|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M010290200 on May 29, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 33, 31186-31192, August 17, 2001
Crystal Structure of Mannanase 26A from Pseudomonas
cellulosa and Analysis of Residues Involved in Substrate
Binding*
Deborah
Hogg ,
Eui-Jeon
Woo§,
David N.
Bolam ,
Vincent
A.
McKie ,
Harry J.
Gilbert , and
Richard W.
Pickersgill§¶
From the Department of Biological and
Nutritional Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 7RU, United Kingdom and the § School of Biological
Sciences, Medical Sciences Building, Queen Mary, University of London,
Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
Received for publication, November 13, 2000, and in revised form, May 29, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The crystal structure of
Pseudomonas cellulosa mannanase 26A has been solved by
multiple isomorphous replacement and refined at 1.85 Å resolution to
an R-factor of 0.182 (R-free = 0.211). The
enzyme comprises ( / )8-barrel architecture with two
catalytic glutamates at the ends of -strands 4 and 7 in precisely
the same location as the corresponding glutamates in other
4/7-superfamily glycoside hydrolase enzymes (clan GH-A glycoside
hydrolases). The family 26 glycoside hydrolases are therefore members
of clan GH-A. Functional analyses of mannanase 26A, informed by the
crystal structure of the enzyme, provided important insights into the role of residues close to the catalytic glutamates. These data showed
that Trp-360 played a critical role in binding substrate at the 1
subsite, whereas Tyr-285 was important to the function of the
nucleophile catalyst. His-211 in mannanase 26A does not have the same
function as the equivalent asparagine in the other GH-A enzymes. The
data also suggest that Trp-217 and Trp-162 are important for the
activity of mannanase 26A against mannooligosaccharides but are less
important for activity against polysaccharides.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mannan is a major matrix polysaccharide in the cell walls of
angiosperms, and comprises a backbone of -1,4-linked mannose units
(in glucomannans the backbone consists of mannose and glucose residues), which are decorated with galactose and acetate residues depending on its origin (1). Endo- 1,4-mannanases
(mannanases), which play a pivotal role in the cleavage of the backbone
of mannans and glucomannans (2), have been isolated from plants (3), anaerobic (4) and aerobic fungi (5), and eubacteria (6, 7). Hydrophobic
cluster analysis and comparison of the sequences of these enzymes have
been used to assign the mannanases to glycoside hydrolase
(GH)1 families 5 and
26.2 Both enzyme families
cleave the glycosidic bonds by a double displacement mechanism (9-11).
Family 26 consists mainly of mannanases and includes Pseudomonas
cellulosa mannanase 26A (Pc Man26A). Endo-acting cellulases and
mannanases are the major enzymes in family 5; recently the structure of
a family 5 mannanase from Thermomonospora fusca (Tf Man5A)
was solved (12). Family 5 glycoside hydrolases are members of the
4/7-superfamily of glycoside hydrolases (also known as clan G-HA (13,
14)), and it has been suggested that family 26 glycoside hydrolases
(GH26) also belong to this superfamily (11). Three highly conserved
residues in this superfamily are an adjacent Asn-Glu pair at the end of
-strand 4 and a Glu at the end of -strand 7, although GH26
mannanases have histidine substituted in place of the asparagine. The
importance of the substitution of an asparagine for a histidine in GH26
enzymes is unclear. To determine whether GH26 enzymes are members of
the GH-A clan, and to investigate the role of amino acids in the active site of these glycoside hydrolases, the three-dimensional structure of
Pc Man26A was solved and a series of substrate-binding site mutants characterized.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Enzyme Expression, Purification, and Crystallization--
Pc
Man26A expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21 (Novagen)
containing the plasmid pDB1 was purified to homogeneity in a single
step using anion exchange chromatography (11). Single crystals were
grown by the hanging drop method initially using Hampton Crystal Screen
Kits to search for appropriate conditions.
DNA Sequencing--
The carboxyl-terminal 49 amino acids of Pc
Man26A did not fit the electron density map, and the sequence of the
3'-end of the Pc Man26A gene (man26A) was therefore
redetermined using an ABI dye-terminator kit and an ABI373 automatic
sequencer. pDB1, which comprises the region of man26A
encoding the mature mannanase cloned into
NdeI/SalI-restricted pET21a (Novagen; Ref. 11), served as the template DNA and the vector's T7 terminator sequence as
the primer. The data clearly showed that the previously determined sequence of man26A (7), was incorrect and that there was an additional C at position 1090 (nucleotide 1 is the A of the ATG initiation codon), resulting in a change in the reading frame at the
3'-end of the gene. The revised sequence of mature Pc Man26A, which is
shown in Table I, could easily be fitted
to the electron density map.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
The primary structure of Pc Man26A
Residues 1-28 of PC Man26A comprise the signal peptide. A mature form
of Pc Man26A consisting of residues Arg-39 (underlined) to Lys-423 was
used for crystallization and subsequent x-ray analysis. The revised
carboxyl terminus is displayed in bold type.
|
|
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
Mutants of man26A were
generated using the Quick Change kit supplied by Stratagene.
Appropriate mutations were generated by using the following
primers (and their complementary sequences): W217A,
5'-CACGAAAATACCGGATCCGCGTTCTGGTGGGG-3'; W156A,
5'-CCAAAAGGGCGTAGCGCCCGTTGGTACCTCCTGGGATCAAAC-3'; W162A,
5'-CGTTGGCACTTCTGCAGATCAAACCCCG-3'; W360A,
5'-GATTGCCTTCCTACTAGTAGCGCGCAATGCCCGC-3'; D283A,
5'-GTACTGGGATTTGCTACGTATGGCCCGGTGG-3'; D283H,
5'-GTACTGGGATTTCATACGTATGGCCCGGTGG-3'; H211N,
5'-CTTTCGCCTGTACAACGAAAATACCGG-3'; H211A,
5'-CTTTCGCCTGTACGCCGAAAATACCGGC-3'; Y285A,
5'-GGGATTTGATACTGCAGGCCCGGTGGCG-3'; H143A,
5'-ACGGTGAGCTCGGCTTTTGATAATCC-3'.
Mutants were initially identified by the presence of primer-derived
restriction sites in the plasmids generated by this method. To ensure
that only the desired mutations had been incorporated into the
mannanase gene, the complete sequences of the mutated forms of
man26A were determined. The mutants were all expressed at
high levels, and circular dichroism spectra revealed that the mutants
had a secondary structure similar to native Man26A.
Assays--
The sources of the Man26A substrates
used in this study were described previously (11) with the exception of
mannotriose and mannohexaose, which were both obtained from Megazyme
International Ltd. Protein concentration was determined by measuring
A280 (15) using a molar extinction coefficient
of 93,600 M 1 cm 1. Assays
used to measure Man26A activity against
2,4-dinitrophenyl- -mannobioside (2,4-DNPM2), carob
galactomannan, and azo-carob galactomannan were as described previously
(11). To evaluate the activity of the mannanase against
mannooligosaccharides, 0.02-460 nM enzyme (depending on the substrate used and the activity of the Man26A derivative) were incubated with 2-14 µM substrate in 50 mM sodium phosphate, 12 mM citrate buffer, pH
6.5, for up to 500 min. At regular intervals, an 0.5-ml aliquot was
removed, the enzyme was inactivated by boiling for 10 min, and the
mannooligosaccharides in the samples were quantified by HPLC as
described previously (11). The progress curves of oligosaccharide
cleavage were used to determine the
kcat/Km of the reaction using
the following equation described by Matsui et al.
(16),
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where k = (kcat/Km)[enzyme],
t represents time, and [S0] and [St]
represent substrate concentration at times 0 and t,
respectively. The purity and conformational integrity of the mutant
enzymes were assessed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and circular dichroism spectroscopy, respectively, as described previously (11).
Data Collection--
High-resolution native data were collected
using the EMBL BW7B beam line at the DORIS storage ring, DESY ( = 0.8374 Å) equipped with a MAR345 image plate. Data from the
monomethyl mercury derivative were collected using the EMBL X31
beam line with a MAR300 image plate at a wavelength of = 1.00621 Å to optimize the anomalous signal. Data from the
uranyl acetate derivative were collected in-house using a MacScience
rotating anode generator with double mirrors and nickel filter
( = 1.5418 Å) equipped with a DIP1030 image plate. The data
were reduced and scaled using DENZO and SCALEPACK (17), and further
calculations were made using the CCP4 program suite (18).
Structure Solution--
A mercury derivative was prepared by
soaking a crystal in 1 mM methyl mercury chloride for
8 h. A uranyl actetate derivative was prepared using 10 mM uranyl acetate, and the crystal was soaked for 2 h.
The isomorphous and anomalous difference Pattersons for the mercury
derivative revealed that the methyl mercury chloride had bound
predominantly to a single site. The uranyl sites were located using
cross-phased difference Fouriers. MLPHARE (19) was used for the
refinement of the heavy atom sites and for the calculation of the
protein phases that were improved using DM (20).
Model Building and Refinement--
WARP (21) was used to
automatically trace the chain of Pc Man26A and facilitate the building
of a model using the graphics program O (22). Subsequent refinement
used ARP (23) and REFMAC (24) to refine atomic positions and B-factors.
The model was validated using PROCHECK (25).
Superimposition of Protein Structures and
Modeling--
Superimposition of Tf Man5A and of P. cellulosa xylanase 10A (Pc Xyn10A) on Pc Man26A was achieved using
the program O (22) as was modeling of the enzyme-substrate complex.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Crystallographic Analysis--
Good quality single crystals were
grown by the hanging drop method using a reservoir of 26% polyethylene
glycol monomethyl ether 550 with 0.012 M zinc sulfate and
0.1 M MES buffer at pH 6.5. These crystals are tetragonal,
space group P41 or P43, with a = 93.2 Å,
c = 54.8 Å and with a single molecule in the asymmetric unit. The
tetragonal crystals can be cryocooled to 100 K directly for data
collection because of their high content of low molecular weight
polyethylene glycol monoethyl ether.
The results of the data collection, phasing, and refinement are
presented in Table II. A single
monomethyl mercury site and 12 uranyl sites were used in calculating
the protein phases. The space group ambiguity was resolved by comparing
the occupancies of the heavy atoms during heavy atom refinement in both
space groups, and the space group was established as P41.
The final model comprises 337 residues in three protein chains, four
zinc ions, and 446 water molecules. One of the zinc ions mediates a crystal contact. The final R-factor and R-free
are 18.2 and 21.1% at 1.85 Å resolution, and the overall
G-factor from PROCHECK is +0.20 (Table II contains
additional measures of the stereochemical quality of the final
model).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Data collection, phasing statistics, refinement details, and model
stereochemistry
The various crystallographic parameters are defined as follows:
Rmerge(I), |Ii I |/ Ii, where
Ii is the intensity of the i-th observation,
I is the mean intensity of the reflection, and the
summation extends over all data; Riso,
|FPH Fp|/ |FP|, the mean
relative isomorphous difference between the native protein (FP)
and the derivative (FPH) data; RCullis,
 FPH + FP| FH|/ |FPH FP|, where FH is the calculated heavy atom structure
factor contribution; phasing power,
FH / E , where E is the root
mean square lack of closure; R, |Fobs Fcalc|/ |Fobs|, where Fobs and
Fcalc represent, respectively, the observed and calculated
structure factor amplitudes.
|
|
There is no evidence in the electron density map for residues 361-391,
but SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of dissolved
crystals showed the protein to have the correct molecular mass. This
sequence is therefore present in the crystal but is highly mobile or
disordered. Also disordered in the crystal are: the eight residues 324 to 331; the five amino-terminal residues, Arg-39 Lys-43; and the four
carboxyl-terminal residues, Leu-420-Lys 423. The final protein model
therefore comprises three chains (Pro-44 Ile-323, Leu-332 Trp-360,
and Thr-392 Thr-419). Adventitious binding of zinc occurs close to the
active site of Pc Man26A, a result of the inclusion of 12 mM zinc sulfate in the crystallization conditions.
Photon-induced x-ray emission analysis (26) of purified Pc Man26A
showed that in buffers lacking zinc there is no zinc bound to
the enzyme. The presence of zinc had no significant effect on the
catalytic activity or stability of the enzyme.
Description of the Crystal Structure of Pc Man26A and Comparison
with Tf Man5A and Other GH-A Enzymes--
The -carbon trace of the
Pc Man26A polypeptide revealed the classic
( / )8-barrel architecture (Fig.
1), as first seen in triose
phosphate isomerase (27), with the major axis running from 1 to
5, typical of clan GH-A enzymes (Fig.
2; Ref. 13). The disordered regions
described above comprised the extreme amino- and carboxyl-terminal
sequences and the loops between 7 and 7 (residues
324-331) and 8 and 8 (residues 361-391). The putative acid/base
catalyst (Glu-212) is at the end of 4, the nucleophile catalyst
(Glu-320) is at the end of 7, Glu-212 and Glu-320 are 5.5 Å apart,
and the spatial location of these amino acids is identical to the
catalytic residues of other clan GH-A enzymes. Pc Man26A and, by
inference, all other GH26 enzymes are therefore demonstrated to be
members of clan GH-A. In addition, the -bulges on strands 4 and 7 adjacent to the active site amino acids are very similar in clan GH-A
enzymes (28), and Pc Man26A has the single -bulge on strand 7 involving the nucleophile and a double -bulge on strand 4 involving
the histidine and acid/base (Fig. 1). The effect of the double
-bulge at the end of 4 is to cause the histidine (or asparagine
in, for example, GH10 and GH5 enzymes) to stack against the acid/base.
The overall location, geometry, and presentation of the active site
amino acids in Man26A are therefore very similar in other clan GH-A
enzymes.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Stereo drawing of the
-carbon backbone of Pc Man26A. The view is
into the active site of the ( / )8-barrel with the
-strands pointing toward the viewer. The active site glutamates at
the ends of -strands 4 and 7 are labeled A212 and
A320. A second characteristic of 4/7-superfamily glycoside
hydrolases are distortions at the carboxyl-terminal ends of -strands
4 and 7, which can be seen clearly in this view. The final structure
comprises three chains labeled A, B, and
C with the two breaks in the polypeptide chain occurring in
loops 7 and 8 at the carboxyl-terminal end of the -barrel
corresponding to regions, which are also disordered in the family 5 mannanase structure. This figure was produced using MOLSCRIPT
(8).
|
|

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Schematic of the
( / )8
architecture of Pc Man26A in the same orientation as Fig.
1. The acid/base (Glu-212) at the end of -strand 4 and
the nucleophile (Glu-320) at the end of -strand 7 are drawn also.
The principal axis of the -barrel runs from top
( -strand 1) to bottom ( -strand 5), which is a further
characteristic of the 4/7 superfamily of glycoside hydrolases (clan
GH-A).
|
|
The detailed interactions involving the active site amino acids are
similar (Fig. 3, A and
B) in the family 26 and 5 mannanases. Corresponding amino
acids contributing to the active site or substrate binding cleft in Pc
Man26A (and Tf Man5A, in parentheses) are: His-211 (Asn-127), Glu-212
(Glu-128), Tyr-285 (Tyr-198), Glu-320 (Glu-225), Trp-360 (Trp-254), and
Arg-208 (Arg-50). In Pc Man26A, OE2 of Glu-212 (the acid/base) hydrogen
bonds OD1 of Asp-283 2.8 Å away; this interaction is likely to
play an important role in the high pKa of the
carboxylic side-chain of the acid/base. ND1 of His-196 in Tf Man5A
occupies a similar position to that of OD1 of Asp-283 in Pc Man26A and
makes an equivalent hydrogen bond to the acid/base catalyst.
Glu-320 (the nucleophile) hydrogen bonds the hydroxyl of Tyr-285 via
OE1 and NH2 of Arg-208 and ND1 of His-211 via OE2. These
hydrogen bonds are equivalent to those between Glu-225 (OE1) and
Tyr-198 (OH) and Glu-225 (OE2) and NH1 of Arg-50 and Asn-127 OD1 in Tf
Man5A. The position of ND1 and NE2 of His-211 in Pc Man26A is
equivalent to the position of OD1 and NE2 of Asn-127 in Tf Man5A (Fig.
3, A and B).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, the active site amino acids of Pc
Man26A drawn in an orientation similar to Fig. 1 with -strand 1 at
the top and 4 at the bottom. Kinetic analyses of
mutants E212A and E320A were consistent with Glu-212 and Glu-320 being
the acid/base and the nucleophile, respectively, in the cleavage of
glycosidic bonds with retention of the anomeric configuration (11).
B, the active site of the family 5 mannanase from Tf Man5A
after superimposition on Pc Man26A. The acid/base and nucleophile are
in very similar positions in both enzymes as are the residues
contributing to the hydrophobic platform Tyr-285 (198 in Tf Man5A) and
Trp-360 (254 in Tf Man5A). His-211 of Pc Man26A is substituted
by Asn-127 in Tf Man5A, and Asp-283 on -strand 5 is substituted by
His-196. There is also a proximal arginine; in Pc Man26A this
is from -strand 4, but in Tf Man5A it is from -strand 2.
|
|
Superimposition of Tf Man5A (12), Bacillus agaratherans
family 5 endoglucanase (29) and Pc Xyn10A (30) on Pc Man26A, using the
-carbon atoms of the asparagine/histidine and the two glutamates,
gives root mean square deviations of 0.187, 0.382, and 1.302 Å,
respectively. The mannanases therefore have the most similar
disposition of active site residues. Key hydrophobic residues at the
1 subsite are also conserved in the mannanases and endoglucanase; Tyr-285 and Trp-360 of Pc Man26A have equivalents in both Tf Man5A (Tyr-198 and Trp-254) and the endoglucanase (Tyr-254 and Trp-262). Binding of a mannose to subsite 1 of Pc Man26A may be similar to that
proposed for Tf Man5A because the "hydrophobic platform" Trp-360
(254) and Tyr-285 (198) are conserved (Figs. 3 and 4). Binding of
mannose residues to subsite 2 will be different in Pc Man26A compared
with Tf Man5A because the pattern of tryptophans is different. Subsite
2 will probably involve Trp-162. A model of mannotriose bound to the
substrate binding cleft of Pc Man26A, built based on the structure of
the Tf Man5A mannobiose complex (12), is shown in Fig.
4.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A model of substrate binding to Pc Man26A
based on the observed binding of mannotriose to subsite +1 of Tf Man5A
and assuming an approximate 21-helix conformation of the
oligosaccharide together with avoidance of steric clashes with the
protein to generate sugars in the proposed subsites 1 and
2.
|
|
Loop Flexibility--
It is interesting to note that the two loops
that are poorly defined or missing in Pc Man26A, loops 7 and 8, are
also flexible or disordered in the family 5 mannanase. However, in Pc
Man26A, loop 8 is 31 residues in length compared with only five
residues in the family 5 enzyme.
Functional Importance of Amino Acids in the Distal Region of the
Substrate Binding Cleft--
The crystal structure of Pc Man26A
suggested that Trp-162 could form an important hydrophobic stacking
interaction with the saccharide unit located at the 2 subsite of the
enzyme. The W162A mutant displayed biochemical properties similar to
native Pc Man26A when using carob galactomannan or azo-carob
galactomannan as the substrates (Table
III). In contrast, W162A was 95-, 70-, and 30-fold less active than the wild type mannanase against
mannotriose, mannotetraose, and mannohexaose, respectively. It is clear
that Trp-162 is critical for the productive binding of
mannooligosaccharides but not for the productive binding of the
polysaccharide mannan. The polysaccharide will be more conformationally
restricted because of the extensive hydrogen bonding within the mannan.
The likely role of Trp-162 is therefore to ensure that oligosaccharides
bind in the correct orientation and conformation for cleavage. Similar observations have been made for Pc Xyn10A subsite 2 and +1 mutants (31, 32) and 6 subsite mutants of the Saccharomyces
cerevisiae amylase (33) on their respective oligosaccharide and
polysaccharide substrates. That binding interactions distal to the
active site have a more profound influence on the cleavage of
oligosaccharides than on polysaccharides is thus an emerging theme in
polysaccharide hydrolases.
His-143 is highly conserved in GH26 enzymes and is located at the 2
subsite. The catalytic properties of H143A showed that the mutant
enzyme exhibited very low activity against all substrates tested, both
mannans and mannooligosaccharides. It would appear, therefore, that
His-143 plays an important role in substrate binding of both
polysaccharides and oligosaccharides at the 2 subsite, probably
through hydrogen bonds between the imidazole ring and the sugar
hydroxyl groups.
Trp-156 in the active site of Man26A (Fig. 4) is more remote from the
substrate-binding site. The catalytic properties of W156A were
very similar to the wild type mannanase, revealing that this aromatic
residue does not play a critical role in substrate binding or
catalysis. This finding is consistent with the enzyme containing only
four subsites extending from 2 to +2.
Functional Importance of Trp-217--
Substrate modeling of Pc
Man26A suggests that Trp-217 forms a hydrophobic stacking interaction
with a mannopyranose unit at the +1 subsite, which is consistent with
the lack of activity of W217A against both mannotriose and
mannotetraose (Table III). In contrast the capacity of W217A to cleave
mannans was only approximately 4-fold lower than the wild type enzyme.
These data are similar to the results obtained for W162A and indicate
that modification of either the 2 or +1 subsite has a larger
influence on oligosaccharide cleavage than polysaccharide hydrolysis.
Functional Importance of W360A--
The structure of Pc Man26A
indicates that Trp-360 interacts with the sugar located at the 1
subsite. The observation that W360A exhibited no catalytic activity
against any of the substrates evaluated (Table III) underlines the
importance of the 1 subsite in binding and catalysis. The interaction
between Trp-360 and the mannose moiety is likely to be critical for
transition state stabilization. The importance of Trp-360 in enzyme
function is further illustrated by the fact that this residue is highly
conserved in clan GH-A enzymes, and substitution of this amino acid
causes a substantial reduction in the catalytic activity of the
respective enzymes. Although the data presented in this paper indicate
that Trp-360 plays an absolutely critical role in binding and
catalysis, this interpretation must be viewed with some caution. It is
possible that the loss of the aromatic residue caused a distortion in
the structure of the 1 subsite, which also contributed to the loss in
activity. Unfortunately, as crystals of W360A have not be obtained, the
influence of this mutation on the integrity of the 1 subsite cannot
be assessed.
Functional Importance of His-211--
The data presented in Table
III revealed that the H211A mutation caused a 100- and 700-fold
decrease in activity against carob galactomannans and
mannotetraose, respectively, but only a 6-fold reduction in activity
against 2,4-DNPM2. The imidazole ring of His-211, by
forming a hydrogen bond with the carboxylic group of Glu-320, plays an
important role in maintaining the position of the catalytic
nucleophile. The loss in activity through the removal of His-211 is
therefore likely to be due to a slight repositioning of the catalytic
nucleophile such that it attacks the C-1 of the mannopyranose residue
less efficiently than in the wild type enzyme.
The mutation of the equivalent residue to His-211 (Asn-127) in Pc
Xyn10A led to a large reduction in k3 but not
k2 against substrates with good leaving groups
(31, 32). This effect is caused by the loss of a hydrogen bond between
Asn-127 and the C-2 hydroxyl of the sugar at the 1 subsite. The fact
that the H211A mutation does not cause a large reduction in
Km against 2,4-DNPM2 suggests that the
histidine does not hydrogen bond to the C-2 hydroxyl of mannose. Thus,
the role of the residue immediately preceding the catalytic
acid/base residue is different between GH26 enzymes and other
members of the 4/7-superfamily (clan GH-A).
The positions of ND1 and NE2 in His-211 are equivalent to the positions
of OD1 and NE2 of the asparagine, and thus replacing His-211 with an
asparagine residue might be anticipated to have little influence of the
activity of Pc Man26A. However, H211N was much less active than wild
type Pc Man26A (Table III). In clan GH-A enzymes the asparagine forms a
hydrogen bond with the histidine, equivalent to Asp-283 in Pc Man26A.
To investigate whether the D283H mutation complements the H211N
substitution, the H211N/D283H mutant was constructed and its catalytic
properties evaluated. The data indicated that the mutant enzyme was
virtually inactive, showing that the activity of the H211N mutant
cannot be recovered by introducing its hydrogen-bonding partner by the
mutation D283H.
Residues That Influence the Catalytic Nucleophile--
The
structure of Pc Man26A revealed that Tyr-285 formed a hydrogen bond
with the catalytic nucleophile Glu-320. The data presented in Table III
showed that the kcat of Y285A against carob
galactomannan and 2,4-DNPM2 was substantially reduced, as
was the kcat/Km for mannotetraose and
the Km against 2,4-DNPM2. It is possible
that the Y285A mutation caused a slight change in the position of the
nucleophile, which did not significantly influence its capacity to
attack the C-1 of the mannose residue at the 1 subsite. However,
subsequent deglycosylation occurs very slowly because this step
requires proton abstraction from Glu-212, and the activated water
molecule will be located further from the glycosyl-enzyme ester
linkage. This interpretation of the properties of Tyr-285 are
consistent with studies on Pc Xyn10A in which the mutation of some
amino acids that influence the position of the catalytic nucleophile
had a greater influence on k3 than
k2 for substrates that had good leaving groups
(32). The low activity against mannan reflects the poorer leaving group
of this substrate, which requires protonation of the glycosidic
oxygen to elicit the k2 and
k3 steps of the reaction.
The removal of the catalytic nucleophile (E320A) of Pc Man26A reduced
the catalytic activity of the enzyme 104-fold, which is not
as great as other nucleophile mutants. A possible explanation for the
relatively high activity displayed by E320A is that another amino acid
is functioning as the catalytic nucleophile; Asp-283, which is
approximately 3.5 Å away from Glu-320, is the only possible candidate.
The observation that the double mutant E320A/D283A showed no detectable
catalytic activity against all of the substrates evaluated (a decrease
of >107) supports the view that Asp-283 can
function as an alternative nucleophile when Glu320 has been removed.
Analysis of the Products Generated by Mutants of Pc
Man26A--
The products generated by the Pc Man26A mutants when
incubated with mannotetraose indicate that H211A, Y265A, and W162A
hydrolyze mannotetraose predominantly to mannobiose, similar to the
wild type protein. In contrast, W217A generates mannose, mannobiose, and mannotriose in the ratio of 1:2.5:1 (Fig.
5). These results suggest that
mannotetraose does not form productive complexes with the enzyme by
occupying exclusively the 2 to +2 subsites but cleaves the substrate
with virtually equal efficiency when occupying either four ( 2 to +2)
or three subsites ( 2 to +1; Trp-217 is located in the aglycone region
of the active site). If Trp-217 only influenced substrate binding at
the +1 subsite, mannotetraose would still interact with the +2
resulting in the generation of two mannobiose molecules. Thus it would
appear that the W217A mutation has compromised substrate binding at
both aglycone subsites, suggesting that the +1 and +2 sites act in
synergy to bind substrate. Thus, loss of binding at the +1 subsite
compromises the utilization of binding energy at the +2 subsite in the
distortion of the mannopyranose ring of the sugar at the 1 subsite
from a chair configuration in its ground state into its transition state conformation. Support for this latter view is provided by a
recent study (34) showing that extensive synergy occurred between the
aglycone subsites of Pc Xyn10A.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
HPLC analysis of mannotetraose hydrolysis by
wild type Man26A and the W217A mutant. Wild type Man26A
(panel A) and W217A (panel B) were incubated with
mannotetraose, and at regular time intervals an aliquot of the reaction
was removed and analyzed by HPLC as described under "Materials and
Methods." The elution times of mannose, mannobiose,
mannotriose, and mannotetraose from the HPLC column are labeled 1 to 4, respectively.
|
|
Conclusions--
The data presented in this report show that the
GH26 enzyme Pc Man26A has a classic ( / )8 barrel
structure in which the catalytic acid/base and nucleophile are
at the ends of 4 and 7, respectively. Thus, this enzyme and, by
inference, all GH26 enzymes are members of the 4/7-superfamily of
glycoside hydrolases (clan GH-A). Site-directed mutagenesis studies
have identified several residues at the active site that play an
important role in substrate binding and catalysis. Trp-360 appears to
play an even more important role in catalysis than the two catalytic
residues. This result underlines the importance of the 1 subsite for
binding and hydrolysis. His-211 is shown to occur at an equivalent
location but to have a different function than the corresponding
asparagine in all other GH families that belong to clan GH-A. The
results also show that Trp-217 dominates substrate binding in the
aglycone region of the active site. Finally, the data reveal that
substrate interactions distal from the active site, at subsites 2 and
+1, have a more profound influence on the binding and cleavage of
mannooligosaccharides than on mannan, an emerging theme in cleavage by
polysaccharide hydrolases.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We acknowledge the use of the EMBL BW7B and
X31 beam lines at the DORIS storage ring, DESY, Hamburg.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological
Sciences Research Council, UK.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1J9Y) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
44-20-7882-6360; Fax: 44-20-8983-0531; E-mail:
r.w.pickersgill@qmw.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M010290200
2
B. Henrissat, and P. Coutinho,
http://afmb.cnrs-mrs.fr/~pedro/CAZY/db.html.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GH, glycoside
hydrolase;
2, 4-DNPM2, 2,4-dinitrophenyl- -mannobioside;
Pc Man26A, family 26 mannanase from Pseudomonas cellulosa;
Tf Man5A, family 5 mannanase from Thermomonospora fusca;
Pc
Xyn10A, family 10 xylanase from Pseudomonas cellulosa;
HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography;
MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic
acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Timell, T. E.
(1967)
Wood Sci. Technol.
1,
45-70
|
| 2.
|
McCleary, B. V.
(1983)
Carbohydr. Res.
119,
191-219
|
| 3.
|
Toorop, P. E.,
Bewley, J. D.,
Abrams, S. R.,
and Hilhorst, H. W. M.
(1999)
J. Plant Physiol.
154,
679-685
|
| 4.
|
Millward-Sadler, S. J.,
Hall, J.,
Black, G. W.,
Hazelwood, G. P.,
and Gilbert, H. J.
(1996)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
141,
183-188
|
| 5.
|
Stalbrand, H.,
Saloheimo, A.,
Vehmaanpera, J.,
Henrissat, B.,
and Pentilla, M.
(1995)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61,
1090-1097
|
| 6.
|
Stoll, D.,
Stalbrand, H.,
and Warren, R. A. J.
(1999)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65,
2598-2605
|
| 7.
|
Braithwaite, K. L.,
Black, G. W.,
Hazlewood, G. P.,
Ali, B. R. S.,
and Gilbert, H. J.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
305,
1005-1010
|
| 8.
|
Kraulis, P. J.
(1991)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
24,
946-950
|
| 9.
|
Koshland, D. E.
(1953)
Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc.
28,
416-436
|
| 10.
|
Harjunp, V.,
Teleman, A.,
Siika-Aho, M.,
and Drakenberg, T.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
234,
278-283
|
| 11.
|
Bolam, D. N.,
Hughes, N.,
Virden, R.,
Lakey, J. H.,
Hazlewood, G. P.,
Henrissat, B.,
and Gilbert, H. J.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
16195-16204
|
| 12.
|
Hilge, M.,
Gloor, S. M.,
Rypniewski, W.,
Sauer, O.,
Heightman, T. D.,
Zimmermann, W.,
Winterhalter, K.,
and Piontek, K.
(1998)
Structure
6,
1433-1444
|
| 13.
|
Jenkins, J.,
Lo Leggio, L.,
Harris, G.,
and Pickersgill, R.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
362,
281-285
|
| 14.
|
Henrissat, B.,
Callebaut, I.,
Fabrega, S.,
Lehn, P.,
Mornon, J. P.,
and Davies, G. J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7090-7094
|
| 15.
|
Stoscheck, C. M.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
182,
50-68
|
| 16.
|
Matsui, I.,
Ishikawa, K.,
Matsui, E.,
Miyairi, S.,
Fukui, S.,
and Honda, S.
(1991)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
109,
566-569
|
| 17.
|
Otwinowski, Z.,
and Minor, W.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
276,
307-326
|
| 18.
|
Collaborative Computational Project Number 4.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
50,
760-767
|
| 19.
|
Otwinowski, Z.
(1991)
in
Isomorphous Replacement and Anomalous Scattering
(Wolf, W.
, and Leslie, A. G. W., eds)
, pp. 80-86, Daresbury CCP4 Study Weekend Proceedings, Daresbury, UK
|
| 20.
|
Cowtan, K.,
and Main, P.
(1998)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
54,
487-493
|
| 21.
|
Perrakis, A.,
Sixma, T. K.,
Wilson, K. S.,
and Lamzin, V. S.
(1997)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
53,
448-455
|
| 22.
|
Jones, T. A.,
Zou, J-T,
Cowan, S. W.,
and Kjeldgaard, M.
(1991)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A
47,
110-119
|
| 23.
|
Lamzin, V. S.,
and Wilson, K. S.
(1993)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
49,
129-147
|
| 24.
|
Murshudov, G. N.,
Vagin, A. A.,
and Dodson, E. J.
(1997)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
53,
240-255
|
| 25.
|
Laskowski, R. A.,
MacAuthur, M. W.,
Moss, D. S.,
and Thornton, J. M.
(1993)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
26,
283-291
|
| 26.
|
Garman, E.
(1999)
Structure
7,
291-299
|
| 27.
|
Banner, D. W.,
Bloomer, A. C.,
Petsko, G. A.,
Phillips, D. C.,
Pogson, C. I.,
Wilson, I. A.,
Corran, P. H.,
Furth, A. J.,
Milman, J. D.,
Offord, R. E.,
Proddle, J. D.,
and Waley, S. G.
(1975)
Nature
255,
609-614
|
| 28.
|
Harris, G. W.,
Jenkins, J. A.,
Connerton, I.,
and Pickersgill, R. W.
(1996)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
52,
393-401
|
| 29.
|
Davies, G.,
Dauter, M.,
Brzozowski, A. M.,
Bjornvad, M. E.,
Andersen, K. V.,
and Schulein, M.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
1926-1932
|
| 30.
|
Harris, G. W.,
Jenkins, J. A.,
Connerton, I.,
Cummings, N.,
Lo Leggio, L.,
Scott, M.,
Hazelwood, G. P,
Laurie, J. I.,
Gilbert, H. J.,
and Pickersgill, R. W.
(1994)
Structure
2,
1107-1116
|
| 31.
|
Charnock, S.,
Lakey, J.,
Virden, R.,
Hughes, N.,
Sinnott, M.,
Hazlewood, G. P.,
Pickersgill, R. W.,
and Gilbert, H. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2942-2951
|
| 32.
|
Charnock, S. J.,
Spurway, T. D.,
Xie, H.,
Beylot, H.-M.,
Virden, R.,
Warren, R. A. J.,
Hazlewood, G. P.,
and Gilbert, H. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32187-32199
|
| 33.
|
Svensson, B.,
Bak-Jensen, K. S.,
Mori, H.,
Sauer, J.,
Jensen, M. T.,
Kramhoft, B.,
Gottschalk,
Christensen, T.,
Sigurskjold, B. W.,
Aghajari, N.,
Haser, R.,
Payre, N.,
Cottaz, S.,
and Driguez, H.
(1999)
in
Recent Advances in Carbohydrate Bioengineering
(Gilbert, H. J.
, Henrissat, B.
, Davies, G. J.
, and Svensson, B., eds)
, pp. 272-281, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge
|
| 34.
|
Armand, S.,
Andrews, S. R.,
Charnock, S. J.,
and Gilbert, H. J.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
7404-7409
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Cartmell, E. Topakas, V. M-A. Ducros, M. D. L. Suits, G. J. Davies, and H. J. Gilbert
The Cellvibrio japonicus Mannanase CjMan26C Displays a Unique exo-Mode of Action That Is Conferred by Subtle Changes to the Distal Region of the Active Site
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 5, 2008;
283(49):
34403 - 34413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhang, J. Ju, H. Peng, F. Gao, C. Zhou, Y. Zeng, Y. Xue, Y. Li, B. Henrissat, G. F. Gao, et al.
Biochemical and Structural Characterization of the Intracellular Mannanase AaManA of Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius Reveals a Novel Glycoside Hydrolase Family Belonging to Clan GH-A
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 14, 2008;
283(46):
31551 - 31558.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Tailford, V. A. Money, N. L. Smith, C. Dumon, G. J. Davies, and H. J. Gilbert
Mannose Foraging by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron: STRUCTURE AND SPECIFICITY OF THE beta-MANNOSIDASE, BtMan2A
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 13, 2007;
282(15):
11291 - 11299.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Taylor, A. Goyal, C. I. P. D. Guerreiro, J. A. M. Prates, V. A. Money, N. Ferry, C. Morland, A. Planas, J. A. Macdonald, R. V. Stick, et al.
How Family 26 Glycoside Hydrolases Orchestrate Catalysis on Different Polysaccharides: STRUCTURE AND ACTIVITY OF A CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM LICHENASE, CtLic26A
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 23, 2005;
280(38):
32761 - 32767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. M. V. Dias, F. Vincent, G. Pell, J. A. M. Prates, M. S. J. Centeno, L. E. Tailford, L. M. A. Ferreira, C. M. G. A. Fontes, G. J. Davies, and H. J. Gilbert
Insights into the Molecular Determinants of Substrate Specificity in Glycoside Hydrolase Family 5 Revealed by the Crystal Structure and Kinetics of Cellvibrio mixtus Mannosidase 5A
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 11, 2004;
279(24):
25517 - 25526.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Bourgault and J. D. Bewley
Variation in Its C-Terminal Amino Acids Determines Whether Endo-beta -Mannanase Is Active or Inactive in Ripening Tomato Fruits of Different Cultivars
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2002;
130(3):
1254 - 1262.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Charnock, I. E. Brown, J. P. Turkenburg, G. W. Black, and G. J. Davies
Convergent evolution sheds light on the anti-beta -elimination mechanism common to family 1 and 10 polysaccharide lyases
PNAS,
September 17, 2002;
99(19):
12067 - 12072.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|