J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 9, 6566-6572, March 3, 2000
Structural Determinants Required for Apical Sorting of an
Intestinal Brush-border Membrane Protein*
Ralf
Jacob,
Marwan
Alfalah,
Jürgen
Grünberg,
Maik
Obendorf, and
Hassan Y.
Naim
From the Department of Physiological Chemistry, School of
Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
The distinct protein and lipid constituents of
the apical and basolateral membranes in polarized cells are sorted by
specific signals. O-Glycosylation of a highly polarized
intestinal brush-border protein sucrase isomaltase is implicated in its
apical sorting through interaction with sphingolipid-cholesterol
microdomains. We characterized the structural determinants required for
this mechanism by focusing on two major domains in pro-SI, the membrane anchor and the Ser/Thr-rich stalk domain. Deletion mutants lacking either domain, pro-SI
ST (stalk-free) and
pro-SI
MA (membrane anchor-free), were constructed and
expressed in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. In the absence
of the membrane anchoring domain, pro-SI
MA does not
associate with lipid rafts and the mutant is randomly delivered to both
membranes. Therefore, the O-glycosylated stalk region is
not sufficient per se for the high fidelity of apical
sorting of pro-SI. Pro-SI
ST does not associate either
with lipid rafts and its targeting behavior is similar to that of
pro-SI
MA. Only wild type pro-SI containing both
determinants, the stalk region and membrane anchor, associates with
lipid microdomains and is targeted correctly to the apical membrane.
However, not all sequences in the stalk region are required for apical
sorting. Only O-glycosylation of a stretch of 12 amino acids (Ala37-Pro48) juxtapose the membrane
anchor is required in conjunction with the membrane anchoring domain
for correct targeting of pro-SI to the apical membrane. Other
O-glycosylated domains within the stalk
(Ala49-Pro57) are not sufficient for apical
sorting. We conclude that the recognition signal for apical sorting of
pro-SI comprises O-glycosylation of the
Ala37-Pro48 stretch and requires the presence
of the membrane anchoring domain.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Biological membranes of polarized cells contain an asymmetrical
distribution of lipid and protein components (1-4). Both kinds of
biomolecules are sorted in the trans-Golgi network complex into different types of vesicles for apical or basolateral delivery (5,
6). Whereas all basolateral sorting signals of membrane proteins
described to date reside in the cytoplasmic domains (7, 8), apical
signals appear to be luminal (7, 9-11). One criterion for apical
delivery could be the presence of asparagine-linked carbohydrates,
since their removal by tunicamycin treatment or site-directed
mutagenesis results in nonpolar secretion (12, 13). Additionally,
insertion of novel N-glycosylation sites into the normally
randomly secreted rat growth hormone leads to apical secretion (14).
Further evidence has accumulated that some apical membrane proteins
accumulate in sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich microdomains (15),
which have been termed sphingolipid-cholesterol rafts.
Glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins as well as
transmembrane proteins, like the hemagglutinin of influenza virus (16)
or intestinal brush-border proteins like sucrase isomaltase and
dipeptidyl peptidase (17) are associated with lipid rafts. Rafts can be
discriminated from other membraneous components based on their
insolubility in nonionic detergents like Triton X-100 or
CHAPS1 at low temperature.
By virtue of its structural features and sorting behavior sucrase
isomaltase (SI, EC 3.2.1.48; 10) constitutes an exquisite model protein
to identify apical sorting signals and to unravel molecular mechanisms
underlying apical targeting. SI is an intestinal transmembrane protein
that is apically targeted in a highly polarized manner in association
with lipid rafts (17, 18). It is a heavily N- and
O-glycosylated protein that is composed of two homologous subunits, sucrase and isomaltase. Inhibition or drastic reduction of
O-glycosylation in Caco-2 cells by using
benzyl-N-acetylgalactosaminide substantially affects the
high sorting fidelity of pro-SI ending with a random delivery of the
protein to both membranes (19). Importantly, O-linked
glycans mediate apical sorting through association with lipid rafts.
Pro-SI contains a stretch of a Ser/Thr-rich domain in immediate
proximity of the membrane (20). Similar domains, referred to as stalk
regions, have been also described for glycophorin (21), the
neurotrophin receptor (22) or the low density lipoprotein receptor (23)
and are thought to be the site of heavy O-glycosylation. In
pro-SI this stretch serves as a link between the globular protein and
the plasma membrane by forming a rigid unfolded structure. Based on its
membrane proximity this domain constitutes a sterically suitable site
for interaction with other cellular factors. For the neurotrophin
receptor it has been shown that the O-glycosylated stalk
domain is required for apical targeting (22). In addition this
requirement could only be demonstrated for membrane-anchored receptors,
whereas the soluble form expressed in Caco-2 cells was secreted into
the basolateral medium in the presence of the stalk domain (24). These
findings suggest that O-glycosylated apically-sorted
proteins interact via O-linked carbohydrates with a
lectin-like cellular protein.
In this paper we describe the characterization of the structures
implicated in the interaction of pro-SI with lipid microdomains along
the polarized transport of pro-SI. We demonstrate that deletion of the
stalk region of pro-SI leads to default targeting of the normally
apically transported pro-SI to both membrane domains and to a
disruption of the association of pro-SI with lipid rafts. The same
sorting behavior was also observed with the soluble form of pro-SI,
indicating that the presence of the membrane-proximal O-glycosylated stalk determines apical targeting and raft
association. Furthermore, membrane association of pro-SI is a necessary
requirement for the stalk domain to fulfill this role in pro-SI transport.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials and Reagents--
Transwell filters (24 mm) were
obtained from Falcon.
L-[35S]RedivueTM
PRO-MIXTM and protein A-Sepharose were obtained from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Streptomycin, penicillin, geneticin-418,
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, methionine-free Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (denoted Met-free medium), and fetal calf
serum were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc.
