|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102022200 on April 13, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 28, 26430-26440, July 13, 2001
Galactan Biosynthesis in Mycobacterium
tuberculosis
IDENTIFICATION OF A BIFUNCTIONAL
UDP-GALACTOFURANOSYLTRANSFERASE*
Laurent
Kremer §¶,
Lynn G.
Dover §,
Caroline
Morehouse ,
Paul
Hitchin **,
Martin
Everett**,
Howard R.
Morris ,
Ann
Dell ,
Patrick J.
Brennan ,
Michael R.
McNeil ,
Christopher
Flaherty ,
Ken
Duncan**, and
Gurdyal S.
Besra ¶¶
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH,
United Kingdom, Department of Biochemistry, Imperial College of
Science, Technology, and Medicine, London, SW7 2AZ, United
Kingdom, ** GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Stevenage
SG1 2NY, United Kingdom, and  Department of
Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
80523-1677
Received for publication, March 6, 2001, and in revised form, April 13, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The cell wall of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis and related genera is unique among prokaryotes,
consisting of a covalently bound complex of mycolic acids,
D-arabinan and D-galactan, which is linked to
peptidoglycan via a special linkage unit consisting of
Rhap-(1 3)-GlcNAc-P. Information concerning the
biosynthesis of this entire polymer is now emerging with the promise of
new drug targets against tuberculosis. Accordingly, we have developed a
galactosyltransferase assay that utilizes the disaccharide
neoglycolipid acceptors
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1, with UDP-Gal in conjunction with isolated membranes. Chemical analysis
of the subsequent reaction products established that the enzymatically
synthesized products contained both -D-Galf linkages ((1 5) and (1 6)) found within the mycobacterial cell, as
well as in an alternating (1 5) and (1 6) fashion consistent with the established structure of the cell wall. Furthermore, through a detailed examination of the M. tuberculosis
genome, we have shown that the gene product of Rv3808c, now
termed glfT, is a novel UDP-galactofuranosyltransferase.
This enzyme possesses dual functionality in performing both (1 5) and
(1 6) galactofuranosyltransferase reactions with the above
neoglycolipid acceptors, using membranes isolated from the heterologous
host Escherichia coli expressing Rv3808c. Thus,
at a biochemical and genetic level, the polymerization of the
galactan region of the mycolyl-arabinogalactan complex has been
defined, allowing the possibility of further studies toward substrate
recognition and catalysis and assay development. Ultimately, this may
also lead to a more rational approach to drug design to be explored in
the context of mycobacterial infections.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Despite more than four decades of effective chemotherapy,
tuberculosis has re-emerged as one of the leading causes of
death by killing 3 million people annually (1). Prevention efforts and
control of tuberculosis is seriously hampered by the appearance of
multi-drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Therefore, new approaches to the treatment of tuberculosis are needed.
Because, the mycobacterial cell wall is essential for viability, it
represents a very attractive target for new anti-mycobacterial agents
(2, 3).
The cell wall core is composed of a covalently linked complex of
mycolic acids, D-arabinan and D-galactan,
attached to peptidoglycan via an
-L-Rhap-(1 3)- -D-GlcNAc
linkage unit (LU)1
(Fig. 1) and is often referred to as the
mAGP complex. Analysis by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
and fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (FAB-MS) (4-7) revealed
that the primary structure was composed of: 1) arabinose (Ara)
and galactose (Gal) residues, which are in the furanose (f)
ring form; 2) two or three arabinan chains attached to C-5 of some of
the 6-linked -D-Galf glycosyl residues; 3)
the galactan, consisting of a linear alternating Gal polymer of around
30 residues possessing both 5-linked -D-Galf
and 6-linked -D-Galf glycosyl residues; and 4) the galactan region of arabinogalactan, linked to the C-6 of some of
the N-glycoly-muramic acid residues of peptidoglycan via the
LU.

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Organization of the galactan region as well
as its relationship to other major cell wall components. , 5, 6- -D-Galf; ,
5- -D-Galf; ,
6- -D-Galf; ,
t- -D-Galf.
|
|
Several front-line drugs are known to target essential components of
the mycobacterial cell wall. For instance, isoniazid is a potent
inhibitor of mycolic acid biosynthesis targeting InhA (8-10) and
possibly KasA (11-13). Also, earlier studies demonstrated that
administration of ethambutol led to a rapid cessation of mycolic acid
transfer to the cell wall and a rapid accumulation of trehalose mono-
and dimycolates (14, 15). Subsequent studies have shown that ethambutol
disrupts the synthesis of the arabinan component of arabinogalactan by
targeting various arabinosyltransferases, embABC
(16-18).
Recent biochemical studies indicate that cell wall synthesis occurs in
conjunction with mycolic acid, arabinogalactan, and peptidoglycan
biosynthesis.2 Initially, LU
synthesis involves the transfer of GlcNAc-1-P and Rha from their
respective sugar nucleotides (UDP-GlcNAc and dTDP-Rha) to endogenous
polyprenol-P (probably C50-P) to form the
polyprenol-P-P-GlcNAc (lipid 1) and polyprenol-P-P-GlcNAc-Rha (lipid 2)
precursors involved in LU synthesis (19). These glycolipid
intermediates then serve as acceptors first for the sequential addition
of Galf from UDP-Galf to generate
polyprenol-P-P-GlcNAc-Rha-Galx (x is ~25-30
residues) and second for the transfer of Araf to this
growing lipid intermediate polyprenol-P-P-LU-galactan using
-D-arabinofuranosyl-1-monophosphoryldecaprenol (DPA) and
phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate donors to afford
polyprenol-P-P-GlcNAc-Rha-Galx-Aray (x is
~20-30 residues and y is 60-70 residues) (20), which at some point
is mycolylated and transglycosylated to peptidoglycan.2
A number of recent studies have defined the genetics and
enzymology surrounding the synthesis of nucleotide precursors
involved in mAGP assembly. For instance, dTDP-Rha (rmlA
(Rv0034), rmlB (Rv3464),
rmlC (Rv3465), rmlD
(Rv3266c), and UDP-Galf formation (UDP-Glcp UDP-Galp (galE,
Rv3634) and UDP-Galp UDP-Galf
(glf, Rv3809c)) have been studied in detail
(21-24). Similarly, other preliminary evidence has established other
open reading frames involved in LU synthesis, notably, rfe
(Rv1302) as the
decaprenol-monophosphate- -N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase and wbbL (Rv3265c) as the rhamnosyltransferase
involved in the synthesis of lipid intermediates 1 and 2 (20). Based on
the findings that the UDP-GlcNAc transferase is tunicamycin-sensitive (25, 26), wbbL is an essential
enzyme,3 and ethambutol and
isoniazid target later steps involved in arabinan and mycolic acid
biosynthesis, we suggest that the intermediate steps in mAGP synthesis,
notably galactan polymerization, would represent novel drug targets. An
understanding of the enzymology and genetics of the
-D-(1 5)-Galf and
-D-(1 6)-Galf transferases is therefore warranted.
In this study, we describe the development of a novel mycobacterial
neoglycolipid-based acceptor assay for
-D-(1 5)Galf and -D-(1 6)Galf transferases. Furthermore,
based on this simple neoglycolipid acceptor assay and genome mining of
the M. tuberculosis data base using hydrophobic cluster
analysis (HCA), we describe the cloning and characterization of the
gene Rv3808c, which we have termed glfT. It is
responsible for mycobacterial galactan polymerization catalyzing both
-D-(1 5)-Galf and
-D-(1 6)-Galf transferases. Thus, GlfT
represents a new cell wall drug target to be exploited in drug
discovery programs leading to novel chemotherapeutics targeting
M. tuberculosis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions--
All cloning steps
were performed in Escherichia coli XL1-Blue (Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA). Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 was a
generous gift from W. R. Jacobs, Albert Einstein College of
Medicine, Bronx, NY (27). M. smegmatis mc2155
was transformed as described previously (28), and recombinant clones
were selected on Middlebrook 7H10 agar supplemented with oleic
acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase enrichment (OADC; Difco, Detroit, MI)
containing 25 µg/ml kanamycin (Sigma). Liquid cultures of
M. smegmatis pMV261 and M. smegmatis
pMV261-Rv3808c were grown at 37 °C in Luria Bertani (LB)
broth medium (Difco) supplemented with 25 µg/ml kanamycin and 0.05%
Tween 80. Liquid cultures of E. coli pUC8 and E. coli pUC8-Rv3808c were grown in LB broth at 37 °C
with 100 µg/ml ampicillin to an
A600 nm = 0.4 and induced for 4 h
with 1 mM isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranose.
