![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 30, 27944-27949, July 27, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expression by Adenoviral
Infection Involves Inactivation of the AP-2rep Transcriptional
Corepressor CtBP1*
,
,
From the
Institute for Microbiology, University of
Regensburg Medical School, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany, the § Institute of Pathology,
University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany, and the ¶ Department of Biochemistry,
G08, University of Sydney,
Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
Received for publication, January 4, 2001, and in revised form, May 21, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AP-2 transcription factors execute important
functions during embryonic development and malignant transformation.
Recently, we have isolated a transcriptional repressor of
AP-2 The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor AP-2 Specific expression patterns of AP-2 genes have further been implicated
in malignant transformation and stress response of mammalian cells.
AP-2 We have previously studied transcriptional mechanisms controlling the
activity of the AP-2 Cell Culture and Transient Transfections--
HeLa and PA-1
clone 9117 (15) cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Sigma).
Transient transfections were performed using a standard calcium
coprecipitation protocol as described previously (16). Luciferase
activity was assayed as recommended by the manufacturer (Promega,
Mannheim, Germany) in a Luminometer Lumat LB 9501 (Berthold, Wildbad,
Germany). Relative light units were normalized to Reporter and Expression Plasmids--
AP-2 promoter constructs
have been described previously, as well as the cytomegalovirus
promoter-driven AP-2rep expression plasmid (21). The same
cytomegalovirus promoter-driven vector (pCMX) vector was used to
construct CtBP1 and E1A 13 S expression plasmids. The entire coding
sequence of CtBP1 was amplified from 10 ng of plasmid DNA using the
sense and reverse primers GCG GAA TTC ATG GGC AGC TCC CAC TTG C and GCG
GAA TTC CTA CAA CTG GTC ACT CG, respectively. The E1A 13 S sequence was
amplified using the primers GGC AAG CTT ATG AGA CAT ATT ATC TGC and GGC
AAG CTT TTA TGG CCT GGG GCG TTT. The CtBP1
PCR1 fragment was digested
with EcoRI, E1A was digested with HindIII, and both were ligated into pCMX-PL1 and verified by sequencing the
entire open reading frame.
Site-specific Mutagenesis--
The CtBP-interacting motifs of
AP-2rep and E1A (PVDLS and PLDLS) were mutated to PVASS and PLASS,
respectively, with the transformer mutagenesis kit following precisely
the manufacturer's protocol (CLONTECH, Palo Alto,
CA). The following primers were used: AP-2rep mutation primer, GAG CCA
GTG GCT AGC TCA ATC AAC; AP-2rep selection primer, GAA TTC GAT ATC AAA
CTT CTG GAG; E1A mutation primer, CAA CCT TTG GCT AGC AGC TGT AAA CGC;
E1A selection primer, GTC TGC AGG ACG ACT CTA. All mutations were
verified by sequencing.
Western Blots--
Equal amounts of protein were loaded onto SDS
12.5% polyacrylamide gels and electroblotted for 1.5 h at 5 mA/cm2. Filters were soaked for 1 h in 5% nonfat dry
milk-phosphate-buffered saline. AP-2 antiserum (Geneka, Montreal,
Canada) was diluted 1:1000, and E1A antiserum (M73 (23)) was diluted
1:100 in 5% nonfat dry milk/phosphate-buffered saline and incubated
overnight at 4 °C. Then, blots were washed three times for 10 min
each, incubated for 1 h with 1:3000-diluted horseradish
peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit immunoglobulin antiserum for AP-2
detection and anti-mouse antiserum for E1A detection, and developed
with a chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
In Vitro Binding Assays--
Murine CtBP1 was cloned into the
vector pCMX-PL1, and 35S-labeled in vitro
translated protein was generated using T7 polymerase and the Promega
TNT system. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins were purified as previously described (21). Protein concentrations were estimated on a Coomassie-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Approximately equal amounts of GST fusion protein were mixed with
35S-labeled in vitro translated protein in HBBNP
buffer (20 mM HEPES/HCl, pH 7.8, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol,
0.1% Nonidet P-40) and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. Beads were
washed four times in HBBNP buffer, and bound proteins were separated on
a polyacrylamide gel and visualized autoradiographically.
Two-hybrid Screening and Two-hybrid Assays--
The
CLONTECH two-hybrid system was used according to
the manufacturer's instructions. A murine embryonal (day 17.5) brain cDNA library in the gal4AD fusion vector, pGAD10, was transfected into the yeast strain Y190 harboring the gal4DBD-AP-2rep NT
(N-terminal) fusion protein expressed from pAS2-1. 65 mCtBP1 clones
differing in length were isolated. Interaction assays between mCtBP1
and AP-2rep NT were performed by co-transfecting pAS2-1/AP-2rep NT together with pGAD10/mCtBP1 into Y190. Colonies were then transferred in liquid cultures, and Adenoviral Infections--
Adenoviral stock solutions were
prepared from 293 cells using a standard protocol (24). HeLa and PA-1
clone 9117 cells were infected with adenoviruses by growing cells to
50% confluency and incubating them with adenoviral suspension in a
minimal volume of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium without fetal
calf serum for 1 h and adding of a larger volume of fetal calf
serum-containing medium for 12 to 72 h. Cells were harvested after
two phosphate-buffered saline wash steps in a minimal volume of
phosphate-buffered saline and were resuspended in Laemmli buffer for
Western blot analysis. Wild-type adenovirus-5 and the following mutated
viruses were used: H5 dl312 (lacking E1A) and H5 dl1135 (lacking amino
acids 225-238 of E1A exon 2, including the PLDLS sequence at 233-237 (25)).
Determination of Multiplicity of Infection--
Virus titers
were determined by plaque assays on the E1-complementing cell line 911 (human embryonic retinoblasts). Control infections with 50 PFU/cell
(1-fold), 5 PFU/cell (0.1-fold), and 0.5 PFU/cell (0.01-fold) of
wild-type virus, mutant H5 dl312, and mutant H5 dl1135,
respectively, yielded almost identical percentages of
E2A-immunopositive cells (data not shown).
Coimmunoprecipitation--
For coimmunoprecipitation in
vitro, the AP-2rep coding sequence was ligated into the
EcoRI site of pCMC-PL2 containing a Kozak ATG translation
start sequence followed by a FLAG-tag motif. The construct was
in vitro transcribed by T7-RNA-polymerase (Stratagene, Heidelberg, Germany) and then in vitro translated. The
FLAG-tagged protein was coincubated with
[35S]methionine-labeled AP-2
For coimmunoprecipitation from cells, the FLAG-tagged AP-2rep construct
was transiently transfected into 1 × 107 HeLa cells.
The cells were lysed in 1 ml of radioimmune precipitation buffer (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) and precleared by adding 200 µl of
protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and shaking at 4 °C
for 6 h. The Sepharose was pelleted, and then 10 µg of
anti-FLAG-antibody was added to the lysate and incubated overnight at
4 °C. Finally, 20 µl of fresh protein G-Sepharose was added for
1 h, recovered by centrifugation, and washed three times with
phosphate-buffered saline. The final pellet was resuspended in 20 µl
of Laemmli buffer, incubated at 95 °C for 5 min, separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and Western blotted. Western
blots were immunoprobed with anti-CtBP antiserum to detect copurified
CtBP as described previously (26).
Real Time PCR--
First strand cDNA was synthesized using 2 µg of total RNA template, 1 µg of random primer (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), 4 µl of 5× first strand buffer (Life Technologies,
Inc.), 2 µl of 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 µl of 10 mM dNTPs, and 1 µl of Superscript Plus (Life
Technologies, Inc.) in a total volume of 20 µl. The amount of
AP-2 The PVDLS Motif of AP-2rep Functions as a Transposable Repressor
Domain--
Conserved structural motifs in the transcriptional
repressor AP-2rep (Klf12) include three Krüppel-related zinc
fingers and an H/C knuckle TGE(K/R)P(Y/F)X in the C terminus
and a serine/threonine-rich domain next to an PVDLS motif in the
N-terminal region (Fig. 1A) (22). The consensus sequence P(V/L)DLS, present in the
adenoviral oncoprotein E1A (27) and many mammalian transcriptional
repressors, has been shown previously to recruit CtBP1 and CtBP2
corepressors (28, 29). To identify transposable protein domains
eliciting transcriptional regulation, we constructed fusion proteins
(schematically shown in Fig. 1A) of the AP-2rep N-terminal
region with the Gal4 DNA binding domain (Gal4/repNT), of the AP-2rep
C-terminal region with the Gal4 DNA binding domain (Gal4/repCT) and the
AP-2rep C-terminal region with the viral activator VP16 (VP16/repCT), respectively. The effect of transiently transfected fusion proteins on
the activity of appropriate luciferase reporters was assayed in HeLa
cells and the human teratocarcinoma cell line PA-1 clone 9117 (Fig.
1B). As reporters we used TK-LUC plasmids containing three
Gal4 binding sites (UAS) or two AP-2rep binding sites (A32 (21)).
Transfection of Gal4/repNT, but not of the unmodified Gal4 protein,
resulted in significant repression of the luciferase reporter (~10-fold). Interestingly, transcriptional repression of the
Gal4/repNT fusion protein was entirely abrogated by a double point
mutation in the putative CtBP interaction motif (PVDLS to PVASS).
Transfection of a Gal4 protein fused with the AP-2rep C-terminal region
did not change activity of the Gal4 reporter, indicating that the zinc
finger domain does not harbor any intrinsic transcription regulatory
activity. As expected, fusion of the viral VP16 activator to the zinc
finger domain resulted in strong activation of the AP-2rep-dependent luciferase reporter. From these data, we
concluded that the AP-2rep N-terminal region harbors a transposable
repressor activity, which is entirely dependent on the PVDLS motif.
Furthermore, the Krüppel-related zinc finger domain of
AP-2rep functions as a sequence-specific DNA binding domain
without significant intrinsic transcriptional regulatory activity.
To address further whether the PVDLS motif conferred transcriptional
repression we fused two copies of the wild-type and the mutated
sequences (RPVDLSR and RPVASSR,
respectively) with Gal4. Results from transient cotransfection with the
Gal4-dependent luciferase reporter indicated that the
putative CtBP interaction domain was both necessary and sufficient for
transcriptional repression (Fig. 1C).
Recruitment of CtBP1 by AP-2rep Is Dependent on the PVDLS
Motif--
To demonstrate that the AP-2rep transcriptional repressor
motif interacts with CtBP corepressors, we assayed protein-protein interaction. Screening 2 × 106 clones of a yeast
two-hybrid library prepared from murine embryonal brain at gestational
stage day 17.5 with the AP-2rep N terminus as a bait resulted in
isolation of 71 independent clones. Determination of the respective
cDNA inserts revealed that 65 of these clones contained partial or
complete fragments of the murine CtBP1 cDNA and that the remaining
six clones represented obvious artifacts (data not shown). A functional
yeast two-hybrid assay indicated robust interaction that resulted in
approximately one-third of
To further assay in vitro interaction between AP-2rep and
CtBP1, we performed a GST pull down experiment. Therefore, GST fusion proteins containing either wild-type AP-2rep or PVASS-mutated AP-2rep
were immobilized to glutathione-coupled Sepharose and incubated with
in vitro translated 35S-labeled protein CtBP1
protein. As shown in Fig. 2B, CtBP1 was specifically
retained by wild-type, but not by mutated AP-2rep fusion protein. In
control experiments, 35S-labeled CtBP1 also failed to
interact with unmodified GST.
To verify specific protein-protein interaction of AP-2rep with CtBP1 by
a second independent method, we also performed coimmunoprecipitations both with in vitro translated AP-2rep and CtBP1 proteins and
with tagged AP-2rep transiently expressed in HeLa cells. Therefore, we
used a flag-modified AP-2rep protein as a bait. As shown in Fig.
2C, we were able to coimmunoprecipitate specifically CtBP1 and also unmodified AP-2rep protein.
When we transiently transfected FLAG-tagged AP-2rep into HeLa cells, we
were able to coprecipitate CtBP1 with an anti-FLAG antibody (Fig.
2D, lanes 5 and 6) from cell extracts. In
comparison, we Western probed HeLa cell lysate transiently transfected
with CtBP1 alone or with both CtBP1 and tagged AP-2rep. Our results shown in Fig. 2D (lanes 1-3) clearly show that a
significant portion of endogenous CtBP-1 present in HeLa cells can be
coimmunoprecipitated with the tagged AP-2rep protein, indicating tight
interaction between the two proteins. In summary, we concluded from
these data that the transcriptional repressor AP-2rep recruits the
corepressor CtBP1 via physical interaction through the PVDLS domain.
Activation of Endogenous AP-2
To analyze whether induction of AP-2 protein by adenoviral infection
involved up-regulation of AP-2
Therefore, we investigated the effect of transiently expressed
E1A protein and explored the role of an intact CtBP interaction motif
in regulation of AP-2
Taken together, our data provide evidence that both adenoviral
infection and transfection of the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A activate
expression of the endogenous AP-2 Recently, we identified the A32 element, an important
cis-regulatory element in the AP-2 The function of CtBP1 and its close homolog CtBP2 as transcriptional
corepressors for the zinc finger-transcription factor Furthermore, data presented in Figs. 3 and 4 show that activation of
AP-2 Exon 1 of E1A has been shown previously to confer transforming activity
in cooperation with activated ras oncogenes (32). Functions mediated through the conserved regions CR1 and CR2 of E1A
include interaction with pRb, p107, and p130, which leads to release of
E2F transcription factor, and interaction with p300 (reviewed in Ref.
25). Additional functions of ras are required for
cell cycle progression in order to overcome p53-induced apoptosis elicited by E1A expression (33). In contrast, the C-terminal region of
exon 2 has been shown to negatively modulate transformation by E1A and
activated ras. The transformation restraining activity of
the E1A C terminus requires interaction with CtBP1 (25). Our data
presented here raise the possibility that AP-2 activation may be
causally involved in executing this activity.
Dependent on the cellular context, AP-2 may exert different
effects. We have shown previously that AP-2 is a strong negative regulator of c-Myc transcriptional target genes and c-Myc-induced apoptosis (Ref. 19 and reviewed in Ref. 34). In nontransformed cells,
activation of the cell cycle inhibitor p21 and negative regulation of
c-Myc transcriptional target genes may restrain cell cycle progression
and delay entry into G1/S-transition. However, in fully
transformed cells harboring mutated ras oncogenes,
transcriptional activity of AP-2 is defective (15), and therefore, the
tumor restraining activities of the E1A C terminus may be overcome.
expression, the novel Krüppel-related zinc
finger protein AP-2rep (Klf12). Here, we show that repression of
AP-2
transcription by AP-2rep is dependent on an
N-terminal PVDLS motif that interacts specifically with the corepressor
CtBP1 both in vivo and in vitro. This
interaction motif was previously identified in the C-terminal region of
the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A. Infection of both HeLa and PA-1
cells with adenovirus type 5 strongly induced AP-2
mRNA.
Consistently, E1A was necessary and sufficient to mediate up-regulation
of AP-2
. Transiently transfected wild-type E1A protein
activated an AP-2rep sensitive cis-regulatory element of the
AP-2
promoter, but E1A protein harboring a mutation in
the PVDLS motif failed to activate. In summary, we conclude that the
adenoviral oncoprotein E1A activates transcription from the endogenous
AP-2
gene, an effect that involves transcriptional
derepression of the AP-2
promoter by interaction of E1A
with the AP-2rep corepressor CtBP1.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
represents
the prototype of a small family of closely related and evolutionarily conserved DNA-binding proteins harboring helix-loop-helix dimerization motifs, AP-2
, AP-2
, and AP-2
(1-3). Highly regulated
expression patterns of AP-2
have been described during
embryonic development of the neural tube, neural crest derivatives, eye
and face, and limb bud, as well as urogential and ectodermal tissues
(4-6). Recently, germ line mutations in the human AP-2
gene have been shown to cause Char syndrome, a familial form of patent
ductus artiosus involving a specific defect in thoracic neural crest cells (7). Studies of AP-2-deficient mice reveal specific defects in
the neural tube, craniofacial structures, and kidney, suggesting that
AP-2 genes execute essential functions in regulating specific gene
expression programs and cell survival during embryonic development (8-11). Consistently, a number of target genes that are
transcriptionally activated or silenced in a cell type-specific fashion
have been identified (12-14).
overexpression was found to result from and to be
functionally involved in N-ras-mediated malignant
transformation of PA-1 human teratocarcinoma cells (15).
AP-2
and AP-2
overexpression in breast
cancer cells direct transcriptional activation of the transmembrane
tyrosinase-coupled receptor c-erbB2 (16) and
correlate with regulation of multiple growth factor signaling pathways
(17). A role of AP-2 in the mammalian stress response following
ultraviolet A radiation has been identified (18). Specific interaction
of AP-2 with the c-Myc-Max heterodimer negatively regulate c-Myc target genes and c-Myc-induced apoptotic cell death (10, 19). Therefore, it has been proposed that AP-2 genes are involved in programming cell survival, particularly in fast-proliferating cells
under stress conditions or under conditions of limited external growth
factor supply that occur particularly during embryonic development and
in neoplastic tissues.
promoter and identified a network of
activating and silencing factors (20, 21). The novel
Krüppel-related zinc-finger repressor factor AP-2rep (Klf12)
mediated down-regulation of AP-2
expression (22).
Interestingly, AP-2rep harbors a putative interaction domain for the
transcriptional corepressor CtBP1, which also binds to the C terminus
of the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A. Viral oncoproteins frequently
reinstruct endogenous gene regulation and provide insights into
molecular mechanisms of malignant transformation. In this study, we
therefore investigated whether adenoviral infection elicits alterations
in AP-2
expression patterns and explored the putative
role of AP-2rep and CtBP1.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase
activity and protein concentration. All experiments were repeated at
least three times, with standard deviations less than 10%.
-galactosidase activity was quantified.
, CtBP1, AP-2rep-FLAG, or
unmodified AP-2rep and precipitated by an anti-FLAG-antibody (Sigma)
and protein A-agarose. Finally, the
[35S]methionine-labeled proteins were visualized on
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels and subsequent autoradiography.
cDNA was quantified using the real-time PCR
LightCycler system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). For PCR, 3 µl of
cDNA preparation, 2.4 µl of 25 mM MgCl2,
0.5 µM forward and reverse primer, and 2 µl of
SybrGreen LightCycler mix were combined in a total volume of 20 µl
(hAP-2
forward primer, AAT TTC TCA ACC GAC AAC ATT; hAP-2
reverse primer, ATC TGT TTT GTA GCC AGG AGC;
-actin
forward primer, CTA CGT CGC CCT GGA CTT CGA GC;
-actin
reverse primer, GAT GGA GCC GCC GAT CCA CAC GG). The following PCR
program was performed: 20 s at 95 °C (initial denaturation);
20 °C/s temperature transition rate up to 95 °C for 15 s,
10 s at 58 °C, 22 s at 72 °C, and 10 s at 82 °C
acquisition mode single, repeated for 40 times (amplification). The PCR
was evaluated by melting curve analysis following the manufacturer's
instructions and checking the PCR products on 1.8% agarose gels. Each
quantitative PCR was performed at least in duplicate.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The PVDLS motif in the AP-2rep N terminus
functions as a transposable transcriptional repressor domain.
A, schematic representation of protein motifs in AP-2rep and
N-terminal and C-terminal protein fragments that were fused with Gal4
(DNA-binding domain) or VP16, respectively. B, luciferase
reporter gene assays in HeLa (top) and PA-1 9117 cells
(bottom). Left, transiently transfected Gal4
fusion constructs. Right, transiently expressed VP16 fusion
protein. C, repression mediated by the dimerized PVDLS motif
fused to Gal4, but not by the mutated motif PVASS.
-gal reporter expression as
compared with SV40 large T antigen interaction with p53, which was
assayed for a positive control (Fig.
2A, pVA3/pTD1). Importantly,
the mutated AP-2rep protein, harboring the same two amino acid
exchanges in the PVDLS motif as used for transient transfections in
Fig. 1C, failed to interact with CtBP1.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Interaction of AP-2rep and CtBP-1 dependent
on the PVDLS domain. A, yeast two-hybrid assay.
-Galactosidase activity mediated by p53/SV40-large T interaction
(pVA3/pTD1) was assayed as a positive control. As bait, wild-type
AP-2rep NT (as shown in Fig. 1A) or AP-2rep NT mutated in
the PVDLS motif was coexpressed with CtBP-1. B, GST in
vitro binding assay. Immobilized GST-AP-2rep fusion protein
retained 35S-labeled CtBP1, but fusion protein mutated in
the PVDLS motif failed to interact. C, immunoprecipitation
in vitro. Unlabeled AP-2rep/FLAG protein was coincubated
with 35S-labeled AP-2
, AP-2rep/FLAG, CtBP1, or AP-2rep
and immunoprecipitated. Coprecipitated proteins were visualized by
autoradiography. AP-2rep (413 amino acids), AP-2rep/FLAG (418 amino
acids), and CtBP1 (440 amino acids) run at almost identical relative
molecular masses of ~50 kDa. D, CtBP1
immunostaining of Western blots prepared from FLAG-immunoprecipitate of
HeLa cells transfected with FLAG-AP-2rep or CtBP1. Transfections were
performed as follows: lane 1, CtBP1; lanes 2 and
3, FLAG-AP-2rep and CtBP1; lanes 5 and
6, FLAG-AP-2rep. Controls were as follows: lane
1, extract of HeLa cells transfected with CtBP1 (without
immunoprecipitation); lane 4, no protein extract; lane
7, immunoprecipitation from HeLa extracts in the absence of
transfected FLAG-AP-2rep.
Expression Is Dependent on
Adenoviral E1A and the CtBP1 Interaction Domain PVDLS--
Based on
previous reports that the C-terminal region of adenovirus E1A elicits
gene regulatory activity through interaction with CtBP proteins (27,
30, 31), we determined the effect of adenovirus infection on endogenous
AP-2 expression levels. Our results shown in Fig.
3A provide evidence that
adenoviral infection of both HeLa and PA-1 (clone 9117) cells leads to
strong induction of AP-2
protein with a maximum ~24 h after
infection and 12 h after maximal expression of adenoviral E1A
protein. In contrast to infection with wild-type virus, mutants lacking
the entire E1A region (Ad5 312 in Fig. 3B) or harboring a
specific microdeletion within the E1A-CtBP interaction motif, including the residues PLDLS at 233-237 (Ad5 1135 in Fig. 3B), did
not induce AP-2
expression. In these experiments, we used identical
virus titers (50 PFU/cell) in the case of all three strains and
controlled equal protein loading by reprobing the Western blots with a
-actin antiserum.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Induction of AP-2
expression by adenovirus type 5 infection. A,
quantitation of AP-2
and E1A on Western blots prepared from cell
lysates of HeLa (left) and PA-1 9117 cells
(right) infected with adenovirus-5. B, AP-2
and
-actin expression in HeLa cells infected for 24 h with
adenovirus type 5, with mutant 312 (E1A deletion) and mutant 1135 (microdeletion in the E1A-CtBP interaction motif) in comparison to
mock-infected cells. Infection was performed with an identical titer of
all three adenoviral strains (50 PFU/cell). C, measurement
of AP-2
mRNA by quantitative real-time PCR (LightCycler) in
wild-type (Ad5), mock, mutant 312 (E1A deletion), and mutant 1135 (microdeletion in the E1A-CtBP interaction motif) infected HeLa cells.
Infection was performed with 50 PFU/cell of all three adenoviral
strains. Bars indicate the ratio of AP-2
mRNA
versus
-actin mRNA.
mRNA, we performed quantitative real time reverse transcription-PCR on RNA templates extracted from
HeLa cell cultures infected for 24 h (Fig. 3C). The
ratio of AP-2
versus
-actin mRNA was increased
~8-fold by wild-type adenovirus but was not significantly altered
after infection with identical titers of mutant adenovirus strains (50 PFU/cell) or in mock-infected cells. Further controls showed that the
induction of AP-2 was dependent on the multiplicity of infection.
Infection with a 
induction, and infection with a

by adenoviral infection is critically dependent on the intact
E1A-CtBP1 interaction motif and involves both AP-2
mRNA and protein.
expression. In parallel, we
measured the effect on a luciferase reporter under control of the
dimerized A32 cis-regulatory element of the AP-2
promoter (Fig.
4A) and on endogenous AP-2
protein levels quantified by Western blots (Fig. 4B).
Transient transfection of E1A resulted in ~2-fold activation of the
A32-dependent luciferase reporter. Importantly, an E1A construct harboring the double point mutation in the CtBP interaction motif did not activate the luciferase reporter. In contrast, we observed moderate but reproducible repression to ~0.6-fold activity (Fig. 4A, E1A mut). Consistent with these results,
transcriptional repression of the A32-dependent reporter by
AP-2rep was entirely abrogated by the double point mutation in the
PVDLS interaction domain. Again, we observed reproducible activation
of the reporter, possibly due to interference with endogenous wild-type
AP-2rep repressor protein and to mutually exclusive binding with
activating transcription factors such as BTEB-1 (21). Importantly,
transiently expressed CtBP1 protein also repressed the A32 luciferase
reporter, indicating that CtBP1 elicits intrinsic transcriptional
repressor activity when appropriately recruited. All results obtained
from measuring luciferase reporter activities were closely paralleled by changes of endogenous AP-2
protein visualized by Western blots of
HeLa cell extracts (Fig. 4B). In general, the effects
of transient transfections were significantly smaller than changes in
AP-2 expression by adenoviral infections, because we observed much higher E1A expression levels after infections (data not shown), and the
activity of an AP-2-dependent promoter depends also on AP-2
isoforms other than AP-2
.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Activation of AP-2
by E1A and repression by AP-2rep dependent on the CtBP1
interaction domain. A, activity of the
AP-2rep-sensitive A32-TK-luciferase reporter in HeLa cells transiently
transfected with wild-type E1A, E1A mutated in the PLDLS motif,
wild-type AP-2rep, and AP-2rep mutated in the PVDLS motif or CtBP1. As
a negative control, cells were mock-transfected with the empty
pBluescript SKII-vector. B, corresponding Western blot of
HeLa cells transfected as shown in A reveals regulation of
endogenous AP-2
expression by AP-2rep, E1A, and CtBP1.
gene. Furthermore, activation of AP-2
transcription is dependent on the
presence of a functional E1A-CtBP interaction motif and involves
inactivation of the transcriptional silencer AP-2rep by direct
interaction with the corepressor CtBP1.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
promoter mediating
both activation and repression of AP-2
mRNA transcription.
Promoter activity was silenced through sequence-specific binding of
AP-2rep, a novel Krüppel-related zinc finger repressor, which
interacted mutually exclusive with activating factors (21). In the
present study, we provide further evidence for a role of AP-2rep in
transcriptional repression that involves physical association
with the corepressor CtBP1. Data presented in Figs. 1 and 2 show that
the transcriptional repressor activity of AP-2rep is tightly associated
with a functional CtBP interaction motif and demonstrate strong
interaction of the two proteins by coimmunoprecipitation both from
endogenous cell extracts and in vitro. Therefore, specific
interaction with CtBP1 through the PVDLS domain is functionally
important and identifies AP-2
as a novel target gene of
CtBP-mediated repression.
EF1 has been
previously detected by Furusawa et al. (29).
Interestingly, these authors have described specific embryonic
expression patterns of CtBP proteins, particularly in structures that
are subject to regulated AP-2 expression, including the face, cephalic
ganglia, dorsal root ganglia, and limb. Therefore, it is possible that CtBP corepressors may contribute to specify expression patterns of
different AP-2 genes during development. The precise functional role of
CtBP proteins in these developmental processes, however, will require
analyses of their respective knockout mice.
mRNA and protein expression by adenoviral infection closely
parallels the ability of E1A protein to interact with CtBP1 through the
PLDLS motif. Thus, our study for the first time identifies that
regulation of an endogenous gene through E1A requires binding of CtBP1
and that sequestration of the transcriptional corepressor changes
significantly gene expression patterns in infected host cells.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are indebted to Arie Otte for generously providing the CtBP antiserum, to G. Chinnadurai for the mutant adenovirus dl1135, and to Ed Harlow for the E1A antiserum.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung (to R. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-241-8089281; Fax: 49-241-8888439; E-mail:
Buettner@pat.rwth-aachen.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M100070200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PFU, plaque-forming unit(s).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Williams, T., Admon, A., Lüscher, B., and Tjian, R. (1988) Genes Dev. 2, 1557-1569 |
| 2. | Moser, M., Pscherer, A., Imhof, A., Bauer, R., Kerscher, M., Amselgruber, W., Sinowatz, F., Hofstaedter, F., Schüle, R., and Buettner, R. (1995) Development 121, 2779-2788 |
| 3. | Oulad-Abdelghani, M., Bouillet, P., Chazaud, C., Dollé, P., and Chambon, P. (1996) Exp. Cell Res. 225, 338-347 |
| 4. | Mitchell, P. J., Timmons, P. M., Hebert, J. M., Rigby, P. W., and Tjian, R. (1991) Genes Dev. 5, 105-119 |
| 5. | Byrne, C., Tainsky, M. A., and Fuchs, E. (1994) Development 120, 2369-2383 |
| 6. | Moser, M., Rüschof, J., and Buettner, R. (1997) Dev. Dyn. 208, 115-124 |
| 7. | Satoda, M., Zhao, F., Diaz, G. A., Burn, J., Goodship, J., Davidson, H. R., Pierpont, M. E., and Gelb, B. D. (2000) Nat. Genet. 25, 42-46 |
| 8. | Schorle, H., Meier, P., Buchert, M., Jaenisch, R., and Mitchell, P. J. (1996) Nature 381, 235-238 |
| 9. | Zhang, J., Hagopian-Donaldson, S., Serbedzija, G., Elsemore, J., Plehn-Dujowich, D., McMahon, A. P., Flavell, R. A., and Williams, T. (1996) Nature 381, 238-241 |
| 10. | Moser, M., Pscherer, A., Roth, C., Becker, J., Mücher, G., Zerres, K., Dixkens, C., Weis, J., Guay-Woodford, L., Buettner, R., and Fässler, R. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 1938-1948 |
| 11. | West-Mays, J. A., Zhang, J., Nottoli, T., Hagopian-Donaldson, S., Libby, D., Strissel, K. J., and Williams, T. (1999) Dev. Biol. 206, 46-62 |
| 12. | Baskin, F., Li, Y. P., Hersh, L. B., Davis, R. M., and Rosenberg, R. N. (1997) Neuroscience 76, 821-827 |
| 13. | Pena, P., Reutens, A. T., Albanese, C., D'Amico, M., Watanabe, G., Donner, A., Shu, I. W., Williams, T., and Pestell, R. G. (1999) Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 1402-1416 |
| 14. | Sinha, S., Degenstein, L., Copenhaver, C., and Fuchs, E. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2543-2555 |
| 15. | Kannan, P., Buettner, R., Chiao, P. J., Yim, S. O., Sarkiss, M., and Tainsky, M. A. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 1258-1269 |
| 16. | Bosher, J. M., Williams, T., and Hurst, H. C. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 744-747 |
| 17. | Turner, B. C., Zhang, J., Gumbs, A. A., Maher, M. G., Kaplan, L., Cater, D., Glazer, P. M., Hurst, H. C., Haffty, B. G., and Williams, T. (1998) Cancer Res. 58, 5466-5472 |
| 18. | Grether-Beck, S., Buettner, R., and Krutmann, J. (1997) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 378, 1231-1236 |
| 19. | Gaubatz, S., Imhof, A., Dosch, R., Werner, O., Mitchell, P. J., Buettner, R., and Eilers, M. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1508-1519 |
| 20. | Bauer, R., Pscherer, A., Imhof, A., Moser, M., Kopp, H., Seegers, S., Kerscher, M., Tainsky, M. A., Hofstaedter, F., and Buettner, R. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1413-1420 |
| 21. | Imhof, A., Schuierer, M., Werner, O., Moser, M., Roth, C., Bauer, R., and Buettner, R. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 194-204 |
| 22. | Roth, C., Schuierer, M., Günther, K., and Buettner, R. (2000) Genomics 63, 384-390 |
| 23. | Harlow, E., Franza, B. R., and Schley, C. (1985) J. Virol. 55, 533-546 |
| 24. | Hardy, S., and Shenk, T. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 4495-4506 |
| 25. | Schaeper, U., Boyd, J. M., Verma, S., Uhlmann, E., Subramanian, T., and Chinnadurai, G. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 10467-10471 |
| 26. | Sewalt, R. G. A. B., Gunster, M. J., Van der Vlag, J., Satijn, D. P. E., and Otte, A. P. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 777-787 |
| 27. | Schaeper, U., Subramanian, T., Lim, L., Boyd, J. M., and Chinnadurai, G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8549-8552 |
| 28. | Turner, J., and Crossley, M. (1999) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 1169-1174 |
| 29. | Furusawa, T., Moribe, H., Kondoh, H., and Higashi, Y. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8581-8590 |
| 30. | Sundqvist, A., Sollerbrant, K., and Svensson, C. (1998) FEBS Lett. 429, 183-188 |
| 31. | Molloy, D. P., Milner, A. E., Yakub, I. K., Chinnadurai, G., Gallimore, P. H., and Grand, R. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20867-20876 |
| 32. | Lin, H. J., Eviner, V., Prendergast, G. C., and White, E. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4536-4544 |
| 33. | Lowe, S. W., and Ruley, H. E. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 535-545 |
| 34. | Hilger-Eversheim, K., Moser, M., Schorle, H., and Buettner, R. (2000) Gene 260, 1-12 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Zhou, L. McPherson, D. Feng, A. Song, C. Dong, S.-C. Lyu, L. Zhou, X. Shi, Y.-T. Ahn, D. Wang, et al. Kruppel-Like Transcription Factor 13 Regulates T Lymphocyte Survival In Vivo J. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 178(9): 5496 - 5504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Turner, H. Nicholas, D. Bishop, J. M. Matthews, and M. Crossley The LIM Protein FHL3 Binds Basic Kruppel-like Factor/Kruppel-like Factor 3 and Its Co-repressor C-terminal-binding Protein 2 J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 12786 - 12795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Poser, M. Golob, M. Weidner, R. Buettner, and A. K. Bosserhoff Down-Regulation of COOH-Terminal Binding Protein Expression in Malignant Melanomas Leads to Induction of MIA Expression Cancer Res., October 15, 2002; 62(20): 5962 - 5966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Bieker Kruppel-like Factors: Three Fingers in Many Pies J. Biol. Chem., September 7, 2001; 276(37): 34355 - 34358. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |