|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 9, 6241-6245, March 3, 2000
Identification and Characterization of a Novel cAMP Receptor
Protein in the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC
6803*
Hidehisa
Yoshimura ,
Toru
Hisabori§,
Shuichi
Yanagisawa , and
Masayuki
Ohmori ¶
From the Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School
of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo
153-8902 and the § Research Laboratory of Resources
Utilization, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuda 4259, Midori-ku,
Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
 |
ABSTRACT |
Three open reading frames of
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 encoding a domain homologous
with the cAMP binding domain of bacterial cAMP receptor protein were
analyzed. These three open reading frames, sll1371, sll1924, and
slr0593, which were named sycrp1, sycrp2, and
sypk, respectively, were expressed in Escherichia coli as His-tagged or glutathione S-transferase
fusion proteins and purified, and their biochemical properties were
investigated. The results obtained for equilibrium dialysis
measurements using these recombinant proteins suggest that SYCRP1 and
SYPK show a binding affinity for cAMP while SYCRP2 does not. The
dissociation constant of His-tagged SYCRP1 for cAMP is approximately 3 µM. A cross-linking experiment using
1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide revealed that
His-tagged SYCRP1 forms a homodimer, and the presence or absence
of cAMP does not affect the formation of the homodimer. The amino acid
sequence reveals that SYCRP1 has a domain similar to the DNA binding
domain of bacterial cAMP receptor protein in the COOH-terminal region.
Consistent with this, His-tagged SYCRP1 forms a complex with DNA that
contains the consensus sequence for E. coli cAMP receptor
protein in the presence of cAMP. These results strongly suggest that
SYCRP1 is a novel cAMP receptor protein.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cyclic AMP (cAMP) is a global signaling molecule that exists in
both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. It mediates a signal from outside the
cell to a target protein that regulates gene expression or the enzyme
activity of various enzymes. cAMP plays a central role in the
regulation of the response to different nutritional states in enteric
bacteria (1). Glucose is known to lower intracellular cAMP levels under
certain conditions in Escherichia coli (2, 3). cAMP
functions to regulate transcription in conjunction with the cAMP
receptor protein (CRP)1 in
Gram-negative bacteria. E. coli CRP has been well
characterized in vitro by a variety of physical and
biochemical techniques, including x-ray analysis of CRP crystals (4,
5). The CRP forms a homodimer; each subunit of this dimer is composed
of two domains. The larger NH2-terminal domain contains the
cAMP binding site and shows homology to a class of
cAMP-dependent protein kinases (6-8). The dimer form of
CRP is able to bind to specific DNA sequences when it is liganded with
cAMP. The COOH-terminal domain can bind to DNA at helix-turn-helix
motif. The cAMP-CRP complex functions as a transcriptional regulator,
activating transcription at several promoters and repressing
transcription from others (1, 9-12).
In the green algae Chlamydomonas, cAMP is reported as a key
second messenger in the mating reaction, but the adenylate cyclase and
the mediator of cAMP have not yet been identified. In this case, the
cAMP signal cascade is poorly understood (13). In Euglena,
Carrie and Edmunds (14) have reported that cAMP mediates the phasing of
the cell division cycle through the circadian clock. Recently, it was
reported that the catalytic subunit of PKA had been identified in
Euglena gracilis (15), although the adenylate cyclase and
regulatory subunit of PKA have not been reported. In higher plants,
many attempts have been made to clone the adenylate cyclase and PKA
genes. Nevertheless, these genes have not been identified in higher plants.
Cyanobacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, are able to perform higher
plant-type oxygen evolving photosynthesis. The intracellular cAMP
levels of cyanobacteria change in response to changes in environmental
conditions such as light-dark, low pH-high pH, oxic-anoxic (16, 17),
and nitrogen replete-deplete (18). Exogenous cAMP stimulates the
gliding movement of Spirulina platensis (19) and also
enhances the cell motility of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (20). These results suggest that cAMP functions as a signaling molecule
in cyanobacteria as well. However, no intracellular molecule that
mediates the cAMP signal has yet been identified in cyanobacteria.
In this report, we investigated the biochemical properties, especially
the cAMP binding affinity, of putative cyanobacterial CRPs. Among them,
a novel cAMP receptor protein was identified as a cyanobacterial cAMP
receptor protein and named SYCRP1.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains and Growth Media--
The E. coli
strains used as hosts were JM109 (recA1, endA1,
gyrA96, thi, hsdR17(rK ,
mK+)), supE44, relA1,
(lac-proAB)/F' (traD36,
proAB, lacIq,
(lacZ)M15)) for cloning and BL21(DE3)pLysS
(F , ompT, hsdS (rB ,
mB ), dcm, gal, (DE3), pLysS) for
the expression of recombinant proteins. Bacteria were grown in
Luria-Bertani medium (21). When required, kanamycin or chloramphenicol
was added at 25 or 30 µg ml 1, respectively.
Construction of Expression Plasmids for Recombinant
Proteins--
To obtain DNA fragments corresponding to sll1371,
sll1924, and slr0593 ORFs (sycrp1, sycrp2 and
sypk, respectively), polymerase chain reactions were
performed with several sets of synthetic primers and genomic DNA from
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. The primers for
sycrp1 were CGA1 (5'-CGGGATCCATGGGCACTAGTCCCC-3') and CGA2 (5'-CCCACCTAGTGTGACAT-3'). Primers for sycrp2 were
HYP1(5'-CGGGATCCATGGCACCACAAAAGC-3') and HYP2
(5'-GGCAACTGCTGAGGTTT-3'). Primers for sypk were PKA1 (5'-CGGGATCCATGGAACTGGGAAAGATT-3') and PKA2 (5'-CAGGCTCTTAGACGTGG-3'). The sequences of the CGA1, HYP1, and PKA1 primers were designed to allow the introduction of a BamHI restriction site
immediately upstream of the initiator ATG codon. Each polymerase chain
reaction product was cloned into pCRII vector (Invitrogen). After
verification of the nucleotide sequence, sycrp1 and
sycrp2 were digested from each plasmid with BamHI
and EcoRI and cloned between the BamHI and
EcoRI sites of the pET-28a expression vector (Novagen). The resulting plasmids were named pCGA and pHYP. The sypk was
partially digested with AluI, and a DNA fragment
corresponding to a putative cAMP binding site (from 291 to 872 relative
to the start site of the open reading frame) was cloned into the
SmaI site of pGEX-2T (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The
direction of the open reading frame was confirmed by restriction
mapping. The resulting plasmid was named pPKA.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins--
The
transformants, BL21(DE3)pLysS cells harboring each of the pCGA, pHYP,
and pPKA plasmids, were grown at 37 °C in 1.5 liter of Luria-Bertani
medium supplemented with kanamycin or ampicillin (25 or 100 µg
ml 1, respectively) and chloramphenicol (30 µg
ml 1). The recombinant genes were expressed in
exponentially growing cells by adding 1 mM
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). After 3 h of incubation, the cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed
with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) buffer containing 100 mM NaCl, and resuspended in 50 ml of Buffer A consisting of
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, and 10%
(w/v) glycerol. The cell suspension was frozen and thawed, and then
sonicated at 4 °C for 9 min (3 min three times) using a sonicator
(model 200M, Kubota Co., Tokyo, Japan). The cell extract was
centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min, and the
supernatant was further centrifuged at 150,000 × g for
45 min.
Recombinant proteins in the 150,000 × g supernatants
were purified with several affinity columns connected to a fast protein liquid chromatography system (FPLC system, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
The 150,000 × g supernatant containing His-tagged
SYCRP1 (His-SYCRP1) was loaded onto a HiTrap chelating column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; 1.6 × 2.5 cm) connected to an FPLC system, and
the proteins were eluted using a step gradient of 30, 60, 100, and 200 mM imidazole in Buffer A. The 200 mM imidazole
fraction was loaded onto a HiTrap Q column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; 1.6 × 2.5 cm) connected to an FPLC system, and eluted using a step gradient of 100 and 200 mM NaCl in Buffer B consisting
of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 10% (w/v) glycerol. The 200 mM NaCl fraction contained purified His-SYCRP1. The
predicted molecular mass of this protein was determined to be 29.5 kDa
using DNASTAR software (DNASTAR Inc).
The 150,000 × g supernatant containing His-tagged
SYCRP2 (His-SYCRP2) was loaded onto a HiTrap SP column (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech; 0.7 × 2.5 cm) connected to an FPLC system, and
was eluted using a step gradient of 100, 200, and 400 mM
NaCl in Buffer B. The 400 mM NaCl fraction was loaded onto
a HiTrap chelating column connected to an FPLC system, and eluted using
a step gradient of 100, 200, and 400 mM imidazole in Buffer
A. The 400 mM imidazole fraction contained purified
His-SYCRP2. The predicted molecular mass of His-SYCRP2 is 30.4 kDa.
The 150,000 × g supernatant containing a fusion
protein (GST-pSYPK) between GST and a portion of SYPK was loaded onto a
glutathione-Sepharose 4B column (10 ml, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech),
and eluted with 5 mM glutathione in Buffer A. The eluate
was loaded onto a HiTrap Q column connected to an FPLC system, and
eluted using a step gradient of 100 and 200 mM NaCl in
Buffer B. The 200 mM NaCl fraction contained purified
GST-pSYPK. The predicted molecular mass of GST-pSYPK is 45.5 kDa.
Equilibrium Dialysis--
Equilibrium dialysis was performed
essentially as described by Hisabori et al. (22). Lucite
cells were fulfilled in a volume of 100 µl per half cell with
dialysis membranes (pore size 15 Å; Biomed Instruments Inc. Co.,
Fullerton, CA). A glass bead (inner diameter = 0.8 mm) was placed
in each half cell to aid stirring. One of the recombinant proteins in
100 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 200 mM
NaCl, and 10% (w/v) glycerol was placed in one side (sample side) of
the lucite cell, and the same volume of cAMP solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 200 mM NaCl, and 10%
(w/v) glycerol was placed in the other side (reference side). The
concentrations of the recombinant proteins and cAMP are indicated in
the legends to Figs. 3 and 4. The filled lucite cells were incubated in
a shaker (BR-15LF, Taitec Co., Saitama, Japan) at 20, 25, or 30 °C.
An incubation period of 6 h was needed to establish equilibria,
and 80-µl samples were taken from each half cell for HPLC analysis.
Assay for Bound cAMP by Reversed-phase HPLC--
An HPLC system
(Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) was used to measure the amounts of cAMP
bound to recombinant proteins. Aliquots from the sample side were
denatured for 5 min with cold trichloroacetic acid, final concentration
4.5% (w/v), or by heating at 95 °C for 2 min, and then centrifuged
at 18,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C to remove proteins.
The 10-µl aliquot of the supernatant from the sample side or 10 µl
from the reference side was applied to a TSK ODS-80Ts column (4.6 mm × 15 cm, Tosoh Co., Tokyo, Japan) equilibrated with 30 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) containing 5% (v/v)
acetonitrile; the effluent was monitored at 259 nm. The flow rate was
1.0 ml/min.
Cross-linking of His-SYCRP1 with
1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC)--
Purified
His-SYCRP1 (4 µg) was incubated in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
8.0), 200 mM NaCl, and 10% (w/v) glycerol, with or without 10 µM cAMP in a final volume of 20 µl for 10 min at
room temperature prior to the addition of EDC to a final concentration
of 25 mM. After 2 h of incubation, the cross-linking
reaction was stopped by the addition of 4× SDS sample-loading buffer.
The samples were loaded onto a 10% SDS-PAGE gel for electrophoresis.
The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250.
Gel Mobility Shift Assay--
An oligonucleotide
(5'-CGGGATCCGCGAAAAGTGTGACATATGTCACACTTTTCGC-3') was synthesized and
used in the assay. The sequence of the oligonucleotide includes a
consensus DNA sequence for E. coli CRP binding and a
BamHI sequence attached to the 5' end of the consensus
sequence. Since the consensus sequence is composed of two palindromic
copies of a 16-bp sequence, preparation of double strand DNA was
achieved by incubating the oligonucleotide at 95 °C for 1 min,
60 °C for 10 min, and 25 °C for 1 h in 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol. The DNA fragment was labeled with Klenow fragment and
[ -32P]dCTP (ICN Biomedicals Inc., Costa Mesa, CA), and
used as a probe. The 32P-labeled probe (10,000 cpm,
approximately 1 ng) was incubated with His-SYCRP1 in a total volume of
20 µl of the binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 60 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 8% (w/v) glycerol, 50 ng
of poly(dI-dC)) with or without a final concentration of 20 µM cAMP for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were
loaded onto 5% polyacrylamide gels
(acrylamide:N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide, 50:1). The
electrophoresis buffer was 0.25× TBE with or without 20 µM cAMP. Electrophoresis was conducted at constant
current (15 mA). When the binding reactions were carried out in buffer containing cAMP, electrophoresis buffer supplemented with 20 µM cAMP was also used. After electrophoresis, the gels
were dried and autoradiographed.
Other Analytical Procedures--
Protein concentration was
determined by the method of Bradford (23). Bovine serum albumin was
used as the standard. SDS-PAGE was carried out in polyacrylamide gels
containing 0.1% SDS by the method of Laemmli (24).
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Selection of ORFs That Predictably Encode cAMP Receptor
Proteins--
The cAMP binding motif in the prokaryotic cAMP receptor
protein and the eukaryotic regulatory subunit of
cAMP-dependent protein kinase is substantially conserved
(6-8). We performed a search for a putative cAMP receptor protein in
the Synechocystis PCC 6803 genome sequencing data (25) and
Cyano Base, with reference to the entire amino acid sequence of
E. coli CRP, and 18 candidate ORFs were first selected.
Based on the presence of functional amino acids that bind cAMP molecule
(4, 26), 18 ORFs were finally narrowed down to 3 ORFs (Fig.
1): sll1371, sll1924, and slr0593, which
we named sycrp1, sycrp2 and sypk,
respectively.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Amino acid sequence alignment of E. coli CRP, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 SYCRP1, SYCRP2, and SYPK. The asterisks mark amino acid
residues that lie close to the cAMP molecule, open
stars indicate residues that function in binding the cAMP
molecule to the E. coli CRP structure, and open
triangles indicate residues that are identical in all four
proteins. Identical and similar residues in at least three of the
sequences are shown in gray boxes.
|
|
Comparison of Deduced Amino Acid Sequences of Three ORFs with E. coli CRP Sequence--
The predicted amino acid sequences of the three
ORFs are overall less similar to E. coli CRP sequence (Fig.
1). The residue identity is only 14-23% between three proteins and
E. coli CRP, although some highly conserved amino acid
residues were identified among these amino acid sequences. The
amino-terminal region, from residues 1 to 88 of SYCRP1, shows low
sequence homology to the corresponding region of E. coli
CRP. However, the next segment, corresponding to residues 89-103 of
SYCRP1, shows high homology to E. coli CRP and contains
several amino acids that participate directly in the binding of cAMP
(indicated by the open stars in Fig. 1). The
identical residues in this segment are Gly-89, Glu-90, Glu-95, Glu-96,
Arg-99, Ser-100, and Val-103, which correspond to Gly-72, Glu-73,
Glu-78, Glu-79, Arg-83, Ser-84, and Val-87 in E. coli CRP,
respectively. The next highly homologous region, residues 138-141 of
SYCRP1, is highly conserved. Arg-124 stabilizes Glu-73 in E. coli CRP through an ionic interaction (4, 26). Thr-128 and Ser-129
participate in the binding of cAMP in E. coli CRP (4, 26),
but these residues are replaced by Leu-144 and Asn-145 in SYCRP1. A
check with the Sequence Motif Search (the GenomeNet web server)
revealed the cAMP binding motif 1 to be [LIVM]-[VIC]-X(2 amino acid
residues)-G-[DENQTA]-X-[GAC]-X(2
amino acid residues)-[LIVMFY](4 amino acid residues)-X(2
amino acid residues)-G and the cAMP binding motif 2 [LIVMF]-G-E-X-[GAS]-[LIVM]-X(amino acid
residues
5-11)-R-[STAQ]-A-X-[LIVMA]-X-[STACV].
These motifs are in pairs. SYCRP1 does not match these motifs
because of several amino acid substitutions. In motif 1 [VIC] and G
(underlined) are replaced by L and H, respectively. In motif 2, A
(underlined) is replaced by T (see Fig. 1; E. coli CRP motif
1 is the segment from Leu-30 to Gly-46 and motif 2 is the segment from
Ile-71 to Ala-89). Together, these data indicate that SYCRP1 must carry a novel cAMP binding motif. E. coli CRP has a
helix-turn-helix motif for DNA-binding in the carboxyl-terminal region
(5, 27). From residues Arg-196 to Glu-207 in SYCRP1, this region shows high homology to the latter helix region in E. coli CRP. The
specific amino acids that interact with DNA in E. coli CRP
are Arg-181, Glu-182, Thr-183, Arg-186, and Lys-189 (5).
SYCRP2 shows high homology (40% similarity) to SYCRP1. However, SYCRP2
lacks several amino acids corresponding to Glu-73, Arg-83, and Ser-84
in E. coli CRP, which participate directly in cAMP binding.
The amino acid sequence of SYPK containing a putative cAMP binding
domain is almost the same as that of SYCRP1. SYPK has common cAMP
binding motifs; however, the entire predicted amino acid sequence of
SYPK comprises 434 amino acids, and the amino- and carboxyl-terminal
regions are different from those in E. coli CRP and SYCRP1.
As a result of BLAST search (the GenBankTM BLAST server),
it is shown that the cAMP binding site of SYPK is similar to that of
the regulatory subunit of PKA in eukaryotes. However, the rest of the
SYPK sequence shows less homology to the regulatory subunit of
eukaryotic PKA.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins--
To
prepare recombinant proteins encoded by these ORFs for biochemical
analysis of the putative cAMP receptor proteins, we constructed
expression vectors (pCGA, pHYP, and pPKA) encoding hybrid proteins with
His tag or GST as described under "Experimental Procedures." When
the entire sypk was cloned into pET-28a, expression of the
desired protein was not observed. Therefore, we cloned the ORF into
pGEX-2T expression vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and succeeded in
expressing the desired protein as a fusion protein with GST.
Unfortunately, the product was insoluble (data not shown). Therefore,
the deduced amino acid sequence of the sypk containing a
putative cAMP-binding site (193 amino acids; 98-290 amino acids in the
entire predicted amino acid sequence, see Fig. 1) was examined. When
the partial sypk was cloned into the pGEX-2T expression
vector and expressed, a soluble product named GST-pSYPK was obtained. Then, this fusion protein was purified by glutathione-Sepharose 4B
column and ion exchange chromatography. Other recombinant proteins (His-tagged SYCRP1 and His-tagged SYCRP2) were purified by
Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid affinity chromatography and ion
exchange chromatography. The molecular masses of both His-tagged SYCRP1 (His-SYCRP1) and His-tagged SYCRP2 (His-SYCRP2) were estimated to be 30 kDa by SDS-PAGE analysis, corresponding closely to the theoretical
values (Fig. 2). The molecular mass of a
major band of GST-pSYPK was estimated to be 45 kDa, but another minor
band was also detected at 45.5 kDa, a value that corresponds to the theoretical molecular mass of GST-pSYPK. Probably several amino acids
in the carboxyl-terminal region were cleaved without any effect on the
binding to cAMP (Fig. 2, lane 6).

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Purification of His-tagged SYCRP1, His-tagged
SYCRP2, and GST-pSYPK. SDS-PAGE was carried out using a 12%
polyacrylamide gel. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue
R-250. Lane 1, cell extract of BL21(DE3)pLysS harboring pCGA
after the addition of 1 mM IPTG (15 µg); lane
2, His-tagged SYCRP1 by Ni2+ affinity chromatography
and ion exchange chromatography (3 µg); lane 3, cell
extract of BL21(DE3)pLysS harboring pHYP after the addition of 1 mM IPTG (15 µg); lane 4, His-tagged SYCRP2 by
Ni2+ affinity chromatography and ion exchange
chromatography (3 µg); lane 5, cell extract of
BL21(DE3)pLysS harboring pPKA after the addition of 1 mM
IPTG (15 µg); lane 6, GST-pSYPK by glutathione-Sepharose
4B chromatography and ion exchange chromatography (3 µg).
M indicates molecular size markers.
|
|
cAMP Binding Activity of Recombinant Proteins--
To determine
the cAMP binding ability of each of the expressed proteins, equilibrium
dialysis measurements were performed at 25 °C as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The results are shown in Fig.
3. Three-fifths of the amount of 5 µM cAMP was bound to 20 µM His-SYCRP1,
suggesting that His-SYCRP1 can bind cAMP. His-SYCRP2 showed low cAMP
binding activity. We had carried out the equilibrium dialysis
measurements using 10 µM cAMP, 10 µM
His-SYCRP2, and 10 µM His-tagged galactosidase (Novagen,
control sample) as negative control under the same conditions as in
Fig. 3 several times (data not shown) and found no cAMP binding
activity of His-SYCRP2. Based on these results, we concluded that
His-SYCRP2 had no cAMP binding activity. It was noted that very high
amounts of cAMP, more than the amounts initially added, were released from 20 µM GST-pSYPK, indicating that GST-pSYPK was
purified together with endogenously bound cAMP. To investigate the
binding specificity of His-SYCRP1 to cAMP, equilibrium dialysis
measurements were performed using 10 µM His-SYCRP1 and 10 µM 5'-AMP or 10 µM cGMP. His-SYCRP1 bound
neither 5'-AMP nor cGMP entirely (data not shown); thus, the data
indicate that His-SYCRP1 binds cAMP specifically.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Binding activity of cAMP to recombinant
proteins determined by equilibrium dialysis. 20 µM
His-SYCRP1, 10 µM His-SYCRP2, and 20 µM
GST-pSYPK were incubated for 6 h in the presence of 5 µM cAMP at 25 °C. The amounts of bound cAMP were
measured by HPLC as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
Dissociation Constant (Kd) of His-SYCRP1 from
cAMP--
To obtain the Kd value of His-SYCRP1 from
cAMP, 0.5-20 µM cAMP was incubated with 5 µM His-SYCRP1 for 6 h at 20 °C or 30 °C for
equilibrium dialysis. The Kd value was determined from the revolution lines by least-square analysis on a Scatchard plot
(Fig. 4). The Kd value
was 2.57 ± 0.08 µM at 20 °C and 2.82 ± 0.09 µM at 30 °C. In this range of temperature, the
Kd values were almost constant. These values are physiologically relevant in bacteria because the intracellular cAMP
concentration is within 0-10 µM (28). The
Kd values of bacterial CRPs are known to be in a
order of 10 5 M in general (29-31). The
obtained Kd value for His-SYCRP1 is comparatively
lower than that of other bacteria. The bacterial CRPs bind both cAMP
and cGMP and the Kd values of both nucleotides are
very similar, that is 10 5 M (29-31).
Considering the predicted maximum amounts of bound cAMP on His-SYCRP1,
approximately 0.6 molecule of cAMP bound on 1 molecule of His-SYCRP1.
This means that a His-SYCRP1 dimer binds 1 molecule of cAMP, as in the
case in E. coli CRP (32).

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Determination of the
Kd value for His-SYCRP1 by equilibrium
dialysis. The binding of cAMP to His-SYCRP1 was measured by
equilibrium dialysis at 20 °C ( ) and 30 °C ( ). 5 µM His-SYCRP1 was incubated for 6 h in the presence
of 0.5-20 µM of cAMP at 20 °C or 30 °C, and then
the amounts of bound cAMP were measured by HPLC as described under
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Cross-linking Analysis of His-SYCRP1--
To determine whether
cyanobacterial CRP forms a dimer, a protein cross-linking experiment of
His-SYCRP1 with the zero-length cross-linking reagent EDC was
performed. Fig. 5 shows the detecting of
a protein-protein cross-linking dimeric His-SYCRP1 band in the absence
of cAMP. In E. coli CRP, cAMP has been reported to stabilize
the CRP dimer form (33). If cAMP stabilized His-SYCRP1, the proportion
of dimeric His-SYCRP1 would be higher when cAMP was added. The addition
of cAMP, however, did not increase the proportion of the dimeric
His-SYCRP1 band in our preparations (Fig. 5). On the other hand, we
could confirm that His-SYCRP1 can bind cAMP molecules as a homodimer.
This result suggests that His-SYCRP1 may act as a transcriptional
regulator as in the case of other bacterial CRPs.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Analysis of EDC cross-link product of
His-SYCRP1. His-SYCRP1 (4 µg) in the presence or absence of 10 µM cAMP was reacted with 25 mM EDC for 2 h at room temperature as described under "Experimental Procedures."
The samples were loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel for
electrophoresis. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue
R-250.
|
|
Gel Mobility Shift Assay of the Binding of His-SYCRP1 to the E. coli CRP Consensus DNA Sequence--
The carboxyl-terminal region of
SYCRP1 shows high homology to the latter part of the helix-turn-helix
motif of E. coli CRP that participates in DNA-binding (Fig.
1). Therefore, there is a possibility that SYCRP1 binds some DNA
sequences that are similar to E. coli CRP-binding sequences.
To clarify this, we performed a gel mobility shift assay using
His-SYCRP1 and an E. coli CRP consensus DNA sequence as
described under "Experimental Procedures." As shown in Fig.
6A, incubation of His-SYCRP1
with the DNA probe in the presence of cAMP resulted in a retarded band
(lanes 2 and 3). The intensity of this band was
reduced by the addition of non-labeled DNA probe but not affected by
the addition of the same amount of poly(dI-dC) (lanes 4 and
5). This shifted band was not detected in the absence of
cAMP (Fig. 6A, lanes 6-9). To examine whether
the retarded complex involves His-SYCRP1, Western blotting analysis
with tetra-His antibodies (Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid horseradish
peroxidase conjugates, Qiagen) was carried out using the gel from the
gel mobility shift assay. As shown in Fig. 6B, the Western
blotting analysis after incubation of His-SYCRP1 with the DNA probe in
the presence of 20 µM cAMP, a His-SYCRP1 protein band was
detected at the same position as the shifted band. This band seems
arise from a specific interaction of His-SYCRP1 with the DNA probe.
His-SYCRP1 alone did not enter the gel in the presence of 20 µM cAMP.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Gel mobility shift assay with His-SYCRP1 and
the consensus sequence for E. coli CRP.
A, binding of purified His-SYCRP1 to the consensus sequence
DNA for E. coli CRP in the presence (lanes 1-5)
or absence (lanes 6-9) of cAMP was examined. The
experiments were carried out as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The 32P-labeled probe DNA (10,000 cpm,
approximately 1 ng) was incubated with the His-SYCRP1, non-labeled DNA,
and poly(dI-dC), which were added in the amounts indicated above each
lane (lanes 1-5) in the presence of 20 µM
cAMP. The 32P-labeled probe DNA (10,000 cpm, approximately
1 ng) and 50 ng of poly(dI-dC) were incubated with the His-SYCRP1 added
in the amounts indicated above each lane (lanes 6-9) in the
absence of cAMP. The composition of the retarded complex and free DNA
are indicated. B, His-SYCRP1 in the retarded complex was
detected by Western blot analysis. The non-labeled DNA probe (100 ng)
and 50 ng of poly(dI-dC) were incubated with the His-SYCRP1 added in
the amounts indicated above each lane (lanes 1-3) in the
presence of 20 µM cAMP.
|
|
It was concluded that His-SYCRP1 bound to an E. coli CRP
consensus DNA sequence, and the binding of His-SYCRP1 to this sequence is dependent on the presence of cAMP in vitro (Fig.
6A). It is unlikely that the His-SYCRP1 protein preparation
is contaminated with E. coli CRP, because no band was
observed except for His-SYCRP1 on denaturating polyacrylamide gel (Fig.
2), and a band migrating at a position corresponding to the shifted
band was observed in Western blotting analysis (Fig.
6B).
SYCRP1 Is a Novel CRP in Cyanobacteria--
Although a
sequence-specific interaction between His-SYCRP1 and a DNA sequence was
observed in competition experiments (lanes 4 and
5 in Fig. 6A), the identification of the optimum
sequence for the binding of His-SYCRP1 remains to be elucidated. The
results obtained in the present experiments suggest that SYCRP1 is a
novel cAMP receptor protein, which is involved in transcriptional
regulation as a mediator of the cAMP signal.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant-in-aid 11132208 for general
scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture of Japan and by a grant from the Program for Promotion of Basic
Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences of Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Life
Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan. Tel.: 81-3-5454-6631; Fax: 81-3-5454-4333; E-mail: cohmori@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CRP, cAMP receptor
protein;
sycrp1, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cAMP
receptor protein-like gene 1;
sycrp2, Synechocystis sp. 6803 cAMP receptor protein-like gene 2;
sypk, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cAMP-dependent
protein kinase-like gene;
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein
kinase;
ORF, open reading frame;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
IPTG, isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside;
PAGE, polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis;
EDC, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide;
FPLC, fast protein
liquid chromatography;
HPLC, high performance liquid
chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Botsford, J. L.,
and Harman, J. G.
(1992)
Microbiol. Rev.
56,
100-122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Makman, R. S.,
and Sutherland, E. W.
(1965)
J. Biol. Chem.
240,
1309-1314[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Pastan, I.,
and Perlman, R. L.
(1970)
Science
169,
339-344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Weber, I. T.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1987)
J. Mol. Biol.
198,
311-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Schultz, S. C.,
Shields, G. C.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1991)
Science
253,
1001-1007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Weber, I. T.,
Steitz, T. A.,
Bubis, J.,
and Taylor, S. S.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
343-351[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Taylor, S. S.,
Bubis, J.,
Toner-Webb, J.,
Sarawat, L. D.,
First, E. A.,
Buechler, J. A.,
Knighton, D. R.,
and Sowadski, J.
(1988)
FASEB J.
2,
2677-2685[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Taylor, S. S.,
Buechler, J. A.,
and Yonemoto, W.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
59,
971-1005[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Kolb, A.,
Busby, S.,
Buc, H.,
Garges, S.,
and Adhya, S.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62,
749-795[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Mori, K.,
and Aiba, H.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
14838-14843[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Hanamura, A.,
and Aiba, H
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
4413-4419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Valentin-Hansen, P.,
Søgaad-Andersen, L.,
and Pedersen, H.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
20,
461-466[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Quarmby, L. M.
(1994)
Plant Mol. Biol.
26,
1271-1287[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Carre, I. A.,
and Edmunds, L. N., Jr.
(1993)
J. Cell Sci.
104,
1163-1173[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Kiriyama, H.,
Nanmori, T.,
Hari, K.,
Matsuoka, D.,
Fukami, Y.,
Kikkawa, U.,
and Yasuda, T
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
450,
95-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Ohmori, M.,
Ohmori, K.,
and Hasunuma, K.
(1988)
Arch. Microbiol.
150,
203-204[CrossRef]
|
| 17.
|
Ohmori, M.
(1989)
Plant Cell Physiol.
30,
911-914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Hood, E. E.,
Armour, S.,
Ownby, J. D.,
Handa, A. K.,
and Bressan, R. A.
(1979)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
588,
193-200[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Ohmori, K.,
Hirose, M.,
and Ohmori, M.
(1992)
Plant Cell Physiol.
33,
21-25[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Terauchi, K.,
and Ohmori, M.
(1999)
Plant Cell Physiol.
40,
248-250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Miller, J. H.
(1972)
Experiments in Molecular Genetics
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 22.
|
Hisabori, T.,
and Sakurai, H.
(1984)
Plant Cell Physiol.
25,
483-493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Kaneko, T.,
Sato, S.,
Kotani, H.,
Tanaka, A.,
Asamizu, E.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Miyajima, N.,
Hirosawa, M.,
Sugiura, M.,
Sasamoto, S.,
Kimura, T.,
Hosouchi, T.,
Matsuno, A.,
Muraki, A.,
Nakazaki, N.,
Naruo, K.,
Okumura, S.,
Shimpo, S.,
Takeuchi, C.,
Wada, T.,
Watanabe, A.,
Yamada, M.,
Yasuda, M.,
and Tabata, S.
(1996)
DNA Res.
3,
109-136[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Vany, M.,
Gilliland, G. L.,
Harman, J. G.,
Peterkofsky, A.,
and Weber, I. T.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
4568-4574[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Weber, I. T.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
3973-3977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Botsford, J. L.
(1981)
Microbiol. Rev.
45,
620-642[Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Takahashi, M.,
Blasy, B.,
and Baudras, A.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
5124-5130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Ren, Y. L.,
Garges, S.,
Adhya, S.,
and Krakow, J. S.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
5127-5132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Chen, P. F.,
Tu, S. C.,
Hagag, N.,
Wu, F. Y.-H.,
and Wu, C. W.
(1985)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
241,
425-431[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Heyduk, T.,
and Lee, J. C.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
6914-6924[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Brown, A. M.,
and Crothers, D. M.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
7387-7391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kaneko, N. Nakajima, S. Okamoto, I. Suzuki, Y. Tanabe, M. Tamaoki, Y. Nakamura, F. Kasai, A. Watanabe, K. Kawashima, et al.
Complete Genomic Structure of the Bloom-forming Toxic Cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843
DNA Res,
January 11, 2008;
(2008)
dsm026v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Shinkai, S. Kira, N. Nakagawa, A. Kashihara, S. Kuramitsu, and S. Yokoyama
Transcription Activation Mediated by a Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein from Thermus thermophilus HB8
J. Bacteriol.,
May 15, 2007;
189(10):
3891 - 3901.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Bhaya, K. Nakasugi, F. Fazeli, and M. S. Burriesci
Phototaxis and Impaired Motility in Adenylyl Cyclase and Cyclase Receptor Protein Mutants of Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803.
J. Bacteriol.,
October 1, 2006;
188(20):
7306 - 7310.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-i. Maeda, C. Sugita, M. Sugita, and T. Omata
Latent Nitrate Transport Activity of a Novel Sulfate Permease-like Protein of the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 3, 2006;
281(9):
5869 - 5876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Masuda and T.-a. Ono
Adenylyl Cyclase Activity of Cya1 from the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803 Is Inhibited by Bicarbonate
J. Bacteriol.,
July 15, 2005;
187(14):
5032 - 5035.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yoshimura, S. Yoshihara, S. Okamoto, M. Ikeuchi, and M. Ohmori
A cAMP Receptor Protein, SYCRP1, is Responsible for the Cell Motility of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803
Plant Cell Physiol.,
April 15, 2002;
43(4):
460 - 463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. G. Ochoa de Alda and J. Houmard
Genomic survey of cAMP and cGMP signalling components in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803
Microbiology,
December 1, 2000;
146(12):
3183 - 3194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|