|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 9, 6246-6251, March 3, 2000
Retroviral Transfection of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells with
Human MDR1 Results in a Major Increase in
Globotriaosylceramide and 105- to 106-Fold
Increased Cell Sensitivity to Verocytotoxin
ROLE OF P-GLYCOPROTEIN IN GLYCOLIPID SYNTHESIS*
Prateek
Lala ,
Shinya
Ito§¶, and
Clifford A.
Lingwood ¶ **
From the Departments of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, § Pediatrics, and Biochemistry,
University of Toronto and the ¶ Research Institute, Hospital
for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
 |
ABSTRACT |
Retroviral infection of the
Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) renal cell line with human
MDR1 cDNA, encoding the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) multidrug
resistance efflux pump, induces a major accumulation of the
glycosphingolipid (GSL), globotriaosylceramide
(Gal 1-4Gal 1-4glucosylceramide-Gb3), the receptor
for the E. coli-derived verotoxin (VT), to effect a
~million-fold increase in cell sensitivity to VT. The shorter chain
fatty acid isoforms of Gb3 (primarily C16 and C18) are
elevated and VT is internalized to the endoplasmic reticulum/nuclear
envelope as we have reported for other hypersensitive cell lines. P-gp (but not MRP) inhibitors, e.g. ketoconazole or cyclosporin
A (CsA) prevented the increased Gb3 and VT sensitivity,
concomitant with increased vinblastine sensitivity. Gb3
synthase was not significantly elevated in MDR1-MDCK cells and was not
affected by CsA. In MDR1-MDCK cells, synthesis of fluorescent
N-[7-(4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole)]-aminocaproyl (NBD)-lactosylceramide (LacCer) and NBD-Gb3 via
NBD-glucosylceramide (GlcCer) from exogenous
NBD-C6-ceramide, was prevented by CsA. We therefore propose
that P-gp can mediate GlcCer translocation across the bilayer, from the cytosolic face of the Golgi to the lumen, to provide increased substrate for the lumenal synthesis of LacCer and subsequently Gb3. These results provide a molecular mechanism for the
observed increased sensitivity of multidrug-resistant tumors to VT and emphasize the potential of verotoxin as an antineoplastic. Two strains
(I and II) of MDCK cells, which differ in their glycolipid profile,
have been described. The original MDR1-MDCK parental cell was not
specified, but the MDR1-MDCK GSL phenotype and glycolipid synthase
activities indicate MDCK-I cells. However, the partial drug resistance
of MDCK-I cells precludes their being the parental cell. We speculate
that the retroviral transfection per se, or the subsequent
selection for drug resistance, selected a subpopulation of MDCK-I cells
in the parental MDCK-II cell culture and that drug resistance in
MDR1-MDCK cells is thus a result of both MDR1 expression and a second,
previously unrecognized, component, likely the high level of GlcCer
synthesis in these cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Verotoxin (VT)1 is an
Escherichia coli elaborated subunit toxin associated with
the (primarily pediatric) microangiopathy, hemolytic uremic syndrome
(1, 2). VT was shown to be the active component in a E. coli
extract, which showed anticancer activity in several in
vitro and in vivo models of neoplasia (3). Ovarian
carcinoma cell lines show particular sensitivity to verotoxin in
vitro. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) cell lines, expressing the MDR1
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) drug efflux pump, derived from these cells showed
approximately 1000-fold increase in sensitivity to verotoxin in
vitro (3). The increase in sensitivity was found to correlate with
the increased synthesis of Gb32
isoforms containing shorter fatty acids (4). Analysis of the neutral
glycolipid content of ovarian tumors showed that Gb3 was elevated for most tumors, but the elevation was markedly greater for
metastases and multidrug-resistant tumors (5). Such tumors showed a
noticeable increase in Gb3 species that migrated more slowly on TLC, consistent with shorter chain fatty acid isoforms. Similarly, human astrocytoma cell lines, which show high sensitivity to
verotoxin in vitro (6) and as nude mice xenografts in
vivo (7), showed increased content of short chain fatty acid
containing Gb3. The presence of the short chain fatty acid
Gb3 species was correlated with an altered intracellular
trafficking of verotoxin within the sensitive cells, such that toxin
was targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum, nuclear envelope, and
nucleus, as opposed to the Golgi in cells deficient in such receptor
isoforms (4).
In order to determine whether the known (glyco)lipid translocase
activity of P-gp itself (8) might play a role in glycolipid biosynthesis or trafficking within cells, we have compared the verotoxin sensitivity and glycolipid biosynthesis of MDCK cells in vitro before and after transfection with the MDR1 gene.
Our studies show MDR1 plays an important role in glycolipid
biosynthesis. In addition, our results cast doubt on the parental
origin of the MDR1-MDCK transfectants and show that the drug resistance of these cells is due in part to an additional, non-MDR1 mechanism.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
VT1 and VT1 B subunit (9) were purified by affinity
chromatography as described (10). VT1B was conjugated with Texas Red
(Molecular Probes) as described by the manufacturer.
Cell Culture--
MDCK cells retrovirally infected with the
human MDR1 cDNA were a gift from Dr. M. Gottesman
(National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) (11). Wild type MDCK
cells (which we have termed MDCK-wt in this study) were from ATCC,
MDCK-I cells were kindly provided by Dr. G. van Meer (University of
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Cells were maintained in
-minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum
and 40 µg/ml gentamycin (MDR1-MDCK medium also contained 80 ng/ml
colchicine). For P-gp inhibition studies, cells were grown in medium
supplemented with 4 µM cyclosporin A (CsA) for 4 days or
5 µM ketoconazole for 6 days.
Glycolipid Extraction--
107 cells were scraped
from the culture dish, centrifuged, and extracted with 20 volumes of
chloroform/methanol (2:1) as described previously (12). The cell pellet
was resuspended in water and extracted with 20 volumes
chloroform/methanol (1:1). The extract was dried, redissolved in
chloroform/methanol (2:1), and partitioned against water. The lower
phase was dried, redissolved in chloroform/methanol (98:2) and applied
on a silica column. The column was washed extensively with chloroform,
and the glycolipid fraction was eluted with acetone/methanol (9:1).
Fatty acid analysis of purified Gb3 was performed by high performance liquid chromatography analysis of the fatty acid methyl esters as previously (4, 13).
VT Overlay--
Verotoxin binding glycolipids were detected by
VT overlay as described (14) using human renal neutral glycolipid
fraction as standard.
Cytotoxicity--
Log phase cells were incubated in the presence
of increasing concentrations of verotoxin or vinblastine for a period
of 3 days. Surviving adherent cells were stained with crystal violet, which was subsequently solubilized in 10% acetic acid for
spectrophotometric quantitation. In some assays, cyclosporin A (4 µM) was added 3 days prior to VT or vinblastine and
maintained during the cytotoxicity assay, to inhibit P-gp function.
C6-NBD-ceramide Metabolic Labeling--
MDR1-MDCK cells were
grown to confluence ± 4 µM CsA. After 30 min in the
absence of serum, cells were treated with a liposome preparation
containing a fluorescent ceramide analog,
N-[7-(4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole)]- -aminocaproyl (16) (C6CerNBD) (Molecular Probes) and 77 mol%
dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (final [lipid] = 30 µM
in -minimal essential medium) and incubated at 4 °C for 90 min to
allow diffusion into the cells (17). Subsequently, cells were washed
and incubated in serum-free media ± CsA for 4 h at 37 °C to
allow cellular metabolism of C6CerNBD (8).
Cells were then washed, trypsinized, and counted, and glycolipids were
extracted, separated by TLC, and viewed under UV illumination. A
separate plate was also visualized by VT1 TLC overlay.
Glycolipid Glycosyltransferase Activity--
5 × 107 cells were washed, scraped into 2 ml of PBS, and
pelleted. The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of
dH2O, exposed to two freeze-thaw cycles, and sonicated for
30 s. The lysate was spun briefly to pellet membrane debris, and
the supernatant (microsomal fraction) was analyzed for protein content
by BCA assay (Pierce); the final protein concentration was adjusted to 2.5 mg/ml. In glass tubes, 20 µg of lipid substrate (LacCer,
Gb3, or Gb4) and 10 µl of Triton X-100 in
CHCl3 (10 mg/ml) were dried under N2. To this
mixture the following reagents were added (final concentrations
indicated): 20 mM MES buffer, pH 6.4, 10 mM
MnCl2, 0.2 µCi of UDP-[14C]galactose
(Gb3 synthase assay) or 0.5 µCi of
UDP-[3H]-N-acetylgalactosamine
(Gb4 and Gb5 synthase assays) (NEN Life Science
Products), 60 µl of microsomal extract (150 µg of protein), ddH2O to 100 µl final reaction volume. This mixture was
vortexed briefly and incubated at 37 °C for 90 min, with shaking.
Subsequently, 0.3 ml of PBS and 2 ml of 2:1
CHCl3/CH3OH were added, vortexed, and allowed
to partition overnight. The lower phase was collected and run on TLC as
described above; the plate was sprayed with enhancing reagent
(EN3HANCE; NEN Life Science Products) and exposed to x-ray
film in a phosphoimaging cassette for 6 days.
Anti-P-glycoprotein/VT1B Cell Labeling--
MDR-MDCK cells were
seeded on 12-mm diameter glass coverslips in a 24-well plate. For cell
surface Gb3 localization, cells were exposed to 1 µg/ml
Texas Red-labeled VT1B (or FITC-VT1B) (18) in PBS for 1 h at
4 °C. (For internalization, cells were then incubated at 37 °C
for 1 h and fixed). Co-staining for human P-gp was performed using
the MRK-16 monoclonal antibody (5 µg/ml; Kamiya), followed by
FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody, also at 4 °C for
1 h. After washing, coverslips were fixed, mounted, and examined
using a Polyvar fluorescent microscope under incident UV illumination.
For immunostaining of intracellular P-gp, cells were grown on glass
coverslips to ~50% confluence, then washed, fixed in 2% formalin,
quenched with 50 mM NH4Cl, and permeabilized
for 15 min with 0.1% Triton X-100, 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS.
Antibodies to P-gp (MRK-16) or the 58-kDa Golgi protein (19) (1:50;
Sigma), and after washing a secondary Texas Red-conjugated goat
anti-mouse antibody were added to the cells in permeabilization buffer.
Cells were washed, fixed again, mounted, and examined.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of MDR1 on the Neutral Glycolipid Content and Verotoxin
Sensitivity--
The glycosphingolipids (GSL) from MDCK-wt cells and
MDR1-MDCK cells are distinct (Fig. 1,
i). In MDCK-wt cells, Forssman glycolipid (Gb5)
is the major species detected, as reported by others for high passage
cultures (20, 21). Low levels of ceramide tetra-, tri-, di-, and
monohexosides are detected. No Gb3 was detected in MDCK-wt
cells by VT TLC overlay (Fig. 1, ii). In contrast, MDR1-
MDCK cells show a major concentration of Gb3, and increased levels of ceramide di- and monohexosides. While glycolipids normally migrate on TLC as doublets as a result of heterogeneity within the
lipid moiety, it is primarily the lower species of each GSL that is
enhanced in the MDR1-MDCK cells (Fig. 1). No Gb4 or
Forssman antigen are detected in the transfected cells.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Comparison of the glycolipid profile and VT
sensitivity of MDCK-wt, MDCK-I, and MDR1-MDCK cells. The lipids of
5 × 106 log. phase cells grown for 3 days with or
without CsA, were extracted and the glycolipid fraction (55) separated
by TLC (solvent 65:25:5 chloroform:methanol:water, v/v/v). Total
glycolipids were stained with orcinol (i) or Gb3
was visualized by VT1 overlay (4) (ii). The doublets of the
glycolipid standards are indicated. Lane 1,
MDCK-wt; lane 2, MDCK-I; lane
3, MDR1-MDCK; lane 4, CsA-treated
MDR1-MDCK; lane 5, probenecid-treated MDR1-MDCK;
lane 6, GSL standards.
|
|
Two variants of MDCK cells with differing glycolipid profiles have been
described (21). In the original report (11), the subtype of MDCK cell
used for transfection was not specified but, according to the
glycolipid profile in Fig. 1, the MDCK-wt cells are MDCK-II, which
express Forssman glycolipid but low levels of globoseries GSL (21). We
therefore also compared the glycolipid profile of MDR1-MDCK cells with
that of MDCK-I cells (Fig. 1) that do not express Gb4 or
Forssman but do express GM3 (21). MDCK-I cells showed high
GlcCer expression (unlike MDCK-wt cells) and low levels of LacCer and
Gb3 (Fig. 1). As in MDCK-MDRI cells, the GlcCer and LacCer
of MDCK-I cells was primarily the species migrating more slowly on TLC.
MDCK-I Gb3 resolved as a doublet and only the slower
species was dramatically elevated in the MDR1-MDCK cells (Fig.
1b). The fatty acid profiles of the elevated
Gb3, LacCer, and GlcCer in MDR1-MDCK cells (Table
I) were similar; the major species were
C16 and C18 (GlcCer contained C18:1 in addition) fatty acids, but very
few long chain species were present.
The increased Gb3 content of the
MDR1-transfected cells results in a 105- to
106-fold increase in sensitivity to VT as compared with
either MDCK-I or MDCK-wt cells (Fig.
2a). The P-gp inhibitor, CsA
(or ketoconazole; data not shown) caused a marked reduction in the
Gb3 (and LacCer and GlcCer) content of MDR1-MDCK cells
(Fig. 1) and a reduction in VT cytotoxicity to that of untransfected
MDCK cells, coincident with inducing increased sensitivity to
vinblastine (Fig. 2b). Despite the expression of endogenous
MDR activity (22), the overall glycolipid profile of untransfected MDCK
cells was not affected by CsA (data not shown). Although the multidrug
resistance-associated protein (MRP) has also been shown to act as a
lipid translocase (23), probenecid, a specific inhibitor of MRP (24)
had no effect on Gb3 synthesis (Fig. 1), VT, or vinblastine
sensitivity (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
VT and vinblastine cytotoxicity to MDCK-wt,
MDCK-I, and MDR1-MDCK cells. VT cytotoxicity (upper
panel) and vinblastine sensitivity (lower panel) were
monitored 3 days after addition, with or without CsA to inhibit
P-gp.
|
|
As expected, MDR1-MDCK cells are resistant to vinblastine and this is
abrogated in the presence of CsA (Fig. 2b). However, MDCK-wt
cells are significantly more susceptible to vinblastine than MDCK-I
cells, and this sensitivity was not increased by CsA (or probenecid;
data not shown) (Fig. 2b). The vinblastine sensitivity of
CsA-treated MDR1-MDCK cells is increased to the equivalent of that
of MDCK-I cells.
Surface and Subcellular P-gp and Gb3--
Double
labeling of MDR1-MDCK cells with Texas red-conjugated VT1B and
anti-P-gp at 4 °C (Fig. 3,
a and b) showed significant surface VT1B
staining. Surface staining by VT1B and anti-P-gp were in part,
coincident. Plasma membrane VT staining was lost following cyclosporin
A treatment (Fig. 3c) as expected. Less expected was the
similar loss of surface P-gp (Fig. 3d). Fluorescent-VT1B incubated with MDR1-MDCK cells and allowed to internalize at 37 °C,
accumulated around the nucleus (Fig. 3e) consistent with an ER/nuclear membrane location. This pattern was distinct from that of
the Golgi, as labeled with antibodies against the 58-kDa Golgi marker
protein (Fig. 3f). In contrast, intracellular P-gp showed the same crescent juxtanuclear Golgi location (Fig. 3g).

View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
TRITC-VT1B and anti-P-gp labeling of
MDCK-MDR1 transfectants. Cell surface double labeling with Texas
Red-VT1B (a and c) and anti-P-gp (MRK16
monoclonal antibody (Ref. 43)) detected using FITC-conjugated
antispecies antibodies (b and d), at 4 °C,
prior to (a and b) or following (c and
d) 72 h of culture in the presence of 4 µM cyclosporin A. e, internalization of
FITC-VT1B by MDR1-MDCK cells at 37 °C. f and
g, permeabilized MDR1-MDCK cells labeled with anti-58-kDa
Golgi marker protein (19) (f) or anti-P-gp (g) at
room temperature. Several labeled Golgi are arrowed.
|
|
Metabolic Labeling of Gb3 ± Cyclosporin
A--
The fluorescent ceramide analogue C6-NBD-ceramide
was taken up and converted to glucosyl NBD-ceramide (NBD-GlcCer) and
NBD-sphingomyelin (NBD-SM) in MDR1-MDCK cells, together with lower
levels of NBD-LacCer and NBD-Gb3 (Fig.
4a).While NBD-SM levels were
unchanged, reduced conversion to NBD-GlcCer and higher residual
NBD-ceramide was seen in the presence of CsA. Conversion of
NBD-ceramide to NBD-LacCer and NBD-Gb3 was prevented in the
presence of CsA. NBD-Gb3 was bound by VT, together with the
endogenous elevated Gb3 of MDR1-MDCK cells (Fig.
4b). This binding was lost after cell CsA treatment.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Anabolism of exogenous NBD-ceramide by
MDR1-MDCK cells ± CsA. MDR1-MDCK cells, ± 48 h of
pretreatment with 4 µM CsA, were treated with
NBD-ceramide for 4 h at 37 °C ± CsA. Glycolipids were
extracted and separated by TLC (equivalent of 2 × 106
cells/lane). Panel a, viewed under UV
illumination; panel b, VT overlay;
panel c, orcinol stain. Normal glycolipid
standards as indicated, were run in the last two
lanes. The position of the NBD-labeled glycolipids are indicated
on the left.
|
|
Glycolipid Glycosyltransferase Activity--
Gb3,
Gb4 and Forssman synthase activities were assayed in the
extracts of MDR1-MDCK, MDCK-I, and MDCK-wt cells. Gb3
synthase was detected in all cell lines (slightly less in MDCK-I cells) (Fig. 5a). Radiolabeled LacCer
was seen for MDCK-I cells only, likely due to their high endogenous
GlcCer content. The MDR1-MDCK Gb3 synthase assay was
unaffected by CsA pretreatment of cells or the direct addition of CsA
in the assay, indicating that P-gp does not play any direct role in
Gb3 synthesis. The expected high activity of the Forssman
-N-acetylgalactosaminyl transferase in MDCK-wt cells was
demonstrated by the fact that [14C]Gb4
synthesized from exogenous Gb3 was partially converted to Forssman in the Gb4 synthase assay. Exogenous
Gb4 was readily converted to [14C]Forssman in
the MDCK-wt extract. Neither Gb4 nor Forssman synthase activities were detected in MDCK-I or MDR1-MDCK extracts.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Glycolipid glycosyltransferase activity of
MDCK cell variants. The activity of Gb3,
Gb4 and Forssman synthases were assayed in the cell extract
as described in the experimental procedures using LacCer,
Gb3, and Gb4 as substrates respectively. The
radiolabeled products were separated by TLC and visualized by
autoradiography. Panel a, Gb3
synthase was assayed in the extract from MDCK-wt (lane
1), MDCK-I (lane 2), untreated
MDR1-MDCK cells (lane 3), CsA-treated MDR1-MDCK
cells (lane 4), and untreated MDR1-MDCK cell
extract to which CsA was added (lane 5). The more
slowly migrating [14C]Gal-labeled species detected on the
TLC (below Gb4) were LacCer-dependent but were
not characterized further. Panel b,
Gb4 and Forssman synthases were assayed in the extract from
MDCK-wt (lanes 1 and 2), MDCK-I
(lanes 3 and 4), and MDR1-MDCK cells
(lanes 5 and 6).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Role of MDR1 in Glycolipid Biosynthesis?--
We have proposed
that verotoxin may provide a new approach to cancer treatment (5-7)
and have observed that drug resistant tumor cells are hypersensitive to
VT (3, 4). The present studies indicate that this may be based on
altered expression of the verotoxin glycolipid receptor,
Gb3.
The first glycosylation step in GSL biosynthesis occurs on the
cytosolic face of the Golgi apparatus (25). The second enzyme, lactosylceramide synthase, the product of which is the precursor for
most GSLs, is within the lumen of the Golgi (26, 27). Thus a mechanism
for the translocation of the substrate, glucosylceramide, for this
enzyme from the cytosolic face to the lumen of the Golgi must exist. We
propose that P-gp acts at this point. The subsequent steps in the
globo-series biosynthesis occur in a stepwise fashion via Golgi-located
lumenal transferases (27). Earlier studies had shown, in polarized
epithelial cells, that P-gp acts as a lipid translocase of limited
specificity (8). P-gp could flip glucosylceramide containing a short
fatty acid derivatized with the NBD fluorescent marker from one side of
the membrane to the other. Such a "flippase" activity has also been
postulated as a mechanism by which P-gp can pump cytotoxic drugs out of
resistant cells (28).
Other studies in drug-resistant cancer have indicated increased GlcCer
synthesis is a marker of MDR in vitro and in vivo
(29, 30). It is proposed (31) that utilization of ceramide in GlcCer biosynthesis prevents ceramide-induced apoptosis. This would explain the partial drug resistance of MDCK-I as opposed to MDCK-wt cells (Fig.
4). Transfection of cells with glucosylceramide synthase can generate a
modest drug resistant phenotype (32) and inhibitors of GSL biosynthesis
have been shown to reverse the MDR phenotype (29). Stimulation of GSL
synthesis by P-gp may provide a further route for depletion of ceramide
pools to effect drug resistance.
The glycolipid species that accumulated in MDR1-MDCK cells were
primarily the more slowly migrating bands on TLC (corresponding to
shorter fatty acid chain containing species (Table I) for GlcCer,
LacCer, and Gb3. We therefore speculate that P-gp may be
involved in the translocation of glucosylceramide from the cytosolic
leaflet of the Golgi bilayer to the lumen but that this translocase
activity may be biased toward short fatty acid containing species. This
bias could result from a lower energy barrier to flip a short, as
opposed to a long, acyl chain. This increased lumenal short chain fatty
acid containing GlcCer provides the substrate for LacCer synthesis,
which in turn, is converted to Gb3. Thus, P-gp
overexpression results in a preferential accumulation of GSLs in this
pathway, which contain shorter fatty acid isoforms. The translocation
of short chain fatty acid containing GlcCer across the Golgi membrane
may disturb the equilibrium of the GlcCer synthetic reaction and thus
stimulate the synthesis of this GlcCer isoform. Alternatively, lumenal
translocation may protect GlcCer from cytosolic degradation. Inhibition
of P-gp with cyclosporin A (or ketoconazole; data not shown) results in
reversal of the Gb3, LacCer, and GlcCer accumulation to
levels typical of MDCK-wt cells.
The untransfected MDCK-wt cells contained a more slowly migrating
species corresponding to Forssman glycolipid, not present in MDR1-MDCK
cells. The accumulation of Gb3, but not Gb4 or
Forssman in MDR1-MDCK cells, together with our finding that treatment
of MDR1-MDCK cells with P-gp inhibitors, while preventing the
accumulation of globoseries glycolipids, did not induce Forssman, and
that we were only able to detect Gb4 synthase in the
"parental" MDCK-wt cells, initially suggested that MDR1 may have a
more complex effect on GSL biosynthesis than simply providing GlcCer
substrate as we propose. However, since two variants of MDCK cells (33)
with differing GSLs have been described (21), we investigated whether the MDR1-MDCK cells might have, in fact, been derived from the other
(Forssman negative) MDCK variant. Our initial results were consistent
with this hypothesis: MDCK-I cells contain Gb3 but not
Gb4 synthase, and express low levels of Gb3 but
no Gb4 or Forssman. In terms of sensitivity to VT, MDCK-wt
and MDCK-I cells are equally resistant (Fig. 2) and the effect of
transfection with MDR1 is equally dramatic no matter which is the
parental cell. However, MDCK-I cells contain high levels of lower band GlcCer, and thus the accumulation of short fatty acid chain LacCer and
Gb3 in MDR1-MDCK cells may be a consequence of the parental phenotype in this case, rather than a property of P-gp as we propose above.
The MDCK variant used in the original transfection was not investigated
(11), but the cell line that has been used as the parent (MDCK-wt) is,
from our glycolipid analysis, MDCK-II (21). If this is indeed the
parent, it is possible that the retroviral transfection was more
efficient in a small subpopulation of MDCK-I cells
(Gb3-positive and therefore perhaps more sensitive to
transfection; Ref. 34) present in the MDCK-wt cell line used.
Alternatively, the drug resistance used to select transformants was
MDCK-I cell selective, perhaps due, for example, to a functional
relationship between Gb3 and MDR1, as is suggested by the
cell surface colocalization of these species. The synthesis of high
levels of GlcCer might also contribute to this resistance, as proposed
by Cabot (35). The relative resistance of MDCK-I, as opposed to MDCK-wt
cells, to vinblastine (Fig. 4) would appear to preclude MDCK-I cells as
being the parental cell, since vinblastine in this concentration range
was used in screening in the original selection of MDR1-MDCK after
transfection (11) and would not have eliminated untransfected parental
cells if they were MDCK-I. This would support our contention that the
"MDCK-I phenotype" was selected from the MDCK-wt (MDCK-II) during
the original transfection/MDR1 selection. This would have significant
implications since the drug-resistant phenotype of the MDR1-MDCK cells
would comprise two components: first, MDR1 expression, and second, due
to the selection of the "MDCK-I phenotype," which might compromise
the interpretation of data obtained from the comparison of these cell
lines (36-38).
MDCK-I appears to be the first cell line that contains Gb3
but is insensitive to VT; MDCK-I cells have been previously shown to be
insensitive to VT (39). Sensitivity was induced when the cells were
pretreated with sodium butyrate (39), a procedure known to up-regulate
MDR1 (40, 41), which correlated with the induction of intracellular
trafficking of the toxin to the ER and nuclear membrane (42), in manner
similar to our observations in astrocytoma and ovarian carcinoma cell
lines (4).
P-gp is located appropriately to carry out GlcCer translocation for GSL
biosynthesis, since P-gp can function in both the Golgi (43-45) and
the nuclear envelope (46), in addition to the plasma membrane. P-gp in
MDR1-MDCK cells is, for the most part, localized in the Golgi,
consistent with the role we propose.
A role for P-gp in the translocation of GlcCer to the Golgi lumen is
further supported by our metabolic studies with NBD-ceramide. This
fluorescent glycolipid precursor was converted to GlcCer, LacCer, and
Gb3 in MDR1-MDCK cells. The fact that the level of NBD-Gb3 was not significantly higher than that of
NBD-LacCer (cf. endogenous Gb3 and LacCer)
supports our conclusion from the Gb3 synthase assay that
MDR1 does not per se increase the activity of this
-galactosyltransferase. In the presence of CsA, anabolism only to
glucosylceramide was seen, suggesting that further elongation of the
carbohydrate by the Golgi-located transferases of the globoseries, requires the MDR1 pump action to translocate the NBD-GlcCer from its
cytosolic site of synthesis to the Golgi lumen. Thus, the NBD-GlcCer
is, and in this context, behaves as, an analogue of short chain fatty
acid GlcCer. It is noteworthy in this context, that MRP, another drug
efflux pump, was able to translocate NBD-GlcCer but, unlike MDR1, not a
C6 fatty acid glucosylceramide species (23).
As expected, VT1 bound to MDR1-MDCK cells, but not after CsA treatment.
Our observation that the surface expression of P-gp was also lost was
not expected. CsA is known to up-regulate the overall expression of
P-gp (47). The significance of partial colocalization of P-gp and
Gb3 on MDR1-MDCK cells is under investigation.
Our present studies provide a molecular explanation for the increased
levels of short chain fatty acid containing Gb3 species in
multidrug-resistant tumors (4, 5, 48). Fatty acid analysis of the
Gb3 species elevated in MDR1-MDCK cells showed a
restriction to C16 and C18 saturated fatty acids. These same fatty acid
isoforms were elevated in MDR variants of ovarian carcinoma cell lines (4), which were 1000-fold hypersensitive to VT and targeted VT to the
ER nucleus as opposed to the Golgi. In MDR1-MDCK cells, VT1B
internalization was consistent with ER nucleus, consistent, in turn
with the Gb3 fatty acid content of these cells.
We suggest P-gp acts to supply increased substrate for the Golgi
lumenal synthesis of GSLs. Thus, the pattern of GSL synthesis prior to
P-gp expression, may determine the P-gp-dependent
phenotype. In tumor cells lacking the globoseries pathway, another
glycolipid series might be amplified. The fact that CsA did not have a
general inhibitory effect on the GSLs of MDCK-wt or MDCK-I cells and
that GM3 synthesis was not increased in MDR1-MDCK cells,
indicate that P-gp is not the only mechanism for GlcCer translocation
to the Golgi lumen. Different translocators may be required (to give different GlcCer (+LacCer) pools) for the other GSL pathways, which
branch from LacCer. This complements Lannert's studies, which indicate
GlcCer can translocate to the lumen of different regions of the Golgi
for the synthesis of different glycolipid series (27). While the basis
of the selective use of the increased LacCer for Gb3
synthesis is unknown, this may be related to the selective retention of
Gb3 in cells treated with fumonisin B (49). Ketoconazole
has a protective effect for other Gb3-containing cell
lines. The CD50 for VT1 is increased 6-fold for Vero cells, 5-fold for
HeLa cells, and 11-fold for SF539 astrocytoma cells in the presence of
this P-gp inhibitor (data not shown), suggesting that P-gp also plays a
role in the Gb3 synthesis of these cells.
It is of interest to note that the nephron is a primary site for the
localization of P-gp in normal cells (50). Gb3 is a major
glycolipid of the human kidney (51) but is not expressed in the adult
glomerulus (52). The kidney is also the major site of verotoxin-induced
pathology in HUS (53).
Several studies have indicated the importance of lipids in the action
of P-gp (54). Whatever its basis, the up-regulation of short fatty acid
chain containing Gb3 species in MDR1-MDCK cells exactly
complements the increased efficacy of these species to mediate
verotoxin-induced cytopathology in vitro (4) and in
vivo (7), and thereby render multidrug-resistant tumor cells hypersensitive to VT. This effect imbues VT with cytotoxic
characteristics ideal to complement current chemotherapy of
Gb3-positive tumors. Our finding of up-regulation of these
Gb3 isoforms in multiple drug-resistant cell lines (4) and
in drug-resistant human tumors (5) strongly supports the clinical
utility of this approach.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Canadian Medical Research Council
Grant MT13073.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Research Inst. Hospital
for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8,
Canada. Tel.: 416-813-5998; Fax: 416-813-5993; E-mail: cling@
sickkids.on.ca.
2
Glycosphingolipids are abbreviated according to
IUPAC-IUB nomenclature (56).
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
VT, verotoxin;
GlcCer, glucosylceramide;
LacCer, lactosylceramide;
NBD, N-[7-(4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole)]-aminocaproyl;
MRP, multidrug resistance-associated protein;
MDCK, Madin-Darby canine
kidney;
MDR, multidrug resistance;
P-gp, P-plycoprotein;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
CsA, cyclosporin A;
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
GSL, glycosphingolipid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Karmali, M. A.
(1989)
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
2,
15-38[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Lingwood, C. A.,
Mylvaganam, M.,
Arab, S.,
Khine, A. A.,
Magnusson, G.,
Grinstein, S.,
and Nyholm, P.-G.
(1998)
in
Shiga Toxin (Verotoxin) Binding to Its Receptor Glycolipid
(Kaper, J. B.
, and O'Brien, A. D., eds)
, pp. 129-139, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 3.
|
Farkas-Himsley, H.,
Rosen, B.,
Hill, R.,
Arab, S.,
and Lingwood, C. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
6996-7000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Arab, S.,
and Lingwood, C.
(1998)
J. Cell. Physiol.
177,
646-660[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Arab, S.,
Russel, E.,
Chapman, W.,
Rosen, B.,
and Lingwood, C.
(1997)
Oncol. Res.
9,
553-563[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Arab, S.,
Murakami, M.,
Dirks, P.,
Boyd, B.,
Hubbard, S.,
Lingwood, C.,
and Rutka, J.
(1998)
J. Neuro. Oncol.
40,
137-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Arab, S.,
Rutka, J.,
and Lingwood, C.
