Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102408200 on April 17, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 26, 23268-23274, June 29, 2001
Effects of 3' Terminus Modifications on mRNA Functional
Decay during in Vitro Protein Synthesis*
Kangseok
Lee
and
Stanley N.
Cohen
§¶
From the Departments of
Genetics and
§ Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine,
Stanford, California 94305-5120
Received for publication, March 16, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The pcnB gene, which encodes the
principal poly(A) polymerase of Escherichia coli, promotes
3'-polyadenylation and chemical decay of mRNA. However, there is no
evidence that pcnB-mediated mRNA destabilization
decreases protein synthesis, suggesting that polyadenylation may
enhance translational efficiency. Using in vitro
translation by E. coli cell extracts and toeprinting
analysis of transcripts encoded by the chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase (CAT) and
-galactosidase genes to investigate this
notion, we found no effect of poly(A) tails on protein
synthesis. However, we observed that 3'-polyguanylation delayed the
chemical decay of CAT mRNA and, even more dramatically, increased
the ability of CAT mRNA to produce enzymatically active full-length
protein in 30 S E. coli cell fractions. This resulted from
interference with the primary mechanism for inactivation of CAT
transcript function in cell extracts, which occurred by
3'-exonucleolytic degradation rather than endonucleolytic fragmentation
by RNase E. Using bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to install poly(G)
tails on mRNAs transcribed from polymerase chain reaction-generated DNA templates, we observed sharply increased synthesis of active proteins in vitro in coupled transcription/translation
reactions. The ability of poly(G) tails to functionally stabilize
transcripts from polymerase chain reaction-generated templates allows
proteins encoded by translational open reading frames on genomic DNA or cDNA to be synthesized directly and efficiently in
vitro.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Polyadenylation of RNA at the 3'-end is now known to occur in
prokaryotic organisms as in eukaryotes (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and
2). The addition of poly(A) tails to bacterial RNA leads to accelerated
RNA degradation by polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase)1 (3-6) and possibly
other 3'- to 5'-exonucleases. However, the only biological consequence
of slowing RNA decay by impeding polyadenylation demonstrated thus far
is altered control of plasmid DNA replication (6). Escherichia
coli pcnB mutants that are deficient in poly(A) polymerase I (7)
show stabilization of RNAI (the antisense repressor of
replication for ColE1-type plasmids), inhibition of plasmid DNA
replication, and sharply decreased plasmid copy number. Although
the failure to add poly(A) tails can also stabilize a variety of
mRNA species in E. coli (8-10), enhanced synthesis of
proteins encoded by these RNAs has not been reported in pcnB mutant bacteria, raising the possibility that poly(A) tails may, while
accelerating the decay of mRNAs, also lead to a compensatory increase in translational efficiency.
During experiments aimed at testing the above idea by analyzing
the effects of poly(A) tails and other types of 3'-transcript ends on
RNA translation in E. coli cell extracts, we observed surprisingly that short tracts of G nucleotides at 3' termini interfere with the ribonucleolytic step responsible for inactivation of
the ability of mRNA to function in translation in vitro,
enabling the use of poly(G) tails as a tool to investigate mechanisms
of mRNA functional decay. Our results indicate that poly(G) tails prolong mRNA functional half-life in E. coli extracts by
interfering with 3'-5'-degradation, implying that inactivation of
mRNA function occurred by this process rather than by
endonucleolytic fragmentation during in vitro translation.
The ability of poly(G) tails to functionally stabilize mRNA,
together with our ancillary discovery of a method for efficiently
installing poly(G) tails on transcripts synthesized by T7 RNA
polymerase from polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified DNA
templates, has yielded an approach for the in vitro
synthesis of proteins encoded by translational open reading frame
sequences on genomic DNA or uncloned cDNA.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains and Plasmids--
E. coli B strain BL21
(F
, hsdS, gal,
OmpT
) was initially used for S-30 preparation when
mRNAs encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) and
LacZ
were used in in vitro translation. SL119
(11), an recD (12) derivative of BL21, was used to prepare
S-30 for a coupled transcription/translation system. For the
preparation of 30 S ribosomal subunits, E. coli K12 strain
CA244 (lacZ, trp, relA, spoT) (13) was used. All plasmids
were maintained in E. coli DH5
(supE44,
hsdR17, recA1, endA1,
gyrA96, thi-1,
(lacIZYA-argF)U169, deoR
(
80dlac
(lacZ)M15)) (14).
pET3a-
was constructed by amplifying the DNA sequence encoding the
LacZ
fragment (amino acids 1-94) from chromosomal DNA of
E. coli strain N3433 (lacZ43, relA, spoT, thi-1)
(15) using oligonucleotides 5'-
(5'-ACAGGATCCATGACCATGATTACGGAT) and 3'-
(5'-ACAGGATCCGTGCATCTGCCAGTTTGA) and cloning into the BamHI
site of pET3a (Novagen). pET3a-CAT was constructed by amplifying the
CAT gene from pACYC184 (16) using oligonucleotides 5'-CAT (5'-ACAGGATCCAGGAGGCTCGAGATGGAGAAAAAAATCACTGGA) and 3'-CAT
(5'-ACAGGATCCTTACGCCCCGCCCTGCCACTC) and cloning them into the
BamHI site of pET3a. Plasmid pLAC-RNE2 is a derivative of
pPM30 (17) that directs the conditional synthesis of a full-length
carboxyl-terminal-tagged form of E. coli RNase E under the
control of the lacUV5 promoter. A hexahistidine-affinity tag
was inserted right before the stop codon of the RNase E gene, and a
stronger ribosome binding sequence was incorporated upstream of
the RNase E coding sequence
(5'-GCGGCCGCAGGAGGTTACGATG, the ribosome binding
sequence is underlined and the start codon is in bold type). Plasmid
pGL3Basic was purchased from Promega, Madison, WI, and pJSE371 was a
gift from Dr. George Jones (18). Plasmid pTH90 was a gift from Dr.
Alexander von Gabain (19).
Enzymes and Reagents--
Avian myeloblastosis virus reverse
transcriptase, T4 polynucleotide kinase, T7 RNA polymerase, and the
restriction enzymes were from New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA. The
oligonucleotides were from Life Technologies, Inc.
[
-32P]ATP (6000 Ci/mmol), [
-32P]UTP
(3000 Ci/mmol), [
-32P]CTP (3000 Ci/mmol),
[3H]chloramphenicol (38.9 Ci/mmol), and ECL detection kit
were from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Anti-T7·tag antibody
horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate and T7·tag affinity
purification kit were from Novagen. M1 antibody was from Eastman Kodak
Co., and anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with HRP was from Promega.
Polyclonal antibodies against E. coli PNPase were a gift
from Dr. A. J. Carpousis. Other chemicals and tRNAs were purchased
from Sigma.
S-30 Preparation and Reactions--
An E. coli-coupled transcription/translation system (S-30) was prepared
from E. coli strain BL21 essentially as described by Lesley
et al. (11). mRNAs containing 20 A tails were used to
determine the optimal concentration of CAT and LacZ
mRNA in reactions. Optimal protein production was observed at 120 nM mRNA for both mRNAs. Coupled
transcription/translation reactions were incubated at 37 °C for
1 h in reaction mixtures containing 1 µg of agarose gel-purified
DNA, unless otherwise indicated.
Synthesis of DNA and RNA--
All mRNAs used in this
study were synthesized using the MEGAscriptTM T7 kit (Ambion,
Austin, TX) and PCR DNA as a template according to the manufacturer's
instructions. 9 S ribosomal RNA transcript was synthesized from
HaeIII-cut plasmid pTH90 using the MEGAshortscriptTM T7 kit
(Ambion). RNA was purified from 6% acrylamide gel containing 8 M urea. For in vitro synthesis of CAT and
LacZ
mRNAs containing no 3'-additions or containing
A20, A40, or G20 in
vitro, PCR-generated DNAs were prepared using 5'-primer (5'-TAATACGACTCACTATAGG) and 3'-primer (5'(none, C20,
T20, or T40)-AAGGCTGTTAGCAGCCGGATCC) and
pET3a-
or pET3a-CAT as template. PCR DNAs for coupled
transcription/translation reactions were prepared as follows. First,
for PCR DNAs containing CAT coding region, 5'-primer that installs the
T7 promoter with different lengths of extra base pairs upstream of the
T7 promoter and 3'-primer that installs 3'-tails were used to amplify
CAT coding region from pET3a-CAT. The 5'-primer was
5'-TAATACGACTCACTATAGG with extra base pairs at the 5' that are 20 random nucleotides or different lengths of upstream sequence of the T7
promoter present in pET3a-CAT plasmid (AGATCTCGATCCCGCGAAAT), and the
3'-primer was 5' (complementary sequence of
tails)-TTACGCCCCGCCCTGCCA (the stop codon is in bold type).
Second, for PCR DNAs containing firefly luciferase gene, the 5'-primer
was
5'-GAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTTAACTTTAAGAAGGAGCCACCATGGAAGACGCCA (the consensus T7 promoter is underlined, and the start codon is in
bold type), 3'-primers were 5'(complementary sequence of tails)-TTACACGGCGATCTTTCCGCC (the stop codon is in bold type), and the template was pGL3Basic. Third, for PCR DNAs containing G
pentaphosphate synthetase I (GPSI), 5'-primer was
5'-GAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGG (the consensus T7 promoter is
underlined), 3'-primer was 5'(complementary sequence of
tails)-TACGGGACGTCACTGCTC (stop codon is in bold type), and
template was pJSE371. Fourth, the coding region of telomere-binding
protein (TP)2 was
amplified from the Streptomyces rochei chromosome using
5'-primer (5'-GAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTTAACTTTAAGAAGGAGATATACATATGGTGGACTCGATCGGAGACGG (the consensus T7 promoter is underlined and the start codon is in bold
type) and 3'-primers (5'(complementary sequence of
tails)-CTACTTGTCGTCATCGTCCTTGTAGTCCAGCTGGATCTCGATCTG, the stop codon is in bold type and the sequence for FLAG·tag is underlined). S1-depleted 30 S was prepared by the procedure published by Tal et al. (20). Briefly, purified 30 S was dialyzed
against a low strength buffer (1 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5)
followed by precipitation of S1-depleted 30 S. S1 protein is the
largest of all 30 S ribosomal proteins, and removal of S1 protein in 30 S was confirmed by visualizing 30 S subunit ribosomal proteins in
SDS-polyacrylamide gel (data not shown here).
Preparation of 30 S Ribosomal Subunits--
30 S ribosomal
subunits were prepared essentially as described by Moazed et
al. (21) except that frozen E. coli CA244 cells were
opened by passing them through a French press at 10,000 p.s.i. twice,
and a 70 S ribosome pellet was washed and resuspended twice in buffer B
before being dialyzed against buffer C.
Extension Inhibition (Toeprinting) Assay--
Toeprinting assay
was performed as described by Ringquist et al. (22) using
avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase at 1 unit/reaction.
The primers CAT-TP (5'-GGATCCGCGACCCATTTG) and
-TP
(5'-GGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGA), which are complementary to CAT and
LacZ
transcripts, respectively, were 5'-end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase and purified
from 15% acrylamide containing 8 M urea. We determined
optimal conditions for binding of the 30 S ribosomal subunits to
mRNA using reverse transcriptase amounts ranging from 0 to 1.6 units/reaction and mRNA to primer ratios from 0.25 to 1 (data not
shown here). We then tested CAT mRNAs in this assay.
Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase Assay--
CAT activity was
determined essentially as described by Nielsen et al.
(23).
RNase E Cleavage Assay--
RNase E cleavage was assayed as
described by McDowall et al. (24).
Luciferase Assay--
Luciferase assay was performed according
to manufacturer's instructions, and the enzymatic activity was
measured in a TD-20e luminometer (Turner).
Protein Work and Western Blotting--
E. coli RNase
E was purified from N3433 cells containing pLAC-RNE2 using the
His·Bind purification kit (Novagen). The enzyme was eluted from
columns using 80 mM imidazole, concentrated, and stored as
described previously (24). CAT protein was purified from BL21 (DE3)
harboring pET3a-CAT after a 1-h induction with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside using the
T7·tag purification kit according to the manufacturer's
instructions. The protein concentration was calculated using Coomassie
Brilliant Blue G250 as described by Sedmak and Grossberg
(25) and using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Prestained protein
molecular weight standards from Life Technologies were used as size
markers. Proteins were run on a 10% Tricine-SDS-polyacrylamide
gel as described by Schägger and von Jagow (26), and gels
were electroblotted to a nitrocellulose filter and probed as described
by Hagège and Cohen (27). The dilutions used for antibodies were
1:10,000 for anti-T7·tag-HRP, 1:1000 for anti-FLAG (M2), and 1:5000
for anti-PNPase, anti-mouse IgG-HRP, and anti-rabbit IgG-HRP. When
blots were used for reprobing they were stripped at 50 °C for 30 min
with occasional agitation in 200 ml of stripping buffer (100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, and 62.5 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 6.7) followed by 2× wash in Tris-buffered saline, 0.05%
Tween 20 for 20 min.
 |
RESULTS |
Effects of Polynucleotide Tails on Translation of Transcripts in
Vitro--
In E. coli, translation begins on nascent
mRNA during the course of its synthesis (28), so that any
translational enhancement by 3'-poly(A) additions would necessarily be
restricted to already completed transcripts. Accordingly, we tested the
ability of full-length mRNA containing or lacking poly(A) tails to
generate protein in vitro. Transcripts encoding CAT or the
fragment of the
-galactosidase (LacZ) protein uniformly labeled
with [32P]UTP were synthesized in vitro by
bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase using PCR-generated DNA fragments as
template (see "Experimental Procedures"). The transcripts, which
contained 0, 20, or 40 adenosine (A) nucleotides at the 3'-end
were gel-purified and added to an E. coli cell extract-based
reaction mixture for in vitro translation. Transcripts
containing twenty 3'-G nucleotides were used as controls. The
mRNAs chosen for translation were relatively small (417 and 807 nucleotides for
and CAT, respectively), and the proteins they
encode are well characterized.
Within 2 min after the addition of CAT or
-mRNA to in
vitro translation reaction mixtures, poly(A) tails 20 or 40 nucleotides in length had been degraded, and decay of primary
transcripts that initially had contained poly(A) tails proceeded at the
same rate as decay of nonadenylated RNA (Fig.
1, A-D).
Consistent with the rapidity of poly(A) tail removal in these E. coli cell extracts, we did not detect an effect of poly(A) tails
on overall CAT or LacZ
protein synthesis (Fig. 1, E and
F). However, we observed during these experiments that
poly(G) tails, which had been added to CAT-encoding transcripts as a
control, dramatically enhanced the production of CAT and LacZ
protein in vitro (Fig. 1, E and F).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effects of different 3'-tails of mRNA on
mRNA decay and translation. In vitro
translation reaction was carried out at 30 °C using gel-purified,
uniformly labeled CAT (A) or lacZ
(B) mRNA with 32P-UTP (120 nM) to measure mRNA decay in the reaction. Samples were
removed at the times indicated, and mRNA was purified by phenol
extraction and ethanol precipitation and analyzed in 6% polyacrylamide
gel containing 8 M urea. C and
D, the amount of full-length mRNA left in each lane was
measured using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager and plotted.
Symbols used in graphs C and D are: , none;
, A20 (20A); , A40
(40A); , G20 (20G) . In
vitro translation was carried out at 30 °C for 30 min for CAT
protein production and 10 min for LacZ protein production using
in vitro synthesized, gel-purified mRNAs (120 nM). Optimal incubation time was determined for maximum
protein yield by measuring protein production at 5-min intervals.
Ten-min incubation time was used for LacZ production because this
peptide was degraded more rapidly in reaction mixtures. E,
functional CAT protein was assayed as indicated under "Experimental
Procedures." F, LacZ protein production was assayed by
Western blot. Percent CAT activity and percent LacZ signal were
obtained by setting values (CAT activity and Western blot signal) from
reactions containing mRNAs lacking tails as 100%. The LacZ
fragment of -galactosidase was epitope-tagged with a T7·tag
peptide sequence at its N terminus, and anti-T7·tag antibody
conjugated with HRP was used in Western blots to detect the fusion
protein. The lengths of polynucleotide tails, which were incorporated
into T7-generated mRNA molecules during primary transcription, were
confirmed by electrophoresis on 6% acrylamide gels by comparing the
size of transcripts because of the addition of tails.
|
|
Initiation of polypeptide chains is known to be the rate-limiting step
in mRNA translation (29-31). Toeprinting assays, which measure the
rate of formation of translation initiation complexes between mRNA
and 30 S ribosomal subunits, have proved useful in evaluating factors
that affect translation initiation (22). We found that neither poly(A)
tails nor primary transcripts were detectably degraded over a 30-min
period in vitro in toeprinting assay mixtures that used
highly purified ribosomes and reverse transcriptase, allowing the use
of toeprinting to test for the possible enhancement of translation
efficiency by poly(A) tails. As seen in Fig.
2A, a toeprint signal produced
by the binding of CAT mRNA to 30 S ribosomal subunits was detected
at a characteristic position (32), 15 nucleotides from the 5'-most
nucleotide of the start codon. CAT transcripts entirely lacking poly(A)
tails or containing tails of 40 As showed similar binding efficiency to
30 S ribosomal subunits (Fig. 2B), indicating that
3'-polyadenylation has no detectable effect on the initiation of
translation. Additionally, whereas ribosomes depleted of S1, which
binds to poly(A) tails and has been speculated to play a role in
translation by recruiting the 30 S subunit to poly(A)-tailed mRNA
(33), produced an expected decrease in toeprint signal (34), the
magnitude of the decrease was unaffected by the presence or absence of
poly(A) tails (Fig. 2).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of poly(A) tail on the rate of 30 S
initiation complex formation. CAT mRNA containing 40 A
nucleotides or lacking any 3'-additions were used in primer
extension inhibition (toeprinting) assays with varying concentrations
of small ribosomal subunits with (30S) or without S1
(30S S1) protein. B, the toeprinting
signal was quantitated as percent toeprinting band relative to the sum
of the mature product and toeprinting bands using a Phosphorimager and
plotted. A, the portions of the mature products, the
toeprinting signal, and the primer bands are indicated. The left
four lanes in the panel are sequencing ladders; the
same CAT mRNA (no tail) and primer were used in toeprinting assays
and sequencing. The location of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and
translation start codon are shown in the CAT sequence depiction.
B, symbols used in the graph are: , none; ,
A40.
|
|
Effects of Poly(G) Tails on Degradation of CAT mRNA--
As
seen in Fig. 1, enhancement of CAT protein synthesis in
vitro by 3'-polyguanylation is associated with retardation of CAT mRNA chemical decay. However, the effect of poly(G) tails on CAT mRNA functional half-life as reflected by the production of active CAT and LacZ
proteins was 4-6 times greater than their effect on
the chemical decay of mRNA (cf. Fig. 1, C and
D versus E and F). This
finding suggested that poly(G) tails might prove useful in
investigating the mechanisms involved in mRNA functional decay. The
initial step in the chemical decay of a variety of E. coli mRNAs is endonucleolytic cleavage by RNase E, the
principal endonuclease of E. coli (for reviews, see Refs. 35
and 36), and poly(G) previously has been found not to affect such
cleavage (37). Whereas RNase E cleavage is also the step that initiates
chemical and functional decay of RNA I (38, 39), a 108-nucleotide
antisense repressor of replication of ColE1-type plasmids, we can find
no published evidence that RNase E cleavage determines the functional half-life of mRNA in E. coli cells. To the contrary,
earlier work by Ono and Kuwano (40) showed that mutation of the
E. coli gene now known to encode RNase E prolongs the
chemical half-life of bulk mRNA but has no effect on mRNA
functional half-life.
As seen in Fig. 3, analysis of CAT
protein produced by mRNA incubated with E. coli cell
extracts for various lengths of time provided evidence that functional
decay of CAT mRNA in 30 S cell fractions is not mediated by
endonucleolytic cleavage. Western blot analysis of N-terminal
T7-epitope-tagged CAT protein showed that CAT transcripts lacking
poly(G) tails generated protein that was slightly shorter in length
than the CAT protein produced by polyguanylated transcripts (Fig.
3B) and that the ability of poly(G) tails to reverse
transcript truncation was directly related to their ability to increase
the production of functional CAT protein. This result, taken together
with evidence that poly(G) tails have a greater effect on CAT
biochemical activity than nontailed transcripts (Fig. 3A),
implies that inactive C-terminally truncated CAT proteins were made in
these reaction mixtures by 3' terminally truncated mRNA decay
intermediates, and consequently that functional inactivation of CAT
transcripts had occurred by degradation proceeding from the 3'-mRNA
end.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effects of different 3'-homopolymer tails on
synthesis of functional CAT protein. A, functional CAT
protein production in vitro was analyzed by measuring CAT
activity in identical volumes removed from reaction mixtures at 5-min
intervals and by plotting the incremental CAT activity of each
sequentially removed volume. B, CAT protein produced in the
reactions was visualized in Western blot analysis. Samples were taken
after a 30-min incubation and CAT protein was detected using
anti-T7 antibody conjugated with HRP. A, symbols used in the
graph are: , none; , A20 (20A); ,
A40 (40A); , G20
(20G).
