|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 9, 6181-6188, March 3, 2000
RNA and DNA Hydrolysis Are Catalyzed by the Influenza Virus
Endonuclease*
Klaus
Klumpp ,
Linh
Doan,
Noel A.
Roberts, and
Balraj
Handa
From Roche Discovery Welwyn, 40 Broadwater Road, Welwyn Garden
City, Herts AL7 3AY, United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
The influenza virus polymerase complex contains a
metal ion-dependent endonuclease activity, which generates
short capped RNA primer molecules from capped RNA precursors. Previous
studies have provided evidence for a two-metal ion mechanism of RNA
cleavage, and the data are consistent with a direct interaction of a
divalent metal ion with the catalytic water molecule. To refine the
model of this active site, we have generated a series of DNA, RNA, and DNA-RNA chimeric molecules to study the role of the 2'-hydroxy groups
on nucleic acid substrates of the endonuclease. We could observe
specific cleavage of nucleic acid substrates devoid of any 2'-hydroxy
groups if they contained a cap structure (m7GpppG) at the 5'-end. The
capped DNA endonuclease products were functional as primers for
transcription initiation by the influenza virus polymerase. The
apparent cleavage rates were about 5 times lower with capped DNA
substrates as compared with capped RNA substrates. Cleavage rates with
DNA substrates could be increased to RNA levels by substituting the
deoxyribosyl moieties immediately 5' and 3' of the cleavage site with
ribosyl moieties. Similarly, cleavage rates of RNA substrates could be
lowered to DNA levels by exchanging the same two ribosyl groups with
deoxyribosyl groups at the cleavage site. These results demonstrate
that the 2'-hydroxy groups are not essential for binding and cleavage
of nucleic acids by the influenza virus endonuclease, but small
differences of the nucleic acid conformation in the endonuclease active
site can influence the overall rate of hydrolysis. The observed
relative cleavage rates with DNA and RNA substrates argue against a
direct interaction of a catalytic metal ion with a 2'-hydroxy group in
the endonuclease active site.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The influenza virus contains a negative strand RNA genome
consisting of eight RNA segments encoding a total of 10 viral proteins. The vRNA1 segments are
transcribed and replicated by a virus-encoded polymerase complex. The
polymerase complex also contains an endonuclease activity, which is
required prior to transcription initiation for the generation of short,
capped RNA primer molecules. Nuclear host pre-mRNAs are the most
likely endonuclease substrates for the generation of primer molecules
in infected cells (1). The influenza virus polymerase is a trimer of
the subunits PA, PB1, and PB2. Prior to transcription initiation, the
trimeric polymerase complex is bound to both ends of a
nucleoprotein-coated single-stranded RNA genome segment forming a
noncovalent circular structure, the viral ribonucleoprotein (RNP)
(2-4). Separate binding sites for both the 5'- and the 3'-end of the
vRNA have recently been mapped on the polymerase subunit PB1 (5, 6).
The binding of the polymerase complex to both vRNA ends has previously
been found to be a prerequisite for the activation of endonuclease and
transcription initiation activities (5, 7, 8).
The process of viral transcription in the infected cell is catalyzed by
the RNP-associated polymerase complex. Transcription starts with the
binding of capped host pre-mRNAs, which are subsequently cleaved by
the endonuclease at distinct sequence-dependent positions 9-15 nucleotides downstream of the cap structure (9-12). The
resulting capped RNA oligonucleotides contain 3'-hydroxyl groups. They
are used as primers for the initiation of transcription (7, 10). The
location of the endonuclease active site on the polymerase complex is
still unknown. Although it has been reported that some polymerase
active sites of RNA polymerases could catalyze nuclease reactions (13,
14), there is strong evidence to suggest the presence of a separate
endonuclease active site on the influenza virus polymerase complex.
Inhibitors selective for either endonuclease or polymerase activities
are known (15, 16), and endonuclease and polymerase activities show
distinct differences in metal ion preference (17). The endonuclease
active site may in fact be located on a different polymerase subunit,
because specific PB2-directed antibodies selectively abolish the
endonuclease activity in vitro (18, 19), whereas the
polymerase active site has been mapped to the PB1 subunit (20, 21).
The cap-dependent endonuclease activity may be regarded as
a rather unique enzyme activity of influenza viruses. However, for the
design and development of selective inhibitors of this activity, it
will be important to identify the most closely related cellular enzymes
and to get a better idea of the endonuclease active site architecture.
Recent experiments have suggested a two-metal ion mechanism of RNA
cleavage for the influenza virus endonuclease reaction based on
cooperative binding of metal ions and synergistic activation by metal
ion combinations as compared with single divalent metal ion reactions
(17). Among the group of metalloproteins for which similar catalytic
mechanisms have been proposed, there are examples of both DNA and RNA
hydrolases (22, 23). Direct discriminatory interactions with the
2'-hydroxy groups of RNAs seems to be rare in this group of enzymes.
This is in contrast to the metal-independent RNases like RNase A and RNase T1, which directly interact with 2'-hydroxyl groups to
distinguish RNA from DNA molecules. They also use the 2'-hydroxy groups
as nucleophiles in the forward reaction to generate cyclic phosphates. In the case of RNA hydrolysis by the ribozyme RNase P, evidence has
been presented for an inner sphere water interaction of a divalent
metal ion with the 2'-hydroxy group at the cleavage site, which
appeared to be a major determinant of RNA specificity of cleavage (24,
25). However, most metal-dependent nuclease proteins can
use both RNA and DNA as substrates, or RNA-DNA discrimination is
achieved by nucleic acid conformational recognition elements rather
than by direct interaction or active exclusion of the 2'-hydroxy group.
Our understanding of the rules that govern cleavage site choice and
substrate selectivity of the influenza virus endonuclease is still very
limited. Here, we used a panel of DNA, RNA, and DNA-RNA chimeric
oligonucleotides to define the role of 2'-hydroxy groups on the
influenza virus endonuclease substrates. Although the endonuclease
presumably is specific for RNA substrates in vivo, we
observed efficient cleavage of DNA oligonucleotides in vitro
albeit with a 5-fold reduced cleavage rate as compared with RNA. The
cleavage under physiological buffer conditions required the presence of
a cap structure on the DNA or RNA substrates. It therefore appears that
the specificity for RNA cleavage by the influenza virus endonuclease
in vivo is mainly determined by the specific interaction of
the polymerase complex with capped RNA and the absence of capped DNA in
the cell. Two nucleotides in the endonuclease active site also
contribute to RNA discrimination. On DNA substrates, the substitution
of the deoxyribose moieties immediately 5' and 3' of the cleavage site
with ribose moieties resulted in nucleic acid substrates that were
cleaved with rates identical to that of RNA.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Influenza virus A/PR/8/34 RNPs were prepared from
purified influenza virus particles on glycerol gradients as described
(4). RNP concentration was determined from the analysis of genomic RNA
content after phenol extraction (17). RNases for RNA sequencing and
unlabeled ribonucleoside 5'-triphosphates were purchased from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech; S-adenosyl-L-methionine was
purchased from Sigma; radiolabeled ribonucleotide 5'-triphosphates
(3000 Ci/mmol) were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; and
vaccinia virus guanylyltransferase was purchased from Life
Technologies, Inc. RNase inhibitor was obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Nucleic Acid Synthesis--
The endonuclease substrate nucleic
acids were based on the sequence of Gem20 RNA,
5'-GAAUACUCAAGCUAUGCAUC-3' (17). The DNA oligonucleotides used in this
study always contain thymidine nucleosides at the uridine positions of
the RNA. The chimeric oligonucleotides were named according to the
parent molecule, G20 for Gem20 RNA or dG20 for Gem20 DNA, with an added
number for the position of the substitution and a suffix, R or D,
depending on whether the substitution was a ribo- or a
deoxyribonucleotide. For example, G20-11D was a capped Gem20 RNA
molecule containing a deoxyribonucleotide at position 11, and
dG20-11,12R was a capped Gem20 DNA molecule containing ribonucleotides
at positions 11 and 12. All oligonucleotides were chemically
synthesized, phosphorylated, and enzymatically capped using vaccinia
virus capping enzyme following published procedures (26-28). The
oligonucleotides were purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on
15% gels containing 8 M urea and quantified according to
the amount of radioactive GTP incorporated into the cap structure.
Endonuclease and Transcription Initiation Reactions--
Except
when indicated so in the figure legends, endonuclease reactions were
performed in 5-µl reaction mixtures containing 1 nM RNP,
50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 100 mM KCl, 0.5 units/µl RNasin, 0.25 µg/µl bovine serum albumin, 0.3% Triton
X-100, 0.015-0.15 nM 32P-cap-labeled nucleic
acid substrate. After incubation at 31 °C for the indicated times,
the reactions were stopped by the addition of 5 µl of loading buffer
(0.5 mM EDTA, 90% formamide, 0.1% (w/v) bromphenol blue,
0.1% (w/v) xylene cyanol). The samples were then incubated for 2 min
at 98 °C and loaded onto 20% acrylamide sequencing gels containing
7 M urea. Band intensities were quantified with a Storm
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.) using ImageQuant version 4.2a
software. For transcription initiation reactions, 10 µM
CTP-Mg was added to the samples prior to the RNPs under the same
reaction and incubation conditions as described above. Nucleic acid
cleavage activity (A) was expressed as relative product formation from the PhosphorImager band volumes according to the equation A = [P]/([P] + [S]) where P represents
product and S represents substrate. Time response curves were fitted to
the exponential equation A = Am(1 e(kappt))
to obtain the pseudo-first order kinetic constants
kapp of the cleavage reactions. Transcription
initiation reactions from 11-mer primers and coupled
endonuclease/transcription initiation reactions from 20-mer substrates
were run under conditions where about 50% of the substrates where
cleaved and elongated. In that case, Km(app) and
kapp values were calculated from fitting
hyperbolic standard curves to the data sets using the equation
A = (kapp
S)/(Km(app) + S), where
S represents the concentration of CTP in the transcription initiation reaction.
 |
RESULTS |
DNA Oligonucleotides Are Specifically Cleaved and Used for
Transcription Initiation by the Influenza Virus Polymerase
Complex--
To study the influenza virus endonuclease reaction we
used a previously characterized model substrate of 20 nucleotides in length, Gem20-M RNA (G20). This RNA substrate contains a cap I structure and is specifically cleaved by the endonuclease activity of
the polymerase complex at a distinct site to generate a capped 11-mer
oligonucleotide, G11, as determined by direct RNA sequencing (17). This
cleavage was dependent on a methylated cap structure on the RNA
substrates2 similar to what
has been established before for other RNA substrate sequences (10).
Surprisingly, a capped 20-mer DNA oligonucleotide of identical sequence
(dG20) was also found to be specifically cleaved at a single site (Fig.
1a). The cleavage product
co-migrated with a capped 11-mer DNA marker (dG11). DNA cleavage was
dependent on the presence of influenza virus RNPs and Mg2+
(Fig. 1a, compare lanes 3-5). As
expected, the DNA oligonucleotide was completely resistant to cleavage
by RNases like RNase A and T1 but was a substrate for the exonuclease
activity of Escherichia coli Klenow fragment.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Capped DNA and RNA function as endonuclease
and polymerase substrates. a, dG20 DNA 20-mer or dG11
DNA 11-mer oligonucleotides were incubated for 1 h at 31 °C in
the presence or absence of 1 nM enzyme (RNP), 1 mM MgCl2, or 10 µM CTP as
indicated. The products of the endonuclease and transcription
initiation reactions were analyzed on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel.
