JBC Transcription and Nuclear Factor Monoclonals

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.R100023200 on June 12, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 32, 29617-29620, August 10, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/32/29617    most recent
R100023200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunbar, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Caplan, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunbar, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Caplan, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

MINIREVIEW
Ion Pumps in Polarized Cells: Sorting and Regulation of the Na+,K+- and H+,K+-ATPases*

Lisa A. Dunbar and Michael J. CaplanDagger

From the Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES

The physiologic function of an ion transport protein is determined, in part, by its subcellular localization and by the cellular mechanisms that modulate its activity. The Na+,K+-ATPase and the H+,K+-ATPases are closely related members of the P-type family of ion transporting ATPases. Despite their homology, these pumps are sorted to different domains in polarized epithelial cells, and their enzymatic activities are subject to distinct regulatory pathways. The molecular signals responsible for these properties have begun to be elucidated. It appears that a complex array of inter- and intramolecular interactions govern trafficking, distribution, and catalytic capacities of these proteins.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES

The P-type ATPase family, whose members include the Na+,K+-, H+,K+-, and Ca2+-ATPases, comprises a nearly ubiquitous collection of ion pumps with catalytic activities that drive myriad physiologic processes (1). These pumps are responsible for such fundamental manifestations of cellular homeostasis as the maintenance of osmotic balance and intracellular ionic composition. Furthermore, almost every transport operation performed by the cells of epithelial tissues is coupled in some fashion to the action of a P-type ATPase (2). The enzymatic activities of these pumps constitute some of the principal means through which all animal cells convert the energy embodied in ATP into electrochemical gradients that can be exploited by all manner of metabolic pathways.

The function of any ion transport protein can be appreciated at several levels of resolution. From the biochemical or biophysical perspective, the nature of a transport process is defined by such kinetic and thermodynamic parameters as its energy dependence, its stoichiometry, and its substrate affinity. Considered from the cell biologic point of view, the operation of an ion transport protein is significant for its influence on the cytoplasmic environment and for its interaction with those proteins that participate in the signaling and trafficking pathways that govern its regulation and distribution. In the broader physiologic context, the role of an ion transport protein is determined not only by all of these factors but also by the constellation of cell types in which it is expressed and the environmental influences that modulate its degree of functional expression. Ideally, a complete understanding of an ion transport process encompasses insights gleaned from and integrated among all of these distinct considerations.

    Ion Pumps in Polarized Cells
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES

The plasma membranes of polarized epithelial cells are subdivided into two compositionally distinct regions (3). In epithelial tissues, basolateral surfaces generally confront the extracellular fluid compartment, whereas apical membranes often form the borders of the lumens of tubular structures. Tight junctions define the boundaries between these membrane compartments and maintain the segregation of their unique protein and lipid components. To create and maintain this anisotropy, epithelial cells must possess mechanisms for targeting particular subsets of membrane proteins to their appropriate plasmalemmal destinations. These mechanisms depend upon information embedded within the structure of each individual membrane protein that specifies its ultimate subcellular distribution (4, 5).

Among the proteins that are differentially distributed between epithelial plasmalemmal domains are the Na+,K+- and gastric H+,K+-ATPases (2). The Na+,K+-ATPase, or sodium pump, uses the energy of one molecule of ATP to drive 3 sodium ions out of the cell and 2 potassium ions into the cell against substantial concentration gradients. The activity of this enzyme energizes such diverse functions as the maintenance of the membrane potential and the renal and intestinal handling of solutes (6). The gastric H+,K+-ATPase exploits a very similar enzymatic mechanism to catalyze the electroneutral exchange of intracellular protons for extracellular potassium ions, thus generating the enormous proton gradients associated with gastric acid secretion (7).

The Na+,K+-ATPase and the H+,K+-ATPase share a great deal of structural homology. They are both composed of an alpha -subunit that is predicted to span the membrane 10 times and a beta -subunit that spans the membrane once in a type II orientation. During the biosynthesis of these pumps, the beta -subunits assemble with the alpha -subunits in the endoplasmic reticulum. Formation of the alpha -beta complex appears to involve interactions between the cytoplasmic, extracytoplasmic, and transmembrane domains of the proteins (8-10) and may be assisted through the involvement of chaperone proteins (11). The assembly process appears to be quite specific. Although cross-assembly of Na+,K+- and H+,K+-ATPase subunit proteins can occur, the alpha -subunit of each pump preferentially associates with its appropriate beta -polypeptide (12, 13). Subunit assembly is required for the holoenzyme complex to reach the plasma membrane (13-15). Preventing this dimerization results in the degradation of the unassembled alpha -subunit (16).

The alpha -subunits of the Na+,K+- and H+,K+-ATPases share ~65% sequence identity, although the amino acid sequences of the beta -subunits are ~35% identical (17-21). Despite this close relationship, however, they differ in several important attributes. One of these differences is dramatically reflected in the subcellular distribution of these ion pumps. The Na+,K+ pump is concentrated at the basolateral membranes of most epithelial cell types (22), whereas the H+,K+ pump accumulates at the apical surface and in subapical storage vesicles in the acid-secreting parietal cells of the stomach (2, 23). The two ion pumps also manifest distinct ion affinities, transport stoichiometries, and inhibitor sensitivities (7).

    Molecular Signals in Ion Pump Sorting
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES

When transfected into the proximal tubule-like pig kidney cell line LLC-PK1 the gastric H+,K+-ATPase alpha - and beta -subunits assemble, travel to the cell surface, and are ultimately found exclusively at the apical membrane. The endogenous Na+,K+-ATPase, on the other hand, is restricted to the basolateral plasma membrane in H+,K+ pump-transfected cells (24). By generating chimeric constructs between the two related pumps, it has been possible to examine the regions of the pump sequences required for their correct localizations in polarized epithelial cells (24-26). Through an analysis of the sorting behaviors of a number of such chimeric pumps expressed by transfection in LLC-PK1 cells, an H+,K+-ATPase signal motif that is sufficient to redirect the normally basolateral Na+,K+-ATPase to the apical surface in transfected epithelial cells has been identified (Fig. 1). This motif resides entirely within the fourth domain (TM4) of the ten predicted transmembrane domains of H+,K+-ATPase alpha -subunit (25).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structural representations of ion pump chimeras. The positions of residues exchanged in four different Na+,K+/H+,K+-ATPase alpha -subunit chimeras are shown in this space-filling color representation superimposed upon the backbone structure of the Ca2+-ATPase (78). The yellow residues correspond to the NH2-terminal 85 residues of the H+,K+-ATPase, which serves in all pump chimeras as an epitope tag that permits the chimeras to be distinguished from the host cell's own population of sodium pumps. This portion of the H+,K+-ATPase does not confer any apical sorting information (25). The turquoise residues correspond to the predicted fourth transmembrane domain of the H+,K+-ATPase, which is sufficient to direct the apical accumulation of those Na+,K+-ATPase/H+,K+-ATPase chimeric molecules that include this H+,K+ pump domain. The red residues and the green residues correspond to the sequences that flank TM4 on its cytoplasmic and extracytoplasmic sides, respectively. Chimeras incorporating these H+,K+-ATPase ectodomain or cytoplasmic domain residues alone in the background of the Na+,K+-ATPase alpha -subunit behave as basolateral proteins. In contrast, a chimera that incorporates both sets of flanking residues behaves as an apical protein. Thus, apical sorting information can be communicated by TM4 or by its flanking domains, demonstrating that the apical sorting determinant is the product of transmembrane conformational interactions (25).

The majority of the polypeptides that have been shown to play a role in membrane protein sorting, such as cytoskeletal elements, adapters, and COP proteins, are soluble and reside in the cytosol (27). The exit of newly synthesized Na+,K+-ATPase from the Golgi complex, for example, appears to require an intact Golgi cytoskeleton containing beta Isigma spectrin and ankyrin Gly-119. Disruption of this matrix results in the retention of a specific subset of membrane proteins, including the sodium pump, within a subcompartment of the Golgi complex (28). It is somewhat surprising, therefore, that information capable of directing the apical sorting of a pump chimera can be entirely buried within the plane of the membrane and thus inaccessible to interpretation by this molecular machinery. This same problem is confronted by proteins anchored to the membrane via covalent attachment to glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI).1 In many epithelial cell types, GPI-linked proteins accumulate predominantly at the apical plasmalemma (29). The signal responsible for this anisotropic distribution appears to be attributable to the GPI anchor itself, which is able to associate in the plane of the membrane with glycosphingolipid (GSL) and cholesterol molecules to form "lipid rafts" (30). These lipid rafts, which coalesce in subdomains of the Golgi complex, appear to give rise to apically directed transport vesicles (31). Thus GPI-linked, as well as at least some transmembrane proteins, are apparently sorted to the apical surface by virtue of their capacity to partition into GSL-rich rafts during their biosynthetic passage through the Golgi (32). Presumably, the targeting proteins that endow these nascent vesicles with their apical specificity are incorporated into GSL-rich rafts through a similar partitioning mechanism. It has recently been suggested that the vectorial basolateral targeting of the Na+,K+-ATPase (33, 34) depends upon its exclusion from GSL-rich raft domains during its passage through the Golgi complex (35, 36).

Numerous proteins that are capable of partitioning into GSL-rich rafts resist detergent solubilization in 1% Triton X-100 at 4 °C (37). This is not the case, however, for the H+,K+-ATPase. The native H+,K+-ATPase and all of the chimeras that incorporate its TM4 segment are fully soluble under these conditions, as is the Na+,K+-ATPase (25). These data indicate that the H+,K+-ATPase TM4 does not appear to exert its influence on sorting through interactions with lipid molecules but may instead mediate intramembranous protein-protein associations or alter the global conformation of the pump protein to create a motif that is accessible to interactions with cytoplasmic polypeptides.

Support for the global conformation hypothesis derives from the sorting behaviors of the non-gastric H+,K+-ATPase proteins. These heterodimeric pumps are close relatives of both the Na+,K+- and gastric H+,K+-ATPases and appear to play a role in potassium reabsorption in the colon and the kidney (38). Although there is physiologic evidence to suggest that (as their name implies) these pumps transport protons in exchange for potassium, recent functional expression studies indicate that sodium may in fact be the preferred counterion in potassium transport (39, 40). The non-gastric H+,K+-ATPase alpha -subunits share ~60% protein sequence identity with both their Na+,K+- and gastric H+,K+-ATPase alpha -subunit counterparts (41). Alignment of the protein sequences of the alpha -subunits from these three pump families reveals that the TM4 segments of the non-gastric pumps are highly homologous to that of the sodium pump and markedly divergent from that of the gastric H+,K+-ATPase. If the TM4 motif were necessary to account for the apical sorting of the gastric H+,K+-ATPase, then the non-gastric H+,K+-ATPases would be expected to behave as basolateral proteins. Transport studies performed on intact epithelial tissues, however, indicate that these pumps are functionally present in the apical plasma membrane (42). Similarly, when exogenously expressed by transfection in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells the human non-gastric H+,K+-ATPase, ATP1AL1, also accumulates at the apical surface (43). Thus, although the gastric H+,K+-ATPase TM4 transmembrane motif is clearly sufficient to specify apical sorting, other pump determinants appear to participate in this targeting process.

The generation of further gastric H+,K+-ATPase/Na+,K+-ATPase chimeras provides additional support for the contention that the TM4 sequence does not act alone. In fact, the discontinuous sequence domains that flank the fourth transmembrane domain can cooperate to recapitulate the apical sorting signal of the fourth transmembrane domain (Fig. 1) (25). Thus, the apical sorting determinant appears to be the product of a conversation between the fourth transmembrane domain and the motifs that abut it. Interestingly, a similar conformational interaction dramatically influences the cation selectivities of these pump chimeras (44, 45). The precise mechanisms through which these sequences cooperate remain to be determined.

    Regulation of Ion Pump Function
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES

Several factors have been identified that regulate Na+,K+-ATPase activity. Most of the effects have been studied in the kidney, where the physiologic regulation of Na+,K+-ATPase function has been well established. Acute regulation of the pump-mediated catalysis may be accomplished by either directly modulating the activity of the enzyme or by changing its localization. The cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), protein kinase C (PKC), and tyrosine phosphorylation of the alpha -subunit of the Na+,K+-ATPase all appear to be potential participants in the short-term regulation of Na+,K+-ATPase activity. Steroid and thyroid hormones are responsible for more long-term regulation of pump capacity by exerting their effects at the transcriptional level (46). The evidence supporting each of these signaling pathways and their relevance to the modulation of pump function are discussed in great depth in an excellent recent review (47).

It is worth noting here, however, that the short-term control of sodium pump function may involve regulated membrane trafficking. Dopamine stimulation of rat renal proximal tubules leads to endocytosis of Na+,K+-ATPase from the basolateral plasmalemma through a mechanism that requires the involvement of class I(A) phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) (48-52). PKC phosphorylation of a serine residue in the NH2-terminal tail of the Na+,K+-ATPase alpha -subunit apparently permits PI3K to bind to an adjacent alpha -subunit proline-rich sequence via an SH3 domain in the p85 subunit of PI3K (52). This binding event may then recruit clathrin adapter complexes (51), leading to the internalization of the Na+,K+-ATPase and the down-regulation of transport function.

The gastric H+,K+-ATPase-driven secretion of acid into the lumen of the stomach is regulated at least as tightly as sodium pump function. In the resting state, the majority of H+,K+-ATPase is restricted to the tubulovesicular elements (TVEs), a system of membranes that resides beneath the plasma membrane. Upon stimulation of the parietal cell by secretagogues there is a transient rise in the intracellular levels of cAMP, inositol trisphosphate, diacylglycerol, and Ca2+. Some combination of these second messengers induces the TVEs to fuse with the apical plasma membrane, thus allowing the H+,K+-ATPase to secrete protons directly into the lumen of the gastric gland (53-55).

To date, it does not appear that the H+,K+-ATPase itself undergoes any covalent modifications during the activation of acid secretion. Instead, the membrane fusion events regulate the ability of the pump to actively secrete protons. Upon the withdrawal of stimulation, the enzyme, along with large portions of the plasma membrane, is re-internalized to create the TVEs. The beta -subunit of the gastric H+,K+-ATPase contains a tyrosine-based endocytosis motif, which is necessary for the re-internalization of the holoenzyme (56). Transgenic mice expressing H+,K+-ATPase beta -subunit in which the critical tyrosine residue is mutated to an alanine fail to re-internalize the enzyme, leading to hypersecretion of acid and chronic gastritis. A similar endocytosis-based mechanism for H+,K+ pump regulation appears to function in the kidney as well, because the mice expressing the mutated H+,K+-ATPase beta -subunit also hyper-reabsorb potassium from their urine (57).

    Pump Interacting Proteins
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES

All of these regulatory phenomena, as well as the sorting processes discussed above, must be mediated by specific protein-protein interactions. It is becoming increasingly clear that ion transport proteins do not exist as isolated individuals in the membranes of living cells. Instead, they appear to participate in an extremely wide array of interactions that help to determine their localization, life span, and susceptibility to control by signals from second messenger systems (58). These protein scaffolds are capable of simultaneously incorporating a mixture of transport proteins, as well as a generous selection of kinases, phosphatases, adapter proteins, and other such arbiters of subcellular signaling and traffic control. It would appear that the cell does not communicate with its complement of transport proteins through the three-dimensional diffusion of regulatory molecules but rather through the organization of a two-dimensional solid state signaling matrix that permits extremely precise integration and spatial constraint. In light of their central role in the maintenance of cellular and organismic homeostasis, it seems highly unlikely that P-type ion pumps would be exempt from participating in these sorts of protein assemblies. Little is known, however, about the specific repertoires of polypeptides that comprise pump-associated scaffolds.

Biochemical studies have identified membrane and peripheral membrane proteins that may interact directly or indirectly with the Na+,K+-ATPase. The small polypeptide with a single membrane-spanning segment, known as the gamma -subunit, is assembled with the Na+,K+-ATPase in a subset of renal epithelial cell types and appears to influence pump kinetics (47, 59). A sodium pump-associated protein related to both the gamma -subunit and to phospholemman was recently isolated from the shark rectal gland (60). This protein appears to be a substrate for phosphorylation by both protein kinases A and C. Phosphorylation may destabilize this protein's apparently inhibitory association with the Na+,K+-ATPase and thus serve to indirectly regulate pump function.

A large body of data establishes the existence of interactions between both the Na+,K+-ATPase and the gastric H+,K+-ATPase alpha -subunits and the cytoskeletal protein ankyrin (61-65). Through their associations with ankyrin, both of these pumps are attached to the meshwork of structural proteins, including spectrin and actin, that constitute the subcortical cytoskeleton. At least in the case of the sodium pump, this interaction is thought to be an important factor in maintaining the anisotropic distribution of the pump in polarized cells (35, 66). In addition to its role in stabilizing pump localization, the ankyrin interaction may also exert a stimulatory effect on pump catalysis by altering the rates of conformational transitions (67). Ankyrin appears to bind to two discontinuous sequence domains present in loops 2-3 and 4-5 of the alpha -subunit cytoplasmic domain (68-70). The NH2-terminal tail of the H+,K+-ATPase may also serve as a substrate for ankyrin association (65).

It has yet to be determined whether the pump-ankyrin interaction is subject to any form of dynamic regulation. In the case of the Na+,K+-ATPase, this complex is thought to play a fairly static role in stabilizing the sodium pump in the plasma membranes of epithelial cells (35, 66). In the gastric parietal cell, the cycling of the H+,K+-ATPase between the apical cell surface and the TVEs necessitates that its association with ankyrin be transient. It is interesting to note in this context that disruption of the fodrin cytoskeleton, through genetic means in Drosophila (71) or via expression of dominant negative constructs in tissue culture cells (72), appears to result in an analogous redistribution of the majority of the Na+,K+-ATPase to intracellular compartments.

Adducin is another spectrin binding protein that can interact directly with the sodium pump alpha -subunit. Adducin appears to serve as a link between spectrin and actin filaments. It can bind calmodulin and is a substrate for PKC and Rho-associated kinase-mediated phosphorylation (73). Adducin stimulates Na+,K+-ATPase activity in vitro by accelerating the rate-limiting potassium de-occlusion step in the catalytic cycle (67). The alpha -subunit residues that comprise the adducin binding site have yet to be identified. Polymorphisms in the sequence of an adducin polypeptide are correlated with hypertension, both in humans and in the Milan hypertensive strain of rats (74). Both rat and human adducins bearing these polymorphisms bind to the alpha -subunit with higher affinity than do their wild type counterparts (67). These observations suggest the interesting possibility that adducin association may be an important determinant in the regulation of renal Na+,K+-ATPase activity under normal circumstances. Furthermore, in the context of certain adducin mutations, adducin-mediated overstimulation of renal pump function may lead to an expansion of extracellular fluid volume and thus to hypertension.

    Future Directions
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES

A more thorough understanding of the cell biologic regulation of ion pumps will require a more complete picture of the protein complexes in which they participate. Although the roster of pump-interacting proteins enumerated above is enticing, it is almost certainly far from complete. Systematic searches for Na+,K+- or H+,K+-ATPase alpha -subunit-associated proteins have not yet been completed. Similarly, no potential partners for either pump's beta -subunits have been identified to date. To understand the mechanisms that determine pump distribution and control the level of pump catalysis it will be necessary to undertake a thorough inventory of these binding partners.

Many studies of the regulation and trafficking of ion pumps make use of pump constructs expressed by transfection in tissue culture cell lines. The most meaningful systems in which to evaluate the importance of particular molecular signals and protein-protein interactions in the determination of pump properties, however, are those that faithfully recapitulate the pump's normal physiologic setting. Recent work in the creation of genetic model systems has facilitated the study of the pumps in relation to physiologic systems. The genes encoding several pump subunit proteins have been disrupted by homologous recombination, and knock-out mice have been generated in which the activities of these pumps have been genetically abrogated (75-77). These model systems allow the role of each pump protein to be assessed in a biologically meaningful setting. They illuminate the pathways that converge to modulate pump activity and reveal the adaptations that occur to compensate for disruptions in pump function.

Ideally, pump subunit constructs mutagenized to alter signals relevant to trafficking or regulation should be expressed in their native cell types, in their native tissues, and in the context of a physiologically intact organism. Such an approach has been utilized in the transgenic mouse studies that demonstrated the requirement for a tyrosine-based signal in the cessation of gastric acid secretion (56). To be interpretable, however, experiments of this sort must either investigate the effects of pump mutations that produce dominant phenotypes or else be performed in an expression system whose own endogenous complement of normal pump molecules has been silenced. The recent generation of knock-out mouse strains, in which the expression of various pump subunit polypeptides has been disrupted, provides precisely these sorts of expression systems. By observing both the cell biologic and physiologic phenotypic consequences of expressing mutated pump proteins in pump subunit knock-out mice it should be possible to determine whether and how a particular signal or interaction operates to control pump function under normal physiologic circumstances. Such studies will hopefully illuminate the manner in which perturbations of these interactions might reproduce such clinically significant pathologies as gastric ulcer disease or hypertension.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank past and present members of the Caplan laboratory for insightful discussions. Carolyn Slayman and Brett Mason provided very helpful comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This minireview will be reprinted in the 2001 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in December, 2001. This is the second article of two in the "Transport ATPase Trafficking Minireview Series." Work from the authors' laboratory presented here is supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM-42136 and DK-17433.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510. Tel.: 203-785-7316; Fax: 203-785-4951; E-mail: michael.caplan@yale.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 12, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.R100023200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; GSL, glycosphingolipid; PKC, protein kinase C; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; TVE, tubulovesicular element.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES

1. Pedersen, P. L., and Carafoli, E. (1987) Trends Biochem. Sci. 12, 146-150
2. Caplan, M. J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, G1304-G1313
3. Caplan, M. J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, F425-F429
4. Caplan, M. J., and Matlin, K. S. (1989) in Functional Epithelial Cells in Culture (Matlin, K. S. , and Valentich, J. D., eds) , pp. 71-127, Alan R. Liss, New York
5. Matter, K. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, R39-R42
6. Horisberger, J. D., Lemas, V., Kraehenbuhl, J. P., and Rossier, B. C. (1991) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 53, 565-584
7. Rabon, E. C., and Reuben, M. A. (1990) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 52, 321-344
8. Hasler, U., Wang, X., Crambert, G., Beguin, P., Jaisser, F., Horisberger, J. D., and Geering, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30826-30835
9. Geering, K., Beggah, A., Good, P., Girardet, S., Roy, S., Schaer, D., and Jaunin, P. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 1193-1204
10. Wang, S. G., and Farley, R. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 29400-29405
11. Beggah, A., Mathews, P., Begui, P., and Geering, K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20895-28903
12. Koenderink, J. B., Swarts, H. G. P., Hermsen, H. P. H., and De Pont, J. J. H. H. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11604-11610
13. Gottardi, C. J., and Caplan, M. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14342-14347
14. Ackermann, U., and Geering, K. (1990) FEBS Lett. 269, 105-108
15. Geering, K. (1990) J. Membr. Biol. 115, 109-121
16. Beguin, P., Hasler, U., Staub, O., and Geering, K. (2000) Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1657-1672
17. Shull, G. E., and Lingrel, J. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 16788-16791
18. Shull, G. E. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 12123-12126
19. Canfield, V. A., Okamoto, C. T., Chow, D., Dorfman, J., Gros, P., Forte, J. G., and Levenson, R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19878-19884
20. Reuben, M. A., Lasater, L. S., and Sachs, G. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6767-6771
21. Toh, B. H., Gleeson, P. A., Simpson, R. J., Moritz, R. L., Callaghan, J. M., Goldkorn, I., Jones, C. M., Martinelli, T. M., Mu, F. T., Humphris, D. C., Pettitt, J. M., Mori, Y., Masuda, T., Sobieszczuk, P., Weinstock, J., Mantamadiotis, T., and Baldwin, G. S. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6418-6422
22. Caplan, M. J. (1990) in Regulation of Potassium Transport Across Biological Membranes (Reuss, L., ed) , pp. 77-101, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
23. Smolka, A., Helander, H. F., and Sachs, G. (1983) Am. J. Physiol. 245, G589-G596
24. Gottardi, C. J., and Caplan, M. J. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 283-293
25. Dunbar, L. A., Aronson, P. L., and Caplan, M. J. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 148, 769-778
26. Muth, T. R., Gottardi, C. J., Roush, D. L., and Caplan, M. J. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, C688-C696
27. Ikonen, E., and Simons, K. (1998) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 503-509
28. Devarajan, P., Stabach, P. R., De Matteis, M. A., and Morrow, J. S. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10711-10716
29. Brown, D., and Rose, J. K. (1992) Cell 68, 533-544
30. Brown, D. A., and London, E. (1998) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 111-136
31. Lafont, F., Verkade, P., Galli, T., Wimmer, C., Louvard, D., and Simons, K. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3734-3738
32. Scheiffele, P., Roth, M. G., and Simons, K. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5501-5508
33. Caplan, M. J., Anderson, H. C., Palade, G. E., and Jamieson, J. D. (1986) Cell 46, 623-631
34. Gottardi, C. J., and Caplan, M. J. (1993) Science 260, 552-554
35. Mays, R. W., Siemers, K. A., Fritz, B. A., Lowe, A. L., van Meer, G., and Nelson, W. J. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 1105-1115
36. Hammerton, R. W., Krzeminski, K. A., Mays, R. W., Ryan, T. A., Wollner, D. A., and Nelson, W. J. (1991) Science 254, 847-850
37. Arreaza, G., Melkonian, K. A., Bernt-LaFevre, M., and Brown, D. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19123-19127
38. Codina, J., Wall, S. M., and Du Bose, T. D., Jr. (1999) Semin. Nephrol. 19, 399-404
39. Grishin, A. V., and Caplan, M. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27772-27778
40. Cougnon, M., Bouyer, P., Planelles, G., and Jaisser, F. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 6516-6520
41. Crowson, M. S., and Shull, G. E. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13740-13748
42. Doucet, A. (1997) Exp. Nephrol. 5, 271-276
43. Reinhardt, J., Grishin, A. V., Oberleithner, H., and Caplan, M. J. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, F417-F425
44. Blostein, R., Dunbar, L., Mense, M., Scanzano, R., Wilczynska, A., and Caplan, M. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 18374-18381
45. Mense, M., Dunbar, L. A., Blostein, R., and Caplan, M. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1749-1756
46. Farman, N. (1996) Miner. Electrolyte Metab. 22, 272-278
47. Therien, A. G., and Blostein, R. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, C541-C566
48. Chibalin, A. V., Ogimoto, G., Pedemonte, C. H., Pressley, T. A., Katz, A. I., Feraille, E., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1920-1927
49. Chibalin, A. V., Pedemonte, C. H., Katz, A. I., Feraille, E., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8814-8819
50. Chibalin, A. V., Katz, A. I., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. M. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, C1458-C1465
51. Ogimoto, G., Yudowski, G. A., Barker, C. J., Kohler, M., Katz, A. I., Feraille, E., Pedemonte, C. H., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. M. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 3242-3247
52. Chibalin, A. V., Zierath, J. R., Katz, A. I., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. M. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1209-1220
53. Hersey, S. J., and Sachs, G. (1995) Physiol. Rev. 75, 155-189
54. Rabon, E., Cuppoletti, J., Malinowska, D., Smolka, A., Helander, H. F., Mendlein, J., and Sachs, G. (1983) J. Exp. Biol. 106, 119-133
55. Urushidani, T., and Forte, J. G. (1987) Am. J. Physiol. 252, G458-G465
56. Courtois-Coutry, N., Roush, D. L., Rajendran, V., McCarthy, J. B., Geibel, J., Kashgarian, M., and Caplan, M. J. (1997) Cell 90, 501-510
57. Wang, T., Courtois-Coutry, N., Giebisch, G., and Caplan, M. J. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, F818-F826
58. Fanning, A. S., and Anderson, J. M. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 432-439
59. Pu, H. X., Cluzeaud, F., Goldshleger, R., Karlish, S. J. D., Farman, N., and Blostein, R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20370-20378
60. Mahmmoud, Y. A., Vorum, H., and Cornelius, F. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35969-35977
61. Nelson, W. J., and Veshnock, P. J. (1987) Nature 328, 533-536
62. Morrow, J. S., Cianci, C. D., Ardito, T., Mann, A. S., and Kashgarian, M. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 455-465
63. Koob, R., Zimmermann, M., Schoner, W., and Drenckhahn, D. (1988) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 45, 230-237
64. Smith, P. R., Bradford, A. L., Joe, E. H., Anjelides, K. J., Benos, D. J., and Saccomani, G. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, C63-C70
65. Festy, F., Robert, J. C., Brasseur, R., and Thomas, A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 7721-7726
66. Nelson, W. J., and Hammerton, R. W. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 893-902
67. Ferrandi, M., Salardi, S., Tripodi, G., Barassi, P., Rivera, R., Manunta, P., Goldshleger, R., Ferrari, P., Bianchi, G., and Karlish, S. J. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, H1338-H1349
68. Devarajan, P., Scaramuzzino, D. A., and Morrow, J. S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2965-2969
69. Zhang, Z., Devarajan, P., Dorfman, A. L., and Morrow, J. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18681-18684
70. Jordan, C., Puschel, B., Koob, R., and Drenckhahn, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29971-29975
71. Dubreuil, R. R., Wang, P., Dahl, S., Lee, J., and Goldstein, L. S. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 149, 647-656
72. Hu, R. J., Moorthy, S., and Bennett, V. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 1069-1080
73. Matsuoka, Y., Li, X., and Bennett, V. (2000) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 57, 884-895
74. Manunta, P., Barlassina, C., and Bianchi, G. (1998) FEBS Lett. 430, 41-44
75. Spicer, Z., Miller, M. M., Andringa, A., Riddle, T. M., Duffy, J. J., Doetschman, T., and Shull, G. E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 21555-21565
76. Scarff, K. L., Judd, L. M., Toh, B. H., Gleeson, P. A., and van Driel, I. R. (1999) Gastroenterology 117, 605-618
77. James, P. F., Grupp, L. L., Grupp, G., Woo, A. L., Askew, G. R., Croyle, M. L., Walsh, R. A., and Lingrel, J. B. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 555-563
78. Toyoshima, C., Nakasako, M., Nomura, H., and Ogawa, H. (2000) Nature 405, 647-655


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
E. Lecuona, L. A. Dada, H. Sun, M. L. Butti, G. Zhou, T.-L. Chew, and J. I. Sznajder
Na,K-ATPase {alpha}1-subunit dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A is necessary for its recruitment to the plasma membrane
FASEB J, December 1, 2006; 20(14): 2618 - 2620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
K. Matlhagela and M. Taub
Regulation of the Na-K-ATPase beta1-subunit promoter by multiple prostaglandin-responsive elements
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): F635 - F646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
D. L. Lovett, M. P. Verzi, J. E. Burgents, C. A. Tanner, K. Glomski, J. J. Lee, and D. W. Towle
Expression Profiles of Na+,K+-ATPase during Acute and Chronic Hypo-osmotic Stress in the Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus.
Biol. Bull., August 1, 2006; 211(1): 58 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. A. Deora, N. Philp, J. Hu, D. Bok, and E. Rodriguez-Boulan
Mechanisms regulating tissue-specific polarity of monocarboxylate transporters and their chaperone CD147 in kidney and retinal epithelia
PNAS, November 8, 2005; 102(45): 16245 - 16250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Zatti, V. Chauvet, V. Rajendran, T. Kimura, P. Pagel, and M. J. Caplan
The C-Terminal Tail of the Polycystin-1 Protein Interacts with the Na,K-ATPase {alpha}-Subunit
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2005; 16(11): 5087 - 5093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
F. Carrozzino, P. Soulie, D. Huber, N. Mensi, L. Orci, A. Cano, E. Feraille, and R. Montesano
Inducible expression of Snail selectively increases paracellular ion permeability and differentially modulates tight junction proteins
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): C1002 - C1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
N. B. Pestov, T. V. Korneenko, R. Radkov, H. Zhao, M. I. Shakhparonov, and N. N. Modyanov
Identification of the {beta}-subunit for nongastric H-K-ATPase in rat anterior prostate
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): C1229 - C1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
I. Wadskog, C. Maldener, A. Proksch, F. Madeo, and L. Adler
Yeast Lacking the SRO7/SOP1-encoded Tumor Suppressor Homologue Show Increased Susceptibility to Apoptosis-like Cell Death on Exposure to NaCl Stress
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2004; 15(3): 1436 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
F. Cornelius and Y. A. Mahmmoud
Direct Activation of Gastric H,K-ATPase by N-Terminal Protein Kinase C Phosphorylation. Comparison of the Acute Regulation Mechanisms of H,K-ATPase and Na,K-ATPase
Biophys. J., March 1, 2003; 84(3): 1690 - 1700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. M. Bertorello, Y. Komarova, K. Smith, I. B. Leibiger, R. Efendiev, C. H. Pedemonte, G. Borisy, and J. I. Sznajder
Analysis of Na+,K+-ATPase Motion and Incorporation into the Plasma Membrane in Response to G Protein-coupled Receptor Signals in Living Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2003; 14(3): 1149 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-X. Wang, M. Ikeda, and W. B. Guggino
The Cytoplasmic Tail of Large Conductance, Voltage- and Ca2+-activated K+ (MaxiK) Channel Is Necessary for Its Cell Surface Expression
J. Biol. Chem., January 17, 2003; 278(4): 2713 - 2722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Ferreira, A. B. Mason, and C. W. Slayman
The Yeast Pma1 Proton Pump: a Model for Understanding the Biogenesis of Plasma Membrane Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2001; 276(32): 29613 - 29616.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/32/29617    most recent
R100023200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunbar, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Caplan, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
 <