JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102850200 on May 2, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 29, 27555-27561, July 20, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/29/27555    most recent
M102850200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hörer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sassoon, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hörer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sassoon, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Crystallographic Structure of the Mannitol 2-Dehydrogenase NADP+ Binary Complex from Agaricus bisporus*

Stefan HörerDagger §, Johan Stoop, Hans Mooibroek||, Ulrich BaumannDagger **, and Judyth SassoonDagger **

From the Dagger  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Berne, Freiestrasse 3, 3012 Berne, Switzerland,  DuPont Crop Genetics, Wilmington, Delaware 19880, and the || Department of Bioconversion, Wageningen University and Research Center, Agrotechnological Research Institute (ATO B.V.), NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands

Received for publication, March 30, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mannitol, an acyclic six-carbon polyol, is one of the most abundant sugar alcohols occurring in nature. In the button mushroom, Agaricus bisporus, it is synthesized from fructose by the enzyme mannitol 2-dehydrogenase (MtDH; EC 1.1.1.138) using NADPH as a cofactor. Mannitol serves as the main storage carbon (up to 50% of the fruit body dry weight) and plays a critical role in growth, fruit body development, osmoregulation, and salt tolerance. Furthermore, mannitol dehydrogenases are being evaluated for commercial mannitol production as alternatives to the less efficient chemical reduction of fructose. Given the importance of mannitol metabolism and mannitol dehydrogenases, MtDH was cloned into the pET28 expression system and overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Kinetic and physicochemical properties of the recombinant enzyme are indistinguishable from the natural enzyme. The crystal structure of its binary complex with NADP was solved at 1.5-Å resolution and refined to an R value of 19.3%. It shows MtDH to be a tetramer and a member of the short chain dehydrogenase/reductase family of enzymes. The catalytic residues forming the so-called catalytic triad can be assigned to Ser149, Tyr169, and Lys173.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mannitol is the most abundant sugar alcohol in nature, occurring in bacteria, algae, lichens, fungi, and many vascular plants (1, 2). In Agaricus bisporus, it is the main storage carbon and can contribute up to 20% of the mycelium dry weight and up to 50% of the fruit body dry weight (3). Mannitol has been reported to accumulate in response to environmental stresses such as salt stress (2, 4, 5). In fungi, its function as an osmoregulatory compound might also be critical in providing an influx of water from the environment to support turgor and fruit body development (2, 6). Other physiological roles of mannitol are also likely including service as the main and most efficient respiratory source during postharvest development and fruit body senescence (7). The advantage of mannitol catabolism over sucrose may be explained by the fact that NAD(P)H is produced during mannitol oxidation and can be converted to ATP, resulting in a more efficient system than in organisms that metabolize sugars.

Furthermore, mannitol metabolism may be involved in the recycling of NADP and NADPH. NADP produced during the conversion of fructose to mannitol becomes available for the oxidative reactions of the pentose phosphate shunt, which in turn release NADPH. The interaction between these two biochemical pathways may result in a fine regulation of the cellular NADP/NADPH ratio and suggests a role for mannitol metabolism in growth regulation (8). The production of transgenic mushrooms with altered characteristics is possible, because transformation procedures have been established (9-11). The lack of detailed information at the molecular level regarding genes and proteins involved in central metabolic processes (such as mannitol metabolism) has restricted the breeding of A. bisporus by genetic methods.

Apart from its agrotechnological importance, mannitol dehydrogenases are being evaluated as an alternative way to synthesize mannitol from fructose. The ability to produce large quantities of pure and active enzyme using microbial expression systems together with the more efficient enzymatic mannitol production process (compared with the chemical reduction of fructose) may enable commercial production of pure mannitol for use in the food industry.

Given the importance of mannitol metabolism in fungi, the MtDH1 gene of A. bisporus has been cloned and characterized (4). In addition, the knowledge of the three-dimensional structure reported in this work makes it easier and more rational to produce mutated variants of mannitol dehydrogenase.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Crystallization of the MtDH-NADP+ Binary Complex-- Expression of the A. bisporus MtDH gene within the Escherichia coli host BL21(DE3), purification of the resulting soluble protein, and production of monoclinic crystals (space group C2) have been reported previously (12). Crystals of the binary complex (MtDH and NADP+) were obtained under similar conditions using the sitting drop vapor diffusion method. NADP+ was added to the protein solution to a final concentration of 1 mM prior to crystallization. The drop was created by combining 5 µl of the protein solution (10-20 mg/ml and 1 mM NADP+) with 5 µl of well solution (90 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 18% PEG 4K, and 9% isopropanol at 20 °C).

X-ray Diffraction Data Collection-- X-ray diffraction data were collected to 1.5-Å resolution at 120 K using a MAR345 image plate detector at beamline BM1A at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble (wavelength = 0.800 Å). The detector was placed 280 mm from the crystal. Each image was exposed in dose mode for ~5 min and consisted of a 0.5° rotation of the crystal. The data from one crystal (1.5 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm) were processed using MOSFLM (13) and SCALA (14, 15). Data collection statistics are listed in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
X-ray diffraction data statistics
Completeness = (number of Fobserved/number of Fexpected) × 100; Rsym = (Sigma |I-< I> |/Sigma I) × 100; < I/sigma I>  = Sigma (I/sigma I)

Initial Phase Determination and Model Refinement-- Molecular replacement was done with the CNS software package (16). Initial molecular replacement calculations proved to be difficult because of the low sequence identity (30% at most) to members of the short chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) family with known three-dimensional structure and because of the large unit cell content in the crystals of MtDH. Parallel attempts to determine the structure by multiple isomorphous replacement were hampered by nonisomorphism where the cell axes varied by 5-8%. Hence, a more extensive molecular replacement approach was undertaken. The tetramer of mouse lung carbonyl reductase (Protein Data Bank entry 1cyd) was used as a search model. The probe had to be modified to give significant solutions in the rotation function calculation in the following way. A sequence alignment between MtDH and mouse lung carbonyl reductase was calculated, and all nonconserved residues were changed to alanine with the SEAMAN program (17). Data from 6 to 10 Å was used in the cross-rotation search, and three tetramers could be located in the asymmetric unit. This corresponds to a Matthews coefficient (18) VM of 2.43 Å3/Da with ~47.5% solvent volume. Subsequent to rigid body refinement, noncrystallographic symmetry restraints were applied, and torsion angle refinement was performed using data in the resolution range from 40 to 3.5 Å (R factor = 39%, Rfree = 40%). In a 2Fo - Fc electron density map, 243 (of 265) residues could be identified, and 222 side chains were build into the electron density map using the program O (19). Attempts to employ noncrystallographic symmetry averaging using CNS and DM (20) failed. The electron density correlation dropped during averaging, and the quality of the map became inferior. In hindsight this can be explained by the large differences among the three individual tetramers concerning their anisotropic movement in the crystal. At this stage automatic model building was carried out with the program ARP/wARP (21) in mode warpNtrace using data in the resolution range from 40 to 1.5 Å, which led to a dramatic improvement. After 10 cycles of automated model building, 260 residues (excluding the 5 N-terminal residues) and the NADP+ could be identified in the resulting 2Fo - Fc electron density map. Two nickel ions per tetramer (coordinated each by the C termini of two monomers) were also added. Evidence showing that these metal ions were nickel arose from the purification by nickel-chelate affinity chromatography and the lack of chelating agents in all buffers and are therefore presumed to be purification artifacts. After the addition of about 3000 water molecules, torsion angle and individual B factor refinements, the R factor dropped to 22.3% (Rfree = 23.6%). Visual inspection of the electron density map and comparison of the three individual tetramers revealed a striking difference in quality, reflected also in the average individual B factors for each subunit (Table II). TLS refinement with the program REFMAC (22, 23) was carried out to account for this behavior. In this procedure, every monomer was treated as a rigid body, for which the three tensors T, L, and S were refined. Because of the possibility that crystal packing restricts movement of whole molecules (24), the largest movements as modeled by the TLS parameters are found in the tetramer showing the smallest number of crystal contacts. The removal of the subunit movement from the individual B factors resulted in comparable B factors for the individual subunits (Table II) and enabled the application of noncrystallographic symmetry restraints. The final model statistics after anisotropic B factor refinement for the nickel ions are listed in Table III.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
TLS refinement
Comparison of average B factors before and after TLS refinement. The difference between the individual subunits can be modeled by refining the three parameters (T, L, and S) for each subunit, which corresponds to a movement of the individual subunits as rigid bodies. After this treatment of the data, the remaining B factors consist solely of the individual movement of each atom, and the average B factors are identical. The number of crystal contacts correlates to the value of the average B factors for the individual subunits before TLS refinement.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Model refinement statistics
R factor = (Sigma (|Fobserved - Fcalculated|/Sigma |Fobserved|) × 100; Free R factor = R value of portion of data omitted from model refinement; F, amplitude.

Molecular Modeling-- The substrate mannitol was modeled into the active site cavity with the program AUTODOCK using the genetic algorithm of the program. The results from 100 docking calculations were clustered into groups containing structures with less than 1.5-Å root mean square deviation. The clusters were sorted by energy.

Analytical Size Exclusion Chromatography and Dynamic Light Scattering-- The quaternary structure of MtDH was investigated by determining the molecular weight of MtDH in solution by size exclusion chromatography and dynamic light scattering. For the size exclusion chromatography, a prepacked Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Superdex 75 HR16/60 column was equilibrated in 100 mM NaCl and 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. The flow rate was set to 0.5 ml/min and controlled by a fast protein liquid chromatography system from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The column was calibrated with a set of standard proteins (1 mg each), and the molecular weight of MtDH was determined by graphical comparison of the measured elution volumes. Dynamic light scattering was performed on a single wavelength fixed angle DynaPro system (Protein Solutions). Protein samples were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min and measured in 12-µl quartz cuvettes. Size distribution analysis was performed with the program DYNALS.

Enzyme Kinetics-- Kinetic measurements were done with a SPECTRAmax 250 microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices). The assay buffer containing the substrate (mannitol or fructose) at different concentrations from 10 to 500 mM, and the cofactor (NADP+ or NADPH) in the range of 40-300 µM was incubated at 30 °C. After the addition of MtDH (4-10 nM), the absorption of NADPH at 340 nm was measured for 30 min, and the initial rate constants were calculated. Km values and Vmax for the substrates and the cofactor were calculated with the program LEONORA (25).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Overall Tertiary and Quaternary Structure of MtDH-- MtDH is a member of the SDR family of enzymes, also known as the tyrosine-dependent oxidoreductase family (reviewed in Ref. 26). The characteristic of this family is the extension of the typical Rossmann fold consisting of two beta alpha beta alpha beta motifs beta A-alpha B-beta B-alpha C-beta C and beta D-alpha E-beta E-alpha F-beta F (27) (reviewed in Ref. 28) by a seventh beta -strand with a left-handed cross-over connection between strands F and G. Secondary structure elements were assigned according to the convention described by Ghosh et al. (29). The loop between beta F and alpha G contains two small helices (alpha FG1, residues 204-209 and alpha FG2, residues 211-220) and one beta -strand (beta FG1, residues 227-229), which form one side of the active site cavity. Within the SDR family this loop is responsible for the substrate specificity among the different enzymes (30-35). The other side of the active site is lined by the insertion loop between beta E and alpha F, which in the case of MtDH contains a small antiparallel beta -sheet, beta EF1 (residues 157-159) and beta EF2 (residues 162-164) (Fig. 1A).


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Stereo drawing of the tertiary and quaternary structure of MtDH. a, ribbon diagram of a single subunit of MtDH. red, alpha -helices; green, beta -strands. The bound NADP+ is shown in Corey-Pauling-Koltun (CPK) representation. b, the homotetramer of MtDH. Each monomeric subunit is shown in a different color (cyan, red, green, and magenta). The C termini of subunits 1 and 3 (cyan and green) coordinate one nickel ion as well as the C termini of subunits 2 and 4. This view is along the axis that intersects the two nickel ions such that only one ion is visible. The figure was prepared with MOLSCRIPT (52) in combination with RASTER-3D (53).

Size exclusion chromatography and dynamic light scattering showed that MtDH is a tetramer in solution. Our kinetic data showed cooperativity in neither the oxidative nor the reductive reaction of MtDH. The crystal structure revealed that the asymmetric unit contains three tetramers. Each tetramer possesses internal 222 symmetry. The interaction surface is 1460 Å2 between monomers 1 (cyan) and 2 (red), 660 Å2 between monomers 1 and 3 (green), and 1740 Å2 between monomers 1 and 4 (magenta) (color coding according to Fig. 1B; calculations were done with the CNS software package (16, 36)). The total surface area buried in each monomer therefore is 3850 Å2 or ~32%.

The C termini of monomer 1s and 3 and the C termini of monomers 2 and 4 coordinate one metal ion each. The absence of anomalous scattering for this metal ion using Cu-Kalpha radiation (1.54 Å) combined with the presence of anomalous scattering peaks using synchrotron radiation (0.80 Å) give good evidence that this metal ion indeed is nickel, which is probably a purification artifact. Also, the trigonal prismatic coordination sphere of each metal ion (two C termini from two individual subunits of one tetramer and four water molecules) is not uncommon for nickel under conditions at which sterical hindrance prevents octahedral coordination.

Location and Conformation of the NADP+ Substrate-- The NADP+ binding site is located at the C-terminal end of the beta -sheet forming the Rossmann fold (Fig. 1A). The substrate binding crevice forms an oval-shaped cavity with dimensions of ~20 × 12 × 7 Å with the cofactor at the bottom of the cavity. Both riboses of the NADP+ have 2E (C2'-endo) puckering, the nicotinamide ring is in the syn conformation, and the adenine in the anti conformation (nomenclature according to International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry-International Union of Biochemistry nomenclature for polynucleotides (37)). This conformation classifies MtDH as B-stereospecific and is typical for SDR enzymes (38). The cofactor is bound to the enzyme by an extensive network of hydrogen bonds, which also involves seven water molecules (Fig. 2). The loops at the C-terminal end of beta -strands A, B, and C are responsible for the binding of the adenosine moiety. In the first loop, Asn20 and Arg21 form hydrogen bonds to the phosphate group of the ribose and the O3' of the ribose, respectively. The main-chain amide groups of Arg43, Ser44, and Ala45 also form hydrogen bonds to the phosphate group. In addition, the side chains of Arg43 and Ser44 coordinate two water molecules together with the phosphate group. The Asn69 hydrogen bonds to the adenosyl amino group, whereas the main chain amide of Val70 interacts with the N1 ring nitrogen. Gln206 and Ile23 form direct hydrogen bonds to the pyrophosphate moiety, whereas Gly18, Arg21, Gly24, Asn96, Gly98, and Thr204 form hydrogen bonds mediated by water molecules.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   View of the NADP+ binding pocket of MtDH. Those residues that contribute to the binding of the cofactor by hydrogen bonds and eight water molecules involved in the hydrogen bonding network are shown. Putative hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines. The figure was prepared with DINO (www.bioz.unibas.ch/~xray/dino) and RASTER-3D (53).

The nicotinamide moiety also shows several residues in hydrogen bonding distance. The active site Lys173 forms a bifurcate hydrogen bond to the O2' and O3' of the ribose; the active site tyrosine also forms a hydrogen bond to the O2'. The amide group of the nicotinamide is kept in place by a contact to Val202 and Thr204 and an additional water molecule.

Location of the Mannitol Substrate and Mechanism of Catalysis-- All attempts to obtain a structure of MtDH with various combinations of NADP, NADPH, mannitol, and fructose to date have failed. For that reason mannitol was modeled into the active site cavity with the program AUTODOCK. The cluster with the lowest energy contained 38 of 100 docked structures. This orientation was assumed to be the best orientation possible for mannitol. In our model, the substrate can form seven hydrogen bonds to the protein. The active site serine (Ser149) is in hydrogen-bonding distance to O1' and O2; Ser151 also interacts with O2'. Further contacts are possible between O3' and the amide group of the nicotinamide and between O5' and Gln166. This orientation places the C2' at a distance of 3.4 Å to the C4 of the nicotinamide, to which the hydrogen is transferred during catalysis (Fig. 3). Structural analysis of other members of the SDR family has shown that three residues are crucial for catalysis, forming the so-called catalytic triad (30, 31, 33, 39-45). The SDR family catalytic triad of MtDH is Ser149-Tyr169-Lys173. The role of the lysine is to orient the nicotinamide moiety of the NADP by forming a bifurcate hydrogen bond to the O2' and O3' of the ribose (46). The proposed reaction mechanism suggests Tyr169 to be deprotonated. This is facilitated by the positively charged environment provided by Lys173 and the NADP+ itself. During catalysis, the tyrosine directly interacts with the substrate hydroxyl group. In the structure presented here, the putative position of the substrate is occupied by a water molecule, which is hydrogen-bonded to both of the active site residues participating in catalysis, Ser149 and Tyr169, and to Ser151. This water molecule lies within a distance of 0.88 Å to the proposed position of the O2' of the mannitol obtained by modeling. A schematic drawing of the reaction mechanism is shown in Fig. 4.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Mannitol binding to MtDH. Mannitol, the NADP, and the residues of MtDH involved in binding of the substrate are shown. Putative hydrogen bonds and distances are shown. In the crystal structure, a water molecule can be found within 0.88 Å distance to the O2' oxygen, which must be expelled upon mannitol binding. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines, and the distance between the O2 of mannitol and the C4 position of the nicotinamide ring is indicated with a dotted line. WAT, water molecule. The figure was prepared with MOLSCRIPT (52) and RASTER-3D (53).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Proposed catalytic mechanism of MtDH. The nicotinamide moiety of the NADP and two residues directly involved in catalysis, Ser149 and Tyr169, are shown. The hydrogen transfer is B-stereospecific (see "Results and Discussion").

Enzymatic Activity of Recombinant MtDH-- The enzymatic parameters of MtDH in steady-state kinetics have been determined for recombinant MtDH (Table IV). The results are comparable with the data determined for the native enzyme isolated from A. bisporus sporocarps (47).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV
Enzymatic parameters of MtDH
Enzymatic parameters of recombinant MtDH. The Km values of the native enzyme are 34 mM for mannitol and 190 mM for fructose as determined by Ruffner et al. (47).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Structure Determination-- Three steps proved to be crucial for fast structure determination and refinement in the case of MtDH. First, different members of the SDR family, for which the three-dimensional structure was available, were used as probes in the molecular replacement calculations. Of those, only one (mouse lung carbonyl reductase; Protein Data Bank entry 1cyd) gave interpretable solutions for the cross-rotation and translation function. In addition, the probe had to be modified. On the basis of a sequence alignment and modeling with the program SWISSMODEL (48), all nonconserved residues were changed to alanine (except for the glycines, which were kept), and differing loops were deleted. Second, automatic model building with ARP/wARP made fast model building possible, keeping in mind that the asymmetric unit of the crystal consists of three tetramers that are not similar enough to apply real-space averaging. Third, describing the difference between the three tetramers as independent rigid body movements and the separate treatment of this behavior with the three parameters T, L, and S for each individual subunit led to remaining B factors that were very similar between the subunits and allowed for subsequent application of noncrystallographic symmetry restraints. This procedure dropped the R factor and Rfree by about 3%. The movement of the three tetramers can be described with a set of three nonintersecting screw axes for each subunit (Fig. 5). A comparison with Table II clearly shows that tetramer 1 (monomers A, B, C, and D), having the highest B factors, also undergoes the largest movements in the crystal. An analysis of the crystal contacts formed by the three tetramers is in accordance to the hypothesis of Hery et al. (24), who theorized that crystal contacts can restrict the movement of whole molecules. The number of contacts is 38 for tetramer 1 compared with 50 and 49 for tetramers 2 and 3, respectively. The treatment of the data as rigid body movement of whole monomers significantly improved the quality of the electron density in tetramer 1, but it is still worse than for the two other tetramers.


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Rigid body movement of the three different tetramers in the asymmetric unit cell. The three tetramers forming the asymmetric unit of the crystal and the three nonintersecting screw axes for each monomer are shown. The length of the axes is proportional to the amplitude of the movement. The axes were calculated with the program TLSANL (23).

Enzymatic Activity and Mechanism of MtDH-- The kinetic constants of recombinant MtDH are comparable with those of the native enzyme. The very low affinity for the substrates has been reported for mannitol dehydrogenases from other organisms (47). MtDH can also to some extent use sorbitol or arabitol as a substrate. This is also demonstrated by our modeling studies. Mannitol can form seven hydrogen bonds to MtDH (see Table V and Fig. 3), whereas sorbitol and arabinol are only able to form six hydrogen bonds. The high Km values may explain why we have not succeeded until now to co-crystallize the binary complex of MtDH and NADP+ with either mannitol or fructose. The high Km value for fructose is probably because of the fact that it is actually the open and not the hemiketal form of the sugar that undergoes the reaction. The equilibrium between the open and ring forms leaves very little substrate in the open form. The ring opening is base-catalyzed, and Tyr169 may act as a catalytic base for both the ring opening and the reduction of the ketone. The pKa of Tyr169 is lowered by the positively charged environment formed by Lys173 and the oxidized NADP+ in the case of mannitol oxidation, leading to a pH optimum of about 9.0 in the case of MtDH. Therefore the distance between the catalytic tyrosine and the lysine can be correlated to the pH dependence of the different enzymes in the SDR family (49).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V
Hydrogen bonds between mannitol and MtDH
Putative hydrogen bonds between different substrates and MtDH.

Cofactor Specificity-- An interesting possibility is to change the preference for the cofactor NADP to the much cheaper NAD by site-specific mutagenesis. The ability to change the cofactor specificity of NAD(P) utilizing enzymes has been demonstrated previously in the case of glutathione reductase (50). A structure alignment was produced with the programs DEJAVU and LSQMAN (51). Structures with less than 1.9 Å root mean square deviation for the Calpha -carbons were compared. An alignment based on this superimposition gives suggestions of mutations necessary to change the cofactor specificity from NADP to NAD (Fig. 6). Two amino acid stretches are responsible for the cofactor specificity, the loop between beta A and alpha B, and the loop between beta B and alpha C. The first loop includes the GXXXGXG motif, where X can be any amino acid. In enzymes using NADP, the position in front of the second glycine (Arg21 in the case of MtDH) is occupied by a positively charged amino acid (arginine or lysine), whereas enzymes using NAD prefer small or even negatively charged amino acids (serine, threonine, or aspartate). A second, highly conserved arginine (Arg43 in MtDH) is found for all proteins using NADP. This arginine is located in the loop between beta B and alpha C. For NAD utilizing enzymes, different modes of interaction with the cofactor can be seen in this position. In the case of Protein Data Bank entries 1eny and 1eno (enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Brassica napus), aromatic residues are making stacking interactions with the adenine ring, whereas a glutamine can be found in enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase of E. coli (Protein Data Bank entry 1qg6) and an isoleucine in 7-alpha -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from E. coli (Protein Data Bank entry 1fmc). The first steps in changing the cofactor specificity are therefore mutations of Arg21 to threonine, serine, or aspartic acid and of Arg43 to either an aromatic or apolar residue.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Sequence alignment of SDR family members with respect to cofactor specificity. Sequences of proteins with known three-dimensional structure and less than 1.9 Å root mean square deviation compared with MtDH were aligned based on the three-dimensional structure. Amino acids are colored as follows: dark gray, glycine; light gray, apolar; black background, negatively charged; gray background, positively charged. The consensus sequence is based on a minimum plurality of four. *, MtDH is listed here for comparison.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Arie van der Bent (ATO) for careful reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Schweizer Nationalfond Grant 31-52398.97 (to U. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: Stefan Hörer, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG, Structural Research, Birkendorferstrasse 65, 88400 Biberach, Germany.

