Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103235200 on May 7, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 28, 25862-25870, July 13, 2001
SOCS-1 Protein Prevents Janus
Kinase/STAT-dependent Inhibition of
Cell Insulin
Gene Transcription and Secretion in Response to Interferon-
*
Sandra
Cottet
,
Philippe
Dupraz
,
Fabienne
Hamburger,
Wanda
Dolci,
Muriel
Jaquet, and
Bernard
Thorens§
From the Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of
Lausanne, 27 Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
Received for publication, April 11, 2001, and in revised form, May 1, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
In the pathogenesis of type I diabetes mellitus,
activated leukocytes infiltrate pancreatic islets and induce
cell
dysfunction and destruction. Interferon (IFN)-
, tumor
necrosis factor-
and interleukin (IL)-1
play important, although
not completely defined, roles in these mechanisms. Here, using the
highly differentiated
Tc-Tet insulin-secreting cell line, we showed
that IFN-
dose- and time-dependently suppressed insulin
synthesis and glucose-stimulated secretion. As described previously
IFN-
, in combination with IL-1
, also induces inducible NO
synthase expression and apoptosis (Dupraz, P., Cottet, S., Hamburger,
F., Dolci, W., Felley-Bosco, E., and Thorens, B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 37672-37678). To assess the role of the Janus
kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway
in IFN-
intracellular signaling, we stably overexpressed SOCS-1
(suppressor of cytokine
signaling-1) in the
cell line. We
demonstrated that SOCS-1 suppressed cytokine-induced STAT-1
phosphorylation and increased cellular accumulation. This was
accompanied by a suppression of the effect of IFN-
on: (i) reduction
in insulin promoter-luciferase reporter gene transcription, (ii)
decrease in insulin mRNA and peptide content, and (iii) suppression of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Furthermore, SOCS-1 also suppressed the cellular effects that require the combined presence of
IL-1
and IFN-
: induction of nitric oxide production and
apoptosis. Together our data demonstrate that IFN-
is responsible
for the cytokine-induced defect in insulin gene expression and
secretion and that this effect can be completely blocked by
constitutive inhibition of the Janus kinase/STAT pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Development of type I diabetes is initiated by the infiltration of
the islets of Langerhans by immune and inflammatory cells. The
activation of leukocytes, following interactions with
cells autoantigens, results in the synthesis of cell-surface and secreted mediators such as the pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-
, TNF-
, and
IL-1
. These participate in the induction of the insulin-secreting
cell dysfunction and destruction (2). However, despite the fact
that these cytokines have been found in the insulitis of non-obese
diabetic mice and in the pancreas of type I diabetic patients, their
exact role in the pathogenesis of type I diabetes remain unclear (for a
review, see Ref. 3).
Insulitis in non-obese diabetic mice (4) as well as in patients with
type I diabetes (5, 6) is mediated by T-helper type 1 (Th1) cells
producing IFN-
1 and IL-2.
The role of IFN-
in the development of type I diabetes has been
evaluated in several studies, but its role in diabetes induction is not
clearly defined. For instance,
cell injury was limited, and
diabetes did not occur in the RIP-LCMV diabetic mouse model when the
mice were deficient in IFN-
(7). Similarly, Wang et al.
(8) reported that non-obese diabetic mice lacking IFN-
receptor
showed a marked inhibition of insulitis and no signs of diabetes. In
contrast, others have shown that deficiency in IFN-
(9) or in
IFN-
receptor (10) impact only mildly on the onset of diabetes in
non-obese diabetic mice.
Whether IFN-
affects islet
cells directly or indirectly through
the activation of other cells such as cytotoxic T-cells or through the
up-regulation of other cytotoxic factors is also not firmly
established. In vitro, many direct effects of IFN-
on
cells have been demonstrated, including the up-regulation of major
histocompatibility complex class I (11, 12), intracellular cell
adhesion molecule-1 (13), and iNOS (14). It has been proposed that
NO production could cause
cells destruction. However, in
human
cells, the role of NO is not established and may be in fact
only partly, or not at all, involved in cell death (15-17). In mouse
cells or insulinomas, NO appears to be only one of the mechanisms
by which these cells are destroyed (18, 19). Another effect of IFN-
is to impair insulin secretion, as shown with rodent islets tested
in vitro (12, 20). In human islets, however, no decrease in
insulin mRNA and peptide levels has been observed, whereas a weak
reduction in GSIS was measured (15).
The signal transduction pathway initiated by binding of IFN-
to its
receptor leads first to JAK1 and JAK2 activation and their association
with the IFN-
receptor (21-23). JAK kinases then phosphorylate
IFN-
receptor on specific tyrosines, which serve as docking sites
for the transcription factor STAT-1. Upon activation by
phosphorylation, STAT-1 molecules homodimerize and translocate into the
nucleus to activate the transcription of target genes. Negative
regulation of JAK/STAT signaling has just begun to be studied, and
recently a family of proteins has been identified as the SOCS
(suppressor of cytokine
signaling) family. The first member of this family was
denoted CIS, for cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein, and has
been shown to bind to phosphorylated tyrosines on multiple cytokine
receptors (24, 25). Subsequently, three groups have independently
identified the second family member denoted SOCS-1, JAB
(JAK-binding protein), and SSI-1
(Stat-induced Stat
inhibitor-1), respectively (26-28). SOCS-1 has
been shown to inhibit JAK kinase by binding to its activation loop,
thus preventing the access of substrates and/or ATP to the enzyme
catalytic pocket (29). Moreover, IFN-
itself has been shown to be a
potent inducer of SOCS-1 in a wide variety of cell lines (30, 31), suggesting that SOCS-1 acts as a negative feedback regulator of JAK/STAT signaling. Studies with SOCS-1 knockout mice have revealed its
important role in negative regulation of IFN-
action; animals deficient in SOCS-1 showed severe defects, the most prominent features
being growth retardation, impaired T-cell and B-cell development,
excessive IFN-
responses, and early mortality (32-35).
