|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102965200 on April 16, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 26, 23525-23530, June 29, 2001
Functional Mapping of Destabilizing Elements in the
Protein-coding Region of the Drosophila fushi tarazu
mRNA*
Jun-itsu
Ito and
Marcelo
Jacobs-Lorena
From the Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine,
Department of Genetics, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4955
Received for publication, April 4, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The instability of the fushi tarazu
(ftz) mRNA is essential for the proper development of
the Drosophila embryo. Previously, we identified a
201-nucleotide instability element (FIE3) in the 3' untranslated region
(UTR) of the ftz mRNA. Here we report on the
identification of two additional elements in the protein-coding region
of the message: the 63-nucleotide-long FIE5-1 and the
69-nucleotide-long FIE5-2. The function of both elements was
position-dependent; the same elements destabilized
RNAs when present within the coding region but did not when embedded in
the 3' UTR of the hybrid mRNAs. We conclude that ftz
mRNA has three redundant instability elements, two in the
protein-coding region and one in the 3' UTR. Although each instability
element is sufficient to destabilize a heterologous mRNA, the
destabilizing activity of the two 5'-elements depended on their
position within the message.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Drosophila embryonic development depends on the precise
temporal and spatial expression of maternal and zygotic pattern-forming genes (1). Maternal pattern-forming genes are transcribed during oogenesis, and their mRNA abundance decreases rapidly in the early embryo. Moreover, many mRNAs encoded by zygotic pattern-forming genes undergo dramatic changes in abundance and spatial distribution during early embryogenesis. To achieve these rapid changes, especially for rapid down-regulation, transcriptional control alone is
insufficient, and regulation at the level of mRNA stability is
essential. For instance, the maternal bicoid mRNA is
completely stable during the first 2 h of embryogenesis but is
rapidly destabilized at cellularization of the blastoderm (2). As
discussed in the following text, the zygotic fushi tarazu
(ftz) mRNA is one of the most unstable eukaryotic
mRNAs known. Given that most mRNAs in the Drosophila
embryo are constitutively stable (30), the question arises how selected
mRNAs in the same embryo cytoplasm are targeted for degradation.
Recognition of the targeted RNAs by the RNA degrading machinery must
involve cis-acting sequences. These sequences are the focus of the
present study.
ftz is a member of the pair-rule class of segmentation genes
and one of the best characterized early zygotic genes. In early embryos
ftz mRNA is detected only from about 1.5 to 4.5 h
after fertilization. When first expressed, ftz mRNA is
uniformly distributed through the embryo (4). As development
progresses, its distribution first becomes restricted to a region
comprising from 15 to 65% of egg length, then to four broad bands, and
finally to seven narrow stripes that encircle the embryo (4-6). The
seven stripes are short-lived, and no ftz mRNA is
detected by 5 h after fertilization. This rapid change of
expression pattern and formation of stripes in a short time span can be
attributed to the termination of transcription in interstripe regions
coupled with rapid mRNA turnover. The need for rapid mRNA
turnover is emphasized by the fact that the FTZ protein activates its
own transcription in a positive feedback loop (7). Thus, it is
important during the evolution of the spatial pattern of ftz
expression that both mRNA and protein be rapidly cleared from the
interstripe regions. Edgar et al. (8) measured ftz mRNA
stability in embryos and found that its half-life changes from 14 min
at 2.5 h to 6 min at 4 h after fertilization. This makes
ftz mRNA one of the shortest-lived mRNAs among
higher eukaryotes (3). Stabilization of ftz mRNA and FTZ
protein results in developmental delay and defects, suggesting that
ftz mRNA and FTZ protein instability are crucial for
normal development (9-11).
Earlier studies from this laboratory using hybrid genes that fuse
ftz sequences to the stable ribosomal protein A1
(rpA1) mRNA provided evidence for at least two
destabilizing elements in ftz mRNA (12). One consisted
of a 201-nucleotide element, including an essential 68-nucleotide
sequence, located in the 3'
UTR1 and termed FIE3
(ftz instability
element 3'). The other element(s) were assigned to the
5'-one-third of the ftz mRNA but remained otherwise
uncharacterized. Here we report on the identification of two separate
5'-instability elements within the first 600 nucleotides of the
ftz mRNA. Both 5'-elements are located within the
protein-coding region of the message. Each 5'-instability element is
sufficient to destabilize the stable rpA1 mRNA, but the
destabilizing activity is dependent on their position within the mRNA.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Construction of Transgenes
The first letter of the name of each construct designates
the promoter that drives it. Thus, F = ftz, r = rpA1, and S = sgs-3 promoter attached to the
hsp26 nurse cell enhancer.
Discrepancies in the ftz Nucleotide Sequence
Numbering in the following text uses +1 as the position of
transcription initiation, which corresponds to position 901 in the
sequence deposited in GenBankTM (accession numbers X00854
and K01951). We found that ftz genomic clone A439
(13) had a nine-nucleotide deletion in the protein-coding region (from
260 to 268) when compared with the sequence deposited in the data base.
To resolve this discrepancy, the ftz 5'-region was amplified
by PCR using DNA from yellow-white flies, the recipient
strain for P-element transformation. Sequencing revealed that the same
nine nucleotides were missing. Moreover, with the exception of the
nine-base deletion and four one-base polymorphisms (C instead of T at
126 and 222, C instead of A at 516, and G instead of C at 551), the
sequence of the entire 5'-one-third of the ftz mRNA
(from 1 to 636) matched the sequence deposited in
GenBankTM.
Ff5r3 and Rr5f3 (see Fig. 1A)
These hybrid genes were reported previously (12). Briefly, the
7.9-kb KpnI-SalI fragment (Ff5) and the 4.0-kb
SalI-KpnI fragment (f3) were obtained from the
ftz genomic clone A439 (13). The 1.1-kb
BamHI-SalI fragment (Rr5) and the 1.3-kb
SalI-BamHI fragment (r3) were obtained from the
plasmid pD5 (14) that contained the 2.4-kb BamHI fragment of
the rpA1 gene. Each fragment of ftz and the
rpA1 gene was combined reciprocally and subcloned into pGEM3
(Promega).
Fftz+aldB and Fftz+aldB-FIE3 (see Fig. 1B)
The 0.7-kb fragment (from 856 to 1557, where +1 is the
transcription initiation site) of rat aldolase B
(aldB) cDNA (15) was synthesized by PCR with primers
ald1 and ald2 (Table I). This PCR
fragment contained the 3'-one-third of the protein-coding region and
entire 3' UTR of the aldB cDNA, including the
polyadenylation signal (16), provided by the primer ald2. The PCR
fragment was cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega), digested
with EcoRI, and inserted into the EcoRI site of
the 3' UTR of f3. In turn, this f3+aldB fragment was fused to Ff5 to
produce Fftz+aldB. A f3-FIE3 fragment that lacks the 201-base pair FIE3
sequence was obtained as previously described (12). Fftz+aldB-FIE3 was
constructed as described for Fftz+aldB, except that f3-FIE3 was used
instead of f3.
Deletion Constructs
Rr Constructs (see Fig. 1C)--
The PCR products synthesized
from Ff5r3 with primers 1 and 2, 1 and 4, and 3 and 2 (Table I) were
digested with NgoMI and inserted into the NgoMI
site in the 3' UTR of the rpA1 gene in plasmid pD5. They
were named Rr-abc, Rr-ab, and Rr-bc, respectively.
Ss Constructs (see Fig. 1D)--
PCR products were synthesized
with the following primers (Table I): Ss-abc, primers 5 and 6; Ss-ab,
primers 5 and 8; Ss-bc, primers 7 and 6; Ss-a, primers 5 and 10; Ss-b,
primers 7 and 8; Ss-c, primers 9 and 6; Ss-b1, primers 7 and 12; Ss-b2,
primers 11 and 8; Ss-b3, primers 15 and 16; Ss-c1, primers 9 and 14;
Ss-c2, primers 13 and 6; Ss-c3, primers 9 and 18; Ss-c4, primers 13 and 14; Ss-c5, primers 17 and 6. For PCR fragments that lacked a
translation initiation site, s-bc, b, c, b1-3, and c1-5, a seven-base
sequence (GATATGG) was provided by the primer to obtain the same
efficient translation initiation site as intact ftz mRNA
(17, 18). The PCR products were fused to r3. All constructs were
sequenced to confirm that the PCR fragments had no errors and that the
reading frame was maintained.
P-element-mediated Transformation
Constructs Rr-abc, ab, bc, Fftz+aldB, and Fftz+aldB-FIE3 were
introduced into CaSpeR vector (19). To provide Ss constructs with a
promoter, they were introduced into the CaSpeR4/GERM4 vector (2), which
contained CaSpeR, polylinker from Gehring's pW8, a nurse cell-specific
enhancer from the heat shock 26 gene hsp26, and the sgs3
promoter. All constructs (500 µg/ml) were mixed with the phs-
helper (20) (100 µg/ml) and injected into yellow-white mutant embryos (19, 21).
Synchronized Embryo Collections
Embryos were collected on fresh yeast plates at 25 °C for
1 h and left at 25 °C to age for different lengths of time.
Embryos were collected, washed with embryo washing buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5), frozen
in liquid nitrogen, and kept at 80 °C. Embryo developmental
synchrony was checked by staging an aliquot of each collection at 2-3
h of development. Collections containing more than 10% older embryos
(retained) or unfertilized eggs were discarded.
RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Hybridization Total RNA
was isolated from frozen embryos by homogenization in TRI
REAGENT (Molecular Research Center, Inc.) following the manufacturer's
recommendations. Northern blot analysis was performed as previously
described (22). Briefly, 10 µg of total RNA was fractionated by
electrophoresis in 1-2% agarose gels containing 18% formaldehyde,
and RNA was transferred to a Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) (23). The RNAs were fixed to the membrane by UV cross-linking
and hybridized with -32P-labeled probes synthesized by
random primer labeling. For hybridization with a different probe, the
membrane was boiled 5 min to remove the first probe, following the
manufacturer's recommendations. The plasmid pD5, containing the
rpA1 gene, Ff5, and f3 were used to prepare probes for
Northern blot hybridization. Estimates of the half-life of mRNAs
were obtained from the quantification of the radioactive signal with
the Molecular Imager system (Bio-Rad). For each transgenic strain,
Northern blot hybridization was repeated at least three times with RNA
from separate embryo collections.
 |
RESULTS |
Rationale--
The stability of transgenic mRNAs in developing
embryos was measured by a strategy previously developed for this
purpose (12). The critical feature is the use of promoters that are
strongly expressed during oogenesis but silent in early embryogenesis. The two promoters used in this study are rpA1 (14) and
hsp26/sgs3 (24, 25). The latter promoter contains
the nurse cell-specific enhancer from the hsp26 gene linked
to the basal sgs3 promoter. Another key feature is that the
ftz mRNA is stable in ovaries and is destabilized at
fertilization.2 As a
consequence, transcripts containing ftz sequences accumulate to high abundance during oogenesis and start decaying when the egg is
fertilized.2 Because the rpA1 and
hsp26/sgs3 promoters are silent in early embryos,
decay of transgenic mRNA abundance (as measured by Northern blot
analysis) serves as a direct measure of mRNA stability. This strategy avoids the use of drugs that may cause artifacts (27). The
rpA1 mRNA is stable in both ovaries and embryos and
served as an internal loading control.
The ftz mRNA Contains Multiple RNA-destabilizing
Sequences--
In an earlier study (12), the stability of the
5'-one-third (here called f5; nucleotides 1-636) and the 3'-two-thirds
(here called f3) of the ftz mRNA was investigated
separately. One of these fragments (f5) was fused to the 3'-two-thirds
(r3) and the other (f3) to the 5'-one-third (r5) of the stable
rpA1 mRNA to yield the Ff5r3 and Rr5f3 hybrid mRNAs,
respectively (Fig. 1A). Both
hybrid transcripts were unstable (Fig.
2A). Rr5f3 is transcribed maternally, and its mRNA decayed rapidly after fertilization. Ff5r3
is transcribed only transiently from the ftz promoter during early embryogenesis, and its rapid decay after 4 h of development (compare 3-4 h and 4-5 h in Fig. 2A) indicates that this
mRNA is highly unstable. We concluded that in addition to the
previously characterized 201-nucleotide FIE3 in the 3' UTR, the
5'-one-third of the ftz mRNA also contains destabilizing
sequences.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Summary of constructs used to identify
ftz mRNA instability elements. The first
letter in the construct name identifies the promoter: R for
rpA1, F for ftz, and S for
hsp26/sgs3 (cf. "Experimental
Procedures"). mRNA stability in transgenic embryos is indicated
to the right. A, stability of reciprocal hybrid
mRNAs containing ftz and rpA1 sequences.
Rr5f3 has the 5'-one-third of the rpA1 gene, including the
promoter region, and the 3'-two-thirds of the ftz gene,
including the 3'-flanking region. Ff5r3 has the 5'-one-third of the
ftz gene, including the promoter region, and the
3'-two-thirds of the rpA1 gene. B, deletion of
the ftz 3'-instability element (FIE3). Both constructs are
driven by the ftz promoter and have a rat aldolase
B (aldB) tag to allow the transcripts to be
distinguished from the endogenous ftz mRNA. Note that
the second construct lacks FIE3. C, overlapping deletions of
the 5'-one-third of the ftz mRNA inserted into the
rpA1 3' UTR. The first construct, with an FIE3 insert,
summarizes the results of a previous study (12). The next three
constructs contain the first 636 nucleotides of the ftz
mRNA (or deletions thereof) inserted into the same position of the
rpA1 3' UTR. D, overlapping deletions of the
5'-one-third of the ftz mRNA, driven by the
hsp26/sgs3 promoter. The promoter contains the
nurse cell-specific hsp26 enhancer upstream of the
sgs3 basic promoter. Each transcript contains 41 nucleotides
of sgs3 followed by 5'-ftz sequences fused in
frame to 3'-rpA1 mRNA sequences. For constructs lacking
the ftz translation initiation site, a six-base pair
sequence containing an ATG was added to confer similar translational
efficiency (cf. "Experimental Procedures").
Horizontal lines, untranslated regions; V, intron;
open boxes, ftz protein-coding regions;
closed boxes, rpA1 protein-coding regions;
stippled boxes, aldB protein-coding region; boxes with
vertical lines, rpA1 promoter region; boxes with
partial black shading, ftz promoter region; boxes
with diagonal lines, sgs3 promoter region. Promoter
regions are not drawn to scale.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Evidence for destabilizing elements in the
5'-region of the ftz mRNA. Each construct was
transformed into the Drosophila germ line. Total RNAs from
synchronized embryos were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization with
ftz and rpA1 probes. The structure of each
construct is illustrated next to its name. Embryo age ranges (in h) are
indicated below the autoradiograms. The rpA1 mRNA served
as a loading control. A, hybrid
ftz/rpA1 mRNAs. The r5f3 construct is driven
by the rpA1 promoter, and the f5r3 construct is driven by
the ftz promoter. mRNA sizes are as follows:
ftz, 1.8 kb; r5f3, 1.4 kb; f5r3, 0.6 kb; rpA1, 0.6 kb.
B, deletion of the FIE3 sequences from the ftz
mRNA. A 700-nucleotide rat aldolase B fragment was inserted in the
ftz 3' UTR to distinguish the transgenic mRNA from the
endogenous ftz mRNA. The second construct differs from
the first by the absence of the 201-nucleotide FIE3 element. Both
constructs are driven by the ftz promoter. mRNA sizes:
ftz+aldB, 2.5 kb; and ftz+aldB-FIE3, 2.3 kb.
|
|
The Fftz+ald-FIE3 construct provided further evidence for the presence
of RNA-destabilizing sequences in f5. This construct consisted of a
deletion of FIE3 from the intact ftz mRNA (Fig. 1B). This construct also contained a rat aldolase
B mRNA (aldB) tag, to allow the transgenic mRNA
to be distinguished on Northern blots from the endogenous
ftz transcript. To verify that insertion of the aldolase tag
does not affect ftz mRNA stability, a control construct
(Fftz+ald; Fig. 1B) containing the intact ftz
mRNA tagged with the aldB fragment was analyzed in parallel. As
shown in Fig. 2B, both constructs were unstable in
Drosophila embryos, indicating that ftz mRNA
contains instability elements other than FIE3. The destabilizing
element of f3 is FIE3 (12). The identification and characterization of
the f5-destabilizing sequences (termed FIE5) was the object of this study.
The Destabilizing Activity of FIE5 Is
Position-dependent--
Previously, we have inserted FIE3
into the 3' UTR of the stable rpA1 gene to demonstrate that
this element is sufficient for mRNA destabilization (12). We
created similar constructs to investigate whether FIE5 is also
sufficient for RNA destabilization. The entire f5 sequence (1),
the 5'-two-thirds (1), and the 3'-two-thirds (211) were
inserted into the 3' UTR of rpA1 to yield constructs Rr-abc,
Rr-ab, and Rr-bc, respectively (Fig. 1C). Transcription in
all constructs was driven by the rpA1 promoter.
Surprisingly, the resulting three transcripts were stable in transgenic
embryos (Fig. 3). These results suggest
that FIE5 destabilizing activity is position-dependent and
that unlike FIE3, FIE5 is not functional when located in the 3'
UTR.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
First generation deletion constructs for the
identification of ftz 5'-instability elements
(FIE5s). The entire 5'-one-third of the ftz mRNA
(r-abc, 636 nucleotides) or deletions thereof (r-ab and r-bc) were
inserted into the 3' UTR of the rpA1 mRNA. All
constructs are driven by the rpA1 promoter. mRNA sizes
are as follows: r-abc, 1.2 kb; r-ab, 1.0 kb; r-bc, 1.0 kb; and rpA1,
0.6 kb. Additional information can be found in the legend to Fig.
2.
|
|
Initial Mapping of the 5'-Destabilizing Sequences--
Next, we
initiated a deletion analysis by placing the f5 fragment at its
original position 5' of the rpA1 sequences. Construct Ss-abc
contained the whole f5 sequence (from 1 to 636), Ss-ab contained the
5'-two-thirds (from 1 to 423), and Ss-bc contained the 3'-two-thirds
(from 217 to 636) (Fig. 1D). All transcripts decayed rapidly
during early embryogenesis (Fig. 4).
These results suggest that FIE5 destabilizing sequences are likely to
be present in the Ss-ab/Ss-bc overlap region. Alternatively, more than
one destabilizing sequence may occur within f5. The results also
indicate that the maternal hsp26/sgs3 promoter
can be used for measurement of mRNA stability despite the presence
of 41 additional sgs3-encoded nucleotides at the 5'-end of
all transcripts driven by this promoter. Separate experiments showed
that these 41 nucleotides contain no destabilizing sequences
(cf. constructs Ss-a, Ss-b2, Ss-c3, and Ss-c5).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Second generation deletion constructs for the
identification of FIE5s. s-abc, s-ab, and s-bc mRNAs are
similar to those described in the legend to Fig. 3 except that
5'-ftz sequences were fused in frame with 3'-rpA1
sequences. A translation initiation site was added at the beginning of
the translated sequence of the s-bc mRNA. All constructs are driven
by the hsp26/sgs3 nurse cell-specific promoter.
mRNA sizes are as follows: s-abc, 1.1 kb; s-ab, 0.9 kb; s-bc, 0.9 kb; s-abc+G, 1.1 kb; and rpA1, 0.6 kb. Additional information can be
found in the legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
Deletion Analysis Identifies Two Separate Destabilizing Elements in
the 5'-Coding Region--
A second generation of constructs placed
each third of f5 next to 5'-rpA1 sequences (Ss-a, Ss-b, and
Ss-c; Fig. 1D). As shown in Fig.
5, s-a mRNA was stable, whereas s-b
and s-c mRNAs decayed rapidly during early embryogenesis. These
results suggest that f5 has at least two destabilizing elements, one
(FIE5-1) within fragment b (from 217 to 423) and the other (FIE5-2)
within fragment c (from 406 to 636). Each element is sufficient for
destabilization of an otherwise stable mRNA, and both elements are
located in the protein-coding region of ftz mRNA.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Third generation deletion mutants for the
identification of FIE5s. The s-a, s-b, and s-c constructs contain
the 5'-one-third, the middle-one-third, and the 3'-one-third of f5,
respectively. A translation initiation site was added to all
constructs. All constructs are driven by the
hsp26/sgs3 nurse cell-specific promoter. mRNA
sizes are as follows: s-a, 0.7 kb; s-b, 0.7 kb; s-c, 0.7 kb;
rpA1, 0.6 kb. Additional information can be found in the
legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
Further Mapping of FIE5-1--
Additional deletion constructs
(Ss-b1 to Ss-b3; Fig. 1D) were generated to further map
FIE5-1. Initial analysis of embryos carrying two overlapping
constructs, Ss-b1 and Ss-b2, indicated that the s-b1 mRNA was
unstable whereas s-b2 mRNA was stable (Fig. 6). These results suggested that FIE5-1
is located in a region of Ss-b1 (250) that does not overlap with
the two stable sequences, SS-a and SS-b2 (Fig. 1D). This
assumption was confirmed with a third construct, Ss-b3 (235),
which encodes an unstable mRNA (Fig. 6). Thus, FIE5-1 is located
within a 63-nucleotide sequence of the ftz protein-coding
region (the stated length takes into account that our construct and
yellow-white flies have nine fewer nucleotides than the
sequence deposited in the data base; cf. "Experimental Procedures").

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Fourth generation deletion mutants for the
mapping of FIE5-1. A translation initiation site was added to all
constructs. All constructs are driven by the
hsp26/sgs3 nurse cell-specific promoter. mRNA
sizes are as follows: s-b1, 0.6 kb; s-b2, 0.6 kb; s-b3, 0.5 kb;
rpA1, 0.6 kb. Additional information can be found in the
legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
Further Mapping of FIE5-2--
Additional deletion constructs
(Ss-c1 to Ss-c5; Fig. 1D) were also generated to further map
FIE5-2. As shown in Fig. 7, the s-c1 and
s-c2 mRNAs were both unstable in early embryos, indicating that an
instability element is located in the region of overlap or that
multiple instability elements are located in ftz fragment c.
To clarify these issues, three more constructs (Ss-c3 to Ss-c5; Fig.
1D) were analyzed. Of the three constructs, only Ss-c4 (from 520 to 588) encoded an unstable mRNA (Fig. 7), indicating that FIE5-2 must reside within this 69-nucleotide region. In some
experiments, the s-c3 mRNA was observed to decline slightly from
0-1 to 1-2 h but remained stable during the remaining time points
(data not shown).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Fourth generation deletion mutants for the
mapping of FIE5-2. A translation initiation site was added to all
constructs. All constructs are driven by the
hsp26/sgs3 nurse cell-specific promoter. mRNA
sizes are as follows: s-c1, 0.6 kb; s-c2, 0.6 kb; s-c3, 0.6 kb; s-c4,
0.5 kb; s-c5, 0.5 kb; rpA1, 0.6 kb. Additional information
can be found in the legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In an earlier study (12), we developed a new method for the
in vivo analysis of mRNA stability in early
Drosophila embryos that does not require the use of drugs or
any experimental interference. This method led to the identification of
a mRNA-destabilizing element (FIE3) in the ftz 3' UTR.
In this work the method was used to identify two additional instability
elements, both in the 5'-protein-coding region. Hence, ftz
mRNA has three redundant destabilizing elements, each of which is
sufficient to promote mRNA degradation in early embryos. Although
the significance of the occurrence of three redundant elements in the
same message can only be speculated on, redundancy may be tied to the
fact that ftz mRNA instability is crucial for normal
embryonic development (see the Introduction).
The half-life of a hybrid mRNA containing FIE3 was previously
estimated to be about 50 min (12). In this study we estimated the
half-life of the FIE5-1-containing s-b mRNA and the
FIE5-2-containing s-c mRNA to be about 51 and 65 min,
respectively.3 Thus, each
element appears to have similar "strength." Each element can act
independently, and we found no evidence that the destabilizing activity
of these elements is additive or synergistic. The estimated half-lives
cited above are significantly longer than the 14-6-min half-life reported previously for the endogenous ftz
mRNA (8). One reason for this difference may be that our
measurements started early during embryonic development (from
fertilization to 4 h), whereas endogenous ftz
transcription occurs between 1.5 and ~4.5 h. The gradual decrease of
ftz mRNA half-life from 14 to 6 min between 2.5 and 4 h of development (8) suggests that degrading activity
increases as embryonic development progresses. Thus, the degrading
activity may be low at the very beginning of embryogenesis. Another
conceivable reason for the difference in estimated half-lives might be
the cytoplasmic localization of the mRNAs (28, 29). Endogenous
ftz mRNA is located in the apical cytoplasm, whereas the
distribution of the hybrid mRNAs in the transgenic embryos is
unknown (30). Apical localization requires the last 53 nucleotides of
the ftz 3' UTR (31, 32), 43 nucleotides of which overlap with FIE3. Deletion of FIE3 (which comprises most of the apical localization sequence) in ftz+aldB-FIE3 did not seem to substantially affect stability when compared with the FIE3-containing ftz+aldB mRNA, suggesting that mRNA stability and localization are
independent of each other.
The r-abc and s-abc mRNAs both contain the identical
5'-ftz sequence; yet their stability in the early embryo
differs dramatically. The main difference between the two mRNAs is
the position of the ftz sequences within the mRNA: in
the 3' UTR for r-abc and in the original 5'-position for s-abc.
Therefore, the structure and sequence of the RNA elements are not
sufficient for destabilizing activity, and position within the mRNA
is crucial. Note that when FIE3 was inserted at the same position in
the rpA1 3' UTR as were the FIE5s in r-abc, FIE3 had full
destabilizing activity. Thus, FIE3 is active, and FIE5s are inactive
when inserted at the identical position of the rpA1
mRNA. These results suggest that FIE5s and FIE3 destabilize
mRNAs by different mechanisms. This position dependence of the FIE5
elements suggests that translation is required for degradation to
occur. Precedents exist for a connection between mRNA stability and
translation (30, 33-36). The suggested dependence of FIE5 activity on
mRNA translation is consistent with the results of Edgar et al.
(8), who reported that general inhibition of embryonic protein
synthesis by cycloheximide injection stabilizes the ftz
mRNA. However, these results do not rule out the alternative possibility that cycloheximide prevents the synthesis of an unstable protein required for mRNA degradation.
The three cis-acting ftz instability elements are likely to
act by providing a binding site for a factor or a protein complex that
mediates mRNA degradation. A sequence comparison among the three
elements and a search for similarity with sequences deposited in data
bases did not yield any significant homologies. Binding sites could be
recognized as secondary structures rather than primary sequences (37).
However, no stable secondary structure that has more than a four-base
straight stem or a common secondary structure among the three elements
was predicted when a computer program of Zuker (26, 38) was used
to fold these sequences. Moreover, site-directed mutagenesis of certain
nucleotides within FIE3 did not alter the destabilizing activity of
this element.2 Thus, it is presently unclear how these
cis-acting elements are recognized in the embryo. Recently, a protein
that binds to the ftz apical localization element was
identified (32). The identification of proteins that recognize the
three instability elements characterized in this and in previous work
will bring significant insights to the questions of sequence
recognition and mechanism of RNA degradation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Robert Cohen and Kam Cheung
(Columbia University) for providing a plasmid containing the
sgs3 promoter and the nurse cell-specific enhancer from
hsp26.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant IBN-9630369 from the National
Science Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Case Western Reserve
University, School of Medicine, Department of Genetics, 10900 Euclid
Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106-4955. Tel.: 216-368-2791; Fax: 216-368-3432;
E-mail: mxj3@po.cwru.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 16, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102965200
2
Fontes, A. M., Riedl, A., and Jacobs-Lorena, M. (2001) Genesis, in press.
3
J. Ito and M. Jacobs-Lorena, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
UTR, untranslated region;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
kb, kilobase(s);
ald, aldolase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ingham, P. W.
(1988)
Nature
335,
25-34
|
| 2.
|
Surdej, P.,
and Jacobs-Lorena, M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2892-2900
|
| 3.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 4.
|
Weiner, M. P.,
and Kornberg, T.
(1985)
Nature
318,
433-439
|
| 5.
|
Hafen, E.,
Kuroiwa, A.,
and Gehring, W. J.
(1984)
Cell
37,
833-841
|
| 6.
|
Yu, Y.,
and Pick, L.
(1995)
Mech. Dev.
50,
163-175
|
| 7.
|
Hiromi, Y.,
and Gehring, W. J.
(1987)
Cell
50,
963-974
|
| 8.
| /deleted in proof
|
| 9.
|
Edgar, B. A.,
Odell, G. M.,
and Schubiger, G.
(1987)
Genes Dev.
1,
1226-1237
|
| 10.
|
Kellerman, K. A.,
Mattson, D. M.,
and Duncan, I.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1925-1935
|
| 11.
|
Welte, M. A.,
Duccan, I.,
and Lindquist, S.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2240-2250
|
| 12.
|
Riedl, A.,
and Jacobs-Lorena, M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3047-3053
|
| 13.
|
Weiner, A. J.,
Scott, M. P.,
and Kaufman, T. C.
(1984)
Cell
37,
843-851
|
| 14.
|
Qian, S.,
Zhang, J.-Y.,
Kay, M. A.,
and Jacobs-Lorena, M.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
987-1003
|
| 15.
|
Tsutsumi, K.,
Mukai, T.,
Tsutsumi, R.,
Mori, M.,
Daimon, M.,
Tanaka, T.,
Yatsuki, H.,
Hori, K.,
and Ishikawa, K.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
14572-14575
|
| 16.
|
Tsutsumi, K.,
Mukai, T.,
Tsutsumi, R.,
Hidaka, S.,
Arai, Y.,
Hori, K.,
and Ishikawa, K.
(1985)
J. Mol. Biol.
181,
153-160
|
| 17.
|
Cavener, D. R.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
1353-1361
|
| 18.
|
Cavener, D. R.,
and Ray, S. C.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
3185-3192
|
| 19.
|
Pirrotta, V.
(1988)
in
Vectors: A Survey of Molecular Cloning Vectors and Their Uses
(Rodriguez, R.
, and Denhart, D., eds)
, pp. 437-456, Butterworth, Boston
|
| 20.
|
Steller, H.,
and Pirrotta, V.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
1640-1649
|
| 21.
|
Rubin, G. M.,
and Spradling, A. C.
(1982)
Science
218,
348-353
|
| 22.
|
Ito, J.,
Kuzumaki, T.,
Otsu, K.,
Iuchi, Y.,
and Ishikawa, K.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
350,
291-297
|
| 23.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 24.
|
Garfinkel, M. D.,
Pruitt, R. E.,
and Meyerowitz, E. M.
(1983)
J. Mol. Biol.
168,
765-789
|
| 25.
|
Serano, T. L.,
Cheung, H. K.,
Frank, L. H.,
and Cohen, R. S.
(1994)
Gene
138,
181-186
|
| 26.
|
Zuker, M.
(1989)
Science
244,
48-52
|
| 27.
|
Shyu, A.-B.,
Greenberg, M. E.,
and Belasco, J. G.
(1989)
Genes Dev.
3,
60-72
|
| 28.
|
Mason, J. O.,
Williams, G. T.,
and Neuberger, M. S.
(1988)
Genes Dev.
2,
1003-1011
|
| 29.
|
Zambetti, G.,
Stein, J.,
and Stein, G.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
2683-2687
|
| 30.
|
Fontes, A. M.,
Ito, J.,
and Jacobs-Lorena, M.
(1999)
Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.
44,
171-202
|
| 31.
|
Davis, I.,
and Ish-Horowicz, D.
(1991)
Cell
67,
927-940
|
| 32.
|
Lall, S.,
Francis-Lang, H.,
Flament, A.,
Norvell, A.,
Schüpbach, T.,
and Ish-Horowics, D.
(1999)
Cell
98,
171-180
|
| 33.
|
Hennigan, A. N.,
and Jacobson, A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3833-3843
|
| 34.
|
Oliveira, C. C.,
and McCarthy, J. E. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8936-8943
|
| 35.
|
Schiavi, S. C.,
Wellington, C. L.,
Shyu, A.-B.,
Chen, C.-Y. A.,
Greenberg, M. E.,
and Belasco, J. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3441-3448
|
| 36.
|
Veyrune, J. L.,
Carillo, S.,
Vié, A.,
and Blanchard, J. M.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
2127-2134
|
| 37.
|
Ross, J.
(1995)
Microbiol. Rev.
59,
423-450
|
| 38.
|
Mathews, D. H.,
Sabina, J.,
Zuker, M.,
and Turner, D. H.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
288,
911-940 presence of 41 additional sgs3-encoded nucleotides at the 5'-end of all
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Semotok, H. Luo, R. L. Cooperstock, A. Karaiskakis, H. K. Vari, C. A. Smibert, and H. D. Lipshitz
Drosophila Maternal Hsp83 mRNA Destabilization Is Directed by Multiple SMAUG Recognition Elements in the Open Reading Frame
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 15, 2008;
28(22):
6757 - 6772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|