** To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 41-031-631-4320; Fax: 41-0)31-631-4887; E-mail: ulrich.baumann@ibc.unibe.ch or sassoon@ibc.unibe.ch.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 2, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102850200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MtDH, mannitol 2-dehydrogenase; SDR, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase; TLS, translation, libration, screw rotation.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Stoop, J. M. H., Williamson, J. D., and Pharr, D. M. (1996) Trends Plant Sci. 5, 139-144
2. Jennings, D. H. (1984) Adv. Microb. Physiol. 25, 149-193
3. Rast, D. (1965) Planta 64, 81-93
4. Stoop, J. M., and Mooibroek, H. (1998) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 4689-4696
5. Stoop, J. M. H., and Pharr, D. M. (1994) Plant Physiol. 106, 503-511
6. Holtz, R. B. (1971) J. Agric. Food Chem. 19, 172-173
7. Hammond, J. B. W., and Nichols, R. (1975) J. Sci. Food Agric. 26, 835-842
8. Dütsch, G. A., and Rast, D. (1972) Phytochemistry 11, 2677-2681
9. Mooibroek, H., van de Rhee, M., Soler-Rivas, C., Mendes, O., Werten, M., Huizing, H., and Wichers, H. (1996) in Progress in Transformation of the Common Mushroom Agaricus bisporus. Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products: Proceedings of the Second International Conference (Royse, D. J., ed) , The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
10. van de Rhee, M. D., Graca, P. M., Huizing, H. J., and Mooibroek, H. (1996) Mol. Gen. Genet. 250, 252-258
11. van de Rhee, M. D., Mendes, O., Werten, M. W., Huizing, H. J., and Mooibroek, H. (1996) Curr. Genet. 30, 166-173
12. Sassoon, J., Hörer, S., Stoop, J., Mooibroek, H., and Baumann, U. (2001) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 57, 711-713
13. Leslie, A. G. W. (1996) Jnt. CCP 4/ESF-EACBM Newslett. Protein Crystallogr. 32, 7-8
14. Evans, P. R. (1997) Jnt. CCP 4/ESF-EACBM Newslett. Protein Crystallogr. 33, 22-24
15. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760-763
16. Brunger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921
17. Kleywegt, G. J. (1996) Jnt. CCP4/ESF-EACBM Newslett. Protein Crystallogr. 32, 32-36
18. Matthews, B. W. (1968) J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491-497
19. Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan, S. W., and Kjeldgaard. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 47, 110-119
20. Cowtan, K. (1994) Jnt. CCP4/ESF-EACBM Newslett. Protein Crystallogr. 31, 34-38
21. Perrakis, A., Morris, R., and Lamzin, V. S. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 458-463
22. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., Lebedev, A., Wilson, K. S., and Dodson, E. J. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 247-255
23. Winn, M. D., Isupov, M. N., and Murshudov, G. N. (2001) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 57, 122-133
24. Hery, S., Genest, D., and Smith, J. C. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 279, 303-319
25. Cornish-Bowden, A. (1995) Analysis of Enzyme Kinetic Data , Oxford University Press
26. Jornvall, H., Persson, B., Krook, M., Atrian, S., Gonzalez-Duarte, R., Jeffery, J., and Ghosh, D. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 6003-6013
27. Rossmann, M. G., Liljas, A., Bränden, C.-I., and Banaszak, L. J. (1975) in Evolutionary and Structural Relationships Among Dehydrogenases (Boyer, P. D., ed) , Academic Press, New York
28. Lesk, A. M. (1995) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5, 775-783
29. Ghosh, D., Weeks, C. M., Grochulski, P., Duax, W. L., Erman, M., Rimsay, R. L., and Orr, J. C. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10064-10068
30. Tanaka, N., Nonaka, T., Tanabe, T., Yoshimoto, T., Tsuru, D., and Mitsui, Y. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 7715-7730
31. Tanaka, N., Nonaka, T., Nakanishi, M., Deyashiki, Y., Hara, A., and Mitsui, Y. (1996) Structure 4, 33-45
32. Mazza, C., Breton, R., Housset, D., and Fontecilla-Camps, J. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8145-8152
33. Ghosh, D., Wawrzak, Z., Weeks, C. M., Duax, W. L., and Erman, M. (1994) Structure 2, 629-640
34. Benach, J., Atrian, S., Gonzalez-Duarte, R., and Ladenstein, R. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 282, 383-399
35. Yamashita, A., Kato, H., Wakatsuki, S., Tomizaki, T., Nakatsu, T., Nakajima, K., Hashimoto, T., Yamada, Y., and Oda, J. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 7630-7637
36. Lee, B., and Richards, F. M. (1971) J. Mol. Biol. 55, 379-400
37. IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN). (1983) Eur. J. Biochem. 131, 9-15
38. Oppenheimer, N. J., and Handlon, A. J. (1992) in Mechansism of NAD-dependent Enzymes: The Enzymes, Mechanism of Catalysis (Sigman, D. S., ed), Vol. 20 , Academic Press, New York
39. Ghosh, D., Erman, M., Wawrzak, Z., Duax, W. L., and Pangborn, W. (1994) Structure 2, 973-980
40. Auerbach, G., Herrmann, A., Gutlich, M., Fischer, M., Jacob, U., Bacher, A., and Huber, R. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 7219-7230
41. Varughese, K. I., Skinner, M. M., Whiteley, J. M., Matthews, D. A., and Xuong, N. H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6080-6084
42. Hulsmeyer, M., Hecht, H. J., Niefind, K., Hofer, B., Eltis, L. D., Timmis, K. N., and Schomburg, D. (1998) Protein Sci. 7, 1286-1293
43. Azzi, A., Rehse, P. H., Zhu, D. W., Campbell, R. L., Labrie, F., and Lin, S. X. (1996) Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 665-668
44. Breton, R., Housset, D., Mazza, C., and Fontecilla-Camps, J. C. (1996) Structure 4, 905-915
45. Su, Y., Varughese, K. I., Xuong, N. H., Bray, T. L., Roche, D. J., and Whiteley, J. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26836-26841
46. Duax, W. L., Griffin, J. F., and Ghosh, D. (1996) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 813-823
47. Ruffner, H. P., Rast, D., Tobler, H., and Karesch, H. (1978) Phytochemistry 17, 865-868
48. Schwede, T., Diemand, A., Guex, N., and Peitsch, M. (2000) Res. Microbiol. 151, 107-112
49. Yamamoto, K., Kurisu, G., Kusunoki, M., Tabata, S., Urabe, I., and Osaki, S. (2001) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 129, 303-312
50. Scrutton, N. S., Berry, A., and Perham, R. N. (1990) Nature 343, 38-43
51. Kleywegt, G. J., and Jones, T. A. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 525-545
52. Kraulis, P. J. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950
53. Merritt, E. A., and Bacon, D. J. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 505-524


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
R. Zhang, G. Zhu, W. Zhang, S. Cao, X. Ou, X. Li, M. Bartlam, Y. Xu, X. C. Zhang, and Z. Rao
Crystal structure of a carbonyl reductase from Candida parapsilosis with anti-Prelog stereospecificity
Protein Sci., August 1, 2008; 17(8): 1412 - 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
N. Nair and H. Zhao
Biochemical Characterization of an L-Xylulose Reductase from Neurospora crassa
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 15, 2007; 73(6): 2001 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Simon-Nobbe, U. Denk, P. B. Schneider, C. Radauer, M. Teige, R. Crameri, T. Hawranek, R. Lang, K. Richter, P. Schmid-Grendelmeier, et al.
NADP-dependent Mannitol Dehydrogenase, a Major Allergen of Cladosporium herbarum
J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16354 - 16360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
R. T. Voegele, M. Hahn, G. Lohaus, T. Link, I. Heiser, and K. Mendgen
Possible Roles for Mannitol and Mannitol Dehydrogenase in the Biotrophic Plant Pathogen Uromyces fabae
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2005; 137(1): 190 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. Lobedanz and L. Sogaard-Andersen
Identification of the C-signal, a contact-dependent morphogen coordinating multiple developmental responses in Myxococcus xanthus
Genes & Dev., September 1, 2003; 17(17): 2151 - 2161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J.-K. Lee, B.-S. Koo, S.-Y. Kim, and H.-H. Hyun
Purification and Characterization of a Novel Mannitol Dehydrogenase from a Newly Isolated Strain of Candida magnoliae
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2003; 69(8): 4438 - 4447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. L. Kavanagh, M. Klimacek, B. Nidetzky, and D. K. Wilson
Crystal Structure of Pseudomonas fluorescens Mannitol 2-Dehydrogenase Binary and Ternary Complexes. SPECIFICITY AND CATALYTIC MECHANISM
J. Biol. Chem., November 1, 2002; 277(45): 43433 - 43442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/29/27555    most recent
M102850200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hörer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sassoon, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hörer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sassoon, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit