![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 29, 27555-27561, July 20, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 30, 2001
Mannitol, an acyclic six-carbon
polyol, is one of the most abundant sugar alcohols occurring in nature.
In the button mushroom, Agaricus bisporus, it is
synthesized from fructose by the enzyme mannitol 2-dehydrogenase
(MtDH; EC 1.1.1.138) using NADPH as a cofactor. Mannitol serves
as the main storage carbon (up to 50% of the fruit body dry weight)
and plays a critical role in growth, fruit body development,
osmoregulation, and salt tolerance. Furthermore, mannitol
dehydrogenases are being evaluated for commercial mannitol production
as alternatives to the less efficient chemical reduction of fructose.
Given the importance of mannitol metabolism and mannitol
dehydrogenases, MtDH was cloned into the pET28 expression system and
overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Kinetic and
physicochemical properties of the recombinant enzyme are
indistinguishable from the natural enzyme. The crystal structure of its
binary complex with NADP was solved at 1.5-Å resolution and refined to
an R value of 19.3%. It shows MtDH to be a tetramer
and a member of the short chain dehydrogenase/reductase family of
enzymes. The catalytic residues forming the so-called catalytic triad
can be assigned to Ser149, Tyr169, and
Lys173.
Mannitol is the most abundant sugar alcohol in nature, occurring
in bacteria, algae, lichens, fungi, and many vascular plants (1, 2). In
Agaricus bisporus, it is the main storage carbon and can
contribute up to 20% of the mycelium dry weight and up to 50% of the
fruit body dry weight (3). Mannitol has been reported to accumulate in
response to environmental stresses such as salt stress (2, 4, 5). In
fungi, its function as an osmoregulatory compound might also be
critical in providing an influx of water from the environment to
support turgor and fruit body development (2, 6). Other physiological
roles of mannitol are also likely including service as the main and
most efficient respiratory source during postharvest development and
fruit body senescence (7). The advantage of mannitol catabolism over
sucrose may be explained by the fact that NAD(P)H is produced during
mannitol oxidation and can be converted to ATP, resulting in a more
efficient system than in organisms that metabolize sugars.
Furthermore, mannitol metabolism may be involved in the recycling of
NADP and NADPH. NADP produced during the conversion of fructose to
mannitol becomes available for the oxidative reactions of the pentose
phosphate shunt, which in turn release NADPH. The interaction between
these two biochemical pathways may result in a fine regulation of the
cellular NADP/NADPH ratio and suggests a role for mannitol metabolism
in growth regulation (8). The production of transgenic mushrooms with
altered characteristics is possible, because transformation procedures
have been established (9-11). The lack of detailed information at the
molecular level regarding genes and proteins involved in central
metabolic processes (such as mannitol metabolism) has restricted the
breeding of A. bisporus by genetic methods.
Apart from its agrotechnological importance, mannitol dehydrogenases
are being evaluated as an alternative way to synthesize mannitol from
fructose. The ability to produce large quantities of pure and active
enzyme using microbial expression systems together with the more
efficient enzymatic mannitol production process (compared with the
chemical reduction of fructose) may enable commercial production of
pure mannitol for use in the food industry.
Given the importance of mannitol metabolism in fungi, the
MtDH1 gene
of A. bisporus has been cloned and characterized (4). In
addition, the knowledge of the three-dimensional structure reported in
this work makes it easier and more rational to produce mutated variants
of mannitol dehydrogenase.
Crystallization of the MtDH-NADP+ Binary
Complex--
Expression of the A. bisporus MtDH gene within
the Escherichia coli host BL21(DE3), purification of the
resulting soluble protein, and production of monoclinic crystals (space
group C2) have been reported previously (12). Crystals of the binary
complex (MtDH and NADP+) were obtained under similar
conditions using the sitting drop vapor diffusion method.
NADP+ was added to the protein solution to a final
concentration of 1 mM prior to crystallization. The drop
was created by combining 5 µl of the protein solution (10-20 mg/ml
and 1 mM NADP+) with 5 µl of well solution
(90 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 18% PEG 4K, and 9% isopropanol
at 20 °C).
X-ray Diffraction Data Collection--
X-ray diffraction data
were collected to 1.5-Å resolution at 120 K using a MAR345 image plate
detector at beamline BM1A at the European Synchrotron Radiation
Facility in Grenoble (wavelength = 0.800 Å). The detector
was placed 280 mm from the crystal. Each image was exposed in dose mode
for ~5 min and consisted of a 0.5° rotation of the crystal. The
data from one crystal (1.5 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm) were processed
using MOSFLM (13) and SCALA (14, 15). Data collection statistics are
listed in Table I.
Initial Phase Determination and Model Refinement--
Molecular
replacement was done with the CNS software package (16). Initial
molecular replacement calculations proved to be difficult because of
the low sequence identity (30% at most) to members of the short chain
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) family with known three-dimensional
structure and because of the large unit cell content in the crystals of
MtDH. Parallel attempts to determine the structure by multiple
isomorphous replacement were hampered by nonisomorphism where the cell
axes varied by 5-8%. Hence, a more extensive molecular
replacement approach was undertaken. The tetramer of mouse lung
carbonyl reductase (Protein Data Bank entry 1cyd) was used as a search
model. The probe had to be modified to give significant solutions in
the rotation function calculation in the following way. A sequence
alignment between MtDH and mouse lung carbonyl reductase was
calculated, and all nonconserved residues were changed to alanine with
the SEAMAN program (17). Data from 6 to 10 Å was used in the
cross-rotation search, and three tetramers could be located in the
asymmetric unit. This corresponds to a Matthews coefficient (18)
VM of 2.43 Å3/Da with
~47.5% solvent volume. Subsequent to rigid body refinement, noncrystallographic symmetry restraints were applied, and torsion angle
refinement was performed using data in the resolution range from 40 to
3.5 Å (R factor = 39%,
Rfree = 40%). In a 2Fo Molecular Modeling--
The substrate mannitol was modeled into
the active site cavity with the program AUTODOCK using the genetic
algorithm of the program. The results from 100 docking calculations
were clustered into groups containing structures with less than 1.5-Å
root mean square deviation. The clusters were sorted by energy.
Analytical Size Exclusion Chromatography and Dynamic Light
Scattering--
The quaternary structure of MtDH was investigated by
determining the molecular weight of MtDH in solution by size exclusion chromatography and dynamic light scattering. For the size exclusion chromatography, a prepacked Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Superdex 75 HR16/60 column was equilibrated in 100 mM NaCl and 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. The flow rate was set to 0.5 ml/min
and controlled by a fast protein liquid chromatography system from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The column was calibrated with a set of
standard proteins (1 mg each), and the molecular weight of MtDH was
determined by graphical comparison of the measured elution volumes.
Dynamic light scattering was performed on a single wavelength fixed
angle DynaPro system (Protein Solutions). Protein samples were
centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min and measured in
12-µl quartz cuvettes. Size distribution analysis was performed with
the program DYNALS.
Enzyme Kinetics--
Kinetic measurements were done with a
SPECTRAmax 250 microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices). The
assay buffer containing the substrate (mannitol or fructose) at
different concentrations from 10 to 500 mM, and the
cofactor (NADP+ or NADPH) in the range of 40-300
µM was incubated at 30 °C. After the addition of MtDH
(4-10 nM), the absorption of NADPH at 340 nm was measured
for 30 min, and the initial rate constants were calculated.
Km values and Vmax for the
substrates and the cofactor were calculated with the program LEONORA
(25).
Overall Tertiary and Quaternary Structure of MtDH--
MtDH is a
member of the SDR family of enzymes, also known as the
tyrosine-dependent oxidoreductase family (reviewed in Ref. 26). The characteristic of this family is the extension of the typical
Rossmann fold consisting of two
Size exclusion chromatography and dynamic light scattering showed
that MtDH is a tetramer in solution. Our kinetic data showed cooperativity in neither the oxidative nor the reductive reaction of
MtDH. The crystal structure revealed that the asymmetric unit contains
three tetramers. Each tetramer possesses internal 222 symmetry. The
interaction surface is 1460 Å2 between monomers 1 (cyan) and 2 (red), 660 Å2 between
monomers 1 and 3 (green), and 1740 Å2 between
monomers 1 and 4 (magenta) (color coding according to Fig.
1B; calculations were done with the CNS software package (16, 36)). The total surface area buried in each monomer therefore is
3850 Å2 or ~32%.
The C termini of monomer 1s and 3 and the C termini of monomers 2 and 4 coordinate one metal ion each. The absence of anomalous scattering for
this metal ion using Cu-K Location and Conformation of the NADP+
Substrate--
The NADP+ binding site is located at the
C-terminal end of the
The nicotinamide moiety also shows several residues in hydrogen bonding
distance. The active site Lys173 forms a bifurcate hydrogen
bond to the O2' and O3' of the ribose; the
active site tyrosine also forms a hydrogen bond to the O2'.
The amide group of the nicotinamide is kept in place by a contact to
Val202 and Thr204 and an additional water molecule.
Location of the Mannitol Substrate and Mechanism of
Catalysis--
All attempts to obtain a structure of MtDH with various
combinations of NADP, NADPH, mannitol, and fructose to date have
failed. For that reason mannitol was modeled into the active site
cavity with the program AUTODOCK. The cluster with the lowest energy contained 38 of 100 docked structures. This orientation was assumed to
be the best orientation possible for mannitol. In our model, the
substrate can form seven hydrogen bonds to the protein. The active site
serine (Ser149) is in hydrogen-bonding distance to
O1' and O2; Ser151 also interacts
with O2'. Further contacts are possible between
O3' and the amide group of the nicotinamide and between
O5' and Gln166. This orientation places the
C2' at a distance of 3.4 Å to the C4 of the nicotinamide,
to which the hydrogen is transferred during catalysis (Fig.
3). Structural analysis of other members of the SDR family has shown that three residues are crucial for catalysis, forming the so-called catalytic triad (30, 31, 33, 39-45).
The SDR family catalytic triad of MtDH is
Ser149-Tyr169-Lys173. The role of
the lysine is to orient the nicotinamide moiety of the NADP by forming
a bifurcate hydrogen bond to the O2' and O3' of
the ribose (46). The proposed reaction mechanism suggests
Tyr169 to be deprotonated. This is facilitated by the
positively charged environment provided by Lys173 and the
NADP+ itself. During catalysis, the tyrosine directly
interacts with the substrate hydroxyl group. In the structure presented
here, the putative position of the substrate is occupied by a water molecule, which is hydrogen-bonded to both of the active site residues
participating in catalysis, Ser149 and Tyr169,
and to Ser151. This water molecule lies within a distance
of 0.88 Å to the proposed position of the O2' of the
mannitol obtained by modeling. A schematic drawing of the reaction
mechanism is shown in Fig. 4.
Enzymatic Activity of Recombinant MtDH--
The enzymatic
parameters of MtDH in steady-state kinetics have been determined for
recombinant MtDH (Table IV). The results are comparable with the data determined for the native enzyme isolated
from A. bisporus sporocarps (47).
Structure Determination--
Three steps proved to be crucial for
fast structure determination and refinement in the case of MtDH. First,
different members of the SDR family, for which the three-dimensional
structure was available, were used as probes in the molecular
replacement calculations. Of those, only one (mouse lung carbonyl
reductase; Protein Data Bank entry 1cyd) gave interpretable
solutions for the cross-rotation and translation function. In addition,
the probe had to be modified. On the basis of a sequence alignment and
modeling with the program SWISSMODEL (48), all nonconserved residues
were changed to alanine (except for the glycines, which were kept), and
differing loops were deleted. Second, automatic model building with
ARP/wARP made fast model building possible, keeping in mind that the
asymmetric unit of the crystal consists of three tetramers that are not
similar enough to apply real-space averaging. Third, describing the
difference between the three tetramers as independent rigid body
movements and the separate treatment of this behavior with the three
parameters T, L, and S for each individual subunit led to remaining
B factors that were very similar between the subunits and
allowed for subsequent application of noncrystallographic symmetry
restraints. This procedure dropped the R factor and
Rfree by about 3%. The movement of the three
tetramers can be described with a set of three nonintersecting screw
axes for each subunit (Fig. 5). A
comparison with Table II clearly shows that tetramer 1 (monomers A, B,
C, and D), having the highest B factors, also undergoes the
largest movements in the crystal. An analysis of the crystal contacts
formed by the three tetramers is in accordance to the hypothesis of
Hery et al. (24), who theorized that crystal contacts
can restrict the movement of whole molecules. The number of contacts is
38 for tetramer 1 compared with 50 and 49 for tetramers 2 and 3, respectively. The treatment of the data as rigid body movement of whole
monomers significantly improved the quality of the electron density in tetramer 1, but it is still worse than for the two other tetramers.
Enzymatic Activity and Mechanism of MtDH--
The kinetic
constants of recombinant MtDH are comparable with those of the native
enzyme. The very low affinity for the substrates has been reported for
mannitol dehydrogenases from other organisms (47). MtDH can also to
some extent use sorbitol or arabitol as a substrate. This is also
demonstrated by our modeling studies. Mannitol can form seven hydrogen
bonds to MtDH (see Table V and Fig. 3),
whereas sorbitol and arabinol are only able to form six hydrogen
bonds. The high Km values may explain why we have
not succeeded until now to co-crystallize the binary complex of MtDH
and NADP+ with either mannitol or fructose. The high
Km value for fructose is probably because of the
fact that it is actually the open and not the hemiketal form of the
sugar that undergoes the reaction. The equilibrium between the open and
ring forms leaves very little substrate in the open form. The ring
opening is base-catalyzed, and Tyr169 may act as a
catalytic base for both the ring opening and the reduction of the
ketone. The pKa of Tyr169 is lowered by
the positively charged environment formed by Lys173 and the
oxidized NADP+ in the case of mannitol oxidation, leading
to a pH optimum of about 9.0 in the case of MtDH. Therefore the
distance between the catalytic tyrosine and the lysine can be
correlated to the pH dependence of the different enzymes in the SDR
family (49).
Cofactor Specificity--
An interesting possibility is to change
the preference for the cofactor NADP to the much cheaper NAD by
site-specific mutagenesis. The ability to change the cofactor
specificity of NAD(P) utilizing enzymes has been demonstrated
previously in the case of glutathione reductase (50). A structure
alignment was produced with the programs DEJAVU and LSQMAN (51).
Structures with less than 1.9 Å root mean square deviation for the
C We thank Arie van der Bent (ATO) for careful
reading of the manuscript.
*
This work was supported by Schweizer Nationalfond
Grant 31-52398.97 (to U. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Stefan Hörer, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma
KG, Structural Research, Birkendorferstrasse 65, 88400 Biberach, Germany.
**
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 41-031-631-4320;
Fax: 41-0)31-631-4887; E-mail: ulrich.baumann@ibc.unibe.ch or
sassoon@ibc.unibe.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 2, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102850200
The abbreviations used are:
MtDH, mannitol 2-dehydrogenase;
SDR, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase;
TLS, translation, libration, screw rotation.
The Crystallographic Structure of the Mannitol
2-Dehydrogenase NADP+ Binary Complex from Agaricus
bisporus*
§,
,
**, and
**
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
University of Berne, Freiestrasse 3, 3012 Berne, Switzerland,
¶ DuPont Crop Genetics, Wilmington, Delaware 19880, and the
Department of Bioconversion, Wageningen University and
Research Center, Agrotechnological Research Institute (ATO B.V.),
NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
X-ray diffraction data statistics
|I
I
|/
I) × 100;
I/
I
=
(I/
I)
Fc electron density map, 243 (of 265) residues could be
identified, and 222 side chains were build into the electron density
map using the program O (19). Attempts to employ noncrystallographic
symmetry averaging using CNS and DM (20) failed. The electron density correlation dropped during averaging, and the quality of the map became
inferior. In hindsight this can be explained by the large differences
among the three individual tetramers concerning their anisotropic
movement in the crystal. At this stage automatic model building was
carried out with the program ARP/wARP (21) in mode warpNtrace using
data in the resolution range from 40 to 1.5 Å, which led to a dramatic
improvement. After 10 cycles of automated model building, 260 residues
(excluding the 5 N-terminal residues) and the NADP+ could
be identified in the resulting 2Fo
Fc
electron density map. Two nickel ions per tetramer (coordinated each by
the C termini of two monomers) were also added. Evidence showing that
these metal ions were nickel arose from the purification by
nickel-chelate affinity chromatography and the lack of chelating agents
in all buffers and are therefore presumed to be purification artifacts. After the addition of about 3000 water molecules, torsion angle and
individual B factor refinements, the R factor
dropped to 22.3% (Rfree = 23.6%). Visual
inspection of the electron density map and comparison of the three
individual tetramers revealed a striking difference in quality,
reflected also in the average individual B factors for each
subunit (Table II). TLS refinement with
the program REFMAC (22, 23) was carried out to account for this behavior. In this procedure, every monomer was treated as a rigid body,
for which the three tensors T, L, and S were refined. Because of the
possibility that crystal packing restricts movement of whole molecules
(24), the largest movements as modeled by the TLS parameters are found
in the tetramer showing the smallest number of crystal contacts. The
removal of the subunit movement from the individual B
factors resulted in comparable B factors for the individual
subunits (Table II) and enabled the application of noncrystallographic
symmetry restraints. The final model statistics after anisotropic
B factor refinement for the nickel ions are listed in Table
III.
TLS refinement
Model refinement statistics
(|Fobserved
Fcalculated|/
|Fobserved|) × 100; Free R factor = R value of portion
of data omitted from model refinement; F, amplitude.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES




motifs
A-
B-
B-
C-
C and
D-
E-
E-
F-
F (27) (reviewed in
Ref. 28) by a seventh
-strand with a left-handed cross-over
connection between strands F and G. Secondary structure elements were
assigned according to the convention described by Ghosh et
al. (29). The loop between
F and
G contains two small
helices (
FG1, residues 204-209 and
FG2, residues 211-220) and
one
-strand (
FG1, residues 227-229), which form one side of the
active site cavity. Within the SDR family this loop is responsible for
the substrate specificity among the different enzymes (30-35). The
other side of the active site is lined by the insertion loop between
E and
F, which in the case of MtDH contains a small antiparallel
-sheet,
EF1 (residues 157-159) and
EF2 (residues 162-164)
(Fig. 1A).

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Stereo drawing of the tertiary and quaternary
structure of MtDH. a, ribbon diagram of a single
subunit of MtDH. red,
-helices; green,
-strands. The bound NADP+ is shown in
Corey-Pauling-Koltun (CPK) representation. b, the
homotetramer of MtDH. Each monomeric subunit is shown in a different
color (cyan, red, green, and
magenta). The C termini of subunits 1 and 3 (cyan
and green) coordinate one nickel ion as well as the C
termini of subunits 2 and 4. This view is along the axis that
intersects the two nickel ions such that only one ion is visible. The
figure was prepared with MOLSCRIPT (52) in combination with RASTER-3D
(53).
radiation (1.54 Å) combined with the
presence of anomalous scattering peaks using synchrotron radiation
(0.80 Å) give good evidence that this metal ion indeed is nickel,
which is probably a purification artifact. Also, the trigonal prismatic
coordination sphere of each metal ion (two C termini from two
individual subunits of one tetramer and four water molecules) is not
uncommon for nickel under conditions at which sterical hindrance
prevents octahedral coordination.
-sheet forming the Rossmann fold (Fig.
1A). The substrate binding crevice forms an oval-shaped
cavity with dimensions of ~20 × 12 × 7 Å with the
cofactor at the bottom of the cavity. Both riboses of the
NADP+ have 2E (C2'-endo) puckering,
the nicotinamide ring is in the syn conformation, and the
adenine in the anti conformation (nomenclature according to
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry-International Union
of Biochemistry nomenclature for polynucleotides (37)). This
conformation classifies MtDH as B-stereospecific and is typical for SDR
enzymes (38). The cofactor is bound to the enzyme by an extensive
network of hydrogen bonds, which also involves seven water molecules
(Fig. 2). The loops at the C-terminal end
of
-strands A, B, and C are responsible for the binding of the
adenosine moiety. In the first loop, Asn20 and
Arg21 form hydrogen bonds to the phosphate group of the
ribose and the O3' of the ribose, respectively. The
main-chain amide groups of Arg43, Ser44, and
Ala45 also form hydrogen bonds to the phosphate group. In
addition, the side chains of Arg43 and Ser44
coordinate two water molecules together with the phosphate group. The
Asn69 hydrogen bonds to the adenosyl amino group, whereas
the main chain amide of Val70 interacts with the N1 ring
nitrogen. Gln206 and Ile23 form direct hydrogen
bonds to the pyrophosphate moiety, whereas Gly18,
Arg21, Gly24, Asn96,
Gly98, and Thr204 form hydrogen bonds mediated
by water molecules.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
View of the NADP+ binding pocket
of MtDH. Those residues that contribute to the binding of the
cofactor by hydrogen bonds and eight water molecules involved in the
hydrogen bonding network are shown. Putative hydrogen bonds are shown
as dotted lines. The figure was prepared with DINO
(www.bioz.unibas.ch/~xray/dino) and RASTER-3D (53).

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Mannitol binding to MtDH. Mannitol, the
NADP, and the residues of MtDH involved in binding of the substrate are
shown. Putative hydrogen bonds and distances are shown. In the crystal
structure, a water molecule can be found within 0.88 Å distance to the
O2' oxygen, which must be expelled upon mannitol binding.
Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines, and the distance
between the O2 of mannitol and the C4 position of the
nicotinamide ring is indicated with a dotted line.
WAT, water molecule. The figure was prepared with
MOLSCRIPT (52) and RASTER-3D (53).

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Proposed catalytic mechanism of MtDH.
The nicotinamide moiety of the NADP and two residues directly involved
in catalysis, Ser149 and Tyr169, are shown. The
hydrogen transfer is B-stereospecific (see "Results and
Discussion").
Enzymatic parameters of MtDH
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (74K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Rigid body movement of the three different
tetramers in the asymmetric unit cell. The three tetramers forming
the asymmetric unit of the crystal and the three nonintersecting screw
axes for each monomer are shown. The length of the axes is proportional
to the amplitude of the movement. The axes were calculated with the
program TLSANL (23).
Hydrogen bonds between mannitol and MtDH
-carbons were compared. An alignment based on this superimposition
gives suggestions of mutations necessary to change the cofactor
specificity from NADP to NAD (Fig. 6).
Two amino acid stretches are responsible for the cofactor specificity,
the loop between
A and
B, and the loop between
B and
C. The
first loop includes the GXXXGXG motif, where
X can be any amino acid. In enzymes using NADP, the position in front of the second glycine (Arg21 in the case of MtDH)
is occupied by a positively charged amino acid (arginine or lysine),
whereas enzymes using NAD prefer small or even negatively charged amino
acids (serine, threonine, or aspartate). A second, highly conserved
arginine (Arg43 in MtDH) is found for all proteins using
NADP. This arginine is located in the loop between
B and
C. For
NAD utilizing enzymes, different modes of interaction with the cofactor
can be seen in this position. In the case of Protein Data Bank
entries 1eny and 1eno (enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Brassica napus),
aromatic residues are making stacking interactions with the adenine
ring, whereas a glutamine can be found in enoyl-acyl carrier protein
reductase of E. coli (Protein Data Bank entry 1qg6) and an
isoleucine in 7-
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from E. coli (Protein Data Bank entry 1fmc). The first steps in changing
the cofactor specificity are therefore mutations of Arg21
to threonine, serine, or aspartic acid and of Arg43 to
either an aromatic or apolar residue.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Sequence alignment of SDR family members with
respect to cofactor specificity. Sequences of proteins with known
three-dimensional structure and less than 1.9 Å root mean square
deviation compared with MtDH were aligned based on the
three-dimensional structure. Amino acids are colored as follows:
dark gray, glycine; light gray, apolar;
black background, negatively charged; gray
background, positively charged. The consensus sequence is based on
a minimum plurality of four. *, MtDH is listed here for
comparison.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Stoop, J. M. H.,
Williamson, J. D.,
and Pharr, D. M.
(1996)
Trends Plant Sci.
5,
139-144
2.
Jennings, D. H.
(1984)
Adv. Microb. Physiol.
25,
149-193
3.
Rast, D.
(1965)
Planta
64,
81-93
4.
Stoop, J. M.,
and Mooibroek, H.
(1998)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64,
4689-4696
5.
Stoop, J. M. H.,
and Pharr, D. M.
(1994)
Plant Physiol.
106,
503-511
6.
Holtz, R. B.
(1971)
J. Agric. Food Chem.
19,
172-173
7.
Hammond, J. B. W.,
and Nichols, R.
(1975)
J. Sci. Food Agric.
26,
835-842
8.
Dütsch, G. A.,
and Rast, D.
(1972)
Phytochemistry
11,
2677-2681
9.
Mooibroek, H.,
van de Rhee, M.,
Soler-Rivas, C.,
Mendes, O.,
Werten, M.,
Huizing, H.,
and Wichers, H.
(1996)
in
Progress in Transformation of the Common Mushroom Agaricus bisporus. Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products: Proceedings of the Second International Conference
(Royse, D. J., ed)
, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
10.
van de Rhee, M. D.,
Graca, P. M.,
Huizing, H. J.,
and Mooibroek, H.
(1996)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
250,
252-258
11.
van de Rhee, M. D.,
Mendes, O.,
Werten, M. W.,
Huizing, H. J.,
and Mooibroek, H.
(1996)
Curr. Genet.
30,
166-173
12.
Sassoon, J.,
Hörer, S.,
Stoop, J.,
Mooibroek, H.,
and Baumann, U.
(2001)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
57,
711-713
13.
Leslie, A. G. W.
(1996)
Jnt. CCP 4/ESF-EACBM Newslett. Protein Crystallogr.
32,
7-8
14.
Evans, P. R.
(1997)
Jnt. CCP 4/ESF-EACBM Newslett. Protein Crystallogr.
33,
22-24
15.
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
50,
760-763
16.
Brunger, A. T.,
Adams, P. D.,
Clore, G. M.,
DeLano, W. L.,
Gros, P.,
Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W.,
Jiang, J. S.,
Kuszewski, J.,
Nilges, M.,
Pannu, N. S.,
Read, R. J.,
Rice, L. M.,
Simonson, T.,
and Warren, G. L.
(1998)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
54,
905-921
17.
Kleywegt, G. J.
(1996)
Jnt. CCP4/ESF-EACBM Newslett. Protein Crystallogr.
32,
32-36
18.
Matthews, B. W.
(1968)
J. Mol. Biol.
33,
491-497
19.
Jones, T. A.,
Zou, J. Y.,
Cowan, S. W.,
and Kjeldgaard.
(1991)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A
47,
110-119
20.
Cowtan, K.
(1994)
Jnt. CCP4/ESF-EACBM Newslett. Protein Crystallogr.
31,
34-38
21.
Perrakis, A.,
Morris, R.,
and Lamzin, V. S.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
458-463
22.
Murshudov, G. N.,
Vagin, A. A.,
Lebedev, A.,
Wilson, K. S.,
and Dodson, E. J.
(1999)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
55,
247-255
23.
Winn, M. D.,
Isupov, M. N.,
and Murshudov, G. N.
(2001)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
57,
122-133
24.
Hery, S.,
Genest, D.,
and Smith, J. C.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
279,
303-319
25.
Cornish-Bowden, A.
(1995)
Analysis of Enzyme Kinetic Data
, Oxford University Press
26.
Jornvall, H.,
Persson, B.,
Krook, M.,
Atrian, S.,
Gonzalez-Duarte, R.,
Jeffery, J.,
and Ghosh, D.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
6003-6013
27.
Rossmann, M. G.,
Liljas, A.,
Bränden, C.-I.,
and Banaszak, L. J.
(1975)
in
Evolutionary and Structural Relationships Among Dehydrogenases
(Boyer, P. D., ed)
, Academic Press, New York
28.
Lesk, A. M.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
5,
775-783
29.
Ghosh, D.,
Weeks, C. M.,
Grochulski, P.,
Duax, W. L.,
Erman, M.,
Rimsay, R. L.,
and Orr, J. C.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10064-10068
30.
Tanaka, N.,
Nonaka, T.,
Tanabe, T.,
Yoshimoto, T.,
Tsuru, D.,
and Mitsui, Y.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
7715-7730
31.
Tanaka, N.,
Nonaka, T.,
Nakanishi, M.,
Deyashiki, Y.,
Hara, A.,
and Mitsui, Y.
(1996)
Structure
4,
33-45
32.
Mazza, C.,
Breton, R.,
Housset, D.,
and Fontecilla-Camps, J. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8145-8152
33.
Ghosh, D.,
Wawrzak, Z.,
Weeks, C. M.,
Duax, W. L.,
and Erman, M.
(1994)
Structure
2,
629-640
34.
Benach, J.,
Atrian, S.,
Gonzalez-Duarte, R.,
and Ladenstein, R.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
282,
383-399
35.
Yamashita, A.,
Kato, H.,
Wakatsuki, S.,
Tomizaki, T.,
Nakatsu, T.,
Nakajima, K.,
Hashimoto, T.,
Yamada, Y.,
and Oda, J.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
7630-7637
36.
Lee, B.,
and Richards, F. M.
(1971)
J. Mol. Biol.
55,
379-400
37.
IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN).
(1983)
Eur. J. Biochem.
131,
9-15
38.
Oppenheimer, N. J.,
and Handlon, A. J.
(1992)
in
Mechansism of NAD-dependent Enzymes: The Enzymes, Mechanism of Catalysis
(Sigman, D. S., ed), Vol. 20
, Academic Press, New York
39.
Ghosh, D.,
Erman, M.,
Wawrzak, Z.,
Duax, W. L.,
and Pangborn, W.
(1994)
Structure
2,
973-980
40.
Auerbach, G.,
Herrmann, A.,
Gutlich, M.,
Fischer, M.,
Jacob, U.,
Bacher, A.,
and Huber, R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
7219-7230
41.
Varughese, K. I.,
Skinner, M. M.,
Whiteley, J. M.,
Matthews, D. A.,
and Xuong, N. H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6080-6084
42.
Hulsmeyer, M.,
Hecht, H. J.,
Niefind, K.,
Hofer, B.,
Eltis, L. D.,
Timmis, K. N.,
and Schomburg, D.
(1998)
Protein Sci.
7,
1286-1293
43.
Azzi, A.,
Rehse, P. H.,
Zhu, D. W.,
Campbell, R. L.,
Labrie, F.,
and Lin, S. X.
(1996)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
3,
665-668
44.
Breton, R.,
Housset, D.,
Mazza, C.,
and Fontecilla-Camps, J. C.
(1996)
Structure
4,
905-915
45.
Su, Y.,
Varughese, K. I.,
Xuong, N. H.,
Bray, T. L.,
Roche, D. J.,
and Whiteley, J. M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26836-26841
46.
Duax, W. L.,
Griffin, J. F.,
and Ghosh, D.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
6,
813-823
47.
Ruffner, H. P.,
Rast, D.,
Tobler, H.,
and Karesch, H.
(1978)
Phytochemistry
17,
865-868
48.
Schwede, T.,
Diemand, A.,
Guex, N.,
and Peitsch, M.
(2000)
Res. Microbiol.
151,
107-112
49.
Yamamoto, K.,
Kurisu, G.,
Kusunoki, M.,
Tabata, S.,
Urabe, I.,
and Osaki, S.
(2001)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
129,
303-312
50.
Scrutton, N. S.,
Berry, A.,
and Perham, R. N.
(1990)
Nature
343,
38-43
51.
Kleywegt, G. J.,
and Jones, T. A.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
277,
525-545
52.
Kraulis, P. J.
(1991)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
24,
946-950
53.
Merritt, E. A.,
and Bacon, D. J.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
277,
505-524
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Zhang, G. Zhu, W. Zhang, S. Cao, X. Ou, X. Li, M. Bartlam, Y. Xu, X. C. Zhang, and Z. Rao Crystal structure of a carbonyl reductase from Candida parapsilosis with anti-Prelog stereospecificity Protein Sci., August 1, 2008; 17(8): 1412 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nair and H. Zhao Biochemical Characterization of an L-Xylulose Reductase from Neurospora crassa Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 15, 2007; 73(6): 2001 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Simon-Nobbe, U. Denk, P. B. Schneider, C. Radauer, M. Teige, R. Crameri, T. Hawranek, R. Lang, K. Richter, P. Schmid-Grendelmeier, et al. NADP-dependent Mannitol Dehydrogenase, a Major Allergen of Cladosporium herbarum J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16354 - 16360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Voegele, M. Hahn, G. Lohaus, T. Link, I. Heiser, and K. Mendgen Possible Roles for Mannitol and Mannitol Dehydrogenase in the Biotrophic Plant Pathogen Uromyces fabae Plant Physiology, January 1, 2005; 137(1): 190 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lobedanz and L. Sogaard-Andersen Identification of the C-signal, a contact-dependent morphogen coordinating multiple developmental responses in Myxococcus xanthus Genes & Dev., September 1, 2003; 17(17): 2151 - 2161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-K. Lee, B.-S. Koo, S.-Y. Kim, and H.-H. Hyun Purification and Characterization of a Novel Mannitol Dehydrogenase from a Newly Isolated Strain of Candida magnoliae Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2003; 69(8): 4438 - 4447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Kavanagh, M. Klimacek, B. Nidetzky, and D. K. Wilson Crystal Structure of Pseudomonas fluorescens Mannitol 2-Dehydrogenase Binary and Ternary Complexes. SPECIFICITY AND CATALYTIC MECHANISM J. Biol. Chem., November 1, 2002; 277(45): 43433 - 43442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||