Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103716200 on May 29, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 31, 28835-28841, August 3, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/31/28835    most recent
M103716200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stockdale, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stockdale, F. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Irx4 Forms an Inhibitory Complex with the Vitamin D and Retinoic X Receptors to Regulate Cardiac Chamber-specific slow MyHC3 Expression*

Gang Feng WangDagger , William Nikovits Jr.Dagger , Zheng-Zheng Bao§, and Frank E. StockdaleDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5151 and the § Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605

Received for publication, April 25, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The slow myosin heavy chain 3 gene (slow MyHC3) is restricted in its expression to the atrial chambers of the heart. Understanding its regulation provides a basis for determination of the mechanisms controlling chamber-specific gene expression in heart development. The observed chamber distribution results from repression of slow MyHC3 gene expression in the ventricles. A binding site, the vitamin D response element (VDRE), for a heterodimer of vitamin D receptor (VDR) and retinoic X receptor alpha  (RXRalpha ) within the slow MyHC3 promoter mediates chamber-specific expression of the gene. Irx4, an Iroquois family homeobox gene whose expression is restricted to the ventricular chambers at all stages of development, inhibits AMHC1, the chick homolog of quail slow MyHC3, gene expression within developing ventricles. Repression of the slow MyHC3 gene in ventricular cardiomyocytes by Irx4 requires the VDRE. Unlike VDR and RXRalpha , Irx4 does not bind directly to the VDRE. Instead two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation assays show that Irx4 interacts with the RXRalpha component of the VDR/RXRalpha heterodimer and that the amino terminus of the Irx4 protein is required for its inhibitory action. These observations indicate that the mechanism of atrial chamber-specific expression requires the formation of an inhibitory protein complex composed of VDR, RXRalpha , and Irx4 that binds at the VDRE inhibiting slow MyHC3 expression in the ventricles.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Although a molecular description of cardiogenesis is being defined, the molecular mechanisms that control cardiomyocyte differentiation into either an atrial or ventricular phenotype remain unclear (1-10). Several chamber-restricted genes have been used as markers to investigate atrial and ventricular lineage diversification (11-21). One of the earliest atrial chamber-specific genes expressed during cardiogenesis, the quail slow MyHC3 gene, serves as a model system to identify molecular pathways governing chamber-specific expression (22-25). The slow MyHC3 gene, a homologue of chick AMHC1 (20, 26, 27) is most closely homologous to the cardiac alpha -MyHC and beta -MyHC in mammals (28). Slow MyHC3 is initially expressed throughout the tubular heart, and atrial chamber-restricted expression is subsequently established by down-regulation in the ventricles during chamber formation (25).

Using a combination of transient transfection assays and transgenic approaches, a 840-base pair fragment of the slow MyHC3 promoter was identified that controls atrial-specific expression (23, 29). Atrial-specific expression is achieved by the positive effects of a GATA factor-binding element in the atria and by inhibition through a nuclear hormone-binding element, vitamin D response element (VDRE),1 in the ventricles (25). Mutational analysis of the slow MyHC3 promoter revealed that the VDRE alone is required for ventricular inhibition (25). The VDRE binds a heterodimer of retinoic X receptor alpha  (RXRalpha ) and vitamin D receptor (VDR), which suppresses slow MyHC3 expression within ventricular but not atrial cardiomyocytes (25). Because both RXRalpha and VDR are expressed within atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes, it was postulated that an unknown ventricular-specific inhibitor, in addition to VDR and RXRalpha , must act through the negative VDRE element (24).

Recently, Bao and co-workers (30) identified an Iroquois family homeobox gene, Irx4, the expression of which is confined to the ventricles throughout heart development in birds and in mammals (30, 31). In mice with targeted disruption of the Irx4 gene there is inappropriate expression of atrial genes within the ventricle (32). Irx4 expression is down stream of Nkx2-5 and dHand and activates the expression of the ventricle myosin heavy chain 1 gene (VMHC1) and suppresses the expression of the AMHC1/slow MyHC3 gene in the ventricles in the chicken (30, 31). However, the molecular mechanism by which Irx4 regulates the inhibition of slow MyHC3/AMHC1 gene expression and activation of VMHC1 gene expression is not known. Here we report that down-regulation of the slow MyHC3 gene by Irx4 is through the VDRE element. Furthermore, Irx4 and the RXRalpha subunit of the VDR/RXRalpha heteroduplex form a protein complex, which inhibits slow MyHC3 gene expression in the ventricles.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transfections and Plasmids-- Primary cultures of embryonic day six atrial and ventricular quail cardiomyocytes were cultured and transfected as described previously (25). Typical transfections included 3 µg of CAT reporter plasmid, 3 µg of the Irx4 or 3 µg of the Irx4 dominant-negative H+enr expression plasmids, and 1 µg of pSV-beta -gal as a reference plasmid to control for transfection efficiency. The CAT constructs used were described previously (23, 25). Briefly, SM3CAT:840D, SM3CAT:808D, and SM3CAT:768D extend from -840, -808, and -768 bp respectively, of the slow MyHC3 promoter through the first exon of non-coding sequence (+18 bp) fused to the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter. CAT reporter constructs ARD1:CAT (previously designated SV/ARD1/F (23)), contain a 160-bp fragment of the slow MyHC3 promoter between positions -840 and -680, VDRE-GATA:CAT contains both the VDR and the GATA element between positions -808 and -741, and GATA:CAT contains the GATA element between positions -775 and -741. All control elements were positioned upstream of the minimal SV40 promoter. The SV40:CAT construct contained only the minimal SV40 promoter fused to CAT. Irx4 was cloned into a RCAS viral vector (30). Transfection efficiencies were normalized to beta -D-galactopyranoside expression, and CAT assays were performed as described previously (23).

Two-hybrid Assay-- To detect Irx4 interactions with RXRalpha or VDR, we employed the mammalian MATCHMAKER two-hybrid assay kit (CLONTECH) with slight modifications. The RXRalpha or VDR genes were inserted in frame with a Gal4 DNA-binding domain in the pM expression vector (CLONTECH), to create pM-RXRalpha or pM-VDR, respectively. Embryonic day six quail atrial cardiomyocytes were transfected with the Gal4 reporter plasmid pG5CAT, pM-RXRalpha or pM-VDR to mediate binding to the Gal4 sites in the reporter plasmid with or without the RCAS-Irx4 expression vector. Three µg of each construct was transfected/60-mm culture. In experiments where the Irx4 expression vector was not transfected along with the reporter, 3 µg of empty expression vector was co-transfected such that in each transfection, 9 µg of plasmid DNA was used.

In Vitro Translation, Co-immunoprecipitation, and Western Blot Analysis-- Irx4 (30), RXRalpha (33), and VDR (4) were cloned into a pBluescript KSII vector. In vitro transcription with Large Scale RNA Production Systems was performed according to the manufacturer (Promega). A rabbit reticulocyte lysate kit from Promega was used for in vitro translation. Interactions between Irx4 and RXRalpha or VDR were assessed by co-immunoprecipitation of in vitro translated RXRalpha or VDR with Irx4. Irx4 contained a HA tag immediately preceding the stop codon. Monoclonal anti-VDR antibody was purchased from Biomol, and anti-RXRalpha antibody was provided by Dr. Elizabeth Allegretto of Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed by mixing 5 µl of each in vitro translated protein with the antibody against one of the proteins in 0.5 ml immunoprecipitation buffer according to Elion (34). Protein G-agarose beads (Sigma) were added to precipitate the antibody-antigen complex, the precipitate was subjected to SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose. Anti-VDR (rat IgG), anti-RXRalpha (rabbit IgG), or anti-HA to HA-tagged Irx4 (rabbit IgG) were incubated with the blots to determine which proteins co-precipitated. Western blots were performed as reported previously (23). horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat against rabbit IgG or rat IgG secondary antibodies were used for detection.

Irx4 Deletion Constructs-- Deletions of the RCAS-Irx4 vector were made via site-directed polymerase chain reaction cloning. Primers with unique restriction site sequences were used to amplify selected regions of the RCAS-Irx4 vector, which were cloned into the pcDNA3.1/His C expression vector (Invitrogen) using standard protocols (25). The Delta 5' construct lacks 5' sequence encoding amino acids 2-134 of Irx4 but retains the remaining 3' sequence including the homeodomain; the Delta 3' construct lacks 3' sequence encoding amino acids 269-515 but contains the remaining 5' sequence including the homeodomain of Irx4; the Delta HD construct lacks sequence encoding amino acids 135-268 containing the homeodomain while retaining 5' and 3' sequence as a fused product; and the Delta 3'Delta 5' construct contains sequence encoding amino acids 135-268, containing primarily the homeodomain. Care was taken to ligate Irx4 cDNA sequences into the expression vector such that in-frame protein products were formed.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The 840 bp immediately upstream of the slow MyHC3 transcriptional initiation site is sufficient to drive correct atrial-specific expression of a reporter gene both in mammals and in birds (23, 29). We have previously demonstrated that a VDRE within this SM3CAT:840D construct is the essential element required for ventricular-specific down-regulation in vitro and in vivo (23, 25). Recently, an Iroquois family homeobox gene, Irx4, was shown to regulate chamber-specific expression of myosin isoforms by suppressing the expression of the AMHC1/slow MyHC3 and activating the expression of the VMHC1 in the ventricles (30).

Irx4 Acts at the VDRE to Inhibit Expression in Atrial Cardiomyocytes-- That Irx4 acts through the VDRE was demonstrated by a series of co-transfections into atrial cardiomyocytes of an Irx4 expression vector, RCAS-Irx4, along with SM3CAT:840D and deletion derivatives. Expression of Irx4 reduced expression of the CAT reporter from co-transfected SM3CAT:840D by nearly 400% (Fig. 1). A similar reduction in reporter expression was observed following deletion of slow MyHC3 sequence upstream of the VDRE (SM3CAT:808D). However, when the VDRE sequence was removed (SM3CAT:768D), Irx4 expression no longer reduced CAT expression in atrial cardiomyocytes (Fig. 1). These results identify a 40-bp region of the slow MyHC3 promoter, containing the VDRE, as the site of Irx4 action.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Irx4 suppresses expression of slow MyHC3 promoter activity in atrial cardiomyocytes. Slow MyHC3 reporter constructs containing either 840, 808, or 768 bp upstream of the transcription start site, were transfected alone (-, black bars), or co-transfected with the Irx4 expression vector, RCAS-Irx4 (Irx4, gray bars) into atrial cardiomyocytes. Co-transfected Irx4 reduced expression from both SM3CAT:840D and SM3CAT:808D reporter constructs while it had a negligible effect on SM3CAT:768D expression. Elements within the lower panel depict the upstream region of the slow MyHC3 promoter. Error bars represent the S.E.

These results were refined by expression of Irx4 in atrial cardiomyocytes co-transfected with shorter regions of the slow MyHC3 promoter, ARD1 (23). We have previously shown that the sequence between positions -840 and -680, designated as ARD1 (see lower panel in Fig. 2) serves as an atrial-specific enhancer both in vitro and in ovo (23). Irx4 suppressed reporter expression from both ARD1:CAT and VDRE-GATA:CAT (sequence containing only the VDRE and GATA binding site elements up-stream of a minimal SV40 promoter) (Fig. 2). However, when the VDRE was removed (GATA:CAT) expression of Irx4 had no effect on reporter expression. A ubiquitously expressed SV40:CAT was unaffected by Irx4 expression. These observations suggest that a functional inhibitory complex can form in atrial cardiomyocytes at the VDRE if Irx4 is present.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Irx4 acts via the VDRE in atrial cardiomyocytes. ARD1:CAT, VDRE-GATA:CAT, and GATA:CAT were transfected alone (-, black bars) or co-transfected with the RCAS-Irx4 expression vector (Irx4) (gray bars) into atrial cardiomyocytes. Co-transfected Irx4 inhibited expression only when the VDRE is present in the reporter construct (ARD1:CAT and VDRE-GATA:CAT), but had no effect in its absence (GATA:CAT and SV40:CAT). Cis-elements in the 160 bp slow MyHC3 enhancer between positions -840 and -680, designated as ARD1 (23), are shown in the lower panel.

RCAS-H+enr Acts at the VDRE to Relieve Inhibition in Ventricular Cardiomyocytes-- To investigate the role of Irx4 in ventricular cardiomyocytes, Bao and co-workers (30) infected avian embryos prior to heart formation with a putative dominant negative form of Irx4, designated RCAS-H+enr, a construct that encodes a fusion protein composed of the chick Irx4 homeodomain and the repressor domain of the Drosophila Engrailed protein. RCAS-H+enr prevented the normally occurring down-regulation of slow MyHC3 in the ventricles of infected embryos as cardiac chamber formation proceeded (30). To identify the promoter element required for the action of the RCAS-H+enr fusion protein, it was co-transfected with the SM3CAT:840D construct into ventricular cardiomyocytes (Fig. 3). RCAS-H+enr significantly increased CAT expression from SM3CAT:840D in ventricular cardiomyocytes, indicating that Irx4 has a target site(s) within the 840-bp promoter. Co-transfection of RCAS-H+enr also up-regulated CAT expression from the SM3CAT:808D construct. However, when the VDRE element was deleted, but the GATA site retained (SM3CAT:768D), inhibition was lost in ventricular cardiomyocytes whether RCAS-H+enr was present or not (Fig. 3). These results demonstrate that the element(s) required for Irx4 action is located between positions -808 and -768, a region that contains the VDRE element.


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Irx4-engrailed fusion protein increases expression of slow MyHC3 promoter in ventricular cardiomyocytes. Slow MyHC3 reporter constructs containing either 840, 808, or 768 bp upstream of the transcription start site were transfected alone (-, dark bars), or co-transfected with RCAS-H+enr (H+enr, gray bars) into ventricular cardiomyocytes. RCAS-H+enr relieved inhibition of reporter constructs containing the VDRE (SM3CAT:840D and SM3CAT:808D) in ventricular cardiomyocytes but had no additional effect when the VDRE was absent (SM3CAT:768D).

The site of Irx4 action in ventricular cardiomyocytes was refined by co-transfection of RCAS-H+enr with ARD1:CAT and deletions derived from it. Co-transfection of ARD1:CAT with RCAS-H+enr into ventricular cardiomyocytes resulted in a 3-fold increase in reporter expression (Fig. 4). Co-transfection of VDRE-GATA:CAT (containing only the VDRE and the GATA elements) with RCAS-H+enr also increased CAT expression in ventricular cardiomyocytes (Fig. 4). However, expression of the GATA:CAT construct, in which the VDRE sequence had been removed, was not affected by RCAS-H+enr expression (Fig. 4). The ubiquitously expressed SV40:CAT control was unaffected by co-transfection with RCAS-H+enr. These results, together with the results of RCAS-Irx4 transfection of atrial cardiomyocytes, localize the Irx4 site of action to the VDRE element, the previously identified inhibitory sequence (23, 24), and indicate that in either atrial or ventricular cardiomyocytes an inhibitory complex can form if Irx4 is present.


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Irx4 acts at the VDRE site in the slow MyHC 3 promoter. The ARD1:CAT, VDRE-GATA:CAT, or GATA:CAT were transfected alone (-, dark bars) or co-transfected with RCAS-H+enr (H+enr, gray bars) into ventricular cardiomyocytes. Co-transfection with the dominant negative Irx4 expression vector increased reporter expression only when the VDRE was present in the reporter construct (ARD1:CAT and VDRE-GATA:CAT) but had no effect in its absence (GATA:CAT and SV40:CAT).

Association of Irx4 and RXRalpha Proteins-- Previous studies have shown that both RXRalpha and VDR proteins bind to the VDRE to influence slow MyHC3 expression (23). However, because both classes of nuclear hormone receptors are expressed in both atria and ventricles we postulated that a ventricle-specific transcriptional repressor, acting at the VDRE, was responsible for inhibition of slow MyHC3 expression (23, 24). The demonstration that Irx4 was required for down-regulation of slow MyHC3 expression (30) made it the likely candidate to act at this site. Because Irx4 is a homeobox-containing transcription factor, and these factors are known DNA-binding proteins, binding of Irx4 directly to the VDRE was tested. In vitro translated Irx4 consistently failed to bind the VDRE in mobility shift assays (negative data not shown) while the same preparation was active in a co-immunoprecipitation assay (see below). This suggests that Irx4 does not exert its effect through directly binding to the VDRE.

Because a heterodimer of VDR and RXRalpha binds strongly to the VDRE (25) and because the site of Irx4 action is in this same region, we determined whether Irx4 would physically associate with RXRalpha and/or VDR proteins. Interaction between Irx4 and RXRalpha was first assessed using a two-hybrid assay. An expression vector, pM-RXRalpha , made by fusing the Gal4 DNA-binding domain with the RXRalpha gene, served as a DNA-binding protein on the Gal4 enhancer present in the pG5CAT reporter construct. The RCAS-Irx4 vector, which produces a functionally active protein (Fig. 2), was used as the second component in the assay. When co-transfected with the pG5CAT reporter into atrial cardiomyocytes, pM-RXRalpha alone permitted a low level of reporter expression while RCAS-Irx4 alone was without effect (Fig. 5A). Co-transfection of both pM-RXRalpha and RCAS-Irx4 with pG5CAT, led to a nearly 5-fold increase of the CAT reporter compared with pM-RXRalpha alone (Fig. 5A). Co-transfection of pM-RXRalpha with an empty RCAS vector did not increase reporter expression relative to the transfection of pM-RXRalpha alone (data not shown).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   In atrial cardiomyocytes Irx4 interacts with RXRalpha but not VDR. Full-length RXRalpha or VDR cDNA was fused to the DNA-binding domain of Gal4, which upon expression binds to the Gal4 binding site of the reporter plasmid pG5CAT. A, expression of the RXRalpha binding vector induces a low level of expression (set to unity) from pG5CAT. Irx4 alone does not induce reporter expression. Co-transfection of Irx4 expression vector and RXRalpha binding vector dramatically increased reporter expression relative to transfection of RXRalpha binding vector alone. B, expression of the VDR binding vector induces a low level of expression (set to unity) from pG5CAT. Irx4 alone does not induce reporter expression. Co-transfection of the Irx4 expression and VDR binding vectors did not increase reporter expression when compared with transfection of the VDR binding vector alone.

Likewise, interaction between Irx4 and VDR was tested. A pM-VDR expression vector, fusing the Gal4 DNA-binding domain with the VDR gene, was co-transfected into atrial cardiomyocytes with RCAS-Irx4 and the pG5CAT reporter. No increase in reporter expression was observed relative to the transfection of pM-VDR alone (Fig. 5B), indicating that Irx4 and VDR do not interact. Together these results demonstrate a protein-protein interaction between Irx4 and RXRalpha , rather than between Irx4 and VDR, of the VDRE-binding heterodimer.

To confirm that Irx4 interacts with RXRalpha , we performed immunoprecipitation experiments. In vitro translated HA-tagged Irx4, RXRalpha , and VDR proteins migrate with distinct electrophoretic mobilities and can be specifically detected on Western blots with anti-HA, anti-RXRalpha , and anti-VDR antibodies (Fig. 6A). In vitro translated HA-tagged Irx4 and RXRalpha proteins were combined and immunoprecipitated with an anti-RXRalpha antibody. The precipitates were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. A characteristic doublet of Irx4 was detected in the precipitate using an anti-HA antibody (Fig. 6B, lane 1). As a control, a rabbit IgG antibody added to the Irx4 and RXRalpha protein mix did not result in a precipitate that contained Irx4 (Fig. 6B, lane 2). Conversely, when the HA-tagged Irx4 and RXRalpha proteins were combined and immunoprecipitated with the anti-HA antibody, RXRalpha was detected in the precipitates by the anti-RXRalpha antibody in the Western blot (Fig. 6B, lane 3). Immunoprecipitation of the Irx4 protein complex by anti-HA was specific because a control rabbit IgG antibody that does not recognize Irx4 did not result in a precipitation of RXRalpha when added to the Irx4 and RXRalpha protein mix (Fig. 6B, lane 4). These results confirm that Irx4 and RXRalpha proteins can physically interact. In contrast an antibody against the HA-tag of Irx4 failed to precipitate VDR, and an antibody against VDR did not co-immunoprecipitate Irx4 (Fig. 6B, lanes 5 and 6). These experiments support the idea that a protein-protein interaction between Irx4 and RXRalpha , rather then between Irx4 and VDR, mediates the inhibition of slow MyHC3 via the VDRE.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   There is a physical association between Irx4 and RXRalpha in vitro. A, in vitro translated Irx4 (HA-tagged), RXRalpha , or VDR proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and detected on immunoblot by anti-HA, anti-RXRalpha , or anti-VDR antibodies, respectively. B, in vitro translated Irx4 (HA-tagged) and RXRalpha were mixed and immunoprecipitated (IP) by anti-RXRalpha or anti-HA antibody. The immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblot (IB), showing that Irx4 co-precipitates with RXRalpha . In vitro translated Irx4 (HA-tagged) and VDR were mixed and immunoprecipitated by anti-HA or anti-VDR antibody (Lanes 1 and 3). Specificity was demonstrated by the failure of a rabbit IgG to immunoprecipitate Irx4 (Lane 2) or RXRalpha (Lane 4). In contrast, VDR did not co-immunoprecipitate with Irx4 (Lanes 5 and 6). The immunoprecipitating antibodies (anti-RXRalpha and anti-HA) separated from antigen by SDS-PAGE are rabbit IgGs and are visible as the lower band in Lanes 1-4. Molecular masses in kDa are shown to the right of the blot.

The Amino-terminal of Irx4 Mediates Inhibition-- A structure-function analysis was performed to identify the region(s) of the Irx4 protein required for its inhibitory function. Deletions of the Irx4 cDNA were made, inserted in frame in a eucaryotic expression vector, and co-transfected with the SM3CAT:840D reporter into atrial or ventricular cardiomyocytes (Fig. 7). Atrial cardiomyocytes have no endogenous Irx4, and no significant inhibition of reporter expression was observed from amino-terminal-truncated Irx4 (Delta 5'), homeodomain-truncated Irx4 (Delta HD), or the Irx4 homeodomain alone (Delta 3'Delta 5'). However, a significant (8- to 10-fold) inhibition of reporter expression was observed from a carboxyl-terminal-truncated Irx4 (Delta 3'). These results demonstrate that the amino-terminal of Irx4 is required for inhibition (Fig. 7).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   The amino end of Irx4 is essential for inhibition. The slow MyHC3 reporter construct, SM3CAT:840D, was transfected alone (no Irx4 construct) or co-transfected with the Irx4 deletion constructs Delta 5', Delta 3', Delta HD, and Delta 3'Delta 5' into atrial or ventricular cardiomyocytes. It should be noted that endogenous Irx4 is present in the ventricular but not the atrial cardiomyocytes. In atrial cardiomyocytes, the Delta 3' construct inhibited reporter expression while none of the other Irx4 deletion constructs had an effect. In ventricular cardiomyocytes, only deletion of the 5' end of Irx4 (Delta 5') effected SM3CAT:840D expression, resulting in a partial relief of inhibition of reporter expression.

The importance of the amino-terminal was reinforced by co-transfection of SM3CAT:840D and the amino-terminal-truncated Irx4 (Delta 5') into ventricular cardiomyocytes. Against a background of endogenous Irx4, this construct was able to partially relieve inhibition of the reporter (Fig. 7). In contrast, no significant relief from inhibition was observed in ventricular cardiomyocytes expressing carboxyl-terminal-truncated Irx4 (Delta 3'), homeodomain-truncated Irx4 (Delta HD), or the Irx4 homeodomain alone (Delta 3'Delta 5') in the presence of endogenous Irx4.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have previously shown that atrial-specific expression of the slow MyHC3 gene is positively regulated by a GATA factor-binding element, essential for cardiac-specific expression, and a negative-acting VDRE element, required to prevent expression in the ventricle (23-25, 29). These two elements are sufficient to drive atrial-specific expression of a reporter construct in primary cardiomyocyte cultures in vitro and in transgenic mice (23, 29). Subsequently, a ventricle-restricted homeodomain protein, Irx4, was discovered, that was capable of regulating cardiac chamber-restricted expression of myosin heavy chain genes including the chicken homologue of slow MyHC3, AMHC1 (30-32). In the current study we demonstrate that the inhibition of slow MyHC3 expression in the ventricle by Irx4 is mediated via the VDRE. Three pieces of evidence suggest that Irx4 acts through the VDRE element rather than the positive GATA element. First, misexpression of Irx4 in atrial cardiomyocytes down-regulates expression of a reporter construct containing the VDRE (VDRE-GATA:CAT) but has no effect on a reporter construct with only the GATA element (GATA:CAT). Second, a dominant-negative form of Irx4, previously shown to up-regulate expression of AMHC1/slow MyHC3 in the ventricles in vivo (30), relieved inhibition of the VDRE-GATA:CAT reporter in ventricular cardiomyocytes but had no effect on expression of the GATA:CAT, which lacks the VDRE element. Third, Irx4 interacts with the RXRalpha subunit of the heterodimeric complex of VDR/RXRalpha that binds at the VDRE element of the slow MyHC3 promoter.

Homeobox-containing proteins found in cardiac tissue have been viewed as DNA-binding transcription factors (8, 35-37); accordingly, we investigated whether Irx4 could directly bind the VDRE sequence of slow MyHC3. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays consistently failed to detect an Irx4 binding activity to the VDRE and surrounding sequence (negative data not shown), under conditions where the VDR/RXRalpha clearly bound (25). A DNA motif, TTAATTAA, to which Iroquois family members are likely to bind, has been reported (38). No sequence similar to this motif is present in or around the VDRE nor within the 840-bp promoter fragment capable of directing atrial-specific expression of the slow MyHC3 gene. Although no high affinity binding of Irx4 to the VDRE site was detected, the possibility can not be excluded that binding of a RXRalpha /VDR heterodimer to the VDRE element facilitates binding of Irx4 to a weak affinity DNA site somewhere in the 40-bp fragment of the slow MyHC3 promoter between -808 and -768. The absence of an Irx4 binding motif in the slow MyHC3 promoter has prompted others to suggest that the mechanism of Irx4 action is via protein-protein interaction (32)

Our previous results indicated that binding of a VDR/RXRalpha heterodimer to the VDRE is required for down-regulation of slow MyHC3 expression in the ventricle (23). Because no consistent difference in protein expression levels of VDR or RXRalpha was detectable between atrial and ventricular nuclear extracts (23), it is unlikely that Irx4 acts directly or indirectly to up-regulate the levels of VDR or RXRalpha proteins in the ventricles.

Two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation assays, demonstrated that Irx4 can physically interact with RXRalpha but not VDR. Co-immunoprecipitation further demonstrated that this interaction is strong enough to withstand the isolation process. An antibody against RXRalpha co-immunoprecipitated Irx4 when both proteins were expressed in vitro, while an anti-VDR antibody did not co-immunoprecipitate Irx4 when VDR and Irx4 were co-expressed. Conversely, an antibody against the HA-tag of Irx4 co-immunoprecipitated RXRalpha but not VDR. Thus, the inhibitory action of Irx4 is likely to be mediated via a protein-protein interaction of Irx4 with RXRalpha .

A region of the Irx4 protein encompassing a portion of the amino terminus and part of the homeodomain is important in the inhibition. An amino-terminal truncation of the Irx4 protein, (Delta 5'), relieved inhibition in ventricular cardiomyocytes. Because ventricular cardiomyocytes express the native Irx4 protein, the relief of inhibition afforded by Delta 5' was minimal (2-fold). While expression of Irx4 proteins with a deletion of either the amino-terminal (Delta 5') or the homeodomain (Delta HD) had no effect in atrial cardiomyocytes, a deletion of the carboxyl-terminal (Delta 3'), which retains the amino-terminal and the homeodomain, significantly inhibited expression of a co-transfected slow MyHC3 reporter construct. That the DNA-binding homeodomain by itself (Delta 3'Delta 5') or with the carboxyl portion of the protein present (Delta 5') did not inhibit reporter expression in atrial cells provides additional evidence that Irx4 works via protein-protein interaction rather then by binding the slow MyHC promoter at, or near, the VDRE.

Fusion of the engrailed repressor to Irx4 created a protein that relieved inhibition of the chicken slow MyHC3 homologue (Ref. 30 and this study), making it likely that the homeodomain also contributes to the inhibitory action of Irx4. Exactly how this dominant negative construct functions in the assays presented here or in vivo is not clear. Bao and co-workers (30) postulated that fusion of the DNA homeodomain with the repressor domain of Engrailed created a protein that interfered with transcriptional activation by the wild-type protein, thus producing a dominant negative effect as well as a potential gain-of-function effect due to active repression. On the one hand, the engrailed-derived moiety may be acting by sterically interfering with the normally occurring Irx4/RXRalpha protein-protein interaction. Although we showed that Irx4 and RXRalpha interact, it remains possible that, in vivo, Irx4 acts indirectly to up-regulate transcription of a repressor at an as yet unidentified locus. Clearly, if there were such a repressor, it must act through the VDRE of the slow MyHC3 gene in the ventricle to regulate slow MyHC3 gene expression. Were this the case, then it must also be postulated that the dominant negative Irx4-engrailed fusion protein inhibits expression from the unidentified locus. Although this hypothesis is a possibility, based on the data here, a more parsimonious explanation favors a model where Irx4 interacts directly with RXRalpha to down-regulate slow MyHC3 gene expression in the ventricle.

Precedence for inhibitory co-factors in cardiomyocytes is found in the literature. A co-factor that regulates ventricle-specific expression of MLC-2v has been reported by Zou and co-workers (39). A 28-bp sequence containing HF-1a and MEF-2 elements within the MLC-2v promoter region confers ventricular chamber-specific gene expression in transgenic mouse (40). A nuclear ankyrin-like repeat protein, CARP (cardiac ankyrin repeat protein), which acts as a cofactor of the HF-1a-binding protein, YB-1, displays a transcriptional inhibitory activity in cardiomyocytes (39, 41). Interestingly, upstream of the VDRE, the slow MyHC3 promoter contains a HF-1a-like motif. However, this region of the slow MyHC3 promoter is not essential for chamber-specific expression of the gene (Ref. 25, and this study).

Homeobox-containing proteins often rely on co-factors for DNA binding and for regulation of transcription (42-45). Cooperative protein-protein interaction between a homeodomain protein and a nuclear hormone receptor to regulate gene expression has been reported in Drosophila embryos (43). Ftz-F1, a member of the nuclear hormone-receptor superfamily, serves as a co-factor to facilitate the binding of the homeodomain protein, Fushi tarazu (Ftz), to weak affinity DNA sites (43). However, few other systems demonstrate that protein-protein interactions mediate the action of homeodomain proteins in the absence of DNA binding.

Mechanisms for chamber-preferential expression of alpha -MyHC, beta -MyHC, and ANF during embryonic development are not clear. Interestingly, another member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, thyroid hormone receptor, is also implicated in the regulation of myosin heavy chains. Expression of alpha -MyHC and beta -MyHC, the two major isoforms of myosin heavy chains in the rodent myocardium, changes in the ventricles in response to developmental changes in thyroid hormone (46, 47). Whether Irx4 binds cooperatively with thyroid hormone receptor to regulate expression of alpha -MyHC or beta -MyHC is not known. Although an inhibitory element is found in the ANF promoter, the mechanism by which the inhibitory element suppresses ANF expression in the ventricle is unclear (36).

Previously we proposed an activation model and an inhibition model to depict regulation of chamber-specific expression of cardiac genes during embryonic development (24). Ventricle-specific expression and inhibitory function of Irx4 fit well with the inhibition model for atrial-specific expression. However, Irx4 is not only an inhibitor of slow MyHC3/AMHC1 but also an activator of VMHC1 in the ventricles (30). The activation model fits ventricular chamber-specific activation of VMHC1 by Irx4. How Irx4 acts as an inhibitor of one gene and an activator of another within the same cell type is not known. Because different homeobox-containing proteins have similar DNA-binding functions in vitro and require cofactors to achieve their biological functions (42), cooperative interaction between Irx4 and a cofactor or direct binding of Irx4 to a target site in the VMHC1 promoter could activate VMHC1 expression in ventricular cardiomyocytes. Investigation of how Irx4 regulates cardiac genes will continue to broaden our understanding of diversification between atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes during development.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Elizabeth Allegretto for providing the rabbit polyclonal anti-RXRalpha antibody. Sandra Conlon provided excellent technical assistance, and Gloria Garcia provided excellent assistance in preparation of the manuscript. Dr. Gordon Cann provided helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 650-725-6449; Fax: 650-736-2282; E-mail: mlfes@stanford.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103716200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: VDRE, vitamin D response element; RXRalpha , retinoic X receptor alpha ; VDR, vitamin D receptor; bp, base pair(s); VMHC1, ventricle myosin heavy chain 1 gene; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; HA, hemagglutinin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Fishman, M. C., and Chien, K. R. (1997) Development 124, 2099-2117
2. Lee, Y., Song, A. J., Baker, R., Micales, B., Conway, S. J., and Lyons, G. E. (2000) Circ. Res. 86, 932-938
3. Liberatore, C. M., Searcy-Schrick, R. D., and Yutzey, K. E. (2000) Dev. Biol. 223, 169-180
4. Lin, N. U., Malloy, P. J., Sakati, N., al-Ashwal, A., and Feldman, D. (1996) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81, 2564-2569
5. Molkentin, J. D., Lin, Q., Duncan, S. A., and Olson, E. N. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 1061-1072
6. Lyons, I., Parsons, L. M., Hartley, L., Li, R., Andrews, J. E., Robb, L., and Harvey, R. P. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1654-1666
7. Stainier, D. Y., and Fishman, M. C. (1992) Dev. Biol. 153, 91-101
8. Tanaka, M., Chen, Z., Bartunkova, S., Yamasaki, N., and Izumo, S. (1999) Development 126, 1269-1280
9. Thomas, T., Yamagishi, H., Overbeek, P. A., Olson, E. N., and Srivastava, D. (1998) Dev. Biol. 196, 228-236
10. Yutzey, K. E., and Bader, D. (1995) Circ. Res. 77, 216-219
11. Bisaha, J. G., and Bader, D. (1991) Dev. Biol. 148, 355-364
12. Bruneau, B. G., Logan, M., Davis, N., Levi, T., Tabin, C. J., Seidman, J. G., and Seidman, C. E. (1999) Dev. Biol. 211, 100-108
13. Durocher, D., Charron, F., Warren, R., Schwartz, R. J., and Nemer, M. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5687-5696
14. Kelly, R., Alonso, S., Tajbakhsh, S., Cossu, G., and Buckingham, M. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 383-396
15. Kubalak, S. W., Miller-Hance, W. C., O'Brien, T. X., Dyson, E., and Chien, K. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16961-16970
16. Lee, Y., Shioi, T., Kasahara, H., Jobe, S. M., Wiese, R. J., Markham, B. E., and Izumo, S. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3120-3129
17. Morin, S., Charron, F., Robitaille, L., and Nemer, M. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 2046-2055
18. O'Brien, T. X., Lee, K. J., and Chien, K. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 5157-5161
19. Yelon, D., Horne, S. A., and Stainier, D. Y. (1999) Dev. Biol. 214, 23-37
20. Yutzey, K. E., Rhee, J. T., and Bader, D. (1994) Development 120, 871-883
21. Zeller, R., Bloch, K. D., Williams, B. S., Arceci, R. J., and Seidman, C. E. (1987) Genes Dev. 1, 693-698
22. Evans, D., Miller, J. B., and Stockdale, F. E. (1988) Dev. Biol. 127, 376-383
23. Wang, G. F., Nikovits, W., Schleinitz, M., and Stockdale, F. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19836-19845
24. Wang, G. F., and Stockdale, F. E. (1999) in Heart Development (Harvey, R. P. , and Rosenthal, N., eds) , pp. 357-369, Academic Press, New York
25. Wang, G. F., Nikovits, W., Schleinitz, M., and Stockdale, F. E. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6023-6034
26. Nikovits, W., Jr., Wang, G. F., Feldman, J. L., Miller, J. B., Wade, R., Nelson, L., and Stockdale, F. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17047-17056
27. Oana, S., Machida, S., Hiratsuka, E., Furutani, Y., Momma, K., Takao, A., and Matsuoka, R. (1998) Biol. Cell 90, 605-613
28. Mahdavi, V., Chambers, A. P., and Nadal-Ginard, B. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 2626-2630
29. Xavier-Neto, J., Neville, C. M., Shapiro, M. D., Houghton, L., Wang, G. F., Nikovits, W., Stockdale, F. E., and Rosenthal, N. (1999) Development 126, 2677-2687
30. Bao, Z. Z., Bruneau, B. G., Seidman, J. G., Seidman, C. E., and Cepko, C. L. (1999) Science 283, 1161-1164
31. Bruneau, B. G., Bao, Z. Z., Tanaka, M., Schott, J. J., Izumo, S., Cepko, C. L., Seidman, J. G., and Seidman, C. E. (2000) Dev. Biol. 217, 266-277
32. Bruneau, B. G., Bao, Z. Z., Fatkin, D., Xavier-Neto, J., Georgakopoulos, D., Maguire, C. T., Berul, C. I., Kass, D. A., Kuroski-de Bold, M. L., de Bold, A. J., Conner, D. A., Rosenthal, N., Cepko, C. L., Seidman, C. E., and Seidman, J. G. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 1730-1736
33. Mangelsdorf, D. J., Borgmeyer, U., Heyman, R. A., Zhou, J. Y., Ong, E. S., Oro, A. E., Kakizuka, A., and Evans, R. M. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 329-344
34. Elion, E. A. (1999) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , et al., eds), Vol. 4 , pp. 20.5.1-20.5.9, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
35. Chen, C. Y., and Schwartz, R. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15628-15633
36. Durocher, D., Chen, C. Y., Ardati, A., Schwartz, R. J., and Nemer, M. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4648-4655
37. Tabin, C. J. (1991) Cell 66, 199-217
38. Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L., del Corral, R. D., de la Calle-Mustienes, E., Ferre-Marco, D., and Modolell, J. (1996) Cell 85, 95-105
39. Zou, Y., Evans, S., Chen, J., Kuo, H. C., Harvey, R. P., and Chien, K. R. (1997) Development 124, 793-804
40. Lee, K. J., Hickey, R., Zhu, H., and Chien, K. R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1220-1229
41. Zou, Y., and Chien, K. R. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2972-2982
42. Li, X., Murre, C., and McGinnis, W. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 198-211
43. Yu, Y., Li, W., Su, K., Yussa, M., Han, W., Perrimon, N., and Pick, L. (1997) Nature 385, 552-555
44. Piper, D. E., Batchelor, A. H., Chang, C. P., Cleary, M. L., and Wolberger, C. (1999) Cell 96, 587-597
45. Passner, J. M., Ryoo, H. D., Shen, L., Mann, R. S., and Aggarwal, A. K. (1999) Nature 397, 714-719
46. Izumo, S., Nadal-Ginard, B., and Mahdavi, V. (1986) Science 231, 597-600
47. Subramaniam, A., Gulick, J., Neumann, J., Knotts, S., and Robbins, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 4331-4336


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
W. He, Y. Jia, and K. Takimoto
Interaction between transcription factors Iroquois proteins 4 and 5 controls cardiac potassium channel Kv4.2 gene transcription
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2009; 81(1): 64 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Myrthue, B. L.S. Rademacher, J. Pittsenbarger, B. Kutyba-Brooks, M. Gantner, D. Z. Qian, and T. M. Beer
The Iroquois Homeobox Gene 5 Is Regulated by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 in Human Prostate Cancer and Regulates Apoptosis and the Cell Cycle in LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3562 - 3570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Xin, E. M. Small, E. van Rooij, X. Qi, J. A. Richardson, D. Srivastava, O. Nakagawa, and E. N. Olson
Essential roles of the bHLH transcription factor Hrt2 in repression of atrial gene expression and maintenance of postnatal cardiac function
PNAS, May 8, 2007; 104(19): 7975 - 7980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T.-T. Wang, L. E. Tavera-Mendoza, D. Laperriere, E. Libby, N. Burton MacLeod, Y. Nagai, V. Bourdeau, A. Konstorum, B. Lallemant, R. Zhang, et al.
Large-Scale in Silico and Microarray-Based Identification of Direct 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Target Genes
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2005; 19(11): 2685 - 2695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
R. G. Kelly, M. Lemonnier, S. Zaffran, A. Munk, and M. E. Buckingham
Cell history determines the maintenance of transcriptional differences between left and right ventricular cardiomyocytes in the developing mouse heart
J. Cell Sci., December 15, 2003; 116(24): 5005 - 5013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. F. M. MOORMAN and V. M. CHRISTOFFELS
Cardiac Chamber Formation: Development, Genes, and Evolution
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2003; 83(4): 1223 - 1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
P. E.M.H. Habets, A. F.M. Moorman, and V. M. Christoffels
Regulatory modules in the developing heart
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2003; 58(2): 246 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. J. Solloway and R. P. Harvey
Molecular pathways in myocardial development: a stem cell perspective
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2003; 58(2): 264 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
B. G. Bruneau
Transcriptional Regulation of Vertebrate Cardiac Morphogenesis
Circ. Res., March 22, 2002; 90(5): 509 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
E.M. SMALL and P.A. KRIEG
Molecular Mechanisms of Chamber-specific Myocardial Gene Expression: Transgenic Analysis of the ANF Promoter
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2002; 67(0): 71 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/31/28835    most recent
M103716200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stockdale, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stockdale, F. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement