![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 30, 28075-28082, July 27, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
,
¶
From the
Molecular Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering
Institute, New York, New York 10021 and the § Microbiology
and Immunology Department, Weill Medical College of Cornell University,
New York, New York 10021
Received for publication, March 9, 2001, and in revised form, May 11, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of
elongating RNA polymerase II serves as a landing pad for macromolecular
assemblies that regulate mRNA synthesis and processing. The capping
apparatus is the first of the assemblies to act on the nascent
pre-mRNA and the one for which binding of the catalytic components
is most clearly dependent on CTD phosphorylation. The present study
highlights a distinctive strategy of cap targeting in fission yeast
whereby the triphosphatase (Pct1) and guanylyltransferase (Pce1)
enzymes of the capping apparatus do not interact physically with each other (as they do in budding yeast and metazoans), but instead bind
independently to the phosphorylated CTD. In vivo
interactions of Pct1 and Pce1 with the CTD in a two-hybrid assay
require 12 and 14 tandem repeats of the CTD heptapeptide, respectively.
Pct1 and Pce1 bind in vitro to synthetic CTD peptides
containing phosphoserine uniquely at position 5 or doubly at positions
2 and 5 of each of four tandem YSPTSPS repeats, but they bind weakly
(Pce1) or not at all (Pct1) to a peptide containing phosphoserine at
position 2. These results illustrate how remodeling of the CTD
phosphorylation array might influence the recruitment and dissociation
of the capping enzymes during elongation. But how does the CTD
structure itself dictate interactions with the RNA processing enzymes
independent of the phosphorylation state? Using CTD-Ser5
phosphopeptides containing alanine substitutions at other positions of
the heptad, we define essential roles for Tyr-1 and Pro-3
(but not Thr-4 or Pro-6) in the binding of
Schizosaccharomyces pombe
guanylyltransferase. Tyr-1 is also essential for binding and allosteric
activation of mammalian guanylyltransferase by CTD
Ser5-PO4, whereas alanine mutations of Pro-3 and Pro-6
reduce the affinity for the allosteric CTD-binding site. These are the
first structure-activity relationships deduced for an effector function
of the phosphorylated CTD.
mRNA capping occurs co-transcriptionally by a series of three
enzymatic reactions in which the 5'-triphosphate terminus of the
pre-mRNA is cleaved to a diphosphate by RNA triphosphatase, then
capped with GMP by RNA guanylyltransferase, and methylated at the N-7
position of guanine by RNA (guanine-7) methyltransferase (1). Specific
targeting of cap formation to transcripts made by RNA polymerase II
(pol II)1 is achieved, at
least in part, through physical interactions of one or more components
of the capping apparatus with the phosphorylated carboxyl-terminal
domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of pol II (2-5). The CTD, which is
unique to pol II, is composed of a tandemly repeated heptad motif
(consensus sequence = YSPTSPS). The mammalian pol II large subunit
has 52 heptad repeats, the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces
pombe subunit has 29 repeats, and the budding yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae subunit has 27 copies (6). The CTD
undergoes a cycle of extensive phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of
Ser-5 and Ser-2, which is coordinated with the transcription cycle.
In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, the guanylyltransferase
(Ceg1) and methyltransferase (Abd1) components of the capping apparatus
bind independently in vitro and in vivo to the
phosphorylated CTD, but not to unphosphorylated CTD (2, 7). The
S. cerevisiae RNA triphosphatase Cet1 does not bind to the
CTD by itself (8), but it does bind to Ceg1 (9-11) and may thus be
escorted to the transcription complex together with Ceg1. The mammalian
capping enzyme Mce1 is a bifunctional polypeptide composed of an
NH2-terminal RNA triphosphatase domain linked to a
COOH-terminal guanylyltransferase domain. Mce1 binds to the pol II CTD
and this interaction also requires CTD phosphorylation (2, 5). The
guanylyltransferase domain Mce1(211-597) per se binds to
CTD-PO4, but the NH2-terminal triphosphatase
domain Mce1(1-210) does not (3, 12). Apparently, the covalent
connection between the mammalian guanylyltransferase and triphosphatase
domains allows the guanylyltransferase to deliver the triphosphatase to
the transcription elongation complex. The mammalian guanylyltransferase
can even deliver heterologous viral or fungal RNA triphosphatases
in vivo when they are fused to create chimeric capping
enzymes (13).
Recent studies indicate that the CTD and CTD phosphorylation play more
than mere architectural roles in coordinating mRNA synthesis and
processing (reviewed in Ref. 14). For example, the phosphorylated CTD
directly stimulates the catalytic activity of the mammalian RNA
guanylyltransferase (12, 15). The remarkable feature of the activation
of mammalian guanylyltransferase by the CTD is the requirement for
phosphoserine at position 5. The guanylyltransferase also binds to CTD
phosphorylated on Ser-2, but this interaction has no effect on enzyme
activity (12).
Deletion analyses of the pol II large subunit have shown that the
growth of fungal and metazoan cells is contingent on a minimal CTD
length. Mammalian cells cannot grow with 25 or fewer CTD heptad repeats, but are fully viable with 36 repeats (16). West and Corden
(17) found that truncating the S. cerevisiae CTD to 7 heptad
repeats was lethal, whereas deletions leaving 8 or 9 heptads elicited
cold-sensitive (cs) and temperature-sensitive
(ts) growth defects, and normal cell growth required at
least 10 integral copies of the heptad. A slightly higher threshold for
yeast CTD length was reported by Nonet et al. (18), whereby
less than 10 heptad repeat was lethal, 10 to 12 repeats resulted in
conditional phenotypes, and 13 or more repeats sustained normal growth.
Mutations that eliminate the hydroxyl moieties (potential phosphate
acceptors) on Tyr-1, Ser-2, or Ser-5 of the heptad sequence are lethal
to S. cerevisiae (17), but it is not clear if the loss of
CTD function in vivo is a direct consequence of a
perturbation of CTD structure (e.g. intra- or intermolecular
loss of hydrogen bonding interactions) or a secondary effect on CTD
phosphorylation state.
There is relatively little known about the fine structure of the CTD
and how such parameters as CTD length, amino acid sequence, and
phosphorylation arrays influence various CTD-PO4 effector functions. The interaction of the capping apparatus with the
phosphorylated CTD provides an attractive model system to address these
issues. Here we present an analysis of the interactions of the capping enzymes of the fission yeast S. pombe with the CTD of the
largest subunit of S. pombe pol II that highlights a new
strategy for independent recruitment of separately encoded
triphosphatase (Pct1) and guanylyltransferase (Pce1) components to the
pol II elongation complex. Analysis of the interaction of S. pombe and mammalian capping enzymes with mutated synthetic CTD
phosphopeptides illuminates for the first time the contributions of
conserved CTD side chains to CTD function independent of any effects on
CTD phosphorylation. This approach should be applicable to the study of
CTD-PO4 effector roles in other co-transcriptional RNA
transactions such as pre-mRNA splicing, polyadenylation, and
transcription termination.
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen--
The screen was performed using the
Matchmaker system from CLONTECH with protocols
specified by the vendor. The full-length PCT1 and
PCE1 genes were inserted into pAS2-1 (2µ TRP1)
so as to fuse them in-frame with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain
(BD). The BD-PCT1 and BD-PCE1 plasmids were
transformed into S. cerevisiae strain Y190. Trp+
isolates were selected and grown in 1-liter cultures SD( CTD Truncation Mutants--
Gene fragments encoding serially
truncated versions of S. pombe Rpb1 were generated by PCR
amplification using antisense primers that introduced stop codons in
lieu of the codons for amino acids 1687, 1669, 1648, 1634, 1592, or
1585 and a XhoI site immediately 3' of the stop codon. The
sense primer introduced a BamHI site at the codon for amino
acid 1516. The PCR products were digested with BamHI and
XhoI and then inserted into the two-hybrid AD fusion vector
pGAD-GH. Sequencing of the inserts in the resulting series of AD-Rbp1
plasmids verified that the truncated RPB1 genes were fused
in-frame to AD and that no unwanted coding changes had been introduced
during amplification and cloning.
Capping Enzymes--
S. pombe RNA triphosphatase Pct1
and mouse guanylyltransferase Mce1(211-597) were produced in E. coli as N-terminal His-tagged fusions and purified from soluble
bacterial lysates by nickel-agarose chromatography as described
previously (3, 20). The Mce1(211-597)-[32P]GMP
intermediate was prepared by reaction of 20 µg of Mce1(211-597) with
5 µM [
S. pombe RNA guanylyltransferase Pce1 was produced in
E. coli as a His-tagged fusion as follows. The pET-PCE1
plasmid (21) was modified by insertion of a DNA fragment encoding an
NH2-terminal 21-amino acid peptide (MGHHHHHHHHHHSSGHIEGRP)
in-frame with the open reading frame encoding the 402-amino acid Pce1
polypeptide. The pETHis-PCE1 plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). A 250-ml culture was grown at 37 °C in LB
medium containing 0.1 mg/ml ampicillin until the
A600 reached 0.5. The culture was adjusted to
0.4 mM isopropyl-1-thio- CTD Phosphopeptides--
NH2-terminal biotinylated
CTD phosphopeptides composed of 4 tandem YSPTSPS repeats containing
phosphoserine at position 2, position 5, or positions 2 plus 5 of each
repeat were synthesized and purified as described previously (12, 22).
Mutant Ser-5 phosphopeptides Y1A (ASPTSPS)4,
P3A (YSATSPS)4, T4A (YSPASPS)4, and P6A
(YSPSTAS)4 were synthesized and purified using the same methods. The molecular weights of the mutant phosphopeptides were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight
mass spectrometry. The measured masses were in agreement with the
calculated theoretical masses within the limits of calibration of the
instrument. The peptides were dissolved in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA and stored at 4 °C.
The biotinylated CTD peptides were absorbed to streptavidin-coated
magnetic beads (Dynabeads M280 streptavidin; Dynal) in binding buffer
(25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM dithiothreitol,
5% glycerol, 0.03% Triton X-100) containing 50 mM NaCl as
described previously (12). The amount of biotinylated CTD peptide was sufficient to saturate the bead-bound streptavidin. After peptide adsorption, the beads were washed three times with binding buffer to
remove any unbound peptide.
CTD Affinity Chromatography--
Affinity chromatography was
performed by mixing 14 µg (280 pmol) of Pce1, 9 µg (240 pmol) of
Pct1, or 4 µg (85 pmol) of Mce1(211-597) with 0.6 mg of CTD peptide
beads (estimated to contain 390 pmol of peptide) in 50 µl of binding
buffer with 50 mM NaCl. After incubation for 30 min on ice,
the beads were concentrated by microcentrifugation for 15 s and
then held in place with a magnet as the supernatant was withdrawn. The
beads were resuspended in 1 ml of binding buffer and subjected to two
cycles of concentration and washing. After the third wash, the beads
were resuspended in 50 µl of binding buffer. Aliquots (20 µl) of
the bead bound fraction were mixed with 4 µl of SDS sample buffer
(200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 8% SDS, 140 nM
S. pombe RNA Triphosphatase and RNA Guanylyltransferase do Not
Interact Physically--
The triphosphatase and guanylyltransferase
components of fungal capping systems have conserved catalytic domains
(1), but the enzymes are not always functionally interchangeable
in vivo. S. pombe and Candida albicans
guanylyltransferases can function in S. cerevisiae with the
endogenous Cet1 triphosphatase (21, 23), but the ability of
heterologous triphosphatases to function with the S. cerevisiae guanylyltransferase is variable and correlates with the
presence or absence of a conserved guanylyltransferase-binding domain
on the surface of the heterologous RNA triphosphatase (11, 24).
S. pombe triphosphatase Pct1 (a 303-amino acid polypeptide), which lacks the surface domain and does not function on its own in
S. cerevisiae, can support cell growth when S. pombe guanylyltransferase Pce1 (a 402-amino acid polypeptide) is
provided in trans (20). Thus, the fission yeast capping
components display a species-specific genetic interaction.
Given that the triphosphatase and guanylyltransferase components of the
capping apparatus are physically associated in budding yeast and
metazoans (with the interaction being noncovalent in S. cerevisiae and covalent in metazoans), the simplest model to account for the genetic interaction would be that S. pombe
triphosphatase Pct1 forms a complex with S. pombe
guanylyltransferase Pce1 and that Pce1, which binds in vitro
to CTD-PO4 (2), in turn chaperones the triphosphatase to
the transcription complex. To test this hypothesis, we asked whether a
mixture of recombinant Pct1 (a homodimer) and recombinant Pce1 (a
monomeric protein) resulted in the formation of a stable heteromeric
complex that could be isolated by velocity sedimentation using the
methods that readily detect formation of a complex between S. cerevisiae Cet1 and Ceg1 (10). We were unable to detect any
complex formation between the S. pombe Pct1 and Pce1 (not
shown). Next, we conducted a two-hybrid screen of a S. pombe
cDNA library linked to the Gal4 activation domain (AD) using as
"bait" either Pce1 or Pct1 fused to the Gal4 DNA-BD.
Although the screens yielded multiple interacting clones in each case
(see below), we did not isolate Pce1 or a fragment thereof using Pct1
as bait. Nor did we isolate Pct1 or a fragment thereof using Pce1 as
bait. To exclude the possibility of a false negative caused by absence
of the Pce1 or Pct1 genes from the S. pombe plasmid library, we performed a directed two-hybrid
interaction assay using an explicitly engineered pair of BD-Pce1 and
AD-Pct1 vectors. Here again, we saw no evidence of interaction between the S. pombe triphosphatase and guanylyltransferase (not
shown). Note that the S. cerevisiae and C. albicans triphosphatase and guanylyltransferase components display
two-hybrid interactions with one another (25).
S. pombe Triphosphatase and Guanylyltransferase Interact with S. pombe CTD in Vivo--
A two-hybrid screen of ~100,000 transformants
for triphosphatase-interacting proteins using BD-Pct1 as bait yielded
16 His+ isolates, of which 8 contained plasmids encoding AD
fused in-frame to a COOH-terminal fragment of Rpb1, the largest subunit
of S. pombe pol II (26). Three different AD-Rpb1
fusion clones were isolated: AD-Rpb1(1305-1752) was recovered twice;
AD-Rpb1(1324-1752) was recovered 5 times; and AD-Rpb1(1478-1752) was
isolated once (Fig. 1). Control
experiments showed that the His+ and
lacZ+ phenotypes required co-transformation with
BD-Pct1 and AD-Rpb1(1305-1752) plasmids and that neither fusion
plasmid was able to drive expression of the HIS3 or
lacZ reporter genes when co-transformed with the BD or AD
vectors (Fig. 2).
A two-hybrid screen of ~200,000 transformants for
guanylyltransferase-interacting proteins using BD-Pce1 as bait
yielded 11 His+ isolates. Sequencing of the AD plasmids
from these strains showed that 8 of the isolates encoded AD fused
in-frame to a COOH-terminal fragment of Rpb1 from residues 1324 to 1752 (Fig. 1). Control transformations confirmed that HIS3 and
lacZ expression required co-transformation with the BD-Pce1
and AD-Rpb1(1324-1752) plasmids (not shown).
Minimal CTD Length Required for Interaction with S. pombe Capping
Enzymes in Vivo--
The AD-Rpb1 fusions that interacted in
vivo with Pce1 or Pct1 contained all 29 tandem copies of the
heptad repeat plus a variable segment of the pol II subunit upstream of
the start of the CTD at position 1551 (26). To gauge the role of the
non-reiterated protein segment, we constructed an AD-Rpb1(1516-1752)
fusion clone and tested it in a directed two-hybrid assay paired with
BD-Pce1 and BD-Pct1. We found that the Rpb1 interaction with both
capping enzymes persisted when the AD fusion contained little more than the CTD repeats per se. Thus, subsequent COOH-terminal
truncations of the CTD were performed with the NH2-terminal
position of Rpb1 fixed at 1516 (Fig. 1).
The salient findings were that the CTD interaction with Pct1 persisted
with undiminished strength (as gauged by colony size during selection
for His+) with 19, 17, or 14 heptad repeats, with
diminished strength after truncation to 12 heptad repeats, and was
eliminated with 6 or fewer heptads (Fig. 1). The two-hybrid CTD
interaction with Pce1 displayed a more stringent requirement for CTD
length; the interaction was of diminished strength at between 19 and 14 heptad repeats and was abolished at 12 or fewer repeats (Fig. 1).
Binding of S. pombe Capping Enzymes to Defined Synthetic CTD
Phosphopeptides--
Previous CTD-binding studies in vitro
involving S. pombe guanylyltransferase employed an
immobilized ligand composed of recombinant GST-CTD that was
enzymatically phosphorylated in vitro using HeLa cell
extract as the source of CTD kinase. The fusion protein contained 15 copies of the YSPTSPS heptad sequence and an average of 3 serine-phosphates per GST-CTD polypeptide (2). We have since developed
synthetic CTD phosphopeptide ligands, in which the numbers and
positions of the phosphates are known and subject to manipulation, to
delineate the requirements for the interaction of capping enzymes with
the CTD (12). Here we employed 28-mer CTD peptide ligands composed of
four tandem repeats of the YSPTSPS heptad that contained phosphoserine at either position 2 or 5 of each heptad or phosphoserine at
both positions 2 and 5 of each heptad. An
NH2-terminal biotin moiety was added during chemical
synthesis so that the peptides could be linked to streptavidin-coated
beads for affinity chromatography purposes. The CTD
phosphopeptide-containing beads, or control beads containing an
unphosphorylated 28-mer CTD peptide, were incubated with purified
recombinant Pce1. The beads were recovered by centrifugation and washed
three times with buffer. The bead-bound material was eluted with 1%
SDS. The input guanylyltransferase protein (L) and the bead-bound
fractions were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The key findings were that
the S. pombe guanylyltransferase bound equally well to the
CTD Ser5-PO4 peptide and the
Ser2-PO4/Ser5-PO4 peptide. Slightly less than
one-fifth of the input protein was retained on the beads in both cases.
Pce1 bound less avidly to the CTD Ser2-PO4 peptide. The
binding was specific for CTD-PO4, because Pce1 did not bind
at all to the beads containing the unphosphorylated CTD peptide (Fig.
3A). Potential effects of the
CTD Ser2-PO4/Ser5-PO4 peptide on Pce1 activity
were gauged by preincubating recombinant Pce1 with increasing amounts
of the peptide (up to 120-fold molar excess of peptide over Pce1) and
then assaying the mixtures for enzyme-GMP complex formation during a
reaction in vitro with [
The novel finding was that the recombinant S. pombe RNA
triphosphatase by itself bound specifically to CTD peptides
phosphorylated on Ser-5 and not to the unphosphorylated peptide or the
Ser2-PO4 peptide (Fig. 3B). Pct1 bound more
avidly to the doubly phosphorylated Ser2-PO4/Ser5-PO4 peptide (~5% of input
protein retained on the bead) compared with the Ser5-PO4 peptide.
These experiments show that: (i) S. pombe
guanylyltransferase and RNA triphosphatase bind independently to
CTD-PO4; (ii) four heptad repeats suffice for binding; and
(iii) the affinities of Pce1 and Pct1 for the CTD are affected by the
site of serine phosphorylation (2 versus 5) or the
complexity of the phosphorylation array (5 versus 2 plus 5).
Thus, the S. pombe capping system is so far unique in that
the triphosphatase component has an intrinsic capacity to recognize the
CTD-PO4 independent of the guanylyltransferase.
