J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 9, 6328-6336, March 3, 2000
The C Terminus of SNAP25 Is Essential for
Ca2+-dependent Binding of Synaptotagmin to
SNARE Complexes*
Roy R. L.
Gerona,
Eric C.
Larsen
,
Judith A.
Kowalchyk, and
Thomas F. J.
Martin§
From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin,
Madison, Wisconsin 53706
 |
ABSTRACT |
The plasma membrane soluble
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein
receptor (SNARE) proteins syntaxin and synaptosome-associated protein
of 25 kDa (SNAP25) and the vesicle SNARE protein vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP) are essential for a late
Ca2+-dependent step in regulated exocytosis,
but their precise roles and regulation by Ca2+ are poorly
understood. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) E, a protease that cleaves
SNAP25 at Arg180-Ile181, completely inhibits
this late step in PC12 cell membranes, whereas BoNT A, which cleaves
SNAP25 at Gln197-Arg198, is only partially
inhibitory. The difference in toxin effectiveness was found to result
from a reversal of BoNT A but not BoNT E inhibition by elevated
Ca2+ concentrations. BoNT A treatment essentially increased
the Ca2+ concentration required to activate exocytosis,
which suggested a role for the C terminus of SNAP25 in the
Ca2+ regulation of exocytosis. Synaptotagmin, a proposed
Ca2+ sensor for exocytosis, was found to bind SNAP25 in a
Ca2+-stimulated manner.
Ca2+-dependent binding was abolished by BoNT E
treatment, whereas BoNT A treatment increased the Ca2+
concentration required for binding. The C terminus of SNAP25 was also
essential for Ca2+-dependent synaptotagmin
binding to SNAP25·syntaxin and SNAP25·syntaxin·VAMP SNARE
complexes. These results clarify classical observations on the
Ca2+ reversal of BoNT A inhibition of neurosecretion, and
they suggest that an essential role for the C terminus of SNAP25 in
regulated exocytosis is to mediate
Ca2+-dependent interactions between
synaptotagmin and SNARE protein complexes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Regulated neurotransmitter secretion is a specialized version of a
general membrane fusion mechanism in which exocytotic fusion is
strictly Ca2+-regulated. Studies of this process have
yielded insights into universal mechanisms for intracellular membrane
fusion and the identity of core components of the fusion machinery
(1-3). VAMP,1 syntaxin, and
SNAP25 are the neural protein substrates for clostridial neurotoxins, a
family of highly selective proteases that potently inhibits
neurosecretion (4, 5). These proteins are soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein
receptors (SNAREs) that mediate the membrane association of
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor, a protein required for
membrane fusion (6). The SNARE proteins are capable of assembling into
extremely stable heterotrimeric complexes (7-9) that consist of a
four-helix bundle in parallel alignment (10-13). A current hypothesis
suggests that the formation of SNARE complexes in trans
across apposing membranes promotes intimate bilayer interactions and
provides the energy to drive membrane fusion (10, 13-16). Studies with
donor and acceptor proteoliposomes containing VAMP or syntaxin/SNAP25
indicate that trans-SNARE complexes can mediate bilayer
phospholipid mixing and possibly fusion (16).
In contrast to the slow fusion mediated by reconstituted SNAREs
in vitro (16), neurosecretion is rapid and
Ca2+-dependent suggesting that Ca2+
may regulate SNARE complex formation (1, 17). Genetic studies have
established an important role for the Ca2+-binding vesicle
protein synaptotagmin I in rapid neurosecretion (18-21). Synaptotagmin
I exhibits Ca2+-dependent interactions with
acidic phospholipids as well as with syntaxin (22-27) leading to its
suggested role as a Ca2+ sensor for exocytosis (1, 18, 22,
23). The precise role of synaptotagmin and its
Ca2+-dependent interactions with phospholipids
or syntaxin in regulated neurosecretion remains to be determined.
Studies of regulated exocytosis in membrane preparations from
neuroendocrine cells demonstrated that SNAREs are required for a late
Ca2+-dependent step that occurs after vesicle
docking and ATP-dependent priming and immediately before
fusion (28, 29). Tetanus toxin and botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) B, C1,
and E completely inhibited the Ca2+-dependent
triggering of exocytosis, which implied that VAMP, syntaxin, and SNAP25
participate in steps close to or at fusion. Paradoxically BoNT A, which
like BoNT E cleaves SNAP25, was only partially inhibitory for triggered
fusion despite efficient proteolysis of SNAP25 (28). Because these
toxins cleave SNAP25 at distinct C-terminal sites
(Arg180-Ile181 for BoNT E and
Gln197-Arg198 for BoNT A; see Refs. 30 and 31),
it was inferred that the domain within the C terminus of SNAP25 between
the toxin cleavage sites plays a distinct role in
Ca2+-dependent membrane fusion events (28). In
the present study, this domain of SNAP25 is revealed to be essential
for Ca2+-dependent interactions with
synaptotagmin. This finding clarifies classical observations that BoNT
A inhibition of neurosecretion is partially reversed by elevating
neuronal Ca2+ levels (32). Moreover, the results suggest
that an important role for the C terminus of SNAP25 in regulated
exocytosis is to mediate Ca2+-dependent
interactions between synaptotagmin and SNARE protein complexes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Assays for Ca2+-activated Exocytosis--
PC12 cells
grown in Dulbecco's modified culture medium supplemented with 5%
horse serum and 5% iron-supplemented calf serum were incubated with
0.5 µCi/ml [3H]norepinephrine (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) plus 0.5 mM sodium ascorbate for 16 h at
37 oC. Cells were washed as described previously (28, 33)
and homogenized by multiple passes through a stainless steel ball homogenizer for preparation of a plasma membrane fraction that contains
docked dense-core vesicles (29). Secretion assays were conducted in
5-min incubations at 30 oC in 0.05 M HEPES, pH
7.2, 0.12 M potassium glutamate, 0.02 M potassium acetate, 0.002 M EGTA, 0.1% bovine serum
albumin, 0.002 M MgATP, and free Ca2+ adjusted
to indicated values. [3H]Norepinephrine was detected in
supernatants following centrifugation of reaction mixtures. Results are
plotted as percent norepinephrine release by normalization to the total
content of [3H]norepinephrine per incubation. BoNT A, B,
and E holotoxins (generously provided by B. R. DasGupta) and BoNT
C1 holotoxin (generously provided by S. Kozaki) were activated by
preincubation with 5 mM dithiothreitol. Toxin treatment of
membrane preparations (at 1-100 nM BoNT) was conducted for
3 min at 30 oC prior to adding Ca2+ for
secretion incubations. Mouse SNAP23 is susceptible to proteolysis by
BoNT A and E but only at concentrations or in incubations that exceed
those used here to cleave SNAP25 by at least 1000-fold (34, 35). It is
unlikely that the rat SNAP23 protein is the functional target of BoNT
inhibition in PC12 cell membranes.
Protein Binding Assays--
Glutathione S-transferase
(GST) fusion proteins encoded by pGEX vectors were produced in
Escherichia coli by standard methods. Vectors encoding
synaptotagmin I C2AB, C2A, C2B, SNAP25B, and VAMP were kindly provided
by R. H. Scheller (36, 37). The vector encoding synaptotagmin III
was kindly provided by M. Fukuda and K. Mikoshiba (38). The vector
encoding syntaxin 1A was kindly provided by E. Chapman (24). GST fusion
proteins were purified by glutathione-agarose chromatography (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) using either glutathione for elution or thrombin
cleavage for removing the GST. GST-SNAP25 was cleaved by BoNTs by
incubation with ~1 µM toxin for 1 h at room
temperature. Standard conditions for binding studies employed 200-µl
reactions containing 0.02 M HEPES, pH 7.2, 0.15 M KCl, 1 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 2.5% bovine serum albumin
or 1% cold fish skin gelatin (Sigma). Binary and ternary SNARE
complexes were formed by overnight incubation at 4 oC of
SNAP25, syntaxin, or VAMP each at 5 µM.
Glutathione-agarose beads containing 5-10 µg of GST-synaptotagmin
(C2AB) were incubated with 1 µM SNAP25, binary complex or
ternary complex. Glutathione-agarose beads containing 5-10 µg of
GST-SNAP25 were incubated with 0.5 µM synaptotagmin
(C2AB). Incubations were for 1 h at 4 oC following
which beads were recovered by centrifugation and washed twice in 400 µl of assay buffer prior to solubilization in sample buffer for
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Detection of SDS-resistant
heterotrimeric SNARE complexes was by described methods (8).
Electrophoresed samples were transferred to nitrocellulose for
immunoblotting with the following antibodies: a polyclonal rabbit
antibody generated with the C2AB regions of synaptotagmin I or III, a
polyclonal rabbit antibody generated with a 15-residue N-terminal VAMP
peptide sequence conjugated to bovine serum albumin, a polyclonal
rabbit antibody generated to a C-terminal SNAP25 peptide (residues
195-206, generously provided by M. Wilson or obtained commercially
from StressGen Biotechnologies Corp.), a rabbit polyclonal antibody
generated to GST-SNAP25 (Alomone Labs), a mouse monoclonal antibody to
syntaxin 1 (HPC-1, Sigma), or a mouse monoclonal antibody to VAMP (Cl
69.1, generously provided by R. Jahn). 125I-Protein A or
goat anti-mouse IgG (NEN Life Science Products) were used as secondary
reagents. Autoradiograms were quantitated with a Molecular Dynamics SI
Densitometer using ImageQuaNT software.
Ca2+-dependent binding of native synaptotagmin
I to SNAP25 was assessed in binding studies with rat brain detergent
extracts incubated with GST-SNAP25 immobilized on glutathione-agarose
as described above. Rat brain extracts were prepared by
homogenizing rat brains in 0.32 M sucrose using 10 strokes
of a motor-driven Teflon glass homogenizer. Following clarification at
5,000 rpm for 2 min in an SS34 rotor, crude synaptosomes were collected by centrifugation at 11,000 rpm for 12 min and solubilized in 1%
Triton X-100 in 0.05 M HEPES, pH 7.2, 0.1 M
NaCl with protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, and 20 µg/ml aprotinin). Detergent
extracts were adjusted to 1 mM EGTA or 1 mM
CaCl2 for binding or immunoprecipitation studies. SNAP25
immunoprecipitations were conducted by overnight incubation of
detergent extracts at 4 oC with SNAP25 monoclonal
antibodies (Sternberger Monoclonals Inc.) or mouse immunoglobulins
immobilized on protein A-Sepharose.
 |
RESULTS |
Ca2+ Reversal of Toxin Inhibition Is Restricted to BoNT
A--
Studies of the late Ca2+-dependent step
of exocytosis in PC12 cells showed that BoNT E completely inhibited
Ca2+-triggered fusion, whereas BoNT A was only partially,
if at all, inhibitory despite effective cleavage of SNAP25 (28, 33). An
explanation for this difference between toxins was suggested by earlier
studies demonstrating that BoNT A inhibition of neurosecretion was
unique in being reversed by elevating Ca2+ levels in
synapses (32). We therefore examined the effects of Ca2+ on
the BoNT inhibition of regulated norepinephrine secretion in a
cell-free assay that utilizes purified PC12 cell plasma membranes containing docked dense-core vesicles (29).
BoNT E treatment strongly inhibited
Ca2+-dependent norepinephrine release at all
Ca2+ concentrations tested (Fig.
1, upper panel). In contrast,
BoNT A treatment inhibited Ca2+-dependent
norepinephrine release at intermediate Ca2+ concentrations,
but inhibition was strongly reduced at high Ca2+
concentrations. BoNT E and BoNT A were present at maximally effective concentrations and catalyzed similar extents of SNAP25 proteolysis (~80%, not shown). Treatment with BoNT A essentially increased the
apparent EC50 for Ca2+ in triggering exocytosis
(from 2.3 ± 0.3 to 4.4 ± 1.1 µM; mean ± S.D. for six experiments). This increase was not simply the result of a
partial attenuation of exocytosis at all Ca2+
concentrations since the percent inhibition by BoNT A decreased with
increasing Ca2+ concentrations unlike that for other BoNTs
(Fig. 1, middle panel).

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Botulinum neurotoxins differ in efficacy for
inhibition of Ca2+-dependent
norepinephrine secretion at high Ca2+ concentrations.
The effectiveness of toxins in inhibiting Ca2+-activated
norepinephrine secretion was tested in PC12 cell membrane preparations
as described under "Experimental Procedures." Upper,
comparison of inhibition by BoNT A (10 7 M)
and BoNT E (10 7 M). Inhibition by BoNT A
decreased at higher Ca2+ concentrations, whereas that by BoNT E was substantial over the full range of Ca2+.
In effect, BoNT A treatment increased the Ca2+
concentration required to activate secretion. The EC50 for
Ca2+ in untreated membranes was 2.3 ± 0.3 µM, whereas it shifted to 4.4 ± 1.1 µM in BoNT A-treated membranes (mean ± S.D.;
n = 6). Middle, BoNT A inhibition of
secretion at different Ca2+ concentrations. Indicated
concentrations of BoNT A were tested for inhibition of norepinephrine
secretion stimulated at 3, 10, and 30 µM
Ca2+. Lower, comparison of inhibition of
norepinephrine secretion by BoNT B (10 7 M)
and BoNT C1 (10 7 M) in the membrane
preparation. Inhibition observed with these toxins was reversed to only
a small extent at higher Ca2+ concentrations. Each data
point shown represents the mean of duplicate determinations that
differed by less than 3%.
|
|
The Ca2+ reversal of inhibition by toxin was unique for
BoNT A and was not observed for BoNT B, which cleaves VAMP (39), or for
BoNT C1, which preferentially cleaves syntaxin (40). These toxins
strongly inhibited Ca2+-dependent
norepinephrine release at all Ca2+ concentrations (Fig. 1,
lower panel). The unique Ca2+ reversal of BoNT A
inhibition of secretion observed in this purified PC12 cell membrane
preparation is similar to that reported previously for BoNT inhibition
in more complex systems such as the neuromuscular junction or
hippocampal and chromaffin cells (32, 41-43).