The migration of products of specific cleavage (dG11) and transcription
initiation (dG11 + 1 nucleotide) are indicated on the left.
The dG20 DNA was also treated with 10 ng/µl RNase A (lane
A), 0.1 unit/µl Klenow fragment (lane
K), 0.1 milliunit/µl micrococcal nuclease (lane
M), and 2 milliunits/µl RNase T1 (lane
T1). b, G20 RNA or G11 RNA oligonucleotides were
incubated as described above. The star indicates a low
efficiency cleavage that occurred at G16 upon prolonged incubation with
the endonuclease.
|
|
The specific DNA cleavage product dG11 of the influenza virus
endonuclease reaction could be elongated by the influenza virus polymerase in the presence of CTP (Fig. 1a, lane
6). In the same way, chemically synthesized dG11 DNA could
be used by the influenza virus polymerase for transcription initiation
with CTP (Fig. 1a, lane 2). The
ability of the polymerase to use CTP for transcription initiation with
dG11 primer suggests a vRNA template-directed initiation reaction with
the 3'-terminal A and G residues of dG11 base-paired to the 3'-end of
the viral RNA (Fig. 2e). CTP
has been previously reported as the preferred nucleotide for
transcription initiation from G11 RNA (17, 28). The efficient use of
the product from dG20 DNA cleavage for transcription initiation with CTP is consistent with the mapping of the endonuclease dG20 DNA cleavage site to dG11.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
CTP dependence of the combined endonuclease
transcription initiation reaction. a, 20-mer DNA
(dG20); b, chimeric (dG20-11R); c, RNA (G20)
molecules were incubated with 1 nM RNP under the same
conditions as described in the legend to Fig. 1 for 60, 30, and 15 min
at 31 °C, respectively, to achieve about 50% conversion of
substrate. CTP concentrations varied between 0.1 nM and 10 µM. a, lane 1,
MgCl2 omitted; lane 2, CTP omitted;
lanes 3-8, endonuclease reactions in the
presence of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 µM CTP.
b, lanes 1-7, 0, 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 µM CTP. c, lane
1, MgCl2 omitted; lanes
2-11, 0, 0, 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 10 µM CTP. d, the relative amount of
transcription initiation product was determined and plotted against the
CTP concentration. Black squares, G20;
white circles, dG20-11R; black
triangles, dG20. The DNA showed the slowest rate and highest
Km value. The chimeric molecule showed an
intermediate rate and a Km value similar to the one
obtained with the RNA substrate. e, schematic representation
of the sequences of vRNA template as present on influenza virus RNP and
the G11 (or dG11) primer molecules aligned for transcription initiation
in the presence of CTP (see also Ref. 17)
|
|
Fig. 1b shows the same set of reactions in the presence of
Gem20-M RNA (G20). G20 cleavage was dependent on RNPs and
Mg2+ and a specific 11-mer primer (G11) was generated by
the endonuclease. G11 could be elongated by the polymerase in the
presence of CTP. G20 was hydrolyzed by RNases A and T1 as well as by
the Klenow fragment. RNase T1 specifically hydrolyzes single-stranded
RNA molecules at guanosine residues. The expected fragments of 11 and
16 nucleotides in length were obtained from RNase T1 digestion of G20
RNA. The RNase T1-derived fragments migrate slightly faster than the
corresponding influenza endonuclease products, because the former
contain 3'-phosphate and the latter contain 3'-hydroxyl groups (10).
Micrococcal nuclease digested both DNA and RNA substrates, albeit dG20
DNA with a slightly slower rate as compared with G20 RNA. The gel in
Fig. 1b also showed a low but significant cleavage of G20 at
a second position, identified as position guanosine G16 (Fig.
1b, star). This site was also influenza
endonuclease-specific as demonstrated by the elongation in the presence
of CTP (Fig. 1b, lane 6), but the
intensity of the band was below 5% of G11 produced in all cases. The
DNA molecule dG20 was also cleaved with low efficiency at nucleotide
position 16 (see below).
Together, these results demonstrated that the influenza virus
endonuclease was able to hydrolyze a DNA analogue of G20 RNA at the
same specific nucleotide position 11 as the RNA molecule. The influenza
virus polymerase could use a capped DNA oligonucleotide for
template-specific transcription initiation, and this primer could
either be chemically synthesized or generated by the endonuclease activity.
Specific Transcription Initiation from 11-Mer DNA
Primers--
Transcription initiation from the dG11 DNA
oligonucleotide appeared to be very efficient, and complete conversion
of dG11 to dG11 + 1 nucleotide occurred at low micromolar
concentrations of CTP (Figs. 1a and 2a), similar
to what had previously been observed with RNA substrates (17, 28). We
then analyzed the initiation reaction at variable CTP concentrations
under conditions where approximately 50% of the substrate was
converted. We observed an ~8-fold upward shift in the apparent
Km value for CTP with DNA (dG20) substrate when
comparing it with RNA (G20) substrate under enzyme excess conditions
(Fig. 2 and Table I). Interestingly, a
DNA substrate containing a ribosyl moiety at the cleavage site
nucleotide 11 (dG20-11R) was specifically cleaved by the influenza
virus endonuclease, and the cleavage product was elongated by the
polymerase in the presence of CTP with an apparent
Km virtually identical to the value obtained with
G20 RNA substrate. The apparent rates of transcription initiation in
the coupled reaction decreased with G20 > dG20-11R > dG20
(Table I).
