![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 8, 5291-5296, February 25, 2000
,
, and
From the Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie,
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria, § Institut für Medizinische
Chemie und Biochemie, Universität Innsbruck, Fritz-Pregl-Stra
e
3, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria, and ¶ Vascular Biology Center,
Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (type III)
(eNOS) was reported to form an inhibitory complex with the bradykinin
receptor B2 (B2R) from which the enzyme is released in an active form
upon receptor activation (Ju, H., Venema, V. J., Marrero, M. B., and Venema, R. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24025-24029). Using a synthetic peptide derived from the known
inhibitory sequence of the B2R (residues 310-329) we studied the
interaction of the receptor with purified eNOS and neuronal
nitric-oxide synthase (type I) (nNOS). The peptide inhibited formation
of L-citrulline by eNOS and nNOS with IC50
values of 10.6 ± 0.4 µM and 7.1 ± 0.6 µM, respectively. Inhibition was not due to an
interference of the peptide with L-arginine or
tetrahydrobiopterin binding. The NADPH oxidase activity of nNOS
measured in the absence of L-arginine was inhibited by the
peptide with an IC50 of 3.7 ± 0.6 µM,
but the cytochrome c reductase activity of the enzyme was
much less susceptible to inhibition (IC50 >0.1
mM). Steady-state absorbance spectra of nNOS recorded
during uncoupled NADPH oxidation showed that the heme remained oxidized
in the presence of the synthetic peptide consisting of amino acids
310-329 of the B2R, whereas the reduced oxyferrous heme complex was
accumulated in its absence. These data suggest that binding of the B2R
310-329 peptide blocks flavin to heme electron transfer.
Co-immunoprecipitation of B2R and nNOS from human embryonic kidney
cells stably transfected with human nNOS suggests that the B2R may
functionally interact with nNOS in vivo. This interaction
of nNOS with the B2R may recruit the enzyme to allow for the effective
coupling of bradykinin signaling to the nitric oxide pathway.
Nitric oxide (NO)1 is a
signaling molecule that is synthesized from L-arginine and
O2 by nitric-oxide synthases (NOS, EC 1.14.13.39) that
exist in the three following isozymes (for a review see Refs. 1 and 2):
nNOS (type I), eNOS (type III), and inducible NOS (type II). nNOS and
eNOS are constitutively expressed and Ca2+-dependent, whereas inducible NOS is
cytokine-inducible and Ca2+-independent. All three isozymes
are homodimers, with each subunit consisting of two domains, an
amino-terminal oxygenase domain containing a heme group and binding
sites for the substrate L-arginine and the cofactor
BH4 and a carboxyl-terminal reductase domain with binding
sites for NADPH and the flavins FAD and FMN. The two domains are joined
by a binding region for CaM that has a dual function, activating
electron transfer both from NADPH to the flavins and from the reductase
to the oxygenase domain (3). Although inducible NOS binds CaM in
nominally Ca2+-free solutions (<30 nM), free
Ca2+ in the micromolar range is essential for CaM binding
to the constitutive isozymes, so that a rise in intracellular free
Ca2+ is a key signal for ligand-induced activation of nNOS
and eNOS (for review see Ref. 1). In vascular endothelial cells, fluid shear stress triggers an alternative, apparently
Ca2+-independent pathway of eNOS activation (for review see
Refs. 4 and 5). Recent reports suggest that shear stress leads to
activation of protein kinase Akt (protein kinase B) (6), which
catalyzes phosphorylation of a specific serine residue of eNOS (S1179
in the human isoform) resulting in Ca2+-independent
activation of the enzyme (7, 8).
The Ca2+-dependent activation of eNOS in
response to ligands such as bradykinin also appears to involve a fairly
complex signaling cascade (for review see Ref. 9). Post-translational
amino-terminal fatty acylation targets eNOS to caveolae in the plasma
membranes of vascular endothelial cells and cardiac myocytes through a
direct inhibitory interaction of the enzyme with caveolin-1 and -3, respectively (10-12). Ligand-induced rises of intracellular
Ca2+ appear to promote a reversible
Ca2+/CaM-mediated dissociation of the inhibitory
eNOS-caveolin complex resulting in transient eNOS activation (13). The
ligand-induced dissociation of eNOS from caveolin might explain the
translocation of the enzyme from the plasma membrane to cytosolic
stuctures in response to stimulation of endothelial cells with
bradykinin (14-16). However, a recent report demonstrated that eNOS
forms an inhibitory complex with the B2R from which the active enzyme is released in a Ca2+-dependent manner upon
receptor activation (17), presumably because of tyrosine
phosphorylation of the eNOS interacting region of the B2R (18).
In vitro binding assays with glutathione
S-transferase fusion proteins corresponding to various
domains of the B2R and functional studies with synthetic peptides
identified the inhibitory eNOS binding site of the receptor as amino
acid residues 310-329, in intracellular domain 4 (17). Although eNOS
dissociation from the receptor was
Ca2+-dependent, the inhibitory B2R peptides had
no effect on Ca2+/CaM binding (17), excluding a reciprocal
regulation of the enzyme by B2R/CaM as described for the caveolin cycle
(19). More recently, similar interactions of eNOS have been described with intracellular domain 4 of other G-protein-coupled receptors, such
as the angiotensin II AT1 and endothelin-1 ETB
receptors but not with the ATP P2Y2 receptor
(18). Thus, the reversible inhibitory interaction of eNOS with
G-protein-coupled receptors appears to be a widespread signaling
mechanism linking receptor activation to endothelial NO formation.
The present study was designed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of
NOS inhibition by B2R binding. For this purpose, we studied how a
synthetic peptide corresponding to the sequence of the B2R interaction
site affects the enzymatic activities and structural properties of
purified eNOS and nNOS. It is shown that enzyme inhibition is most
likely a consequence of peptide binding in close proximity to the
prosthetic heme group, resulting in impaired reductive activation of
molecular oxygen. The B2R peptides inhibited eNOS and nNOS with similar
potency, indicating that both isoforms might interact with the receptor
in cells. This hypothesis was corroborated in co-immunoprecipitation
experiments performed with HEK 293 cells stably overexpressing human
nNOS.
Materials--
Rat nNOS was purified from recombinant
baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells as described previously (20, 21).
L-[2,3,4,5-3H]arginine hydrochloride (57 Ci/mmol) was from American Radiolabeled Chemicals Inc., purchased
through Humos Diagnostica GmbH (Maria Enzersdorf, Austria).
BH4 was obtained from Dr. B. Schircks Laboratories, Jona,
Switzerland.
3'-(6R)-5,6,7,8-[3H]Tetrahydro-L-biopterin
(14 Ci/mmol) was synthesized enzymatically from
[8,5'-3H]GTP as described previously (22). Human nNOS and
eNOS cDNA clones were generous gifts from Dr. John Parkinson
(Berlex Biosciences, Richmond, CA). NADPH was purchased from Pharma
Waldhof GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany). Monoclonal anti-B2R antibody
(Clone 20, mouse) was obtained from Transduction Laboratories
(Lexington, KY) and peroxidase-conjugated anti-IgG antibodies and the
enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection kit were from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Polyclonal anti-nNOS antibodies were raised
in rabbits against purified recombinant rat nNOS. Synthetic peptides
were obtained from the Medical College of Georgia Biochemistry Core
Facility and were >95% pure as determined by high performance liquid
chromatography (17). The EasySelect Pichia expression kit
was from Invitrogen, purchased through Bio-Trade (Vienna, Austria).
Other materials for molecular biology were from New England Biolabs,
Life Technologies, Inc., and Qiagen. Myoglobin (product number M1882),
carbonic anhydrase (product number C4831), and all other chemicals were
from Sigma.
Expression and Purification of Human eNOS--
Recombinant human
eNOS was expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris as described
elsewhere in detail.2
Briefly, human wild type eNOS cDNA was cloned into the expression vector pPICZA (EasySelect Pichia expression kit,
Invitrogen). The final DNA construct was linearized with
PmeI, and the DNA was transformed into the yeast
P. pastoris KM71. An overnight culture (30 °C)
was inoculated from a single colony in 10 ml of buffered minimal
glycerol medium, buffered minimal glycerol medium containing 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6), 13.4 g/liter yeast nitrogen
base without amino acids, 0.4 mg/liter biotin, 40 mg/l L-histidine, 1% glycerol (v/v). The next day this culture
was used to inoculate 750 ml of buffered minimal glycerol medium
(1:200), and the culture was grown overnight at 30 °C to an
A600 of 4-6. The cells were then harvested and resuspended
in 150 ml of buffered minimal methanol medium, containing 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6), 13.4 g/liter yeast nitrogen
base without amino acids, 400 µg/liter biotin, 40 mg/liter
L-histidine, 5% methanol (v/v)) in the presence of 4 mg/liter hemin chloride and incubated for 24 h at 30 °C to
induce protein expression. Yeast cells were then harvested, resuspended
in 50 mM Tris/HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 12 mM 2-mercaptoethanol,
1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM CHAPS,
and homogenized by vigorous vortexing with glass beads (0.5 mm).
Following removal of the glass beads, the homogenate was centrifuged at
30,000 × g for 15 min to yield a supernatant used for
protein purification by affinity chromatography as described previously
for bovine eNOS (23). The final elution performed was with 20 mM Tris/HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 100 mM
NaCl and 4 mM EGTA. The enzyme was stored at Transfection of HEK 293 Cells with Human nNOS--
A HEK 293 cell line stably expressing human nNOS was established according to a
protocol that will be described elsewhere in
detail.3 Briefly, the
pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen), which contains the neomycin resistance
cassette and the cDNA for human nNOS, was used. Plasmid DNA was
prepared for transfection by linearization with PvuI, followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. HEK
293 cells were transfected at 40% confluence with 5 µg of linearized
plasmid DNA using SuperFect (Qiagen) or Tfx-50 (Promega). The cells
were replated 48 h after transfection at 0.5-1 × 106 cells per plate in 100 mm plates in medium containing 1 mg/ml G418. After 10-12 days, isolated colonies of resistant cells
were tested for activity, and the HEK/nNOS line was maintained in 250 µg/ml G418.
Determination of Enzyme Activities--
NOS activity was
determined as formation of
L-[2,3,4,5-3H]citrulline from
L-[2,3,4,5-3H]arginine (25). Incubations were
for 10 min at 37 °C in 0.1 ml of 50 mM
triethanolamine/HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mM
L-[2,3,4,5-3H]arginine (~80,000
counts/min), 0.5 mM CaCl2, 10 µg/ml CaM, 0.2 mM NADPH, 10 µM BH4, 5 µM FAD, 5 µM FMN, 0.2 mM CHAPS.
CaM-dependent NADPH:oxygen and NADPH:cytochrome
c oxidoreductase activities of nNOS and eNOS were determined
spectrophotometrically in the absence of L-arginine as
described previously (26, 27).
NOS Steady-state Absorption Spectra--
The spectral identity
of the nNOS steady state during NADPH oxidation was investigated by
rapid-scan spectroscopy with a Bio-Sequential SX-17MV Stopped-Flow
spectrofluorimeter (Applied Photophysics, Leatherhead, UK). Samples
were illuminated with an ozone-free 150-Watt xenon lamp and detected
with a photodiode array, equipped with a 200-730-nm grating. Final
conditions were as follows: 1.0 µM nNOS, 15 µM NADPH, 7.5 µM (125 µg/ml) CaM, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 50 mM potassium
Pi (pH 7.4), 0.2 mM CHAPS, 2.4 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, ± 0.3 mM B2R 310-329, at 25 °C. All
reagents were premixed in one syringe except for potassium
Pi, which was present in both syringes, and CaM, which was
used to start the reaction and was added to the second syringe only. To
obtain difference spectra, the pre-mixing spectra, representing the
average of the spectra recorded separately for the contents of the two
syringes, were subtracted from the spectra recorded subsequent to the
addition of CaM.
BH4 Binding--
Radioligand binding studies
using [3H]BH4 as high affinity ligand were
performed as described previously with minor modifications (28, 29).
For saturation binding, nNOS (0.5 µg) was incubated for 10 min at
37 °C in 0.1 ml of a 50 mM triethanolamine/HCl buffer (pH 7.4) with 10 nM [3H]BH4
(~14 nCi) and increasing concentrations of unlabeled BH4 (0-10 µM) in the absence and presence of 30 µM B2R 310-329 peptide, followed by rapid vacuum
filtration with the MultiScreen assay system from Millipore and
determination of the radioactivity retained on the filters by liquid
scintillation counting. Data were corrected for nonspecific binding
determined in the presence of 1 mM unlabeled BH4.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting--
10 confluent
100-mm Petri dishes of HEK 293 cells overexpressing nNOS were washed
with phosphate-buffered saline, harvested, and centrifuged for 5 min at
1,300 revolutions/min. The pellet was washed with phosphate-buffered
saline and homogenized in 1 ml of chilled Tris buffer (20 mM) (pH 7.4) containing 2.5 mM EDTA and 1%
Triton X-100 for 15 min at 4 °C. The homogenate was centrifuged at
10,000 × g for 25 min at 4 °C. Anti-nNOS antiserum
(400 µl) or anti-B2R antibody (50 µl) were then added to the lysate
(400 and 100 µl for precipitation with anti-nNOS and anti-B2R
antibodies, respectively) and rocked for 2 h at 4 °C, followed
by addition of Tris buffer-equilibrated protein A-Sepharose (400 and 50 µl for precipitation with anti-nNOS and anti-B2R antibodies,
respectively) and rocking for another 3.5 h at 4 °C.
Precipitates and supernatants were separated by centrifugation. The
pellets were washed twice with chilled buffer (50 mM
Tris/HCl (pH 8.0), 500 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100),
suspended in 60 µl of Laemmli buffer, and boiled for 5 min at
95 °C, followed by electrophoresis on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels as
described (30). The separated proteins were transferred to
nitrocellulose membranes by electroblotting for 90 min at 240 mA,
followed by immunodetection with anti-B2R (1:3,000 dilution) or
anti-nNOS (1:5,000 dilution) antibodies, using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG, respectively, and
the enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Statistics and Data Evaluation--
All affinity constants
(EC50, IC50, Km, and
KD) as well as Bmax and
Vmax values were obtained by non-linear
regression analyses of individual experiments followed by the
calculation of arithmetic mean values. Unless otherwise indicated, data
are given as means ± S.E. of three independent experiments.
A synthetic peptide corresponding to the sequence of the B2R-eNOS
interaction site (B2R 310-329) (17) inhibited the catalytic activity
of purified recombinant eNOS and nNOS in the arginine to citrulline
conversion assay with IC50 values of 10.6 ± 0.4 and
7.1 ± 0.6 µM, respectively (Fig.
1). Similar results were obtained with a
slightly longer peptide corresponding to the same region of the
receptor (B2R 310-334), whereas two peptides derived from other
sequences of the B2R (330-341 and 348-364) had no effects (data not
shown). The effects of the synthetic peptide on enzyme kinetic
parameters of eNOS and nNOS are summarized in Table
1. Although the maximal activities of
both isozymes were significantly reduced by the B2R 310-329 peptide
(10 µM), there was no significant effect on the
Km values for L-arginine, indicating
that the peptide did not compete with substrate binding.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
70 °C in
the presence of 1 mM CHAPS. Protein was determined with the
Bradford method using bovine serum albumin as a standard protein
(24).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effects of the B2R 310-329 peptide on the
formation of L-citrulline by eNOS (A) and
nNOS (B). Purified recombinant eNOS and nNOS
(0.1-0.2 µg each) were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in 0.1 ml of
50 mM triethanolamine/HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mM L-[2,3,4,5-3H]arginine, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 10 µg/ml CaM, 0.2 mM
NADPH, 10 µM BH4, 5 µM FAD, 5 µM FMN, and 0.2 mM CHAPS in the presence of
the indicated concentrations of the B2R peptide. Data are the mean
values ± S.E. of three experiments.
Enzyme kinetic parameters determined in the absence and presence of B2R
310-329 peptide (10 µM)
In a previous study we observed that the potency of an inhibitory
peptide decreased dramatically with increasing NOS concentrations, rendering it impossible to study the mechanism of enzyme inhibition using biochemical methods requiring protein concentrations >50 nM (31). However, this effect was much less pronounced with B2R 310-329. As shown in Fig.
2A, the inhibitory effect of
the peptide (~75% inhibition at 30 µM) was not
affected when the concentration of eNOS was increased from 15 to 225 nM, although a significantly higher potency of the peptide
was apparent at the lowest NOS concentration tested (7.5 nM). Similarly, inhibition of nNOS was not very sensitive to protein concentration. The enzyme inhibition produced by 30 µM B2R 310-329 decreased from about 80% to 60% with
nNOS concentrations increasing from 6.3 to 190 nM (Fig.
2B)
|
It appeared conceivable that inhibition of NOS was due to an interference of the peptide with the shuttle of electrons from NADPH to the heme. This electron transport chain, which is catalyzed by the flavins FAD and FMN upon binding of Ca2+/CaM, can be assayed as CaM-dependent cytochrome c reductase activity of both nNOS (3, 27) and eNOS (23). At concentrations producing almost maximal NOS inhibition (50-100 µM), the B2R peptide had no effect on the reductase activities of either eNOS or nNOS. Although a significant inhibition of cytochrome c reduction was observed at higher peptide concentrations (data not shown), these results suggested that the inhibition of L-citrulline formation cannot be explained by an interference of the peptide with electron transport or CaM binding.
Based on these observations, it appeared likely that the B2R 310-329
peptide interfered with NADPH oxidation and/or heme reduction. The
NADPH oxidase activity of NOS, which becomes apparent when nNOS or eNOS
are activated with Ca2+/CaM in the absence of
L-arginine or BH4, results in reduction of
O2 to superoxide/H2O2 at the cost
of NADPH. This uncoupled NADPH oxidation is catalyzed at significant
rates by nNOS (32, 33) and human eNOS,2 whereas the
reaction is down-regulated in other isozymes (23, 34, 35), most likely
because the heme reduction potential remains below the critical value
of
291 mV in the absence of substrate and pterin (36). As shown in
Fig. 3, nNOS exhibited an NADPH oxidase
activity of 1.51 ± 0.004 µmol × min
1 × mg
1, which was inhibited by the B2R peptide with an
IC50 of 3.7 ± 0.6 µM. Similarly, the
NADPH oxidase activity of human eNOS (200 ± 40 nmol × µmol × min
1 × mg
1) was inhibited
to 28.9 ± 5.31% of controls in the presence of 0.1 mM of the peptide.
|
Together with the lack of effect on electron transfer, inhibition of
uncoupled NADPH oxidation suggested that the B2R peptide blocked
reduction of the heme or prevented subsequent binding and reductive
activation of O2 (37). To address this issue, we studied
the effect of the B2R 310-329 peptide on the NOS steady-state absorbance spectrum during uncoupled NADPH oxidation by rapid-scan spectroscopy. Mixing 1 µM nNOS and 15 µM
NADPH with 7.5 µM CaM in the presence of
CaCl2 caused rapid bleaching of the NADPH absorbance at 340 nm, corresponding to an oxidation rate of 1.35 µM NADPH s
1. When the same experiment was performed in the
presence of 0.3 mM B2R 310-329, the oxidation rate was
slowed down (by about 70%) to 0.40 µM NADPH
s
1. The absolute spectra were dominated by the
absorbances of NADPH and the peptide and thus did not conclusively
reveal the identity of the nNOS steady state, although a shoulder at
~418 nm was apparent in the absence but not in the presence of the
peptide (not shown). Indeed, a pronounced increase of the absorbance at
424 nm, presumably due to accumulation of the oxyferrous complex
absorbing at 417 nm (38), was apparent in the difference spectra that
were obtained by subtracting the pre-mixing spectra from the
steady-state spectra recorded immediately (0.1 s) after the addition of
CaM (Fig. 4). In the presence of 0.3 mM B2R peptide, accumulation of the oxyferrous complex was
largely inhibited without appearance of other absorbing species. In
both cases, the steady-state spectra remained unchanged until the NADPH
was completely oxidized, followed by re-oxidation of the flavins (not
shown).
|
Pterin analogs (39-41) and other compounds (25) competing with
BH4 binding act as potent NOS inhibitors. Therefore,
several sets of experiments were carried out to test for a possible
interference of the B2R peptide with pterin activation of NOS. First,
NOS activity was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations
of BH4. As shown in Fig.
5A, pterin-free human
eNOS2 was activated by BH4 with an
EC50 value of 0.42 ± 0.084 µM to a
specific activity of 0.19 ± 0.01 µmol × min
1 × mg
1. In the presence of 30 µM B2R 310-329, maximal enzyme activity was reduced to
0.06 ± 0.001 µmol × min
1 × mg
1, and the EC50 of BH4
decreased to 0.142 ± 0.020 µM. A similarly non-competitive type of inhibition was obtained with nNOS. The EC50 values obtained in the absence and presence of 30 µM B2R 310-329 were 0.21 ± 0.010 and 0.25 ± 0.077 µM, respectively (Fig. 5B). Radioligand
binding studies using [3H]BH4 as high
affinity ligand of nNOS (28) yielded similar results. The
KD values obtained from saturation experiments
carried out in the absence and presence of B2R 310-329 were 134 ± 10 and 270 ± 30 nM, and the corresponding
Bmax values were 71 ± 6 and 63 ± 12 pmol bound per nmol of protein, respectively. Finally, low-temperature SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis experiments (23, 30) indicated
that the peptide (0.1 mM) did not affect the stability of
eNOS and nNOS dimers analyzed with or without
L-arginine/BH4 (data not shown).
|
Based on the observation that the B2R 310-329 peptide inhibited nNOS
with similar potency as eNOS, we speculated that nNOS might interact
with the B2R in cells as described previously for eNOS (17). To address
this issue, we performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments with a HEK
293 cell line constitutively expressing the B2R and stably
overexpressing human nNOS.3 With the anti-B2R antibody we
did not detect the 69-kDa band present in endothelial cells (17),
indicating that the receptor is predominantly expressed as
non-glycosylated protein in HEK cells. Immunoprecipitation was
performed with anti-nNOS or anti-B2R antibodies, followed by Western
blotting with anti-B2R and anti-nNOS antibodies, respectively. Fig.
6 shows that immunoprecipitation of nNOS
resulted in co-precipitation of the B2R (42 kDa; left panel), whereas immunoprecipitation of the B2R led to
co-precipitation of nNOS (160 kDa; right panel). These bands
were not detectable in precipitates obtained from identical samples
precipitated in the presence of buffer instead of the antibodies (data
not shown).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The amino acid residues 310-329 in the intracellular domain 4 of
the B2R were shown to form an inhibitory complex with eNOS in
endothelial cells (17). Using a synthetic peptide corresponding to the
inhibitory sequence of the B2R, we have now elucidated the mechanism by
which this interaction leads to NOS inhibition. We found that formation
of L-citrulline by both recombinant human eNOS and rat nNOS
was inhibited by similar concentrations of the peptide (3-30
µM), suggesting that the target site of NOS has been
conserved between the two constitutive isozymes. Our data indicate that
the interaction with the receptor does not affect the transfer of
electrons within the reductase domain. Because this electron shuttle is
essentially dependent on Ca2+/CaM binding (27, 42), it is
also unlikely that the inhibitory effect is due to a competition of the
peptide with CaM binding. However, we cannot exclude that such an
effect is responsible for the inhibition of cytochrome c
reduction observed at high (
0.1 mM) concentrations of the
peptide. The inhibition was most likely not due to an interference with
the binding or activity of BH4. Functional studies showed
that formation of L-citrulline resulting from endogenously
bound BH4 was inhibited by the peptide to a similar degree
as the maximal activity obtained with the pterin-saturated enzyme
(cf. Fig. 5). Despite small effects on the apparent binding
affinity of BH4, we obtained no conclusive evidence
supporting a BH4-competitive type of inhibition by the B2R
310-329 peptide. Moreover, the peptide had no effect on the stabilization of eNOS and nNOS dimers under denaturating conditions, further indicating that the inhibitory effect is unrelated to the
binding or activity of BH4.
With respect to the mechanism of inhibition, the most relevant information was obtained from the effects of the B2R peptide on nNOS steady-state absorbance spectra recorded during uncoupled NADPH oxidation. During NOS catalysis the heme is thought to cycle between Fe(III), Fe(II), Fe(II)O2, and a number of unstable species (38). The steady-state absorbance spectra reflect the relative concentrations of these species, with the oxidized and reduced enzyme absorbing at 394 and 412 nm, respectively. For the oxyferrous complex, absorbance maxima of 417 and 427 nm were reported (37, 38). Under control conditions, the steady-state absorbance spectrum exhibited a shoulder at 418 nm, whereas the absorbance difference spectrum was characterized by an increase in the aborbance at 424 nm, in accordance with previous observations (43). We ascribe these absorbance changes to the accumulation of the Fe(II)O2 complex accumulating during uncoupled NADPH oxidation. In the presence of the B2R 310-329 peptide (0.3 mM), which inhibited NADPH oxidation by about 70%, formation of the Fe(II)O2 complex was suppressed without appearance of another species, indicating that the heme was not reduced under these conditions. These data strongly suggest that the B2R 310-329 peptide affects NOS catalysis by interference with flavin-to-heme electron transfer.
Co-precipitation of the B2R and nNOS from HEK cell lysates under highly
stringent conditions adds the B2R to a number of other functional and
structural proteins that have been shown to interact with nNOS in both
neurons and skeletal muscle. These proteins include
1-syntrophin (44-46), postsynaptic density proteins
(45), the protein inhibitor of
nNOS, PIN (47), caveolin-3 (48), the carboxyl-terminal PD2
ligand of nNOS (49), the muscle isoform of phosphofructokinase (50),
and the N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype of
glutamate receptors (51). Except caveolin, which appears to interact
with as yet unidentified sites in the reductase and oxygenase domains
(52), most of these proteins bind to nNOS at its amino-terminal
extension containing a PDZ motif, which is found in various structural
proteins and may be important for scaffolding receptors, ion channels,
and enzymes engaged in specific signaling processes (53). Thus,
although the interacting site of NOS is not known, our data suggest
that the B2R is the first example of a cellular protein interacting
with nNOS via binding to the oxygenase domain in close proximity to the
catalytic center of the enzyme.
Considering the widespread occurrence and biological actions of
bradykinin in mammalian tissues, these results have considerable physiological implications. In addition to its actions as an
endothelium-dependent vasodilator, bradykinin has several
biological functions mediated by neuronal rather than endothelial NO.
For example, activation of neuronal NO/cGMP signaling by bradykinin was
suggested to be involved in the induction of pain (54, 55), penile
erection (56), noradrenaline release from cardiac sympathetic neurons (57), and neurogenic smooth muscle relaxation (58). Our results indicate that these processes are associated with a reversible interaction between the B2R and nNOS. This interaction may not only be
important to recruit NOS at the site where it is needed but may
additionally constitute an important cytoprotective mechanism. At
suboptimal levels of L-arginine or BH4 the
uncoupling of NADPH oxidation from L-arginine oxidation
results in the formation of the potent cytotoxins superoxide and
peroxynitrite by both eNOS (59-61) and nNOS (26, 32, 33, 62, 63). In
light of the important pathophysiological role of the NO/superoxide
reaction (64), formation of an inhibitory complex with the B2R, in
which the uncoupled reaction is fully blocked, could be protective
against endothelial dysfunction (65-68), stroke (69-72), and other
disease states promoted by inflammatory oxidative stress.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Eva Pitters and Margit Rehn for excellent technical assistance and Dr. Benjamin Hemmens for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Grants 13586-MED, 13013-MED (to B. M.), 12191-MED (to K. S.), and 13793-MOB (to E. R. W.) from the Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung in Austria.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of a doctoral scholarship from the Austrian Academy of Sciences.
Supported by Grants HL57201 and HL62152 from the National
Institutes of Health and by a grant-in-aid from the American Heart Association.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 43-316-380-5567; Fax: 43-316-380-9890; E-mail: mayer@kfunigraz.ac.at.
2 Leber, A., Hemmens, B., Klösch, B.,Goessler, W., Raber, G., Mayer, B., and Schmidt, K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37658-37664.
3 P. Andrew and B. Mayer, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: NO, nitric oxide; B2R, bradykinin receptor B2; B2R 310-329, synthetic peptide consisting of amino acids 310-329 of the B2R; CaM, calmodulin; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; HEK, human embryonic kidney; BH4, tetrahydrobiopterin; NOS, NO synthase; eNOS, endothelial NO synthase (type III); nNOS, neuronal NO synthase (type I).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Mayer, B., and Hemmens, B. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 477-481[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Stuehr, D. J. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1411, 217-230[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Abu-Soud, H. M.,
Yoho, L. L.,
and Stuehr, D. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32047-32050 |
| 4. | Fleming, I., Bauersachs, J., and Busse, R. (1997) J. Vasc. Res. 34, 165-174[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Busse, R., and Fleming, I. (1998) J. Vasc. Res. 35, 73-84[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Dimmeler, S.,
Assmus, B.,
Hermann, C.,
Haendeler, J.,
and Zeiher, A. M.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
83,
334-341 |
| 7. | Fulton, D., Gratton, J. P., McCabe, T. J., Fontana, J., Fujio, Y., Walsh, K., Franke, T. F., Papapetropoulos, A., and Sessa, W. C. (1999) Nature 399, 597-601[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Dimmeler, S., Fleming, I., Fisslthaler, B., Hermann, C., Busse, R., and Zeiher, A. M. (1999) Nature 399, 601-605[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Sase, K., and Michel, T. (1997) Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 7, 28-37 |
| 10. |
Feron, O.,
Belhassen, L.,
Kobzik, L.,
Smith, T. W.,
Kelly, R. A.,
and Michel, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22810-22814 |
| 11. |
Ju, H.,
Zou, R.,
Venema, V. J.,
and Venema, R. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18522-18525 |
| 12. |
Garcia-Cardena, G.,
Martasek, P.,
Masters, B. S. S.,
Skidd, P. M.,
Couet, J.,
Li, S. W.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Sessa, W. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25437-25440 |
| 13. |
Feron, O.,
Saldana, F.,
Michel, J. B.,
and Michel, T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3125-3128 |
| 14. |
Michel, T.,
Li, G. K.,
and Busconi, L.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6252-6256 |
| 15. | Venema, V. J., Marrero, M. B., and Venema, R. C. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 226, 703-710[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Prabhakar, P.,
Thatte, H. S.,
Goetz, R. M.,
Cho, M. R.,
Golan, D. E.,
and Michel, T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27383-27388 |
| 17. |
Ju, H.,
Venema, V. J.,
Marrero, M. B.,
and Venema, R. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24025-24029 |
| 18. | Marrero, M. B., Venema, V. J., Ju, H., He, H., Liang, H., Caldwell, R. B., and Venema, R. C. (1999) Biochem. J. 343, 335-340 |
| 19. |
Michel, J. B.,
Feron, O.,
Sacks, D.,
and Michel, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15583-15586 |
| 20. | Harteneck, C., Klatt, P., Schmidt, K., and Mayer, B. (1994) Biochem. J. 304, 683-686 |
| 21. | Mayer, B., List, B. M., Klatt, P., Harteneck, C., and Schmidt, K. (1996) Methods Enzymol. 268, 420-427[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Werner, E. R., Schmid, M., Werner-Felmayer, G., Mayer, B., and Wachter, H. (1994) Biochem. J. 304, 189-193 |
| 23. | List, B. M., Klösch, B., Völker, C., Gorren, A. C. F., Sessa, W. C., Werner, E. R., Kukovetz, W. R., Schmidt, K., and Mayer, B. (1997) Biochem. J. 323, 159-165 |
| 24. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Mayer, B., Klatt, P., Werner, E. R., and Schmidt, K. (1994) Neuropharmacology 33, 1253-1259[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Mayer, B., John, M., Heinzel, B., Werner, E. R., Wachter, H., Schultz, G., and Böhme, E. (1991) FEBS Lett. 288, 187-191[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Klatt, P.,
Heinzel, B.,
John, M.,
Kastner, M.,
Böhme, E.,
and Mayer, B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
11374-11378 |
| 28. |
Klatt, P.,
Schmid, M.,
Leopold, E.,
Schmidt, K.,
Werner, E. R.,
and Mayer, B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13861-13866 |
| 29. |
Riethmüller, C.,
Gorren, A. C. F.,
Pitters, E.,
Hemmens, B.,
Habisch, H. J.,
Heales, S. J. R.,
Schmidt, K.,
Werner, E. R.,
and Mayer, B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16047-16051 |
| 30. | Klatt, P., Schmidt, K., Lehner, D., Glatter, O., Bächinger, H. P., and Mayer, B. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3687-3695[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Mayer, B., Pitters, E., Pfeiffer, S., Kukovetz, W. R., and Schmidt, K. (1997) Nitric Oxide 1, 50-55[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Heinzel, B., John, M., Klatt, P., Böhme, E., and Mayer, B. (1992) Biochem. J. 281, 627-630 |
| 33. |
Pou, S.,
Pou, W. S.,
Bredt, D. S.,
Snyder, S. H.,
and Rosen, G. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
24173-24176 |
| 34. | Olken, N. M., Rusche, K. M., Richards, M. K., and Marletta, M. A. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 177, 828-833[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Feldman, P. L., Griffith, O. W., Hong, H., and Stuehr, D. J. (1993) J. Med. Chem. 36, 491-496[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Presta, A., Weber-Main, A. M., Stankovich, M. T., and Stuehr, D. J. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 9460-9465[CrossRef] |
| 37. |
Abu-Soud, H. M.,
Gachhui, R.,
Raushel, F. M.,
and Stuehr, D. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17349-17353 |
| 38. |
Bec, N.,
Gorren, A. C. F.,
Mayer, B.,
and Lange, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13502-13508 |
| 39. |
Klatt, P.,
Schmidt, K.,
Brunner, F.,
and Mayer, B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1674-1680 |
| 40. | Werner, E. R., Pitters, E., Schmidt, K., Wachter, H., Werner-Felmayer, G., and Mayer, B. (1996) Biochem. J. 320, 193-196 |
| 41. |
Bömmel, H. M.,
Reif, A.,
Fröhlich, L. G.,
Frey, A.,
Hofmann, H.,
Marecak, D. M.,
Groehn, V.,
Kotsonis, P.,
La, M.,
Koster, S.,
Meinecke, M.,
Bernhardt, M.,
Weeger, M.,
Ghisla, S.,
Prestwich, G. D.,
Pfleiderer, W.,
and Schmidt, H. H. H. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33142-33149 |
| 42. |
Abu-Soud, H. M.,
Feldman, P. L.,
Clark, P.,
and Stuehr, D. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32318-32326 |
| 43. |
Adak, S.,
Crooks, C.,
Wang, Q.,
Crane, B. R.,
Tainer, J. A.,
Getzoff, E. D.,
and Stuehr, D. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26907-26911 |
| 44. | Brenman, J. E., Chao, D. S., Xia, H. H., Aldape, K., and Bredt, D. S. (1995) Cell 82, 743-752[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. | Brenman, J. E., Chao, D. S., Gee, S. H., Mcgee, A. W., Craven, S. E., Santillano, D. R., Wu, Z. Q., Huang, F., Xia, H. H., Peters, M. F., Froehner, S. C., and Bredt, D. S. (1996) Cell 84, 757-767[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. |
Hashida-Okumura, A.,
Okumura, N.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Buijs, R. M.,
Romijn, H. J.,
and Nagai, K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11736-11741 |
| 47. |
Jaffrey, S. R.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1996)
Science
274,
774-777 |
| 48. |
Venema, V. J.,
Ju, H.,
Zou, R.,
and Venema, R. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28187-28190 |
| 49. | Jaffrey, S. R., Snowman, A. M., Eliasson, M. J. L., Cohen, N. A., and Snyder, S. H. (1998) Neuron 20, 115-124[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. |
Firestein, B. L.,
and Bredt, D. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10545-10550 |
| 51. |
Sattler, R.,
Xiang, Z. G.,
Lu, W. Y.,
Hafner, M.,
MacDonald, J. F.,
and Tymianski, M.
(1999)
Science
284,
1845-1848 |
| 52. |
Ghosh, S.,
Gachhui, R.,
Crooks, C.,
Wu, C. Q.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Stuehr, D. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22267-22271 |
| 53. | Kornau, H. C., Seeburg, P. H., and Kennedy, M. B. (1997) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 368-373[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 54. | Nakamura, A., Fujita, M., and Shiomi, H. (1996) Br. J. Pharmacol. 117, 407-412[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 55. | Holthusen, H. (1997) Pain 69, 87-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 56. | Teixeira, C. E., Moreno, R. A., Ferreira, U., Rodrigues-Netto, N., Jr., Fregonesi, A., Antunes, E., and De Nucci, G. (1998) Br. J. Urol. 81, 432-436[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 57. | Kurz, T., Tolg, R., and Richardt, G. (1997) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 29, 2561-2569[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 58. | Sheng, H., Ishii, K., Förstermann, U., and Murad, F. (1995) Lung 173, 373-378[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 59. |
Pritchard, K. A.,
Groszek, L.,
Smalley, D. M.,
Sessa, W. C.,
Wu, M. D.,
Villalon, P.,
Wolin, M. S.,
and Stemerman, M. B.
(1995)
Circ. Res.
77,
510-518 |
| 60. |
Vasquez-Vivar, J.,
Kalyanaraman, B.,
Martasek, P.,
Hogg, N.,
Masters, B. S. S.,
Karoui, H.,
Tordo, P.,
and Pritchard, K. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9220-9225 |
| 61. |
Xia, Y.,
Tsai, A. L.,
Berka, V.,
and Zweier, J. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25804-25808 |
| 62. |
Culcasi, M.,
Lafon-Cazal, M.,
Pietri, S.,
and Bockaert, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12589-12593 |
| 63. |
Pou, S.,
Keaton, L.,
Surichamorn, W.,
and Rosen, G. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9573-9580 |
| 64. | Beckman, J. S., and Koppenol, W. H. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 40, C1424-C1437 |
| 65. |
Cosentino, F.,
and Katusic, Z. S.
(1995)
Circulation
91,
139-144 |
| 66. | Katusic, Z. S. (1996) Free Radical Biol. Med. 20, 443-448[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 67. | Stroes, E., Kastelein, J., Cosentino, F., Erkelens, W., Wever, R., Koomans, H., Luscher, T., and Rabelink, T. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 99, 41-46[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 68. |
Cosentino, F.,
and Lüscher, T. F.
(1999)
Cardiovasc. Res.
43,
274-278 |
| 69. |
Estevez, A. G.,
Spear, N.,
Manuel, S. M.,
Radi, R.,
Henderson, C. E.,
Barbeito, L.,
and Beckman, J. S.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
923-931 |
| 70. |
Gonzalez-Zulueta, M.,
Ensz, L. M.,
Mukhina, G.,
Lebovitz, R. M.,
Zwacka, R. M.,
Engelhardt, J. F.,
Oberley, L. W.,
Dawson, V. L.,
and Dawson, T. M.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
2040-2055 |
| 71. | Endres, M., Scott, G., Namura, S., Salzman, A. L., Huang, P. L., Moskowitz, M. A., and Szabo, C. (1998) Neurosci. Lett. 248, 41-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 72. |
Eliasson, M. J. L.,
Huang, Z. H.,
Ferrante, R. J.,
Sasamata, M.,
Molliver, M. E.,
Snyder, S. H.,
and Moskowitz, M. A.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
5910-5918 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg, F. Marceau, W. Muller-Esterl, D. J. Pettibone, and B. L. Zuraw International Union of Pharmacology. XLV. Classification of the Kinin Receptor Family: from Molecular Mechanisms to Pathophysiological Consequences Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2005; 57(1): 27 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||