Synaptotagmin Interacts with the C Terminus of SNAP25 in a
Ca2+-dependent Manner--
Because cleavage of
SNAP25 by BoNT A increased the EC50 for Ca2+
activation of exocytosis, we considered the possibility that SNAP25 was
involved in the Ca2+ regulation of exocytosis. The
Ca2+-binding vesicle protein synaptotagmin has been
proposed to function as a Ca2+ sensor for exocytosis (1,
18, 22), so we determined whether synaptotagmin interacts directly with
SNAP25. In the absence of Ca2+, recombinant SNAP25 was
found to bind an immobilized recombinant synaptotagmin I cytoplasmic
domain (Fig. 2A, upper panel)
as was previously reported (44). However, the inclusion of
Ca2+ in the binding reaction markedly enhanced SNAP25
binding to synaptotagmin I (Fig. 2A, upper panel). In the
reverse orientation, binding of the synaptotagmin I cytoplasmic domain
to immobilized SNAP25 was also observed, and the binding was strongly
stimulated by inclusion of Ca2+ (Fig. 2A, lower
panel). Quantitation of several binding experiments in both
formats showed that Ca2+ stimulated the interaction of
SNAP25 with synaptotagmin I by 2.5-5-fold (Fig. 2B).
Synaptotagmin I binding to SNAP25 in the absence of Ca2+
was of relatively low affinity (KD
~1.2 µM), but Ca2+ increased the affinity
of the interaction about 6-fold to a KD ~0.2 µM (Fig. 2C). The stoichiometry of the
binding at saturation in the absence or presence of Ca2+
approached 1:1.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Distinct
Ca2+-independent and
Ca2+-dependent interactions between
synaptotagmin I (Syt I) and SNAP25. A,
Upper, binding of SNAP25 to immobilized synaptotagmin I. Glutathione (GSSG)-agarose beads containing 5 µg of
GST-cytoplasmic domain fusion protein of synaptotagmin I or without
bound protein were incubated with 5 µg of SNAP25 either in the
absence or presence of 1 mM Ca2+ as indicated.
Beads were washed and solubilized in sample buffer for analysis of the
bound fraction by Western blotting with a SNAP25 antibody.
Lower, binding of synaptotagmin I cytoplasmic domain to
immobilized SNAP25. GSSG-agarose beads containing 5 µg of GST-SNAP25
or without bound protein were incubated with 5 µg of synaptotagmin I
cytoplasmic domain in the absence or presence of 1 mM
Ca2+. Beads were processed for Western blotting with
synaptotagmin I antibody. B, summary of synaptotagmin
I-SNAP25 binding studies. Binding studies similar to those of
A and B were analyzed by Western blotting and
quantified by densitometry. Inclusion of 1 mM
Ca2+ in the incubations stimulated binding 2.5-4-fold
above that observed with 2 mM EGTA. C,
synaptotagmin I binding to SNAP25 exhibits saturation for
Ca2+-independent and Ca2+-dependent
interactions. Binding of the indicated concentrations of synaptotagmin
I cytoplasmic domain to 5 µg of GST-SNAP25 immobilized on
GSSG-agarose beads was determined. In four similar experiments, the
stoichiometry of binding at saturation (+Ca2+)
was 0.3-0.8 mol of synaptotagmin I bound per mol of SNAP25.
|
|
High Ca2+ concentrations were required to stimulate
synaptotagmin I binding to SNAP25 with half-maximal stimulation
observed at ~200 µM Ca2+ (Fig.
3A). When tested at 1 mM, Sr2+, Ba2+, and
Mg2+ did not stimulate the interaction (not shown).
Synaptotagmin I interactions with syntaxin were previously reported to
exhibit a very similar Ca2+ dependence and cation
specificity (24-27). Synaptotagmin contains two C2 domains that
mediate Ca2+-dependent activities of the
protein (45). To define the region of synaptotagmin I required for the
Ca2+-stimulated interaction with SNAP25, recombinant
proteins representing the full cytoplasmic domain (C2AB), a
membrane-proximal region containing the C2A domain (C2A), or a
membrane-distal region containing the C2B domain (C2B) were used as
immobilized ligands. The C2B protein exhibited virtually no SNAP25
binding in the presence or absence of Ca2+ (Fig.
3B). In contrast, the C2A fusion protein exhibited
Ca2+-stimulated interactions with SNAP25 although it did
not possess the full activity of the complete cytoplasmic domain
(C2AB). These results for SNAP25 were similar to those for
synaptotagmin I interactions with syntaxin where the C2A domain
exhibited partial Ca2+-dependent binding
activity (24-27). The syntaxin binding domain of synaptotagmin I has
recently been shown to consist of the C2A domain with a linker region
plus a portion of the C2B domain (62).

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Interactions between synaptotagmin I
(Syt I) and SNAP25 require the C terminus of SNAP25
and the C2A domain of synaptotagmin I. A, Ca2+
dependence of synaptotagmin I-SNAP25 interaction. Binding studies were
conducted at the indicated Ca2+ concentrations with 5 µg
of synaptotagmin I cytoplasmic domain and 10 µg of GST-SNAP25
(control) or BoNT A-treated GST-SNAP25 (BoNT A)
immobilized on GSSG-agarose beads. SNAP25 was quantitatively cleaved by
BoNT A treatment. Cleavage by BoNT A shifted the Ca2+
dependence of the binding to the right. B, domains of
synaptotagmin I required for SNAP25 binding. GST fusion proteins
consisting of the complete synaptotagmin I cytoplasmic domain
(C2AB), the membrane-proximal domain (C2A), or
the membrane-distal domain (C2B) were immobilized in
equimolar amounts on GSSG-agarose beads and incubated with 1 µM SNAP25 in the absence ( ) or presence (+) of 1 mM Ca2+. SNAP25 binding to the C2B fusion
protein was not different from binding to protein-free agarose beads.
The C2A fusion protein exhibited significant SNAP25 binding, but it was
quantitatively less than that for the C2AB fusion protein.
C, effect of cleavage by BoNT A and BoNT E on SNAP25
interactions with synaptotagmin I. Binding reactions were conducted
with immobilized intact GST-SNAP25 or with GST-SNAP25 preparations that
were cleaved by treatment with BoNT A or BoNT E. Gel electrophoresis
and Western blotting confirmed that cleavage by toxins was
quantitative. Binding in the absence of Ca2+ (filled
histograms) was not affected by BoNT treatment, whereas binding
stimulated by Ca2+ (open histograms) was
inhibited by BoNT treatment.
|
|
To define the region of SNAP25 essential for synaptotagmin I binding,
immobilized SNAP25 was quantitatively cleaved with BoNT A or BoNT E. SNAP25 truncated by cleavage with either toxin retained its capacity to
interact with synaptotagmin I in the absence of Ca2+ (Fig.
3C, closed bars) as previously reported (44). In contrast, the Ca2+-dependent interaction of SNAP25 with
synaptotagmin I was completely abolished by treatment with BoNT E and
partially inhibited by treatment with BoNT A (Fig. 3C, open
bars). The extent of inhibition of synaptotagmin I binding
observed with BoNT A-treated SNAP25 was dependent upon the
Ca2+ concentration in the binding reaction with the
inhibition strongly reduced at high Ca2+ concentrations
(Fig. 3A). BoNT A treatment essentially increased the
EC50 for Ca2+ stimulation of synaptotagmin I
binding to SNAP25.
Additional studies on native synaptotagmin I and SNAP25 in brain
detergent extracts revealed Ca2+-dependent
interactions between these proteins similar to those observed with
recombinant proteins (Fig. 4). The
specific immunoprecipitation of SNAP25 from rat brain detergent
extracts resulted in the co-isolation of synaptotagmin I (Fig.
4A, lane 2), which was markedly enhanced by inclusion of
Ca2+ (lane 3 versus 2).
The Ca2+-stimulated retention of synaptotagmin I in the
SNAP25 immunoprecipitates was largely eliminated by treatment with BoNT
E (lane 4). Neither condition altered the recovery of
syntaxin in the SNAP25 immunoprecipitates, and neither condition
promoted the retention of CAPS, an abundant cytosolic protein. In a
similar manner, synaptotagmin I in brain detergent extracts exhibited
Ca2+-dependent retention on immobilized
GST-SNAP25 (Fig. 4B). Ca2+ promoted
synaptotagmin I binding over the same concentration range
(EC50 ~300 µM) as was observed in binary
protein binding studies with the recombinant proteins (Fig. 4B,
lanes 3-6; compare with Fig. 3A). Cleavage of the C
terminus of SNAP25 with BoNT A or E markedly reduced the
Ca2+-dependent binding of native synaptotagmin
I to SNAP25 (Fig. 4B, lane 6 versus 7 and 8). Neither Ca2+ nor toxin treatment
markedly affected the binding of native syntaxin to SNAP25.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Native SNAP25 and synaptotagmin I exhibit
Ca2+-stimulated interactions dependent
upon the C terminus of SNAP25. A, Ca2+
stimulates the interaction of native SNAP25 and synaptotagmin I. Rat
brain detergent extracts were incubated with BoNT E for 30 min at
30 oC where indicated, adjusted to either 1 mM
EGTA ( Ca2+) or 1 mM
CaCl2 (+Ca2+) with pH adjustment to
7.2, and incubated for 16 h at 4 oC with immobilized
control mouse IgGs or SNAP25 immune IgGs. Washed immunoprecipitates
were analyzed by immunoblotting for CAPS, synaptotagmin I, syntaxin,
and SNAP25. Rat brain detergent extract (10% of starting material) was
analyzed in parallel (6th lane). Immunoprecipitations were
specific for the SNAP25 IgGs (compare 1st and 5th
lanes). Ca2+ stimulated the
co-immunoprecipitation of synaptotagmin I (2nd
lane versus 3rd lane), which was
reduced by BoNT E treatment (4th lane). In
contrast, the co-immunoprecipitation of syntaxin was unaffected by
Ca2+ or toxin treatment. CAPS was not co-immunoprecipitated
with SNAP25. B, Ca2+ stimulates the binding of
native synaptotagmin I to immobilized SNAP25. Rat brain detergent
extract was incubated for 2 h on ice with GSSG-agarose beads or 20 µg of GST-SNAP25 immobilized on GSSG-agarose beads at indicated
concentrations of Ca2+ (2 mM EGTA indicated as
0 mM Ca2+). Parallel incubations were conducted
with immobilized GST-SNAP25 quantitatively cleaved with BoNT A or E. The washed beads were eluted for SDS gel analysis and immunoblotting
with synaptotagmin I or syntaxin antibodies. Little binding of
synaptotagmin I to control beads was detected (1st and
2nd lanes). Ca2+ stimulated the
binding of synaptotagmin I to SNAP25 with an EC50 ~300
µM (2nd to 5th lanes).
Cleavage of SNAP25 with BoNT A or E markedly reduced the
Ca2+-dependent binding of synaptotagmin I
(7th and 8th lanes). Syntaxin binding
to SNAP25 was largely unaffected by Ca2+ or BoNT
treatment.
|
|
Ca2+ Dependence of the Interaction with SNAP25 Varies
with the Synaptotagmin Isoform--
There were considerable
similarities between the effects of Ca2+ in reversing BoNT
A inhibition of exocytosis (Fig. 1, upper panel) and in
reversing BoNT A inhibition of synaptotagmin I-SNAP25 interactions (Fig. 3A) except that the effective Ca2+
concentrations differed. Several synaptotagmin isoforms that differ in
Ca2+ sensitivity have been characterized (26, 27, 45).
Ca2+-dependent interactions of isoforms such as
synaptotagmin I with syntaxin occur at high (~200 µM)
Ca2+ concentrations, whereas isoforms such as synaptotagmin
III exhibit Ca2+-dependent interactions with
syntaxin at lower (~10 µM) Ca2+
concentrations (26, 27). Synaptotagmin III was found to exhibit Ca2+-stimulated interactions with SNAP25 at much lower
Ca2+ concentrations than those required for synaptotagmin I
(Fig. 5A). The stimulation of
binding exhibited an EC50 for Ca2+ of ~8
µM, which is closer to the EC50 for
Ca2+-activated dense-core vesicle exocytosis (2.3 µM, Fig. 1). The Ca2+-dependent
binding of synaptotagmin III to SNAP25 required C-terminal regions of
SNAP25 since cleavage by BoNT A and E inhibited the binding (Fig.
5B). High Ca2+ concentrations were partially
effective in restoring synaptotagmin III binding to BoNT A-cleaved
SNAP25 and to a lesser extent to BoNT E-cleaved SNAP25 (data not
shown).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Synaptotagmin III interactions with SNAP25
are stimulated at lower Ca2+ concentrations.
A, Ca2+ stimulates SNAP25 binding to
synaptotagmin III. 10 µg of GST-cytoplasmic domain fusion protein of
synaptotagmin III immobilized on GSSG-agarose beads was incubated with
10 µg of SNAP25 in the presence of 2 mM EGTA without or
with adequate CaCl2 to generate the indicated
concentrations of free ionic Ca2+. The mean of three
experiments is plotted with range indicated. B, BoNT A and
BoNT E inhibit Ca2+-stimulated interactions between
synaptotagmin III and SNAP25. 10 µg of GST-cytoplasmic domain fusion
protein of synaptotagmin III immobilized on GSSG-agarose beads was
incubated with 10 µg of intact SNAP25, BoNT A-cleaved SNAP25, or BoNT
E-cleaved SNAP25 as indicated either in the absence or presence of 1 mM Ca2+. For 1st lane,
SNAP25 was incubated with empty GSSG-agarose beads.
|
|
C-terminal Regions of SNAP25 Are Required for
Ca2+-dependent Synaptotagmin Interactions with
SNARE Complexes--
SNAP25 and syntaxin form relatively stable
heterodimeric complexes consisting of a 2:1 molar ratio of syntaxin to
SNAP25 (9). Such binary complexes may be the prevalent form of SNAP25
in cellular membranes, so we examined SNAP25 binding to synaptotagmin I
in the presence of syntaxin under conditions where heterodimers form. Under our conditions, the binding of syntaxin alone to immobilized synaptotagmin I was not detected in either the absence or presence of
Ca2+ (Fig. 6A, 1st two
lanes). However, inclusion of SNAP25 promoted Ca2+-dependent syntaxin binding to
synaptotagmin I, which increased progressively with increasing SNAP25
concentration (Fig. 6A). The results indicate that
Ca2+-dependent syntaxin binding under these
conditions is mediated by the formation of syntaxin/SNAP25 heterodimers
and the Ca2+-dependent binding of the
heterodimers to synaptotagmin I. Syntaxin/SNAP25 heterodimers were as
effective as ligands for Ca2+-dependent
interactions with synaptotagmin I as were SNAP25 monomers. The
Ca2+-dependent binding of syntaxin to
synaptotagmin I was strongly inhibited by cleavage of the C terminus of
SNAP25 with BoNT E and to a lesser extent BoNT A (Fig. 6B).
Since the C terminus of SNAP25 is not required for the formation of
syntaxin/SNAP25 heterodimers (46), the results indicate that
Ca2+-dependent binding of binary SNARE
complexes to synaptotagmin I requires the C terminus of SNAP25.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Synaptotagmin I binds binary
syntaxin·SNAP25 complexes in a
Ca2+-dependent manner. A,
syntaxin binding to synaptotagmin I is mediated through heterodimer
formation. 5 µg of GST-synaptotagmin I immobilized on GSSG-agarose
beads was incubated with 1 µM syntaxin in the presence or
absence of 1 mM Ca2+ with increasing
concentrations of SNAP25 from 0-1 µM. Binding was
assessed by Western blotting with syntaxin monoclonal and SNAP25
polyclonal antibodies. Ca2+-dependent syntaxin
binding was not detected in the absence of SNAP25. B,
Ca2+-dependent binding of binary complexes to
synaptotagmin I requires the C terminus of SNAP25. Binding incubations
similar to those of A were conducted with 1 µM
SNAP25, BoNT A-treated SNAP25, or BoNT E-treated SNAP25 in the absence
or presence of 1 µM syntaxin. Bound SNAREs were detected
by Western blotting with syntaxin and SNAP25 antibodies. Syntaxin
binding to synaptotagmin I (upper panel), mediated through
formation of binary syntaxin·SNAP25 complexes, was inhibited by
treatment of SNAP25 with BoNT A or BoNT E. The 15% SDS-acrylamide gels
resolved SNAP25 and co-migrating BoNT A-cleaved SNAP25 from higher
mobility BoNT E-cleaved SNAP25 (lower panel). An artifact
migrated immediately behind SNAP25 (see 11th and
12th lanes). BoNT E-cleaved SNAP25 bound to
synaptotagmin I was equivalent to SNAP25 bound in the absence of
Ca2+. BoNT A-cleaved SNAP25 bound to synaptotagmin I was
equivalent to that observed in Fig. 3A at 1 mM
Ca2+.
|
|
It has been suggested that Ca2+ may act in exocytosis to
trigger the formation of ternary SNARE complexes in trans to
drive bilayer fusion (14). To determine whether synaptotagmin I also exhibited Ca2+-stimulated interactions with ternary SNARE
complexes, VAMP was included in the preincubations. Under these
conditions, the Ca2+-dependent binding of VAMP
to synaptotagmin I was observed, whereas little or no VAMP binding was
detected in the absence of SNAP25 or syntaxin (i.e. in the
absence of ternary complex formation) (Fig.
7A). The results indicate that
Ca2+-dependent VAMP binding is mediated through
ternary SNARE complex binding to synaptotagmin I, which was confirmed
by finding that synaptotagmin I-bound SNARE proteins were present in
SDS-resistant complexes (data not shown). Binary and ternary SNARE
complexes exhibited similar Ca2+-dependent
binding to synaptotagmin I as detected by bound SNAP25 (Fig.
7B). Inclusion of VAMP to form heterotrimeric complexes reduced syntaxin binding relative to that of SNAP25 (Fig.
7B), which is consistent with the different stoichiometries
of ternary (syntaxin·SNAP25·VAMP as 1:1:1) and binary
(syntaxin·SNAP25 as 2:1) SNARE complexes (9).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Synaptotagmin I binds ternary SNARE complexes
in a Ca2+-dependent manner.
A, VAMP binding to synaptotagmin I is mediated by binding of
ternary SNARE complexes. Overnight incubations were conducted with 1 µM VAMP and 1 µM syntaxin and/or 1 µM SNAP25 as indicated. Preassembled complexes were
incubated in the presence or absence of 1 mM
Ca2+ with 5 µg of GST-synaptotagmin I immobilized on
GSSG-agarose beads. Bound VAMP was assessed by Western blotting with a
VAMP monoclonal antibody. Ca2+-stimulated VAMP binding to
synaptotagmin I was detected when syntaxin and SNAP25 were present to
form ternary complexes. B, comparison of synaptotagmin I
binding by binary and ternary SNARE complexes. Syntaxin and SNAP25 were
preincubated to form heterodimers or preincubated with VAMP to form
heterotrimers. Binding of the SNARE complexes to synaptotagmin I in the
presence or absence of 1 mM Ca2+ was assessed.
Similar amounts of SNAP25 were bound in a
Ca2+-dependent manner for binary and ternary
complex binding. Ternary complex binding resulted in reduced
Ca2+-dependent syntaxin binding in accord with
the reduced molar content of syntaxin in heterotrimeric compared with
heterodimeric complexes. C,
Ca2+-dependent interactions of ternary SNARE
complexes with synaptotagmin I require the C terminus of SNAP25.
