Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104687200 on June 4, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 32, 29871-29879, August 10, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/32/29871    most recent
M104687200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Menahem, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boime, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Menahem, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boime, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Position of the alpha  and beta  Subunits in a Single Chain Variant of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Affects the Heterodimeric Interaction of the Subunits and Receptor-binding Epitopes*

David Ben-MenahemDagger, Albina Jablonka-Shariff§, Ricia K. Hyde, Mary R. Pixley, Shivaji Srivastava, Peter Berger, and Irving Boime||

From the Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 and the  Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Austrian Academy of Science, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Received for publication, May 22, 2001, and in revised form, June 1, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The glycoprotein hormone family represents a class of heterodimers, which include the placental hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (CG) and the anterior pituitary hormones follitropin, lutropin, and thyrotropin. They are composed of common alpha  subunit and a hormone-specific beta  subunit. Based on the CG crystal structure, it was suggested that the quaternary subunit interactions are crucial for biological activity. However, recent observations using single chain glycoprotein hormone analogs, where the beta  and alpha  subunits are linked (NH2-CGbeta -alpha ; CGbeta alpha orientation), implied that the heterodimeric-like quaternary configuration is not a prerequisite for receptor binding/signal transduction. To study the heterodimeric alignment of the two subunit domains in a single chain and its role in the intracellular behavior and biological action of the hormone, a single chain CG variant was constructed in which the carboxyl terminus of alpha  was fused to the CGbeta amino terminus (NH2-alpha -CGbeta ; alpha CGbeta orientation). The secretion rate of alpha CGbeta from transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells was less than that seen for CGbeta alpha . The alpha CGbeta tether was not recognized by dimer-specific monoclonal antibodies and did not bind to lutropin/CG receptor. To define if one or both subunit domains were modified in alpha CGbeta , it was co-transfected with a monomeric alpha  or CGbeta gene. In each case, alpha CGbeta /alpha and alpha CGbeta /CGbeta complexes were formed indicating that CG dimer-specific epitopes were established. The alpha CGbeta /alpha complex bound to receptor indicating that the beta  domain in the alpha CGbeta tether was still functional. In contrast, no significant receptor binding of alpha CGbeta /CGbeta was observed indicating a major perturbation in the alpha  domain. These results suggest that although dimeric-like determinants are present in both alpha CGbeta /alpha and alpha CGbeta /CGbeta complexes, the receptor binding determinants in the alpha  domain of the tether are absent. These results show that generating heterodimeric determinants do not necessarily result in a bioactive molecule. Our data also indicate that the determinants for biological activity are distinct from those associated with intracellular behavior.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The glycoprotein hormones lutropin (LH),1 follitropin (FSH), thyrotropin, and choriogonadotropin (CG) are heterodimers, which consist of a common alpha  subunit and a unique beta  subunit that confer the receptor specificity of the ligand. The subunits combine non-covalently early in the secretory pathway, and formation of the heterodimer is crucial for binding to the gonadal and thyroid receptors. Although it is well established that both subunits contain residues critical for bioactivity, recent evidence indicates that the quaternary interactions between the two subunits are essential for intracellular behavior but not for in vitro bioactivity (1-3). This conclusion was based on the single chain gonadotropin model where the amino end of the common alpha  subunit was genetically fused to the carboxyl end of CGbeta subunit (designated CGbeta alpha ; Fig. 1) (4). This analog was secreted efficiently and was active in in vitro and in vivo bioassays. The CGbeta alpha orientation was chosen to keep the carboxyl end of the alpha  subunit unmodified because this region is critical for high affinity receptor binding (5-11). However, it was unclear whether the orientation of the tethered subunit domains affects the heterodimeric alignment between the two subunits, resulting in functional determinants for secretion and bioactivity, or if the two domains can swivel with respect to each other producing heterodimer-like contacts regardless of their position. To examine this issue, we constructed a single chain hCG in which the carboxyl terminus of the alpha  subunit was genetically fused to the amino end of CGbeta subunit (alpha CGbeta ; Fig. 1). This design reverses the relative position of the linked subunit domains compared with the first generation of single chain analog described above.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The orientation of the alpha  and CGbeta subunit domains in single chains. The CGbeta subunit (open box) is genetically fused to the alpha  subunit (stippled box). CGbeta alpha indicates amino-terminal location of the beta  subunit, whereas alpha CGbeta denotes that the carboxyl end position is occupied by the beta  subunit. In CGbeta Delta T the carboxyl-terminal peptide (CTP) subunit is absent. In the case of alpha cCGbeta Delta T, the CTP was deleted from the carboxyl end of the CGbeta subunit and inserted between the carboxyl end of the alpha  and amino terminus of the CGbeta subunits.

Several parameters were examined for determining the function of the reverse-oriented constructs as follows: 1) the secretion rate and recovery from the media, 2) the ability of the tethered alpha /beta domains to combine and form heterodimeric-specific epitopes with co-transfected monomeric subunits, and 3) formation of receptor binding determinants. Here we show that the relative position of the alpha  and CGbeta tethered domains in the single chain is critical for bioactivity but not for secretion. In addition, alpha CGbeta /alpha and alpha CGbeta /CGbeta complexes were observed when the single chain was co-expressed with individual subunits. Dimer-specific conformational epitopes were detected in both complexes, but only alpha CGbeta /alpha was bioactive. This implies that formation of heterodimeric interactions does not ensure bioactivity. The results support the hypothesis that epitopes for gonadotropin assembly and bioactivity are distinct and can be uncoupled from each other.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Construction of Single Chains-- Engineering of the single chain CGbeta alpha was described previously (4). To construct alpha CGbeta , the CGbeta gene was inserted in frame at the carboxyl end of the alpha  subunit gene using overlapping polymerase chain reaction. The following primers were used in the construction: 1) 5'-CTACAGGAAAACCCATT-3'; 2) 5'-GCGGCTCCTTGGAAGATTTGTGATAAT-3'; 3) 5'-ATTATCACAAATCTTCCAAGGAGCCGC-3'; 4) 5'-TGAGTCGACATGATAATTCAGTGATTGAAT-3'. From the alpha  minigene, product


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Product A.
A was generated using primers 1 and 2. Primer 1 encodes residues 12-17 at the alpha  subunit amino terminus.

Primer 2 contains the first 4 codons of the CGbeta subunit and the last 5 codons of the alpha  subunit. In another reaction, primers 3 and 4 were used with CGbeta alpha as template. Primer 3 encodes the first 4 amino acids of the CGbeta subunit (residues 1-4) and the last 5 amino acids of the alpha  subunit (residues 88-92). Primer 4 contains some of the intron sequence between CGbeta exons 2 and 3 and also includes a newly created SalI site. The fragment derived from this reaction is product


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Product B.
B.

In a second reaction, fragments A and B were used as overlapping templates with primers 1 and 4 to generate product


View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Product C.
C. Product C was sequenced to ensure no errors were introduced during the polymerase chain reaction. Following NsiI and SalI digestion, the fragment was cloned into pBS containing the alpha  minigene including its signal sequence (pBSalpha CG exon 2). The CGbeta exon 3 flanked by SalI site was isolated from pM2HACGbeta (4). CGbeta exon 3 was ligated to SalI-digested pBSalpha CGbeta in the correct orientation with alpha CGbeta exon 2 resulting in pBSalpha CGbeta . This was then cloned into BamHI-digested pM2HA. The final product contains NH2-alpha (with signal peptide)-CGbeta (without signal peptide) COOH.

To construct the alpha cCGbeta Delta T single chain, a carboxyl-terminal peptide (CTP) was deleted from the CGbeta subunit and inserted between the alpha  and CGbeta Delta T domains. To facilitate construction of alpha cCGbeta Delta T, the CTP-derived sequence linked to the carboxyl-terminal of the alpha  subunit was truncated at amino acid residue 117 (instead of residue 114) and included 28 residues rather than 31 amino acids. This analog bearing the 28-amino acid linker exhibited the same intracellular and extracellular characteristics (data not shown) as reported previously for single chains containing a 31-amino acid linker (4).

DNA Transfection and Cell Culture-- All variants were inserted into the mammalian expression vector pM2HA (4) and were transfected into CHO cells by the calcium phosphate method. Stable clones were selected ~11 days after transfection by using the neomycin analog G418 (250 µg/ml). The clones were maintained in Ham's F-12 medium (supplemented with penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 2 mM glutamine) containing 5% fetal bovine serum and G418 (125 µg/ml) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95% air, as described previously (12).

Metabolic Labeling-- Pulse-chase experiments were performed as described previously (4, 13). Aliquots of cell lysate and medium were immunoprecipitated with polyclonal antisera directed against either the common alpha  or the CGbeta subunit, and the proteins were resolved on 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (4). The secretion half-time (t1/2) and recovery efficiency of the single chains were estimated by determining the time (min) when half of the maximal secreted variant was detected in the medium; the recovery of the secreted variants is expressed as a fraction (%) of the total (intracellular + secreted) (4, 13).

Western Blot Analysis-- Media samples were resolved on 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels without heating and under nonreduced conditions to prevent dissociation of the hCG heterodimer and were blotted onto nitrocellulose. The blots were probed with antisera or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as described in the figure legends. Purified hCG (CR 127) was kindly supplied by Dr. A. Parlow (National Hormone and Pituitary Program, Torrence, CA). Rabbit polyclonal antisera against the human alpha  or CGbeta subunits were raised in our laboratory. The hCG conformational sensitive mAbs that recognize primarily the heterodimer, but not the monomeric CGbeta subunit, were provided by Dr. Steven Birken (Columbia University Medical School, New York). The blots were visualized with the Western Light Detection System (Tropix, Inc., Bedford, MA) following the manufacturer's protocol. Western blot analysis was performed 3-5 times using 3 independent collection media.

Radioreceptor Assay-- Conditioned media were concentrated using either a Centricon concentrator (Amicon Inc., Beverly, MA) or an ultra-free concentrator (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Subsequently, the samples were washed in phosphate-buffered saline and quantitated using a double polyclonal based radioimmunoassay kit (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA), containing antiserum that recognizes the CGbeta subunit. Receptor binding and cAMP production were determined using a transfected CHO cell line, expressing the human LH/CG receptor (14). Total binding was 15%, and nonspecific binding (in the presence of 5 µg of hCG) was 1.5% of total counts. The cAMP accumulation was determined using the Adenyl Cyclase Activation Flash Plate kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) as per manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 5 × 104 stably transfected CHO cells were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with ligands; 125I-cAMP was then added, and the cells were incubated for 17 h at room temperature. The flash plate was then read in a Packard Top Counter. Each experiment was performed at least 3 times, and the data are presented as the mean ± S.E. of 3 independent culture collections.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Biosynthesis of hCG Tether Variants-- To compare the secretion of CGbeta alpha and alpha CGbeta from stably transfected CHO cells, pulse-chase experiments were performed. Cells were labeled with 35S-Promix, chased with unlabeled amino acids, and aliquots of lysate and medium immunoprecipitated with polyclonal alpha  antiserum (Fig. 2). Although recovery of both variants from the media was similar, alpha CGbeta was secreted slower (t1/2 = 155 min) than CGbeta alpha (t1/2 = 90 min).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Secretion kinetics of CGbeta alpha and alpha CGbeta . CHO cells expressing the chimeras were pulsed-labeled and chased for the indicated times (hr). Cell lysates and media were immunoprecipitated with alpha  subunit antiserum, and the reduced and heated proteins were resolved on 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The recovery (%) and secretion half-times (t1/2) were calculated as described under "Experimental Procedures."

To examine if the two subunit domains in alpha CGbeta could form intrachain heterodimeric-like interactions, media samples were electrophoresed under nonreduced conditions without heating, and the blots were probed with polyclonal alpha  antiserum and a panel of CG dimer-specific mAbs (Fig. 3). The alpha  antiserum recognizes both native CG heterodimer and the non-combined alpha  subunit (Fig. 3, panel A, lane 1) and the two single chain variants (lanes 2 and 3) that migrate with an apparent molecular mass of 50 kDa. Larger forms were also observed, and although their composition is unclear, aggregates have been observed in the synthesis of a variety of single chain mutants (1-3) and during hCG purification (15, 16). Aggregation is more extensive for alpha CGbeta , implying that its structure differs from that of CGbeta alpha . When the blots were probed with a CG dimer-specific mAb (panel B), the native dimer (lane 1) and CGbeta alpha were seen (lane 2). No signal corresponding to the 50 kDa of alpha CGbeta protein was observed (lane 3). Similar results were obtained with six additional dimer-specific mAbs (not shown). These data suggest that compared with CGbeta alpha , the two tethered domains in alpha CGbeta cannot form intrachain heterodimeric determinants recognizable by these conformational sensitive antibodies. If absence of alpha CGbeta immunoreactivity to mAbs is due to inhibition of the native dimeric interactions between the subunit domains, alpha CGbeta should be in a more open configuration than CGbeta alpha . To test this prediction, both variants were probed with mAb 68 that primarily reacts with the monomeric form of the CGbeta subunit rather than the heterodimer (panel C). As expected, the non-combined CGbeta subunit control secreted from transfected cells was immunoreactive (lane 4), and the heterodimer was not detected (lane 1). Whereas CGbeta alpha was poorly recognized by the CGbeta -specific mAb (lane 2), alpha CGbeta was much more immunoreactive (lane 3). These data imply that the conformation of one or both subunit domains in alpha CGbeta is altered, which inhibits an intrachain heterodimeric-like interaction.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Western blot analyses of CGbeta alpha and alpha CGbeta . The samples were electrophoresed under non-reduced conditions and probed with the following: alpha  antiserum (panel A), mAb (designated 40) specific for the hCG heterodimer (Di mAb; panel B), and an mAb (designated 68) specific for the monomeric CGbeta subunit (panel C). Di refers to the native heterodimer. The migration of the free alpha  and beta  subunits and the non-aggregated single chain (tether) are indicated by the arrows. This experiment was repeated 5 times with 3 independent collection media.

A major difference between the two single chain variants is the presence of the native CTP in the CGbeta subunit (17) between the subunit domains in CGbeta alpha . As discussed previously, the CTP sequence lacks extensive secondary structure and serves as a natural linker (18). The alpha CGbeta analog was constructed without a linker to maintain consistency with the subunit structure of CGbeta alpha . To assess if the intracellular effects of alpha CGbeta are related to the absence of a linker sequence, a different chimera was constructed where the CTP was deleted from the carboxyl end of the CGbeta subunit and inserted between the alpha  and CGbeta subunits (alpha cCGbeta Delta T) (Fig. 1). When examined by pulse-chase kinetics (Fig. 4, panel A), the secretion rate was 3-fold greater (t1/2 = 50 min), and the recovery was higher (80%) than alpha CGbeta (t1/2 = 155 min; recovery = 70%). To examine the ability of alpha cCGbeta Delta T to generate heterodimer-like determinants, blots containing this variant were screened with the mAbs described above (Fig. 4, panels B and C). In contrast to the results seen with alpha CGbeta , alpha cCGbeta Delta T is recognized by dimer-specific mAb (panel B, lanes 3 and 4), although its immunoreactivity to CGbeta or alpha  monomer-specific mAbs is reduced considerably (panel C, lanes 1-4). Thus, the presence of the linker sequence in alpha cCGbeta Delta T increases the heterodimeric alignment of the alpha  and beta  domains.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Intracellular behavior of alpha cCGbeta Delta T. The chimera alpha cCGbeta Delta T was subjected to pulse-chase kinetics (panel A) as described in Fig. 2. Panels B and C are Western blots containing non-reduced proteins. Blot in panel B was probed with alpha  antiserum (lanes 1 and 2), and mAb 40 against the hCG heterodimer (Di mAb; lanes 3 and 4). Blot in panel C was probed with mAbs specific for either the monomeric CGbeta (mAb 68; lanes 1 and 2) or the monomeric alpha  subunit (mAb 80; lanes 3 and 4). This experiment was repeated 3-5 times with 3 independent collection media.

Biological Activity of the Variants-- The receptor binding affinity of the variants was determined using CHO cells stably expressing the human LH/CG receptor. CGbeta alpha displayed high affinity binding, displacing the iodinated tracer similar to that of native hCG (Fig. 5A; Table I). In contrast, no binding was observed with alpha CGbeta . However, alpha cCGbeta Delta T does bind to receptor, although its affinity is reduced about 100- and 70-fold when compared with CGbeta alpha and the heterodimer, respectively. Signal transduction of the chimeras was assessed by quantitating adenylate cyclase activation (Fig. 5B; Table I). Native hCG, CGbeta alpha , and alpha cCGbeta Delta T caused a concentration-dependent increase in cAMP accumulation. Although, the stimulation of alpha cCGbeta Delta T was 25-30-fold less than the controls, the induced levels of cAMP were greater than expected based on the receptor binding data (see "Discussion"). The results show that for the variant in the alpha beta configuration (alpha cCGbeta Delta T), the linker can rescue a significant portion of the receptor binding activity, but the lack of a free carboxyl end in the alpha  subunit nevertheless reduces the binding affinity. These observations are similar to data seen with the heterodimer containing an alpha  subunit with a CTP unit at its carboxyl end (10). In that study it was shown that the receptor binding affinity of this analog was reduced over 100-fold.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Bioactivity of hCG single chain chimeras. Varying concentrations of single chains were incubated for 16-18 h at room temperature with stably transfected CHO cells expressing the LH/CG receptor (panel A). Signal transduction of the ligands was determined under the same conditions by measuring cAMP (panel B). Data are mean ± S.E. of 4-6 experiments.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
LH/CG receptor binding and cAMP stimulation by the hCG single chain chimeras
Results are expressed as ± S.E. (n = 3-5) of three independent media collections. IC50 (ng/ml) and EC50 (ng/ml) define the ligand concentration that displaces 50% of the tracer and achieves half-maximal adenylate cyclase stimulation, respectively. ND, no binding or cAMP detected.

Intrachain Subunit Domains and Assembly Competence-- It is evident that compared with CGbeta alpha , alpha CGbeta is biologically inactive, indicating that reversing the positions of the subunits dramatically alters the overall structure of the single chain. A key question is whether or not the reduction in receptor binding is related to modifications of one or both of the alpha /beta domains. To address this point, we co-transfected alpha CGbeta with either the alpha  or CGbeta subunit gene. We reasoned that if the intrachain domains were substantially misfolded, this would be reflected in their inability to form heterodimeric-like contacts with either of the co-transfected monomeric subunits. For example, co-transfecting the single chain gene with the monomeric CGbeta subunit gene will assess the assembly determinants in the alpha  domain of the single chain. Because alpha CGbeta and the free subunits do not bind to the LH/CG receptor (Fig. 5A) (11, 19-21) and are not recognized by dimer-specific mAbs, any observed biologic activity and formation of heterodimeric-like epitopes would be presumptive for the presence of a alpha CGbeta /monomeric subunit functional complex.

We first examined the integrity of the tethered CGbeta domain by co-expressing the monomeric alpha  subunit with alpha CGbeta (Fig. 6). The secreted proteins were analyzed in Western blots using polyclonal alpha  antiserum (panel A) and a CG dimer-specific mAb 40 (panel B). The alpha  antiserum recognized heterodimer and uncombined alpha  subunit (panel A, lane 3) and alpha CGbeta (lane 2 and 3). In addition, a 70-kDa band corresponding to alpha CGbeta /alpha was detected in cells co-expressing both the single chain and the monomeric subunit (lane 3). The interaction between the incoming alpha  subunit and the tethered CGbeta subunit domain formed heterodimeric-like epitopes because the complex was recognized by a dimer-specific mAb (panel B, lane 3).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Interaction of the alpha CGbeta single chain with the monomeric alpha  subunit. Cells expressing alpha CGbeta co-transfected with the monomeric alpha  subunit (alpha CGbeta +alpha ) were probed with alpha  antiserum (panel A) or an hCG dimer-specific mAb 40 (Di mAb; panel B). The electrophoretic migrations of alpha CGbeta /alpha and of the non-aggregated single chain alpha CGbeta (Di(alpha CGbeta )) are indicated by the arrows (seen in lane 3 of panels A and B). The presence of uncombined alpha  subunit is seen in lane 3 of panel A. This experiment was repeated 3-5 times with 3 independent collection media.

The integrity of the intrachain alpha  domain was examined with cells co-expressing alpha CGbeta and the monomeric CGbeta subunit (Fig. 7). The dimer-specific mAb 53 recognizes CGbeta alpha (lane 1) but not alpha CGbeta (lane 2). However, the alpha CGbeta /CGbeta complex is immunoreactive (lane 3, asterisk). Six other conformational sensitive mAbs also detected both the alpha CGbeta /CGbeta and the alpha CGbeta /alpha complexes (data not shown). Thus, the intrachain alpha  subunit can form a heterodimer-like interaction with a co-expressed monomeric CGbeta subunit. Both alpha CGbeta /alpha and alpha CGbeta /CGbeta complexes and the heterodimer dissociate after heating (3 min, 95 °C) in the absence of beta -mercaptoethanol (data not shown). This result indicates that the association of the monomeric subunit with the tethered domain is non-covalent, comparable to subunit interactions seen in the native heterodimer. These experiments show that both the alpha  and the CGbeta subunit domains in alpha CGbeta retain the ability to assemble with a monomeric subunit despite their inability to exhibit an intrachain heterodimeric configuration.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Complex formation between alpha CGbeta and co-transfected monomeric CGbeta or CGbeta Delta T subunits. Media derived from cells co-expressing the alpha CGbeta single chain and monomeric CGbeta subunit (alpha CGbeta +CGbeta ; lane 3) or monomeric CGbeta devoid of the CTP (alpha CGbeta +CGbeta Delta T; lane 4) were blotted under non-reduced conditions and probed with mAb 53, which is specific for the hCG heterodimer. The asterisks in lanes 3 and 4 denote the alpha CGbeta /CGbeta and alpha CGbeta /CGbeta Delta T complexes, respectively. This experiment was repeated 3-5 times with 3 independent collection media.

Determinants for Bioactivity in alpha CGbeta -- The alpha CGbeta /alpha complex binds to the human LH/CG receptor although with reduced affinity compared with the heterodimer (Fig. 8A; Table I). The observed dose-dependent binding could only result from synthesis of a alpha CGbeta /alpha complex since neither alpha CGbeta nor the monomeric alpha  subunit alone exhibits significant receptor binding. In contrast, alpha CGbeta /CGbeta did not displace the tracer (Fig. 8A) despite the formation of immunoreactive dimer-specific epitopes (see Fig. 7, lane 3). Because both alpha CGbeta and the monomeric beta  subunit contain the CTP at their carboxyl termini, which are glycosylated and sialylated, the absence of alpha CGbeta /CGbeta receptor binding could be related to charge interference of two CTPs. To examine this point alpha CGbeta was co-transfected with a CGbeta monomeric variant lacking the CTP (CGbeta Delta T). Although alpha CGbeta /CGbeta Delta T complex exhibited heterodimeric-like interactions (see Fig. 7, lane 4), it nevertheless did not bind to the receptor (Fig. 8A; Table I). The data imply that lack of bioactivity in the alpha CGbeta /CGbeta complex is not due to the additional CTP. The cAMP levels induced by the complexes paralleled receptor binding (Fig. 8B; Table I). Thus, although the monomeric subunits in both alpha CGbeta /alpha and alpha CGbeta /CGbeta form heterodimeric contacts, only the alpha CGbeta /alpha complex is bioactive. These results indicate that determinants for receptor binding/signal transduction are preserved in the intrachain beta  subunit of alpha CGbeta but not in the alpha  domain.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Bioactivity of alpha CGbeta single chain complexed with either the monomeric alpha  (alpha CGbeta /alpha ), CGbeta (alpha CGbeta /CGbeta ), or CGbeta Delta T (alpha CGbeta /CGbeta Delta T) subunits. The experiment was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 5. Data are mean ± S.E. of 4-6 experiments.

The data described above demonstrated that the presence of the CTP as a linker in alpha cCGbeta Delta T partially restores activity of the alpha CGbeta . We examined if this linker would reconstitute binding determinants in the tethered subunit domains and enhance the binding affinity when co-transfected with the monomeric alpha , CGbeta , or CGbeta Delta T subunits (Fig. 9). (As expected, alpha cCGbeta Delta T/alpha was immunoreactive with dimer-specific mAbs (data not shown).) The affinity of the alpha cCGbeta Delta T/CGbeta complex was the same as alpha cCGbeta Delta T (panel A). Although there was a significant increase in binding of alpha cCGbeta Delta T/alpha compared with alpha cCGbeta Delta T, it was similar to alpha CGbeta /alpha . In addition, insertion of the linker sequence does not restore the bioactivity to the levels seen for the heterodimer or CGbeta alpha . These data imply that not only the lack of a free carboxyl end in the alpha  subunit but also modifying the amino end in the CGbeta subunit reduces receptor binding. Similar to the alpha CGbeta complexes, the analog-induced cAMP levels paralleled receptor binding (panel B). The results of the immuno- and bioactivities of the analogs are summarized in Table II.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Bioactivity of the alpha cCGbeta Delta T variant synthesized in cells co-expressing either the monomeric alpha  (alpha cCGbeta Delta T/alpha ) or CGbeta (alpha cCGbeta Delta T/CGbeta ) subunits. Data are mean ± S.E. of 4-6 experiments.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Summary of the Western blot analyses and bioactivity of hCG single chain chimeras


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Previously, we and others (4, 21-24) observed that single chain variants of the glycoprotein hormone family exhibit biological activity comparable to the corresponding heterodimers. In such chimeras, e.g. CGbeta alpha , the beta  subunit occupies the amino-terminal end of the molecule linked to the alpha  subunit. This orientation was chosen to preserve the free carboxyl end in the alpha  subunit due to its importance for maximal receptor binding efficiency (5-11).

To examine if the relative position of the two subunit domains is critical for generating a functional single chain gonadotropin, we engineered a tethered hCG in which the position of the two domains was reversed (alpha CGbeta ) relative to the CGbeta alpha orientation. In both alpha beta and beta alpha configurations, the variants were secreted efficiently which shows that the relative position of the linked subunits was not critical for secretion. However, in contrast to CGbeta alpha , the intra-chain subunits in alpha CGbeta exhibited no detectable reactivity to hCG dimer-specific mAbs, although each domain was capable of forming a heterodimeric-like complex with its complementary monomeric subunit. This suggests that the structural constraints generated at the alpha -beta linkage do not favor a heterodimeric alignment for the two domains. We also observed that alpha CGbeta did not bind to the receptor compared with CGbeta alpha , which implies that accessibility of receptor binding determinants is dependent on the position of the alpha beta subunits in the single chain. A major structural difference between CGbeta alpha and alpha CGbeta is the presence of a CTP sequence between the two tethered domains in CGbeta alpha . As reported previously (18), we considered this sequence a natural linker since it is serine/proline-rich and thus lacks significant secondary structure. In the case of alpha CGbeta , the CTP is at the carboxyl end of the single chain, and thus it does not serve as a linker. When the CTP was deleted from the carboxyl end of the CGbeta subunit and inserted between the alpha  and beta  subunits, the resulting alpha cCGbeta Delta T was rapidly and efficiently secreted and exhibited strong immunoreactivity to dimer- but not monomer-specific mAbs. The alpha cCGbeta Delta T variant was bioactive, but the binding affinity was reduced compared with CGbeta alpha . These data suggest that in the absence of linker the alignment of the alpha /beta domains is perturbed especially at the carboxyl end of the alpha  subunit.

Our results are consistent with a recent report that a single chain hCG constructed in the alpha beta configuration and a CTP between the subunits is biologically active (25). In that work the binding affinity of the chimera was reduced 25-30-fold, whereas signal transduction was decreased only 10-fold. Similarly, we find that whereas the binding affinity of alpha cCGbeta Delta T is reduced 70-100-fold, adenylate cyclase activation is reduced about 20-fold. Thus, there is an apparent uncoupling of binding/signal transduction when the subunit domains in the single chain are in the alpha /beta orientation. This hypothesis is supported by data that show if the hCG heterodimer contains an alpha  subunit with a deleted 59-87 disulfide bond, this analog stimulated cAMP synthesis to a greater extent than expected based on its low binding affinity (12). Because cysteine residue 87 is at the carboxyl end of the subunit, the data imply that the conformational changes in this region expose determinants that are more efficient in stimulating downstream intracellular signaling reactions compared with the wild type heterodimer. That these alpha -carboxyl-terminal mutants exhibited signal transduction is not in agreement with a previous study (26) that mutating or deleting carboxyl-terminal amino acids 88-92 of the alpha  subunit abolished adenylate cyclase activation for the hCG heterodimer. One explanation to account for these variances is the use of a different bioassay for assessing signal transduction in that work (26). Recently, Gupta and Dighe (27) constructed a chimera composed of the alpha  subunit attached to the amino terminus of the beta  subunit through a single glycine residue linker. The receptor binding of this analog was reduced only 10-fold. Thus, it is apparent from the above studies that the binding affinity of alpha CGbeta is reduced, but there are quantitative differences in the reported binding affinities. The disparity between our alpha CGbeta data and that of Gupta and Sighe (27) is due to the presence of the glycine linker in their construct, which may have increased the binding affinity. This is analogous to the results seen with alpha cCGbeta Delta T.

Previously, we compared the secretion and biological activity of the CGbeta alpha lacking the CTP sequence and FSHbeta alpha single chains constructed devoid of a linker (28). We observed that for these variants the secretion rate was substantially reduced, but receptor binding/signal transduction was unaffected. Although absence of the linker sequence in the alpha CGbeta tether lowered the secretion rate, no biological activity was detected. One explanation that could account for these differences is the interference between the adjacent disulfide bonds at the junction between the subunits since the 26-110 disulfide bond in the CGbeta subunit (conserved position 20-104 in the FSHbeta subunit) is critical for secretion (13). Based on chemical modification and mutagenesis studies, it appears that the CGbeta carboxyl and alpha  subunit amino-terminal regions do not contain key receptor contact sites (10, 29). Presumably, this accounts for high affinity receptor binding of CGbeta alpha devoid of CTP and FSHbeta alpha without linker despite their altered secretion kinetics. In the alpha CGbeta single chain, however, there could be a significant perturbation of the last disulfide bridge, i.e. Cys-59-87 in the alpha  subunit and the adjacent amino-terminally located disulfide bond in the beta  subunit. It is well documented that the 87-92-amino acid sequence in the alpha  subunit is crucial for high affinity receptor binding by the heterodimers (5-11). That the Cys-59-87 bond does not impair secretion or assembly of the wild type heterodimer (12) might explain why the monomeric CGbeta subunit can form a heterodimer-like complex with alpha CGbeta , yet alpha CGbeta /CGbeta is biologically inactive. In the case of the alpha CGbeta /alpha complex, the carboxyl terminus of the bound monomeric alpha  subunit is free, and thus alpha CGbeta /alpha binds to the LH/CG receptor and activates adenyl cyclase.

Despite the absence of the linker sequence in alpha CGbeta , it is evident that much of the native alpha  subunit structure is intact since it has the capacity to form heterodimeric contacts with the co-transfected CGbeta subunit (Table II). The absence of heterodimer-like interactions in alpha CGbeta per se implies that the two domains cannot swivel with respect to each other. The data support the hypothesis that flexibility at the carboxyl end of the alpha  subunit is a critical component for receptor recognition by the single chain variants and by native heterodimers but not for the intracellular behavior of the subunit.

The data presented in Fig. 9 suggest that altering the amino end of the CGbeta subunit affects the binding affinity. This is consistent with a previous study of Xia et al. (30), which examined the role of the lysine residue at position 2 in the CGbeta subunit. They suggested that the conformation of the amino end might be associated with receptor binding. In another investigation (31), a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues 1-16 of the CGbeta subunit was shown to inhibit binding of 125I-hCG to porcine Leydig cells.

Our results also show that the presence of heterodimeric determinants does not necessarily result in a biologically active molecule (Table II), which is in agreement with the report of a naturally occurring mutation in the LHbeta gene (32). A single amino acid substitution in the LHbeta subunit (glutamine to arginine at residue 54) was associated with hypogonadism. It was shown that the mutated subunit formed a heterodimer that did not bind to the receptor in vitro. The uncoupling of a quaternary event and target binding are also supported by recent mutation studies of the Escherichia coli lactose repressor protein (LacI), where it was demonstrated that although assembly and folding of the two functional domains were not significantly affected, their affinity for the DNA target sequence was reduced dramatically (33). These results are consistent with our earlier studies that gonadotropin variants composed of more than 2 subunit domains bind and activate the receptor (21). That such variants with bulky constituents relative to the native heterodimer are bioactive implies flexibility in the ligand-receptor interaction. The data show that the relative position of the alpha - and CGbeta -tethered domains in single chain CG is critical for bioactivity but not for secretion. Moreover, since no amino acid mutations were created in the alpha CGbeta molecule, the data imply that receptor binding determinants in this variant are not accessible to the receptor due to an altered conformation or by interference created from the other intrachain beta  subunit. Thus, quaternary interactions are essential for the intracellular trafficking of the heterodimers but not for receptor recognition and signal activation. In the latter case, the role of the heterodimeric structure is to ensure that the appropriate epitopes in each subunit are brought in contact with the receptor triggering the biological response.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Vicenta Garcia-Campayo for advice during this study. We thank Dr. Raj Kumar for critical comments and Linda Creacy and Kristy Chamberlain for their assistance in preparing the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a grant from the Organon Co. (Oss, The Netherlands).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Current address: Dept. of Clinical Pharmacology, Ben-Gurion University, P. O. Box 653, Be'er Sheva, Israel 84105.

§ Recipient of an NRSA award from the National Institutes of Health.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-362-2556; Fax: 314-361-3560; E-mail: iboime@pcg.wustl.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 4, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104687200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: LH, lutropin; FSH, follitropin; CG, human choriogonadotropin; CTP, carboxyl-terminal peptide of the CGbeta subunit; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; mAbs, monoclonal antibodies.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sato, A., Perlas, E., Ben-Menahem, D., Kudo, M., Pixley, M. R., Furuhashi, M., Hsueh, A. J. W., and Boime, I. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18098-18103
2. Ben-Menahem, D., Kudo, M., Pixley, M. R., Sato, A., Suganuma, N., Perlas, E., Hsueh, A. J. W., and Boime, I. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6827-6830
3. Jackson, A., Berger, P., Pixley, M., Klein, C., Hsueh, A., and Boime, I. (1999) Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 2175-2188
4. Sugahara, R., Pixley, M. R., Minami, S., Perlas, E., Ben-Menahem, D., Hsueh, A. J. W., and Boime, I. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2041-2045
5. Charlesworth, M. C., McCormick, D. J., Madden, B., and Ryan, R. J. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 13409-13416
6. Chen, F., Wang, Y., and Puett, D. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 914-919
7. Ji, T., Grossman, M., and Ji, I. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17299-17302
8. Merz, W. E. (1979) Eur. J. Biochem. 101, 541-553
9. Bielinska, M., Pixley, M. R., and Boime, I. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 111, 330 (Abstr. 1844)
10. Furuhashi, M., Shikone, T., Fares, F., Sugahara, T., Hsueh, A. J. W., and Boime, I. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 54-63
11. Pierce, J. G., and Parsons, T. F. (1981) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 465-495
12. Furuhashi, M., Ando, H., Bielinska, M., Pixley, M. R., Shikone, T., Hsueh, A. J. W., and Boime, I. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25543-25548
13. Suganuma, N., Matzuk, M. M., and Boime, I. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19302-19307
14. Kanda, M., Jablonka-Shariff, A., Sato, A., Pixley, M. R., Bos, E., Hiro'oka, T., Ben-Menahem, D., and Boime, I. (1999) Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 1873-1881
15. Birken, S., Maydelman, Y., Gawinowicz, M. A., Pound, A., Liu, Y., and Hartree, A. S. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 1402-1411
16. Lustbader, J., Birken, S., Pollak, S., Levinson, L., Bernstine, E., Hsiung, N., and Canfield, R. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14204-14212
17. Birken, S., and Canfield, R. E. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 5386-5392
18. Ben-Menahem, D., and Boime, I. (1996) Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 7, 100-105
19. Parsons, T. F., and Pierce, J. G. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 6010-6015
20. Keene, J. L., Matzuk, M. M., Otani, T., Fauser, B., Galway, A. B., Hsueh, A. J. W., and Boime, I. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 4769-4775
21. Ben-Menahem, D., Hyde, R., Pixley, M. R., Berger, P., and Boime, I. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 15070-15077
22. Narayan, P., Wu, C., and Puett, D. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 1720-1726
23. Grossmann, M., Wong, R., Szkudlinski, M. W., and Weintraub, B. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21312-21316
24. Fares, F. A., Yamabe, S., Ben-Menahem, D., Pixley, M. R., Hsueh, A. J. W., and Boime, I. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 2459-2464
25. Narayan, P., Gray, J., and Puett, D. (2000) Endocrinology 141, 67-71
26. Yoo, J., Zeng, H., Ji, I., Murdoch, W. J., and Ji, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13034-13042
27. Gupta, C. S, and Dighe, R. R. (2000) J. Mol. Endocrinol. 24, 157-164
28. Sugahara, T., Sato, A., Kudo, M., Ben-Menahem, D., Pixley, M. R., Hsueh, A. J. W., and Boime, I. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10445-10448
29. Fares, F. A., Suganuma, N., Nishimori, K., LaPolt, P. S., Hsueh, A. J. W., and Boime, I. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 89, 4304-4308
30. Xia, R., Huang, J., Chen, T. M., and Puett, D. (1993) J. Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 337-343
31. Salesse, R., Bidart, J. M., Troalen, F., Bellet, D., and Garnier, J. (1990) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 68, 113-119
32. Weiss, J., Axelrod, L., Whitcomb, R. W., Harris, P. E., Crowley, W. F., and Jameson, J. L. (1992) N. Engl. J. Med. 326, 179-183
33. Falcon, C. M., and Matthews, K. S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 30849-30857


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Bielinska, E. Genova, I. Boime, H. Parviainen, S. Kiiveri, J. Leppaluoto, N. Rahman, M. Heikinheimo, and D. B. Wilson
Gonadotropin-Induced Adrenocortical Neoplasia in NU/J Nude Mice
Endocrinology, September 1, 2005; 146(9): 3975 - 3984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
G. B. Fralish, B. Dattilo, and D. Puett
Structural Analysis of Yoked Chorionic Gonadotropin-Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Ectodomain Complexes by Circular Dichroic Spectroscopy
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2003; 17(7): 1192 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
G. B. Fralish, P. Narayan, and D. Puett
Consequences of Single-Chain Translation on the Structures of Two Chorionic Gonadotropin Yoked Analogs in {alpha}-{beta} and {beta}-{alpha} Configurations
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2003; 17(4): 757 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. L. Schubert, P. Narayan, and D. Puett
Specificity of Cognate Ligand-Receptor Interactions: Fusion Proteins of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and the Heptahelical Receptors for Human Luteinizing Hormone, Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone, and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
Endocrinology, January 1, 2003; 144(1): 129 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/32/29871    most recent
M104687200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Menahem, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boime, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Menahem, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boime, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement