JBC Advanced Glycation Endproducts

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M011021200 on May 3, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 28, 25953-25958, July 13, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/28/25953    most recent
M011021200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirota, K.
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirota, K.
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Redox-sensitive Transactivation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor by Tumor Necrosis Factor Confers the NF-kappa B Activation*

Kiichi HirotaDagger §, Miyahiko Murata, Tatsuya ItohDagger , Junji Yodoi||, and Kazuhiko FukudaDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University, the  Department of Integrative Brain Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, and the || Department of Biological Responses, Institute of Virus Research, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan

Received for publication, December 6, 2000, and in revised form, May 1, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cross-communication between different signaling systems allows the integration of the great diversity of stimuli that a cell receives under varying physiological situations. In this paper we have explored the possibility that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor signal cross-talks with epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor signal on the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) activation pathway. We have demonstrated that overexpression of the EGF receptor (EGFR) in NIH3T3 cells significantly enhances TNF-induced NF-kappa B-dependent luciferase activity even without EGF, that EGF treatment has a synergistic effect on the induction of the reporter activity, and that this enhancement is suppressed by AG1478, EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We also have shown that TNF induces tyrosine phosphorylation and internalization of the overexpressed EGFR in NIH3T3 cells and the endogenously expressed EGFR in A431 cells and that the transactivation by TNF is suppressed by N-acetyl-L-cysteine or overexpression of an endogenous reducing molecule, thioredoxin, but not by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors and protein kinase C inhibitor. Taken together, this evidence strongly suggests that EGFR transactivation by TNF, which is regulated in a redox-dependent manner, is playing a pivotal role in TNF-induced NF-kappa B activation.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A cardinal concept in signal transduction is that receptors are activated by highly specific interactions with cognate ligands. Hence each receptor recognizes one or a few structurally related ligands, and each ligand stereochemically "fits" one or perhaps two structurally related receptors. The specificity of biological responses generated to extracellular signals depends on adherence to this rule. For some time, however, it has been clear that structurally unrelated receptors may communicate with each other in what is termed receptor transactivation or cross-talk. Although receptor cross-talk is no doubt real, its biological importance remains unclear. Understanding the mechanism(s) by which inter-receptor communication occurs may offer the experimental means to explore the underlying biology.

The initial steps in the major pathway utilized by tumor necrosis factor (TNF)1 to activate the NF-kappa B are fairly well understood (1, 2). The NF-kappa B activation is usually initiated by the interaction of TNF with TNFR1 (p55), one of two distinct surface receptors, the other is TNFR2 (p75). Ligand-induced clustering of TNFR1 leads to the recruitment of TRADD to the intracellular portion of the receptor (3). Receptor-bound TRADD recruits both the protein kinase designated receptor-interacting protein (RIP) and the ring/zinc finger protein TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2). These two adapter proteins lead to the activation of the NF-kappa B as well as the activation of the stress-activated protein kinases such as c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 MAPK (3). IL-1 also activates NF-kappa B and stress-activated protein kinases using a similar pathway initiated by ligand binding to the type 1 IL-1 receptor and involving adapter proteins MyD88, IL-1 receptor-associated kinase, and TRAF6 (4). The precise connection between RIP-TRAF2 or IL-1 receptor-associated kinase-TRAF6 complexes and NF-kappa B are less well established but are thought to involve the MAPK kinase kinase family members MEKK-1 or NF-kappa B-inducing kinase (NIK) (5). Both of these protein kinases can directly phosphorylate and activate Ikappa B kinase (IKK) which is a multiprotein enzyme complex consisting of IKK-1, IKK-2, and NEMO (also known as IKKgamma ) subunits (2, 6-9). IKK-alpha and IKK-beta phosphorylate members of the Ikappa B family that share a common mechanism for regulation of NF-kappa B. In resting cells, Ikappa B proteins bind to and mask the nuclear localization sequence of NF-kappa B resulting in the retention of the transcription factor in the cytosol. Phosphorylation of Ikappa B by IKKs targets this protein for rapid ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome (2, 10). This process releases NF-kappa B which then translocates to the nucleus and induces transcription. MEKK-1, but not NIK, catalyzes the phosphorylation and activation of yet other MAPK kinases and is probably responsible for the parallel activation of stress-activated protein kinases (11-13).

Recently, an alternative signaling pathway has been described in some cells in which Akt directly phosphorylates IKKs leading to the activation of NF-kappa B, independent of MEKK-1 and NIK (14). This pathway thus allows growth factors such as platelet-derived protein kinase to activate NF-kappa B (15). Moreover, TNF and IL-1 have been found to activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway, potentially providing an alternative pathway for TNF and IL-1 to activate NF-kappa B that is independent of NIK or MEKK-1. The importance of this alternative NF-kappa B pathway compared with the previously described TRADD/RIP/TRAF2 or MyD88/IL-1 receptor-associated kinase/TRAF6 cytokine signaling pathways is unknown and may vary with the cell type. TNF and IL-1 also activate MAPK, but this pathway is even less well defined.

The epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor is ubiquitously expressed in various tissues and is thus positioned to influence a wide range of responses, depending on the coordinate expression of the cognate ligand (16, 17). A number of reports have demonstrated that various extracellular stimuli, unrelated to EGF-like ligands, can also activate the EGF receptor (18). These diverse stimuli include numerous agonists such as carbachol, bombesin, thrombin, and lysophosphatidic acid for heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors, cytokine receptors such as prolactin, growth hormone adhesion receptors such as integrins, membrane-depolarizing agents such as KCl, and environmental stress factors such as ultraviolet irradiation, gamma -irradiation, oxidants, heat shock, and hyperosmotic shock (19-21). Activation of EGF receptors by such seemingly unrelated and indirect means is potentially biologically significant (18-20).

Together, this evidence prompted us to investigate a possibility of cross-talk between TNFalpha -induced signals and EGFR-mediated signals on the NF-kappa B activation. In this paper, we have demonstrated that TNFalpha transactivates EGFR in a redox-sensitive manner, and this activation enhances the NF-kappa B activation.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Lines and Reagents-- A murine embryonic fibroblast cell line NIH3T3 was obtained from Dr. H. Sabe (Osaka Bioscience Institute, Osaka, Japan). A human embryo kidney cell-derived cell line HEK293 and human carcinoma A431 cells were from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (50 units/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin) at 37 °C under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Recombinant human TNFalpha and recombinant human EGF were purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Monoclonal antibodies raised against EGF receptor (E12020) and activated EGF receptor (E12120) were from BD Transduction Laboratory. Tyrphostin AG1478, wortmannin, LY294002, PD98059, and GF109203X were from Calbiochem. N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) was from Sigma.

Plasmids-- An expression vector of GFP-fused human EGF receptor (EGFR), in which the GFP moiety is fused to the C terminus of EGFR, pEGFR-EGFP, was kindly provided by Dr. Alexander Sorkins (University of Colorado Health Science Center). Point mutation of EGFR, K721A, was performed by a PCR-based technique (22) based on pEGFR-EGFP and resulted in pEGFR(K721A)-EGFP. pEGFP-N3 was obtained from CLONTECH. Expression plasmids of TRAF2 and IKKalpha were kindly provided by Drs. Reiko Shinkura and Kazuhiro Kitada, Kyoto University (23). An expression plasmid for human thioredoxin, pcDNA3-TRX, was described previously (24, 25). pNF-kappa B-Luc and pSV40-beta -galactosidase were from Stratagene and Promega, respectively.

Transfection and Reporter Gene Assay-- Cells were plated in 24-well plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells per well. The Fugene 6 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was used for transfection. In each transfection, 250 ng of pNF-kappa B-Luc and 100 ng of pSV40-beta -galactosidase as an internal control were pre-mixed and used. In the case of NIH3T3 cells, 250 ng of pEGFR-EGFP or pEGFP-N3 plasmids were used additionally. 12 h after transfection, cells were serum-starved (0.1%) or not. After a further 12 h of incubation, cells were treated with TNFalpha and/or EGF with or without kinase inhibitors. After 6 h, the cells were harvested, and the luciferase activity was determined using an assay system (Promega) with a luminometer, Lumat LB9507 (Berthold) (24-27). The relative fold induction of luciferase activity was calculated after normalization dividing the luciferase activity by beta -galactosidase activity. Each experiment was done at least two times in triplicate, and the data shown are representative of them.

Western Blotting-- After treatments, cells were lysed with a buffer (5 mM Hepes, 250 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 100 µM Va3VO4 supplemented by Complete protease inhibitor mixture, Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Whole cell lysates (50 µg) were separated on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Western blotting analysis was performed following the protocol described previously (24, 26). Briefly, after electroblotting, the polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) were treated with 5% (w/v) skim milk in TBS-T (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 137 mM NaCl, 0.5% Tween 20) and incubated with antigen-specific antibodies against EGF receptor (1:2500) or activated form EGF receptor (1:1000), followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:2000) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The epitope was visualized with an ECL Western blot detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Confocal Microscopy-- NIH3T3 cells were plated onto chamber slides (LabTech) and transfected by pEGFP-N3 or pEGFR-EGFP. After 12 h, cells were serum-starved (0.1% serum) for 12 h and then stimulated for 15 min in the absence or presence of TNF or EGF. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and mounted in 90% glycerol with 1 mg/ml p-phenylenediamine and examined with a confocal microscope, MRC-1024 (Bio-Rad) (24).

Statistical Analysis-- Statistical significance between two groups was tested using the unpaired Student's t test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a value of p < 0.05.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Overexpression of EGF Receptor Enhances TNFalpha -induced NF-kappa B Transcriptional Activation in NIH3T3 Cells-- Because NIH3T3 cells express EGFR only in low density, we can examined the effects of EGFR on the TNFalpha -induced NF-kappa B activation by overexpression of EGFR. In Fig. 1A, pEGFR-EGFP enhanced the NF-kappa B-dependent luciferase activity compared with pEGFP-N3 (lane 2). The concentration of serum did not cause any significant differences (lanes 2 and 5). EGF has been shown to activate NF-kappa B in rat aortic smooth muscle cells (28) and A431 carcinoma cells (29) but not in human microvascular endothelial cells (30). Therefore, we examined the effect of EGF on the NF-kappa B activation in NIH3T3 cell. Treatment with EGF by itself did not have any significant effects (lane 3) but made significant synergistic effect with TNF treatment (lane 4). This enhancing effect of EGFR was in a dose-dependent manner for the pEGFR-EGFP plasmid (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Enhancement of the TNFalpha -induced NF-kappa B transcriptional activation by overexpression of EGF receptor in NIH3T3 cells. NIH3T3 cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were transfected by pEGFR-EGFP or pEGFP-N3 plasmids. 12 h after transfection, cells were treated with 100 ng/ml TNF (lanes 2, 4, and 5) and/or 500 ng/ml EGF (lanes 3 and 4). The cells then underwent the luciferase assay following the protocol given under "Experimental Procedures." In lane 5, the culture media was replaced with the media with 0.5% serum. The results are the means ± S.D. and presented as fold increases in luciferase activity over the base line seen with the mock transfectant without treatment. This is a representative of two independent experiments that were done in triplicate. #, p < 0.05.

Kinase Inhibitors Suppress TNFalpha -induced NF-kappa B Transcriptional Activation in NIH3T3 Cells and HEK293 Cells-- The EGFR is a transmembrane protein, and the ligation of EGF to the receptor results in an increase in the tyrosine kinase activity of the cytoplasmic domain and the autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues (31). Various protein kinases such as PKC, MAPK, and EGFR itself are considered to be involved in the tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR indirectly or directly (16). In order to explore the molecular mechanisms, we used a series of kinase inhibitors (Fig. 2A). The effect of expression of pEGFR-EGFP was suppressed dose-dependently by treatment with tyrphostin AG1478 (right columns of lanes 2-4), which is a rather selective EGFR tyrosine kinases inhibitor. AG1478 treatment did not have significant effects on TNFalpha -induced NF-kappa B activation in pEGFP-N3-transfected NIH3T3 cells (left columns of lanes 2-4). In contrast, both PI3K inhibitors, LY294002 and wortmannin, and a PKC inhibitor, GF109203X, suppressed the NF-kappa B activation in both pEGFP-N3- and pEGFR-EGFP-transfected NIH3T3 cells (lanes 5-8, 11, and 12). Because a line of reports have demonstrated that reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs) play a pivotal role in the TNF-induced NF-kappa B activation, we tried a potent antioxidant NAC in this assay. Interestingly, NAC almost completely abolished EGFR-mediated enhancement of the NF-kappa B activation induced by TNF (lane 13). In contrast, the MEK-1 inhibitor, PD98059, did not have any significant effects on the NF-kappa B activation (lanes 9 and 10). Treatment with AG1478 or NAC caused similar suppressive effects of the NF-kappa B activation in HEK293 cells (Fig. 2B) as well as in pEGFR-EGFP-transfected NIH3T3 cells.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of kinase inhibitors on the TNFalpha -induced NF-kappa B transcriptional activation. NIH3T3 cells were transfected by reporter plasmid and pEGFR-EGFP- or pEGFP-N3 (A). 12 h after transfection, cells were pretreated with AG1478, LY294002, wortmannin, PD98059, GF109203X, or NAC for 1 h and then treated with TNF. HEK293 cells (B and C) were transfected by reporter plasmid and pEGFR-EGFP, pEGFR-EGFP(K721A), or pEGFP-N3 plasmids as indicated (C) and pretreated with AG1478 or NAC for 1 h (A). 6 h after incubation, cells underwent the luciferase assay following the protocol under "Experimental Procedures." The results are the means ± S.D. and are presented as fold increases in luciferase activity over the base line seen in the column without TNF treatment. This is a representative of two independent experiments that were done in triplicate. A, %, p < 0.05 compared with pEGFP-N3 treated with TNF; #, p < 0.05 compared with pEGFR-EGFP treated with TNF; B and C, #, p < 0.05.

We then examined the effect of overexpression of kinase-dead EGFR (K721A) on the TNF-induced NF-kappa B-dependent gene expression in HEK293 cells. As shown in Fig. 2C, expression of the EGFR(K721A)-EGFP chimera blocked the NF-kappa B-dependent gene expression in a plasmid dose-dependent manner. Together with the results using A1478, the tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR plays very critical roles in TNF-induced NF-kappa B activation process.

EGF Transactivation by TNF Is Not Suppressed by Inhibitors of PI3K and PKC but by NAC Treatment and TRX Expression-- Next we examined whether EGFR could be activated by TNFalpha or not by using an antibody that specifically recognizes the "activated" EGFR from which tyrosine residues were phosphorylated (32). We detected significant signals of activated EGFR (upper row) in pEGFR-EGFP-transfected NIH3T3 cells treated by EGF (Fig. 3A, lane 4) or TNF (lane 5). Neither 100 µM LY294002 (lane 7) nor 10 µM GF109203X (lane 8) affected TNF-induced EGFR activation. In contrast, NAC dose-dependently suppressed the EGFR phosphorylation by TNF (lanes 9 and 10). EGFR endogenously expressed in A431 cells were also phosphorylated by TNF treatment (Fig. 3B, lane 3), and this phosphorylation was suppressed by AG1478 (lane 4) or NAC treatment (lane 5) as well as exogenously expressed EGFR in NIH3T3 cells. Moreover, expression of an endogenous protein with antioxidant property, TRX blocked phosphorylation of EGFR expressed in NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 3C).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   TNF transactivates EGFR. NIH3T3 cells (4 × 106) were transfected by pEGFP-N3 or pEGFR-EGFP and incubated for 12 h. The transfected NIH3T3 cells (A and C) and A431 cells (B) were serum-starved for 12 h and then stimulated for 15 min in the absence or presence of TNF (500 ng/ml), EGF (500 ng/ml), and NAC (A, lane 9; 20 mM, and A, lane 10 and B, lane 5, 40 mM) or AG1478 (250 nM). C, cells were co-transfected with pEGFR-EGFP and pcDNA3-TRX or pcDNA3 before treatment. Cells were harvested and then subjected to Western blotting analysis using antibodies raised against EGF receptor and activated EGF receptor as described under "Experimental Procedures."

If the observed tyrosine phosphorylation reflects EGFR activation, it should lead to multimerization and internalization of EGFR (17). To examine whether stimulation of TNFR leads to internalization of transactivated EGFR, we examined the intracellular localization of overexpressed EGFR-EGFP in NIH3T3 cells with confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. Fig. 4 shows that in unstimulated cells transfected with pEGFR-EGFP, EGFR localizes primarily to the cell surface (Fig. 4B). TNFalpha (500 ng/ml) treatment of these cells, however, leads to an increase in EGFR localized inside the cells (Fig. 4C). EGF (500 ng/ml) treatment also leads to the internalization (Fig. 4D). GFP was homogeneously expressed in cells and did not have any particular localization pattern (Fig. 4A).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Internalization of EGFR by TNF. NIH3T3 cells on chamber slides were transfected with pEGFP-N3 or pEGFR-EGFP. 12 h later, cells were serum-starved (0.1% serum) for 12 h and then stimulated for 15 min in the absence (A and B) or presence of 500 ng/ml TNF (C) or 500 ng/ml of EGF (D). Cells were washed by PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and subjected to analysis with confocal microscopy.

TRAF2-induced NF-kappa B Activation Is Sensitive but IKKalpha -induced NF-kappa B Activation Is Not Sensitive to AG1478 in HEK293 Cells-- To explore the AG1478-sensitive step in the NF-kappa B activation, we overexpressed signaling intermediate molecules, TRAF2 and IKKalpha , in HEK293 cells (Fig. 5). Overexpression of TRAF2 induced significantly NF-kappa B-dependent gene expression, and this was suppressed by treatment with AG1478 (250 nM) (Fig. 5A). In contrast, AG1478 (250 nM) did not have any significant effect on the IKKalpha -induced NF-kappa B activation (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   TRAF2-induced NF-kappa B activation is sensitive but IKKalpha -induced NF-kappa B activation is not to AG1478 in HEK293 cells. HEK293 cells were transfected with mock, TRAF2 (A), or IKKalpha (B) expression plasmids. 12 h after transfection, cells were treated with or without AG1478 (250 nM). After 8 h of incubation, cells were harvested and underwent the luciferase assay. The results are the means ± S.D. and are presented as fold increases in luciferase activity over the base line seen with the mock transfectant without treatment. This is a representative of two independent experiments that were done in triplicate.

TRAF2 Induced EGFR Phosphorylation in a Redox-dependent Manner in NIH3T3 Cells-- We next examined the effect of TRAF2 on the EGFR phosphorylation. HEK293 cells were transfected by TRAF2 expression vector with or without NAC treatment. As shown in Fig. 6, EGFR phosphorylation was significantly enhanced by TRAF2 overexpression (lane 3), and the enhancement was abolished by NAC treatment (lane 4). H2O2 by itself enhanced EGFR phosphorylation (lane 2).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   TRAF2-induced EGFR transactivation is sensitive to NAC. NIH3T3 cells (4 × 106) were transfected by pcDNA3 (lanes 1 and 2) and TRAF2 (lanes 3 and 4) with pEGFP-EGFR. 6 h after transfection, cells were serum-starved for 12 h. In lane 2, cells were treated with H2O2 (200 µM). Cells were harvested and then subjected to Western blotting analysis using antibodies raised against the EGF receptor and activated EGF receptor as described under "Experimental Procedures."


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this paper, we have described the EGFR transactivation by TNF and its involvement in TNF-induced NF-kappa B activation. We have demonstrated that the transactivation is redox-sensitive but dependent on activity of neither P13K nor PKC. In contrast, the NF-kappa B activation process is redox-sensitive and dependent on the activity of PI3K and PKC but not MAPK.

The EGFR is a transmembrane glycoprotein, and the ligation of EGF to the receptor results in the dimer formation, an increase in the tyrosine kinase activity of the cytoplasmic domain, and the autophosphorylation of several tyrosine residues (33, 34). Intracellular tyrosine kinases such as Src and focal adhesion kinase and EGFR itself are considered to be involved in the tyrosine phosphorylation (18). Under certain circumstances, intracellular tyrosine kinase activity is dependent on other kinases such as PKC, PI3K, and MAPK. Our results of EGFR transactivation assay using anti-activated EGFR antibody demonstrate that treatment with a PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, and a PKC inhibitor, GF109203X, do not influence the EGFR transactivation by TNF (Fig. 3A). Because the MEK inhibitor, PD98059, does not have any effect on TNF-induced NF-kappa B activity in NIH3T3 cells, MAPK may not be involved in this transactivation. Interestingly and very importantly, NAC, a very potent antioxidant, treatment almost completely abolished TNF-induced EGFR transactivation and suppressed NF-kappa B activation (Fig. 3A, lanes 9 and 10). On the other hand, treatment with pharmacological inhibitors of PI3K and PKC significantly suppress TNF-induced EGFR-dependent NF-kappa B activation (Fig. 2A, lanes 5-8, 11, and 12). Taken together, it is highly suggested that steps sensitive to PI3K inhibitor and PKC inhibitor are located downstream of the EGFR in the TNF-induced NF-kappa B activation pathway.

ROI plays an essential role in the TNF-induced signaling pathways to NF-kappa B and stress-activated protein kinases (35). Intracellularly generated ROI has been shown to act as a second messenger of the signaling (36, 37). It has been also shown that EGFR activation is modulated by redox principle (38-40). In fact, ROIs enhance the EGFR phosphorylation by a ligand-independent mechanism (38, 40-42). Although it is unclear how ROI is involved in this process, one plausible mechanism is the reversible inactivation of protein-tyrosine phosphatases (38). Because all protein-tyrosine phosphatases have catalytic sites containing reactive cysteine residues, which form a thiol-phosphatase intermediate during catalysis, oxidation of these residues leads to their inactivation. Thiol-mediated redox systems such as glutathione and TRX systems have been demonstrated to be involved in these processes (22, 24, 26, 43). Overexpression of TRX suppressed the TNF-induced EGFR phosphorylation (Fig. 3C) as did the treatment with NAC. We have shown that redox-sensitive steps in the TNF-induced NF-kappa B signaling pathway are down from TRAF2 and up to IKK in HEK293 cells (27). In addition, in this study, we have shown that TRAF2 overexpression induces EGFR phosphorylation in a redox-dependent manner and TRAF2-induced NF-kappa B activation is AG1478-dependent (Figs. 5 and 6). Consistent with this observation, Liu et al. (44) recently showed that not only TNF but also just overexpression of TRAF2 fosters the production of ROI in transfected cells and that overexpression of TRX or treatment with antioxidants suppressed part of the downstream signaling cascades. Rac1 is an essential subunit of the NADPH oxidase system even in non-phagocytotic cells, and overexpression of the constitutively active mutant of Rac1 confers generation of ROI in certain cells, and overexpression of dominant negative mutant suppresses ROI generation by growth factor such as EGF and platelet-derived protein kinase as well as by TNF (45-49). Together with our results (Figs. 4 and 5), the ROI of downstream TNFR and TRAF2 may play a role in the EGFR transactivation process. In this study we have clearly demonstrated that treatment with AG1478 significantly suppresses TRAF2-induced NF-kappa B-dependent gene expression but not IKKalpha -induced gene expression (Fig. 5). Moreover, TRAF2 induces EGFR phosphorylation in a redox-dependent manner (Fig. 6). In addition to signaling by protein-to-protein interaction, the diffusible second messenger, ROI, mainly H2O2 downstream of the TNFR-TRAF2 complex may certainly contribute to this signaling pathway.

Considering the ubiquitous expression of EGFR in various types of cells, particularly in cancer cells, transactivation of EGFR by TNF may play very important roles in the activation of NF-kappa B in physiological and pathophysiological scenarios. Further studies on the molecular mechanism of this phenomenon may lead to a better understanding of the TNF signaling pathway. In particular, it may be very interesting to determine whether TNF-induced transactivation of EGFR involves proteolytic cleavage of membrane-bound EGFR ligands such as HB-EGF in the case of G protein-coupled receptor ligands including carbachol, bombesin, and thrombin (50). Moreover, it also seems interesting and significant to determine whether the transactivation potentiates other signaling pathways downstream of TNFR such as MAPKs activation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Alexander Sorkin, Reiko Shinkura, and Hajime Kitada for providing plasmids; Drs. Takumi Kawabe, Toshifumi Tetsuka, Katsushi Miura, Shin Kurosawa, and Kaikobad Irani for critical reading of the manuscript; Dr. Kenjiro Mori for encouragement; Kanako Murata for technical help; and Yoko Kanekiyo and Etsuko Kobayashi for secretarial help.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-75-751-3436; Fax: 81-75-752-3259; E-mail: khirota@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 3, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M011021200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: TNF, tumor necrosis factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; NF-kappa B, nuclear factor-kappa B; EGFR, EGF receptor; TRX, thioredoxin; ROI, reactive oxygen intermediate; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NAC, N-acetyl-L-cysteine; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; TRAF, TNF receptor-associated factor; IL, interleukin; NIK, NF-kappa B-inducing kinase; IKK, Ikappa B kinase; MEKK, MAPK/extracellular signal-regulating kinase kinase kinase; GFP, green fluorescent protein; EGFP, enhanced GFP; TRADD, TNF receptor-associated death domain.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Vandenabeele, P., Declercg, W., Beyaert, R., and Fiers, W. (1995) Trends Cell Biol. 5, 392-399
2. Karin, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27339-27342
3. Liu, Z.-G., Hsu, H., Goeddel, D. V., and Karin, M. (1996) Cell 87, 565-576
4. Cao, Z., Xiong, J., Takeuchi, M., Kurama, T., and Goeddel, D. V. (1996) Nature 383, 443-446
5. Malinin, N. L., Boldin, M. P., Kovalenko, A. V., and Wallach, D. (1997) Nature 385, 540-544
6. Zandi, E., Rothwart, D. M., Delhase, M., Hayakawa, M., and Karin, M. (1997) Cell 91, 243-252
7. Mercurio, F., Zhu, H., Murray, B. W., Shevchenko, A., Bennett, B. L., Li, J. W., Young, D. B., Barbosa, M., Mann, M., Manning, A., and Rao, A. (1997) Science 278, 860-866
8. Yamaoka, S., Courtois, G., Bessia, C., Whiteside, S. T., Weil, R., Agou, F., Kirk, H. E., Kay, R. J., and Israël, A. (1998) Cell 93, 1231-1240
9. Woronicz, J. D., Gao, X., Cao, Z., Rothe, M., and Goeddel, D. V. (1997) Science 278, 866-869
10. Lee, F. S., Peters, R. T., Dang, L. C., and Maniatis, T. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 9319-9324
11. Minden, A., Lin, A., Claret, F.-X., Abo, A., and Karin, M. (1995) Cell 81, 1147-1157
12. Ichijo, H., Nishida, E., Irie, K., ten Dijke, P., Saitoh, M., Moriguchi, T., Takagi, M., Matsumoto, K., Miyazono, K., and Gotoh, Y. (1997) Science 275, 90-94
13. Yao, Z., Diener, K., Wang, X. S., Zukowski, M., Matsumoto, G., Zhou, G., Mo, R., Sasaki, T., Nishina, H., Hui, C. C., Tan, T.-H., Woodgett, J. P., and Penninger, J. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32378-32383
14. Ozes, O. N., Mayo, L. D., Gustin, J. A., Pfeffer, S. R., Pfeffer, L. M., and Donner, D. B. (1999) Nature 401, 82-85
15. Romashkova, J. A., and Makarov, S. S. (1999) Nature 401, 86-90
16. Carpenter, G. (1987) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1987, 881-914
17. Carpenter, G. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 146, 697-702
18. Zwick, E., Hackel, P. O., Prenzel, N., and Ullrich, A. (1999) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 20, 408-412
19. Daub, H., Wallasch, C., Lankenau, A., Herrlich, A., and Ullrich, A. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 7032-7044
20. Daub, H., Weiss, F. U., Wallasch, C., and Ullrich, A. (1996) Nature 379, 557-560
21. Rosette, C., and Karin, M. (1996) Science 274, 1194-1197
22. Hirota, K., Matsui, M., Iwata, S., Nishiyama, A., Mori, K., and Yodoi, J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 3633-3638
23. Shinkura, R., Kitada, K., Matsuda, F., Tashiro, K., Ikuta, K., Suzuki, M., Kogishi, K., Serikawa, T., and Honjo, T. (1999) Nat. Genet. 22, 74-77
24. Hirota, K., Murata, M., Sachi, Y., Nakamura, H., Takeuchi, J., Mori, K., and Yodoi, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27891-27897
25. Hirota, K., Murata, M., Itoh, T., Yodoi, J., and Fukuda, K. (2001) FEBS Lett. 489, 134-138
26. Hirota, K., Matsui, M., Murata, M., Takashima, Y., Chen, F. S., Itoh, T., Fukuda, K., and Yodoi, J. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 274, 177-182
27. Takeuchi, J., Hirota, K., Itoh, T., Shinkura, R., Kitada, K., Yodoi, J., Namba, T., and Fukuda, K. (2000) Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2, 83-92
28. Obata, H., Biro, S., Arima, N., Kaieda, H., Kihara, T., Eto, H., Miyata, M., and Tanaka, H. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 224, 27-32
29. Sun, L., and Carpenter, G. (1998) Oncogene 16, 2095-2102
30. Izumi, H., Ono, M., Ushiro, S., Kohno, K., Kung, H.-F., and Kuwano, M. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 214, 654-662
31. Van der Geer, P., Hunter, T., and Lindberg, R. A. (1994) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10, 251-337
32. Barbier, A. J., Poppleton, H. M., Yigzaw, Y., Mullenix, J. B., Wiepz, G. J., Bertics, P. J., and Patel, T. B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14067-14073
33. Carpenter, G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 7709-7712
34. Carpenter, G. (2000) BioEssays 22, 697-707
35. Li, N., and Karin, M. (1999) FABEB J. 13, 1137-1143
36. Finkel, T. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 248-253
37. Finkel, T. (2000) FEBS Lett. 476, 52-54
38. Lee, S.-R., Kwon, K.-S., Kim, S.-R., and Rhee, S. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15366-15372
39. Kamata, H., Shibukawa, Y., Oka, S.-I., and Hirata, H. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 1933-1944
40. Wang, X., McCullough, K. D., Franke, T. F., and Holbrook, N. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 14624-14631
41. Devary, Y., Gottlieb, R. A., Smeal, T., and Karin, M. (1992) Cell 71, 1081-1091
42. Gamou, S., and Shimizu, N. (1995) FEBS Lett. 357, 161-164
43. Nakamura, H., Nakamura, K., and Yodoi, J. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 351-369
44. Liu, H., Nishitoh, H., Ichijo, H., and Kyriakis, J. M. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2198-2208
45. Sundaresan, M., Yu, Z.-X., Ferrans, V. J., Irani, K., and Finkel, T. (1995) Science 270, 296-299
46. Sulciner, D. J., Iran, K., Yu, Z.-X., Ferrans, V. J., Goldschmidt-Clermont, P., and Finkel, T. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 7155-7121
47. Irani, K., Xia, Y., Zweier, J. L., Sollot, S. J., Der, C. J., Fearon, E. R., Sundaresan, M., Finkel, T., and Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J. (1997) Science 275, 1649-1652
48. Bae, Y. S., Kang, S. W., Seo, M. S., Baines, I. C., Tekle, E., Chock, P. B., and Rhee, S. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 217-221
49. Kang, S. W., Chae, H. Z., Seo, M. S., Kim, K., Baines, I. C., and Rhee, S. G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6297-6302
50. Prenzel, N., Zwick, E., Daub, H., Leserer, M., Abraham, R., Wallasch, C., and Ullrich, A. (1999) Nature 402, 884-888


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
N. L. Cianciola, D. Crooks, A. H. Shah, and C. Carlin
A Tyrosine-Based Signal Plays a Critical Role in the Targeting and Function of Adenovirus RID{alpha} Protein
J. Virol., October 1, 2007; 81(19): 10437 - 10450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Scartozzi, I. Bearzi, C. Pierantoni, A. Mandolesi, F. Loupakis, A. Zaniboni, V. Catalano, A. Quadri, F. Zorzi, R. Berardi, et al.
Nuclear Factor-kB Tumor Expression Predicts Response and Survival in Irinotecan-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab-Irinotecan Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3930 - 3935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
C.-W. Lee, C.-C. Lin, W.-N. Lin, K.-C. Liang, S.-F. Luo, C.-B. Wu, S.-W. Wang, and C.-M. Yang
TNF-{alpha} induces MMP-9 expression via activation of Src/EGFR, PDGFR/PI3K/Akt cascade and promotion of NF-{kappa}B/p300 binding in human tracheal smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): L799 - L812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
L. Finzi, V. Barbu, P.-R. Burgel, M. Mergey, K. S. Kirkwood, E. C. Wick, J.-Y. Scoazec, F. Peschaud, F. Paye, J. A. Nadel, et al.
MUC5AC, a Gel-Forming Mucin Accumulating in Gallstone Disease, Is Overproduced via an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway in the Human Gallbladder
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2006; 169(6): 2031 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. A. Lemarie, P.-L. Tharaux, B. Esposito, A. Tedgui, and S. Lehoux
Transforming Growth Factor-{alpha} Mediates Nuclear Factor {kappa}B Activation in Strained Arteries
Circ. Res., August 18, 2006; 99(4): 434 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Ando, T. Ohmori, F. Inoue, T. Kadofuku, T. Hosaka, H. Ishida, T. Shirai, K. Okuda, T. Hirose, N. Horichi, et al.
Enhancement of Sensitivity to Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells with Acquired Resistance to Gefitinib
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 11(24): 8872 - 8879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. Lora, D. M. Zhang, S. M. Liao, T. Burwell, A. M. King, P. A. Barker, L. Singh, M. Keaveney, J. Morgenstern, J. C. Gutierrez-Ramos, et al.
Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Triggers Mucus Production in Airway Epithelium through an I{kappa}B Kinase {beta}-dependent Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 36510 - 36517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Shukla, T. Flanders, K. M. Lounsbury, and B. T. Mossman
The {gamma}-Glutamylcysteine Synthetase and Glutathione Regulate Asbestos-induced Expression of Activator Protein-1 Family Members and Activity
Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 64(21): 7780 - 7786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Hirota, R. Fukuda, S. Takabuchi, S. Kizaka-Kondoh, T. Adachi, K. Fukuda, and G. L. Semenza
Induction of Hypoxia-inducible Factor 1 Activity by Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41521 - 41528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W.-N. U. Chen, R. L. Woodbury, L. E. Kathmann, L. K. Opresko, R. C. Zangar, H. S. Wiley, and B. D. Thrall
Induced Autocrine Signaling through the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Contributes to the Response of Mammary Epithelial Cells to Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha}
J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 18488 - 18496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
L. J. Egan, A. de Lecea, E. D. Lehrman, G. M. Myhre, L. Eckmann, and M. F. Kagnoff
Nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation promotes restitution of wounded intestinal epithelial monolayers
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): C1028 - C1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Tepel
Oxidative stress: does it play a role in the genesis of essential hypertension and hypertension of uraemia?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1439 - 1442.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Tepel
Oxidative stress: does it play a role in the genesis of essential hypertension and hypertension of uraemia?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2003; 18(88): 1439 - 1442.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. Banan, A. Farhadi, J. Z. Fields, E. Mutlu, L. Zhang, and A. Keshavarzian
Evidence That Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Activation Is Critical in Oxidant-Induced Disruption of the Microtubule Cytoskeleton and Barrier Integrity and That Its Inactivation Is Essential in Epidermal Growth Factor-Mediated Protection of the Monolayers of Intestinal Epithelia
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2003; 306(1): 13 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. M. Hobbs and F. M. Watt
Regulation of Interleukin-1{alpha} Expression by Integrins and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Keratinocytes from a Mouse Model of Inflammatory Skin Disease
J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(22): 19798 - 19807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Hoyos, A. Imam, I. Korichneva, E. Levi, R. Chua, and U. Hammerling
Activation of c-Raf Kinase by Ultraviolet Light. REGULATION BY RETINOIDS
J. Biol. Chem., June 21, 2002; 277(26): 23949 - 23957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Hemi, K. Paz, N. Wertheim, A. Karasik, Y. Zick, and H. Kanety
Transactivation of ErbB2 and ErbB3 by Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha and Anisomycin Leads to Impaired Insulin Signaling through Serine/Threonine Phosphorylation of IRS Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., March 8, 2002; 277(11): 8961 - 8969.
[Abstract] [Fu