(1999)
Oncol. Res.
11,
33-39[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
van Helvoort, A.,
Smith, A.,
Sprong, H.,
Fritzsche, I.,
Schinkel, A.,
Borst, P.,
and van Meer, G.
(1996)
Cell
87,
507-517[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Ramotar, K.,
Boyd, B.,
Tyrrell, G.,
Gariepy, J.,
Lingwood, C. A.,
and Brunton, J.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
272,
805-811[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Boulanger, J.,
Huesca, M.,
Arab, S.,
and Lingwood, C. A.
(1994)
Anal. Biochem.
217,
1-6[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Pastan, I.,
Gottesman, M.,
Ueda, K.,
Lovelace, E.,
Rutherford, A.,
and Willingham, M.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
4486-4490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Pudymaitis, A.,
Armstrong, G.,
and Lingwood, C. A.
(1991)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
286,
448-452[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Myher, J. J.,
Kuksis, A.,
and Pind, S.
(1989)
Lipids
24,
396-407[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Yui, S. C. K.,
and Lingwood, C. A.
(1992)
Anal. Biochem
202,
188-192[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Lee, L.,
Abe, A.,
and Shayman, J. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14662-14669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Lipsky, N. G.,
and Pagano, R. E.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
2608-2612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Pagano, R.,
and Martin, O.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
4439-4445[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Khine, A. A.,
and Lingwood, C. A.
(1994)
J. Cell. Physiol.
161,
319-332[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Bloom, G.,
and Brashear, T.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
16083-16092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Nichols, G. E.,
Lovejoy, J. C.,
Borgman, C. A.,
Sanders, J. M.,
and Young, W. W., Jr.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
887,
1-12[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Hansson, G. C.,
Simons, K.,
and van Meer, G.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
483-489[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Hunter, J.,
Hirst, B. H.,
and Simmons, N. L.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1179,
1-10[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Raggers, R. J.,
van Helvoort, A.,
Evers, R.,
and van Meer, G.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
415-422[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Gollapudi, S.,
Kim, C.,
Tran, B.,
Sangha, S.,
and Gupta, S.
(1997)
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.
40,
150-158[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Jeckel, D.,
Karrenbauer, A.,
Burger, K.,
van Meer, G.,
and Wieland, F.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
259-267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Lannert, H.,
Bunning, C.,
Jeckel, D.,
and Wieland, F.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
342,
91-96[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Lannert, H.,
Gorgas, K.,
Meiner, I.,
Wieland, F. T.,
and Jeckel, D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2939-2946[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Higgins, C.,
and Gottesman, M.
(1992)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
17,
18-21[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Lavie, Y.,
Cao, H.,
Bursten, S. L.,
Giuliano, A. E.,
and Cabot, M. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19530-19536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Lavie, Y.,
Fiucci, G.,
and Lisovitch, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32380-32383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Lucci, A.,
Cho, W.,
Han, T.,
Giuliano, A.,
Morton, D.,
and Cabot, M.
(1998)
Anticancer Res.
18,
475-480[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Liu, Y.-Y.,
Han, T.-Y.,
Giuliano, A. E.,
and Cabot, M. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1140-1146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Richardson, J.,
Scalera, V.,
and Simmons, N.
(1981)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
673,
26-36[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Puri, A.,
Hug, P.,
Jernigan, K.,
Barchi, J.,
Kim, H.-Y.,
Hamilton, J.,
Wiels, J.,
Murray, G. J.,
Brady, R. O.,
and Blumenthal, R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14435-14440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Cabot, M. C.,
Han, T.-Y.,
and Giuliano, A. E.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
431,
185-188[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Horio, M.,
Chin, K.,
Currier, S.,
Goldenberg, S.,
Williams, C.,
Pastan, I,
Gottesman, M.,
and Handler, J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
14880-14884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Horio, M.,
Pastan, I.,
Gottesman, M.,
and Handler, J.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1027,
116-122[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Zhang, Y.,.,
and Benet, L.
(1998)
Pharm. Res.
15,
1520-1524[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Sandvig, K.,
Prydz, K.,
Ryd, M.,
and van Deurs, B.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
113,
553-562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Bates, S. E.,
Currier, S. J.,
Alvarez, M.,
and Fojo, A. T.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
6366-6372[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Morrow, C. S.,
Nakagawa, M.,
Goldsmith, M. E.,
Madden, J. J.,
and Cowan, K. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10739-10746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Sandvig, K.,
Ryd, M.,
Garred, O.,
Schweda, E.,
and Holm, P. K.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
53-64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Molinari, A.,
Cianfriglia, M.,
Meschini, S.,
Calcabrini, A.,
and Arancia, G.
(1994)
Int J. Cancer
59,
789-795[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Molinari, A.,
Calcabrini, A.,
Meschini, S.,
Stringaro, A.,
Del Bufalo, D.,
Cianfriglia, M.,
and Arancia, G.
(1998)
Int. J. Cancer
75,
885-893[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Willingham, M.,
Richert, N. D.,
Cornwell, M. M.,
Tsuruo, T.,
Hamada, H.,
Gottesman, M. M.,
and Pastan, I. H.
(1987)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
35,
1451-1456[Abstract]
|
| 46.
|
Baldini, N.,
Scotlandi, K.,
Serra, M.,
Shikita, T.,
Zini, N.,
Ognibene, A.,
Santi, S.,
Ferracini, R.,
and Maraldi, N. M.
(1995)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
68,
226-239[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Jette, L.,
Beaulieu, E.,
Leclerc, J. M.,
and Beliveau, R.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
F756-F765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Lingwood, C. A.,
Khine, A. A.,
and Arab, S.
(1998)
Acta Biochem. Polonic.
45,
351-359
|
| 49.
|
Meivar-Levy, I.,
and Futerman, A. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4607-4612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Ernest, S.,
Rajaraman, S.,
Megyesi, J.,
and Bello-Reuss, E. N.
(1997)
Nephron
77,
284-289[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Boyd, B.,
and Lingwood, C. A.
(1989)
Nephron
51,
207-210[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Lingwood, C. A.
(1994)
Nephron
66,
21-28[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Lingwood, C. A.
(1996)
Trends Microbiol
4,
147-153[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Sharom, F. J.
(1997)
J. Membr. Biol.
160,
161-175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Obrig, T.,
Louise, C.,
Lingwood, C.,
Boyd, B.,
Barley-Maloney, L.,
and Daniel, T.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
15484-15488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature.
(1977)
Lipids
12,
455-463[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Stamm, M. Mohr, P. S. Bridger, E. Schropfer, M. Konig, W. C. Stoffregen, E. A. Dean-Nystrom, G. Baljer, and C. Menge
Epithelial and Mesenchymal Cells in the Bovine Colonic Mucosa Differ in Their Responsiveness to Escherichia coli Shiga Toxin 1
Infect. Immun.,
November 1, 2008;
76(11):
5381 - 5391.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. De Rosa, C. Ackerley, B. Wang, S. Ito, D. M. Clarke, and C. Lingwood
Inhibition of Multidrug Resistance by AdamantylGb3, a Globotriaosylceramide Analog
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 22, 2008;
283(8):
4501 - 4511.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Smith, D. J. Sillence, T. Falguieres, R. M. Jarvis, L. Johannes, J. M. Lord, F. M. Platt, and L. M. Roberts
The Association of Shiga-like Toxin with Detergent-resistant Membranes Is Modulated by Glucosylceramide and Is an Essential Requirement in the Endoplasmic Reticulum for a Cytotoxic Effect
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2006;
17(3):
1375 - 1387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Chen, R. J. Mireles, S. D. Campbell, J. Lin, J. B. Mills, J. J. Xu, and T. A. Smolarek
DIFFERENTIAL INTERACTION OF 3-HYDROXY-3-METHYLGLUTARYL-COA REDUCTASE INHIBITORS WITH ABCB1, ABCC2, AND OATP1B1
Drug Metab. Dispos.,
April 1, 2005;
33(4):
537 - 546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Norris-Cervetto, R. Callaghan, F. M. Platt, R. A. Dwek, and T. D. Butters
Inhibition of Glucosylceramide Synthase Does Not Reverse Drug Resistance in Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 24, 2004;
279(39):
40412 - 40418.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Khine, P. Tam, A. Nutikka, and C. A. Lingwood
Brefeldin A and filipin distinguish two globotriaosyl ceramide/verotoxin-1 intracellular trafficking pathways involved in Vero cell cytotoxicity
Glycobiology,
August 1, 2004;
14(8):
701 - 712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. De Rosa, D. Sillence, C. Ackerley, and C. Lingwood
Role of Multiple Drug Resistance Protein 1 in Neutral but Not Acidic Glycosphingolipid Biosynthesis
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 27, 2004;
279(9):
7867 - 7876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hidemura, Y. L. Zhao, K. Ito, A. Nakao, Y. Tatsumi, H. Kanazawa, K. Takagi, M. Ohta, and T. Hasegawa
Shiga-Like Toxin II Impairs Hepatobiliary Transport of Doxorubicin in Rats by Down-Regulation of Hepatic P Glycoprotein and Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein Mrp2
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
May 1, 2003;
47(5):
1636 - 1642.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Chen, E. Hanson, J. W. Watson, and J. S. Lee
P-Glycoprotein Limits the Brain Penetration of Nonsedating but not Sedating H1-Antagonists
Drug Metab. Dispos.,
March 1, 2003;
31(3):
312 - 318.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. L. W. Cooling, D. S. Zhang, S. J. Naides, and T. A. W. Koerner
Glycosphingolipid expression in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: common expression of shiga toxin and parvovirus B19 receptors on early myeloblasts
Blood,
January 15, 2003;
101(2):
711 - 721.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Plo, G. Lehne, K. J. Beckstrom, N. Maestre, A. Bettaieb, G. Laurent, and D. Lautier
Influence of Ceramide Metabolism on P-Glycoprotein Function in Immature Acute Myeloid Leukemia KG1a Cells
Mol. Pharmacol.,
August 1, 2002;
62(2):
304 - 312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. van Meer and Q. Lisman
Sphingolipid Transport: Rafts and Translocators
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 12, 2002;
277(29):
25855 - 25858.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-Y. LIU, T.-Y. HAN, A. E. GIULIANO, and M. C. CABOT
Ceramide glycosylation potentiates cellular multidrug resistance
FASEB J,
March 1, 2001;
15(3):
719 - 730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. van Meer
What sugar next? Dimerization of sphingolipid glycosyltransferases
PNAS,
February 13, 2001;
98(4):
1321 - 1323.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Luker, T. P. Flagg, Q. Sha, K. E. Luker, C. M. Pica, C. G. Nichols, and D. Piwnica-Worms
MDR1 P-glycoprotein Reduces Influx of Substrates without Affecting Membrane Potential
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 21, 2001;
276(52):
49053 - 49060.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|