Benzyl-N-acetyl-
-D-galactosaminide (benzyl-GalNAc), endo-
-N-acetylglucosaminidase
F/glycopeptidase F (Endo F/GF), Polybrene, pepstatin, leupeptin,
aprotinin, and molecular weight standards for SDS-PAGE were purchased
from Sigma. Acrylamide and N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide were
obtained from Carl Roth GmbH & Co, Karlsruhe, Germany. SDS, TEMED,
ammonium persulfate, dithiothreitol, and Triton X-100 were obtained
from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.
Endo-
-N-acetylglucosaminidase H (Endo H), restriction
enzymes, Taq-polymerase, and ligase were purchased from
Roche Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany. All other reagents were of
superior analytical grade.
Immunochemical Reagents--
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were a
generous gift from Dr. H.-P. Hauri, Biocenter, Basel, and Dr. E. E. Sterchi, University of Bern, Switzerland (25). For
immunoprecipitation of pro-SI a mixture of four different monoclonal
antibodies was used (HBB 1/691, HBB 2/614, HBB 3/705, and HBB
2/219).
Construction of the Deletion Mutants--
Deletion of the stalk
domain of pro-SI (pro-SI
ST, ST stands for stalk region)
and subdomains of the stalk domain was performed by
oligonucleotide-directed looping out mutagenesis with the Quick
ChangeTM in Vitro Mutagenesis System from
Stratagene. The template constituted a full-length cDNA encoding
pro-SI cloned into pSG8-vector (26). The following oligonucleotides
were used in this context:
stalkupstream: 5'-GCCTTAATTGTTGTTTTAGCAGGAAAATGTCCAAATGTGT-3';
stalkdownstream: 5'-ACACATTTGGACATTTTCCTGCTAAAACAACAATTAAGGC-3';
stalk37-48upstream: GTTTTAGCAACTAAGACACCTGCTACTACTCGTGTGACTACA;
stalk37-48downstream: TGTAGTCACACGAGTAGTAGCAGGTGTCTTAGTTGCTAAAAC;
stalk49-57upstream: AGTGATTCTACTTCAACTCCATCTGATTCAGGAAAATGTCCA;
stalk49-57downstream: TGGACATTTTCCTGAATCAGATGGAGTTGAAGTAGAATCACT;
stalk37-57upstream: GTTTTAGCAACTAAGACACCTTCTGATTCAGGAAAATGTCCA;
stalk37-57downstream: TGGACATTTTCCTGAATCAGAAGGTGTCTTAGTTGCTAAAAC. Deletion of the
sequences was confirmed by sequencing and the plasmids obtained were
denoted pSG8-SI
ST, pSG8-SI
ST37-48,
pSG8-SI
ST49-57, and pSG8-SI
ST37-57.
For the generation of an anchorless, soluble form of pro-SI the signal
sequence of lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LPH) (27) was fused with the N
terminus of the stalk domain by "polymerase chain reaction sowing."
In this procedure four different oligonucleotides were used:
EcoRI-LPH:
5'-GAATTCGTTCCTAGAAAATGGAGCTGTCTTGGCATGTAG-3'; cLPH-signal:
5'-TGACCCCCAGCATGAAAAACT-3'; SI-st (st stands for stalk-region):
5'-ATCAGTGATTCTACTTC -3'; cLPH-ma (ma stands for membrane anchor):
5'- AGAAAAGAGAACGTACAAAGCTTGAACACTAAAGTTTCTTCC-3'. In the
first two polymerase chain reaction reactions the LPH signal sequence
and the isomaltase domain were amplified with the primer pairs
EcoRI-LPH/cLPH-signal and SI-st/cLPH-ma. The resulting
fragments were annealed by polymerase chain reaction sowing, and
finally an 853-base pair EcoRI/XhoI-fragment of
this construct was used to replace the N terminus of pro-SI encoded on
pSG8-SI (26). The resulting sequence was confirmed by sequencing and
the plasmid obtained was denoted pSG8-SI
MA.
Transfection and Generation of Stable MDCK Cell Lines--
MDCK
cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life
Technologies, Inc., Eggenstein, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 50 units/ml penicillin and
streptomycin at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells
were transfected with 5 µg of the appropriate recombinant DNA using
Polybrene (28). Stably transfected MDCK cells were selected in the
presence of 0.25 mg/ml active G418 (Life Technologies, Inc.) and after
18-23 days, surviving colonies were isolated with cloning rings.
Stable transformants expressing pro-SIWT,
pro-SI
ST, and pro-SI
MA were screened by
immunoprecipitation. For transient transfection experiments MDCK cells
were transfected with pSG8-SI
ST37-48, pSG8-SI
ST49-57, and pSG8-SI
ST37-57
using the calcium phosphate procedure as described before (29).
Biosynthetic Labeling of Cells, Immunoprecipitation, and
SDS-PAGE--
Metabolic labeling of MDCK cells grown on filters or
plated in six-well culture dishes was performed as described previously (28). For higher transfection efficiency on filters transiently transfected MDCK cells were treated with trypsin prior to transfection to dissociate the cells and achieve an optimal exposure of cells to
DNA. Transiently transfected cells and MDCK clones expressing pro-SIWT, pro-SI
ST, and
pro-SI
MA were labeled for 1 h with 100 µCi of
[35S]methionine and chased for different times with
unlabeled methionine. The medium of MDCK cells expressing the
anchorless mutant pro-SI
MA was collected, set to pH 8.0 by Hepes (30 mM), and protease inhibitors were added. The
medium and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with the mAb anti-SI
mixture as described by Naim et al. (18) and cell surface
antigens were immunoprecipitated from intact cells on filters by
addition mAb anti-SI to either the apical or basolateral compartments.
The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE according to Laemmli
(30). After electrophoresis the gels were fixed, soaked in 16%
salicylic acid for signal amplification, and subjected to fluorography.
