|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103159200 on June 4, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 32, 29846-29853, August 10, 2001
The (I/Y)XGG Motif of Adenovirus DNA Polymerase
Affects Template DNA Binding and the Transition from Initiation to
Elongation*
Arjan B.
Brenkman ,
Marinus R.
Heideman ,
Veronica
Truniger§,
Margarita
Salas§, and
Peter C.
van der Vliet ¶
From the University Medical Center, Department of
Physiological Chemistry and Center for Biomedical Genetics, Utrecht,
The Netherlands and § Centro de Biología Molecular
"Severo Ochoa," Universidad Autónoma, Canto Blanco,
28049 Madrid, Spain
Received for publication, April 10, 2001, and in revised form, May 30, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Adenovirus DNA polymerase (Ad pol) is a
eukaryotic-type DNA polymerase involved in the catalysis of
protein-primed initiation as well as DNA polymerization. The functional
significance of the (I/Y)XGG motif, highly conserved
among eukaryotic-type DNA polymerases, was analyzed in Ad pol by
site-directed mutagenesis of four conserved amino acids. All mutant
polymerases could bind primer-template DNA efficiently but were
impaired in binding duplex DNA. Three mutant polymerases required
higher nucleotide concentrations for effective polymerization and
showed higher exonuclease activity on double-stranded DNA. These
observations suggest a local destabilization of DNA substrate at the
polymerase active site. In agreement with this, the mutant polymerases
showed reduced initiation activity and increased
Km(app) for the initiating nucleotide, dCMP.
Interestingly, one mutant polymerase, while capable of elongating on
the primer-template DNA, failed to elongate after protein priming. Further investigation of this mutant polymerase showed that
polymerization activity decreased after each polymerization step and
ceased completely after formation of the precursor terminal
protein-trinucleotide (pTP-CAT) initiation intermediate. Our results
suggest that residues in the conserved motif (I/Y)XGG in Ad
pol are involved in binding the template strand in the polymerase
active site and play an important role in the transition from
initiation to elongation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Adenoviruses contain a linear double-stranded genome of ~36
kilobases with two origins of replication located in the
inverted terminal repeats. At each 5'-end of the adenovirus genome, a
terminal protein (TP)1 is
covalently linked. Replication initiates via a protein-priming mechanism (1) involving the Ad pol and precursor terminal protein (pTP). Ad pol and pTP form a tight heterodimer of which the pTP acts as
a primer and is covalently linked to the initiating nucleotide dCMP.
Initiation of replication is catalyzed by Ad pol and can be stimulated
by the two cellular transcription factors NFI and Oct-1, which function
to recruit and position the pTP-pol complex on the origin of
replication (Ref. 2 and references therein). Ad pol initiates
replication opposite the fourth base of the template strand and
synthesizes a pTP-CAT intermediate. For elongation to occur, this
intermediate jumps back to be paired with template residues 1-3, after
which pTP dissociates from Ad pol and elongation starts (3, 4).
Elongation occurs via a strand displacement mechanism that requires the
viral DNA-binding protein (reviewed in Refs. 5 and 6). Late in
infection, pTP is cleaved by a virus-encoded protease into TP and the
precursor part (reviewed in Refs. 5 and 6). The actual role of pTP
processing is at present unclear. Initiation and elongation are
performed by the same polymerase, but the two processes differ in
sensitivity to inhibitors (7, 8). This suggests that a conformational change occurs upon transition from initiation to elongation, most likely after the formation of pTP-CAT. In agreement with this notion,
kinetic studies revealed that the Km for dCTP is
lower for initiation than for elongation (9). In addition to its
synthetic activities, Ad pol also possesses a distributive 3'-5'-exonuclease activity, shown to be involved in proofreading (10).
Many DNA polymerases have been characterized and were generally found
to have a polymerase and a 3'-5'-exonuclease activity. Sequence
comparisons of DNA polymerases from bacterial, viral, and cellular
origin led to a classification into four groups, A, B (also known as
-like), C, and D, based on amino acid similarities with
Escherichia coli pol I, II, and III, and human DNA pol (11-13). Based on their extent of similarity, six highly conserved motifs (I-VI), which were proposed to lie in the polymerase active site, were identified in human pol (14). DNA polymerases containing these six motifs (see Fig. 1) were designated -like DNA polymerases (12). Further alignments showed that motifs I-III are conserved in all
groups of DNA polymerases (12), while a seventh conserved motif was
identified in the -like DNA polymerases (15, 16). Besides conserved
motifs located in the C-terminal part of DNA polymerases, three
sequence motifs (Exo I-III) were shown to form an evolutionary
conserved 3'-5'-exonuclease site (17-19). Extensive biochemical
analysis of a number of prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA polymerases,
such as the Klenow fragment of E. coli pol I (12), T4
(reviewed in Ref. 20), herpes simplex virus (21), 29
(reviewed in Ref. 22), and pol (23), has shown that residues
located in conserved motifs of these different DNA polymerases play
similar roles in dNTP or DNA binding or in catalysis of polymerase or
3'-5'-exonuclease activity. Analysis of a number of DNA polymerases suggests that the polymerase active site is structurally and
functionally conserved for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA
polymerases (24-28). They are all proposed to utilize an identical
two-metal ion-catalyzed polymerase mechanism but differ extensively in
many of their structural features (29). The crystal structure of phage
RB69 DNA polymerase (24) can serve as prototype of the pol family
of DNA polymerases, since the recently solved crystal structures of
Thermococcus gorgonarius DNA polymerase (30) and Thermococcus sp. 9 degrees N-7 (31) are topologically
similar to this DNA polymerase.
Ad pol is an -like DNA polymerase belonging to the subclass of
protein-priming DNA polymerases. Site-directed mutagenesis studies have
identified motif I as a motif important for initiation and elongation
activity of Ad pol (32). Furthermore, two putative zinc finger domains
were identified (33), and linker mutagenesis studies have shown that
multiple regions, including motifs IV and V, in Ad pol are essential
for Ad DNA replication (34-36). Recently, a set of 22 alanine
substitutions of conserved residues in the C-terminal part of Ad pol
suggests an arrangement of conserved motifs in Ad pol similar to RB69
DNA polymerase (37).
An additional motif, YXG(G/A), located N-terminal of
motif II (12, 18) of the polymerase active site, was shown to be highly
conserved among -like DNA polymerases (38). Mutational analysis of
this motif in 29 DNA polymerase, which starts replication by
protein-priming, led to the proposal that it is involved in the binding
stability of the DNA template at the polymerization active site (38).
