![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 33, 30753-30760, August 17, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
, and
**
From the
Instituto de Biologia Molecular y Celular de
Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia-C.S.I.C., Camino de
Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain and the ¶ Laboratory of
Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, NICHD, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, April 3, 2001, and in revised form, May 29, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Phosphorylation of the Adaptation to changes in the extracellular environment is a
critical event for cell survival. Single cell organisms such as the
budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are able to adapt
rapidly to extreme changes in extracellular salinity or nutrient
availability and are consequently convenient model systems to study
stress tolerances. Salt stress implies both exposures to osmotic stress and to specific cation toxicity (1). In yeast an increased extracellular osmolarity causes the induction of a number of
stress-protective genes of which the major outcome is the accumulation
of glycerol and the restoration of turgor pressure (2). The high
osmolarity glycerol mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway plays a
dominant role in the signal transduction contributing to the adaptive
response of yeast to high osmolarity or salinity (1-3). Additionally, the Ras-cAMP-protein kinase A pathway that responds more generally to
stresses and nutrient availability also plays an important role in
osmotic adaptation (4-6). Adaptation to salt stress also requires the
modification of plasma or vacuolar membrane transport systems to
exclude toxic ions from the cytosol. Both the high osmolarity glycerol
pathway and the calcium-calcineurin pathway participate in the
regulation of ion transporters during salt stress, especially of the
Na+-pumping ATPase encoded by the ENA1 gene (1).
Considerably less information exists about cellular targets of salt
toxicity. Sodium and lithium inhibit Hal2p, a specific phosphatase
acting on 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphate
(PAP)1 (7, 8). PAP
accumulation during salt stress inhibits sulfate assimilation and RNA
processing, and this accounts for part of the salt toxicity. In
addition lithium inhibits the essential ribonuclease MRP (9).
Other targets of salt toxicity must exist, although previous mutational
analyses have failed to identify them.
In the present work a genetic analysis has led to the
identification of Gcn2p as a negative determinant of yeast salt
tolerance. This protein kinase participates in one of the best
characterized mechanisms of translational regulation in
eukaryotes, which involves the phosphorylation of the
Plasmids and Strains
All plasmids used in this study are derived from YCp50 (p16), a
low copy number plasmid marked with URA3 and containing
either the GCN4 wild type allele (p164) (13), a
GCN4 mutant allele that contains only the first uORF (p235),
or a GCN4-lacZ fusion including the GCN4
5'-noncoding region with all four short uORFs (p180) (14). Yeast cells
were transformed by the lithium acetate protocol according to Gietz
et al. (15). Yeast strains H1725 (gcd7-201) and
H1794 (gcd7-201 gcn2) were derived from the H1727 (Mat Culture Conditions and Analysis of Salt Tolerance
Standard methods for yeast culture and manipulation were used
(20). In order to test for salt tolerance, the different strains were
grown to saturation (48 h) in liquid-rich medium. Cultures were diluted
10-, 100-, and 1,000-fold, and volumes of about 3 µl were dropped
with a stainless steel replicator (Sigma) on plates containing 2%
Bacto-Agar (Difco) and rich medium with NaCl, KCl, or sorbitol as
indicated. Rich medium (YPD) contained 1% yeast extract (Difco), 2%
Bacto-peptone (Difco), and 2% glucose.
Construction, Isolation, and Genetic Analysis of Sed Mutants
Strain AG86 (W303-1B
ena1-4::HIS3) was transformed with a
mTn-lacZ/LEU2 mutagenized insertion library (21). Disruption mutants that suppressed the salt sensitivity of this strain were isolated as
colonies growing after 9 days in synthetic minimal medium plates (SD)
supplemented with methionine (100 µg/ml) and 0.6 M NaCl. SD plates contain 2% Bacto-Agar (Difco), 2% glucose, 0.7% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (Difco), 50 mM succinic
acid adjusted to pH 5.5 with Tris base, and adenine (30 µg/ml),
tryptophan (80 µg/ml), and uracil (30 µg/ml) as required. Mutants
with the strongest salt tolerance phenotype were isolated and
designated sed mutants (for suppression of
ena1-4 by disruption). By crossing with the
SKY697 strain (W303-1A ena-4::HIS3),
sporulation, and tetrad dissection the linkage between the salt
tolerance phenotype and the transposon insertion was verified. To
identify the genomic site of transposon insertion in the most relevant
mutants, a plasmid rescue method was followed (21).
Immunoblot Analysis
Immunodetection of eIF2 Immunodetection of Hal2p--
Yeast strains were grown to
mid-logarithmic phase in liquid YPD medium or YPD medium with KCl (1.25 M) or NaCl (1.25 M). Protein extraction,
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, blotting, and immunoassay with
a polyclonal antibody against Hal2p were performed as described
(18).
Yeast cells were grown in liquid SD medium with all amino acids
supplemented to mid-logarithmic phase and then shifted to fresh SD
medium without any amino acid supplements or SD medium with all amino
acid supplements and either KCl (1.25 M) or NaCl (1.25 M). In all cultures uracil was omitted to keep selection for the p180 plasmid. Preparation of cells and determination of the
Amino Acid Uptake and Incorporation Experiments
Yeast cells were grown in liquid SD medium to mid-logarithmic
phase, shifted to fresh SD medium or SD medium with either KCl (1.25 M) or NaCl (1.25 M), and incubated for an
additional 2 h, corresponding to steady-state levels of
intracellular cations (24). Subsequently amino acid uptake and
incorporation assays were performed. In case of SD medium without salts
the 2-h extra incubation period was omitted.
Uptake of Phenylalanine and Leucine--
Cells were washed and
incubated in 50 mM succinate/Tris buffer (pH 5.5), 2%
glucose with 10 µM [14C]phenylalanine or
[14C]leucine and with either KCl (1.25 M),
NaCl (1.25 M), or no extra salts added. Amino acid uptake
was measured during 2 min of incubation by liquid scintillation
counting as described (25).