|
|
Could these results be due to a possible absence of active RNase E in
the 30 S cell extract fractions used for transcription/translation reactions? As seen in Fig. 4A,
endonuclease fragmentation of CAT mRNA was observed in these
reaction mixtures, and the pattern and rate of fragmentation was
unchanged by poly(G) tails. Moreover, the fragmentation pattern was
similar to that produced by digestion of CAT mRNA by purified RNase
E implying that endogenous RNase E is present and active in 30 S
fractions. This was shown directly by using 9 S ribosomal RNA, a
236-nucleotide transcript whose site-specific cleavage by RNase E has
been extensively characterized. As seen in Fig. 4B,
incubation of the 236-nucleotide 9 S transcript in
transcription/translation reaction generated the 206-nucleotide and
126-nucleotide fragments characteristically produced by RNase E
cleavage. The additional presence of exonucleolytic activity in these
extracts was shown by evidence that fragments generated by RNase E
cleavage of 9 S RNA were themselves degraded (Fig. 4B) and
that the combined radioactivity detected in full-length 9 S RNA and
identifiable RNase E-generated fragments of this substrate diminished
with time (69% remained after 10 min). Further experiments presented
in Fig. 4A specifically confirmed earlier evidence (37) that
the rate and pattern of cleavage of CAT mRNA by purified RNase E is
not affected by the presence of a 3'-tract of G nucleotides on
the substrate (cf. 20G versus
20A).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Evidence for both RNase E activity and
exonucleolytic activity in 30 S fractions. A, mRNA
decay was measured as described in the Fig. 1 legend. Five pmol of CAT
mRNA and 200 ng of affinity-purified RNase E were incubated in
1 × RNase E cleavage buffer, and samples were removed at the
times indicated. B, gel-purified, 9 S RNA (500 nM) uniformly labeled with [32P]CTP was used
as substrate. The locations of RNase E cleavage sites generating bands
of the sizes shown are indicated as a and b; an
additional band corresponding to p5S (126 nucleotides) results from
heterogeneity of the site of cleavage at a, as reported
previously (48). All reactions were carried out at 37 °C, and
reaction mixtures containing no protein are indicated as *.
|
|
Installation of Poly(G) Tails on Transcripts Encoded by PCR
Products during Coupled Transcription/Translation in Vitro--
The
ability of poly(G) tails to significantly protect mRNA from
functional decay during in vitro protein synthesis suggested that the installation of poly(G) tails onto mRNA molecules might be
useful as a strategy for increasing the yield of active protein in
coupled transcription/translation reactions in vitro. If so, we hypothesized, poly(G)-tailed transcripts made by in vitro
transcription of PCR-generated templates containing genomic open
reading frames (ORFs) potentially could facilitate the synthesis of
functional proteins encoded by genes on unfractionated DNA templates.
The approach we devised to test this idea involved the synthesis
of run-off CAT gene transcripts by the highly efficient bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (41). The 5'-primer used to generate the template by
PCR installs the bacteriophage T7 promoter (42) near the 5'-end of the
template, and the 3'-primer installs a 20-nucleotide stretch of poly(C)
at the template's 3'-end. This was expected to lead to synthesis of
homopolymeric G tails on T7-generated transcripts. The E. coli cell extracts employed for these experiments were prepared
from an exodeoxyribonuclease-deficient (recD) strain (SL119)
to minimize degradation of linear DNA templates.
Using the coupled transcription/translation system described above, no
chemical or functional stabilization of CAT mRNA by poly(G) tails
was observed. This raised the possibility that synthesis of
poly(G)-tailed transcripts by T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) was not
occurring in these E. coli cell extracts, consistent with earlier evidence (11) that transcription of PCR-generated DNA fragments
containing the T7 promoter is mediated by the E. coli RNAP
rather than by T7 RNAP in coupled transcription/translation reaction
mixtures. In such a case, the inability of the E. coli enzyme to efficiently transcribe homopolymer sequences (43) could lead
to the absence of poly(G) tails on transcripts. This interpretation was
tested and confirmed by the finding that the addition of rifampicin, an
inhibitor of E. coli RNAP but not of T7 RNAP (44), to
reaction mixtures sharply decreased protein production in
vitro (Fig. 5A). However,
in contrast to our results using PCR-generated templates, Nevin and
Pratt (45) observed that linearized plasmid DNA containing the T7
promoter was efficiently transcribed in E. coli cell
extracts in the presence of rifampicin. We compared the sequence of
Nevin and Pratt's template with ours and found that theirs contained
additional base pairs 5' to the T7 promoter. That these nucleotides are
crucial to the ability of the T7 RNAP to initiate transcription on
linear DNA templates is shown in Fig. 5. Whereas rifampicin-independent
transcription occurred on a template containing 17 base pairs 5' to the
T7 promoter (i.e. the restriction endonuclease-generated
BglII-EcoRV DNA fragment), a PCR-generated DNA
fragment that included the same promoter but lacked additional upstream
base pairs failed to function as a template for T7 RNAP.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Parameters affecting efficiency of T7
promoters. A, effects of base pairs upstream of the T7
promoter on T7 RNA polymerase-directed transcription. One µg of DNA
was used in 20 µl of coupled in vitro
transcription/translation reaction. The reaction was carried out either
in the presence ( ) or in the absence ( ) of externally added T7
RNA polymerase (1 unit/µl) and rifampicin (500 ng/µl).
B, map of plasmid pET3a-CAT showing locations of relevant
restriction enzyme cleavage sites, the T7 promoter, the CAT gene, and
the PCR product generated using primers indicated under "Experimental
Procedures." C, determination of a minimum number of extra
base pairs upstream of the T7 promoter required for optimal
transcription by T7 RNAP. Extra base pairs were added 5' to the T7
promoter in pET3a using PCR primers (see "Experimental
Procedures"), and CAT activity was measured in coupled
transcription/translation reactions. D, analysis of
transcription and mRNA decay in coupled transcription/translation
reactions. Samples were removed at the times indicated, and
[32P]UTP incorporation into transcripts was analyzed by
6% polyacrylamide gel in gels containing 8 M urea.
Rifampicin (10 ng/µl) was added to reactions containing T7 RNAP (1 unit/µl). The DNA concentration used was 50 ng/µl. In the last
lane, in vitro transcribed CAT mRNA from PCR
DNA (PT7) was loaded as a size marker (+).
|
|
Further experiments showed that CAT protein synthesis encoded by
transcripts generated by the E. coli RNAP (i.e.
those made in the absence of rifampicin) decreased as the length of the
template increased (Fig. 5A). Also, as few as 5 base pairs
upstream of the T7 promoter on the template DNA fragment were
sufficient to promote rifampicin-independent synthesis of CAT to a
level that was much higher than that achieved by E. coli
RNAP (Fig. 5, C and D). This effect was
independent of the nucleotide sequence of the 5' base pairs (the
20-base-pair natural sequence versus randomly inserted base
pairs) (Fig. 5C, N20) and was due specifically to
transcription by T7 RNAP (Fig. 5D).
Stabilization of mRNA Function during Coupled
Transcription/Translation in Vitro--
PCR-generated CAT gene
templates containing the T7 promoter and 5 upstream base pairs plus
3'-sequences that generate different types of tails on the transcripts
encoded by these templates (Fig. 6,
A and B) were used for the synthesis of active
CAT protein in vitro during coupled
transcription/translation. As shown, the number of G nucleotides
required for the maximum yield of translation product peaked at 15. Installation of 15 G nucleotides internal to the transcript and
3' to the ORF yielded about 70% of the protein production observed
with 15 G nucleotides at the 3' terminus. Whereas the same
length of homopolymeric C nucleotides also increased the
production of functional CAT protein to 30-60 µg/ml of the reaction
(Fig. 6C), this effect was not observed for other mRNAs we tested. The observed steady state level and rate of decay for CAT
mRNA containing poly(G) and poly(C) tails (Fig. 6,
D-G) correlated well with the effects of
homopolymeric additions on CAT protein produced by
transcription/translation of templates synthesized by PCR.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of 3'-additions and inserted sequences
on translation and stability of CAT mRNA.
A, effect of the number of G nucleotides at the 3'
terminus of mRNA on translation. PCR-generated DNAs containing 5 base pairs upstream of the T7 promoter and different tails 3' to the
CAT protein coding region were used in a coupled
transcription/translation reaction, and the amount of translation
product was measured using CAT assay. B, effects of
different 3' termini on CAT mRNA translation. 15 G
nucleotides were internally incorporated at the 3' terminus,
followed by 5 A nucleotides (15G5A) or five random
nucleotides (15G5N). Reactions similar to those
described above were carried out except that PCR products with
different tails were used in this experiment. C,
quantitation of CAT proteins synthesized in a coupled
transcription/translation reaction. Epitope-tagged CAT protein was
affinity-purified from the E. coli cell extracts (BL21
(DE3)) harboring pET3a-CAT using anti-T7·tag antibody. The indicated
amounts of purified CAT protein were loaded onto a 10%
Tricine-SDS-polyacrylamide gel along with 1 µl samples taken from the
in vitro reaction shown in Fig. 6B
(C15 and G15). CAT protein was detected in
Western blot using anti-T7·tag antibody. D, analysis of
steady-state levels of mRNA in coupled transcription/translation
reaction was conducted. F, [32P]UTP was added
to reactions, samples were removed at the times indicated, and the
percent of undegraded CAT transcripts was quantitated using a
PhosphorImager. The percent of undegraded CAT mRNA was plotted
relative to CAT mRNA containing a tail of 15 Gs present
after 10 min of incubation, which was set at 100%.
E, reaction conditions were as described in Fig.
1A, except a coupled transcription/translation reaction
mixture was used in these experiments. G, the percent of RNA
left in the reactions was plotted. F and G, the
symbols used in the graphs are: , N15 (15N);
, A15 (15A); , C15
(15C); , G15 (15G).
|
|
Poly(G) tails also increased the yield in coupled
transcription/translation reactions of proteins specified by other
PCR-generated templates. These included firefly luciferase and
Streptomyces chromosomal ORFs encoding GPSI or a
21-kDa S. rochei telomere binding
protein2 (Fig. 7). The effect
of 3'-polyguanylation on the synthesis of biologically active 80-kDa
GPSI by poly(G) tails was 2-fold, whereas production of the 21-kDa TP
was increased 22-fold by the poly(G) tail. For these proteins, as well
as for luciferase and CAT, the extent of functional stabilization of
transcripts by poly(G) was inversely related to transcript length.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effects of poly(G) tails on translation of
luciferase, GPSI, and TP mRNA. A, effects
of different 3' termini on translation of luciferase mRNA. Reaction
mixtures were similar to those described in Fig. 6B
except that PCR products contain luciferase protein sequence.
The amounts of luciferase protein produced in reactions was measured
and compared by setting the amount of luciferase activity encoded by
transcripts containing a G15 tail as 100%. B,
effects of poly(G) tails on translation of GPSI and TP. GPSI- and
TP-coding regions were amplified either from plasmid (GPSI) or directly
from S. rochei chromosome (TP), and the
translation product was detected in Western blots using anti-T7·tag
(GPSI) or anti-FLAG·tag antibody (TP). The same membrane was reprobed
with antibody to E. coli PNPase antibody to produce a
control for possible variations in loading.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our investigations of a possible effect of poly(A) tails of
mRNA on bacterial mRNA translation revealed no evidence that
3'-polyadenylation alters the ability of transcripts to produce
proteins in vitro. However, we observed that 3'-poly(G)
additions to transcripts can increase the chemical and, even more
dramatically, the functional half-life of mRNA in E. coli cell extracts, yielding up to an 80-fold increase in
coupled transcription/translation reaction during 1-h incubations (Fig.
6B).
Guanine-rich nucleic acid segments are known to form a structure termed
a "G quartet" (46), which commonly is found within telomeres. It
was shown previously that G tails inhibit the binding and action of
PNPase (5), one of two major 3'- to 5'-exonucleases of E. coli. However, poly(G) tails do not affect cleavage by RNase E
(37), the principal endoribonuclease of E. coli, and in our experiments did not alter the rate or pattern of fragmentation of CAT
mRNA by RNase E present in the reaction mixtures used for in
vitro protein synthesis. Instead, they protected against the C-terminal truncation of protein encoded by the mRNA. Whereas there
is substantial evidence that RNase E initiates the chemical decay
in vivo of a variety of mRNAs (for reviews, see Refs. 35 and 36) and both the chemical and functional decay of RNA I (38, 39),
published evidence for an effect of RNase E cleavage on the functional
half-life of mRNA in E. coli cells is lacking. Our
conclusion that functional inactivation of CAT mRNA in E. coli cell extracts occurs by a mechanism other than
endonucleolytic cleavage is consistent with the finding that mutation
of the E. coli rne (formerly known as ams) gene
affects bulk mRNA half-life in vivo but not functional
decay (40). Nevertheless, interference by poly(G) tails with 3'- to
5'-exonucleolytic decay may not entirely explain their effect on the
functional inactivation of mRNAs, as the synthesis of active CAT
protein paradoxically was observed to decrease when the length of the
tail extended past 15 nucleotides. Additionally, the effect of poly(G)
tails on protein synthesis decreased as the length of the primary
transcript increased, suggesting that functional decay of CAT mRNA
in vitro may not be entirely independent of endonucleolytic cleavage.
We found during our investigations that at least five nonspecific base
pairs 5' to the bacteriophage T7 promoter is required for efficient
transcription by T7 RNAP. This effect and also the effect of poly(G)
tails on mRNA functional half-life were observed for a commercially
available transcription/translation reaction mixture
(PROTEINscript-PROTM, Ambion) as well as for the E. coli cell extracts we prepared. Using as template a DNA that contained the
CAT ORF, a 5'-primer that installed the T7 promoter and additional base
pairs at the 5'-end of the PCR-generated CAT ORF-containing template,
and a 3'-primer that installed a poly(G) tail on run-off transcripts
synthesized by T7 RNA polymerase, our reaction mixtures yielded a level
of protein that was comparable with that reported for in
vitro protein synthesis systems employing genes cloned on circular
plasmid DNA (47).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Björn Sohlberg for helpful
discussions and comments on the manuscript. We also thank Dr. G. H. Jones for providing a plasmid and Dr. R. R. Burgess for
providing a bacterial strain.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by NIGMS, National Institutes of
Health Grant GM54158 (to S. N. C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Genetics,
Room M322, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, CA 94305-5120; Tel.: 650-723-5315; Fax: 650-725-1536;
E-mail: sncohen@stanford.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 17, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102408200
2
Bao, K. and Cohen, S. N. (2001) Genes Dev.
15, in press.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PNPase, polynucleotide phosphorylase;
RNAP, RNA polymerase;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
HRP, horseradish peroxidase;
ORF, open reading frame;
GPSI, guanosine pentaphosphate synthetase I;
TP, telomere binding protein;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cohen, S. N.
(1995)
Cell
80,
829-832
|
| 2.
|
Sarkar, N.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
173-197
|
| 3.
|
Coburn, G. A.,
and Mackie, G. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15776-15781
|
| 4.
|
Blum, E.,
Carpousis, A. J.,
and Higgins, C. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4009-4016
|
| 5.
|
Lisitsky, I.,
and Schuster, G.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
261,
468-474
|
| 6.
|
Xu, F.,
Lin-Chao, S.,
and Cohen, S. N.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6756-6760
|
| 7.
|
Cao, G. J.,
and Sarkar, N.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10380-10384
|
| 8.
|
O'Hara, E. B.,
Chekanova, J. A.,
Ingle, C. A.,
Kushner, Z. R.,
Peters, E.,
and Kushner, S. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1807-1811
|
| 9.
|
Hajnsdorf, E.,
Braun, F.,
Haugel-Nielsen, J.,
and Régnier, P.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
3973-3977
|
| 10.
|
Szalewska-Palasz, A.,
Wrobel, B.,
and Wegrzyn, G.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
432,
70-72
|
| 11.
|
Lesley, S. A.,
Brow, M. A.,
and Burgess, R. R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
2632-2638
|
| 12.
|
Biek, D. P.,
and Cohen, S. N.
(1986)
J. Bacteriol.
167,
594-603
|
| 13.
|
Brenner, S.,
and Beckwith, J. R.
(1965)
J. Mol. Biol.
13,
629-637
|
| 14.
|
Hanahan, D.
(1983)
J. Mol. Biol.
166,
557-580
|
| 15.
|
Goldblum, K.,
and Apirion, D.
(1981)
J. Bacteriol.
146,
128-132
|
| 16.
|
Chang, A. C.,
and Cohen, S. N.
(1978)
J. Bacteriol.
134,
1141-1156
|
| 17.
|
Meacock, P. A.,
and Cohen, S. N.
(1980)
Cell
20,
529-542
|
| 18.
|
Jones, G. H.,
and Bibb, M. J.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
4281-4288
|
| 19.
|
Sohlberg, B.,
Lundberg, U.,
Hartl, F.-U.,
and von Gabain, A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
277-281
|
| 20.
|
Tal, M.,
Aviram, M.,
Kanarek, A.,
and Weiss, A.
(1972)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
281,
381-392
|
| 21.
|
Moazed, D.,
Stern, S.,
and Noller, H. F.
(1986)
J. Mol. Biol.
187,
399-416
|
| 22.
|
Ringquist, S.,
MacDonald, M.,
Gibson, T.,
and Gold, L.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
10254-10262
|
| 23.
|
Nielsen, D. A.,
Chang, T. C.,
and Shapiro, D. J.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
179,
19-23
|
| 24.
|
McDowall, K. J.,
Kaberdin, V. R.,
Wu, S.-W.,
Cohen, S. N.,
and Lin-Chao, S.
(1995)
Nature
374,
287-290
|
| 25.
|
Sedmak, J. J.,
and Grossberg, S. E.
(1977)
Anal. Biochem.
79,
544-552
|
| 26.
|
Schägger, H.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
368-379
|
| 27.
|
Hagège, J. M.,
and Cohen, S. N.
(1997)
Mol. Microbiol.
25,
1077-1090
|
| 28.
|
Stent, G. S.
(1966)
Proc. R. Soc. Lond B. Biol. Sci.
164,
181-197
|
| 29.
|
McCarthy, J. E.,
and Brimacombe, R.
(1994)
Trends Genet.
10,
402-407
|
| 30.
|
Calogero, R. A.,
Pon, C. L.,
Canonaco, M. A.,
and Gualerzi, C. O.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
6427-6431
|
| 31.
|
Dreyfus, M.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
204,
79-94
|
| 32.
|
Hartz, D.,
McPheeters, D. S.,
Traut, R.,
and Gold, L.
(1988)
Methods Enzymol.
164,
419-425
|
| 33.
|
Kalapos, M. P.,
Paulus, H.,
and Sarkar, N.
(1997)
Biochimie (Paris)
79,
493-502
|
| 34.
|
Moll, I.,
Resch, A.,
and Bläsi, U.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
436,
213-217
|
| 35.
|
Steege, D. A.
(2000)
RNA
6,
1079-1090
|
| 36.
|
Coburn, G. A.,
and Mackie, G. A.
(1999)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
62,
55-108
|
| 37.
|
Huang, H.,
Liao, J.,
and Cohen, S. N.
(1998)
Nature
391,
99-102
|
| 38.
|
Lin-Chao, S.,
and Cohen, S. N.
(1991)
Cell
65,
1233-1242
|
| 39.
|
Bouvet, P.,
and Belasco, J. G.
(1992)
Nature
360,
488-491
|
| 40.
|
Ono, M.,
and Kuwano, M.
(1979)
J. Mol. Biol.
129,
343-357
|
| 41.
|
Iost, I.,
Guillerez, J.,
and Dreyfus, M.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
619-622
|
| 42.
|
Dunn, J. J.,
and Studier, F. W.
(1983)
J. Mol. Biol.
166,
477-535
|
| 43.
|
Jacques, J. P.,
and Kolakofsky, D.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
707-713
|
| 44.
|
Sippel, A.,
and Hartmann, G.
(1968)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
157,
218-219
|
| 45.
|
Nevin, D. E.,
and Pratt, J. M.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
291,
259-263
|
| 46.
|
Zimmerman, S. B.,
Cohen, G. H.,
and Davies, D. R.
(1975)
J. Mol. Biol.
92,
181-192
|
| 47.
|
Kim, D. M.,
and Swartz, J. R.
(2000)
Biotechnol. Prog.
16,
385-390
|
| 48.
|
Cormack, R. S.,
and Mackie, G. A.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
228,
1078-1090
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.-G. Liou, H.-Y. Chang, C.-S. Lin, and S. Lin-Chao
DEAD Box RhlB RNA Helicase Physically Associates with Exoribonuclease PNPase to Degrade Double-stranded RNA Independent of the Degradosome-assembling Region of RNase E
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 18, 2002;
277(43):
41157 - 41162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.