|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 8, 5591-5599, February 25, 2000
Protein Kinase C Activation Stimulates the Phosphorylation
and Internalization of the sst2A Somatostatin Receptor*
R. William
Hipkin ,
Yining
Wang, and
Agnes
Schonbrunn§
From the Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology,
University of Texas Health Sciences Center Houston,
Houston, Texas 77225
 |
ABSTRACT |
The sst2A receptor is expressed in the endocrine,
gastrointestinal, and neuronal systems as well as in many
hormone-sensitive tumors. This receptor is rapidly internalized and
phosphorylated in growth hormone-R2 pituitary cells following
somatostatin binding (Hipkin, R. W., Friedman, J., Clark, R. B., Eppler, C. M., and Schonbrunn, A. (1997) J. Biol.
Chem. 272, 13869-13876). The protein kinase C (PKC)
activator, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), also stimulates sst2A
phosphorylation. Here we examine the mechanisms and
consequences of PMA and agonist-induced sst2A phosphorylation. Like
somatostatin, both PMA and bombesin increased sst2A receptor phosphorylation within 2 min. The PKC inhibitor GF109203X blocked PMA-
and bombesin- stimulated sst2A phosphorylation, whereas stimulation by the somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 was unaffected. Agonist and PMA
each stimulated phosphorylation in two receptor domains, the third
intracellular loop and the C-terminal tail. Functionally, PMA
dramatically increased the internalization of the sst2A receptor-ligand complex. This PMA stimulation was blocked by GF109203X, whereas basal
internalization was unaffected. However, neither basal nor PMA-stimulated internalization was altered by pertussis toxin, whereas
both were blocked by hypertonic sucrose. Therefore PKC activation and
agonist binding stimulate sst2A phosphorylation by distinct mechanisms,
and PKC potentiates internalization of the sst2A receptor via
clathrin-coated pits. Thus, hormonal stimulation of PKC-coupled
receptors may provide a mechanism for regulating the inhibitory actions
of somatostatin in target tissue.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
For most G protein-coupled receptors, exposure to an agonist leads
to a decrease in receptor responsiveness (homologous desensitization) often coincident with internalization of surface receptors (for reviews
see Refs. 1 and 2). Additionally, agonist-independent or heterologous
desensitization may occur when hormonal activation of one receptor
reduces cellular responsiveness through a different receptor system
(3). Whereas homologous desensitization may be mediated by either G
protein-coupled receptor kinases
(GRKs)1 or second
messenger-dependent protein kinases, heterologous
desensitization is thought to involve only the latter. GRKs
preferentially phosphorylate the agonist-occupied receptor, increasing
its affinity for cytoplasmic arrestins, which disrupt receptor G
protein coupling and may also act as adaptors for receptor
internalization via clathrin-coated pits. In contrast, heterologous
desensitization can involve phosphorylation of unoccupied as well as
agonist-occupied receptors and may or may not be associated with
increased receptor internalization.
The somatostatin peptides (SRIF-14 and SRIF-28) regulate endocrine,
exocrine, immune, and neuronal function through binding to a family of
six G protein-coupled receptors (sst1, sst2A, sst2B, sst3, sst4, and
sst5) (4, 5). Expression of the SRIF receptor 2A subtype (sst2A) in the
central nervous system (6), the pituitary (7), the endocrine and
exocrine pancreas (8, 9), and the gastrointestinal tract (10) as well
as in a variety of neoplasms (11, 12) supports the contention that this
receptor isotype mediates many of the physiological and pathological
actions of SRIF. Thus, elucidation of the mechanisms involved in sst2A
receptor regulation has important implications in understanding SRIF function.
We previously showed that the sst2A receptor is rapidly desensitized,
internalized, and phosphorylated following agonist stimulation in GH-R2
cells, a pituitary cell line transfected to express high levels of this
receptor subtype (13). Moreover, incubation with the protein kinase C
activator, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) also produced a
dramatic increase in receptor phosphorylation (13). Although the signal
transduction pathways most potently and widely affected by the sst2A
receptor include inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and Ca2+
channels and stimulation of K+ channels (4, 5), recent
studies have shown sst2A stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis in
transfected COS-7 (14) and F4C1 pituitary cells
(15). Further, SRIF has been shown to increase inositol phosphate
levels in several tissues by activating endogenous SRIF receptors (16,
17). Our observation that PMA treatment stimulated sst2A receptor
phosphorylation within minutes led us to investigate the mechanism and
functional impact of protein kinase C activation on sst2A receptors. In
this report, we examined the involvement of protein kinase C in
homologous and heterologous sst2A receptor phosphorylation, identified
the regions of the receptor phosphorylated in response to agonist and
PMA, and determined the effect of PKC activation on receptor internalization.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Hormones and Supplies--
Cell culture media and G418 were
purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. and fetal bovine serum was from
JRH Biosciences (Lexiexa, KS). The generation and specificity of the
sst2A receptor antiserum (R2-88) has been described (18). Leupeptin,
pepstatin A, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, soybean trypsin inhibitor,
bacitracin, PMA, N-chlorosuccinimide, cyanogen bromide,
Nonidet P-40, and protein A were obtained from Sigma.
N-dodecyl- -D-maltoside was purchased from
Calbiochem. Pertussis toxin was purchased from List Biological
Laboratories, Inc. (Campbell, CA). Okadaic acid and GF109203X-HCl were
purchased from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA). Dowex AG 1-X8 anion
exchange resin (200-400 mesh, chloride format), Bradford reagent, and
reagents for electrophoresis and Western blotting were obtained from
Bio-Rad. Phosphate-free DMEM and [32P]orthophosphate were
purchased from ICN Biomedicals (Irvine, CA). [3H]inositol
(specific activity, 18.9 Ci/mmol) was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
All other reagents were of the best grade available and were purchased
from common suppliers.
Cell Culture--
The clonal GH4-R2.20 cell line, hereafter
referred to as GH-R2 cells, was generated by transfecting
GH4C1 pituitary tumor cells with the rat sst2A
receptor and was maintained in DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% newborn
calf serum as described previously (13). Experimental cultures were
used 2-7 days after seeding, with a medium change 18-24 h prior to
use. 32PO4-labeling experiments were carried
out with cells plated in 100-mm dishes, whereas receptor binding
experiments used cells plated in 35-mm wells.
Measurement of Inositol Phosphates--
GH-R2 cells were seeded
at a density of 2 × 105/35-mm plate and fed 2 days
later with DMEM/F12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells were
then labeled with 1 µCi/ml [3H]inositol in
inositol-deficient DMEM containing 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum for
24 h. The cells were washed twice with 1 ml HBSS buffer (118 mM NaCl, 4.6 mM KCl, 0.5 mM
CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 5.0 mM HEPES, 10 mM D-glucose) and
incubated with fresh HBSS containing 10 mM LiCl at 37 °C
for 20 min. Cells were then treated with the indicated reagents for 45 min at 37 °C. Cells were extracted with 5% of perchloric acid, and
[3H]inositol phosphates were extracted and purified on
Dowex anion exchange resin as described previously (19).
Cell Membrane Preparation--
GH-R2 cell membranes were
prepared as described previously (13). Briefly, cells were cooled on
ice, washed with, and scraped into cold phosphate-buffered saline (10 mM Na2HPO4, 150 mM
NaCl, pH 7.4) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM sodium
pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 0.1 mM
sodium orthovanadate, and 100 nM okadaic acid). Following
centrifugation, the cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml/dish
homogenization buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM
EDTA, 3 mM EGTA, pH 7.6) containing phosphatase inhibitors
and incubated on ice for 15 min. Following homogenization and a two
step centrifugation procedure, membranes were resuspended in cold
gly-gly buffer (20 mM glycylglycine, 1 mM
MgCl2, 250 mM sucrose, pH 7.2), snap frozen,
and stored at 70 °C until assay.
Purification of the Phosphorylated sst2A Receptor--
Metabolic
labeling of cells and subsequent immunoprecipitation of the sst2A
receptor was carried out as described previously (13). Briefly, cells
were incubated for 3 h in phosphate-free DMEM containing 1 mCi of
[32P]orthophosphate and 1% newborn calf serum. Following
treatment with various hormones or pharmacological agents, cells were
cooled, washed, and scraped into cold HEPES-buffered saline (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) containing
protease and phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 50 µg/ml bacitracin, 5 mM EDTA, 3 mM EGTA, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 0.1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, and 100 nM okadaic acid). Following centrifugation, cell pellets were solubilized with HEPES-buffered saline containing 4 mg/ml dodecyl- -maltoside and the aforementioned inhibitors (lysis buffer) for 60 min at 4 °C. The detergent lysates were centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min, and the
protein content of the supernatants was assessed by Bradford assay
(Bio-Rad).
The sst2A receptor was then partially purified from equal amounts of
soluble protein by lectin affinity chromatography using wheat germ
agglutinin-agarose (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and
immunoprecipitated with receptor antibody at a final dilution of 1:200
(13). Precipitated proteins were solubilized in sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 10%
2-mercaptoethanol (v/v), 6 M urea, pH 6.8) at 60 °C for
15 min and resolved on 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels
(SDS-PAGE).
Chemical Cleavage and Peptide Mapping of Phosphorylated sst2A
Receptor--
Phosphorylated receptor, immunoprecipitated from
32P-labeled GH-R2 cells, was located on dried SDS
acrylamide gels by autoradiography. The dried gel piece containing the
receptor was cut out and rehydrated for 10 min, and the receptor was
eluted by incubating the chopped gel in 1 ml of elution buffer (50 mM NH4HCO3 buffer, pH 7.8; 0.1% SDS (w/v), 0.5% 2-mercaptoethanol (v/v)) overnight at 30 °C with rocking. The eluted receptor was then precipitated with 12%
trichloroacetic acid using 20 µg of boiled RNase1 as carrier as
described previously (20). For cleavage at methionine residues, the
precipitated receptor was dissolved in 50 µl of 70% formic acid and
incubated with 100 mg/ml cyanogen bromide (CNBr) for 2 h at room
temperature (21). The sample was then frozen on dry ice and
lyophilized. For cleavage at tryptophan residues, the immunoprecipitate
was incubated with N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) using a
modification of the method described by Lischwe and Ochs (22). The
precipitated receptor was dissolved in 20 µl of urea, glacial acetic
acid, and water (1 g:1 ml:1 ml) and denatured by incubating at room temperature for 30 min. Following the addition of 20 µl of 50 mM NCS in urea, glacial acetic acid, and water, the sample
was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Another 20 µl of 50 mM NCS in urea, glacial acetic acid, and water is then
added, and the incubation is continued for an additional 30 min.
Following the addition of 1 ml of cold elution buffer, peptides were
precipitated with trichloroacetic acid as described above.
Phosphopeptides generated with CNBr or NCS were separated on a
discontinuous Tricine-urea SDS-PAGE system described by Schagger and
van Jagow (23) using a 16.5% acrylamide, 6 M urea
resolving gel. Following electrophoresis, the phosphopeptides are
electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane
as described previously (13) and analyzed using a PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics) (19). In some experiments, the C-terminal receptor peptide was identified by immunoblotting (13) with the R2-88 sst2A
receptor antiserum (1:10,000) (18).
Radioligand Binding and Internalization--
The somatostatin
analog [Tyr11]SRIF (Bachem, Torrance, CA) was
radioiodinated using chloramine T and subsequently purified by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography. Internalization of the receptor-bound ligand was examined using two experimental approaches differing in the temperature of radioligand binding. In both
paradigms, GH-R2 cells were washed with 37 °C binding buffer (F12
medium containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, and 5 mg/ml lactalbumin hydrolysate) and incubated in the absence or presence of
various pharmacological agents for the times indicated. In one
paradigm, approximately 150,000 cpm of
[125I-Tyr11]SRIF was added either without or
with 100 nM unlabeled SRIF, and the incubation was
continued at 37 °C for various times. Alternatively, following
incubation with the pharmacological agents, the cells were washed with
cold binding buffer and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h in fresh
buffer containing [125I-Tyr11]SRIF
( 150,000 cpm/ml) without or with 100 nM unlabeled SRIF, conditions in which equilibrium binding to cell surface receptors is
achieved. Following the binding reaction, the cells were washed with
cold buffer to remove unbound trace and then incubated for various
times at 37 °C in the continued absence or presence of pharmacological agents to allow internalization of the receptor-bound ligand.
Following internalization at 37 °C, cells were rinsed with cold
binding buffer and then incubated for 5 min in cold acidic glycine-buffered saline (100 mM glycine, 50 mM
NaCl, pH 3.0) to release a surface-bound ligand (13). After collecting
the acidic buffer, cells were dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH. The
radioactivity in both the glycine buffer (representing surface-bound
ligand) and the cell lysates (representing internalized ligand) was
then measured in a Amersham Pharmacia Biotech gamma spectrometer at an
efficiency of 75%. Specific binding was calculated as the difference between the amount of radioligand bound in the absence (total binding)
and presence of 100 nM SRIF (nonspecific binding).
Other Methods--
Protein A (Sigma) was covalently coupled to
CNBr-activated Sepharose B according to the manufacturer's
instructions (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Receptor phosphorylation was
quantitated using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) (19). Unless
otherwise indicated results of a representative experiment are shown;
all experiments were performed at least two times.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of Protein Kinase C Activation on sst2A Receptor
Phosphorylation--
Our previous studies showed that incubation of
GH-R2 cells with the protein kinase C activator PMA markedly stimulated
sst2A receptor phosphorylation (13). To determine whether this pathway was of physiological significance, we examined the effect of two hormones previously shown to activate phospholipase C in the parental line used to generate GH-R2 cells, namely GH4C1
cells. Surprisingly, incubation with 100 nM TRH did not
stimulate sst2A receptor phosphorylation in GH-R2 cells (data not
shown). However, further investigation showed that TRH did not increase
inositol phosphate formation in this cell line (Table
I). Because bombesin did induce a modest increase in inositol phosphate accumulation (Table I), we next incubated 32PO4-labeled cultures with this
peptide. Following detergent solubilization and partial purification by
lectin chromatography, the sst2A receptor was immunoprecipitated with a
specific receptor antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE, autoradiography,
and phosphoimaging. As shown in Fig. 1,
bombesin caused a time-dependent increase in sst2A receptor phosphorylation, which reached 1.8 ± 0.1 times the basal level after 5 min. Although this increase in phosphorylation was considerably less than that produced by a 5-min incubation with agonist or PMA
(7.3 ± 0.9 and 5.7 ± 0.5 fold, respectively), the
observation that bombesin rapidly stimulated sst2A receptor
phosphorylation showed that cross-talk does occur between the bombesin
and sst2A receptors.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of hormones on inositol phosphate formation in GH-R2 cells
GH-R2 cells were preequilibrated with 1 µCi/ml[3H]inositol
for 24 h and then incubated with 10 mM LiCl for 20 min. Cells were treated with the indicated hormones or agents for 45 min and then extracted with 5% perchloric acid. Total inositol
phosphates were quantitated as described under "Experimental
Methods."
|
|

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The effect of agonist, PMA, or bombesin on
sst2A receptor phosphorylation. Top,
32PO4-labeled GH-R2 cells were incubated in the
absence or presence of 200 nM PMA, 100 nM SMS,
or 100 nM bombesin for the times shown. Following detergent
solubilization and purification by lectin chromatography and
immunoprecipitation with receptor antiserum, proteins were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and phosphoimaging. Bottom, in two independent
experiments, receptor phosphorylation was quantitated by phosphoimage
analysis following a 5-min incubation with either no addition, SMS,
PMA, or bombesin (Mean ± range, n = 2).
|
|
Because bombesin produced a rather modest increase in sst2A receptor
phosphorylation, we further characterized the more robust PMA response.
To this end, 32PO4-labeled GH-R2 cells were
incubated with 200 nM PMA for various periods of time (Fig.
2, left panel) or with
different concentrations of PMA for 15 min (Fig. 2, right
panel). PMA-stimulated receptor phosphorylation was half-maximal
at about 5 min, maximal by 15 min, and maintained through 30 min of
incubation (Fig. 2, left panel). Increased receptor
phosphorylation was evident upon incubation with 5 nM PMA
and was concentration-dependent (EC50 50 nM) reaching a maximum at 100 nM PMA (Fig. 2,
right panel). Thus, sst2A receptor phosphorylation depends
on both the concentration and duration of PMA exposure.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The time course and dose response for PMA
stimulation of sst2A receptor phosphorylation.
32PO4-labeled GH-R2 cells were incubated either
with 200 nM PMA for the times shown (left) or
with the indicated concentrations of PMA for 15 min (right).
Following detergent solubilization and purification by lectin
chromatography and immunoprecipitation, proteins were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and phosphoimaging. Data shown are representative of two
independent experiments.
|
|
The Role of Protein Kinase C in sst2A Receptor
Phosphorylation--
We used two different approaches to assess the
role of PKC in agonist- and PMA-induced sst2A receptor phosphorylation.
To determine whether the sst2A receptor was coupled to phospholipase C
in GH-R2 cells, we measured the effect of the sst2 receptor selective
analog, SMS 201-995 (SMS) on [3H] inositol phosphate
accumulation. SMS produced a small, but reproducible increase in IP
formation (Table I), suggesting that it could lead to PKC activation in
GH-R2 cells.
We next assessed the role of PKC in PMA and
agonist-dependent sst2A receptor phosphorylation using the
selective PKC inhibitor GF109203X (24).
32PO4-labeled GH-R2 cells were preincubated in
the presence or absence of 4 µM GF109203X for 15 min
prior to a 5-min incubation with no additions, 100 nM SMS,
or 200 nM PMA. The data in Fig.
3 show that GF109203X abolished
PMA-induced sst2A receptor phosphorylation but had no effect on SMS
stimulation. Bombesin-stimulated receptor phosphorylation was also
blocked by GF109203X (data not shown). Thus PMA- and
bombesin-stimulated sst2A receptor phosphorylation are mediated by
activation of PKC, whereas agonist-stimulated phosphorylation is
not.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The effect of protein kinase C inhibition on
agonist- and PMA-stimulated receptor phosphorylation.
32PO4-labeled GH-R2 cells were incubated in the
absence or presence of 4 µM GF109203X for 15 min prior to
the addition of 100 nM SMS, 200 nM PMA, or no
agent. Following an additional 5 min of incubation, the sst2A receptor
was purified and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphoimaging. The
top shows an autoradiogram from a representative experiment.
The bottom shows the amount of receptor phosphorylation
measured in two independent experiments by phosphoimaging (mean ± range).
|
|
Despite the differences in mechanism, phosphorylation in response to
PMA and SRIF may occur at common sites on the receptor. With the
expectation that two agents, which produced receptor phosphorylation at
identical sites, should not have an additive effect, we measured the
increase in sst2A receptor phosphorylation produced by maximal
concentrations of both SRIF and PMA. As shown in Fig.
4, the increase in
32PO4 incorporated into the sst2A receptor
following incubation with both 100 nM SRIF and 200 nM PMA was close to the sum of the 32PO4 incorporation produced by treatment with
the two agents individually. This observation suggests that agonist-
and PMA-stimulated sst2A receptor phosphorylation occur on at least
partly distinct residues.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Additivity of sst2A receptor phosphorylation
in response to agonist and PMA.
32PO4-labeled GH-R2 cells were incubated either
with no additions, 100 nM SRIF for 15 min, 200 nM PMA for 20 min, or PMA for 5 min followed by both PMA
and SRIF for the subsequent 15 min. After detergent solubilization and
purification by lectin chromatography and immunoprecipitation, proteins
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by either autoradiography
(top) or phosphoimaging (bottom, mean ± range of two independent experiments).
|
|
Mapping the Sites of sst2A Receptor Phosphorylation--
We
previously demonstrated that basal-, agonist-, and PMA-stimulated sst2A
receptor phosphorylation occur primarily on serine and, to a small
extent, on threonine residues (13). However, to determine the
functional consequences of sst2A receptor phosphorylation, the
phosphorylation sites on the receptor must first be identified. We
therefore used peptide mapping to characterize the intracellular regions of the sst2A receptor that were phosphorylated.
Chemical cleavage of the receptor at methionine residues with CNBr is
predicted to generate 11 peptides, four of which encompass intracellular regions containing serine and threonine residues (Fig.
5A). CNBr cleavage of the
sst2A receptor immunoprecipitated from cells treated with 100 nM SRIF generated a single phosphorylated band between 8 and 9 kDa (Fig. 6, top panel).
Based on the predicted molecular masses of the expected peptide
products, this band could contain peptides from either the third
intracellular loop (8924 Da) or the C-terminal tail of the receptor
(8509 Da). We did not detect phosphopeptides at molecular masses
predicted for either the C-terminal peptide from the first
intracellular loop (2197 Da) or the peptide from the second
intracellular loop (2980 Da). CNBr cleavage of a basally phosphorylated
receptor or receptor phosphorylated in response to treatment with 200 nM PMA also produced a single phosphorylated band between 8 and 9 kDa (data not shown).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Peptide fragments expected from cleavage of
the sst2A receptor by CNBr and NCS. The structure of the rat sst2A
receptor is shown schematically with serine and threonine residues in
the intracellular regions designated by filled circles. Incubation with
CNBr or NCS results in hydrolysis of proteins at methionine or
tryptophan residues, respectively. Cleavage of the rat sst2A receptor
with CNBr (top) is predicted to generate a terminal
methionine and eleven peptides, four of which contain potential
intracellular phosphate acceptor sites. Cleavage of the receptor with
NCS (bottom) is predicted to generate nine peptides, five of
which contain intracellular serines or threonines. Tables show the
predicted molecular masses of potential phosphopeptides for each
cleavage method.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Peptide mapping of the phosphorylated sst2A
receptor. 32PO4-labeled GH-R2 cells were
incubated for 15 min with either 100 nM SRIF
(top) or in the absence or presence of 100 nM
SRIF or 200 nM PMA (bottom). Following detergent
solubilization, lectin affinity chromatography, and
immunoprecipitation, proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Receptor was
localized by autoradiography and then eluted from the gel as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Eluted protein was hydrolyzed with
either 100 mg/ml CNBr or 50 mM NCS, and the resulting
peptides were resolved by Tricine-SDS-PAGE. Following transfer to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, phosphopeptides were detected by
phosphoimaging (right). The C-terminal receptor peptide was
subsequently identified by immunoblot analysis (left).
|
|
To directly localize the C-terminal tail receptor peptide, we
electrophoretically transferred the CNBr-generated cleavage products to
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and then immunoblotted with the
R2-88 receptor antibody, which recognizes a region in the C terminus
of the sst2A receptor (18). As can be seen in Fig. 6 (top
panel), a single immunoreactive peptide was detected at the
expected molecular weight. Further, the CNBr-generated immunoreactive
receptor peptide co-migrated with the phosphorylated band. Thus,
Western blot analysis of CNBr cleavage products confirmed that the
C-terminal tail of the receptor was a potential site for sst2A receptor
phosphorylation but could not distinguish phosphorylation within the
C-terminal and the third intracellular receptor domains.
To discriminate between the third intracellular loop and the C-terminal
regions of the receptor, we utilized NCS to hydrolyze the receptor
protein at tryptophan residues (22). Cleavage of the sst2A receptor
with NCS is predicted to generate nine peptides, five of which
represent intacellular regions of the receptor containing serine and
threonine residues (Fig. 5). NCS cleavage of the receptor immunoprecipitated from cells treated with no additions (basal phosphorylation), 100 nM SRIF, or 200 nM PMA
generated two discernable phosphopeptides of approximately 7 and 11 kDa
(Fig. 6, bottom right). On the basis of predicted molecular
masses, these peptides must represent the third intracellular loop
(7409 Da) and the C-terminal tail (11,030 Da) of the receptor.
Immunoblot analysis of the electrophoresed peptides (Fig. 6,
bottom panel) confirmed that the 11-kDa band contained the C
terminus of the receptor protein. We thus conclude that phosphorylation
of the sst2A receptor in response to PMA or agonist occurs on both the
third intracellular loop and C-terminal tail. However, the additive
phosphorylation response to these agents (Fig. 4) suggests that the
specific residues phosphorylated in these receptor regions are
different for the two stimuli.
Effect of PKC Activation on sst2A Receptor-Ligand
Internalization--
To investigate the functional consequences of
PKC-mediated receptor phosphorylation, we assessed the cellular
distribution of receptor-bound ligand following pretreatment of GH-R2
cells with PMA (Fig. 7). In one type of
experiment (Fig. 7, left panels), GH-R2 cells were
preincubated with 200 nM PMA for 15 min at 37 °C, prior
to the addition of [125I-Tyr11]SRIF.
Following continued incubation at 37 °C for the times shown, cells
were chilled and then treated with cold acidic glycine-buffered saline
to release surface-bound ligand. After collecting the acidic wash, the
cells were dissolved in base and the radioactivity in both the glycine
buffer, representing surface-bound ligand, and the cell lysates,
representing internalized ligand, were measured. As shown in Fig. 7
(upper left panel), a time-dependent
intracellular accumulation of receptor-bound ligand occurred in both
PMA-treated and -untreated cells. However, in the absence of PMA,
relatively little receptor-ligand internalization occurred during the
first two minutes of incubation even though radioligand binding at the cell surface was more than half-maximal. In two experiments there was
5.9 ± 0.25-fold more radioligand inside PMA-treated cells at 2 min than in untreated cells. Overall, PMA dramatically increased both
the rate and extent of [125I-Tyr11]SRIF
accumulation in cells and reduced the lag between radioligand binding
at the cell surface and internalization (Fig. 7, left panels).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The effect of PMA on the internalization of
the sst2A receptor-ligand complex. Left, following a
15-min incubation at 37 °C in the presence ( ) or absence ( ) of
200 nM PMA, GH-R2 cells were further incubated with
[125I-Tyr11]SRIF (150,000 cpm/ml) at 37 °C
for the times indicated. Right, after a 15-min treatment at
37 °C with ( ) or without ( ) 200 nM PMA, GH-R2
cells were incubated with [125I-Tyr11]SRIF
(150,000 cpm/ml) at 4 °C for 2 h. Cells were then washed to
remove unbound [125I-Tyr11]SRIF, warmed, and
further incubated at 37 °C in the continued presence or absence of
PMA. In both panels, cells were chilled at the times shown, washed to
remove unbound peptide, and incubated for 5 min at 4 °C with acidic
glycine-buffered saline to release surface-bound ligand. Following
removal of the glycine buffer, the cells were dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH.
Radioactivity was measured in both the cell lysates, representing
internalized ligand (top) and in the acid wash representing
surface-bound ligand (bottom). Data represent the specific
binding (mean ± S.E.) in triplicate samples in a representative
of three independent experiment.
|
|
In an alternate approach, cells were pretreated with or without 200 nM PMA as described above but the subsequent binding of [125I-Tyr11]SRIF was carried out at 4 °C
so that the receptor-ligand complex remained at the cell surface during
the binding incubation (Fig. 7, right panels). Following
removal of the unbound ligand in the medium, cells were incubated at
37 °C in the continued absence or presence of PMA to allow
redistribution of the receptor-ligand complex. At the times shown, the
surface-bound and internalized radioligand were measured as described
above. In this experimental paradigm, the rate of ligand binding is
separated from the measurement of internalization rates, because the
amount of radioligand prebound to the receptor is unaffected by the PMA
pretreatment. Again, there was a time-dependent
accumulation of the sst2A receptor-ligand complex in the intracellular
compartment (Fig. 7A, right top panel), and this
accumulation was paralleled by a decrease in surface binding (Fig.
7A, right bottom panel). PMA dramatically
stimulated the internalization of the receptor-bound ligand (Fig. 7,
right panels). The effect was greatest at early time points;
at 2 min there was 6.9 ± 1.1-fold (n = 3) more
internalized radioligand in PMA-treated than in untreated cells.
Together, these data demonstrate that incubation of GH-R2 cells with
PMA markedly stimulates both the initial rate and extent of sst2A
receptor-mediated internalization.
To determine whether the effect of PMA on internalization occurred
through activation of PKC, we preincubated cells in the presence or
absence of the selective PKC inhibitor, GF 109203X for 15 min prior to
a 5-min incubation with no additions or 200 nM PMA (Fig.
8). Under these conditions, GF 109203X
completely inhibits PMA-stimulated sst2A receptor phosphorylation with
no effect on phosphorylation of the receptor in response to agonist (Fig. 3). Cells were then chilled and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h
with [125I-Tyr11]SRIF and then warmed and
incubated at 37 °C in the continued absence or presence of 4 µM GF 109203X and PMA to allow internalization to occur.
PMA exposure again stimulated the intracellular accumulation of the
receptor-ligand complex. Although GF 109203X did not significantly affect [125I-Tyr11]SRIF internalization in
control cells, it abolished the increase in sst2A receptor
internalization in response to the phorbol ester (Fig. 8).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
The effect of protein kinase C inhibition on
PMA-stimulated internalization. GH-R2 cells were incubated in the
presence ( , ) or absence ( , ) of 4 µM
GF109203X at 37 °C for 15 min. After the addition of 200 nM PMA to some of the dishes ( , ), cells were
incubated for an additional 5 min at 37 °C. Cells were then
incubated at 4 °C for 2 h with
[125I-Tyr11]SRIF (150,000 cpm/ml) in the
absence and presence of 100 nM SRIF, washed, and then
incubated at 37 °C in the continued presence or absence of GF109203X
and PMA to allow receptor internalization to occur. At the times shown,
cells were chilled and washed with acidic glycine-buffered saline to
remove surface-bound ligand and then dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH. The graph
shows the amount of specifically bound radioligand in the internalized
compartment (mean ± S.E. of triplicate samples in one of two
independent experiments).
|
|
Mechanisms of sst2A Receptor Internalization--
Pertussis toxin
pretreatment prevents sst2A-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase but
does not affect sst2A receptor phosphorylation (13). To assess the
requirement for sst2A receptor Gi/o coupling for receptor
internalization, we pretreated GH-R2 cells in the absence or presence
of 100 ng/ml pertussis toxin (PTX) for 18-24 h and then measured the
internalization of prebound [125I-Tyr11]SRIF.
This PTX treatment prevented SMS inhibition of vasoactive intestinal
peptide-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity (data not shown). Control
and PTX-treated cells were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min in the
absence or presence of 200 nM PMA and then at 4 °C for
2 h with [125I-Tyr11]SRIF. The amount of
internalized ligand was determined following a 5-min incubation at
37 °C in the continued absence or presence of PMA. PTX treatment had
no effect on the internalization of the receptor-bound ligand in either
the absence or in the presence of PMA (Fig.
9, top panel). We therefore
conclude that coupling of the sst2A receptor to PTX-sensitive G
proteins is not required for receptor internalization nor does receptor
uncoupling alter PMA stimulation of internalization.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
The effect of pertussis toxin or hypertonic
sucrose on receptor-mediated internalization. Top,
GH-R2 cells were incubated for 16-18 h at 37 °C in growth medium in
the absence (open bars) or presence (closed bars)
of 100 ng/ml PTX. Cells were then incubated at 37 °C in the presence
or absence of 200 nM PMA for 15 min, cooled, and then
incubated further at 4 °C for 2 h with
[125I-Tyr11]SRIF (150,000 cpm/ml) with or
without 100 nM SRIF. After ligand binding, cells were
washed to remove free [125I-Tyr11]SRIF,
warmed, and further incubated for 5 min at 37 °C to allow
internalization to occur. Bottom, following incubation for
15 min at 37 °C in the presence or absence of 200 nM
PMA, GH-R2 cells were cooled and then incubated for 2 h at 4 °C
with [125I-Tyr11]SRIF (150,000 cpm/ml) in the
absence (open bars) or presence (closed bars) of
0.45 M sucrose. After ligand binding, cells were washed to
remove free [125I-Tyr11]SRIF, warmed, and
further incubated for 5 min at 37 °C either in the absence or
continued presence of 0.45 M sucrose. For all cells,
internalized ligand was measured after an acid wash as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The figure shows the specifically bound
radioligand in the internalized compartment (mean ± S.E. of
triplicate samples in one of two representative experiments).
|
|
To examine the role of clathrin-coated pits in
[125I-Tyr11]SRIF internalization, cells were
preincubated with or without PMA as described above, chilled, and
incubated with [125I-Tyr11]SRIF 4 °C for
2 h in the presence or absence of 0.45 M sucrose, which disrupts endocytosis via clathrin-coated pits (25). The cells
were then washed, warmed to 37 °C, and incubated in the continued
absence or presence of PMA and sucrose. The surface-bound and
internalized ligand was measured after a 5-min incubation. Exposure to
hypertonic sucrose markedly inhibited
[125I-Tyr11]SRIF internalization in both
untreated cells and PMA-stimulated cells (Fig. 9, bottom
panel), indicating that both basal- and PMA-stimulated
internalization of the sst2A receptor occurs through clathrin-coated pits.
Taken together, these data show that sst2A receptor internalization in
response to agonist, either alone or in the presence of PMA, occurs via
clathrin-mediated endocytosis and is independent of G protein coupling.
 |
DISCUSSION |
A number of early studies reported modulatory effects of protein
kinase C on SRIF receptor signaling and binding. Acute exposure to
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate was shown to attenuate SRIF inhibition
of adenylyl cyclase in both S49 lymphoma cells (26) and
GH4C1 pituitary tumor cells (27). Protein
kinase C activation also blocked SRIF-inhibition of Ca2+
currents in chick and rat sympathetic neurons (28, 29). Treatment with
phorbol esters for several hours decreased SRIF binding in GH4C1 pituitary cells (30), pancreatic acinar
cells (31, 32), and gastric chief cells (33). In
GH4C1 cells, TRH, which increases diacylglycerol formation and PKC activity, led to a similar
down-regulation of SRIF receptors as did phorbol esters (34). In chief
cells protein kinase C activation with cholecystokinin also decreased SRIF receptor binding (33). However, such heterologous regulation of
SRIF receptors was not observed in all systems examined. For example,
in AtT-20 pituitary cells, PMA treatment did not alter SRIF activation
of an inwardly rectifying potassium current, whereas cannabinoid CB1
receptor activation of this current was blocked (35). Similarly,
phorbol esters did not alter SRIF-induced hyperpolarization in guinea
pig submucosal neurons (36). These studies illustrate the capacity of
protein kinase C to perturb the function of some, but not all,
endogenous sst receptors and indicate that this kinase may have a role
in the regulation of cellular responsiveness to SRIF. However, past
studies used tissues or cell lines, which endogenously express
unidentified and/or multiple SRIF receptor subtypes, and the degree to
which the function of any individual sst receptor was affected by
phorbol ester or heterologous hormone treatment was not determined.
We had previously found that incubation of GH-R2 cells with PMA for 15 min causes a 30-fold increase in sst2A receptor phosphorylation, an
effect similar in magnitude to that produced by agonist (13). The
studies reported here demonstrate for the first time that PMA increases
the internalization of the sst2A receptor-hormone complex concomitantly
with receptor phosphorylation. Stimulation of both receptor
phosphorylation and endocytosis occurs within minutes of PMA treatment
and these PMA effects are both blocked by the protein kinase C
inhibitor GF109203X. Further,32PO4 is
incorporated into the C-terminal tail and the third intracellular loop
of the sst2A receptor after PMA as well as SRIF treatment of GH-R2
cells. Hence, SRIF and PMA both lead to receptor phosphorylation at
multiple sites.
Our conclusion that agonist binding leads to phosphorylation of the
sst2A receptor within both the C-terminal tail and the third
intracellular loop differs from that of Schwartkop et al. (37) who deduced that agonist-dependent phosphorylation of
the sst2A receptor is restricted to the C terminus. Their conclusion was based on the observation that truncation of a T7-tagged sst2A receptor at residue 325, which removes the last 44 amino acids from the
C terminus, prevents agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation (37).
However, when considered in light of our biochemical data showing that
the wild-type receptor is phosphorylated within the third intracellular
loop as well as in the C-terminal region, two alternate explanations
seem more likely. Receptor phosphorylation may occur in sequential
steps such that phosphorylation of residues in the C-terminal tail of
the sst2A receptor is required for subsequent phosphorylation of
residues in the third intracellular loop. Such a hierarchical
phosphorylation scheme has been proposed for the phosphorylation of the
N-formylpeptide receptor by GRK2 (38). Alternatively, it is
possible that the sst2A receptor kinase interacts most avidly with a
receptor domain that is different from the domain phosphorylated, as
has been shown for rhodopsin kinase (39). Thus, the 325 truncation
of the sst2A receptor, rather than removing all phosphorylation sites,
may produce conformational changes that indirectly decrease the
efficiency of receptor phosphorylation.
The similarity between the SRIF- and PMA-induced phosphorylation of the
sst2A receptor led us to investigate whether the two effects were
catalyzed by the same enzyme(s). SRIF stimulation of GH-R2 cells led to
a modest 60% increase in IP formation (Table I) indicating that SRIF
could activate protein kinase C in this cell line. The observed
increase in IP formation in GH-R2 cells is consistent with previous
reports that sst2A is linked to phosphoinositide hydrolysis when
overexpressed in COS-7 (14) and F4C1 pituitary cells (15). However, the protein kinase C inhibitor GF109203X did not
affect SRIF stimulation of sst2A receptor phosphorylation, whereas the
PMA stimulation was blocked. Receptor phosphorylation in response to
bombesin, which stimulated IP formation somewhat more than SRIF, was
also blocked by GF10920X. Hence, sst2A receptor phosphorylation can
occur by different biochemical pathways. Whereas protein kinase C
activity is essential for the action of PMA and bombesin, it is not
involved in agonist regulation. Why GF109203X does not at least
partially inhibit SRIF-stimulated sst2A phosphorylation is unclear.
Perhaps the DAG formed upon SRIF stimulation is not sufficient to
activate PKC. This possibility is supported by the observation that
bombesin, which induced a modest increase in IP formation, elicits only
a 2-fold increase in sst2A receptor phosphorylation. Thus the
contribution of PKC to agonist-stimulated receptor phosphorylation may
be sufficiently small in GH-R2 cells as to be indiscernable. Overall,
our studies clearly demonstrate that in the case of sst2A receptor
phosphorylation homologous and heterologous regulation occur by
different mechanisms in GH-R2 cells. Whether this conclusion can be
extended to other cell types remains to be determined.
The enzymatic pathway involved in PMA- and bombesin-stimulated receptor
phosphorylation is not known but could involve either direct
phosphorylation of the receptor by PKC or PKC activation of a different
kinase. Direct sst2A phosphorylation by PKC is possible because PKC
consensus sites are present in both the third intracellular loop
(KYKSSGIR and RKKSEKK) and the C-terminal tail (RSDSKQDK and RLNETTQR)
of the receptor (40). Although PKC catalyzed phosphorylation has been
shown to regulate the activity of some GRKs (1, 3), PMA-stimulated
sst2A phosphorylation is unlikely to result from GRK activation because
PMA increases sst2A receptor phosphorylation in the absence of SRIF,
whereas GRKs are thought to phosphorylate only agonist-occupied
receptors (1-3). Consistent with GRK phosphorylation of sst2A being
dependent on agonist binding, GRK2 translocates to the plasma membrane
upon SRIF treatment of S49 lymphoma cells (41), which express the sst2A
receptor (42). Further, the observation that SRIF and PMA increase
sst2A phosphorylation in an additive manner suggests that different
residues are phosphorylated under the two conditions and provides
additional support for the conclusion that GRKs do not catalyze both
SRIF- and PMA-stimulated sst2A receptor phosphorylation. Several other
G protein-coupled receptors, including rhodopsin, are similarly
phosphorylated by PKC and GRK at different residues (19, 43). Thus,
based on available data, the simplest hypothesis is that PKC directly
phosphorylates the sst2A receptor at sites other than those targeted by GRKs.
A number of investigators have shown that SRIF binding leads to the
internalization of the hormone-sst2A receptor complex via a
clathrin-mediated pathway (5). We show here that PMA dramatically
increases this rate of internalization and that the PMA-stimulated
endocytosis is also blocked by hypertonic sucrose, an inhibitor of
receptor internalization via clathrin-coated vesicles (25). Several
observations indicate that the PMA effects on sst2A receptor
phosphorylation and increased receptor internalization are linked. They
both occur within minutes of PMA treatment and are both blocked by
protein kinase C inhibition. In contrast, endocytosis of the
SRIF-receptor complex in the absence of PMA is unaffected by GF109203X.
Further, the effect of PMA is specific to sst2A internalization; we did
not observe significant stimulation of sst1 receptor endocytosis in
transfected GH pituitary
cells.2 Similarly, sst3
internalization was not affected by phorbol ester treatment in
transfected RIN1046-38 cells (44). Thus, PMA is unlikely to increase
sst2A internalization by altering the function of components of the
cellular endocytic machinery. However, further experiments will be
required to establish a causal relationship between PKC-catalyzed sst2A
receptor phosphorylation and increased receptor internalization.
Although hormone binding was found to induce sst2A receptor endocytosis
in all studies to date, substantial quantitative differences were
observed in the extent of internalization at steady state. The fraction
of receptor-bound hormone, which was resistant to an acid wash after a
60-min incubation at 37 °C, was about 20% in CHO-K1 cells (45),
50-75% in COS-7 cells (46), and over 95% in HEK cells (37). In GH-R2
cells we have observed anywhere from 20 to 50% internalization at
steady state in different experiments (Ref. 13 and this report).
Although sst2A receptor internalization will undoubtedly be influenced
by the cellular complement of GRKs and arrestins present in each cell
line, the PKC stimulation of endocytosis described in this report
suggests that variable activation of PKC by either serum factors or by
SRIF itself may also affect the rate and extent of sst2A receptor internalization.
The regulation of sst2A receptor function in the pituitary via
heterologous activation of PKC is likely to be of substantial physiological importance. The sst2A receptor isotype mediates the
effect of SRIF on the secretion of several pituitary hormones, including GH (7, 47), and overall hormone secretion by the pituitary
depends on the interactions of multiple hypothalamic and paracrine
factors many of which activate protein kinase C. Our data suggest that,
in addition to their direct stimulatory effects on pituitary hormone
synthesis and secretion, these factors may also blunt the inhibitory
effect of SRIF by regulating the cell surface expression of sst2A. In
fact, regulation of sst2A receptor trafficking by PKC activation may
have physiological ramifications in many other tissues, including the
brain, the endocrine and exocrine pancreas, the immune system, and the
GI tract. Furthermore, because the diagnostic and therapeutic use of
radiolabeled SRIF analogs depends to a large extent on their internalization by sst2A receptors expressed on tumors (48), understanding the mechanisms by which PKC activation regulates sst2A
internalization in various cancers and the use of agents which act via
PKC to stimulate receptor-mediated endocytosis of radiolabeled SRIF
analogs may have important clinical applicability.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Research Grant DK32234 (to
A. S.) from the NIDDK, National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Partially supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Juvenile
Diabetes Foundation. Current address: Dept. of Immunology, Schering-Plough Research Inst., Kenilworth, NJ 07033-0539.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas Houston, P. O. Box 20708, Houston, TX 77225. Tel.: 713-500-7470; Fax:
713-500-7456; E-mail: aschonb@farmr1.med.uth.tmc.edu.
2
Q. Liu and A. Schonbrunn, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GRK, G protein
coupled receptor kinase;
SRIF, somatostatin;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium;
SMS, SMS 201-995
(D-Phe-Cys-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cys-Thr-ol);
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
NCS, N-chlorosuccinimide;
PKC, protein
kinase C;
IP, immunoprecipitate;
PTX, pertussis toxin;
GH, growth
hormone;
TRH, thyrotropin-releasing hormone.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Krupnick, J. G.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
38,
289-319[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Pitcher, J. A.,
Freedman, N. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
653-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Chuang, T. T.,
Iacovelli, L.,
Sallese, M.,
and De Blasi, A.
(1996)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
17,
416-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Schonbrunn, A.,
Gu, Y. Z.,
Dournard, P.,
Beaudet, A.,
Tannenbaum, G. S.,
and Brown, P. J.
(1996)
Met. Clin. Exp.
45,
8-11
|
| 5.
|
Meyerhof, W.
(1998)
Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol.
133,
55-108[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Dournaud, P.,
Gu, Y. Z.,
Schonbrunn, A.,
Mazella, J.,
Tannenbaum, G. S.,
and Beaudet, A.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
4468-4478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Mezey, E.,
Hunyady, B.,
Mitra, S.,
Hayes, E.,
Liu, Q.,
Schaeffer, J.,
and Schonbrunn, A.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
414-419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Hunyady, B.,
Hipkin, R. W.,
Schonbrunn, A.,
and Mezey, E.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
2632-2635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Reubi, J. C.,
Kappeler, A.,
Waser, B.,
Schonbrunn, A.,
and Laissue, J.
(1998)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
83,
3746-3749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Reubi, J. C.,
Laissue, J. A.,
Waser, B.,
Steffen, D. L.,
Hipkin, R. W.,
and Schonbrunn, A.
(1999)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
84,
2942-2950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Reubi, J. C.,
Kappeler, A.,
Waser, B.,
Laissue, J.,
Hipkin, R. W.,
and Schonbrunn, A.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
153,
233-245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Hofland, L. J.,
Liu, Q.,
van Koetsveld, P. M.,
Zuyderwijk, J.,
van der Ham, F.,
de Krijger, R. R.,
Schonbrunn, A.,
and Lamberts, S. W. F.
(1999)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
84,
775-780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Hipkin, R. W.,
Friedman, J.,
Clark, R. B.,
Eppler, C. M.,
and Schonbrunn, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13869-13876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Akbar, M.,
Okajima, F.,
Tomura, H.,
Majid, M. A.,
Yamada, Y.,
Seino, S.,
and Kondo, Y.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
348,
192-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Chen, L.,
Fitzpatrick, V. D.,
Vandlen, R. L.,
and Tashjian, A. H., Jr.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18666-18672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Marin, P.,
Delumeau, J. C.,
Tence, M.,
Cordier, J.,
Glowinski, J.,
and Premont, J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
9016-9020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
Coy, D. H.,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23458-23463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Gu, Y. Z.,
and Schonbrunn, A.
(1997)
Mol. Endocrinol.
11,
527-537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Williams, B. Y.,
Wang, Y.,
and Schonbrunn, A.
(1996)
Mol. Pharmacol.
50,
716-727[Abstract]
|
| 20.
|
van der Geer, P.,
and Hunter, T.
(1994)
Electrophoresis
15,
544-554[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Delange, R. J.
(1978)
Methods Cell Biol.
18,
169-188[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Lischwe, M. A.,
and Ochs, D.
(1982)
Anal. Biochem.
127,
453-457[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Schagger, H.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
368-379[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Toullec, D.,
Pianetti, P.,
Coste, H.,
Bellevergue, P.,
Grand-Perret, T.,
Ajakane, M.,
Baudet, V.,
Boissin, P.,
Boursier, E.,
Loriolle, F.,
Duhamel, L.,
Charon, D.,
and Kirilovsky, J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15771-15781[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Heuser, J. E.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
108,
389-400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Katada, T.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Watanabe, Y.,
Bauer, S.,
and Jakobs, K. H.
(1985)
Eur. J. Biochem.
151,
431-437[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Gordeladze, J. O.,
Bjoro, T.,
Torjesen, P. A.,
Ostberg, B. C.,
Haug, E.,
and Gautvik, K. M.
(1989)
Eur. J. Biochem.
183,
397-406[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Golard, A.,
Role, L. W.,
and Siegelbaum, S. A.
(1993)
J. Neurophysiol.
70,
1639-1643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Shapiro, M. S.,
Zhou, J. Y.,
and Hille, B.
(1996)
J. Neurophysiol.
76,
311-320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Osborne, R.,
and Tashjian, A. H. J.
(1982)
Cancer Res.
42,
4375-4381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Matozaki, T.,
Sakamoto, C.,
Nagao, M.,
and Baba, S.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
1414-1420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Zeggari, M.,
Susini, C.,
Viguerie, N.,
Esteve, J. P.,
Vaysse, N.,
and Ribet, A.
(1985)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
128,
850-857[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Felley, C. P.,
O'Dorisio, T. M.,
Howe, B.,
Coy, D. H.,
Mantey, S. A.,
Pradhan, T. K.,
Sutliff, V. E.,
and Jensen, R. T.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
266,
G789-G798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Schonbrunn, A.,
and Tashjian, A. H., Jr.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
190-198[Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Garcia, D. E.,
Brown, S.,
Hille, B.,
and Mackie, K.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
2834-2841[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Shen, K. Z.,
and Surprenant, A.
(1993)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
470,
619-635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Schwartkop, C. P.,
Kreienkamp, H. J.,
and Richter, D.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
72,
1275-1282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Prossnitz, E. R.,
Kim, C. M.,
Benovic, J. L.,
and Ye, R. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1130-1137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Hurley, J. B.,
Spencer, M.,
and Niemi, G. A.
(1998)
Vision Res.
38,
1341-1352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Toker, A.
(1998)
Front. Biosci.
3,
D1134-1147[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Mayor, F., Jr.,
Benovic, J. L.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
6468-6471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Dent, P.,
Wang, Y.,
Gu, Y. Z.,
Wood, S. L.,
Reardon, D. B.,
Mangues, R.,
Pellicer, A.,
Schonbrunn, A.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1997)
Cell. Signalling
9,
539-549[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Greene, N. M.,
Williams, D. S.,
and Newton, A. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10341-10344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Roosterman, D.,
Roth, A.,
Kreienkamp, H. J.,
Richter, D.,
and Meyerhof, W.
(1997)
J. Neuroendocrinol.
9,
741-751[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Hukovic, N.,
Panetta, R.,
Kumar, U.,
and Patel, Y. C.
(1996)
Endocrinology
137,
4046-4049[Abstract]
|
| 46.
|
Nouel, D.,
Gaudriault, G.,
Houle, M.,
Reisine, T.,
Vincent, J. P.,
Mazella, J.,
and Beaudet, A.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
296-306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Parmar, R. M.,
Chan, W. W.,
Dashkevicz, M.,
Hayes, E. C.,
Rohrer, S. P.,
Smith, R. G.,
Schaeffer, J. M.,
and Blake, A. D.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
263,
276-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Reubi, J. C.,
Lamberts, S. J.,
and Krenning, E. P.
(1995)
J. Recept. Signal. Transduct. Res.
15,
379-392[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Liu, M. S. Bee, and A. Schonbrunn
Site Specificity of Agonist and Second Messenger-Activated Kinases for Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2A (Sst2A) Phosphorylation
Mol. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2009;
76(1):
68 - 80.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. F. Berbari, A. D. Johnson, J. S. Lewis, C. C. Askwith, and K. Mykytyn
Identification of Ciliary Localization Sequences within the Third Intracellular Loop of G Protein-coupled Receptors
Mol. Biol. Cell,
April 1, 2008;
19(4):
1540 - 1547.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Liu, D. A. Dewi, W. Liu, M. S. Bee, and A. Schonbrunn
Distinct Phosphorylation Sites in the SST2A Somatostatin Receptor Control Internalization, Desensitization, and Arrestin Binding
Mol. Pharmacol.,
February 1, 2008;
73(2):
292 - 304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Sharif, L. Gendron, J. Wowchuk, P. Sarret, J. Mazella, A. Beaudet, and T. Stroh
Coexpression of Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 5 Affects Internalization and Trafficking of Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2007;
148(5):
2095 - 2105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Tulipano and S. Schulz
Novel insights in somatostatin receptor physiology
Eur. J. Endocrinol.,
April 1, 2007;
156(suppl_1):
S3 - S11.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Duran-Prado, C. Bucharles, B. J. Gonzalez, R. Vazquez-Martinez, A. J. Martinez-Fuentes, S. Garcia-Navarro, S. J. Rhodes, H. Vaudry, M. M. Malagon, and J. P. Castano
Porcine Somatostatin Receptor 2 Displays Typical Pharmacological sst2 Features but Unique Dynamics of Homodimerization and Internalization
Endocrinology,
January 1, 2007;
148(1):
411 - 421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Markovic, N. Papadopoulou, T. Teli, H. Randeva, M. A. Levine, E. W. Hillhouse, and D. K. Grammatopoulos
Differential Responses of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Type 1 Variants to Protein Kinase C Phosphorylation
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
December 1, 2006;
319(3):
1032 - 1042.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Mundell, M. L. Jones, A. R. Hardy, J. F. Barton, S. M. Beaucourt, P. B. Conley, and A. W. Poole
Distinct Roles for Protein Kinase C Isoforms in Regulating Platelet Purinergic Receptor Function
Mol. Pharmacol.,
September 1, 2006;
70(3):
1132 - 1142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Bartoe, W. L. McKenna, T. K. Quan, B. K. Stafford, J. A. Moore, J. Xia, K. Takamiya, R. L. Huganir, and L. Hinck
Protein interacting with C-kinase 1/protein kinase Calpha-mediated endocytosis converts netrin-1-mediated repulsion to attraction.
J. Neurosci.,
March 22, 2006;
26(12):
3192 - 3205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Liu, R. Cescato, D. A. Dewi, J. Rivier, J.-C. Reubi, and A. Schonbrunn
Receptor Signaling and Endocytosis Are Differentially Regulated by Somatostatin Analogs
Mol. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2005;
68(1):
90 - 101.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ben-Shlomo, K. A. Wawrowsky, I. Proekt, N. M. Wolkenfeld, S.-G. Ren, J. Taylor, M. D. Culler, and S. Melmed
Somatostatin Receptor Type 5 Modulates Somatostatin Receptor Type 2 Regulation of Adrenocorticotropin Secretion
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 24, 2005;
280(25):
24011 - 24021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Hardy, P. B. Conley, J. Luo, J. L. Benovic, A. W. Poole, and S. J. Mundell
P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors for ADP desensitize by distinct kinase-dependent mechanisms
Blood,
May 1, 2005;
105(9):
3552 - 3560.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Naik, C. K. Billington, R. M. Pascual, D. A. Deshpande, F. P. Stefano, T. A. Kohout, D. M. Eckman, J. L. Benovic, and R. B. Penn
Regulation of Cysteinyl Leukotriene Type 1 Receptor Internalization and Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 11, 2005;
280(10):
8722 - 8732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Noble, L. A. Kallal, M. H. Pausch, and J. L. Benovic
Development of a Yeast Bioassay to Characterize G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinases: IDENTIFICATION OF AN NH2-TERMINAL REGION ESSENTIAL FOR RECEPTOR PHOSPHORYLATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 28, 2003;
278(48):
47466 - 47476.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kermorgant, D. Zicha, and P. J. Parker
Protein Kinase C Controls Microtubule-based Traffic but Not Proteasomal Degradation of c-Met
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 1, 2003;
278(31):
28921 - 28929.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Perron, Z.-g. Chen, D. Gingras, D. J. Dupre, J. Stankova, and M. Rola-Pleszczynski
Agonist-independent Desensitization and Internalization of the Human Platelet-activating Factor Receptor by Coumermycin-Gyrase B-induced Dimerization
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 18, 2003;
278(30):
27956 - 27965.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Elberg, R. W. Hipkin, and A. Schonbrunn
Homologous and Heterologous Regulation of Somatostatin Receptor 2
Mol. Endocrinol.,
November 1, 2002;
16(11):
2502 - 2514.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Srinivasan, H. Fujino, and J. W. Regan
Differential Internalization of the Prostaglandin F2alpha Receptor Isoforms: Role of Protein Kinase C and Clathrin
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
July 1, 2002;
302(1):
219 - 224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Pfeiffer, T. Koch, H. Schroder, M. Laugsch, V. Hollt, and S. Schulz
Heterodimerization of Somatostatin and Opioid Receptors Cross-modulates Phosphorylation, Internalization, and Desensitization
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 24, 2002;
277(22):
19762 - 19772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Thibonnier, C. L. Plesnicher, K. Berrada, and L. Berti-Mattera
Role of the human V1 vasopressin receptor COOH terminus in internalization and mitogenic signal transduction
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
July 1, 2001;
281(1):
E81 - E92.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Horikawa, B. D. Gaylinn, C. E. Lyons Jr., and M. O. Thorner
Molecular Cloning of Ovine and Bovine Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Receptors: The Ovine Receptor Is C-Terminally Truncated
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2001;
142(6):
2660 - 2668.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Coutts, S. Anavi-Goffer, R. A. Ross, D. J. MacEwan, K. Mackie, R. G. Pertwee, and A. J. Irving
Agonist-Induced Internalization and Trafficking of Cannabinoid CB1 Receptors in Hippocampal Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
April 1, 2001;
21(7):
2425 - 2433.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Morse, J. Behan, T. M. Laz, R. E. West Jr., S. A. Greenfeder, J. C. Anthes, S. Umland, Y. Wan, R. W. Hipkin, W. Gonsiorek, et al.
Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Human Histamine Receptor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
March 1, 2001;
296(3):
1058 - 1066.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Xiang, G.-H. Yu, J. Guo, L. Chen, W. Hu, G. Pei, and L. Ma
Heterologous Activation of Protein Kinase C Stimulates Phosphorylation of delta -Opioid Receptor at Serine 344, Resulting in beta -Arrestin- and Clathrin-mediated Receptor Internalization
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 9, 2001;
276(7):
4709 - 4716.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Strassheim and C. L. Williams
P2Y2 Purinergic and M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors Activate Different Phospholipase C-beta Isoforms That Are Uniquely Susceptible to Protein Kinase C-dependent Phosphorylation and Inactivation
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 8, 2000;
275(50):
39767 - 39772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Liu and A. Schonbrunn
Agonist-induced Phosphorylation of Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 1 (Sst1). RELATIONSHIP TO DESENSITIZATION AND INTERNALIZATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 26, 2001;
276(5):
3709 - 3717.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Hanyaloglu, M. Vrecl, K. M. Kroeger, L. E. C. Miles, H. Qian, W. G. Thomas, and K. A. Eidne
Casein Kinase II Sites in the Intracellular C-terminal Domain of the Thyrotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor and Chimeric Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptors Contribute to beta -Arrestin-dependent Internalization
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 18, 2001;
276(21):
18066 - 18074.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|