|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M100856200 on March 1, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 20, 16931-16935, May 18, 2001
FKBP12 Binding Modulates Ryanodine Receptor Channel Gating*
Marta
Gaburjakova,
Jana
Gaburjakova,
Steven
Reiken,
Fannie
Huang,
Steven O.
Marx,
Nora
Rosemblit, and
Andrew R.
Marks
From the Center for Molecular Cardiology and Departments of
Medicine and Pharmacology, Columbia University College of Physicians
and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032
Received for publication, January 30, 2001, and in revised form, February 28, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The ryanodine receptor (RyR1)/calcium release
channel on the sarcoplasmic reticulum of skeletal muscle is comprised
of four 565,000-dalton RyR1s, each of which binds one FK506 binding
protein (FKBP12). RyR1 is required for excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. FKBP12, a cis-trans
peptidyl-prolyl isomerase, is required for the normal gating of the
RyR1 channel. In the absence of FKBP12, RyR1 channels exhibit increased
gating frequency, suggesting that FKBP12 "stabilizes" the channel
in the open and closed states. We now show that substitution of a Gly,
Glu, or Ile for Val2461 in RyR1 prevents FKBP12 binding to
RyR1, resulting in channels with increased gating frequency. In the
case of the V2461I mutant RyR1, normal channel function can be restored
by adding FKBP12.6, an isoform of FKBP12. These data identify
Val2461 as a critical residue required for FKBP12 binding
to RyR1 and demonstrate the functional role for FKBP12 in the RyR1
channel complex.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ryanodine receptor
(RyR)1-1/Ca2+
release channel on the sarcoplasmic reticulum of skeletal muscle is a
tetrameric channel with a molecular mass of ~2.3 million daltons. The
channel is comprised of a signaling complex that includes four
molecules of FKBP12, originally identified as KC7, a peptide that
co-purified with RyR1 (1), and kinases and phosphatases that regulate
the channel function in particular by modulating the binding of the immunophilin subunit to the channel (2). FKBP12 is required for the
normal gating of the channel and for coupled gating between neighboring
channels (3, 4).
Binding of FKBP12 to RyR1 in skeletal muscle and the closely related
isoform FKBP12.6 to RyR2 in cardiac muscle modulates channel gating. We
have shown previously that dissociation of FKBP12 from RyR1 or FKBP12.6
from RyR2 channels increases the gating frequency of the channel
manifested as reduced open and closed dwell times (2, 3, 5). Others
have confirmed a role for FKBP12/12.6 in RyR1/RyR2 function (6-9),
whereas one group has reported no functional role for FKBP12.6 in RyR2
(10). However, this same group has now reported that cardiomyocytes from an FKBP12.6 null mouse exhibit defects in Ca2+
signaling (11), consistent with a role for FKBP12.6 in regulating RyR2
as we showed originally (2, 5). Protein kinase A phosphorylation of RyR2 dissociates FKBP12.6 from the channel, resulting in increased Ca2+ sensitivity for activation (2). We have proposed that
this is a physiological pathway (part of the "fight or flight"
response) that regulates excitation-contraction coupling and
specifically increases excitation-contraction coupling gain by
increasing the amount of Ca2+ released for a given trigger
(2, 12). In failing hearts this pathway is over-stimulated and becomes
maladaptive, resulting in protein kinase A hyperphosphorylation of the
RyR2 channels (2). Protein kinase A-hyperphosphorylated RyR2 channels
in failing hearts are depleted of FKBP12.6 and exhibit single-channel properties (2) similar to those observed in RyR1 channels in the
absence of FKBP12 (3).
A motif that can bind FKBP12 was suggested by studies that identified
the ideal substrate for prolyl isomerization (13). In these studies
Schreiber and co-workers (13) concluded that FKBP12 was binding to a
twisted-amide transition state intermediate in the peptidyl-prolyl bond
of its substrates. They subsequently showed that FK506 and rapamycin,
immunosuppressant drugs that bind to FKBP12, are twisted amide
surrogates. The binding of FKBP12 to the hydrophobic motif identified
as the optimal substrate for peptidyl-prolyl isomerization present in
the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (an intracellular
Ca2+ release channel with structural homology to RyR
channels) was examined subsequently using a yeast two-hybrid
interaction screen (14). The present study is the first to establish
the precise location of an FKBP12 binding site on the intact
full-length RyR1 channel. We show that Val2461 is a key
residue mediating FKBP12 binding to RyR1 and that mutations at this
site that inhibit FKBP12 binding to RyR1 result in significant defects
in single-channel function, which is consistent with altered channel
gating because of the absence of FKBP12. To demonstrate that the
defects in single-channel properties are caused by lack of FKBP12
binding as opposed to some other structural change in the channel, we
generated a mutant V2461I RyR1 channel that does not bind FKBP12 but
does bind FKBP12.6. Addition of FKBP12.6 to the V2461I mutant RyR1
restores normal channel function.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Expression of Recombinant Wild-type and Mutant
RyR1--
Mutagenesis of RyR1 was performed using a cassette
containing nucleotides 6597-11766. The sequences of the primers used
for mutagenesis (including conservative substitutions to generate new
restriction sites) were as follows: V2461H, c cgc gcc atc ctt cgc
agt ctt cat ccc ctg gac gac c; V2461E, c ctt cgc tcc ctc gag ccc ctg
gac gac c; V2461G, c ctt cgc tcc ctc ggg ccc ctg gac gac c; and V2461I,
cc atc ctt cgc tca tta att ccc ctg gac gac c.
The Morph site-specific plasmid DNA mutagenesis kit (5 Prime 3 Prime, Boulder, CO) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The corresponding mutant fragments were digested with
NsiI and SapI (at nucleotides 7453 and 7647, respectively) and subcloned into an expression vector (pCMV5)
containing a full-length RyR1 clone cut with the same enzymes. HEK293
cells were maintained in T175 flasks in minimum Eagle's media
containing 10% fetal bovine serum and were passed every 3-4 days. One
T175 flask (50% confluent) was transfected with 20.0 µg of DNA using
the Ca2+ phosphate precipitation method. Forty-eight h
post-transfection, the cells were washed twice, scraped into
phosphate-buffered saline, and pelleted by centrifugation at 2500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. After resuspending the pellet in
0.5 ml of 20 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5, containing protease
inhibitors (complete EDTA-free inhibitors from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), the cells were allowed to swell for 30 min on ice before
lysis by 20 strokes of a Dounce homogenizer. Cell homogenates were
diluted with an equal volume of ice-cold medium containing 500 mM sucrose and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, and
centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min. Supernatants were recovered and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 45 min. Pellets were resuspended in a buffer containing 250 mM
sucrose, and the protein concentration of the microsomes was determined
by Bradford assay. Aliquots were stored at 80 °C.
Immunoprecipitations--
Approximately 200 µg of wild-type or
mutant RyR1 containing microsomes were diluted to a total of 500 µl
with immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1.0 mM
EDTA, 1.0 mM NaF, 1.0 mM
Na3VO4, and 0.25% Triton X-100) containing
protease inhibitors. These samples were incubated with 2.0 µl of
anti-RyR antibody for 1 h at 4 °C followed by the addition of
40 µl of protein A-Sepharose (1:1 in phosphate-buffered saline) for
1 h at 4 °C. After the beads were washed four times for 5 min
in immunoprecipitation buffer, the proteins were eluted with SDS sample
buffer, heated to 95 °C for 4 min, and assayed for both RyR and FKBP
by Western analysis.
Stripping FKBP12 from RyR1 and Rebinding
FKBP12.6--
Recombinant RyR1 microsomes were washed in 0.5 ml of 10 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5, containing protease inhibitors and
were centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 45 min. Pellets
were resuspended in a buffer containing 10 mM HEPES, 300 mM sucrose, and 0.9% NaCl. Microsomes (200 µg) were
added to 0.2 ml of imidazole buffer (5 mM imidazole, pH
7.4, and 0.3 M sucrose) and incubated for 1 h at
37 °C with varying concentrations of rapamycin. Samples were
centrifuged at 95,000 × g for 10 min, and the
supernatants were collected. Pellets were washed two times in 0.2 ml of
imidazole buffer and centrifuged at 95,000 × g for 10 min. The final pellet was resuspended in 0.2 ml of imidazole buffer.
Both the pellet and supernatant were separated by polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and analyzed for FKBP12 by Western blotting.
Recombinant RyR1 containing microsomes was resuspended in 250 µl of
imidazole buffer (5 mM imidazole, pH 7.4, and 0.3 M sucrose) and incubated with 5 µM
recombinant FKBP12.6 for 4 h at 4 °C. Samples were centrifuged
at 95,000 × g for 10 min, and the pellets were washed
twice and resuspended in 500 ml of immunoprecipitation buffer. RyR1 was
immunoprecipitated from these samples as described above.
Single-channel Recordings--
Single-channel experiments were
conducted under voltage-clamp conditions. Sarcoplasmic reticulum
vesicles were added to the cis chamber and induced to fuse
with planar lipid bilayers composed from 3:1 phosphatidyl
ethanolamine/phosphatidyl serine (Avanti Polar Lipids, Birmingham, AL).
The bilayer cup was made of polystyrene with a 0.15-mm aperture. Fusion
was promoted by KCl added to the cis chamber. After
incorporation of a single Ca2+ release channel, the KCl
gradient was eliminated by perfusion of the cis chamber with
cis solution. Solutions used for channel analysis were as
follows: trans solution, 250 mM Hepes, 53 mM Ca(OH)2, 50 mM KCl, pH 7.35; and
cis solution, 250 mM HEPES, 125 mM
Tris, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM
CaCl2, pH 7.35. Free Ca2+ concentration was
determined using the program CHELATOR (15). The trans
chamber was connected to the head-stage input of an Axon 200 amplifier
(Axon Instruments) using a silver/AgCl electrode and agar/KCl
bridge. The cis chamber was held at ground with a similar
electrode. The single-channel currents were filtered at 1 kHz with an
8-pole Bessel filter (Warner Instruments) and digitized at 4 kHz. Data
were collected on a Pentium computer using AxoScope1 (Axon Instruments)
and a Digidata 1200 (Axon Instruments) interface. The pClamp 6 program
(Axon Instruments) was used for analyzing single-channel data. Open
probability and the lifetime of open events and gating frequency were
identified by 50% threshold analysis using at least 2 min of
continuous record. The Student's t test was used for
statistical analyses.
 |
RESULTS |
To identify determinants for the binding of FKBP12 to the RyR1
channel we generated four mutant forms of the 5037-amino acid RyR1
channel subunit. In each case we introduced substitutions for
Val2461, which is in the immediately N-terminal position
relative to Pro2462 (referred to as the P1 position)
predicted to form a binding site for FKBP12 on RyR1 (2, 14). The choice
of amino acids to substitute for Val2461 was guided by data
showing that the P1 amino acid strongly influences the catalytic
efficiency for cis-trans peptidyl-prolyl
isomerization by FKBP12 of synthetic peptide substrates (13).
Hydrophobic residues (Leu, Ile, Phe, and Val) in the P1 position
resulted in the highest catalytic efficiency, whereas charged residues (His and Glu) reduced the catalytic efficiency, and Gly exhibited the
lowest catalytic efficiency (13).
Therefore we generated four mutant forms of RyR1, V2461G, V2461E,
V2461H, and V2461I (Fig. 1A).
Wild-type and mutant RyR1 were expressed in HEK293 cells (which contain
endogenous FKBP12). Co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed
to determine whether FKBP12 was associated physically with the
recombinant wild-type and mutant RyR1 as we had demonstrated previously
for native RyR1 (16) and for recombinant RyR1 expressed in Sf9
cells (3). FKBP12 co-immunoprecipitated with the recombinant wild-type RyR1 and with the V2461H mutant but not with the V2461G, V2461E, or
V2461I mutant forms of RyR1 (Fig. 1B). These data identify the P1 residue Val2461 as being critical in determining the
binding of FKBP12 to RyR1.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Mutations in RyR1 eliminate FKBP12 binding to
the channel. A, four mutant RyR1 channels were
generated, each with a single amino acid substitution in the P1
position relative to Pro2462 (denoted by the
arrow). FKBP12/12.6 binding sites are compared for RyR1 and
RyR2. B, co-immunoprecipitations of RyR1 and FKBP12 were
performed as described previously (16), showing that FKBP12
co-immunoprecipitated with wild-type (WT) RyR1 and with the
V2461H mutant but not with the V2461G, V2461E, or V2461I mutant
channels. C, FKBP12 was competed off from wild-type and
mutant V2461H RyR1 with rapamycin. Microsomes containing recombinant
RyR1 were incubated with varying concentrations of rapamycin as shown,
and RyR1 was sedimented by centrifugation followed by immunoblotting
the pellet (P) and supernatant (S) using the
anti-FKBP12 antibody.
|
|
FKBP12 can be competed off from RyR1 using the immunosuppressant drugs
FK506 or rapamycin at nanomolar concentrations (3). Experiments were
performed in which membranes containing recombinant wild-type or mutant
RyR1 were isolated from transfected HEK293 cells, centrifuged, and
assayed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/immunoblotting to
determine whether FKBP12 is bound to RyR1 (in the pellet, P, Fig. 1C). Treatment of the membranes with rapamycin
dissociates RyR1-bound FKBP12 so that it appears in the supernatant,
S. Compared with wild type RyR1, rapamycin sensitivity of
the V2461H mutant channel was increased ~10-fold. Rapamycin competed
FKBP12 off from the V2461H mutant channel at a concentration of 10 nM, and complete removal of FKBP12 was achieved with 100 nM compared with 1000 nM for the wild-type
channel (Fig. 1C). The V2461E, V2461G, and V2461I mutant
RyR1 channels did not bind FKBP12 in this assay (data not shown), which
is in agreement with the co-immunoprecipitation experiments.
To analyze the functional consequences of reduced affinity for FKBP12
in the mutant RyR1 channels, the single-channel properties of
recombinant proteins were examined in planar lipid bilayers (Table
I). One of the prominent features of RyR1
expressed in the absence of FKBP12 is an increase in the gating
frequency compared with native RyR1 or wild-type RyR1 channels
co-expressed with FKBP12 (3). The wild-type recombinant RyR1 channel
expressed in HEK293 cells (which contain endogenous FKBP12) exhibited
the same single-channel properties (n = 11, e.g. Fig. 2A and
Table I) as reported previously for native RyR1 and for wild-type RyR1 co-expressed with FKBP12 in Sf9 cells (3, 17). The V2461H mutant
RyR1 channel that binds FKBP12 but with reduced affinity (Fig.
1C) also exhibited normal single-channel properties
(n = 9, e.g. Fig. 2B and Table
I). However, the V2461E mutant RyR1 channel did exhibit a significant
increase in the gating frequency (n = 21, e.g. Fig. 2C and Table I) as did the V2461G
mutant RyR1 (n = 16, e.g. Fig. 2D
and Table I). This rank order of the appearance of increased gating
frequency in the mutant RyR1 channels correlates with the increased
affinity of FKBP12 for substrates with Val in the P1 position compared
with those with His, Glu, or Gly. The amplitude histograms for the
V2461E (Fig. 2C), V2461G (Fig. 2D), and V2461I
(Fig. 4C) mutant RyR1 channels suggest that these mutant
channels exhibit partial openings or subconductance states as reported
previously for RyR1 expressed in the absence of FKBP12 (3). However,
given the increased gating frequency of these mutant channels and the
time resolution of our recording system (~1 ms), we are not able to
resolve the five discrete states (closed, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, fully open)
reported previously (3).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Single channel properties of wild-type and mutant recombinant RyR1
All values are expressed as mean ± S.D. Channels were recorded
using [Ca2+]cis = 150 nM.
|
|

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Altered single-channel properties of mutant
RyR1 channels that do not bind FKBP12. Characterization of
recombinant wild type (A) and mutant V2461H (B),
V2461E (C), and V2461G (D) RyR1 channels is
shown. Representative current traces under control conditions
cis (cytosolic) Ca2+ 150 nM and
after the addition of caffeine (5 mM) are shown also.
Single-channel currents were recorded at 0 mV (trans
versus cis) in asymmetrical Ca2+
solutions (cis = 150 nM Ca2+
free, trans = 53 mM Ca(OH)2).
All-points amplitude histograms were generated from 5 × 104 points. c indicates the closed state of the
channels. Channel openings are upward.
|
|
The open dwell times, gating frequency, and open probability of the
wild-type RyR1 and mutant V2461H channels were similar (Table I). In
contrast, the open dwell times were significantly shorter, and the
gating frequency was significantly higher for the V2461E and V2461G
mutant channels compared with the wild-type channel (Table I). These
data indicate that the V2461E and V2461G mutant channels are less
stable in the open or closed states as suggested previously for RyR1
channels expressed in the absence of FKBP12 (3).
One possible explanation for the observed changes in single-channel
function in the RyR1 mutants that do not bind FKBP12 is that the
substituted amino acids cause structural changes in the channel that
result in altered function independent of FKBP12 binding. To address
this possibility specifically we designed a mutant RyR1 (V2461I) that
does not bind FKBP12 but does bind FKBP12.6 and therefore could be
"rescued" by the addition of FKBP12.6. The ability to restore
normal function to the mutant RyR1 channel would exclude the
possibility that the amino acid substitutions themselves cause the
observed changes in channel function independent of FKBP12 binding.
Using co-immunoprecipitations, we showed that the V2461I mutant RyR1
(expressed in HEK293 cells that contain FKBP12 but not FKBP12.6) binds
FKBP12.6 (Fig. 3) but not FKBP12 (Fig.
1B). When the V2461I mutant channel was examined in planar lipid bilayers, it exhibited the same increased gating frequency as the
V2461G mutant RyR1 (Fig. 4B).
However, when FKBP12.6 was added to the RyR1 V2461I mutant, normal
channel function comparable with that of the wild-type RyR1 was
restored (Fig. 4D). In contrast, the addition of FKBP12 to
the V2461I mutant RyR1 channel failed to restore normal channel
function (Fig. 4C).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Some mutant RyR1 channels that do not bind
FKBP12 do bind FKBP12.6. Wild-type and mutant RyR1 were incubated
with recombinant FKBP12.6. Co-immunoprecipitations of RyR1 and FKBP12.6
were performed as described previously (2), showing that FKBP12.6
co-immunoprecipitated with wild type (WT) RyR1 and with the
V2461I and V2461H mutants but not with the V2461G or V2461E mutant RyR1
channels. Control, RyR1 from skeletal muscle and recombinant
FKBP12.6.
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
FKBP12.6 (but not FKBP12) restores normal
channel function to the V2461I mutant RyR1 channel.
Characterization of recombinant wild type (A) and mutant
V2461I (B), V2461I plus FKBP12 (C), and V2461I
plus FKBP12.6 (D) RyR1 channels is shown. Representative
current traces under control conditions cis (cytosolic)
Ca2+ 150 nM and after the addition of caffeine
(5 mM) are shown also. Single-channel currents were
recorded at 0 mV (trans versus cis) in
asymmetrical Ca2+ solutions (cis = 150 nM Ca2+ free, trans = 53 mM Ca(OH)2). All-points amplitude histograms
were generated from 5 × 104 points. c
indicates the closed state of the channels. Channel openings are
upward.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The mechanism whereby FKBP12 catalyzes the
cis-trans isomerization of peptidyl-prolyl bonds
is to bind to and lower the energy of the unstable twisted-amide
transition state intermediate (18). FKBP12 also may bind to the
twisted-amide transition state intermediate of a peptidyl-prolyl bond
on RyR1. Stabilization of an unstable bond may be part of the mechanism
whereby binding of FKBP12 allows the RyR1 channel to assume a
conformation that permits optimal gating (3) as well as coupled gating
between neighboring channels (4). As such, this would be a novel role
for an immunophilin and would imply that steric constraints hinder the
complete isomerization of the peptidyl-prolyl bond to either fully
cis or trans conformations. This is because the
affinity of FKBP12 for either the cis or trans conformation of the peptidyl-prolyl bond would be reduced, whereas evidence suggests that in vivo FKBP12 is bound tightly to
RyR1. Because the interaction between FKBP12 and RyR1 likely involves the catalytic site of the enzyme, tight in vivo binding to
the substrate would not be consistent with RyR1-bound FKBP12
functioning as a true enzyme.
The results for the binding of FKBP12 to V2461H, V2461E, and
V2461G mutant RyR1 channels correlate precisely with the increased affinity of FKBP12 for substrates with a hydrophobic residue at the P1
position Gly (13); however, the lack of FKBP12 binding to the V2461I
mutant RyR1 diverges from this model. Interestingly, the catalytic
efficiency (kcat/Km) of
FKBP12-catalyzed reactions for peptide substrates in which the amino
acid residue at the P1 position is varied is 7-fold higher for
substrates with Val (wild type) at the P1 position compared with His,
37-fold higher compared with Glu, and 41-fold higher compared with Gly (13). This rank order of efficiency of the FKBP12-catalyzed isomerization of peptide substrates has been used to support the idea
that stabilization of the twisted-amide intermediate is the mechanism
of amide rotation by FKBP12 (18). Because the rank order of the
catalytic efficiency of FKBP12 correlates with the binding of FKBP12 to
the wild-type and three of the four mutant RyR1 channels FKBP12 (Fig.
1), the mechanism by which FKBP12 modulates RyR1 channel gating may
involve binding to and stabilization of a twisted-amide transition
state intermediate of a peptidyl-prolyl bond in RyR1. However, the
finding that FKBP12 does not bind to the V2461I mutant RyR1 would seem
to cast some doubt on this interpretation.
Compared with peptides with Gly at the P1 position, the catalytic
efficiency of FKBP12-catalyzed reactions was 3-fold higher when the P1
residue was a Leu and 2-fold higher when the P1 residue was an Ile
(13). Among the other channels and receptors known to bind FKBP12,
three contain a Leu (inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptors 1 and 2 and
T RI) at the P1 position and one (RyR2) has an Ile at the P1
position. The finding that the V2461I mutant RyR1 channel does not bind
FKBP12 was not predicted on the basis of examining the catalytic
efficiency of FKBP12 because the enzyme isomerizes a synthetic peptide
with Ile in the P1 position more efficiently than one with Val (13).
Our data show that FKBP12.6 binds with high affinity to the V2461I
mutant RyR1 just as it binds to the wild-type RyR2 channel that has an
Ile in the corresponding P1 position (Fig. 1A). The binding
of FKBP12.6 but not FKBP12 to the V2461I RyR1 mutant could be explained
if the catalytic sites formed by hydrophobic pockets were slightly
different in size such that FKBP12.6 accepted the side chain of an Ile,
whereas FKBP12 does not. An alternative explanation would be that it is not the catalytic site of FKBP12/12.6 that binds to the residue at
position 2461 in RyR1, leaving open the possibility that the catalytic
site is interacting with another peptidyl-prolyl bond in the channel.
The structure of FKBP12 bound to the type 1 transforming growth
factor receptor shows that the P1 residue and the Pro in the FKBP12
binding site do not interact with FKBP12. However, this report also
notes that there are other contact sites between FKBP12 and
transforming growth factor receptor (19). The data in the present
study suggest that the FKBP12 binding site on RyR1 may have a
significantly different structure from that on the transforming growth
factor receptor because mutations of the P1 residue strongly
influence binding of FKBP12 but also does not exclude the possibility
that other residues in RyR1 (and by inference in RyR2) besides the P1
residue participate in FKBP12/12.6 binding to the channels. Rather, the
present study establishes the critical role of Val2461 in
FKBP12 binding.
Single-channel data showing defects in mutant RyR1 channels that do not
bind FKBP12 are consistent with data from RyR1 channels expressed in
Sf9 cells that lack FKBP12 (3) and RyR1 channels from the FKBP12
knockout mouse that exhibited similar single-channel defects
(20).
In addition to the effects on single-channel properties noted
above, a role for FKBP12 in coupled gating between neighboring RyR1
channels has been proposed (4). One model for how FKBP12 can influence
gating of individual channels is that each of the subunits of
RyR1 contribute a pore through the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane, and
FKBP12 stabilizes the channel in a conformation that permits the four
subunits of the channel to gate simultaneously (21). To explain how
FKBP12 can also influence coupled gating between channels, the model
would have to include stabilization of a conformational state that
enhances interactions between neighboring channels (21).
The present study supports the concept that FKBP12 binding to
RyR1 stabilizes the channel in a favorable conformation. As such, this
is a novel mechanism for regulating ion channel gating. The
substitution of Gly for Val2461 at the P1 position would be
expected to introduce significantly increased flexibility around the
peptidyl-prolyl bond at this position because of the small size of Gly.
Increased flexibility around the Gly-Pro bond might destabilize the
channel contributing to the reduction in dwell times and the
corresponding increase in gating frequency exhibited by the V2461G
mutant RyR1 channels. The demonstration that FKBP12.6 can restore
normal function to the V2461I mutant channel excludes the possibility
that the observed defects in single-channel function are caused by the
amino acid substitution independent of whether FKBP12 is bound to the channel.
Taken together our data indicate that Val2461 is a critical
determinant of FKBP12 binding to RyR1, which is required for normal channel function. However, these data do not exclude the possibility that there are other contact sites between FKBP12 and RyR1 and other
residues in RyR1 that also are required for binding of FKBP12 to the channel.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank W. Hendrickson for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of
Health Grants RO1 HL61503, RO1 HL56180, RO1 AI39794, and RO3 TW00949
(to A. R. M.), the American Heart Association (to A. R. M.
and S. O. M.), the Whitaker Foundation (to S. R.), and the
Richard and Lynne Kaiser Family Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Doris Duke Distinguished Clinical Scientist. To whom
correspondence should be addressed: Center for Molecular Cardiology, Box 65, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Rm.
9-401, 630 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032. Tel.: 212-305-0270; Fax:
212-305-3690; E-mail: arm42@columbia.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 1, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M100856200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RyR, ryanodine
receptor;
FKBP12, FK506-binding protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Marks, A. R.,
Tempst, P.,
Hwang, K. S.,
Taubman, M. B.,
Inui, M.,
Chadwick, C.,
Fleischer, S.,
and Nadal-Ginard, B.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8683-8687
|
| 2.
|
Marx, S. O.,
Reiken, S.,
Hisamatsu, Y.,
Jayaraman, T.,
Burkhoff, D.,
Rosemblit, N.,
and Marks, A. R.
(2000)
Cell
101,
365-376
|
| 3.
|
Brillantes, A. B.,
Ondrias, K.,
Scott, A.,
Kobrinsky, E.,
Ondriasova, E.,
Moschella, M. C.,
Jayaraman, T.,
Landers, M.,
Ehrlich, B. E.,
and Marks, A. R.
(1994)
Cell
77,
513-523
|
| 4.
|
Marx, S. O.,
Ondrias, K.,
and Marks, A. R.
(1998)
Science
281,
818-821
|
| 5.
|
Kaftan, E.,
Marks, A. R.,
and Ehrlich, B. E.
(1996)
Circ. Res.
78,
990-997
|
| 6.
|
Timerman, A. P.,
Ogunbumni, E.,
Freund, E.,
Wiederrecht, G.,
Marks, A. R.,
and Fleischer, S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22992-22999
|
| 7.
|
Chen, S. R.,
Zhang, L.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11953-11957
|
| 8.
|
Ahern, G. P.,
Junankar, P. R.,
and Dulhunty, A. F.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
352,
369-374
|
| 9.
|
Ahern, G. P.,
Junankar, P. R.,
and Dulhunty, A. F.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
72,
146-162
|
| 10.
|
Timerman, A. P.,
Onoue, H.,
Xin, H. B.,
Barg, S.,
Copello, J.,
Wiederrecht, G.,
and Fleischer, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20385-20391
|
| 11.
|
Xin, H. B.,
Senbonmatsu, T.,
Wang, Y.-X.,
Copello, J.,
Ji, G.-J.,
Collier, M. L.,
Deng, K.-Y.,
Jeyakumar, L.,
Sutherland, M.,
Magnuson, M.,
Inagami, T.,
Kotilikoff, M.,
and Fleischer, S.
(2001)
Biophys. J.
80,
579 (abstr.)
|
| 12.
|
Marks, A. R.
(2000)
Circ. Res.
87,
8-11
|
| 13.
|
Albers, M. W.,
Walsh, C. T.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1990)
J. Org. Chem.
55,
4984-4986
|
| 14.
|
Cameron, A. M.,
Nucifora, F. C., Jr.,
Fung, E. T.,
Livingston, D. J.,
Aldape, R. A.,
Ross, C. A.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27582-27588
|
| 15.
|
Schoenmakers, T. J.,
Visser, G. J.,
Flik, G.,
and Theuvenet, A. P.
(1992)
BioTechniques
12,
870-874, 876-879
|
| 16.
|
Jayaraman, T.,
Brillantes, A.-M. B.,
Timerman, A. P.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Fleischer, S.,
Tempst, P.,
and Marks, A. R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9474-9477
|
| 17.
|
Ondrias, K.,
Brillantes, A. M.,
Scott, A.,
Ehrlich, B. E.,
and Marks, A. R.
(1996)
Soc. Gen. Physiol. Ser.
51,
29-45
|
| 18.
|
Rosen, M. K.,
Standaert, R. F.,
Galat, A.,
Nakatsuka, M.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1990)
Science
248,
863-866
|
| 19.
|
Huse, M.,
Chen, Y. G.,
Massague, J.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1999)
Cell
96,
425-436
|
| 20.
|
Shou, W.,
Aghdasi, B.,
Armstrong, D. L.,
Guo, Q.,
Bao, S.,
Charng, M. J.,
Mathews, L. M.,
Schneider, M. D.,
Hamilton, S. L.,
and Matzuk, M. M.
(1998)
Nature
391,
489-492
|
| 21.
|
Marks, A. R.
(1996)
Physiol. Rev.
76,
631-649
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Gomez, A. Rueda, Y. Sainte-Marie, L. Pereira, S. Zissimopoulos, X. Zhu, R. Schaub, E. Perrier, R. Perrier, C. Latouche, et al.
Mineralocorticoid Modulation of Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor Activity Is Associated With Downregulation of FK506-Binding Proteins
Circulation,
April 28, 2009;
119(16):
2179 - 2187.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Hamilton and I. I. Serysheva
Ryanodine Receptor Structure: Progress and Challenges
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 13, 2009;
284(7):
4047 - 4051.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Nattel, A. Maguy, S. Le Bouter, and Y.-H. Yeh
Arrhythmogenic Ion-Channel Remodeling in the Heart: Heart Failure, Myocardial Infarction, and Atrial Fibrillation
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2007;
87(2):
425 - 456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Zissimopoulos, N. Docrat, and F. A. Lai
Redox Sensitivity of the Ryanodine Receptor Interaction with FK506-binding Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 9, 2007;
282(10):
6976 - 6983.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Aracena-Parks, S. A. Goonasekera, C. P. Gilman, R. T. Dirksen, C. Hidalgo, and S. L. Hamilton
Identification of Cysteines Involved in S-Nitrosylation, S-Glutathionylation, and Oxidation to Disulfides in Ryanodine Receptor Type 1
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 29, 2006;
281(52):
40354 - 40368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Liu, B. Colombi, M. Memmi, S. Zissimopoulos, N. Rizzi, S. Negri, M. Imbriani, C. Napolitano, F. A. Lai, and S. G. Priori
Arrhythmogenesis in Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: Insights From a RyR2 R4496C Knock-In Mouse Model
Circ. Res.,
August 4, 2006;
99(3):
292 - 298.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Huang, J. Shan, S. Reiken, X. H. T. Wehrens, and A. R. Marks
Analysis of calstabin2 (FKBP12.6)-ryanodine receptor interactions: Rescue of heart failure by calstabin2 in mice
PNAS,
February 28, 2006;
103(9):
3456 - 3461.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Hidalgo
Cross talk between Ca2+ and redox signalling cascades in muscle and neurons through the combined activation of ryanodine receptors/Ca2+ release channels
Phil Trans R Soc B,
December 29, 2005;
360(1464):
2237 - 2246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Ai, J. W. Curran, T. R. Shannon, D. M. Bers, and S. M. Pogwizd
Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Modulates Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor Phosphorylation and Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ Leak in Heart Failure
Circ. Res.,
December 9, 2005;
97(12):
1314 - 1322.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Lehnart, X. H.T. Wehrens, and A. R. Marks
Defective Ryanodine Receptor Interdomain Interactions May Contribute to Intracellular Ca2+ Leak: A Novel Therapeutic Target in Heart Failure
Circulation,
June 28, 2005;
111(25):
3342 - 3346.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Murayama, T. Oba, S. Kobayashi, N. Ikemoto, and Y. Ogawa
Postulated role of interdomain interactions within the type 1 ryanodine receptor in the low gain of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release activity of mammalian skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
June 1, 2005;
288(6):
C1222 - C1230.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Zissimopoulos and F. A. Lai
Interaction of FKBP12.6 with the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor C-terminal Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 18, 2005;
280(7):
5475 - 5485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. Sinkins, M. Goel, M. Estacion, and W. P. Schilling
Association of Immunophilins with Mammalian TRPC Channels
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 13, 2004;
279(33):
34521 - 34529.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Sanokawa-Akakura, H. Dai, S. Akakura, D. Weinstein, J. E. Fajardo, S. E. Lang, S. Wadsworth, J. Siekierka, and R. B. Birge
A Novel Role for the Immunophilin FKBP52 in Copper Transport
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 2, 2004;
279(27):
27845 - 27848.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Lehnart, X. H.T. Wehrens, P. J. Laitinen, S. R. Reiken, S.-X. Deng, Z. Cheng, D. W. Landry, K. Kontula, H. Swan, and A. R. Marks
Sudden Death in Familial Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Associated With Calcium Release Channel (Ryanodine Receptor) Leak
Circulation,
June 29, 2004;
109(25):
3208 - 3214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. H. Lee, S.-H. Rho, S.-J. Kwon, S. H. Eom, P. D. Allen, and D. H. Kim
N-terminal Region of FKBP12 Is Essential for Binding to the Skeletal Ryanodine Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 18, 2004;
279(25):
26481 - 26488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Pan, Y. Hirata, R. Y. Nagaraj, J. Zhao, M. Nishi, S. M. Hayek, M. B. Bhat, H. Takeshima, and J. Ma
Co-expression of MG29 and Ryanodine Receptor Leads to Apoptotic Cell Death: EFFECT MEDIATED BY INTRACELLULAR Ca2+ RELEASE
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 7, 2004;
279(19):
19387 - 19390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Blayney, S. Zissimopoulos, E. Ralph, E. Abbot, L. Matthews, and F. A. Lai
Ryanodine Receptor Oligomeric Interaction: IDENTIFICATION OF A PUTATIVE BINDING REGION
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 9, 2004;
279(15):
14639 - 14648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. H.T. Wehrens, S. E. Lehnart, S. R. Reiken, and A. R. Marks
Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II Phosphorylation Regulates the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor
Circ. Res.,
April 2, 2004;
94(6):
e61 - e70.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Van Acker, G. Bultynck, D. Rossi, V. Sorrentino, N. Boens, L. Missiaen, H. De Smedt, J. B. Parys, and G. Callewaert
The 12 kDa FK506-binding protein, FKBP12, modulates the Ca2+-flux properties of the type-3 ryanodine receptor
J. Cell Sci.,
March 1, 2004;
117(7):
1129 - 1137.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Lee, S.-H. Rho, D. W. Shin, C. Cho, W. J. Park, S. H. Eom, J. Ma, and D. H. Kim
Negatively Charged Amino Acids within the Intraluminal Loop of Ryanodine Receptor Are Involved in the Interaction with Triadin
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 20, 2004;
279(8):
6994 - 7000.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Stange, L. Xu, D. Balshaw, N. Yamaguchi, and G. Meissner
Characterization of Recombinant Skeletal Muscle (Ser-2843) and Cardiac Muscle (Ser-2809) Ryanodine Receptor Phosphorylation Mutants
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 19, 2003;
278(51):
51693 - 51702.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. B. Bolger, A. H. Peden, M. R. Steele, C. MacKenzie, D. G. McEwan, D. A. Wallace, E. Huston, G. S. Baillie, and M. D. Houslay
Attenuation of the Activity of the cAMP-specific Phosphodiesterase PDE4A5 by Interaction with the Immunophilin XAP2
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 2003;
278(35):
33351 - 33363.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Avila, E. H. Lee, C. F. Perez, P. D. Allen, and R. T. Dirksen
FKBP12 Binding to RyR1 Modulates Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Mouse Skeletal Myotubes
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 13, 2003;
278(25):
22600 - 22608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Reiken, A. Lacampagne, H. Zhou, A. Kherani, S. E. Lehnart, C. Ward, F. Huang, M. Gaburjakova, J. Gaburjakova, N. Rosemblit, et al.
PKA phosphorylation activates the calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor) in skeletal muscle: defective regulation in heart failure
J. Cell Biol.,
March 17, 2003;
160(6):
919 - 928.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Masumiya, R. Wang, J. Zhang, B. Xiao, and S. R. W. Chen
Localization of the 12.6-kDa FK506-binding Protein (FKBP12.6) Binding Site to the NH2-terminal Domain of the Cardiac Ca2+ Release Channel (Ryanodine Receptor)
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 31, 2003;
278(6):
3786 - 3792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Reiken, M. Gaburjakova, S. Guatimosim, A. M. Gomez, J. D'Armiento, D. Burkhoff, J. Wang, G. Vassort, W. J. Lederer, and A. R. Marks
Protein Kinase A Phosphorylation of the Cardiac Calcium Release Channel (Ryanodine Receptor) in Normal and Failing Hearts. ROLE OF PHOSPHATASES AND RESPONSE TO ISOPROTERENOL
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(1):
444 - 453.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Marks
Clinical Implications of Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor/Calcium Release Channel Mutations Linked to Sudden Cardiac Death
Circulation,
July 2, 2002;
106(1):
8 - 10.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Bosco, E. Z. Eisenmesser, S. Pochapsky, W. I. Sundquist, and D. Kern
Catalysis of cis/trans isomerization in native HIV-1 capsid by human cyclophilin A
PNAS,
April 16, 2002;
99(8):
5247 - 5252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.H.T. WEHRENS and A.R. MARKS
Myocardial Disease in Failing Hearts: Defective Excitation-Contraction Coupling
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol,
January 1, 2002;
67(0):
533 - 542.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Bultynck, D. Rossi, G. Callewaert, L. Missiaen, V. Sorrentino, J. B. Parys, and H. De Smedt
The Conserved Sites for the FK506-binding Proteins in Ryanodine Receptors and Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors Are Structurally and Functionally Different
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 7, 2001;
276(50):
47715 - 47724.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Goel, R. Garcia, M. Estacion, and W. P. Schilling
Regulation of Drosophila TRPL Channels by Immunophilin FKBP59
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 12, 2001;
276(42):
38762 - 38773.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Bosco, E. Z. Eisenmesser, S. Pochapsky, W. I. Sundquist, and D. Kern
Catalysis of cis/trans isomerization in native HIV-1 capsid by human cyclophilin A
PNAS,
April 16, 2002;
99(8):
5247 - 5252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|