Incorporation of
Phenylalanine--
[14C]Phenylalanine (10 µM) was added to the cultures after the 2-h incubation
period, and cells were further incubated. Samples were taken after 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min, mixed with trichloroacetic acid to a final
concentration of 10%, incubated on ice, and passed through 4.5-µm
nitrocellulose filters. Filters were washed with 10% trichloroacetic
acid and H2O and were then assayed for
[14C]phenylalanine activity by liquid scintillation
counting as above.
Measurement of Intracellular Cation Accumulations
Cells grown in YPD medium to mid-logarithmic phase were
supplemented with NaCl and incubated for an additional 120 min. The steady-state intracellular sodium and potassium concentrations were
measured by atomic absorption spectrometry after centrifugation, washing, and extraction of the cells as described (24).
A Transposon Insertion into the GCN2 Locus Causes NaCl
Tolerance--
In order to identify novel determinants of salt
tolerance in S. cerevisiae, we have designed a screening
based on the isolation of recessive, loss-of-function mutations
suppressing the salt sensitivity of ena1-4 disruptants in
medium supplemented with methionine. To this end we used a
transposon-tagging strategy in which the ena1-4 strain was
transformed with a mTn-lacZ/LEU2 mutagenized insertion library (21).
The ena1-4 strain was used to avoid the complex regulatory
system of this major determinant of salt tolerance (1), whereas
methionine supplementation bypasses the salt-sensitive Hal2p
phosphatase (18). Disruption mutants, which suppressed the salt
sensitivity of this strain, were isolated and designated sed
mutants, for suppression of ena by
disruption. In five out of seven tested sed
mutants so far, the phenotype was linked to the transposon insertion.
Identification of the insertion locus in the genome showed that these
five sed mutants were allelic and that the insertion
occurred 12 nucleotides upstream of the GCN2 open reading
frame (sed1 mutant, Fig.
1A) on chromosome IV. To
verify that this event resulted in a loss of GCN2 function, we constructed a gcn2 mutant by removing the complete
GCN2 open reading frame. The sed1 and the
gcn2 mutations suppress the Na+ sensitivity of
the ena1-4 strain to the same extent, indicating that the
transposon insertion in the proximal promoter region of GCN2
completely abolishes its activity (Fig. 1B).
Salt Tolerance of a gcn2 Strain Is Specific for Sodium and Is Not
Due to Altered Cation Accumulation--
GCN2 encodes a
protein kinase involved in translational regulation during amino acid
starvation, a regulatory pathway called the "general amino acid
control response" (12). The connection of this pathway with salt
tolerance could be mediated by the translation of some protein related
to either osmotic regulation or ion homeostasis. Further analysis of
the behavior of gcn2 mutants subjected to salinity or
osmotic stress revealed that the salt tolerance phenotype was specific
for Na+ ions (Fig. 2). No
increased tolerance to toxic concentrations of KCl or sorbitol was
observed. On the contrary, gcn2 mutants grew somewhat slower
in the presence of high concentrations of K+ ions. The same
phenotypes of the gcn2 mutation were observed in an
ENA1-4 strain (Fig. 2).
Sodium tolerance may be due to reduced intracellular Na+
accumulation, and therefore we measured steady-state levels of
intracellular sodium and potassium after a NaCl shock. As mentioned
above, the enhanced salt tolerance by loss of GCN2 function
is independent of the presence of ENA1, encoding the cation
extrusion pump that acts as the major determinant of salt tolerance in
S. cerevisiae. Although the efflux of Na+ from
yeast cells is mostly dependent on the Ena1p ATPase (26), activities of
other transporters like the H+-antiporter Nha1p (27), the
vacuolar H+-antiporter Nhx1p (28), the Trk1,2p
K+-transporter (24), or the Pma1p H+-ATPase
(17) might affect intracellular cation accumulation. However, as
indicated in Table I, steady-state levels
of intracellular sodium and potassium after the NaCl shock were not
significantly altered by loss of function of GCN2.
Accordingly the effects of loss of GCN2 function on yeast
salt tolerance could still be observed in nha1,
nhx1, or trk1,2 mutant strains (data not shown),
indicating that the known systems mediating sodium homeostasis are not
involved.
Loss of Function of GCN1 and GCN3 Also Causes Sodium
Tolerance--
It has been proposed that during amino acid starvation,
activation of the general amino acid control response due to eIF2
A similar genetic analysis was carried out using cells disrupted for
the GCN3 locus. During translation initiation eIF2 delivers the initiator methionyl-tRNA (tRNA Sodium Activates Gcn2p-dependent Phosphorylation of
eIF2 Loss of GCN2 Function Does Not Improve Translation Under Salt
Stress--
Although in yeast cells this is not very apparent, in
mammalian cells eIF2 Sodium Activates the Translational Control of GCN4
Expression--
In contrast with mammalian cells, in yeast the Gcn2
response, rather than regulating total protein synthesis, leads to
enhanced translation of a specific mRNA encoding Gcn4p, a
transcriptional activator of genes encoding amino acid biosynthetic
enzymes (12).
To determine whether the enhanced eIF2 GCN4 Activation Causes Salt Sensitivity--
In order to test the
hypothesis that the negative effect of GCN2 on salt
tolerance could be attributed to GCN4 activation, we used
three different genetic approaches. In the first approach, we checked
the salt tolerance of the gcd7-201 mutant (16).
GCD7 encodes the
In the second approach, we investigated the effect of loss of
CPC2 function in the W303-1A background. CPC2
encodes a G
The third approach was designed to test directly whether enhanced
GCN4 activity results in sodium sensitivity. In this
experiment a mutant GCN4 allele with only the first uORF
intact (thus lacking uORFs 2-4) was introduced in isogenic
gcn2 and GCN2 strains. This mutant allele
expresses GCN4 at a derepressed level, independent of
GCN2 function, and turns on amino acid biosynthetic genes
but does not affect translation (14). As shown in Fig. 7C,
introduction of this mutant allele in a gcn2 strain again
increased sodium sensitivity (compare p164 and p235). Here we show
results for the ena1-4 strain, but identical results were
also obtained in an ENA1-4 gcn4 strain (data not shown).
Testing the gcn2 phenotype in a gcn4 mutant is
complicated by the salt sensitivity of the latter (40). Nevertheless,
using a relatively low salt concentration (0.5 M NaCl), we
could not detect salt tolerance conferred by the gcn2
mutation in the gcn4 background (data not shown).
Altogether, these results demonstrate that elevated GCN4
activity causes sodium sensitivity.
Implication of HAL2 in the GCN2-mediated Sodium Toxicity--
The
activation of Gcn2 by sodium could be indirect, mediated by the known
target of sodium toxicity in yeast Hal2p (8). HAL2/MET22
encodes a nucleotidase that dephosphorylates PAP, an intermediate of
the sulfate assimilation pathway. This nucleotidase is inhibited by
Na+ but not by K+ (7). PAP accumulation during
salt stress inhibits sulfate assimilation into methionine and RNA
processing (8, 9). The observation that Na+ but not
K+ ions were able to induce Gcn2p-mediated eIF2
Three different experiments were performed. Since the HAL2
gene was identified in a genetic screening as a gene that confers salt
tolerance to yeast upon overexpression (18), the first experiment was
designed to analyze whether loss of GCN2 function could
benefit HAL2 expression levels. Comparison of Hal2p
accumulation levels by immunoblot analysis in cells grown in the
absence or presence of high concentrations of Na+ or
K+ clearly showed that this was not the case (Fig.
8A). On the contrary, Hal2p
levels were highest in GCN2 cells grown in the presence of
NaCl. This latter observation is consistent with the idea that NaCl
induces GCN4 expression and consequently also the expression of amino acid biosynthetic genes such as HAL2. In the second
experiment we wanted to control whether we could still observe enhanced
salt tolerance conferred by loss of GCN2 function in a
hal2 background. The increased salt sensitivity of the
hal2 mutant complicated this experiment, but nevertheless
loss of GCN2 function was able to increase salt tolerance to
some extent (Fig. 8B). Important, eIF2 High Salinity Induces the General Amino Acid Control
Response--
In the present study, a genetic screening for negative
determinants of yeast salt tolerance has led to the following
discoveries. (i) High salinity induces the Gcn2p-mediated
phosphorylation of eIF2
The mechanisms regulating this response under saline stress conditions
seem to be conserved with those operating during amino acid limiting
conditions because in both stress conditions the same factors seem to
be involved in the activation of the response (e.g. Gcn1p,
Gcn2p, eIF2 What Physiological Event Would Cause the Na+-mediated
Activation of the General Amino Acid Control Response?--
Protein
kinase Gcn2p is a multidomain protein that contains a region homologous
to histidyl-tRNA synthetases juxtaposed to the kinase catalytic moiety.
This domain regulates Gcn2p kinase function by monitoring the levels of
uncharged tRNAs accumulating during amino acid limitations (29-31).
Uncharged tRNAs were shown to bind directly with the HisRS-related
region, and mutations in this domain (gcn2-m2) that block
tRNA interaction also abolish the kinase function in vivo.
The fact that in contrast to the wild type GCN2 allele
neither the gcn2-m2 mutant allele nor the gcn2-K628R allele, mutated in the kinase catalytic domain,
could complement the salt tolerance phenotype caused by loss of
GCN2 function (data not shown) seems to confirm that in
response to saline stress this HisRS-related region also is responsible
for the induction of Gcn2p protein kinase activity.
It is reasonable to wonder whether the activation of Gcn2p during salt
stress is a consequence of amino acid limitations. Several authors (40,
41) have already reported on the strong inhibition of amino acid uptake
by high concentrations of Na+. However, as shown in the
present work, both high Na+ and K+
concentrations inhibit equally the rate of initial amino acid uptake.
This suggests that the rapid activation of the amino acid control
response by Na+, which does not occur with high
concentrations of K+, cannot solely be due to amino acid
starvation as a consequence of the decreased rate of amino acid uptake.
Consistent with this view is the finding that toxic concentrations of
Li+, which do not inhibit amino acid uptake (40), also
induce eIF2
Another hypothesis that could explain the rapid activation of the amino
acid control response upon salt stress is that high intracellular
Na+ concentrations somehow impede normal tRNA processing or
synthesis, creating defective tRNAs that can activate Gcn2p in the
absence of amino acid starvation (30, 46, 48, 49). Various antecedents for toxicity of Na+ or Li+ cations to RNA
processing are known. In the field of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase
recognition of tRNA, it has been reported that salts, such as sodium
chloride, can inhibit nucleoprotein complex formation and/or enzymatic
activity (50-54). PAP accumulation due to the salt-mediated inhibition
of Hal2p inhibits the 5' Why Does the Activation of the General Amino Acid Control Response
Negatively Affect Yeast Salt Tolerance?--
Yeast salt tolerance
seems to depend on three kinds of proteins as follows: cation
transporters, regulators of these transporters, and cation toxicity
targets (1). Loss of GCN2 function does not seem to
up-regulate members of the first two categories as Na+ and
K+ intracellular accumulation after a NaCl shock was not
significantly altered by loss of GCN2 function. The only
identified and probably most important in vivo target of
lithium and sodium toxicity in yeast identified so far is the
nucleotidase Hal2p (7, 8). Overexpression of Hal2p confers salt
resistance in yeast (18). However, Hal2p accumulation levels were not
increased by loss of GCN2 function, and both the salt
tolerance conferred by the gcn2 mutation and the
Gcn2p-mediated phosphorylation of eIF2
The most plausible possibility is that overexpression of many of the
amino acid biosynthetic genes due to overactivation of the Gcn2p-Gcn4p
pathway is harmful for yeast growth during salt stress conditions and
may create certain metabolic problems. Several observations support
this hypothesis as follows. (i) In the gcn2 strain induction
of GCN4 expression by salt stress is almost completely abolished, and Gcn4p stays more or less present at basal levels. (ii)
Overexpressing GCN4 to derepressed levels without affecting translation initiation renders sodium sensitivity to gcn2
strains. (iii) A cpc2 mutation that leads to high
transcriptional activity of Gcn4p without increasing GCN4
expression itself (39) negatively affects yeast salt tolerance.
However, elevated GCN4 expression may not be sufficient to
fully account for the salt-sensitive phenotype, and a Gcn2p-mediated decrease in translational efficiency, although modest, may also contribute. In yeast eIF2
Consequently, it cannot be excluded that each of the above discussed
aspects participates in some way, and therefore salt tolerance
conferred by loss of GCN2 function may reflect the outcome of a sensitive balance between counteracting cellular processes. For
example, it has been demonstrated recently that the presence of the
GCN4 gene is vital for yeast growth under NaCl or KCl stress (40). We may hypothesize that there is a balance between the effects of
two independent phenomena: the positive effect of the Gcn2p-Gcn4p
pathway on salt tolerance and the toxic overactivation by
Na+ of this pathway. This leads to the apparent
contradictory situation that the gcn4 mutation renders cells
highly salt-sensitive, whereas the gcn2 mutation confers
NaCl tolerance. A final point is that, given the conservation of the
Gcn2p-eIF2
-subunit of eukaryotic
initiation factor 2 (eIF2
) is a conserved mechanism regulating
protein synthesis in response to various stresses. A screening for
negative factors in yeast salt stress tolerance has led to the
identification of Gcn2p, the single yeast eIF2
kinase that is
activated by amino acid starvation in the general amino acid control
response. Mutation of other components of this regulatory circuit such
as GCN1 and GCN3 also resulted in improved NaCl
tolerance. The gcn2 phenotype was not accompanied by
changes in sodium or potassium homeostasis. NaCl induced a
Gcn2p-dependent phosphorylation of eIF2
and
translational activation of Gcn4p, the transcription factor that
mediates the general amino acid control response. Mutations that
activate Gcn4p function, such as gcd7-201,
cpc2, and deletion of the translational regulatory region
of the GCN4 gene, also cause salt sensitivity. It can be
postulated that sodium activation of the Gcn2p pathway has toxic
effects on growth under NaCl stress and that this novel mechanism of
sodium toxicity may be of general significance in eukaryotes.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2
) at serine 51 (10, 11). In yeast this regulatory pathway is activated when cells are
subjected to amino acid or purine starvation and is called the general
amino acid control (12). Yeast Gcn2 protein kinase regulates the
translation of a single mRNA species, encoding Gcn4p, a transcriptional
activator of genes involved in the synthesis of amino acids. This
regulation is mediated by four short open reading frames (uORFs) in the
leader of the GCN4 mRNA, which renders GCN4
expression hypersensitive to the levels of active eIF2 in the cell. In
cells not limiting for amino acids and thus with abundant active eIF2,
the uORFs block GCN4 translation. In cells deprived of an
amino acid or purine, Gcn2p phosphorylation of eIF2
leads to reduced
active eIF2 levels, which alleviates the inhibitory effects of the
uORFs and allows increased GCN4 translation. Here we present
a link between this regulatory pathway and the response to salinity
stress. We demonstrate that salt stress induces the general amino acid control response and postulate that (over)activation of this pathway results in some toxic effect that inhibits growth under NaCl stress. The conserved nature of the Gcn2p pathway suggests that this mechanism of sodium toxicity may be of general significance in eukaryotes.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
leu2-3,112 ura3-52) background
and have been described previously (16). All other strains were derived
from the W303-1A (Mata ade 2-1 can1-100
his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1) or W303-1B
(Mat
) background. Strains SKY697 and AG86 have been obtained by disrupting the ENA1-4 open reading frames
and have been described elsewhere (17). A
hal2::URA3 disruption cassette (18) was
used to generate the hal2 mutants, whereas cpc2,
gcn1, gcn2, and gcn3 mutants were
generated by replacing the respective open reading frames with a
loxP-kanMX-loxp disruption cassette following the method
described by Güldener et al. (19).
--
Strains were grown in liquid YPD
medium to mid-logarithmic phase and then shifted to fresh minimal SD
medium without any amino acid supplements or YPD medium with NaCl (1.25 M) or KCl (1.25 M) as indicated. Protein
extraction, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Western blotting
with the ECL Plus detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), using
either a polyclonal antibody that specifically recognizes eIF2
phosphorylated at serine 51 or a polyclonal antibody that recognizes
both phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of eIF2
, were
executed as described (22). The MacBas version 2.5 software was used to
quantify the optical density of the eIF2
bands on scanned autoradiographs.
-Galactosidase Assay
-galactosidase activity was performed as described (23).
-Galactosidase activity was measured during a period of 10 h following shift of medium.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A transposon insertion into the
GCN2 locus causes NaCl tolerance. A
shows a schematic representation of the chromosome IV (Chrom.
IV) region between positions 1,022,500 and 1,032,500 in the
sed1 strain. Both chromosomal strands (W and
C) with their most important features, including open
reading frames (YDR282c, GCN2, and DPP1, c-strand) and a solo
-long
terminal repeat of a transposon (LTR, w-strand), are shown.
The broken arrow indicates the mTn-lacZ/LEU2 insertion at 12 base pairs from the GCN2 open reading frame. B shows a drop
test assay of gcn2 mutants. Strain AG86 (GCN2)
and its derivatives AG209 (gcn2) and AG183 (sed1)
were grown in liquid YPD medium to saturation, and serial dilutions
were dropped on YPD plates with or without 0.5 M NaCl.
Growth was recorded after 2 days in the absence of stress or after 5 days in the presence of NaCl.

View larger version (119K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The tolerance phenotype of a gcn2
mutant is specific for sodium and is independent of a functional
ENA1-4 locus. Strains AG86 (ena1-4
GCN2) and W303-1A (ENA1-4 GCN2) and their respective
derivatives AG209 (ena1-4 gcn2) and AG207 (ENA1-4
gcn2) were grown in liquid YPD medium to saturation, and serial
dilutions were dropped on YPD plates with either NaCl (0.5 and 1.25 M for ena1-4 and ENA1-4 strains,
respectively), KCl (1 M), or sorbitol (1.5 M),
as indicated. Growth was recorded after 2 days in the absence of stress
and in the presence of sorbitol or KCl and after 5 days in the presence
of NaCl.
Lack of effect of loss of GCN2 function on cation accumulation by yeast
cellsa
phosphorylation by Gcn2p is induced by uncharged tRNA (29-31). GCN2 function in vivo also requires
GCN1 and GCN20, encoding two proteins that form a
complex that associates with ribosomes, physically interacts with
Gcn2p, and is proposed to mediate activation of Gcn2p protein kinase in
response to elevated levels of uncharged tRNA (32, 33). To determine
whether this complex is also responsible for the negative effect of
GCN2 on salt tolerance, we constructed gcn1
mutant strains. Loss of function of GCN1 increased sodium tolerance in both ena1-4 and ENA1-4 cells to
the same extent as loss of GCN2 function (Fig.
3).

View larger version (77K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Loss of function of GCN1 and
GCN3 also causes sodium tolerance. Strains AG86
(ena1-4 GCN2) and W303-1A (ENA1-4 GCN2) and
their respective derivatives AG209 (ena1-4 gcn2), AG247
(ena1-4 gcn1), AG248 (ena1-4 gcn3), AG207
(ENA1-4 gcn2), AG249 (ENA1-4 gcn1), and AG250
(ENA1-4 gcn3) were grown in liquid YPD medium to
saturation, and serial dilutions were dropped on YPD plates with or
without NaCl (0.5 and 1.25 M for ena1-4 and
ENA1-4 strains, respectively). Growth was recorded after 2 days in the absence of stress or after 5 days in the presence of
NaCl.


by Gcn2p converts eIF2 from a substrate to an inhibitor of
eIF2B, thereby blocking or lowering ternary complex formation. GCN3 encodes the
-subunit of eIF2B and as such forms part
of the regulatory subcomplex in eIF2B that mediates inhibition of the
guanine nucleotide exchange function by phosphorylated eIF2
(34-36). As in the case of GCN1 and GCN2, loss
of GCN3 function also increased sodium tolerance (Fig. 3).
These results suggest that the initial participants of the general
amino acid control response somehow negatively affect yeast salt tolerance.
at Serine 51--
It has been described that constitutive
activation of the Gcn2p kinase in the GCN2c-517 dominant
mutant allele results in growth inhibition (37). Therefore, it seemed
plausible that the negative effect of Gcn2p during Na+
stress could be due to (over)activation of the kinase. This possibility was explored by determining whether saline stress enhances
phosphorylation of eIF2
, a known physiological substrate of the
Gcn2p kinase. Experiments were carried out by immunoblot analysis
following the method described by Yang et al. (22), using
polyclonal antibodies that either specifically recognize eIF2
phosphorylated at serine 51 or that recognize both phosphorylated and
non-phosphorylated eIF2
(Fig. 4). As
expected, high extracellular NaCl concentrations increased eIF2
phosphorylation. This phosphorylation was entirely Gcn2p dependent
since in gcn2 cells there was no detectable phosphorylation of eIF2
. The increase in phosphorylation was detectable 15 min after
mid-logarithmic phase cells were shifted to medium containing NaCl and
was visible for at least 24 h (data not shown). The highest ratio
of phosphorylated to non-phosphorylated eIF2
was observed after
1 h following the shift to medium containing NaCl. This phenomenon
is apparently due to the toxicity of the Na+ ions and not
to an osmotic effect since equivalent concentrations (with respect to
osmolarity) of KCl (and sorbitol, data not shown) did not evoke
increased phosphorylation of eIF2
(Fig. 4).

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Sodium stress induces phosphorylation of
eIF2
in yeast. Strain W303-1A
(GCN2) and its derivative AG207 (gcn2) were grown
in liquid YPD medium to mid-logarithmic phase and then shifted to
minimal SD medium without any amino acid supplements or YPD medium with
NaCl (1.25 M) or KCl (1.25 M). Cells were
further incubated, and aliquots were analyzed at the indicated times
(i.e. minutes following the shift of medium) for eIF2
phosphorylation at serine 51. I-III, respectively, show the
measurement of eIF2
levels using a polyclonal antibody that
recognizes both phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of eIF2
,
the immunoblot analysis with a polyclonal antibody that specifically
recognizes eIF2
phosphorylated at serine 51, and the fold increase
in the ratio of phosphorylated to total eIF2
, relative to the value
at time 0. The experiments were repeated twice with similar
results.
phosphorylation can lead to a severe
down-regulation of the translation initiation rate and consequently of
total protein synthesis (11). Therefore, we wanted to determine whether
translation efficiency under salt stress is improved in gcn2
cells and whether this could explain the salt tolerance phenotype. To
this end, we measured incorporation of radioactive labeled
phenylalanine into proteins in GCN2 and gcn2
strains in the presence of high Na+ concentrations (Fig.
5A). As a control we performed
the same measurements in medium with an equivalent concentration of
K+ instead of normal medium since under these conditions
the rate of amino acid uptake is similar to that in
Na+-supplemented medium (Fig. 5B). Also, during
the period of the assay in both conditions cells suffer a similar
temporary growth arrest (data not shown). Incorporation of
phenylalanine was scored following a 2-h preincubation period in the
presence of the salts to allow the cells to reach steady-state levels
of intracellular cation concentrations. Under these conditions
Na+ ions were found to inhibit translation substantially
more than K+ ions. However, and most importantly, no
significant differences in translation efficiency under salt stress
conditions were observed between GCN2 and gcn2
cells (Fig. 5A), suggesting that the salt tolerance
phenotype of gcn2 mutants cannot be attributed to a general
improvement of translation initiation.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of salt stress on amino acid
incorporation into proteins (A) and uptake into cells
(B). Yeast cells were grown in liquid SD medium
to mid-logarithmic phase, shifted to fresh SD medium with either KCl
(1.25 M) or NaCl (1.25 M), and incubated for
2 h more. Subsequently, amino acid uptake and incorporation assays
were performed. A, yeast strain W303-1A (GCN2,
closed symbols) and its derivative AG207 (gcn2,
open symbols) were assayed for 60 min for phenylalanine
(Phe) incorporation into proteins in the presence of either
KCl (squares) or NaCl (triangles). B
yeast wild type cells (W303-1A) were assayed for the initial rate of
phenylalanine (Phe) and leucine (Leu) uptake by the cells in the
absence of salts (open bar) and in the presence of NaCl
(hatched bar) or KCl (filled bar). Values are
indicated as pmol/mg cells (A) and pmol/min/mg cells
(B), respectively, and represent the average of two
independent measurements differing less than 10%.
phosphorylation induced by
toxic Na+ levels leads to translational stimulation of
GCN4 expression, we measured
-galactosidase activity in
W303-1A cells, transformed with a plasmid expressing a
GCN4-lacZ fusion containing all four uORFs, under different
stress conditions (Fig. 6). As a positive control we used cells grown to mid-logarithmic phase in SD medium supplemented with all amino acids, which then were shifted to SD medium
without any amino acid supplement. This strategy to induce amino acid
starvation was used instead of the more common method of using toxic
amino acid analogues due to the incompatibility with the amino acid
auxotrophies of the W303-1A strain. Nevertheless, in this way
GCN4 expression could also be induced with similar kinetics
as reported previously (38) for 3-aminotriazole-induced starvation.
Accordingly, Gcn2p-dependent eIF2
phosphorylation was
also enhanced using this strategy (Fig. 4). As expected, when cells
were shifted to medium with NaCl, GCN4 expression was
induced, whereas a shift to medium with an equivalent concentration of KCl did not induce GCN4 expression. Comparison of
-galactosidase activities in NaCl-stressed GCN2 or
gcn2 cells showed that the GCN4 expression was
largely Gcn2p-dependent, as is also the case for amino
acid-starved cells. GCN4 induction was detected ~4 h after
the shift to medium with NaCl and increased to higher levels than those
obtained by amino acid starvation.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Kinetics of expression of a
GCN4::lacZ fusion upon
shift to salt stress conditions. Strain W303-1A (GCN2,
closed symbols) and its derivative AG207 (gcn2,
open symbols), both transformed with the
p180[GCN4::lacZ URA3] plasmid, were
grown in liquid minimal SD medium with all amino acids supplemented to
mid-logarithmic phase and then shifted to fresh SD medium without any
amino acid supplements (circles) or SD medium with all amino
acid supplements and either KCl (1.25 M,
squares) or NaCl (1.25 M, triangles).
-Galactosidase activity was scored every 2 h for 10 h
after the shift of medium for the GCN2 strain, whereas for
the gcn2 strain
-galactosidase activity was assayed at
three time points, 0, 3, and 9 h following the shift of medium.
Time is indicated in hours and
-galactosidase activity as units of
enzyme activity (nmol/min/mg protein). Values represent the average of
at least three independent measurements differing less than 10%.
-subunit of eIF2B that with Gcn3p and
Gcd2p forms a regulatory subcomplex that mediates inhibition of eIF2B
exchange function by phosphorylated eIF2
(34). The
gcd7-201 mutation elevates GCN4 expression levels
(16) and, as indicated in Fig. 7A, this results in decreased
salt tolerance. Deletion of GCN2 in this mutant background
improved salt tolerance.

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Activation of GCN4
function causes sodium sensitivity. Strain H1727 (GCN2
GCD7) and its derivatives H1725 (GCN2 gcd7-201) and
H1794 (gcn2 gcd7-201) (A), strain W303-1A
(GCN2 CPC2) and its derivatives AG254 (GCN2 cpc2)
and AG255 (gcn2 cpc2) (B), and strain AG86
(ena1-4 GCN2) and its derivative AG209 (ena1-4
gcn2) transformed with plasmids p16[YCp50],
p164[YCp50-GCN4], or p235[YCp50-'ORF1-only-GCN4'] (C)
were grown in liquid YPD medium to saturation, and serial dilutions
were dropped on YPD plates with or without NaCl (1.25 M in A and B and 0.5 M in
C). Growth was recorded after 2 days in the
absence of stress or after 5 days in the presence of NaCl.
-like WD protein that is required for the inhibition of
Gcn4p transcriptional activity in the absence of amino acid starvation
(39). The cpc2 mutation leads to increased transcription of
Gcn4p-dependent genes under non-starvation conditions
without increasing GCN4 expression. Again we found a
negative effect on salt tolerance, and this could also be counteracted
by additionally deleting the GCN2 gene in the
cpc2 mutant (Fig. 7B).
phosphorylation led us to determine whether HAL2 is
implicated in the GCN2-mediated sodium toxicity.
phosphorylation
following the shift to medium with NaCl is still observed in a
hal2 mutant strain and with similar kinetics as in the
HAL2 strain (data not shown). This suggests that the presence of HAL2 is not a requisite for the activation of
the Gcn2p kinase and that loss of HAL2 function does not
abolish this activation.

View larger version (68K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Implication of HAL2 in the
GCN2-mediated sodium toxicity. A,
Hal2p accumulation in salt-stressed yeast cells depends on
GCN2. Yeast strain W303-1A (GCN2) and its
derivative AG207 (gcn2) were grown to mid-logarithmic phase
in liquid-rich medium either in the absence of salts (YPD) or in the
presence of KCl (1.25 M) or NaCl (1.25 M).
Upper and lower panels, respectively, show the
Ponceau-stained nitrocellulose blot and the immunoblot analysis with
the polyclonal antibody recognizing Hal2p. As a control a protein
extract of AG258 (W303-1A hal2) cells was added. Lane
M contains marker proteins to which purified Hal2p was added. The
molecular mass (in kDa) and the position of Hal2p
(arrowhead) are indicated at the left and the
right of the figure, respectively. B, salt
tolerance of gcn2 mutants is independent of a functional
HAL2 gene. Strain AG86 (ena1-4 HAL2 GCN2) and
its derivatives AG267 (ena1-4 hal2 GCN2), AG268
(ena1-4 hal2 gcn2), and AG209 (ena1-4 HAL2
gcn2) were grown in liquid YPD medium to saturation, and serial
dilutions were dropped on YPD plates with or without NaCl (0.2 M). Growth was recorded after 2 days in the absence of
stress or after 5 days in the presence of NaCl.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and thereby activates the translational
control of GCN4. (ii) This response negatively affects salt
tolerance. The former observation again underscores the statement made
by Yang et al. (22) that induction of Gcn2p activity and
GCN4 translational control occurs in response to a wider
spectrum of nutrient deprivations than was previously thought. This
phenomenon was originally found to occur when yeast cells are subjected
to amino acid starvation (42). Later it was found that purine
starvation (43) and, more recently, glucose limitation (22) could also
induce the general amino acid control response. Alternate pathways
activated by various stress situations that induce GCN4
mRNA translation without the requirement of a functional Gcn2p
kinase have also been described (44-46).
, eIF2B, and Gcn4p). However, as is also the case for the
response to glucose limitation, there are some differences in the
regulatory mechanisms in response to amino acid starvation and high
salinity, the most important being the delay in time between activation
of Gcn2p and activation of Gcn4p. In the case of starvation for amino
acids and glucose both events are tightly linked in time and can be
detected almost simultaneously. This delay might reflect the temporary
growth arrest, which yeast cells suffer when transferred to media with
high NaCl concentrations and which is necessary for cells to adapt to
the new and severe growth conditions. During this period translation is
drastically reduced as can be deduced from Fig. 5A and from
the down-shift in expression of genes encoding ribosomal proteins or
other proteins involved in translation (47). This might affect de
novo translation of GCN4 mRNA, whereas a signal
transduction process with factors that do not need de novo
synthesis, such as phosphorylation of eIF2
by the Gcn2 protein
kinase, could still proceed.
phosphorylation (data not shown).
3'-exoribonucleases Xrn1p and Rat1p, and
consequently 5' processing of the 5.8 S rRNA and small nucleolar RNAs,
degradation of pre-rRNA spacer fragments, and mRNA turnover are
inhibited. Lithium also inhibits the activity of RNase MRP by a
mechanism that is not mediated by PAP (9). Interestingly,
overexpression of the NME1 gene coding for the RNA component
of the MRP ribonuclease, which causes improper 5.8 S ribosomal
RNA maturation and which could thus affect ribosomal biogenesis and
translation initiation, can stimulate GCN4 mRNA translation (45, 46).
induced by sodium seemed to
be independent of HAL2. Also, overactivation of the sulfur
amino acid biosynthetic pathway and thus a potential increase in PAP
accumulation cannot (solely) account for the observed phenotypes. For
example, loss of function of MET16 could not enhance yeast
salt tolerance (data not shown). Expression of MET16,
encoding the reductase that converts 3'-phospho-5'-adenylylsulfate to
sulfite, the biosynthetic step in which PAP is also generated as a
by-product, is also regulated by Gcn4p (55, 56). Apparently, salt
tolerance caused by loss of GCN2 function cannot be simply
explained by a single-gene model but instead may rely on a more general
and complex effect on gene expression.
phosphorylation does not lead to a severe
down-regulation of total protein synthesis, but a transient decrease in
the rate of translational initiation and amino acid incorporation
following the removal of amino acids from the growth medium could be
observed (57). Although in our amino acid incorporation assay we could
not detect an effect of loss of GCN2 function on general
translation efficiency under salt stress, some observations impede us
to reject this possibility. First, loss of GCN2 function improved salt tolerance in the gcd7-201 background, although
in the general amino acid control pathway GCD7 is epistatic
to GCN2 (16); and second, overexpressing GCN4 to
derepressed levels without affecting translation initiation
dramatically reduces salt tolerance although not to the level of wild
type yeast cells.
stress pathway in eukaryotes, the fact that sodium
induction of this pathway mediates sodium toxicity may be of general significance.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Alan G. Hinnebusch for kindly providing yeast strains and plasmids and critically reviewing the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Recipient of a Marie Curie Research training grant from the European Commission (Brussels, Belgium). Present address: Dept. Plantengenetica, Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie, Universiteit Gent, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
Fellow of the Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (Madrid, Spain).
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Instituto de Biologia Molecular y Celular de Plantas, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia-C.S.I.C., Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain. Tel.: 34-963877883; Fax: 34-963877859; E-mail: serrano@ibmcp.upv.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 14, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102960200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PAP, 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphate; eIF2, eukaryotic initiation factor 2; uORF, upstream open reading frame.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Serrano, R., Mulet, J. M., Rios, G., Marquez, J. A., de Larrinoa, I. F., Leube, M. P., Mendizabal, I., Pascual-Ahuir, A., Proft, M., Ros, R., and Montesinos, C. (1999) J. Exp. Bot. 50, 1023-1036 |
| 2. | Hohmann, S. (1997) in Yeast Stress Responses (Hohmann, S. , and Mager, W. H., eds) , pp. 101-145, R. G. Landes Co., Austin, TX |
| 3. | Brewster, J. L., de Valoir, T., Dwyer, N. D., Winter, E., and Gustin, M. C. (1993) Science 259, 1760-1763 |
| 4. | Thevelein, J. M. (1994) Yeast 10, 1753-1790 |
| 5. | Marquez, J. A., and Serrano, R. (1996) FEBS Lett. 382, 89-92 |
| 6. | Norbeck, J., and Blomberg, A. (1998) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 158, 121-126 |
| 7. | Murguia, J. R., Bellés, J. M., and Serrano, R. (1995) Science 267, 232-234 |
| 8. | Murguia, J. R., Bellés, J. M., and Serrano, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29029-29033 |
| 9. | Dichtl, B., Stevens, A., and Tollervey, D. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 7184-7195 |
| 10. | Hershey, J. W. B. (1991) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 717-755 |
| 11. | de Haro, C., Mendéz, R., and Santoyo, J. (1997) FASEB J. 10, 1378-1387 |
| 12. | Hinnebusch, A. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21661-21664 |
| 13. | Hinnebusch, A. G. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 2349-2360 |
| 14. | Mueller, P. P., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1986) Cell 45, 201-207 |
| 15. | Gietz, R. D., Schiestl, R. H., Willems, A. R., and Woods, R. A. (1995) Yeast 11, 355-360 |
| 16. | Bushman, J. L., Asuru, A. I., Matts, R. L., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1920-1932 |
| 17. | Goossens, A., de la Fuente, N., Forment, J., Serrano, R., and Portillo, F. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 7654-7661 |
| 18. | Gläser, H. U., Thomas, D., Gaxiola, R., Montrichard, F., Surdin-Kerjan, Y., and Serrano, R. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 3105-3110 |
| 19. | Güldener, U., Heck, S., Fiedler, T., Beinhauer, J., and Hegemann, J. H. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2519-2524 |
| 20. | Guthrie, C., and Fink, G. R. (eds) (1991) Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology , Academic Press, Inc., New York |
| 21. | Burns, N., Grimwade, B., Ross-Macdonald, P. B., Choi, E. Y., Finberg, K., Roeder, G. S., and Snyder, M. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 1087-1105 |
| 22. | Yang, R., Wek, S. A., and Wek, R. C. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2706-2717 |
| 23. | Gaxiola, R., de Larrinoa, I. F., Villalba, J. M., and Serrano, R. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3157-3164 |
| 24. | Mulet, J. M., Leube, M. P., Kron, S. J., Rios, G., Fink, G. R., and Serrano, R. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3328-3337 |
| 25. | Vallejo, C. G., and Serrano, R. (1989) Yeast 5, 307-319 |
| 26. | Haro, R., Garciadeblas, B., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (1991) FEBS Lett. 291, 189-191 |
| 27. | Prior, C., Potier, S., Souciet, J. L., and Sychrova, H. (1996) FEBS Lett. 387, 89-93 |
| 28. | Nass, R., Cunningham, K. W., and Rao, R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26145-26152 |
| 29. | Wek, R. C., Jackson, B. M., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 4579-4583 |
| 30. | Wek, S. A., Zhu, S., and Wek, R. C. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4497-4506 |
| 31. | Dong, J., Qiu, H., Garcia-Barrio, M., Anderson, J., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 269-279 |
| 32. | Vazquez de Aldana, C. R., Marton, M. J., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3184-1399 |
| 33. | Garcia-Barrio, M., Dong, J., Ufano, S., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 1887-1899 |
| 34. | Yang, W., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6603-6616 |
| 35. | Pavitt, G. D., Yang, W., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1298-1313 |
| 36. | Pavitt, G. D., Ramaiah, K. V., Kimball, S. R., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 514-526 |
| 37. | Dever, T. E., Feng, L., Wek, R. C., Cigan, A. M., Donahue, T. F., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1992) Cell 68, 585-596 |
| 38. | Albrecht, G., Mösch, H. U., Hoffman, B., Reusser, U., and Braus, G. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12696-12702 |
| 39. | Hoffmann, B., Mösch, H. U., Sattlegger, E., Barthelmess, I. B., Hinnebusch, A. G., and Braus, G. H. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 31, 807-822 |
| 40. | Pascual-Ahuir, A., Serrano, R., and Proft, M. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 16-25 |
| 41. | Norbeck, J., and Blomberg, A. (2000) Yeast 16, 121-137 |
| 42. | Hinnebusch, A. G. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 6442-6446 |
| 43. | Rolfes, R. J., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 5099-5111 |
| 44. | Engelberg, D., Klein, C., Martinetto, H., Struhl, K., and Karin, M. (1994) Cell 77, 381-390 |
| 45. | Tavernarakis, N., Alexandraki, D., Liodis, P., Tzamarias, D., and Thireos, G. (1996) Gene (Amst.) 179, 271-277 |
| 46. | Qiu, H., Hu, C., Anderson, J., Björk, G. R., Sarkar, S., Hopper, A. K., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2505-2516 |
| 47. | Rep, M., Krantz, M., Thevelein, J. M., and Hohmann, S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8290-8300 |
| 48. | Lanker, S., Bushman, J. L, Hinnebusch, A. G., Trachsel, H., and Mueller, P. (1992) Cell 70, 647-657 |
| 49. | Vazquez de Aldana, C. R., Wek, R. C., Segundo, P. S., Truesdell, A. G., and Hinnebusch, A. G. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7920-7932 |
| 50. | Smith, D. W. E. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 896-901 |
| 51. | Sein, K. T., and Becarevic, A. (1971) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 145, 164-168 |
| 52. | Bonnet, J., and Ebel, J. P. (1975) Eur. J. Biochem. 58, 193-201 |
| 53. | Bonnet, J., Renaud, M., Raffin, J. P., and Remy, P. (1975) FEBS Lett. 53, 154-158 |
| 54. | Florentz, C., Kern, D., and Giege, R. (1990) FEBS Lett. 261, 335-338 |
| 55. | O'Connell, K. F., Surdin-Kerjan, Y., and Baker, R. E. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1879-1888 |
| 56. | Jia, M. H., Larossa, R. A., Lee, J. M., Rafalski, A., Derose, E., Gonye, G., and Xue, Z. (2000) Physiol. Genomics 3, 83-92 |
| 57. | Tzamarias, D., Roussou, I., and Thireos, G. (1989) Cell 57, 947-954 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Melamed, L. Pnueli, and Y. Arava Yeast translational response to high salinity: Global analysis reveals regulation at multiple levels RNA, July 1, 2008; 14(7): 1337 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-L. Todeschini, C. Condon, and L. Benard Sodium-induced GCN4 Expression Controls the Accumulation of the 5' to 3' RNA Degradation Inhibitor, 3'-Phosphoadenosine 5'-Phosphate J. Biol. Chem., February 10, 2006; 281(6): 3276 - 3282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Steffensen and P. A. Pedersen Heterologous Expression of Membrane and Soluble Proteins Derepresses GCN4 mRNA Translation in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2006; 5(2): 248 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Ventoso, M. A. Sanz, S. Molina, J. J. Berlanga, L. Carrasco, and M. Esteban Translational resistance of late alphavirus mRNA to eIF2{alpha} phosphorylation: a strategy to overcome the antiviral effect of protein kinase PKR Genes & Dev., January 1, 2006; 20(1): 87 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Conesa, R. Ruotolo, P. Soularue, T. A. Simms, D. Donze, A. Sentenac, and G. Dieci Modulation of Yeast Genome Expression in Response to Defective RNA Polymerase III-Dependent Transcription Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2005; 25(19): 8631 - 8642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|