In the present study, we evaluated the role of IFN-
on inducing
cell dysfunction and apoptosis. We used as a model system the
conditionally immortalized
Tc-Tet cells. These cells display a
normal glucose dose-dependent stimulation of insulin
secretion, they can be growth-arrested in the presence of tetracycline,
and, when transplanted in diabetic mice, they can maintain
normoglycemia for several months (36). We previously genetically
modified these cells to express the Bcl-2 gene. These modified cells,
referred to as CDM3D, display improved resistance to stress-induced
apoptosis, show increased viability at high cell density, and grow more
vigorously in cell culture than the parental cells (37). More recently, we further engineered the CDM3D cells for overexpression of proteins interfering with the IL-1
signaling pathway. These proteins were dominant-negative mutants of MyD88 (MyD88-Toll and MyD88-lpr), an
adaptor protein linking the IL-1 receptor to downstream signaling molecules. We demonstrated an increased resistance of these cells to
IL-1
/IFN-
-induced iNOS expression and nitrite production and an
increased resistance to cytokine-induced apoptosis but no resistance to
impaired GSIS induced by cytokines (1).
Here we demonstrate that in CDM3D cells, IFN-
alone is sufficient to
induce a sustained, time- and dose-dependent decrease in
insulin mRNA levels, peptide cellular content and
glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. We show that the stable
expression of SOCS-1 in CDM3D cells blocks IFN-
-induced STAT-1
phosphorylation and increased cellular accumulation and prevents the
negative effect of the cytokine on insulin gene expression and
stimulated secretion. Furthermore, the continuous expression of SOCS-1
also blocks the cellular effects that require the combined presence of
IFN-
and IL-1
: an increase in NO production and an induction of
apoptosis. These data characterize the role of IFN-
on
cell dysfunction and identify a molecular way of preventing these
negative cytokine effects.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture--
CDM3D cells are
Tc-Tet cells (36) that have
been modified to overexpress Bcl-2 (37). They were grown in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) containing 25 mM glucose and supplemented with 15% horse serum (Amimed,
BioConcept, Allschwil, Switzerland), 2.5% fetal bovine serum (Life
Technologies, Inc.), 10 mM Hepes, 1 mM sodium
pyruvate, 2 mM glutamine, at 37 °C with 5%
CO2. For nitrite secretion measurements, medium was changed to RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Inc.), which has a lower level of
nitrite content.
Analysis of Insulin and SOCS-1 Expression by Northern
Blot--
Total RNA was isolated and analyzed by Northern blot as
described previously using specific probes prepared by random-primer labeling (38). Densitometry scanning of the blots was performed using
the Bio-Rad phosphorus imaging device, IMAGE
FX.
Preparation of Lentiviral Vectors and Infection of CDM3D
Cells--
The human SOCS-1 cDNA, kindly provided by Dr. R. W. Furlanetto (Rochester, NY), contains a FLAG epitope. It was
subcloned into a modified SIN-18-phosphoglycerate kinase-woodchuck
hepatitis virus vector (SIN-18-PGK-WHV) (39, 40) that contains a
neomycin resistance gene downstream of an internal ribosome entry site from encephalomyocarditis virus, kindly provided by Dr. N. Déglon (University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland). High titer stocks of
lentiviral vectors packaged by the multiply attenuated lentivirus CMV
R8.91 and pseudotyped with the vesicular stomatitis virus-G envelope protein (plasmid pMD-G) were prepared by transient
transfection of 293T cells as described (37, 41, 42). SOCS-1 virus
titer was determined by p24 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. CDM3D cells were transduced with a multiplicity of
infection of 10-20. Selection of the pool of infected cells was
initiated 48 h after infection by adding 800 µg/ml of G418 for 1 week, followed by 400 µg/ml of the drug for an additional week.
Insulin Secretion--
Cells were plated in 24-well dishes at a
density of 105 cells/well 48 h before incubation with
cytokines. Following cytokine exposure for 48 h, cells were then
incubated for 1 h in Hepes-buffered Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate
buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin with 2.8 mM glucose and 200 µM isobutylmethylxanthine (Sigma). The medium was changed, and cells were incubated again for
1 h in Hepes-buffered Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer/0.5% bovine
serum albumin containing 2.8 or 16.7 mM glucose and
isobutylmethylxanthine. Secreted insulin was quantitated by
radioimmunoassay (Linco Research, Labodia, Yens, Switzerland) as
described (37, 43). Intracellular insulin was measured in acid-ethanol
cell lysates. Briefly, cells were lysed in 250 µl of 75% ethanol,
1.5% concentrated hydrochloric acid. Aliquots of cell lysates were
also analyzed for DNA content (44) to normalize the secretion data. The
lysates in acid ethanol were neutralized with
volume of 1 M Na2CO3, and DNA content was
determined by fluorescence using a Fluoroskan-II microplate fluorometer
(Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland) with an excitation filter set at 355 nm
and an emission filter set at 460 nm.
Cytokine-induced Nitrite Accumulation--
Nitrite accumulation
in the conditioned culture medium was detected spectrophotometrically
(at 540 nm) by the Griess reaction in the presence of 1 mM
sulfanilamide and 0.1 M HCl (45). The concentrations (pmol
of NO
/mg protein) were calculated
from the absorption before (A1) and after (A2) the addition of 70 mM naphthylethylenediamine and compared with a standard
curve derived from NaNO2 (0-20 µM). The
values shown are the means ± S.D. of three independent
experiments performed in triplicate.
Preparation of Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Extracts--
At
determined times, cytokine-stimulated or untreated cells were lysed on
ice in 200 µl of buffer A (20 mM Tris, pH 7.8, 10 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol) with 4 mM Na3VO4
and 10 mM NaF, complemented with 50 µg/ml of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 2 µg/ml of aprotinin. Cell lysates were incubated for 15 s in 50 µl of buffer A with 2.5% Nonidet P-40 and centrifuged at 4 °C for 15 s in a
microcentrifuge (2000 rpm). The recovered supernatant
constitutes the cytoplasmic extract. The pelleted nuclei were
resuspended for 15 min in 100 µl of buffer A with 1% Nonidet P-40,
0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 300 mM NaCl and
centrifuged at 4 °C for 15 min in a microcentrifuge (13,000 rpm),
the recovered supernatant corresponding to the nuclear extract. The
amount of total proteins in the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions was
determined by colorimetric dosage with the Micro BCA protein assay
reagent (Pierce).
Western Blot Analysis--
Cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were
immunoassayed as described previously (46) to detect both total and
tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT-1 proteins, using a rabbit polyclonal
anti-STAT-1 antibody (diluted 1:200) and a mouse monoclonal
anti-phospho-STAT-1 antibody (diluted 1:100), respectively (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). The SOCS-1 protein level was
determined in cell lysates prepared in 5% SDS, 5 mM EDTA,
and 80 mM Tris, pH 6.8, with 50 µg/ml of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 2 µg/ml of aprotinin. SOCS-1
protein was detected in immunoblot using the anti-FLAG-M2 mouse
monoclonal antibody (Sigma).
Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assays--
Cells were
seeded in 24-well dishes at a density of 105 cells/well
48 h before transfection with the indicated plasmids using the
LipofectAMINE 2000 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). A total of 1 µg of DNA was transfected, which consisted of 0.8 µg of
insulin-luciferase reporter plasmid containing fragment
326 to +30 of
the human insulin gene promoter linked to luciferase (47) (kindly
provided by Dr. A. Abderrahmani, University Hospital, Lausanne,
Switzerland) and 0.2 µg of a
-galactosidase reporter plasmid
(driven by the cytomegalovirus promoter), which was used to correct for
transfection efficiency. 72 h after transfection, cells were
stimulated with cytokines for 18 h, and relative activity of
luciferase and
-galactosidase was determined as described (1).
Cytotoxicity Assay--
Two days before induction of apoptosis,
cells were seeded in a polylysine-treated 96-well microtiter plate
(104 cells/well). The medium was changed, and the cells
were left untreated or treated for 36 h with a combination of
TNF-
, IL-1
, and IFN-
(103 units/ml each).
Cytokine-induced cell death was assessed using a cytotoxicity assay
based on tetrazolium dyes (CellTiter 96® Aqueous One Solution Cell
Proliferation Assay; Promega, Madison, WI). MTS tetrazolium
compound is bioreduced by metabolically active cells into a colored
formazan product that is proportional to the number of viable cells. 20 µl/well of MTS tetrazolium reagent were added in the culture medium
of the determined cell lines. After 2 h of incubation at 37 °C,
the absorbance at 490 nm was recorded using an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay plate reader, and the percentage of viable cells
was determined.
 |
RESULTS |
IFN-
Reduces Insulin mRNA Levels and Glucose-stimulated
Insulin Secretion--
We previously reported that
Tc-Tet cells
expressing Bcl-2, referred to as CDM3D cells, had impaired GSIS when
exposed to IL-1
and IFN-
. We proposed that this was mostly due to
an effect of IFN-
on total insulin content (1), because IL-1
alone had no effect, whereas IFN-
induced the full inhibition. Here we first evaluated the dose dependence of the IFN-
inhibitory effect. Fig. 1A shows the
insulin secreted by CDM3D cells pre-exposed to different concentrations
of cytokines for 48 h and then kept in the presence of 2.8 or 16.7 mM glucose for 1 h. IFN-
markedly inhibited insulin
secretion at both basal and high glucose concentrations. A very
significant effect was detected with doses as low as 5 units/ml. The
defect in insulin secretion was correlated with a parallel decrease in
cellular insulin content (Fig. 1B). Secretion of insulin,
expressed as a percentage of insulin content, was not reduced by
IFN-
treatment (not shown), suggesting that the defect in secretory
response may be due to a decrease in insulin content. A separate role
of IFN-
directly on inhibition of glucose-stimulated insulin
secretion can, however, not be excluded.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Dose-dependent reduction of
insulin secretion by IFN- . A,
CDM3D cells were treated with IL-1 (10 units/ml) and increasing
concentrations of IFN- or left untreated. The secreted insulin was
then evaluated following a 1-h incubation in the presence of 2.8 or
16.7 mM glucose. At low and high glucose concentrations,
the secreted insulin was reduced by increasing IFN- concentrations.
The data presented are the means ± S.E. (n = 3).
*, p < 0.05 versus untreated cells.
U, units/ml. B, intracellular insulin content was
reduced by 50% in CDM3D cells exposed to IFN- (150 units/ml) for
48 h. The data are the means ± S.E. (n = 6).
*, p < 0.005 versus untreated cells.
|
|
Next, to determine whether the IFN-
effect on cellular insulin
content correlated with a decrease in insulin mRNA level, CDM3D
cells were treated with IFN-
or with IFN-
plus IL-1
for 48 h, and insulin mRNA was assessed by Northern blot analysis. Fig. 4A shows that IFN-
alone or in combination with
IL-1
reduced the insulin mRNA content by ~70%. To determine
the rate at which IFN-
reduced the cellular insulin mRNA
content, cells were exposed for different periods of time to IFN-
,
and the insulin to actin mRNA levels were determined. Fig.
4B shows that the insulin mRNA levels decreased
progressively to reach a minimal value after 48 h. Treatment for
up to 5 days did not induce a more extensive reduction of this mRNA
level. Because the half-life of the insulin mRNA in these cells is
~24 h (not shown), this indicates that the inhibitory effect of
IFN-
is probably taking place immediately after the addition of
IFN-
to the cells.
Lentivirus-mediated Transfer of the Human SOCS-1 Gene in CDM3D
Cells--
To evaluate whether the IFN-
pathway in CDM3D cells
could be regulated by the suppressor of cytokine signaling-1, we
overexpressed the SOCS-1 protein with a recombinant lentivirus. Pools
of transduced cells were selected in the presence of G418 and SOCS-1
transcripts, and proteins were detected by Northern and Western blot
analysis (Fig. 2). We then verified that
these cells were still able to secrete insulin in response to glucose.
A 4-6-fold stimulation of insulin secretion was observed in response
to high glucose concentrations (data not shown and see Fig. 6).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of human SOCS-1 mRNA and
protein in CDM3D cells. Left panel, detection of SOCS-1
mRNA in total RNA was performed by Northern blot analysis.
Right panel, the lysates of control and SOCS-1-expressing
cells were analyzed by Western blot. A 24-kDa band corresponding to
human SOCS-1 was only detected in the SOCS-1-transduced cells. The data
presented are representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
SOCS-1 Blocks IFN-
-induced Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Nuclear
Accumulation of STAT-1--
To evaluate the role of SOCS-1 on
IFN-
-induced activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, we
assessed the level of STAT-1 tyrosine phosphorylation in CDM3D and
SOCS-1 CDM3D cells exposed to IFN-
in the presence or the absence of
IL-1
. Fig. 3 shows that phospho-STAT-1
could be easily detected in the cytosol and nuclear fraction of CDM3D
cells as early as 3 h (Fig. 3A) and up to 72 h
after initiation of treatment (Fig. 3B). At 72 h of treatment, a large induction of total STAT-1 was observed in both cytosolic and nuclear fractions of control cells. In contrast, in
SOCS-1 CDM3D cells, no phospho-STAT-1 could be detected at either time
of analysis, and only a very small increase in total STAT-1 was
visible. The band migrating slightly below STAT-1 is probably STAT-1
(an alternative splicing product of STAT-1 lacking the C-terminal 38 amino acid residues).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
IFN- -dependent tyrosine
phosphorylation and accumulation of STAT-1 is suppressed in CDM3D
expressing SOCS-1. Western blot analysis of
tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT-1 (PY-STAT-1) was performed
with cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions from the indicated cell lines
stimulated with IFN- (200 units/ml), IL-1 (20 units/ml) plus
IFN- (200 units/ml; I/F), and IL-1 plus TNF- (200 units/ml; I/T) for 3 h (A) or 72 h
(B). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with a rabbit
polyclonal anti-STAT-1 antibody. Tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT-1 was
detected in cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts from CDM3D cells treated
with IFN- alone, or in combination with IL-1 . In contrast, the
tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT-1 in response to cytokines was blocked
in SOCS-1-expressing cells. In the same way, no tyrosine-phosphorylated
STAT-1 (PY-STAT-1) was observed in CDM3D cells treated with IL-1 and
TNF- . Upon prolonged exposure, STAT-1 was shown to be increased in
cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions from CDM3D cells treated with IFN-
or with IFN- plus IL-1 , although no protein accumulation was
observed in SOCS-1-expressing cells. The data presented in A
are representative of three independent experiments, and the data shown
in B are the results of one experiment.
|
|
SOCS-1 Prevents IFN-
-induced Reduction of Insulin
mRNA--
To determine whether SOCS-1 overexpression could
suppress the decrease in insulin mRNA induced by IFN-
, SOCS-1
CDM3D cells were treated with IFN-
, alone or in combination with
IL-1
. Fig. 4A shows that
expression of SOCS-1 protected cells exposed for 48 h to IFN-
alone (150 units/ml) or to IFN-
in the presence of IL-1
at 10 units/ml. SOCS-1 similarly provided a complete protection against
IFN-
-mediated suppression of insulin mRNA expression for up to 5 days (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Cytokine-induced inhibition of insulin
mRNA is prevented in CDM3D cells expressing SOCS-1. The cells
were treated with various cytokines for determined times, whereas
untreated cells were used as control. Northern blot detection of
insulin mRNA was performed using a human insulin-specific probe on
total RNA. The blot was stripped and reprobed with a mouse -actin
probe to control for gel loading, and the respective insulin and actin
bands were assessed by densitometry scanning (ratio of insulin
versus actin was expressed in percentage of untreated
cells). The results showed that SOCS-1 completely prevents the
suppression of insulin mRNA in cells treated for 48 h with
IFN- alone (150 units/ml) or in combination with IL-1 (10 units/ml; I/F) (A) and that this protective
effect was maintained for up to 120 h in CMD3D cells stimulated
with IFN- (50 units/ml) (B). I, insulin;
A, actin; wt, wild type. The data presented are
representative of three separate experiments.
|
|
To determine whether the protective effect was at the transcriptional
level, we assessed whether cytokine-induced reduction in insulin
transcription was blocked in the presence of SOCS-1. To address this
question CDM3D and SOCS-1 CDM3D cells were transiently transfected with
an insulin-luciferase reporter gene and stimulated with cytokines for
18 h before luciferase assays were performed. As shown in Fig.
5, insulin promoter-driven luciferase
activity was decreased by 42 ± 5.9% in CDM3D cells exposed to
IFN-
at 150 units/ml and by 44 ± 6.5% in cells treated both
with IL-1
(10 units/ml) and IFN-
(150 units/ml). An almost
complete protection against cytokine-mediated decrease in insulin
reporter activity was achieved in SOCS-1 CDM3D cells. Analysis of
insulin mRNA stability in CDM3D cells, left untreated or treated
with IFN-
in the presence of actinomycin D, did not show any
destabilizing effect of the cytokine, confirming that the decrease in
insulin mRNA is at the transcriptional level (data not shown).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
SOCS-1 prevents cytokine-induced decrease in
insulin gene transcription. The cells were co-transfected with an
insulin-luciferase reporter as well as a control cytomegalovirus-LacZ
construct to assess for transfection efficiency. 72 h
post-transfection, the cells were stimulated with 10 units/ml of
IL-1 plus 150 units/ml of IFN- , and luciferase as well as
-galactosidase activities were measured 18 h after stimulation.
These results demonstrated that exposure to cytokines induces a
decrease in insulin reporter activity in CDM3D cells, whereas the
suppression of insulin gene transcription was prevented in
SOCS-1-expressing cells. The data presented as percentages of the
untreated cells are the means ± S.E. of two independent
experiments, each performed in triplicate. *, p < 0.05 versus untreated cells; **, p < 0.0001 versus untreated cells.
|
|
SOCS-1 Protects CDM3D Cells against Cytokine-induced Suppression of
Glucose-stimulated Insulin Secretion--
To determine whether
expression of SOCS-1 also protected cytokine-treated cells from
impaired GSIS, we performed secretion experiments in cells exposed for
48 h to IFN-
, alone or in combination with IL-1
or IL-1
and TNF-
. The cells were then incubated in the presence of 2.8 or
16.7 mM glucose for 1 h. Fig.
6A shows that insulin
secretion at basal glucose concentration was reduced following cytokine
treatment in CDM3D but not in SOCS-1 CDM3D cells. Similarly, at 16.7 mM glucose, insulin secretion was markedly decreased in
CDM3D cells after treatment with the various cytokine combinations, and
SOCS-1 completely prevented these inhibitory effects. As shown in Fig.
6B, the reduced secretion in CDM3D cells was correlated with
a reduction of cellular insulin levels that reached 58.7 ± 1.77%
after treatment with IFN-
only and 75.7 ± 1.29 and 73.5 ± 1.55% after exposure to IFN-
and IL-1
or a combination of the
three cytokines, respectively. The presence of SOCS-1 almost completely
prevented the reduction in intracellular insulin content induced by the
cytokines (Fig. 6B). When the secretion was expressed as a
percentage of the total intracellular insulin content, the secretion
rate was not affected in cytokine-treated cells as compared with
untreated cells (Fig. 6C).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
SOCS-1 protects CDM3D cells against
cytokine-mediated reduction of glucose-stimulated insulin
secretion. The cells were treated for 48 h with IFN- alone
(150 units/ml), IFN- in combination with IL-1 (10 units/ml), or
IFN- with IL-1 plus TNF- (100 units/ml) or left untreated.
Insulin secretion was then evaluated following an 1-h incubation in the
presence of 2.8 or 16.7 mM glucose. A, at low
and high glucose concentrations in CDM3D cells, GSIS is markedly
reduced by IFN- alone or by the combinations of cytokines, whereas
cytokine-induced reduction of secretion was prevented in cells
expressing SOCS-1. *, p < 0.005; ¶,
p < 0.05 versus untreated cells.
B, intracellular insulin content was strongly reduced
(60-70%) in CDM3D cells exposed to cytokines, whereas expression of
SOCS-1 prevented this inhibitory effect. *, p < 0.0001 versus untreated cells; ¶, p < 0.0001 versus IFN- -treated cells; §, p < 0.005 versus untreated cells. C, secretion of insulin
at 16.7 mM glucose, expressed relative to insulin content,
was not significantly modified following treatment with cytokines. The
data are the means ± S.E. of two independent experiments, each
done in triplicate.
|
|
SOCS-1 Prevents Cytokine-induced iNOS mRNA Expression, NO
Secretion, and Apoptosis--
We previously showed that induction of
iNOS mRNA and nitrite production by CDM3D cells required the
combined action of IL-1
and IFN-
and that iNOS expression was
completely suppressed by blocking IL-1 intracellular signaling pathway
(1). Here, we show that the presence of SOCS-1 similarly blocked the
cytokine-mediated induction of iNOS mRNA accumulation and NO
production. Indeed, SOCS-1 CDM3D cells, in contrast to parental CDM3D
cells, exposed for 24 h to IFN-
alone or in combination with
IL-1
did not express iNOS mRNA as assessed by Northern blot
analysis (Fig. 7A) and did not
increase nitrite production (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
SOCS-1 protein blocks iNOS mRNA
accumulation and NO secretion induced by cytokines. A,
Northern blot analysis indicated that the presence of SOCS-1 suppressed
iNOS mRNA accumulation upon 48 h of exposure to 10 units/ml of
IL-1 plus 150 units/ml of IFN- (I/F). The blot was
stripped and reprobed with a mouse -actin probe to control for gel
loading. B, nitrite accumulation was measured in cells
stimulated for 19 h with the same concentration of cytokines as in
A and with 100 units/ml of TNF- . These results
demonstrated that SOCS-1 can inhibit iNOS mRNA and NO production in
cytokine-treated CDM3D cells. The data are the means ± S.E. of
three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.
|
|
Cytokine-induced apoptosis of
Tc-Tet cells was partially prevented
by the expression of Bcl-2. Additional blocking of the IL-1
intracellular signaling pathway conferred an increased resistance to
apoptosis (1). Here, we evaluated whether blocking the IFN-
signaling pathway would also confer an increased resistance to apoptosis induced by a combination of the three cytokines. Fig. 8 shows that SOCS-1 CDM3D cells exposed
for 36 h to a combination of 103 units/ml of TNF-
,
IL-1
, and IFN-
were almost completely protected from apoptosis.
This was in contrast to CDM3D cells in which a ~40% reduction of
viability was observed.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Recombinant SOCS-1 protects CDM3D cells
against cytokine-induced apoptosis. The cells were exposed for
36 h to 103 units/ml of TNF- , IL-1 , and IFN-
before measuring the viability. The results showed that blocking
IFN- intracellular signaling with recombinant SOCS-1 protects CDM3D
cells against cytokine-induced apoptosis. The data are the means ± S.E. of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.
*, p < 0.005 versus untreated cells.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we report that IFN-
strongly inhibits insulin
gene expression, induces a reduction in cellular insulin content, and
decreases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. The effect of IFN-
involves activation of the JAK/STAT pathway because overexpression of
the suppressor or cytokine SOCS-1 prevented
IFN-
-dependent: (i) tyrosine phosphorylation and
increased cellular accumulation of STAT-1, (ii) decrease in insulin
gene transcription and intracellular insulin content, and (iii)
inhibition of GSIS. Furthermore, up-regulation of iNOS, increase in NO
production, and apoptosis, which require the combined presence of
IL-1
and IFN-
, were also suppressed by stable expression of
SOCS-1.
IFN-
induces a sustained and dose-dependent inhibition
of insulin mRNA and peptide levels in CDM3D cells. A significant
decrease in secreted insulin is already detected with concentrations as low as 5 units/ml. The reduction by ~50% of the cellular insulin content reached with maximally active doses of IFN-
is closely correlated with the reduction in insulin transcript and with the transcriptional activity of an insulin promoter-luciferase reporter construct. This is finally reflected on the secretory potential of the
treated cells. Because secretion expressed as a percentage of the total
cellular insulin content was not modified by IFN-
, this indicates
that the negative effect of this cytokine on insulin secretion was
mediated, at least in part, by a decrease in hormone content. A
possible additional role of IFN-
on inhibition secretion cannot,
however, be excluded.
These results also indicate that the IFN-
effect is independent of
the presence of other cytokines such as IL-1
. These data are
consistent with previous in vitro evidence suggesting that IFN-
might directly affect
cell function and viability. However, species-specific regulations of
cell function by IFN-
have been
described. For instance, a decrease in glucose-stimulated insulin
secretion was observed in primary mouse islets treated with high
concentrations of IFN-
(2000 units/ml) (48, 49), whereas incubation
of rat islets with IFN-
led to reduced insulin accumulation without
any changes in insulin secretory response to 16.7 mM
glucose (50). In human islets, prolonged exposure to IFN-
alone did
not induce a decrease in insulin transcript and peptide levels, whereas
only a weak reduction in GSIS was observed (15). In addition to these
different susceptibilities between islets from different species, the
effect of cytokines may also depend on whether islets of Langerhans or
purified
cells or
cell lines are studied. Indeed, the presence
of non-
cells within intact islets, such as endothelial cells or
passenger leukocytes, which are sensitive to different cytokines, may
also indirectly modulate
cell function. In this context, our data with a pure
cell line displaying highly differentiated function certainly provide important information on the cellular effect of
IFN-
.
Stimulation of CDM3D cells with IFN-
results in the tyrosine
phosphorylation of the transcription factor STAT-1 and the appearance of the phosphorylated form in the nuclear fraction. Moreover, expression of STAT-1 is markedly induced in CDM3D cells as evidenced after a 72-h exposure to IFN-
. Such an increase in STAT-1 content after stimulation with this cytokine has also been observed in NIH-3T3
and M1 cells (31), suggesting a positive feedback regulation of STAT-1
synthesis. The molecular mechanisms by which IFN-
mediates inhibition of transcription of the insulin gene are not known. It has
been suggested in a recent report that IFN-
-induced inhibition of
c-Myc expression relies on the consensus
-activated sequence element
to which STAT-1 homodimers bind and that STAT-1 might interact with a
co-repressor bound elsewhere in the c-Myc promoter (51). In the rat
insulin 1 gene promoter, Galsgaard et al. (52) reported the
presence of a
-activated sequence element, providing a possible
initial explanation for IFN-
-mediated inhibitory effect.
If the IFN-
signaling in
cells depends on the JAK/STAT pathway,
stable overexpression of SOCS-1 in CDM3D cells should block it. We
indeed demonstrated a complete suppression of the tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT-1 induced in response to IFN-
and an inhibition of STAT-1 accumulation, which was especially visible at the
72-h time point. Furthermore, SOCS-1 blocked the effect of IFN-
on
reducing the insulin mRNA and insulin peptide intracellular levels.
Importantly, this protected the cells against the decrease in GSIS
induced by this cytokine. These data therefore strongly suggest that
the IFN-
signaling pathway requires JAK kinase phosphorylation of
STAT-1, a result in agreement with a recent report showing that IFN-
treatment of mouse and rat islets was associated with prolonged
tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT-1 (53).
That SOCS-1 could confer resistance to IFN-
was previously reported
when studying NIH-3T3 and M1 cells overexpressing SOCS-1, but not
SOCS-2 or SOCS-3. In these cells, IFN-
was no longer able to induce
the tyrosine phosphorylation and DNA binding activity of STAT-1 (31).
Sakamoto et al. (31) also found that
IFN-
-resistant clones derived from LoVo and Daudi cells expressed
high level of constitutive SOCS-1 and showed reduced JAK and STAT-1
phosphorylation upon IFN-
treatment. SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 proteins
display overlapping activities, and both are induced by and inhibit the
actions of cytokines such as IL-2, IL-6, and IFN-
(31, 54-56).
However, SOCS-1 appears to be considerably more active than SOCS-3 in
the regulation of the IFN-
intracellular signaling pathway (31, 55).
Consistent with these in vitro studies, the phenotype of SOCS-1-deficient mice revealed a key role for SOCS-1 in modulating IFN-
action that could not be compensated by SOCS-3 in
vivo (34). SOCS-1 seems thus to act as a critical regulator of
cellular sensitivity to IFN-
, and we demonstrated in this study that
overexpressed SOCS-1 can efficiently and in a prolonged manner block
IFN-
-mediated intracellular signaling and prevent impaired insulin
regulation in mouse
cells in response to IFN-
action.
We previously showed in CDM3D cells that the production of nitrite,
associated with the increase in iNOS mRNA and protein levels,
required the combined presence of IL-1
and IFN-
(1). We further
demonstrated that expression of dominant-negative mutants of MyD88, an
adapter protein participating in IL-1
signaling, is sufficient to
reduce cytokine-induced nuclear factor
B transcriptional activity as
well as iNOS expression and NO production. In the present study, stable
expression of SOCS-1 leads to the complete suppression of iNOS mRNA
induction and nitrite accumulation in response to cytokines. Thus,
whereas IL-1
and IFN-
are needed simultaneously for nitrite
production, blocking either the IL-1
or IFN-
intracellular
signaling pathway is sufficient to completely prevent the iNOS
response. Therefore, both pathways must converge to the iNOS gene to
activate its transcription, but the exact mechanisms involved are not
yet known. A similar situation was observed for induction of apoptosis
in CDM3D cells. Expression of proteins interfering with the IL-1
signaling pathway protected the cells against cytokine-induced
apoptosis; an almost complete protection was also conferred by SOCS-1 expression.
Taken together our data indicate that cytokines can activate distinct
pathways to induce
cells dysfunctions and apoptosis. Impaired
secretory response to glucose is solely mediated by IFN-
, whereas
cell apoptosis requires at least the combined presence of IL-1
and
IFN-
. The present and previously published data indicate furthermore
that the deleterious effect of cytokines may be blocked by
overexpression of proteins interfering with specific signaling
pathways. Ultimately, these observations may pave the way to the
genetic engineering of tolerance in
cells to be transplanted in
type I diabetic patients.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. R. Furlanetto for the initial
suggestion to use SOCS-1 as inhibitor of interferon intracellular
signaling and for providing the FLAG-SOCS-1 cDNA. We thank Dr. A. Abderrahmani for providing the insulin-luciferase reporter plasmid.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Juvenile Diabetes Foundation
International Grant 4-1999-844 and by Grant 31-46958.96 from the Swiss National Science Foundation (to B. T.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. of Pharmacology
and Toxicology, University of Lausanne, 27 rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-21-692-53-90; Fax:
41-21-692-53-55; E-mail: bthorens@ipharm.unil.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 7, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103235200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IFN, interferon;
IL, interleukin;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
JAK, Janus
kinase;
STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription;
SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling;
GSIS, glucose-stimulated insulin
secretion;
iNOS, inducible NO synthase;
MTS, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)2H-tetrazolium.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Dupraz, P.,
Cottet, S.,
Hamburger, F.,
Dolci, W.,
Felley-Bosco, E.,
and Thorens, B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
37672-37678
|
| 2.
|
Kay, T. W. H.,
Thomas, H. E.,
Harrison, L. C.,
and Allison, J.
(2000)
Trends Endocrinol. Metab.
11,
11-15
|
| 3.
|
Rabinovitch, A.
(1998)
Diabetes Metab. Rev.
14,
129-151
|
| 4.
|
Katz, J. D.,
Benoist, C.,
and Mathis, D.
(1995)
Science
268,
1185-1188
|
| 5.
|
Kallmann, B. A.,
Huther, M.,
Tubes, M.,
Feldkamp, J.,
Bertrams, J.,
Gries, F. A.,
Lampeter, E. F.,
and Kolb, H.
(1997)
Diabetes
46,
237-243
|
| 6.
|
Wilson, S. B.,
Kent, S. C.,
Patton, K. T.,
Orban, T.,
Jackson, R. A.,
Exley, M.,
Porcelli, S.,
Schatz, D. A.,
Atkinson, M. A.,
Balk, S. P.,
Strominger, J. L.,
and Hafler, D. A.
(1998)
Nature
391,
177-181
|
| 7.
|
von Herrath, M. G.,
and Oldstone, M. B.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
531-539
|
| 8.
|
Wang, B.,
Andre, I.,
Gonzalez, A.,
Katz, J. D.,
Aguet, M.,
Benoist, C.,
and Mathis, D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13844-13849
|
| 9.
|
Hultgren, B.,
Huang, X.,
Dybdal, N.,
and Stewart, T. A.
(1996)
Diabetes
45,
812-817
|
| 10.
|
Thomas, H. E.,
Parker, J. L.,
Schreiber, R. D.,
and Kay, T. W.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
102,
1249-1257
|
| 11.
|
Campbell, I. L.,
and Harrison, L. C.
(1990)
Mol. Biol. Med.
7,
299-309
|
| 12.
|
Baldeon, M. E.,
Neece, D. J.,
Nandi, D.,
Monaco, J. J.,
and Gaskins, H. R.
(1997)
Diabetes
46,
770-778
|
| 13.
|
Yagi, N.,
Yokono, K.,
Amano, K.,
Nagata, M.,
Tsukamoto, K.,
Hasegawa, Y.,
Yoneda, R.,
Okamoto, N.,
Moriyama, H.,
Miki, M.,
et al..
(1995)
Diabetes
44,
744-752
|
| 14.
|
Eizirik, D. L.,
Flodstrom, M.,
Karlsen, A. E.,
and Welsh, N.
(1996)
Diabetologia
39,
875-890
|
| 15.
|
Eizirik, D. L.,
Sandler, S.,
Welsh, N.,
Cetkovic-Cvrlje, M.,
Nieman, A.,
Geller, D. A.,
Pipeleers, D. G.,
Bendtzen, K.,
and Hellerstrom, C.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
93,
1968-1974
|
| 16.
|
Rabinovitch, A.,
Suarez-Pinzon, W. L.,
Strynadka, K.,
Schulz, R.,
Lakey, J. R.,
Warnock, G. L.,
and Rajotte, R. V.
(1994)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
79,
1058-1062
|
| 17.
|
Rabinovitch, A.,
and Suarez-Pinzon, W. L.
(1998)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
55,
1139-1149
|
| 18.
|
Suarez-Pinzon, W. L.,
Strynadka, K.,
Schulz, R.,
and Rabinovitch, A.
(1994)
Endocrinology
134,
1006-1010
|
| 19.
|
Zumsteg, U.,
Frigerio, S.,
and Hollander, G. A.
(2000)
Diabetes
49,
39-47
|
| 20.
|
Rabinovitch, A.,
Suarez-Pinzon, W. L.,
Shi, Y.,
Morgan, A. R.,
and Bleackley, R. C.
(1994)
Diabetologia
37,
733-738
|
| 21.
|
Greenlund, A. C.,
Farrar, M. A.,
Viviano, B. L.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
1591-1600
|
| 22.
|
Darnell, J. E.,
Kerr, I. M.,
and Stark, G. R.
(1994)
Science
264,
1415-1421
|
| 23.
|
Darnell, J. E.
(1997)
Science
277,
1630-1635
|
| 24.
|
Yoshimura, A.,
Ohkubo, T.,
Kiguchi, T.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Hara, T.,
and Miyajima, A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2816-2826
|
| 25.
|
Yasukawa, H.,
Sasaki, A.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
18,
143-164
|
| 26.
|
Endo, T. A.,
Masuhara, M.,
Yokouchi, M.,
Suzuki, R.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Mitsui, K.,
Matsumoto, A.,
Tanimura, S.,
Ohtsubo, M.,
Misawa, H.,
Miyazaki, T.,
Leonor, N.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Fujita, T.,
Kanakura, Y.,
Komiya, S.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1997)
Nature
387,
921-924
|
| 27.
|
Naka, T.,
Narazaki, M.,
Hirata, M.,
Matsumoto, T.,
Minamoto, S.,
Aono, A.,
Nishimoto, N.,
Kajita, T.,
Taga, T.,
Yoshizaki, K.,
Akira, S.,
and Kishimoto, T.
(1997)
Nature
387,
924-929
|
| 28.
|
Starr, R.,
Willson, T. A.,
Viney, E. M.,
Murray, L. J.,
Rayner, J. R.,
Jenkins, B. J.,
Gonda, T. J.,
Alexander, W. S.,
Metcalf, D.,
Nicola, N. A.,
and Hilton, D. J.
(1997)
Nature
387,
917-921
|
| 29.
|
Yasukawa, H.,
Misawa, H.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Masuhara, M.,
Sasaki, A.,
Wakioka, T.,
Ohtsuka, S.,
Imaizumi, T.,
Matsuda, T.,
Ihle, J. N.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1309-1320
|
| 30.
|
Suzuki, R.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Yasukawa, H.,
Masuhara, M.,
Wakioka, T.,
Sasaki, A.,
Yuge, K.,
Komiya, S.,
Inoue, A.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
2271-2278
|
| 31.
|
Sakamoto, H.,
Yasukawa, H.,
Masuhara, M.,
Tanimura, S.,
Sasaki, A.,
Yuge, K.,
Ohtsubo, M.,
Ohtsuka, A.,
Fujita, T.,
Ohta, T.,
Furukawa, Y.,
Iwase, S.,
Yamada, H.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1998)
Blood
92,
1668-1676
|
| 32.
|
Naka, T.,
Matsumoto, T.,
Narazaki, M.,
Fujimoto, M.,
Morita, Y.,
Ohsawa, Y.,
Saito, H.,
Nagasawa, T.,
Uchiyama, Y.,
and Kishimoto, T.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15577-15582
|
| 33.
|
Starr, R.,
Metcalf, D.,
Elefanty, A. G.,
Brysha, M.,
Willson, T. A.,
Nicola, N. A.,
Hilton, D. J.,
and Alexander, W. S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14395-14399
|
| 34.
|
Alexander, W. S.,
Starr, R.,
Fenner, J. E.,
Scott, C. L.,
Handman, E.,
Sprigg, N. S.,
Corbin, J. E.,
Cornish, A. L.,
Darwiche, R.,
Owczarek, C. M.,
Kay, T. W.,
Nicola, N. A.,
Hertzog, P. J.,
Metcalf, D.,
and Hilton, D. J.
(1999)
Cell
98,
597-608
|
| 35.
|
Marine, J. C.,
Topham, D. J.,
McKay, C.,
Wang, D.,
Parganas, E.,
Stravopodis, D.,
Yoshimura, A.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1999)
Cell
98,
609-616
|
| 36.
|
Efrat, S.,
Fusco-DeMane, D.,
Lemberg, H.,
al Emran, O.,
and Wang, X.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
3576-3580
|
| 37.
|
Dupraz, P.,
Rinsch, C.,
Pralong, W. F.,
Rolland, E.,
Zufferey, R.,
Trono, D.,
and Thorens, B.
(1999)
Gene Ther.
6,
1160-1169
|
| 38.
|
Gremlich, S.,
Bonny, C.,
Waeber, G.,
and Thorens, B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30261-30269
|
| 39.
|
Zufferey, R.,
Dull, T.,
Mandel, R. J.,
Bukovsky, A.,
Quiroz, D.,
Naldini, L.,
and Trono, D.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
9873-9880
|
| 40.
|
Zufferey, R.,
Donello, J. E.,
Trono, D.,
and Hope, T. J.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
2886-2892
|
| 41.
|
Naldini, L.,
Blomer, U.,
Gallay, P.,
Ory, D.,
Mulligan, R.,
Gage, F. H.,
Verma, I. M.,
and Trono, D.
(1996)
Science
272,
263-267
|
| 42.
|
Zufferey, R.,
Nagy, D.,
Mandel, R. J.,
Naldini, L.,
and Trono, D.
(1997)
Nat. Biotechnol.
15,
871-875
|
| 43.
|
Guillam, M. T.,
Hummler, E.,
Schaerer, E.,
Yeh, J. I.,
Birnbaum, M. J.,
Beermann, F.,
Schmidt, A.,
Deriaz, N.,
Thorens, B.,
and Wu, J. Y.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
17,
327-330
|
| 44.
|
Rago, R.,
Mitchen, J.,
and Wilding, G.
(1990)
Anal. Biochem.
191,
31-34
|
| 45.
|
Green, L. C.,
Wagner, D. A.,
Glogowski, J.,
Skipper, P. L.,
Wishnok, J. S.,
and Tannenbaum, S. R.
(1982)
Anal. Biochem.
126,
131-138
|
| 46.
|
Gremlich, S.,
Roduit, R.,
and Thorens, B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3216-3222
|
| 47.
|
Olson, L. K.,
Redmon, J. B.,
Towle, H. C.,
and Robertson, R. P.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
92,
514-519
|
| 48.
|
l Campbell, I. L.,
Iscaro, A.,
and Harrison, L. C.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
141,
2325-2329
|
| 49.
|
Dunger, A.,
Cunningham, J. M.,
Delaney, C. A.,
Lowe, J. E.,
Green, M. H.,
Bone, A. J.,
and Green, I. C.
(1996)
Diabetes
45,
183-189
|
| 50.
|
Sternesjo, J.,
Bendtzen, K.,
and Sandler, S.
(1995)
Autoimmunity
20,
185-190
|
| 51.
|
Ramana, C. V.,
Grammatikakis, N.,
Chernov, M.,
Nguyen, H.,
Goh, K. C.,
Williams, B. R.,
and Stark, G. R.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
263-272
|
| 52.
|
Galsgaard, E. D.,
Gouilleux, F.,
Groner, B.,
Serup, P.,
Nielsen, J. H.,
and Billestrup, N.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
652-660
|
| 53.
|
Heitmeier, M. R.,
Scarim, A. L.,
and Corbett, J. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
29266-29273
|
| 54.
|
Adams, T. E.,
Hansen, J. A.,
Starr, R.,
Nicola, N. A.,
Hilton, D. J.,
and Billestrup, N.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1285-1287
|
| 55.
|
Song, M. M.,
and Shuai, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
35056-35062
|
| 56.
|
Ito, S.,
Ansari, P.,
Sakatsume, M.,
Dickensheets, H.,
Vazquez, N.,
Donnelly, R. P.,
Larner, A. C.,
and Finbloom, D. S.
(1999)
Blood
93,
1456-1463
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Klinger, C. Poussin, M.-B. Debril, W. Dolci, P. A. Halban, and B. Thorens
Increasing GLP-1-Induced {beta}-Cell Proliferation by Silencing the Negative Regulators of Signaling cAMP Response Element Modulator-{alpha} and DUSP14
Diabetes,
March 1, 2008;
57(3):
584 - 593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Tang, P. Han, A. I. Oprescu, S. C. Lee, A. V. Gyulkhandanyan, G. N.Y. Chan, M. B. Wheeler, and A. Giacca
Evidence for a Role of Superoxide Generation in Glucose-Induced {beta}-Cell Dysfunction In Vi |