![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 32, 29617-29620, August 10, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The physiologic function of an ion transport
protein is determined, in part, by its subcellular localization and by
the cellular mechanisms that modulate its activity. The
Na+,K+-ATPase and the
H+,K+-ATPases are closely related members of
the P-type family of ion transporting ATPases. Despite their homology,
these pumps are sorted to different domains in polarized epithelial
cells, and their enzymatic activities are subject to distinct
regulatory pathways. The molecular signals responsible for these
properties have begun to be elucidated. It appears that a complex array
of inter- and intramolecular interactions govern trafficking,
distribution, and catalytic capacities of these proteins.
The P-type ATPase family, whose members include the
Na+,K+-, H+,K+-, and
Ca2+-ATPases, comprises a nearly ubiquitous collection of
ion pumps with catalytic activities that drive myriad physiologic
processes (1). These pumps are responsible for such fundamental
manifestations of cellular homeostasis as the maintenance of osmotic
balance and intracellular ionic composition. Furthermore, almost every transport operation performed by the cells of epithelial tissues is
coupled in some fashion to the action of a P-type ATPase (2). The
enzymatic activities of these pumps constitute some of the principal
means through which all animal cells convert the energy embodied in ATP
into electrochemical gradients that can be exploited by all manner of
metabolic pathways.
The function of any ion transport protein can be appreciated at several
levels of resolution. From the biochemical or biophysical perspective,
the nature of a transport process is defined by such kinetic and
thermodynamic parameters as its energy dependence, its stoichiometry,
and its substrate affinity. Considered from the cell biologic point of
view, the operation of an ion transport protein is significant for its
influence on the cytoplasmic environment and for its interaction with
those proteins that participate in the signaling and trafficking
pathways that govern its regulation and distribution. In the broader
physiologic context, the role of an ion transport protein is determined
not only by all of these factors but also by the constellation of cell
types in which it is expressed and the environmental influences that
modulate its degree of functional expression. Ideally, a complete
understanding of an ion transport process encompasses insights gleaned
from and integrated among all of these distinct considerations.
The plasma membranes of polarized epithelial cells are subdivided
into two compositionally distinct regions (3). In epithelial tissues,
basolateral surfaces generally confront the extracellular fluid
compartment, whereas apical membranes often form the borders of the
lumens of tubular structures. Tight junctions define the boundaries
between these membrane compartments and maintain the segregation of
their unique protein and lipid components. To create and maintain this
anisotropy, epithelial cells must possess mechanisms for targeting
particular subsets of membrane proteins to their appropriate
plasmalemmal destinations. These mechanisms depend upon information
embedded within the structure of each individual membrane protein that
specifies its ultimate subcellular distribution (4, 5).
Among the proteins that are differentially distributed between
epithelial plasmalemmal domains are the Na+,K+-
and gastric H+,K+-ATPases (2). The
Na+,K+-ATPase, or sodium pump, uses the energy
of one molecule of ATP to drive 3 sodium ions out of the cell and 2 potassium ions into the cell against substantial concentration
gradients. The activity of this enzyme energizes such diverse functions
as the maintenance of the membrane potential and the renal and
intestinal handling of solutes (6). The gastric
H+,K+-ATPase exploits a very similar enzymatic
mechanism to catalyze the electroneutral exchange of intracellular
protons for extracellular potassium ions, thus generating the enormous
proton gradients associated with gastric acid secretion (7).
The Na+,K+-ATPase and the
H+,K+-ATPase share a great deal of structural
homology. They are both composed of an The When transfected into the proximal tubule-like pig kidney cell
line LLC-PK1 the gastric
H+,K+-ATPase
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES
![]()
Ion Pumps in Polarized Cells
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES
-subunit that is predicted to
span the membrane 10 times and a
-subunit that spans the membrane
once in a type II orientation. During the biosynthesis of these pumps,
the
-subunits assemble with the
-subunits in the endoplasmic
reticulum. Formation of the
-
complex appears to involve
interactions between the cytoplasmic, extracytoplasmic, and
transmembrane domains of the proteins (8-10) and may be assisted through the involvement of chaperone proteins (11). The assembly process appears to be quite specific. Although cross-assembly of
Na+,K+- and
H+,K+-ATPase subunit proteins can occur, the
-subunit of each pump preferentially associates with its appropriate
-polypeptide (12, 13). Subunit assembly is required for the
holoenzyme complex to reach the plasma membrane (13-15). Preventing
this dimerization results in the degradation of the unassembled
-subunit (16).
-subunits of the Na+,K+- and
H+,K+-ATPases share ~65% sequence identity,
although the amino acid sequences of the
-subunits are ~35%
identical (17-21). Despite this close relationship, however, they
differ in several important attributes. One of these differences is
dramatically reflected in the subcellular distribution of these ion
pumps. The Na+,K+ pump is concentrated at the
basolateral membranes of most epithelial cell types (22), whereas the
H+,K+ pump accumulates at the apical surface
and in subapical storage vesicles in the acid-secreting parietal cells
of the stomach (2, 23). The two ion pumps also manifest distinct ion
affinities, transport stoichiometries, and inhibitor sensitivities
(7).
![]()
Molecular Signals in Ion Pump Sorting
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Ion Pumps in Polarized...
Molecular Signals in Ion...
Regulation of Ion Pump...
Pump Interacting Proteins
Future Directions
REFERENCES
- and
-subunits assemble,
travel to the cell surface, and are ultimately found exclusively at the
apical membrane. The endogenous Na+,K+-ATPase,
on the other hand, is restricted to the basolateral plasma membrane in
H+,K+ pump-transfected cells (24). By
generating chimeric constructs between the two related pumps, it has
been possible to examine the regions of the pump sequences required for
their correct localizations in polarized epithelial cells (24-26).
Through an analysis of the sorting behaviors of a number of such
chimeric pumps expressed by transfection in LLC-PK1 cells,
an H+,K+-ATPase signal motif that is sufficient
to redirect the normally basolateral
Na+,K+-ATPase to the apical surface in
transfected epithelial cells has been identified (Fig.
1). This motif resides entirely within the fourth domain (TM4) of the ten predicted transmembrane domains of
H+,K+-ATPase
-subunit (25).

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Structural representations of ion pump
chimeras. The positions of residues exchanged in four different
Na+,K+/H+,K+-ATPase
-subunit chimeras are shown in this space-filling color
representation superimposed upon the backbone structure of the
Ca2+-ATPase (78). The yellow residues correspond
to the NH2-terminal 85 residues of the
H+,K+-ATPase, which serves in all pump chimeras
as an epitope tag that permits the chimeras to be distinguished from
the host cell's own population of sodium pumps. This portion of the
H+,K+-ATPase does not confer any apical sorting
information (25). The turquoise residues correspond to the
predicted fourth transmembrane domain of the
H+,K+-ATPase, which is sufficient to direct the
apical accumulation of those
Na+,K+-ATPase/H+,K+-ATPase
chimeric molecules that include this H+,K+ pump
domain. The red residues and the green residues
correspond to the sequences that flank TM4 on its cytoplasmic and
extracytoplasmic sides, respectively. Chimeras incorporating these
H+,K+-ATPase ectodomain or cytoplasmic domain
residues alone in the background of the
Na+,K+-ATPase
-subunit behave as basolateral
proteins. In contrast, a chimera that incorporates both sets of
flanking residues behaves as an apical protein. Thus, apical sorting
information can be communicated by TM4 or by its flanking domains,
demonstrating that the apical sorting determinant is the product of
transmembrane conformational interactions (25).
The majority of the polypeptides that have been shown to play a role in
membrane protein sorting, such as cytoskeletal elements, adapters, and
COP proteins, are soluble and reside in the cytosol (27). The exit of
newly synthesized Na+,K+-ATPase from the Golgi
complex, for example, appears to require an intact Golgi cytoskeleton
containing
I
spectrin and ankyrin Gly-119. Disruption of this
matrix results in the retention of a specific subset of membrane
proteins, including the sodium pump, within a subcompartment of the
Golgi complex (28). It is somewhat surprising, therefore, that
information capable of directing the apical sorting of a pump chimera
can be entirely buried within the plane of the membrane and thus
inaccessible to interpretation by this molecular machinery. This same
problem is confronted by proteins anchored to the membrane via covalent
attachment to glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI).1 In many epithelial
cell types, GPI-linked proteins accumulate predominantly at the apical
plasmalemma (29). The signal responsible for this anisotropic
distribution appears to be attributable to the GPI anchor itself, which
is able to associate in the plane of the membrane with
glycosphingolipid (GSL) and cholesterol molecules to form "lipid
rafts" (30). These lipid rafts, which coalesce in subdomains of the
Golgi complex, appear to give rise to apically directed transport
vesicles (31). Thus GPI-linked, as well as at least some transmembrane
proteins, are apparently sorted to the apical surface by virtue of
their capacity to partition into GSL-rich rafts during their
biosynthetic passage through the Golgi (32). Presumably, the targeting
proteins that endow these nascent vesicles with their apical
specificity are incorporated into GSL-rich rafts through a similar
partitioning mechanism. It has recently been suggested that the
vectorial basolateral targeting of the Na+,K+-ATPase (33, 34) depends upon its
exclusion from GSL-rich raft domains during its passage through the
Golgi complex (35, 36).
Numerous proteins that are capable of partitioning into GSL-rich rafts resist detergent solubilization in 1% Triton X-100 at 4 °C (37). This is not the case, however, for the H+,K+-ATPase. The native H+,K+-ATPase and all of the chimeras that incorporate its TM4 segment are fully soluble under these conditions, as is the Na+,K+-ATPase (25). These data indicate that the H+,K+-ATPase TM4 does not appear to exert its influence on sorting through interactions with lipid molecules but may instead mediate intramembranous protein-protein associations or alter the global conformation of the pump protein to create a motif that is accessible to interactions with cytoplasmic polypeptides.
Support for the global conformation hypothesis derives from the sorting
behaviors of the non-gastric H+,K+-ATPase
proteins. These heterodimeric pumps are close relatives of both the
Na+,K+- and gastric
H+,K+-ATPases and appear to play a role in
potassium reabsorption in the colon and the kidney (38). Although there
is physiologic evidence to suggest that (as their name implies) these
pumps transport protons in exchange for potassium, recent functional
expression studies indicate that sodium may in fact be the preferred
counterion in potassium transport (39, 40). The non-gastric
H+,K+-ATPase
-subunits share ~60% protein
sequence identity with both their Na+,K+- and
gastric H+,K+-ATPase
-subunit counterparts
(41). Alignment of the protein sequences of the
-subunits from these
three pump families reveals that the TM4 segments of the non-gastric
pumps are highly homologous to that of the sodium pump and markedly
divergent from that of the gastric
H+,K+-ATPase. If the TM4 motif were necessary
to account for the apical sorting of the gastric
H+,K+-ATPase, then the non-gastric
H+,K+-ATPases would be expected to behave as
basolateral proteins. Transport studies performed on intact epithelial
tissues, however, indicate that these pumps are functionally present in
the apical plasma membrane (42). Similarly, when exogenously expressed by transfection in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells the human
non-gastric H+,K+-ATPase, ATP1AL1, also
accumulates at the apical surface (43). Thus, although the gastric
H+,K+-ATPase TM4 transmembrane motif is clearly
sufficient to specify apical sorting, other pump determinants appear to
participate in this targeting process.
The generation of further gastric
H+,K+-ATPase/Na+,K+-ATPase
chimeras provides additional support for the contention that the TM4
sequence does not act alone. In fact, the discontinuous sequence domains that flank the fourth transmembrane domain can cooperate to
recapitulate the apical sorting signal of the fourth transmembrane domain (Fig. 1) (25). Thus, the apical sorting determinant appears to
be the product of a conversation between the fourth transmembrane domain and the motifs that abut it. Interestingly, a similar
conformational interaction dramatically influences the cation
selectivities of these pump chimeras (44, 45). The precise mechanisms
through which these sequences cooperate remain to be determined.
| |
Regulation of Ion Pump Function |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several factors have been identified that regulate
Na+,K+-ATPase activity. Most of the effects
have been studied in the kidney, where the physiologic regulation of
Na+,K+-ATPase function has been well
established. Acute regulation of the pump-mediated catalysis may be
accomplished by either directly modulating the activity of the enzyme
or by changing its localization. The cAMP-dependent protein
kinase (PKA), protein kinase C (PKC), and tyrosine phosphorylation of
the
-subunit of the Na+,K+-ATPase all appear
to be potential participants in the short-term regulation of
Na+,K+-ATPase activity. Steroid and thyroid
hormones are responsible for more long-term regulation of pump capacity
by exerting their effects at the transcriptional level (46). The
evidence supporting each of these signaling pathways and their
relevance to the modulation of pump function are discussed in great
depth in an excellent recent review (47).
It is worth noting here, however, that the short-term control of sodium
pump function may involve regulated membrane trafficking. Dopamine
stimulation of rat renal proximal tubules leads to endocytosis of
Na+,K+-ATPase from the basolateral plasmalemma
through a mechanism that requires the involvement of class I(A)
phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) (48-52). PKC phosphorylation of a
serine residue in the NH2-terminal tail of the
Na+,K+-ATPase
-subunit apparently permits
PI3K to bind to an adjacent
-subunit proline-rich sequence via an
SH3 domain in the p85 subunit of PI3K (52). This binding event may then
recruit clathrin adapter complexes (51), leading to the internalization
of the Na+,K+-ATPase and the down-regulation of
transport function.
The gastric H+,K+-ATPase-driven secretion of acid into the lumen of the stomach is regulated at least as tightly as sodium pump function. In the resting state, the majority of H+,K+-ATPase is restricted to the tubulovesicular elements (TVEs), a system of membranes that resides beneath the plasma membrane. Upon stimulation of the parietal cell by secretagogues there is a transient rise in the intracellular levels of cAMP, inositol trisphosphate, diacylglycerol, and Ca2+. Some combination of these second messengers induces the TVEs to fuse with the apical plasma membrane, thus allowing the H+,K+-ATPase to secrete protons directly into the lumen of the gastric gland (53-55).
To date, it does not appear that the
H+,K+-ATPase itself undergoes any covalent
modifications during the activation of acid secretion. Instead, the
membrane fusion events regulate the ability of the pump to actively
secrete protons. Upon the withdrawal of stimulation, the enzyme, along
with large portions of the plasma membrane, is re-internalized to
create the TVEs. The
-subunit of the gastric
H+,K+-ATPase contains a tyrosine-based
endocytosis motif, which is necessary for the re-internalization of the
holoenzyme (56). Transgenic mice expressing
H+,K+-ATPase
-subunit in which the critical
tyrosine residue is mutated to an alanine fail to re-internalize the
enzyme, leading to hypersecretion of acid and chronic gastritis. A
similar endocytosis-based mechanism for H+,K+
pump regulation appears to function in the kidney as well, because the
mice expressing the mutated H+,K+-ATPase
-subunit also hyper-reabsorb potassium from their urine (57).
| |
Pump Interacting Proteins |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All of these regulatory phenomena, as well as the sorting processes discussed above, must be mediated by specific protein-protein interactions. It is becoming increasingly clear that ion transport proteins do not exist as isolated individuals in the membranes of living cells. Instead, they appear to participate in an extremely wide array of interactions that help to determine their localization, life span, and susceptibility to control by signals from second messenger systems (58). These protein scaffolds are capable of simultaneously incorporating a mixture of transport proteins, as well as a generous selection of kinases, phosphatases, adapter proteins, and other such arbiters of subcellular signaling and traffic control. It would appear that the cell does not communicate with its complement of transport proteins through the three-dimensional diffusion of regulatory molecules but rather through the organization of a two-dimensional solid state signaling matrix that permits extremely precise integration and spatial constraint. In light of their central role in the maintenance of cellular and organismic homeostasis, it seems highly unlikely that P-type ion pumps would be exempt from participating in these sorts of protein assemblies. Little is known, however, about the specific repertoires of polypeptides that comprise pump-associated scaffolds.
Biochemical studies have identified membrane and peripheral membrane
proteins that may interact directly or indirectly with the
Na+,K+-ATPase. The small polypeptide with a
single membrane-spanning segment, known as the
-subunit, is
assembled with the Na+,K+-ATPase in a subset of
renal epithelial cell types and appears to influence pump kinetics (47,
59). A sodium pump-associated protein related to both the
-subunit
and to phospholemman was recently isolated from the shark rectal gland
(60). This protein appears to be a substrate for phosphorylation by
both protein kinases A and C. Phosphorylation may destabilize this
protein's apparently inhibitory association with the
Na+,K+-ATPase and thus serve to indirectly
regulate pump function.
A large body of data establishes the existence of interactions between
both the Na+,K+-ATPase and the gastric
H+,K+-ATPase
-subunits and the cytoskeletal
protein ankyrin (61-65). Through their associations with ankyrin, both
of these pumps are attached to the meshwork of structural proteins,
including spectrin and actin, that constitute the subcortical
cytoskeleton. At least in the case of the sodium pump, this interaction
is thought to be an important factor in maintaining the anisotropic
distribution of the pump in polarized cells (35, 66). In addition to
its role in stabilizing pump localization, the ankyrin interaction may
also exert a stimulatory effect on pump catalysis by altering the rates
of conformational transitions (67). Ankyrin appears to bind to two
discontinuous sequence domains present in loops 2-3 and 4-5 of the
-subunit cytoplasmic domain (68-70). The NH2-terminal tail of the H+,K+-ATPase may also serve as a
substrate for ankyrin association (65).
It has yet to be determined whether the pump-ankyrin interaction is subject to any form of dynamic regulation. In the case of the Na+,K+-ATPase, this complex is thought to play a fairly static role in stabilizing the sodium pump in the plasma membranes of epithelial cells (35, 66). In the gastric parietal cell, the cycling of the H+,K+-ATPase between the apical cell surface and the TVEs necessitates that its association with ankyrin be transient. It is interesting to note in this context that disruption of the fodrin cytoskeleton, through genetic means in Drosophila (71) or via expression of dominant negative constructs in tissue culture cells (72), appears to result in an analogous redistribution of the majority of the Na+,K+-ATPase to intracellular compartments.
Adducin is another spectrin binding protein that can interact directly
with the sodium pump
-subunit. Adducin appears to serve as a link
between spectrin and actin filaments. It can bind calmodulin and is a
substrate for PKC and Rho-associated kinase-mediated phosphorylation
(73). Adducin stimulates Na+,K+-ATPase activity
in vitro by accelerating the rate-limiting potassium de-occlusion step in the catalytic cycle (67). The
-subunit residues
that comprise the adducin binding site have yet to be identified.
Polymorphisms in the sequence of an adducin polypeptide are correlated
with hypertension, both in humans and in the Milan hypertensive strain
of rats (74). Both rat and human adducins bearing these polymorphisms
bind to the
-subunit with higher affinity than do their wild type
counterparts (67). These observations suggest the interesting
possibility that adducin association may be an important determinant in
the regulation of renal Na+,K+-ATPase activity
under normal circumstances. Furthermore, in the context of certain
adducin mutations, adducin-mediated overstimulation of renal pump
function may lead to an expansion of extracellular fluid volume and
thus to hypertension.
| |
Future Directions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A more thorough understanding of the cell biologic regulation of
ion pumps will require a more complete picture of the protein complexes
in which they participate. Although the roster of pump-interacting proteins enumerated above is enticing, it is almost certainly far from
complete. Systematic searches for Na+,K+- or
H+,K+-ATPase
-subunit-associated proteins
have not yet been completed. Similarly, no potential partners for
either pump's
-subunits have been identified to date. To understand
the mechanisms that determine pump distribution and control the level
of pump catalysis it will be necessary to undertake a thorough
inventory of these binding partners.
Many studies of the regulation and trafficking of ion pumps make use of pump constructs expressed by transfection in tissue culture cell lines. The most meaningful systems in which to evaluate the importance of particular molecular signals and protein-protein interactions in the determination of pump properties, however, are those that faithfully recapitulate the pump's normal physiologic setting. Recent work in the creation of genetic model systems has facilitated the study of the pumps in relation to physiologic systems. The genes encoding several pump subunit proteins have been disrupted by homologous recombination, and knock-out mice have been generated in which the activities of these pumps have been genetically abrogated (75-77). These model systems allow the role of each pump protein to be assessed in a biologically meaningful setting. They illuminate the pathways that converge to modulate pump activity and reveal the adaptations that occur to compensate for disruptions in pump function.
Ideally, pump subunit constructs mutagenized to alter signals relevant
to trafficking or regulation should be expressed in their native cell
types, in their native tissues, and in the context of a physiologically
intact organism. Such an approach has been utilized in the transgenic
mouse studies that demonstrated the requirement for a tyrosine-based
signal in the cessation of gastric acid secretion (56). To be
interpretable, however, experiments of this sort must either
investigate the effects of pump mutations that produce dominant
phenotypes or else be performed in an expression system whose own
endogenous complement of normal pump molecules has been silenced. The
recent generation of knock-out mouse strains, in which the expression
of various pump subunit polypeptides has been disrupted, provides
precisely these sorts of expression systems. By observing both the cell
biologic and physiologic phenotypic consequences of expressing mutated
pump proteins in pump subunit knock-out mice it should be possible to
determine whether and how a particular signal or interaction operates
to control pump function under normal physiologic circumstances. Such
studies will hopefully illuminate the manner in which perturbations of these interactions might reproduce such clinically significant pathologies as gastric ulcer disease or hypertension.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank past and present members of the Caplan laboratory for insightful discussions. Carolyn Slayman and Brett Mason provided very helpful comments on the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This minireview will be reprinted in the 2001 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in December, 2001. This is the second article of two in the "Transport ATPase Trafficking Minireview Series." Work from the authors' laboratory presented here is supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM-42136 and DK-17433.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cellular and
Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar
St., New Haven, CT 06510. Tel.: 203-785-7316; Fax: 203-785-4951; E-mail: michael.caplan@yale.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 12, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.R100023200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; GSL, glycosphingolipid; PKC, protein kinase C; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; TVE, tubulovesicular element.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Pedersen, P. L., and Carafoli, E. (1987) Trends Biochem. Sci. 12, 146-150 |
| 2. | Caplan, M. J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, G1304-G1313 |
| 3. | Caplan, M. J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, F425-F429 |
| 4. | Caplan, M. J., and Matlin, K. S. (1989) in Functional Epithelial Cells in Culture (Matlin, K. S. , and Valentich, J. D., eds) , pp. 71-127, Alan R. Liss, New York |
| 5. | Matter, K. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, R39-R42 |
| 6. | Horisberger, J. D., Lemas, V., Kraehenbuhl, J. P., and Rossier, B. C. (1991) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 53, 565-584 |
| 7. | Rabon, E. C., and Reuben, M. A. (1990) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 52, 321-344 |
| 8. | Hasler, U., Wang, X., Crambert, G., Beguin, P., Jaisser, F., Horisberger, J. D., and Geering, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30826-30835 |
| 9. | Geering, K., Beggah, A., Good, P., Girardet, S., Roy, S., Schaer, D., and Jaunin, P. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 1193-1204 |
| 10. | Wang, S. G., and Farley, R. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 29400-29405 |
| 11. | Beggah, A., Mathews, P., Begui, P., and Geering, K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20895-28903 |
| 12. | Koenderink, J. B., Swarts, H. G. P., Hermsen, H. P. H., and De Pont, J. J. H. H. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11604-11610 |
| 13. | Gottardi, C. J., and Caplan, M. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14342-14347 |
| 14. | Ackermann, U., and Geering, K. (1990) FEBS Lett. 269, 105-108 |
| 15. | Geering, K. (1990) J. Membr. Biol. 115, 109-121 |
| 16. | Beguin, P., Hasler, U., Staub, O., and Geering, K. (2000) Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1657-1672 |
| 17. | Shull, G. E., and Lingrel, J. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 16788-16791 |
| 18. | Shull, G. E. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 12123-12126 |
| 19. | Canfield, V. A., Okamoto, C. T., Chow, D., Dorfman, J., Gros, P., Forte, J. G., and Levenson, R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19878-19884 |
| 20. | Reuben, M. A., Lasater, L. S., and Sachs, G. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6767-6771 |
| 21. | Toh, B. H., Gleeson, P. A., Simpson, R. J., Moritz, R. L., Callaghan, J. M., Goldkorn, I., Jones, C. M., Martinelli, T. M., Mu, F. T., Humphris, D. C., Pettitt, J. M., Mori, Y., Masuda, T., Sobieszczuk, P., Weinstock, J., Mantamadiotis, T., and Baldwin, G. S. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6418-6422 |
| 22. | Caplan, M. J. (1990) in Regulation of Potassium Transport Across Biological Membranes (Reuss, L., ed) , pp. 77-101, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX |
| 23. | Smolka, A., Helander, H. F., and Sachs, G. (1983) Am. J. Physiol. 245, G589-G596 |
| 24. | Gottardi, C. J., and Caplan, M. J. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 283-293 |
| 25. | Dunbar, L. A., Aronson, P. L., and Caplan, M. J. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 148, 769-778 |
| 26. | Muth, T. R., Gottardi, C. J., Roush, D. L., and Caplan, M. J. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, C688-C696 |
| 27. | Ikonen, E., and Simons, K. (1998) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 503-509 |
| 28. | Devarajan, P., Stabach, P. R., De Matteis, M. A., and Morrow, J. S. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10711-10716 |
| 29. | Brown, D., and Rose, J. K. (1992) Cell 68, 533-544 |
| 30. | Brown, D. A., and London, E. (1998) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 111-136 |
| 31. | Lafont, F., Verkade, P., Galli, T., Wimmer, C., Louvard, D., and Simons, K. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3734-3738 |
| 32. | Scheiffele, P., Roth, M. G., and Simons, K. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5501-5508 |
| 33. | Caplan, M. J., Anderson, H. C., Palade, G. E., and Jamieson, J. D. (1986) Cell 46, 623-631 |
| 34. | Gottardi, C. J., and Caplan, M. J. (1993) Science 260, 552-554 |
| 35. | Mays, R. W., Siemers, K. A., Fritz, B. A., Lowe, A. L., van Meer, G., and Nelson, W. J. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 1105-1115 |
| 36. | Hammerton, R. W., Krzeminski, K. A., Mays, R. W., Ryan, T. A., Wollner, D. A., and Nelson, W. J. (1991) Science 254, 847-850 |
| 37. | Arreaza, G., Melkonian, K. A., Bernt-LaFevre, M., and Brown, D. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19123-19127 |
| 38. | Codina, J., Wall, S. M., and Du Bose, T. D., Jr. (1999) Semin. Nephrol. 19, 399-404 |
| 39. | Grishin, A. V., and Caplan, M. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27772-27778 |
| 40. | Cougnon, M., Bouyer, P., Planelles, G., and Jaisser, F. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 6516-6520 |
| 41. | Crowson, M. S., and Shull, G. E. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13740-13748 |
| 42. | Doucet, A. (1997) Exp. Nephrol. 5, 271-276 |
| 43. | Reinhardt, J., Grishin, A. V., Oberleithner, H., and Caplan, M. J. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, F417-F425 |
| 44. | Blostein, R., Dunbar, L., Mense, M., Scanzano, R., Wilczynska, A., and Caplan, M. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 18374-18381 |
| 45. | Mense, M., Dunbar, L. A., Blostein, R., and Caplan, M. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1749-1756 |
| 46. | Farman, N. (1996) Miner. Electrolyte Metab. 22, 272-278 |
| 47. | Therien, A. G., and Blostein, R. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, C541-C566 |
| 48. | Chibalin, A. V., Ogimoto, G., Pedemonte, C. H., Pressley, T. A., Katz, A. I., Feraille, E., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1920-1927 |
| 49. | Chibalin, A. V., Pedemonte, C. H., Katz, A. I., Feraille, E., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8814-8819 |
| 50. | Chibalin, A. V., Katz, A. I., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. M. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, C1458-C1465 |
| 51. | Ogimoto, G., Yudowski, G. A., Barker, C. J., Kohler, M., Katz, A. I., Feraille, E., Pedemonte, C. H., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. M. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 3242-3247 |
| 52. | Chibalin, A. V., Zierath, J. R., Katz, A. I., Berggren, P. O., and Bertorello, A. M. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1209-1220 |
| 53. | Hersey, S. J., and Sachs, G. (1995) Physiol. Rev. 75, 155-189 |
| 54. | Rabon, E., Cuppoletti, J., Malinowska, D., Smolka, A., Helander, H. F., Mendlein, J., and Sachs, G. (1983) J. Exp. Biol. 106, 119-133 |
| 55. | Urushidani, T., and Forte, J. G. (1987) Am. J. Physiol. 252, G458-G465 |
| 56. | Courtois-Coutry, N., Roush, D. L., Rajendran, V., McCarthy, J. B., Geibel, J., Kashgarian, M., and Caplan, M. J. (1997) Cell 90, 501-510 |
| 57. | Wang, T., Courtois-Coutry, N., Giebisch, G., and Caplan, M. J. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, F818-F826 |
| 58. | Fanning, A. S., and Anderson, J. M. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 432-439 |
| 59. | Pu, H. X., Cluzeaud, F., Goldshleger, R., Karlish, S. J. D., Farman, N., and Blostein, R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20370-20378 |
| 60. | Mahmmoud, Y. A., Vorum, H., and Cornelius, F. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35969-35977 |
| 61. | Nelson, W. J., and Veshnock, P. J. (1987) Nature 328, 533-536 |
| 62. | Morrow, J. S., Cianci, C. D., Ardito, T., Mann, A. S., and Kashgarian, M. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 455-465 |
| 63. | Koob, R., Zimmermann, M., Schoner, W., and Drenckhahn, D. (1988) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 45, 230-237 |
| 64. | Smith, P. R., Bradford, A. L., Joe, E. H., Anjelides, K. J., Benos, D. J., and Saccomani, G. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, C63-C70 |
| 65. | Festy, F., Robert, J. C., Brasseur, R., and Thomas, A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 7721-7726 |
| 66. | Nelson, W. J., and Hammerton, R. W. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 893-902 |
| 67. | Ferrandi, M., Salardi, S., Tripodi, G., Barassi, P., Rivera, R., Manunta, P., Goldshleger, R., Ferrari, P., Bianchi, G., and Karlish, S. J. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, H1338-H1349 |
| 68. | Devarajan, P., Scaramuzzino, D. A., and Morrow, J. S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2965-2969 |
| 69. | Zhang, Z., Devarajan, P., Dorfman, A. L., and Morrow, J. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18681-18684 |
| 70. | Jordan, C., Puschel, B., Koob, R., and Drenckhahn, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29971-29975 |
| 71. | Dubreuil, R. R., Wang, P., Dahl, S., Lee, J., and Goldstein, L. S. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 149, 647-656 |
| 72. | Hu, R. J., Moorthy, S., and Bennett, V. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 1069-1080 |
| 73. | Matsuoka, Y., Li, X., and Bennett, V. (2000) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 57, 884-895 |
| 74. | Manunta, P., Barlassina, C., and Bianchi, G. (1998) FEBS Lett. 430, 41-44 |
| 75. | Spicer, Z., Miller, M. M., Andringa, A., Riddle, T. M., Duffy, J. J., Doetschman, T., and Shull, G. E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 21555-21565 |
| 76. | Scarff, K. L., Judd, L. M., Toh, B. H., Gleeson, P. A., and van Driel, I. R. (1999) Gastroenterology 117, 605-618 |
| 77. | James, P. F., Grupp, L. L., Grupp, G., Woo, A. L., Askew, G. R., Croyle, M. L., Walsh, R. A., and Lingrel, J. B. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 555-563 |
| 78. | Toyoshima, C., Nakasako, M., Nomura, H., and Ogawa, H. (2000) Nature 405, 647-655 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Lecuona, L. A. Dada, H. Sun, M. L. Butti, G. Zhou, T.-L. Chew, and J. I. Sznajder Na,K-ATPase {alpha}1-subunit dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A is necessary for its recruitment to the plasma membrane FASEB J, December 1, 2006; 20(14): 2618 - 2620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Matlhagela and M. Taub Regulation of the Na-K-ATPase beta1-subunit promoter by multiple prostaglandin-responsive elements Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): F635 - F646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Lovett, M. P. Verzi, J. E. Burgents, C. A. Tanner, K. Glomski, J. J. Lee, and D. W. Towle Expression Profiles of Na+,K+-ATPase during Acute and Chronic Hypo-osmotic Stress in the Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus. Biol. Bull., August 1, 2006; 211(1): 58 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Deora, N. Philp, J. Hu, D. Bok, and E. Rodriguez-Boulan Mechanisms regulating tissue-specific polarity of monocarboxylate transporters and their chaperone CD147 in kidney and retinal epithelia PNAS, November 8, 2005; 102(45): 16245 - 16250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zatti, V. Chauvet, V. Rajendran, T. Kimura, P. Pagel, and M. J. Caplan The C-Terminal Tail of the Polycystin-1 Protein Interacts with the Na,K-ATPase {alpha}-Subunit Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2005; 16(11): 5087 - 5093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Carrozzino, P. Soulie, D. Huber, N. Mensi, L. Orci, A. Cano, E. Feraille, and R. Montesano Inducible expression of Snail selectively increases paracellular ion permeability and differentially modulates tight junction proteins Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): C1002 - C1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. B. Pestov, T. V. Korneenko, R. Radkov, H. Zhao, M. I. Shakhparonov, and N. N. Modyanov Identification of the {beta}-subunit for nongastric H-K-ATPase in rat anterior prostate Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): C1229 - C1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Wadskog, C. Maldener, A. Proksch, F. Madeo, and L. Adler Yeast Lacking the SRO7/SOP1-encoded Tumor Suppressor Homologue Show Increased Susceptibility to Apoptosis-like Cell Death on Exposure to NaCl Stress Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2004; 15(3): 1436 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cornelius and Y. A. Mahmmoud Direct Activation of Gastric H,K-ATPase by N-Terminal Protein Kinase C Phosphorylation. Comparison of the Acute Regulation Mechanisms of H,K-ATPase and Na,K-ATPase Biophys. J., March 1, 2003; 84(3): 1690 - 1700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Bertorello, Y. Komarova, K. Smith, I. B. Leibiger, R. Efendiev, C. H. Pedemonte, G. Borisy, and J. I. Sznajder Analysis of Na+,K+-ATPase Motion and Incorporation into the Plasma Membrane in Response to G Protein-coupled Receptor Signals in Living Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2003; 14(3): 1149 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-X. Wang, M. Ikeda, and W. B. Guggino The Cytoplasmic Tail of Large Conductance, Voltage- and Ca2+-activated K+ (MaxiK) Channel Is Necessary for Its Cell Surface Expression J. Biol. Chem., January 17, 2003; 278(4): 2713 - 2722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ferreira, A. B. Mason, and C. W. Slayman The Yeast Pma1 Proton Pump: a Model for Understanding the Biogenesis of Plasma Membrane Proteins J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2001; 276(32): 29613 - 29616. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||