|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M101933200 on May 29, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 30, 27831-27839, July 27, 2001
The Selectivity Filter of the Voltage-gated Sodium Channel Is
Involved in Channel Activation*
Karlheinz
Hilber ,
Walter
Sandtner ,
Oliver
Kudlacek ,
Ian W.
Glaaser§,
Eva
Weisz ,
John W.
Kyle§,
Robert J.
French¶ ,
Harry A.
Fozzard§,
Samuel C.
Dudley**, and
Hannes
Todt 
From the Institute of Pharmacology, University of
Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria, the ** Division of Cardiology, Emory
University, Atlanta, Georgia 30033, the Atlanta Veterans
Administration Hospital, Decatur, Georgia 30033, the ¶ Department
of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 4N1,
Canada, and the § Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories,
The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Received for publication, March 2, 2001, and in revised form, April 27, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Amino acids located in the outer
vestibule of the voltage-gated Na+ channel determine
the permeation properties of the channel. Recently, residues lining the
outer pore have also been implicated in channel gating. The domain (D)
IV P-loop residue alanine 1529 forms a part of the putative selectivity
filter of the adult rat skeletal muscle (µ1) Na+ channel.
Here we report that replacement of alanine 1529 by aspartic acid
enhances entry to an ultra-slow inactivated state. Ultra-slow inactivation is characterized by recovery time constants on the order
of ~100 s from prolonged depolarizations and by the fact that entry
to this state can be reduced by binding to the pore of a mutant
µ-conotoxin GIIIA, suggesting that ultra-slow inactivation may
reflect a structural rearrangement of the outer vestibule. The voltage
dependence of ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D is U-shaped,
with a local maximum near 60 mV, whereas activation is maximal only
above 20 mV. Furthermore, a train of brief depolarizations produces
more ultra-slow inactivation than a single maintained depolarization of
the same duration. These data suggest that ultra-slow inactivation
emanates from "partially activated" closed states and that the
P-loop in DIV may undergo a conformational change during channel
activation, which is accentuated by DIV-A1529D.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Upon depolarization voltage-gated Na+ channels first
open and then enter one or more inactivated states. These inactivated states can be separated by their contribution to the time course of
recovery. Upon repolarization from brief (millisecond time scale)
depolarizations recovery is characterized by a single kinetic phase
with a time constant of a few milliseconds ("fast inactivation"). If adult rat skeletal muscle (µ1) Na+ channels,
heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes, are inactivated for 20 ms and then repolarized, the channels recover from
inactivation with three distinct time constants, implying that there
are at least three distinct inactivated states. These time constants are in the order of several ms (fast inactivation), several hundred ms
("intermediate inactivation"), and several thousand ms ("slow inactivation") (1, 2). When the channels are inactivated for even
longer periods, a component of recovery can be identified with a time
constant in the range of 30-100 s (3-6). We refer to this inactivated
state, from which channels recover with time constants in the order of
~100 s, as "ultra-slow inactivation" (7).
Prolonged inactivation may be of substantial significance in a broad
variety of physiological and pathological settings. In neurons,
accumulation of Na+ channel prolonged inactivation may
influence activity-dependent neuronal excitability,
especially under pathological conditions of intense discharge such as
epilepsy (8). In skeletal muscle, differences in Na+
channel prolonged inactivation may underlie differences in fast and
slow twitch muscle excitability (9). Several genetic skeletal muscle
diseases are a result of defects in inactivation (10). In the heart,
myocardial infarction is associated with a delay in recovery from
inactivation of Na+ currents (11, 12). This effect may
produce inhomogeneities of cardiac impulse conduction, setting the
stage for reentrant arrhythmias and predisposing to sudden cardiac
death. Understanding the mechanisms of prolonged inactivation also
could define new targets for drug development and therapeutic
strategies against neurologic, neuromuscular, and cardiac disorders.
The molecular basis of fast inactivation is thought to be a "ball and
chain" mechanism involving a cytoplasmic loop between the third and
fourth domain (the III-IV linker) (13-15), but little is known about
the mechanism of the slower forms of inactivation.
We have shown previously that the mutations
µ1-DIII-K1237E1 and
µ1-DIV-A1529D favor entry to the ultra-slow inactivated state (6,
16). Residues Lys1237 in DIII and Ala1529 in
DIV are predicted to line the outer channel pore and, together with
residues Asp400 in DI and Glu755 in DII, are
presumed to form a part of the selectivity filter of the channel
(17-22).
Recent work from other laboratories suggests that the voltage sensors
in DIII and DIV play a unique role in coupling fast inactivation to
voltage-dependent activation (23, 24). Also, DIV voltage
sensors have been shown to play a role in slow inactivation (25). In
the present study we explore in detail the properties of
ultra-slow inactivation in the mutant DIV-A1529D. We find that ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D has a U-shaped voltage
dependence. It can be induced more efficiently by depolarizing voltage
trains, suggesting that ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D occurs
from intermediate closed states that are occupied on the way to the open state. This suggests that the P-loop in DIV may be involved in the
activation mechanism of the channel.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Mutagenesis of the µ1--
The oligonucleotide-directed point
mutation A1529D was introduced using four primer polymerase chain
reaction. An oligonucleotide containing the mutation was designed with
a change in a silent restriction site to allow rapid identification of
the mutant. A vector consisting of the µ1 coding sequence flanked by
Xenopus globin 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions was provided
as a gift by R. Moorman. This was used as the template for mutagenesis, and polymerase chain reaction fragments were isolated and subcloned into this template using directional ligations. Incorporation of the
mutation was confirmed by DNA sequencing of the entire polymerized
regions. The vector was linearized by SalI digestion and
transcribed with SP6 DNA-dependent RNA polymerase using
reagents from the mCAP RNA capping kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The rat brain 1 subunit of the Na+
channel was also subcloned into pAlterXG, and transcription was prepared from a BamHI-linearized template using SP6 RNA polymerase.
Stage V and VI Xenopus oocytes were isolated from female
frogs (NASCO, Ft. Atkinson, WI), were washed with Ca2+-free
solution (90 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NaHPO4, and 5 mM HEPES titrated to pH 7.6 with 1 N
NaOH), were treated with 2 mg/ml collagenase (Sigma) for 1.5 h,
and had their follicular cell layers manually removed. Approximately
50-100 ng of cRNA was injected into each oocyte with a Drummond
micro-injector (Broomall, PA). The oocytes were incubated at 17 °C
for 12 h to 3 days before examination.
Recordings were made in the two-electrode voltage clamp configuration
using a Dagan CA-1 voltage clamp (Dagan, Minneapolis, MN) or a TEC 10CD
clamp (NPI Electronic, Tamm, Germany). Both clamp amplifiers had a
series compensation circuit. All recordings were obtained at room
temperature (20-22 °C). The oocytes were placed in recording
chambers in which the bath flow rate was about 100 ml/h, and the bath
level was adjusted so that the total bath volume was less than 500 µl. The electrodes were filled with 3 M KCl and had
resistances of less than 1 M . Using pCLAMP6 (Axon Instruments,
Foster City, CA) software, data were acquired at 71.4 kHz after low
pass filtration at 2 kHz ( 3dB). Curve fitting was performed using
ORIGIN 3.5 (MicroCal Software, Inc., Northampton, MA). Recordings were
made in a bathing solution that consisted of 90 mM NaCl,
2.5 mM KCl, 1 mM BaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES titrated
to pH 7.2 with 1 N NaOH. BaCl2 was used as a
replacement for CaCl2 to minimize
Ca2+-activated Cl currents, which arise as a
consequence of Ca2+ entry via some of the mutant channels.
To test for Ca2+ permeation in DIV-A1529D oocytes were
bathed in the following solution: 85 mM CaCl2,
2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES-Ca(OH)2, pH
7.2.
The mutant µ-conotoxin GIIIA R13Q (µ-CTX R13Q) was synthesized by
solid state synthesis on a polystyrene-based Rink amide resin on an
Applied Biosystems 431A synthesizer, as described previously (26). The
crude linear peptide was initially desalted on Sephadex G-10/20%
acetic acid and then purified by preparative HPLC to ~90%
homogeneity as determined by analytical HPLC. Following folding of the
peptide by air oxidation, µ-CTX R13Q was purified to near homogeneity
by HPLC.
Data Evaluation--
The time courses of recovery from
inactivation of normalized peak inward currents were fit with the
following exponential functions.
|
(Eq. 1)
|
or
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where I2 is the peak inward Na+ current
of the test pulse during recovery, I1 is the peak inward
Na+ current of a test pulse under fully available
conditions, 1, 2, and 3
are the time constants of distinct components of recovery, A1, A2, and
A3 are the respective amplitudes of these time
constants, and C is the final level of recovery. The time
course of development of the ultra-slow inactivated state was best fit
with a single exponential function.
|
(Eq. 3)
|
where d is the time constant of development of
ultra-slow inactivation and S is the final
level of ultra-slow inactivation expressed as a fraction of total inactivation.
The data are expressed as the means ± S.E. Statistical
comparisons were made using the two-tailed Student's t
test. A p < 0.05 was considered as being significant.
Unless otherwise stated n = 6.
 |
RESULTS |
Recovery from Ultra-slow Inactivation in µ1 and
DIV-A1529D--
DIV-A1529D shows a slowly recovering component of
inactivation. Fig. 1A shows
the growth of inward currents through DIV-A1529D channels with
subsequent pulses at 20-s intervals. From a holding potential of 120
mV, the channels were first inactivated by a 300-s depolarizing
prepulse to 50 mV. Recovery from inactivation after returning to
120 mV was monitored by repetitive test pulses to 10 mV. The test
pulse duration was 30 ms. About 50% of the current recovered within
20 s, whereas the remaining fraction took several minutes to
complete recovery.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D.
A, growth of inward current during recovery from ultra-slow
inactivation in DIV-A1529D channels. From a holding potential of 120
mV, the channels were inactivated by a 300-s depolarizing step to 50
mV. Thereafter, the potential was returned to 120 mV, and recovery
from inactivation was monitored by repetitive 30-ms test pulses to 10
mV at 20-s intervals. B, comparison of the time courses of
recovery from inactivation, produced by a 300-s depolarizing prepulse
to 50 mV in native µ1 (filled circles) and in DIV-A1529D
(filled squares; n = 6 for each data point).
The time course of recovery was monitored by successive 20-ms test
pulses to 10 mV, applied at 20-s intervals. Peak inward currents were
normalized to the final current level attained after full recovery.
Recovery was substantially slower in DIV-A1529D channels than in wild
type µ1. The time course of recovery was best fit with double
exponential functions (Equation 1; connecting lines).
C, the time course of development of ultra-slow inactivation
in DIV-A1529D. The membrane potential was depolarized from 120 to
50 mV for variable durations, and the time course of recovery at
120 mV was monitored for each prepulse duration as described for
B. The time course of recovery from ultra-slow inactivation
for each prepulse duration was then fitted with two exponentials
(Equation 1). The amplitude of the ultra-slow exponential component of
recovery (A2 in Equation 1 = Finactivating) is plotted as a function of the
respective duration of the inactivating prepulse. The connecting
line is the result of a single exponential fit (Equation 3) to the
data points. The time constant of development of ultra-slow
inactivation was 81 ± 17.9 s. D, growth of inward
current during recovery from ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D,
coexpressed with the rat brain 1 subunit. From a holding
potential of 120 mV, the channels were inactivated by a 1200-s
depolarizing step to 50 mV. Thereafter, the potential was returned to
120 mV, and recovery from inactivation was monitored by repetitive
30-ms test pulses to 10 mV at 20-s intervals. E, peak
inward currents of the experiment shown in D were normalized
to the final current level attained after full recovery. The time
course of recovery was best fit with a double exponential function
(Equation 1; connecting line). The time constant of the
slower component representing recovery from ultra-slow inactivation was
130 s, which is similar to the mean value for DIV-A1529D only
channels (110.9 ± 11.5 s; see text). F,
comparison of the amplitude of ultra-slow inactivation in
DIV-A1529D+ 1 channels following inactivating prepulses
to 50 mV. Prepulse duration was 300 s (n = 5)
and 1200 s (n = 4). Prolonging prepulse duration
from 300 to 1200 s significantly increased the amplitude of
ultra-slow inactivation to a value of ~0.6. This amplitude was
similar to the amplitude of ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D alone channels, following prepulses of 300-s duration. Thus,
coexpression with the 1 subunit slowed development of
ultra-slow inactivation.
|
|
DIV-A1529D shows a larger component of a slowly recovering current in
comparison with µ1. Fig. 1B summarizes the time course of
recovery from inactivation, produced by a 300-s depolarizing prepulse
to 50 mV in native µ1 and in constructs with the mutation DIV-A1529D (n = 6 for each data point). To ensure
complete recovery from fast inactivation between test pulses, the test
pulse duration was decreased to 20 ms. The data were normalized to the
final current level after full recovery. Clearly, wild type µ1
currents recovered completely within ~50 s, whereas the time course
of recovery of DIV-A1529D channels was substantially slower. The data
points were well fitted with two exponentials (Equation 1) reflecting
two channel populations recovering from distinct inactivated states,
which we refer to as slow and ultra-slow inactivation (6).
Recovery from slow inactivation had a mean time constant of 7.9 ± 1.3 and 7.1 ± 1.4 s in µ1 and DIV-A1529D, respectively. The corresponding amplitudes were 0.58 ± 0.04 in µ1 and
0.35 ± 0.02 in DIV-A1529D (p < 0.01). Time
constants of recovery from ultra-slow inactivation were 78.4 ± 19.8 s in µ1 and 110.9 ± 11.5 s in DIV-A1529D.
The amplitudes were 0.22 ± 0.02 in µ1 and 0.62 ± 0.04 in
DIV-A1529D (p < 0.01). Thus, significantly more
channels recovered from ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D than in
µ1.
Development of Ultra-slow Inactivation in DIV-A1529D--
To
determine the time course of development of ultra-slow inactivation in
DIV-A1529D, prepulses to 50 mV of variable duration were applied from
a holding potential of 120 mV, and the time course of recovery at
120 mV was monitored for each prepulse duration by subsequent 30-ms
test pulses to 10 mV at 20-s intervals. The time course of recovery
for each prepulse duration was then fitted with two exponentials that
yielded time constants and amplitudes of slow and ultra-slow
inactivation (Equation 1). In Fig. 1C the amplitude of the
ultra-slow exponential component of recovery, reflecting the fraction
of channels recovering from ultra-slow inactivation
(A2 in Equation 1 = Finactivating), is plotted as a function of the
respective durations of the inactivating prepulse. The
connecting line is the result of a single exponential fit (Equation 3) to the data points. The time constant of development of
ultra-slow inactivation was 81 ± 17.9 s. Thus, both entry to and exit from ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D channels had time
constants similar to those previously found in DIII-K1237E channels
(6).
Coexpression of DIV-A1529D with the Rat Brain 1
Subunit--
Coexpression of the 1 subunit with the subunit of the µ1 Na+ channel speeds current decay and
accelerates recovery from fast and slow inactivation (6, 27-30). We
wanted to explore whether the 1 subunit affected
recovery from ultra-slow inactivation in addition to well
known modulating effects of 1 on fast and slow inactivation. We found that, compared with DIV-A1529D
alone, longer prepulse durations were required to drive
DIV-A1529D+ 1 channels into ultra-slow inactivation. Fig.
1 (D and E) shows the time course of recovery of
DIV-A1529D+ 1 channels from ultra-slow inactivation
produced by a 1200-s inactivating prepulse to 50 mV. Note that the
prepulse duration was four times as long as in the experiment with
DIV-A1529D alone, shown in Fig. 1A. Inward currents
during recovery of DIV-A1529D+ 1 were slowly increasing, suggesting that the channels recovered from ultra-slow inactivation. Comparison of the current traces in Fig. 1 (A and
D) demonstrates that coexpression with 1
substantially accelerated current decay. However, the time course of
recovery from ultra-slow inactivation of DIV-A1529D+ 1
was similar to that of DIV-A1529 alone (Fig. 1, B and
E). Fig. 1F shows that increasing the prepulse
duration from 300 to 1200 s significantly increased the fraction
of DIV-A1529D+ 1 channels recovering from ultra-slow
inactivation. In contrast, entry into ultra-slow inactivation at 50
mV in DIV-A1529D alone channels was completed after ~300 s (Fig.
1C). Thus, coexpression of DIV-A1529D with the
1 subunit did not abolish ultra-slow inactivation but
delayed entry into the ultra-slow inactivated state.
Voltage Dependence of Ultra-slow Inactivation--
The fraction of
channels recovering from ultra-slow inactivation was strongly
voltage-dependent. To examine the voltage dependence of
ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D, the oocytes were depolarized for
300 s from 120 mV to prepulse voltages in the range of 90 mV
to +30 mV. After each prepulse the potential was returned to 120 mV,
and recovery was monitored by 20-ms test pulses to 10 mV at 20 s
intervals (n = 4-12). The time course of recovery for each prepulse potential was then fit with a double exponential function
(Equation 1) to estimate the fraction of channels recovering from
ultra-slow inactivation (A2 = Finactivating).
To facilitate comparison with standard availability curves,
the fraction of channels not recovering from ultra-slow
inactivation
|
(Eq. 4)
|
was plotted as a function of prepulse voltage in Fig.
2. The voltage dependence of ultra-slow
inactivation was U-shaped. At prepulse potentials of approximately 60
mV Fnoninactivating reached a minimum of ~ 0.3, whereas this fraction was substantially increased as prepulse
potentials were set at more positive and at more negative values.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Voltage dependence of ultra-slow inactivation
in DIV-A1529D and
DIV-A1529D+ 1. The membrane
potential was depolarized from 120 mV to the indicated prepulse
voltages for 300 s, and the time course of recovery at 120 mV
was monitored for each prepulse potential as described for Fig.
1B (n = 4-12). The time course of recovery
from ultra-slow inactivation for each prepulse potential was then fit
with a double exponential function (Equation 1) to estimate the
fraction of channels recovering from ultra-slow inactivation
(A2). Channel availability defined as the
fraction of channels not recovering from ultra-slow inactivation
(1 A2 = Fnoninactivating) is plotted as a function of
prepulse voltage. Inset, Current-voltage relationship in
DIV-A1529D, determined by 20-ms test pulses to the indicated
potentials, from a holding potential of 120 mV (open
squares). Open circles, integrated inward currents,
reflecting charge entry, versus voltage.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 1F, coexpression of the
1 subunit with DIV-A1529D slowed entry into the
ultra-slow inactivated state. Hence, the fraction of
DIV-A1529D+ 1 channels that had entered the ultra-slow
inactivated state after a prepulse duration of 300 s was smaller
than if only the subunit was expressed. However, the voltage
dependence of ultra-slow inactivation of DIV-A1529D+ 1 channels was similar to DIV-A1529D alone, exhibiting a U shape with
minimum availability at ~-60 mV (Fig. 2). As shown in Fig. 1D, coexpression with the 1 subunit strongly
reduced slow current decay but still left a substantial amount of
ultra-slow inactivation. Thus, ultra-slow inactivation was not confined
to the abnormally slow gating fraction of µ1 channels expressed in
Xenopus oocytes. Because entry into ultra-slow inactivation
was faster in DIV-A1529D alone channels, further experiments were
performed without coexpression of 1.
U-shaped voltage dependence of inactivation is well known in calcium
channels, where it is frequently taken as evidence for Ca2+
current-dependent inactivation (31). To test for
Ca2+ current-dependent inactivation, oocytes
expressing DIV-A1529D channels were bathed in a high Ca2+
solution (85 mM CaCl2; see "Experimental
Procedures"). Upon exchange of the standard 90 mM
Na+ with the high Ca2+ solution, all inward
current was lost, indicating a lack of measurable permeation of
Ca2+ ions through DIV-A1529D channels. This argues against
Ca2+ current-dependent inactivation in
DIV-A1529D channels.
Ultra-slow inactivation occurred at more hyperpolarized voltages than
the ionic current. As shown in the inset of Fig. 2, maximum
inward current in DIV-A1529D occurred at potentials positive to 20
mV, whereas Fnoninactivating was minimal at
approximately 60 mV. Similarly, integrated inward currents
representing charge entry (Fig. 2, inset, Q)
peaked at 20 mV and declined to 0 at 50 mV. These values are
consistent with published data from wild type µ1 expressed in
Xenopus oocytes (32, 33) and in mammalian cells (34). The
discrepancy between the voltage yielding maximal ultra-slow
inactivation and the voltage of maximum inward current and of maximum
charge entry strongly argues against current-dependent inactivation.
Voltage Dependence of Na+ Channel Availability
Following Brief Conditioning Prepulses--
Given the U-shaped voltage
dependence of ultra-slow inactivation, it was important to determine
whether other inactivated states in DIV-A1529D also had nonmonotonic
dependence on prepulse voltage.
The following protocol was designed to obtain an estimate of the
voltage dependence of inactivated states that were elicited by
conditioning prepulses short enough to avoid entry of channels into
ultra-slow inactivation. 1-s conditioning prepulses to various voltages
were applied, and the available, noninactivated fraction of channels
was gauged by a subsequent test pulse (Fig.
3). Both in wild type µ1 and in
DIV-A1529D channel availability after 1-s conditioning prepulses
decreased monotonically with depolarization, asymptotically approaching
zero at potentials positive to 40 mV. The absence of U-shaped voltage
dependence of inactivation produced by a 1-s prepulse suggested that
the ultra-slow inactivated state in DIV-A1529D was unlikely to be
connected to those inactivated states that were produced by 1-s
conditioning prepulses.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Voltage dependence of steady-state
availability probed by 1-s conditioning prepulses. From a holding
potential of 120 mV the membrane potential was changed to the level
displayed on the abscissa. Subsequently, the membrane
potential was stepped to 20 mV for 20 ms to assay the available peak
inward currents. The available peak inward currents were normalized to
1 by the current measured at the holding potential of 120 mV. Both in
wild type µ1 and in DIV-A1529D channel availability decreased
monotonically with depolarization, reaching a minimum at potentials
positive to 40 mV. The solid lines represent fits to a
Boltzmann function I/Imax = 1/(1 + exp ((V V1/2)/k))
where V1/2 is the midpoint of the curve and
k is the slope factor.
|
|
Recovery from a 1-s Conditioning Prepulse--
Prepulses of 1-s
duration have been shown to recruit a minimum of three inactivated
states in µ1 (1). Although the experiment shown in Fig. 3 suggested a
monotonic voltage dependence of other than ultra-slow inactivated
states, it failed to provide information regarding the relative
partitioning among faster inactivated states at a given prepulse
potential. Thus, we sought to explore whether conditioning prepulses of
1-s duration would be able to recruit a minimum number of three
distinct states of inactivation in DIV-A1529D and, if so, whether any
one of these states had a nonmonotonic voltage dependence similar to
ultra-slow inactivation. Therefore, we examined the time course of
recovery of DIV-A1529D channels after a 1-s conditioning prepulse to
50 mV (i.e. Fnoninactivating was at
minimum) and to 10 mV (where Fnoninactivating
at maximum). As shown in Fig. 4 the time
course of recovery in DIV-A1529D was adequately fitted with three
exponential decay functions (Equation 2), suggesting the presence of at
least three inactivation processes (1).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Time course of recovery from a 1-s
conditioning prepulse in DIV-A1529D. DIV-A1529D channels were
inactivated by a 1-s conditioning prepulse to 10 mV (A,
n = 11) and to 50 mV (B, n = 6). Recovery from inactivation at 120 mV was assessed by 20-ms test
pulses to 20 mV at variable intervals following the inactivating
prepulse (because of clamp speed limitations of the two electrode
voltage clamp in Xenopus oocytes intervals <10 ms were not
tested). The peak inward currents were normalized to the maximum
recovery (1) and to the availability of the test pulse with the
shortest coupling interval (0), to correct for differences in channel
availability between prepulses at 10 mV and prepulses at 50 mV. The
solid lines show least square fits by a third order
exponential decay function (Equation 2). The time constants were
obtained by repetitive fitting sessions and then fixed, whereas the
amplitudes were allowed to float for the final fitting (84). The
fitting parameters of time constants were 1 = 100 ms,
2 = 2000 ms, and 3 = 12000 ms, for both
prepulse potentials. The fitting parameters of amplitudes at potential
10 mV were A1 = 0.05 ± 0.01, A2 = 0.59 ± 0.02, and
A3 = 0.36 ± 0.02. The fitting parameters
at potential 50 mV were A1 = 0.05 ± 0.01, A2 = 0.61 ± 0.02, and
A3 = 0.33 ± 0.01. The amplitudes were
statistically not different at potentials 10 and 50 mV
(p > 0.05).
|
|
The amplitudes of recovery from inactivation, reflecting the fraction
of channels recovering from anyone distinct state were similar for both
prepulse potentials (see legend to Fig. 4). This result indicates that
within the range of examined prepulse voltages, the mutation DIV-A1529D
did not affect the voltage dependence of inactivated states produced by
brief prepulse durations. Thus, it is unlikely that brief prepulses
could produce inactivated states showing U-shaped voltage dependence.
Ultra-slow Inactivation in DIV-A1529D Is Favored by Pulse
Trains--
The fact that inactivation produced by 1-s prepulses did
not exhibit U-shaped voltage dependence argues against a serial
Markovian kinetic scheme, where ultra-slow inactivation is reached via
faster inactivated states. The voltage range where ultra-slow
inactivation reached a local maximum was around 60 to 50 mV. This
is the voltage range over which Na+ channels are activated,
i.e. the channels pass through a number of closed states to
reach a final open state. Therefore, we reasoned that ultra-slow
inactivation could be connected to the kinetic processes of activation
and/or deactivation. To test this we examined whether ultra-slow
inactivation could be produced by repetitive brief depolarizations that
enhance the probability of channels to undergo transitions between
closed and open states. Fig.
5A shows the effect of 3333 repetitive step depolarizations to 20 mV, applied from a holding
potential of 120 mV. Each depolarization had a duration of 2 ms,
followed by an interpulse interval of 28 ms, at 120 mV (33.3 Hz). The
entire duration of the pulse train was 100 s. Each data point in
Fig. 5A indicates the inward current elicited by one out of
50 applied pulses. Clearly, the pulse train was associated with a
slowly developing decline in peak inward current, reflecting cumulative
channel inactivation. After 100 s the 33.3 Hz train was stopped,
and recovery from cumulative inactivation was monitored by repetitive
20-ms test pulses to 20 mV, applied at 20-s intervals from a holding
potential of 120 mV. The time course of recovery was very slow, and
the initial current level (before the 33.3 Hz train) was not reached
until >200 s had elapsed at 120 mV. Fitting a double exponential
function to the normalized time course of recovery after the train
(Fig. 5B, line) revealed that ~36% of the
channels recovered from ultra-slow inactivation ( = 85 s).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D can be
produced by a pulse train. A, from a holding potential
of 120 mV, 3333 step depolarizations to 20 mV were applied. Each
depolarization had a duration of 2 ms, followed by 28 ms at 120 mV.
Only one out of 50 pulses is shown. During the pulse train the peak
inward current declined progressively, indicating cumulative
inactivation. After 100 s the pulse train was stopped, and
recovery from inactivation was monitored by repetitive 20-ms
depolarizations to 20 mV from a holding potential of 120 mV, at
20-s intervals. B, normalized time course of recovery after
the pulse train shown in A. The data were fit by a double
exponential function (Equation 1; solid line).
|
|
Table I presents a quantitative
comparison between the fraction of channels recovering from
ultra-slow inactivation, produced by a single 15-s prepulse to 50 mV,
by a 33.3-Hz pulse train, and by a 20-Hz pulse train (n = 6 for each protocol). During the trains 2-ms step depolarizations to
20 mV were applied for a total duration of 100 s. The cumulative
amount of time the channels spent at depolarized potentials was 6.6 and
4 s during the 33.3- and 20-Hz trains, respectively. After each
train the time course of recovery was examined as described for the
train in Fig. 5. The data in Table I demonstrate that the fraction of
channels recovering from ultra-slow inactivation
(A2) was significantly greater after each train
than after the single prepulse, even though channels spent
substantially less time at depolarized potentials during each train
than during the constant voltage. Previously we showed that during a
single 300-s depolarization to 20 mV only ~10% of channels entered
the ultra-slow inactivated state, whereas following a 300-s
depolarization to 60 mV, ~70% of channels became ultra-slow
inactivated. During the depolarizing trains channels were either at the
holding potential of 120 mV or at the depolarized potential of 20
mV. Neither of these potentials should recruit a substantial amount of
ultra-slow inactivation. The fact that multiple repeated
depolarizations drove substantially more channels into ultra-slow
inactivation than a single prolonged depolarization to the same
potential suggests that ultra-slow inactivation is favored by the
repeated transitions between open and closed states. It is unlikely
that ultra-slow inactivation developed from open states because, as
demonstrated by the current voltage relationship (Fig. 2,
inset), the threshold for channel opening was positive to
50 mV, and ultra-slow inactivation was maximal at approximately 60
mV. We conclude that ultra-slow inactivation most likely is attained
via transitions from "near" open states. This hypothesis may also
explain the U shape of ultra-slow inactivation; we assume that upon
depolarization channels undergo a number of closed state transitions
before the final open state occurs. The probability for channels to
populate any specific closed state depends on the transmembrane
potential. Ultra-slow inactivation may occur from closed states that
have a high probability to be recruited at approximately 60 mV.
Holding channels at 60 mV may accumulate those closed states from
which a kinetic pathway leads into ultra-slow inactivation, explaining
why entry to ultra-slow inactivation is maximal at this voltage.
Similarly, cycling channels between closed and open states during pulse
trains will also accumulate channels in specific closed states that
could be connected to the ultra-slow inactivated state.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Parameters of recovery from ultra-slow inactivation produced by a
single 15-s prepulse to 50 mV, by a 100-s 33.3 Hz train of 2 ms
depolarizations to 20 mV, and by a 100-s 20 Hz train of 2-ms
depolarizations to 20 mV
The holding potential between step depolarizations was 120 mV. The
time course of recovery was assessed as described in the legends to
Figs. 1B and 5B. Parameters 2 and
A2 refer to the result of double exponential fits
(Equation 1) to the time courses of recovery.
|
|
Molecular Mechanism of Ultra-slow Inactivation in
DIV-A1529D--
Previously, we have reported that the mutation
DIII-K1237E in µ1 enhanced the probability of entry to ultra-slow
inactivation (6). We hypothetized that ultra-slow inactivation may
result from a conformational change of the outer channel vestibule.
This hypothesis was supported by the observation that binding of the mutated µ-conotoxin GIIIA R13Q to the outer channel pore dramatically reduced the likelihood of DIII-K1237E channels entering ultra-slow inactivation. One explanation for this effect was that binding of
µ-CTX R13Q to the outer channel vestibule protected channels from
entry to ultra-slow inactivation by physical hindrance of the
underlying conformational change of the outer channel vestibule. Assessment of channel gating kinetics in the toxin-bound state was
possible because µ-CTX R13Q only partially occludes the outer vestibule, resulting in a residual current of about 25-30% of that in
control (35).
We tested whether µ-CTX R13Q reduced the likelihood of DIV-A1529D
channels to enter the ultra-slow inactivated state, as has been
demonstrated with DIII-K1237E channels. Fig.
6A shows the time course of
recovery of DIV-A1529D channels from a 300-s prepulse to 50 mV.
Recovery at 120 mV was monitored by repetitive 20-ms test pulses at
20-s intervals. The currents were assessed during control and during
superfusion with 27 µM µ-CTX R13Q. Binding of µ-CTX
R13Q substantially reduced the amount of ultra-slow recovery from
inactivation.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Recovery from ultra-slow inactivation in
DIV-A1529D is modulated by a mutant µ-conotoxin
known to bind at the outer vestibule. A, recovery from
ultra-slow inactivation was examined during a toxin-free control
(solid squares) and during superfusion with 27 µM µ-CTX R13Q (open squares). Ultra-slow
inactivation was produced by a 300-s inactivating prepulse to 50 mV.
Recovery was assessed as described in the legend of Fig. 1B.
Connecting lines represent double exponential fits (Equation 1). The parameters are given in the text. Clearly, superfusion with
µ-CTX R13Q substantially speeded recovery from ultra-slow
inactivation. B, µ-CTX R13Q (27 µM,
open squares) substantially raised the nadir of U-shaped
voltage dependence of ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D (control,
solid squares). The voltage dependence of ultra-slow
inactivation was determined as described for Fig. 3.
|
|
The time constants of recovery from ultra-slow inactivation
( 2) were 120.4 ± 4.0 and 94.1 ± 11.2 s
(p < 0.05; n = 6 for each measurement)
during control and during superfusion with µ-CTX R13Q, respectively.
µ-CTX R13Q also reduced the amplitudes of recovery from ultra-slow
inactivation (A2; control: 0.76 ± 0.02; µ-CTX R13Q: 0.47 ± 0.09; p < 0.05). Thus,
µ-CTX R13Q reduced both the time constant and the amplitude of
ultra-slow inactivation.
These results suggest that binding of µ-CTX R13Q protects a fraction
of channels from entry to ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D as well
as in DIII-K1237E. However, µ-CTX R13Q has been shown to shift
voltage-dependent channel gating, perhaps by an
electrostatic effect on the voltage sensors (35). To test whether the
reduction of ultra-slow inactivation by µ-CTX R13Q may have resulted
from a voltage shift of ultra-slow inactivation, we investigated the
effect of µ-CTX R13Q on the voltage dependence of ultra-slow
inactivation. As demonstrated in Fig. 6B, µ-CTX R13Q
reduced ultra-slow inactivation over the voltage range where ultra-slow
inactivation was maximal, i.e. between 60 and 40 mV,
without shifting its voltage dependence. Thus, the toxin-mediated reduction in the probability of entry to ultra-slow inactivation did
not result from a mere shift of the voltage dependence of ultra-slow inactivation.
These results support the notion that ultra-slow inactivation is
produced by a conformational change in the outer vestibule of the
channel. µ-CTX R13Q may act as a "splint in the vestibule," thereby preventing channels from entry to the ultra-slow inactivated state.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The major findings of the present study are: (i) the mutation
DIV-A1529D in µ1 increased the propensity of Na+ channels
to enter an ultra-slow inactivated state, (ii) the voltage dependence
of the ultra-slow inactivated state was U-shaped, (iii) entry to the
ultra-slow inactivated state was promoted by repeated brief
depolarizing pulses, and (iv) entry to the ultra-slow inactivated state
was reduced by blocking the outer channel vestibule with a mutant
µ-CTX GIIIA.
Kinetic Effects of Mutations in the Selectivity Filter
Region--
Recently, we reported that replacement of the lysine at
site 1237 in µ1 by serine and by glutamic acid dramatically increased the likelihood of entry to an ultra-slow inactivated state (6). However, mutating residue K1237 not only altered channel gating but
also caused a substantial loss of ionic selectivity (22, 36). This dual
effect of amino acid replacements at site 1237 raised the question of
whether ultra-slow inactivation was produced by variations in species
or in number of permeating ions rather than by an alteration in channel
structure per se. The finding that the charge conserving
mutation K1237R was not associated with substantial amounts of
ultra-slow inactivation (6) despite having dramatic effects on ionic
selectivity (22) supported the idea that some kind of structural effect
of the mutation was the basis for the enhanced likelihood of entry to
ultra-slow inactivation. The present study adds further support to the
latter contention because we were able to demonstrate that substantial
amounts of ultra-slow inactivation can be recruited by the mutation
DIV-A1529D. Mutations at this site or homologous sites in other
Na+ channel isoforms exhibit only minor effects on ionic
selectivity (19, 21, 36, 37). The fact that ultra-slow inactivation can
be observed in a mutant with severely altered permeation properties (DIII-K1237E) and in a mutant with highly preserved permeation properties (DIV-A1529D) argues against the notion that the disruption of ionic selectivity forms the basis of ultra-slow inactivation. Ultra-slow inactivation appears to occur by a mechanism unrelated to
changes in permeation.
Origin of U-shaped Inactivation--
One of the unexpected
findings of the present study was that the voltage dependence of
ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D was U-shaped, whereas ultra-slow
inactivation in DIII-K1237E had a monotonic dependence on prepulse
voltage (Fig. 6A in Ref. 6). U-shaped voltage dependence of
inactivation is a well recognized entity in Ca2+ channels,
but there are only few reports of this phenomenon in Na+
channels. Chandler and Meves (38) observed U-shaped voltage dependence
of inactivation in Na+ channels of squid giant axons
internally perfused with NaF. In a more recent report, U-shaped voltage
dependence of inactivation was observed in BTX-modified Na+
channels (39). In both reports the upturn of
voltage-dependent availability at positive prepulse
potentials was assumed to result from a second nonabsorbing inactivated state.
In Ca2+ channels U-shaped inactivation is widely considered
to result from Ca2+ current-dependent
inactivation (31). In Na+ channels,
[Ca2+]i has been demonstrated to modulate
inactivation (40). Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that mutant
Na+ channels, which allow permeation of Ca2+
ions, might exhibit Ca2+ current-dependent
inactivation. In case of the mutant DIV-A1529D Ca2+
current-dependent inactivation seems unlikely because we
were unable to detect Ca2+ permeation when the oocytes were
bathed in a solution containing 85 mM Ca2+.
This is consistent with the finding that the mutation A1741E (in rat
brain II, corresponding to A1529E in µ1) was blocked by Ca2+ (IC50 = 119 µM), and no
permeation of Ca2+ or Ba2+ was detected (36).
In yet another report the mutation A1529C did not exhibit
Ca2+ permeability (37).
Furthermore, the fact that U-shaped inactivation reached a maximum near
50 mV, whereas maximum inward current and maximum charge entry
occurred at potentials positive to 20 mV, strongly argues
against current-dependent inactivation.
Recently, it was shown that U-shaped voltage dependence in delayed
rectifier K+ channels and in N-type calcium channels arises
from purely voltage-dependent mechanisms (41-43). It was
suggested that U-shaped inactivation occurs preferentially from
partially activated closed states, i.e. nonconducting states
that have some or all voltage sensors in the activated position. This
model was supported by the observation that a train of depolarizing
pulses cycling channels through closed and open states produced more
inactivation than a single depolarizing pulse of the same duration,
despite the fact that the net time during which channels were
depolarized was longer with a single conditioning prepulse (41). The
observation that accumulation of intermediate closed states during
repetitive pulses produced more inactivation than single pulses of the
same duration suggests that inactivation occurred mainly from
intermediate closed states (41, 42). Additional strong support for
preferential closed state inactivation as the basis for U-shaped
voltage dependence of inactivation came from the observation in
voltage-gated Ca2+ channels that the inactivation rate was
fastest at a voltage where only one-third of the total gating charge
had moved (43).
"Cumulative inactivation" (44), i.e. inactivation that
builds up during repetitive brief depolarizations, has been reported in
a subset of K+ channels (44-52). Aldrich (53) suggested
that during pulse trains, where the pulse duration is sufficiently
short to avoid inactivation within a pulse, channels inactivate
predominantly from closed states. Upon repolarization, after each
pulse, recovery from inactivation is sufficiently slow that little
recovery occurs during the short interpulse interval.
In the present study, we found that DIV-A1529D channels could be driven
into ultra-slow inactivation by repetitive brief depolarizations. Furthermore, a steady depolarization to 50 mV of the same duration as
the applied pulse train produced substantially less ultra-slow inactivation despite the fact that channels spent substantially more
time at depolarized potentials. These results are consistent with the
idea that ultra-slow inactivation is reached preferentially via closed
states. Hence, DIV-A1529D channels are most likely to undergo
ultra-slow inactivation at the voltage range of 60 to 50 mV because
this voltage range has the highest probability to accumulate
intermediate closed states, which may provide a pathway for entry to
the ultra-slow inactivated state.
µ-CTX R13Q Interferes with Ultra-slow Inactivation in
DIV-A1529D--
Na+ channel block by µ-CTX R13Q is
incomplete, leaving residual single channel current, which allows the
examination of channel gating in the blocked state (6, 35, 54, 55).
Recently, we presented evidence that µ-CTX R13Q is capable of
destabilizing the ultra-slow inactivated state by a mechanism unrelated
to simple electrostatic interaction with the gating process (6),
suggesting that µ-CTX R13Q interacted with the outer channel
vestibule in a way that prevented ultra-slow inactivation. We proposed
that ultra-slow inactivation most likely reflected a rearrangement of
the outer pore, similar to C-type inactivation in voltage-gated
K+ channels and that binding of µ-CTX R13Q to the outer
pore stabilized the structure of the outer vestibule, thereby
protecting channels from ultra-slow inactivation. In the present study
ultra-slow inactivation in DIV-A1529D was substantially reduced when
µ-CTX R13Q was bound to the outer vestibule. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 6B, superfusion with µ-CTX R13Q did not result in a
shift of the voltage dependence of ultra-slow inactivation, but the U-shaped dependence on prepulse voltage appeared blunted relative to
the unblocked state. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the
reduction of ultra-slow inactivation by µ-CTX R13Q did not result
from electrostatic interaction with the voltage-sensing channel
structures, but most likely resulted from an impediment of entry to the
ultra-slow inactivated state, similar to the interaction of µ-CTX
R13Q with DIII-K1237E (6). The molecular mechanism of the protection
from ultra-slow inactivation by µ-CTX R13Q remains to be elucidated.
In theory, a part of µ-CTX R13Q protruding into the outer pore could
act as a splint in the vestibule, preventing a pore collapse as the
molecular event underlying ultra-slow inactivation. Alternatively, the
toxin might, by virtue of multiple interactions with the outer surface
of the channel (56, 57), act as a molecular scaffold, thereby
stabilizing the structure of the outer vestibule.
The Outer Vestibule of the Na+ Channel May Be Involved
in Activation Gating--
For DIV-A1529D the dynamic rearrangement of
the pore, which most likely forms the basis of ultra-slow inactivation
is preferentially reached through intermediate closed states, on the
way to the open state of the channel. This suggests that the residue
Ala1529 may be involved in the process of opening the
channel pore. We envision that the P-loop of domain IV, which contains
residue A1529, undergoes some kind of movement during the opening
process of the channel. The replacement of alanine 1529 by aspartic
acid might interfere with this motion, thus rendering the channel
susceptible to undergo the molecular rearrangement that is reflected by
ultra-slow inactivation.
The notion that the P-loop in DIV may participate in channel gating is
supported by the finding that this part of the channel is
extraordinarily flexible (21, 58, 59). This flexibility may be mediated
by two glycines in close proximity to residue Ala1529
(Gly1530 and Gly1533). Glycine residues are
considered to allow for a high degree of protein backbone flexibility
(60). Contrary to P-loop DIV, P-loops in DII and III contain only one
glycine (Gly754 and Gly1238, respectively), and
P-loop of DI does not contain any glycine. This underscores a
potentially unique role of P-loop in DIV as a flexible part of the channel.
Complementary support for a possible role of the DIV P-loop as a part
of the gating machinery of the channel comes from the demonstration
that the adjacent DIV S6 segment plays an important role in fast
inactivation (61-64), slow inactivation (64-66), and in binding of
batrachotoxin (BTX) and local anesthetics (64, 67, 68).
BTX is a potent neurotoxin that stabilizes the open state of
Na+ channels. As a result the channels open persistently,
activation is shifted in the hyperpolarized direction, deactivation is
slowed, and inactivation is prevented (69). Furthermore, the ionic
selectivity of BTX-modified channels is substantially reduced, which
indicates that the selectivity filter may be involved in the action of
the drug. Finally, BTX binding has been shown to produce U-shaped voltage dependence of Na+ channel availability (39). Thus,
BTX-modified channels share a number of properties with channels
carrying the mutation DIV-A1529D. This suggests that both
Ala1529 and the binding site of BTX may be mechanistically
linked to structures involved in the gating machinery. This notion is
supported by a recent report demonstrating that the residue DIV-S6
Val1583 is implicated in BTX binding and in channel gating
(64). According to a recent model of the Na+ channel, the
DIV-S6 residue Val1583 may be in reasonable proximity to
the DIV-P-loop residue Ala1529 to allow for interaction
between the two residues during a rearrangement associated with channel
gating (70, 71). In this context it is noteworthy that the DIV P-loop
may not only be extremely flexible, as discussed above, but may
protrude farther into the pore than P-loops of domains I-III, based on
electrical distance measurements (19). Thus, it is not unreasonable to
assume an interaction of the P-loop residue Ala1529 with
residues located in DIV-S6.
Similar to BTX binding, the local anesthetic block is well known to be
linked to channel gating. A mutual relationship appears to exist
between the local anesthetic block and the conformation of the outer
channel vestibule because outer pore mutations influence the access of
local anesthetics to their binding pocket (71, 72), and local
anesthetic binding is associated with a structural rearrangement of the
outer channel vestibule (73). Furthermore, recent studies suggest that
the mechanism of action of the local anesthetic lidocaine involves
transitions along the activation pathway (74-76). These findings
accord well with the idea that DIV-S6 and the DIV P-loop may be linked
to activation gating.
Tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin are known to block the
Na+ channel by binding to its outer vestibule/selectivity
filter region and thereby occluding the pore (77). Makielski et
al. (78) characterized a "post-repolarization" block by these
toxins and proposed that the toxins had a higher affinity for a
pre-open state that was accessed briefly during depolarization and for
a more prolonged period during recovery (78). Satin et al.
(79) further showed that the DI vestibule residue, which is the
greatest determinant of isoform differences in toxin affinity
(Tyr401 in µ1), influences the rate constants for
recovery through the pre-open higher affinity state. This reinforces
the idea that some residues in the channel vestibule are involved in
the conformational changes associated with the pre-open state.
This idea gains further support from recent structural data regarding
the bacterial KscA K+ channel. In KcsA the transmembrane
helices, TM2, which are structurally equivalent to S6, undergo a
structural rearrangement during activation (80). Specifically, TM2
rotates in a counterclockwise direction while swinging away from the
permeation pathway, thus increasing the diameter of the inner
vestibule. A similar model has been proposed for the mechanism of
activation in voltage-gated K+ channels (81, 82). In the
voltage-gated Na+ channel the inner vestibule is considered
to be lined by the S6 segments of domains I-IV (83). As mentioned
above, it is plausible that the P-loop residue Ala1529 may
be in close proximity to the binding pocket for BTX and local anesthetics in S6. Thus, molecular motions of the DIV S6 segment during
activation gating may well be transmitted to the adjacent P-loop
residues and vice versa.
In summary, we propose that the mobility of the P-loop in DIV allows
for participation of this structure in the complex rearrangement of S6
segments during channel opening. The mutation DIV-A1529D may interfere
with this complex rearrangement prior to channel opening. As a result
the outer channel vestibule undergoes a dynamic rearrangement that
forms the basis of the propensity of DIV-A1529D to enter the ultra-slow
inactivated state at voltages near the threshold for channel opening,
thus accounting for the U-shaped voltage dependence of ultra-slow inactivation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Yu Huang, Bei Li, Gayle Tonkovich,
and Anton Karel for technical assistance. Thanks are due to Dr. Denis
McMaster (Peptide Synthesis Laboratory, University of Calgary Faculty
of Medicine) for providing the peptide, µ-CTX R13Q.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant HL-P01-20592 (to H. A. F.), by funds from the
Max Kade Foundation, Inc., New York (to H. T.), by Grant
P13961-MED from the Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen
Forschung (to H. T.), by an American Heart Association Southeast
Affiliate Beginning Grant-in-Aid (to S. C. D.), by a
Scientist Development Award from the American Heart Association (to
S. C. D.), by a Procter and Gamble University Research Exploratory
Award (to S. C. D.), by National Institutes of Health Grant HL64828
(to H. A. F.), and by funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health
Research.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Distinguished Scientist
and a Medical Scientist of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. of
Pharmacology, University of Vienna, Währingerstrasse 13A, A-1090
Vienna, Austria. Tel.: 43-1-4277-64120; E-mail:
hannes.todt@univie.ac.at.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M101933200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
D, domain;
CTX, conotoxin;
HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography;
BTX, batrachotoxin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Nuss, H. B.,
Balser, J. R.,
Orias, D. W.,
Lawrence, J. H.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Marban, E.
(1996)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
494,
411-429
|
| 2.
|
Kambouris, N. G.,
Hastings, L. A.,
Stepanovic, S.,
Marban, E.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Balser, J. R.
(1998)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
512,
693-705
|
| 3.
|
Cummins, T. R.,
and Sigworth, F. J.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
71,
227-236
|
| 4.
|
Wang, S.,
and Wang, G. K.
(1996)
Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol.
432,
692-699
|
| 5.
|
Featherstone, D. E.,
Richmond, J. E.,
and Ruben, P. C.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
71,
3098-3109
|
| 6.
|
Todt, H.,
Dudley, S. C. J.,
Kyle, J. W.,
French, R. J.,
and Fozzard, H. A.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
76,
1335-1345
|
| 7.
|
Fox, J. M.
(1976)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
426,
232-244
|
| 8.
|
Fleidervish, I. A.,
Friedman, A.,
and Gutnick, M. J.
(1996)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
493,
83-97
|
| 9.
|
Ruff, R. L.,
Simoncini, L.,
and Stühmer, W.
(1987)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
383,
339-348
|
| 10.
|
Cannon, S. C.
(1996)
Trends Neurosci.
19,
3-10
|
| 11.
|
Pu, J.,
Balser, J. R.,
and Boyden, P. A.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
83,
431-440
|
| 12.
|
Pu, J.,
and Boyden, P. A.
(1997)
Circ. Res.
81,
110-119
|
| 13.
|
Stuhmer, W.,
Conti, F.,
Suzuki, H.,
Wang, X. D.,
Noda, M.,
Yahagi, N.,
Kubo, H.,
and Numa, S.
(1989)
Nature
339,
597-603
|
| 14.
|
Patton, D. E.,
West, J. W.,
Catterall, W. A.,
and Goldin, A. L.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10905-10909
|
| 15.
|
West, J. W.,
Patton, D. E.,
Scheuer, T.,
Wang, Y.,
Goldin, A. L.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10910-10914
|
| 16.
|
Todt, H.,
Hilber, K.,
Dudley, S. C.,
Kudlacek, O.,
French, R. J.,
Kyle, J. W.,
and Fozzard, H. A.
(2000)
Biophys. J.
78,
83 (abstr.)
|
| 17.
|
Lipkind, G. M.,
and Fozzard, H. A.
(1994)
Biophys. J.
66,
1-13
|
| 18.
|
Chiamvimonvat, N.,
Perez Garcia, M. T.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Marban, E.
(1996)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
491,
51-59
|
| 19.
|
Chiamvimonvat, N.,
Perez-Garcia, M. T.,
Ranjan, R.,
Marban, E.,
and Tomaselli, G. F.
(1996)
Neuron
16,
1037-1047
|
| 20.
|
Perez-Garcia, M. T.,
Chiamvimonvat, N.,
Marban, E.,
and Tomaselli, G. F.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
300-304
|
| 21.
|
Tsushima, R. G.,
Li, R. A.,
and Backx, P. H.
(1997)
J. Gen. Physiol.
109,
463-475
|
| 22.
|
Favre, I.,
Moczydlowski, E.,
and Schild, L.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
71,
3110-3125
|
| 23.
|
Cha, A.,
Ruben, P. C.,
George, A. L. J.,
Fujimoto, E.,
and Bezanilla, F.
(1999)
Neuron
22,
73-87
|
| 24.
|
Horn, R.,
Ding, S.,
and Gruber, H. J.
(2000)
J. Gen. Physiol.
116,
461-476
|
| 25.
|
Mitrovic, N.,
George, A. L.,
and Horn, R.
(2000)
J. Gen. Physiol.
115,
707-718
|
| 26.
|
French, R. J.,
and Dudley, S. C. J.
(1999)
Methods Enzymol.
294,
575-605
|
| 27.
|
Isom, L. L.,
De Jongh, K. S.,
Patton, D. E.,
Reber, B. F.,
Offord, J.,
Charbonneau, H.,
Walsh, K.,
Goldin, A. L.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1992)
Science
256,
839-842
|
| 28.
|
Patton, D. E.,
Isom, L. L.,
Catterall, W. A.,
and Goldin, A. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
17649-17655
|
| 29.
|
Nuss, H. B.,
Chiamvimonvat, N.,
Perez-Garcia, M. T.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Marban, E.
(1995)
J. Gen. Physiol.
106,
1171-1191
|
| 30.
|
Chang, S. Y.,
Satin, J.,
and Fozzard, H. A.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
70,
2581-2592
|
| 31.
|
Eckert, R.,
and Chad, J. E.
(1984)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
44,
215-267
|
| 32.
|
Zhou, J. Y.,
Potts, J. F.,
Trimmer, J. S.,
Agnew, W. S.,
and Sigworth, F. J.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
775-785
|
| 33.
|
Cannon, S. C.,
McClatchey, A. I.,
and Gusella, J. F.
(1993)
Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol.
423,
155-157
|
| 34.
|
Ukomadu, C.,
Zhou, J.,
Sigworth, F. J.,
and Agnew, W. S.
(1992)
Neuron
8,
663-676
|
| 35.
|
French, R. J.,
Prusak-Sochaczewski, E.,
Zamponi, G. W.,
Becker, S.,
Kularatna, A. S.,
and Horn, R.
(1996)
Neuron
16,
407-413
|
| 36.
|
Heinemann, S. H.,
Terlau, H.,
Stühmer, W.,
Imoto, K.,
and Numa, S.
(1992)
Nature
356,
441-443
|
| 37.
|
Perez, G. M.,
Chiamvimonvat, N.,
Ranjan, R.,
Balser, J. R.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Marban, E.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
72,
989-996
|
| 38.
|
Chandler, W. K.,
and Meves, H.
(1970)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
211,
653-678
|
| 39.
|
Wang, G. K.,
and Wang, S. Y.
(1992)
J. Gen. Physiol.
99,
1-20
|
| 40.
|
Bulatko, A. K.,
and Greeff, N. G.
(1995)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
484,
307-312
|
| 41.
|
Klemic, K. G.,
Shieh, C. C.,
Kirsch, G. E.,
and Jones, S. W.
(1998)
Biophys. J.
74,
1779-1789
|
| 42.
|
Patil, P. G.,
Brody, D. L.,
and Yue, D. T.
(1998)
Neuron
20,
1027-1038
|
| 43.
|
Jones, L. P.,
DeMaria, C. D.,
and Yue, D. T.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
76,
2530-2552
|
| 44.
|
Aldrich, R. W. J.,
Getting, P. A.,
and Thompson, S. H.
(1979)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
291,
507-530
|
| 45.
|
Neher, E.,
and Lux, H. D.
(1971)
Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol.
322,
35-38
|
| 46.
|
DeCoursey, T. E.,
Chandy, K. G.,
Gupta, S.,
and Cahalan, M. D.
(1984)
Nature
307,
465-468
|
| 47.
|
Matteson, D. R.,
and Deutsch, C.
(1984)
Nature
307,
468-471
|
| 48.
|
DeCoursey, T. E.
(1990)
J. Gen. Physiol.
95,
617-646
|
| 49.
|
Marom, S.,
Goldstein, S. A.,
Kupper, J.,
and Levitan, I. B.
(1993)
Receptors Channels
1,
81-88
|
| 50.
|
Quattrocki, E. A.,
Marshall, J.,
and Kaczmarek, L. K.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
73-86
|
| 51.
|
Bertoli, A.,
Moran, O.,
and Conti, F.
(1996)
Exp. Brain. Res.
110,
401-412
|
| 52.
|
Mathes, C.,
Rosenthal, J. J.,
Armstrong, G. M.,
and Gilly, W. F.
(1997)
J. Gen. Physiol.
109,
435-448
|
| 53.
|
Aldrich, R. W.
(1981)
Biophys. J.
36,
519-532
|
| 54.
|
Becker, S.,
Prusak-Sochaczewski, E.,
Zamponi, G.,
Beck-Sickinger, A. G.,
Gordon, R. D.,
and French, R. J.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
8229-8238
|
| 55.
|
French, R. J.,
and Horn, R.
(1997)
in
From Ion Channels to Cell-to-Cell Conversations
(Latorre, R.
, and Saez, J., eds)
, pp. 67-89, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 56.
|
Chahine, M.,
Sirois, J.,
Marcotte, P.,
Chen, L.,
and Kallen, R. G.
(1998)
Biophys. J.
75,
236-246
|
| 57.
|
Dudley, S. C.,
Chang, N.,
Hall, J.,
Lipkind, G.,
Fozzard, H. A.,
and French, R. J.
(2000)
J. Gen. Physiol.
116,
679-690
|
| 58.
|
Benitah, J. P.,
Ranjan, R.,
Yamagishi, T.,
Janecki, M.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Marban, E.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
603-613
|
| 59.
|
Tsushima, R. G.,
Li, R. A.,
and Backx, P. H.
(1997)
J. Gen. Physiol.
110,
59-72
|
| 60.
|
Creighton, T. E.
(1993)
Proteins, Structures and Molecular Properties
, p. 7, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York
|
| 61.
|
Cannon, S. C.,
and Strittmatter, S. M.
(1993)
Neuron
10,
317-326
|
| 62.
|
McPhee, J. C.,
Ragsdale, D. S.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12346-12350
|
| 63.
|
McPhee, J. C.,
Ragsdale, D. S.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12025-12034
|
| 64.
|
Vedantham, V.,
and Cannon, S. C.
(2000)
Biophys. J.
78,
2943-2958
|
| 65.
|
Hayward, L. J.,
Brown, R. H., Jr.,
and Cannon, S. C.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
72,
1204-1219
|
| 66.
|
Wright, S. N.,
Wang, S. Y.,
and Wang, G. K.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
54,
733-739
|
| 67.
|
Wang, S. Y.,
and Wang, G. K.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
76,
3141-3149
|
| 68.
|
Linford, N. J.,
Cantrell, A. R.,
Qu, Y.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13947-13952
|
| 69.
|
Khodorov, B. I.
(1985)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
45,
57-148
|
| 70.
|
Lipkind, G. M.,
and Fozzard, H. A.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
8161-8170
|
| 71.
|
Sunami, A.,
Glaaser, I. W.,
and Fozzard, H. A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
2326-2331
|
| 72.
|
Sunami, A.,
Dudley-SC, J.,
and Fozzard, H. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14126-14131
|
| 73.
|
Ong, B. H.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Balser, J. R.
(2000)
J. Gen. Physiol.
116,
653-662
|
| 74.
|
Nuss, H. B.,
Kambouris, N. G.,
Marban, E.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Balser, J. R.
(2000)
Biophys. J.
78,
200-210
|
| 75.
|
Hanck, D. A.,
Makielski, J. C.,
and Sheets, M. F.
(2000)
Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol.
439,
814-821
|
| 76.
|
Vedantham, V.,
and Cannon, S. C.
(1999)
J. Gen. Physiol.
113,
7-16
|
| 77.
|
Hille, B.
(1992)
Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes
, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA
|
| 78.
|
Makielski, J. C.,
Satin, J.,
and Fan, Z.
(1993)
Biophys. J.
65,
790-798
|
| 79.
|
Satin, J.,
Kyle, J. W.,
Fan, Z.,
Rogart, R.,
Fozzard, H. A.,
and Makielski, J. C.
(1994)
Biophys. J.
66,
1353-1363
|
| 80.
|
Perozo, E.,
Cortes, D. M.,
and Cuello, L. G.
(1999)
Science
285,
73-78
|
| 81.
|
Holmgren, M.,
Shin, K. S.,
and Yellen, G.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
617-621
|
| 82.
|
del Camino, D.,
Holmgren, M.,
Liu, Y.,
and Yellen, G.
(1998)
Nature
403,
321-325
|
| 83.
|
Fozzard, H. A.,
and Hanck, D. A.
(1996)
Physiol. Rev.
76,
887-926
|
| 84.
|
Nuss, H. B.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Marban, E.
(1995)
J. Gen. Physiol.
106,
1193-1209
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Z. Miloushev, J. A. Levine, M. A. Arbing, J. F. Hunt, G. S. Pitt, and A. G. Palmer III
Solution Structure of the NaV1.2 C-terminal EF-hand Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 6, 2009;
284(10):
6446 - 6454.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Jost, D. M. Hillis, Y. Lu, J. W. Kyle, H. A. Fozzard, and H. H. Zakon
Toxin-Resistant Sodium Channels: Parallel Adaptive Evolution across a Complete Gene Family
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
June 1, 2008;
25(6):
1016 - 1024.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Xiong, Y. Z. Farukhi, Y. Tian, D. DiSilvestre, R. A. Li, and G. F. Tomaselli
A conserved ring of charge in mammalian Na+ channels: a molecular regulator of the outer pore conformation during slow inactivation
J. Physiol.,
November 1, 2006;
576(3):
739 - 754.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Ulbricht
Sodium Channel Inactivation: Molecular Determinants and Modulation
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2005;
85(4):
1271 - 1301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Fukuda, T. Nakajima, P. C Viswanathan, and J. R Balser
Compound-specific Na+ channel pore conformational changes induced by local anaesthetics
J. Physiol.,
April 1, 2005;
564(1):
21 - 31.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Sandtner, J. Szendroedi, T. Zarrabi, E. Zebedin, K. Hilber, I. Glaaser, H. A. Fozzard, S. C. Dudley, and H. Todt
Lidocaine: A Foot in the Door of the Inner Vestibule Prevents Ultra-Slow Inactivation of a Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel
Mol. Pharmacol.,
September 1, 2004;
66(3):
648 - 657.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kanai, S. Hirose, H. Oguni, G. Fukuma, Y. Shirasaka, T. Miyajima, K. Wada, H. Iwasa, S. Yasumoto, M. Matsuo, et al.
Effect of localization of missense mutations in SCN1A on epilepsy phenotype severity
Neurology,
July 27, 2004;
63(2):
329 - 334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Kass
Sodium Channel Inactivation Goes with the Flow
J. Gen. Physiol.,
June 28, 2004;
124(1):
7 - 8.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-C. Kuo, W.-Y. Chen, and Y.-C. Yang
Block of Tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ Channel Pore by Multivalent Cations: Gating Modification and Na+ Flow Dependence
J. Gen. Physiol.,
June 28, 2004;
124(1):
27 - 42.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hering, A. Feltz, and R. C. Lambert
Slow inactivation of the CaV3.1 isotype of T-type calcium channels
J. Physiol.,
March 1, 2004;
555(2):
331 - 344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. TERLAU and B. M. OLIVERA
Conus Venoms: A Rich Source of Novel Ion Channel-Targeted Peptides
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2004;
84(1):
41 - 68.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Xiong, R. A. Li, Y. Tian, and G. F. Tomaselli
Molecular Motions of the Outer Ring of Charge of the Sodium Channel: Do They Couple to Slow Inactivation?
J. Gen. Physiol.,
August 25, 2003;
122(3):
323 - 332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Talavera, A. Janssens, N. Klugbauer, G. Droogmans, and B. Nilius
Pore Structure Influences Gating Properties of the T-type Ca2+ Channel {alpha}1G
J. Gen. Physiol.,
May 27, 2003;
121(6):
529 - 540.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M Rich and M. J Pinter
Crucial Role of Sodium Channel Fast Inactivation in Muscle Fibre Inexcitability in a Rat Model of Critical Illness Myopathy
J. Physiol.,
March 1, 2003;
547(2):
555 - 566.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Peng, Q. Shu, Z. Liu, and S. Liang
Function and Solution Structure of Huwentoxin-IV, a Potent Neuronal Tetrodotoxin (TTX)-sensitive Sodium Channel Antagonist from Chinese Bird Spider Selenocosmia huwena
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 27, 2002;
277(49):
47564 - 47571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hilber, W. Sandtner, O. Kudlacek, B. Schreiner, I. Glaaser, W. Schutz, H. A. Fozzard, S. C. Dudley, and H. Todt
Interaction between Fast and Ultra-slow Inactivation in the Voltage-gated Sodium Channel. DOES THE INACTIVATION GATE STABILIZE THE CHANNEL STRUCTURE?
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 27, 2002;
277(40):
37105 - 37115.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Khan, L Romantseva, A Lam, G Lipkind, and H A Fozzard
Role of outer ring carboxylates of the rat skeletal muscle sodium channel pore in proton block
J. Physiol.,
August 15, 2002;
543(1):
71 - 84.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N Wright
Comparison of aconitine-modified human heart (hH1) and rat skeletal ({micro}1) muscle Na+ channels: an important role for external Na+ ions
J. Physiol.,
February 1, 2002;
538(3):
759 - 771.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Ren, B. Navarro, H. Xu, L. Yue, Q. Shi, and D. E. Clapham
A Prokaryotic Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel
Science,
December 14, 2001;
294(5550):
2372 - 2375.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. Wright
Comparison of aconitine-modified heart (hH1) and skeletal ({micro}1) muscle Na+ channels: an important role for external Na+ ions
J. Physiol.,
December 19, 2001;
(2001)
200101291.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|