![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 26, 23667-23673, June 29, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University
of British Columbia,
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
Received for publication, April 5, 2001, and in revised form, April 18, 2001
The hormone glucose-dependent
insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an important regulator of insulin
secretion. GIP has been shown to increase adenylyl cyclase activity,
elevate intracellular Ca2+ levels, and stimulate a
mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in the pancreatic
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP, or
gastric inhibitory
polypeptide)1 is a 42-amino
acid polypeptide hormone synthesized by mucosal K cells of the duodenum
and jejunum and released into the circulation in response to nutrient
ingestion (1-4). GIP and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are thought
to be the major hormones (incretins) that constitute the endocrine
component of the enteroinsular axis in humans and are responsible for
at least 50% of postprandial insulin secretion (5). In
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type 2 diabetes
mellitus), the incretin effect following oral glucose administration is
reduced or absent (6, 7), and the ability of intravenous GIP, but not
GLP-1, to stimulate insulin secretion is severely blunted (7, 8). This
implies that a defective GIP signal transduction system and/or a
reduced number of functional GIP receptors may contribute to the
pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. A greater understanding of the
signal transduction systems activated by GIP should assist in
determining whether reduced responsiveness involves changes at this level.
The receptor for GIP (9-11) is a member of the class II G
protein-coupled receptor superfamily, which includes receptors for glucagon, GLP-1, secretin, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (12).
Stimulation of the GIP receptor has been shown to stimulate adenylyl
cyclase and elevate intracellular cAMP levels in pancreatic islets
(13), islet tumor cell lines (14), and various cell lines transfected
with the GIP receptor (10, 15, 16). In addition, GIP has been shown to
increase uptake of Ca2+ into isolated islets (17) and
increase intracellular Ca2+ levels in HIT-T15 (18), RINm5F
(9), and COS cells (10). We have shown that the GIP receptor probably
couples to various Ca2+ channels (10), but there is no
evidence for GIP-stimulated IP3 production (18). There is,
however, evidence that GIP stimulates insulin secretion (19) and
activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (20) via a
wortmannin-sensitive pathway, implying a role for phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase. It is therefore clear that GIP action on the pancreatic
Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) catalyzes the
hydrolysis of the sn-2 fatty acid substituents from
glycerophospholipid substrates to yield a free fatty acid and a
2-lysophospholipid (21, 22). In the Heterotrimeric G proteins are activated by G protein-coupled receptors
and undergo GDP/GTP exchange at the level of the G These observations provided the rationale for determining whether
arachidonic acid and PLA2 are involved in the glucose
potentiating effects of GIP in the Cell Transfection and Tissue Culture--
CHO-K1 cells cultured
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 medium (Life
Technologies, Inc.) and supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum
(Cansera, Rexdale, Canada) were stably transfected with the wild type
rat GIP receptor as described previously (10, 15). The CHO-K1 cell line
obtained by pooling clones was termed rGIP-15 and has previously been
shown to express receptors at levels similar to high level expressing
clones (15). In experiments targeted at investigating a role for
G
Iodination of GIP and Binding Analysis--
Synthetic porcine
GIP (5 µg) was iodinated by the chloramine-T method, and the
125I-GIP was further purified by reverse phase high
performance liquid chromatography to a specific activity of 250-300
µCi/µg, (10). The aliquots were subsequently lyophilized and stored
at cAMP and Insulin Determination--
The cells were passaged into
24-well culture plates at 5 × 104 cells/well for
CHO-K1 clones and 5 × 105 cells/well for Arachidonic Acid Release--
Arachidonic acid release was
determined by methods adapted from Shuttleworth and Thompson (40).
Cells were harvested and passaged into 24-well culture plates at 4 × 104 cells/well for CHO-K1 clones and 2 × 105 cells/well for Data Analysis--
The data are expressed as the means ± S.E. with the number of individual experiments presented in the figure
legend. All of the data were analyzed using the nonlinear regression
analysis program PRISM (Graphpad, San Diego, CA), and the significance was tested using the Student's t test and analysis of
variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey post-test (p < 0.05)
as indicated in figure legends.
Initial studies were targeted at investigating GIP receptor
signaling in an expression system, the rGIP-15 clone of CHO-K1 cells.
Static incubations (45 min) revealed a concentration dependence to
GIP-stimulated arachidonic acid production (Fig.