We also studied transcription initiation from chemically synthesized
11-mer primer molecules, a reaction independent of endonuclease activity (Fig. 3). Under the gel
electrophoresis conditions used, the DNA oligonucleotides migrated
significantly faster during acrylamide electrophoresis as compared with
RNA oligonucleotides (Fig. 3). The transcription initiation reactions
were adjusted to conditions where approximately 50% of the primer was
elongated when CTP was saturating. The apparent Km
values calculated from these experiments were similar to those observed
in the coupled endonuclease/transcription initiation reaction. Again,
Km(app) for CTP was significantly higher for
transcription initiation from the DNA primer dG11 as compared with
initiation from the RNA primer G11. Surprisingly, replacing the
deoxyribonucleotide at position 11 of dG11 with a ribonucleotide
generated a primer (dG11-11R) that was initiated with an apparent
Km even lower than that observed with G11 RNA. The
apparent rates of transcription initiation were virtually identical
with any of the three 11-mer substrates under these conditions.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
CTP dependence of transcription initiation
from DNA and RNA primer molecules. Capped primer nucleic acids as
indicated above the gels were incubated with 1 nM RNP under the same conditions as described in the legend
to Fig. 1 for 10 min at 31 °C. CTP concentrations varied between 0.2 nM and 2 µM. The migration positions of the
substrates and transcription initiation products on a denaturing
acrylamide gel are indicated on the left. DNA
oligonucleotides were migrating faster than RNA oligonucleotides of the
same size and sequence. The plot shows a PhosphorImager analysis of the
relative product formation as apparent on the gels. Whereas the
apparent initiation rates were similar, the Km
values varied over a 35-fold window (see Table I). White
circles, dG11-11R; black squares,
G11; black triangles, dG11.
|
|
These results showed that 2'-hydroxy groups on the nucleic acid
substrates were not required for catalysis by neither the endonuclease
nor the polymerase active sites. However, subtle differences in
conformation of the nucleic acid 3'-end at the polymerase active site
could influence the efficiency of transcription initiation.
Cleavage Specificity of dG20 DNA at Position 11 Is Maintained Even
after Introduction of Ribosyl Moieties at Different Positions of the
Sequence--
Cleavage of different species of capped RNA molecules by
the influenza virus endonuclease has been observed before at varying positions in a region between 9 and 15 nucleotides downstream of the
cap structure depending on the RNA sequence used in the cleavage
reaction. At present, the factors involved in the influence of the
sequence environment around the cleavage site on cleavage site
selection and cleavage efficiency are not very well understood (9-12,
29, 30). Previously, Olsen et al. (27) have introduced a
deoxyribosyl moiety at the cleavage site of a different RNA oligonucleotide substrate of the influenza virus endonuclease. This
modification induced a one-nucleotide downstream shift of the cleavage
site from the preferred position 13 to position 14 on an avian
myeloblastosis virus RNA 4-derived sequence (27). These observations
suggested a considerable flexibility in the distance between
cap-binding and endonuclease sites on the polymerase complex and a
significant preference for cleavage at ribosyl moieties on the nucleic
acid substrate. To further analyze the mechanism of cleavage site
choice, we therefore devised a series of DNA oligonucleotides based on
the dG20 sequence containing single ribosyl moieties in the region of
nucleotides 8-12.
Surprisingly, the endonuclease did not follow the ribonucleotide
positions on the DNA substrates. Instead, the specific endonuclease cleavage site at position 11 was preserved as the major cleavage site
in all dG20-derived oligonucleotides independently of the position of
the ribosyl moiety (Fig. 4). With these
DNA substrates, the endonuclease showed slight differences in cleavage
rates and in the efficiency of using a second specific cleavage site at position dG16 (Fig. 4, star). However, the major cleavage
site was at dG11 in all cases. Only the substrate dG20-10R also showed a low level of cleavage at the ribosyl position 10 in addition to
predominant cleavage at deoxyribonucleotide position 11. These results
suggested that in the case of the dG20 DNA sequence the chimeric
nucleic acid substrates were bound in a single, fixed position relative
to cap-binding and endonuclease sites.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Nucleic acid cleavage at guanosine 11 occurs
independently of the location of ribonucleotide residues in dG20.
dG20 DNA or dG20 derivatives containing single ribonucleotide
substitutions at the position (as indicated by the number and suffix R)
were incubated with influenza virus RNP for variable times up to 60 min
at 31 °C. The migration positions on a denaturing acrylamide gel of
the 20-mer substrates and the 11-mer products are indicated on the
left. The star indicates an alternative cleavage
site corresponding to position dG16. The nucleic acids were mainly
cleaved at position 11 or 16, but no bias to cleavage at
ribonucleotides was apparent. Only dG20-10R showed a low efficiency
additional cleavage site at position 10.
|
|
Endonuclease Cleavage Rates Are Regulated by Nucleotides 11 and 12 on G20-derived Substrates--
As shown above with the dG20-derived
nucleic acid sequence, cleavage site choice at position 11 was dominant
even when cleavage had to occur at a deoxyribosyl group and even if
ribonucleotides were present in the previously reported endonuclease
range of 9-15 nucleotides from the cap structure. These results
demonstrated that both DNA and RNA molecules were surprisingly
efficient endonuclease substrates. There were, however, measurable
differences in cleavage rates when RNA and DNA substrates were compared
in this assay. As shown in Fig. 5 (and
Table II), G20 RNA was cleaved about 5 times faster than dG20 DNA by the influenza virus endonuclease.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Improving the efficiency of DNA cleavage by
incorporation of ribonucleotides on either side of the preferred
cleavage site. Endonuclease reactions were performed and analyzed
on acrylamide gels as described in the legend to Fig. 4.
Lanes 1 and 2 show markers of G11 and
dG11 endonuclease products on the gel. The RNA, DNA, and chimeric
molecules indicated above the gel were incubated with
influenza RNPs for variable times up to 40 min. The analysis of
relative product formation was plotted on a graph against time, and the
data were fitted to calculate pseudo-first order rate constants. The
two RNA substrates, G20 and 7A16A, showed the highest rates; the DNA
substrate dG20 showed the lowest rate. A DNA substrate with two
ribonucleotide substitutions at positions 11 and 12 (dG20-11,12R)
showed a rate of cleavage virtually identical to G20 RNA, whereas an
RNA substrate with two deoxyribonucleotide substitutions at these
positions showed a slow rate of 11-mer formation (G20-11,12D).
