![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 2, 1516-1522, January 12, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Metabolic Research Unit and Department of Medicine,
University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0540
Received for publication, July 18, 2000, and in revised form, September 13, 2000
The vasorelaxant and anti-mitogenic activities of
the atrial and brain natriuretic peptides depend upon their binding to
the type A natriuretic peptide receptor (NPR-A) expressed on the
surface of vascular cells. Intervention strategies aimed at controlling NPR-A expression are limited by the paucity of studies in this area.
Here we identify a sequence CCAAT between The natriuretic peptides are a family of vasoactive hormones that
play an important role in the regulation of blood pressure and
cardiovascular homeostasis (1). Atrial natriuretic peptide and brain
natriuretic peptide are both produced predominantly in the heart and
circulate in plasma. Their natriuretic, diuretic, and vasorelaxant
activities are mediated through the type A natriuretic peptide receptor
(NPR-A)1 (2) (also known as
guanylyl cyclase A) present on the surface of vascular smooth muscle
and other cells. Recent studies by two independent groups (3, 4) showed
that complete absence of NPR-A in mice leads to hypertension, cardiac
hypertrophy, and sudden death, indicating a critical role for NPR-A in
the regulation of cardiovascular homeostasis.
The molecular regulation of NPR-A gene transcription is only poorly
understood. The rat NPR-A gene has been cloned and sequenced. Sequence
analysis identified very few sequence elements for known transcription
factors. However, three putative Sp1 consensus binding sites
(positioned between The CCAAT box is present in a number of eukaryotic promoters (7-10)
and has been demonstrated to be important for the transcription of many
of those genes (7-10). In relatively simple, TATA-less promoters,
which, like the NPR-A promoter, contain only one or two additional
cis-acting elements, the CCAAT box is absolutely required for
regulating gene transcription (10-12). In contrast, the CCAAT box is
somewhat less critical for TATA-containing promoters (10-12).
Typically, the CCAAT element is found as a single copy in the forward
or reverse orientation immediately upstream of the transcription start
site. In the TATA-less NPR-A promoter, the CCAAT sequence is positioned
in the reverse orientation between Materials--
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed against
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) Plasmid Construction and Site-directed Mutagenesis--
The
construction of
Site-directed mutagenesis of the CCAAT site was carried out with
the QuickChange kit from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). In brief, 10-50 ng
of Cell Culture--
Embryonic RASM cells (passage 19) were kindly
provided by H. Ives (University of California, San Francisco, CA).
Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified
incubator in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's-H21 medium containing
10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml
streptomycin, and 2% (v/v) broth, tryptose phosphate.
Drosophila Schneider cells (SL-2) were obtained from the
Cell Culture Facility at the University of California (San Francisco,
CA). Cells were cultured in Schneider's medium containing 10% fetal
bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at
25 °C.
Transfection, Luciferase, and Preparation of Nuclear Extracts--
Cells were harvested and
lysed by the addition of 0.5 ml of lysis buffer (containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 µg/ml aprotinin) on ice for 10 min. Lysates
were centrifuged; the pelleted nuclei were resuspended in buffer B
(containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 420 mM NaCl,
1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 25%
glycerol, and the above protease inhibitors) and kept on ice for 30 min. Nuclei were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min, and the
supernatant extracts were saved. Extracts were stored at UV Cross-linking Analysis--
Purified
32P-end-labeled, double-stranded oligonucleotide spanning
the CCAAT site in the NPR-A promoter or a control oligonucleotide encoding a C/EBP binding site was incubated with 10 µg of RASM nuclear extract in binding reaction buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH
7.5, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µM ZnSO4, 0.2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin,
10% glycerol, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40) containing 0.5 µg of
poly(dI-dC) at room temperature for 30 min. Each reaction mixture was
then pipetted onto parafilm and subjected to irradiation for 10-20 min
at a distance of 5 mm using an ultraviolet lamp with 254-nm emission.
Samples were resolved by electrophoresis on 10% denaturing
polyacrylamide gel and exposed to an x-ray film for autoradiography.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
The
CCAAT oligonucleotides used for EMSAs were as follows: wild-type,
5'-GTTAAAGAGTCAGGATTGGTTCCCCCGGCTCTC-3'; mutant,
5'-GTTAAAGAGTCAGGgcgttTTCCCCCGGCTCTC-3'. Only coding strand
sequence is provided; mutagenized bases are identified by lowercase
letters, and the CCAAT sequence is underlined. The sequence (coding
strand) of the C/EBP binding oligonucleotide is:
5'-TAGCTGAGATCTTGCGTAACCATTGCCCA-3'. Nuclear extracts (10 µg)
were incubated in binding reaction buffer containing 0.5 µg of
poly(dI-dC) at room temperature for 10 min. Purified
32P-end-labeled, double-stranded oligonucleotide was added
for an additional 10 min in a total volume of 20 µl. For competition experiments, a 1-100-fold molar excess of unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide was added to the binding reaction. For
immunoperturbation experiments, nuclear extracts were incubated on ice
for 1 h with 2 µg of polyclonal antibody against C/EBP GST Pull-down Assay--
35S-Labeled Sp1 protein was
synthesized in vitro using the TnT SP6 quick-coupled
transcription/translation system from Promega (Madison, WI) according
to the manufacturer's instructions. GST fusion protein expression
vectors including pGEX-CBF-A, pGEX-CBF-B, pGEX-CBF-C, and pGEX-Sp1 were
transformed into the BL-21 strain of Escherichia coli
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), expanded in suspension culture and induced
(3 h) with 1 mM isopropyl
Ten µg of each GST-CBF subunit bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads
was incubated with 4 µl of in vitro translated
35S-Sp1 in 150 µl of protein binding buffer at 4 °C
for 1 h. The reaction contents were then precipitated by
centrifugation. The precipitate was washed three times with 500 µl of
protein binding buffer, resuspended in 15 µl of SDS sample buffer,
and loaded on a 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The gel was dried
and exposed to x-ray film prior to autoradiography.
Coimmunoprecipitation--
One mg of RASM nuclear extract was
mixed with 2 µg of either anti-Sp1 antibody or anti-Rel A (p65)
antibody in 200 µl of protein binding buffer. As a control, 200 µg
of RASM nuclear extract was mixed with either 10 µg of GST alone or
GST-Sp1 bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads. After incubation at
4 °C for 2 h, the reaction mixtures were pelleted, and the
precipitates were washed three times with protein binding buffer,
resuspended, and boiled with SDS sample buffer. The protein was
resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane,
and immunoblotted with anti-NF-YA antibody. The immunoprecipitated
protein signal was detected using the ECLTM Western blot detection
system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Statistic Analysis--
Data were evaluated by one-way analysis
of variance using Newman-Keul's test for significance.
Three Sp1 consensus sites and one CCAAT site have been identified
by DNA sequence analysis in the proximal 5'-flanking sequence of NPR-A
gene (5, 6). All of these regulatory elements are present within a
segment of the NPR-A gene, extending from 387 base pairs upstream to
the transcription start site, which we showed previously to direct the
optimal level of NPR-A promoter activity in RASM cells (6). The
relative location and specific mutations introduced at each of these
sites are presented in Fig. 1A. To determine the relative
contribution of each of these putative regulatory elements to NPR-A
gene transcription, mutations were introduced into each site within the
context of the A number of transcriptional activators that bind to the CCAAT motif
have been described. One or more of these may participate in
CCAAT-dependent, NPR-A promoter activity. These factors
include C/EBP (13-16), NF-Y (17-19), mouse y-box protein 1 (MSY-1)
(20), and CCAAT binding transcription factor/nuclear factor-1
(CTF/NF-1) (19, 21). We performed UV cross-linking and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) to identify the protein(s) that interact with the CCAAT motif in the proximal NPR-A promoter. UV cross-linking analysis showed at least two protein complexes in RASM nuclear extracts, with molecular mass values of ~117 and ~78 kDa, that associated with a labeled oligonucleotide spanning the CCAAT motif in
the NPR-A promoter, but not with an otherwise identical oligonucleotide containing the mutations that block NPR-A promoter activity (Fig. 2). We also cross-linked the same RASM
extracts with an oligonucleotide that binds to C/EBPs in rat liver
tissue and pituitary progenitor GHFT1-5 cells (22, 23). Three nuclear
proteins of ~42, ~48, and ~52 kDa were identified. Although a low
intensity ~42-kDa band was seen in the RASM extracts, the ~48- and
~52-kDa bands were clearly distinguishable from those interacting
with the NPR-A CCAAT sequence (Fig. 2). This suggests that C/EBP
proteins are present in the RASM nuclear extract but, for the most
part, do not bind to the CCAAT motif in the NPR-A promoter.
Functional Interaction of NF-Y and Sp1 Is Required for Type A
Natriuretic Peptide Receptor Gene Transcription*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
141 and
137 of the NPR-A
promoter that, when mutated, reduces promoter activity by 90% in rat
aortic smooth muscle (RASM) cells. Protein/DNA cross-linking and
immunoperturbation of electrophoretically shifted complexes formed
between RASM nuclear extracts and an oligonucleotide surrounding the
CCAAT sequence indicates that the heterotrimeric transcription factor
NF-Y binds specifically to the wild-type, but not mutated, CCAAT
element. Cotransfection of a dominant negative mutant of the NF-YA
subunit results in a concentration-dependent decrease in
the activity of the NPR-A promoter in RASM cells confirming that
endogenous NF-Y is an activator of the promoter. Mutation of the CCAAT
element, in conjunction with mutation of all three Sp1 sites previously
shown to be involved in NPR-A promoter regulation, virtually eliminates
NPR-A promoter activity in RASM cells. Coexpression of all three NF-Y
subunits together with Sp1 in Drosophila cells deficient in
these factors indicates that NF-Y and Sp1 act synergistically to
reconstitute NPR-A promoter activity. A direct physical association between NF-Y and Sp1 can be demonstrated both in vitro by
glutathione S-transferase pull-down assay and in the intact
cell by coimmunoprecipitation and functional studies. Together, these
studies show that NPR-A promoter activity is dominantly regulated
through functional, and possibly physical, interactions of NF-Y and Sp1.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
341 and
51) and a CCAAT motif (positioned at
137) were present upstream from the promoter of the NPR-A gene (5).
Our earlier studies (6) demonstrated a critical role for the Sp1 family
of transcription factors in regulating NPR-A gene transcription in rat
aortic smooth muscle (RASM) cells, but the role of the CCAAT sequence
remains unknown.
137 and
141 upstream of the
transcription start site. In the present study, we show that the CCAAT
box is important for NPR-A gene transcription. We have identified the
nuclear proteins that associate with the CCAAT box as the
heterotrimeric NF-Y complex, and we have demonstrated that functional,
and possibly physical, interaction of NF-Y with Sp1 is essential for
optimal transcription of the NPR-A promoter in vascular smooth muscle cells.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, C/EBP
, and C/EBP
, and
goat polyclonal antibody directed against Sp1 were a kind gift from S. McKnight (University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas,
TX). Mouse monoclonal antibody directed against nuclear factor-Y (NF-Y) A was purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against NF-YB was a gift from M. Roberto (University of Milan, Milan, Italy). Poly(dI-dC), glutathione-SepharoseTM 4B, and
T7 Sequenase were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Schneider
cell medium was obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. All
oligonucleotides were synthesized by Cruachem, Inc. Other reagents were
obtained through standard commercial suppliers.
387 rat NPR-A luciferase has been described
previously (6). The NF-YA expression plasmids pNF-YA (wild-type) and
pNF-YA29 (dominant negative form) were provided by R. Mantovani (University of Milan, Milan, Italy). pPacSp1 and Copia
-galactosidase were obtained from R. Tjian (University of
California, Berkeley, CA). pPacNF-YA, pPacNF-YB, and pPacNF-YC were
provided by T. F. Osborne (University of California, Irvine, CA).
pcDNA3/Sp1 was from K.-S. Chang (University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX). Full-length and mutant GST-Sp1 in
a pGex2TKMSC expression vector were provided by E. Wintersberger
(Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria). pCite-CBF-A, pCite-CBF-B,
and pCite-CBF-C were from B. de Crombrugghe (M. D. Anderson Cancer
Center). GST-CBF-C (NF-YC) in the pGEX-4T-3 vector was provided by
S. N. Maity (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center). GST-CBF-A (NF-YB)
and GST-CBF-B (NF-YA) were constructed by PCR amplification of the
corresponding coding sequences from pCite-CBF-A and pCite-CBF-B,
respectively. The full-length CBF-A cDNA was generated with
oligonucleotides containing BamHI (sense) and
XhoI (antisense) restriction sites at their 5' termini and the full-length CBF-B cDNA generated with oligonucleotides
containing EcoRI (sense) and XhoI (antisense) at
their 5' termini. PCR products were cut with the appropriate
restriction enzymes and inserted into the pGEX-4T-3 vector.
387 NPR-A luciferase, 125 ng of two complementary mutagenic
primers (sense, 5'-GTTAAAGAGTCAGGgcgttTTCCCCCGGCTCTC-3'; antisense, 5'-GAGAGCCGGGGGAAaacgcCCTGACTCTTTAAC-3'); mutagenized bases
are indicated by lowercase letters), 0.2 mM dNTPs, and 2.5 units of Pfu DNA polymerase were mixed in the PCR reaction
buffer. PCR was carried out for 18 cycles using 30 s denaturation
at 95 °C, 1 min annealing at 55 °C, and 2 min/kilobase extension
at 68 °C. After PCR, 1 µl of DpnI was added to the
reaction to cut the parental DNA template, and 5 µl of this digest
was used for transformation. Several candidate colonies were screened
by sequencing, and positive colonies were chosen for large scale DNA
preparation. Mutation of three consensus Sp1 sites in the NPR-A gene
promoter has been described previously (6).
-Galactosidase Assays--
RASM
cells were transiently transfected with 10 µg of
387 rat NPR-A
luciferase or the relevant promoter mutant and 1-5 µg of pNF-YA or
pNF-YA29 by electroporation (Gene-Pulser, Bio-Rad) at 250 mV and 960 µF. For Drosophila Schneider cells, 5 µg of
387 NPR-A
luciferase or the relevant promoter mutant and 2 µg of Copia
-galactosidase were cotransfected along with increasing amounts
(1-10 µg) of pPacSp1, and/or plasmids encoding NF-Y subunits (pPacNF-YA, pPacNF-YB, and pPacNF-YC), alone or in combination, by
electroporation at 180 mV and 960 microfarads. After transfection, cells were plated on six-well plastic plates and cultured for 48 h. Cells were harvested and lysed in 100 µl of cell culture lysis
reagent (Promega, WI). Protein concentration of each cell extract was
measured using Coomassie protein reagent (Pierce). Cell lysates were
processed (20 µg of protein/sample) and assayed for luciferase as
described previously. Measurements of
-galactosidase activity were
made using the Galacto-Light PlusTM kit from Tropix, Inc. (Bedford, MA).
80 °C
prior to use.
,
C/EBP
, C/EBP
, NF-YA, NF-YB, DBP, TEF, Sp1, or Sp3 prior to the
addition of labeled probe. Independent studies with the anti-C/EBP
(23) and C/EBP
(data not shown) antibodies demonstrated that each
was capable of disrupting (C/EBP
) or supershifting (C/EBP
) the
relevant DNA-protein complex in the mobility shift assay. All samples
were resolved on 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. Gels were dried and exposed to film for autoradiography.
-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Cells were pelleted, sonicated
in TST buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20, and centrifuged. The
resultant supernatant was then added to 300 µl of
glutathione-Sepharose beads, mixed on a rotating wheel at 4 °C for
1 h, and centrifuged. The pellet containing the bound GST fusion
protein was washed three times with TST buffer, then resuspended in 300 µl of protein binding buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH
7.9), 150 mM KCl, 25 mM MgCl2, 10%
glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% Triton X-100, and
0.1% Nonidet P-40. Bound protein was quantitated using the Coomassie
protein assay reagent (Pierce).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
387 NPR-A luciferase reporter and transfected into
RASM cells. Our previous studies showed that both Sp1 and Sp3 bind to
each of the three Sp1 consensus sites in the NPR-A promoter and that
mutation of all three Sp1 sites in concert reduced
387 NPR-A
luciferase reporter activity in RASM cells to 10% that of the native
promoter. In the present study, we showed that mutation of the CCAAT
site resulted in a similar ~90% reduction in activity whereas
mutation of the CCAAT and Sp1 sites in combination virtually eliminated
NPR-A promoter activity (Fig. 1B). Thus, a CCAAT-binding
transcription factor is a dominant activator of the NPR-A promoter.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Mutation of Sp1 and CCAAT sites eliminates
rat NPR-A promoter activity in transiently transfected RASM cells.
The CCAAT site is on the minus strand in the NPR-A promoter and reads
as ATTGG in the figure. Panel A, location and
site-directed mutagenesis of the Sp1 and CCAAT sites. WT and
MUT represent the wild-type and mutagenized sites.
Mutagenized bases are indicated by lowercase
letters, and the putative regulatory element is
underlined. Panel B, 10 µg of
wild-type (WT)
387 NPR-A LUC or the mutant
(MUT) indicated were transiently transfected into RASM
cells. After 48 h of culture, cells were lysed for luciferase
assay. The data represent the mean ± S.D. from four experiments
done in triplicate.

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
UV cross-link analysis of proteins present in
RASM nuclear extracts that bind to the CCAAT site in the rat NPR-A
promoter. Ten micrograms of RASM nuclear extract was incubated
with 32P-labeled, double-stranded CCAAT or CCAAT mutant
oligonucleotide (see "Experimental Procedures" for description) or
a control 32P-labeled, double-stranded oligonucleotide
encoding a known C/EBP binding site. The reaction mixture was
irradiated by UV at 254 nm for 10-20 min, then separated on a 10%
denaturing polyacrylamide gel and exposed to x-ray film.
EMSA of DNA-binding proteins present in RASM extracts was carried out.
A single slowly migrating band was observed which was effectively
competed by unlabeled wild-type (WT) oligonucleotide but not
by its mutated counterpart (Fig.
3A). EMSA with the
C/EBP-specific oligonucleotide demonstrated a faster-migrating protein
complex supporting our contention (see above) that C/EBP does not
participate in formation of the complex identified on the NPR-A CCAAT
element (Fig. 3B). This conclusion drew further support from
the failure of the C/EBP oligonucleotide to compete with the native
complex on the NPR-A promoter fragment (Fig. 3B). The
117-kDa size of the UV cross-linked protein is similar to the size
predicted for the CCAAT-binding, heterotrimeric NF-Y complex, raising
the possibility that this transcription factor is involved in
regulation of the NPR-A gene. To test this hypothesis, we employed
specific antibodies directed against subunits of the NF-Y protein
complex. Immunoperturbation studies showed that the slowly migrating
band in the EMSA was supershifted or disrupted by antibody directed
against the A or B subunits of NF-Y, but was not recognized by antibody
directed against C/EBP
, C/EBP
, C/EBP
, DBP, or TEF (Fig.
3C). Collectively, these findings support the hypothesis
that the RASM nuclear protein that binds to the CCAAT box of the NPR-A
promoter is NF-Y.
|
NF-Y (also called CBF or CP1) is a ubiquitous transcription factor that
binds to CCAAT motifs in the proximal promoters of a large number of
mammalian genes (7-12, 17-19). NF-Y/CBF consists of three subunits,
A, B, and C, all of which are required for DNA binding. To confirm that
the CCAAT box is essential for NPR-A gene expression, we examined the
effect of forced overexpression of NF-Y or an NF-Y dominant negative
mutant on NPR-A promoter activity. Overexpression of wild-type NF-YA
failed to activate the NPR-A luciferase reporter (Fig.
4); however, cotransfection of a dominant
negative mutant of NF-YA (pNF-YA29) resulted in a
dose-dependent reduction of
387 NPR-A promoter activity
in RASM cells (Fig. 4). The mutant NPR-A reporter lacking the CCAAT element was unaffected by pNF-YA29. The failure of NF-YA to activate the NPR-A promoter might reflect the fact that the ubiquitously expressed NF-Y protein, or more specifically NF-YA, is not limiting for
NPR-A gene transcription in RASM cells. To confirm that NF-Y is an
activator of the NPR-A promoter, we introduced the NPR-A luciferase
reporter into Schneider cells, a Drosophila cell line that
does not express appreciable levels of a number of mammalian transcription factors, including Sp1 and NF-Y. As shown in Fig. 5A, overexpression of the
three NF-Y subunits (A, B, and C) led to a
concentration-dependent increase in NPR-A-driven reporter activity in Schneider cells.
|
|
Cooperative interactions among transcription factors have been shown to
be important for the regulation of a number of gene promoters. Indeed,
simultaneous mutation of all of the Sp1 sites and the CCAAT motif led
to a reduction in NPR-A promoter activity to background levels (Fig.
1B). To determine whether Sp1 cooperates with NF-Y at the
NPR-A promoter,
387 NPR-A luciferase was cotransfected into Schneider
cells along with Drosophila expression vectors encoding Sp1
and the three NF-Y subunits. Whereas expression of either Sp1 or NF-Y
activated the NPR-A promoter to a moderate degree, simultaneous
expression of both Sp1 and NF-Y together resulted in a dramatic
increase in promoter activity (Fig. 5A). This increase
exceeded that seen with either transcription factor alone, implying
that Sp1 and NF-Y act cooperatively to drive NPR-A gene transcription.
Transcription factors may cooperate at a promoter by separately
contacting different rate-limiting targets, by mutually contacting a
single rate-limiting target or by interacting with each other to form a
novel activity. We performed a GST pull-down assay to probe the
potential interaction of Sp1 and NF-Y in vitro. As shown in
Fig. 5B, [35S]methionine-labeled Sp1 was able
to bind GST-NF-YA and NF-YC, but not GST alone or NF-YB, suggesting
that Sp1 interacts physically with the NF-YA and NF-YC subunits. For
the converse experiment, nuclear extracts from RASM cells were
incubated with GST-Sp1 or GST alone, and the washed beads were
electrophoresed, blotted onto filters, and then probed with anti-NF-YA
antibody. This demonstrated that endogenous NF-YA in RASM cells also
interacted with Sp1 (Fig. 5C). Finally, we conducted
coimmunoprecipitation studies to show that Sp1 and NF-YA interact in
the context of the intact cell. Immunoprecipitation of Sp1 from the
same extracts followed by Western blot analysis for NF-YA revealed a
low intensity but specific band, which migrated in a position the size
of NF-YA (Fig. 5C). As a control, NF-YA was not
coimmunoprecipitated when anti-Rel A antibody was used in place of
anti-Sp1 antibody (Fig. 5C). Thus, NF-Y and Sp1 interact
both in vitro and in the context of the intact cell.
Finally, we asked whether this interaction could be demonstrated to
have functional sequelae in the cell. To address this, we transfected
NPR-A promoter-driven luciferase constructs, with mutations at either
the Sp1 or NF-Y binding sites, into Drosophila Schneider
cells, alone or in combination with Sp1 or NF-Y expression vectors. As
shown in Fig. 5D, the CCAAT mutant promoter displayed a
robust response to cotransfected Sp1 but no response to NF-Y. However,
when Sp1 and NF-Y were cotransfected together, there was a small but
statistically significant increment in promoter activity. We interpret
this increment as reflective of the ability of Sp1 to recruit NF-Y into
the regulatory complex through protein-protein interaction. Similar
findings were observed with the triple Sp1 mutant promoter.
Cotransfection with NF-Y effected a significant increase in promoter
activity while Sp1 was completely ineffective. Once again,
overexpression of NF-Y and Sp1 together led to an increment in promoter
activity that exceeded that seen with either transcription factor alone.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we demonstrated that a CCAAT box in the proximal 5'
flanking sequence of the NPR-A gene is essential for transcriptional activity. Mutation of the CCAAT motif spanning
142 to
138 relative to the transcriptional start site resulted in 90% reduction in NPR-A
promoter activity. A number of nuclear transcription factors have been
shown to bind to the CCAAT box, including C/EBP, NF-Y, MSY-1, and
CTF/NF-1 (13-21). Only NF-Y requires all five base pairs for binding
(7). UV cross-linking, EMSA competition, and immunoperturbation studies
demonstrated that the trans-acting factor NF-Y, but not C/EBP, bound to
the CCAAT site in the proximal NPR-A promoter. Moreover, forced
expression of a dominant negative mutant of NF-YA resulted in a
dramatic reduction in NPR-A promoter activity. Together, these data
suggest that NF-Y, when bound to the CCAAT element, plays a critical
role in the regulation of NPR-A gene transcription.
NF-Y is a ubiquitous heterotrimeric transcription factor, also referred as CP1 or CBF, that consists of NF-YA, NF-YB, and NF-YC subunits with molecular mass values of 42, 36, and 40 kDa, respectively (24-27). NF-YB and NF-YC contain a conserved histone-fold motif, which forms a dimer that interacts with NF-YA (26, 27). All three NF-Y subunits are required for binding to the CCAAT motif (26, 27). Our cross-linking studies demonstrated that at least two complexes with molecular masses of 78 and 117 kDa specifically cross-linked to the CCAAT sequence of the NPR-A promoter. These are very close to the predicted molecular mass of NF-YB/NF-YC dimers and the heterotrimeric complex of all three NF-Y subunits, respectively. Functional analysis has shown that NF-Y is crucial for transcriptional activation and reinitiation on genes like NPR-A, which lack a TATA box (10-12, 28). Interestingly, NF-Y has been shown to recognize CCAAT boxes in several genes involved in growth regulation, including murine ribonucleotide reductase R2 (29), murine E2F-1 (30), cyclin B1 (31), cdc2 (32), cyclin A (32), the protein phosphatase cdc25C (32), and human thymidine kinase (33). Recent studies also demonstrated that stable expression of a dominant negative mutant of NF-Y in mouse fibroblast cells resulted in retardation of cell growth and inhibition of transcription of various cellular genes (34), implying that NF-Y may be crucial for cell cycle progression. The liganded NPR-A has been demonstrated to function in a growth suppressant mode in vascular smooth muscle, endothelial, and cardiac fibroblast cells in culture (35-37), implying that transcriptional control by NF-Y may be more than fortuitous.
Our earlier studies documented the importance of Sp1 to NPR-A gene transcription (6). We have shown here that NF-Y does not work in isolation, but rather operates in conjunction with Sp1 to regulate NPR-A gene transcription. Mutation of the CCAAT and Sp1 sites in combination completely eliminated NPR-A promoter activity, whereas overexpression of both Sp1 and NF-Y in Drosophila cells led to amplification of NPR-A promoter activity beyond that seen with either transcription factor alone. Furthermore, we demonstrated a physical interaction between these two transcription factors in vitro and in vivo that may play a role in their cooperative functional activity. Gel shift studies in which both Sp1 and NF-Y were examined, either alone or in combination, did not suggest that their functional cooperativity was due to cooperative binding of these factors to the NPR-A promoter, at least in vitro (data not shown). However, Wright et al. (38) have demonstrated that the half-life of either NF-Y or Sp1 binding is dramatically increased when both transcription factors are bound to the proximal promoter of the major histocompatibility complex class II-associated invariant chain (Ii) gene. We cannot exclude the possibility that similar interactions between Sp1 and NF-Y might stabilize their binding on the NPR-A promoter. In addition, Sp1 and NF-Y can bind individually to separate loci on the p300 coactivator (39-41). It is possible that the functional interaction of NF-Y and Sp1 could involve synergistic regulation of this important transcriptional coactivator.
Taken together, the studies presented here demonstrate that the bulk of
NPR-A gene expression in RASM cells depends upon functional, and
possibly physical, interactions between two transcription factors, NF-Y
and Sp1. Since regulation of blood pressure depends, in part, upon the
correct expression of NPR-A in relevant target tissues, the intricate
molecular processes controlling NF-Y and Sp1 expression and activity
are likely to be important components in the regulatory machinery
governing cardiovascular homeostasis at the organismal level.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to S. McKnight, M. Roberto, R. Mantovani, R. Tjian, T. F. Osborne, K.-S. Chang, E. Wintersberger, B. de Crombrugghe, and S. N. Maity, who provided important reagents used in this study.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grant HL45637 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Metabolic Research
Unit and Dept. of Medicine, 1109 HSW, University of California, San
Francisco, CA 94143-0540. Tel.: 415-476-2729; Fax: 415-476-1660; E-mail: gardner@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 5, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006350200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: NPR-A, type A natriuretic peptide receptor; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; RASM, rat aortic smooth muscle.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Levin, E. R., Gardner, D. G., and Samson, W. K. (1998) N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 321-328 |
| 2. | Kishimoto, I., Dubois, S. K., and Garbers, D. L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6215-6219 |
| 3. | Lopez, M. J., Wong, S. K. F., Kishimoto, I., Dubois, S., Mach, V., Friesen, J., Garbers, D. L., and Beuve, A. (1995) Nature 378, 65-68 |
| 4. | Oliver, P. M., Fox, J. E., Rockman, H. A., Kim, H. S., Reddick, R. L., Pandey, K. N., Hilgram, S. L., Smithies, O., and Maeda, N. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 14730-14735 |
| 5. | Yamaguchi, R., Rutledge, L. J., and Garbers, D. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20414-20420 |
| 6. | Liang, F., Schaufele, F., and Gardner, D. G. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 1695-1701 |
| 7. | Bucher, P. (1990) J. Mol. Med. 212, 563-578 |
| 8. | Mantovani, R. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 1135-1143 |
| 9. | Maity, S., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1998) Trends Biochem. Res. 23, 174-178 |
| 10. | Mantovani, R. (1999) Gene (Amst.) 239, 15-17 |
| 11. | Mantovani, R., Pessara, U., Tronche, F., Li, X.-Y., Knapp, A. M., Pasquali, J. L., Benoist, C., and Mathis, D. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3315-3322 |
| 12. | Liberati, C., Ronchi, A., Lievens, P., Ottolenghi, S., and Mantovani, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16880-16889 |
| 13. | Johnson, P. F., Landschulz, W. H., Graves, B. J., and McKnight, S. L. (1987) Genes Dev. 1, 133-146 |
| 14. | Graves, B. J., Johnson, P. F., and McKnight, S. L. (1986) Cell 44, 565-576 |
| 15. | Landschulz, W. H., Johnson, P. F., Adashi, E. Y., Graves, B. J., and McKnight, S. L. (1988) Genes Dev. 2, 786-800 |
| 16. | Osada, S., Yamamoto, H., Nishihara, T., and Imagawa, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3891-3896 |
| 17. | Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R. A., Bollekens, J., Dorn, A., Benoist, C., and Mathis, D. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 7265-7282 |
| 18. | Dorn, A., Bollekens, J., Staub, A., Benoist, C., and Mathis, D. (1987) Cell 50, 863-872 |
| 19. | Chodosh, L. A., Baldwin, A. S., Carthew, R. W., and Sharp, P. A. (1988) Cell 53, 11-24 |
| 20. | Schwartzbauer, G., Yu, J. H., Cheng, H., and Menon, R. K. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24760-24769 |
| 21. | Mermod, N., O'Neill, E. A., Kelly, T. J., and Tjian, R. (1989) Cell 58, 741-753 |
| 22. | Schaufele, F., Cassill, J. A., West, B. L., and Reudelhuber, T. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14592-14598 |
| 23. | Schaufele, F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21484-21489 |
| 24. | Vuorio, T., Maity, S. N., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 22480-22486 |
| 25. | Maity, S. N., Vuorio, T., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 5378-5382 |
| 26. | Sinha, S., Maity, S. N., Lu, J., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 1624-1628 |
| 27. | Kim, I. S., Sinha, S., de Crombrugghe, B., and Maity, S. N. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4003-4013 |
| 28. | Chang, Z. F., and Liu, C. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17893-17898 |
| 29. | Filatov, D., and Thelander, L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25239-25243 |
| 30. | Hsiao, K. M., McMahon, S. L., and Farnham, P. J. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 1526-1537 |
| 31. | Katula, K. S., Wright, K. L., Paul, H., Surman, D. R., Nuckolls, F. J., Smith, J. W., Ting, J. P. J., Yates, J., and Cogswell, J. P. (1997) Cell Growth Differ. 8, 811-820 |
| 32. | Zwicker, J., Lubicello, F. C., Wolfraim, L. A., Gross, C., Truss, M., Engeland, K., and Muller, R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4514-4522 |
| 33. | Good, L., Chen, J., and Chen, K. Y. (1995) J. Cell. Physiol. 163, 636-644 |
| 34. | Hu, Q., and Maity, S. K. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 4435-4444 |
| 35. | Itoh, H., Pratt, R. E., and Dzau, V. J. (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 86, 1690-1697 |
| 36. | Itoh, H., Pratt, R. E., Ohno, M., and Dzau, V. J. (1992) Hypertension 19, 758-761 |
| 37. | Cao, L., and Gardner, D. G. (1995) Hypertension 25, 227-234 |
| 38. | Wright, K. L., Moore, T. L., Vilen, B. J., Brown, A. M., and Ting, J. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20978-20986 |
| 39. | Faniello, M. C., Bevilacqua, M. A., Condorelli, G., de Crombrugghe, B., Maity, S. N., Avvedimento, V. E., Cimino, F., and Costanzo, F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7623-7626 |
| 40. | Xiao, H., Hasegawa, T., and Isobe, K. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1371-1376 |
| 41. | Krumm, A., Madisen, L., Yang, X. J., Goodman, R., Nakatani, Y., and Groudine, M. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 13501-13506 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. G. Gardner, S. Chen, D. J. Glenn, and C. L. Grigsby Molecular Biology of the Natriuretic Peptide System: Implications for Physiology and Hypertension Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 419 - 426. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Alimov, O.-K. Park-Sarge, K. D. Sarge, H. H. Malluche, and N. J. Koszewski Transactivation of the Parathyroid Hormone Promoter by Specificity Proteins and the Nuclear Factor Y Complex Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3409 - 3416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Huang, S. Zhao, S. Ammanamanchi, M. Brattain, K. Venkatasubbarao, and J. W. Freeman Trichostatin A Induces Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Type II Receptor Promoter Activity and Acetylation of Sp1 by Recruitment of PCAF/p300 to a Sp1{middle dot}NF-Y Complex J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 10047 - 10054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Niimi, Y. Hayashi, S. Futaki, and K. Sekiguchi SOX7 and SOX17 Regulate the Parietal Endoderm-specific Enhancer Activity of Mouse Laminin {alpha}1 Gene J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 38055 - 38061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rahmutula, J. Cui, S. Chen, and D. G. Gardner Transcriptional Regulation of Type B Human Natriuretic Peptide Receptor Gene Promoter: Dependence on Sp1 Hypertension, September 1, 2004; 44(3): 283 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Uramoto, A. Hackzell, D. Wetterskog, A. Ballagi, H. Izumi, and K. Funa pRb, Myc and p53 are critically involved in SV40 large T antigen repression of PDGF {beta}-receptor transcription J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2004; 117(17): 3855 - 3865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q.-S. Zhu, B. Qian, and D. Levy CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {alpha} (C/EBP{alpha}) Activates Transcription of the Human Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene (EPHX1) through the Interaction with DNA-bound NF-Y J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 29902 - 29910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Alimov, M. C. Langub, H. H. Malluche, O.-K. Park-Sarge, and N. J. Koszewski Contrasting Mammalian Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Promoters: Nuclear Factor-Y Binds to a Deoxyribonucleic Acid Element Unique to the Human PTH Promoter and Acts as a Transcriptional Enhancer Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2713 - 2720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Coss, S. B. R. Jacobs, C. E. Bender, and P. L. Mellon A Novel AP-1 Site Is Critical for Maximal Induction of the Follicle-stimulating Hormone {beta} Gene by Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone J. Biol. Chem., January 2, 2004; 279(1): 152 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Schuettengruber, E. Simboeck, H. Khier, and C. Seiser Autoregulation of Mouse Histone Deacetylase 1 Expression Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2003; 23(19): 6993 - 7004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. R. Jacobs, D. Coss, S. M. McGillivray, and P. L. Mellon Nuclear Factor Y and Steroidogenic Factor 1 Physically and Functionally Interact to Contribute to Cell-Specific Expression of the Mouse Follicle-Stimulating Hormone-{beta} Gene Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2003; 17(8): 1470 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhao, K. Venkatasubbarao, S. Li, and J. W. Freeman Requirement of a Specific Sp1 Site for Histone Deacetylase-mediated Repression of Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Type II Receptor Expression in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2624 - 2630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhou, K. R. Mehta, A. P. Choi, S. Scolavino, and X. Zhang DNA Damage-induced Inhibition of Securin Expression Is Mediated by p53 J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(1): 462 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Borestrom, H. Zetterberg, K. Liff, and L. Rymo Functional Interaction of Nuclear Factor Y and Sp1 Is Required for Activation of the Epstein-Barr Virus C Promoter J. Virol., December 20, 2002; 77(2): 821 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Abdelrahim, I. Samudio, R. Smith III, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe Small Inhibitory RNA Duplexes for Sp1 mRNA Block Basal and Estrogen-induced Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Progression in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 2, 2002; 277(32): 28815 - 28822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ge, L. H. Matherly, and J. W. Taub Transcriptional Regulation of Cell-specific Expression of the Human Cystathionine beta -Synthase Gene by Differential Binding of Sp1/Sp3 to the -1b Promoter J. Biol. Chem., November 16, 2001; 276(47): 43570 - 43579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|