Heterotrimeric complexes were assembled in overnight incubations with
full-length, BoNT A-, or BoNT E-treated SNAP25. Binding to
synaptotagmin I was determined in the absence (2 mM EGTA)
or presence of Ca2+ at 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mM as
indicated. BoNT A treatment partially inhibited (by ~56%) and BoNT E
treatment strongly inhibited (by ~72%)
Ca2+-dependent ternary complex binding to
synaptotagmin I. D, BoNT E treatment inhibits ternary SNARE
complex assembly, whereas BoNT A treatment has no effect. SDS-resistant
SNARE complexes were detected following assembly of complexes with
intact, BoNT A-, and BoNT E-treated SNAP25. Samples were split for gel
electrophoresis following incubation in sample buffer at
30 oC ( ) or boiling (+). SDS-resistant SNARE complexes
of ~60 and 90 kDa, similar to those previously reported (9), were
detected by Western blotting with syntaxin monoclonal antibodies. BoNT
A treatment had little if any effect (<10%) on SDS-resistant
complexes in three similar experiments. In contrast, BoNT E treatment
reduced SDS-resistant complexes either partially (as shown) or
completely in three similar experiments. Residual complexes following
BoNT E treatment exhibited an altered electrophoretic mobility.
|
|
The Ca2+-dependent binding of VAMP to
synaptotagmin I was strongly inhibited when BoNT E- or BoNT A-treated
SNAP25 was used to assemble ternary complexes (Fig. 7C). The
inhibition of VAMP binding could result either from destabilization of
ternary complexes by BoNT treatment (8) or from inhibition of the
binding of ternary complexes to synaptotagmin I by the removal of
essential portions of SNAP25 by toxin cleavage. Under our conditions,
BoNT E treatment was found to destabilize ternary SNARE complexes (Fig. 7D) as previously reported (8), and this likely accounts for the inhibition of Ca2+-dependent VAMP binding
to synaptotagmin I (Fig. 7C). In contrast, BoNT A treatment
had virtually no effect on the stability of SDS-resistant ternary SNARE
complexes (Fig. 7D) as previously reported (8). Therefore,
the reduction in SNARE complex binding to synaptotagmin I resulting
from BoNT A treatment (Fig. 7C) implies that SNAP25 C-terminal residues removed by BoNT A cleavage are essential for the
Ca2+-dependent interaction of synaptotagmin I
with ternary SNARE complexes.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The data in this study indicate that synaptotagmin exhibits a high
affinity Ca2+-dependent interaction with SNAP25
monomers, with syntaxin/SNAP25 heterodimers, and with
syntaxin/SNAP25/VAMP heterotrimers. In each case, an essential
determinant for Ca2+-dependent synaptotagmin
binding is the C terminus of SNAP25. The results provide an explanation
for the reversal of BoNT A inhibition of neurosecretion at elevated
Ca2+ concentrations observed in classical studies. They
also suggest a plausible basis for the Ca2+ regulation of exocytosis.
In 1977 Thesleff and co-workers (32) reported that treatment with a
K+ channel blocker that increases synaptic accumulation of
Ca2+ could partially overcome the paralytic effects of BoNT
A in the neuromuscular junction. Similarly Simpson (47) reported that BoNT A decreased the Ca2+ cooperativity of neurotransmitter
release and suggested that BoNT A acted close to the site of
Ca2+ action in neurotransmitter release to cause a
decreased affinity or efficacy of Ca2+. Reversal of
inhibition by Ca2+ is relatively unique to BoNT A and has
not been observed for tetanus toxin, BoNT B, BoNT F, or BoNT D (41,
48-50) and only to a lesser extent for BoNT E (51, 52). These
classical studies, conducted before the molecular targets of BoNT
action were known, foreshadowed the conclusion of the present study
that the target of BoNT A action, SNAP25, is closely linked to the
Ca2+ regulation of neurotransmitter release.
Studies of toxin action in permeable cell assays have found BoNT A to
be far less effective in inhibiting
Ca2+-dependent secretion than BoNT E or other
toxins in contrast to its effectiveness in intact nerve cells (28, 33,
53). The present results clarify this distinctive feature of BoNT A by finding that the high Ca2+ concentrations used to optimally
activate exocytosis in permeable cells results in a reversal of BoNT A
inhibition. Because such relatively high Ca2+
concentrations are rarely achieved in intact cell studies, these findings readily account for reported discrepancies between intact cell
and permeable cell studies on the efficacy of BoNT A as an inhibitor of
regulated secretion (54). Decreased inhibition by BoNT A has also been
observed in intact cell studies when high Ca2+
concentrations are used to elicit exocytosis (43).
Because BoNT A cleavage of SNAP25 decreased the Ca2+
sensitivity of regulated exocytosis, it seemed possible that SNAP25 was involved in the Ca2+ sensing reactions of exocytosis. This
idea motivated direct binding studies of SNAP25 with synaptotagmin I, a
proposed Ca2+ sensor for exocytosis (1, 18, 22). A
Ca2+-independent interaction between these proteins, which
does not require the C terminus of SNAP25, was described previously
(44). The binding studies reported here, in contrast, revealed a novel Ca2+-dependent interaction between SNAP25 and
synaptotagmin that requires the C terminus of SNAP25. Truncation of
SNAP25 from Ile181 to Gly206 by BoNT E
treatment abolished Ca2+-dependent
synaptotagmin I binding, which correlates with the strong inhibitory
effect of this toxin on Ca2+-activated exocytosis.
Truncation of SNAP25 from Arg198 to Gly206 by
BoNT A treatment, in contrast, modified the Ca2+ dependence
for the binding of synaptotagmin I to SNAP25 by shifting it to higher
Ca2+ concentrations, an effect that was similar to that of
BoNT A on Ca2+-activated exocytosis. The qualitatively
similar inhibition by BoNT A and reversal at elevated Ca2+
concentrations for both Ca2+-dependent
synaptotagmin-SNAP25 binding and for
Ca2+-dependent exocytosis provides a striking
correlation. This correlation is consistent with a role for SNAP25 as
an important effector for synaptotagmin in the
Ca2+-triggering reactions of exocytosis. Another possible
basis for the Ca2+ reversal of BoNT A inhibition of
exocytosis is the cation-binding site in the ternary SNARE complex
located near the BoNT A cleavage site (13, 55); however,
Ca2+ binding to this site remains to be demonstrated.
Previous studies identified a number of
Ca2+-dependent interactions for synaptotagmin
including with acidic phospholipids, SV2, synaptotagmin itself, and
syntaxin (23, 24-27, 56, 57, 58), but it has been unclear which, if
any, of these mediates the essential role of synaptotagmin in
exocytosis. The characteristics of the synaptotagmin I-SNAP25
interaction reported here bear a striking resemblance to those
described for the synaptotagmin I-syntaxin interaction (24-27). Both
are stimulated at high Ca2+ concentrations, are not
supported by Sr2+ or Ba2+, and involve in part
the membrane-proximal C2A domain of synaptotagmin I (45). Different
synaptotagmin isoforms exhibit characteristic Ca2+
dependences for interactions with both syntaxin and SNAP25.
Synaptotagmin I interacts with both SNAREs at Ca2+
concentrations similar to those required for triggering synaptic vesicle exocytosis (~200 µM), whereas synaptotagmin III
requires the lower Ca2+ concentrations characteristic of
triggering dense-core vesicle exocytosis (~10 µM)
(1-3, 17). The similarity of Ca2+-dependent
synaptotagmin binding to both SNAREs suggests the possibility that both
plasma membrane SNAREs or complexes containing them are the
Ca2+-dependent effectors for synaptotagmin.
Ca2+-dependent synaptotagmin binding to SNAP25
appeared to be of higher affinity than the binding to syntaxin. The
apparent KD reported for
Ca2+-dependent synaptotagmin I-syntaxin
interactions is ~0.5-2 µM (24, 25), whereas we
estimated an apparent KD ~0.2 µM for
Ca2+-dependent synaptotagmin I-SNAP25 binding.
More directly, when compared at the same concentration,
Ca2+-dependent SNAP25 binding to immobilized
synaptotagmin I was readily detected, whereas that of syntaxin was not
(Fig. 5A). Syntaxin binding to synaptotagmin I was, however,
evident in the presence of SNAP25 because syntaxin·SNAP25 binary
complexes formed and bound to synaptotagmin I in a
Ca2+-dependent manner. The C terminus of SNAP25
was required for optimal Ca2+-dependent
interactions between synaptotagmin I and binary SNARE complexes. A
similar high affinity Ca2+-dependent binding of
ternary SNARE complexes to synaptotagmin I was observed, which also
required the C terminus of SNAP25. These results indicate that
Ca2+-dependent interactions between
synaptotagmin and SNAP25 or SNARE complexes are mediated in part
through the C terminus of SNAP25.
It was surprising that Ca2+-dependent
synaptotagmin binding to SNAP25 or to binary or ternary SNARE complexes
was so similar since SNAP25 may be largely unstructured as a monomer
but acquires
-helicity in binary and ternary SNARE complexes (9).
Possibly monomeric SNAP25 becomes structured in complexes with
synaptotagmin. The C-terminal region of SNAP25 likely represents a
direct site for Ca2+-dependent synaptotagmin
binding since Ca2+-dependent binding to a
C-terminal SNAP25 fragment can be detected, and a C-terminal SNAP25
peptide inhibits binding.2
The region Ile181-Gln197 may constitute the
core of this binding site since BoNT E cleavage abolishes
Ca2+-dependent interactions with synaptotagmin.
The region Arg198-Gly206 may indirectly affect
binding since cleavage by BoNT A reduces synaptotagmin binding in a
manner that is partially compensated by elevating the Ca2+ concentration.
The recent structural elucidation of a protease-resistant core of the
ternary SNARE complex as consisting of a four-helix bundle in parallel
orientation (13) reveals a potential site for
Ca2+-dependent interactions of synaptotagmin.
The C-terminal membrane-proximal region of syntaxin (residues
220-266), reported to mediate Ca2+-dependent
interactions with synaptotagmin I (Refs. 24, 25, and 62 but also see
Ref. 59), is juxtaposed to the BoNT-sensitive C terminus of SNAP25
(residues 181-206) (e.g. syntaxin Ile230 aligns
with SNAP25 Ile178 of SNAP25; Ref. 13). Residues from these
regions contributed by SNAP25 and syntaxin in binary or ternary SNARE
complexes may constitute the essential
Ca2+-dependent binding site for synaptotagmin.
The Ca2+ triggering of membrane fusion could be mediated by
the Ca2+-dependent binding of synaptotagmin on
the vesicle to syntaxin and SNAP25 on the plasma membrane.
Ca2+ could promote synaptotagmin binding to syntaxin/SNAP25
heterodimers, which would bring VAMP on the vesicle into proximity with
syntaxin/SNAP25 heterodimers to form ternary SNARE complexes that could
initiate fusion (16). Alternatively, Ca2+ could stimulate
the binding of synaptotagmin to partially "zippered" pre-assembled
ternary SNARE complexes bridging the vesicle and plasma membrane to
promote full zippering and the initiation of fusion (10, 14, 15, 60).
Finally, Ca2+-independent interactions might drive the
assembly of pre-fusion complexes between synaptotagmin and SNARE
proteins (7). The Ca2+-dependent interaction
between synaptotagmin and SNAP25 described here could mediate molecular
interactions within the complex that promote a fusion-competent conformation.
The C terminus of SNAP25 is targeted for proteolysis by three of the
clostridial neurotoxins (BoNT E, A, and C1) indicating its importance,
but its precise role in Ca2+-activated neurotransmitter
secretion has not previously been identified. Studies have shown that
the C-terminal 9 residues of SNAP25 removed by BoNT A are required for
VAMP interactions (46) and that removal of the C-terminal 26 residues
by BoNT E cleavage compromises ternary SNARE complex formation (8). Our
results indicate that the C-terminal 9 residues of SNAP25 affect the
Ca2+ dependence of exocytosis and the Ca2+
dependence of synaptotagmin binding to SNAP25. The C-terminal region of
SNAP25 between BoNT A and E cleavage sites
(Ile181-Gln197) is essential for
Ca2+-triggered membrane fusion (28) and for
Ca2+-dependent synaptotagmin binding. The
recent finding that a C-terminal SNAP25 fragment is capable of
promoting Ca2+-dependent rescue of BoNT
E-inhibited exocytosis further reinforces the view that the C terminus
of SNAP25 participates directly in the Ca2+ triggering of
exocytosis (61). By mediating Ca2+-dependent
interactions between synaptotagmin and SNARE complexes, the C terminus
of SNAP25 may constitute a key element of a Ca2+ switch for
regulated exocytosis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Research Grants DK25861 and DK40428 (to T. F. J. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by National Institutes of Health Predoctoral Training
Grant GM07215.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
University of Wisconsin, 433 Babcock Dr., Madison, WI 53706. Tel.:
608-263-2427; Fax: 608-262-3453; E-mail:
tfmartin@facstaff.wisc.edu.
2
E. C. Larsen, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
VAMP, vesicle-associated membrane protein;
SNARE, soluble
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein
receptor;
SNAP, synaptosome-associated protein;
BoNT, botulinum
neurotoxin;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
CAPS, 3-(cyclohexylamino)propanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sudhof, T. C.
(1995)
Nature
375,
645-653[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Calakos, N.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(1996)
Physiol. Rev.
76,
1-29[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Martin, T. F. J.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
271-276[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Montecucco, C.,
and Schiavo, G.
(1993)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
18,
324-327[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Niemann, H.,
Blasi, J.,
and Jahn, R.
(1994)
Trends Cell Biol.
4,
179-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Sollner, T.,
Whiteheart, S. W.,
Brunner, M.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Geromanos, S.,
Tempst, P.,
and Rothman, J. E.
(1993)
Nature
362,
318-324[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Sollner, T.,
Bennett, M. K.,
Whiteheart, S. W.,
Scheller, R. H.,
and Rothman, J. E.
(1993)
Cell
75,
409-418[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Hayashi, T.,
McMahon, H.,
Yamasaki, S.,
Binz, T.,
Hata, Y.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Niemann, H.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
5051-5061[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Fasshauer, D.,
Otto, H.,
Eliason, W. K.,
Jahn, R.,
and Brunger, A. T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28036-28041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Hanson, P. I.,
Roth, R.,
Morisaki, H.,
Jahn, R.,
and Heuser, J. R.
(1997)
Cell
90,
523-535[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Lin, R. C.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(1997)
Neuron
19,
1087-1094[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Poirier, M. A.,
Xiao, W.,
Macosko, J. C.,
Chan, C.,
Shin, Y.-K.,
and Bennett, M. K.
(1998)
Nature Struct. Biol.
5,
765-769[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Sutton, R. B.,
Fasshauer, D.,
Jahn, R.,
and Brunger, A. T.
(1998)
Nature
395,
347-353[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Jahn, R.,
and Hanson, P. I.
(1998)
Nature
393,
14-15[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Fiebig, K. M.,
Rice, L. M.,
Pollock, E.,
and Brunger, A. T.
(1999)
Nature Struct. Biol.
6,
117-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Weber, T.,
Zemelman, B. V.,
McNew, J. A.,
Westermann, B.,
Gmachl, M.,
Parlati, F.,
Sollner, T. H.,
and Rothman, J. E.
(1998)
Cell
92,
759-772[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Neher, E.
(1998)
Neuron
20,
389-399[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Geppert, M.,
Goda, Y.,
Hammer, R. E.,
Li, C.,
Rosahl, T. W.,
Stevens, C. F.,
and Sudhof, T. C.
(1994)
Cell
79,
717-727[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
DiAntonio, A.,
Parfitt, K. D.,
and Schwarz, T. L.
(1993)
Cell
73,
1281-1290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Littleton, J. T.,
Stern, M.,
Perin, M.,
and Bellen, H. J.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10888-10892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Nonet, M. L.,
Grundahl, K.,
Meyer, B. J.,
and Rand, J. B.
(1993)
Cell
73,
1291-1305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Brose, N.,
Petrenko, A. G.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Jahn, R.
(1992)
Science
256,
1021-1025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Sutton, R. B.,
Davletov, B. A.,
Berghuis, A. M.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Sprang, S. R.
(1995)
Cell
80,
929-938[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Chapman, E. R.,
Hanson, P. I.,
An, S.,
and Jahn, R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23667-23671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Kee, Y.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
1975-1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Li, C.,
Ullrich, B.,
Zhang, J. Z.,
Anderson, R. G. W.,
Brose, N.,
and Sudhof, T. C.
(1995)
Nature
375,
594-599[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Li, C.,
Davletov, B. A.,
and Sudhof, T. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24898-24902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Banerjee, A.,
Kowalchyk, J. A.,
DasGupta, B. R.,
and Martin, T. F. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20227-20230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Martin, T. F. J.,
and Kowalchyk, J. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14447-14453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Schiavo, G.,
Santucci, A.,
DasGupta, B. R.,
Mehta, P. P.,
Jontes, J.,
Fenfenati, F.,
Wilson, M. C.,
and Montecucco, C.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
335,
99-103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Binz, T.,
Blasi, J.,
Yamasaki, S.,
Baumeister, A.,
Link, E.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
Jahn, R.,
and Niemann, H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1617-1620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Lundh, H.,
Leander, S.,
and Thesleff, S.
(1977)
J. Neurol. Sci.
32,
29-43[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Lomneth, R.,
Martin, T. F. J.,
and DasGupta, B. R.
(1991)
J. Neurochem.
57,
1413-1421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Washbourne, P.,
Pellizzari, R.,
Baldini, G.,
Wilson, M. C.,
and Montecucco, C.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
418,
1-5[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Vaidyanathan, V. V.,
Yoshino, K.,
Jahnz, M.,
Dorries, C.,
Bade, S.,
Nauenburg, S.,
Neimann, H.,
and Binz, T.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
72,
327-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Elferink, L. A.,
Peterson, M. R.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(1993)
Cell
72,
153-159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Pevsner, J.,
Hsu, S.-C.,
Braun, J. E. A.,
Calakos, N.,
Ting, A. E.,
Bennett, M. K.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
353-361[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Fukuda, M.,
Kojima, T.,
Aruga, J.,
Niinobe, M.,
and Mikoshiba, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26523-26527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Schiavo, G.,
Benfenati, F.,
Poulain, B.,
Rosetto, O.,
Polverino de Laureto, P.,
DasGupta, B. R.,
and Montecucco, C.
(1992)
Nature
359,
832-835[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Schiavo, G.,
Shone, C. C.,
Bennett, M. K.,
Scheller, R. H.,
and Montecucco, C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10566-10570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Sellin, L. C.,
Thesleff, S.,
and DasGupta, B. R.
(1983)
Acta Physiol. Scand.
119,
127-133[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Capogna, M.,
McKinney, R. A.,
O'Connor, V. O.,
Gahwiler, B. H.,
and Thompson, S. M.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
7190-7202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Xu, T.,
Binz, T.,
Niemann, H.,
and Neher, E.
(1998)
Nature Neurosci.
1,
192-200[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Schiavo, G.,
Stenbeck, G.,
Rothman, J. E.,
and Sollner, T. H.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
997-1001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Rizo, J.
(1996)
Neuron
17,
379-388[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Chapman, E. R.,
An, S.,
Barton, N.,
and Jahn, R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27427-27432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Simpson, L. L.
(1978)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
206,
661-669[Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Dreyer, F.,
and Schmitt, A.
(1981)
Neurosci. Lett.
26,
307-311[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Kauffman, J. A.,
Way, J. F.,
Siegel, L. S.,
and Sellin, L. C.
(1985)
Toxicol. App. Pharmacol.
79,
211-217[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Molgo, J.,
Comella, J. X.,
Angaut-Petit, D.,
Pecot-Dechavassine, M.,
Tabti, N.,
Faille, L.,
Mallart, A.,
and Thesleff, S.
(1990)
J. Physiol. (Paris)
84,
152-166[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Molgo, J.,
DasGupta, B. R.,
and Thesleff, S.
(1989)
Acta Physiol. Scand.
137,
497-501[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Simpson, L. L.
(1986)
Infect. Immun.
52,
858-862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Sadoul, K.,
Lang, J.,
Montecucco, C.,
Weller, U.,
Regazzi, R.,
Catsicas, S.,
Wollheim, C. B.,
and Halban, P. A.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
1019-1028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Lawrence, G. W.,
Foran, P.,
Mohammed, N.,
DasGupta, B. R.,
and Dolly, J. O.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
3061-3067[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Fasshauer, D.,
Sutton, R. B.,
Brunger, A. T.,
and Jahn, R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15781-15786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Schivell, A. E.,
Batchelor, R. H.,
and Bajjalieh, S. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27770-27775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Chapman, E. R.,
An, S.,
Edwardson, J. M.,
and Jahn, R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5844-5849[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Schiavo, G.,
Gu, Q.-M.,
Prestwich, G. D.,
Sollner, T. H.,
and Rothman, J. E.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13327-13332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Shao, X.,
Li, C.,
Fernandez, I.,
Zhang, X.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Rizo, J.
(1997)
Neuron
18,
133-142[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Weis, W. I.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(1998)
Nature
395,
328-329[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]< |