|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102633200 on June 19, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 34, 31642-31650, August 24, 2001
Proteolytic Activation of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion
Protein
CLEAVAGE AT TWO FURIN CONSENSUS SEQUENCES*
Gert
Zimmer,
Linda
Budz, and
Georg
Herrler
From the Institut für Virologie, Tierärztliche
Hochschule Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
Received for publication, March 23, 2001, and in revised form, June 13, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The F (fusion) protein of the respiratory
syncytial viruses is synthesized as an inactive precursor
F0 that is proteolytically processed at the
multibasic sequence KKRKRR136 into the subunits
F1 and F2 by the cellular protease furin. This maturation process is essential for the F protein to gain fusion competence. We observed that proteolytic cleavage additionally occurs
at another basic motif, RARR109, that
also meets the requirements for furin recognition. Cleavage at both
sites leads to the removal from the polypeptide chain of a glycosylated
peptide of 27 amino acids. When the sequence RARR109 was
changed to NANR109 or to RANN109 by
site-directed mutagenesis, cleavage by furin was completely prevented.
Although the mutants were still processed at position Arg136, they did not show any syncytia formation.
Proteolytic cleavage of the modified motifs was achieved by treatment
of transfected cells with trypsin converting the F mutants into their
fusogenic forms. Our findings indicate that both furin consensus
sequences have to be cleaved in order to activate the fusion protein.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Endoproteolytic cleavage is a common post-translational
modification of membrane and secretory proteins on the exocytotic route. Precursors of peptide hormones, neuropeptides, growth factors, coagulation factors, serum albumin, cell surface receptors, and adhesion molecules are converted to their biological active form by an
endoproteolytic cleavage usually at the C-terminal end of an arginine
residue (1). Likewise, many viral membrane proteins involved in the
fusion process between viral and cellular membranes depend on
proteolytic activation (2, 3). The cleavage of these proteins usually
results in the exposition of a hydrophobic fusion peptide at the N
terminus of the membrane-anchored fragment. The fusion peptide is
supposed to initiate the fusion process by direct interaction with the
lipid bilayer of the host membrane. Cleavage of the fusion proteins is
therefore essential for virus infectivity. The majority of the viral
fusion proteins contain a multibasic cleavage motif of the consensus
sequence RX(K/R)R. This sequence is recognized and cleaved
by furin, an ubiquitous subtilisin-like endoprotease localized in the
trans-Golgi network (2, 3). The ubiquitous expression of furin
has important consequences for virus pathogenicity as all cells produce
infectious virus with activated fusion proteins allowing the rapid
spread of infection. Some viral glycoproteins contain a monobasic
cleavage site that is not recognized by furin. Viral glycoproteins of
this type are activated by trypsin-like proteases that are secreted by
a restricted subset of host cells or by co-infecting bacteria (4, 5).
As a consequence, many cells will produce virus that is not
proteolytically activated and therefore not infectious. Viruses with a
monobasic cleavage motif in their fusion proteins usually cause
localized infections and are unable to spread to different organs or
tissues. Thus, the cleavage site is an important determinant of virus
pathogenicity. This concept has been well established for Newcastle
disease virus, Sendai virus, and avian influenza viruses (2, 3).
Human respiratory syncytial virus
(HRSV)1 and bovine
respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) are closely related members of the genus Pneumovirus within the family
Paramyxoviridae. HRSV is the most important viral agent of
pediatric respiratory tract disease worldwide causing bronchiolitis and
pneumonia (6). A very similar disease is caused by BRSV in calves
(7-10). The importance of HRSV as a respiratory pathogen makes
development of a safe and effective vaccine a demand of high priority.
The envelope of the respiratory syncytial viruses contains three
glycoproteins, designated F, G, and SH, respectively. The presence of
both the G and SH protein is non-essential for virus replication in
cell culture (11-13). The F protein is a highly conserved molecule
with a homology of 80% or more between different serotypes of HRSV and
BRSV and it is the major virus antigen inducing neutralizing antibodies (14-16). The F protein plays a central role in virus entry. It mediates fusion between the viral and cellular membrane thereby allowing the nucleocapsid to enter the cytoplasm of the host cell. In
addition, cells infected with RSV can fuse with adjacent cells resulting in giant, multinucleated syncytia. Syncytia formation can
also be observed with cells transfected with the F gene, although coexpression of F together with G and/or SH protein has been reported to enhance fusion activity (17, 18). Recent studies suggest that
certain glycosaminoglycans of the cell surface are required for HRSV
infection (19-22). The G as well as the F protein have been
demonstrated to bind to these carbohydrate structures (19, 23, 24).
The F protein is a type I integral membrane protein that is synthesized
as a precursor F0 of 70 kDa which is post-translationally cleaved by a cellular protease at a multibasic sequence into two disulfide-linked subunits F2 (20 kDa) and F1
(50 kDa) (25, 26). The cleavage site preceding the hydrophobic fusion
peptide is composed of six basic amino acids (KKRKRR) and is strictly
conserved in all HRSV and BRSV isolates. This sequence meets the
requirements for furin recognition but with respect to the number of
basic amino acid residues, it differs from those of all other
paramyxoviruses that usually have tri- or tetrabasic motifs (2, 3).
Pulse-chase experiments using various drugs that inhibit the vesicular
transport between the endoplasmatic reticulum and Golgi compartments
suggested that the F0 precursor is cleaved in the Golgi or
trans-Golgi network (26, 27). Proteolytic activation of the F protein
was also inhibited when RSV-infected cells were treated with a peptidyl chloromethylketone inhibitor containing the furin target sequence (27).
In addition, Lovo cells that do not express furin because of a genetic
defect did not efficiently cleave the F0 precursor protein
(27). These data provide evidence that furin is responsible for RSV F
protein activation. Interestingly, in neither case the uncleaved
precursor F0 was detected at the cell surface suggesting that only the proteolytically cleaved fusion protein is transported to
the plasma membrane (26, 27). In this respect, RSV differs from other
paramyxovirus fusion proteins that are transported to the cell surface
also in their uncleaved form (28). The F0 of RSV contains
another conserved furin consensus sequence (FCS-2) that is separated
from the furin motif FCS-1 immediately upstream of the fusion peptide
by a stretch of 27 amino acids (Fig. 1). This peptide, pep27, contains
one potential N-glycosylation site in the case of BRSV and
two to three N-glycosylation motifs in the case of HRSV. In
this report, we investigated the role of FCS-2 in the proteolytic
activation of the RSV fusion proteins by site-directed mutagenesis. We
provide evidence that both furin consensus sequences have to be cleaved
to obtain an active fusion protein.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cells and Virus--
BSR-T7/5 cells were a generous gift of Dr.
Conzelmann (Max-von-Pettenhofer-Institut, München, Germany). The
cells were grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium with Earle's
salts (EMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, non-essential
amino acids, and 0.5 mg/ml G418 sulfate (Calbiochem-Novabiochem, Bad
Soden, Germany). Vero cells and primary chicken fibroblasts were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium with 5 and 10% fetal
calf serum, respectively. Human respiratory syncytial virus (Long
strain), a generous gift of Dr. Streckert (Ruhr-Universität,
Bochum, Germany) was propagated in Vero cells. Recombinant vaccinia
virus MVA-T7 was provided by Dr. Sutter (Technische Universität,
München, Germany) and was propagated in primary chicken fibroblasts.
Cloning and Mutagenesis of the F Genes--
Total RNA was
prepared from Vero cells infected with the strain Long of HRSV and
reverse transcribed using the Expand reverse transcriptase (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and random hexamers for
priming. The open reading frame of the F protein was amplified from the
cDNA by polymerase chain reaction and was cloned into the pTM1
vector downstream of the T7 promoter (29) to give pTM1-hF. The whole
open reading frame of F was sequenced and compared with the published
sequence (30). The following differences were found: V76E, P101S,
T152I, S211N, and A442V. The F gene of BRSV (strain ATue51908) was
amplified by polymerase chain reaction from a pBluescript SK plasmid
(kindly provided by Dr. Conzelmann, München) and cloned into the
pTM1 vector to give pTM1-bF. Mutagenesis was performed using the
QuikChange Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
The nucleotide exchanges were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Radioimmunoprecipitation--
Transient expression of the F
protein was performed in BSR-T7/5 cells, a subline of BHK-21 cells
stably expressing T7 RNA polymerase under the control of the
cytomegalovirus promoter (31). The cells were grown in 35-mm
dishes to 90% confluence and were infected with 5 focus-forming units
per cell of a recombinant vaccinia virus (MVA) encoding T7-RNA
polymerase (32). Infection with the recombinant vaccinia virus resulted
in a higher expression level compared with uninfected BSR-T7/5 cells.
One hour post-infection the cells were washed twice and transfected
with 5 µg of plasmid DNA using 10 µl of the LipofectAMINE 2000 transfection reagent (Life Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany). At
20 h post-transfection, the cells were starved for 1 h in
methionine/cysteine-deficient EMEM and then cultured for 3 h in
0.5 ml of the same medium supplemented with 100 µCi of
[35S]methionine/cysteine (Tran35S-label, ICN,
Eschwege, Germany). In some experiments, the furin inhibitor
decanoyl-RVKR-chloromethylketone (50 µM; dec-RVKR-cmk; Bachem, Heidelberg, Germany) was added at the start of starvation period and maintained in the medium during radiolabeling of the cells.
For pulse-chase experiments, the cells were labeled for 5 min with 100 µCi of [35S]methionine/cysteine in 250 µl of
starvation medium and chased for different time intervals in 1 ml of
normal EMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum. The cells were lysed in 1 ml of Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Nonidet P-40,
and protease inhibitor mixture) and insoluble material was removed by
centrifugation. To 500 µl of each supernatant were added 50 µl of a
50% slurry of protein A-Sepharose (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) and
2.5 µl of the RSV3216 monoclonal antibody directed toward the HRSV F
protein (Serotec, Oxford, United Kingdom). After agitation for 90 min
at 4 °C, the immunoprecipitates were collected by centrifugation,
washed four times with Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer, and eluted by boiling
the beads in 2-fold concentrated sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer. The immunoprecipitates were run on an Tricine-SDS 10% polyacrylamide gel under reducing conditions (33). The gels were fixed
in 10% acetic acid, 40% methanol for 30 min, incubated in Amplify
enhancer reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany) for
another 30 min and dried. The gels were exposed for 12 h, in case
of the pulse-chase experiment for up to 10 days, at 80 °C to
Bio-Max autoradiography film (Kodak, Rochester, NY). For treatment with
N-glycosidase F, the immunoprecipitates were eluted in 50 µl of 1% SDS in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, by heating the samples at 100 °C for 10 min. The protein A-Sepharose was pelleted by centrifugation and the eluted F protein was recovered from the supernatant. To 10 µl of the supernatant, 90 µl of 50 mM phosphate buffer containing 1% octylglucoside (Sigma),
1 mM EDTA, and 1 µg of each the protease inhibitors
leupeptin, pepstatin A, and Pefabloc (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)
were added. A 30-µl aliquot of this solution was incubated for 3 h at 37 °C with 6 units of N-glycosidase F (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals), while the control received no enzyme. The
reaction was stopped by addition of 50 µl of 2-fold concentrated SDS
sample buffer containing 200 mM dithiothreitol. The samples
were analyzed by Tricine-SDS 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as
described above. The dried gels were exposed to Bio-Max autoradiography
film for 4 days.
Cell Surface Biotinylation--
BSR-T7/5 cells were infected
with MVA-T7 and transfected with recombinant pTM1 plasmid as described
in the previous section. Twenty hours post-transfection, the cells were
washed three times with PBS and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C
either with EMEM containing L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl
chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin (Sigma) at a concentration of 1 µg/ml or with EMEM alone. Thereafter, the cells were washed with
ice-cold PBS and incubated for 20 min at 4 °C with 0.5 ml of PBS
containing 0.5 mg/ml Sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The cells
were washed once with 0.1 M glycine in PBS and incubated in
the same solution for 15 min at 4 °C in order to quench excess
biotinylation reagent. The cells were solubilized in Nonidet P-40 lysis
buffer and F protein was immunoprecipitated as described above. The
immunoprecipitates were run on an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel under
reducing or nonreducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose by
the semi-dry blotting technique (34). The membrane was incubated with
blocking reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) overnight at 4 °C,
washed three times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, and incubated
with streptavidin-peroxidase (1:1000, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for
1 h at room temperature. The nitrocellulose was washed as
described above and incubated for 1 min with a chemoluminescent
peroxidase substrate (BM chemoluminescence blotting substrate, Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). The resulting light emission was visualized by
short exposure of the membrane to Bio-Max autoradiography film.
Immunofluorescence Analysis--
BSR-T7/5 cells grown on 24-well
tissue culture plates to 80-90% confluence were infected with
recombinant vaccinia MVA-T7 virus and transfected with 2 µg of
plasmid DNA using 4 µl of the Superfect transfection reagent (Qiagen,
Hilden, Germany). Twenty hours after transfection, the cells were
detached either by incubation with PBS containing 1 mM EDTA
or by trypsinization (0.125% trypsin). The cells were suspended in
EMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum and seeded in 24-well tissue
culture plates containing 12-mm coverslips. After 20 more hours of cell
culture, the cells were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at
room temperature and excess paraformaldehyde was quenched with 0.1 M glycine in PBS for 5 min. The cells were incubated with
the RSV3216 monoclonal antibody for 1 h at room temperature,
washed three times with PBS, and subsequently incubated with a
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody directed to mouse
immunoglobulin (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Both antibodies were used
at a dilution of 1:200. Conventional epifluorescence was performed with
a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope. Digital photographs were taken using a
digital video camera (INTAS focus imager, INTAS, Göttingen, Germany).
 |
RESULTS |
The RSV fusion protein contains two conserved FCS. FCS-1 is
located immediately upstream of the fusion peptide while FCS-2 is
separated from the fusion peptide by a stretch of 27 amino acids,
designated pep27 (Fig. 1). In analogy to
other paramyxoviruses it has been assumed that proteolytic activation
of the RSV fusion protein occurs by cleavage at only FCS-1 resulting in
an F1 subunit with the hydrophobic fusion peptide at the
very N terminus. If cleavage would occur at FCS-2 rather than at FCS-1,
a shorter F2 subunit would be expected, while the amino
acid stretch of pep27 would be located upstream of the fusion peptide
at the N terminus of F1. If cleavage occurs at both FCS-1
and FCS-2, pep27 will be absent from the mature F protein. In the
latter case, if cleavage is experimentally restricted to either FCS-1
or FCS-2, pep27 will be part of either the F1 or the
F2 subunit, respectively. In order to determine the site(s)
of proteolytic activation, we abolished the furin recognition motif
(RX(R/K)R) at FCS-1 or FCS-2 in the HRSV fusion protein by
site-directed mutagenesis. The FCS-1 sequence RKRR136 was
changed to RKRK136 (mutant hF:R136K) and the FCS-2 sequence
RARR109 was modified to RANN109
(hF:R108N/R109N). The parental and mutated F protein genes were cloned into the pTM1 plasmid, a vector designed for gene expression under control of the T7 promotor. This plasmid also contains the internal ribosomal entry site from encephalomyocarditis virus to allow
cap-independent translation of the transcripts (29). Transient
expression of the F protein was achieved by transfection of BSR-T7/5
cells, a cell line that stably expresses the T7-RNA polymerase (31). In
addition to transfection, the cells were infected with a recombinant
vaccinia virus encoding the T7-RNA polymerase gene as this procedure
significantly enhanced the level of F protein expression. The
transfected cells were metabolically labeled with
[35S]methionine/cysteine and the recombinant F protein
was immunoprecipitated from the cell lysates by the monoclonal antibody
RSV3266. The epitope recognized by this antibody is located on the
F1 subunit and has been mapped to amino acids
255-279.2 The
immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Tricine-SDS-PAGE under reducing
conditions (Fig. 2A). The
parental F protein (lane a) appeared as several distinct
bands. In addition to the uncleaved precursor F0 (70/72
kDa), the large subunit F1 (50 kDa), and the small subunit
F2 (22 kDa), we also detected a 58-kDa form of the fusion
protein. We propose that this latter band represents an intermediate
product that most likely originates from a fusion protein that was
proteolytically processed at FCS-2 but not at FCS-1. This form was
designated F1+ and probably contains pep27 attached to the
F1 subunit. In accordance with our view, F1+
disappeared when cleavage at FCS-2 was prevented by site-directed mutagenesis of the furin motif (mutant hF:R108R/N109N, lane
c). Concomitantly, the F2 subunit was almost
completely transformed into a 38-kDa form that probably represents
pep27 attached to F2 (designated F2+). When we
changed the furin motif of FCS-1 but kept FCS-2 intact (mutant
hF:R136K, lane e), most of F1 was converted to
F1+, but not to F0 as it would be expected if only a single furin cleavage site exists. Although the furin
recognition motif of FCS-1 was abolished in mutant hF:R136K, some
F1 was still detected indicating that the basic motif
KKKKRK136 either represents a suboptimal furin recognition
motif or is cleaved by an endogenous trypsin-like enzyme. In order to
prevent cleavage at both FCS-1 and FCS-2, the furin inhibitor
decanoyl-RVKR-chloromethylketone (dec-RVKR-cmk) was applied in the
experiment. The inhibitor at a concentration of 50 µM was
added 1 h before the transfected cells were labeled with
[35S]methionine/cysteine and was maintained in the medium
until cell lysis. Under these conditions, the major band detectable was
the precursor F0 (lanes b, d, and f).
Minor bands of F1 and F2 indicate that some F
protein was cleaved despite the presence of the inhibitor. As a control
for the efficiency of the inhibitor, the hemagglutinin HA of fowl
plague virus, influenza A/FPV/Rostock/34 virus (H7N1), was expressed in
BSR-T7/5 under the same experimental conditions (Fig. 2B).
This viral glycoprotein contains a cleavage motif, KKREKR, that is
similar to that of the RSV fusion protein. In the absence of the furin
inhibitor, in addition to the cleavage products HA1 and
HA2, a substantial amount of uncleaved hemagglutinin (HA0) was detected (Fig. 2B, lane a) indicating
that the influenza HA was not cleaved as efficiently in BSR-T7/5 cells
as was the RSV F protein (compare lanes a from Fig. 2,
A and B). Only faint bands of cleavage products
HA1 and HA2 are visible in the presence of the
inhibitor dec-RVKR-cmk (Fig. 2B, lane b). This finding suggests that the F protein of RSV is much more sensitive to the action
of furin than is the hemagglutinin of fowl plague virus. Proteolytic
cleavage of both HA and F is sensitive to the furin inhibitor. Taken
together, these data provide the first evidence that the RSV fusion
protein is proteolytically processed at two furin consensus
sequences.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Position of the two furin consensus sequences
FCS-1 and FCS-2 within the fusion proteins of HRSV (strain Long) and
BRSV (strain ATue51908). Amino acids 102 to 159 of the fusion
proteins are shown. The furin consensus sequences and the hydrophobic
fusion peptides are boxed. Furin will cleave at the C
terminus of the numbered residues, Arg109 and
Arg136. Potential N-glycosylation sites are
underlined. The proteolytic cleavage products described in
this communication (F2, F2+, F1,
F1+, and pep27) are indicated below.
|
|

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Proteolytic processing of parental and mutant
HRSV F protein. MVA-T7-infected BSR-T7/5 cells were transfected
with recombinant pTM1 plasmids. A, lanes a and b, parental
F; lanes c and d, hF:R108N/R109N; lanes
e and f, hF:R136K; lane g, pTM1 without F;
B, lanes a and b, pTM1-HA. The cells
were metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine
and either treated with the furin inhibitor dec-RVKR-cmk or left
untreated as indicated on the top of the gels. F protein and
hemagglutinin were immunoprecipitated from the cell lysates, and the
immunoprecipitates were separated by Tricine-SDS 10% polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions. The relative positions
of standard proteins of the indicated molecular masses (in kDa) are
shown on the left. The proteolytic products are indicated on
the right.
|
|
The difference in the apparent molecular mass of about 16 kDa
between F2 and F2+ on the one hand and between
F1 and F1+ on the other hand is too large to be
solely attributed to pep27 that corresponds to only 3 kDa. Pep27 of the
HRSV fusion protein (strain Long) contains three potential
N-glycosylation sites, Asn116,
Asn120, and Asn126. To analyze whether
oligosaccharides attached to these sites are responsible for the
strikingly high molecular weight of F2+, we
immunoprecipitated the parental F protein as well as the mutants hF:R133K/R136K and hF:R108N/R109N from transfected, metabolically labeled cells and treated them with N-glycosidase F, an
enzyme that removes all N-linked carbohydrates. The samples
were run on a Tricine-SDS-polyacrylamide gel to separate the different F2 and F2+ forms (indicated by
arrowheads in Fig.
3A). When the parental protein
was treated with N-glycosidase F, the 22-kDa F2
band (lane a) shifted to its deglycosylated form with an
apparent molecular mass of about 10 kDa (lane b). This
change in the electrophoretic mobility is due to the removal of two
N-linked oligosaccharides attached to the
N-glycosylation sites at Asn27 and
Asn70 (35). A similar result was obtained with the FCS-1
mutant hF:R133K/R136K (lanes c and d). In
contrast, deglycosylation of the 38-kDa F2+ band of the
FCS-2 mutant hF:R108N/R109N (lane e) resulted in a 13-kDa
band (lane f). The difference in the molecular mass of 3 kDa
between deglycosylated F2 and deglycosylated
F2+ corresponds to the size of pep27. This experiment also
shows that about two-thirds of the molecular weight of F2+
can be attributed to N-linked carbohydrates. Assuming that a
single N-glycan corresponds to 3 to 6 kDa, we suppose that
oligosaccharides are attached to at least to two of the three potential
N-glycosylation sites. There appears to be some variation in
the glycosylation pattern of pep27. In addition to F2+ (38 kDa), a 28-kDa band was detected that may represent an
underglycosylated form of F2+ (lane e, see arrow).

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Detection of N-glycans
attached to pep27. Parental or mutant F proteins were
immunoprecipitated from transfected, metabolically labeled BSR-T7/5
cells and were either treated with N-glycosidase F or left
untreated as indicated on the top. The samples were applied
to Tricine-SDS 10% polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed under
reducing conditions. A, analysis of HRSV F; lanes
a and b, parental F protein; lanes c and
d, hF:R136K; lanes e and f,
hF:R108N/R109N. B, analysis of BRSV F; lanes a
and b, parental bF; lanes c and d,
bF:N120Q; lanes e and f, bF:K108N/R109N;
lanes g and h, bF:K108N/R109N/N120Q. The
arrowheads indicate the positions of the different
F2 and F2+ forms. The arrow points
to a band that presumably represents an underglycosylated form of
F2+.
|
|
The primary sequence of the BRSV (strain ATue51908) fusion protein also
contains two furin consensus sequences that are located at the same
positions as FCS-1 and FCS-2 of the HRSV homologue (Fig. 1). However,
the intervening peptide between the two cleavage sites shows only
little homology with its counterpart from HRSV and contains only one
potential N-glycosylation site located at Asn120. In case that this peptide is released from the BRSV
fusion protein due to a similar mechanism as observed with the HRSV
fusion protein, it should differ from its HRSV counterpart with regard
to glycosylation and molecular weight. In order to get information
about the proteolytic processing of the fusion protein of BRSV, the F
protein of this virus was analyzed by radioimmunoprecipitation and
enzymatic deglycosylation as shown above for the HRSV F protein. Fig.
3B shows that the bF2 subunit of the parental F
protein migrates as a 17-kDa band (lane a) that is converted
to a 10-kDa form when treated with N-glycosidase F
(lane b). The smaller size of bF2 of this BRSV strain compared with the F2 subunit of HRSV (Fig. 3A, lane
a) is due to the lack of a potential N-glycosylation
site at Asn70 that is present in HRSV and in most other
BRSV isolates. We assumed that the BRSV bF0 like its human
homologue is cleaved at both FCS-1 and FCS-2. As a consequence, the
N-linked oligosaccharide at Asn120 would be
removed together with pep27 and cannot be detected in the mature
protein. To provide experimental evidence for this view, we replaced
Asn120 with a glutamine residue and thus abolished the
N-glycosylation motif. The bF2 subunit of this
mutant (bF:N120Q, lane c) showed the same apparent molecular
weight as the parental bF2. Therefore, the decrease in size
after treatment with N-glycosidase F is only due to the
removal of the single N-glycan at Asn27
(lanes b and d). To prevent the cleavage at FCS-2
by furin, we changed the motif RAKR109 to
RANN109. The bF2 subunit of this mutant
(bF:K108N/R109N, lane e) was converted into a 26-kDa form
that was reduced to a 13-kDa band upon treatment with
N-glycosidase F (lane f). When we introduced into
this mutant the N120Q mutation to give the triple mutant bF:K108N/R109N/N120Q (lane g), we obtained a bF2
subunit of about 20 kDa that migrated as a 13-kDa band after
deglycosylation (lane h). These data show that the
difference in molecular mass between the parental bF2 and
the 26-kDa form can be attributed to the presence of pep27 (3 kDa) that
contains a single N-linked oligosaccharide at
Asn120. In analogy to HRSV F2+, the 26-kDa form
was designated bF2+.
Other authors had noticed that the uncleaved precursor F0
is not detected at the cell surface suggesting that only the
proteolytically cleaved fusion protein is transported to the plasma
membrane (26, 27). We asked whether the cleavage products
F1+ and F2+ produced by the FCS-1 and FCS-2
mutants, respectively, would be found at the cell surface. For this
purpose, we labeled transfected cells with sulfo-NHS-biotin at 4 °C.
This reagent does not penetrate the plasma membrane and therefore
reacts only with proteins at the cell surface (36). In parallel
experiments, the cells were treated with 1 µg/ml trypsin prior to
biotinylation. With this approach we tried to answer the question
whether the modified FCS motifs would be cleaved at the cell surface by
exogenous trypsin at one of the basic amino acids still present in the
motifs. Following the biotinylation procedure, F protein was
immunoprecipitated, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to a
nitrocellulose membrane. The biotin label was used for detection of the
cell surface F protein by a streptavidin-peroxidase complex (Fig.
4). When the samples were treated with
dithiothreitol to reduce disulfide bonds (lower panel), only
the F1 but not the F2 subunit of the parental fusion protein was recognized (lane a). The F2
subunit appears not to be accessible to biotinylation. No evidence for
the presence of the uncleaved precursor F0 on the cell
surface was obtained by the biotinylation approach. Under non-reducing
conditions (upper panel), the biotinylated F protein
migrated as a 72-kDa band indicating that the F2 and
F1 subunits formed a disulfide-linked complex (F1,2) that was expressed at the cell surface. With the
FCS-2 mutants hF:R106N (lane c), hF:R106N/R108N (lane
e), and hF:R106K/R109K (lane g) only the F1
subunit was detected under reducing conditions. The characteristic
F2+ form found with these mutants in the immunoprecipitation analysis (see Fig. 2, lane c) appears to
be as inaccessible to biotinylation as is the parental F2
subunit. Under nonreducing conditions (upper panel), the
FCS-2 mutants revealed a higher molecular weight than the parental
protein. The difference is explained by the glycosylated pep27 that
remained attached to F2. To account for the presence of
both F1 and F2+, this complex was designated
F1,2+. While the mutant hF:R106N/R108N (lane
e) showed only the F1,2+ form, a small amount of the mutant proteins hF:R106N (lane c) and hF:R106K/R109K
(lane g) was cleaved and converted into F1,2.
When the cells were treated with trypsin prior to biotinylation, all
three mutants were completely converted into F1,2
demonstrating that the modified FCS-2 motifs represent suitable
substrates for this protease (lanes d, f, and h).
The mutant hF:R108N/R109N was correctly processed by trypsin as well
(not shown) indicating that cleavage is possible not only at position
109 but also at position 106. Because it was not possible to label
F2+ and F2 with biotin, we performed the same
experiment with metabolically labeled cells (Fig. 4B). In
this way we could demonstrate for four FCS-2 mutants that trypsin
treatment results in the conversion of F2+ to
F2. In Fig. 4B, the small amount of
F0 present in the untreated sample of the parental and the mutant proteins is somewhat decreased after trypsin treatment. This
result may indicate either that a portion of the precursor that is not
accessible to biotinylation is present at the cell surface, or that
trypsin was internalized by the cell and thus had access to
intracellular F0.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of trypsin on HRSV F mutants at the
cell surface. A, BSR-T7/5 cells were transfected in
duplicate with recombinant pTM1 plasmids (lanes a and
b, parental F; lanes c and d,
hF:R106N; lanes e and f, hF:R106N/R108N;
lanes g and h, hF:R106K/R109K; lanes i
and j, hF:R136K; lanes k and l,
hF:R133K/R136K; lanes m and n, hF:R135S). One
duplicate of each transfection was treated with 1 µg/ml trypsin for
1 h while the other duplicate remained untreated as indicated on
top of the gel. The cells were labeled with sulfo-NHS-biotin
at 4 °C and F protein was immunoprecipitated from the cell lysates
using a monoclonal antibody. The immunoprecipitates were separated by
conventional SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (lower
panel) or nonreducing conditions (upper panel),
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with streptavidin
peroxidase. B, transfected BSR-T7/5 cells were metabolically
labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 3 h and
were either treated for 1 h with 1 µg/ml trypsin or remained
untreated as indicated. F protein was immunoprecipitated from the cell
lysates, and the immunoprecipitates were separated by Tricine-SDS 10%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions
(lanes a and b, parental F; lanes c
and d, hF:R106N; lanes e and f, hF:R106N/R108N; lanes
g and h, hF:R106K/R109K; lanes i and
j, hF:R108N/R109N). The different F protein forms are
indicated on the right. The relative positions of standard
proteins of the indicated molecular masses (in kDa) are shown on the
left.
|
|
The biotinylation approach was also applied to three mutants with a
modified FCS-1 motif (Fig. 4A), i.e. hF:R136K
(lane i), hF:R133K/R136K (lane k), and hF:R135S
(lane m). Under reducing conditions (lower
panel), the three mutants showed the characteristic F1+ band that represents pep27 attached to the
F1 subunit. Some F1 was also observed
indicating that the mutations introduced into FCS-1 did not completely
block cleavage by furin. In particular, Arg135 appears to
be less important for furin recognition (lane m). Under
nonreducing conditions (upper panel), the mutants migrated as a disulfide-linked complex composed of F1+ and
F2 that was designated F1+,2. It could not be
distinguished from the F1,2+ complex of the FCS-2 mutants
(lanes c, e, and g) on basis of electrophoretic
mobility. Partial cleavage at the modified FCS-1 by furin explains the
appearance of the F1,2 bands (lanes i, k, and
m). When the transfected cells were treated with trypsin,
FCS-1 mutants hF:1R136K (lane j) and hF:R133K/R136K
(lane l) were almost completely degraded and partial
decomposition was observed with mutant hF:R135S (lane n).
This result suggests that the changes made in the FCS-1 motifs caused
the fusion protein to adopt a different conformation with domains being
exposed that are highly sensitive toward trypsin. In this respect,
FCS-1 differs significantly from FCS-2, since changes made in the
latter motif did not result in degradation by trypsin. Corresponding
mutations were also introduced into the FCS-1 and FCS-2 of the BRSV
fusion protein. The results were essentially the same (not shown). The mutations R106N, R106N/K108N, and K108N/R109N rendered FCS-2
quite resistant toward furin but allowed efficient cleavage of the
modified motifs at the cell surface by trypsin. Mutations in the FCS-1 on the other hand changed the conformation of the protein resulting in
reduced cell surface expression and degradation by trypsin.
There are two possible explanations for the behavior of the FCS-1
mutants. First, the amino acid changes by themselves may interfere with
the correct folding of the protein. Alternatively, the F protein may
require cleavage at FCS-1 in order to adopt a more stable conformation.
In the latter case, the order of cleavage at the furin consensus
sequences may be important for the generation of a correctly folded and
fusogenic F1,2 complex. In order to find out whether
cleavage at FCS-1 and FCS-2 occur in a sequential order, the fusion
protein of HRSV was transiently expressed in BSR-T7/5 cells, and the
course of protein maturation was followed by pulse-chase analysis (Fig.
5). The precursor F0 was
detected as a band of 72 kDa which showed an increasing intensity from 0 to 15 min of chase. During this time, the protein was subject to
glycosylation and folding which possibly resulted in an improved presentation of the antigenic epitope used for immunoprecipitation. With chase times longer than 15 min, the intensity of the
F0 band continuously decreased. This was paralleled by an
increase in the 50-kDa F1 subunit. Detectable amounts of
F2 and F2+ were visible after 20 min of chase.
A faint band of about 32 kDa (below the F2+ band) was
detected from 0 to 30 min of chase with more or less constant
intensity. This band presumably represents a fragment of the F protein
that was generated by proteolytic attack during immunoprecipitation.
The detection of the F1+ form was complicated by the
presence of another band which showed the same mobility in the gel as
F1+. This band was already detected after the 5-min pulse
(0' chase) but, in contrast to F0, did not show an increase
in its intensity even after a chase of 10 min. However, starting with
15 min of chase, parallel to the appearance of F1, the
amount of this band increased with time and showed a drop after 30 min.
These data indicate that after a chase of 15 min F0 has
entered the trans-Golgi network compartment where it was cleaved by
furin at FCS-1 and FCS-2. The detection of small amounts of both
intermediates F1+ and F2+ suggests that
cleavage at FCS-1 does not depend on previous cleavage at FCS-2 and
vice versa.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Pulse-chase analysis of HRSV F protein
maturation. Vaccina MVA-T7-infected BSR-T7/5 cells were
transfected with pTM1 plasmid encoding HRSV F protein. Twenty hours
post-transfection the cells were labeled with
[35S]methionine/cysteine for 5 min and chased with
non-radioactive medium for the periods indicated on top of
the gel (in minutes). At the end of each chase period, the cells were
lysed and F protein was immunoprecipitated. The immunoprecipitates were
analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
In the previous experiments, we have shown that the RSV fusion proteins
are processed at two furin consensus sequences resulting in the removal
of the glycosylated peptide pep27. We wanted to determine whether
cleavage at FCS-1 (adjacent to the fusion peptide) is sufficient to
render the F protein fusion-active or whether cleavage at FCS-2 is also
required for fusion competence. For this reason, the ability of HRSV
FCS-1 and FCS-2 mutants to form syncytia in transfected BSR-T7/5 cells
was analyzed by immunofluorescence (Fig.
6). The parental F protein (row 1, left column) was found to induce several large syncytia, whereas
the FCS-2 mutant hF:R106N (row 2, left column) did not show
a significant fusion activity. Rarely, some small syncytia were
observed that were probably caused by small amounts of the mutant
proteins that were cleaved despite the mutations introduced into the
furin motif (compare Fig. 4A). The mutant hF:R106K/R109K
(not shown) revealed a similar phenotype as hF:R106N. With mutants
hF:R108N/R109N (row 3, left column) and hF:R106N/R108N (not
shown), single fluorescent cells, but no syncytia were observed. In
accordance with this phenotype, both mutants were not cleaved at the
single basic amino acids of their modified FCS-2 (see Fig. 4A,
lane e; Fig. 2A, lane c). All the FCS-2 mutants were
processed at FCS-1. However, our results suggest that this is not
sufficient for the F protein to be fusion-active. From the previous
experiment (see Fig. 4, A and B) we knew that trypsin is capable of cleaving at the modified FCS-2. Therefore, the
transfected cells were treated with trypsin and cultured thereafter for
20 h to allow syncytia to form. With no exception, the FCS-2 mutants revealed numerous, large syncytia indistinguishable from those
formed by the parental F protein (rows 1-3, right column). Thus, the fusion protein has to be cleaved at FCS-2 to be converted to
its active form. Similar results were obtained with the corresponding FCS-2 mutants of BRSV bF:R106N, bF:R106N/K108N, and bF: K108N/R109N (not shown). We performed a complementary experiment using HRSV FCS-1
mutants hF:R136K (row 4) and hF:R133K/R136K (not shown). The
biotinylation approach has shown that these mutants are inefficiently cleaved by furin and largely degraded by exogenous trypsin (see above,
Fig. 4A). In accordance with this result, no syncytia were observed in the untreated and in the trypsin-treated sample (row 4). The mutant hF:R135S (row 5) was capable of inducing
syncytia that were smaller than those formed by the parental F protein (row 1). Consistent with this phenotype, the mutation
introduced into FCS-1 did not completely prevent furin action resulting
in a substantial amount of F1 in addition to
F1+ (Fig. 4A, lane m). Trypsin treatment did not
enhance syncytia formation (Fig. 6, row 5). This finding can
also be explained by the result shown in Fig. 4 (lane n),
where this mutant protein was only partially degraded by trypsin
retaining an amount of F1 comparable to the amount of
F1 in the untreated sample (compare lanes m and
n of Fig. 4A). Taken, together, mutant analysis
indicates that cleavage at FCS-2 is required for the F protein to
induce syncytia formation. Trypsin activation mutants could be
generated with mutations introduced into FCS-2 but not into FCS-1.

View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Indirect surface immunofluorescence analysis
of HRSV F protein mutants. Vaccina MVA-T7-infected BSR-T7/5 cells
were transfected with pTM1 plasmids encoding either parental or mutated
HRSV F proteins as indicated. Twenty hours after transfection, the
cells were detached either by incubation with PBS containing 1 mM EDTA (left column) or by trypsinization
(right column), seeded on coverslips, and cultured for 20 more hours in the presence of fetal calf serum. The cells were fixed
with 3% paraformaldehyde and F protein was visualized using a
monoclonal antibody directed to HRSV F protein and a fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse Ig serum. The samples were
examined at 200-fold magnification using a Zeiss axioplan 2 microscope
equipped for epifluorescence (left panel of each column) and
phase contrast (right panel of each column).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Membrane fusion plays an important role in the vesicular transport
between cellular compartments (37), in the fertilization of the
mammalian egg (38, 39), and in cell entry of enveloped viruses (40).
Best understood is this process in the case of enveloped viruses that
initiate infection by a fusion event between the viral lipid envelope
and the membrane of the target cell. Viral fusion activity is mediated
by a viral surface protein and often involves a stretch of hydrophobic
amino acids. This so-called fusion peptide is believed to interact with
the lipids of the target membrane resulting in a destabilization of the
cell membrane (reviewed in Ref. 41). In this way, a fusion process is
initiated that is believed to proceed via hemifusion (fusion of the
outer leaflets of the two lipid bilayers), formation of small pores (fusion of both leaflets of the two partner membranes), and extension of the pores (42, 43). Virus-mediated fusion must be regulated to
ensure that the viral fusion protein only reacts with the target but
not with other cellular or viral membranes. Studies with the hemagglutinin of influenza viruses suggest that after synthesis the
viral fusion proteins adopt a metastable conformation, in which the
fusion peptide is not exposed to the hydrophilic environment. In order
to trigger the fusion of membranes, the fusion protein has to undergo a
conformational change. In the course of this intramolecular
rearrangement, the fusion peptide becomes exposed and thus is able to
interact with the target membrane (44-47). With viruses that enter
cells by endocytotic uptake, e.g. influenza viruses and
vesicular stomatitis virus, the conformational change may be induced by
the low pH encountered within endosomes. In the case of viruses that
fuse with the plasma membrane, the conformational change may result
from the binding to a specific cell surface receptor as has been shown
for the interaction between HIV and chemokine receptors (48). Whatever
cellular factor, low pH or specific surface receptor, is used to
trigger the fusion activity, with most enveloped viruses the exposition
of the fusion peptide will only occur after proteolytic cleavage of the
fusion protein into two subunits. In most cases, cleavage is achieved
by furin-like enzymes in the trans-Golgi network, a late compartment of
the secretory pathway. In this way, the fusion protein may be prevented from aberrant fusion reactions within vesicular compartments such as
endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi. As shown for the influenza hemagglutinin (49), proteolytic cleavage may also induce a first conformational change in the viral fusion protein.
The fusion protein of RSV resembles many other viral fusion proteins in
the location of the fusion peptide immediately downstream of a furin
recognition motif (2, 3). Proteolysis at this site by furin-like
enzymes results in two cleavage products with the fusion peptide at the
N terminus of the membrane-anchored subunit F1. A unique
feature of the RSV F proteins is that there are two furin recognition
motifs and that cleavage has to occur at both FCS-1 and FCS-2 in order
to render the protein fusion-active. Other viral fusion proteins only
contain a single recognition site for furin. This is also true for the
fusion proteins of the related pneumonia virus of mice and the avian
pneumoviruses (50, 51). In the glycoprotein of HIV, gp160, there is a
stretch of basic amino acids (KAKRR504) that is separated
from the actual furin cleavage site (REKR511) by only three
amino acids. However, despite the basic character, the sequence of the
former peptide is not consistent with the furin recognition motif
RX(R/K)R. Analysis of mutants has revealed that only the
furin motif REKR511, but not the KAKRR504
sequence is required for proteolytic activation of the HIV glycoprotein (52).
Modification of FCS-1 in the RSV fusion protein by site-directed
mutagenesis resulted in the appearance of an F1+ band that
is expected if cleavage occurs only at FCS-2 and pep27 remains attached
to the F1 subunit. In addition to F1+, some
F1 was observed with all FCS-1 mutants. The F1
band was most prominent in the mutant R135S. This is consistent with
other reports that the basic amino acid at the 2 position within the
furin recognition motif is less important for cleavage by furin than
are the R( 1) and R( 4) residues (53). Syncytia formation indicated
that the fusion activity was reduced but not abolished in this mutant. In contrast, no snycytia were observed with the mutants R136K and
R133K/R136K indicating that the amount of F1 protein
observed in these mutants was not sufficient for a detectable fusion
activity. The RSV fusion proteins contain a lysine at position 6 and
basic residues at this position have been reported to compensate for less favorable amino acids at the 1 and 4 position (54). Therefore, the low level of F1 in the R136K and R133K/R136K mutants
may result from cleavage by furin. The amino acid exchanges in the
FCS-1 mutants were chosen such that an arginine or lysine was retained at the 1 position. In this way it was expected that trypsin treatment should result in proteolytic activation as has been shown for the
fusion proteins of other paramyxoviruses that have a single arginine at
the cleavage site (2, 3). However, the F proteins of the R136K and
R133K/R136K mutants were almost completely degraded and consequently no
fusion activity was induced by trypsin. With the R135S mutant, some
F1 was retained but still more than half of the protein was
degraded and the low fusion activity was not enhanced by trypsin
treatment. From this result we conclude that mutations in the FCS-1
motif affect the conformation of the fusion protein by exposing
trypsin-sensitive domains. This is in contrast to the mutant fusion
protein of a recombinant measles virus that becomes fusion-active after
trypsin treatment (28).
Modification of FCS-2 by site-directed mutagenesis resulted in the
appearance of an F2+ band that is expected if cleavage occurs only at FCS-1 and pep27 remains attached to F2. With
mutants R106N/R108N and R108N/R109N cleavage at FCS-2 was almost
completely abolished, whereas some F2 was detectable with
mutants R106N and R106K/R109K. The former mutants retained only a
single basic amino acid of the furin recognition site, whereas the two
latter mutants contain two or three basic amino acids. However, these
basic residues do not form a genuine furin cleavage site and there are
no nearby basic residues to compensate for less favorable amino acids
at the 1 and/or 4 positions. Therefore, we cannot exclude that the
small amount of F2 observed with mutants R106N and
R106K/R109K is due to cleavage by a protease other than furin,
e.g. a trypsin-like enzyme. It should be noted that in the
same cells the influenza C glycoprotein HEF that contains a single
arginine residue at the cleavage site was partially
cleaved.3 Therefore, a
trypsin-like enzyme is expected to be present in BSR-T7/5 cells and may
be responsible for the partial cleavage of the mutants mentioned above.
In contrast to FCS-1, FCS-2 mutants were not degraded by trypsin.
Treatment with this protease rather converted F1,2+ into
F1,2. Concomitantly the fusion activity was enhanced as
indicated by the formation of syncytia. This result suggests that, in
contrast to FCS-1, mutations at FCS-2 have no detrimental effect on the
conformation of the RSV F protein. Interestingly, proteolytic
activation was possible also with mutant R108N/R109N. In this mutant
trypsin can cleave at Arg106, but not at amino acids 108 or
109. Conversely, cleavage of the parental protein by furin and cleavage
of mutant R106N/R108N by trypsin is possible at
Arg109 but not at Arg106. This result indicates
that proteolytic activation of the RSV fusion protein does not require
a site-specific cleavage at FCS-2.
The data presented here demonstrate that cleavage at both FCS-1 and
FCS-2 is required for the F protein to induce syncytia formation. Our
pulse-chase experiment indicates that both F1+ and
F2+ are present in cells expressing F protein suggesting that furin or a furin-like enzyme that acts on F protein does not have
a strict temporal preference for FCS-1 or FCS-2. The data obtained with
our mutants also show that cleavage at either site does not depend on
prior cleavage of the other site. As a consequence of the two
proteolytic events, pep27 is released from the polypeptide chain of the
fusion protein and there is no cysteine residue to form disulfide bonds
with either F1 or F2. Consistent with this
view, mutations in either FCS-1 or FCS-2 resulted in a band with
reduced electrophoretic mobility (F1+,2 or
F1,2+, respectively). The release of pep27 may
facilitate the structural rearrangement required to convert the RSV
fusion protein into its fusogenic form. This may explain why in the
case of RSV cleavage at FCS-1 is not sufficient to make the F protein
fusion-competent.
Pep27 in the F protein of both HRSV and BRSV is glycosylated. The
oligosaccharide(s) do not prevent the cellular proteases from
activating the fusion protein. This is different from the hemagglutinin
of influenza viruses. In a strain of the H5 subtype, an oligosaccharide
in the vicinity of the furin recognition motif prevented cleavage by
furin and rendered the virus apathogenic. A variant derived from this
virus that had lost this carbohydrate side chain because of a mutation
in the glycosylation motif was highly pathogenic (55).
Mutations in FCS-2 like R106N/R108N and R108N/R109N are potential
candidates for the generation of a live attenuated RSV vaccine by
reverse genetics (31, 56). Recombinant RSV containing a fusion protein
that depends on activation by trypsin-like proteases rather than by
furin are expected to be less virulent than the parental virus. In
contrast to furin that is ubiquitously expressed, trypsin-like
proteases are secreted by only a subset of cells in the organism. In
addition, proteolytic processing of the viral fusion protein may be
limited due to the low concentrations of these proteases in some
extracellular fluids. As a consequence, the mutant viruses are expected
to have a restricted cell tropism and will grow to lower titers than
the parental virus. Most important, spread of infection will be
limited. Recently, a recombinant measles virus with a modified furin
consensus sequence has been described that requires exogenous protease
for activation of infectivity (28). Unlike the parental measles virus,
the mutant did not induce neural disease in susceptible transgenic mice
and showed moderate productive infection of the lung. With respect to a
safe, live-attenuated RSV vaccine, similar mutants of RSV will be of high interest.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The work was supported Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant
HE 1168/11-1/2 (to G. H.) and European Community Grant
QLK2-CT-1999-00443.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
This publication is dedicated to Prof. Dr. R. Rott on the occasion of
his 75th birthday.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institut für
Virologie, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany. Fax: 49-511-953-8898; E-mail:
Georg.Herrler@tiho- hannover.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 19, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102633200
2
G. Zimmer and B. Voges, unpublished data.
3
G. Zimmer, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HRSV, human
respiratory syncytial virus;
BRSV, bovine respiratory syncytial virus;
RSV, respiratory syncytial virus;
FCS, furin consensus sequence;
EMEM, Earle's minimal essential medium;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]- glycine;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barr, P. J.
(1991)
Cell
66,
1-3
|
| 2.
| Klenk, H.-D., and Garten, W. (1994) in Cellular Receptors for
Animal Viruses (Wimmer, E., ed) Monograph 28, pp. 241-280, Cold
Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 3.
|
Klenk, H.-D.,
and Garten, W.
(1994)
Trends Microbiol.
2,
39-43
|
| 4.
|
Tashiro, M.,
Ciborowski, P.,
Klenk, H.-D.,
Pulverer, G.,
and Rott, R.
(1987)
Nature
325,
536-537
|
| 5.
|
Tashiro, M.,
Klenk, H.-D.,
and Rott, R.
(1987)
J. Gen. Virol.
68,
2039-2041
|
| 6.
|
Collins, P. L.,
McIntosh, K.,
and Chanock, R. M.
(1996)
in
Fields Virology
(Fields, B. N., ed)
, pp. 1313-1351, Raven Press, New York
|
| 7.
|
Stott, E. J.,
and Taylor, G.
(1985)
Arch. Virol.
84,
1-52
|
| 8.
|
Baker, J. C.
(1991)
Vet. Q.
13,
47-59
|
| 9.
|
Baker, J. C.,
Ames, T. R.,
and Markham, R. J. F.
(1986)
Am. J. Vet. Res.
47,
240-245
|
| 10.
|
Kimman, T. G.,
and Westenbrink, F.
(1990)
Arch. Virol.
112,
1-25
|
| 11.
|
Karron, R. A.,
Buonagurio, D. A.,
Georgiu, A. F.,
Whitehead, S. S.,
Adamus, J. E.,
Clements-Mann, M. L.,
Harris, D. O.,
Randolph, V. B.,
Udem, S. A.,
Murphy, B. R.,
and Sidhu, M. S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13961-13966
|
| 12.
|
Bukreyev, A.,
Whitehead, S. S.,
Murphy, B. R.,
and Collins, P. L.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
8973-8982
|
| 13.
|
Whitehead, S. S.,
Bukreyev, A.,
Teng, M. N.,
Firestone, C. Y.,
St. Claire, M.,
Elkins, W. R.,
Collins, P. L.,
and Murphy, B. R.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
3438-3442
|
| 14.
|
Olmsted, R. A.,
Elango, N.,
Prince, G.,
Murphy, B. R.,
Johnson, P. R.,
Moss, B.,
Chanock, R. M.,
and Collins, P. L.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
7462-7466
|
| 15.
|
Wertz, G. W.,
Stott, E. J.,
Young, K. K.,
Anderson, K.,
and Ball, L. A.
(1987)
J. Virol.
61,
293-301
|
| 16.
|
Connors, M.,
Collins, P. L.,
Firestone, C. Y.,
and Murphy, B. R.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
1634-1637
|
| 17.
|
Heminway, B. R., Yu, Y.,
Tanaka, Y.,
Perrine, K. G.,
Gustafson, E.,
Bernstein, M.,
and Galinski, M. S.
(1994)
Virology
200,
801-805
|
| 18.
|
Pastey, M. K.,
and Samal, S. K.
(1997)
J. Gen. Virol.
78,
1885-1889
|
| 19.
|
Krusat, T.,
and Streckert, H.-J.
(1997)
Arch. Virol.
142,
1247-1254
|
| 20.
|
Martinez, I.,
and Melero, J. A.
(2000)
J. Gen. Virol.
81,
2715-2722
|
| 21.
|
Hallak, L. K.,
Collins, P. L.,
Knudson, W.,
and Peeples, M. E.
(2000)
Virology
271,
264-275
|
| 22.
|
Hallak, L. K.,
Spillmann, D.,
Collins, P. L.,
and Peeples, M. E.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
10508-10513
|
| 23.
|
Feldman, S. A.,
Hendry, R. M.,
and Beeler, J. A.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
6610-6617
|
| 24.
|
Feldman, S. A.,
Audet, S.,
and Beeler, J. A.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
6442-6447
|
| 25.
|
Gruber, C.,
and Levine, S.
(1985)
J. Gen. Virol.
66,
1241-1247
|
| 26.
|
Collins, P. L.,
and Mottet, G.
(1991)
J. Gen. Virol.
72,
3095-3101
|
| 27.
|
Bolt, G.,
Pedersen, L. O.,
and Birkeslund, H. H.
(2000)
Virus Res.
68,
25-33
|
| 28.
|
Maisner, A.,
Mrkic, B.,
Herrler, G.,
Moll, M.,
Billeter, M. A.,
Cattaneo, R.,
and Klenk, H.-D.
(2000)
J. Gen. Virol.
81,
441-449
|
| 29.
|
Moss, B.,
Elroy-Stein, O.,
Mizukami, T.,
Alexander, W. A.,
and Fuerst, T. R.
(1990)
Nature
348,
91-92
|
| 30.
|
Lopez, J. A.,
Villanueva, N.,
Melero, J. A.,
and Portela, A.
(1988)
Virus Res.
10,
249-262
|
| 31.
|
Buchholz, U. J.,
Finke, S.,
and Conzelmann, K.-K.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
251-259
|
| 32.
|
Sutter, G.,
Ohlmann, M.,
and Erfle, V.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
371,
9-12
|
| 33.
|
Schägger, H.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
368-379
|
| 34.
|
Kyhse-Anderson, J.
(1984)
J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods
10,
203-209
|
| 35.
|
Zimmer, G.,
Trotz, I.,
and Herrler, G.
(2001)
J. Virol.
75,
4744-4751
|
| 36.
|
Le Bivic, A.,
Real, F. X.,
and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
9313-9317
|
| 37.
|
Jahn, R.,
and Sudhof, T. C.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68,
863-911
|
| 38.
|
Huovila, A. P. J.,
Almeida, E. A.,
and White, J. M.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
692-699
|
| 39.
|
Wolfsberg, T. G.,
and White, J. M.
(1996)
Dev. Biol.
180,
389-401
|
| 40.
|
Hernandez, L. D.,
Hoffman, L. R.,
Wolfsberg, T. G.,
and White, J. M.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
12,
627-661
|
| 41.
| White, J. M. (1994) in Cellular Receptors for Animal
Viruses (Wimmer, E., ed) Monograph 28, pp. 281-301, Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 42.
|
Blumenthal, R.,
Sarkar, D. P.,
Durell, S.,
Howard, D. E.,
and Morris, S. J.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
63-71
|
| 43.
|
Melikyan, G. B.,
and Chernomordik, L. V.
(1997)
Trends Microbiol.
5,
349-355
|
| 44.
|
Wilson, I. A.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1981)
Nature
289,
366-375
|
| 45.
|
Carr, C. M.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1993)
Cell
73,
823-832
|
| 46.
|
Bullough, P. A.,
Hughson, F. M.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1994)
Nature
371,
37-43
|
| 47.
|
Carr, C. M.,
Chaudry, C.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14306-14313
|
| 48.
|
Dimitrov, D. S.
(1997)
Cell
91,
721-730
|
| 49.
|
Chen, J.,
Lee, K. H.,
Steinhauer, D. A.,
Stevens, D. J.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1998)
Cell
95,
409-417
|
| 50.
|
Chambers, P.,
Pringle, C. R.,
and Easton, A. J.
(1992)
J. Gen. Virol.
73,
1717-1724
|
| 51.
|
Yu, Q.,
Davis, P. J.,
Barrett, T.,
Binns, M. M.,
Boursnell, M. E.,
and Cavanagh, D.
(1991)
J. Gen. Virol.
72,
75-81
|
| 52.
|
Bosch, V.,
and Pawlita, M.
(1990)
J. Virol.
64,
2337-2344
|
| 53.
|
Molloy, S. S.,
Bresnahan, P. A.,
Leppla, S. H.,
Klimpel, K. R.,
and Thomas, G.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16396-16402
|
| 54.
|
Krysan, D. J.,
Rockwell, N. C.,
and Fuller, R. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
23229-23234
|
| 55.
|
Kawaoka, Y.,
Naeve, C. W.,
and Webster, R. G.
(1984)
Virology
139,
303-316
|
| 56.
|
Collins, P. L.,
Hill, M. G.,
Camargo, E.,
Grosfeld, H.,
Chanock, R. M.,
and Murphy, B. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11563-11567
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Belouzard, V. C. Chu, and G. R. Whittaker
Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites
PNAS,
April 7, 2009;
106(14):
5871 - 5876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Goris, S. Uhlenbruck, C. Schwegmann-Wessels, W. Kohl, F. Niedorf, M. Stern, M. Hewicker-Trautwein, R. Bals, G. Taylor, A. Braun, et al.
Differential Sensitivity of Differentiated Epithelial Cells to Respiratory Viruses Reveals Different Viral Strategies of Host Infection
J. Virol.,
February 15, 2009;
83(4):
1962 - 1968.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Johnstone, S. Guil, M. A. Rico, B. Garcia-Barreno, D. Lopez, J. A. Melero, and M. Del Val
Relevance of viral context and diversity of antigen-processing routes for respiratory syncytial virus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes
J. Gen. Virol.,
September 1, 2008;
89(9):
2194 - 2203.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Shirogane, M. Takeda, M. Iwasaki, N. Ishiguro, H. Takeuchi, Y. Nakatsu, M. Tahara, H. Kikuta, and Y. Yanagi
Efficient Multiplication of Human Metapneumovirus in Vero Cells Expressing the Transmembrane Serine Protease TMPRSS2
J. Virol.,
September 1, 2008;
82(17):
8942 - 8946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Herfst, V. Mas, L. S. Ver, R. J. Wierda, A. D. M. E. Osterhaus, R. A. M. Fouchier, and J. A. Melero
Low-pH-Induced Membrane Fusion Mediated by Human Metapneumovirus F Protein Is a Rare, Strain-Dependent Phenomenon
J. Virol.,
September 1, 2008;
82(17):
8891 - 8895.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Rawling, B. Garcia-Barreno, and J. A. Melero
Insertion of the Two Cleavage Sites of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Protein in Sendai Virus Fusion Protein Leads to Enhanced Cell-Cell Fusion and a Decreased Dependency on the HN Attachment Protein for Activity
J. Virol.,
June 15, 2008;
82(12):
5986 - 5998.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Eckardt-Michel, M. Lorek, D. Baxmann, T. Grunwald, G. M. Keil, and G. Zimmer
The Fusion Protein of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Triggers p53-Dependent Apoptosis
J. Virol.,
April 1, 2008;
82(7):
3236 - 3249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Winter, C. Schwegmann-Wessels, U. Neumann, and G. Herrler
The Spike Protein of Infectious Bronchitis Virus Is Retained Intracellularly by a Tyrosine Motif
J. Virol.,
March 15, 2008;
82(6):
2765 - 2771.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Gardner and R. E. Dutch
A Conserved Region in the F2 Subunit of Paramyxovirus Fusion Proteins Is Involved In Fusion Regulation
J. Virol.,
August 1, 2007;
81(15):
8303 - 8314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Crim, S. A. Audet, S. A. Feldman, H. S. Mostowski, and J. A. Beeler
Identification of Linear Heparin-Binding Peptides Derived from Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Glycoprotein That Inhibit Infectivity
J. Virol.,
January 1, 2007;
81(1):
261 - 271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Martin, L. J. Calder, B. Garcia-Barreno, J. J. Skehel, and J. A. Melero
Sequence elements of the fusion peptide of human respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein required for activity
J. Gen. Virol.,
June 1, 2006;
87(6):
1649 - 1658.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-F. Valarcher, J. Furze, S. G. Wyld, R. Cook, G. Zimmer, G. Herrler, and G. Taylor
Bovine respiratory syncytial virus lacking the virokinin or with a mutation in furin cleavage site RA(R/K)R109 induces less pulmonary inflammation without impeding the induction of protective immunity in calves
J. Gen. Virol.,
June 1, 2006;
87(6):
1659 - 1667.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Aspehaug, A. B. Mikalsen, M. Snow, E. Biering, and S. Villoing
Characterization of the Infectious Salmon Anemia Virus Fusion Protein
J. Virol.,
October 1, 2005;
79(19):
12544 - 12553.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Zimmer, S. Bossow, L. Kolesnikova, M. Hinz, W. J. Neubert, and G. Herrler
A Chimeric Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Protein Functionally Replaces the F and HN Glycoproteins in Recombinant Sendai Virus
J. Virol.,
August 15, 2005;
79(16):
10467 - 10477.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hanika, B. Larisch, E. Steinmann, C. Schwegmann-Wessels, G. Herrler, and G. Zimmer
Use of influenza C virus glycoprotein HEF for generation of vesicular stomatitis virus pseudotypes
J. Gen. Virol.,
May 1, 2005;
86(5):
1455 - 1465.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Ruiz-Arguello, D. Martin, S. A. Wharton, L. J. Calder, S. R. Martin, O. Cano, M. Calero, B. Garcia-Barreno, J. J. Skehel, and J. A. Melero
Thermostability of the human respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein before and after activation: implications for the membrane-fusion mechanism
J. Gen. Virol.,
December 1, 2004;
85(12):
3677 - 3687.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Biacchesi, M. H. Skiadopoulos, L. Yang, E. W. Lamirande, K. C. Tran, B. R. Murphy, P. L. Collins, and U. J. Buchholz
Recombinant Human Metapneumovirus Lacking the Small Hydrophobic SH and/or Attachment G Glycoprotein: Deletion of G Yields a Promising Vaccine Candidate
J. Virol.,
December 1, 2004;
78(23):
12877 - 12887.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Johnstone, P. de Leon, F. Medina, J. A. Melero, B. Garcia-Barreno, and M. D. Val
Shifting immunodominance pattern of two cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes in the F glycoprotein of the Long strain of respiratory syncytial virus
J. Gen. Virol.,
November 1, 2004;
85(11):
3229 - 3238.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Schwegmann-Wessels, M. Al-Falah, D. Escors, Z. Wang, G. Zimmer, H. Deng, L. Enjuanes, H. Y. Naim, and G. Herrler
A Novel Sorting Signal for Intracellular Localization Is Present in the S Protein of a Porcine Coronavirus but Absent from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-associated Coronavirus
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 15, 2004;
279(42):
43661 - 43666.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Konig, K. Giesow, K. Schuldt, U. J. Buchholz, and G. M. Keil
A novel protein expression strategy using recombinant bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV): modifications of the peptide sequence between the two furin cleavage sites of the BRSV fusion protein yield secreted proteins, but affect processing and function of the BRSV fusion protein
J. Gen. Virol.,
July 1, 2004;
85(7):
1815 - 1824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Kohl, G. Zimmer, I. Greiser-Wilke, L. Haas, V. Moennig, and G. Herrler
The surface glycoprotein E2 of bovine viral diarrhoea virus contains an intracellular localization signal
J. Gen. Virol.,
May 1, 2004;
85(5):
1101 - 1111.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Easton, J. B. Domachowske, and H. F. Rosenberg
Animal Pneumoviruses: Molecular Genetics and Pathogenesis
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.,
April 1, 2004;
17(2):
390 - 412.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Zimmer, M. Rohn, G. P. McGregor, M. Schemann, K.-K. Conzelmann, and G. Herrler
Virokinin, a Bioactive Peptide of the Tachykinin Family, Is Released from the Fusion Protein of Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 21, 2003;
278(47):
46854 - 46861.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Douglas, M. L. Panis, E. Ho, K.-Y. Lin, S. H. Krawczyk, D. M. Grant, R. Cai, S. Swaminathan, and T. Cihlar
Inhibition of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion by the Small Molecule VP-14637 via Specific Interactions with F Protein
J. Virol.,
May 1, 2003;
77(9):
5054 - 5064.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Schlender, G. Zimmer, G. Herrler, and K.-K. Conzelmann
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Fusion Protein Subunit F2, Not Attachment Protein G, Determines the Specificity of RSV Infection
J. Virol.,
April 15, 2003;
77(8):
4609 - 4616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. van Bleek, M. C. Poelen, R. van der Most, H. F. Brugghe, H. A. M. Timmermans, C. J. Boog, P. Hoogerhout, H. G. Otten, and C. A. C. M. van Els
Identification of Immunodominant Epitopes Derived from the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Protein That Are Recognized by Human CD4 T Cells
J. Virol.,
December 20, 2002;
77(2):
980 - 988.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Zimmer, K.-K. Conzelmann, and G. Herrler
Cleavage at the Furin Consensus Sequence RAR/KR109 and Presence of the Intervening Peptide of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Protein Are Dispensable for Virus Replication in Cell Culture
J. Virol.,
August 12, 2002;
76(18):
9218 - 9224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Smith, M. C. Lawrence, and P. M. Colman
Modelling the structure of the fusion protein from human respiratory syncytial virus
Protein Eng. Des. Sel.,
May 1, 2002;
15(5):
365 - 371.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. von Messling and R. Cattaneo
Amino-Terminal Precursor Sequence Modulates Canine Distemper Virus Fusion Protein Function
J. Virol.,
March 27, 2002;
76(9):
4172 - 4180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|