Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103179200 on June 22, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 34, 31732-31737, August 24, 2001
Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of Tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentum) Aminopeptidase P*
Felix
Hauser,
Jochen
Strassner, and
Andreas
Schaller
From the Institute of Plant Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology Zürich, Universitätstrasse 2, CH-8092
Zürich, Switzerland
Received for publication, April 10, 2001, and in revised form, June 12, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
A cDNA (LeAPP2) was cloned from
tomato coding for a 654 amino acid protein of 72.7 kDa. The
deduced amino acid sequence was >40% identical with that of mammalian
aminopeptidase P, a metalloexopeptidase. All amino acids reported
to be important for binding of the active site metals and catalytic
activity, respectively, were conserved between LeAPP2 and
its mammalian homologues. LeAPP2 was expressed in
Escherichia coli in N-terminal fusion with glutathione
S-transferase and was purified from bacterial extracts.
LeAPP2 was verified as an aminopeptidase P,
hydrolyzing the amino-terminal Xaa-Pro bonds of bradykinin and
substance P. LeAPP2 also exhibited endoproteolytic activity
cleaving, albeit at a reduced rate, the internal -Phe-Gly bond of
substance P. Apparent Km (15.2 ± 2.4 µM) and Km/kcat (0.94 ± 0.11 mM
1 × s
1) values were
obtained for H-Lys(Abz)-Pro-Pro-pNA as the substrate. LeAPP2 activity was maximally stimulated by addition of 4 mM MnCl2 and to some extent also by
Mg2+, Ca2+, and Co2+, whereas other
divalent metal ions (Cu2+, Zn2+) were
inhibitory. Chelating agents and thiol-modifying reagents inhibited the
enzyme. The data are consistent with LeAPP2 being a
Mn(II)-dependent metalloprotease. This is the first
characterization of a plant aminopeptidase P.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Proline is unique among the proteinogenic amino acids in that its
side chain is bonded to both the
-carbon and the amino group. The
resulting cyclic structure imposes conformational restraints on
proline-containing peptides relevant for structure and function of many
physiologically important biomolecules. A key role for proline residues
is the protection against nonspecific proteolytic degradation. Hence
proline is frequently found and conserved in peptide hormones,
neuropeptides, and growth factors (1-3). Many bioactive polypeptides
share a Xaa-Pro motif at their N termini shielding them against
nonspecific N-terminal degradation. The degradation of these peptides
requires proteases with specificity for the Xaa-Pro motif including
proline-selective dipeptidases (dipeptidyl peptidases II and IV,
cleaving the post-Pro bond) and aminopeptidase P (Xaa-Pro
aminopeptidase, cleaving the pre-Pro bond). Cleavage of the Xaa-Pro
motif by either one of these peptidases may initiate the proteolytic
degradation/inactivation of the peptide or may result in an altered
bioactivity (2-4).
Aminopeptidase P (APP,1 EC
3.4.11.9) was first isolated from Escherichia coli (5) and
has subsequently been characterized from many microbial and mammalian
sources (reviewed in Ref. 4). Mammalian APPs are now known to comprise
at least two distinct forms, a cytosolic form and a membrane-bound form
attached to the plasma membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)
anchor (6-14). APPs hydrolyze the peptide bond between any amino acid and a penultimate proline residue at the N termini of oligopeptide and
protein substrates. A free amino group is required at the N terminus
and the scissile bond must be in the trans configuration (15). The hydrolysis of dipeptides is very slow compared with the
hydrolysis of longer chains, indicating the existence of a third
subsite for substrate binding, which was confirmed for E. coli and mammalian APPs (10, 15). Likely physiological substrates of APP include bradykinin, substance P, and peptide-YY (15-18), and
APP has been implicated in the regulation of cardiovascular and
pulmonary functions in vivo (19-21).
In higher plants, only very few peptides with hormone-like functions
are presently known (22, 23), but a more general role for peptides as
signal molecules in the regulation of plant defense, growth, and
development is anticipated (24). Likewise, the proteases involved in
the maturation and degradation of plant peptide hormones are still
elusive. In the present work, we used a partial cDNA as a probe to
isolate the cDNAs of two APPs from tomato. One of the enzymes
(LeAPP2) was functionally expressed in E. coli,
purified from bacterial extracts, and characterized biochemically. This
is the first characterization of an APP from any plant source.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cloning of LeAPP2--
All basic molecular techniques were
adapted from published protocols (25, 26). A cDNA library from
tomato shoot tissue in
ZAP (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used (27)
and 9.5 × 106 plaque-forming units were screened on
nitrocellulose membranes. A partial tomato cDNA
(LeAPP1)2 with
sequence similarity to human aminopeptidase P was used as a probe.
Hybridization with the radiolabeled cDNA (`Prime-It' system,
Stratagene) was performed at 42 °C in 50% formamide, 5× SSC (1×
SSC is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate),
0.5% SDS, 2× Denhardt's solution (1× Denhardt's solution: 0.02%
Ficoll, 0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.02% bovine serum albumin), 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and 200 µg/ml of
denatured salmon sperm DNA. Filters were washed in 0.5× SSC, 0.5% SDS
at 60 °C and were subsequently exposed to x-ray film (Kodak X-Omat AR) using an intensifying screen. Individual positive
phage clones
were identified in two consecutive rounds of screening. Recombinant
pBluescript cDNA phagemids were excised in vivo using the ExAssist helper-phage according to the recommended procedure (Stratagene). RACE-PCR was performed to obtain full-length cDNAs using the SMART RACE cDNA amplification kit
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. In a first step, single-stranded cDNA
was synthesized from total RNA of tomato leaves using M-MLV reverse
transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) and oligo(dT) as the primer.
Subsequently, the full-length LeAPP1 and LeAPP2
cDNAs were amplified using gene-specific primers
(5'-CCTTGCAAAAGCTCTGAAGAACCCTGTT-3' and 5'-AATGAGGCATGTCAAGCTGC-3'
(Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland) and the universal primer provided
with the kit. The PCR products were gel-purified and cloned into
pCR-Script (Stratagene). The identity of all PCR-generated clones was
confirmed by sequence analysis of at least three independent PCR
products using fluorescent dideoxy chain terminators in the cycle
sequencing reaction (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and the Applied
Biosystems model 373A DNA sequencer.
Northern and Southern Blot Analysis--
RNA was isolated from
different tissues of tomato plants using a phenol-based extraction
procedure (26). Total RNA (5 µg) was separated on
formaldehyde/agarose gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes
according to standard protocols (26). For Southern blot analysis,
genomic DNA was extracted from tomato leaf tissue using the Nucleon
Phytopure DNA extraction kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Ten µg of
DNA were restricted using the enzymes indicated in the legend to Fig. 2
and were subjected to DNA gel blot analysis using the radiolabeled
3'-untranslated regions of the LeAPP cDNAs as probes.
Hybridization, washing, and evaluation of blots were done as described
(28).
Expression of LeAPP2--
The open reading frame of
LeAPP2 was amplified by PCR using Pfu Turbo DNA
polymerase (Stratagene) and synthetic oligonucleotide primers (forward
primer: 5'-ATGGCGGATACACTCGCAGC-3'; reverse primer: 5'-GGGGTACCTAAGAGCACTGAACATCTCA-3' (Microsynth, Balgach Switzerland)). The PCR product was cloned into the StuI/KpnI
sites of pGEX-G (29) a derivative of pGEX-3x (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), to yield pGEX-APP2. This construct allows expression of
LeAPP2 in N-terminal fusion with glutathione
S-transferase (GST) in E. coli under control of
the IPTG-inducible tac promoter. The expression construct
was verified by sequence analysis and was transformed into E. coli BL21 codon plus (DE3)-RIL (Stratagene). Cultures (500 ml)
were grown at 37 °C to an A600 of 1.0, IPTG
was added to a final concentration of 1 mM, and cultures
were grown for another 2 h at room temperature. The cells were
harvested by centrifugation (2500 × g, 15 min,
4 °C) and stored at
80 °C.
Purification of Recombinant LeAPP2--
E. coli cells
were resuspended in 20 ml of buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCL, pH
8.0, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) containing 0.1 mg/ml DNaseI and 1 mg/ml lysozyme. After 20 min at room temperature,
cells were lysed by sonication. The cell debris was removed by
centrifugation (35000 × g, 15 min, 4 °C), and the
supernatant was subjected to affinity chromatography on a
glutathione-Sepharose 4B column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; 1-ml bed
volume) equilibrated in buffer A. After extensive washing with buffer A
and buffer B (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0), the fusion protein
(GST·LeAPP2) was eluted with buffer B containing 10 mM reduced glutathione. The progress of protein purification was monitored by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis performed on 10% polyacrylamide gels using the buffer system described by Laemmli (30). Gels were stained for protein detection using Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250.
Steady State Kinetic Analyses--
For continuous assay of
LeAPP2 activity, H-Lys(Abz)-Pro-Pro-pNA (Bachem;
Bubendorf, Switzerland) was used as an internally quenched fluorogenic
substrate (31). Unless stated otherwise, the assays contained 125 ng of
the GST·APP2 fusion protein and 50 µM of the substrate
in a total volume of 500 µl of 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 4 mM MnCl2, and the fluorescence was recorded in
a Kontron SFM 25 fluorimeter (
ex: 320 nm,
em: 411 nm). To analyze the effect of different divalent
metal ions on the reaction rate, the enzyme was incubated with the
respective salt for 5 min before the reaction was started by addition
of the substrate. The inhibitory effects of
N-ethylmaleimide, 1, 10-phenanthroline, 2-mercaptoethanol, diethylpyrocarbonate, and EDTA were assayed after a preincubation period of 30 min.
MALDI-TOF/MS Assay of LeAPP2 Specificity--
The degradation of
bradykinin, substance P (Sigma), and systemin (Enzyme System Products,
Livermore, CA; 50 µM each) by the GST·APP2 fusion
protein (250 nM) was analyzed using MALDI-TOF mass
spectrometry. The reaction was performed at room temperature in a total
volume of 50 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 4 mM MnCl2. 1-µl aliquots were taken at
intervals and mixed on the MALDI-TOF/MS sample plate with an equal
volume of the crystallization matrix (2 parts of saturated
2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in acetone, 1 part 0.1% (v/v)
trifluoroacetic acid). Crystals were washed repeatedly with deionized
water and air-dried before recording the mass spectra with a Voyage
Elite mass spectrometer using the reflectron mode for increased mass
accuracy. Peptide masses were further analyzed using the program PAWS
v. 8.1.1 (freeware edition for MacOS 7.5, copyright ProteoMetrics, 1997).
 |
RESULTS |
Molecular Cloning of LeAPP1 and -2--
A partial cDNA with
sequence similarity to human APP was serendipitously
isolated3 in a genetic screen
for the identification of proteases involved in either the maturation
or the degradation/inactivation of systemin an oligopeptide signal
molecule involved in wound signal transduction (32). The screen had
been devised for the identification of endopeptidases with known
specificity (33). Hence, the isolated cDNA, which encodes an APP,
i.e. an exopeptidase, likely represents a false positive.
The sequence was completed at its 5'-end by RACE-PCR and termed
LeAPP1 (GenBankTM accession number AJ308541).
Using the LeAPP1 cDNA as a probe, a tomato cDNA
library was screened at moderate stringency resulting in the isolation
of seven clones, four of which corresponded to LeAPP1
although three appeared to encode a second aminopeptidase P,
i.e. LeAPP2. As indicated by a sequence
comparison with the LeAPP1 cDNA, all three clones were
incomplete at their 5'-ends, and RACE-PCR was performed to obtain the
full-length sequence (GenBankTM accession number AJ310676).
The LeAPP2 cDNA encompasses an open reading frame of
1962 base pairs coding for a protein of 654 amino acids with a
calculated Mr 72,682. The deduced amino acid
sequence was compared with those of LeAPP1 and the cytosolic and membrane-bound forms of human aminopeptidase P (82, 46, and 41%
sequence identity, respectively; Fig. 1).
All amino acid residues implicated in the binding of active site metals
(Asp-451, Asp-462, His-525, Glu-561, Glu-574; Ref. 34) and two further
histidines (His-432 and His-535, numbers refer to the LeAPP2
sequence) proposed to play a role during catalysis in proton shuttling
from the dinuclear metal center to the solvent (35) are conserved
between the four sequences. There are no obvious sequence elements for
targeting to subcellular compartments, and therefore, LeAPP2
is likely to be a cytosolic enzyme. This conclusion is in agreement
with the higher overall similarity of LeAPP2 with the
cytosolic form of human APP as compared with the membrane-bound form,
which contains N- and C-terminal signal sequences (12). Whereas the
sequence similarity between the tomato and human enzymes is high in the N- and C-terminal regions, a stretch of low similarity extends from
amino acids 237 to 393 of LeAPP2 where there are two
insertions in the plant sequences (amino acids 237-252 and 373-392 of
LeAPP2) lacking a counterpart in the human proteins.

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Sequence alignment of tomato and human
APPs. The amino acid sequences deduced from the LeAPP1
(GenBankTM accession number AJ308541) and LeAPP2
(AJ310676) cDNAs are shown and compared with human cytosolic
(hcAPP, AF272981) and membrane-bound (hmAPP, AF195953) APPs. The
alignment was done with the program pileup of the University of
Wisconsin GCG package and was processed using boxshade at
www.ch.embnet.org. Identical residues and conservative replacements are
shown with black and gray shading, respectively.
Conserved active site residues implicated in metal binding (*) and
catalysis ( ) are indicated.
|
|
The 3'-untranslated regions of the LeAPP1 and 2 cDNAs
were used as probes on gel blots of tomato genomic DNA (Fig.
2, A and B). The
hybridization pattern obtained with the probe derived from the
LeAPP1 cDNA may indicate the existence of a third,
closely related gene in the haploid tomato genome (Fig. 2A).
The LeAPP2 probe, on the other hand, was found to be
gene-specific and was thus suitable for the analysis of
LeAPP2 expression on RNA gel blots (Fig. 2C). A
single class of LeAPP2 transcripts was detected in all
tissues analyzed, being more prevalent in tomato roots and cultured
cells than in flowers, leaves, and cotyledons (Fig. 2C).

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Northern and Southern blot analyses.
Tomato genomic DNA (10 µg) was digested with XbaI
(lane 1), HindIII (lane 2),
EcoRI (lane 3), and DraI (lane
4), separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred to
nitrocellulose membranes (A, B). The DNA gel
blots were probed with radiolabeled DNA fragments derived from the
3'-untranslated regions of the LeAPP1 (A) and
LeAPP2 (B) cDNAs. The positions of DNA size
markers (in kilobases) are indicated. For Northern blot analysis
(C), total RNA was isolated from tomato cotyledons
(lane 1), leaves (lane 2), roots (lane
3), flowers (lane 4), and cultured cells (lane
5). RNA (5 µg) gel blots were probed with a gene-specific
fragment of the LeAPP2 cDNA (top) or a
ubiquitin cDNA (UBQ, bottom) as a control of
RNA loading.
|
|
Expression, Purification, and Catalytic Activity of
LeAPP2--
The open reading frame of the LeAPP2 cDNA
was cloned into the expression vector pGEX-G and expressed in E. coli in N-terminal fusion with GST. From 1 liter of E. coli culture, 4 mg of soluble GST·LeAPP2 were
purified by affinity chromatography (Fig.
3). The apparent molecular mass of the
purified protein of 105 kDa is consistent with the mass expected for
the GST (26 kDa)-LeAPP2 (72.7 kDa) fusion protein. A few
minor contaminants with estimated masses of 70, 43, and 35 kDa,
respectively, co-purified during affinity chromatography and likely
represent degradation products of GST·LeAPP2 as indicated
by N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis (data not shown). Efficient
cleavage of the GST moiety of the fusion protein by factor Xa treatment
proved to be impossible. Hence, the GST·LeAPP2 fusion
protein was used in all further studies. GST·LeAPP2 could
be stored at
20 °C or, in concentrated solution (0.5 mg/ml), at
4 °C for several weeks without a significant loss of activity.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Expression and purification of
GST·LeAPP2. Preparations of E. coli-expressed GST·LeAPP2 are shown at various stages
of purification on a Coomassie-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel.
Individual lanes show the crude extract (lane 1), which was
separated by centrifugation in insoluble (lane 2) and
soluble fractions (lane 3), and GST·LeAPP2
purified from the latter by affinity chromatography on
glutathione-Sepharose 4B (4). The mass (in kDa) and position of
standard proteins (Bio-Rad) are indicated.
|
|
The proteolytic activity of GST·LeAPP2 was assayed using
an internally quenched, fluorogenic substrate (H-Lys(Abz)-Pro-Pro-pNA, (31)). The release of the N-terminal Lys(Abz) by aminopeptidase P
activity was followed spectrofluorometrically. The reaction rate was a
linear function of the protein concentration over the investigated
range of 0-2 mg/ml. LeAPP2 activity was affected by
addition of divalent cations (Fig.
4A). Increasing concentrations of MnCl2 and MgCl2 stimulated LeAPP2
activity with MnCl2 being most effective at a concentration
of 4 mM. CaCl2 and CoCl2 stimulated LeAPP2 activity at 0.4 mM but were inhibitory at
4 mM. Complete inhibition of LeAPP2 activity was
observed after addition of 4 mM ZnCl2 or
CuSO4 (Fig. 4A). LeAPP2 activity was
also inhibited by metal-chelating agents with 1,10-phenanthroline being
much more effective than EDTA (half-maximal inhibition at 36 and 340 µM, respectively). Furthermore, treatment with the
histidine-alkylating reagent diethylpyrocarbonate or
sulfhydryl-modifying reagents (2-mercaptoethanol,
N-ethylmaleimide) resulted in half-maximal inhibition of
LeAPP2 activity at concentrations of 11, 43, and 79 µM, respectively. Apparent Km and
kcat values were derived from steady state
kinetic analyses in the presence of 4 mM MnCl2
at pH 7.5 where LeAPP2 exhibited highest activity (Fig. 4,
B and C). A Km of 15.2 ± 2.4 µM was determined for H-Lys(Abz)-Pro-Pro-pNA, and the
catalytic efficiency
(Km/kcat) was found to be
0.94 ± 0.11 mM
1 × s
1.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Catalytic properties of
GST·LeAPP2. Unless otherwise indicated, assays
of LeAPP2 activity were performed in 0.1 M
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 in the presence of 4 mM MgCl2
using H-Lys(Abz)-Pro-Pro-pNA (50 µM) as the
substrate. A, divalent metal ion dependence of
GST·LeAPP2 activity. The activity of
GST·LeAPP2 in the presence of increasing concentrations of
MnCl2, MgCl2, CaCl2,
CoCl2, ZnCl2, or CuSO4 was analyzed
and is expressed as percent of the activity observed in the absence of
added metal ions (100% = 26 pkat/ml). The relative error of individual
data points was between 0.01 and 0.2%. B,
GST·LeAPP2 activity as a function of pH.
GST·LeAPP2 activity was assayed in 0.1 M
Tris-HCl buffer in presence of 4 mM MnCl2. It
is expressed in percent of the maximum activity observed at pH 7.5 (100% = 50 pkat/ml). C, substrate dependence of
GST·LeAPP2 activity. GST·LeAPP2 (250 ng/ml) activity was assayed with increasing concentrations of
H-Lys(Abz)-Pro-Pro-pNA, and apparent catalytic constants were derived
from a double-reciprocal (Lineweaver-Burk) plot of the data. The values
are the means ± S.D. of eight independent experiments.
|
|
Substrate Specificity of LeAPP2--
For the analysis of
LeAPP2 substrate specificity, bradykinin and substance P,
two substrates of mammalian APPs, were employed. The proteolytic
cleavage of bradykinin and substance P by LeAPP2 was
followed by MALDI-TOF/MS. The N-terminal Arg-Pro- bond of bradykinin
(Arg-Pro-Pro-Gly-Phe-Ser-Pro-Phe-Arg, Mr = 1060.2) was rapidly cleaved by LeAPP2. The subsequent
hydrolysis of the Pro-Pro- bond at the newly formed N terminus was much
slower (Fig. 5). Hydrolysis of the
N-terminal Arg-Pro- bond of substance P (Arg-Pro-Lys-Pro-Gln-Gln-Phe-Phe-Gly-Leu-Met, Mr = 1348.6) was considerably slower than the cleavage of the respective
bond in bradykinin (Fig. 5) indicating an extended site for substrate recognition in LeAPP2. Surprisingly, prolonged incubation
with LeAPP2 resulted in the processing of a second, internal
bond in substance P, i.e. the -Phe-Gly- bond (Fig. 5).
Whereas MALDI-TOF/MS does not allow a precise quantification of
reaction rates, a qualitative estimation of reaction rates is possible
by comparing the time required for complete cleavage at a certain
position. A preference of LeAPP2 for Arg-Pro-Pro- > Arg-Pro-Lys- > Pro-Pro-Gly- > -Phe-Gly- is evident (Fig. 5).
Systemin, a peptide hormone-like signaling molecule from tomato plants
(32), was not a substrate of LeAPP2. The observed processing
of bradykinin and substance P as well as the hydrolysis of
H-Lys(Abz)-Pro-Pro-pNA are clearly the result of aminopeptidase P,
i.e. LeAPP2, activity. A protein preparation from
E. coli expressing an inactive form of LeAPP2
lacking eleven amino acids from the N terminus was devoid of
proteolytic activity indicating the absence of any contaminating
E. coli protease from the LeAPP2 preparation
(data not shown).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
MALDI-TOF/MS assay of
GST·LeAPP2 substrate specificity. Bradykinin
(left panel) and substance P (right panel) were
incubated with LeAPP2 in the presence of 4 mM
MnCl2 at pH 7.5. Aliquots were taken at the time points
indicated on the right and analyzed by MALDI-TOF/MS. The
masses observed for bradykinin fragments correspond to peptides lacking
one or two amino acids from the N terminus (calculated mass of 904.0 and 806.9, respectively). Two fragments were generated from substance P
(right panel). The larger fragment with a mass of 1191.9 was
generated by cleavage of the N-terminal Arg residue (calculated mass of
1192.4). Subsequent endoproteolytic cleavage generated a fragment with
a mass of 891.4 (calculated mass of 891.0) corresponding to hydrolysis
of the -Phe-Gly- bond of substance P.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
APP, like X-Pro dipeptidase (prolidase) and methionyl
aminopeptidases of types I and II, belong to the M24 family in the
clan MG of metalloproteases (36, 37). Whereas the overall sequence similarity between these enzymes is rather low, their C-terminal catalytic domains share a common structural feature called the pita-bread-fold (38). The structures of E. coli methionyl
aminopeptidase and APP have been solved and two metal ions were found
to be "sandwiched" in the pita-bread domain. The metal ions are
liganded by two Asp, one His, and two Glu residues, respectively, which
are strictly conserved in this family of proteases (35, 39, 40). The requirement of these residues for the catalytic activity of porcine APP
has been demonstrated by site-directed mutagenesis (34). We report here
the cloning and characterization of a related enzyme from tomato called
LeAPP2. This is the first characterization of an
aminopeptidase P from any plant. LeAPP2 shares considerable sequence similarity with both E. coli and mammalian APPs in
both the C-terminal pita-bread- as well as in the N-terminal domains. All the amino acid residues involved in metal binding (34, 35) as well
as two histidine residues implicated in proton shuttling between the
solvent and the dinuclear metal center (35) are conserved in
LeAPP2 (Fig. 1).
In addition to the structural similarity, LeAPP2 shares
functional characteristics with known APPs. LeAPP2 expressed
and purified from E. coli as a GST fusion protein exhibited
APP activity, releasing the N-terminal amino acid from peptides with a
penultimate proline residue. It was found to process typical substrates
of mammalian APPs, i.e. bradykinin and substance P. The
catalytic properties as well as structural similarity indicate a closer
relationship with the cytosolic as compared with the membrane-bound
forms of mammalian APPs. The pH optimum of 7.5 for LeAPP2
activity (Fig. 4B) is consistent with its localization in
the cytoplasm. Similar to the cytosolic APP from rat brain (7),
LeAPP2 clearly preferred Arg-Pro-Pro- (bradykinin) over
Arg-Pro-Lys- (substance P), which indicates an extended binding site
for recognition of the P'2 residue of the substrate as it
was reported for E. coli and mammalian APPs (10, 15). Like
the cytosolic APPs from E. coli, Rattus norvegicus, and Homo sapiens, but unlike the
membrane-bound enzymes from R. norvegicus and Bos
taurus, the tomato enzyme tolerates a Lys residue in the
P'2 position.
LeAPP2 also hydrolyzed the N-terminal Pro-Pro- bond of
processed bradykinin, albeit at a slower rate. Cleavage of the Pro-Pro- bond at the N terminus of oligopeptide substrates has also been reported for the cytosolic rat and E. coli APPs (7, 41). The
rat cytosolic APP functionally expressed in E. coli,
however, was found to be unable to hydrolyze the N-terminal Pro-Pro-
bond of a synthetic oligopeptide substrate (13). Endopeptidase
activity, i.e. the cleavage of the -Phe-Gly- bond in
substance P, appears to be a unique feature of LeAPP2. The
fact that protein preparations from E. coli cultures
carrying the empty expression vector, as well as cultures expressing a
truncated, inactive LeAPP2, were devoid of any proteolytic
activity, unequivocally shows that the observed endoproteolytic
activity is a property of LeAPP2 and not that of a
contaminating E. coli enzyme.
There are conflicting reports in the literature with respect to the
metal requirement of APPs. Until recently, supported by the crystal
structures of E. coli methionyl aminopeptidase and APP,
which revealed the presence of dinuclear metal centers in both enzymes
(35, 39), two manganese (Mn(II)) or zink (Zn(II)) ions per subunit were
considered necessary for maximum catalytic activity in cytosolic and
membrane-bound APPs, respectively (Ref. 14, and references therein).
For methionyl aminopeptidase, on the other hand, two equivalents
of cobalt (Co(II)) were proposed to be required based on the
reproducible observation of highest activity in vitro in the
presence of Co(II). Both the nature and the amount of metal required
in vivo have recently been questioned, however.
E. coli methionyl aminopeptidase was shown to be maximally
activated upon addition of only one Fe(II) ion and iron is likely to be
the in vivo ligand. Whereas the first Fe(II) ion is bound with high affinity (Kd = 0.3 µM), the
Kd of the second metal binding site was reported to
be 2.5 mM, and therefore, this site is likely to be
unoccupied in vivo (42, 43). Likewise, the two metal binding
sites in human cytosolic APP (hcAPP) appear to differ in affinity. Upon
expression in E. coli, this enzyme was found to contain only
one equivalent of Mn(II), and this was sufficient to support
proteolytic activity (14). The hydrolysis of bradykinin and substance P
by hcAPP was stimulated 2.7-fold upon further addition of
Mn2+, whereas Mg2+, Ca2+,
Cu2+, and Zn2+ were found to be inhibitory (in
order of increasing inhibition, Ref. 14). The effects of divalent metal
ions on LeAPP2 activity are essentially the same as those
observed for hcAPP (Fig. 4A) and, therefore,
LeAPP2 is also likely to be a single
Mn(II)-dependent enzyme.
The function of the second metal ion binding site remains obscure.
Roles in the regulation of proteolytic activity or in positioning the
substrate by binding its N-terminal amine group have been proposed (34,
43). A competition of substrate and metal ion for the same binding
site may explain the earlier observation that the inhibitory and
stimulating effects of cations on APP activity can be
substrate-dependent (44, 45).
The enzymatic properties of LeAPP2 were further
characterized using H-Lys(Abz)-Pro-Pro-pNA as the substrate for which
an apparent Km of 15.2 ± 2.4 µM
and a catalytic efficiency
(Km/kcat) of 0.94 ± 0.11 mM
1 × s
1 were derived
from steady-state kinetic analyses (Fig. 4C). These values
are within the range of catalytic constants reported for other APPs (2,
7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19). Likewise, the inhibitor profile of
LeAPP2 is typical for APPs. LeAPP2 was found to
be inhibited by chelating agents with 1,10-phenanthroline being much
more effective than EDTA. Consistent with the essential role of
histidine residues in binding of the active site metal and in
catalysis, LeAPP2 was inactivated by a histidine-modifying reagent (diethylpyrocarbonate). Inhibition by 2-mercaptoethanol and
N-ethylmaleimide may indicate a functionally important
cysteine residue. There is, however, no cysteine residue conserved
between the two tomato and human enzymes (Fig. 1). Alternatively, thiol reagents may compete with the substrate as a ligand of the active site
metal. The inhibiton by both metal chelators and thiol reagents has
been reported widely for other APPs (7, 8, 10, 14, 19).
The function of LeAPP2 in planta remains obscure
as long as the in vivo substrate(s) are elusive. They will
include oligopeptides with an amino-terminal Xaa-Pro motif. Such
peptides may arise during protein degradation implying a function for
LeAPP2 in protein turnover. Physiological substrates may
also include plant peptide hormones implying a function for
LeAPP2 in the regulation of hormone stability/activity.
Considering the role of mammalian APPs in the degradation of bradykinin
and substance P, it is tempting to speculate on such a function for
LeAPP2. However, only very few peptide hormone-like signal
molecules are known in plants (22), and none of them contains an
N-terminal Xaa-Pro motif. They are therefore not likely to be
substrates of LeAPPs. Yet peptides are anticipated to play a
much broader role in plant signal transduction than presently
appreciated (24), and they may require APPs for the regulation of activity.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Peter Macheroux (ETH
Zürich) for help with the MALDI-TOF/MS experiments and D. Frasson
for excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant No. 31.56855.99 of the
Swiss National Science Foundation (to A. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ308541 and AJ310676.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 41-1-632-6016;
Fax: 41-1-632-1084; E-mail: andreas.schaller@ipw.biol.ethz.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 22, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103179200
2
J. Strassner and A. Schaller, unpublished observations.
3
J. Strassner and A. Schaller, submitted for publication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
APP, aminopeptidase
P;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside;
MALDI-TOF/MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight/mass
spectrometry;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
RACE, rapid amplification
of cDNA ends.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Mentlein, R.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
2,
251-256
|
| 2.
|
Yaron, A.,
and Naider, F.
(1993)
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
28,
31-81
|
| 3.
|
Vanhoof, G.,
Goossens, F.,
De Meester, I.,
Hendriks, D.,
and Scharpé, S.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
736-744
|
| 4.
|
Cunningham, D. F.,
and O'Connor, B.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1343,
160-186
|
| 5.
|
Yaron, A.,
and Mlynar, D.
(1968)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
32,
658-663
|
| 6.
|
Hooper, N. M.,
Hryszko, J.,
and Turner, A. J.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
267,
509-515
|
| 7.
|
Harbeck, H. T.,
and Mentlein, R.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
198,
451-458
|
| 8.
|
Rusu, I.,
and Yaron, A.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
210,
93-100
|
| 9.
|
Ryan, J. W.,
Valido, F.,
Berryer, P.,
Chung, A. Y. K.,
and Ripka, J. E.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1119,
140-147
|
| 10.
|
Orawski, A. T.,
and Simmons, W. H.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11227-11236
|
| 11.
|
Hyde, R.,
Hooper, N. M.,
and Turner, A. J.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
319,
197-201
|
| 12.
|
Venema, R. C.,
Ju, H.,
Zou, R.,
Venema, V. J.,
and Ryan, J. W.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1354,
45-48
|
| 13.
|
Czirják, G.,
Burkhart, W. A.,
Moyer, M. B.,
Antal, J.,
Shears, S. B.,
and Enyedi, P.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1444,
326-336
|
| 14.
|
Cottrell, G. S.,
Hooper, N. M.,
and Turner, A. J.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
15121-15128
|
| 15.
|
Yoshimoto, T.,
Orawski, A. T.,
and Simmons, W. H.
(1994)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
311,
28-34
|
| 16.
|
Orawski, A. T.,
Susz, J. P.,
and Simmons, W. H.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
75,
123-132
|
| 17.
|
Medeiros, M. S.,
and Turner, A. J.
(1994)
Biochimie (Paris)
76,
283-287
|
| 18.
|
Kim, K. S.,
Kumar, S.,
Simmons, W. H.,
and Brown, N. J.
(2000)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
292,
295-298
|
| 19.
|
Simmons, W. H.,
and Orawski, A. T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4897-4903
|
| 20.
|
Ryan, J. W.,
Berryer, P.,
Chung, A. Y.,
and Sheffy, D. H.
(1994)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
269,
941-947
|
| 21.
|
Blais, C.,
Marceau, C.,
Rouleau, J. L.,
and Adam, A.
(2000)
Peptides
21,
1903-1940
|
| 22.
|
Schaller, A.
(1999)
Plant Mol. Biol.
40,
763-769
|
| 23.
|
Ryan, C. A.,
and Pearce, G.
(2001)
Plant Physiol.
125,
65-68
|
| 24.
|
Schaller, A.
(2001)
in
Bioactive Natural Products
(Atta-Ur-Rahman, ed)
, Elsevier, Amsterdam, in press
|
| 25.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
and Struhl, K.
(1987)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York
|
| 26.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 27.
|
Schmid, J.,
Schaller, A.,
Leibinger, U.,
Boll, W.,
and Amrhein, N.
(1992)
Plant J.
2,
375-383
|
| 28.
|
Schaller, A.,
and Oecking, C.
(1999)
Plant Cell
11,
263-272
|
| 29.
|
Görlach, J.,
and Schmid, J.
(1996)
Gene (Amst.)
170,
145-146
|
| 30.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 31.
|
Stöckel-Maschek, A.,
Mrestani-Klaus, C.,
Stiebitz, B.,
Demuth, H.-U.,
and Neubert, K.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1479,
15-31
|
| 32.
|
Pearce, G.,
Strydom, D.,
Johnson, S.,
and Ryan, C. A.
(1991)
Science
253,
895-898
|
| 33.
|
Smith, T. A.,
and Kohorn, B. D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
5159-5162
|
| 34.
|
Cottrell, G. S.,
Hyde, R.,
Lim, J.,
Parsons, M. R.,
Hooper, N. M.,
and Turner, A. J.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
15129-15135
|
| 35.
|
Wilce, M. C. J.,
Bond, C. S.,
Dixon, N. E.,
Freeman, H. C.,
Guss, J. M.,
Lilley, P. E.,
and Wilce, J. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
3472-3477
|
| 36.
|
Rawlings, N. D.,
and Barrett, A. J.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
248,
183-210
|
| 37.
|
Barrett, A. J.,
Rawlings, N. D.,
and Woessner, J. F.
(1998)
Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes
, pp. 1394-1411, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
|
| 38.
|
Bazan, J. F.,
Weaver, L. H.,
Roderick, S. L.,
Huber, R.,
and Matthews, B. W.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2473-2477
|
| 39.
|
Roderick, S. L.,
and Matthews, B. W.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
3907-3912
|
| 40.
|
Sprinkle, T. J.,
Caldwell, C.,
and Ryan, J. W.
(2000)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
378,
51-56
|
| 41.
|
Yoshimoto, T.,
Murayama, N.,
Takashi, H.,
Tone, H.,
and Tsuru, D.
(1988)
J. Biochem.
104,
93-97
|
| 42.
|
D'souza, V. M.,
and Holz, R. C.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
11079-11085
|
| 43.
|
D'souza, V. M.,
Bennett, B.,
Copik, A. J.,
and Holz, R. C.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
3817-3826
|
| 44.
|
Lloyd, G. S.,
and Turner, A. J.
(1995)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
33,
60S
|
| 45.
|
Lloyd, G. S.,
Hryszko, J.,
Hooper, N. M.,
and Turner, A. J.
(1996)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
52,
229-236
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. S. Lee, Y. J. Kim, S. S. Bae, J. H. Jeon, J. K. Lim, B. C. Jeong, S. G. Kang, and J.-H. Lee
Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of Aminopeptidase P from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Thermococcus sp. Strain NA1.
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
March 1, 2006;
72(3):
1886 - 1890.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-J. Tu, S.-Y. Park, and L. L. Walling
Isolation and Characterization of the Neutral Leucine Aminopeptidase (LapN) of Tomato
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2003;
132(1):
243 - 255.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Rutschmann, U. Stalder, M. Piotrowski, C. Oecking, and A. Schaller
LeCPK1, a Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase from Tomato. Plasma Membrane Targeting and Biochemical Characterization
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2002;
129(1):
156 - 168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.