Large scale cultures of bacteria, as described above, were harvested, washed, with phosphate-buffered saline, and stored at 20 °C until further use.
Plasmids and DNA Manipulation--
The E. coli-mycobacterial shuttle vector pMV261 containing the
hsp60 promoter was used as described previously (29).
Analysis of plasmids from mycobacteria was achieved by electroduction
in E. coli as described previously (30). Restriction enzymes
and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals, and
Vent DNA polymerase was purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly,
MA). All DNA manipulations were performed using standard protocols, as
described by Sambrook et al. (31).
Expression of Rv3808c--
The Rv3808c open reading
frame was cloned into the mycobacterial over-expression vector pMV261
as follows. PCR amplification was performed using the upstream primer
P1 5'-TGA GTG AAC TCG CCG CGA GCC TGC TGT C-3' and the downstream
primer P2 5'-CGA ATT CAG CCA TGC TCG GGC TCT TG-3', which
contains an EcoRI restriction site (underlined). The
1918-base pair PCR product was then digested with EcoRI and
cloned into the MluNI/EcoRI-restricted pMV261
giving rise to pMV261-Rv3808c. For expression in E. coli, the blunt-ended PCR fragment was cloned into a pUC8 plasmid
cut by SmaI giving rise to pUC8-Rv3808c. DNA
sequencing for each construct verified the coding sequence of
Rv3808c as well as its junctions with the hsp60
and Plac promoters.
Synthesis of
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
and -D-Galf-(1 6)-
-D-Galf-O-C10:1 Acceptors--
The
synthetic acceptors based on
-D-Galf were
synthesized using a combination of methods developed by Sugawara et al. (32), Veeneman et al. (33), Wolfrom
et al. (34), and Zurmond et al. (35). Briefly, in
the case of the -D-(1 5)-Galf disaccharide,
the thioethyl glycoside was initially acetylated, chlorinated, and
alkylated with 9-decen-1-ol using mercuric cyanide and mercuric
bromide. Following deprotection and selective protection, the 5-OH
position of the triprotected monosaccharide derivative was glycosylated
using the activated donor
chloro-tetra-O-acetyl- -D-Galf, which was eventually deprotected to yield the desired disaccharide, as
shown in Fig. 2A. The
synthesis is convenient because it can be adapted to generate the
-D-(1 6)-Galf disaccharide. Basically, following deprotection and selective protection/deprotection, using the
dimethoxytrityl group, the 6-OH position is glycosylated using
chloro-tetra-O-acetyl- -D-Galf,
which is then deprotected to yield the
-D-(1 6)-Galf disaccharide as shown in Fig.
2B. The acceptor products (boxed in Fig. 2,
A and B) were purified to homogeneity by silica
gel chromatography and analyzed by 1H and 13C
nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and electrospray mass
spectroscopy (ES-MS) as follows: for
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1, melting point 103-105 °C, [ D]
42.8o (c 1, H20), 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) 1.27-1.48 (10H, m), 1.51-1.62 (2H, m), 2.01-2.10 (2H, m), 3.40 (1H, dt, J = 9.5 and 6.5 Hz),
3.61-4.12 (13H, m), 4.81 (1H, d, J = 2Hz), 4.91 (1H,
dm, J = 10.3 Hz), 4.98 (1H, dm, J = 16.9 Hz), 5.17 (1H, s), 5.81 (1H, ddt, J = 16.9, 10.3, and 6.7 Hz); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) 27.4, 30.3, 30.4, 30.6, 30.7, 30.9, 35.1, 63.0, 64.3, 69.1, 72.3, 77.3, 78.7, 78.9, 82.9, 83.5, 83.8, 84.9, 109.2, 109.4, 114.9, 140.3. m/z (ES-MS) 498.2926 (M+ + NH4); and for
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1,
melting point 92-93 °C, [ ]D
74.8o (c 1, H20), 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) 1.38-1.52 (10H, m), 1.64-1.71 (2H, m), 2.10-2.15 (2H, m), 3.52 (1H, dt, J = 9.5 and 6.5 Hz),
3.65 (1H, dd, J = 7.0 and 10.4 Hz), 3.72 (1H, dd,
J = 4.0 and 2.7 Hz), 3.77-3.82 (1H, dt), 3.83-3.87
(1H, m), 3.89 (1H, dd, J = 4.6 Hz) 3.95-4.13 (7H, m),
4.94 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.98 (1H, dm,
J = 12.5 Hz), 5.00 (1H, s), 5.05 (1H, dm,
J = 17.1 Hz), 5.90 (1H, ddt, J = 17.1, 12.5, and 6.7 Hz); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD)
27.3, 30.2, 30.3, 30.6, 30.6, 30.8, 34.9, 69.0, 64.5, 70.7, 71.1, 72.6,
78.9, 78.9, 82.9, 83.5, 84.6, 85.0, 109.3, 110.0, 114.9, 140.3.m/z (ES-MS) 498.2917 (M+ + NH4).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Neoglycolipid acceptors. A,
synthesis of
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1.
B, synthesis of
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1.
a, EtSH, concentrated HCl, 39%; b, HgO,
concentrated HCl, H2O, 43%; c,
Ac2O, pyr, 87%; d, Cl2,
CCl4, 84%; e, HgCN2,
HgBr2, MeCN, decen-1-ol, 56%; f,
NH3, MeOH, 89%; g,
Me2C(OMe)2, camphorsulfonic acid, DMF, 86%;
h, BzCl, pyr, 91%; i, acetic acid,
H2O, 76%; j, PivCl, pyr, 78%; k,
HgCN2, HgBr2, MeCN, 59%; l,
NH3, MeOH, 90%; m, TrCl, pyr, 72%;
n, BzCl, pyr, 89%; o, acetic acid, 58%;
p, HgCN2, HgBr2, MeCN, 70%;
q, NH3, MeOH, 85%.
|
|
The complete synthesis and full description of all
intermediates leading to
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 will be documented
separately.4
Preparation of Membrane and Cell Wall Enzyme
Fractions--
M. smegmatis pMV261, M. smegmatis pMV261-Rv3808c, E. coli pUC8, and
E. coli pUC8-Rv3808c were grown as described
earlier, harvested, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and stored
at 20 °C until required. Mycobacterial cells (10 g wet weight)
were washed and resuspended in 30 ml of buffer A, containing 50 mM MOPS (adjusted to pH 8.0 with KOH), 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol, and 10 mM MgCl2 at 4 °C
and subjected to probe sonication (Soniprep 150, MSE Sanyo Gallenkamp,
Crawley, Sussex, UK; 1-cm probe) for a total time of 10 min in 60-s
pulses with 90-s cooling intervals between pulses. E. coli
cells were disrupted in a similar fashion using 30-s pulses and 45-s
cooling intervals between pulses. The sonicates were centrifuged at
27,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C. The resulting
mycobacterial cell wall pellets were resuspended in buffer A. Percoll
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) was added to yield a 60%
suspension and centrifuged at 27,000 × g for 1 h
at 4 °C. The upper, particulate, diffuse cell wall enzymatically
active (P60) band was collected and washed three times with buffer A
and resuspended in buffer A at a final protein concentration of 10 mg/ml. Membrane fractions were obtained by centrifugation of the
27,000 × g supernatant at 100,000 × g
for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant was carefully removed and the
membranes gently resuspended in buffer A at a protein concentration of
20 mg/ml. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay reagent kit (Pierce).
Galactosyltransferase
Assay--
-D-Galf(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
and
-D-Galf(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
(2 mM), which were stored as 100 mM ethanol
stocks, were dried under a stream of argon in a microcentrifuge tube
(1.5 ml), which was placed in a vacuum desiccator for 15 min to remove
any residual solvent. Both acceptors were then resuspended with the remaining constituents of the galactosyltransferase assay in buffer A. The reaction mixtures for assessing [14C]Gal
incorporation consisted of UDP-[U-14C]Gal (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, 327 mCi/mmol, 0.25 µCi, 10 µl), ATP (1 mM, 5 µl), NADH (100 mM, 8 µl), membranes
(250 µg, 12.5 µl), and the cell wall fraction (250 µg, 25 µl)
in a final reaction volume of 80 µl. In some instances the cell wall
fraction was omitted and replaced by buffer A. The reaction mixtures
were then incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. A
CHCl3:CH3OH (1:1, 533 µl) solution was then
added to the incubation tubes and the entire contents centrifuged at
18,000 × g. The supernatant was recovered, dried under
a stream of argon, resuspended in
C2H5OH:H2O (1:1, 1 ml), and loaded
onto a pre-equilibrated (C2H5OH:H2O
(1:1)) 1-ml Whatman strong anion exchange cartridge, which was washed
with 3 ml of ethanol. The eluate was dried and the resulting products
partitioned between the two phases arising from a mixture of
n-butanol (3 ml) and H20 (3 ml). The resulting
organic phase was recovered following centrifugation at 3,500 × g, and the aqueous phase was again extracted twice with 3 ml
of n-butanol-saturated water; the pooled extracts were
back-washed twice with water saturated with n-butanol (3 ml). The n-butanol-saturated water fraction was dried and
resuspended in 200 µl of n-butanol. The total cpm of
radiolabeled material extractable into the n-butanol phase was measured by scintillation counting using 10% of the labeled material and 10 ml of EcoScintA (National Diagnostics, Atlanta). The
incorporation of [14C]Gal was determined by subtracting
counts present in control assays (either incubation of the reaction
components in the absence of the acceptors or from membranes prepared
from empty pMV261 or pUC8 constructs). Another 10% of the labeled
material was subjected to thin-layer chromatography (TLC) in
CHCl3:CH3OH:NH4OH:H2O
(65:25:0.5:3.6) on aluminum-backed Silica Gel 60 F254
plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Autoradiograms were obtained by
exposing TLCs to x-ray film (Kodak X-Omat) for 4-5 days.
Analysis of Reaction Products--
Large scale reaction mixtures
containing unlabeled UDP-Gal (80 mM),
-D-Galf(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
or
-D-Galf(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 (80 mM), and the other components were prepared and
processed as described above. The final water-saturated
n-butanol phases were dried, applied to preparative TLC
plates along with radiolabeled material (50,000 cpm) to trace the cold
enzymatically synthesized products, and developed in
CHCl3:CH3OH:NH4OH:H2O
(65:25:0.5:3.6). The plates were then sprayed with 0.01%
1,6-diphenylhexatriene in petroleum ether:acetone (9:1), and the
starting material (acceptors) and products were localized under
long wave (366 nm) UV light (36). The plate was then redeveloped in
toluene to remove the reagent. Autoradiography was performed by
exposing the TLC to x-ray film (Kodak X-Omat) for 24 h. The bands
corresponding to reaction products were recovered from the plates by
re-extraction with n-butanol (3 × 3 ml). The combined
n-butanol phases were washed with water saturated previously
with n-butanol, and the dried samples were
per-O-methylated, subjected to FAB-MS and subsequent mild
acid hydrolysis, per-O-ethylation, and glycosyl linkage analysis.
Chemical Derivatization for FAB-MS and GC-MS
Analysis--
Per-O-methylation using the sodium hydroxide
procedure was performed as described previously (37). After
derivatization the reaction products were purified on a Sep-Pak
C18 cartridge (Waters) as described (37). Partially
per-O-methylated, per-O-ethylated alditols were
prepared for GC-MS linkage analysis as follows. Partial hydrolysis of
the per-O-methylated sample was achieved using 2 M trifluoroacetic acid at 70 °C for 1 h. Samples
were dried and then reduced with NaBH4 (10 mg/ml) in 2 M NH3 for 2 h at room temperature. Excess
borates were removed by repeated additions (4×) of 10% acetic acid in
methanol followed by evaporation. Samples were then
per-O-ethylated following the per-O-methylation procedure described previously but using C2H5I
(37).
GC-MS and FAB-MS Analysis--
GC-MS analysis was carried out on
a Fisons Instruments MD800 fitted with a RTX-5 fused silica capillary
column (30 m × 0.25 mm internal diameter, Restek Corp.). The
partially per-O-methylated, per-O-ethylated
alditol acetates were dissolved in hexanes prior to on-column injection
at 65 °C. The GC oven was held at 65 °C for 1 min before being
increased to 290 °C at a rate of 8 °C/min. FAB mass spectra were
acquired using a ZAB-2 S.E. 2 FPD mass spectrometer fitted with
a cesium ion gun operated at 30 kV. Data acquisition and processing
were performed using VG Analytical Opus software. Solvents and matrices
were as described (37).
Electrophoresis Methods--
M. smegmatis cells were
washed in phosphate-buffered saline and disrupted by sonication (1-cm
probe; Soniprep 150; MSE Ltd., Crawley, Sussex, UK) for 10 cycles of
60-s pulses with 90-s cooling intervals between pulses and fractionated
as described previously. Separation of 20 µg of proteins from the
membrane or the P60 cell wall fractions was carried out by
SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a MiniProtean II
system (Bio-Rad). Proteins were stained with Coomassie Blue R350
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
 |
RESULTS |
Sequence Comparisons of Various Glycosyltransferase
Sequences--
Similarity between glycosyltransferases is often
very low and precludes their straightforward grouping by standard
sequence alignment algorithms (38, 39). The sensitive HCA method
has been used successfully in several cases for the grouping of
proteins of very low sequence similarity (40). This method relies upon a two-dimensional representation of protein sequences, in which hydrophobic clusters are determined and then used for sequence comparisons, thus allowing a visual comparison and detection of conserved structural features (see Fig.
3B).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Putative galactosyltransferases.
A, genomic organization around glf and
Rv3808c locus in M. tuberculosis.
B, HCA of Rv3808c and a number of processive
inverting -glycosyltransferases (from Saxena et al.
(60)): AcsAB, cellulose synthase from Acetobacter
xylinum ( 1-4; GenBankTM accession no.
X54676); HasA, hyaluronan synthase from Streptococcus
pyogenes ( 1-3, 1-4; GenBankTM accession no.
L21187); NodC, nodulation factor synthesis from
Azorhizobium caulinodans ( 1-4; GenBankTM
accession no. L18897); Chs1, chitin synthase 1 from
Saccharomyces cerevisiae ( 1-4;
GenBankTM accession no. M14045);
GlfT, galactofuranosyltransferase from M. tuberculosis H37Rv ( 1-5, 1-6; Rv3808c);
Ppm1, interdomain hinge region of polyprenol
monophosphomannose synthase from M. tuberculosis H37Rv
(Rv2051c).
|
|
Wiggins and Munro (41) have recently shown that the amino acid
DXD motif was found to be conserved in several
glycosyltransferase families from both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, even
though these families do not show any other obvious sequence
relationships. In almost all cases, the pair of aspartic acid residues
are flanked by four hydrophobic residues on the N-terminal side, with
the third of these often being an aromatic residue. This motif has also
been reported to be crucial for substrate recognition and/or catalytic
activity of several glycosyltransferases including
galactosyltransferases (41-44).
The M. tuberculosis H37Rv genome was analyzed using a
combination of BLAST (45) and HCAs identifying several
(Rv0539, Rv1208, Rv1500,
Rv3631, Rv1518, Rv1541,
Rv2957, Rv3631, Rv3782,
Rv3808c) putative -glycosyltransferases. Notably, these
analyses identified the gene Rv3808c, which being located
immediately downstream from the UDP-Galp mutase
glf (Rv3809c) (Fig. 3A), represented a
strong candidate as a galactofuranosyltransferase. The first four
nucleotides of Rv3808c and the last four of
Rv3809c overlapped, suggesting that Rv3808c was
possibly a -galactosyltransferase transcriptionally coupled to the
glf gene. BLAST analysis also revealed that Rv3808c possessed homology with glycosyltransferases from
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, Pyrococcus
abyssi, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and RfbE
(Rv3782), another putative glycosyltransferase from M. tuberculosis. The HCAs presented in Fig. 3B illustrate
residues and patterns of hydrophobic clustering that are highly
conserved in Rv3808c and other -glycosyltransferases.
Over-expression of Rv3808c in M. smegmatis and E. coli--
To
establish the relationship between the M. tuberculosis open
reading frame Rv3808c and galactan polymerization, we
adopted a two-step strategy. First, we over-expressed
Rv3808c in M. smegmatis and E. coli.
Briefly, the gene was amplified by PCR, and the PCR product was ligated
into the mycobacterial expression vector pMV261 under the control of
the mycobacterial hsp60 promoter, resulting in
pMV261-Rv3808c. For expression in E. coli, the
blunt-ended PCR fragment was cloned into a pUC8 plasmid under the
control of a Plac promoter, giving rise to
pUC8-Rv3808c. Subsequently, constructs (including the empty
pMV261 and pUC8 plasmids) were transformed into M. smegmatis and E. coli. SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (Fig. 4A)
illustrated the levels of Rv3808c expression in M. smegmatis harboring the pMV261-Rv3808c construct, consistent with expected size of Rv3808c (68 kDa) in both
the P60 and membrane fractions, which was also characteristic in terms of cellular localization of biochemical activity (19, 20). Moreover, a
similar product of apparent molecular mass 68 kDa was also
observed within the P60 and membrane fractions of E. coli
pUC8-Rv3808c and was absent in E. coli pUC8 (Fig.
4B). Interestingly, over-expression using pET28a also led to
over-expression of Rv3808c but led to the recombinant
protein being recovered entirely within the cell pellet with no
measurable enzymatic activity detected within the cell pellet or the
cytosolic or membrane fractions (data not shown). The second part of
the proposed strategy was to develop a convenient assay system to
measure galactosyltransferase activities involved in mycobacterial
galactan polymerization, i.e. 5-linked
-D-Galf and 6-linked
-D-Galf transferase activities.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Over-expression of Rv3808c
in M. smegmatis (A) and
E. coli (B). Crude lysates of
strains carrying either the control plasmid (pMV261 and
pUC8) or the Rv3808c-over-expressing plasmids
were fractionated as described under "Materials and Methods."
Proteins (20 µg) were then subjected to a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and visualized by Coomassie Blue staining. The
numbers on the right (A) or the
left (B) margin indicate the
molecular size standards, and the arrows indicate the
over-expressed Rv3808c protein.
|
|
Development of a Simple Mycobacterial Galactosyltransferase
Assay--
Lee et al. (46) described the synthesis of a
variety of diarabinoside- and triarabinoside-based acceptors designed
for the development of an in vitro mycobacterial arabinosyl
transferase assay using the synthetic donor DP[1-14C]A.
Following careful chemical analysis of the enzymatically synthesized
products, it was confirmed that DPA was the donor for the mycobacterial
enzymes DPA:arabinan (1 5) arabinosyltransferase and DPA:arabinan
(1 2) arabinosyltransferase. Based on this rationale of the use of
specific neoglycolipid acceptors, the
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
acceptors were synthesized as shown in Fig. 2, A and
B, respectively, corresponding to the two major structural
motifs found within the galactan of arabinogalactan. Assays performed
in the presence of membranes and the cell wall enzymatic fraction P60
resulted in excellent [14C]Galf incorporation
from UDP-[14C]Galp following endogenous
conversion to UDP-[14C]Galf and transferase
activity for both
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
acceptors. A concentration of 4 mM of both acceptors
resulted in maximum galactosyltransferase activity with concentrations
of >10 mM leading to significant inhibition of the
[14C]Galf transferase activity, presumably
because of the detergent-like properties of the acceptor adversely
affecting enzymatic activity at these higher concentrations. Typically,
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1, which behaved as a poorer substrate for
UDP-[14C]Galf and the respective
galactosyltransferase(s), yielded 16,000-30,000 cpm/assay, whereas the
more efficient
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 acceptor afforded 50,000-80,000 cpm/assay. A key feature of the assay
appeared to be the inclusion of NADH, which when omitted resulted in a
deleterious effect. This effect has recently been attributed a
co-factor for the UDP-[14C]Galp mutase
glf gene (47). Interestingly, assays performed with P60
alone resulted in very poor [14C]Galf
incorporation using both acceptors; however, it provided a synergistic
effect (0.5-fold increase) when added with membranes as compared with
membranes alone (data not shown). This is attributable to the higher
specific activity observed for UDP-Galp (glf)
mutase activity within P60 preparations, resulting in a greater pool of
UDP-Galf for the subsequent galactosyltransferase(s). As a consequence, assays were always supplemented with P60 and NADH.
TLC/autoradiography clearly demonstrated the enzymatic conversion of
both the disaccharide acceptors to their corresponding trisaccharide
products (Fig. 5A, lane
2,
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1, and lane 3,
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1).
The -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
gave rise to a second, slower migrating band, which, based on relative
migration profiles, would be anticipated to be a tetrasaccharide
product
( -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1) resulting from further elongation of the trisaccharide precursor (Fig.
5A, lane 3,
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1). It is clear from the absence of radioactivity in the control assay (Fig. 5A, lane 1) that the disposable anion
exchange cartridge, followed by the water/n-butanol
partitioning steps successfully removed any unused
UDP-[14C]Gal, [14C]Gal and other
polyprenol-P-based lipid precursors involved in arabinogalactan
biosynthesis. Another advantage of the partitioning steps was the
removal of any salts, which would otherwise hinder the resolution of
the enzymatically synthesized products.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
An autoradiogram of reaction products
produced through inclusion of acceptors
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
at 4 mM with mycobacterial membrane preparations and
UDP-[14C]Galp. A,
membranes prepared from M. smegmatis carrying pMV261.
Lane 1, control (no acceptor); lane 2,
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
[G5G]; lane 3,
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
[G6G]. B, membranes prepared from M. smegmatis
carrying either pMV261 or pMV261-Rv3808c. Lane 1,
pMV261
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
[G5G]; lane 2, pMV261-Rv3808c,
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
[G5G]; lane 3, pMV261,
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
[G6G]; lane 4, pMV261-Rv3808c,
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
[G6G]; lane 5, pMV261; lane 6,
pMV261-Rv3808c. TLC/autoradiography was performed using
CHCl3:CH3OH:NH4OH:H2O
(65:25:0.5:3.6), and products were revealed through exposure to
Kodak X-Omat film for 4 days.
|
|
Mycobacterial Galactosyltransferase Assays and M. smegmatis
pMV261-Rv3808c and E. coli pUC8-Rv3808c --
M. smegmatis
transformed with pMV261-Rv3808c or empty pMV261 was examined for
galactosyltransferase activity using the
-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
neoglycolipid acceptor cell-free assay described above. Analysis of the
reaction products by TLC/autoradiography (Fig. 5B) clearly
indicate that the overproduction of Rv3808c in the recombinant M. smegmatis strain resulted in a higher overall incorporation of
[14C]Gal from the nucleotide precursor into both
acceptors in comparison to the empty pMV261 strain. The level of
activity varied between preparations, but pMV261-Rv3808c
consistently enhanced activity by 50-70% in comparison with the empty
pMV261 plasmid (data not shown). Interestingly, the formation of the
resulting trisaccharide product from both acceptors,
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
and -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
was increased (Fig. 5B, lane 2) as was the
tetrasaccharide product for
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 (Fig. 5B, lane 4).
This increase was surprising because we anticipated that
Rv3808c would encode a single
-D-galactosyltransferase (5-linked or 6-linked). The
level of [14C]Gal incorporation and TLC profiles suggests
three possibilities. First, Rv3808c could encode for a
regulatory protein, and increased expression would lead to enhanced
activity for both acceptors as observed. Second, the acceptors could
possess very poor specificity and both recognize either 5-linked
-D-Galf or 6-linked
-D-Galf transferases. An alternative and more
attractive scenario would be that Rv3808c is a bifunctional
enzyme and performs both 5-linked -D-Galf and
6-linked -D-Galf activities. This is an
hypothesis that could be determined first by expression of
enzymatically active Rv3808c in a heterologous host, such as E. coli, and then by isolation of the corresponding products
and complete chemical characterization to determine their structures.
E. coli transformed with pUC8-Rv3808c or pUC8 was examined
for galactosyltransferase activity using the
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
neoglycolipid acceptor cell-free assay described above. Again
TLC/autoradiography of the reaction products demonstrated that the
control assays (without acceptor) are devoid of any radiolabeled
products, illustrating the efficiency of the strong anion exchange
columns (Fig. 6, lanes 1 and
2). Interestingly, the control E. coli pUC8 (Fig.
6, lane 3) possessed a minor product, presumably a
trisaccharide, in relation to
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 and a series of products, possibly tri-, tetra-, and pentasaccharide with
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
(Fig. 6, lane 5). This would imply that the acceptors are
recognized by the endogenous E. coli galactosyltransferases,
which utilize UDP-Galf in O-antigen biosynthesis, even though the acceptors do not conform to a motif present in the
O-antigen side chain (48). However, it is clear from
TLC/autoradiography (Fig. 6, lanes 4 and 6) that
membrane preparations from E. coli transformed with
pUC8-Rv3808c and in conjunction with both of the
neoglycolipid acceptors produced profiles distinct from E. coli pUC8 but characteristic and similar to M. smegmatis and M. smegmatis pMV261-Rv3808c.
These results obtained in a heterologous host eliminated the
possibility that Rv3808c encoded a regulatory protein and suggested
that Rv3808c was in fact a galactosyltransferase transferring
[14C]Gal from UDP-[14C]Galf to
both acceptors. The issue of which linkages, 5- or 6-linked, were
formed in these assays was established through detailed product characterization (see below).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
An autoradiogram of reaction products
produced through inclusion of acceptors
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
at 4 mM with E. coli membrane preparations
and UDP-[14C]Gal. Membranes prepared from E. coli pUC8 and E. coli pUC8-Rv3808c.
Lane 1, pUC8, no acceptor; lane 2,
pUC8-Rv3808c, no acceptor; lane 3, pUC8,
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
(G5G); lane 4, pUC8-Rv3808c,
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
(G5G); lane 5, pUC8,
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
(G6G); lane 6, pUC8-Rv3808c,
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
(G6G). TLC/autoradiography was performed using
CHCl3:CH3OH:NH4OH:H2O
(65:25:0.5:3.6), and products were revealed through exposure to
Kodak X-Omat film for 5 days.
|
|
Chemical Analysis of Reaction Products--
The newly synthesized
products resulting from Rv3808c expression were further
characterized from assays containing both acceptors -D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
(resulting trisaccharide ?) and -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
(resulting trisaccharide and tetrasaccharide ?) and cold UDP-Gal. The
per-O-methylated
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 acceptor revealed strong signals at m/z 601 and 709 in Fig.
7A, corresponding to the
sodiated molecular ion, and an adduct with the monothioglycerol
matrix giving rise to a pseudomolecular ion, respectively. The
corresponding trisaccharide product Fig. 7B shows the
sodiated molecular ion for the trisaccharide product at m/z
805 and the matrix-derived pseudomolecular ion at m/z 913. The signal at m/z 601 in Fig.
8A is the sodiated molecular
ion for the per-O-methylated
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
acceptor. The sodiated per-O-methylated trisaccharide
product is shown in Fig. 8B at m/z 805, with the
matrix-derived pseudomolecular ion 108 mass units higher at
m/z 913. Fig. 8C shows the
per-O-methylated tetrasaccharide product at m/z
1009 and the matrix-derived pseudomolecular ion at m/z 1117. The FAB-MS analysis of the per-O-methylated products provided direct evidence for the addition of an extra hexosyl unit to
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
with the sequential addition of two such units giving rise to a
tri- and tetrasaccharide products in relation to
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1.
Further evidence for the addition of new Galf units to both
acceptors was sought through glycosyl linkage analysis. Initial GC-MS
analysis of the partially per-O-methylated,
per-O-acetylated alditol acetates produced
non-stoichiometric amounts of each linkage, thus hindering their
assignment. A second strategy was adopted where the
per-O-methylated products were partially hydrolyzed with
acid, reduced and per-O-ethylated (PMAE) according to Fig.
9, and analyzed by GC-MS to determine what new glycosyl linkages were catalyzed by Rv3808c. This strategy in
combination with high performance liquid chromatography fractionation of PMAE cleavage products was used previously to establish the structure of mycobacterial arabinogalactan (4). The purified PMAE
cleavage products were subsequently hydrolyzed, reduced, and
per-O-acetylated, and following GC-MS analysis, they
provided a finger-print profile in terms of relative retention times
and fragmentation ions characteristic of individual PMAE cleavage products (4). In this study, the
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
acceptors generated, as expected, a terminal 1 5-linked PMAE cleavage
product (Table I, retention time 26.92 min, cleavage product A [t-Gal1-5Gal-ol] and a
terminal 1 6-linked PMAE cleavage product (Table I, retention time
28.14 min, cleavage product B [t-Gal1-6Gal-ol]),
respectively, consistent with our previous studies based on retention
times of these PMAE fragments (4). The
enzymatically synthesized trisaccharide product from the
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
acceptor produced two cleavage products (Table I). Cleavage product C
[6Eth-Gal1-5Gal-ol], with a retention time of 27.00 min,
corresponded to an internal cleavage product, which based on the
per-O-ethylation pattern suggested that the new
Galf unit was 6-linked (Table I). More importantly, the
cleavage product at 27.99 min based on retention time corresponded to a
terminal 1 6-linked PMAE cleavage product [t-Gal1-6Gal-ol] implying a new 1 6 linkage. The two
cleavage products together provide the complete structure of the
enzymatically synthesized product as
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1. The enzymatically synthesized trisaccharide product from the
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 acceptor also produced two cleavage products (Table I) with retention times of 28.24 min corresponding to the internal cleavage product D
[5Eth-Gal1-6Gal-ol] suggesting that the new Galf unit was
5-linked and, more importantly, cleavage product A at 26.80 min, which corresponds to a terminal 1 5-linked PMAE cleavage product
[t-Gal1-5-Gal-ol], thus implying a new 1 5 linkage. The
two cleavage products together provide the complete structure of
the enzymatically synthesized product as
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1.
A similar analysis of PMAE cleavage products produced with the
enzymatically synthesized tetrasaccharide product from the
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 acceptor produced PMAE cleavage products B
[t-Gal1-6Gal-ol, retention time 28.09 min], C
[6Eth-Gal1-5Gal-ol], retention time 27.32 min, and D
[5Eth-Gal1-6Gal-ol], retention time 28.24 min (Table I), thus
establishing the identity of the enzymatically synthesized tetrasaccharide product as
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
FAB-MS analysis of
per-O-methylated
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
acceptor (A) and the putative trisaccharide product
(B). A, the signal at m/z 687 is
the protonated pseudomolecular ion. The signals at m/z 731 and 815 are matrix derived. B, the signals at m/z
783 and 891 are the protonated molecular ion and pseudomolecular ion,
respectively. The signals at m/z 579 and 687 are the
protonated molecular ion and pseudomolecular ion of the starting
acceptor. Signals marked with an X are solvent
impurities.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
FAB-MS analysis of
per-O-methylated
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
acceptor (A) and the putative trisaccharide product
(B) and tetrasaccharide product
(C). The signal at m/z 731 in
panel A is matrix-derived. Signals marked with an
X are solvent impurities.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
An illustration of the sequence of reactions
used to produce partially per-O-methylated, reduced,
and partially per-O-ethylated monoglycosyl
alditols.
|
|
Thus, the chemical analysis is consistent with the
galactosyltransferase activity encoded by Rv3808c,
alternating between 1 5 and 1 6 linkages. In summary, the
biochemical evidence shows that Rv3808c, which we have now termed
GlfT, is a bifunctional enzyme that catalyzes the
polymerization of the galactan region of mAGP through
-D-(1 5) and
-D-(1 6)-galactofuranosyltransferases activities.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The D-galactan region of arabinogalactan from
M. tuberculosis is based upon a backbone structure of
repeat units of
5)- -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-(1 . Neoglycolipid glycosyltransferase acceptors have been utilized in a
variety of glycosyltransferase assays and in particular in studies
related to arabinan biosynthesis in M. tuberculosis (46). In
this current report a novel galactosyltransferase assay was developed
that utilized synthetic neoglycolipid acceptors
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1 and
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1,
with UDP-Galf as the Galf donor presented in the
form of UDP-Galp and UDP-Galp mutase (the glf gene product) and isolated membrane preparations from
M. smegmatis and E. coli. Chemical analysis of
the reaction products demonstrated that the
-D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
acceptor resulted in a trisaccharide product
( -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1), whereas the
-D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1
acceptor yielded a trisaccharide
( -D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1) and a tetrasaccharide
( -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-(1 5)- -D-Galf-(1 6)- -D-Galf-O-C10:1) consistent with the expected alternating linkage
profile of the galactan region of arabinogalactan.
The "one enzyme, one linkage" hypothesis of Hagopian and Eylar (49)
was one of the early dogmas of glycobiology. However, several enzymes
consisting of a single polypeptide chain have been demonstrated to
catalyze the transfer of a least two distinct sugars. For instance,
work on the E. coli K5 enzyme KfiC that synthesizes the
structurally related heparosan polysaccharide [ 1 4GlcUA- 1 4GlcNAc] has suggested that this protein is
responsible for the alternating and addition of each
monosaccharide to the appropriate acceptor polysaccharide (50).
Mutagenesis and deletion analysis showed that the GlcUA-transferase
activity of KfiC could be removed while retaining the
GlcNAc-transferase activity, indicating that two separate active sites
are present within this enzyme (51). Perhaps the most documented
examples of bifunctional glycosyltransferases are the hyaluronan
synthases that polymerize a polysaccharide composed of repeating
disaccharide [ 1 4GlcUA- 1 3GlcNAc] units (52). It was shown
that the hyaluronan synthase from Pasteurella multocida
transfers individual monosaccharides sequentially during the
polymerization reaction (53). Recent dissection of this enzyme provided
direct evidence for the existence of two separate glycosyltransferase
sites (54). The glycosidic linkages of the type 3 capsular
polysaccharide of Streptococcus pneumoniae
[(3) -D-GlcUA-(1 4)- -D-Glc-(1 )n] are formed by the membrane-associated type 3 synthase (Cps3S), which is
capable of synthesizing polymers from UDP-sugar precursors (55). In
Klebsiella pneumoniae serotype O1, the lipopolysaccharide O
antigen contains D-galactan I
[ 3- -D-Galf-1 3- -D-Galp-1]. Clarke et al. (56) demonstrated that the product of the
rfbF gene is required for the initiation of the
D-galactan I component biosynthesis. Furthermore,
overexpression of the RfbF protein in E. coli led to dual
galactopyranosyl and galactofuranosyl transferase activities,
indicating that RfbF may be a bifunctional enzyme (56).
Our findings in association with the neoglycolipid assay demonstrate
that Rv3808c (now termed glfT) from M. tuberculosis encodes a novel bifunctional enzyme, which performs
two glycosyltransferases, UDP-Galf: -D-(1 5)galactofuranosyltransferase
and
UDP-Galf: -D-(1 6)galactofuranosyltransferase, involved in cell wall galactan polymerization. However, the question remains to be answered whether one or two distinct catalytic sites are
responsible for these two galactosyltransferases activities. Experiments are under way to determine the location and nature of the
active site(s). Interestingly, the chromosomal location of
Rv3808c in what is termed a "cell wall biosynthetic
cluster" (57) supports this notion, which is now supported by
detailed biochemical evidence. Other open reading frames of interest in this region include the emb cluster
(arabinofuranosyltransferases) (18, 58) and antigen 85 (mycolyltransferase) (59). However, more important was the location of
the adjacent open reading frame designated as glf
(Rv3809c), which provides the activated galactofuranose in
the form of UDP-Galf.
Homology between glycosyltransferases is often extremely low.
Therefore, we employed HCA to examine the predicted product of
Rv3808c with other glycosyltransferase genes within the
M. tuberculosis genome. A conserved domain organization is
commonly found in "inverting" glycosyltransferases when analyzed
using this powerful technique. Domain A contains a series of
hydrophobic clusters that predict alternating -strands ( 1- 4)
and -helices ( 1- 3). Conserved aspartate residues, often as
part of a DXD motif, are found immediately to the C terminus
of -strands 2 and 4 in the predicted loop regions. Although several
potential DXD motifs are present within GlfT, most occur
toward the interior of the loop regions well away from the
-strands. A classic DXD motif, in this case
Asp256-258, immediately following a vertical
hydrophobic cluster (Ile-Leu-Phe-Met255) (Fig.
3B), strongly suggests the existence of a -strand
(putative 2). Similarly, a putative 4
(Leu-Phe-Ile-Lys-Trp 370) strand with C-terminal
DXD (Asp-Asp-Ala-Asp374) motif is found around 100 residues
away. Together these features suggest that the likely location of
domain A is between these residues. Although another DXD
motif is found C-terminal to a vertical hydrophobic cluster
(Asp-Lys-Asp-Asp404), this provides a poor
conservation in relation to domain A organization.
Processive -glycosyltransferases such as GlfT also contain a second
conserved structural unit, domain B. One feature of this domain is the
presence of a C-terminal motif, QXXRW. Contrary to what has
been reported previously (20), GlfT does contain this motif
(Gln-Asp-Ala-Arg-Trp555). However, it is prudent to
consider that this region of the protein is glutamine- and
arginine-rich and that QXXRX is represented an
additional four times in a 113-residue stretch (residues 482-594). Although the structural determinants within domain B are less well
defined, a conserved aspartate residue usually occurs ~40-50 residues nearer the N terminus. The nearest upstream aspartate residue
does occur at residue 492, but the intervening sequence is
proline-rich, suggesting the likely presence of a "hinge" region similar to that seen in the mycobacterial polyprenol
monophosphomannose synthase Ppm1 (Fig. 3B).
In summary, the biochemical and molecular understanding of critical
steps in cell wall assembly in M. tuberculosis, such as galactan polymerization via glfT, should now substantially
enhance current tuberculosis drug discovery efforts and lead to
the development of new therapeutic anti-tubercular agents.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by GlaxoWellcome Research and
Development (UK) ActionTB program, the Medical Research Council
(Grants 49343 and 49342), the Wellcome Trust, the National
Institutes of Health (Grants AI-45317 and AI-18357), and Grant AI-38087
from the National Cooperative Drug Discovery Groups for the Treatment of Opportunistic Infections, NIAID, National Institutes of Health. Genomic DNA was provided by the Tuberculosis Research Materials and
Vaccine Testing Contract (NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Grant
NO1-AI-75320).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
These two authors contributed equally to this work.
¶
Supported through a Heiser Trust post-doctoral fellowship.
Present address: INSERM U447, Institut Pasteur de Lille, 1 rue du Pr.
Calmette, BP245-59019 Lille Cedex, France.
**
Holder of a United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological Sciences
Research Council CASE (DERA) studentship.
¶¶
Currently a Lister Institute Jenner research fellow. To
whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 0191- 222-5412; Fax: 0191-222-7736; E-mail:
g.s.besra@newcastle.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 13, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102022200
2
I. C. Hancock and G. S. Besra,
unpublished results.
3
M. R. McNeil, unpublished results.
4
C. Flaherty and G. S. Besra, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LU, linkage unit;
DPA, -D-arabinofuranosyl-1-monophosphoryldecaprenol;
ES-MS, electrospray mass spectroscopy;
FAB-MS, fast atom bombardment
mass spectrometry;
f, furanose;
GC-MS, gas chromatography
mass spectrometry;
HCA, hydrophobic cluster analysis;
J, coupling constant;
mAGP, mycolyl-arabinogalactan-peptidoglycan;
-P, phosphate;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PMAE, per-O-methylated-alditol-per-O-ethylated;
Rha, rhamnose;
m, multiplet;
d, doublet;
s, singler;
dm, double multiplet;
ddt, double-double-triplet.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bloom, B. R.,
and Murray, C. J.
(1992)
Science
257,
1055-1064
|
| 2.
|
Barry, C. E., III.
(1997)
Biochem. Pharmacol
54,
1165-1172
|
| 3.
|
Young, D. B.,
and Dunkan, K.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
49,
641-673
|
| 4.
|
Daffé, M.,
Brennan, P. J.,
and McNeil, M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
6734-6743
|
| 5.
|
McNeil, M.,
Daffé, M.,
and Brennan, P. J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
18200-18206
|
| 6.
|
McNeil, M. R.
(1999)
in
Genetics of Bacterial Polysaccharides
(Goldberg, J., ed)
, pp. 207-223, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
|
| 7.
|
Besra, G. S.,
Khoo, K.-H.,
McNeil, M. R.,
Dell, A.,
Morris, H. R.,
and Brennan, P. J.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
4257-4266
|
| 8.
|
Quémard, A.,
Lacave, C.,
and Lanéelle, G.
(1991)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35,
1035-1039
|
| 9.
|
Banerjee, A.,
Dubnau, E.,
Quemard, A.,
Balasubramanian, V.,
Um, K. S.,
Wilson, T.,
Collins, D.,
de Lisle, G.,
and Jacobs, W. R., Jr.
(1994)
Science
263,
227-230
|
| 10.
|
Kremer, L.,
Baulard, A. R.,
and Besra, G. S.
(2000)
in
Molecular Genetics of Mycobacteria
(Hatfull, G. F.
, and Jacobs, W. R., Jr., eds)
, pp. 173-190, ASM Press, Washington D. C.
|
| 11.
|
Mdluli, K.,
Slayden, R. A.,
Zhu, Y. Q.,
Ramaswamy, S.,
Pan, X.,
Mead, D.,
Crane, D. D.,
Musser, J. M.,
and Barry, C. E., III.
(1998)
Science
280,
1607-1610
|
| 12.
|
Kremer, L.,
Douglas, J. D.,
Baulard, A. R.,
Morehouse, C.,
Guy, M. R.,
Alland, D.,
Dover, L. G.,
Lakey, J. H.,
Jacobs, W. R., Jr.,
Brennan, P. J.,
Minnikin, D. E.,
and Besra, G. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
16857-16864
|
| 13.
|
Slayden, R. A.,
Lee, R. E.,
and Barry, C. E.
(2000)
Mol. Microbiol.
38,
514-525
|
| 14.
|
Takayama, K.,
Armstrong, E. L.,
Kunigi, K. A.,
and Kilburn, J. O.
(1979)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
16,
240-242
|
| 15.
|
Kilburn, J. O.,
and Takayama, K.
(1981)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
20,
401-404
|
| 16.
|
Takayama, K.,
and Kilburn, J. O.
(1989)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
33,
1493-1499
|
| 17.
|
Mikusova, K.,
Slayden, R. A.,
Besra, G. S.,
and Brennan, P. J.
(1995)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39,
2484-2489
|
| 18.
|
Belanger, A. E.,
Besra, G. S.,
Ford, M. E.,
Mikusova, K.,
Belisle, J. T.,
Brennan, P. J.,
and Inamine, J. M.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
11919-11924
|
| 19.
|
Mikusova, K.,
Mikus, M.,
Besra, G. S.,
Hancock, I.,
and Brennan, P. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7820-7828
|
| 20.
|
Mikusova, K.,
Yagi, T.,
Stern, R.,
McNeil, M. R.,
Besra, G. S.,
Crick, D. C.,
and Brennan, P. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33890-33897
|
| 21.
|
Ma, Y.,
Mills, J. A.,
Belisle, J. T.,
Vissa, V.,
Howell, M.,
Bowlin, K.,
Scherman, M. S.,
and McNeil, M.
(1997)
Microbiology
143,
937-945
|
| 22.
|
Hoang, T. T.,
Ma, Y.,
Stern, R. J.,
McNeil, M. R.,
and Schweizer, H. P.
(1999)
Gene
237,
361-371
|
| 23.
|
Weston, A.,
Stern, R. J.,
Lee, R. E.,
Nassau, P. M.,
Monsey, D.,
Martin, S. L.,
Scherman, M. S.,
Besra, G. S.,
Duncan, K.,
and McNeil, M. R.
(1998)
Tuber. Lung Dis.
78,
123-131
|
| 24.
|
Stern, R. J.,
Lee, T. Y.,
Lee, T. J.,
Yan, W.,
Scherman, M. S.,
Vissa, V. D.,
Kim, S. K.,
Wanner, B. L.,
and McNeil, M. R.
(1999)
Microbiology
145,
663-671
|
| 25.
|
Ward, J. B.
(1977)
FEBS Lett.
78,
151-154
|
| 26.
|
Ward, J. B.,
and Curtis, C. A.
(1982)
Eur. J. Biochem.
122,
125-132
|
| 27.
|
Snapper, S. B.,
Melton, R. E.,
Mustafa, S.,
Kieser, T.,
and Jacobs, W. R., Jr.
(1990)
Mol. Microbiol.
4,
1911-1919
|
| 28.
|
Kremer, L.,
Baulard, A.,
Estaquier, J.,
Content, J.,
Capron, A.,
and Locht, C.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
642-653
|
| 29.
|
Stover, C. K.,
de la Cruz, V. F.,
Fuerst, T. R.,
Burlein, J. E.,
Benson, L. A.,
Bansal, G. P.,
Young, J. F.,
Lee, M. H.,
Hatfull, G. F.,
Snapper, S. B.,
Barletta, R. G.,
Jacobs, W. R., Jr.,
and Bloom, B. R.
(1991)
Nature
351,
456-460
|
| 30.
|
Baulard, A.,
Jourdan, C.,
Mercenier, A.,
and Locht, C.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
4105
|
| 31.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, F. E.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 32.
|
Sugawara, F.,
Nakayama, H.,
and Ogawa, T.
(1986)
Agric. Biol. Chem.
50,
1557-1561
|
| 33.
|
Veeneman, G. H.,
Notermans, S.,
Hoogerhout, P.,
and van Boom, J. H.
(1989)
Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas
108,
344-350
|
| 34.
|
Wolfrom, M. L.,
McWain, P.,
Pagnucco, R.,
and Thompson, A.
(1964)
J. Org. Chem.
29,
454-457
|
| 35.
|
Zurmond, H. M.,
vander Klein, P. A. M.,
Veeneman, G. H.,
and van Boom, J. H.
(1990)
Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas.
109,
437-441
|
| 36.
|
Besra, G. S.,
Sievert, T.,
Lee, R. E.,
Slayden, R. A.,
Brennan, P. J.,
and Takayama, K.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12735-12739
|
| 37.
|
Dell, A.,
Reason, A. J.,
Khoo, K. H.,
Panico, M.,
McDowell, R. A.,
and Morris, H. R.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
230,
108-132
|
| 38.
|
Paulson, J. C.,
and Colley, K. J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
17615-17618
|
| 39.
|
Joziasse, D. H.
(1992)
Glycobiology
2,
271-277
|
| 40.
|
Gaboriaud, C.,
Bissery, V.,
Benchetrit, T.,
and Mornon, J. P.
(1987)
FEBS Lett.
224,
149-155
|
| 41.
|
Wiggins, C. A.,
and Munro, S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7945-7950
|
| 42.
|
Shibayama, K.,
Ohsuka, S.,
Tanaka, T.,
Arakawa, Y.,
and Ohta, M.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5313-5318
|
| 43.
|
Breton, C.,
Bettler, E.,
Joziasse, D. H,
Geremia, R. A,
and Imberty, A.
(1998)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
123,
1000-1009
|
| 44.
|
Hagen, F. K.,
Hazes, B.,
Raffo, R.,
deSa, D.,
and Tabak, L. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
6797-6803
|
| 45.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410
|
| 46.
|
Lee, R. E.,
Brennan, P. J.,
and Besra, G. S.
(1997)
Glycobiology
7,
1121-1128
|
| 47.
|
Barlow, J. N.,
and Blanchard, J. S.
(2000)
Carbohydr. Res.
328,
473-480
|
| 48.
|
Whitfield, C.
(1995)
Trends Microbiol.
3,
178-185
|
| 49.
|
Hagopian, A.,
and Eylar, E. H.
(1968)
Arch. Biochim. Biophys.
128,
422-433
|
| 50.
|
Petit, C.,
Rigg, G. P.,
Pazzani, C.,
Smith, A.,
Sieberth, V.,
Stevens, M.,
Boulnois, G.,
Jann, K.,
and Roberts, I. S.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
17,
611-620
|
| 51.
|
Griffiths, G.,
Cook, N. J.,
Gottfridson, E.,
Lind, T.,
Lidholt, K.,
and Roberts, I. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11752-11757
|
| 52.
|
Weigel, P. H.,
Hascall, V. C.,
and Tammi, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13997-14000
|
| 53.
|
DeAngelis, P. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26557-26562
|
| 54.
|
Jing, W.,
and DeAngelis, P. L.
(2000)
Glycobiology
10,
883-889
|
| 55.
|
Cartee, R. T.,
Forsee, W. T.,
Schutzbach, J. S.,
and Yother, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3907-3914
|
| 56.
|
Clarke, B. R.,
Bronner, D.,
Kleenleyside, W. J.,
Severn, W. B.,
Richards, J. C.,
and Whitfield, C.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
5411-5418
|
| 57.
|
Cole, S. T.,
Brosch, R.,
Parkhill, J.,
Garnier, T.,
Churcher, C.,
Harris, D.,
Gordon, S. V.,
Eiglmeier, K.,
Gas, S.,
Barry, C. E., III,
Tekaia, F.,
Badcock, K.,
Basham, D.,
Brown, D.,
Chillingworth, T.,
Connor, R.,
Davies, R.,
Devlin, K.,
Feltwell, T.,
Gentles, S.,
Hamlin, N.,
Holroyd, S.,
Hornsby, T.,
Jagels, K.,
Krogh, A.,
McLean, J.,
Moule, S.,
Murphy, L.,
Oliver, K.,
Osborne, J.,
Quail, M. A.,
Rajandream, M. A.,
Rogers, J.,
Rutter, S.,
Seeger, K.,
Skelton, J.,
Squares, S.,
Squares, R.,
Sulston, J. E.,
Taylor, K.,
Whitehead, S.,
and Barrell, B. G.
(1998)
Nature
393,
537-544
|
| 58.
|
Telenti, A.,
Philipp, W. J.,
Sreevatsan, S.,
Bernasconi, C.,
Stockbauer, K. E.,
Wieles, B.,
Musser, J. M.,
and Jacobs, W. R., Jr.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
567-570
|
| 59.
|
Belisle, J. T.,
Vissa, V. D.,
Sievert, T.,
Takayama, K.,
Brennan, P. J.,
and Besra, G. S.
(1997)
Science
276,
1420-1422
|
| 60.
|
Saxena, I. M.,
Brown, R. M., Jr.,
Fevre, M.,
Geremia, R. A.,
and Henrissat, B.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
1419-1424
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Schmalhorst, S. Krappmann, W. Vervecken, M. Rohde, M. Muller, G. H. Braus, R. Contreras, A. Braun, H. Bakker, and F. H. Routier
Contribution of Galactofuranose to the Virulence of the Opportunistic Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus
Eukaryot. Cell,
August 1, 2008;
7(8):
1268 - 1277.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Belanova, P. Dianiskova, P. J. Brennan, G. C. Completo, N. L. Rose, T. L. Lowary, and K. Mikusova
Galactosyl Transferases in Mycobacterial Cell Wall Synthesis
J. Bacteriol.,
February 1, 2008;
190(3):
1141 - 1145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Berg, D. Kaur, M. Jackson, and P. J Brennan
The glycosyltransferases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis--roles in the synthesis of arabinogalactan, lipoarabinomannan, and other glycoconjugates
Glycobiology,
June 1, 2007;
17(6):
35R - 56R.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Seidel, L. J. Alderwick, H. L. Birch, H. Sahm, L. Eggeling, and G. S. Besra
Identification of a Novel Arabinofuranosyltransferase AftB Involved in a Terminal Step of Cell Wall Arabinan Biosynthesis in Corynebacterianeae, such as Corynebacterium glutamicum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 18, 2007;
282(20):
14729 - 14740.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Seidel, L. J. Alderwick, H. Sahm, G. S. Besra, and L. Eggeling
Topology and mutational analysis of the single Emb arabinofuranosyltransferase of Corynebacterium glutamicum as a model of Emb proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Glycobiology,
February 1, 2007;
17(2):
210 - 219.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Alderwick, L. G. Dover, M. Seidel, R. Gande, H. Sahm, L. Eggeling, and G. S. Besra
Arabinan-deficient mutants of Corynebacterium glutamicum and the consequent flux in decaprenylmonophosphoryl-D-arabinose metabolism
Glycobiology,
November 1, 2006;
16(11):
1073 - 1081.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Mikusova, M. Belanova, J. Kordulakova, K. Honda, M. R. McNeil, S. Mahapatra, D. C. Crick, and P. J. Brennan
Identification of a novel galactosyl transferase involved in biosynthesis of the mycobacterial cell wall.
J. Bacteriol.,
September 1, 2006;
188(18):
6592 - 6598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Alderwick, M. Seidel, H. Sahm, G. S. Besra, and L. Eggeling
Identification of a Novel Arabinofuranosyltransferase (AftA) Involved in Cell Wall Arabinan Biosynthesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 9, 2006;
281(23):
15653 - 15661.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Alderwick, E. Radmacher, M. Seidel, R. Gande, P. G. Hitchen, H. R. Morris, A. Dell, H. Sahm, L. Eggeling, and G. S. Besra
Deletion of Cg-emb in Corynebacterianeae Leads to a Novel Truncated Cell Wall Arabinogalactan, whereas Inactivation of Cg-ubiA Results in an Arabinan-deficient Mutant with a Cell Wall Galactan Core
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 16, 2005;
280(37):
32362 - 32371.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yagi, S. Mahapatra, K. Mikusova, D. C. Crick, and P. J. Brennan
Polymerization of Mycobacterial Arabinogalactan and Ligation to Peptidoglycan
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 11, 2003;
278(29):
26497 - 26504.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Schaeffer, G. Agnihotri, C. Volker, H. Kallender, P. J. Brennan, and J. T. Lonsdale
Purification and Biochemical Characterization of the Mycobacterium tuberculosisbeta -Ketoacyl-acyl Carrier Protein Synthases KasA and KasB
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 7, 2001;
276(50):
47029 - 47037.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Crick, S. Mahapatra, and P. J. Brennan
Biosynthesis of the arabinogalactan-peptidoglycan complex of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Glycobiology,
September 1, 2001;
11(9):
107R - 118R.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|