1a). In agreement with
previous, non-incretin, studies on CHO-K1 cells (41, 42), ATP (5 µM) increased AA release from rGIP-15 cells by greater than 200% (p < 0.01, n = 4). Parallel
studies were performed in It is well established that the insulinotropic action of GIP is
dependent on elevated glucose levels and that glucose induces activation of PLA2 in pancreatic Analysis of the time dependence of AA release in rGIP-15 cells
demonstrated maximal release at 10 min (Fig.
3a), which correlates well
with that for GIP-stimulated cAMP production (maximal plateau reached
at 10-15 min in rGIP-15 and
A New Pathway for Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic
Polypeptide (GIP) Receptor Signaling
EVIDENCE FOR THE INVOLVEMENT OF PHOSPHOLIPASE
A2 IN GIP-STIMULATED INSULIN SECRETION*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-cell. In the current study we demonstrate a role for arachidonic
acid in GIP-mediated signal transduction. Static incubations revealed
that both GIP (100 nM) and ATP (5 µM)
significantly increased [3H]arachidonic acid
([3H]AA) efflux from transfected Chinese hamster ovary K1
cells expressing the GIP receptor (basal, 128 ± 11 cpm/well; GIP,
212 ± 32 cpm/well; ATP, 263 ± 35 cpm/well;
n = 4; p < 0.05). In addition, GIP
receptors were shown for the first time to be capable of functionally
coupling to AA production through G
dimers in Chinese hamster
ovary K1 cells. In a
-cell model (
TC-3), GIP was found to elicit
[3H]AA release, independent of glucose, in a
concentration-dependent manner (EC50 value of
1.4 ± 0.62 nM; n = 3). Although GIP
did not potentiate insulin release under extracellular
Ca2+-free conditions, it was still capable of elevating
intracellular cAMP and stimulating [3H]AA release. Our
data suggest that cAMP is the proximal signaling intermediate
responsible for GIP-stimulated AA release. Finally, stimulation of
GIP-mediated AA production was shown to be mediated via a
Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2. Arachidonic
acid is therefore a new component of GIP-mediated signal transduction
in the
-cell.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-cell involves several interacting signal transduction pathways.
-cell, glucose has been shown to
hydrolyze membrane phospholipids, leading to the accumulation of
arachidonic acid (AA), which ultimately amplifies insulin secretion
(23, 24). PLA2 has been identified in both human and rat
islets (25), as well as in various insulinoma cell lines (26, 27).
These
-cell models have been shown to express
Ca2+-dependent cytosolic PLA2 (28),
ATP-stimulatable Ca2+-independent cytosolic
PLA2 (iPLA2), and secretory PLA2
(29) isoforms. A role for all of these enzymes in glucose-induced
insulin release has been suggested (25, 26, 30-32).
subunit, leading
to dissociation of the trimer into G
and G
subunits (33). The
G
subunits have recently been shown to act on a number of
effector targets including ion channels, enzymes, and kinases (33).
Recent data suggested that inactivation of free G
completely
abolished KCl, Ca2+, and GTP
S-evoked insulin release
from HIT-T15 cells (34), establishing a role for these subunits in
insulin secretion. A role for G
has also been demonstrated in the
coupling of PLA2 and arachidonic acid production in rod
outer segments (35) and to the activation of cardiac potassium channels
(36).
-cell, with a focus on G
subunits as a coupling mechanism. We show for the first time that GIP
stimulates AA release from CHO-K1 cells and clonal
-cells (
TC-3).
Coupling of the GIP receptor to AA production in CHO-K1 cells was via
G
subunits, whereas cAMP was shown to be the mediator in
TC-3
cells. The PLA2 isoform activated by GIP in
TC-3 cells
was Ca2+-independent and hypothesized to be the same as
that activated by glucose when stimulating insulin secretion.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

signaling, rGIP-15 clones were transiently transfected with
plasmid DNA encoding the C terminus of
-adrenergic receptor kinase
(
ARKct) (37) or the empty vector (pRK5). Briefly, 40-60% confluent
monolayers in 10-cm culture plates (Becton Dickenson, Lincoln Park, NJ)
were transfected using SuperfectTM (Qiagen, Valencia, CA)
transfection reagent according to the manufacturers' protocol. Cells
were harvested 18-24 h post-transfection and passaged into 24-well
plates for subsequent arachidonic acid release experiments. The empty
plasmid pRK5 and the plasmid pRK-
ARKct (495) were kindly
provided by Dr. R. J. Lefkowitz (37). Passages 20-30 of rGIP-15
cells were used in these experiments.
TC-3 cells were obtained from a frozen stock that was originally a
gift from Dr. S. Efrat (Diabetes Center, Albert Einstein College of
Medicine, New York) (38). Cells were cultured in low glucose (5.5 mM) Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 12.5% horse serum (Cansera) and
2.5% fetal bovine serum (Cansera). Passages 20-30 were used in these experiments.