Black squares, G20; white
diamonds, dG20-11,12R; black
triangles, dG20-11R; white triangles,
dG20-12R; black circles, dG20; white
squares, G20-11,12R; white circles,
7A16A RNA.
|
|
To investigate the nucleotide positions involved in this low but
significant level of RNA-DNA discrimination, we measured the cleavage
rates with dG20 derivatives containing single ribonucleotides along the
sequence. The molecules with ribonucleotide replacements at positions
between the cap structure and position 10 were all cleaved most
efficiently at deoxyribonucleotide dG11 with cleavage rates that were
indistinguishable from those of dG20 DNA, as exemplified by dG20-8R
and dG20-10R (Table II). Substitution of deoxyribonucleotide 11 with a
ribonucleotide led to a 3-fold increase in cleavage rate with
dG20-11R. Introducing a ribonucleotide at position 12 also showed a
low but reproducible improvement in endonuclease activity (dG20-12R;
Fig. 5). The combination of ribonucleotide replacements at positions 11 and 12 generated a nucleic acid substrate, dG20-11,12R, that was
cleaved as fast as G20 RNA (Fig. 5). To independently assess the
relative cleavage rate with a different RNA sequence, we measured
endonuclease activity with RNA oligonucleotide "7A16A," which is a
G20 RNA derivative with a double mutation of U7A and G16A. This RNA
molecule was cleaved with a rate indistinguishable from that of G20 RNA
(Fig. 5, Table II). As mentioned above, the RNA molecules migrated more
slowly than the DNA oligonucleotides on the acrylamide gels (Fig.
5).
These experiments showed that three related oligonucleotides, two RNA
molecules and one DNA molecule with two ribonucleotide replacements at
positions 11 and 12, were all cleaved with identical, high rates by the
influenza virus endonuclease. If these two positions in the G20/dG20
sequence indeed determined the RNA/DNA-like rates of cleavage, then
single deoxynucleotide substitutions in the RNA molecule should show
reciprocal effects to the ones described above.
Fig. 6 shows a series of G20-derived RNA
molecules with single deoxyribonucleotide replacements around the
cleavage site. As before, the major cleavage site at nucleotide 11 was
maintained independently of the deoxyribonucleotide position. There was
no shift in the cleavage site position, even when a single deoxyribosyl moiety was introduced at the preferred cleavage site, nucleotide 11 (Fig. 6, G20-11D). This chimeric molecule was cleaved at the deoxyribonucleotide position 11 with strong selectivity over any ribonucleotide upstream or downstream. Whereas a deoxyribonucleotide at
nucleotide position 12 only had a very small, if insignificant effect
on the cleavage rate, there was a 2-3-fold downward shift in activity
after replacement of nucleotide 11 with a deoxyribonucleotide (G20-11D). The nucleic acid with deoxyribonucleotides at both positions 11 and 12, G20-11,12D, was cleaved much less efficiently and
showed a 11-mer formation rate very close to that of dG20. In addition
to the low efficiency of cleavage at position 11 of G20-11,12D, this
endonuclease substrate showed an increased number of alternative
cleavage sites along the sequence. The increase in unspecific RNA
hydrolysis became more apparent with more highly labeled G20-11,12D
preparations (compare Figs. 5 and 6). The background cleavage results
in relatively low final concentrations of 11-mer product with
G20-11,12D as compared with other substrates. The G20-derived RNA
7A16A was again included as an independent standard of RNA cleavage
rates.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Reduction of RNA cleavage rates by
introducing deoxyribonucleotides on either side of the cleavage
site. Endonuclease reactions were performed and analyzed on
acrylamide gels as described in the legend to Fig. 4. The RNA, DNA, and
chimeric molecules indicated above the gel were incubated
with influenza RNPs for variable times up to 40 min. The analysis of
relative product formation is plotted on a graph against time, and the
data were fitted to calculate pseudo-first order rate constants. The
two RNA substrates, G20 and 7A16A, showed the highest rates; the DNA
substrate dG20 showed the lowest rate. An RNA substrate with two
deoxyribonucleotide substitutions at positions 11 and 12 showed a rate
of product formation similar to dG20 DNA. G20-11D with a single
deoxyribonucleotide at position 11 is still cleaved specifically at
position 11 only. Black squares, G20;
white squares, G20-12D; black
triangles, G20-11D; white diamonds,
G20-11,12D; black circles, dG20;
white triangles, 7A16A RNA.
|
|
These results demonstrated that although the binding register of the
G20-derived sequences was not influenced by either the presence or
absence of 2'-hydroxy groups, the single nucleotides on each side of
the cleavage site were major determinants of the apparent cleavage rate.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The Level of RNA/DNA Discrimination in the Influenza Virus
Endonuclease Active Site Is Low--
This work addressed the problem
of DNA/RNA discrimination by single strand-specific nucleases. The
endonuclease of influenza virus constitutes an activity that is closely
linked to the polymerase activity of the virus-encoded
RNA-dependent RNA polymerase as well as to a specific
cap-binding site on the polymerase complex. In the context of the
complete trimeric influenza virus polymerase complex, the endonuclease
cleaves RNA molecules to generate primers for transcription initiation.
This activity appears to be tightly controlled by allosteric effects,
since it is dependent on binding of a cap structure to the cap binding
site on the PB2 subunit. But a high affinity binding site for the cap
structure on the polymerase complex is only exposed after binding of a
conserved promoter RNA sequence to the subunit PB1 (5, 31-33).
Previous studies of the influenza virus endonuclease suggested a
two-metal ion mechanism for this active site, analogous to the active
site of the Klenow fragment exonuclease (17, 27, 34). However, in the
crystal structure of the complex between single-stranded DNA and the
Klenow exonuclease domain, the catalytic metal ions are not in
proximity to the ribose 2'-position (35-37), and the Klenow fragment
exonuclease readily hydrolyzes both RNA and DNA substrates
(e.g. Fig. 1, lane K). To further
elaborate the comparison between the influenza virus endonuclease and
the Klenow model active site, we were therefore interested in
determining how the influenza virus polymerase complex achieved the
apparent specificity for RNA cleavage, which is observed in
vivo.
Surprisingly, with the G20 sequences used in this study, the
single-stranded DNA molecules were efficiently cleaved at the same
position (dG11) as the corresponding RNA molecules (G11). This
suggested that the endonuclease active site itself only had a limited
ability to distinguish RNA from DNA molecules. The cleavage rate of
dG20 DNA was about 5-fold lower than the rate of G20 RNA. However,
RNA-like cleavage rates could be obtained in DNA molecules containing
single ribonucleotides on both sides of the cleavage site. This
magnitude of RNA/DNA discrimination makes it unlikely that the
2'-hydroxy group is involved in interactions directly contributing to
catalysis of the chemical reaction. Mutagenesis experiments with other
metal-dependent nucleases have shown at least
2-3-magnitude larger effects on catalysis upon removal of monodentate
metal ion ligands in the active site (36, 38-50). One nuclease, where
evidence for a direct interaction of a metal ion with the 2'-hydroxy
group has been obtained, RNase P, shows a more than 3000-fold reduction
of cleavage rate when a deoxyribonucleotide was introduced at the
cleavage site (24). Therefore, we consider it unlikely that the
2'-hydroxy group is a ligand of one of the catalytic metal ions in the
endonuclease active site.
The present results are more consistent with a model in which the
2'-hydroxy group at the cleavage site has only an indirect conformational influence on the catalytic step. For example, it could
reduce the energy barrier for the nucleic acid substrate to adopt a
ribose conformation geometrically aligned for the chemical reaction by
favoring a C3'-endo conformation of the ribose at the cleavage site.
Cleavage Site Choice at Position 11 of (d)G20 Substrate Is Dominant
over Ribonucleotide Preference at the Cleavage Site--
We were also
surprised to find that by replacing single deoxyribonucleotides along
the dG20 DNA molecule with ribonucleotides, we could not induce
cleavage activity at the single ribonucleotide position. It has been
reported with other RNA substrates that the influenza virus
endonuclease, although functionally linked to the cap binding site,
could cleave RNA molecules at variable distances 9-15 nucleotides from
the cap (7, 9-12, 30, 51-53). Hagen et al. (30) showed
that the endonuclease could alter cleavage site choice when single
bases were changed on a model RNA substrate similar to G20 RNA. In the
present study, the major cleavage site at (d)G11 was always retained on
all DNA and RNA substrates we examined containing the G20 base
sequence. Only in some cases were alternative cleavage sites observed.
The major alternative cleavage site was at the guanosine residue G16.
But the extent to which cleavage occurred at this site was independent
of the status of the 2'-position on the ribose of G16.
The cleavage rates of the DNA molecules containing single
ribonucleotide exchanges were virtually identical to the rates of complete DNA molecules except in the cases where positions 11 and 12 were affected. None of the chimeric molecules we studied showed
cleavage at (d)G11 with a rate higher than G20 RNA or lower than the
5-fold reduction observed with dG20 DNA. These results suggested that
the binding of DNA, RNA, and chimeric molecules in the area between cap
structure and cleavage site was independent of any conformational
effects or interactions mediated by the 2'-hydroxy groups. In all
cases, the nucleic acid substrate was kept in an identical position
relative to cap binding and endonuclease active sites. This suggests
that the cleavage at deoxyribonucleotide dG11 was significantly faster
than a rearrangement of the substrate nucleic acid on the endonuclease
protein to insert ribonucleotides upstream or downstream of position 11 into the active site.
These results appear to be in contrast to the observations of Olsen
et al. with a different RNA substrate sequence. They found that they could virtually abolish cleavage activity at the preferred position 13 on an avian myeloblastosis virus-derived RNA
oligonucleotide by replacing the ribonucleotide at position 13 with a
deoxyribonucleotide. With this molecule, the cleavage site was instead
shifted to position 14, and the cleavage efficiency appeared to be
reduced (27). Why the endonuclease behaves differently on the avian
myeloblastosis virus RNA-derived oligonucleotide is not clear at the
moment, but it could be related to the very unusual U-rich sequence of the avian myeloblastosis virus RNA with U represented by 14 out of 18 nucleotides. It is possible that U-rich sequences bind differently to
influenza virus polymerase as compared with mixed sequence oilgonucleotides. The fact that poly(U) is a surprisingly strong inhibitor of endonuclease activity when compared with other
homopolymers and unspecific RNAs is consistent with this possibility
(54).
The Cap Binding Site, but Not the Endonuclease Active Site Is the
Major Determinant of Single-stranded Nucleic Acid
Discrimination--
Within the fixed binding register of (d)G20 RNA
and DNA substrates on the polymerase complex, the ribonucleotides at
positions 11 and 12 measurably regulated the rate of nucleic acid
cleavage within a 5-fold window of activity. Either RNA molecules with single deoxyribonucleotide substitutions or DNA molecules with single
ribonucleotide substitutions gave corresponding results, demonstrating
that position 11 had the major effect on nuclease activity with a more
than additive contribution from position 12. This could be explained if
the ribose conformation at position 11 had the principal influence on
the geometry of the target phosphate between bases 11 and 12 with a
smaller contribution of position 12 2'-OH toward the same preferred
phosphate conformation.
Nevertheless, if the endonuclease active site were the only determinant
of nucleic acid selectivity, a significant amount of DNA would still be
hydrolyzed by this enzyme in a mixture of RNA and DNA molecules. But
the influenza virus endonuclease is also regulated by the cap binding
site of the protein. Neither RNA nor DNA cleavage could be detected
under the present in vitro conditions if these nucleic acids
lacked a cap structure or if they lacked m7G at the 5'-end. We
estimated that the cleavage rate of uncapped RNA must be at least 2 orders of magnitude slower than cleavage of capped DNA (data not
shown). The dependence of the influenza virus endonuclease on
methylated cap structures has been reported before for a different
substrate (10).
These results suggest that the influenza virus endonuclease has not
been optimized to distinguish RNA from DNA, but rather to recognize
capped nucleic acids. With no capped DNA molecules present in the
cellular environment, this specificity ensures the use of RNA
substrates for cleavage and the use of capped RNA primers for
transcription initiation. It may therefore be speculated that the
influenza virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase has recruited and combined a prototypical low specificity two-metal ion nuclease domain and a cap binding domain to create the unique system of cap
snatching for the highly specific generation of capped viral mRNAs.
Transcription Initiation from DNA Primers--
The specificity of
DNA cleavage by the influenza virus endonuclease was supported by the
efficient use of the DNA primers for transcription initiation in the
presence of CTP. Since CTP-dependent initiation has so far
only been observed with primers containing guanosine residues at the
3'-end, these observations are consistent with the mapping of the major
cleavage site to guanosine residue (d)G11 with all nucleic acid
substrates of this study irrespective of ribo- or deoxyribonucleotide
positions elsewhere on the molecule.
All substrates supported transcription initiation with CTP. In a
preliminary analysis of this reaction under single turnover conditions,
we observed a significant increase in the apparent Km value for CTP with dG11 DNA primers, whereas the
apparent initiation rates (kapp) were very
similar with DNA and RNA primers (Table I). This is consistent with a
model where the presence of a deoxyribonucleotide in the polymerase
active site mainly interferes with the binding of the next NTP
substrate rather than with the catalytic step. It may be possible that
a ribonucleotide at the 3-end of the primer takes up a conformation
that allows more efficient base stacking with the incoming NTP. More
experiments are required to test this model and to investigate the
influence of further nucleotide modifications on binding interactions
in the polymerase active site. Interestingly, when we added only a
single 2'-hydroxyl group to the 3'-terminal nucleotide we obtained a
primer molecule with an apparent Km value for CTP
even lower than the Km value in the presence of G11
RNA and with no apparent change in the initiation rate.
In the combined endonuclease/transcription initiation reactions in the
presence of (d)G20 nucleic acids and CTP, the apparent rate of
transcription initiation was about 5-fold lower with dG20 DNA as
compared with G20 RNA, similar to what had been observed in the
endonuclease reaction. This indicated that under these conditions the
cleavage reaction was rate-limiting. The apparent Km
value for CTP was again higher with the DNA substrate and could be
lowered to a value close to the one obtained with G20 RNA by adding a
2'-hydroxyl group to nucleotide 11 of the dG20 DNA.
Together these results showed that capped, single-stranded DNA
molecules were efficient substrates for both endonuclease and polymerase active sites during transcription initiation in
vitro. The main determinants for RNA selectivity were the cap
structure and the binding of two nucleotides in the endonuclease active site. The binding of the spacer sequence between these two sites was
independent of 2'-hydroxy groups on nucleic acid substrates. The major
effect of a deoxyribonucleotide at the 3'-end of a primer molecule was
an increase of the Km value of the first NTP to be incorporated.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: klaus.
klumpp{at}roche.com.
2
K. Klumpp and L. Doan, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RNP, ribonucleoprotein;
vRNA, viral genomic RNA;
G20, cap
1-(2'-methoxy)-Gem20 RNA;
dG20, cap 1-(2'-methoxy)-Gem20 DNA.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lamb, R. A.,
and Krug, R. M.
(1996)
in Virology
, 3rd Ed., Vol. 1
, pp. 1353-1395, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia
|
| 2.
|
Hsu, M. T.,
Parvin, J. D.,
Gupta, S.,
Krystal, M.,
and Palese, P.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
8140-8144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Honda, A.,
Mukaigawa, J.,
Yokoiyama, A.,
Kato, A.,
Ueda, S.,
Nagata, K.,
Krystal, M.,
Nayak, D. P.,
and Ishihama, A.
(1990)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
107,
624-628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Klumpp, K.,
Ruigrok, R. W. H.,
and Baudin, F.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1248-1257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Li, M. L.,
Ramirez, B. C.,
and Krug, R. M.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5844-5852[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Gonzalez, S.,
and Ortin, J.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
631-637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Hagen, M.,
Chung, T. D.,
Butcher, J. A.,
and Krystal, M.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
1509-1515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Fodor, E.,
Pritlove, D. C.,
and Brownlee, G. G.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
4092-4096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Plotch, S. J.,
Bouloy, M.,
and Krug, R. M.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
1618-1622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Plotch, S. J.,
Bouloy, M.,
Ulmanen, I.,
and Krug, R. M.
(1981)
Cell
23,
847-858[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Caton, A. J.,
and Robertson, J. S.
(1980)
Nucleic Acids Res.
8,
2591-2603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Beaton, A. R.,
and Krug, R. M.
(1981)
Nucleic Acids Res.
9,
4423-4436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Reines, D.
(1994)
Transcription: Mechanism and Regulation
, pp. 263-278, Raven Press, New York
|
| 14.
|
Thomas, M. J.,
Platas, A. A.,
and Hawley, D. K.
(1998)
Cell
93,
627-637[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Tomassini, J.,
Selnick, H.,
Davies, M. E.,
Armstrong, M. E.,
Baldwin, J.,
Bourgeois, M.,
Hastings, J.,
Hazuda, D.,
Lewis, J.,
McClements, W.,
Ponticello, G.,
Radzilowski, E.,
Smith, G.,
Tebben, E.,
and Wolfe, A.
(1994)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38,
2827-2837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Tisdale, M.,
Ellis, M.,
Klumpp, K.,
Court, S.,
and Ford, M.
(1995)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39,
2454-2458[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Doan, L.,
Handa, B.,
Roberts, N. A.,
and Klumpp, K.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
5612-5619[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Shi, L.,
Summers, D. F.,
Peng, Q.,
and Galarza, J. M.
(1995)
Virology
208,
38-47[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Blok, V.,
Cianci, C.,
Tibbles, K. W.,
Inglis, S. C.,
Krystal, M.,
and Digard, P.
(1996)
J. Gen. Virol.
77,
1025-1033[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Biswas, S. K.,
and Nayak, D. P.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
1819-1826[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Braam, J.,
Ulmanen, I.,
and Krug, R. M.
(1983)
Cell
34,
609-618[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Dismukes, G. C.
(1996)
Chem. Rev.
96,
2909-2926[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Wilcox, D. E.
(1996)
Chem. Rev.
96,
2435-2458[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Smith, D.,
and Pace, N. R.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
5273-5281[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Chen, Y.,
Li, X.,
and Gegenheimer, P.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
2425-2438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Brownlee, G. G.,
Fodor, E.,
Pritlove, D. C.,
Gould, K. G.,
and Dalluge, J. J.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
2641-2647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Olsen, D. B.,
Benseler, F.,
Cole, J. L.,
Stahlhut, M. W.,
Dempski, R. E.,
Darke, P. L.,
and Kuo, L. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7435-7439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Klumpp, K.,
Ford, M. J.,
and Ruigrok, R. W.
(1998)
J. Gen. Virol.
79,
1033-1045[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Lamb, R. A.,
and Choppin, P. W.
(1983)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
52,
467-506[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Hagen, M.,
Tiley, L.,
Chung, T. D.,
and Krystal, M.
(1995)
J. Gen. Virol.
76,
603-611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Cianci, C.,
Tiley, L.,
and Krystal, M.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
3995-3999[Abstract]
|
| 32.
|
Blaas, D.,
Patzelt, E.,
and Kuechler, E.
(1982)
Nucleic Acids Res.
10,
4803-4812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Ulmanen, I.,
Broni, B. A.,
and Krug, R. M.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
7355-7359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Steitz, T. A.,
and Steitz, J. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6498-6502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Freemont, P. S.,
Friedman, J. M.,
Beese, L. S.,
Sanderson, M. R.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
8924-8928[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Beese, L. S.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
25-33[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Brautigam, C. A.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
277,
363-377[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Derbyshire, V.,
Grindley, N. D.,
and Joyce, C. M.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
17-24[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Wang, J., Yu, P.,
Lin, T. C.,
Konigsberg, W. H.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
8110-8119[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Frey, M. W.,
Nossal, N. G.,
Capson, T. L.,
and Benkovic, S. J.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
2579-2583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Abdus Sattar, A. K.,
Lin, T. C.,
Jones, C.,
and Konigsberg, W. H.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
16621-16629[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Esteban, J. A.,
Soengas, M. S.,
Salas, M.,
and Blanco, L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
31946-31954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Hwang, K. Y.,
Baek, K.,
Kim, H. Y.,
and Cho, Y.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
707-713[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Shen, B.,
Nolan, J. P.,
Sklar, L. A.,
and Park, M. S.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3332-3338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Katayanagi, K.,
Ishikawa, M.,
Okumura, M.,
Ariyoshi, M.,
Kanaya, S.,
Kawano, Y.,
Suzuki, M.,
Tanaka, I.,
and Morikawa, K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22092-22099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Kanaya, S.,
Kohara, A.,
Miura, Y.,
Sekiguchi, A.,
Iwai, S.,
Inoue, H.,
Ohtsuka, E.,
and Ikehara, M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
4615-4621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Weston, S. A.,
Lahm, A.,
and Suck, D.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
226,
1237-1256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Jones, S. J.,
Worrall, A. F.,
and Connolly, B. A.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
264,
1154-1163[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Selent, U.,
Ruter, T.,
Kohler, E.,
Liedtke, M.,
Thielking, V.,
Alves, J.,
Oelgeschlager, T.,
Wolfes, H.,
Peters, F.,
and Pingoud, A.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
4808-4815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Thielking, V.,
Selent, U.,
Kohler, E.,
Wolfes, H.,
Pieper, U.,
Geiger, R.,
Urbanke, C.,
Winkler, F. K.,
and Pingoud, A.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
6416-6422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Bouloy, M.,
Morgan, M. A.,
Shatkin, A. J.,
and Krug, R. M.
(1979)
J. Virol.
32,
895-904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Krug, R. M.,
Broni, B. A.,
and Bouloy, M.
(1979)
Cell
18,
329-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Dhar, R.,
Chanock, R. M.,
and Lai, C. J.
(1980)
Cell
21,
495-500[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Kawakami, K.,
Mizumoto, K.,
and Ishihama, A.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
3637-3649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Hooker, R. Strong, R. Adams, B. Handa, J. H. Merrett, J. A. Martin, and K. Klumpp
A sensitive, single-tube assay to measure the enzymatic activities of influenza RNA polymerase and other poly(A) polymerases: application to kinetic and inhibitor analysis
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 1, 2001;
29(13):
2691 - 2698.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Leahy, D. C. Pritlove, L. L. M. Poon, and G. G. Brownlee
Mutagenic Analysis of the 5' Arm of the Influenza A Virus Virion RNA Promoter Defines the Sequence Requirements for Endonuclease Activity
J. Virol.,
January 1, 2001;
75(1):
134 - 142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|