Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M008847200 on April 23, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 26, 23341-23348, June 29, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/26/23341    most recent
M008847200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glading, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glading, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Membrane Proximal ERK Signaling Is Required for M-calpain Activation Downstream of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling*

Angela GladingDagger , Florian Überall§, Stephen M. Keyse, Douglas A. Lauffenburger||, and Alan WellsDagger **

From the Dagger  Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, the § Institute of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria, the  Imperial Cancer Research Fund Molecular Pharmacology Unit, Biomedical Research Centre, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY, United Kingdom, and the || Division of Bioengineering and Environmental Health, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Received for publication, September 27, 2000, and in revised form, February 21, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Localization of signaling is critical in directing cellular outcomes, especially in pleiotropic signaling pathways. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/microtubule-associated protein kinase, which promotes cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation is found in the nucleus and throughout the cytoplasm. Recently, it has been shown that nuclear translocation of ERK is required for transcriptional changes and cell proliferation. However, the cellular consequences, of cytoplasmic signaling have not been defined. We explored whether cytoplasmic, specifically membrane-proximal, ERK signaling is involved in growth factor-induced cell motility. We previously have demonstrated that increased M-calpain activity downstream of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated ERK activation is necessary for epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced motility. Calpain isoforms also have been found in nuclear, cytosolic, and plasma membrane-associated compartments in a variety of cell types. We now employ cell engineering approaches to control localization of the upstream EGFR and ERK activities to examine the spatial effect of upstream signal locale on downstream calpain activity. With differential ligand-induced internalization and trafficking-restricted receptor variants, we find that calpain activity is triggered only by plasma membrane-restricted activated EGFR, not by internalized (although still active) EGFR. Cells transfected with membrane-targeted ERK1 and ERK2, which sequester endogenous ERKs, exhibited normal EGF-induced calpain activity. Transfection of an inactive ERK phosphatase (MKP-3/Pyst1) that sequesters ERK in the cytoplasm prevented calpain activation as well as de-adhesion. These data strongly suggest that EGF-induced calpain activity can be enhanced near sites of membrane-proximal EGFR-mediated ERK signaling, providing insights about how calpain activity might be regulated and targeted to enhance its effects on adhesion-related substrates.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The individual biophysical processes of extension, adhesion, de-adhesion, and contraction must be finely regulated in a temporal and spatial manner to enable productive fibroblast motility (3). A change in cell motility is just one of the many pleiotropic effects of signaling mediated by the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR),1 and it has been suggested that such specific cellular responses are determined by the spatial targeting of downstream signaling events. This simple concept is complicated by the fact that EGFR-mediated cell motility requires signaling through the ubiquitous intracellular effector, ERK (4), which is present in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments. Furthermore, our previous studies have demonstrated that ERK activates the ubiquitously distributed intracellular neutral protease calpain to affect de-adhesion during epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated cell motility (5, 6). This alteration in adhesiveness is coincident with EGFR-mediated focal adhesion disassembly (4), suggesting that the target of calpain is a component of the adhesion plaque. In support of this, calpain has been shown to cleave many adhesion plaque proteins, such as talin, ezrin, pp125FAK, and the cytoplasmic tail of beta 1 and beta 3 integrins (7-13). However, calpain does cleave other cytosolic and nuclear targets (14) and is involved in other responses such as proliferation and apoptosis (15-19).

Localization of calpain has been described in many cell types. This is best documented in erythrocytes, in which calpain translocates to the membrane from the cytosol and complexes with a number of cytoskeletal proteins when activated by ionophore or thrombin (20-23). Unfortunately, these studies investigated a nonmotile cell type and focused on the predominant isoform in erythrocytes, µ-calpain (calpain-I). In nucleated, adherent cells, this isoform has been reported to translocate to the membrane upon injury, whereas the isoform critical for EGF-induced motility (5), M-calpain (calpain-II), remains cytoplasmic (24). Direct action on adhesion sites is supported by findings in BS-C-1 epithelial cells that M-calpain co-localized with talin in the periplasma membrane space as visualized by indirect immunofluorescence (25). However, these findings have been disputed in recent publications, which have not found either calpain isoform in focal adhesions, even in the face of µ-calpain overexpression (26, 27). These diverse findings may result from the fact that calpain can perform diverse functions and that most studies of calpain localization are directed solely to identify the distribution of the protein and not the distribution of its activity. However, for an enzyme distributed at high levels throughout the cellular space, one mode of determining selective cellular outcome might be to activate only preresident calpain in a spatially restricted locale. Recent advances in cell and molecular engineering now enable us to localize the upstream activators of M-calpain and thus begin to define the active subcellular compartments. Thus, localizing the subcellular locale of calpain activation by ERK would provide insight into how a cell selects from among multiple possible responses to a pleiotropic signal and suggest physiological targets to probe.

Binding of ligand to the EGFR leads to activation of M-calpain subsequent to ERK/MAP kinase signaling (5). This allows us to exploit the ability to produce differential EGFR signaling between internalized and cell surface EGFR. Upon ligand binding, EGFR is internalized into an early endosomal compartment before being either degraded or recycled to the cell surface. Two EGFR ligands differentially segregate in the acidic pH of the endosome; EGF remains bound to the receptor, whereas transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha ) dissociates. Consequently, EGFR retains activity in the early endosome when bound by EGF but not by TGF-alpha (28). This has profound effects on downstream signaling, since from the endosome, EGFR is able to activate Ras (29), but not phospholipase C-gamma (28). Both signaling pathways are triggered by cell surface-localized EGFR. However, since M-calpain is activated by ERK signaling, which is three steps downstream from Ras, it is quite possible for actual localization to be different between the EGFR signal, ERK activation, and subsequent calpain functioning. Furthermore, while Ras is membrane-localized due to farnesylation and thus one might favor a membrane location of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling complex, Ras can be fully activated both from plasma membrane EGFR and endosomal EGFR (29). Obviously, the accessibility of focal adhesion components would differ greatly from these two sites. Two recent molecular constructs can localize ERK signaling to permit a cell engineering approach to control localization. ERK chimeras that express the Ras farnesylation sequence at their C terminus (ERK1-CAAX and ERK2-CAAX) and are membrane-bound sequester endogenous ERK at the plasma membrane (1) and provide for plasma membrane-localized signaling. A catalytically inactive cytoplasmic MAP kinase phosphatase, MKP-3/Pyst1, which binds and sequesters ERK in the cytoplasm, but does not affect its activity (2, 30), provides for cytosolic ERK signaling. Using a combination of these cell and molecular engineering approaches, we have found the site of ERK-mediated calpain activation to be localized at the plasma membrane, and this localization is required for EGF-induced de-adhesion. This constraint supports a model that emphasizes calpain activity targeting focal adhesion components during cell motility and provides insight into how ERK signaling might differentially induce specific cellular responses.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Human recombinant TGF-alpha , dichlorotriazinylaminofluorescein (DTAF), digitonin, and all other buffer reagents were obtained from Sigma. Human recombinant EGF was obtained from Collaborative Biomedical Products (Bedford, MA). All cell culture reagents were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. PD098059, anti-phospho-ERK, and anti-phospho-p90RSK antibodies were obtained from New England Biolabs (Boston, MA). 7-Amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin-t-Boc-L-leucyl-L-methionine amide (Boc-LM-CMAC), Alexa 594 goat anti-mouse, and Alexa 594 goat anti-rabbit antibodies were obtained from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR). Purified microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP2) was obtained from Cytoskeleton (Denver, CO). pEGFP was obtained from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA).

Cell Culture-- NR6 mouse fibroblasts transduced to express either wild type (WT) human EGFR (NR6) or a signaling-restricted construct lacking all autophosphorylation motifs, c'973 (c'973 NR6) (31, 32), were cultured using minimum essential medium (MEM)-alpha , 26 mM sodium bicarbonate with 7.5% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1× MEM nonessential amino acids, and the antibiotics penicillin, streptomycin, and G418 (350 µg/ml) as the growth medium. Cells were quiesced at subconfluence using restricted serum conditions without G418 (MEM-alpha , 26 mM sodium bicarbonate with 1% dialyzed fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1× MEM nonessential amino acids, and the antibiotics penicillin and streptomycin) for 18-24 h prior to experiments.

MAP2-DTAF Calpain Activity Assay-- Briefly, MAP2 was labeled with DTAF by incubation of MAP2 and DTAF in pH 8.5 PIPES buffer for 30 min at 4 °C. Labeled MAP2 was then isolated by size exclusion column chromatography and dialyzed against pH 7.5 HEPES buffer overnight. Cells were grown to confluence in 10-cm tissue culture plates and quiesced for 24 h. After 1 min of treatment with EGF (10 nM), cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with cell lysis buffer (20 nM HEPES (pH 7.4), 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 500 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM sodium vanadate). After removing the cell debris by centrifugation, 0.9 µg of DTAF-labeled MAP2 was added to the samples with either 0 or 0.1 mM free Ca2+ concentration. Fluorescence was immediately measured by an Aminco-Bowman Series II spectrofluorimeter (Spectronic Instruments Inc., Rochester, NY), at excitation and emission wavelengths of 490 and 520 nm respectively, for 3 min at room temperature (5, 33).

EGFR Signaling Compartmentation Protocol-- Haugh et al. (28, 29) previously have shown that internalized EGFR can retain activity dependent on the binding properties of its ligand (Fig. 1A). Internalization of the EGFR can be induced by treatment with ligand, with a maximum level of internalized receptor peaking at 20 min of treatment. Since we have found that calpain activity peaks at 5 min treatment with EGF and declines below base line by 30 min (Fig. 1B), the MEK inhibitor PD098059 was used during the first 20 min incubation to prevent a loss of calpain activity during the internalization process. PD098059 prevents calpain activation by ERK but does not have any direct effect on calpain. NR6 fibroblasts containing high levels of wild type EGFR were treated with 20 nM EGF or TGF-alpha in the presence of 2 µM PD098059 for 20 min. Cells were then washed once with ice-cold WHIPS buffer (20 mM HEPES, 130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 1 mg/ml polyvinylpyrrolidine, pH 7.4) and then incubated for 2 min in an ice-cold acid wash (50 mM glycine-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mg/ml polyvinylpyrrolidine, pH 3.0). This stripped any remaining ligand from the EGFR on the cell surface (34). The cells were then washed again with ice cold WHIPS buffer and then reincubated with or without 20 nM TGF-alpha in binding buffer for 5 min. The cells were then either lysed for Western blotting of active ERK or loaded with 10 µM Boc-LM-CMAC and used for the following calpain activity assay.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, schematic of EGFR signaling compartmentation protocol. EGFR ligands TGF-alpha or EGF are added to NR6 fibroblasts expressing wild type EGFR. During a 20-min incubation at 37 °C, the receptors are internalized to the early endosomal compartment. In this compartment, with a pH of ~6.4, TGF-alpha dissociates from the receptor. However, EGF remains bound and continues to signal Ras activation. After this initial incubation, the cells are washed and then stripped of accessible (surface) ligand with a mild acid buffer for 2 min. TGF-alpha is then added back to the cells to produce four different conditions in which EGFR signaling is differentially localized. B, time course of EGF-induced calpain activity. Cells were treated with 10 nM EGF for the times shown and then lysed, and fluorescein-tagged MAP2-calpain substrate was added. An increase in fluorescence of the substrate was measured using a spectrofluorometer. n = 4.

Calpain Activity Assay-- NR6 WT cells plated on glass coverslips were loaded for 20 min at 37 °C with 10 µM Boc-LM-CMAC, a synthetic calpain substrate (5, 35). After loading, the cells were treated with growth factor for 5 min and then mounted on glass slides, and images of the Boc-LM-CMAC fluorescence were obtained. The substrate is designed so that fluorescent quenching is removed upon calpain cleavage, resulting in an increase in fluorescence. Images were then false colored to grayscale; increased lightness correlates with increased calpain activity.

Expression of Engineered Constructs-- Cells were electroporated to express the various ERK and MKP-3/Pyst1 constructs in the presence of green fluorescent protein (GFP) to mark expressing cells following standard protocols. Cells were trypsinized, pelleted, and resuspended in Opti-MEM medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) in electroporation cuvettes, and the appropriate plasmid DNA was added to a total of 20-40 µg. pEGFP plasmid was co-transfected at a 0.1 molar ratio. The cells were electroporated at 0.220 V and 960 microfarads for 5 s. The cells were then replated and allowed to grow for 48 h before use in experiments, with one change of medium.

To ensure that the constructs functioned as previously demonstrated (1, 30), indirect immunofluorescence was utilized to identify the distribution of active ERK (phosphorylated ERK) in transfected cells. Cells were transfected as above and plated on glass coverslips. The cells were treated 48 h after transfection in the presence and absence of 10 nM EGF for 10 min. The cells were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. at room temperature and then washed with PBS four times. To remove cell cytosolic contents but retain membrane and cytoskeleton associated molecules, some of the coverslips were exposed to 8 µM digitonin plus 100 µM MgCl and 200 µM ATP for 10 min at room temperature and washed twice with PBS. Control coverslips were permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100, which enables antibody access to intracellular targets without removal of cytosolic macromolecules. To visualize the activated ERK, primary antibody (anti-phospho-ERK, clone E10) diluted in 1% bovine serum albumin (1:400) was applied to the coverslips, which were then incubated in a humidified chamber for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were washed twice with PBS, and secondary antibody (Alexa 594 goat anti-mouse) diluted in 1% BSA (1:1000) was applied for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were observed for Alexa 594 fluorescence using an Olympus BX40 microscope (× 40 magnification), and images were captured using a SPOT CCD camera. Transfected cells were identified by GFP expression.

Indirect immunofluorescence of phospho-p90RSK was performed on mock (GFP only)- and MKP-3/Pyst1-transfected cells. Cells were fixed and treated as above, using Triton X-100 to permeabilize the cells for staining. Primary antibody (anti-phospho-p90RSK, Thr360/Ser364) diluted in 1% bovine serum albumin (1:1000) was applied for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were washed twice, and secondary antibody (Alexa 594 goat anti-rabbit, 1:1000) was applied for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were observed for fluorescence as above. Transfected cells were identified by GFP expression.

Adhesion Assay-- Cell-substratum adhesiveness was quantitated using an inverted centrifugation detachment assay. Transfected cells were plated on 16-well glass slides (Nunc, Rochester, NY). At 48 h post-transfection, cells were treated with and without 10 nM EGF in the culture medium for 10 min. The plastic well walls were then removed, and the remaining well divisions were filled with PBS. Coverslips were then applied and sealed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay sealing tape (Corning, Cambridge, MA). The slides were then centrifuged inverted for 5 min at 3000 rpm at 37 °C using a Beckman CS6R plate centrifuge; 3000 rpm (1643 × g) was chosen empirically as the force required to detach approximately half of the EGF-treated cells. Before and after the centrifugation, the number of GFP-expressing cells in each well was counted by fluorescent microscopy.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Calpain Is Activated by an Internalization-deficient EGFR, c'973-- NR6 fibroblasts expressing both WT and internalization-deficient (c'973) EGFR were used in the Boc-LM-CMAC calpain activity assay. c'973 NR6 cells exhibited calpain activity equivalent to that seen in WT cells (Fig. 2). This indicated that internalization of the EGFR was not required for EGFR-mediated calpain activity.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Internalization-deficient EGFR signals EGF-induced calpain activity. NR6 cells expressing WT or c'973 EGFR were plated on glass coverslips at ~50% confluency. The cells were then loaded with 10 µM of the calpain substrate Boc-LM-CMAC. The cells were treated with or without 10 nM EGF for 5 min, mounted on glass slides, and observed using a fluorescent microscope (BX40, Olympus). Images were false colored to grayscale; therefore, brightness correlates with increased fluorescence intensity and calpain activity.

EGFR Activates ERK from both the Plasma Membrane and Internal Sites-- Previous studies had shown that both internalized and cell surface EGFR signaled Ras activation (29). However, the activation of downstream molecules, such as ERK, was not shown. That elements downstream from Ras would be activated was not assumed, since EGFR phosphorylates phospholipase C-gamma from the endosome but this fails to hydrolyze phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (28). To address this, we determined whether ERK was activated under conditions that produced differential external and internal signaling (Fig. 1A). ERK was phosphorylated by both internal and external active EGFR (Fig. 3). Thus, there are a number of ways in which ERK activation can be linked to the activation of calpain. First, ERK may activate calpain globally within the cell. Second, ERK may translocate to a specific location within the cell to target calpain activation. Third, upstream components of the MAP kinase pathways such as Raf or MEK may translocate to the site of ERK/calpain activation. Finally, only one site of ERK activation may be relevant for activation of M-calpain.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   ERK is activated by both internal and surface EGFR. The immunoblot shows anti-phospho-ERK. Lane 1, notx; lane 2, TGF-alpha for 5 min; lane 3, EGF for 20 min (internal only); lane 4, EGF for 20 min, strip, TGF-alpha for 5 min (internal and external); lane 5, TGF-alpha for 20 min (no signal); lane 6, TGF-alpha for 20 min, strip, TGF-alpha for 5 min (external only). Results shown are representative of at least three separate experiments.

Calpain Is Activated Downstream of EGFR Located on the Plasma Membrane-- We applied cellular engineering first to sort through the possibilities. If we spatially isolated EGFR activation, we could determine the likelihood of various translocations of ERK or its upstream mediators to sites of calpain action. Therefore, we asked whether internal EGFR could activate calpain. NR6 WT cells were treated with either TGF-alpha or EGF (20 nM) for 20 min to drive internalization of the receptor. Under normal experimental conditions, EGFR-mediated calpain activity peaks at 5 min of stimulation with EGF and is greatly reduced at 20 min (Fig. 1B) probably due to autoproteolysis. In order to observe calpain activity after internalization of the EGFR, the MEK inhibitor PD098059 was added during the first 20 min of incubation. After internalization, any remaining ligand was removed by a mild acid strip (34), and the cells were then treated with or without TGF-alpha for an additional 5 min. Control experiments demonstrated that the washing procedure removed the PD098059 and allowed full EGFR activation of ERK as determined by phospho-ERK detection (data not shown). Under these conditions, calpain activity using the Boc-LM-CMAC substrate was assessed (Fig. 4). The presence of external signaling only (TGF-alpha , strip, TGF-alpha ) induced calpain activity as robustly as internal and external signaling. Internal signaling only did not result in calpain activity, although ERK was phosphorylated equivalently to external only (Fig. 3) and Ras is strongly activated under these conditions (29). Thus, the phosphorylation of ERK following internal signaling does not lead to activation of calpain. This strongly suggests that the subcellular localization of ERK may be a critical determinant in regulating the activity of calpain.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Internalized EGFR does not signal EGF-induced calpain activity. A, calpain activity (lightness correlates with activity). Note that the MEK inhibitor PD098059 was present in these experiments during the first 20 min incubation. Lane 1, notx; lane 2, TGF-alpha for 5 min; lane 3, EGF for 20 min (internal only); lane 4, EGF for 20 min, strip, TGF-alpha for 5 min (internal and external); lane 5, TGF-alpha for 20 min (no signal); lane 6, TGF-alpha for 20 min, strip, TGF-alpha for 5 min (external only). B, calpain activity in the presence of PD098059 for the total treatment time. Images are representative of at least three separate experiments, five fields per condition, average of 12 cells per field.

Sequestering ERK1 and ERK2 at the Membrane Does Not Affect EGFR-mediated Calpain Activity-- Having rapidly determined that ERK localized to the plasma membrane is probably responsible for calpain activation, molecularly engineered ERK chimeras expressing the Ha-Ras farnesylation sequence were transfected into NR6 WT cells. Control nonlocalizing chimeras that have a nonfunctional farnesylation sequence (SAAX) were also transfected. Both ERK1-CAAX and ERK2-CAAX chimeras sequester endogenous ERK at the plasma membrane (1). Control experiments demonstrate that transfection of both ERK chimeras induces localization of active ERK at the plasma membrane, which is retained even in the face of digitonin treatment, which causes loss of cytoplasmic contents. Nonlocalizing chimeras did not have the ability to localize active ERK to the membrane or retain it upon digitonin treatment (Fig. 5A). Cells expressing the CAAX chimeras exhibited EGF-induced calpain activity at the same level as mock-transfected cells (Fig. 6). In addition, expression of both ERK1 and ERK2 chimeras together to localize all ERK signaling to the plasma membrane did not diminish EGF-induced calpain activity. These findings strongly supported the contention that membrane-localized ERK can activate calpain.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Activated ERK can be localized to plasma membrane or cytosolic compartments. A, indirect immunofluorescence staining of phospho-ERK. Cells were transfected with either both ERK1 and ERK 2 CAAX constructs, ERK1 and ERK2 SAAX control constructs, or MKP-3/Pyst1. Transfected cells were identified by co-transfection with GFP (data not shown). Cells were fixed after treatment with or without EGF and permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100 for standard immunofluorescence or digitonin to allow extraction of the cytosolic components. The arrows indicate transfected cells. Images are representative of two separate experiments. B, indirect immunofluorescence of phospho-p90RSK. p90RSK is a cytosolic target of ERK. Cells transfected with MKP-3/Pyst1 were stained for phospho-p90RSK in the presence and absence of EGF treatment. The arrows indicate transfected cells. Images are representative of two separate experiments.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Membrane-anchored ERKs activate calpain in response to EGF stimulation. Cells were both singly and doubly transfected with ERK-CAAX chimeras (membrane-bound) and loaded with the calpain substrate Boc-LM-CMAC. The cells were then treated with or without EGF for 5 min, and images were taken. The arrows indicate transfected cells as observed by co-transfection of GFP. Farnesylation-negative ERK-SAAX chimeras were also transfected into cells and also exhibited EGF-induced calpain activity (data not shown). Shown is a representative of three experiments.

Sequestering ERK in the Cytoplasm Reduces EGFR-mediated Calpain Activity-- The counterpoint to the foregoing is whether non-plasma membrane-associated ERK also can activate calpain, providing for a model of global calpain activation. An inactive form of MAPK phosphatase, MKP-3/Pyst1, binds endogenous ERK and retains it in its cytosolic location (30). Control experiments show that, in cells expressing MKP-3/Pyst1, phosphorylated ERK is localized in the cytosol and that phosphorylated ERK is lost with the cytosolic contents upon digitonin treatment (Fig. 5A). Importantly, MKP-3/Pyst1 does not interfere with the ability of ERK to phosphorylate its cytoplasmic targets. To verify that MKP-3/Pyst1-bound ERK was still functional in our system, we used immunofluorescence to stain for phosphorylated p90RSK, a cytoplasmic target of ERK phosphorylated in response to growth factor stimulation (2). Phospho-p90RSK was observed in mock-transfected cells as well as MKP-3/Pyst1-transfected cells, treated with EGF (Fig. 5B). Expression of MKP-3/Pyst1 in NR6 WT cells inhibited EGF-induced calpain activity compared with mock-transfected cells, using the Boc-LM-CMAC assay (Fig. 7). A conundrum is presented by the clear inhibition of calpain activation by the inactive MKP-3/Pyst1 construct. The construct has been reported to be capable of phosphorylating a membrane-anchored target (2), and thus one might expect membrane-associated M-calpain to be accessible. While lacking a demonstrated explanation, numerous possibilities render this deficit less than disconcerting; threshold considerations, steric accessibility, and inability to attain a protein-protein interaction in addition to merely phosphorylating all have precedents. Despite these limitations, these results, combined with our observation that ERK activation mediated by internal signaling does not lead to calpain activation strongly suggest that a plasma membrane-associated signaling complex that includes activated ERK is required.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Cytoplasmically sequestered ERK does not activate calpain. Cells were transfected with MKP-3/Pyst1, an inactive MAPK phosphatase that binds to and sequesters both ERK isoforms in the cytoplasm but does not interfere with activity (2, 30). The cells were then loaded as above, and calpain activity was observed. No calpain activity was observed upon EGF stimulation in MKP-3/Pyst1-transfected cells. The arrows indicate transfected cells as observed by co-transfection of GFP. Shown is a representative of three experiments.