20 °C until use. Competitive binding analyses were performed as
described previously with minor modifications (10). Briefly, CHO-K1
cells plated 2 days prior in 24-well plates were washed twice with
4 °C Krebs-Ringer (115 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl,
1.2 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM NaHCO3, 1.28 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4) containing 10 mM HEPES
and 0.1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4 (KRBH), and incubated in
triplicate for 14-18 h at 4 °C with 125I-GIP (50 000 cpm/well) in the presence or the absence of unlabeled GIP (synthetic
human GIP1-42; Bachem, Torrence, CA). After two
consecutive washes in ice-cold buffer, cells were solubilized with 0.1 M NaOH and transferred to test tubes for counting.
Nonspecific binding was defined as that measured in the presence of an
excess of human GIP (1 µM), and specific binding was
expressed as a percentage of maximum binding
(%B/Bo).
TC-3
cells. For cAMP studies, cells were washed twice with KRBH and then
stimulated for 30 min with GIP in the presence of the phosphodiesterase
inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine at 0.5 mM
concentration (RBI/Sigma). Following stimulation, reactions were
stopped, and cells were lysed in 70% ice-cold ethanol, cellular debris
was removed by centrifugation, and cAMP was subsequently quantified by
radioimmunoassay (Biomedical Technologies Inc., Stoughton, MA). All
insulin release experiments were performed over 60 min in KRBH in the
absence of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, and insulin secreted into the
medium was quantified by radioimmunoassay as previously reported
(39).
TC-3 cells. The respective media were
replaced with media containing 0.125 µCi/ml [3H]AA
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences) 18-24 h following passaging, and the
plates were incubated for an additional 36-48 h. Prior to the addition
of experimental agents, the wells were washed twice with 0.5 ml of KRBH
and allowed to equilibrate for 1 h. Ca2+-free
experiments were conducted in KRBH containing equimolar Mg2+ and supplemented with 10 mM EGTA. The
agonists were dissolved in Krebs-Ringer buffer, added in triplicate
(0.5 ml total volume/well), and incubated for the length of time shown
in the figure legends. As a positive control, ATP was added at a final
concentration of 5 µM. When used, the inhibitor haloenol
lactone suicide substrate (HELSS; Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) was added
for 30 min prior to washing and addition of agonists. After incubation,
0.4-ml aliquots were placed into scintillation vials followed by the
addition of 10 ml of Econo 2 scintillation fluid (Fisher), and the
radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry. AA
released from cells was generally between 2-6% of total
[3H]AA incorporated into cells.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
TC-3 cells, a model of the pancreatic
-cell. These cells respond to arachidonic acid in a
glucose-dependent manner (Fig.
2). In the presence of glucose, AA
potentiated insulin secretion at concentrations as low as 10 µM (Fig. 2a), whereas 20-fold greater
concentrations were required before a response was observed under
glucose-free conditions (Fig. 2c). The potentiation of
insulin secretion elicited by 100 µM AA is comparable
with that elicited by 100 nM GIP under 11 mM
glucose conditions (Fig. 2a versus Fig. 8). GIP
was found to stimulate AA release in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1, b and
c). Interestingly, the EC50 value for
GIP-stimulated AA release (1.4 nM ± 0.62 nM;
n = 3) was similar to that for insulin release in these
cells (data not shown), in contrast to the 5-fold higher
EC50 value for cAMP production (39).

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The effect of GIP on arachidonic acid release
from rGIP-15 (a) and
TC-3
cells (b and c). The cells were
prelabeled with [3H]AA for 36-48 h and preincubated in
KRBH for 1 h prior to the addition of agonists. The medium was
removed at 45 min for a and 60 min for b and
c, and the radioactivity measured by liquid scintillation
counting. In c, GIP stimulation was conducted under
glucose-free conditions. For a, n = 4; for
b, n = 7-8; and for c,
n = 3-4. *, p < 0.05; **,
p < 0.001 for basal versus all; #,
p < 0.05 for 11 mM versus 100 nM GIP as tested by ANOVA. Gluc, glucose.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effect of exogenous arachidonic acid on
insulin release and intracellular cAMP under
glucose-dependent (a and
b) and -independent (c and
d) conditions in
TC-3
cells. Increasing concentrations of arachidonic acid were added to
KRBH buffer containing zero (c, n = 3-7;
d, n = 3) and 11 mM glucose
(a, n = 3-6; b, n = 3). Insulin secretion and intracellular cAMP production were
assessed by radioimmunoassay. *, p < 0.05 for basal
versus all; #, p < 0.05 for 11 mM versus GIP as tested by ANOVA.
-cells. However, we
have recently shown that GIP receptor coupling to adenylyl cyclase in
TC-3 cells is independent of extracellular glucose concentrations
(39). In the current study, increases in [3H]AA efflux
stimulated by GIP were also found to be independent of extracellular
glucose (Fig. 1c), indicating that GIP-induced and
glucose-induced increases in AA release were mediated via separate pathways.
TC-3 cells; n = 3). In
contrast, GIP-induced AA release was not detected before 30 min of
incubation in the
TC-3 cells (Fig. 3b), and
glucose-induced release was not observed until after 60 min of
incubation (Fig. 3b). It was considered possible that these
differences in onset of response may reflect alternative GIP
receptor-effector coupling systems in the two cell types. Because
G
has been previously implicated in the activation of
phospholipase A2 (35), an inhibitor peptide of G
,
ARKct (
-adrenergic receptor kinase C-terminal tail), was
transiently expressed in rGIP-15 cells. To confirm that cells had been
transfected, GIP receptor internalization was monitored because G
subunits have been shown to be required for G protein receptor
kinase-mediated G protein-coupled receptor internalization (43).
Expression of
ARKct was associated with an inhibition of receptor
internalization in these cells (versus pRK5 vector control;
n = 3). Initial experiments were conducted to examine GIP receptor binding and cAMP production in this expression model.
ARKct expression was not found to have any significant effect on
either receptor affinity for GIP or on activation of adenylyl cyclase
(IC50 values for binding: 3.95 nM ± 0.91 (n = 3) and 4.07 nM ± 0.97 (n = 3); EC50 values for cAMP production:
0.73 nM ± 0.12 (n = 3) and 0.49 nM ± 0.09 (n = 3) for vector and
ARKct, respectively). GIP receptors were shown, for the first time, to be
capable of functionally coupling to AA production through G
dimers, because the expression of
ARKct significantly suppressed the
GIP-mediated response by almost 70% (Fig.
4, p < 0.05). Purinergic receptors were also found to be coupled to AA production via G
dimers, because
ARKct expression reduced ATP-stimulated AA
production by greater than 40%.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Time course analysis of GIP-stimulated
arachidonic acid release in rGIP-15 (a) and
TC-3 cells (b). The medium
was removed at indicated time points, and AA efflux was measured as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Note that GIP-stimulated
AA release was evident by 30 min; however, no effect of glucose was
observed by this point. For a, n = 4, and for
b, n = 3-4. *, p < 0.05.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of G protein

inhibition on GIP-mediated
arachidonic acid release in rGIP-15 cells. rGIP-15 cells
expressing the GIP receptor were transiently transfected with 10 µg
pRK5 vector or
ARKct cDNA construct, and the medium was removed
at 45 min. AA efflux was measured as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The inset illustrates basal levels of AA
release. *, p < 0.05.
To characterize further the pathway by which AA is produced in the
TC3-cell by GIP, the effect of
ARKct expression was investigated. To ensure that transfection had occurred, cells were typically cotransfected with green fluorescent protein as a marker of
transfection efficiency. Inhibition of G
action had no effect on
glucose- or GIP-stimulated AA release (
ARKct expression
versus pRK5 control; n = 3) or insulin
secretion in
TC-3 cells (Fig. 5). In
addition, pertussis toxin (100 and 500 ng/ml) had no effect on AA
release, indicating that toxin sensitive G
-proteins
(G
i, G
o, and G
q) do not
play a role in glucose- or GIP-stimulated AA release in
TC-3 cells
(data not shown). This agrees with our previous studies showing that
pertussis toxin at 500 ng/ml had no effect on cAMP levels in
TC-3
cells (39). However, both the diterpene forskolin and the incretin
GLP-1, agents that specifically elevate intracellular cAMP levels, were
able to stimulate AA release (Fig. 6),
indicating that GIP may be acting on AA release via stimulation of
adenylyl cyclase in the
TC3-cell. Interestingly, the specific
protein kinase A inhibitor, H89 (5 µM), showed no effect
on GIP- or forskolin-stimulated AA release (Fig.
7). The possibility that
AA-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity can also be refuted because
exogenous AA had either no effect or slightly inhibited basal cAMP
production in
TC-3 cells (Fig. 2, b and
d).
|
|
|
The reduction of extracellular Ca2+ was found to have no
effect on GIP-stimulated AA release, implying that a
Ca2+-independent mechanism was involved in the production
of AA (Fig. 8a). As predicted,
neither glucose nor GIP was able to stimulate insulin secretion from
TC3-cells under stringent Ca2+-free conditions (Fig.
8b). However, GIP was clearly still capable of elevating
cAMP levels despite a reduction in basal cAMP production (Fig.
8c). The cAMP levels resulting from GIP stimulation under Ca2+-free conditions were, however, significantly
suppressed compared with control conditions (p < 0.05). The ability of GIP to release AA under Ca2+-free
conditions suggested that a Ca2+-independent
PLA2 was involved. An inhibitor specific for
iPLA2, HELSS, has previously been shown to inhibit
glucose-stimulated AA production and insulin secretion in several
-cell models (30, 44, 45). In the present study, HELSS was found to
inhibit GIP-stimulated AA production as well as glucose- and
GIP-stimulated insulin secretion (Fig.
9), supporting the aforementioned
hypothesis that the enzyme coupled to GIP receptor signaling is a
Ca2+-independent PLA2.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In human type 2 diabetes there is a decreased insulin response to
GIP that is of unknown etiology. One possible underlying defect is in
the normal signal transduction pathways by which GIP stimulates insulin
secretion in
-cells. It has been established that GIP stimulates
adenylyl cyclase (13), increases intracellular Ca2+
(18), and activates mitogen-activated protein kinase (20), and the
current study was undertaken to identify alternate mechanisms of
regulating
-cell function. We have shown that GIP receptors in
TC-3 cells and transfected CHO-K1 cells are capable of coupling to
transduction systems that release arachidonic acid from membrane lipids
via activation of a Ca2+-independent phospholipase
A2. Additionally, this signaling pathway was shown to
involve G protein 
coupling in CHO-K1 cells, whereas a cyclic
AMP-mediated pathway is probably involved in
TC-3 cells.
Initial studies of GIP-stimulated AA release revealed a marked
difference in the time dependence of AA release between CHO-K1 and
TC-3 cells. The much more rapid release evident in rGIP-15 cells is
in agreement with previously observed AA production rates observed with
rhodopsin and muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells (41, 42)
and other cell types (40, 46, 47). However, coupling of GIP to AA
release was much slower in
TC-3 cells, suggesting a unique GIP
receptor-AA coupling mechanism. There was also a difference between
GIP- and glucose-induced AA release in
TC-3 cells, with GIP
initiating release by 30 min, whereas glucose had no effect by this
time (Fig. 3). This suggests that separate mechanisms couple glucose
and the GIP receptor to AA production. Extensive studies have
established that the glucose-induced AA production coupled to
-cell
insulin secretion (24, 48) involved activation of an ATP sensitive,
Ca2+-independent PLA2 (27, 48). This enzyme has
been identified in a number of insulinoma cell lines, including
TC-3
cells (44), and further studies were therefore performed to determine
whether GIP-induced AA release also resulted from its activation.
The C-terminal fragment of the
-adrenergic receptor kinase protein
(
ARKct or G protein receptor kinase 2) was utilized to study the
role of G
signaling. Jelsema and Axelrod (35) first suggested
that activation PLA2 can be performed by G
subunits. In the present study it was found that the GIP receptor can couple to
PLA2 via G protein 
subunits in CHO-K1 cells, whereas
neither glucose nor GIP-stimulated arachidonic release or insulin
secretion were dependent on G
subunit signaling in
TC-3 cells
(Fig. 4). This is in contrast to their involvement in K+-
and bombesin-stimulated insulin secretion in HIT-T15 cells (34). Further studies are needed to determine whether G
subunits are involved in GIP receptor-effector coupling in other targets such as the
stomach, fat, or the adrenal gland (49-51).
Glucose-, GIP-, and ATP-stimulated AA release were all shown to be independent of extracellular Ca2+, indicating that they are likely acting on a similar iPLA2 isoform. Recently cholecystokinin, another insulinotropic peptide, was also shown to activate islet PLA2 independently of extracellular Ca2+ (52). Despite a complete ablation of insulin release under Ca2+-free (extracellular) conditions, intracellular cAMP levels were still stimulated by GIP (Fig. 8c), implying that this may be the proximal messenger to AA release. A reduction in basal cAMP production is likely attributable to a decrease in basal Ca2+-activated adenylyl cyclase activity, therefore accounting for the reduction in GIP stimulated cAMP. From these observations it therefore seems likely that both GIP-stimulated cAMP and AA production are proximal signaling events independent of glucose and extracellular Ca2+ but insufficient to elicit insulin exocytosis. However, these signaling intermediates may play more direct roles in the actions of GIP under euglycemic conditions, such as those in the adipocyte (50).
In islets, glucose stimulation can elevate endogenously generated AA
from the micromolar range to cellular concentrations of 50-200
µM, as measured by mass spectrometry (48). In agreement with work published by Metz (53), exogenous AA over this range was able
to stimulate insulin release from
TC-3 cells in the presence of
glucose. However, in its absence, responsiveness to AA was reduced at
least 10-fold. Interestingly, application of exogenous AA has been
shown to elevate intracellular Ca2+ concentrations in
pancreatic islets (53), and there is considerable evidence suggesting a
role for arachidonic acid itself or its metabolites in the regulation
of capacitive and noncapacitive Ca2+ influx in a number of
cellular systems (54, 55). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that
fluxes in free endogenous AA, brought about by GIP, may play an
integral role in regulating intracellular Ca2+
concentrations and thereby influence insulin secretion.
Our studies indicate that the mediation of GIP-stimulated
PLA2 activity probably occurs via cAMP actions in the
-cell. Because the specific iPLA2 inhibitor HELSS
ablated insulin responses to glucose and thus the potentiating effect
of GIP (Fig. 9) the converging actions on insulin secretion of these
two secretogogues may occur distal to the formation of cAMP (by GIP)
and arachidonic acid (by glucose and/or GIP). Arachidonic acid and/or
its metabolites may therefore be mainly involved in the fine tuning of
the insulin response. The actions of cAMP could be direct, via
activation of small G proteins (e.g. Rap), or through a
guanine nucleotide exchange factor; however, the involvement of protein
kinase A is unlikely (Fig. 7). These results are in contrast to a
recent study demonstrating an inhibitory affect of cAMP and incretins (GIP and GLP-1) on CCK-8-stimulated arachidonic acid production and
insulin release in the rodent islet (56). However, implicit in studies
conducted with isolated islets is the existence of paracrine and
endocrine interactions between
-,
-, and PP cells that contribute
to a functional response. This may account for the different responses
observed in the clonal cell line used in the present study.
Finally, in the current study, production of AA was assessed by
measuring the total radioactivity secreted from
TC-3 cells. Although
it has been shown in studies on tumor
-cell lines that a
surprisingly small percentage of released radioactivity consists of
metabolites (48), a recent study suggested a role for lipooxygenase-12 metabolites in
-cell function (57). Further studies need to be
conducted to discriminate between AA and its metabolites produced by
GIP stimulation of the
-cell.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. R. J. Lefkowitz for the pRK5
vector and
ARKct construct, Simon Hinke for insight into the
manuscript, and Cuilan Nian for technical support on this project.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Canadian Medical Research Council Grant 590007 and by funds from the Canadian Diabetes Association.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by a Medical Research Council doctoral research fellowship.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2146 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada. Tel.: 604-822-3088; Fax: 604-822-6048; E-mail: mcintoch@interchange.ubc.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 25, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103023200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide;
GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1;
AA, arachidonic acid;
PLA2, phospholipase A2;
iPLA2, Ca2+-independent cytosolic PLA2;
KRBH, Krebs-Ringer buffer with HEPES;
HELSS, haloenol lactone suicide
substrate;
GTP
S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
ANOVA, analysis of
variance.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Pederson, R., Schubert, H. E., and Brown, J. C. (1975) Diabetes 24, 1050-1056 |
| 2. | Falko, J. M., Crockett, S. E., Cataland, S., and Mazzaferri, E. L. (1975) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 41, 260-265 |
| 3. | Cataland, S., Crockett, S. E., Brown, J. C., and Mazzaferri, E. L. (1974) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 39, 223-228 |
| 4. | Pederson, R., and Brown, J. C. (1978) Endocrinology 103, 610-615 |
| 5. | Fehmann, H.-C., Göke, R., and Göke, B. (1995) Endocr. Rev. 16, 390-410 |
| 6. | Nauck, M., Stöckman, R., Ebert, R., and Creutzfeldt, W. (1986) Diabetologia 29, 46-52 |
| 7. | Holst, J., Gromada, J., and Nauck, M. (1997) Diabetologia 40, 984-986 |
| 8. | Nauck, M., Heimesaat, M., Ørskov, C., Holst, J., Ebert, R., and Creutzfeldt, W. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 301-307 |
| 9. | Usdin, T., Mezey, É., Button, D., Brownstein, M., and Bonner, T. (1993) Endocrinology 133, 2861-2870 |
| 10. | Wheeler, M., Gelling, R., McIntosh, C., Georgiou, J., Brown, J., and Pederson, R. (1995) Endocrinology 136, 4629-4639 |
| 11. | Gremlich, S., Porret, A., Hani, E., Cherif, D., Vionnet, N., Froguel, P., and Thorens, B. (1995) Diabetes 44, 1202-1208 |
| 12. | Weiss, J. (1998) Pharmacol. Ther. 80, 231-264 |
| 13. | Siegel, E. G., and Creutzfeldt, T. W. (1985) Diabetologia 28, 857-861 |
| 14. | Amiranoff, B., Vauclin-Jacques, N., and Laburthe, M. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 123, 671-676 |
| 15. | Gelling, R., Wheeler, M., Xue, J., Gyomorey, S., Nian, C., Pederson, R., and McIntosh, C. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 2640-2643 |
| 16. | McIntosh, C., Wheeler, M., Gelling, R., Brown, J., and Pederson, R. (1996) Acta Physiol. Scand. 157, 361-365 |
| 17. | Wahl, M., Plehn, R., Landsbeck, E., Verspohl, E., and Ammon, H. (1992) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 90, 117-123 |
| 18. | Lu, M., Wheeler, M., Leng, X.-H., and Boyd, A. (1993) Endocrinology 132, 94-100 |
| 19. | Straub, S., and Sharp, G. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 224, 369-374 |
| 20. | Kubota, A., Yamada, Y., Yasuda, K., Someya, Y., Ihara, Y., Kagimoto, S., Watanabe, R., Kuroe, A., Ishida, H., and Seino, Y. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 235, 171-175 |
| 21. | Balsinde, J., and Dennis, E. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 16069-16072 |
| 22. | Mukherjee, A. B., Miele, L., and Pattabiraman, N. (1994) Biochem. Pharmacol. 48, 1-10 |
| 23. | Turk, J., Wolf, B. A., and McDaniel, M. L. (1987) Prog. Lipid Res. 26, 125-181 |
| 24. | Turk, J., Gross, R. W., and Ramanadham, S. (1993) Diabetes 42, 367-374 |
| 25. | Chen, M., Yang, Z., Naji, A., and Wolf, B. A. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 2901-2909 |
| 26. | Loweth, A. C., Scarpello, J. H. B., and Morgan, N. G. (1995) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 112, 177-183 |
| 27. | Ramanadham, S., Wolf, M., Jett, P., Gross, R. W., and Turk, J. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 7442-7452 |
| 28. | Ma, Z., Ramanadham, S., Hu, Z., and Turk, J. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1391, 384-400 |
| 29. | Ramanadham, S., Ma, Z., Arita, H., Zhang, S., and Turk, J. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1390, 301-312 |
| 30. | Ramanadham, S., Gross, R. W., Han, X., and Turk, J. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 337-346 |
| 31. | Roldan, E., and Fragio, C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13962-13970 |
| 32. | Murakami, M., Kudo, I., Suwa, Y., and Inoue, K. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 209, 257-265 |
| 33. | Clapham, D., and Neer, E. (1997) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 37, 167-203 |
| 34. | Zhang, H., Yasrebi-Nejad, H., and Lang, J. (1998) FEBS Lett. 424, 202-206 |
| 35. | Jelsema, C. L., and Axelrod, J. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 3623-3627 |
| 36. | Kim, D., Lewis, D. L., Graziadei, L., Neer, E. J., Bar-Sigi, D., and Clapham, D. E. (1989) Nature 337, 557-560 |
| 37. | Koch, W., Hawes, B., Inglese, J., Luttrell, L., and Lefkowitz, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6193-6197 |
| 38. | Efrat, S., Linde, S., Kofod, H., Spector, D., Delannoy, M., Grant, S., Hanahan, D., and Baekkeskov, S. (1988) Cell Biol. 85, 9037-9041 |
| 39. | Hinke, S. A., Pauly, R. P., Ehses, J., Kerridge, P., Demuth, H.-U., McIntosh, C. H. S., and Pederson, R. A. (2000) J. Endocrinol. 165, 281-291 |
| 40. | Shuttleworth, T. J., and Thompson, J. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32636-32643 |
| 41. | Bymaster, F., Calligaro, D., and Falcone, J. (1999) Cell. Signal. 11, 405-413 |
| 42. | Dickerson, C. D., and Weiss, E. R. (1995) Exp. Cell Res. 216, 46-50 |
| 43. | Lin, H. C., Duncan, J. A., Kozasa, T., and Gilman, A. G. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5057-5060 |
| 44. | Ramanadham, S., Wolf, M., Li, B., Bohrer, A., and Turk, J. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1344, 153-164 |
| 45. | Gross, R. W., Ramanadham, S., Kruszka, K., Han, X., and Turk, J. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 327-336 |
| 46. | Balsinde, J., Balboa, M. A., and Dennis, E. A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 375, 22544-22549 |
| 47. | Sauvadet, A., Rohn, T., Pecker, F., and Pavoine, C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12437-12445 |
| 48. | Simonsson, E., and Ahren, B. (2000) Int. J. Pancreatol. 27, 1-11 |
| 49. | McIntosh, C., Pederson, R., Koop, H., and Brown, J. (1981) Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 59, 468-472 |
| 50. | McIntosh, C., Bremsak, I., Lynn, F. C., Gill, R., Hinke, S. A., Gelling, R., Nian, C., McKnight, G., Jaspers, S., and Pederson, R. A. (1998) Endocrinology 140, 398-404 |
| 51. | Lacroix, A., Bolté, E., Tremblay, J., Dupré, J., Poitras, P., Fournier, H., Garon, J., Garrel, D., Bayard, R., Taillefer, R., Flanagan, R., and Hamet, P. (1992) N. Engl. J. Med. 327, 974-980 |
| 52. | Simonsson, E., Karlsson, S., and Ahren, B. (1998) Diabetes 47, 1436-1443 |
| 53. | Metz, S. A. (1988) Diabetes 37, 1453-1469 |
| 54. | Osterhout, J. L., and Shuttleworth, T. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8248-8254 |
| 55. | Rzigalinski, B. A., Willoughby, K. A., Hoffman, S. W., Falck, J. R., and Ellis, E. F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 175-182 |
| 56. | Simonsson, E., Karlsson, S., and Ahren, B. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269, 242-246 |
| 57. | Owada, S., Larsson, O., Arkhammer, P., Katz, A. I., Chibalin, A. V., Berggren, P., and Bertorello, A. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2000-2008 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. J. Lu, Q. Yang, W. Sun, S. C. Woods, D. D'Alessio, and P. Tso Using the lymph fistula rat model to study the potentiation of GIP secretion by the ingestion of fat and glucose Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): G1130 - G1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Kim, C. Nian, and C. H. S. McIntosh Activation of Lipoprotein Lipase by Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide in Adipocytes: A ROLE FOR A PROTEIN KINASE B, LKB1, AND AMP-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE CASCADE J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2007; 282(12): 8557 - 8567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Kim, W. S. Choi, J. S. M. Han, G. Warnock, D. Fedida, and C. H. S. McIntosh A Novel Mechanism for the Suppression of a Voltage-gated Potassium Channel by Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide: PROTEIN KINASE A-DEPENDENT ENDOCYTOSIS J. Biol. Chem., August 5, 2005; 280(31): 28692 - 28700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Song, X. Zhang, C. Zhao, N. T. Ang, and Z. A. Ma Inhibition of Ca2+-Independent Phospholipase A2 Results in Insufficient Insulin Secretion and Impaired Glucose Tolerance Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 19(2): 504 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-H. Ding, Q. Zhong, J. Xu, and C. M. Isales Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide: differential effects on hepatic artery vs. portal vein endothelial cells Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2004; 286(5): E773 - E779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Ehses, V. R. Casilla, T. Doty, J. A. Pospisilik, K. D. Winter, H.-U. Demuth, R. A. Pederson, and C. H. S. McIntosh Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Promotes {beta}-(INS-1) Cell Survival via Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate-Mediated Caspase-3 Inhibition and Regulation of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Endocrinology, October 1, 2003; 144(10): 4433 - 4445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Pamir, F. C. Lynn, A. M. J. Buchan, J. Ehses, S. A. Hinke, J. A. Pospisilik, K. Miyawaki, Y. Yamada, Y. Seino, C. H. S. McIntosh, et al. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor null mice exhibit compensatory changes in the enteroinsular axis Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2003; 284(5): E931 - E939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Mayo, L. J. Miller, D. Bataille, S. Dalle, B. Goke, B. Thorens, and D. J. Drucker International Union of Pharmacology. XXXV. The Glucagon Receptor Family Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2003; 55(1): 167 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Ehses, S. L. Pelech, R. A. Pederson, and C. H. S. McIntosh Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Activates the Raf-Mek1/2-ERK1/2 Module via a Cyclic AMP/cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase/Rap1-mediated Pathway J. Biol. Chem., September 27, 2002; 277(40): 37088 - 37097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||