|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M011094200 on May 18, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 32, 30381-30391, August 10, 2001
Src Homology 2 Domain-containing Inositol 5-Phosphatase 1 Mediates Cell Cycle Arrest by Fc RIIB*
Odile
Malbec ,
Christian
Schmitt§,
Pierre
Bruhns ,
Gerald
Krystal¶,
Wolf H.
Fridman , and
Marc
Daëron
From the Laboratoire d'Immunologie Cellulaire et
Clinique, INSERM U.255, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France, the
§ Laboratoire d'Immunologie Cellulaire, CNRS UMR 7627, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, 75013 Paris, France,
and ¶ The Terry Fox Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia
B5Z 1L3, Canada
Received for publication, December 11, 2001, and in revised form, May 9, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
We previously found that low
affinity receptors for the Fc portion of IgG, Fc RIIB, which are
widely expressed by hematopoietic cells, can negatively regulate
receptor tyrosine kinase-dependent cell
proliferation. We investigated here the mechanisms of this inhibition.
We used as experimental models wild-type mast cells, which
constitutively express the stem cell factor receptor Kit and Fc RIIB,
Fc RIIB-deficient mast cells reconstituted with wild-type or mutated
Fc RIIB, and Src homology 2 domain-containing inositol polyphosphate
5-phosphatase 1 (SHIP1)-deficient mast cells. We found that,
upon coaggregation with Kit, Fc RIIB are tyrosyl-phosphorylated, recruit SHIP1, but not SHIP2, SH2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 or -2, abrogate Akt phosphorylation, shorten the duration
of the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases of the
Ras and Rac pathways, abrogate cyclin induction, prevent cells
from entering the cell cycle, and block thymidine incorporation. Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of Kit-dependent cell
proliferation was reduced in SHIP1-deficient mast cells, whereas
inhibition of IgE-induced responses was abrogated. Cell proliferation
was, however, inhibited by coaggregating Kit with Fc RIIB whose
intracytoplasmic domain was replaced with the catalytic domain of
SHIP1. These results demonstrate that Fc RIIB use SHIP1 to inhibit
pathways shared by receptor tyrosine kinases and immunoreceptors to
trigger cell proliferation and cell activation, respectively, but that, in the absence of SHIP1, Fc RIIB can use other effectors that specifically inhibit cell proliferation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Fc RIIB are widely expressed single-chain low affinity receptors
for the Fc portion of IgG antibodies that bind multivalent immune
complexes with high avidity. They exist as two (Fc RIIB1 and -B2 in
humans) or three (Fc RIIB1, -B1', and -B2 in mice) alternatively
spliced products of the FcgR2b gene (1). Fc RIIB isoforms
are differentially expressed by lymphoid and myeloid cells; mouse B
cells express Fc RIIB1 and -B1' (2), T cells express Fc RIIB1 (3),
and mast cells and macrophages express Fc RIIB1, -B1', and -B2 (2,
4). When coaggregated on the same cell with receptors bearing
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs
(ITAMs),1 murine and human
Fc RIIB were shown to negatively regulate cell activation. Thus,
Fc RIIB inhibit BCR-mediated B cell activation (5-7), T cell
receptor-mediated T cell activation (3) and high affinity IgE
receptor (Fc RI)-mediated mast cell activation (3, 8). Long ago, B
cell Fc R, which were later identified as Fc RIIB (9), were also
shown to inhibit BCR-mediated B cell proliferation (6), and we found
recently that murine Fc RIIB can negatively regulate the
proliferation of mast cells induced by Kit (10). Kit is a typical
receptor tyrosine kinase for stem cell factor (SCF) that belongs to the
colony-stimulating factor-1/platelet-derived growth factor receptor
subfamily (11) and controls cell proliferation during gametogenesis,
melanogenesis, and hematopoiesis (12). The present work aimed at
elucidating the mechanism(s) by which Fc RIIB could inhibit cell proliferation.
Works published during the last 5 years documented the molecular
mechanisms used by murine Fc RIIB to negatively regulate cell
activation triggered by ITAM-bearing receptors. The inhibitory properties of Fc RIIB were found to depend on an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM) present in the intracytoplasmic (IC) domain of all murine and human isoforms of Fc RIIB (3, 13). The coaggregation of Fc RIIB with activating receptors enables
the Src family protein tyrosine kinase Lyn to phosphorylate not only
ITAMs but also the Fc RIIB ITIM (14). The tyrosyl-phosphorylated ITIM
recruits the SH2 domain-containing inositol phosphate 5-phosphatase 1 (SHIP1) (15, 16), which inhibits two major signaling pathways triggered
by ITAM-bearing receptors, the Ca2+ response and the Ras
pathway. The preferred substrate of SHIP1 is indeed
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PI(3,4,5)P3), generated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) (17).
PI(3,4,5)P3 mediates the membrane translocation of a subset
of molecules containing a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain. Among these
molecules is the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (18), which is mandatory for
phospholipase C- (19) to be activated and to generate inositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate, leading to the mobilization of intracellular
Ca2+. SHIP1 was recently found to inhibit the activation of
Erk1/2, the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases of the
Ras pathway, independently of its phosphatase activity. When
recruited by Fc RIIB, SHIP1 is tyrosyl-phosphorylated and serves as
an adapter protein. It recruits p62dok, which is in turn
tyrosyl-phosphorylated and recruits RasGAP. RasGAP activates the
autocatalytic GTPase activity of ras, thereby preventing the activation
of the ras pathway. SHIP1 therefore appears as the major effector of
Fc RIIB-dependent negative regulation of cell activation by acting at
different steps of signal transduction via phosphatase
activity-dependent and -independent mechanisms. As a
consequence, the activation of Ca2+-dependent
enzymes that promote the nuclear translocation of the nuclear factor of
activation NF-AT is prevented, as well as MAP kinase-dependent downstream events. MAP kinase substrates
are transcription factors that cooperate with NF-AT to induce
the transcription of cytokine genes (20, 21). By recruiting SHIP1, Fc RIIB therefore arrest the intracellular propagation of activation signals triggered by ITAM-bearing receptors and subsequent cellular responses. These include exocytosis, in mast cells (3, 8), and cytokine
secretion, in mast cells (8), B cells (7) and T cells (3).
Mechanisms used by Fc RIIB to inhibit cell proliferation are poorly
understood. They are difficult to examine in B cells. Indeed, B cell
activation and proliferation can both be triggered by the BCR, which is
constitutively associated with several coreceptors whose respective
roles in B cell activation and proliferation are not well known.
Another reason is that most biochemical studies that unraveled the
inhibitory mechanisms used by Fc RIIB were conducted in transformed
cell lines whose proliferation became independent of the regulatory
mechanisms that control the growth of normal cells. By contrast with B
cells, the activation and proliferation of mast cells can be triggered
independently by Fc RI and by Kit, respectively (22). Evidence that
Fc RIIB can negatively regulate the proliferation of Kit-induced mast
cell proliferation originated from our observation that anti-Kit
antibodies could induce the proliferation of primary mast cells derived
in vitro from mouse bone marrow (BMMCs) provided that their
Fc portions could not bind to Fc RIIB that are constitutively
expressed by these cells. Comparable proliferative responses were
induced by F(ab')2 fragments of anti-Kit antibodies in wt
mast cells, by intact anti-Kit antibodies in Fc RIIB /
mast cells, or by intact anti-Kit antibodies in wt mast cells whose
Fc RIIB were blocked with anti-Fc RIIB antibodies. No proliferation was observed if anti-Kit antibodies were allowed to coaggregate Kit
with Fc RIIB on wt mast cells (10). Fc RIIB therefore inhibit mouse
mast cell proliferation when coaggregated with Kit, and BMMCs provide
an appropriate model to study the effects of Fc RIIB on signal
transduction pathways leading to cell proliferation.
When dimerized by SCF, Kit autophosphorylates and recruits several
kinases including PI3K. By generating PI(3,4,5)P3, PI3K enables the membrane translocation of the protein kinase Akt and the
exchange factor Vav via their PH domain. These molecules, altogether,
prevent cell death and activate the Rac pathway whose terminal
effectors are the MAP kinases p38 and JNK (23). Kit also recruits Shc,
which, when phosphorylated, recruits the adapter protein Grb2. Grb2
recruits the exchange factor Sos, which activates the Ras pathway,
whose terminal effectors are the MAP kinases Erk1/2 (24). Rac and Ras
MAP kinases shuttle into the nucleus, and they cooperate to activate
transcription factors that control the expression of cyclin genes (25).
Cyclins are the positive regulatory subunits of a class of protein
kinases collectively called cyclin-dependent kinases. These
phosphorylate proteins of the retinoblastoma family, leading to the
release of the transcription factors E2F, which control the coordinated
expression of proteins required for the stepwise progression through
the cell cycle (26). In the present study, we provide evidence that,
when coaggregated with Kit, Fc RIIB selectively recruit SHIP1,
inhibit the Ras and the Rac pathways, and prevent cells from entering
into the cell cycle by blocking the transcription of cyclin genes. The
inhibitory effects of Fc RIIB were partially suppressed in
SHIP1 / mast cells and could be mimicked by Fc RIIB,
whose IC domain was replaced with the catalytic domain of SHIP1.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Antibodies--
The mAb anti-mouse Fc RIIB K9.361 (27) and the
mouse IgE mAb 2682-I (28) were used as culture supernatants. The rat
mAbs anti-mouse Fc RIIB 2.4G2 (29) and anti-mouse Kit ACK2 (22) were
affinity-purified on protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). ACK2 antibodies were biotinylated as described previously (30). Phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled F(ab')2 fragments of goat
anti-mouse Ig (GAM), F(ab')2 fragments of anti-biotin mAbs,
and F(ab')2 fragments and intact IgG of polyclonal rabbit
anti-mouse Ig (RAM) were purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch
Laboratories (West Grove, PA), mouse anti-cyclins D2 and D3 antibodies
were from Neomarkers (Union City, CA), rabbit anti-cyclin A antibodies
were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), and rabbit
anti-phospho-Erk, Erk, phospho-JNK, JNK, phospho-p38, p38, phospho-Akt,
and Akt antibodies were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Rabbit
antibodies anti-Fc RIIB IC domain (31) were a gift from
Dr. Catherine Sautès-Fridman (Institut Curie, Paris, France).
Rabbit anti-SHIP2 antibodies (32) were a gift from
Dr. David Wisniewski (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-phosphotyrosine
(PY) mAb PY-20 was purchased from Chemicon (Temecula, CA), rabbit
anti-SHIP1 antibodies were from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid,
NY), mouse monoclonal anti-SHP-1 and anti-SHP-2 were from Transduction
Laboratories (Lexington, KY), and HRP-conjugated GAM and goat
anti-rabbit Ig antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Cells--
BMMCs were obtained by culturing mouse bone marrow
cells in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (complete medium), and 2% X63-IL3-conditioned medium. After 4 weeks, cultures contained more than
90% mast cells. Culture reagents were from Life Technologies, Inc.
cDNA Constructs--
cDNA encoding wt Fc RIIB1 and IC
domain-deleted Fc RIIB (Fc RIIB(IC1)) were described previously
(14). cDNA encoding a chimeric molecule made of the extracellular
and transmembrane domains of Fc RIIB and, as an IC domain, residues
387-829 of human SHIP1, containing the catalytic domain (residues
428-806) was constructed by polymerase chain reaction using the
following primers. Sense, 5'-CTG GTA CCG ATG AAG AAC AAG
CAC TCA GAG-3'; antisense, 5'-GGG CAG GAG CTC TTC TTA GGC
CTC TAA CCG AAG GGC-3'. KpnI (GGTACC) and SacI
(GAGCTC) sites are underlined. The resulting fragment was cloned at
KpnI and SacI sites into an NT vector
containing sequences encoding the extracellular and transmembrane
domains and the six first amino acids of intracytoplamsic domain of
Fc RIIB1, under the control of the SR promoter and containing a
resistance gene to zeocin (NT-zeo) (33). The amplification product was sequenced on the two strains.
Retroviral-mediated Gene Transfer--
A biscistronic retroviral
vector (LZRS-IRES.EGFP) was constructed based on the LZRS-LacZ
of Nolan and colleagues (34) in which the LacZ gene was replaced by an
IRES (35) fused to the EGFP reporter gene. wt and mutant Fc RIIB were
inserted into LZRS-IRES.EGFP at HindIII and EcoRI
sites upstream of the IRES sequence. Viral supernatants were produced
from transfected Phoenix packaging cells (ATCC; F-14727) after
selection for high green fluorescent protein fluorescence. Titers
(0.9-2 × 106 colony-forming units EGFP/ml)
were estimated by infection of 3T3 cells with serial dilutions of
virus stocks and measurement of EGFP fluorescence. BMMCs were
infected by three rounds of 24-h culture with virus supernatant in the
presence of 2% X63-IL3-conditioned medium and 8 µg/ml protamine
sulfate on fibronectin-coated plates. 2 days after infection,
EGFP+ cells were selected by cell sorting using a FACStar
Plus flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).
Indirect Immunofluorescence--
Aliquots of 5 × 105 BMMCs were incubated for 1 h at 0 °C with
K9.361. Cells were washed and stained for 30 min at 0 °C with 50 µg/ml of PE-labeled F(ab')2 GAM. Fluorescence was
analyzed using a FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson). All BMMCs used
in this study expressed comparable levels of Kit as assessed with ACK2.
Cell Stimulation and Thymidine Incorporation--
BMMCs, in RPMI
containing 1% fetal calf serum and 0.5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma),
were preincubated with or without 10 µg/ml 2.4G2 for 1 h at
37 °C, and aliquots of 3 × 104 BMMCs were
incubated with preformed immune complexes for 24 h at 37 °C.
0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine/well were added (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech), and radioactivity incorporated into cells was
measured 4 h later. All BMMCs used incorporated comparable amounts
of thymidine in response to SCF.
Serotonin Release--
BMMCs, loaded with
[3H]serotonin (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), were
incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with IgE anti-2,4-dinitrophenol and
washed, and aliquots of 2 × 105 BMMCs were challenged
for 10 min at 37 °C with RAM F(ab'2) or IgG. The percentage of
[3H]serotonin released was measured as described
(36).
TNF Release--
Aliquots of 7 × 105 BMMCs,
previously sensitized by a 1-h incubation at 37 °C with IgE, were
incubated for 3 h at 37 °C with 1 µM RAM
F(ab')2 or IgG. Cell-free supernatants were harvested and
assayed for TNF . TNF was measured by a cytotoxic assay on L929
cells as described (37).
Cell Cycle Analysis--
BMMCs were incubated with or without 10 µg/ml 2.4G2 for 1 h at 37 °C in culture medium supplemented
with 2% WEHI-3B-conditioned medium. Cells at 1 × 106 cells/ml were incubated for 24 h with preformed
immune complexes in the same medium. Cells were treated with 75%
ethanol for 2 h at 4 °C and then with 50 µg/ml RNase (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals), and nuclei were stained for 15 min with 100 µg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma). Fluorescence was analyzed using a
FACScalibur. The percentages of cells in G0 + G1, S, and G2 + M were calculated using the
Modfit program (Verity Software House, Topchan, ME).
Assessment of Cell Viability--
Aliquots of 5 × 105 BMMCs were incubated for 10 min at 0 °C with
propidium iodide and with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated annexin
V as recommended by the manufacturer (Immunotech, Marseille-Luminy, France). Fluorescence was analyzed using a FACScalibur.
Western Blot Analysis of Whole Cell Lysates--
BMMCs were
incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with or without 10 µg/ml 2.4G2,
washed, challenged at 37 °C with immune complexes, and lysed by
three cycles of freeze thawing, i.e. 1 min in
liquid nitrogen followed by 1 min at 37 °C, in lysis buffer
containing 50 mM Tris pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1%
Nonidet P-40, 1 mM Na3VO4, 5 mM NaF, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride.
Lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at
4 °C. Proteins were quantitated using a Bio-Rad protein assay.
Indicated amounts of proteins were electrophoresed and transferred onto
Immobilon-P (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Membranes were saturated with 5%
skimmed milk (Régilait, Saint-Martin-Belle-Roche, France)
in Western buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM
Tris, and 0.5% Tween 20 (Merck, Schuchardt, Germany), pH 7.4, and Western blotted with the indicated antibodies followed by HRP goat
anti-rabbit Ig antibodies or HRP-GAM. Labeled antibodies were detected
using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis--
BMMCs were
incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with or without 10 µmg/ml 2.4G2,
washed, challenged for 5 min at 37 °C with immune complexes, and
lysed in lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 5 mM NaF, 5 mM
sodium pyrophosphate, 0.4 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Postnuclear lysates were
immunoprecipitated with 2.4G2-coated Sepharose beads, electrophoresed,
and transferred onto Immobilon-P. Membranes were saturated with either
5% bovine serum albumin or with 5% skimmed milk in Western buffer.
Fc RIIB immunoprecipitates were Western blotted with HRP-conjugated
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies and with the indicated antibodies
followed by HRP goat anti-rabbit Ig antibodies or HRP-GAM. Labeled
antibodies were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence.
 |
RESULTS |
Anti-Kit Antibodies Can Trigger the Same Signaling Events as
SCF--
We found previously that anti-Kit antibodies can exert
opposite effects on mast cell proliferation. They can mimic SCF and induce cells to proliferate by aggregating Kit via their Fab portions, and they can inhibit this proliferation by coaggregating Kit with Fc RIIB via their Fc portion. To analyze the mechanisms of
Fc RIIB-dependent inhibition of Kit-induced mast cell
proliferation, we first checked that anti-Kit antibodies trigger the
same proliferative signals as SCF.
BMMCs were nonstimulated, stimulated with SCF, or stimulated with
anti-Kit immune complexes. In the latter case, cells were preincubated
with the rat mAb 2.4G2 that blocks the binding site of Fc RIIB (29),
prior to stimulation with preformed immune complexes made of
biotinylated anti-Kit ACK2 (biotin-ACK2) and anti-biotin IgG antibodies
as described (10). Intracellular signals and cell responses known to be
triggered by SCF were examined when stimulating mast cells under these
conditions. Upon dimerization, Kit recruits and activates PI3K (23).
Akt activation is a reflection of PI3K-dependent
PI(3,4,5)P3 generation. Kit also recruits adapter proteins
that lead to the activation of MAP kinases (24). Akt (Fig.
1A), Erk1/2, JNK, and p38
activation (Fig. 1B) was assessed by examining their
phosphorylation by Western blotting 10 min after stimulation. MAP
kinases activate transcription factors that promote the expression of
cyclin genes (25). The up-regulation of cyclins D2 and D3, and of
cyclin A, was assessed by Western blotting 6 and 24 h after
stimulation, respectively (Fig. 1C). Cyclins D control the
entry of cells into the G1 phase, and cyclin A controls DNA
replication and the entry into the G2 phase (26). The
percentage of cells in the S + G2M phases of the cell cycle was assessed by flow cytometry following iodide propidium labeling 24 h after stimulation (Fig. 1D). Thymidine
incorporation occurs when cells that have entered the cell cycle reach
the S phase. Thymidine incorporation was assessed during a 4-h window,
24 h after stimulation (Fig. 1E). All above responses
were triggered by SCF and by biotin-ACK2-anti-biotin complexes. Erk1/2
and p38 activation and cyclin D3 induction were of comparable
intensities in response to the two stimuli. Akt phosphorylation and
cyclin D2 induction were slightly less intense, and JNK activation and cyclin A induction were clearly less intense when induced by antibodies than when induced by SCF. The proportion of cycling cells was 2-fold
lower, and thymidine incorporation was 6-fold lower in response to
anti-Kit antibodies than in response to SCF.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Comparison of SCF- and anti-Kit immune
complex-induced responses. BMMCs were preincubated with medium or
with 2.4G2, washed, and stimulated for various periods of time at
37 °C. BMMCs preincubated with medium were stimulated with 100 ng/ml
(or with indicated concentrations) of SCF or with medium
(Med); BMMCs preincubated with 2.4G2 were stimulated with
immune complexes made of biotin-ACK2 and anti-biotin antibodies
(a-Kit). A, Akt phosphorylation; B,
Erk, JNK, and p38 phosphorylation. BMMCs were stimulated for 10 min at
37 °C before they were lysed. 20 µg (for Akt and Erk) or 80 µg
total proteins (for JNK and p38) were electrophoresed and Western
blotted with indicated antibodies. C, cyclin expression.
BMMCs were starved in complete medium for 24 h before use. They
were stimulated for 6 h (for cyclins D) or 24 h (for cyclin
A) before they were lysed. 20 µg of total proteins were
electrophoresed and Western blotted with indicated antibodies.
D, cell cycle analysis. BMMCs, resuspended at 1 × 106 cells/ml in culture medium supplemented with 2%
WEHI-3B-conditioned medium, were stimulated for 24 h at 37 °C.
Nuclei were labeled with propidium iodide, and percentages of cells in
(G0 + G1), S, and (G2 + M) were
determined by flow cytometry. The figure represents the percentage of
cells in (S + G2M). E, thymidine incorporation.
BMMCs were stimulated for 24 h at 37 °C before thymidine
incorporation was measured. BMMCs preincubated with medium were
stimulated with indicated concentrations of SCF (left
panel); BMMCs preincubated with 2.4G2 were stimulated with
complexes made of indicated concentrations of biotin-ACK2 and 0 or 3 µg/ml anti-biotin antibodies (right panel). The figure
represents thymidine incorporation as a function of the concentration
of SCF (left panel) or of the concentration of biotin-ACK2
(right panel).
|
|
Anti-Kit antibodies can therefore trigger the same proliferative
signals as SCF, although less efficiently. We next conducted a backward
analysis of signaling events that stand upstream of cell division,
comparing the effects of aggregating Kit and of coaggregating Kit with
Fc RIIB.
When Coaggregated with Kit, Fc RIIB Block the Cell Cycle by
Inhibiting Cyclin Expression--
We examined the cell cycle and the
induction of cyclins, in relation with inhibition of thymidine
incorporation, in BMMCs from Fc RIIB+/+ and
Fc RIIB / mice. Fc RIIB+/+ BMMCs, but
not Fc RIIB / BMMCs, expressed Fc RIIB as assessed
by indirect immunofluorescence with the Fc RIIB-specific mAb K9.361
(Fig. 2A). Kit was aggregated by biotin-ACK2-anti-biotin complexes in Fc gRIIB+/+ cells
that were preincubated with 2.4G2 and in Fc RIIB /
cells, whether or not they were preincubated with 2.4G2. Kit was
coaggregated with Fc RIIB by the same complexes in
Fc RIIB+/+ cells that were not preincubated with
2.4G2.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of Kit-dependent
thymidine incorporation, cell cycle, and cyclin induction by
Fc RIIB. A,
Fc RIIB expression. The binding of the anti-Fc RIIB mAb K9.361 was
assessed by indirect immunofluorescence (gray histograms,
cells incubated with K9.361 and PE-GAM F(ab')2; black
histograms, cells incubated with PE-GAM F(ab')2 only).
B, thymidine incorporation. Fc RIIB+/+ BMMCs
and Fc RIIB / BMMCs, preincubated with 2.4G2 (Kit
aggregation; open symbols) or without 2.4G2 (Fc RIIB-Kit
coaggregation; closed symbols) were incubated for 24 h
with complexes made of the indicated concentrations of biotin-ACK2 and
anti-biotin antibodies, and thymidine incorporation was measured. The
figure represents thymidine incorporation as a function of the
concentration of biotin-ACK2. C, cell cycle analysis.
Fc RIIB+/+ BMMCs and Fc RIIB / BMMCs,
preincubated with 2.4G2 (Kit aggregation; open bars) or
without 2.4G2 (Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation; closed bars)
were resuspended at 1 × 106 cells/ml in culture
medium supplemented with 2% WEHI-3B-conditioned medium and incubated
for 24 h with complexes made of 10 µg/ml biotin-ACK2 and the
indicated concentrations of anti-biotin antibodies. Nuclei were labeled
with propidium iodide, and percentages of cells in (G0 + G1), S, and (G2 + M) were determined by flow
cytometry. The figure represents the percentage of cells in (S + G2M). D, cyclin expression.
Fc RIIB+/+ BMMCs were starved in complete medium for
24 h, preincubated with 2.4G2 (Kit aggregation) or without 2.4G2
(Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation), and incubated for 6 h for cyclins D
detection or for 24 h for cyclin A detection with complexes made
of 10 µg/ml biotin-ACK2 (Biot-ACK2) and the indicated
concentrations of anti-biotin (anti-Biot) antibodies. Cells
were lysed, and 20 µg of total proteins were electrophoresed and
Western blotted with the indicated antibodies.
|
|
Biotin-ACK2-anti-biotin complexes induced thymidine incorporation in
Fc RIIB / BMMCs whether or not they were preincubated
with 2.4G2 and in Fc RIIB+/+ BMMCs that were preincubated
with 2.4G2. Biotin-ACK2 complex-induced thymidine incorporation varied
similarly in the two cell types with the relative concentrations of
biotin-ACK2 and anti-biotin antibodies. Optimal responses were induced
by complexes formed at equivalence. No thymidine incorporation
was induced in Fc RIIB+/+ BMMCs that were not
preincubated with 2.4G2 (Fig. 2B).
A dose-dependent increase in the percentage of cells
in S + G2M was observed following stimulation of
Fc RIIB+/+ BMMCs with biotin-ACK2-anti-biotin
complexes, when preincubated with 2.4G2, but not when not preincubated
with 2.4G2. A comparable dose-dependent increase in the
proportion of Fc RIIB / cells in S + G2M
was observed, whether or not cells were preincubated with 2.4G2 (Fig.
2C).
The induction of cyclin D2, cyclin D3, and cyclin A was examined in wt
BMMCs following Kit aggregation and following coaggregation of Kit with
Fc RIIB using the same ligands as above. Kit aggregation increased
the intracellular levels of cyclins D2, D3, and A. All three cyclins
remained at basal levels following coaggregation of Kit with Fc RIIB
(Fig. 2D). Fc RIIB can therefore prevent BMMCs from
entering the cell cycle by inhibiting the induction of cyclins.
When Coaggregated with Kit, Fc RIIB Inhibit the Activation of
Erk, JNK, p38, and Akt--
Kit was aggregated or coaggregated with
Fc RIIB for various periods of time in wt BMMCs using the same
ligands as in Fig. 2, and the phosphorylation of the MAP kinases
Erk1/2, JNKs, and p38 and of the protein kinase Akt were examined. All
three MAP kinases were inducibly phosphorylated upon Kit aggregation as early as 3 min after stimulation. Phosphorylation remained at a
comparable level at 10 min and decreased at 30 min. The phosphorylation of Erk, JNKs, and p38 occurred normally 3 min after coaggregation of
Kit with Fc RIIB but was inhibited at 30 min (Fig.
3). Akt was phosphorylated within 3 min
following Kit aggregation, and phosphorylation remained constant until
30 min. Akt phosphorylation was inhibited 3 min after coaggregation of
Kit with Fc gRIIB and abolished at 30 min (Fig. 3). Fc RIIB
therefore shorten the duration of Kit-dependent Erk, JNK,
p38, and Akt phosphorylation.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Inhibition of Kit-dependent Erk,
JNK, p38, and Akt by Fc RIIB. BMMCs,
preincubated with 2.4G2 (Kit aggregation) or without 2.4G2
(Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation), were incubated for the indicated periods
of time with complexes made of 3 µg/ml biotin-ACK2
(Biot-ACK2) and 3 µg/ml anti-biotin (anti-Biot)
antibodies. Cells were lysed, and 5 µg of total proteins for Erk and
Akt detection, 25 µg for p38 detection, or 50 µg for JNK detection
were electrophoresed and Western blotted with the indicated
antibodies.
|
|
Inhibition of Kit-dependent Cell Proliferation Requires
the Fc RIIB Intracytoplasmic Domain--
We next analyzed Fc RIIB
sequences involved in negative regulation of Kit-dependent
proliferation. To this aim, Fc RIIB / BMMCs were
reconstituted with Fc RIIB1 or with Fc RIIB(IC1) (Fig. 4A). Kit was aggregated or
coaggregated with Fc RIIB under the same conditions as in Fig. 2, and
thymidine incorporation was measured. The two types of cells
incorporated comparable amounts of thymidine following Kit aggregation.
Thymidine incorporation was suppressed when coaggregating Kit with
Fc RIIB1 but not with Fc RIIB(IC1) (Fig. 4B). Inhibition
of proliferation, which was abolished in Fc RIIB /
BMMCs, was therefore fully restored following reconstitution with
Fc RIIB1 but not with Fc RIIB(IC1).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Requirement of
Fc RIIB intracytoplasmic sequences for
inhibition of Kit-dependent cell proliferation.
A, Fc RIIB expression. The binding of the anti-Fc RIIB
mAb K9.361 was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence (gray
histograms, cells incubated with K9.361 and PE-GAM
F(ab')2; black histograms, cells incubated with
PE-GAM F(ab')2 only). B, thymidine
incorporation. Fc RIIB / BMMCs reconstituted
with Fc RIIB1 (Fc RIIB / B1) or
Fc RIIB(IC1)
(Fc RIIB / IC1), preincubated
with 2.4G2 (Kit aggregation; open circles) or without 2.4G2
(Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation; closed circles) were incubated
for 24 h with complexes made of indicated concentrations of
biotin-ACK2 and 3 µg/ml anti-biotin antibodies, and thymidine
incorporation was measured. The figure represents thymidine
incorporation as a function of the concentration of biotin-ACK2.
C, Erk and Akt phosphorylation. BMMCs, preincubated with
2.4G2 (Kit aggregation) or without 2.4G2 (Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation),
were incubated for the indicated periods of time with complexes made of
3 µg/ml biotin-ACK2 (Biot-ACK2) and 3 µg/ml anti-biotin
(anti-Biot) antibodies. Cells were lysed, and 5 µg of
total proteins for Erk detection or 20 µg for Akt detection were
electrophoresed and Western blotted with the indicated
antibodies.
|
|
Biochemical events associated with Kit-dependent
proliferation were also examined in the same two BMMCs under the same
conditions as in Fig. 3. Kit aggregation induced Erk and Akt
phosphorylation at 3 min, and phosphorylation remained at comparable
levels until 30 min in the two cell types. Erk phosphorylation was
partially inhibited 10 min and abolished 30 min after coaggregation of
Kit with Fc RIIB1. It was unaffected by coaggregating Kit with
Fc RIIB(IC1). Akt phosphorylation was dramatically inhibited 3 min
and remained abolished 30 min after coaggregation of Kit with
Fc RIIB1. It was unaffected by coaggregating Kit with Fc RIIB(IC1)
(Fig. 4C). Thus, to inhibit Kit-dependent
proliferation, Fc RIIB require the conservation of their IC domain.
Upon Coaggregation with Kit, Fc RIIB Becomes
Tyrosyl-phosphorylated and Recruits SHIP1 but Not SHIP2, SHP-1, or
SHP-2--
Negative regulation of cell activation by Fc RIIB is
correlated with the recruitment of SH2 domain-containing phosphatases by tyrosyl-phosphorylated Fc RIIB (15, 16, 38). We investigated which
phosphatases were recruited by Fc RIIB upon coaggregation with Kit.
Fc RIIB / BMMCs reconstituted with Fc RIIB1 were
stimulated or not with biotin-ACK2-anti-biotin immune complexes, and
Fc RIIB1 were immunoprecipitated. Their phosphorylation was assessed
by Western blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies, and
phosphatases coprecipitated with Fc RIIB1 were identified by Western
blotting with specific antibodies. As observed previously (30),
Fc RIIB1 became tyrosyl-phosphorylated when coaggregated with Kit.
SHIP1, but not SHIP2, SHP-1, or SHP-2, coprecipitated with
tyrosyl-phosphorylated Fc RIIB (Fig.
5). Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of
Kit-dependent proliferation therefore correlated with the
selective recruitment of SHIP1.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Recruitment of SHIP1, but not SHIP2, SHP-1,
or SHP-2, by Fc RIIB when
tyrosyl-phosphorylated upon coaggregation with Kit. Fc RIIB were
immunoprecipitated from BMMCs stimulated for 5 min with medium or with
complexes made of 3 µg/ml biotin-ACK2 (Biot-ACK2) and 3 µg/ml anti-biotin (anti-Biot) antibodies.
Immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed and sequentially Western
blotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (anti-PY),
anti-Fc RIIB antibodies to check that comparable amounts of materials
were immunoprecipitated, and anti-SHIP2, anti-SHIP1, anti-SHP-2, and
anti-SHP-1 antibodies to identify coprecipitated phosphatases. Whole
cell lysates (WCL) were used as positive controls.
|
|
SHIP1 Deletion Abrogates Fc RIIB-mediated Inhibition of Akt and
Erk Activation and Attenuates Inhibition of Cyclin D3
Induction--
To investigate the role of SHIP1 in the negative
regulation of Kit-dependent cell proliferation by
Fc RIIB, we compared the effects of coaggregating Kit with Fc RIIB
in BMMCs derived from SHIP1 / and SHIP1+/+
mice. We first checked the phenotype of SHIP1 /
BMMCs. SHIP1 / BMMCs expressed SHP-1, SHP-2, and
SHIP2 (not shown) but not SHIP1 (Fig.
6A), and as previously
suggested (39), they responded more vigorously to SCF. Akt and Erk
phosphorylation were indeed more intense and lasted longer in
SHIP1 / BMMCs than in SHIP1+/+ BMMCs, in
response to SCF stimulation (Fig. 6A).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Suppression of
Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of Akt and Erk
activation and reduction of inhibition of cyclin D3 induction by SHIP1
deletion. A, absence of SHIP1 expression and enhanced
responses to SCF in SHIP1 / BMMCs. Aliquot of
SHIP1+/+ and SHIP1 / BMMCs were lysed with
SDS, and proteins were precipitated with cold aceton. Whole cell
lysates were electrophoresed (5 × 105
cells/lane) and Western blotted with anti-SHIP1 antibodies.
SHIP1+/+ and SHIP1 / BMMCs were starved
overnight in complete medium and stimulated with SCF for the indicated
times. SDS-solubilized lysates (5 × 105
cells/lane) were subjected to Western blot analysis with
anti-phospho-Akt and anti-phospho-Erk antibodies, and the membrane was
reprobed with anti-Erk antibodies. B, Erk and Akt
phosphorylation. SHIP1+/+ and SHIP1 / BMMCs,
preincubated with 2.4G2 (Kit aggregation) or without 2.4G2
(Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation), were incubated for the indicated periods
of time with complexes made of 3 µg/ml biotin-ACK2
(Biot-ACK2) and 3 µg/ml anti-biotin (anti-Biot)
antibodies. Cells were lysed, and 10 µg of total proteins for Erk
detection or 40 µg for Akt detection were electrophoresed and Western
blotted with the indicated antibodies. C, cyclin D3
induction. Fc RIIB / BMMCs, Fc RIIB /
BMMCs reconstituted with Fc RIIB1, and SHIP1 / BMMCs
were starved in complete medium for 24 h, preincubated with 2.4G2
(Kit aggregation) or without 2.4G2 (Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation), and
incubated for 6 h with complexes made of 3 µg/ml biotin-ACK2 and
3 µg/ml anti-biotin antibodies. Cells were lysed, and 20 µg of
total proteins were electrophoresed and Western blotted with
anti-cyclin D3 antibodies.
|
|
Akt phosphorylation was also observed following Kit aggregation with
antibodies in SHIP1 / and SHIP1+/+ BMMCs,
and as observed in response to SCF, it was more intense in
SHIP1 / cells than in SHIP1+/+ cells. It was
inhibited at 3 min and abolished at 10 and 30 min in
SHIP1+/+ BMMCs, but not in SHIP1 / BMMCs,
following the coaggregation of Kit with Fc RIIB (Fig. 6B).
Erk phosphorylation was also observed following Kit aggregation in both
types of cells, and as observed in response to SCF, it was more intense
in SHIP1 / cells than in SHIP1+/+ cells. It
was abolished at 30 min in SHIP1+/+ BMMCs, but not in
SHIP1 / BMMCs, following the coaggregation of Kit with
Fc RIIB (Fig. 6B).
We also examined the requirement of SHIP1 for Fc RIIB to inhibit the
induction of cyclin D3. Cyclin D3 was induced following Kit aggregation
in Fc RIIB / BMMCs, in Fc RIIB /
BMMCs reconstituted with Fc RIIB1, and in
SHIP1 / BMMCs that had been preincubated with
2.4G2 and stimulated with biotin-ACK2-anti-biotin complexes. Cyclin D3
induction was suppressed in Fc RIIB / BMMCs
reconstituted with Fc RIIB1 but not in Fc RIIB /
BMMCs that had been stimulated with the same complexes without preincubation with 2.4G2. Under the same conditions, cyclin D3 induction was also inhibited in SHIP1 / BMMCs, but it
did not return to basal level (Fig. 6C). Thus, SHIP1
deletion abolished Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of Akt and Erk
activation and decreased Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of cyclin D3 induction.
SHIP1 Deletion Partially Suppresses Fc RIIB-mediated Inhibition
of Kit-dependent Cell Proliferation--
We next compared
the effects of coaggregating Kit with Fc RIIB on thymidine
incorporation in SHIP1 / and SHIP1+/+ BMMCs,
using the same conditions as in Fig. 2. Thymidine incorporation induced
by Kit aggregation was abolished following coaggregation of Kit with
Fc RIIB in SHIP1+/+ BMMCs and still inhibited, though
only partially, in SHIP1 / BMMCs (Fig.
7A). This result was
unexpected, because SHIP1 deletion was reported to abrogate
Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of BCR-induced cell activation in DT40
cells (40). This led us to investigate the consequences of
coaggregating Fc RIIB with Fc RI in SHIP1 / mast
cells. SHIP1+/+ and SHIP1 / BMMCs were
sensitized with murine IgE and challenged with F(ab')2 fragments of RAM antibodies to aggregate Fc RI or with intact RAM IgG
antibodies to coaggregate Fc RI with Fc RIIB. Both serotonin release (Fig. 7B) and TNF secretion (Fig. 7C)
induced by Fc RI aggregation were inhibited in SHIP1+/+
BMMCs following coaggregation of Fc RI with Fc RIIB. Inhibition of
both responses was abolished in SHIP1 / BMMCs (Fig. 7,
B and C).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Partial suppression of
Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of
Kit-dependent cell proliferation by SHIP1 deletion.
A, thymidine incorporation. SHIP1+/+ and
SHIP1 / BMMCs, preincubated with 2.4G2 (Kit aggregation;
open circles) or without 2.4G2 (Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation;
closed circles) were incubated for 24 h with complexes
made of the indicated concentrations of biotin-ACK2 and 3 µg/ml
anti-biotin antibodies, and thymidine incorporation was measured. The
figure represents thymidine incorporation as a function of the
concentration of biotin-ACK2. B, serotonin release.
SHIP1+/+ and SHIP1 / BMMCs were sensitized
with mouse IgE before they were challenged for serotonin release with
the indicated concentrations of RAM F(ab')2 (Fc RI
aggregation; open circles) or IgG (Fc RI-Fc RIIB
coaggregation; closed circles). The figure represents the
percentage of serotonin released as a function of the concentration of
RAM. C, TNF secretion. SHIP1+/+ and
SHIP1 / BMMCs were sensitized with mouse IgE before they
were challenged for 3 h with or without 1 µM RAM
F(ab')2 (Fc RI aggregation; open symbols) or
IgG (Fc RI-Fc RIIB coaggregation; closed symbols).
Cell-free supernatants were harvested, and 2-fold dilutions were tested
for cytotoxicity on L929 cells. The figure represents the percentage of
cytotoxicity as a function of the dilution of supernatants.
D, Cell viability. SHIP1+/+ and
SHIP1 / BMMCs, preincubated with 2.4G2 (Kit aggregation)
or without 2.4G2 (Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation), were incubated for
24 h with complexes made of 3 µg/ml biotin-ACK2
(Biot-ACK2) and 3 µg/ml anti-biotin (anti-Biot)
antibodies. Dead cells and apoptotic cells were visualized with
propidium iodide and annexin V. FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate.
|
|
The residual inhibition of thymidine incorporation in
SHIP1 / BMMCs could be explained if BMMCs underwent
apoptosis following coligation of Kit with Fc RIIB. SHIP1 was indeed
reported to act as an anti-apoptotic molecule in B cells (40, 41).
SHIP1+/+ and SHIP1 / BMMCs were therefore
cultured for 24 h with medium alone or with biotin-ACK2-anti-biotin complexes after they had been preincubated with
or without 2.4G2. Dead cells were visualized with annexin-V and
propidium iodide. Comparable proportions of viable cells (80-90%) were observed in the two cell types in all three conditions (Fig. 7D). Apoptosis therefore does not account for residual
inhibition of SHIP1 / BMMC proliferation.
Thus, whereas Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of
Fc RI-dependent cell activation was abolished in
SHIP1 / BMMCs, and although SHIP1 only coprecipitated
with Fc RIIB phosphorylated upon coaggregation with Kit in
SHIP1+/+ BMMCs, Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of
Kit-dependent cell proliferation was only partially
abrogated in SHIP1 / BMMCs. This partial effect
correlates with the partial inhibition of cyclin D3 induction observed
in SHIP1 / cells.
The Catalytic Domain of SHIP1 Is Sufficient to Negatively Regulate
Kit-dependent Mast Cell Proliferation--
The above
genetic approach provided negative evidence that SHIP1 is involved in
Fc RIIB-mediated negative regulation of Kit-dependent cell proliferation. To obtain direct, positive evidence that SHIP1 can
be an effector of this regulation, we constructed a cDNA encoding a
chimeric molecule made of Fc RIIB whose IC domain was replaced with
the catalytic domain of SHIP1. This cDNA was expressed in Fc RIIB / BMMCs, and the chimera was compared with
Fc RIIB expressed by wt BMMCs for its ability to negatively regulate
Kit-dependent proliferation. The expression of the
Fc RIIB-SHIP1 chimera was confirmed by indirect immunofluorescence
with K9.361 (Fig. 8A). Comparable thymidine incorporation was observed following Kit aggregation in both cells. Thymidine incorporation was similarly inhibited following coaggregation of Kit with wt Fc RIIB or with the
Fc RIIB-SHIP1 chimera (Fig. 8B). A SHIP1 chimera could
therefore mimic Fc RIIB-mediated negative regulation of
Kit-dependent mast cell proliferation.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
The catalytic domain of SHIP1 is sufficient
to negatively regulate Kit-dependent mast cell
proliferation. A, Fc RIIB expression. The binding of
the anti-Fc RIIB mAb K9.361 to wt BMMCs and
Fc RIIB / BMMCs reconstituted with a chimera made of
Fc RIIB whose IC domain was replaced by the catalytic domain of SHIP1
(Fc RIIB / FcR-SHIP1) was
assessed by indirect immunofluorescence (gray histograms,
cells incubated with K9.361 and PE-GAM F(ab')2; black
histograms, cells incubated with PE-GAM F(ab')2 only).
B, thymidine incorporation. wt BMMCs and
Fc RIIB / FcR-SHIP1 BMMCs, preincubated with 2.4G2
(Kit aggregation; open circles) or without 2.4G2
(Fc RIIB-Kit coaggregation; closed circles), were
incubated for 24 h with complexes made of the indicated
concentrations of biotin-ACK2 and 1 µg/ml anti-biotin antibodies, and
thymidine incorporation was measured. The figure represents thymidine
incorporation as a function of the concentration of biotin-ACK2.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The present work aimed at investigating the mechanism by which
Fc RIIB negatively regulate cell proliferation. We used, as an
experimental model, Kit-dependent mast cell proliferation
that we previously found to be negatively regulated by Fc RIIB (10). We show here that SHIP1 is selectively recruited by
tyrosyl-phosphorylated Fc RIIB and plays a critical but not exclusive
role in inhibiting transduction pathways that lead to the transcription
of cyclin genes and the progression of cells through the cell cycle.
We observed previously a dual effect of IgG anti-Kit antibodies, they
can activate cell proliferation by aggregating Kit via their Fab
portions, and they can inhibit cell proliferation by coaggregating Kit
with Fc RIIB via their Fab and Fc portions (10). We therefore used
anti-Kit antibodies to analyze the mechanism of
Fc RIIB-dependent inhibition of Kit-induced
proliferation. Beforehand, we checked that anti-Kit antibodies
triggered the same intracellular signals as SCF. When dimerized by SCF,
Kit is probably under an optimal spatial configuration on the cell membrane but possibly not when aggregated by anti-Kit antibodies. We
found no qualitative difference between signals examined upon stimulation of BMMCs with SCF and with anti-Kit antibodies, but we did
find quantitative differences. Antibodies were indeed less efficient
than SCF, and apparently, late signals were more attenuated than early
signals following stimulation with antibodies. Whatever the reason of
these differences, these preliminary results validated the use of
anti-Kit antibodies for studying Fc RIIB-dependent inhibition of signals generated by Kit and leading to mast cell proliferation.
Inhibition of thymidine incorporation correlated with the tyrosyl
phosphorylation of Fc RIIB induced upon coaggregation with Kit.
Inhibition observed in Fc RIIB / BMMCs reconstituted
with wt Fc RIIB1 was not seen in Fc RIIB / BMMCs
reconstituted with an IC domain-deleted Fc RIIB. Inhibition is
therefore not a consequence of steric hindrance between extracellular domains and ligands but requires the IC domain of Fc RIIB. Four tyrosines are contained in this domain, one being within the ITIM (3,
13), which when tyrosyl-phosphorylated, has been shown to mediate the
recruitment of SHIP1 in mast cells and B cells (3, 15) and SHIP2 in B
cells (42, 43), but not SHP-1 or SHP-2 in both cells (16, 44),
following coaggregation of Fc RIIB with ITAM-bearing receptors. When
coaggregated with Kit, tyrosyl-phosphorylated Fc RIIB was
found to recruit SHIP1, but not SHIP2, SHP-1, or SHP-2, as
assessed by coprecipitation. Early events associated with
Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of Kit-induced mast cell proliferation
therefore resemble early events associated with Fc RIIB-mediated
inhibition of Fc RI-induced mast cell activation (15, 16).
Akt phosphorylation induced by Kit aggregation was inhibited following
coaggregation of Kit with Fc RIIB. Inhibition of Akt phosphorylation
was not observed when Kit was coaggregated with an IC domain-deleted
Fc RIIB, suggesting that this inhibition is a consequence of the
recruitment of SHIP1 by tyrosyl-phosphorylated IC sequences of
Fc RIIB. Indeed, inhibition of Akt phosphorylation did not occur in
SHIP1 / cells. Interestingly, both SCF-induced and
anti-Kit-induced Akt phosphorylation were more intense, particularly at
later time points, in SHIP1 / BMMCs than in
SHIP1+/+ BMMCs, and Fc RIIB-dependent
inhibition of Akt phosphorylation seen in SHIP1+/+ cells
was more pronounced at the same late time points. When activated, Kit
recruits and activates PI3K (23), which generates PI(3,4,5)P3, enabling the membrane translocation of
proteins bearing a PH domain including Akt. Akt phosphorylation, which
requires the membrane recruitment of Akt, is a reflection of PI3K
activation, and inhibition of Akt phosphorylation is a likely
reflection of the catalytic activity of SHIP1, whose preferred
substrate is PI(3,4,5)P3. Similar observations were made in
B cells following coaggregation of Fc RIIB with BCR (45, 46). We also
found that the phosphorylation of p38 and JNK, the terminal effector MAP kinases of the Rac pathway, was inhibited following coaggregation of Kit with Fc RIIB. This inhibition is also likely due to the recruitment of SHIP1 and the subsequent degradation of
PI(3,4,5)P3, which mediates the membrane recruitment of Vav.
Erk1/2 phosphorylation observed following Kit aggregation was of a
shorter duration following the coaggregation of Kit with Fc RIIB.
This effect was not observed when Kit was coaggregated with an IC
domain-deleted Fc RIIB. Inhibition of Erk phosphorylation is also a
likely consequence of the recruitment of SHIP1 by
tyrosyl-phosphorylated Fc RIIB, because it was prevented in
SHIP1 / BMMCs. Like Akt phosphorylation, both
SCF-induced and anti-Kit-induced Erk phosphorylation lasted longer in
SHIP1 / BMMCs than in SHIP1+/+ BMMCs, and
Fc RIIB-dependent inhibition of Erk phosphorylation seen
in SHIP1+/+ cells was more pronounced at late time points.
Several mechanisms were proposed to explain how SHIP1 could inhibit
immunoreceptor-induced Erk activation. One leads to a decreased
production of molecules that activate Ras. Thus, by preventing the
Bruton's tyrosine kinase-dependent full activation of
phospholipase C- , SHIP1 may decrease the conversion of
phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate into inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol. Diacylglycerol activates protein kinase C, which
activates Ras. Another mechanism consists in the sequestration of
molecules that are necessary for the activation of Ras. SHIP1 was
indeed reported to compete with Gbr2 for binding Shc, thereby preventing the constitution of the complex of adapters that connect immunoreceptors to the Ras pathway (47). Finally, SHIP1 has recently
been shown to inhibit Erk activation by functioning as an adapter
molecule. When recruited by Fc RIIB in B cells, SHIP1 is indeed a
substrate of Lyn, and when tyrosyl phosphorylated, it recruits Dok via
its phosphotyrosine-binding domain. Dok is itself phosphorylated
by Lyn and recruits RasGAP via its SH2 domain. RasGAP antagonizes with
Sos by accelerating the hydrolysis of GTP into GDP on Ras (48). Kit
also recruits adapter proteins that, via the exchange factor Sos,
activate the Ras pathway, whose ultimate effectors are the MAP kinases
Erk1/2 (24). Whether one or several of these nonexclusive mechanisms
account(s) for Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of
Kit-dependent activation of Erk1/2 remains to be investigated.
The induction of cyclins D2, D3 (we found no cyclin D1 in BMMCs), and A
observed following Kit aggregation was inhibited when Kit was
coaggregated with Fc RIIB. This effect was not observed in
Fc RIIB / BMMCs. This inhibition likely results from
the inhibition of MAP kinase activation. MAP kinases were indeed shown
to control the transcription of cyclin genes (25). Inhibition of cyclin D3 induction was, however, reduced but not suppressed in
SHIP1 / BMMCs, although inhibition of MAP kinase
activation was abolished. This result suggests that, among the
mechanisms that control cyclin D3 expression and that are inhibited by
Fc RIIB, one can distinguish mechanisms whose inhibition by Fc RIIB
is SHIP1-dependent and mechanisms whose inhibition by
Fc RIIB is SHIP1-independent.
As a consequence of the inhibition of cyclin induction, the increased
proportion of cells entering the S phase observed following Kit
aggregation was not seen following the coaggregation of Kit with
Fc RIIB. This correlates with inhibition of thymidine incorporation. Expectedly, Fc RIIB-induced inhibition of thymidine
incorporation was reduced in SHIP1 / BMMCs, but
unexpectedly, it was not abolished. This partial inhibition is
consistent with the partial inhibition of cyclin D3 induction in the
absence of SHIP1. In contrast, Fc RIIB-mediated inhibition of
Fc RI-dependent serotonin release and TNF secretion
was abrogated in SHIP1 / BMMCs. Incidentally, this is
the first demonstration of the mandatory role of SHIP1 in
Fc RIIB-mediated negative regulation of IgE-dependent mast cell activation. The differential effect of SHIP1 deletion on
inhibition of Fc RI-induced mast cell activation and of Kit-induced mast cell proliferation suggests that Fc RIIB utilize SHIP1 to inhibit pathways shared by Fc RI and Kit such as GTP-binding
protein-dependent MAP kinase activation but that Fc RIIB
can also inhibit Kit-specific pathways in the absence of SHIP1. SHIP1
has been reported to prevent cell death by acting as an antiapoptotic
factor in B cells (41). The residual inhibition of thymidine
incorporation seen in SHIP1 / BMMCs, however, could not
be explained by a decreased cell viability. Residual inhibition could
be accounted for by mechanisms that complement
SHIP1-dependent mechanisms in wt cells or by mechanisms that compensate SHIP1-dependent mechanisms in the absence
of SHIP1 but are not operating in wt cells. Whatever they are,
SHIP1-independent mechanisms are not sufficient to abolish cell
proliferation, because inhibition of proliferation was only reduced in
SHIP1 / cells. To determine whether
SHIP1-dependent mechanisms may suffice to abolish cell
proliferation, we constructed a chimeric molecule, the IC domain of
which was constituted by the catalytic domain of SHIP1. This chimera
inhibited thymidine incorporation as efficiently as Fc RIIB1, when
coaggregated with Kit. This result indicates that the enzymatic
activity of SHIP1 is sufficient for inhibiting Kit-dependent mast cell proliferation.
In conclusion, we used here anti-Kit antibodies as analytical tools to
study the mechanism of Fc RIIB-dependent negative
regulation of cell proliferation. We found that this regulation depends
primarily on the recruitment of SHIP1 by tyrosyl-phosphorylated
Fc RIIB when these receptors are coaggregated with Kit by anti-Kit
antibodies. Under these conditions, SHIP1 was found to extinguish
Kit-induced signals depending on the recruitment of molecules that have
a PH domain to the membrane and downstream signals, as well as the activation of the Ras pathway. Noticeably, signaling pathways triggered
by Kit, but not by Fc RI and therefore possibly-specific for cell
proliferation, could be inhibited by Fc RIIB in the absence of SHIP1.
However, although Fc RIIB could inhibit not only pathways shared by
cell activation and cell proliferation, but also pathways specific for
cell proliferation, the inhibition of common pathways, by SHIP1, was
sufficient to prevent cell proliferation. Our work also provides
information on the mechanisms by which SHIP1 negatively regulates
signals triggered by Kit. Hematopoietic progenitors from
SHIP1 / mice were indeed reported to be hyper-responsive
to several growth factors including SCF (39), and we show here that Akt
and Erk phosphorylation were more intense and lasted longer in
SHIP1 / BMMCs than in SHIP1+/+ BMMCs, in
response to both anti-Kit antibodies and SCF stimulation. Whether
triggered by SCF or by anti-Kit antibodies, Kit-derived signals are
under the control of SHIP1 through the inhibition of
PI(3,4,5)P3-dependent early events. By
recruiting more SHIP1, Fc RIIB may therefore enhance the constitutive
negative regulation of Kit signaling by SHIP1.
Based on these results, anti-Kit antibodies may be envisioned as being
more than analytical tools. Abnormal cell proliferation may indeed
arise from mutations of Kit that render this receptor constitutively
activated. A few well characterized oncogenic Kit mutations were found
in mastocytosis, mastocytomas, mast cell leukemias, and intestinal
tumors derived from Cajal interstitial cells, and these mutations are
thought to be the etiology of these proliferative diseases. Our results
provide the molecular grounds for a potential therapeutic use of
anti-Kit antibodies in such malignant diseases.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to
Dr. Ulrich Hämmerling (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,
New York, NY) for anti-Fc RIIB allotypic mAb K9.361, Dr. Catherine
Sautès-Fridman (Institut Curie, Paris, France) for rabbit
polyclonal antibodies against the IC domain of Fc RIIB,
Dr. Marco Colonna (Basel Institute for Immunology, Basel,
Switzerland) for ACK2 cells, Dr. David Wisniewski (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) for anti-SHIP2 antibodies, and Hélène Hardré-Liénard (Institut Curie,
Paris, France) for SHIP1 cDNA.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by INSERM, the Association
pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC), and the Institut Curie. P. B.
is the recipient of a fellowship from the ARC. G. K. is a Terry
Fox Cancer Research Scientist of the National Cancer Institute of
Canada (NCI-C) supported by funds from the Canadian Cancer Society and the Terry Fox Run.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratoire
d'Immunologie Cellulaire et Clinique, INSERM U.255, Institut
Biomédicale des Cordeliers, 15 rue de l'Ecole de Médecine,
75006 Paris, France. Tel.: 33-1-5310-0406; Fax: 33-1-4051-0420; E-mail:
Marc.Daeron@U255.bhdc.jussieu.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 18, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M011094200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ITAM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif;
BCR, B cell receptor
for antigen;
BMMC, bone marrow-derived mast cells;
GAM, goat
anti-mouse Ig;
HRP, horseradish peroxidase;
IC, intracytoplasmic;
ITIM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif;
MAP, mitogen-activated
proteins;
PE, phycoerythrin;
PH, pleckstrin homology;
PI(3, 4,5)P3, phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase;
PY, phosphotyrosine;
RAM, rabbit
anti-mouse Ig;
SH2, Src homology 2;
SCF, stem cell factor;
SHIP, SH2
domain-containing inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase;
SHP, SH2
domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase;
wt, wild-type;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
Fc RIIB(IC1), IC domain-deleted Fc RIIB;
IRES, internal ribosomal
entry sequence;
EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein;
TNF, tumor
necrosis factor;
biotin-ACK2, biotinylated anti-Kit ACK2.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Daëron, M.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
203-234
|
| 2.
|
Latour, S.,
Fridman, W. H.,
and Daëron, M.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
189-197
|
| 3.
|
Daëron, M.,
Latour, S.,
Malbec, O.,
Espinosa, E.,
Pina, P.,
Pasmans, S.,
and Fridman, W. H.
(1995)
Immunity
3,
635-646
|
| 4.
|
Benhamou, M.,
Bonnerot, C.,
Fridman, W. H.,
and Daëron, M.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
144,
3071-3077
|
| 5.
|
Sinclair, N. R. S. C.,
and Chan, P. L.
(1971)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
12,
609-615
|
| 6.
|
Phillips, N. E.,
and Parker, D. C.
(1984)
J. Immunol.
132,
627-632
|
| 7.
|
Amigorena, S.,
Bonnerot, C.,
Drake, J.,
Choquet, D.,
Hunziker, W.,
Guillet, J. G.,
Webster, P.,
Sautès, C.,
Mellman, I.,
and Fridman, W. H.
(1992)
Science
256,
1808-1812
|
| 8.
|
Daëron, M.,
Malbec, O.,
Latour, S.,
Arock, M.,
and Fridman, W. H.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
577-585
|
| 9.
|
Amigorena, S.,
Bonnerot, C.,
Choquet, D.,
Fridman, W. H.,
and Teillaud, J. L.
(1989)
Eur. J. Immunol.
19,
1379-1385
|
| 10.
|
Malbec, O.,
Fridman, W. H.,
and Daëron, M.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
4424-4429
|
| 11.
|
Qiu, F.,
Ray, P.,
Brown, K.,
Baker, P. E.,
Jhanwar, S.,
Ruddle, F. H.,
and Besmer, P.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
1003-1010
|
| 12.
|
Dubreuil, P.,
Rottapel, R.,
Reith, A. D.,
Forrester, L.,
and Bernstein, A.
(1990)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
599,
58-65
|
| 13.
|
Muta, T.,
Kurosaki, T.,
Misulovin, Z.,
Sanchez, M.,
Nussenzweig, M. C.,
and Ravetch, J. V.
(1994)
Nature
368,
70-73
|
| 14.
|
Malbec, O.,
Fong, D.,
Turner, M.,
Tybulewicz, V. L. J.,
Cambier, J., C.,
Fridman, W. H.,
and Daëron, M.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
1647-1658
|
| 15.
|
Ono, M.,
Bolland, S.,
Tempst, P.,
and Ravetch, J. V.
(1996)
Nature
383,
263-266
|
| 16.
|
Fong, D. C.,
Malbec, O.,
Arock, M.,
Cambier, J. C.,
Fridman, W. H.,
and Daëron, M.
(1996)
Immunol. Lett.
54,
83-91
|
| 17.
|
Lioubin, M. N.,
Algate, P. A.,
Tsai, S.,
Carlberg, K.,
Aebersold, R.,
and Rohrschneider, L. R.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1084-1095
|
| 18.
|
Corvera, S.,
and Czech, M. P.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
442-446
|
| 19.
|
Scharenberg, A. M.,
El-Hillal, O.,
Fruman, D. A.,
Beitz, L. O.,
Li, Z.,
Lin, S.,
Gout, I.,
Cantley, L. C.,
Rawlings, D. J.,
and Kinet, J.-P.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1961-1972
|
| 20.
|
Su, B.,
and Karin, M.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
8,
402-411
|
| 21.
|
Jiang, A.,
Craxton, A.,
Kurosaki, T.,
and Clark, E. A.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
188,
1297-1306
|
| 22.
|
Ogawa, M.,
Matsuzaki, Y.,
Nishikawa, S.,
Hayashi, S.,
Kunisada, T.,
Sudo, T.,
Kina, T.,
Nakauchi, H.,
and Nishikawa, S.
(1991)
J. Exp. Med.
174,
63-71
|
| 23.
|
Timokhina, I.,
Kissel, H.,
Stella, G.,
and Besmer, P.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6250-6262
|
| 24.
|
Rottapel, R.,
Reedijk, M.,
Williams, D. E.,
Lyman, S. D.,
Anderson, D. M.,
Powson, T.,
and Bernstein, A.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
3043-3051
|
| 25.
|
Kerkhoff, E.,
and Rapp, U. R.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
1457-1462
|
| 26.
|
Beijersbergen, R. L.,
and Bernards, R.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1287,
103-120
|
| 27.
|
Kimura, S.,
Tada, N.,
Nakayama, E.,
Liu, Y.,
and Hammerling, U.
(1981)
Immunogenetics
14,
3-14
|
| 28.
|
Liu, T. T.,
Bohn, J. W.,
Ferry, E. L.,
Yamamoto, H.,
and Molinaro, C. A.
(1980)
J. Immunol.
124,
2728
|
| 29.
|
Unkeless, J. C.
(1979)
J. Exp. Med.
150,
580-596
|
| 30.
|
Malbec, O.,
Fridman, W. H.,
and Daëron, M.
(1999)
Cur. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
244,
13-27
|
| 31.
|
Sautès, C.,
Varin, N.,
Teillaud, C.,
Daëron, M.,
Even, J.,
Hogarth, P. M.,
and Fridman, W. H.
(1991)
Eur. J. Immunol.
21,
231-234
|
| 32.
|
Wisniewski, D.,
Strife, A.,
Swendeman, S.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Geromanos, S.,
Kavanaugh, W. M.,
Tempst, P.,
and Clarkson, B.
(1999)
Blood
93,
2707-2720
|
| 33.
|
Bruhns, P.,
Marchetti, P.,
Fridman, W. H.,
Vivier, E.,
and Daëron, M.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
3168-3175
|
| 34.
|
Kinsella, T.,
and Nolan, G.
(1996)
Hum. Gene Ther.
7,
1405-1413
|
| 35.
|
Berlioz, C.,
and Darlix, J.-C.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
2214-2222
|
| 36.
|
Daëron, M.,
Bonnerot, C.,
Latour, S.,
and Fridman, W. H.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
1365-1373
|
| 37.
|
Latour, S.,
Bonnerot, C.,
Fridman, W. H.,
and Daëron, M.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
2155-2162
|
| 38.
|
D'Ambrosio, D.,
Hippen, K. H.,
Minskoff, S. A.,
Mellman, I.,
Pani, G.,
Siminovitch, K. A.,
and Cambier, J. C.
(1995)
Science
268,
293-296
|
| 39.
|
Helgason, C. D.,
Damen, J. E.,
Rosten, P.,
Grewal, R.,
Sorensen, P.,
Chappel, S. M.,
Borowski, A.,
Jirik, F.,
Krystal, G.,
and Humphries, R. K.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1610-1620
|
| 40.
|
Ono, M.,
Okada, H.,
Bolland, S.,
Yanagi, S.,
Kurosaki, T.,
and Ravetch, J. V.
(1997)
Cell
90,
293-301
|
| 41.
|
Pearse, R. N.,
Kawabe, T.,
Bolland, S.,
Guinamard, R.,
Kurosaki, T.,
and Ravetch, J. V.
(1999)
Immunity
10,
753-760
|
| 42.
|
Muraille, E.,
Bruhns, P.,
Pesesse, X.,
Daëron, M.,
and Erneux, C.
(2000)
Immunol. Lett.
72,
7-15
|
| 43.
|
Bruhns, P.,
Vély, F.,
Malbec, O.,
Fridman, W. H.,
Vivier, E.,
and Daëron, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
37357-37364
|
| 44.
|
Lesourne, R.,
Bruhns, P.,
Fridman, W. H.,
and Daëron, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
6327-6336
|
| 45.
|
Astoul, E.,
Watton, S.,
and Cantrell, D.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
1511-1520
|
| 46.
|
Carver, D. J.,
Aman, M. J.,
and Ravichandran, K. S.
(2000)
Blood
96,
1449-1456
|
| 47.
|
Tridandapani, S.,
Chacko, G. W.,
Van Brocklyn, J. R.,
and Coggeshall, L. M.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
158,
1125-1132
|
| 48.
|
Tamir, I.,
Stolpa, J. C.,
Helgason, C. D.,
Nakamura, K.,
Bruhns, P.,
Daëron, M.,
and Cambier, J. C.
(2000)
Immunity
12,
347-358
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-L. Gu, V. L. Goss, C. Reeves, L. Popova, J. Nardone, J. MacNeill, D. K. Walters, Y. Wang, J. Rush, M. J. Comb, et al.
Phosphotyrosine profiling identifies the KG-1 cell line as a model for the study of FGFR1 fusions in acute myeloid leukemia
Blood,
December 15, 2006;
108(13):
4202 - 4204.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Isnardi, R. Lesourne, P. Bruhns, W. H. Fridman, J. C. Cambier, and M. Daeron
Two Distinct Tyrosine-based Motifs Enable the Inhibitory Receptor Fc{gamma}RIIB to Cooperatively Recruit the Inositol Phosphatases SHIP1/2 and the Adapters Grb2/Grap
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 10, 2004;
279(50):
51931 - 51938.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Hernandez-Hansen, G. A. Mackay, C. A. Lowell, B. S. Wilson, and J. M. Oliver
The Src kinase Lyn is a negative regulator of mast cell proliferation
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
January 1, 2004;
75(1):
143 - 151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|