EGF Induces Cell De-adhesion in the Presence of Membrane-anchored but Not Cytosolic ERK-- Previously, we demonstrated that calpain is required for EGF-induced de-adhesion during active motility (5, 6). Therefore, we queried EGF-induced de-adhesion in cells expressing either both ERK1 and ERK2 chimeras or the MKP-3/Pyst1 construct. Cells expressing either the CAAX (membrane-localizing) ERK chimeras or the control (nonlocalizing) SAAX chimeras displayed EGF-induced de-adhesion indistinguishable from mock-transfected cells (GFP only). Therefore, localization of ERK to the plasma membrane was permissive for normal EGF-induced de-adhesion. However, MKP-3/Pyst1 transfected cells displayed reduced de-adhesion in the presence of EGF (Fig. 8). This indicates that cytoplasmic active ERK is not sufficient for EGF-induced de-adhesion. These data provide a clearer picture of EGF-mediated calpain activation through ERK, in that ERK and EGF activities are required at the plasma membrane for calpain activity and for EGF-induced de-adhesion. This strongly suggests that calpain's role in EGF-induced motility is to facilitate adhesion turnover, and its action occurs at the plasma membrane.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   EGF-induced de-adhesion is mediated by plasma membrane-localized by not cytoplasmically sequestered ERK. Cells were transfected with either both ERK CAAX chimeras, both ERK SAAX control chimeras, or MKP-3/Pyst1. Cells were co-transfected with GFP, which allowed the adhesion of transfected cells alone to be studied. Cells were treated with or without EGF for 30 min and then placed inverted onto a plate centrifuge rotor and spun at 3000 rpm for 5 min. The number of transfected cells adherent was counted before and after centrifugation in three representative, marked fields. The number of cells remaining adherent was expressed as a percentage of mock-transfected, untreated cells remaining. Data are mean ± S.E. from two separate experiments, with four wells per condition, three fields per well. p < 0.01 comparing the EGF-treated transfected cells with the EGF-treated control transfectants.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Herein we provide evidence that EGF-induced calpain activity begins at the plasma membrane. Both EGFR and ERK must be present and active at the plasma membrane in order for EGF-induced calpain activity to be stimulated. Plasma membrane-localized EGFR drove calpain activity, whereas internalized EGFR, although able to activate ERK, did not activate calpain, suggesting that ERK needed to be at the plasma membrane. Furthermore, active ERK confined to the cytoplasm was not able to activate calpain, but membrane-tethered ERK was. Finally, EGF-induced de-adhesion, which is required for induced cell migration (36), was inhibited by restricting ERK to the cytoplasm but not by restricting ERK to the plasma membrane. This suggests a model whereby EGF signaling at the plasma membrane drives the activation of M-calpain, which in turn cleaves focal adhesion proteins and mediates de-adhesion. One caveat in this model is that we were unable to directly visualize M-calpain activation. Using immunofluorescence and GFP-tagged constructs, we found that M-calpain has a pancellular distribution as previously reported (37-40), which does not change appreciably with EGF exposure (data not shown). We did see some punctate aggregates of GFP-tagged calpain in the overlay of a pancellular distribution that may reflect the reported localization of calpain with focal adhesions (25). Visualization of calpain activity using the Boc-LM-CMAC fluorescent substrate has also proved challenging even with rapid analyses that allow for detection of calcium transients, since the substrate appears to not be restricted spatially before or after cleavage. Despite these limitations, the data provide a model in which ERK activation of calpain is segregated by subcytoplasmic locale to dictate a specific outcome of cell signaling.

The ability to spatially localize specific signals broadens the range of cell responses from any one pleiotropic signaling element. ERK has two isoforms that are present throughout the cytoplasm and shuttle into the nucleus when activated. While it has been experimentally demonstrated only recently that nuclear localization of ERK is required for transcriptional changes and proliferation as predicted (1, 2), the role of ERK in other cellular locales has not been elucidated. Herein, we have shown that ERK attains a plasma membrane-proximal locale to activate calpain and contribute to growth factor-induced de-adhesion and cell motility. Since both ERK and calpain have been implicated in the competing cell responses of locomotion and proliferation (1, 4, 5, 41), the spatial segregation allows EGFR signaling to discriminate between these biological outcomes. Furthermore, the requirement for ERK to be active at the inner face of the plasma membrane, the locale of many putative targets, suggests that ERK and calpain may co-localize. This would suggest that ERK may directly activate M-calpain; in support of this, we have early preliminary data that suggest that direct phosphorylation of M-calpain by active ERK increases proteolytic activity. Thus, the operative element of EGFR-mediated de-adhesion may occur through a tightly spatially segregated multimeric complex.

Calpain also is involved in multiple cellular responses; the presence of two ubiquitous calpain isoforms suggests in itself that there may be many different roles for these proteins. Our studies have found that M-calpain (calpain-II) is preferentially activated by EGF stimulation and that it serves to regulate de-adhesive processes during motility. µ-Calpain (calpain-I) has been suggested to be active in integrin-mediated motility and also in cell spreading and lammelipodial formation (10, 42). Our current findings do not exclude this role for µ-calpain but suggest that M- and µ-calpain may play complementary roles in the motile cell. Differential activation and localization of not only protein, but activity, would therefore serve to regulate the adhesive and de-adhesive properties of the cell. µ-Calpain, which has a much lower calcium requirement in vitro, could be activated by integrin receptors forming adhesions at the leading edge or by stretch-activated calcium receptors (43), which can provide adequate local increases in calcium concentration. M-calpain, on the other hand, which has a millimolar requirement for calcium in vitro, would then be activated by ERK at sites of focal adhesion. The concerted action of these two proteases would present a mechanism by which the highly regulated motility machinery could be fine tuned during haptokinesis and chemokinesis.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Ian Reynolds, Hidenori Shiraha, and Jason Haugh for helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This study was supported by NIGMS, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Grant GM54739, a grant from the Department of Defense/Veterans Affairs Initiative on Combat Casualty (to A. W.), and NCI, NIH, Grant CA69213 (to D. A. L.), and the Austrian Fond SFB, F208.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology, 713 Scaife Hall, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Tel.: 412-647-7813; Fax: 412-647-8567; E-mail: wellsa@msx.upmc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M008847200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAP, microtubule-associated protein; MEK, MAP kinase/ERK kinase; TGF, transforming growth factor; DTAF, dichlorotriazinylaminofluorescein; Boc-LM-CMAC, t-Boc-L-leucyl-L-methionine-7-amino-4-chloromethyl coumarin amide; MEM, minimal essential medium; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; GFP, green fluorescent protein; WT, wild type; notx, mock-treated.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hochholdinger, F., Baier, G., Nogalo, A., Bauer, B., Grunicke, H. H., and Überall, F. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8052-8065
2. Brunet, A., Roux, D., Lenormand, P., Dowd, S., Keyse, S., and Pouyssegur, J. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 664-674
3. Lauffenburger, D. A., and Horwitz, A. F. (1996) Cell 84, 359-369
4. Xie, H., Pallero, M. A., Gupta, D., Chang, P., Ware, M. F., Witke, W., Kwiatkowski, D. J., Lauffenburger, D. A., Murphy-Ullrich, J. E., and Wells, A. (1998) J. Cell Science 111, 615-624
5. Glading, A., Chang, P., Lauffenburger, D. A., and Wells, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2390-2398
6. Shiraha, H., Gupta, K., Glading, A., and Wells, A. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 146, 243-253
7. Cooray, P., Yuan, Y., Schoenwaelder, S. M., Mitchell, C. A., Salem, H. H., and Jackson, S. P. (1996) Biochem. J. 318, 41-47
8. Mugumara, M., Nishimuta, S., Tomisaka, Y., Ito, T., and Matsumura, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 117, 1036-1042
9. Carragher, N. O., Levdau, B., Ross, R., and Raines, E. W. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 619-629
10. Potter, D. A., Tirnauer, J. S., Janssen, R., Croall, D. E., Hughes, C. N., Fiacco, K. A., Mier, J. W., Maki, M., and Herman, I. M. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 647-662
11. Tranqui, L., and Block, M. R. (1995) Exp. Cell Res. 217, 149-156
12. Pfaff, M., Xiaoping, D., and Ginsberg, M. (1999) FEBS Lett. 460, 17-22
13. Potts, A., Croall, D., and Hemler, M. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 212, 2-9
14. Croall, D. E., and McGrody, K. S. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 13223-13230
15. Santella, L., Kyozuka, K., Riso, L. D., and Carafoli, E. (1998) Cell Calcium 23, 123-130
16. Chua, B., Guo, K., and Li, P. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5131-5135
17. Utz, P., and Anderson, P. (2000) Cell Death Differ. 7, 589-602
18. Ariyoshi, H., Okahara, K., Sakon, M., Kambayashi, J., Kawashima, S., Kawasaki, T., and Monden, M. (1998) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 18, 493-498
19. Arthur, J., Elce, J., Hegadorn, C., Williams, K., and Greer, P. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 4474-4481
20. Ariyoshi, H., Shiba, E., Sakon, M., Kambayashi, J., Yoshida, K., Kawashima, S., and Mori, T. (1993) Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 30, 63-72
21. Michetti, M., Salamino, F., Tedesco, I., Averna, M., Minafra, R., Melloni, E., and Pontremoli, S. (1996) FEBS Lett. 392, 11-15
22. Kuboki, M., Ishii, H., and Kazama, M. (1987) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 929, 164-172
23. Pontremoli, S., Melloni, E., Sparatore, B., Salamino, F., Michetti, M., Sacco, O., and Horecker, B. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 128, 331-338
24. Zhao, X., Posmantur, R., Kampfl, A., Liu, S., Wang, K., Newcomb, J., Pike, B., Clifton, G., and Hayes, R. (1998) J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 18, 161-167
25. Beckerle, M. C., Burridge, K., DeMartino, G. N., and Croall, D. E. (1987) Cell 51, 569-577
26. Kulkarni, S., Saido, T. C., Suzuki, K., and Fox, J. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21265-21275
27. Bialkowska, K., Kulkarni, S., Du, X., Goll, D. E., Saido, T. C., and Fox, J. E. B. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 151, 685-695
28. Haugh, J. M., Schooler, K., Wells, A., Wiley, H. S., and Lauffenburger, D. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8958-8965
29. Haugh, J. M., Huang, A. C., Wiley, H. S., Wells, A., and Lauffenburger, D. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34350-34360
30. Groom, L., Sneddon, A., Alessi, D., Dowd, S., and Keyse, S. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 3621-3632
31. Chen, P., Gupta, K., and Wells, A. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 547-555
32. Wells, A., Welsh, J. B., Lazar, C. S., Wiley, H. S., Gill, G. N., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1990) Science 247, 962-964
33. Tompa, P., Schad, E., Baki, A., Alexa, A., Batke, J., and Friedrich, P. (1995) Anal. Biochem. 228, 287-293
34. Haigler, H. T., Maxfield, F. R., Willingham, M. C., and Pastan, I. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 1239-1241
35. Rosser, B. G., Powers, S. P., and Gores, G. J. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23593-23600
36. Wells, A., Gupta, K., Chang, P., Swindle, S., Glading, A., and Shiraha, H. (1998) Microsc. Res. Technique 43, 395-411
37. Hamakubo, T., Kannagi, R., Murachi, T., and Matus, A. (1986) J. Neurosci. 6, 3103-3111
38. Kitahara, A., Ohtsuki, H., Kirahata, Y., Yamagata, Y., Takano, E., Kanagi, R., and Murachi, T. (1985) FEBS Lett. 184, 120-124
39. Kitahara, A., Takano, E., Ohtsuki, H., Kirahata, Y., Yamagata, Y., Kanagi, R., and Murachi, T. (1986) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 63, 343-348
40. Yoshimura, N., Hatanaka, M., Kitahara, A., Kawaguchi, N., and Murachi, T. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 9847-9852
41. Klemke, R. L., Cai, S., Giannini, A. L., Gallagher, P. J., deLanerolle, P., and Cheresh, D. A. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 481-492
42. Huttenlocher, A., Palecek, S. P., Lu, Q., Zhang, W., Mellgren, R. L., Lauffenburger, D. A., Ginsburg, M. H., and Horwitz, A. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32719-32722
43. Lee, J., Ishihara, A., Oxford, G., Johnson, B., and Jacobson, K. (1999) Nature 400, 382-386


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
B. Casar, I. Arozarena, V. Sanz-Moreno, A. Pinto, L. Agudo-Ibanez, R. Marais, R. E. Lewis, M. T. Berciano, and P. Crespo
Ras Subcellular Localization Defines Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1 and 2 Substrate Specificity through Distinct Utilization of Scaffold Proteins
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2009; 29(5): 1338 - 1353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
H. Wang, V. Patel, H. Miyazaki, J.S. Gutkind, and W.A. Yeudall
Role for EPS8 in squamous carcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2009; 30(1): 165 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
S. D. Smith, Z. M. Jaffer, J. Chernoff, and A. J. Ridley
PAK1-mediated activation of ERK1/2 regulates lamellipodial dynamics
J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2008; 121(22): 3729 - 3736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. R. Sprague, T. S. Fraley, H. S. Jang, S. Lal, and J. A. Greenwood
Phosphoinositide Binding to the Substrate Regulates Susceptibility to Proteolysis by Calpain
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2008; 283(14): 9217 - 9223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. Badowski, G. Pawlak, A. Grichine, A. Chabadel, C. Oddou, P. Jurdic, M. Pfaff, C. Albiges-Rizo, and M. R. Block
Paxillin Phosphorylation Controls Invadopodia/Podosomes Spatiotemporal Organization
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2008; 19(2): 633 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
E. J. Joslin, L. K. Opresko, A. Wells, H. S. Wiley, and D. A. Lauffenburger
EGF-receptor-mediated mammary epithelial cell migration is driven by sustained ERK signaling from autocrine stimulation
J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2007; 120(20): 3688 - 3699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
T. Miyazaki, K. Honda, and H. Ohata
Requirement of Ca2+ influx- and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-mediated m-calpain activity for shear stress-induced endothelial cell polarity
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): C1216 - C1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
P. A. Nuzzi, M. A. Senetar, and A. Huttenlocher
Asymmetric Localization of Calpain 2 during Neutrophil Chemotaxis
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2007; 18(3): 795 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Xu and X. Deng
Suppression of Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion by Protein Phosphatase 2A through Dephosphorylation of {micro}- and m-Calpains
J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 35567 - 35575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Shao, J. Chou, C. J. Baty, N. A. Burke, S. C. Watkins, D. B. Stolz, and A. Wells
Spatial Localization of m-Calpain to the Plasma Membrane by Phosphoinositide Biphosphate Binding during Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated Activation.
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(14): 5481 - 5496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
A. Tomas, B. Yermen, L. Min, J. E. Pessin, and P. A. Halban
Regulation of pancreatic {beta}-cell insulin secretion by actin cytoskeleton remodelling: role of gelsolin and cooperation with the MAPK signalling pathway
J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2006; 119(10): 2156 - 2167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L.-T. Su, M. A. Agapito, M. Li, W. T. N. Simonson, A. Huttenlocher, R. Habas, L. Yue, and L. W. Runnels
TRPM7 Regulates Cell Adhesion by Controlling the Calcium-dependent Protease Calpain
J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2006; 281(16): 11260 - 11270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Marzia, R. Chiusaroli, L. Neff, N.-Y. Kim, A. H. Chishti, R. Baron, and W. C. Horne
Calpain Is Required for Normal Osteoclast Function and Is Down-regulated by Calcitonin
J. Biol. Chem., April 7, 2006; 281(14): 9745 - 9754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Xu and X. Deng
Protein Kinase C{iota} Promotes Nicotine-induced Migration and Invasion of Cancer Cells via Phosphorylation of {micro}- and m-Calpains
J. Biol. Chem., February 17, 2006; 281(7): 4457 - 4466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
S. J. Franco and A. Huttenlocher
Regulating cell migration: calpains make the cut
J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2005; 118(17): 3829 - 3838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Parnaud, E. Hammar, D. G. Rouiller, and D. Bosco
Inhibition of calpain blocks pancreatic {beta}-cell spreading and insulin secretion
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2005; 289(2): E313 - E321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Yin, Q. Zheng, C. Yan, and B. C. Berk
GIT1 Is a Scaffold for ERK1/2 Activation in Focal Adhesions
J. Biol. Chem., July 29, 2005; 280(30): 27705 - 27712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Pullikuth, E. McKinnon, H.-J. Schaeffer, and A. D. Catling
The MEK1 Scaffolding Protein MP1 Regulates Cell Spreading by Integrating PAK1 and Rho Signals
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2005; 25(12): 5119 - 5133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Zatz and A. Starling
Calpains and Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., June 9, 2005; 352(23): 2413 - 2423.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
K. Ehrenreiter, D. Piazzolla, V. Velamoor, I. Sobczak, J. V. Small, J. Takeda, T. Leung, and M. Baccarini
Raf-1 regulates Rho signaling and cell migration
J. Cell Biol., March 14, 2005; 168(6): 955 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
L. Satish, H. C. Blair, A. Glading, and A. Wells
Interferon-Inducible Protein 9 (CXCL11)-Induced Cell Motility in Keratinocytes Requires Calcium Flux-Dependent Activation of {micro}-Calpain
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2005; 25(5): 1922 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. S. Hendriks, G. Orr, A. Wells, H. S. Wiley, and D. A. Lauffenburger
Parsing ERK Activation Reveals Quantitatively Equivalent Contributions from Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and HER2 in Human Mammary Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 6157 - 6169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Xu and X. Deng
Tobacco-specific Nitrosamine 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone Induces Phosphorylation of {micro}- and m-Calpain in Association with Increased Secretion, Cell Migration, and Invasion
J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53683 - 53690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
K. Sato, S. Hattori, S. Irie, H. Sorimachi, M. Inomata, and S. Kawashima
Degradation of Fodrin by m-Calpain in Fibroblasts Adhering to Fibrillar Collagen I Gel
J. Biochem., December 1, 2004; 136(6): 777 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. Inserte, D. Garcia-Dorado, M. Ruiz-Meana, L. Agullo, P. Pina, and J. Soler-Soler
Ischemic preconditioning attenuates calpain-mediated degradation of structural proteins through a protein kinase A-dependent mechanism
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2004; 64(1): 105 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Ajenjo, E. Canon, I. Sanchez-Perez, D. Matallanas, J. Leon, R. Perona, and P. Crespo
Subcellular Localization Determines the Protective Effects of Activated ERK2 against Distinct Apoptogenic Stimuli in Myeloid Leukemia Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32813 - 32823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. T. Eblen, J. K. Slack-Davis, A. Tarcsafalvi, J. T. Parsons, M. J. Weber, and A. D. Catling
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Feedback Phosphorylation Regulates MEK1 Complex Formation and Activation during Cellular Adhesion
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2004; 24(6): 2308 - 2317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Glading, R. J. Bodnar, I. J. Reynolds, H. Shiraha, L. Satish, D. A. Potter, H. C. Blair, and A. Wells
Epidermal Growth Factor Activates m-Calpain (Calpain II), at Least in Part, by Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase-Mediated Phosphorylation
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2004; 24(6): 2499 - 2512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Kifor, I. Kifor, F. D. Moore Jr., R. R. Butters Jr., and E. M. Brown
m-Calpain Colocalizes with the Calcium-sensing Receptor (CaR) in Caveolae in Parathyroid Cells and Participates in Degradation of the CaR
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 31167 - 31176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Mamoune, J.-H. Luo, D. A. Lauffenburger, and A. Wells
Calpain-2 as a Target for Limiting Prostate Cancer Invasion
Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 63(15): 4632 - 4640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
D. E. GOLL, V. F. THOMPSON, H. LI, W. WEI, and J. CONG
The Calpain System
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2003; 83(3): 731 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. K. Wong, H. H. Le, A. Zsarnovszky, and S. M. Belcher
Estrogens and ICI182,780 (Faslodex) Modulate Mitosis and Cell Death in Immature Cerebellar Neurons via Rapid Activation of p44/p42 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2003; 23(12): 4984 - 4995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
S. M. Carlin, M. Roth, and J. L. Black
Urokinase potentiates PDGF-induced chemotaxis of human airway smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): L1020 - L1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. A. Lokuta, P. A. Nuzzi, and A. Huttenlocher
Calpain regulates neutrophil chemotaxis
PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 4006 - 4011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Delmas, N. Aragou, S. Poussard, P. Cottin, J.-M. Darbon, and S. Manenti
MAP Kinase-dependent Degradation of p27Kip1 by Calpains in Choroidal Melanoma Cells. REQUIREMENT OF p27Kip1 NUCLEAR EXPORT
J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2003; 278(14): 12443 - 12451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. S. Hendriks, L. K. Opresko, H. S. Wiley, and D. Lauffenburger
Coregulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Levels and Locations: Quantitative Analysis of HER2 Overexpression Effects
Cancer Res., March 1, 2003; 63(5): 1130 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
J. M. Haugh
Localization of Receptor-Mediated Signal Transduction Pathways: The Inside Story
Mol. Interv., September 1, 2002; 2(5): 292 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Shiraha, A. Glading, J. Chou, Z. Jia, and A. Wells
Activation of m-Calpain (Calpain II) by Epidermal Growth Factor Is Limited by Protein Kinase A Phosphorylation of m-Calpain
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2002; 22(8): 2716 - 2727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. A. Barbieri, C. M. Heath, E. M. Peters, A. Wells, J. N. Davis, and P. D. Stahl
Phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-Kinase-1beta Is Essential for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-mediated Endocytosis
J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2001; 276(50): 47212 - 47216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
G. Maheshwari, H. S. Wiley, and D. A. Lauffenburger
Autocrine epidermal growth factor signaling stimulates directionally persistent mammary epithelial cell migration
J. Cell Biol., December 24, 2001; 155(7): 1123 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/26/23341    most recent
M008847200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glading, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glading, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement