|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M010806200 on April 11, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 26, 24301-24308, June 29, 2001
Intracellular Chelation of Iron by Bipyridyl Inhibits DNA Virus
Replication
RIBONUCLEOTIDE REDUCTASE MATURATION AS A PROBE OF INTRACELLULAR
IRON POOLS*
Annette M.
Romeo,
Linda
Christen,
Edward G.
Niles, and
Daniel J.
Kosman
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Microbiology, School of
Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York,
Buffalo, New York 14214
Received for publication, November 30, 2000, and in revised form, March 28, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The efficient replication of large DNA viruses
requires dNTPs supplied by a viral ribonucleotide reductase. Viral
ribonucleotide reductase is an early gene product of both vaccinia and
herpes simplex virus. For productive infection, the apoprotein must
scavenge iron from the endogenous, labile iron pool(s). The
membrane-permeant, intracellular Fe2+ chelator,
2,2'-bipyridine (bipyridyl, BIP), is known to sequester iron from this
pool. We show here that BIP strongly inhibits the replication of both
vaccinia and herpes simplex virus, type 1. In a standard plaque assay,
50 µM BIP caused a 50% reduction in plaque-forming units
with either virus. Strong inhibition was observed only when BIP was
added within 3 h post-infection. This time dependence was observed
also in regards to inhibition of viral late protein and DNA synthesis
by BIP. BIP did not inhibit the activity of vaccinia ribonucleotide
reductase (RR), its synthesis, nor its stability indicating that BIP
blocked the activation of the apoprotein. In parallel with its
inhibition of vaccinia RR activation, BIP treatment increased the RNA
binding activity of the endogenous iron-response protein, IRP1, by
1.9-fold. The data indicate that the diiron prosthetic group in
vaccinia RR is assembled from iron taken from the BIP-accessible,
labile iron pool that is sampled also by ferritin and the
iron-regulated protein found in the cytosol of mammalian cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Organisms have an ambiguous relationship with iron (1-3).
Iron is essential to replication and growth, yet at the same time iron is cytotoxic. Iron is nutritionally essential due to its role as
prosthetic group in a variety of enzymes and electron transfer
proteins required for energy metabolism, for a variety of
metabolic interconversions, and for the biosynthesis of the deoxyribonucleotides required for DNA synthesis and repair (4). Cytotoxicity is due to the efficiency by which iron, as
Fe2+, can support the production of oxygen radicals,
particularly the hydroxyl radical, HO· (3). Consequently, cells
and organisms tightly regulate the uptake, efflux, and
compartmentalization of iron so as to modulate the amount of iron
accumulated and to ensure that by the appropriate sequestration, the
cytotoxic potential of the iron that is absorbed is appropriately
suppressed (4-6).
Pathogens and their hosts share this ambiguous relationship with iron
(7-13). However, pathogens live within the context of the
iron-restricted milieu that the host maintains as a key to the
suppression of the cytotoxic potential of iron. Bacterial pathogens
adapt to this iron-limited environment in several ways. One is the
production of chelating agents that possess exceptionally large
affinities for iron as either Fe2+ or Fe3+ (9,
11, 14). Another strategy is to divert transferrin iron by producing
transferrin receptors that compete with the host's (11, 12). The
dependence on the host's supply of iron that pathogens exhibit makes
them susceptible to the potential bacteriostatic effects of host iron
limitation or chelation. A large body of evidence indicates that
manipulation of host iron status does lead to a modulation of the
proliferation and virulence of many bacteria and protozoa (10, 13, 15,
16).
In contrast to such organisms, viruses have not evolved mechanisms for
actively scavenging host iron. In part, this is no doubt due to the
fact that viruses produce limited metabolic machinery except for that
required for the replication of their genome. On the other hand, DNA
viruses are directly dependent on iron for their proliferation as a
result of the essential role that iron plays in the catalytic center of
ribonucleotide reductase (RR)1 (17-19). RR is encoded
in most if not all large DNA viral genomes (e.g. pox and
herpes viruses) and is produced early in infection to support the
production of the dNTPs required for viral DNA synthesis (20-23).
This pattern is found in the host as well, because mammalian RR
is cell cycle-regulated with strong induction of its synthesis in S
phase concurrent with genome replication (24).
Eukaryotic and viral ribonucleotide reductase is a heterodimeric
protein (17-19, 25). The vaccinia virus subunits are referred to as R1
and R2. R1, the large subunit (87 kDa), binds NTPs and is regulatory in
nature (26). R2, the small subunit (37 kDa), contains the active site
of the enzyme that includes a diiron core and a catalytic tyrosyl
radical (27). The genes encoding these two subunits are found on the
HindIII F and I genomic fragments, respectively (26, 27).
Both are early genes in that they are temporally expressed prior to DNA
replication in the vaccinia infectious cycle (28). That a DNA
virus requires the pool of dNTPs provided by RR in support of its
replicative cycle is indicated by the effect of hydroxyurea (HU). HU
inactivates ribonucleotide reductases by quenching the catalytic
tyrosyl radical. HU blocks vaccinia replication in cultured cells
(29).
The vaccinia infection, and the essential role of RR in it, provides a
useful biologic system in which to explore the mechanism by which
iron-dependent enzymes obtain the metal that is critical to
their activity. In effect, infection introduces in a regulated fashion
a gene that encodes an iron-dependent enzyme whose biologic function (support of DNA synthesis and viral replication) and enzyme
activity (NDP/NTP reduction) can be readily assayed. Analysis of the
iron acquisition pathway employed by the viral RR will permit us to
identify the iron pool(s) and proteins involved. This provides us with
a useful model system that will permit the analysis of how iron is
trafficked to iron apoproteins, and perhaps, how modulation of
this trafficking could specifically impact on the replication of cell pathogens.
In this study, we have used the membrane-permeant, Fe2+
chelator, 2,2'-bipyridyl (BIP), as a probe of whether and how cellular iron is required for a productive infection by vaccinia virus in
cultured cells. BIP has been established to interact with the "labile" iron pool within eukaryotic cells (30-32). This pool
accounts for ~20% of the newly arrived iron in a cell (30) and
appears to be the pool that is sensed by regulatory factors such as
iron-response element-binding protein (IREPB/IRP1, cytosolic aconitase)
(5, 33, 34) and, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the
iron-regulated transcription factor, Aft1p (35, 36). We show here that
this pool appears also to support a productive viral infection by
providing the iron required for the activation of the vaccinia RR.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cells and Virus--
Vaccinia virus, strain WR, herpes simplex
virus type 1, strain KOS, and the African green monkey kidney cell line
BSC40 were used for this study. Monolayer cultures were grown
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.)
supplemented with 10% calf serum (HyClone, Logan, UT). Viral stocks
were prepared from 48-h infected monolayers; these were titered in a
standard plaque assay (37). This same assay was used to determine viral yield in both vaccinia and herpesvirus infections. A plaque assay was
used also to demonstrate that BIP did not inhibit a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) infection. VSV is an RNA virus.
Analysis of Protein Synthesis in Virus-infected
Cultures--
The labeling procedure of Niles et al. (38)
was used to follow protein synthesis in vaccinia-infected cells.
Confluent monolayers of BSC40 were inoculated with vaccinia virus at a
multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 20 for 30 min. The medium was
aspirated and replaced with virus-free medium. At varying times after
infection, the medium was removed; the cells were washed once with
prewarmed phosphate-buffered saline, and the cells were pulse-labeled
for 15 min with 0.8 ml of prewarmed phosphate-buffered saline
containing 100 µCi/ml [35S]methionine (>1175 Ci/mmol,
PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The label was removed, and the cells were
moved into 1.0 ml of SDS-electrophoresis sample buffer (39). The
labeled proteins were fractionated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and were
subsequently visualized in the gel by autoradiography.
Analysis of DNA Synthesis--
The protocol described by Condit
and Motyczka was used (37). Duplicate 60-mm dishes of BSC40 monolayers
were infected at an m.o.i. of 10. At varying times post-infection, the
cells were pulse-labeled for 15 min with 15 µCi of
[3H]thymidine (>80 µCi/mmol, PerkinElmer Life
Sciences). Cells were scraped from the dishes into 1 ml of water and
mixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid. The precipitates were collected
and washed on glass fiber filters and counted in a Beckman
scintillation spectrophotometer.
Analysis of RNA Binding Activity of Iron-response Element-binding
Protein, IRP1--
Cell extracts were prepared from control cells, and
cells were treated with BIP (100 µM) for 3 h and
used in an RNA gel shift assay for IRP1 (40) using as probe a 92-base
ribooligonucleotide containing the IRE from the human ferritin L chain
mRNA (41, 42). The extracts were prepared by detergent lysis (0.5%
Nonidet P-40) in 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.5) containing 10 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM
phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, and RNasin (40 units, Promega, Madison,
WI). The riboprobe was transcribed from plasmid pTZ18RM1 (see Ref. 42,
kindly supplied by Dr. William Walden) with T7 RNA polymerase, labeled
with [ -32P]UTP following the standard procedure
(Technical Manual TM016, Promega Corp., Madison, WI), and purified on a
10% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea. The binding
reactions (40, 42) were resolved on a 6% polyacrylamide gel; the gel
was dried and analyzed using a Bio-Rad PhosphorImager and Molecular
Analyst software.
Analysis of Vaccinia Ribonucleotide Reductase Synthesis and
Stability--
The labeling and immunoprecipitation protocols were as
described by Howell et al. (28). Duplicate 60-mm dishes of
BSC40 monolayers were infected at an m.o.i. of 10. At varying times post-infection, the cells were pulse-labeled for 1 h with
80 µCi [35S]methionine, harvested, and washed. A
cell extract was prepared in a lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 1% SDS, 0.008% bromphenol
blue, and 7.5% glycerol. Extract was incubated with polyclonal
antibody to either the R1 or R2 subunit of vaccinia virus (kindly
supplied by Dr. Christopher Mathews), and the immunocomplexes were
isolated by adsorption to protein A-Sepharose CL-4B beads (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). After washing, the pellet was resuspended in 50 µl of Laemmli buffer and boiled, and 25 µl was applied to a 10%
SDS-PAGE gel. The labeled R1 and R2 subunits were visualized by autoradiography.
Analysis of Vaccinia Ribonucleotide Reductase Activity--
The
assay described by Slabaugh et al. (43) was followed.
Monolayers of BSC40 cells (100-mm dishes) were infected at an m.o.i. of
10. At various times post-infection, the medium was removed, and the
dishes were placed on ice. All further manipulations were performed at
4 °C. Following washing in a 25 mM Hepes buffer containing 10 mM dithiothreitol, cell extracts were
prepared in a hypotonic Hepes lysis buffer with the assistance of a
Dounce homogenizer. Aliquots (20 µl) of these extracts were used in a ribonucleotide reductase assay mixture containing 25 µM
(~200 cpm/pmol) [3H]cytidine 5'-diphosphate (>20
Ci/mmol, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). After 30 min the reaction
mixtures were quenched by the addition of 10 M perchloric
acid. The mixture was clarified by centrifugation, and 40 µl of the
supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube that was tightly capped.
Following boiling to convert all nucleotides to monophosphates and
clarification of this mixture by centrifugation, a marker solution
containing 20 mM each of CMP, dCMP, and dUMP was added, and
the total nucleotides were fractionated by chromatography on
plastic-backed cellulose thin layer plates. dUMP is a secondary product
as a result of the dCMP deaminase activity present in BSC40 cell
extracts. The markers permitted visualization of the reaction products
under UV light; the corresponding regions of the plates were removed
and counted in a Beckman scintillation spectrophotometer.
 |
RESULTS |
Bipyridyl Inhibits Vaccinia Virus Production--
Confluent
monolayers of BSC40 cells were inoculated with vaccinia virus at an
m.o.i. of 10, either in the absence of 2,2'-bipyridyl (control) or in
the presence of BIP from 10 to 100 µM. Initial tests
demonstrated that at 100 µM BIP did not markedly inhibit the growth of these cells to confluency and did not cause significant changes in cell morphology or survival in confluent cultures (data not
shown). Plates were titered for the number of viable virus produced
after 48 h of infection (Fig. 1).
The data show that BIP caused a 3-4-log decrease in viral yield with
the sharpest decrease occurring between 40 and 80 µM.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Bypyridyl inhibits vaccinia virus infection
in a concentration-dependent manner. Confluent monolayers of BSC40
cells were infected by vaccinia virus at an m.o.i. of 10 in the
presence of the [BIP] as indicated. Virus-infected cells were
collected at 48 hpi, and the viral yield was determined in a standard
plaque assay. Each value in the figure is derived from a minimum of
five dilutions. The results shown are representative of four separate
experiments.
|
|
Bipyridyl Inhibits Production of Intermediate and Late Vaccinia
Proteins but Not of Early Gene Products--
Early viral gene
expression precedes DNA replication. Both are required for intermediate
and late gene expression. A survey of protein production during a
vaccinia infection serves as a temporal measure of the progression of
the infectious cycle. To determine where in this cycle the
BIP-dependent inhibition of virus formation occurred, cells
were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine at different
times, i.e. hours post-infection (hpi). Radiolabeled
proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and observed by autoradiography
(Fig. 2). Analysis of protein synthesis
in the control infected cells (no BIP) demonstrated the onset of viral
early protein production (examples designated by E in Fig. 2) within 3 hpi followed by the shut-off of synthesis of these and host
proteins at 6 hpi. The loss of host and early virus gene expression
precedes onset of the viral late protein synthesis that is dependent on
the initiation of viral DNA replication. The effect of BIP (100 µM in this experiment) was striking. BIP did not inhibit
the production of viral early proteins. However, it delayed the
shut-off of viral early and host protein synthesis and prevented the
accumulation of late viral proteins. This phenotype would be consistent
with the inhibition by BIP of viral DNA replication.

View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Bypyridyl blocks the synthesis of late but
not early vaccinia virus proteins. Confluent monolayers of BSC40
cells were infected at an m.o.i. of 20. The +BIP culture
media contained 100 µM BIP added at the time of
infection. The cultures were subsequently pulse-labeled with
[35S]methionine for 30 min at the times post-infection
indicated in the figure. The mocked-infected cells (M) were
labeled at 10 h. Cells were washed, collected, and cell extracts
fractionated on SDS-PAGE; the fractionated proteins were visualized by
autoradiography. E, examples of vaccinia early proteins; p4a
and p4b, examples of vaccinia late proteins. A host protein, actin, is
also indicated (Host). Note the shut-off of host protein
synthesis concurrent with the onset of vaccinia late gene expression;
both are inhibited by BIP. The figure was prepared from a scanned,
digitized file of the autoradiograph.
|
|
Bipyridyl Inhibits Vaccinia DNA Replication--
Viral DNA
replication was assessed directly by measuring the rate of
[3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA at different times
post-infection. A typical time course of labeling is shown in Fig.
3. Although the non-infected control
cells (closed triangles) exhibited a constant level of
[3H]thymidine incorporation (average value over the 9-h
experiment, 12,650 cpm), the vaccinia-infected cells showed a 10-fold
increase in incorporation at 3-6 hpi that then declined to control
levels at 9 hpi (open circles). BIP inhibited this
virus-dependent burst of DNA synthesis in a
concentration-dependent manner that closely paralleled the
concentration-dependent effect on viral yield seen in Fig.
1. Thus, 40 µM BIP inhibited [3H]thymidine
incorporation by <10% (open triangles), whereas 60 µM BIP inhibited >90% (closed circles) with
little further inhibition at 100 µM BIP (labeling not
different from uninfected control cells, closed triangles).
This result also was fully consistent with the inhibition by BIP of
late protein synthesis (Fig. 2) since expression of late genes, but not
early ones, requires concurrent DNA synthesis. In summary, both
labeling experiments indicate that BIP inhibits viral DNA synthesis and
that this results in a block to further progression of the infectious
cycle including expression of viral intermediate and late genes.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Bypyridyl blocks vaccinia
virus-dependent DNA synthesis in a reversible manner.
Confluent monolayers of BSC40 cells were infected at an m.o.i. of 10. Cells were pulsed-labeled with [3H]thymidine for 15 min
at the times indicated in the figure. The cells were washed and
collected, and labeled polynucleotides were precipitated with
trichloroacetic acid. The precipitates were collected on glass fiber
filters that were counted in a Beckman scintillation spectrophotometer.
The samples were as follows: vaccinia-infected cells, no additions
(open circles); vaccinia-infected cells, 40 µM
BIP (open triangles); vaccinia-infected cells, 100 µM BIP (closed circles); mock-infected cells
(closed triangles). The recovery of DNA synthesis in
BIP-treated cells also was examined. BIP-treated (100 µM), vaccinia-infected cells were pulsed-labeled at 6 and
12 hpi (closed squares). At 6 hpi, duplicate cultures were
washed free of BIP and then pulse-labeled at the times indicated in the
figure (open squares). The recovery of DNA synthesis in
these cells was then determined as above. The bars on the
values for the control infected cells represent the S.E.
(n = 3). The values for the BIP-treated, infected cells
are averages of duplicate samples from one experiment that is
representative of three separate experiments. The ranges in these
values was 5-12%.
|
|
Bipyridyl Inhibition of Vaccinia DNA Replication and Virus
Production Is Reversible--
This block was reversible as indicated
by the additional results shown in Fig. 3. At 6 hpi, the BIP (100 µM) was removed from a set of cultures, and DNA synthesis
was measured in these now BIP-free cells. Within 1 h, DNA
synthesis began and followed a time course similar to the
virus-infected cell controls (cf. open squares to open
circles). This recovery of virus-dependent DNA synthesis led to a productive infection since the viral yield from
these cultures was equivalent to the yield from cultures that had never
been treated with BIP (2.8 versus 2.5 × 109 plaque-forming units, respectively). Viral infected
cells from which the BIP had not been removed did not exhibit this DNA
synthesis pattern at any time over the 12-h experiment (closed
squares) and exhibited the 3-log decrease in viral yield shown in
Fig. 1.
Bipyridyl Inhibition of Vaccinia DNA Replication and Virus
Production Occurs Early in the Infectious Cycle--
BIP appears to
block virus production by inhibiting viral DNA replication. Thus, BIP
appears to work early in the infectious cycle. If the BIP effect was
restricted to an early step in infection, then at some time point
post-infection, BIP would no longer be able to inhibit. This inference
was tested by measuring both incorporation of
[3H]thymidine at 6 hpi and viral yield at 48 hpi in cells
that were treated with BIP (100 µM) at various times
post-infection. In Fig. 4 the DNA
synthesis in these cells was compared with that in uninfected cells
(mock) and in control infected cells (none, no
BIP added). The data demonstrate that to inhibit strongly DNA synthesis
at 6 hpi, BIP must be added by 3 hpi (stippled bars). A
similar result was observed in regards to the inhibition of viral yield
(Fig. 5, closed circles). The
results were completely consistent with the inference above that BIP
acted early in infection and that the mechanism of BIP inhibition of
virus production was linked to the BIP inhibition of DNA synthesis.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Bypyridyl, hydroxyurea, and Ara-C inhibit
viral DNA synthesis at different times post-infection. Confluent
monolayers of BSC40 cells were infected with vaccinia virus at an
m.o.i. of 10. The DNA synthesis in all cultures was then determined by
pulse labeling with [3H]thymidine as above. Inhibitors
were added at the times post-infection indicated in the figure. The
additions were as follow: BIP, 100 µM (stippled
bars); HU, 10 mM (shaded bars); Ara-C, 100 µg/ml (solid bars). The values are averages of duplicate
cultures for each sample and are representative of two separate
experiments. Typical ranges, which varied from 4 to 11% in this
experiment, are illustrated by the bars on the mock-infected
and infected cell controls.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Bypyridyl, hydroxyurea, and Ara-C inhibit
viral replication at different times post-infection; a
membrane-impermeant Fe2+ chelator, BPS, does not
inhibit. BIP (100 µM, closed circles),
hydroxyurea (10 mM, open triangles), and Ara-C
(100 µg/ml, open squares) were added to vaccinia-infected
monolayers of BSC40 cells at the times post-infection indicated in the
figure. The viral yield in these infected cells was then determined at
48 hpi by a standard plaque assay. The inhibition of vaccinia virus
infection by the membrane-impermeant Fe2+ chelator, BPS
(100 µM), was also tested. This reagent was without
inhibitory effect (open circles). The data in the figure are
representative of three separate experiments.
|
|
To probe further the mechanism of the BIP inhibition, the temporal
effect of other inhibitors on viral DNA synthesis and yield was
determined. In particular, HU inhibits active RR by reducing the ferric
iron core. This results in the loss of the tyrosyl radical essential to
the catalytic activity of this enzyme (27). RR is an early protein
produced by vaccinia and other large DNA viruses and is required for a
productive infection (20, 26, 27). Alternatively, we employed cytosine
arabinoside (Ara-C), which directly inhibits DNA polymerization.
The temporal sensitivity of viral-dependent DNA synthesis
to these two inhibitors is shown in Fig. 4. The corresponding
inhibition of viral yield is shown in Fig. 5. Unlike BIP, HU inhibited
DNA synthesis by 70% even if added at 5 hpi (Fig. 4, shaded
bars), whereas Ara-C retained full inhibition when added at this
time (solid bars). A similar pattern was observed in regard
to viral yield (Fig. 5). HU (open triangles) and Ara-C
(open squares) were equally effective in inhibiting viral
yield when added up to 2 hpi. However, differences were observed when
these inhibitors were added at later times. In contrast to BIP, HU was
fully effective when added up to 3 hpi, while in contrast to both of
the other compounds Ara-C was fully effective even when added 4 hpi.
The premise underlying our original prediction that BIP would inhibit
vaccinia infection was that this lipophilic, membrane-permeant Fe2+ chelator would readily diffuse into cells and
sequester iron within the cells that otherwise would be available in
support of viral replication. The data show clearly that BIP does
inhibit viral replication. A membrane-impermeant iron chelator was used also to show that the inhibitory effect of BIP was due to the chelation
of intracellular iron only. Thus, the anionic Fe2+
chelator, bathophenanthroline disulfonic acid (BPS) was tested as an
inhibitor of viral yield. As the data show, BPS was completely without
effect on the production of viable virus (Fig. 5, open circles).
Bipyridyl Treatment Increases the RNA Binding Activity of
IRP1--
The result with BPS was fully consistent with the inference
that the inhibition of viral replication due to BIP resulted from an
effect that BIP had on the partitioning of intracellular iron and not
on extracellular processes that result in iron accumulation. This
inference was tested by comparing the RNA binding activity of the BCS40
IRP1 in cell extracts derived from control and BIP-treated cells. Thus,
cells were incubated with 100 µM BIP for 3 h; cell extracts were isolated and used to program a standard RNA binding assay
(40) using as probe a ribooligonucleotide derived from the human
ferritin L chain mRNA (41, 42). The gel shift analysis of these
binding reactions is shown in Fig. 6
(inset). Quantitative PhosphorImager analysis of the gel
demonstrated that BIP treatment resulted in an average 1.9-fold
increase (±0.1) in this binding activity based on a linear least
squares treatment of the PhosphorImager data (Fig. 6,
graph). This result quantitatively reproduced the 1.8-fold
increase in IRP1 binding activity in K562 cells due to the
membrane-permeant Fe2+ chelator, salicylaldehyde
isonicotinoyl hydrazone (SIH) (32). This effect has been correlated
directly to the chelation by SIH of intracellular iron in these cells
(32).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Bypyridyl treatment increases the RNA binding
activity of IRP1. BSC40 cells were treated with BIP (100 µM) for 3 h. Cell extracts were prepared from the
BIP-treated and control cells and used to program RNA binding assays.
The binding assays were prepared in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.6),
5% glycerol, 0.2 M KCl, 5 µg of tRNA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, and 30 units RNasin and included probe (25,000 cpm) and
the quantity of cell extract indicated. The mixtures were subsequently
resolved on an agarose gel that was dried and developed by
phosphorimaging using a Bio-Rad instrument and Molecular Analyst
software. The IRP1-binding values in the graph represent the adjusted
counts registered by the PhosphorImager. The digitized phosphorimage is
shown in the inset. Based on the fitted slopes of the
binding curves, the fold increase in IRP1 binding activity in the
BIP-treated cells was 1.9 ± 0.2. These slopes were determined by
linear least squares analysis using Prism 3.0 software from GraphPad
(Cambridge, MA).
|
|
Bipyridyl Treatment Does Not Inhibit Ribonucleotide Reductase
Subunit Synthesis but Blocks Enzyme Activation--
The results above
were consistent with the hypothesis that BIP inhibited vaccinia virus
production by blocking the build-up of the dNTPs necessary for viral
replication. The working model proposes that this block was due to an
inhibition of the iron-activation of apoRR and, furthermore, that this
inhibition was a consequence of the BIP chelation of the intracellular
iron otherwise accessible for this purpose.
This assumption that the target of the BIP treatment was the viral
ribonucleotide reductase was tested directly. First, pulse-labeling and
immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out to determine the
pattern of R1 and R2 synthesis and turnover during infection and BIP
treatment. These data are shown in Fig.
7. They are fully consistent with the
labeling results shown in Fig. 2 in that the synthesis of these two
early gene products was not inhibited by BIP treatment (Fig.
7A). In fact, in cells treated with BIP, the synthesis of
these proteins was extended up 10 hpi. In contrast, R1 and R2 synthesis
in the untreated, virus-infected control cells had declined
significantly at this time concurrent with initiation of intermediate
and late gene expression (cf. Fig. 2). Furthermore, BIP had
no effect on R1 and R2 protein stability. Thus, protein produced at 4 hpi exhibited no turnover in 3 h whether or not BIP was present
(cf. lanes 1 and 2 to lanes 3 and
4, Fig. 7B). In general, the data show clearly
that BIP-treated virus-infected cells exhibit normal synthesis and
stability of RR subunits.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Bypyridyl does not inhibit ribonucleotide
reductase subunit synthesis nor alter subunit stability.
A, vaccinia-infected cells were pulse-labeled with
[35S]methionine at the times post-infection indicated in
the figure. The vaccinia R1 and R2 subunits synthesized at these times
post-infection were detected separately by immunoprecipitation with
rabbit polyclonal antisera to VVR1 and VRR2, respectively, followed by
SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. B, BSC40 cells were infected
in the absence or presence of 100 µM BIP and then
pulse-labeled for 30 min with [35S]methionine at 2.5-3
hpi. Following a chase with a 100-fold excess cold methionine (cells
collected immediately at ~3 hpi) or following a chase period of
4 h (cells collected at 7 hpi), cell extracts were prepared, and
the vaccinia R1 and R2 subunits were analyzed as above. The figure was
prepared from scanned, digitized files of the autoradiographs.
|
|
On the other hand, BIP treatment strongly reduced the ribonucleotide
reductase activity in virus-infected cells (Fig.
8). In this experiment, cell extracts
were prepared from a panel of cell samples that included mock-infected
and BIP-free controls. In addition, the BIP was removed from some
cultures at 6 h as above, with extracts prepared at 9 hpi. These
extracts were then assayed for their total ribonucleotide reductase
activity using [3H]CDP as substrate (43). The data are
presented in terms of the virus-derived RR activity, that is the values
given have been corrected for the endogenous, virus-independent
contribution to the total.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Bypyridyl inhibits the activation of vaccinia
ribonucleotide reductase; the recovery from this inhibition is
inhibited by cycloheximide. Confluent monolayers of BSC40 cells
were infected by vaccinia virus at an m.o.i. of 10 in the absence or
presence of 100 µM BIP. At 6 hpi, cells were collected,
and cell extracts were assayed for ribonucleotide reductase activity by
the production of [3H]dCMP/dUMP from
[3H]CDP (1st two bars). Infected cells from a
second set of cultures were collected at 9 hpi and analyzed for enzyme
activity also (2nd set of bars). A third set of BIP-treated
infected cultures was handled in the following manner. One-half of this
set was treated with cycloheximide (CHX, 100 µg/ml) for 15 min, and then both halves were washed free of BIP, including
cycloheximide in the wash buffer and restored media of the
cycloheximide-treated cultures. Cell extracts were subsequently
prepared from these two sets of cultures at 9 hpi and assayed for
reductase activity (last set of bars). All values shown have
been corrected for the endogenous, virus-independent activity that was
14 ± 5 units (pmol of CDP reduced/min/mg protein). The S.E. in
these corrected values are given in the figure. Note that BIP added
in vitro to either the extracts or to the assay mixture had
no effect on the reductase activity measured (data not shown).
|
|
The viral-dependent values for cells that had not been
treated with BIP are similar to what has been reported previously using this same assay method (solid bars at 6 and 9 hpi,
BIP) (43). The decline in RR activity over this period parallels
the decrease in the synthetic rate as shown in Fig. 7A
( BIP samples). In contrast, the RR activity in the
BIP-treated cells was strongly reduced at 6 and, most dramatically, at
9 hpi (stippled bars). In the set of cultures from which BIP
had been removed, the virus-dependent RR activity had
recovered by 9 hpi to 65% of the peak activity normally observed in
infected cells that had not been BIP-treated (open bar,
compare with solid bar, 6 hpi). This was
consistent with the observation that the DNA synthesis in such cultures
also recovered in this time frame (Fig. 3). These observations are fully consistent with the hypothesis that vaccinia virus replication and infectivity can be inhibited by iron chelation and that the viral
target of this chelation is ribonucleotide reductase. Importantly, in
control assays, we showed that BIP added to either the cell extracts or
to the assay mixtures themselves had no effect on the RR activity
measured in these extracts (data not shown). This result indicates that
the vaccinia ribonucleotide reductase is not inactivated by an iron
chelator like BIP. This stands in sharp contrast to the sensitivity of
the mammalian enzyme to such reagents (18, 44). Furthermore, the
insensitivity of vaccinia RR to BIP in vitro is consistent
with the fact that BIP addition to infected cells at 3 hpi or later had
no effect on either viral-dependent DNA synthesis (Fig. 4)
or infection (Fig. 5).
However, the data show that following removal of BIP, RR activity did
increase. The immunoprecipitation results show that RR subunit
synthesis is sustained in these BIP-treated cells and that RR subunits
are stable (Fig. 7). The question arises whether the increase in RR
activity seen between 6 and 9 hpi following removal of the BIP was due
to metal addition to extant apoRR subunits, or to maturation of newly
synthesized ones, or both. Treatment of the cells with cycloheximide
prior to BIP withdrawal was carried out to address this question. The
result is shown in Fig. 8, shaded bar. Thus, cycloheximide
completely inhibited the recovery of RR activity between 6 and 9 hpi.
This result indicated that the recovery typically observed following
removal of the BIP required protein synthesis. Whether this lack of
recovery was due to inhibition of new RR synthesis, or to inhibition of
the synthesis of some other factor required for iron activation of
apoRR, or both, could not be deduced from this result.
Bipyridyl Inhibits HSV-1 but Not VSV Infection--
Vaccinia is a
large DNA virus that replicates in the cytoplasm. To determine if the
BIP effect was specific to such viruses, as our hypothesis would
require, and/or to viruses that replicate in the cytoplasm only, the
effect of BIP on herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and vesicular
stomatitis virus (VSV) replication was determined. Unlike vaccinia,
HSV-1 is a DNA virus that replicates in the nucleus; the data in Fig.
9A show that in comparison to vaccinia it is equally sensitive to BIP with a closely parallel concentration dependence (compare closed squares to
closed circles). In contrast, VSV, an RNA virus, was
completely insensitive to BIP. This was demonstrated by a simple plaque
assay as illustrated in Fig. 9B and confirmed by more
quantitative viral yield analysis (data not shown). These comparisons
indicate that BIP most likely inhibits proliferation of DNA viruses
only and indicate further that the cell locale of the viral replisome
is not a factor in this inhibitory activity.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Bypyridyl inhibits HSV-1 infection as
effectively as vaccinia infection but not vesicular stomatitis virus
infection. A, confluent monolayers of BSC40 cells were
infected with either vaccinia virus or herpes simplex virus type 1 at
an m.o.i. of 10 in the absence or presence of the [BIP] as indicated
in the figure. Cells were removed at 48 hpi and assayed for virus
production by a standard plaque assay. The values are representative of
three separate experiments. B, confluent monolayers of BSC40
cells were infected with the equivalent of 20 plaque-forming units of
VSV in the absence or presence of 100 µM BIP. The image
of these monolayers was obtained at 48 hpi. This image was generated by
direct digitization of the plates using Bio-Rad Gel Doc hardware.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A variety of data suggests that eukaryotic cells contain a pool of
iron that is accessible to membrane-permeant, iron-chelating agents
like BIP. The most direct measurement of this "labile iron pool"
(LIP) in mammalian cells is given by a membrane-permeant fluorescent
iron chelator such as calcein (30-32, 45). The fluorescence of calcein
(CA) is quenched upon iron binding; the amount of CA-bound iron is
subsequently determined by the amount of CA fluorescence recovered upon
addition of a competing, membrane-permeant iron chelator like BIP or
SIH. Although there is some controversy about the specificity of CA for
Fe2+ versus Fe3+ (45), the data
clearly show that chelators like BIP and SIH are
Fe2+-specific indicating that in the cell CA is chelating
Fe2+. This chelatable Fe2+ constitutes ~20%
of the total iron in both mammalian and yeast cells in culture (30,
35). Most reasonably, the major fraction of the remaining iron in these
cells would be in ferritin (mammalian cells) (4, 32, 34) or in the
yeast vacuole (46, 47). In most cell types, except for mature
erythrocytes, only a minor fraction of total cell iron is bound as a
prosthetic group in iron proteins. Among these would be ribonucleotide
reductase, whether the endogenous enzyme or a pathogen-encoded one,
e.g. the vaccinia virus RR.
One cytoplasmic protein that samples the LIP in mammalian cells is the
iron-regulatory element-binding protein or cytosolic aconitase
(reviewed in Refs. 4 and 5). IRP1 is active as an RNA-binding protein
when in an iron-depleted state; when iron-replete, IRP1 is equivalent
to aconitase with its 4Fe-4S cluster and cannot bind to RNA. IRP1
binding to ferritin mRNA inhibits translation initiation of this
transcript, whereas binding to the mRNA for the transferrin
receptor stabilizes this message thereby enhancing receptor synthesis.
Both transcripts contain an iron-response sequence element (IRE) that
is specifically recognized by IRP1. Cabantchik and co-workers (32)
demonstrated that the IRP1 isolated from SIH-treated K562 cells had a
2-fold increase in IRE binding activity when assayed in
vitro in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. In these cells,
SIH treatment reduced the LIP by 75% providing evidence that the
increase in IRP1 binding activity was due to the chelation of iron from
this pool. We have demonstrated that BIP in BSC40 cells causes a
quantitatively equivalent increase of IRP1 binding activity and that
this increase parallels a decrease in the apparent iron activation of
vaccinia RR. Although we did not measure a decrease in the LIP
due to BIP directly, we do note that in the BCS40 cells the decrease in
RR activation caused by BIP treatment was ~75% also.
Experiments in S. cerevisiae suggested that this organism
has a pool of Fe2+ that is linked to the regulation of the
transcription factor, Aft1p. Under conditions of low cell iron, Aft1p
activates expression of the cohort of genes that encode the proteins
responsible for the uptake and trafficking of iron in yeast (36). Iron,
then, negatively regulates Aft1p transcriptional activity much as it does the RNA binding activity of IRP1, although the mechanism of this
negative regulation of Aft1p is not known. Analogous to the effect of
SIH and BIP on IRP1 RNA binding activity in mammalian cells, in yeast
BIP strongly activates the transcriptional activity of Aft1p. This pool
of BIP-accessible Fe2+ accounts for ~18% of the total
cell iron based on the amount of BIP-extractable iron in the yeast cell
(35). This percentage is comparable to the ~20% of total delivered
iron in K562 cells that is associated with the LIP in those cells
(30-32). In summary, eukaryotic cells appear to have a pool of
Fe2+ that, at the least, is linked to the
iron-dependent modulation of the activity of factors that
regulate the production of iron-handling proteins. In as much as this
pool can be buffered by production of ferritin H chain, for example,
indicates that this pool supports both regulatory and storage functions
(32). Linking these two functions is physiologically reasonable since
the targets of the iron-dependent regulation are those
genes that encode the proteins responsible for maintaining the size of
this pool (5).
The data here add to this picture in that they suggest that this pool
supplies iron for an iron-dependent enzyme, as well, since
BIP blocks the activation of the vaccinia ribonucleotide reductase. The
inhibition of this activation parallels the extent to which BIP and SIH
reduce the LIP in mammalian cells in culture (30, 31, 34). Both
reagents reduce the signal from this pool of Fe2+ by 75%;
as noted, BIP reduced the RR activity by an identical percentage (227 versus 58 units, Fig. 8). The close quantitative comparison
may indicate that the apoRR directly samples the BIP-accessible Fe2+ pool in BSC40 cells. Such a mechanism would be
appropriate for a cytoplasmically produced and targeted protein like
the vaccinia RR that is most likely associated with the cytoplasmic
viral replisome.
A large body of evidence links the severity and/or progression of
cellular pathogenesis to cellular iron status (2, 8, 10, 13, 15, 16,
48). However, little is known about possible underlying mechanisms of
this linkage. One common theme is a decreased level of DNA synthesis
whether of host or pathogen-specific DNA. For example, treatment of
several human cancer cell lines with desferrioxamine (deferoxamine,
DFO) strongly inhibited DNA synthesis in these cells. However, unlike
BIP or SIH, DFO is not readily membrane-permeant; in addition, as its
name implies, DFO binds Fe3+. Experimentally, DFO added to
the growth medium of K562 cells does not chelate iron out of the
intracellular calcein-iron complex (30, 32). Therefore, DFO exerts its
effect by inducing a chronic inhibition of cell iron accumulation
rather than an acute sequestration of iron from the LIP. Nonetheless,
the probable iron limitation in the LIP, as would occur in cells that
were chronically iron-deprived, did correlate with a decreased DNA
synthesis and, most reasonably, the cell proliferation that attends
metastatic disease (15, 16). However, in none of these experiments was
the decrease in DNA synthesis and/or cell proliferation correlated with
a decrease in RR activity as we have established here.
Clearly, reduction in the size of the LIP, whether caused by chronic
limitation of cell iron accumulation or by direct, acute withdrawal of
Fe2+ from the pool by a membrane-permeant ferrous
ion-chelating agent, results in a decrease in RR activity. Nyholm
et al. (44) and Cooper et al. (18) have
demonstrated that addition of membrane-permeant or -impermeant iron
chelators to cultured mouse cells resulted in a decrease in the
intracellular concentration of RR-active sites. This decline was shown
by the decreased EPR signal due to the tyrosyl-free radical component
of the RR-active site. The formation and stability of this radical
depend on the diiron prosthetic group in this active site. We were not
able to detect this RR radical in vaccinia-infected BSC40 cells by EPR
(data not shown). At least in the work by Nyholm et al.
(44), however, this signal was detectable only in RR-overproducing
cells. Nonetheless, the RR activity and protein analyses that we show
here provide similar information, namely that BIP treatment results in
the accumulation of inactive RR subunits.
Thus, the results shown here are the first to link iron chelation from
the LIP with the loss of RR activity and the resulting block in the
infectious cycle of a cell pathogen. Importantly, we have shown that
unlike the mammalian RR, which appears to have a labile diiron active
site (18, 44), the vaccinia enzyme is resistant to inactivation by an
iron chelator. In consequence, BIP, which does not inactivate the
vaccinia RR, inhibited only if added within the first 3 h
post-infection. This was in contrast to HU, which inactivates RR and
therefore was effective in blocking vaccinia DNA synthesis and
infectivity even when added at 4-5 hpi. Thus, our in vivo
data strongly indicate that the BIP-mediated withdrawal of iron from
the LIP of the infected cells prevents activation of the vaccinia RR
rather than leading to its inactivation. The lack of active vaccinia RR
subsequently blocks the onset of viral-dependent DNA
synthesis and the viral replicative and infectious cycle.
This cycle appears stalled at the interface between early and
intermediate gene expression. The fact that in the presence of the
BIP-mediated arrest R1 and R2 subunit synthesis persisted for up to 10 hpi (these are otherwise early gene products) is good evidence for this
inference, and so is the fact that the onset of DNA synthesis
immediately followed BIP withdrawal up to several hpi. This arrested
infectious state remained poised for resumption of a productive
infection up to ~16 hpi. The viral replicative capacity in the
BIP-treated cells sharply declined at later times post-infection. In
summary these data provide a fairly clear view of how manipulation of
the labile iron pool in mammalian cells alters the progression of one
type of cellular pathogenesis. They also raise the question of whether
such manipulation with a simple organic compound like BIP might have
some therapeutic use.
Our work does not directly provide evidence for the mechanism by which
the diiron center of active RR is assembled, only that the required
iron most likely is derived from the LIP. There is limited, and
controversial, evidence from S. cerevisiae that eukaryotic cells may produce a chaperone for the iron targeted for RR-active site
assembly (17, 25). In the yeast genome RNR1 and
RNR3 encode large subunit isoforms, whereas RNR2
and RNR4 encode isoforms of the small subunit that contains
the diiron cluster and the catalytic tyrosyl free radical (17, 25, 49,
50). Rnr2p clearly is the small subunit isoform that is found in active
RR in yeast. However, the function of Rnr4p is not fully known. Chabes et al. (17) have suggested that Rnr4p is an alternative
subunit in active RR. In contrast, Nguyen et al. (25)
propose that Rnr4p, which they demonstrated was not catalytically
active, could serve as an iron chaperone in the efficient assembly of
the diiron cluster in apoRnr2p. In yeast, analogous copper chaperones
are essential for the trafficking of copper to their respective target
proteins (51). If Rnr4p does assist in the targeting of iron to Rnr2p, a mammalian homologue could be involved in the targeting of iron from
the LIP to the viral R2 protein. However, none of the mammalian genome
data bases contain genes encoding yeast Rnr4p-like proteins. This
leaves open the question of whether S. cerevisiae is unique in terms of the mechanism of iron targeting to apoRnr2p, and, if so, of
how this targeting to the endogenous or vaccinia virus R2 is achieved
in mammalian cells.
We performed one experiment that might have provided some information
on this point. By releasing the infected cells from the
BIP-dependent block in the presence of cycloheximide, we
wished to determine if protein synthesis was required for the
subsequent activation of viral RR. Cycloheximide treatment did inhibit
activation. However, there are two reasonable explanations for this
effect. First is simply that only newly synthesized R2 subunits can be activated. The second explanation is that the synthesis of an accessory
protein is required for this activation. We cannot distinguish between
these two mechanisms, nor can we exclude the possibility that
both are involved. The Western blot analysis showed that R1 and R2
subunits were present and stable in the BIP-treated cells and that upon
BIP withdrawal R1 and R2 synthesis continued in the absence of
concurrent cycloheximide treatment. However, the work of Nyholm
et al. (44) and Cooper et al. (18) noted above
indicated that mammalian apoR2 could be reactivated in vivo suggesting that the vaccinia R2 subunits accumulating in the infected, BIP-treated cells could have been activated also. If this inference is
correct, then our cycloheximide result suggests that concurrent synthesis of some protein(s) is required for this activation. Experiments in progress are designed to confirm that iron-depleted vaccinia RR can be reactivated in vivo and to subsequently
identify the cell protein(s) that is required for this diiron cluster
assembly process.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Christopher Mathews (Oregon
State University, Corvallis, OR) for the vaccinia virus R1 and R2
antisera used for the immunoprecipitation experiments. We thank
Dr. William Walden (University of Illinois, Chicago) for the
pTZ18RM1 plasmid for the preparation of the IRE-containing riboprobe.
We thank Dr. William Ruyechan (State University of New York, Buffalo)
for the stock of herpes simplex virus type 1 and for helpful comments about this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DK53820 (to D. J. K.) and AI43933 (to E. G. N.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
140 Farber Hall, 3435 Main St., Buffalo, NY 14214. Tel.: 716-829-2842;
Fax: 716-829-2661; E-mail: camkos@acsu.buffalo.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 11, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M010806200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RR, ribonucleotide
reductase;
HU, hydroxyurea;
BIP, 2,2'-bipyridyl;
VSV, vesicular
stomatitis virus;
m.o.i., multiplicity of infection;
hpi, hours
post-infection;
BPS, bathophenanthroline disulfonic acid;
Ara-C, cytosine arabinoside;
HSV-1, herpes simplex virus type 1;
LIP, labile
iron pool;
CA, calcein;
SIH, salicylaldehyde isonicotinoyl hydrazone;
IRE, iron-response element;
DFO, desferrioxamine;
PAGE, polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hill, H. A. O.
(1983)
in
Biological Aspects of Metals and Metal-related Diseases
(Sarkar, B., ed)
, pp. 15-21, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
|
| 2.
|
Polla, B. S.
(1999)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
57,
1345-1349
|
| 3.
|
Halliwell, B.,
and Gutteridge, J. M. C.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
86,
1-85
|
| 4.
|
Aisen, P.,
Wessling-Resnick, M.,
and Leibold, E. A.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
3,
200-206
|
| 5.
|
Eisenstein, R. S.,
Kennedy, M. C.,
and Beinert, H.
(1997)
in
Metal Ions in Gene Regulation
(Silver, S.
, and Walden, W., eds)
, pp. 157-216, International Thomson Publishing, New York
|
| 6.
|
Wessling-Resnick, M.
(1999)
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
34,
285-314
|
| 7.
|
Weinberg, E. D.,
and Weinberg, G. A.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.
8,
164-169
|
| 8.
|
Taramelli, D.,
Brambilla, S.,
Sala, G.,
Bruccoleri, A.,
Tognazioli, C.,
Riviera-Uzielli, L.,
and Boelaert, J. R.
(2000)
Infect. Immun.
68,
1724-1726
|
| 9.
|
Neilands, J. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26723-26726
|
| 10.
|
Mabeza, G. F.,
Loyevsky, M.,
Gordeuk, V. R.,
and Weiss, G.
(1999)
Pharmacol. Ther.
81,
53-75
|
| 11.
|
Howard, D. H.
(1999)
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
12,
394-404
|
| 12.
|
Cornelissen, C. N.,
and Sparling, P. F.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
14,
843-850
|
| 13.
|
Cabantchik, Z. I.,
Moody-Haupt, S.,
and Gordeuk, V. R.
(1999)
FEMS Immun. Med. Microbiol.
26,
289-298
|
| 14.
|
Britigan, B. E.,
Rasmussen, G. T.,
Olakanmi, O.,
and Cox, C. D.
(2000)
Infect. Immun.
68,
1271-1275
|
| 15.
|
Darnell, G.,
and Richardson, D. R.
(1999)
Blood
94,
781-792
|
| 16.
|
Richardson, D. R.
(1997)
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
75,
1164-1180
|
| 17.
|
Chabes, A., V., D.,
Larsson, G.,
Liu, A.,
Graslund, A.,
Wijmenga, S.,
and Thelander, L.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
2474-2479
|
| 18.
|
Cooper, C. E.,
Lynagh, G. R.,
Hoyes, K. P.,
Hider, R. C.,
Cammack, R.,
and Porter, J. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20291-20299
|
| 19.
|
Lamarche, N.,
Matton, G.,
Massie, B.,
Fontecave, M.,
Atta, M.,
Dumas, F.,
Gaudreau, P.,
and Langelier, Y.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
320,
129-135
|
| 20.
|
Prichard, M. N.,
and Shipman, C., Jr.
(1995)
Chemotherapy
41,
384-395
|
| 21.
|
Jacobson, J. G.,
Leib, D. A.,
Goldstein, D. J.,
Bogard, C. L.,
Schaffer, P. A.,
Weller, S. K.,
and Coen, D. M.
(1989)
Virology
173,
276-283
|
| 22.
|
Idowu, A. D.,
Fraser-Smith, E. B.,
Poffenberger, K. L.,
and Herman, R. C.
(1992)
Antiviral Res.
17,
145-156
|
| 23.
|
Cameron, J. M.,
McDougall, I.,
Marsden, H. S.,
Preston, V. G.,
Ryan, D. M.,
and Subak-Sharpe, J. H.
(1988)
J. Gen. Virol.
69,
2607-2612
|
| 24.
|
Eriksson, S.,
Graslund, A.,
Skog, S.,
Thelander, L.,
and Tribukait, B.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
11695-11700
|
| 25.
|
Nguyen, H.-H. T.,
Ge, J.,
Perlstein, D. L.,
and Stubbe, J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12339-12344
|
| 26.
|
Slabaugh, M. B.,
Davis, R. E.,
Roseman, N. A.,
and Mathews, C. K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
17803-17810
|
| 27.
|
Howell, M. L.,
Sanders-Loehr, J.,
Loehr, T. M.,
Roseman, N. A.,
Mathews, C. K.,
and Slabaugh, M. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1705-1711
|
| 28.
|
Howell, M. L.,
Roseman, N. A.,
Slabaugh, M. B.,
and Mathews, C. K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7155-7162
|
| 29.
|
Slabaugh, M. B.,
and Mathews, C. K.
(1986)
J. Virol.
60,
506-514
|
| 30.
|
Breuer, W.,
Epsztejn, S.,
and Cabantchik, Z. I.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24209-24215
|
| 31.
|
Epsztejn, S.,
Kakhlon, O.,
Glickstein, H.,
Breuer, W.,
and Cabantchik, I.
(1997)
Anal. Biochem.
248,
31-40
|
| 32.
|
Konijn, A. M.,
Glickstein, H.,
Vaisman, B.,
Meyron-Holtz, E. G.,
Slotki, I. N.,
and Cabantchik, Z. I.
(1999)
Blood
94,
2128-2134
|
| 33.
|
Hanson, E. S.,
and Leibold, E. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7588-7593
|
| 34.
|
Picard, V.,
Epsztejn, S.,
Santambrogio, P.,
Cabantchik, Z. I.,
and Beaumont, C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15382-15386
|
| 35.
|
Hassett, R. F.,
Romeo, A. M.,
and Kosman, D. K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7628-7636
|
| 36.
|
Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y.,
Stearman, R.,
Dancis, A.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
3377-3384
|
| 37.
|
Condit, R. C.,
and Motyczka, A.
(1981)
Virology
113,
224-241
|
| 38.
|
Niles, E. G.,
Lee-Chen, G.-J.,
Shuman, S.,
Moss, B.,
and Broyles, S. S.
(1989)
Virology
172,
513-522
|
| 39.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 40.
|
Leibold, E. A.,
and Munro, H. N.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
2171-2175
|
| 41.
|
Walden, W. E.,
Daniels-McQueen, S.,
Brown, P. H.,
Gaffield, L.,
Russell, D. A.,
Bielser, D.,
Bailey, L. C.,
and Thach, R. E.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
9503-9507
|
| 42.
|
Swenson, G. R.,
Patino, M. M.,
Beck, M. M.,
Gaffield, L.,
and Walden, W. E.
(1991)
Biol. Met.
4,
48-55
|
| 43.
|
Slabaugh, M. B.,
Johnson, T. L.,
and Mathews, C. K.
(1984)
J. Virol.
52,
507-514
|
| 44.
|
Nyholm, S.,
Mann, G. J.,
Johansson, A. G.,
Bergeron, R. J.,
Graslund, A.,
and Thelander, L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26200-26205
|
| 45.
|
Thomas, F.,
Serratrice, G.,
Beguin, C.,
Aman, E. S.,
Pierre, J. L.,
Fontecave, M.,
and Laulhere, J. P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13375-13383
|
| 46.
|
Raguzzi, F.,
Lesuisse, E.,
and Crichton, R. R.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
231,
253-258
|
| 47.
|
Urbanowski, J. L.,
and Piper, R. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
38061-38070
|
| 48.
|
Cinatl, J., Jr.,
Hoffmann, F.,
Cinatl, J.,
Wever, B.,
Scholz, M.,
Rabenau, H.,
Stieneker, F.,
Kabickova, H.,
Blasko, M.,
and Doerr, H. W.
(1995)
Antiviral Res.
31,
23-34
|
| 49.
|
Huang, M.,
and Elledge, S. J.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6105-6113
|
| 50.
|
Wang, P. J.,
Chabes, A.,
Casagrnade, R.,
Tian, X. C.,
Thelander, L.,
and Huffaker, T. C.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6114-6121
|
| 51.
|
Harrison, M. D.,
Jones, C. E.,
and Dameron, C. T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.
4,
145-153
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. E. Crowe, L. M. Maglova, P. Ponka, and J. M. Russell
Human cytomegalovirus-induced host cell enlargement is iron dependent
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
October 1, 2004;
287(4):
C1023 - C1030.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Surguladze, K. M. Thompson, J. L. Beard, J. R. Connor, and M. G. Fried
Interactions and Reactions of Ferritin with DNA
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 9, 2004;
279(15):
14694 - 14702.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|