Additionally, it was shown to be important for the formation of a
stable complex between TP and DNA polymerase, resulting in transition
defects from TP priming to DNA priming during replication of 29
TP-DNA (39). A multiple alignment of the YXG(G/A)
motif in eukaryotic-type DNA-dependent DNA polymerases has
been shown previously by Truniger et al. (38). In
eukaryotic-type DNA polymerases, the motif has the consensus
sequence YXG(G/A), but for the subclass of
protein-primed DNA polymerases, the motif could be restricted to the
consensus YXGG. For these DNA polymerases, including Ad pol,
the highly conserved tyrosine residue is often an isoleucine. This led
us to define the motif as (I/Y)XGG.
Here, we report the detailed characterization of the
(I/Y)XGG motif in Ad pol, which has been subjected to
site-directed mutational analysis. We propose that the motif is
involved in the stabilization of the template strand at the polymerase
active site. During pTP-primed initiation, this indirectly affects the
binding of the initiating nucleotide, as well as the transition of the
initiation intermediate pTP-CAT from initiation to elongation, thereby
leading to abortive replication. Based on the crystal structure of
RB69, modeled with primer-template and dNTP, we propose a hydrophobic
interaction between the conserved isoleucine and the ribose moiety of
the nucleotide preceding the template base.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
DNA Templates and Substrates--
All oligonucleotides,
unlabeled nucleotides, [ -32P]dNTPs (3000 Ci/mmol), and
[ -32P]ATP (5000 Ci/mmol) were purchased from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech. T30 (5'-AATCCAAAATAAGGTATATTATTGATGATG) represents
the first 30 nucleotides of the bottom strand of the adenovirus 5 genome, and T20 represents the first 20. D20 (5'-CATCATCAATAATATACCTT)
is the complementary strand of T20. Labeling of D20 was performed with
T4 polynucleotide kinase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and [ -32P]ATP. D20 was used for the 3'-5'-exonuclease
assay on ssDNA. For the polymerase/exonuclease coupled assay, gel
retardation, and 3'-5'-exonuclease assay on dsDNA, 5'-labeled D20
was hybridized to T30 or to T20. The hybrid molecules D20/T30 and
T20/D20 were obtained by boiling oligonucleotides in 60 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, followed by slow cooling to
room temperature. D20/T30 and D20/T20 were purified by 10%
polyacrylamide-1× TBE gel electrophoresis. Ad 5 TP-DNA was isolated as
described (40).
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
A full-length Ad pol cDNA
encoding amino acids 1-1199 (provided by Henk G. Stunnenberg (41)) was
cloned in the EcoRI and SphI sites of the
pFastBac donor plasmid. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using
the QuickChange method from Stratagene. The oligonucleotides for the
polymerase chain reaction mutagenesis were as follows: for
R661A, 5'-ATGCTGGCGGCCACGTAATCG and 5'-CGATTACGTGGCCGCCAGCAT; for I664S,
5'-TCTTCCACCGCGGGAGCTGGCG and 5'-
CGCCAGCTCCCGCGGTGGAAGA; for I664Y,
5'-TCTTCCACCGCGGTAGCTGGCG and
5'-CGCCAGCTACCGCGGTGGAAGA; for G666A/G667A,
5'-GTAGCATCTTGCAGCGCGGATGCTC and
5'-GAGCATCCGCGCTGCAAGATGCTAC, with changes
marked boldface type.
The presence of the desired mutations was confirmed by complete
sequencing of each mutant gene. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into DH10Bac competent cells, which contain the bacmid with
a mini-attTn7 target site and a helper plasmid. The mini-Tn7 element on the pFastBac plasmid can transpose to the
mini-attTn7 target site on the bacmid in the presence of
transposition proteins provided by the helper plasmid. Colonies
containing recombinant bacmids were identified by disruption of the
lacZ gene. Bacmid DNA was isolated by means of a
high molecular weight minipreparation. This DNA was then used to
transfect insect cells with Lipofectin (Life Technologies) according to
the manufacturer's manual. After 72 h of transfection, the
recombinant baculoviruses were harvested and amplified for several rounds.
Expression and Purification of Ad DNA Polymerase
Mutants--
Insect cells (Sf-9) were grown as monolayers on
167.5-cm2 plates in SF900 II medium (Life Technologies) at
27 °C. Plates were infected with recombinant baculovirus expressing
the wild-type or mutant Ad pol when ~80% confluence was reached.
After 56 h of infection, cells were harvested and washed with
ice-cold PBS. Cells were resuspended in a hypotonic lysis buffer
containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM DTT, 2 µg/ml
aprotinin, and 1 µg/ml leupeptin and placed on ice. After 10 min,
cells were disrupted by 20 strokes of a Dounce homogenizer (B pestle),
and NaCl was added to a final concentration of 200 mM. The
lysate was cleared by ultracentrifugation at 25,000 rpm in a SW28 rotor
for 30 min at 4 °C.
For purification to near homogeneity, the lysate was loaded on a
SP-Sepharose column, equilibrated with buffer A (25 mM
HEPES, pH 7.5, 20% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM DTT) containing 200 mM NaCl. The column was washed extensively with buffer
A, 200 mM NaCl and eluted with buffer A, 450 mM NaCl. Fractions were collected and analyzed on a 7.5%
polyacrylamide, SDS gel followed by silver staining. Peak fractions
were collected; dialyzed against buffer A, 100 mM NaCl; and
loaded on a ssDNA-cellulose column (Sigma). After washing with buffer
A, 150 mM NaCl, protein was eluted at 600 mM
NaCl. Peak fractions were dialyzed against buffer B (25 mM
HEPES, pH 8.0, 20% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM DTT) containing
100 mM NaCl and loaded onto a 1-ml Mono Q HR 5/5 column
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). After washing with buffer B, 100 mM NaCl, protein was eluted in a gradient of buffer B,
100-500 mM NaCl. Peak fractions were collected, and the
purity of the protein was estimated to be >95% by gel electrophoresis and Coomassie staining.
Proteins and Buffers--
pTP was a gift from Panagiotis N. Kanellopoulos. N-DNA-binding protein was purified as described (42).
The buffer used for dilution of the replication proteins contained 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 20% glycerol, 120 mM NaCl,
and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA).
DNA Polymerase/Exonuclease Coupled Assay--
Partial duplex
D20/T30 containing a stretch of 10 nucleotides protruding from the
5'-end was used as primer-template to study DNA-dependent
DNA polymerization and 3'-5'-exonuclease activity. The reaction
mixture (12.5 µl) contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 4%
glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mM
MgCl2, 0.05 ng of 5'-labeled D20/T30, 12.5 ng of wild-type
or mutant DNA polymerase, and the indicated amounts of dNTPs. Reactions
were stopped after 10 min at 37 °C by the addition of sequencing
loading buffer (10 mM EDTA, 98% formamide, and 0.025%
bromphenol blue). Samples were analyzed on 8 M urea-20%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by autoradiography.
Polymerization or 3'-5'- exonuclease activity were detected as an
increase or decrease in size, respectively, of the 5'-labeled D20 primer.
3'-5'-Exonuclease Assays--
Exonucleolytic breakdown of ssDNA
and dsDNA was tested using 5'-labeled D20 and 5'-labeled D20/T30,
respectively. The reaction mixture (25 µl) contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 4% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 1 mg/ml BSA, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2,
0.05 ng of ssDNA or dsDNA, and the reaction was started by the addition
of 25 ng of wild-type polymerase or mutant polymerases. Incubation was at 37 °C, allowing conditions to be linear both in time and enzyme concentration. Reactions were stopped by the addition of sequencing loading buffer. After analysis by 8 M urea-20%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the 3'-5'-exonuclease activity is
measured as a decrease in size of the DNA by densitometry. From these
data, the catalytic efficiency of the mutants (indicated in Table II) was calculated relative to wild-type Ad pol.
DNA Binding Assays--
Gel retardation was performed using
5'-labeled D20/T30 and 5'-labeled D20/T20. The binding reaction (20 µl) contained 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 4% Ficoll, 1 mM EDTA, 55 mM NaCl, 4 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.05 ng of either
5'-labeled D20/T30 or 5'-labeled D20/T20, and the indicated amounts of
Ad pol or the corresponding mutants. After incubation for 5 min at
4 °C, samples were loaded and separated on a 10% polyacrylamide-1×
TBE gel at 4 °C. Gels were dried, autoradiographed, and quantified
using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA).
Initiation and Partial Elongation of DNA
Replication--
Initiation of replication was performed in a standard
incubation mixture of 25 µl in the presence of 25 mM
HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1 µg of BSA, 50 nM [ -32P]dCTP, and the indicated amounts
of Ad pol and pTP. As template, either 0.6 µg of origin-containing
T30 or 60 ng of TP-DNA were used. When TP-DNA was used, 250 ng of
N-DNA-binding protein was added per reaction. Initiation coupled to
partial/truncated elongation was performed under similar conditions as
initiation in the presence of the indicated concentrations of dCTP,
dATP, and dTTP. No dGTP was added in the reaction mixture. Reactions
were performed at 37 °C for 45 min and were stopped by adding EDTA
to a final concentration of 80 mM. The samples were
precipitated with 20% trichloroacetic acid on ice. Precipitates were
washed with 5% trichloroacetic acid, dissolved in sample buffer,
analyzed on an SDS-7.5% polyacrylamide gel, and autoradiographed.
Replication products were quantified by densitometric analysis
following exposure on a PhosphorImager.
The Km(app) for pTP deoxynucleotidylation was
determined by performing initiation assays with
[ -32P]dCTP with wild-type and mutant polymerases using
increasing concentrations of unlabeled dCTP (1-1000 µM).
The Km(app) was calculated from three experiments.
Glycerol Gradient Sedimentation--
The standard incubation
mixture (200 µl) for glycerol gradient analysis contained 2 µg of
Ad pol, 1.2 µg of pTP, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM MgCl2, and NaCl to a
final concentration of 55 mM. After incubation for 30 min
on ice, the mixture was layered on top of a 4.8-ml linear 10-30%
(v/v) glycerol gradient containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 M NaCl, and
100 µg of BSA as an internal control. Gradients were centrifuged for
24 h at 50,000 rpm in a SW50 rotor at 4 °C. A control gradient with 1.2 µg of pTP was run under similar conditions. Fractions were
collected from the bottom of the tube and analyzed on an SDS-7.5%
polyacrylamide gel. BSA was visualized by silver staining, and pTP, Ad
pol, and the pTP-pol complex were visualized by immunoblotting using an anti-pol and anti-pTP-pol antiserum (43) Quantitation of the
relative amounts of pTP and pol present in each fraction was carried
out by densitometry.
 |
RESULTS |
In order to understand the role of the (I/Y)XGG motif
in Ad pol, individual residues of this region were mutated (Fig.
1) as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The isoleucine was changed into tyrosine (I664Y) as
present in RB69, 29, and most other cellular, bacterial, and viral
DNA polymerases (39) and also into serine (I664S) to study the effect
of another nonconservative change. The two glycines are invariantly
conserved among protein-primed DNA polymerases but the second glycine
is often an alanine among bacterial, viral, and many cellular DNA
polymerases (39). Both glycines were changed into alanines, giving
mutant polymerase G666A/G667A. A positive charge preceding the
(I/Y)XGG motif (Arg661) appears to be
specifically conserved among protein-primed and cellular DNA
polymerases (38) and was changed into alanine (R661A). Construction of
baculoviruses and expression and purification of the recombinant
proteins was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." During purification, all mutant polymerases behaved essentially as wild-type Ad pol.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Sequence conservation in Ad pol: relative
location and alignment of the (I/Y)XGG motif. The
relative location of the motifs conserved in eukaryotic-type DNA
polymerases are indicated for Ad pol. Motif VI is lacking in Ad pol
(14), and motif IV largely aligns with Exo II (19). In the
lower panel, the motif (I/Y)XGG as
defined in Ref. 38 is aligned for the DNA polymerases RB69, 29, and
Ad pol (indicated as Ad-5), with the conserved amino acids
in boldface type. An arginine, specifically
conserved among protein-primed and cellular -like DNA polymerases,
has been underlined. Mutant polymerases are shown at the
bottom and are designated by the original amino acid (in
single-letter notation), its position in Ad pol, and the replacing
amino acid.
|
|
Mutations at the (I/Y)XGG Motif Alter the Wild-type
Polymerase/Exonuclease Balance--
A polymerase/exonuclease coupled
assay was performed to study the coordination of both degradative and
polymerization activities with the mutant polymerases. The functional
coupling between synthesis and degradation on primer-template D20/T30
was assayed as a function of the dNTP concentration. As shown in Fig.
2, 3'-5'-exonucleolytic digestion of the
primer strand occurred in the absence of nucleotides. By the addition
of increasing amounts of dNTPs, the equilibrium was shifted toward
synthesis, exonucleolysis being competed by DNA polymerization. In the
presence of 25 nM dNTPs, the wild-type Ad pol was able to
extend D20/T30 until 27-28 nucleotides, and from 125 nM
dNTPs full extension of the primer-template was accomplished (D30/T30).
Whereas mutant polymerase R661A allowed full polymerization at
approximately similar nucleotide concentrations as the wild-type enzyme
(125 nM, Fig. 2), mutant polymerases I664S and I664Y
required a 5-fold higher amount (Fig. 2 and Table
I). On the other hand, mutant polymerase
G666A/G667A required a 200-fold higher dNTP concentration compared with
the wild-type enzyme for full polymerization (Fig. 2 and Table I).
Furthermore, an increased exonuclease activity was observed for mutant
polymerases I664S, I664Y, and G666A/G667A upon comparison of their
degradation activities (Fig. 2, 0 nM lanes) with
that of the wild-type polymerase, as can be seen by the higher
intensity of the faster moving bands. The higher amount of dNTPs,
required to fully elongate the primer-template for these three mutant
polymerases, might be explained, at least partially, by their higher
exonuclease activity. The 3'-5'-exonuclease activity was therefore
determined on both ssDNA and dsDNA, and the results are quantified in
Table I. Indeed, the exonuclease activity on primer-template DNA was
increased for mutant polymerases I664S, I664Y, and G666A/G667A (Table
I). Degradation of ssDNA by all mutant polymerases was slightly lower
than that by the wild-type polymerase and proceeded in a distributive
manner. An increased exonuclease activity on primer-template DNA might
be the result of a lower DNA binding stability of the mutant
polymerases in the polymerase active site.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
DNA polymerase/exonuclease coupled
assay. The assay was carried out using 5'-labeled D20/T30
primer-template, the indicated concentration of each dNTP, and 25 ng of
wild-type or mutant Ad pol. The arrows indicate the position
of the 20-mer (nonelongated primer) and the 30-mer (elongated
primer).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Enzymatic activities of Ad wild-type and mutant polymerases
The assays were performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
DNA Binding of the Mutant DNA Polymerases Is Affected on Duplex
DNA--
To examine the dsDNA binding capability of the different
mutant DNA polymerases, gel retardation assays were performed with the
primer-template molecule D20/T30 and duplex DNA molecule D20/T20. The
formation of Ad pol-DNA complexes with the primer-template D20/T30 was similar for the wild-type and the mutant DNA polymerases (Fig. 3A). However, all mutant
polymerases were affected in binding duplex DNA (Fig. 3B),
although mutant polymerase R661A to a lesser extent than mutant
polymerases I664S, I664Y, and G666A/G667A. As can be seen in Fig. 3,
A and B, a second migrating band is visible for
wild-type polymerase and on primer-template DNA for all mutant
polymerases. A likely explanation for the presence of two migrating
complexes is the existence of two forms of binding DNA by Ad pol (Ad
pol monomeric and dimeric forms under conditions of low ionic strength
(44)). These results are in agreement with the increased exonuclease
activity found for three mutants on dsDNA (Table I) and indicate a
decreased stability of the DNA in the polymerase active site.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
DNA binding on duplex DNA is affected for all
mutant polymerases. The gel retardation assay was performed
using 5'-labeled dsDNA in the presence of the indicated amounts of
wild-type or mutant Ad pol. Bands corresponding to free DNA and to
polymerase-DNA complexes are indicated with an arrow.
A, Ad pol binding to primer-template DNA D20/T30.
B, Ad pol binding to duplex DNA D20/T20.
|
|
Initiation Activity Is Affected in All DNA Polymerase Mutants in
the (I/Y)XGG Motif--
Since Ad pol uses pTP as primer in a
template-dependent fashion during initiation, the formation
of pTP-C was studied using T30 as template. As shown in Table
II, the initiation activities of
all mutant polymerases were severely affected with values of 14, 25, 17, and 11% compared with wild-type Ad pol for mutant polymerases
I664S, I664Y, R661A, and G666A/G667A, respectively.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Protein-primed activities of Ad wild-type and mutant polymerases
The assays were performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
When the mutant polymerases were tested for initiation using TP-DNA
(the adenovirus genome with covalently linked TP to each 5' DNA end),
similar differences could be observed (Table II). Initiation performed
without template or with an oligonucleotide of unrelated sequence did
not result in any activity (data not shown), in agreement with previous
data showing origin dependence (3, 45, 46). When initiation was
performed with a 200-fold higher dCTP concentration, the initiation
activity of the mutant polymerases showed an increase from 11-25 to
36-63% of the wild-type level (Table II), suggesting a reduced
affinity for the initiating nucleotide, dCMP. Therefore, the apparent
Km (Km(app)) for incorporation of
dCTP was determined (Table II). Wild-type Ad pol showed a
Km(app) of 8.3 µM for the initiating nucleotide dCTP. Mutant polymerase R661A showed a
Km(app) value, which was only slightly increased
compared with wild-type Ad pol. On the other hand, the
Km values of mutant polymerases I664S and I664Y were
both 3-fold higher, while the Km(app) of mutant
polymerase G666A/G667A was shown to be 9 times higher than that of the
wild-type polymerase (Table II).
The initiation impairment observed could be explained by an affected
template strand binding of the mutated residues of the (I/Y)XGG motif. This could lead to an incorrect positioning
of the templating nucleotide, explaining the increased
Km(app) shown for the initiating nucleotide. Another
explanation for an increased Km(app) for the
initiating nucleotide could be a defective pTP/pol interaction. To
discriminate between these possibilities, glycerol gradient analysis
was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" to study
the interaction of pTP and the Ad pol mutants. Interaction with pTP was
found to be stable, whereby all mutant polymerases behaved essentially
as the wild-type Ad pol (Table II). It is therefore likely that the
increased Km(app) observed for the mutant
polymerases is a result of destabilization of the template DNA strand,
indirectly affecting dNTP binding. These results support the role of
the (I/Y)XGG motif as a motif involved in binding template DNA.
Mutant Polymerase G666A/G667A Is Elongation-defective after
Protein-primed Initiation--
Initiation on adenovirus DNA starts
opposite the fourth nucleotide in the origin of replication with the
formation of pTP-C, which extends to position 6, forming a pTP-CAT
intermediate (3). The transition from initiation to elongation in
adenovirus DNA replication is characterized by a jumping-back
mechanism, which recovers the terminal three nucleotides, resulting in
DNA primer-template elongation and dissociation of pTP (3, 4). To study
elongation after protein priming, truncated replication reactions were
performed in the presence of 50 nM dCTP and additionally 40 µM dATP and 40 µM dTTP but without dGTP.
Under the conditions chosen (low dCTP), only part of the pTP-CAT
intermediate is elongated until position 26 (the first C-residue in the
template), thus providing an internal control for elongation
efficiency. The pTP-26 product will migrate as a band of 90 kDa in
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and is clearly distinguishable from the pTP-CAT
intermediate (Fig. 4A).
Wild-type Ad pol shows both the pTP-CAT intermediate and pTP-26
formation with a 5-fold higher intensity for pTP-26 than for pTP-CAT.
Taking into account the five C residues in pTP-26, this
indicates that equal amounts of pTP-CAT and pTP-26 were synthesized under these conditions, resulting in an elongation/initiation ratio of
1. Whereas the absolute levels of DNA synthesis were lower for mutant
polymerases I664Y and R661A, the elongation to initiation ratios were
similar to those of wild-type Ad pol. On the other hand, for mutant
polymerase I664S, a pTP-26 product was visible only after long
exposure, giving an elongation/initiation ratio of 0.01. For mutant
polymerase G666A/G667A, no pTP-26 formation could be detected. When
elongation was performed with increasing concentrations of dCTP,
elongation activity could be partially restored for mutant polymerase
I664S, increasing the elongation/initiation ratio to 0.2 (10 µM dCTP), while mutant polymerase G666A/G667A remained
elongation-defective (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Protein-primed initiation and partial
elongation on single-stranded origin containing DNA. Activity was
assayed using 600 ng of T30 (the template DNA strand of the Ad 5 origin), 50 nM [ -32P]dCTP, 90 ng of Ad
pTP, and 100 ng of either wild-type or mutant Ad pol. A,
initiation followed by partial elongation. In this assay, 40 µM each of dATP and dTTP were added to allow elongation
up to 26 nucleotides. The positions of the pTP-CAT intermediate and the
pTP-26 product are indicated. B, initiation followed by
partial elongation as a function of the dNTP concentration. Partial
elongation was allowed in the presence of 50 nM
[ -32P]dCTP, 40 µM each of dATP and dTTP,
and increasing amounts of unlabeled dCTP.
|
|
Since mutant polymerase G666A/G667A showed no detectable elongation
activity following initiation, we wondered whether initiation of mutant
polymerase G666A/G667A resulted in the formation of pTP-CA and pTP-CAT
intermediates. Therefore, initiation was assayed in the presence of
labeled dATP or dTTP as shown in Fig. 5.
To ascertain that the labeled nucleotide incorporated occupied the second or third position in pTP-CAT, respectively, 200 µM
nonlabeled dCTP (in the case of [ -32P]dATP) or a 200 µM concentration of each dCTP and dATP (in the case of
[ -32P]dTTP) was included in the reaction. When any of
the three -32P-labeled dNTPs were supplied separately as
the only nucleotide, only dCMP could be directly linked to pTP (Ref. 3
and data not shown). Mutant polymerase G666A/G667A could incorporate
three nucleotides to form the pTP-CAT intermediate. This result shows that mutant polymerase G666A/G667A is capable of dNTP incorporation using both the OH group of the serine (the priming amino acid of pTP)
and the 3'-OH of nucleotides for polymerization, in agreement with the
DNA-primed results (Fig. 2). However, DNA synthesis by mutant
polymerase G666A/G667A stalls after pTP-CAT intermediate formation.
Additionally, we observe a decrease in activity during each
polymerization step from pTP-C to pTP-CAT, resulting in abortive replication for mutant polymerase G666A/G667A. These results suggest a
defective translocation of the pTP-pol complex along the template DNA
during the transition from initiation to elongation.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mutant polymerase G666A/G667A is capable of
pTP-CAT formation. Initiation was performed using 600 ng of T30,
90 ng of Ad pTP, and 100 ng of either wild-type or mutant Ad pol. Each
reaction contained either 50 nM [ -32P]dCTP
marked as C; 200 µM dCTP and 50 nM
[ -32P]dATP marked as A; or 200 µM dCTP, 200 µM dATP, and 50 nM
[ -32P]dTTP marked as T. The percentage of
initiation activity is based on the incorporation of each radiolabeled
nucleotide relative to the wild-type polymerase and corrected for the
elongation activity of mutant polymerases I664S and G666A/G667A.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The (I/Y)XGG motif (defined as
YXG(G/A) in 29 DNA polymerase), highly
conserved among eukaryotic-type DNA polymerases and located at the
N-terminal site of the polymerase domain (38), was mutated in Ad pol to
determine the function of these conserved residues in both DNA- and
protein-primed reactions. Four mutant polymerases were obtained: R661A,
I664S, I664Y, and G666A/G667A.
The (I/Y)XGG Motif in Ad Pol Stabilizes the Template Strand in the
Polymerase Active Site--
Mutational analysis in the
(I/Y)XGG motif of 29 DNA polymerase revealed an important
role of this motif in the binding stability of the template strand at
the polymerase active site (38). Different mutations in the same
residue of this motif resulted in a pol/exo balance shifted either
toward polymerization or toward exonucleolysis, depending on the
stabilization of the template strand at a particular active site.
During DNA-primed replication, three of the four mutant Ad pols
described here showed a pol/exo balance shifted toward exonucleolysis
(low pol/exo balance). Mutant polymerases I664S, I664Y, and G666A/G667A
were shown to have a 2-3-fold increased exonuclease activity on dsDNA,
while their activity on ssDNA was wild type-like. The increased
exonuclease activity of these three mutant polymerases explains, at
least partially, the higher dNTP concentrations required for effective
polymerization on the same primer-template and indicates that DNA
binding in the polymerase active site is affected. Indeed, when binding
of duplex DNA was tested, the mutant polymerases were clearly affected
in dsDNA binding in comparison with the wild-type Ad pol, indicating
that a local destabilization of the template DNA at the polymerization active site exists in these mutant polymerases. However, no defective primer-template binding could be seen for any of the mutant
polymerases. A possible explanation for this difference is that the
mutant polymerases destabilize primer-template DNA only locally. Duplex DNA at the polymerase active site is held in position by numerous interactions of the fingers, palm, and thumb as has been shown in the
crystal structure of Taq polymerase complexed with duplex DNA (25). However, in the presence of a 5'-template overhang, additional DNA contacts with the fingers are possible as shown in the
crystal structure of bacteriophage T7 complexed with a primer-template
(47). These additional contacts could further stabilize the
primer-template at the polymerase active site, therefore affecting the
DNA binding detectably only on duplex DNA. In the case of the 29 DNA
polymerase mutants, defective retardation of dsDNA indicated a
defective stabilization of the template strand at the polymerization
active site and resulted in a low pol/exo balance (38). For mutant
polymerase G666A/G667A the local destabilization of the primer-template
at the polymerization active site might have an additional indirect
effect on the positioning of the template strand. This could result in
a template base that is incorrectly positioned for base pairing with
the incoming nucleotide and thereby affect the affinity of this
mutant polymerase for nucleotides during polymerization (200-fold
higher nucleotide requirement).
The possible role of the (I/Y)XGG motif as a DNA binding
motif is in agreement with the proposed localization of its residues (39) in the crystal structure of RB69 DNA polymerase modeled with DNA.
The structure of RB69 DNA polymerase, one of the three DNA polymerases
belonging to the -like DNA polymerases (family B) of which the
crystal structure is known (24, 30, 31), can serve as a prototype for
eukaryotic-type DNA polymerases. The RB69 polymerase active site
modeled with a primer-template and a dNTP (crystallographic data from
Protein Data Bank number 1WAH (39)) shows that the tyrosine of the
(I/Y)XGG motif (Tyr391, corresponding to
Ile664 in Ad pol) interacts directly with the phosphate
between the two nucleotides preceding the one acting as the template.
Also, Gly393 and Ala394 are positioned close to
the template strand. The motif is located more than 12 Å away from the
dNTP binding site, indicating that a direct role of the
(I/Y)XGG motif in dNTP binding is highly unlikely.
Decreased Template Binding Affects pTP-primed Initiation--
All
four mutants described here were affected in pTP-primed initiation. The
affected initiation activity and increase in the Km(app) for the initiating nucleotide are likely a
consequence of the local destabilization of the template strand at the
polymerization active site, resulting indirectly in the incorrect
positioning of the template strand for base pairing with the incoming
nucleotide. This is in agreement with the results of the DNA binding
experiments (Fig. 3) and with the position of the (I/Y)XGG
motif in the RB69 structure, modeled with a primer-template and
incoming dNTP (crystallographic data from Protein Data Bank number 1WAH
(39)). A decrease in initiation activity for the (I/Y)XGG
mutants of 29 DNA polymerase was also observed but was explained by
an impaired interaction between TP and 29 pol (39). Since in 29
DNA polymerase protein-primed initiation is templated by the second
nucleotide of the TP-DNA, the (I/Y)XGG motif could be
located at the position of the TP during this reaction. Such an
interaction defect is less likely for Ad pol during initiation, since
it occurs opposite the fourth nucleotide, a situation where the motif
is proposed to be in direct contact with the template strand
(crystallographic data from Protein Data Bank number 1WAH (39)) and
located rather distant from the protein primer. Indeed, we did not
observe interaction differences between the wild-type and mutant
polymerases and pTP as determined by glycerol gradient centrifugation.
However, minor differences in interaction with pTP may not be detected
in this assay. The increase in the Km(app) for dCTP
did not completely explain the decrease of the initiation activity in
the case of mutant polymerase R661A. One possible explanation is that
the interaction between pTP and Ad pol for mutant polymerase R661A was
not fully functional, as has been shown to be the case for some 29
DNA polymerase mutants (48).
The (I/Y)XGG Motif Is Involved in the Transition from Initiation to
Elongation--
Whereas the phenotypes of mutant DNA polymerases I664S
and I664Y were mostly comparable, they clearly differed in their
ability to elongate after protein priming. The elongation/initiation
ratio of mutant polymerase I664Y was wild type-like, while mutant
polymerase I664S showed a reduced elongation activity and was unable to
restore the wild-type elongation to initiation ratio even at high dNTP concentrations. Mutant polymerase G666A/G667A had no detectable elongation activity even at high dNTP concentrations. However, both
mutant polymerases, G666A/G667A and I664S, had been shown to be able to
elongate a primer-template (Fig. 2) and were capable of pTP-CAT
formation (Fig. 5). These results show that both mutant polymerases can
use protein and DNA as a primer, and therefore the elongation defect of
mutant polymerase G666A/G667A must lie in the transition from
initiation to elongation. A decrease in the activity of mutant
polymerases I664S and G666A/G667A during each additional polymerization
step following initiation (C-CA-CAT) was observed, indicating a
defective translocation of the pTP-pol complex along the template DNA.
In the case of mutant polymerase G666A/G667A, this defective
translocation led to abortive replication after the formation of the
initiation intermediate pTP-CAT. The role of the (I/Y)XGG
motif in stabilization of the template strand at the polymerase active
site probably leads during initiation of protein-primed replication to
a defect in the translocation of the template strand before, during,
and after the jumping-back mechanism. A transition defect from
initiation to elongation in TP-DNA has been described for three 29
mutant polymerases studied at the (I/Y)XGG motif (39). One
of these mutated residues was Gly228, corresponding to
Gly666 in Ad pol, which was changed into Ala. Their
interaction defect with TP and/or DNA was proposed to cause a premature
dissociation of TP, DNA polymerase, and DNA, resulting in the
transition defect of the mutant polymerases. These mutant polymerases
were not able to repolymerize short DNA fragments. Although a pTP-pol
interaction defect was not found for the Ad pol mutants described here,
they might not be able to efficiently bind the pTP-CAT intermediate. This would result in abortive replication. Glycine residues are often
found in loops, as is Gly393, the first glycine of the
(I/Y)XGG motif of RB69 polymerase. Thus, the glycine pair in
Ad pol most likely functions as a structural element. The conservation
of the glycine pair among many -like DNA polymerases suggests that
it may play a critical role in creating the optimal environment for
accommodation of the template strand. Recently, a study of Ad pol was
carried out with crude lysates of 22 site-directed mutations to
identify conserved residues involved in Ad pol function (37). In this
study, mutant polymerases G667D and G666A/G667A from the
(I/Y)XGG motif were tested for initiation activity, DNA
binding, pTP-pol interaction, and polymerization activity on calf
thymus DNA. Both mutant polymerases were mainly affected in
initiation and dsDNA binding activity and were shown to interact with
pTP, in agreement with our observations. In contrast, the initiation
activity of mutant polymerase G666A/G667A was found to be much higher
(50-75%) than in our study (11%). A likely explanation for this
apparent discrepancy is that their assay conditions included nuclear
extract that could contain cellular factors that might stimulate
initiation. In addition, the presence of Mn2+ instead of
Mg2+ used in the present study strongly reduces the
specific nucleotide selection (3), which may lead to aberrant
initiation products.
A Hydrophobic Contact That Positions the Template Strand--
In
DNA polymerases of different Ad serotypes, the tyrosine in the
(I/Y)XGG motif is an isoleucine. In contrast to tyrosine, isoleucine cannot hydrogen-bond with the phosphate between the two
nucleotides preceding the one acting as a template as described for
29 pol (39). When the motif is aligned with the amino acid sequences
of eukaryotic DNA-dependent DNA polymerases, the tyrosine is a phenylalanine in several bacterial and viral polymerases and an
isoleucine in several TP-primed DNA polymerases, like Ad pol (38). This
suggests that a hydrophobic residue at this position is important and
might interact with the template DNA in the polymerase active site.
Indeed, our results show an affected elongation for mutant polymerases
I664S, whereas mutant polymerase I664Y has a wild type-like
elongation/initiation ratio (Fig. 4A). Moreover, changing
the tyrosine of the (I/Y)XGG motif of 29 pol into serine (Y226S) to keep the hydroxyl group resulted in a drastic phenotype with
null polymerization and no dsDNA binding (38). Substitution into
phenylalanine (Y226F), however, retained polymerization and dsDNA
binding (38). We therefore propose that the isoleucine in the
(I/Y)XGG motif of Ad pol interacts directly with the ribose moiety of the 3'-nucleotide preceding the templating nucleotide. This
interaction might be important in the case of a tyrosine as well. Such
a model is consistent with our results but also explains why the
(I/Y)XGG motif in 29 pol controls the pol/exo balance
immediately after the formation of the initiation product TP-dAMP (39).
The TP-primed initiation of 29 pol starts opposite the second
nucleotide of the template and uses a sliding-back mechanism to recover
the terminal nucleotide (49). If the hydrogen bond between
Tyr226 (the equivalent of Ile664 in Ad pol) and
the phosphate between the two nucleotides preceding the template base
were important, the pol/exo balance could only start at the formation
of TP-(dAMP)3. However, the pol/exo balance (which is due
to the role of the motif for stably binding DNA at the polymerase
active site (38)), starts at TP-(dAMP)2 (39) when the
hydrogen bond does not exist. This result is readily explained when the
template is positioned correctly by a hydrophobic interaction with the
nucleotide next to the template base. A similar hydrophobic interaction
has been shown to be involved in discriminating between
deoxynucleotides versus ribonucleotides in T7 DNA polymerase (47). Tyr526 together with Glu480 wedges the
ribose moiety of the incoming nucleotide, thereby forming a hydrophobic
pocket at the C2' position of the ribose that could exclude
ribonucleotides from the polymerase active site (47).
In summary, our results support the conclusion drawn from the
mutational analysis of 29 DNA polymerase that the
(I/Y)XGG motif is involved in the coordination of synthesis
and degradation due to its importance for the binding stability of the
template DNA at the polymerization active site. Its role in DNA binding makes it additionally important for the transition steps from initiation to elongation. In addition, we propose that
Ile664 directly interacts with the ribose moiety of the
nucleotide next to the template nucleotide, which holds the template
into position for correct initiation, jumping back, and subsequent elongation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Rob de Jong, Kevin Augustijn, and
Bas van Breukelen for critical reading of the manuscript and Rob de
Jong and Miguel de Vega for stimulating discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the Netherlands
Organization for scientific research (to P. C. v. d. V.), by
National Institutes of Health Grant 2R01 GM27242-21 and Dirección
General de Investigación Científica y Técnica grant
PB98-0645 (to M. S.), by an institutional grant from the
Fundación Ramón Areces (to the Centro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa"), and by European Union Contract
FMRX-CT97-0125 (to P. C. v. d. V. and M. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Universiteitsweg
100, P.O. Box 85060, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Tel.: 31-302538989; Fax: 31-302539035; E-mail:
p.c.vandervliet@med.uu.nl.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 4, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103159200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TP, terminal
protein;
Ad, adenovirus;
pol, polymerase;
exo, exonuclease;
pTP, precursor terminal protein;
ssDNA, single-stranded DNA;
dsDNA, double-stranded DNA;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
BSA, bovine serum
albumin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Salas, M.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
60,
39-71
|
| 2.
|
de Jong, R. N.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1999)
Gene (Amst.)
236,
1-12
|
| 3.
|
King, A. J.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
5786-5792
|
| 4.
|
King, A. J.,
Teertstra, W. R.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24617-24623
|
| 5.
|
Hay, R. T.
(1996)
Adenovirus DNA Replication
in
DNA Replication in Eukaryotic Cells
(DePamphilis, M. L., ed)
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 6.
|
van der Vliet, P. C.
(1995)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
199,
1-30
|
| 7.
|
Nagata, K.,
Guggenheimer, R. A.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
4266-4270
|
| 8.
|
Sussenbach, J. S.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1984)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
109,
53-73
|
| 9.
|
Mul, Y. M.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
641-647
|
| 10.
|
King, A. J.,
Teertstra, W. R.,
Blanco, L.,
Salas, M.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
1745-1752
|
| 11.
|
Braithwaite, D. K.,
and Ito, J.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
787-802
|
| 12.
|
Delarue, M.,
Poch, O.,
Tordo, N.,
Moras, D.,
and Argos, P.
(1990)
Protein Eng.
3,
461-467
|
| 13.
|
Ito, J.,
and Braithwaite, D. K.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
4045-4057
|
| 14.
|
Wong, S. W.,
Wahl, A. F.,
Yuan, P. M.,
Arai, N.,
Pearson, B. E.,
Arai, K.,
Korn, D.,
Hunkapiller, M. W.,
and Wang, T. S.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
37-47
|
| 15.
|
Hwang, C. B.,
Ruffner, K. L.,
and Coen, D. M.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
1774-1776
|
| 16.
|
Blasco, M. A.,
Mendez, J.,
Lazaro, J. M.,
Blanco, L.,
and Salas, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
2735-2740
|
| 17.
|
Blanco, L.,
Bernad, A.,
and Salas, M.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
112,
139-144
|
| 18.
|
Blanco, L.,
Bernad, A.,
Blasco, M. A.,
and Salas, M.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
100,
27-38
|
| 19.
|
Bernad, A.,
Blanco, L.,
Lazaro, J. M.,
Martin, G.,
and Salas, M.
(1989)
Cell
59,
219-228
|
| 20.
|
Reha-Krantz, L. J.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
262,
323-331
|
| 21.
|
Larder, B. A.,
Kemp, S. D.,
and Darby, G.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
169-175
|
| 22.
|
Blanco, L.,
and Salas, M.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
262,
283-294
|
| 23.
|
Copeland, W. C.,
Dong, Q.,
and Wang, T. S.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
262,
294-303
|
| 24.
|
Wang, J.,
Sattar, A. K.,
Wang, C. C.,
Karam, J. D.,
Konigsberg, W. H.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1997)
Cell
89,
1087-1099
|
| 25.
|
Eom, S. H.,
Wang, J.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1996)
Nature
382,
278-281
|
| 26.
|
Beese, L. S.,
Friedman, J. M.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
14095-14101
|
| 27.
|
Kiefer, J. R.,
Mao, C.,
Braman, J. C.,
and Beese, L. S.
(1998)
Nature
391,
304-307
|
| 28.
|
Pelletier, H.,
Sawaya, M. R.,
Wolfle, W.,
Wilson, S. H.,
and Kraut, J.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
12742-12761
|
| 29.
|
Steitz, T. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17395-17398
|
| 30.
|
Hopfner, K. P.,
Eichinger, A.,
Engh, R. A.,
Laue, F.,
Ankenbauer, W.,
Huber, R.,
and Angerer, B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3600-3605
|
| 31.
|
Rodriguez, A. C.,
Park, H. W.,
Mao, C.,
and Beese, L. S.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
299,
447-462
|
| 32.
|
Joung, I.,
Horwitz, M. S.,
and Engler, J. A.
(1991)
Virology
184,
235-241
|
| 33.
|
Joung, I.,
and Engler, J. A.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
5788-5796
|
| 34.
|
Roovers, D. J.,
Overman, P. F.,
Chen, X. Q.,
and Sussenbach, J. S.
(1991)
Virology
180,
273-284
|
| 35.
|
Roovers, D. J.,
van der Lee, F. M.,
van der Wees, J.,
and Sussenbach, J. S.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
265-276
|
| 36.
|
Chen, M.,
and Horwitz, M. S.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
6116-6120
|
| 37.
|
Liu, H.,
Naismith, J. H.,
and Hay, R. T.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
11681-11689
|
| 38.
|
Truniger, V.,
Lazaro, J. M.,
Salas, M.,
and Blanco, L.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
3430-3441
|
| 39.
|
Truniger, V.,
Blanco, L.,
and Salas, M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
286,
57-69
|
| 40.
|
Coenjaerts, F. E.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
262,
548-560
|
| 41.
|
Stunnenberg, H. G.,
Lange, H.,
Philipson, L.,
van Miltenburg, R. T.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
2431-2444
|
| 42.
|
Dekker, J.,
Kanellopoulos, P. N.,
Loonstra, A. K.,
van Oosterhout, J. A.,
Leonard, K.,
Tucker, P. A.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1455-1463
|
| 43.
|
Coenjaerts, F. E.,
van Oosterhout, J. A.,
and van der Vliet, P. C.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
5401-5409
|
| 44.
|
Temperley, S. M.,
and Hay, R. T.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
761-768
|
| 45.
|
Harris, M. P.,
and Hay, R. T.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
201,
57-67
|
| 46.
|
Dobbs, L.,
Zhao, L. J.,
Sripad, G.,
and Padmanabhan, R.
(1990)
Virology
178,
43-51
|
| 47.
|
Doublie, S.,
Tabor, S.,
Long, A. M.,
Richardson, C. C.,
and Ellenberger, T.
(1998)
Nature
391,
251-258
|
| 48.
|
Dufour, E.,
Mendez, J.,
Lazaro, J. M.,
de Vega, M.,
Blanco, L.,
and Salas, M.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
304,
289-300
|
| 49.
|
Mendez, J.,
Blanco, L.,
Esteban, J. A.,
Bernad, A.,
and Salas, M.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
9579-9583
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Longas, M. de Vega, J. M. Lazaro, and M. Salas
Functional characterization of highly processive protein-primed DNA polymerases from phages Nf and GA-1, endowed with a potent strand displacement capacity
Nucleic Acids Res.,
November 6, 2006;
34(20):
6051 - 6063.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Mysiak, C. Wyman, P. E. Holthuizen, and P. C. van der Vliet
NFI and Oct-1 bend the Ad5 origin in the same direction leading to optimal DNA replication
Nucleic Acids Res.,
December 1, 2004;
32(21):
6218 - 6225.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Mysiak, P. E. Holthuizen, and P. C. van der Vliet
The adenovirus priming protein pTP contributes to the kinetics of initiation of DNA replication
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 25, 2004;
32(13):
3913 - 3920.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Mysiak, M. H. Bleijenberg, C. Wyman, P. E. Holthuizen, and P. C. van der Vliet
Bending of Adenovirus Origin DNA by Nuclear Factor I as Shown by Scanning Force Microscopy Is Required for Optimal DNA Replication
J. Virol.,
February 15, 2004;
78(4):
1928 - 1935.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. van Breukelen, A. B. Brenkman, P. E. Holthuizen, and P. C. van der Vliet
Adenovirus Type 5 DNA Binding Protein Stimulates Binding of DNA Polymerase to the Replication Origin
J. Virol.,
December 20, 2002;
77(2):
915 - 922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Brenkman, E. C. Breure, and P. C. van der Vliet
Molecular Architecture of Adenovirus DNA Polymerase and Location of the Protein Primer
J. Virol.,
July 17, 2002;
76(16):
8200 - 8207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Wang and J. Hu
Distinct Requirement for Two Stages of Protein-Primed Initiation of Reverse Transcription in Hepadnaviruses
J. Virol.,
May 13, 2002;
76(12):
5857 - 5865.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|