydAB promoter DNA. In A, arrows indicate the shifted (white) and non-shifted (black) bands. Band shift is expressed as the ratio of shifted to non-shifted DNA in B. Bars in B and lanes in A are identically ordered. The negative control contained both superoxide dismutase and catalase without CydR protein (lane 1). Reconstituted (lanes 2 and 4-18) and unreconstituted (lane 3) CydR proteins were used at a final concentration of 2 µM. Before allowing protein-DNA complex formation, reconstituted CydR was anaerobically incubated in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7) (lane 2) in the presence of catalase (lane 4), superoxide dismutase (lane 5), or a mixture of both enzymes (lane 6). Increasing O2, NO, and NaNO2 concentrations (indicated by the wedges in B) were used for preincubation with the reconstituted CydR protein in the absence (lanes 7, 9, 11, and 13-18) or presence (lanes 8, 10, and 12) of a mixture of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase. The [O2]/[CydR] ratios were 0.0001:1 (lanes 7 and 8), 0.6:1 (lanes 9 and 10), and 6:1 (lanes 11 and 12). The [NO]/[CydR] and [NO2-]/[CydR] ratios were 0.1:1 (lanes 13 and 14), 0.6:1 (lanes 15 and 16), and 6:1 (lanes 17 and 18). Concentrations of CydR are given for the monomer.

An [NO]/[CydR] ratio of 0.6 (6.25 µM NO) was equally effective in preventing DNA retardation by CydR. The presence of O2 in NO solutions forms nitrite ion, and so control lanes (Fig. 8A, lanes 13-18) were set up with nitrite at concentrations similar to those of NO. No significant effects were observed in these cases.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

An absolute requirement for aerotolerant nitrogen fixation in A. vinelandii appears to be synthesis of the quinol oxidase cytochrome bd (1, 12). We have previously shown genetically that transcription of the cydAB operon, encoding the two subunits of cytochrome bd, is repressed by CydR (27) and that mutation of CydR causes elevation of oxidase synthesis (12, 27). Cytochrome bd levels, as well as cytochrome bd-specific mRNA, increase in a wild-type strain when the oxygen concentration increases under non-nitrogen-fixing conditions (18, 27). The converse is true in cydR mutants, i.e. the cytochrome bd concentration increases sharply when the oxygen concentration decreases. The trends are the same in cells grown under nitrogen-fixing conditions.2

The transcriptional start site of cydAB was mapped in this work to 268-269 bp upstream of the cydAB ATG translational initiation codon by primer extension. This method is probably more precise than the ribonuclease protection assay (38), which placed the transcriptional start site at 275-277 bp upstream of the cydAB translational initiation site. We and Moshiri et al. (38) have not obtained any evidence for a second promoter for the cydAB operon in A. vinelandii. The transcriptional start site is the same under both nitrogen-fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing conditions (38). Putative -10 and -35 regions were identified based on similarity to the promoters recognized by E. coli sigma 70. However, A. vinelandii RNA polymerase may recognize different promoter sequences, and further promoter analysis is required. Moshiri et al. (13) showed that the cloned A. vinelandii cydAB genes in E. coli could reconstitute cyanide-insensitive respiratory chain activity from NADH to O2, but not succinate- or lactate-dependent respiration, and that cytochrome d was detectable spectroscopically. In another study, however, the cloned cydAB genes did not complement an E. coli cydAB mutant for growth on Zn2+- and azide-containing medium, and no cytochrome d was detected spectroscopically (41). Moshiri et al. (38) demonstrated that the cydAB genes are up-regulated under nitrogen-fixing conditions in a sigma 54-dependent manner. However, the promoter of cydAB does not resemble the typical sigma 54-dependent promoter, but is more similar to the E. coli sigma 70-dependent promoter. It is possible that sigma 54 regulates the expression of cytochrome bd indirectly.

The CydR protein has now been purified by glutathione-Sepharose 4B affinity column chromatography to near-homogeneity. The aerobically purified CydR protein can be reconstituted into an active form, as can the aerobically purified E. coli Fnr protein (29, 30), and only in this state binds to target sequences in the cydAB promoter identifiable by footprinting studies and similarity to Fnr boxes. Two CydR-protected regions were seen at this promoter, as was also revealed in E. coli (26) by DNase I footprinting studies of Fnr binding to the cydAB regulatory region. One region of 25 bp extends from positions -17 to +7 and thus overlaps the transcriptional start site (+1). Another region of 24 bp extends from positions -61 to -38 and is centered at position -50.5 relative to the same start site. This arrangement of CydR (Fnr)-binding sites is very similar to that of the cydAB promoter in E. coli, in which the Fnr sites extend from positions -13 to +10 and from positions -67 to -45, respectively, with reference to the start of P1 transcription. Only one putative Fnr site was considered by Lynch and Lin (25). Thus, in both A. vinelandii and E. coli, an Fnr-like protein acts directly to repress cydAB gene expression. In E. coli, however, both sites are bound by Fnr with similar affinity, and the sites become occupied simultaneously as the protein concentration is increased (26). In E. coli, the upstream site centered at position -53.5 is identical to the consensus sequence, whereas the site at the start of cydAB transcription has a single mismatch. In A. vinelandii, however, CydR binds both sites, but with higher affinity for the +1 CydR box. This may reflect the closer match of the +1 site to the Fnr consensus sequence. "Anaerobic" cydAB repression in A. vinelandii may involve the binding of two pairs of CydR monomers over the +1 and -50.5 regions, which prevents essential RNA polymerase-DNA contacts. CydR binding to the primary (high-affinity) +1 site could cooperatively help CydR binding to the secondary (low-affinity) -50.5 site.

Thus, even in this obligately aerobic bacterium, cydAB transcription is still regulated in response to O2. However, whereas the absorbance loss at 420 nm of the Fnr protein in E. coli requires an [O2]/[Fnr] ratio of ~1 (31), a ratio of only ~0.1 is sufficient to cause loss of the distinctive 420 nm band of the Fe-S cluster in CydR. Furthermore, an [O2]/[CydR] ratio of ~0.6 significantly prevents the retardation by CydR of its target DNA, whereas a ratio of 3 is needed to abolish the retardation by Fnr of its target DNA (31). This observation is perhaps not surprising given the requirement in this organism that the cytoplasmic oxygen tension should be maintained at very low levels, despite ready penetration of oxygen through the cytoplasmic membrane from an external growth environment that may be air-saturated. Although intracellular oxygen levels have not been measured in A. vinelandii (or any other bacterium), CydR appears to be a highly sensitive monitor of cytoplasmic oxygen, as anticipated for continued operation of nitrogenase under highly aerobic growth conditions. We envisage that, during growth under microaerobic conditions, intracellular oxygen concentrations are sufficiently low to allow nitrogenase function and that CydR would be active, repressing cydAB expression. Under conditions of stress imposed by high oxygen, the repressed levels of cytochrome bd may not maintain the essentially anoxic state of the cytoplasm that is required for nitrogenase and CydR will be inactivated; this in turn derepresses cytochrome bd synthesis, which provides respiratory protection.

Several lines of evidence indicate that cysteine-rich motifs of metal-binding proteins and redox-sensitive metal clusters of metalloproteins are natural biosensors not only of O2 and Fe (40), but also of NO (42). Fe-S-containing proteins like dehydratases have long been known as targets of O2- and H2O2 (43) and are also targets of NO. NO forms complexes with Fe-S clusters in model compounds (44), and mitochondrial Fe-S enzymes are inhibited by NO (45). Aconitase is especially sensitive to NO, but it has recently been proposed that the peroxynitrite anion (ONOO-), formed in the reaction of NO with O2-, is the inactivating species (46, 47). Regulatory Fe-S-containing proteins like SoxR and mammalian iron-responsive element- binding protein 1 have also been shown to be NO-sensitive (40, 48, 49), but it was not known whether Fnr is sensitive to NO or insensitive, as is the molybdenum metalloenzyme xanthine oxidase (50). We now show for the first time that a member of the Fnr family is inactivated by NO as well as by oxygen. The mechanism of this inactivation needs further study. The physiological function of the effects of NO on CydR, if any, are unclear. However, although A. vinelandii is not itself a denitrifying bacterium, it inhabits environments where other bacteria produce NO as an intermediate in this pathway. NO may derepress cytochrome bd so that nitrogenase is protected by respiration and able to exploit the end product of denitrification, namely dinitrogen.

The peak observed in absorbance spectra at 315 nm formed after adding O2 or NO may be a breakdown product of the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster or reflect the presence of substoichiometric iron levels in the protein (51). Several studies of Fnr including recent Mössbauer spectroscopy (52) show that the loss of the 420 nm-absorbing form of Fnr is due to conversion of the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster to a [2Fe-2S]2+ cluster. Only stoichiometric amounts of O2 are needed for this inactivation, whereas ferricyanide is required in considerable excess (31), suggesting that Fnr is a true O2 sensor. The greater sensitivity of CydR to oxygen than of Fnr suggests that even substoichiometric amounts of O2 are adequate for cluster inactivation. A plausible mechanism that accounts for the oxygen sensitivity of the [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters of Fnr-like proteins and the biphasic nature of the response (40) requires a rapid oxygen-driven, redox-balanced conversion of [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters to [2Fe-2S]2+ via a [3Fe-4S]+ intermediate. In this process, O2 oxidizes [4Fe-4S]2+ to [3Fe-4S]+, releasing Fe2+ and generating superoxide anion. The superoxide (generated close to the [3Fe-4S]+ cluster) reduces it, yielding [2Fe-2S]2+ and Fe2+ and regenerating O2, which is free to attack further [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters. That the presence of superoxide dismutase and catalase enhances DNA target retardation supports the involvement of superoxide and H2O2 in conversion of CydR to the inactive form.

The low levels of cytochrome bd at low-oxygen tensions in wild-type cells are presumably due to repression by CydR, but levels of cytochrome bd under low aeration in cydR mutants are significantly higher than those in both wild-type (cydR+) and the cydR mutants under high aeration (18, 27). This suggests that there may be another regulator that represses the expression of cytochrome bd under high aeration. There is no evidence for or against an ArcA/ArcB system in A. vinelandii. Therefore, at present, the possible involvement of ArcA-P in CydR (Fnr)-dependent repression of cydAB is unknown, but unlike E. coli, mechanisms for maximizing cydAB expression microaerobically are not evident and may be unnecessary.

So far, only the cydAB operon has been unequivocally shown to be regulated by CydR. However, increased activity of NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase that is insensitive to capsaicin (i.e. NADH dehydrogenase II) is co-induced with cytochrome bd in a cydR mutant (53), and the O2-sensitive phenotype of a nifU mutant is corrected by the introduction of a cydR mutation (54). Furthermore, an unexplained phenotype of cydR mutants is their inability to grow under conditions of low aeration (12, 27). A likely explanation is that one or more genes required for microaerobic growth are CydR-regulated. Comparative analysis of the proteome of wild-type A. vinelandii and a cydR mutant is now under way to determine the extent of gene regulation accomplished by CydR.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Ed T. Ralph for providing the purified NifS protein, P. Gokhale for scanning gels and quantifying bands, Ron Adams for imaging, and Martin N. Hughes for valuable advice on practical and theoretical aspects of NO chemistry.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant G04903 (to R. K. P., G. S., and S. H.) and Advanced Fellowship award (to J. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Krebs Inst. for Biomolecular Research, University of Sheffield, Firth Ct., Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. Tel.: 44-114-222-4447; Fax: 44-114-272-8697; E-mail: r.poole@sheffield.ac.uk.

2 S. E. Edwards, S. Hill, and R. K. Poole, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: bp, base pair(s); GST, glutathione S-transferase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Poole, R. K., and Hill, S. (1997) Biosci. Rep. 17, 303-317[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Kim, J., and Rees, D. C. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 389-397[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Robson, R. L., and Postgate, J. R. (1980) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 34, 183-207[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Hill, S. (1992) in Biological Nitrogen Fixation (Stacey, G., ed) , pp. 86-133, Chapman and Hall Ltd., London
5. Poole, R. K. (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 726, 205-243[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Poole, R. K. (1988) in Bacterial Energy Transduction (Anthony, C., ed) , pp. 231-291, Academic Press Ltd., London
7. D'mello, R., Palmer, S., Hill, S., and Poole, R. K. (1994) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 121, 115-120[CrossRef]
8. Haddock, B. A., and Jones, C. W. (1977) Bacteriol. Rev. 41, 47-99[Free Full Text]
9. Leung, D., Van Der Oost, J., Kelly, M., Saraste, M., Hill, S., and Poole, R. K. (1994) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 119, 351-358[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Yang, T. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 848, 342-351[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Thöny-Meyer, L., Beck, C., Preisig, O., and Hennecke, H. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 14, 705-716[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Kelly, M. J. S., Poole, R. K., Yates, M. G., and Kennedy, C. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 6010-6019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Moshiri, F., Chawla, A., and Maier, R. J. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 6230-6241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. D'mello, R., Hill, S., and Poole, R. K. (1994) Microbiology 140, 1395-1402
15. Kolonay, J. F., Moshiri, F., Gennis, R. B., Kaysser, T. M., and Maier, R. J. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 4177-4181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Junemann, S., and Wrigglesworth, J. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16213-16220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Gennis, R. B., and Stewart, V. (1996) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology (Niedhardt, F. C. , Curtiss, R., III , Ingraham, J. L. , Lin, E. C. C. , Low, K. B. , Magasanik, B. , Reznikoff, W. S. , Riley, M. , Schaechter, M. , and Umbarger, H. E., eds), 2nd Ed. , pp. 217-261, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
18. D'mello, R., Leung, D., Poole, R. K., and Hill, S. (1996) Microbiology 143, 231-237
19. D'mello, R., Hill, S., and Poole, R. K. (1996) Microbiology 142, 755-763[Abstract]
20. Guest, J. R., Green, J., Irvine, A. S., and Spiro, S. (1996) in Regulation of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli (Lin, E. C. C. , and Lynch, A. S., eds) , pp. 317-342, R. G. Landes Co., Georgetown, TX
21. Sawers, G. (1999) Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 181-187[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Iuchi, S., Chepuri, V., Fu, H.-A., Gennis, R. B., and Lin, E. C. C. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 6020-6025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Cotter, P. A., and Gunsalus, R. P. (1992) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 91, 31-36[CrossRef]
24. Tseng, C.-P., Albrecht, J., and Gunsalus, R. P. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 1094-1098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Lynch, A. S., and Lin, E. C. C. (1996) J Bacteriol. 178, 6238-6249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Cotter, P. A., Melville, S. B., Albrecht, J. A., and Gunsalus, R. P. (1997) Mol. Microbiol. 25, 605-615[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Wu, G., Hill, S., Kelly, M. J. S., Sawers, G., and Poole, R. K. (1997) Microbiology 143, 2197-2207[Abstract]
28. Green, J., Trageser, M., Six, S., Unden, G., and Guest, J. R. (1991) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1310, 137-144
29. Khoroshilova, N., Beinert, H., and Kiley, P. J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2499-2503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Green, J., Bennett, B., Jordan, P., Ralph, E. T., Thomson, A. J., and Guest, J. R. (1996) Biochem. J. 316, 887-892
31. Jordan, P. A., Thomson, A. J., Ralph, E. T., Guest, J. R., and Green, J. (1997) FEBS Lett. 416, 349-352[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
33. Aiba, H., Adhya, S., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 11905-11910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Yagüe, E., Wood, D. A., and Thurston, C. F. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 12, 41-47[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Beinert, H. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 131, 373-378[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Poole, R. K., Anjum, M. F., Membrillo-Hernández, J., Kim, S. O., Hughes, M. N., and Stewart, V. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 5487-5492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Rhodes, D. (1989) in Protein Function (Creighton, T., ed) , pp. 186-195, IRL Press Ltd., Oxford
38. Moshiri, F., Smith, E. G., Taormino, J. P., and Maier, R. J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 23169-23174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Spiro, S., and Guest, J. R. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 310-314[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Rouault, T. A., and Klausner, R. D. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 174-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Kelly, M. J. S. (1991) The Role of the Respiratory Chain in the Nitrogen Fixing Bacterium Azotobacter Vinelandii.Ph.D. thesis , King's College London, University of London
42. Drapier, J.-C., and Bouton, C. (1996) Bioessays 18, 549-556[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Flint, D. H., Tuminello, J. F., and Emptage, M. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22369-22376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Butler, A. R., Glidewell, C., and Li, M. S. (1988) Adv. Inorg. Chem. 32, 335-392
45. Geng, Y. J., Hansson, G. K., and Holme, E. (1992) Cir