Role of CTD-PO4 Primary Structure in Binding of S. pombe Capping Enzymes--
Pct1 and Pce1 both require serine
phosphorylation to bind to the CTD in vitro; hence, we
surmise that the true interacting partner in the in vivo
two-hybrid assay is an AD-Rpb1 fusion protein that has been
phosphorylated by one or more of the CTD kinases resident in S. cerevisiae. Thus, it is possible that the observed requirement for
at least 12 or 14 heptad repeats for a two-hybrid interaction of the
CTD with Pct1 or Pce1 in vivo (these values being much
greater than the 4 repeats sufficient for detection of the interactions
in vitro) is reflective of the CTD length requirements for
attaining the proper phosphorylation array(s) to which the capping
enzymes can bind. This scenario highlights the inherent limitations to
structure-function analyses of phosphorylation-dependent CTD interactions in vivo: (i) the true structure of the
CTD-PO4 ligand in the cell is not readily ascertained; (ii)
effects of CTD mutations on the biological readout can be caused
indirectly by affecting CTD phosphorylation by
cyclin-dependent protein kinases or dephosphorylation by
CTD phosphatases; and (iii) it is difficult to distinguish effects on
phosphorylation dynamics from phosphorylation-independent alterations
in CTD structure that influence ligand binding.
To circumvent these limitations and establish clear structure-activity
relationships for CTD binding to the S. pombe
guanylyltransferase, we used mutated versions of the synthetic 28-mer
CTD Ser5-PO4 peptides in which Tyr-1, Pro-3, Thr-4, or
Pro-6 were replaced by alanine in each of the four tandem heptad
repeats. The Y1A and P3A mutations abolished Pce1 binding to the CTD
Ser5-PO4 peptide immobilized on streptavidin beads, whereas
the T4A and P6A mutations were without significant effect (Fig.
4A). Thus, Tyr-1 and Pro-3 are
critical for Pce1 binding independent of any possible effects on
phosphorylation, which is not a variable in this experiment. The lack
of a requirement for the Pro-6 side chain for Pce1 binding to
phosphorylated CTD is an instructive finding that would be difficult to
establish without using a chemically synthesized Ser5-PO4
CTD ligand, because the conserved proline at position 6 is a component
of the Ser-Pro specificity determinant for the cyclin-dependent kinases that catalyze the enzymatic
phosphorylation of the CTD on the neighboring Ser-5.
An analysis of the binding of S. pombe triphosphatase to the
WT and mutant 28-mer CTD Ser5-PO4 peptides is shown in Fig.
4B. The Y1A, P3A, and P6A mutations abolished Pct1 binding,
whereas the T4A mutation had no adverse effect.
Role of CTD Structure in Binding and Activation of Mammalian
Guanylyltransferase--
We showed previously that phosphorylation of
either Ser-2 or Ser-5 within the synthetic (YSPTSPS)4
ligand was sufficient for the CTD to bind the guanylyltransferase
domain of mammalian capping enzyme, but that stimulation of
guanylyltransferase activity was a unique property of CTD
Ser5-PO4 (12). Moreover, because stimulation of enzyme-GMP
complex formation by the CTD Ser5-PO4 peptide was undiminished by an excess of the CTD Ser2-PO4 peptide, it
was proposed that the mammalian capping enzyme has two binding sites for CTD-PO4: an allosteric activator site that is specific
for the Ser-5 phosphopeptide and a second binding site that accepts the
Ser-2 phosphopeptide. This model raises the question of whether phosphorylation of both Ser-2 and Ser-5 would alter the interactions of
the CTD with mammalian guanylyltransferase.
We compared the binding of Mce1(211-597) to a series of 28-mer
synthetic CTD peptides containing either Ser5-PO4,
Ser2-PO4 plus Ser5-PO4, or no phosphates. To
facilitate quantitation of guanylyltransferase binding to the
immobilized peptides, we mixed the recombinant Mce1(211-597) protein
with an aliquot of the covalent Mce1(211-597)-[32P]GMP
intermediate that had been isolated by gel filtration. The radiolabeled
species comprised ~5% of protein applied to the CTD peptide beads.
Analysis of the total guanylyltransferase by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie
Blue staining indicated that the enzyme bound better to the
Ser2-PO4/Ser5-PO4 peptide than to the
Ser5-PO4 peptide and there was only trace binding to the
unphosphorylated CTD peptide (Fig.
5A). Analysis of the bound
Mce1(211-597)-[32P]GMP intermediate by SDS-PAGE and
scanning with a PhosphorImager confirmed these results (Fig.
5B).
In a separate experiment, we tested the effects of the CTD
phosphopeptides on guanylyltransferase activity (Fig.
6). Mce1(211-597) was preincubated on
ice with increasing concentrations of the Ser2-PO4/Ser5-PO4 or Ser5-PO4
peptides and aliquots of the mixtures were then assayed for enzyme-GMP
complex formation. We found that formation of the enzyme-GMP complex
was stimulated 2.5-fold by either CTD phosphopeptide. The dependence of
the extent of stimulation on peptide concentration was similar for the
Ser2-PO4/Ser5-PO4 and Ser5-PO4
ligands. Stimulation was maximal at 2.5 µM peptide (Fig.
6) and increasing the peptide concentration to 5 µM
elicited no further stimulation (not shown). Half-maximal stimulation
was attained at peptide concentrations of 0.2 to 0.3 µM
(with guanylyltransferase concentration being 0.1 µM). We
conclude that the guanylyltransferase activation function of Ser-5
phosphorylation is "dominant" over the non-activating Ser-2
phosphorylation and that the putative allosteric site on the mammalian
guanylyltransferase does not discriminate significantly between the
Ser-2/Ser-5 and Ser-5 phosphorylation arrays.
The effects of position-specific alanine substitutions within the four
heptad repeats of the CTD Ser5-PO4 peptide on binding to
the mammalian guanylyltransferase are shown in Fig. 5. Whereas changing
Thr-4 to alanine had no effect, the introduction of alanine in lieu of
Tyr-1 virtually abolished the affinity of CTD Ser5-PO4 for
the guanylyltransferase. Changing either Pro-3 or Pro-6 to alanine
reduced the extents of capping enzyme binding to about one-third of
that seen with the wild type CTD Ser5-PO4 ligand. The
effects of the alanine substitutions on the stimulation of enzyme-GMP
adduct formation by CTD Ser5-PO4 paralleled the effects on
enzyme binding. The T4A peptide was as effective an activator as the
wild type peptide, as gauged by the extent of activation (2.5-fold at
2.5 µM T4A peptide) and the concentration dependence of
stimulation (half-maximal at 0.3 µM T4A peptide) (Fig.
6). The Y1A mutant peptide, which did not bind to Mce1(211-597), also failed to stimulate the guanylyltransferase activity at concentrations up to 5 µM Y1A (Fig. 6 and data not shown). The P3A and
P6A mutants, which displayed intermediate binding in the affinity
chromatography assay, also showed diminished affinity for the
allosteric effector site on Mce1(211-597), as revealed by the shifts
to the right in their respective activation profiles; the
guanylyltransferase activity at 2.5 µM P3A or P6A was
less than half of that at the equivalent level of the wild-type peptide
(Fig. 6). Raising the P3A and P6A concentrations to 5 µM
elicited a further increase in the guanylyltransferase activity (not
shown), to about the levels achieved at 0.6 and 0.4 µM of
the wild-type CTD Ser5-PO4 peptide. We estimate the P3A and
P6A mutations diminish affinity for the allosteric site by factors of
about 8 and 10, respectively.
Independent Recruitment of S. pombe Triphosphatase and
Guanylyltransferase to the Transcription Elongation Complex--
The
present study highlights a distinctive strategy of cap targeting in
fission yeast whereby the triphosphatase and guanylyltransferase components of the capping apparatus do not interact physically with
each other (as they do in budding yeast and metazoans), but instead
bind independently to the phosphorylated CTD. The capacity of S. pombe RNA triphosphatase to bind to the CTD in vivo and in vitro contrasts with apparent inability to detect direct
interactions of the S. cerevisiae or mammalian
triphosphatases with the CTD (8, 12). How then to explain the observed
genetic interaction of S. pombe Pct1 with Pce1 for
functional complementation of cap formation in S. cerevisiae? Recent studies suggest that the essential interaction
in trans between the S. cerevisiae
guanylyltransferase Ceg1 and triphosphatase Cet1 confers important
functional advantages on Ceg1, by antagonizing negative effects of
CTD-PO4 binding on the guanylyltransferase activity of Ceg1
(8) or by protecting the inherently labile Ceg1 protein against thermal
inactivation at physiological
temperatures.2 Because the
S. pombe triphosphatase Pct1 lacks the high-affinity Ceg1-binding domain responsible for these salutary effects on Ceg1
function (11), it is most likely that the loss of Ceg1 function is
responsible for the failure of Pct1 by itself to complement the
cet1 Importance of CTD Length and Phosphorylation Array for CTD Effector
Functions--
The observation of a minimal CTD length for
interactions with S. pombe Pct1 in vivo, with
partial phenotypes at the immediate supra-threshold repeat lengths, and
"normal" interactions with about half of the full-sized S. pombe CTD, mirrors to a considerable degree the overall pattern of
CTD length effects on yeast cell growth (17, 18). The threshold length
for the CTD two-hybrid interactions with S. pombe Pce1 is
shifted upward by several heptad repeats compared with the requirements
for S. cerevisiae cell growth. To our knowledge, the effects
on fine incremental changes in CTD length in S. pombe Rpb1
on the growth of S. pombe have not been reported.
Nevertheless, it is reasonable to think that at least some of the
limitations on cell growth that accompany CTD truncation pertain to
disruption of key contacts with the capping apparatus. Suppression
analysis of CTD deletions in S. cerevisiae point clearly
to interactions with the Srb complex as a limiting determinant of CTD
function during transcription initiation (27). Yet, the finding that
sublethal CTD truncations exacerbate the phenotypes of S. cerevisiae ceg1-ts mutants (4) argues that capping enzyme
recruitment during elongation can also be limiting for cell growth.
The higher CTD length requirements for capping enzyme interactions
in vivo in a two-hybrid assay versus in
vitro with synthetic CTD phosphopeptides suggest that CTD length
effects on CTD phosphorylation may influence the in vivo
readout. It is also possible that the accessibility of the CTD to the
capping enzymes in vivo in the two-hybrid assay is affected
by the presence of additional proteins and macromolecular assemblies
that compete for binding sites on the CTD, with the result being that a
longer CTD is needed for the two-hybrid interactions with the capping enzymes.
Truncation of the mammalian pol II CTD to a length of only 5 heptad
repeats leads to a significant reduction in the efficiency of mRNA
capping in mammalian cells (2). Given the high affinity of the
mammalian capping enzyme for CTD Ser5-PO4 or
Ser2-PO4/Ser5-PO4 peptides containing 4 heptad
repeats, and the fact that Mce1 binds, albeit with lower affinity, to a
CTD Ser5-PO4 peptide containing only two heptads (12), it
is again possible that the in vivo length restriction on
CTD-directed mammalian capping reflects requirements to attain an
adequate CTD phosphorylation array. Indeed, the Cdk7-cyclin
H-p36 complex preferentially phosphorylates longer CTD
substrates with multiple YSPTSPS repeats (28). However, it is also
possible that the accessibility of the truncated CTD in vivo
in the context of the mammalian transcription elongation complex is
limited by the structure of RNA polymerase II per se, the
presence of protein factors associated with the polymerase (although
not necessarily with the CTD), and the competition among CTD-binding
proteins for the shortened CTD.
Ser-5 and Ser-2 are both extensively phosphorylated in vivo
and various CTD serine kinases differ in their site preference (29-31). Here we found that binding of the S. pombe
triphosphatase to the CTD is enhanced when both Ser-2 and
Ser-5 are phosphorylated compared with Ser-5 phosphorylation alone. A
similar enhancement of binding to the doubly phosphorylated CTD
versus singly phosphorylated CTD was reported for the cap
methyltransferase of C. albicans (22). However, Ser-2
phosphorylation did not significantly affect the binding of S. pombe Pce1 to the Ser5-PO4 CTD and we saw only a
modest increase in binding of the mammalian guanylyltransferase to the
doubly phosphorylated CTD, with no increase in the amplitude of the
allosteric CTD Ser5-PO4 effect.
We show here that the S. pombe capping enzymes Pct1 and Pce1
can discriminate between Ser2-PO4 and Ser5-PO4
CTD ligands containing the identical number of heptads and phosphate
moieties; Pct1 did not bind at all to the CTD phosphorylated on Ser-2
under the conditions tested, whereas Pce1 bound less avidly to the
Ser2-PO4 CTD than to the Ser5-PO4 form.
Functional distinctions between the Ser-2 and Ser-5 positions had been
suggested previously by the identification of extragenic suppressors of
S2A mutations of the CTD heptad and the finding that they are incapable
of suppressing S5A mutations (32) and by the disparate allosteric
effects of Ser-2 and Ser-5 phosphorylation on the mammalian
guanylyltransferase (12). It is conceivable that the differences
between the Ser-2 and Ser-5 phosphorylation arrays with respect to CTD
interactions with capping enzymes would be less marked if the number of
Ser2-PO4 heptad repeats was increased significantly. The
technical problems of synthesizing and isolating a defined homogeneous
CTD phosphopeptide of, for example, 10 or more heptad repeats with an
identical phosphorylation site in each heptad hamper an evaluation of
this scenario.
Dissecting the Importance of CTD Primary Structure for
CTD-PO4 Effector Functions--
The CTD of elongating pol
II serves as a landing pad for multiple macromolecular assemblies that
regulate mRNA synthesis and processing (14). The capping apparatus
is the first of the assemblies to act on the nascent pre-mRNA and
the one for which binding of the catalytic components is most clearly
dependent on CTD phosphorylation. Dynamic remodeling of the CTD
phosphate array in the elongation complex by kinases and phosphatases
can thereby influence the efficiency and timing of capping and the
dissociation of the capping enzymes from the elongation complex (7,
33). But how does the CTD structure itself dictate interactions with
the RNA modifying enzymes independent of the phosphorylation state?
Using mutated versions of the CTD Ser5-PO4 peptide, we
uncovered structure-activity relationships for the non-phosphorylated
side chains in CTD-PO4 interactions with fission yeast and
mammalian capping enzymes.
First, we established that the Thr-4 side chain plays no apparent role
in Pce1, Pct1, or Mce1 binding and is not critical for Mce1 activation.
These results are remarkable given that the threonine side chain is
present in 44 of 52 repeats of the mammalian CTD and 26 of 29 repeats
of S. pombe CTD, but they are consistent with the recent
report that S. cerevisiae is viable when every one of the
Thr-4 positions in its CTD was replaced by alanine (34).
Second, we showed that Tyr-1 is essential for the interaction of the
phosphorylated CTD with Pce1, Pct1, and Mce1. It had been established
previously that Tyr-1 was essential for S. cerevisiae growth (17), but it was not clear if Tyr-1 mutations were lethal because: (i) they prevent tyrosine phosphorylation, (ii) Tyr-1 is
important for serine phosphorylation, or (iii) Tyr-1 is critical for
one or more essential CTD interactions independent of confounding phosphorylation effects. The experiments herein do not bear on the
first two issues, but our data are consistent with the third scenario.
Although binding to Pce1, Pct1, and Mce1 was affected by the Y1A
change, we cannot infer whether the loss of function was caused by an
intramolecular perturbation of CTD-PO4 structure or the
loss of a key intermolecular contact between Tyr-1 and the
CTD-PO4-binding site on the capping enzymes. Tyr-1 is
present in all of the 52 heptad repeats of the mammalian CTD and in all 29 repeats of the S. pombe CTD.
Third, we find that alanine substitution for Pro-3 had a more severe
impact on interaction with Pce1 and Pct1 (elimination of detectable
binding) than it did on Mce1 (reduced affinity in binding and
activation). Conversely, the P6A mutation affected binding and
activation of Mce1, but had little impact on Pce1 binding, while
eliminating binding of Pct1. These results indicate that the structural
basis for interaction with the phosphorylated CTD is at least somewhat
variable between capping enzymes from different species. We
anticipate that synthetic phosphopeptides containing defined
modifications will provide powerful tools to dissect the structural
requirements for recognition of the phosphorylated CTD by other RNA
processing enzymes and macromolecular complexes.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Trp) medium.
The cells were harvested and transformed by the LiCl method with an
S. pombe cDNA library in a GAL4 activation
domain (AD) fusion plasmid (2µ LEU2) (19). The
transformant pool was selected directly for HIS3 reporter
expression by plating on SD(-Trp, -Leu, -His) agar containing 25 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole. The total number of
transformants screened was estimated by plating an aliquot of the pool
on SD(-Trp, -Leu) agar. The His+ colonies were selected
after incubation for 3 to 7 days at 30 °C, then patched and
restreaked on SD(-Trp, -Leu, -His, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole) agar. Single
colonies that retested for His+ were patched and tested for
lacZ reporter expression using the
-galactosidase
colony-lift filter assay. DNA recovered from the strains that tested
positive for both HIS3 and lacZ expression was
used as the template for PCR amplification of the S. pombe DNA insert with flanking primers specific for the AD-fusion plasmid. The PCR products were gel-purified and then sequenced. The AD plasmid
clones were recovered after transformation into Escherichia coli DH5
.
-32P]GTP and 2.5 mM
MgCl2 for 30 min at 30 °C. The reaction mixture was
adjusted to 25 mM EDTA and 10% glycerol and the native
enzyme-GMP intermediate resolved from free [32P]GTP by
gel filtration through a 1-ml column of Sephadex G-50.
-D-galactopyranoside
and 2% ethanol and incubation was continued for 20 h at 17 °C.
Cells were harvested by centrifugation and stored at
80 °C. All
subsequent procedures were performed at 4 °C. Thawed bacteria were
resuspended in 25 ml of buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol). Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
and lysozyme were added to final concentrations of 300 µM
and 100 µg/ml, respectively. After incubation on ice for 30 min,
Triton X-100 was added to a final concentration of 0.1% and the lysate
was sonicated to reduce viscosity. Insoluble material was removed by
centrifugation for 45 min at 18,000 rpm in a Sorvall SS34 rotor. The
soluble extract was mixed for 30 min with 1 ml of
Ni2+-NTA-agarose (Qiagen) that had been equilibrated with
buffer A containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 25 mM imidazole.
The slurry was poured into a column and the resin was washed with 10 ml
of buffer A containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 50 mM
imidazole. Pce1 was then step-eluted with 250 mM imidazole
in buffer A. The enzyme preparation (7 mg of protein) was dialyzed
against buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5% glycerol, 0.03% Triton X-100, and stored at
80 °C. The protein
concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad dye-binding method with
bovine serum albumin as the standard.
-mercaptoethanol, 40% glycerol), heated at 90 °C for 3-5 min,
and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
S. pombe capping enzymes interact
with the Rpb1 CTD in vivo. Plasmids encoding the
indicated AD-Rpb1 fusions were transformed into S. cerevisiae Y190 cells bearing the BD-PCE1 or BD-PCT1 plasmid. The
limits of the Rpb1 polypeptide segment of the fusion protein are
indicated and drawn to scale as horizontal lines. The CTD
heptad repeats are depicted as vertical bars. The AD-Rpb1
fusions that were recovered in the two-hybrid screen of the S. pombe cDNA library are indicated by check marks. Other
derivatives were engineered by PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis.
Single Trp+ Leu+ isolates were selected and
streaked on SD(-Trp, -Leu, -His, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole) agar medium to
test for HIS3 expression. Robust growth on selective medium
was scored as ++ (see Fig. 2A). Strains that grew no better
than the DB-PCT1 plus AD control (see Fig. 2A) were scored
as minus (
). Intermediate levels of growth were scored as + or ± on the basis of His+ colony size.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Specificity of the Pct1-CTD two-hybrid
interaction. The BD-Pct1 and AD-Rpb1(1305-1752) fusion plasmids
and the BD and AD vectors without inserts were transformed pairwise
into S. cerevisiae Y190. Panel A, single
Trp+ Leu+ isolates containing the indicated
plasmid pairs were selected and streaked on SD(-Trp, -Leu, -His,
3-amino-1,2,4-triazole) agar medium. The plate was photographed after
incubation for 5 days at 30 °C. Panel B, Trp+
Leu+ isolates containing the indicated plasmid pairs were
patched on SD(-Trp, -Leu) agar medium. The cell patches were
photographed after incubation for 1 day at 30 °C
(Growth). The cell patches were then tested for
-galactosidase activity using the colony-lift filter assay. A
photograph of the filter is shown (lacZ).
-32P]GTP. The
phosphopeptide had no significant stimulatory or inhibitory effect on
Pce1 activity (not shown).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Binding of S. pombe capping
enzymes to the phosphorylated CTD. A, the CTD peptide
with 4 tandem heptad repeats is shown. An NH2-terminal
biotin anchors the peptide to a streptavidin-coated magnetic bead.
Aliquots of Pce1 (14 µg) (panel A) and Pct1 (9 µg)
(panel B) were subjected to CTD affinity chromatography
using beads with immobilized CTD peptides: either unphosphorylated (
)
or phosphorylated at Ser-2, Ser-5, or Ser-2 + Ser-5 of each heptad
repeat. Aliquots comprising 8% of the input Pce1 or 4% of the input
Pct1 (L) and 40% of the CTD-bound SDS eluate fractions were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and the polypeptides were visualized by staining
with Coomassie Blue dye.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effects of alanine mutations on binding of
the S. pombe guanylyltransferase to CTD
Ser5-PO4. The wild-type (WT) CTD peptide
with 4 tandem heptad repeats containing phosphoserine at position 5 is
shown. An NH2-terminal biotin anchors the peptide to a
streptavidin-coated magnetic bead. Aliquots of Pce1 (14 µg)
(panel A) or Pct1 (15 µg) (panel B) were
subjected to affinity chromatography using beads with immobilized WT
CTD Ser5-PO4 peptide or the indicated mutant peptide.
Aliquots comprising 40% of the bead-bound fraction were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and the polypeptides were visualized by staining with
Coomassie Blue dye.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effects of alanine mutations on binding of
the mammalian guanylyltransferase to CTD Ser5-PO4.
Aliquots of the mammalian guanylyltransferase (a mixture of 4 µg of
the recombinant Mce1(211-597) protein plus 0.2 µg of the isolated
Mce1(211-597)-[32P]GMP intermediate) were subjected to
affinity chromatography using beads with immobilized CTD peptides
consisting of 4 heptad repeats: either unphosphorylated
(CTD), phosphorylated at Ser-5 (CTD
Ser5-PO4), or phosphorylated at Ser-2 plus Ser-5
(2 + 5). Aliquots comprising 40% of the input enzyme
(L) and 40% of the bead-bound SDS eluate fraction were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and the Mce1(211-597) polypeptides were
visualized by staining with Coomassie Blue dye (panel A).
Aliquots comprising 10% of the bead-bound SDS eluate fraction were
resolved by SDS-PAGE and the signal intensities (PSL) of the
bound Mce1(211-597)-[32P]GMP complexes were quantitated
by scanning the gel with a PhosphorImager (panel B).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effects of alanine mutations on stimulation
of the guanylyltransferase activity of mammalian capping enzyme by CTD
Ser5-PO4. Mce1(211-597) (20 pmol) was preincubated
for 15 min on ice with 0, 63, 125, 250, 500, or 1000 pmol of the
indicated CTD phosphopeptides in 10 µl of binding buffer containing
25 mM NaCl. An aliquot (1 µl) of each mixture was then
assayed for enzyme-GMP complex formation in a reaction mixture (20 µl) containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2 mM
dithiothreitol, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.17 µM [
-32P]GTP. The reactions were
quenched with SDS after incubation for 10 min at 37 °C and the
products were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The signal intensities of the
Mce1(211-597)-[32P]GMP complexes were quantitated by
scanning the dried gel with a PhosphorImager and then normalized to
that of the no CTD control reaction (defined as 1.0). The fold
stimulation is plotted as a function of the final concentration of
peptide in the guanylyltransferase reaction, which contained 0.1 µM Mce1(211-597). The data shown are averages of three
independent experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
mutation. However, co-expression of Pct1 with Pce1, which is inherently thermostable2 and is not inhibited by
CTD-PO4 (present study), circumvents the need for a
Ceg1-binding domain on the triphosphatase and allows functional
complementation of the first step of capping by Pct1.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank San San Yi for expert peptide synthesis and Julie Cooper for the S. pombe AD-cDNA library.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM52470.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 212-717-3623; E-mail: s-shuman@ski.mskcc.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 31, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102170200
2 S. Hausmann, C. K. Ho, and S. Shuman, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: pol II, polymerase II; CTD, carboxyl-terminal domain; BD, binding domain; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Shuman, S. (2000) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 66, 1-40 |
| 2. | McCracken, S., Fong, N., Rosonina, E., Yankulov, K., Brothers, G., Siderovski, D., Hessel, A., Foster, S., Shuman, S., and Bentley, D. L. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3306-3318 |
| 3. | Ho, C. K., Sriskanda, V., McCracken, S., Bentley, D., Schwer, B., and Shuman, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9577-9585 |
| 4. | Cho, E., Takagi, T., Moore, C. R., and Buratowski, S. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3319-3326 |
| 5. | Yue, Z., Maldonado, E., Pillutla, R., Cho, H., Reinberg, D., and Shatkin, A. J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 12898-12903 |
| 6. | Dahmus, M. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19009-19012 |
| 7. | Schroeder, S., Schwer, B., Shuman, S., and Bentley, D. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 2435-2440 |
| 8. | Cho, E., Rodriguez, C. R., Takagi, T., and Buratowski, S. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 3482-3487 |
| 9. | Ho, C. K., Schwer, B., and Shuman, S. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5189-5198 |
| 10. | Lehman, K., Schwer, B., Ho, C. K., Rouzankina, I., and Shuman, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22668-22678 |
| 11. | Ho, C. K., Lehman, K., and Shuman, S. (1999) Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 4671-4678 |
| 12. | Ho, C. K., and Shuman, S. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 405-411 |
| 13. | Ho, C. K., Martins, A., and Shuman, S. (2000) J. Virol. 74, 5486-5494 |
| 14. | Hirose, Y., and Manley, J. L. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 1415-1429 |
| 15. | Wen, Y., and Shatkin, A. J. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1774-1779 |
| 16. | Bartolomei, M. S., Halden, N. F., Cullen, C. R., and Corden, J. L. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 330-339 |
| 17. | West, M. L., and Corden, J. L. (1995) Genetics 140, 1223-1233 |
| 18. | Nonet, M., Sweetser, D., and Young, R. A. (1987) Cell 50, 909-915 |
| 19. | Cooper, J. P., Nimmo, E. R., Allshire, R. C., and Cech, T. R. (1997) Nature 385, 744-747 |
| 20. | Pei, Y., Schwer, B., Hausmann, S., and Shuman, S. (2001) Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 387-396 |
| 21. | Shuman, S., Liu, Y., and Schwer, B. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 12046-12050 |
| 22. | Schwer, B., Lehman, K., Saha, N., and Shuman, S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1857-1864 |
| 23. | Yamada-Okabe, T., Shimmi, O., Doi, R., Mizumoto, K., Arisawa, M., and Yamada-Okabe, H. (1996) Microbiology 142, 2515-2523 |
| 24. | Lima, C. D., Wang, L. K., and Shuman, S. (1999) Cell 99, 533-543 |
| 25. | Yamada-Okabe, T., Mio, T., Matsui, M., Kashima, Y., Arisawa, M., and Yamada-Okabe, H. (1998) FEBS Lett. 435, 49-54 |
| 26. | Azuma, Y., Yamagashi, M., Ueshima, R., and Ishihama, A. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 461-468 |
| 27. | Thompson, C. M., Koleske, A. J., Chao, D. M., and Young, R. A. (1993) Cell 73, 1361-1375 |
| 28. | Rickert, P., Corden, J. L., and Lees, E. (1999) Oncogene 18, 1093-1102 |
| 29. | Gebara, M. M., Sayre, M. H., and Corden, J. L. (1997) J. Cell. Biochem. 64, 390-402 |
| 30. | Patturajan, M., Schulte, R. J., Sefton, B. M., Berezney, R., Vincent, M., Bensaude, O., Warren, S. L., and Corden, J. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4689-4694 |
| 31. | Zhou, M., Halanski, M. A., Radonovich, M. F., Kashanchi, F., Peng, J., Price, D. H., and Brady, J. N. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 5077-5086 |
| 32. | Yuryev, A., and Corden, J. L. (1996) Genetics 143, 661-671 |
| 33. | Komarnitsky, P., Cho, E. J., and Buratowski, S. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 2452-2460 |
| 34. | Stiller, J. W., McConaughy, B. L., and Hall, B. D. (2000) Yeast 16, 57-64 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Liu, A. L. Greenleaf, and J. W. Stiller The Essential Sequence Elements Required for RNAP II Carboxyl-terminal Domain Function in Yeast and Their Evolutionary Conservation Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2008; 25(4): 719 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Chapman, M. Heidemann, T. K. Albert, R. Mailhammer, A. Flatley, M. Meisterernst, E. Kremmer, and D. Eick Transcribing RNA Polymerase II Is Phosphorylated at CTD Residue Serine-7 Science, December 14, 2007; 318(5857): 1780 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Pei, H. Du, J. Singer, C. St. Amour, S. Granitto, S. Shuman, and R. P. Fisher Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 9 (Cdk9) of Fission Yeast Is Activated by the CDK-Activating Kinase Csk1, Overlaps Functionally with the TFIIH-Associated Kinase Mcs6, and Associates with the mRNA Cap Methyltransferase Pcm1 In Vivo Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2006; 26(3): 777 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hausmann, H. Koiwa, S. Krishnamurthy, M. Hampsey, and S. Shuman Different Strategies for Carboxyl-terminal Domain (CTD) Recognition by Serine 5-specific CTD Phosphatases J. Biol. Chem., November 11, 2005; 280(45): 37681 - 37688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Mandal, C. Chu, T. Wada, H. Handa, A. J. Shatkin, and D. Reinberg Functional interactions of RNA-capping enzyme with factors that positively and negatively regulate promoter escape by RNA polymerase II PNAS, May 18, 2004; 101(20): 7572 - 7577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hausmann, H. Erdjument-Bromage, and S. Shuman Schizosaccharomyces pombe Carboxyl-terminal Domain (CTD) Phosphatase Fcp1: DISTRIBUTIVE MECHANISM, MINIMAL CTD SUBSTRATE, AND ACTIVE SITE MAPPING J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 10892 - 10900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Chapman, B. Palancade, A. Lang, O. Bensaude, and D. Eick The last CTD repeat of the mammalian RNA polymerase II large subunit is important for its stability Nucleic Acids Res., January 2, 2004; 32(1): 35 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Pei and S. Shuman Characterization of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cdk9/Pch1 Protein Kinase: Spt5 PHOSPHORYLATION, AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION, AND MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43346 - 43356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hausmann, Y. Pei, and S. Shuman Homodimeric Quaternary Structure Is Required for the in Vivo Function and Thermal Stability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe RNA Triphosphatases J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 30487 - 30496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yeo, P. S. Lin, M. E. Dahmus, and G. N. Gill A Novel RNA Polymerase II C-terminal Domain Phosphatase That Preferentially Dephosphorylates Serine 5 J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 26078 - 26085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takagi, A. K. Walker, C. Sawa, F. Diehn, Y. Takase, T. K. Blackwell, and S. Buratowski The Caenorhabditis elegans mRNA 5'-Capping Enzyme. IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 14174 - 14184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Pei, B. Schwer, and S. Shuman Interactions between Fission Yeast Cdk9, Its Cyclin Partner Pch1, and mRNA Capping Enzyme Pct1 Suggest an Elongation Checkpoint for mRNA Quality Control J. Biol. Chem., February 21, 2003; 278(9): 7180 - 7188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Carty and A. L. Greenleaf Hyperphosphorylated C-terminal Repeat Domain-associating Proteins in the Nuclear Proteome Link Transcription to DNA/Chromatin Modification and RNA Processing Mol. Cell. Proteomics, August 1, 2002; 1(8): 598 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||