![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 7, 5111-5119, February 18, 2000
,From the Department of Pathology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D. C. 20007
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The E5 oncoprotein of bovine papillomavirus type
1 is a Golgi-resident, 44-amino acid polypeptide that can transform
fibroblast cell lines by activating endogenous platelet-derived growth
factor receptor Papillomaviruses are double-stranded DNA tumor viruses that induce
benign and malignant neoplasia in a wide range of vertebrate hosts,
including cervical carcinoma in humans (1-3). Bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1)1 induces
fibropapillomas in cattle and has been used as a model system to study
papillomavirus-induced transformation in vitro (1,
4-6).
The predominant transforming activity of BPV-1 is attributable to the
E5 oncoprotein (4, 5, 7), a small hydrophobic protein (44 amino acids)
that is localized primarily in membranes of the Golgi apparatus (8).
Targeting of E5 to the trans-Golgi compartment appears to be necessary
for cell transformation (9). E5 stably associates with the
platelet-derived growth factor receptor Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI 3-Ks) are a family of enzymes that
phosphorylate inositol phospholipids specifically at the D-3 position
of the inositol ring. The phosphorylated lipid products of PI 3-Ks
serve as second messengers that are involved in the regulation of cell
growth and differentiation, apoptosis, cytoskeletal organization, cell
motility, membrane trafficking, and glucose metabolism (18-20).
Heterodimeric (p85/p110) PI 3-K plays a key role in growth
factor-induced mitogenic signaling and is important for cellular
transformation by v-src, v-ros, and the middle-T antigen of polyoma virus (19, 21-24). The expression of constitutively active heterodimeric PI 3-K is sufficient to induce characteristics of
cellular transformation, including anchorage-independent growth (25).
Although it has been reported that wt BPV-1 E5 elevates basal PI 3-K
activity in immunoprecipitates from NIH 3T3 cells, PI 3-K activation
was presumed to result solely from the constitutive activation of
receptor tyrosine kinases (26). In the present study, we investigated
the possibility that PDGF-R-independent activation of PI 3-K
constitutes an alternative pathway by which several new BPV-1 E5
mutants transform cells. We show that these new E5 mutants induce
tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of PI 3-K without significantly
activating the PDGF-R or the ras-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathway. Thus, it appears that the E5 oncoprotein utilizes an additional signaling pathway for activating PI 3-K and mediating cell
transformation that is independent of PDGF-R activation.
Generation and Maintenance of Cell Lines--
NIH 3T3 cells and
cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and
antibiotics (Life Technologies, Inc.). To analyze signal transduction
pathways in the absence of growth factors, 50% confluent cultures were
washed twice with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS) and
were incubated in DMEM containing 0.1% FBS for 20-24 h before experiments.
Stable NIH 3T3 cell lines expressing wt BPV-1 E5 and the E5 point
mutants Q17G, Q17S, L24A, and L26A were generated as described previously (14, 27) by geneticin G418 selection of cells co-transfected with E5 DNA and the neomycin resistance-conferring plasmid, LNCX, at a
ratio of 9:1 (E5 DNA:LNCX) using
Ca3(PO4)3-DNA coprecipitation (28).
All E5 constructs were tagged at their N terminus with the 6-amino acid
AU1 epitope, which is recognized by the AU1 monoclonal antibody (29).
The presence of this epitope does not affect the biological activity of
E5 (27). Stable NIH 3T3 cell lines expressing the sis
oncogene were similarly transfected and selected using a
v-sis construct from J. Pierce (National Institutes of Health).
Proliferation Assays--
To assess the proliferation of
attached cells in defined media, 2 × 104 cells were
plated in 60-mm tissue culture dishes in 4 ml of DMEM containing 2.5%
FBS. After 24 h, 1 dish of each cell line was harvested using
trypsin/EDTA treatment and counted (Coulter Electronics) to determine
the initial cell density. The remaining cultures were washed with
D-PBS, and the medium was replaced with 4 ml of DMEM containing 0.5%
FBS (basal medium). To assay PDGF-dependent growth, basal
medium was supplemented with recombinant human PDGF BB (Life
Technologies, Inc.) at a final concentration of 20 ng/ml. Insulin-dependent growth was assayed in basal medium
supplemented with bovine insulin (Life Technologies, Inc.) at a final
concentration of 5 µg/ml. After 3 days in defined media, the cells
were harvested and counted as above to determine the final cell
density. Results are expressed as the percent increase in the number of
cells, which is 100 × (final density
To assay anchorage-independent growth, 1 ml of 0.3% agarose containing
1.7 × 103 cells was layered over 1 ml of 0.6%
agarose in 35-mm dishes. A sterile 3% agarose stock solution was
prepared in D-PBS and diluted to the above concentrations by mixing
with DMEM (minus phenol red) containing 10% FBS and antibiotics (Life
Technologies, Inc.). Cultures initially were overlaid with 0.5 ml of
this medium and were given further additions as necessary to prevent
desiccation for a period of 3-4 weeks.
Immunoprecipitation and Electrophoresis--
E5 expression was
analyzed by immunoprecipitating epitope-tagged E5 protein from 100-mm
tissue culture dishes of 80-90% confluent [35S]methionine-labeled cells using the AU1 monoclonal
antibody (Berkeley Antibody Co.) as described previously (9).
For anti-PDGF-R and anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitations, 150-mm
tissue culture dishes of 80-90% confluent cells were placed on ice
and washed with 25 ml of D-PBS containing 1 mM
Na3VO4. Cells were scraped into 0.9 ml of SDS
lysis buffer (0.4% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM
EDTA, 50 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.4) at room temperature and
were immediately heated for 10 min at 95 °C. The lysates were subjected to ultrasonic disruption (2 pulses of 10 s) using a Sonics and Materials, Inc. apparatus fitted with a microprobe. These
were then mixed with 0.1 ml of 20% (w/v) Triton X-100 and were
clarified by centrifugation for 5 min at 1000 × g. The
protein concentration of clarified lysates was determined using the
Bio-Rad DC protein assay with bovine IgG as the standard. Aliquots of lysates containing 0.8 mg of protein were mixed with 15 µl of protein
A-agarose beads (Pierce; ImmunoPure Plus) and 4 µg of affinity-purified anti-PDGF-R Immunoblotting--
For immunoblot analysis, cells from 100-mm
tissue culture dishes at 80-90% confluency were washed with 10 ml of
D-PBS and scraped into 0.3 ml of 2× SDS gel sample buffer. The lysates
were heated for 5 min at 95 °C and were subjected to ultrasonic
disruption, alkylation, and SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as
above. SDS gels were transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore) in a Bio-Rad Trans-Blot apparatus in (192 mM glycine, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3) at constant current (3200 mA × h
for 1.5 mm gels). Membranes were blocked for 30 min at room temperature
in WB (0.5% (w/v) Triton X-100, 140 mM NaCl, 10 mM Na3PO4, pH 7.4) containing 2% bovine serum albumin (ICN 81003) and were labeled for 90 min with primary antibody diluted in WB + 2% bovine serum albumin:
anti-PDGF-R
Anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblots were blocked for 2 h in TBS (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) containing 5%
(w/v) bovine serum albumin (Sigma, essentially fatty acid-free) and 1%
(w/v) ovalbumin (blocking buffer) and were labeled overnight at 4 °C with an antiphosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody (Upstate Biotechnology clone 4G10) at a concentration of 1 µg/ml in blocking buffer. The
immunoblots were washed 3 times with 20 ml of TBS (10 min/wash), labeled with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:5000 dilution in blocking buffer) for 90 min at room temperature, and washed with TBS again. Tyrosine-phosphorylated polypeptides were
detected by means of chemiluminescence.
PI 3-Kinase Assay--
PI 3-K activity was measured essentially
as described by Soltoff et al. (31). Briefly, cells from
150-mm tissue culture dishes at 80-90% confluency were washed twice
with 25 ml of buffer A (137 mM NaCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 20 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5) and scraped into 1 ml of lysis
buffer (buffer A containing 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1% (v/v) Nonidet
P-40, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.2 mM Na3VO4, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin) at 4 °C. After ultrasonic disruption and
clarification, tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were immunoprecipitated
from aliquots of lysates containing 0.5 mg of protein as described
above. Immunoprecipitates were washed 3 times with lysis buffer and 3 times with kinase assay buffer (100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM Na3VO4,
10 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.0). PI 3-K activity of the
immunoprecipitates was assayed by adding 5 µl of kinase assay buffer,
10 µl of 25 mM MgCl2, 250 µM
ATP, 1 mCi/ml [ Transforming E5 Mutants Are Defective for PDGF-R Activation and
Induction of Growth Factor Independence
To study how BPV-1 E5 oncoprotein mutants transform fibroblast
cell lines without activating the PDGF-R, we generated NIH 3T3 cell
lines that stably express wt BPV-1 E5 and the E5 point mutants Q17S,
L24A, L26A, and Q17G. Q17S E5, in which serine is substituted for
glutamine at position 17, transforms NIH 3T3 cells with 39% the
efficiency of wt E5 in a focus formation assay (27) but does not induce
PDGF-R tyrosine phosphorylation, indicative of receptor activation
(17). The L24A and L26A mutants, in which leucine residues at positions
24 and 26 of E5 are replaced with alanine, transform NIH 3T3 cells with
305% and 225% the efficiency of wt E5 but do not induce tyrosine
phosphorylation of the PDGF-R (14). As a negative control, we used Q17G
E5, in which glycine is substituted for glutamine at position 17. This
mutant does not transform NIH 3T3 cells (0% focus formation) (27) and
does not activate the PDGF-R (17). As shown in Fig.
1, wt and mutant E5 proteins were
expressed at similar levels in the cell lines. The expression of L24A
E5 was somewhat higher, and E5 was not detected in normal NIH 3T3
cells. In some experiments, we employed an NIH 3T3 cell line that
stably expresses the sis oncogene as a control. Constitutive
expression of the PDGF B-like sis gene product in these
cells causes transformation due to persistent activation of endogenous
PDGF-Rs (32, 33). E5 was not detected in the sis-expressing
cells (Fig. 1).
(PDGF-R). However, the recent discovery of E5
mutants that exhibit strong transforming activity but minimal PDGF-R
tyrosine phosphorylation indicates that E5 can potentially use
additional signal transduction pathway(s) to transform cells. We now
show that two classes of E5 mutants, despite poorly activating the PDGF-R, induce tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of
phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-K) and that this activation is
resistant to a selective inhibitor of PDGF-R kinase activity,
tyrphostin AG1296. Consistent with this independence from PDGF-R
signaling, the E5 mutants fail to induce significant cell proliferation
in the absence of PDGF, unlike wild-type E5 or the sis
oncoprotein. Despite differences in growth factor requirements,
however, both wild-type E5 and mutant E5 cell lines form colonies in
agarose. Interestingly, activation of PI 3-K occurs without concomitant
activation of the ras-dependent
mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. The known ability of
constitutively activated PI 3-K to induce anchorage-independent cell
proliferation suggests a mechanism by which the mutant E5 proteins
transform cells.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(PDGF-R) (10, 11), 16-kDa
pore-forming subunit of the vacuolar H+-ATPase (12), and an
-adaptin-like protein (13). The dimerization of E5 monomers appears
to trigger trans-phosphorylation and activation of associated PDGF-Rs
(10, 14-16). However, although PDGF-R activation undoubtedly
contributes to cellular transformation by wild-type (wt) E5,
transforming E5 mutants have been described that induce minimal PDGF-R
phosphorylation because they are defective in PDGF-R binding (14, 17)
or dimerization (14). The existence of two different classes of E5
mutants that lack a correlation between PDGF-R activation and cell
transformation indicates that there is an additional pathway(s) by
which E5 can transform cells.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
initial
density)/initial density. To analyze the contribution of PDGF-R
signaling to proliferation, the selective PDGF-R kinase inhibitor,
tyrphostin AG1296 (30), was added to cultures along with
Me2SO (final 0.5%) as the cells were shifted into basal
medium ± growth factors. A 5 mM stock solution of
AG1296 (Calbiochem or Alexis Biochemicals) was prepared in
Me2SO and stored as aliquots at
70 °C.
polyclonal antibody
(Calbiochem) or 4 µg of 5H1 anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody
(a gift of A. Burkhardt and J. Bolen) and were rotated end over end for 90 min at 4 °C. Subsequently, the beads were washed 3 times with 1 ml of modified radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1%
deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 20 mM MOPS-NaOH, pH 7.0) (5 min
rotating end-over-end per wash) and 3 times with 1 ml of D-PBS. Bound
proteins were eluted by incubating the beads in 40 µl of 1× SDS gel
sample buffer (3% SDS, 20 mM dithiothreitol, 1.5 mM EDTA, 11% sucrose, 0.008% bromphenol blue, 112 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8) for 20 min at 37 °C with occasional
vortex mixing. Samples were then alkylated by the addition of 80 mM iodoacetamide and incubation for 30 min at 37 °C.
Electrophoresis was performed in 1.5-mm polyacrylamide Tris-glycine
mini-gels (Novex) using alkylated molecular weight markers (Sigma).
Gels were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride
membranes and labeled with antibodies as outlined below.
rabbit polyclonal antibody at 2 µg/ml,
anti-PI 3-K (85 kDa subunit) rabbit polyclonal antibody at 1 µg/ml,
anti-Erk2 monoclonal antibody at 2 µg/ml (Upstate Biotechnology), or
anti-active MAPK (Erk1/Erk2) rabbit polyclonal antibody at 25 ng/ml
(Promega). Subsequently, membranes were washed 3 times with 20 ml of WB
(10 min/wash), labeled for 90 min with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated
goat anti-rabbit IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Tropix) in WB + 2% bovine serum albumin (1:5000 dilution), and washed 3 times with WB.
Labeled proteins were detected using the CDP-Star chemiluminescent
substrate (Tropix) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
-32P]ATP, 50 mM HEPES-NaOH,
pH 7.0; 20 µl of 0.5 mg/ml phosphatidylinositol (Avanti Polar Lipids)
in 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.015% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 10 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.0; and mixing continuously for 10 min
at room temperature. Assays were terminated by the addition of 60 µl
of 2 N HCl and 160 µl of chloroform-methanol (1:1)
followed by vortex mixing and centrifugation for 30 s in an
Eppendorf microcentrifuge. 50 µl of the lipid-containing organic
(lower) phase was spotted on Silica Gel 60 thin-layer chromatography
plates (Merck) that had been prechromatographed in 1% (w/v) potassium
oxalate and dried in a 70 °C oven. Samples were chromatographed for
30 min using chloroform/methanol/H2O/NH4OH
(60:47:11.3:2) as the solvent. Plates were air-dried, and
phosphorylated PI was detected by autoradiography at
70 °C with an
intensifying screen. PI and PI phosphate standards (Calbiochem) were
chromatographed in parallel with kinase assay samples and were
visualized by exposing the chromatography plates to I2 vapor.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Stable expression of E5 constructs in NIH 3T3
cell lines. Epitope-tagged E5 protein was immunoprecipitated from
exponentially growing cells labeled with [35S]methionine.
Equivalent amounts of cell protein were immunoprecipitated for each
lane using the AU1 monoclonal antibody and were resolved on
14% SDS gels. Molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicated on the
left.
PDGF-R Tyrosine Phosphorylation--
The ability of E5 mutants to
activate the PDGF-R was evaluated in the cell lines used in this study
by analyzing levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated PDGF-R in the
absence of exogenous growth factors. Initially, tyrosine-phosphorylated
proteins were immunoprecipitated from serum-starved cells and then were
immunoblotted to detect tyrosine-phosphorylated PDGF-Rs. For this
analysis, cells were lysed in the presence of SDS and immediately
boiled to avoid potential post-lysis phosphorylation/dephosphorylation
or proteolysis. Boiling in SDS also served to disrupt protein-protein
interactions, so that the anti-PDGF-R immunoblots reflected
tyrosine-phosphorylated PDGF-Rs rather than unphosphorylated PDGF-Rs
associated with tyrosine-phosphorylated protein(s). In addition, cells
were incubated with Na3VO4 for 10 min before
lysis to inhibit tyrosine phosphatases and optimize the detection of
tyrosine-phosphorylated PDGF-R on the immunoblots. As shown in Fig.
2A, serum-starved, control 3T3
cells exhibited basal levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated mature PDGF-R
(mPDGF-R), whereas cells stimulated with 10% FBS showed enhanced
tyrosine phosphorylation. In contrast, all other cell lines expressing either transformation-competent E5 constructs (wt, L26A, Q17S, or L24A)
or the transformation-defective Q17G E5 mutant showed levels of mPDGF-R
tyrosine phosphorylation that were comparable with control 3T3 cells.
As anticipated, although wt E5 did not increase tyrosine
phosphorylation of the mPDGF-R, it did induce significant tyrosine
phosphorylation of the immature PDGF-R (iPDGF-R) (Fig. 2A),
consistent with its primary localization in the Golgi apparatus (8). No
other E5 mutant induced significant phosphorylation of the iPDGF-R,
although L24A E5 did promote a very low level of phosphorylation
(Fig. 2A).
|
These results were further evaluated by performing the reverse experiment under the same experimental conditions, i.e. immunoprecipitation with anti-PDGF-R antibodies and labeling the immunoblot with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. As shown in Fig. 2B, a high level of mPDGF-R tyrosine phosphorylation was observed in normal 3T3 cells after the addition of 10% FBS, and an equally elevated level of iPDGF-R tyrosine phosphorylation was seen in the wt E5 cell line. Unstimulated 3T3 cells and mutant E5 cell lines exhibited very low levels of PDGF-R tyrosine phosphorylation. Increased PDGF-R tyrosine phosphorylation in the wt E5 cell line was not due to enhanced expression of the PDGF-R; in fact, these cells contained somewhat lower levels of the receptor (Fig. 2C). Therefore, as judged by tyrosine phosphorylation, activation of the mPDGF-R was induced only by serum, which is compatible with exogenous PDGF binding to cell-surface PDGF-Rs. Only wt E5 was able to induce significant phosphorylation of the iPDGF-R. In agreement with recent studies (14, 17), a number of transforming E5 mutants (L26A, Q17S, and L24A) induced only minimal phosphorylation of either the mPDGF-R or iPDGF-R.
Proliferation Assays--
To employ criteria other than
phosphorylation to demonstrate that the L26A, Q17S, and L24A
transforming E5 mutants do not significantly activate the PDGF-R, cell
lines expressing wt and mutant E5 proteins were tested for their
ability to proliferate in 20-fold reduced levels of growth factors. As
shown in Fig. 3A, normal NIH
3T3 cells increased in number by only 60% over a period of 3 days in
basal medium (DMEM + 0.5% FBS), and cells that expressed the
nontransforming Q17G E5 mutant increased by only 160%. When basal
medium was supplemented with recombinant PDGF, the number of 3T3 cells
and Q17G E5-expressing cells increased by 340% and 440%,
respectively. Moreover, the stimulation of cell proliferation by PDGF
was sensitive to tyrphostin AG1296, a selective inhibitor of PDGF-R
tyrosine kinase activity (30). 20 µM tyrphostin AG1296
reduced the proliferation of 3T3 cells and Q17G E5-expressing cells to
120% and 140%, respectively, which were similar to levels of
proliferation in the absence of PDGF (Fig. 3A). The
selectivity of tyrphostin AG1296 for the PDGF-R was demonstrated by its
relatively minor effect on insulin-stimulated proliferation in these
cell lines. 3T3 cells increased in number by 300%, and Q17G
E5-expressing cells increased by 350% in basal medium supplemented
with insulin. 20 µM tyrphostin AG1296 inhibited this
growth by only 33 and 26%, respectively (Fig. 3A).
|
In contrast to the control 3T3 and Q17G E5-expressing cells, wt E5 and sis cell lines grew well in basal medium; cells expressing wt E5 increased by 340%, and cells expressing sis increased by 370% (Fig. 3A). These increases were very similar to those of control 3T3 cells and Q17G E5-expressing cells in the presence of PDGF. Furthermore, the proliferation induced by wt E5 and sis was enhanced only slightly by PDGF (430% increase in cell number for wt E5 and 380% increase for sis) and was sensitive to tyrphostin AG1296 (120% and 110% increase in cell number in the presence of 20 µM inhibitor) (Fig. 3A). The fact that tyrphostin AG1296 reduced the proliferation of wt E5- and sis-expressing cells to levels characteristic of control cells in basal medium (i.e. 3T3 and Q17G E5 cells) confirmed that wt E5 and sis enable proliferation in basal medium due to their activation of the PDGF-R.
The proliferation in basal medium of cell lines expressing the transforming L26A, Q17S, and L24A E5 mutants was strikingly similar to that of control cells that do not activate the PDGF-R (Fig. 3A). Cells expressing L26A E5 increased in number by 40%, which was less than the proliferation of normal 3T3 cells. Q17S E5- and L24A E5-expressing cells increased by 140%, which was less than the proliferation of cells that expressed the nontransforming Q17G E5 mutant. The slowed proliferation of these cells in basal medium, however, was not the consequence of a general defect in cell growth, since the L26A E5 and L24A E5 cell lines multiplied at the same rate as normal 3T3 cells, Q17G E5 expressers, and sis-expressing cells in medium containing 10% FBS (Fig. 3B). Cells expressing Q17S E5 multiplied at even a slightly higher rate (Fig. 3B). The results of these proliferation assays are therefore in agreement with the analysis of PDGF-R tyrosine phosphorylation and indicate that among the E5 constructs employed in this study only wt E5 significantly activates the PDGF-R.
The identity of mitogenic signal(s) responsible for the partially enhanced proliferation of Q17G E5-expressing cells relative to normal NIH 3T3 cells in basal medium (additional 100% increase in cell number) is not known. Regardless, this signaling does not induce PDGF-R tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 2, A and B) and does not lead to transformation, since the Q17G E5 mutant is nontransforming in focus formation assays.
Transforming E5 Mutants Confer Anchorage Independence
Although the L26A, Q17S, and L24A E5 mutants have previously been
shown to induce foci in NIH 3T3 cells (14, 27), they do not
significantly activate the PDGF-R or support growth factor-independent proliferation. To determine whether these mutants can induce additional characteristics of the transformed phenotype, we evaluated their ability to promote anchorage-independent growth (Fig.
4). In soft agar, cells expressing the
nontransforming Q17G E5 mutant generated relatively few small colonies,
whereas cells expressing wt E5 formed many colonies, both small and
large in size. The L26A and L24A E5 cell lines also formed many small
and large colonies. The transforming Q17S E5 mutant triggered an
increase predominantly in the number of small colonies compared with
the Q17G E5 control (Fig. 4). In summary, transforming E5 mutants that
are defective for PDGF-R activation are unable to induce growth
factor-independent proliferation but can induce
anchorage-independent proliferation.
|
E5 Does Not Constitutively Activate the Erk/MAPK Signal Transduction Pathway
Numerous growth and differentiation signals initiate a protein phosphorylation cascade in which activated Ras triggers the sequential activation of Raf, MAPK kinase (MEK), and the 44 kDa and 42 kDa MAPKs, Erk1, and Erk2 (34-36). Since constitutively active forms of Ras, Raf, and MEK are oncogenic (34, 35, 37-39), we asked whether transforming E5 mutants might directly or indirectly activate component(s) of the Erk/MAPK signal transduction pathway, leading to the constitutive activation of Erk1 and Erk2.
The activation of Erk1 and Erk2 involves their phosphorylation (by MEK)
on proximal N-terminal threonine and tyrosine residues (40). Levels of
active Erk1/Erk2 can be quantified on immunoblots using antibodies
raised against a doubly phosphorylated peptide corresponding to the Erk
phosphorylation site (41). As shown in Fig.
5A, active Erk1/Erk2 were not
detectable on immunoblots of serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells but were
readily detected 10 min after 10% FBS was added to the cells (compare
the first and second lanes). There was no evidence of Erk
activation in serum-starved cells expressing wt E5 (third
lane), demonstrating that wt E5 does not constitutively
activate these kinases to levels associated with acute serum-induced
signaling. Active Erk1/Erk2 also were not detected in exponentially
growing 3T3 cells in the continuous presence of 10% FBS (fourth
lane). Immunoblots labeled with an antibody that recognizes
Erk2 irrespective of its phosphorylation state showed that these same
samples contained equal amounts of Erk2 protein (lower panel
of Fig. 5A).
|
To detect lower levels of Erk activation in exponentially growing and serum-starved cells, it was necessary to increase the amount of phosphorylated Erk1 and Erk2 on the immunoblots. Treatment of serum-starved 3T3 cells with Na3VO4 (to inhibit tyrosine dephosphorylation) and okadaic acid (to inhibit serine/threonine dephosphorylation) for 10 min before lysis made possible the detection of active Erk1/Erk2 (Fig. 5A; compare the second and sixth lanes). As expected, cells grown in the continuous presence of 10% FBS and treated with these same inhibitors for 10 min showed even higher levels of Erk activation (fifth lane). The ability to detect active Erk1/Erk2 in serum-starved 3T3 cells now permitted an analysis of the effects of the various E5 mutants on Erk phosphorylation (upper panel of Fig. 5B). Treatment of serum-starved cells expressing wt or mutant E5 constructs with Na3VO4 and okadaic acid demonstrated that Erk activation was identical in all cell lines tested. Thus, none of the transforming E5 constructs (including wt E5) constitutively activate the Erk/MAPK signaling pathway as determined by the phosphorylation state of Erk1 and Erk2.
Transforming E5 Mutants Activate PI 3-K
Heterodimeric PI 3-K is a critical component of signal transduction pathways that are involved in the mitogenic response to various growth factors and in oncogenic transformation (18, 19). In rodent fibroblasts, expression of constitutively active PI 3-K in the presence of serum is sufficient to induce characteristics of cellular transformation, including anchorage-independent growth (25). Given our finding that transforming E5 mutants do not activate Erk/MAPK signaling, studies were undertaken to ascertain whether or not these oncoproteins activate PI 3-K signaling.
PI 3-K Tyrosine Phosphorylation--
The activation of
heterodimeric PI 3-K often involves phosphorylation of the 85-kDa
regulatory subunit (p85) on tyrosine (23, 24, 42, 43). Therefore, we
measured levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated p85 in serum-starved 3T3
cell lines expressing wt and mutant E5 proteins to screen for possible
effects of E5 on PI 3-K activity. Tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were
immunoprecipitated from cell lysates, and the immunoprecipitates were
probed for p85 on immunoblots. As with our analysis of PDGF-R
phosphorylation, lysates were boiled in SDS to disrupt protein-protein
interactions before immunoprecipitation so that anti-p85 immunoblots
would not contain unphosphorylated p85 that was associated with another
tyrosine-phosphorylated protein(s). This technique proved to be
quantitative within a defined range of protein concentrations, since
the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated p85 that was detected increased
linearly with increasing quantities of lysate (Fig.
6A).
|
Tyrosine-phosphorylated p85 was readily detected in serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells 10 min after adding FBS (Fig. 6B, first lane) but was present at a 10-fold lower level if FBS was not added (second lane). Tyrosine phosphorylation of p85 also was detected in cells expressing the sis oncogene (fifth lane). These results are consistent with the well documented activation of PI 3-K by the PDGF-R tyrosine kinase (23, 24, 43). The nontransforming Q17G E5 mutant (third lane) did not increase p85 tyrosine phosphorylation in serum-starved cells (12% of the FBS-stimulated level); however, wt E5 (fourth lane) induced tyrosine phosphorylation of p85 to nearly the same level as FBS (84% of the FBS-stimulated level). Most importantly, we found that transforming E5 mutants that were defective for PDGF-R activation nevertheless induced tyrosine phosphorylation of p85 in the absence of growth factors (sixth to eighth lanes). Serum-starved cell lines expressing L26A E5, Q17S E5, or L24A E5 contained tyrosine-phosphorylated p85 at 51, 22, or 130% of the FBS-stimulated level, respectively. These values represent a 2-13-fold increase in p85 tyrosine phosphorylation relative to control 3T3 cells and Q17G E5-expressing cells. The total amount of p85 present in each of the cell lines varied by at most 16% (Fig. 6C) and therefore could not account for the much greater variation in levels of tyrosine phosphorylated p85.
To further clarify the role of PDGF-R activation in E5-induced PI 3-K activation, serum-starved cell lines expressing wt E5 or L26A E5 were treated with 0.3-3 µM tyrphostin AG1296 for 60 min before lysis and analysis of tyrosine phosphorylated p85. Tyrphostin AG1296 previously has been shown to completely inhibit PDGF-R kinase activity in intact Swiss 3T3 cells and in isolated cell membranes at these concentrations (30). As indicated in Fig. 6D, 3 µM tyrphostin AG1296 decreased p85 tyrosine phosphorylation by 70% in wt E5-expressing cells, suggesting that a component of PI 3-K activation in these cells is the consequence of PDGF-R activation. However, 3 µM tyrphostin AG1296 had no effect on the tyrosine phosphorylation of p85 in cells expressing L26A E5. Thus, E5 mutants that cannot significantly activate the PDGF-R, such as L26A E5, apparently activate PI 3-K by a separate, tyrphostin-insensitive mechanism. It is also likely that the residual (30%) tyrphostin-resistant activity of wt E5 indicates utilization of the same alternative pathway to PI 3-K activation.
PI 3-K Activity--
In vitro lipid kinase assays were
performed to determine whether E5-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of
the PI 3-K p85 regulatory subunit indeed reflected increased PI 3-K
activity. Tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were immunoprecipitated from
serum-starved cells and tested for their ability to phosphorylate
exogenous PI in the presence of [
-32P]ATP. As
expected, essentially no PI kinase activity was detected in control NIH
3T3 cells or in cells expressing the nontransforming Q17G E5 mutant
(Fig. 7A, second and third
lanes). When PDGF-R-signaling pathways were activated by
adding FBS to the medium (first lane) or by constitutive
expression of wt E5 (fourth lane) or the sis oncogene (fifth lane), 32P-labeled PI phosphate
was increased. However, since Ras activates PI 3-K independently of p85
phosphorylation (22), it is not surprising that the addition of serum,
which rapidly activates Ras, elevated PI 3-K activity to a greater
extent than p85 tyrosine phosphorylation. An elevated level of PI 3-K
activity also was present in cells expressing the L26A, Q17S, and L24A
E5 mutants that do not activate the PDGF-R (sixth through eighth
lanes). These results show that a number of transforming E5
mutants induce phosphorylation and activation of heterodimeric PI 3-K
by means of a pathway that does not require activation of the
PDGF-R.
|
The independence of PI 3-K activation from PDGF-R signaling in L26A
E5-expressing cells was further evidenced by its insensitivity to
tyrphostin AG1296. PI 3-K activity in these cells was not affected by
treatment with 0.3-3 µM tyrphostin AG1296 for 60 min
before lysis, whereas identical tyrphostin AG1296 treatment of wt
E5-expressing cells partially lowered levels of PI 3-K activity (Fig.
7B). These results are in agreement with the effects of
tyrphostin AG1296 on p85 tyrosine phosphorylation induced by wt and
L26A E5 (Fig. 6D) and support the view that wt E5 utilizes
both PDGF-R-dependent and PDGF-R-independent mechanisms to
activate PI 3-K.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two new classes of E5 oncoprotein mutants have been identified that are hypertransforming but show only minimal PDGF-R activation (14, 17). To investigate the mechanism of cell transformation by these mutants, we sought to identify other mitogenic signal transduction pathways that are constitutively activated in cell lines.
Transforming E5 Mutants Defective for PDGF-R Activation-- wt BPV-1 E5 induces trans-phosphorylation and activation of the PDGF-R by effectively cross-linking endogenous PDGF-R monomers via transmembrane interactions (10, 14-16). Nevertheless, E5 mutants that induce little or no receptor phosphorylation because they are defective for PDGF-R binding (Q17S, L21A, and L24A) or homodimerization (L7A, L25A, and L26A) can efficiently transform fibroblast cell lines (14, 17). In the current study, we show that members of both classes of transforming E5 mutants (Q17S, L24A, and L26A) not only fail to efficiently stimulate PDGF-R phosphorylation in NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 2) but also fail to functionally activate the PDGF-R in these same cells. Thus, the proliferation of cell lines that express Q17S E5, L24A E5, or L26A E5 requires PDGF and/or other growth factors, whereas cells that express wt E5 or the sis oncogene are relatively growth factor-independent (Fig. 3).
In contrast to our results with NIH 3T3 cells, Klein et al. (44) found that Q17S E5 increases PDGF-R phosphorylation 7-fold in a different murine cell line, C127. This discrepancy may derive from the use of different cell lines, since Q17S E5 has a 7.5-fold higher transformation efficiency in C127 cells than in NIH 3T3 cells (27). A similar biological disparity exists in murine hematopoietic cells. Although another Q17S E5 construct appears to activate the PDGF-R and induce interleukin-3 (IL-3)-independent proliferation when co-expressed with exogenous PDGF-Rs in Ba/F3 murine hematopoietic cells (44), our Q17S E5 mutant fails to induce IL-3-independent proliferation in 32D murine hematopoietic cells when co-expressed with the PDGF-R (17). It remains to be determined whether these opposite activities derive from different levels of E5 expression, from epitope-tagging of the protein, or from the use of different cell lines. Regardless of the results with Q17S E5, however, we have employed two additional E5 mutants that only minimally activate the PDGF-R yet exhibit a 2-3-fold increase in transforming activity relative to wt E5.
E5 Activates Heterodimeric PI 3-K Independently of PDGF-R Activation-- We have shown that PI kinase activity is present in anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates of serum-starved cells that express wt E5 or the Q17S-, L24A-, or L26A-transforming E5 mutants. In contrast, PI kinase activity is barely detectable in similar immunoprecipitates of serum-starved normal NIH 3T3 cells and control cells expressing the nontransforming Q17G E5 mutant. Therefore, three different transforming E5 mutants that are defective for PDGF-R activation are still able to activate a PI-kinase(s). PI-kinase activation appears to be constitutive since it occurs in serum-starved cells.
There is compelling evidence that the activated PI-kinase detected in our study is heterodimeric (p85/p110) PI 3-K, a key component of mitogenic signaling pathways (18, 19, 22, 24). Heterodimeric PI 3-K can phosphorylate PI (Fig. 7) as well as PI 4-phosphate and PI 4,5-bisphosphate and is present in anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates (Fig. 6), unlike PI 4-kinases and other classes of PI 3-Ks (18-20, 24, 45). Moreover, the activation of heterodimeric PI 3-K by the PDGF-R involves tyrosine phosphorylation of the p85 regulatory subunit (23, 24, 42, 43). We show that constitutive activation of the PDGF-R in cell lines that express wt E5 or the sis oncogene leads to increased PI kinase activity in anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates and to increased tyrosine phosphorylation of the PI 3-K p85 subunit on immunoblots. Activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (including the PDGF-R) by 10% FBS also elicits a concomitant increase in immunoprecipitable PI kinase activity and p85 tyrosine phosphorylation. Finally, increased tyrosine phosphorylation of the PI 3-K p85 subunit is correlated with the increased PI kinase activity induced by Q17S E5, L24A E5, and L26A E5, which do not significantly activate the PDGF-R.
Because heterodimeric PI 3-K can be directly activated by the PDGF-R, it appears that wt E5 induces PI 3-K activation via two signaling pathways: one in which PDGF-R activation is an intermediate step and another, which does not require PDGF-R activation. Transforming E5 mutants that are defective for PDGF-R activation have to activate PI 3-K via the latter pathway. This model is supported by our observation that the highly selective PDGF-R kinase inhibitor, tyrphostin AG1296, partially inhibits PI 3-K activation and tyrosine phosphorylation of the PI 3-K p85 subunit induced by wt E5 but does not inhibit PI 3-K activation and p85 tyrosine phosphorylation induced by L26A E5, which elicits little or no PDGF-R activation.
Mechanism of PI 3-K Activation by E5 Mutants-- It has been reported that expression of the BPV-1 E5 oncoprotein in NIH 3T3 cells constitutively activates Ras and elevates levels of PI 3-K activity present in anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) immunoprecipitates (26). Although Ras can activate heterodimeric PI 3-K (22), it seems unlikely that Ras is involved in the activation of PI 3-K by the transforming E5 mutants that we have studied. Typically, Ras activates the Erk/MAPK signaling pathway, which includes sequential activation of the Raf, MEK, and Erk protein kinases (34-36). We have not observed activation of Erk1 and Erk 2 in serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells that express mutant or wt E5 proteins. Since E5 is predominantly localized in membranes of the Golgi apparatus (8) and Ras-mediated activation of Raf occurs at the plasma membrane (37, 46), cellular compartmentalization may prevent the downstream activation of MEK and Erk. More importantly, Ras activation of PI 3-K involves the GTP-dependent interaction of Ras with the PI 3-K p110 catalytic subunit and does not result in tyrosine phosphorylation of the PI 3-K p85 regulatory subunit (22). Our finding that PI 3-K activation induced by wt E5 and the Q17S, L24A, and L26A E5 mutants is associated with increased tyrosine phosphorylation of the PI 3-K p85 subunit argues against Ras-mediated activation. Since E5 has no intrinsic protein kinase activity, this finding implies that the Q17S, L24A, and L26A E5 mutants activate a protein-tyrosine kinase other than the PDGF-R, which in turn activates PI 3-K by phosphorylating p85.
Receptor tyrosine kinases other than the PDGF-R are known to activate PI 3-K, including the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor, EGF-R, and insulin receptor (19, 24), and could potentially explain the ability of the PDGF-R-independent E5 mutants to transform cells. However, a number of results argue against a role for these kinases in PI 3-K activation by E5. 1. Goldstein et al. (15) show that the co-expression of wt BPV-1 E5 and the PDGF-R causes IL-3-independent proliferation in 32D murine hematopoietic cells that normally require IL-3 for growth. In contrast, IL-3-independent proliferation was not observed when the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor or EGF-R were co-expressed with wt E5, indicating that E5 does not activate these receptors. NIH 3T3 cells have approximately 10% as many EGF-Rs as PDGF-Rs (47, 48), and the addition of EGF to serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells increases PI 3-K activity in anti-EGF-R immunoprecipitates by only 45% (26). In our study, E5 mutants that are defective for PDGF-R activation increase PI 3-K tyrosine phosphorylation up to 13-fold. 3. PI 3-K activation by the insulin receptor does not involve tyrosine phosphorylation of the PI 3-K p85 subunit but rather is a direct result of p85 binding to distinct, tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin-receptor substrate proteins (19, 49). E5 mutants that are deficient in PDGF-R activation do not support growth factor-independent proliferation in basal medium. Growth factor-independent proliferation does occur in cells where the PDGF-R is constitutively activated due to the expression of wt E5 or the sis oncogene. If alternative growth factor receptors were activated by E5 mutants, one might expect reduced growth factor requirements in these cells. However, despite these reservations, additional experiments will be required to definitively rule out the participation of alternative receptor tyrosine kinases. PI 3-K has also been detected in complexes with numerous nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, including focal adhesion kinase, Src, Fyn, Lyn, Abl, and Lck (50-55). These interactions can lead to the activation of PI 3-K (50, 52, 54), although tyrosine phosphorylation of the PI 3-K p85 subunit is not obligatory (50, 52).
Interestingly, the transforming activity of wt E5 and the PDGF-R-independent E5 mutants correlates with their ability to alkalinize the lumen of the Golgi apparatus in NIH 3T3 cells. Ratio-imaging experiments using a pH-sensitive fluorescent probe selectively targeted to the Golgi apparatus indicate that E5 inhibits acidification of the Golgi lumen by the vacuolar H+-ATPase.2 Inactivation of the vacuolar H+-ATPase presumably results from binding interactions between its 16-kDa pore-forming subunit and E5 (12). Further investigation will be necessary to determine whether or not an alkalinized Golgi compartment, pH 7.0, can lead to the activation of a protein kinase that in turn phosphorylates the p85 subunit of PI 3-K.
PI 3-K Activation Is Correlated with Anchorage-independent Growth-- We have shown that wt E5, which constitutively activates the PDGF-R and PI 3-K, causes the proliferation of NIH 3T3 cells to become independent of growth factors and attachment, whereas transforming E5 mutants that constitutively activate PI 3-K, but not the PDGF-R, confer anchorage independence only. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that the Q17S, L24A, and L26A E5 mutants activate PI 3-K without activating any receptor tyrosine kinases, since inducible expression of a constitutively active PI 3-K mutant in rat embryo fibroblasts promotes anchorage-independent growth but does not eliminate the growth factor requirement for proliferation (25). PI 3-K activation is sufficient to cause serum-starved cells to enter S phase of the cell cycle, but progression through the entire cell cycle additionally requires growth factor receptor signaling (25). It may be that PI 3-K activation abrogates anchorage requirements for proliferation because anchorage normally is required for the activation of PI 3-K in response to growth factors (57).
Constitutive activation of the focal adhesion kinase and Abl tyrosine
kinases, and Rho and Cdc42 small G-proteins, leads to cell
proliferation that is anchorage-independent but growth
factor-dependent (58). It is likely that some of these
signaling proteins may confer anchorage independence by activating PI
3-K, whereas others may be downstream targets of PI 3-K that are
important for enabling anchorage-independent growth (18, 19, 50, 54).
Since anchorage-independent growth is closely correlated with
tumorigenicity in animal models (59) and transient expression of
constitutively active PI 3-K promotes carcinoma invasion (56),
dissecting the effect of the E5 oncoprotein on PI
3-K-dependent signaling pathways may provide valuable
insights into normal cell proliferation and neoplasia.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank J. Pierce for the v-sis construct and A. Burkhardt and J. Bolen for the generous gift of 5H1 anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody. We also thank B. Duckworth for helpful advice on PI 3-K assays.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Support for this project was provided by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1CA53371 (NCI) (to R. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
This author made significant contributions to this study.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3900 Reservoir Rd., NW, Washington, DC 20007. Tel.: 202-687-1704; Fax: 202-687-8934; E-mail: schleger@gusun.georgetown.edu.
2 Schapiro, F., Sparkowski, J., Adduci, A., Suprynowicz, F., Schlegel, R., and Grinstein, S. (2000) J. Cell Biol., in press.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
BPV-1, bovine
papillomavirus type 1;
PDGF-R, platelet-derived growth factor receptor
;
mPDGF-R, mature PDGF-R;
iPDGF-R, immature PDGF-R;
wt, wild-type;
PI 3-K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase;
MEK, MAPK kinase;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
D-PBS, Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline;
MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
Erk, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
IL-3, interleukin-3;
EGF-R, epidermal growth factor receptor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Lancaster, W. D.,
and Olson, C.
(1982)
Microbiol. Rev.
46,
191-207 |
| 2. | Schwarz, E., Freese, U. K., Gissmann, L., Mayer, W., Roggenbuck, B., Stremlau, A., and zur Hausen, H. (1985) Nature 314, 111-114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Yee, C., Krishnan-Hewlett, I., Baker, C. C., Schlegel, R., and Howley, P. M. (1985) Am. J. Pathol. 119, 361-366[Abstract] |
| 4. | Dvoretzky, I., Shober, R., Chattopadhyay, S. K., and Lowy, D. R. (1980) Virology 103, 369-375[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Lowy, D. R., Dvoretzky, I., Shober, R., Law, M. F., Engel, L., and Howley, P. M. (1980) Nature 287, 72-74[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Tada, A.,
Sekine, H.,
Yamamoto, T.,
Fuse, A.,
and Simizu, B.
(1989)
J. Gen. Virol.
70,
1593-1599 |
| 7. | Chen, E. Y., Howley, P. M., Levinson, A. D., and Seeburg, P. H. (1982) Nature 299, 529-534[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Burkhardt, A., Willingham, M., Gay, C., Jeang, K.-T., and Schlegel, R. (1989) Virology 170, 334-339[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Sparkowski, J., Anders, J., and Schlegel, R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3055-3063[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Drummond-Barbosa, D. A., Vaillancourt, R. R., Kazlauskas, A., and DiMaio, D. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2570-2581[Abstract] |
| 11. |
Petti, L.,
and DiMaio, D.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6736-6740 |
| 12. | Goldstein, D. J., Finbow, M. E., Andresson, T., McLean, P., Smith, K., Bubb, V., and Schlegel, R. (1991) Nature 352, 347-349[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Cohen, B. D.,
Lowy, D. R.,
and Schiller, J. T.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6462-6468 |
| 14. |
Adduci, A. J.,
and Schlegel, R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10249-10258 |
| 15. |
Goldstein, D. J.,
Li, W.,
Wang, L.-M.,
Heidaran, M. A.,
Aaronson, S.,
Shinn, R.,
Schlegel, R.,
and Pierce, J. H.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
4432-4441 |
| 16. |
Lai, C. C.,
Henningson, C.,
and DiMaio, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15241-15246 |
| 17. | Sparkowski, J., Mense, M., Anders, J., and Schlegel, R. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 2420-2430[Abstract] |
| 18. | Carpenter, C. L., and Cantley, L. C. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1288, 11-16 |
| 19. | Shepherd, P. R., Withers, D. J., and Siddle, K. (1998) Biochem. J. 333, 471-490 |
| 20. | Toker, A., and Cantley, L. C. (1997) Nature 387, 673-676[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Cantley, L. C., Auger, K. R., Carpenter, C., Duckworth, B., Graziani, A., Kapeller, R., and Soltoff, S. (1991) Cell 64, 281-302[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Downward, J. (1997) Adv. Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res. 31, 1-10[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Kaplan, D. R., Whitman, M., Schaffhausen, B., Pallas, D. C., White, M., Cantley, L., and Roberts, T. M. (1987) Cell 50, 1021-1029[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Soltoff, S. P., Carpenter, C. L., Auger, K. R., Kapeller, R., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. C. (1992) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 57, 75-80[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Klippel, A.,
Escobedo, M.-A.,
Wachowicz, M. S.,
Apell, G.,
Brown, T. W.,
Giedlin, M. A.,
Kavanaugh, W. M.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5699-5711 |
| 26. |
Ghai, J.,
Ostrow, R. S.,
Tolar, J.,
McGlennen, R. C.,
Lemke, T. D.,
Tobolt, D.,
Liu, Z.,
and Faras, A. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
12879-12884 |
| 27. |
Sparkowski, J.,
Anders, J.,
and Schlegel, R.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
6120-6123 |
| 28. | Graham, F. L., and van der Eb, A. J. (1973) Virology 52, 456-467[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Lim, P. S., Jenson, A. B., Cowsert, L., Nakai, Y., Lim, L. Y., Jin, X. W., and Sundberg, J. P. (1990) J. Infect. Dis. 162, 1263-1269[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Kovalenko, M.,
Gazit, A.,
Bohmer, A.,
Rorsman, C.,
Ronnstrand, L.,
Heldin, C.-H.,
Waltenberger, J.,
Bohmer, F.-D.,
and Levitzki, A.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
6106-6114 |
| 31. |
Soltoff, S. P.,
Carraway, K. L., III,
Prigent, S. A.,
Gullick, W. G.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
3550-3558 |
| 32. | Waterfield, M. D., Scrace, G. T., Whittle, N., Stroobant, P., Johnson, A., Wasteson, A., Westermark, B., Heldin, C.-H., Huang, J. S., and Deuel, T. F. (1983) Nature 304, 35-39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Doolittle, R. F.,
Hunkapiller, M. W.,
Hood, L. E.,
Devare, S. G.,
Robbins, K. C.,
Aaronson, S. A.,
and Antoniades, H. N.
(1983)
Science
221,
275-277 |
| 34. | Marshall, C. J. (1995) Cell 80, 179-185[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Waskiewicz, A. J., and Cooper, J. A. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 798-805[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Hunter, T. (1995) Cell 80, 225-236[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Leevers, S. J., Paterson, H. F., and Marshall, C. J. (1994) Nature 369, 411-414[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Mansour, S. J.,
Matten, W. T.,
Hermann, A. S.,
Candia, J. M.,
Rong, S.,
Fukasawa, K.,
Vande Woude, G. F.,
and Ahn, N. G.
(1994)
Science
265,
966-970 |
| 39. | Cowley, S., Paterson, H., Kemp, P., and Marshall, C. J. (1994) Cell 77, 841-852[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Payne, D. M., Rossomando, A. J., Martino, P., Erickson, A. K., Her, J.-H., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D. F., Weber, M. J., and Sturgill, T. W. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 885-892[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Khokhlatchev, A.,
Xu, S.,
English, J.,
Wu, P.,
Schaefer, E.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11057-11062 |
| 42. | Carpenter, C. L., and Cantley, L. C. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 11147-11156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Kazlauskas, A. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 5-14[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Klein, O.,
Polack, G. W.,
Surti, T.,
Kegler-Ebo, D.,
Smith, S. O.,
and DiMaio, D.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
8921-8932 |
| 45. | Lopez-Ilasaca, M. (1998) Biochem. Pharmacol. 56, 269-277[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. | Stokoe, D., MacDonald, S. G., Cadwallader, K., Symons, M., and Hancock, J. F. (1994) Science 264, 1463-1467 |