Sucrose Gradient Centrifugation of Triton X-100-solubilized MDCK
Cells--
Transiently transfected and stable MDCK cells expressing
wild type pro-SI, pro-SI
ST, and pro-SI
MA
were biosynthetically labeled with [35S]methionine for
4 h and solubilized as described above. Microdomains preparation
was performed by loading the detergent extracts on 5-35% sucrose
gradients, followed by ultracentrifugation as described (31). The
gradients were fractionated into 12 fractions, immunoprecipitated with
mAb anti-SI, and the isolated proteins subjected to SDS-PAGE.
Other Procedures--
Digestion of 35S-labeled
immunoprecipitates with endo-
-N-acetylglucosaminidase H
(Endo H) and endo-
-N-acetylglucosaminidase F/glycopeptidase F (Endo F/GF) was performed as described previously (32).
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of Pro-SIWT, Pro-SI
ST, and
Pro-SI
MA in MDCK Cells--
To investigate the
influence of the stalk and the membrane anchoring domain on the sorting
of pro-SI in polarized cells, two constructs of pro-SI were generated.
In the first construct only the stalk region
(Thr33-Ser60) was deleted from wild type pro-SI
(denoted pro-SI
ST). The second construct contained the
stalk region, but lacked the entire transmembrane domain (denoted
pro-SI
MA). Pro-SI is a type II glycoprotein that is
synthesized with an uncleavable signal sequence residing in its
membrane domain. The signal sequence is therefore eliminated upon
deletion of the membrane anchor. We therefore fused the cleavable
signal sequence of the type I glycoprotein, human intestinal
brush-border lactase-phlorizin hydrolase, to the N-terminal end
immediately in front of the stalk region of pro-SI (Fig.
1). Both constructs,
pro-SI
ST and pro-SI
MA, as well as wild
type pro-SI were stably transfected in MDCK cells and the positive
clones were selected by immunoprecipitation of detergent extracts of
biosynthetically labeled cells with mAb anti-SI. Fig.
2A shows that biosynthetic
labeling of MDCK-SIWT for 6 h revealed two
polypeptides, an Endo H-resistant and an Endo H-sensitive band. In
analogy with pro-SI isolated from human intestinal biopsy samples (18)
and Caco-2 cells (25), these polypeptides correspond to the 210-kDa
mannose-rich pro-SI (pro-SIh) and the 245-kDa complex
glycosylated pro-SI (pro-SIc). Similar to pro-SI in
intestinal cells (18), N-deglycosylation of pro-SI revealed
two polypeptides, one which contains O-linked glycans (a
205-kDa polypeptide) and is derived from mature pro-SIc and the other is derived from mannose-rich pro-SIh and is
devoid of O-glycosylation. A similar double band pattern was
not revealed upon Endo F/GF treatment of the pro-SI
ST
mutant from which the stalk region was truncated. Instead one slightly
diffuse band of apparent molecular weight approximately similar to that
of the N-deglycosylated mannose-rich species of
pro-SI
ST was discerned. Obviously a substantial
reduction in the size of the O-glycans has occurred due to
the deletion of the stalk region. On the other hand,
N-linked glycosylation and maturation in the Golgi apparatus
of pro-SI
ST has occurred normally (see later Fig.
3). As shown in Fig. 2A, the
pro-SI
ST mutant revealed two biosynthetic forms during
the same labeling period as wild type pro-SI. These polypeptides could
be distinguished from each other when Endo H treatment was performed.
Similar to wild type pro-SI, a mannose-rich Endo H-sensitive form and a
mature Endo H-resistant form could be discerned indicating that
truncation of the stalk domain had no influence on the transport of
pro-SI from the endoplasmic reticulum to the site of maturation in the Golgi apparatus. Other evidence for the drastic reduction in the amount
of O-glycosylation due to the deletion of the stalk region is obtained when cells were biosynthetically labeled at 15 °C. At
this temperature transport of proteins is arrested in the endoplasmic reticulum preventing thus O-glycosylation which commences in
the cis-Golgi (33). Under these conditions, pro-SI
ST
revealed a mannose-rich form which was N-deglycosylated with
Endo H or Endo F/GF to polypeptides with similar apparent molecular
weights. The diffused band pattern of the Endo F/GF product of
pro-SI
ST at 37 °C as compared with its counterpart at
15 °C indicates that some O-glycosylation has occurred.
Nevertheless, the extent of O-glycans is substantially less
than that in wild type pro-SI. Together the results demonstrate that
the stalk domain of pro-SI is the major site of
O-glycosylation in the pro-SI molecule.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the structure of
pro-SI in small intestinal cells. Structural features of pro-SI
deduced from biosynthetic studies (18) and cDNA cloning (20, 42).
Pro-SI is a type II membrane glycoprotein
(Nin/Cout) that is synthesized with an
uncleavable signal sequence which also serves as a membrane anchoring
domain (20). The cytoplasmic tail contains 12 amino acid residues and
is followed by a membrane anchor of 20 amino acids and a Ser/Thr-rich
stalk domain/region of 28 amino acids that is considered to be part of
the isomaltase subunit. The stalk region is suggested to be heavily
O-glycosylated (42). Isomaltase ends with amino acid residue
Arg1007 and sucrase starts immediately thereafter with
Ile1008. The Arg/Ile peptide sequence between isomaltase
and sucrase is a trypsin site where the mature large precursor pro-SI
is cleaved in the intestinal lumen by pancreatic trypsin (25).
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Identification of molecular forms of wild
type pro-SI, pro-SI ST and
pro-SI MA in MDCK cells.
A, MDCK cells stably expressing wild type pro-SI or
pro-SI ST were biosynthetically labeled for 6 h at
37 °C (upper panel) or 10 h at 15 °C (lower
panel) with [35S]methionine. Detergent extracts were
immunoprecipitated with mAb anti-SI antibodies. The immunoprecipitates
were divided into equal parts and treated with Endo H, Endo F/GF, or
not treated. The proteins were submitted to SDS-PAGE on 6% slab gels
followed by fluorography. B, MDCK stably expressing
pro-SI MA cells were biosynthetically labeled for 6 h with [35S]methionine at 37 °C. Cellular lysates and
culture medium were immunoprecipitated with mAb anti-SI antibodies.
Further treatment of the immunoprecipitates was as in A. C, MDCK stably expressing pro-SI MA cells were
biosynthetically labeled for 6 h with
[35S]methionine in the presence or absence of
benzyl-GalNAc (denoted Benzyl). Secreted
pro-SI MA was immunoprecipitated from the culture medium
and treated or not treated with Endo H and Endo F/GF. The samples were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
|
|

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Transport kinetics of wild type pro-SI,
pro-SI ST, and
pro-SI MA in MDCK cells.
A, MDCK cells stably expressing pro-SI and
pro-SI ST were pulse labeled for 1 h with
[35S]methionine and chased for the indicated times with
2.5 mM unlabeled methionine. Wild type pro-SI and
pro-SI ST were immunoprecipitated from the cell lysates
with mAb anti-SI and the immunoprecipitates were divided into equal
parts, one of which was treated with Endo H and the other was not
treated. The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE on 6% gels and
fluorography. B, MDCK cells stably expressing
pro-SI MA were subjected to pulse-chase labeling as in
A. Pro-SI MA was immunoprecipitated from the
cell lysates and the medium and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE on 6% SDS gel followed by fluorography.
|
|
Next the structural features and biosynthesis of the anchorless mutant
pro-SI
MA were investigated. This mutant was secreted into the medium in biosynthetically labeled MDCK cells indicating that
deletion of the membrane anchoring domain had no consequences on the
intracellular transport of pro-SI
MA (Fig.
2B). The soluble pro-SI
MA form had an
apparent molecular mass of 240 kDa and is resistant to treatment with
Endo H indicating that it is complex glycosylated. The cellular form of
pro-SI
MA in the cell lysates revealed the mannose-rich
form which was sensitive to treatment with Endo H. Endo F/GF treatment
of secreted complex glycosylated pro-SI
MA generated a
polypeptide that was larger than the N-deglycosylated
cellular counterpart indicating that the secreted form contained Endo
F/GF-resistant O-glycans. O-Glycosylation of the
pro-SI
MA was further confirmed by treatment of cells with benzyl-GalNAc, a potent inhibitor of O-glycosylation.
Fig. 2C demonstrates that pro-SI
MA was
transport competent in the presence of benzyl-GalNAc and it was
secreted into the medium. However, a marked shift in the apparent
molecular weight was revealed as compared with the control
pro-SI
MA in the absence of benzyl-GalNAc indicating a
decrease in the extent of O-linked glycosylation. This view
was confirmed by N-deglycosylation of the secreted
pro-SI
MA glycoforms with Endo F/GF. The deglycosylated
control pro-SI
MA was larger than its counterpart from
cells treated with benzyl-GalNAc. This demonstrates that the shift in
the size of secreted pro-SI
MA generated upon
benzyl-GalNAc treatment is not due to N-linked glycosylation
otherwise a similar product of N-deglycosylation would have
been obtained and this was not the case.
The results shown above demonstrated that the pro-SI mutants were
transport competent. To determine, however, whether truncation of the
stalk region and the transmembrane domains have affected the transport
kinetics of these mutants as compared with wild type pro-SI,
pulse-chase experiments with [35S]methionine were
performed. Fig. 3A shows that within 1 h of pulse, only
the mannose-rich glycosylated forms of wild type pro-SI, pro-SI
MA, and pro-SI
ST appeared which
were sensitive to Endo H treatment. After 1 h of chase Endo
H-resistant complex, glycosylated forms of pro-SIWT and
pro-SI
ST could be detected, which became the predominant
bands with increasing chase periods. The fact that complex glycosylated
species were detected within the same period of chase indicates that
wild type pro-SI and pro-SI
ST have been transported to
the Golgi apparatus at almost similar rates. However, complete
processing of the mannose-rich species to the complex glycosylated form
was achieved only with wild type pro-SI after 6 h of chase, while
almost 15% pro-SI
ST were still present in the
mannose-rich form indicating that the processing kinetics of the
pro-SI
ST mutant are slightly slower than those of wild
type. The transport kinetics of pro-SI
MA were assessed
by comparing the proportions of pro-SI
MA in the cell
lysates with those in the medium (Fig. 3B). A faint band corresponding to the complex glycosylated secreted form of
pro-SI
MA was found in the medium already after 1 h
of chase and the intensity of this band increased substantially within
the next chase time points. At 6 h of chase the secreted form
constituted almost 90% of total pro-SI
MA. Here
again, pro-SI
MA is transported within the cell at almost
similar rates as wild type pro-SI and comparable to the transport of
pro-SI in the small intestine (18).
Cell Surface Expression of Wild Type Pro-SI,
Pro-SI
ST, and SI
MA in MDCK
Cells--
Next we wanted to determine how the deletions of the
transmembrane domain and the stalk region have affected the polarized sorting of the pro-SI mutants. For this purpose, MDCK cells expressing wild type pro-SI and the mutants were grown on transparent polyester membranes in multiwell tissue culture plates, which allow separate access to both surface domains, the apical and the basolateral. The
cells were labeled 5-8 days after confluency with
[35S]methionine for 6 h and cell surface
immunoprecipitation of pro-SI was performed with mAb anti-SI. Fig.
4A shows that approximately 95% of pro-SIWT were immunoprecipitated from the apical
membrane in line with previous data obtained in Caco-2 cells. By
contrast, deletion of the transmembrane domain was associated with a
dramatic shift in the sorting behavior of the pro-SI mutants. In
pulse-chase experiments pro-SI
ST was immunoprecipitated
from the apical and basolateral membranes at all chase time points.
Scanning of the fluorograms revealed about 60% of
pro-SI
ST at the apical membrane as compared with 40% at
the basolateral (Fig. 4D). These values did not change with
increasing chase times demonstrating a random delivery of this mutant
to the cell surface. The deletion of the 28-amino acid Ser/Thr-rich
stalk region has therefore substantial effects on the polarized sorting
of pro-SI
ST but not on its transport competence (see
Fig. 3A). Consequently, the stalk domain plays an important
role in apical targeting of pro-SI in MDCK cells.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Polarized delivery of wild type
pro-SI,
pro-SI ST, and
pro-SI MA to the cell surface of
MDCK cells. A, MDCK cells expressing wild type pro-SI were
grown on filters and labeled with [35S]methionine for
6 h. SI was immunoprecipitated either from the apical
(a) or the basolateral (b) membrane and subjected
to SDS-PAGE (6%) and fluorography. B, MDCK cells expressing
pro-SI ST or pro-SI MA were grown on
filters, pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine for 1 h
and chased in medium containing 2.5 mM unlabeled methionine
for the indicated times. Pro-SI ST was immunoprecipitated
from the apical or basolateral membranes. Pro-SI MA is a
secreted form and was immunoprecipiated from the culture media that
were collected from the apical or basolateral compartments. Samples
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE on 6% slab gels and fluorography. C,
D, and E, the fluorograms in A and
B were scanned and the proportions of wild type pro-SI
(panel C), pro-SI ST (panel D), and
pro-SI MA (panel E) in the apical or
basolateral membranes (C and D) or media
(E) were calculated.
|
|
We next asked whether the stalk domain per se is capable of
targeting pro-SI
MA to the apical membrane. MDCK cells
expressing this form were grown on filters and subjected to a
pulse-chase protocol. Since pro-SI
MA is a secreted form,
the media were collected from the apical and basolateral sides of the
filter and immunoprecipitated with mAb anti-SI. At 2 h of chase
pro-SI
ST was almost equally secreted into both
compartments. This pattern did not change with increasing chase times.
Densitometric scanning demonstrated that almost 50% of
pro-SI
MA were secreted through either membrane (Fig.
4E). It is clear that the stalk region of pro-SI is a
necessary, but not a sufficient component of the apical sorting signal
of pro-SI. To accomplish its task in directing pro-SI to the apical
membrane it requires additionally the membrane anchoring domain.
Pro-SI
ST and Pro-SI
MA Are Not
Associated with Lipid Rafts in MDCK Cells--
Many membrane proteins
with a glycolipid anchor and also some transmembrane proteins are
transported to the apical surface of epithelial cells in association
with detergent-insoluble membrane microdomains enriched in
glycosphingolipids and cholesterol, known as lipid rafts (3, 10, 15,
34). Pro-SI belongs to this class of proteins that associate with lipid
rafts through O-linked glycans prior to apical sorting. We
wanted therefore to determine whether or not the deletion mutants are
associated with lipid rafts. Here, pro-SI
ST and
pro-SI
MA and wild type pro-SI were analyzed in sucrose
gradients of Triton X-100 detergent extracts of biosynthetically
labeled cells. In line with previous data (19, 35), Fig.
5 demonstrates that the complex
glycosylated mature wild type pro-SI, but not the mannose-rich
polypeptide, was associated with lipid rafts, since it was found in the
floating fractions (fractions 9 and 10) at low buoyant density (10,
36). By contrast to wild type pro-SI, the gradients corresponding to pro-SI
ST and pro-SI
MA did not contain
pro-SI forms in the floating fractions indicating that the mutants are
not associated with lipid rafts. The results indicate that association
of pro-SI with membrane microdomains requires the presence of both
protein domains, the stalk region and the membrane anchor.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Sucrose gradient centrifugation of Triton
X-100 solubilized MDCK cells stably expressing wild type pro-SI,
pro-SI ST,
pro-SI MA. MDCK cells
expressing wild type pro-SI, pro-SI ST,
pro-SI MA were biosynthetically labeled for 4 h with
[35S]methionine. The cells were solubilized with Triton
X-100 at 4 °C and the detergent extracts were loaded on a 5-35%
sucrose gradient as described (34). Each gradient was divided into 12 fractions. Wild type pro-SI and the mutants pro-SI ST and
pro-SI MA were immunoprecipitated and subjected to
SDS-PAGE on 6% slab gels followed by fluorography.
|
|
Characterization of a Stretch within the Stalk Region That Is
Required for Sorting and Association of Pro-SI with Lipid
Rafts--
We wanted further to identify the sequences within the
stalk region responsible for polarized targeting of pro-SI and its association with lipid rafts. For this purpose three different pro-SI
mutants were generated from which short stretches within the stalk
region were deleted. The mutant pro-SI
ST37-48 lacked 12 amino acids (Ala37-Pro48) from the N-terminal
half of the stalk whereas 9 residues
(Ala49-Pro57) at the C-terminal half were
deleted in the pro-SI
ST49-57. Finally, the mutant
pro-SI
ST37-57 lacked sequences around the center of the
stalk domain (Fig. 6). These mutants were
transiently transfected in MDCK cells followed by metabolic labeling
and immunoprecipitation with mAb anti-SI. Each of the mutants was
characterized by a double band, which corresponded to the mannose-rich
and complex glycosylated forms as assessed by Endo H treatment (Fig.
7). Deglycosylation of the mutants with Endo F/GF revealed in each case two bands. In analogy with previous deglycosylation data (see Fig. 2) the upper bands contain Endo F/GF-resistant O-glycans. The higher apparent molecular
weight of the upper bands of N-deglycosylated
pro-SI
ST37-48 and pro-SI
ST49-57 as
compared with that of pro-SI
ST37-57 suggests that the
latter mutant is less O-glycosylated than the former two
mutants. This is supported by the fact that 9 Ser/Thr putative
O-glycan sites were deleted in this mutant, while
pro-SI
ST37-48 and pro-SI
ST49-57 lack 5 and 4 potential O-glycosylation sites, respectively. The
comparable size of the O-glycosylated pro-SI
ST37-48 and pro-SI
ST49-57
glycofroms suggest that these mutants had no significant differences in
the number of O-glycosyl sugar chains.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Schematic representation of the deletion
mutants, pro-SI ST37-48,
pro-SI ST49-57, and
pro-SI ST37-57. The
orientation of the membrane anchor, the stalk domain, and the start of
the isomaltase subunit are indicated. The sequence of the stalk is
shown in single-letter code.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Identification of molecular forms of
pro-SI ST37-48,
pro-SI ST49-57, and
pro-SI ST37-57 in transiently
transfected MDCK cells. MDCK cells were transfected with
pSG8-SI ST37-48, pSG8-SI ST49-57, and
pSG8-SI ST37-57 and biosynthetically labeled for 6 h at 37 °C with [35S]methionine. Detergent extracts
were immunoprecipitated and treated with Endo H, Endo F/GF, or not
treated as indicated for Fig. 2.
|
|
Next the polarized transport of the mutants was investigated in
transiently transfected MDCK cells that have been grown on membrane
filters. Fig. 8 demonstrates, that
pro-SI
ST49-57 was transported predominantly to the
apical cell surface, whereas pro-SI
ST37-48 and
pro-SI
ST37-57 are equally segregated to both membranes,
the apical and basolateral. This demonstrates that only
O-glycosylation of the membrane proximal half of the stalk
encompassing the sequences Ala37-Pro48 is
absolutely required for apical delivery of pro-SI. In view of these
findings it was necessary to examine the association of these mutants
with membrane microdomains. Fig. 9
demonstrates that the pro-SI
ST49-57 mutant was found in
the Triton X-100 insoluble floating fractions, while
pro-SI
ST37-48 and pro-SI
ST37-57 were
not detected in similar fractions of sucrose gradients.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Polarized delivery of
pro-SI ST37-48,
pro-SI ST49-57, and
pro-SI ST37-57 to the cell surface
of MDCK cells. A, transiently transfected MDCK cells were
grown on filters and labeled with [35S]methionine for
6 h. SI was immunoprecipitated either from the apical
(a) or the basolateral (b) membrane and subjected
to SDS-PAGE (6%) and fluorography. B, the fluorograms were
scanned and the proportions of pro-SI in the apical or basolateral
membranes were calculated.
|
|

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Analysis of the association of wild type
pro-SI and its mutants with lipid rafts. MDCK cells transiently
expressing pro-SI ST37-48,
pro-SI ST49-57, and pro-SI ST37-57 were
biosynthetically labeled, solubilized, and the extracts were loaded on
a sucrose gradient as described for Fig. 5. From each gradient 12 fractions were immunoprecipitated with mAb anti-SI and subjected to
SDS-PAGE followed by fluorography.
|
|
It is obvious therefore that association of pro-SI with membrane
microdomains is the decisive step along the apical sorting of this
protein. This association takes place through O-glycans located in the proximal half of pro-SI. O-Glycosylation in
the distal half of the stalk does not constitute an efficient signal for microdomain association and subsequently apical transport of
pro-SI.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The high fidelity of sorting of pro-SI to the apical membrane is
dramatically lost when O-glycosylation is affected resulting in random delivery of pro-SI to both membranes (19, 37). Another highly
O-glycosylated membrane protein, dipeptidyl peptidase IV, is
also sorted by a default mechanism when O-glycosylation is affected (37). Processing of the N-glycans of pro-SI and
dipeptidyl peptidase IV, which are heavily N-glycosylated,
is not necessary for correct sorting, provided that
O-glycans are properly processed. These observations
underline the key role played by O-glycans in the
segregation mechanism of pro-SI (and also dipeptidyl peptidase IV) into
vesicles destined for the apical plasma membrane. The question that
arises is that of the structural determinants within pro-SI required
for its high sorting fidelity. Is the presence of O-glycans
alone sufficient for an efficient sorting and what is the location of
the O-glycans involved in the sorting event? It has been
always proposed, but never shown, that the stalk region of pro-SI is
heavily O-glycosylated due to the presence of a Ser/Thr-rich domain (18, 19, 37). Our data demonstrate that this is indeed the case,
since deletion of this domain results in a significant reduction of
O-glycosylation of pro-SI. The stalk region belongs structurally to the isomaltase subunit. Here we could demonstrate that
the O-glycosylated stalk region of pro-SI plays a central role in the sorting event. The polarized transport of
pro-SI
ST in MDCK cells is dramatically altered upon
deletion of this domain and this finding indicates that other
O-glycans, most notably those located in the sucrase
subunit, do not constitute an essential part of the apical sorting
signal. Importantly, the deletion of the stalk region neither affects
the overall folding of pro-SI nor its transport competence which occurs
within the cell and to the cell surface, apical or basolateral, with
wild type kinetics. This lends support to the notion that one important
role of the stalk region in the overall structure of pro-SI is to serve
as a link between the globular protein and the membrane. An association of O-glycans with lipid rafts has been demonstrated to be
the driving sorting mechanism of pro-SI to the apical membrane (17, 35)
whereby this association is disrupted in the absence of O-glycans (19). The data presented here define structural
determinants required for this association and demonstrate that
O-glycans alone are neither sufficient for an association of
pro-SI with lipid rafts nor for its apical targeting. A mutant that
contains the O-glycosylated stalk domain, but lacks the
membrane anchoring domain, is not detected in membrane microdomains and
is secreted randomly from both sides of the membrane. It is important
to note that this deletion does not affect the transport rate of
pro-SI, since the mutant is transported intracellularly with wild type kinetics. Likewise, the membrane anchor alone without the
O-linked glycans is not capable of promoting the interaction
of pro-SI with lipid rafts and, as in the anchorless mutant, also here
sorting by default takes place with normal transport kinetics.
Obviously the two determinants, the O-glycosylated stalk
region and the membrane anchor of pro-SI are not absolutely required
for efficient transport of pro-SI intracellularly and to the cell
surface in non-polarized fashion. Nevertheless, these structures are
indispensable components of the sorting mechanism of pro-SI. It is
clear, however, that the stalk region per se without or with
impaired O-glycosylation does not constitute the sorting
signal, since impaired or inhibited O-glycosylation of the
stalk in full-length pro-SI leads to random delivery of the molecule to
both membranes.
Our data could further define a subdomain within the stalk region that
is necessary and sufficient for the association of pro-SI with membrane
microdomains and subsequent apical sorting. This domain comprises a
stretch of 12 amino acids located juxtapose the membrane anchoring
domain of pro-SI. In fact, a panel of deletion mutants of the stalk
domain reveal that only a pro-SI
ST49-57 mutant
containing this stretch is transported in a polarized fashion, while
pro-SI
ST37-48 and pro-SI
ST49-57 are not. Importantly all these mutants are O-glycosylated,
membrane anchored, and transport competent, but display different
detergent extractabilities with Triton X-100. Here again, the apically
sorted pro-SI
ST49-57 is the only mutant that associates
with membrane microdomains. A direct implication of these data is that O-glycosylation per se is not sufficient for
pro-SI to enter into an interaction with microdomains even in the
presence of the membrane anchoring domain. It is clear that the signal
for apical sorting and for microdomain association constitutes the
membrane anchoring domain and the immediate upstream
O-glycosylated stretch of the stalk region. Algorithmic
analyses of the Ala37-Pro48 subdomain reveal a
high O-glycosylation potential for the quartet Ser44-Thr45-Ser46-Thr47
suggesting the presence of a bulky O-glycan structure that
could be efficiently recognized and more avidly bound by a putative sorting receptor. A similar motif is not present in the other deletion
mutants in which the potential O-glycosylation sites are
distributed over the sequence.
An example of an apically sorted protein that utilizes
O-glycans as a sorting signal is the neurotrophin receptor
(p75NTR). In MDCK cells and in contrast to pro-SI,
p75NTR does not require the membrane anchoring domain as an
auxiliary component, since a secretory mutant of this protein that
contains an O-glycosylated stalk region is correctly sorted
(22). However, it is not known yet whether the sorting mechanism of
p75NTR is similar to that of pro-SI and occurs through an
interaction of O-linked glycans with lipid rafts. Apical
sorting signals contained in the membrane anchoring domain have been
described for the hemagglutinin of the influenza virus, which
associates with membrane microdomains prior to apical delivery (16).
Mutations in the critical residues Gly520 and
Ser521 of the membrane anchor reduce substantially the
interaction of the mutants with lipid rafts with subsequent alteration
in the apical sorting pattern (38). However, it is still unclear
whether other determinants in hemagglutinin, such as
N-linked glycans, are primarily required as a recognition
site before association of hemagglutinin with microdomains takes place.
In light of growing knowledge with endogenous and engineered apical
proteins the consensus is now emerging that one major sorting mechanism
to the apical membrane constitutes the interaction of proteins with
membrane microdomains (15). How and when does this interaction ensue? The pro-SI model suggests that an interaction between
O-glycans and a putative component in the trans-Golgi
network triggers the sorting events with lipid rafts marking the final
step. Neither the presence of the membrane anchor nor an unglycosylated
stalk region are sufficient for lipid rafts association and apical
sorting. Until present only a few studies are known which allude to a
putative role of O-linked glycans in apical sorting. These
involve proteins of the brush-border membrane and the neurotrophin
receptor, p75NTR (22, 37). For example, the sorting of the
brush-border proteins pro-SI, dipeptidyl peptidase IV, and
p75NTR largely depends on the presence of
O-glycosylated carbohydrates. By contrast, two other heavily
O-glycosylated proteins, aminopeptidase N and
lactase-phlorizin hydrolase are sorted to the apical membrane through
non-glycan signals located in their ectodomains and do not associate
with rafts before sorting (17, 29). In the particular case of
aminopeptidase N, it has been shown that the wild type protein
associates with rafts (17). However, deletion of the potentially
O-glycosylated stalk region and the membrane anchor of
aminopeptidase N remains without marked effects on the apical sorting
of a secretory form of this protein (40, 41) suggesting that the
sorting of aminopeptidase N occurs through a mechanism independent of
association with lipid rafts.
In view of the increasing body of data on the role of N- and
O-linked glycosylation in the context of apical sorting, a
comparison of the sorting pathways that utilize these two types of
carbohydrates as recognition signals is worthwhile. For example, are
the N- and O-linked glycan signals recognized by
similar or different cellular elements and is recognition the primary
step in a cascade of events. Of the few common structural features
between N- and O-linked glycans are galactose and
sialic acid residues. It is reasonable to assume that a common
cellular, lectin-like protein binds these residues, whereby the binding
capacity and the kinetics of this binding vary depending on the
location of the carbohydrate residues within the protein and probably
on the extent of glycosylation. Glycans found in the vicinity of the
membrane are likely to interact more readily with a putative sorting
factor than residues in more distal positions. O-Glycans in
the stalk region of pro-SI or in the heavily O-glycosylated
dipeptidyl peptidase IV would conform to this pattern. Along this it is
important to determine whether deletion of particular Ser/Thr residues
in the stalk region of pro-SI is associated with reduction in the
sorting fidelity. Drastic elevation in apical sorting of a glycosylated
mutant of the growth hormone occurs when the number of
N-glycosylated sites is increased (14) supporting the view
that a higher level of glycosylation may be critical in the sorting
event. However, the idea should not be excluded that the engineered
N-linked glycans in the growth hormone do not
constitute the apical signal per se, but are
implicated in the generation of a particular epitope in the protein
that acts as a signal. Such a putative role of glycosylation is
unlikely to apply for the heavily O-glycosylated and rigid
stalk region of pro-SI indicating that O-linked
glycans act directly as an apical signal.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Hans-Peter Hauri, Biozentrum,
University of Basel, and Dr. Erwin Sterchi, Institute of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, University of Bern, Switzerland, for generous
gifts of monoclonal anti-SI antibodies.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Grant Na 331/1-2, Bonn/Germany (to H. Y. Naim), and
Sonderforschungsbereich Grant 280.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiological
Chemistry, School of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany. Tel.: 49-511-953-8780; Fax: 49-511-953-8585; E-mail: hnaim@biochemie.tiho-hannover.de.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
SI, sucrase isomaltase (all forms);
pro-SI, uncleaved sucrase isomaltase;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
benzyl-GalNAc, benzyl-N-acetyl-
-D-galactosaminide;
Endo H, endoglyosidase H;
Endo F/GF, endoglycosidase F/N-glycopeptidase F;
LPH, lactase-phlorizin hydrolase;
MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney cells;
TEMED, N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
van Meer, G.,
Stelzer, E. H.,
Wijnaendts-van-Resandt, R. W.,
and Simons, K.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
1623-1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
van Meer, G.,
and Simons, K.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
1455-1464[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Matlin, K. S.,
and Simons, K.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
99,
2131-2139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Matlin, K.,
Bainton, D. F.,
Pesonen, M.,
Louvard, D.,
Genty, N.,
and Simons, K.
(1983)
J. Cell Biol.
97,
627-637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Wandinger-Ness, A.,
Bennett, M. K.,
Antony, C.,
and Simons, K.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
987-1000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Griffiths, G.,
and Simons, K.
(1986)
Science
234,
438-443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Hunziker, W.,
Harter, C.,
Matter, K.,
and Mellman, I.
(1991)
Cell
66,
907-920[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Casanova, J. E.,
Apodaca, G.,
and Mostov, K. E.
(1991)
Cell
66,
65-75[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Mostov, K. E.,
de Bruyn Kops, A.,
and Deitcher, D. L.
(1986)
Cell
47,
359-364[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Brown, D. A.,
Crise, B.,
and Rose, J. K.
(1989)
Science
245,
1499-1501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Lisanti, M. P.,
Le Bivic, A.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
2117-2127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Urban, J.,
Parczyk, K.,
Leutz, A.,
Kayne, M.,
and Kondor-Koch, C.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
2735-2743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kitagawa, Y.,
Sano, Y.,
Ueda, M.,
Higashio, K.,
Narita, H.,
Okano, M.,
Matsumoto, S.,
and Sasaki, R.
(1994)
Exp. Cell Res.
213,
449-457[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Scheiffele, P.,
Peranen, J.,
and Simons, K.
(1995)
Nature
378,
96-98[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Simons, K.,
and Ikonen, E.
(1997)
Nature
387,
569-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Scheiffele, P.,
Roth, M. G.,
and Simons, K.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5501-5508[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Danielsen, E. M.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
1596-1605[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Naim, H. Y.,
Sterchi, E. E.,
and Lentze, M. J.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
7242-7253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Alfalah, M.,
Jacob, R.,
Preuss, U.,
Zimmer, K. P.,
Naim, H.,
and Naim, H. Y.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
593-596[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Hunziker, W.,
Spiess, M.,
Semenza, G.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1986)
Cell
46,
227-234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Jokinen, M.,
Andersson, L. C.,
and Gahmberg, C. G.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
11314-11321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Yeaman, C.,
Le Gall, A. H.,
Baldwin, A. N.,
Monlauzeur, L.,
Le Bivic, A.,
and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
929-940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kozarsky, K.,
Kingsley, D.,
and Krieger, M.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
4335-4339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Monlauzeur, L.,
Breuza, L.,
and Le Bivic, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30263-30270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Hauri, H. P.,
Sterchi, E. E.,
Bienz, D.,
Fransen, J. A.,
and Marxer, A.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
838-851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Moolenaar, C. E.,
Ouwendijk, J.,
Wittpoth, M.,
Wisselaar, H. A.,
Hauri, H. P.,
Ginsel, L. A.,
Naim, H. Y.,
and Fransen, J. A.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
557-567[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Mantei, N.,
Villa, M.,
Enzler, T.,
Wacker, H.,
Boll, W.,
James, P.,
Hunziker, W.,
and Semenza, G.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
2705-2713[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Jacob, R.,
Brewer, C.,
Fransen, J. A.,
and Naim, H. Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2712-2721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Jacob, R.,
Preuss, U.,
Panzer, P.,
Alfalah, M.,
Quack, S.,
Roth, M. G.,
Naim, H.,
and Naim, H. Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8061-8067[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Naim, H. Y.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
296,
607-615
|
| 32.
|
Naim, H. Y.,
Sterchi, E. E.,
and Lentze, M. J.
(1987)
Biochem. J.
241,
427-434[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Roth, J.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
98,
399-406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Lisanti, M. P.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
Graeve, L.,
Saltiel, A. R.,
and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
9557-9561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
| Mirre, C., Monlauzeur, L., Garcia, M., Delgrossi, M. H., and Le
Bivic, A. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. C887-C894
|
| 36.
|
Sargiacomo, M.,
Sudol, M.,
Tang, Z.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
789-807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Naim, H. Y.,
Joberty, G.,
Alfalah, M.,
and Jacob, R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17961-17967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Lin, S.,
Naim, H. Y.,
Rodriguez, A. C.,
and Roth, M. G.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
51-57[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 40.
|
Vogel, L. K.,
Noren, O.,
and Sjostrom, H.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
308,
14-17[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Vogel, L. K.,
Spiess, M.,
Sjostrom, H.,
and Noren, O.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
2794-2797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Green, F.,
Edwards, Y.,
Hauri, H. P.,
Povey, S.,
Ho, M. W.,
Pinto, M.,
and Swallow, D.
(1987)
Gene (Amst.)
57,
101-110[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea