|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103716200 on May 29, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 31, 28835-28841, August 3, 2001
Irx4 Forms an Inhibitory Complex with the Vitamin D and Retinoic
X Receptors to Regulate Cardiac Chamber-specific slow MyHC3
Expression*
Gang Feng
Wang ,
William
Nikovits Jr. ,
Zheng-Zheng
Bao§, and
Frank E.
Stockdale ¶
From the Department of Medicine, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5151 and the
§ Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts School
of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605
Received for publication, April 25, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The slow myosin heavy chain 3 gene (slow
MyHC3) is restricted in its expression to the atrial chambers of
the heart. Understanding its regulation provides a basis for
determination of the mechanisms controlling chamber-specific gene
expression in heart development. The observed chamber distribution
results from repression of slow MyHC3 gene expression in
the ventricles. A binding site, the vitamin D response element (VDRE),
for a heterodimer of vitamin D receptor (VDR) and retinoic X receptor
(RXR ) within the slow MyHC3 promoter mediates
chamber-specific expression of the gene. Irx4, an
Iroquois family homeobox gene whose expression is
restricted to the ventricular chambers at all stages of development,
inhibits AMHC1, the chick homolog of quail slow
MyHC3, gene expression within developing ventricles. Repression
of the slow MyHC3 gene in ventricular cardiomyocytes by
Irx4 requires the VDRE. Unlike VDR and RXR , Irx4 does not bind directly to the VDRE. Instead two-hybrid and
co-immunoprecipitation assays show that Irx4 interacts with the RXR
component of the VDR/RXR heterodimer and that the amino terminus of
the Irx4 protein is required for its inhibitory action. These
observations indicate that the mechanism of atrial chamber-specific
expression requires the formation of an inhibitory protein complex
composed of VDR, RXR , and Irx4 that binds at the VDRE inhibiting
slow MyHC3 expression in the ventricles.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Although a molecular description of cardiogenesis is being
defined, the molecular mechanisms that control cardiomyocyte
differentiation into either an atrial or ventricular phenotype remain
unclear (1-10). Several chamber-restricted genes have been used as
markers to investigate atrial and ventricular lineage diversification (11-21). One of the earliest atrial chamber-specific genes expressed during cardiogenesis, the quail slow MyHC3 gene, serves as a
model system to identify molecular pathways governing chamber-specific expression (22-25). The slow MyHC3 gene, a homologue of
chick AMHC1 (20, 26, 27) is most closely homologous to the
cardiac -MyHC and
-MyHC in mammals (28). Slow MyHC3
is initially expressed throughout the tubular heart, and atrial
chamber-restricted expression is subsequently established by
down-regulation in the ventricles during chamber formation (25).
Using a combination of transient transfection assays and transgenic
approaches, a 840-base pair fragment of the slow MyHC3 promoter was identified that controls atrial-specific expression (23,
29). Atrial-specific expression is achieved by the positive effects of
a GATA factor-binding element in the atria and by inhibition through a
nuclear hormone-binding element, vitamin D response element
(VDRE),1 in the ventricles
(25). Mutational analysis of the slow MyHC3 promoter
revealed that the VDRE alone is required for ventricular inhibition
(25). The VDRE binds a heterodimer of retinoic X receptor (RXR )
and vitamin D receptor (VDR), which suppresses slow MyHC3
expression within ventricular but not atrial cardiomyocytes (25).
Because both RXR and VDR are expressed within atrial and ventricular
cardiomyocytes, it was postulated that an unknown ventricular-specific
inhibitor, in addition to VDR and RXR , must act through the negative
VDRE element (24).
Recently, Bao and co-workers (30) identified an Iroquois
family homeobox gene, Irx4, the expression of which is
confined to the ventricles throughout heart development in birds and in mammals (30, 31). In mice with targeted disruption of the Irx4 gene
there is inappropriate expression of atrial genes within the ventricle
(32). Irx4 expression is down stream of Nkx2-5 and dHand and activates the expression of the ventricle
myosin heavy chain 1 gene (VMHC1) and suppresses the
expression of the AMHC1/slow MyHC3 gene in the ventricles in
the chicken (30, 31). However, the molecular mechanism by which
Irx4 regulates the inhibition of slow MyHC3/AMHC1
gene expression and activation of VMHC1 gene expression is
not known. Here we report that down-regulation of the slow
MyHC3 gene by Irx4 is through the VDRE element. Furthermore, Irx4
and the RXR subunit of the VDR/RXR heteroduplex form a protein
complex, which inhibits slow MyHC3 gene expression in the ventricles.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Transfections and Plasmids--
Primary cultures of embryonic
day six atrial and ventricular quail cardiomyocytes were
cultured and transfected as described previously (25). Typical
transfections included 3 µg of CAT reporter plasmid, 3 µg of the
Irx4 or 3 µg of the Irx4 dominant-negative H+enr
expression plasmids, and 1 µg of pSV- -gal as a reference plasmid to control for transfection efficiency. The CAT constructs used were
described previously (23, 25). Briefly, SM3CAT:840D, SM3CAT:808D, and
SM3CAT:768D extend from 840, 808, and 768 bp respectively, of the
slow MyHC3 promoter through the first exon of non-coding
sequence (+18 bp) fused to the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter. CAT reporter constructs ARD1:CAT (previously designated SV/ARD1/F (23)), contain a 160-bp fragment of
the slow MyHC3 promoter between positions 840 and 680,
VDRE-GATA:CAT contains both the VDR and the GATA element between
positions 808 and 741, and GATA:CAT contains the GATA element
between positions 775 and 741. All control elements were positioned
upstream of the minimal SV40 promoter. The SV40:CAT construct contained
only the minimal SV40 promoter fused to CAT. Irx4 was cloned
into a RCAS viral vector (30). Transfection efficiencies were
normalized to -D-galactopyranoside expression, and CAT
assays were performed as described previously (23).
Two-hybrid Assay--
To detect Irx4 interactions with RXR or
VDR, we employed the mammalian MATCHMAKER two-hybrid assay kit
(CLONTECH) with slight modifications. The
RXR or VDR genes were inserted in frame with a
Gal4 DNA-binding domain in the pM expression vector
(CLONTECH), to create pM-RXR or
pM-VDR, respectively. Embryonic day six quail atrial cardiomyocytes
were transfected with the Gal4 reporter plasmid pG5CAT,
pM-RXR or pM-VDR to mediate binding to the Gal4 sites in
the reporter plasmid with or without the RCAS-Irx4 expression vector.
Three µg of each construct was transfected/60-mm culture. In
experiments where the Irx4 expression vector was not transfected along
with the reporter, 3 µg of empty expression vector was co-transfected such that in each transfection, 9 µg of plasmid DNA was used.
In Vitro Translation, Co-immunoprecipitation, and Western Blot
Analysis--
Irx4 (30), RXR (33), and
VDR (4) were cloned into a pBluescript KSII vector. In
vitro transcription with Large Scale RNA Production Systems was
performed according to the manufacturer (Promega). A rabbit
reticulocyte lysate kit from Promega was used for in vitro
translation. Interactions between Irx4 and RXR or VDR were assessed
by co-immunoprecipitation of in vitro translated RXR or
VDR with Irx4. Irx4 contained a HA tag immediately preceding the stop
codon. Monoclonal anti-VDR antibody was purchased from Biomol, and
anti-RXR antibody was provided by Dr. Elizabeth Allegretto of Ligand
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed by mixing 5 µl of each in vitro translated protein with the antibody against one of the proteins in 0.5 ml immunoprecipitation buffer according to Elion (34). Protein G-agarose beads (Sigma) were added to
precipitate the antibody-antigen complex, the precipitate was subjected
to SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose. Anti-VDR (rat IgG),
anti-RXR (rabbit IgG), or anti-HA to HA-tagged Irx4 (rabbit IgG)
were incubated with the blots to determine which proteins
co-precipitated. Western blots were performed as reported previously
(23). horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat against rabbit IgG or rat
IgG secondary antibodies were used for detection.
Irx4 Deletion Constructs--
Deletions of the
RCAS-Irx4 vector were made via site-directed polymerase
chain reaction cloning. Primers with unique restriction site sequences
were used to amplify selected regions of the RCAS-Irx4 vector, which were cloned into the pcDNA3.1/His C expression vector (Invitrogen) using standard protocols (25). The 5' construct lacks
5' sequence encoding amino acids 2-134 of Irx4 but retains the
remaining 3' sequence including the homeodomain; the 3' construct lacks 3' sequence encoding amino acids 269-515 but contains the remaining 5' sequence including the homeodomain of Irx4; the HD construct lacks sequence encoding amino acids 135-268 containing the
homeodomain while retaining 5' and 3' sequence as a fused product; and
the 3' 5' construct contains sequence encoding amino acids
135-268, containing primarily the homeodomain. Care was taken to
ligate Irx4 cDNA sequences into the expression vector such that
in-frame protein products were formed.
 |
RESULTS |
The 840 bp immediately upstream of the slow MyHC3
transcriptional initiation site is sufficient to drive correct
atrial-specific expression of a reporter gene both in mammals and in
birds (23, 29). We have previously demonstrated that a VDRE within this SM3CAT:840D construct is the essential element required for
ventricular-specific down-regulation in vitro and in
vivo (23, 25). Recently, an Iroquois family homeobox
gene, Irx4, was shown to regulate chamber-specific expression of myosin isoforms by suppressing the expression of the
AMHC1/slow MyHC3 and activating the expression of the
VMHC1 in the ventricles (30).
Irx4 Acts at the VDRE to Inhibit Expression in Atrial
Cardiomyocytes--
That Irx4 acts through the VDRE was demonstrated
by a series of co-transfections into atrial cardiomyocytes of an Irx4
expression vector, RCAS-Irx4, along with SM3CAT:840D and deletion
derivatives. Expression of Irx4 reduced expression of the CAT reporter
from co-transfected SM3CAT:840D by nearly 400% (Fig.
1). A similar reduction in reporter
expression was observed following deletion of slow MyHC3
sequence upstream of the VDRE (SM3CAT:808D). However, when the VDRE
sequence was removed (SM3CAT:768D), Irx4 expression no longer reduced
CAT expression in atrial cardiomyocytes (Fig. 1). These results
identify a 40-bp region of the slow MyHC3 promoter, containing the VDRE, as the site of Irx4 action.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Irx4 suppresses expression of slow
MyHC3 promoter activity in atrial cardiomyocytes.
Slow MyHC3 reporter constructs containing either 840, 808, or 768 bp upstream of the transcription start site, were transfected
alone ( , black bars), or co-transfected with the Irx4
expression vector, RCAS-Irx4 (Irx4, gray bars) into atrial
cardiomyocytes. Co-transfected Irx4 reduced expression from both
SM3CAT:840D and SM3CAT:808D reporter constructs while it had a
negligible effect on SM3CAT:768D expression. Elements within the
lower panel depict the upstream region of the slow
MyHC3 promoter. Error bars represent the S.E.
|
|
These results were refined by expression of Irx4 in atrial
cardiomyocytes co-transfected with shorter regions of the slow MyHC3 promoter, ARD1 (23). We have previously shown that the sequence between positions 840 and 680, designated as ARD1 (see lower panel in Fig. 2) serves
as an atrial-specific enhancer both in vitro and in
ovo (23). Irx4 suppressed reporter expression from both ARD1:CAT
and VDRE-GATA:CAT (sequence containing only the VDRE and GATA binding
site elements up-stream of a minimal SV40 promoter) (Fig. 2). However,
when the VDRE was removed (GATA:CAT) expression of Irx4 had no effect
on reporter expression. A ubiquitously expressed SV40:CAT was
unaffected by Irx4 expression. These observations suggest that a
functional inhibitory complex can form in atrial cardiomyocytes at the
VDRE if Irx4 is present.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Irx4 acts via the VDRE in atrial
cardiomyocytes. ARD1:CAT, VDRE-GATA:CAT, and GATA:CAT were
transfected alone ( , black bars) or co-transfected with
the RCAS-Irx4 expression vector (Irx4) (gray bars) into atrial
cardiomyocytes. Co-transfected Irx4 inhibited expression only when the
VDRE is present in the reporter construct (ARD1:CAT and VDRE-GATA:CAT),
but had no effect in its absence (GATA:CAT and SV40:CAT). Cis-elements
in the 160 bp slow MyHC3 enhancer between positions 840
and 680, designated as ARD1 (23), are shown in the lower panel.
|
|
RCAS-H+enr Acts at the VDRE to Relieve Inhibition in
Ventricular Cardiomyocytes--
To investigate the role of Irx4 in
ventricular cardiomyocytes, Bao and co-workers (30) infected avian
embryos prior to heart formation with a putative dominant negative form
of Irx4, designated RCAS-H+enr, a construct that encodes a
fusion protein composed of the chick Irx4 homeodomain and the repressor
domain of the Drosophila Engrailed protein.
RCAS-H+enr prevented the normally occurring down-regulation
of slow MyHC3 in the ventricles of infected embryos as
cardiac chamber formation proceeded (30). To identify the promoter
element required for the action of the RCAS-H+enr fusion
protein, it was co-transfected with the SM3CAT:840D construct into
ventricular cardiomyocytes (Fig. 3).
RCAS-H+enr significantly increased CAT expression from
SM3CAT:840D in ventricular cardiomyocytes, indicating that Irx4 has a
target site(s) within the 840-bp promoter. Co-transfection of
RCAS-H+enr also up-regulated CAT expression from the
SM3CAT:808D construct. However, when the VDRE element was deleted, but
the GATA site retained (SM3CAT:768D), inhibition was lost in
ventricular cardiomyocytes whether RCAS-H+enr was present
or not (Fig. 3). These results demonstrate that the element(s) required
for Irx4 action is located between positions 808 and 768, a region
that contains the VDRE element.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Irx4-engrailed fusion protein increases
expression of slow MyHC3 promoter in ventricular
cardiomyocytes. Slow MyHC3 reporter constructs
containing either 840, 808, or 768 bp upstream of the transcription
start site were transfected alone ( , dark bars), or
co-transfected with RCAS-H+enr (H+enr,
gray bars) into ventricular cardiomyocytes.
RCAS-H+enr relieved inhibition of reporter constructs
containing the VDRE (SM3CAT:840D and SM3CAT:808D) in ventricular
cardiomyocytes but had no additional effect when the VDRE was absent
(SM3CAT:768D).
|
|
The site of Irx4 action in ventricular cardiomyocytes was refined by
co-transfection of RCAS-H+enr with ARD1:CAT and deletions
derived from it. Co-transfection of ARD1:CAT with
RCAS-H+enr into ventricular cardiomyocytes resulted in a
3-fold increase in reporter expression (Fig.
4). Co-transfection of VDRE-GATA:CAT (containing only the VDRE and the GATA elements) with
RCAS-H+enr also increased CAT expression in ventricular
cardiomyocytes (Fig. 4). However, expression of the GATA:CAT construct,
in which the VDRE sequence had been removed, was not affected by
RCAS-H+enr expression (Fig. 4). The ubiquitously expressed
SV40:CAT control was unaffected by co-transfection with
RCAS-H+enr. These results, together with the results of
RCAS-Irx4 transfection of atrial cardiomyocytes, localize the Irx4 site
of action to the VDRE element, the previously identified inhibitory
sequence (23, 24), and indicate that in either atrial or ventricular cardiomyocytes an inhibitory complex can form if Irx4 is present.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Irx4 acts at the VDRE site in the slow
MyHC 3 promoter. The ARD1:CAT, VDRE-GATA:CAT, or
GATA:CAT were transfected alone ( , dark bars) or
co-transfected with RCAS-H+enr (H+enr,
gray bars) into ventricular cardiomyocytes. Co-transfection
with the dominant negative Irx4 expression vector increased reporter
expression only when the VDRE was present in the reporter construct
(ARD1:CAT and VDRE-GATA:CAT) but had no effect in its absence (GATA:CAT
and SV40:CAT).
|
|
Association of Irx4 and RXR Proteins--
Previous studies have
shown that both RXR and VDR proteins bind to the VDRE to influence
slow MyHC3 expression (23). However, because both classes of
nuclear hormone receptors are expressed in both atria and ventricles we
postulated that a ventricle-specific transcriptional repressor, acting
at the VDRE, was responsible for inhibition of slow MyHC3
expression (23, 24). The demonstration that Irx4 was required for
down-regulation of slow MyHC3 expression (30) made it the
likely candidate to act at this site. Because Irx4 is a
homeobox-containing transcription factor, and these factors are known
DNA-binding proteins, binding of Irx4 directly to the VDRE was tested.
In vitro translated Irx4 consistently failed to bind the
VDRE in mobility shift assays (negative data not shown) while the same
preparation was active in a co-immunoprecipitation assay (see below).
This suggests that Irx4 does not exert its effect through directly
binding to the VDRE.
Because a heterodimer of VDR and RXR binds strongly to the VDRE (25)
and because the site of Irx4 action is in this same region, we
determined whether Irx4 would physically associate with RXR and/or
VDR proteins. Interaction between Irx4 and RXR was first assessed
using a two-hybrid assay. An expression vector, pM-RXR , made
by fusing the Gal4 DNA-binding domain with the
RXR gene, served as a DNA-binding protein on the Gal4
enhancer present in the pG5CAT reporter construct. The RCAS-Irx4
vector, which produces a functionally active protein (Fig. 2), was used
as the second component in the assay. When co-transfected with the
pG5CAT reporter into atrial cardiomyocytes, pM-RXR alone permitted a low level of reporter expression while RCAS-Irx4 alone was without effect (Fig. 5A).
Co-transfection of both pM-RXR and RCAS-Irx4 with pG5CAT, led to a
nearly 5-fold increase of the CAT reporter compared with pM-RXR
alone (Fig. 5A). Co-transfection of pM-RXR with an empty
RCAS vector did not increase reporter expression relative to the
transfection of pM-RXR alone (data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
In atrial cardiomyocytes Irx4 interacts with
RXR but not VDR. Full-length RXR or
VDR cDNA was fused to the DNA-binding domain of Gal4, which upon
expression binds to the Gal4 binding site of the reporter plasmid
pG5CAT. A, expression of the RXR binding vector induces a
low level of expression (set to unity) from pG5CAT. Irx4 alone does not
induce reporter expression. Co-transfection of Irx4 expression vector
and RXR binding vector dramatically increased reporter expression
relative to transfection of RXR binding vector alone. B,
expression of the VDR binding vector induces a low level of expression
(set to unity) from pG5CAT. Irx4 alone does not induce reporter
expression. Co-transfection of the Irx4 expression and VDR binding
vectors did not increase reporter expression when compared with
transfection of the VDR binding vector alone.
|
|
Likewise, interaction between Irx4 and VDR was tested. A
pM-VDR expression vector, fusing the Gal4 DNA-binding domain
with the VDR gene, was co-transfected into atrial
cardiomyocytes with RCAS-Irx4 and the pG5CAT reporter. No increase in
reporter expression was observed relative to the transfection of pM-VDR
alone (Fig. 5B), indicating that Irx4 and VDR do not
interact. Together these results demonstrate a protein-protein
interaction between Irx4 and RXR , rather than between Irx4 and VDR,
of the VDRE-binding heterodimer.
To confirm that Irx4 interacts with RXR , we performed
immunoprecipitation experiments. In vitro translated
HA-tagged Irx4, RXR , and VDR proteins migrate with distinct
electrophoretic mobilities and can be specifically detected on Western
blots with anti-HA, anti-RXR , and anti-VDR antibodies (Fig.
6A). In vitro
translated HA-tagged Irx4 and RXR proteins were combined and
immunoprecipitated with an anti-RXR antibody. The precipitates were
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to
a nitrocellulose membrane. A characteristic doublet of Irx4 was
detected in the precipitate using an anti-HA antibody (Fig. 6B,
lane 1). As a control, a rabbit IgG antibody added to the Irx4 and
RXR protein mix did not result in a precipitate that contained Irx4
(Fig. 6B, lane 2). Conversely, when the HA-tagged Irx4 and
RXR proteins were combined and immunoprecipitated with the anti-HA
antibody, RXR was detected in the precipitates by the anti-RXR
antibody in the Western blot (Fig. 6B, lane 3).
Immunoprecipitation of the Irx4 protein complex by anti-HA was specific
because a control rabbit IgG antibody that does not recognize Irx4 did
not result in a precipitation of RXR when added to the Irx4 and
RXR protein mix (Fig. 6B, lane 4). These results confirm
that Irx4 and RXR proteins can physically interact. In contrast an
antibody against the HA-tag of Irx4 failed to precipitate VDR, and an
antibody against VDR did not co-immunoprecipitate Irx4 (Fig. 6B,
lanes 5 and 6). These experiments support the idea that
a protein-protein interaction between Irx4 and RXR , rather then
between Irx4 and VDR, mediates the inhibition of slow MyHC3
via the VDRE.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
There is a physical association between Irx4
and RXR in vitro.
A, in vitro translated Irx4 (HA-tagged), RXR ,
or VDR proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and detected on immunoblot by
anti-HA, anti-RXR , or anti-VDR antibodies, respectively.
B, in vitro translated Irx4 (HA-tagged) and
RXR were mixed and immunoprecipitated (IP) by anti-RXR
or anti-HA antibody. The immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
analyzed by immunoblot (IB), showing that Irx4
co-precipitates with RXR . In vitro translated Irx4
(HA-tagged) and VDR were mixed and immunoprecipitated by anti-HA or
anti-VDR antibody (Lanes 1 and 3). Specificity
was demonstrated by the failure of a rabbit IgG to immunoprecipitate
Irx4 (Lane 2) or RXR (Lane 4). In contrast,
VDR did not co-immunoprecipitate with Irx4 (Lanes 5 and
6). The immunoprecipitating antibodies (anti-RXR and
anti-HA) separated from antigen by SDS-PAGE are rabbit IgGs and are
visible as the lower band in Lanes 1-4.
Molecular masses in kDa are shown to the right of the
blot.
|
|
The Amino-terminal of Irx4 Mediates Inhibition--
A
structure-function analysis was performed to identify the region(s) of
the Irx4 protein required for its inhibitory function. Deletions of the
Irx4 cDNA were made, inserted in frame in a eucaryotic expression
vector, and co-transfected with the SM3CAT:840D reporter into atrial or
ventricular cardiomyocytes (Fig. 7).
Atrial cardiomyocytes have no endogenous Irx4, and no significant
inhibition of reporter expression was observed from
amino-terminal-truncated Irx4 ( 5'), homeodomain-truncated Irx4
( HD), or the Irx4 homeodomain alone ( 3' 5'). However, a
significant (8- to 10-fold) inhibition of reporter expression was
observed from a carboxyl-terminal-truncated Irx4 ( 3'). These results
demonstrate that the amino-terminal of Irx4 is required for inhibition
(Fig. 7).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The amino end of Irx4 is essential for
inhibition. The slow MyHC3 reporter construct,
SM3CAT:840D, was transfected alone (no Irx4 construct) or
co-transfected with the Irx4 deletion constructs 5', 3', HD,
and 3' 5' into atrial or ventricular cardiomyocytes. It should be
noted that endogenous Irx4 is present in the ventricular but not the
atrial cardiomyocytes. In atrial cardiomyocytes, the 3' construct
inhibited reporter expression while none of the other Irx4 deletion
constructs had an effect. In ventricular cardiomyocytes, only deletion
of the 5' end of Irx4 ( 5') effected SM3CAT:840D expression,
resulting in a partial relief of inhibition of reporter
expression.
|
|
The importance of the amino-terminal was reinforced by co-transfection
of SM3CAT:840D and the amino-terminal-truncated Irx4 ( 5') into
ventricular cardiomyocytes. Against a background of endogenous Irx4,
this construct was able to partially relieve inhibition of the reporter
(Fig. 7). In contrast, no significant relief from inhibition was
observed in ventricular cardiomyocytes expressing
carboxyl-terminal-truncated Irx4 ( 3'), homeodomain-truncated Irx4
( HD), or the Irx4 homeodomain alone ( 3' 5') in the presence of
endogenous Irx4.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have previously shown that atrial-specific expression of the
slow MyHC3 gene is positively regulated by a GATA
factor-binding element, essential for cardiac-specific expression, and
a negative-acting VDRE element, required to prevent expression in the
ventricle (23-25, 29). These two elements are sufficient to drive
atrial-specific expression of a reporter construct in primary
cardiomyocyte cultures in vitro and in transgenic mice (23,
29). Subsequently, a ventricle-restricted homeodomain protein, Irx4,
was discovered, that was capable of regulating cardiac
chamber-restricted expression of myosin heavy chain genes including the
chicken homologue of slow MyHC3, AMHC1 (30-32).
In the current study we demonstrate that the inhibition of slow
MyHC3 expression in the ventricle by Irx4 is mediated via the
VDRE. Three pieces of evidence suggest that Irx4 acts through the VDRE
element rather than the positive GATA element. First, misexpression of
Irx4 in atrial cardiomyocytes down-regulates expression of a reporter
construct containing the VDRE (VDRE-GATA:CAT) but has no effect on a
reporter construct with only the GATA element (GATA:CAT). Second, a
dominant-negative form of Irx4, previously shown to up-regulate
expression of AMHC1/slow MyHC3 in the ventricles in
vivo (30), relieved inhibition of the VDRE-GATA:CAT reporter in
ventricular cardiomyocytes but had no effect on expression of the
GATA:CAT, which lacks the VDRE element. Third, Irx4 interacts with the
RXR subunit of the heterodimeric complex of VDR/RXR that binds at
the VDRE element of the slow MyHC3 promoter.
Homeobox-containing proteins found in cardiac tissue have been viewed
as DNA-binding transcription factors (8, 35-37); accordingly, we
investigated whether Irx4 could directly bind the VDRE sequence of
slow MyHC3. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays
consistently failed to detect an Irx4 binding activity to the VDRE and
surrounding sequence (negative data not shown), under conditions where
the VDR/RXR clearly bound (25). A DNA motif, TTAATTAA, to which Iroquois family members are likely to bind, has been
reported (38). No sequence similar to this motif is present in or
around the VDRE nor within the 840-bp promoter fragment capable of
directing atrial-specific expression of the slow MyHC3 gene.
Although no high affinity binding of Irx4 to the VDRE site was
detected, the possibility can not be excluded that binding of a
RXR /VDR heterodimer to the VDRE element facilitates binding of Irx4
to a weak affinity DNA site somewhere in the 40-bp fragment of the
slow MyHC3 promoter between 808 and 768. The absence of
an Irx4 binding motif in the slow MyHC3 promoter has
prompted others to suggest that the mechanism of Irx4 action is via
protein-protein interaction (32)
Our previous results indicated that binding of a VDR/RXR heterodimer
to the VDRE is required for down-regulation of slow MyHC3
expression in the ventricle (23). Because no consistent difference in
protein expression levels of VDR or RXR was detectable between
atrial and ventricular nuclear extracts (23), it is unlikely that Irx4
acts directly or indirectly to up-regulate the levels of VDR or RXR
proteins in the ventricles.
Two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation assays, demonstrated that Irx4
can physically interact with RXR but not VDR. Co-immunoprecipitation further demonstrated that this interaction is strong enough to withstand the isolation process. An antibody against RXR
co-immunoprecipitated Irx4 when both proteins were expressed in
vitro, while an anti-VDR antibody did not co-immunoprecipitate
Irx4 when VDR and Irx4 were co-expressed. Conversely, an antibody
against the HA-tag of Irx4 co-immunoprecipitated RXR but not VDR.
Thus, the inhibitory action of Irx4 is likely to be mediated via a
protein-protein interaction of Irx4 with RXR .
A region of the Irx4 protein encompassing a portion of the amino
terminus and part of the homeodomain is important in the inhibition. An
amino-terminal truncation of the Irx4 protein, ( 5'), relieved
inhibition in ventricular cardiomyocytes. Because ventricular
cardiomyocytes express the native Irx4 protein, the relief of
inhibition afforded by 5' was minimal (2-fold). While expression of
Irx4 proteins with a deletion of either the amino-terminal ( 5') or
the homeodomain ( HD) had no effect in atrial cardiomyocytes, a
deletion of the carboxyl-terminal ( 3'), which retains the
amino-terminal and the homeodomain, significantly inhibited expression
of a co-transfected slow MyHC3 reporter construct. That the
DNA-binding homeodomain by itself ( 3' 5') or with the
carboxyl portion of the protein present ( 5') did not inhibit
reporter expression in atrial cells provides additional evidence that
Irx4 works via protein-protein interaction rather then by binding the
slow MyHC promoter at, or near, the VDRE.
Fusion of the engrailed repressor to Irx4 created a protein
that relieved inhibition of the chicken slow MyHC3 homologue
(Ref. 30 and this study), making it likely that the homeodomain also contributes to the inhibitory action of Irx4. Exactly how this dominant
negative construct functions in the assays presented here or in
vivo is not clear. Bao and co-workers (30) postulated that fusion
of the DNA homeodomain with the repressor domain of Engrailed created a
protein that interfered with transcriptional activation by the
wild-type protein, thus producing a dominant negative effect as well as
a potential gain-of-function effect due to active repression. On the
one hand, the engrailed-derived moiety may be acting by
sterically interfering with the normally occurring Irx4/RXR
protein-protein interaction. Although we showed that Irx4 and RXR
interact, it remains possible that, in vivo, Irx4 acts
indirectly to up-regulate transcription of a repressor at an as yet
unidentified locus. Clearly, if there were such a repressor, it must
act through the VDRE of the slow MyHC3 gene in the ventricle
to regulate slow MyHC3 gene expression. Were this the case,
then it must also be postulated that the dominant negative
Irx4-engrailed fusion protein inhibits expression from the unidentified
locus. Although this hypothesis is a possibility, based on the data
here, a more parsimonious explanation favors a model where Irx4
interacts directly with RXR to down-regulate slow MyHC3
gene expression in the ventricle.
Precedence for inhibitory co-factors in cardiomyocytes is found in the
literature. A co-factor that regulates ventricle-specific expression of
MLC-2v has been reported by Zou and co-workers (39). A 28-bp
sequence containing HF-1a and MEF-2 elements within the MLC-2v promoter region confers ventricular chamber-specific
gene expression in transgenic mouse (40). A nuclear ankyrin-like repeat
protein, CARP (cardiac ankyrin repeat protein), which acts as a
cofactor of the HF-1a-binding protein, YB-1, displays a transcriptional inhibitory activity in cardiomyocytes (39, 41). Interestingly, upstream
of the VDRE, the slow MyHC3 promoter contains a HF-1a-like motif. However, this region of the slow MyHC3 promoter is
not essential for chamber-specific expression of the gene (Ref. 25, and
this study).
Homeobox-containing proteins often rely on co-factors for DNA binding
and for regulation of transcription (42-45). Cooperative protein-protein interaction between a homeodomain protein and a nuclear
hormone receptor to regulate gene expression has been reported in
Drosophila embryos (43). Ftz-F1, a member of the nuclear
hormone-receptor superfamily, serves as a co-factor to facilitate the
binding of the homeodomain protein, Fushi tarazu (Ftz), to weak
affinity DNA sites (43). However, few other systems demonstrate that
protein-protein interactions mediate the action of homeodomain proteins
in the absence of DNA binding.
Mechanisms for chamber-preferential expression of
-MyHC, -MyHC, and ANF
during embryonic development are not clear. Interestingly, another
member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, thyroid hormone
receptor, is also implicated in the regulation of myosin heavy chains.
Expression of -MyHC and
-MyHC, the two major isoforms of myosin heavy
chains in the rodent myocardium, changes in the ventricles in response
to developmental changes in thyroid hormone (46, 47). Whether Irx4
binds cooperatively with thyroid hormone receptor to regulate
expression of -MyHC or
-MyHC is not known. Although an inhibitory
element is found in the ANF promoter, the mechanism by which
the inhibitory element suppresses ANF expression in the
ventricle is unclear (36).
Previously we proposed an activation model and an inhibition model to
depict regulation of chamber-specific expression of cardiac genes
during embryonic development (24). Ventricle-specific expression and
inhibitory function of Irx4 fit well with the inhibition model for
atrial-specific expression. However, Irx4 is not only an inhibitor of
slow MyHC3/AMHC1 but also an activator of VMHC1 in the ventricles (30). The activation model fits ventricular chamber-specific activation of VMHC1 by Irx4. How Irx4 acts
as an inhibitor of one gene and an activator of another within the same
cell type is not known. Because different homeobox-containing proteins
have similar DNA-binding functions in vitro and require cofactors to achieve their biological functions (42), cooperative interaction between Irx4 and a cofactor or direct binding of Irx4 to a
target site in the VMHC1 promoter could activate
VMHC1 expression in ventricular cardiomyocytes.
Investigation of how Irx4 regulates cardiac genes will continue to
broaden our understanding of diversification between atrial and
ventricular cardiomyocytes during development.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. Elizabeth Allegretto
for providing the rabbit polyclonal anti-RXR antibody. Sandra Conlon
provided excellent technical assistance, and Gloria Garcia provided
excellent assistance in preparation of the manuscript. Dr. Gordon Cann
provided helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
650-725-6449; Fax: 650-736-2282; E-mail: mlfes@stanford.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103716200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
VDRE, vitamin D
response element;
RXR , retinoic X receptor ;
VDR, vitamin D
receptor;
bp, base pair(s);
VMHC1, ventricle myosin heavy
chain 1 gene;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
HA, hemagglutinin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Fishman, M. C.,
and Chien, K. R.
(1997)
Development
124,
2099-2117
|
| 2.
|
Lee, Y.,
Song, A. J.,
Baker, R.,
Micales, B.,
Conway, S. J.,
and Lyons, G. E.
(2000)
Circ. Res.
86,
932-938
|
| 3.
|
Liberatore, C. M.,
Searcy-Schrick, R. D.,
and Yutzey, K. E.
(2000)
Dev. Biol.
223,
169-180
|
| 4.
|
Lin, N. U.,
Malloy, P. J.,
Sakati, N.,
al-Ashwal, A.,
and Feldman, D.
(1996)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
81,
2564-2569
|
| 5.
|
Molkentin, J. D.,
Lin, Q.,
Duncan, S. A.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1061-1072
|
| 6.
|
Lyons, I.,
Parsons, L. M.,
Hartley, L.,
Li, R.,
Andrews, J. E.,
Robb, L.,
and Harvey, R. P.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1654-1666
|
| 7.
|
Stainier, D. Y.,
and Fishman, M. C.
(1992)
Dev. Biol.
153,
91-101
|
| 8.
|
Tanaka, M.,
Chen, Z.,
Bartunkova, S.,
Yamasaki, N.,
and Izumo, S.
(1999)
Development
126,
1269-1280
|
| 9.
|
Thomas, T.,
Yamagishi, H.,
Overbeek, P. A.,
Olson, E. N.,
and Srivastava, D.
(1998)
Dev. Biol.
196,
228-236
|
| 10.
|
Yutzey, K. E.,
and Bader, D.
(1995)
Circ. Res.
77,
216-219
|
| 11.
|
Bisaha, J. G.,
and Bader, D.
(1991)
Dev. Biol.
148,
355-364
|
| 12.
|
Bruneau, B. G.,
Logan, M.,
Davis, N.,
Levi, T.,
Tabin, C. J.,
Seidman, J. G.,
and Seidman, C. E.
(1999)
Dev. Biol.
211,
100-108
|
| 13.
|
Durocher, D.,
Charron, F.,
Warren, R.,
Schwartz, R. J.,
and Nemer, M.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5687-5696
|
| 14.
|
Kelly, R.,
Alonso, S.,
Tajbakhsh, S.,
Cossu, G.,
and Buckingham, M.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
383-396
|
| 15.
|
Kubalak, S. W.,
Miller-Hance, W. C.,
O'Brien, T. X.,
Dyson, E.,
and Chien, K. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
16961-16970
|
| 16.
|
Lee, Y.,
Shioi, T.,
Kasahara, H.,
Jobe, S. M.,
Wiese, R. J.,
Markham, B. E.,
and Izumo, S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3120-3129
|
| 17.
|
Morin, S.,
Charron, F.,
Robitaille, L.,
and Nemer, M.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
2046-2055
|
| 18.
|
O'Brien, T. X.,
Lee, K. J.,
and Chien, K. R.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5157-5161
|
| 19.
|
Yelon, D.,
Horne, S. A.,
and Stainier, D. Y.
(1999)
Dev. Biol.
214,
23-37
|
| 20.
|
Yutzey, K. E.,
Rhee, J. T.,
and Bader, D.
(1994)
Development
120,
871-883
|
| 21.
|
Zeller, R.,
Bloch, K. D.,
Williams, B. S.,
Arceci, R. J.,
and Seidman, C. E.
(1987)
Genes Dev.
1,
693-698
|
| 22.
|
Evans, D.,
Miller, J. B.,
and Stockdale, F. E.
(1988)
Dev. Biol.
127,
376-383
|
| 23.
|
Wang, G. F.,
Nikovits, W.,
Schleinitz, M.,
and Stockdale, F. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19836-19845
|
| 24.
|
Wang, G. F.,
and Stockdale, F. E.
(1999)
in
Heart Development
(Harvey, R. P.
, and Rosenthal, N., eds)
, pp. 357-369, Academic Press, New York
|
| 25.
|
Wang, G. F.,
Nikovits, W.,
Schleinitz, M.,
and Stockdale, F. E.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6023-6034
|
| 26.
|
Nikovits, W., Jr.,
Wang, G. F.,
Feldman, J. L.,
Miller, J. B.,
Wade, R.,
Nelson, L.,
and Stockdale, F. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17047-17056
|
| 27.
|
Oana, S.,
Machida, S.,
Hiratsuka, E.,
Furutani, Y.,
Momma, K.,
Takao, A.,
and Matsuoka, R.
(1998)
Biol. Cell
90,
605-613
|
| 28.
|
Mahdavi, V.,
Chambers, A. P.,
and Nadal-Ginard, B.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
2626-2630
|
| 29.
|
Xavier-Neto, J.,
Neville, C. M.,
Shapiro, M. D.,
Houghton, L.,
Wang, G. F.,
Nikovits, W.,
Stockdale, F. E.,
and Rosenthal, N.
(1999)
Development
126,
2677-2687
|
| 30.
|
Bao, Z. Z.,
Bruneau, B. G.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Seidman, C. E.,
and Cepko, C. L.
(1999)
Science
283,
1161-1164
|
| 31.
|
Bruneau, B. G.,
Bao, Z. Z.,
Tanaka, M.,
Schott, J. J.,
Izumo, S.,
Cepko, C. L.,
Seidman, J. G.,
and Seidman, C. E.
(2000)
Dev. Biol.
217,
266-277
|
| 32.
|
Bruneau, B. G.,
Bao, Z. Z.,
Fatkin, D.,
Xavier-Neto, J.,
Georgakopoulos, D.,
Maguire, C. T.,
Berul, C. I.,
Kass, D. A.,
Kuroski-de Bold, M. L.,
de Bold, A. J.,
Conner, D. A.,
Rosenthal, N.,
Cepko, C. L.,
Seidman, C. E.,
and Seidman, J. G.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
1730-1736
|
| 33.
|
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
Borgmeyer, U.,
Heyman, R. A.,
Zhou, J. Y.,
Ong, E. S.,
Oro, A. E.,
Kakizuka, A.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
329-344
|
| 34.
|
Elion, E. A.
(1999)
in
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
(Ausubel, F. M.
, et al., eds), Vol. 4
, pp. 20.5.1-20.5.9, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 35.
|
Chen, C. Y.,
and Schwartz, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15628-15633
|
| 36.
|
Durocher, D.,
Chen, C. Y.,
Ardati, A.,
Schwartz, R. J.,
and Nemer, M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4648-4655
|
| 37.
|
Tabin, C. J.
(1991)
Cell
66,
199-217
|
| 38.
|
Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L.,
del Corral, R. D.,
de la Calle-Mustienes, E.,
Ferre-Marco, D.,
and Modolell, J.
(1996)
Cell
85,
95-105
|
| 39.
|
Zou, Y.,
Evans, S.,
Chen, J.,
Kuo, H. C.,
Harvey, R. P.,
and Chien, K. R.
(1997)
Development
124,
793-804
|
| 40.
|
Lee, K. J.,
Hickey, R.,
Zhu, H.,
and Chien, K. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1220-1229
|
| 41.
|
Zou, Y.,
and Chien, K. R.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2972-2982
|
| 42.
|
Li, X.,
Murre, C.,
and McGinnis, W.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
198-211
|
| 43.
|
Yu, Y.,
Li, W.,
Su, K.,
Yussa, M.,
Han, W.,
Perrimon, N.,
and Pick, L.
(1997)
Nature
385,
552-555
|
| 44.
|
Piper, D. E.,
Batchelor, A. H.,
Chang, C. P.,
Cleary, M. L.,
and Wolberger, C.
(1999)
Cell
96,
587-597
|
| 45.
|
Passner, J. M.,
Ryoo, H. D.,
Shen, L.,
Mann, R. S.,
and Aggarwal, A. K.
(1999)
Nature
397,
714-719
|
| 46.
|
Izumo, S.,
Nadal-Ginard, B.,
and Mahdavi, V.
(1986)
Science
231,
597-600
|
| 47.
|
Subramaniam, A.,
Gulick, J.,
Neumann, J.,
Knotts, S.,
and Robbins, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4331-4336
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. He, Y. Jia, and K. Takimoto
Interaction between transcription factors Iroquois proteins 4 and 5 controls cardiac potassium channel Kv4.2 gene transcription
Cardiovasc Res,
January 1, 2009;
81(1):
64 - 71.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Myrthue, B. L.S. Rademacher, J. Pittsenbarger, B. Kutyba-Brooks, M. Gantner, D. Z. Qian, and T. M. Beer
The Iroquois Homeobox Gene 5 Is Regulated by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 in Human Prostate Cancer and Regulates Apoptosis and the Cell Cycle in LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2008;
14(11):
3562 - 3570.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Xin, E. M. Small, E. van Rooij, X. Qi, J. A. Richardson, D. Srivastava, O. Nakagawa, and E. N. Olson
Essential roles of the bHLH transcription factor Hrt2 in repression of atrial gene expression and maintenance of postnatal cardiac function
PNAS,
May 8, 2007;
104(19):
7975 - 7980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-T. Wang, L. E. Tavera-Mendoza, D. Laperriere, E. Libby, N. Burton MacLeod, Y. Nagai, V. Bourdeau, A. Konstorum, B. Lallemant, R. Zhang, et al.
Large-Scale in Silico and Microarray-Based Identification of Direct 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Target Genes
Mol. Endocrinol.,
November 1, 2005;
19(11):
2685 - 2695.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Kelly, M. Lemonnier, S. Zaffran, A. Munk, and M. E. Buckingham
Cell history determines the maintenance of transcriptional differences between left and right ventricular cardiomyocytes in the developing mouse heart
J. Cell Sci.,
December 15, 2003;
116(24):
5005 - 5013.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. M. MOORMAN and V. M. CHRISTOFFELS
Cardiac Chamber Formation: Development, Genes, and Evolution
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2003;
83(4):
1223 - 1267.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. E.M.H. Habets, A. F.M. Moorman, and V. M. Christoffels
Regulatory modules in the developing heart
Cardiovasc Res,
May 1, 2003;
58(2):
246 - 263.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Solloway and R. P. Harvey
Molecular pathways in myocardial development: a stem cell perspective
Cardiovasc Res,
May 1, 2003;
58(2):
264 - 277.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. G. Bruneau
Transcriptional Regulation of Vertebrate Cardiac Morphogenesis
Circ. Res.,
March 22, 2002;
90(5):
509 - 519.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.M. SMALL and P.A. KRIEG
Molecular Mechanisms of Chamber-specific Myocardial Gene Expression: Transgenic Analysis of the ANF Promoter
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol,
January 1, 2002;
67(0):
71 - 80.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|