![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 34, 31839-31844, August 24, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, June 6, 2001, and in revised form, June 27, 2001
Estrogen receptors (ERs)1
highly expressed by multiple myeloma (MM) cells and stimulation of
estrogenic ligands leads to cell apoptosis. Interleukin (IL)-6 is a
major growth factor in the pathogenesis of MM. However, little is known
concerning the molecular consequences of ER activation on
IL-6-regulated MM cell growth. Here we show that the ER agonist
17 Multiple myeloma (MM),1
a clonal B-cell malignancy, accounts for 10% of all hematologic
cancers and remains an incurable hematological malignancy characterized
by the expansion of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow and by
the development of osteolytic lesions (1-3). The main clinical
manifestations of the disease include pancytopenia, hyperproteinemia,
renal dysfunction, bone lesions, and immunodeficiency (4-7).
Interleukin-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine with biological activities on a
wide variety of cells. Although IL-6 does not function as a growth
factor for normal B-cells or for proliferating plasmablasts, IL-6
induces myeloma cell growth. IL-6 is involved in the origin of all
benign and malignant plasma cell expansions (8-14). IL-6, derived from
either autocrine or paracrine sources, is particularly relevant for the
biology of MM. IL-6 is able to stimulate the growth of bone marrow
plasma cells from patients with MM. Myeloma cells frequently express a
functional IL-6 receptor and sometimes are able to produce IL-6 in an
autocrine fashion. Growth of MM cells or cell lines can be inhibited by
antibodies directed against IL-6; in selected cases, an anti-tumor
effect of anti-IL-6 antibodies has also been observed in
vivo. IL-6 also acts as an inhibitor of apoptosis of human MM
cells. Therefore, IL-6 and its signal transduction pathway could be a
good therapeutic target for the treatment of MM (15, 16).
Estrogens exert a wide variety of effects on cell growth, development,
and differentiation (17). Estrogens have important regulatory functions
within the reproductive systems of both females and males, in mammary
gland development and differentiation as anti-atherosclerotic agents,
in central nervous system functions, and in the regulation of
hypothalamic-gonadal axis. Estrogen is the most important sex steroid
for maintenance of skeletal homeostasis. Clinical studies have
highlighted the importance of estrogen deficiency not only in causing
the rapid and transient bone loss that accompanies menopause in women
but also in contributing to the slower, sustained age-related bone loss
in elderly women and men. Estrogens mediate these activities through
binding to a specific nuclear receptor protein, the estrogen receptor,
that functions as a signal transducer and transcriptional factor to
modulate expression of target genes (18, 19). Importantly, Yamamoto
et al. (20) reported that active ER directly associates with
and acts as a transcriptional co-factor for STAT3 induced by IL-6 in
breast cancer cells. Interestingly, most patient MM cells and human MM
cell lines express estrogen receptors (21). Several studies have
recently shown that estrogens and selective estrogen receptor
modulators may induce apoptosis and G1 cell cycle arrest of
human MM cells (22). Although the biological and molecular aspects of
apoptosis induced by ER ligands have been studied, the mechanism of
ER-mediated inhibition of IL-6-inducible MM cell growth has not been evaluated.
In this study, we have chosen two human IL-6-dependent
myeloma cell lines, KAS-6/1 and ANBL6, from patients with aggressive disease as model systems to investigate the role and molecular targets
of estrogen in cell growth of multiple myeloma. We provide evidence
that steroid-activated ER potently blocks IL-6 signal transduction
pathway by blocking the transcriptional activity of activated STAT3.
17 Materials--
17 Cell Culture--
The IL-6-dependent MM cell lines,
ANBL6 and KAS6/1, kindly provided by Dr. Renee Tschumper, were
maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, penicillin-streptomycin (50 IU/ml and 50 µg/ml, respectively), and IL-6 (1 ng/ml). The cells were
deprived of IL-6 and serum for 24 h prior to stimulation. The
cells were then treated with varying concentrations of 17 Proliferation Assays--
Cell proliferation was examined by
measuring DNA synthesis using tritiated thymidine uptake (24).
Quiescent cells (50 × 103/well) were plated in hexad
in flat bottom 96-well microtiter plates in 200 µl of growth medium,
employing 5% fetal calf serum in the presence or absence of IL-6 (2 ng/ml). The cells were treated for 16 h with 17 Ribonuclease Protection Assays--
Total RNA was isolated from
treated or control cells using TRIzol (Life Technologies, Inc.). IL-6
receptor RNA message was examined by RNase protection assay using 20 µg of total RNA hybridized to 2 × 106 cpm of
33P-labeled probe corresponding to hCR2 (PharMingen, San
Dieogo, CA) overnight at 56 °C. Unhybridized RNA was digested with
RNase T1 and RNase A for 45 min at 30 °C and then digested with
proteinase K for 15 min at 37 °C. After phenol/chloroform extraction
and sodium acetate/ethanol precipitation, hybridized RNA probes were denatured at 90 °C for 3 min and electrophoresed on a 5%
polyacrylamide gel. The dried gels were exposed to x-ray film (24).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis--
Cell pellets
were solubilized in lysis buffer as described previously (25, 26). Cell
lysates were rotated end over end at 4 °C for 60 min, and insoluble
material was pelleted at 12,000 × g for 20 min. The
supernatants were incubated with 5 µg/ml human polyclonal Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
The nuclear extract
was prepared as described previously (24). For the electrophoretic
mobility shift assay, end-labeled 32P-STAT3 oligonucleotide
probes corresponding to the m67 SIE gene sequence
5'-AGCTTGTCGACATTTCCCGTAAATCGTCGAG-3') were used (27, 28). The probe
was then incubated with 5 µg of nuclear extracted proteins in 15 µl
of binding mixture (50 mmol/liter Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 25 mmol/liter
MgCl2, 0.5 mmol/liter dithiothreitol, 50% glycerol) at
4 °C for 15 min. For supershift assay, the nuclear extracts were
preincubated with 1 µg of either normal rabbit serum or antisera specific to STAT3 at 4 °C for 30 min. The DNA-protein complexes were
resolved on a 5% polyacrylamide gel. The dried gels were exposed to
x-ray film.
Construction and Transfection of STAT3-binding Element
SIE/Luciferase Reporter Plasmid--
An oligonucleotide consisting of
three copies of IL-6 nuclear-activated factor STAT3 binding promoters
of the m67 SIE in a direct repeat was synthesized with SacI
and XhoI overhangs and ligated into pGL3 luciferase reporter
vector (Promega, Madison, WI). The correct reporter construct sequence
was confirmed by DNA sequencing. According to the manufacturer's
instructions, Fugene-6 was used to transfect the STAT3 reporter plasmid
into MM cells in 12-well plates for 8 h. Following transfection, the cells were incubated in serum-free, phenol red-free medium with or
without 2ng/ml IL-6, 500 nM 17 Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
(RT-PCR)--
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol from parallel sets
of treated cells. 1 µg of RNA was used for first strand RT reaction using the Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). The same amount of cDNAs was subsequently used for PCR amplification. PCR conditions for PIAS3 were one denaturing cycle of 1 min at 95 °C, 25 amplification cycles (94 °C for 30 s,
55 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min), and one final
extension cycle of 20 min at 72 °C, resulting in a product of 240 base pairs. The hPIAS3-specific PCR primers were designed at the
3'-untranslated region of the gene (5'-GAT TGG GAA GGA GGG CAC AGG-3'
and 5'-ACT TCC CCT GCC TCC TAC TCC-3') (29). As an internal control, we evaluated the expression of the housekeeping gene
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in parallel PCR
reactions, using 2 µl of the same cDNAs with the following
oligonucleotides: 3' (5'-TCC ACC ACC CTG TTG CTG TA-3') and 5' (5'-ACC
ACA GTC CAT GCC ATC AC-3') will give a fragment of 452 base pairs.
RT-PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels visualized with
ethidium bromide.
Co-immunoprecipitation Assays--
The cells were lysed in 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40. Immunoprecipitation was
carried out using polyclonal anti-ER antibodies or antiphospho-STAT3. Western blot was performed by Effect of Expression of ERs and Their Ligands on IL-6-inducible
Cell Proliferation of MM Cells--
Two principal human estrogen
receptors have been cloned: ER
Because IL-6 plays a major role in the proliferation of clonal
malignant plasma cells in multiple myeloma, we asked whether the
estrogen ligands could block IL-6-mediated MM cell growth. For this
assay, the ANBL6 MM cells were cultured in the presence or absence of
increasing concentrations of E2 and stimulated by IL-6. As presented in
Fig. 2A, IL-6-inducible
[3H]thymidine incorporation was inhibited by
17 Estrogen Does Not Alter IL-6R Chain Expression--
Because the
initial step in IL-6 signaling requires activation of its cognate
receptor chains (31), we examined whether estrogen-mediated inhibitory
effects were due to reduced expression of IL-6 receptor Estrogen Did Not Affect IL-6-induced JAK2 and STAT3 Tyrosine
Phosphorylation--
A major signal transduction pathway for IL-6
involves activation of JAK kinases and the transcription factor STAT3
(35-39). To clarify whether the ligand-activated estrogen receptor
affect IL-6 induced tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK2 and STAT3, the
cells were treated with E2 (200 nM) for 2 h at
37 °C and stimulated with or without IL-6 for 10 min. The cells were
lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-JAK2 or anti-STAT3 and
immunoblotted with antiphosphotyrosine. As shown in Fig.
4, tyrosine-phosphorylated JAK2 and STAT3
was observed in exogenous IL-6-stimulated KAS6/1 cells (lanes
b and d) and ANBL6 cells (lanes f and
h) but not in lysates from unstimulated cells (lanes
a, c, e, and g). 17 Estradiol Specifically Blocked IL-6-induced STAT3 DNA Binding
Activity and Transactivation--
To examine the effect of activated
ER on the DNA binding activity of STAT3, we performed gel
electrophoretic mobility shift assays by the use of a radiolabeled,
double-stranded, STAT3 oligonucleotide corresponding to the SIE
element. As shown in Fig. 5, nuclear extracts (5 µg) obtained from IL-6-stimulated ANBL6 cells displayed considerable SIE DNA binding activity (lane c) as compared
with equivalent protein samples obtained from non-IL-6-treated cells (lanes a and b). These IL-6-inducible DNA
complexes could be partially supershifted with anti-STAT3 (lane
d), confirming its identity. Moreover, we measured IL-6-induced
SIE DNA binding activities of cells treated with 17
To further quantitatively assess whether 17 Estrogen Decreases the Interaction between the Estrogen Receptor
and IL-6-activated STAT3 Signaling--
To analysis the molecular
basis of inhibition of activated ER PIAS3 Acts as a Co-regulator for Ligand-activated ER
Inhibiting IL-6-inducible STAT3 Activation--
Steroid nuclear
receptors mediate their actions by using various co-regulatory proteins
(40, 41). The protein inhibitor of activated STAT3 (PIAS3) protein is a
co-regulator and has been shown to bind specifically to STAT3, but not
to other STATs, and to inhibit transactivation of a STAT3-responsive
reporter gene (42-44). To explore whether PIAS3 is involved in the
inhibitory effect of ligand-activated ER on the IL-6-inducible STAT3
activation, RT-PCR and co-immunoprecipitation were employed. First, the
RT-PCR assay was successfully applied to quantify different levels of mRNA of PIAS3 in MM cell treated with 17 Interleukin-6 has an essential role in the malignant progression
of MM by regulating the growth and survival of myeloma tumor cells (45,
46). Estrogen appears to be a negative regulator of normal
hematopoiesis and lymphopoiesis (47, 48). However, much less is known
about the effect of estrogens and ERs on IL-6-dependent MM
cells. Using Western blot analysis, we demonstrated that both IL-6-dependent MM cell lines KAS6/1 and ANBL6 dominantly
expressed IL-6 mediates its functions through IL-6R STAT3 is a latent transcription factor that mediates cytokine- and
growth factor-directed transcription. The nuclear receptor ER is also a
ligand-activated transcriptional factor. How does estrogen-activated ER
block IL-6-induced STAT3 activation in MM cells? Direct protein-protein
interaction between transcription factors and ligand-activated nuclear
receptors has been shown to involved in the regulation of
transcriptional activity of transcription factors (51). Zhang et
al. (52) reported that STAT3 acts as a co-activator of nuclear
receptor glucocorticoid receptor signaling. Yamamoto et al.
(20) has shown that estrogen negatively regulates IL-6 signaling
mediated by STAT3 in an IL-6-responsive, ER-positive breast cancer
cells and the reconstituted ER signaling in 297T cells. In addition,
they also demonstrated that active ER directly associates with STAT3
(20). In the present study on MM cells, we demonstrated that ER indeed
cross-talks with phosphorylated STAT3 in the absence of ER ligand
estrogen (Fig. 7). However, this interaction was disassociated in the
addition of estrogen, which suggested that the inhibitory effect of
ligand-activated ER on IL-6/STAT3 signaling might be not directly
achieved by the physical interaction between ER and STAT3. It is
possible that other proteins activated by liganded ER have to be
recruited to STAT3, which leads to the abrogation of STAT3 DNA binding
and transactivation.
The transcriptional activity of steroid receptors relies not only on
their ability to enter the nucleus and bind DNA but also on their
interactions with other transcription factors and a number of
co-regulator protein complexes (40, 41). PIAS is a novel family of
nuclear proteins that includes ARIP3 (androgen
receptor-interacting protein
3), Miz1 (Msx-ineracting
zinc finger 1), GBP (Gu/RNA
helicase II-binding protein), PIAS1, and PIAS3.
Kotaja et al. (43) analyzed the cross-talk between steroid
receptors and PIAS proteins. PIAS proteins influence androgen receptor
function more divergently, in that ARIP3 represses it but Miz1 and
PIAS1 activate it. PIAS1 (53) and PIAS3 (42-44, 54) are reported to
function as specific inhibitors of STAT1 and STAT3 signaling,
respectively. This study presents experimental evidence that estrogen
could induce the mRNA expression of PIAS3 (Fig. 8A) and
increase PIAS3 physical association with IL-6-activated STAT3 (Fig.
8B), in turn blocking transcriptional activity of STAT3.
These data suggested that PIAS3 plays a co-regulatory role in the
ligand-activated ER, inhibiting IL-6-triggered STAT3 signaling pathway
in MM cell biology.
Taken together, STAT3 functions as a principal transcription factor
regulating the replication of MM cells in response to IL-6. Here, we
have demonstrated that the effects of activated ER induce the blockade
of STAT3 transcriptional activity via PIAS3, provide for the molecular
basis of the biological effects of estrogens observed in MM cells, and
have potential therapeutic implications.
We are very grateful to Dr. Joost Oppenheim
for critical review of the manuscript and Dr. Taosheng Chen for discussion.
*
This work was been funded in whole or in part with funds
from the National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health under
Contract NO1-CO-56000.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Intramural Research
Support Program, SAIC, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 27, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105185200
The abbreviations used are:
MM, multiple
myeloma;
ER, estrogen receptor;
STAT, signal transducers and activators
of transcription;
E2, 17
Activation of Estrogen Receptor Blocks Interleukin-6-inducible
Cell Growth of Human Multiple Myeloma Involving Molecular Cross-talk
between Estrogen Receptor and STAT3 Mediated by Co-regulator PIAS3*
§,
,
,
,
Intramural Research Support Program, Science
Applications International Corporation and the ¶ Cytokine
Molecular Mechanisms Section, Laboratory of Molecular Immunoregulation,
Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute,
Frederick, Maryland 21702
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSSION
REFERENCES
-estradiol completely abolished IL-6-inducible MM cell
proliferation. By contrast, the ER antagonist ICI 182,780 overcame the
inhibitory effect of estrogen. Estrogen blocked STAT3 DNA binding and
transactivation but failed to affect the mRNA expression of IL-6
receptor chains or activation of JAK2 and STAT3. Estrogen-activated ER
did not associate directly with STAT3. Estrogen induced the mRNA
expression of PIAS3 (protein inhibitor
of activated STAT3) and increased
PIAS3 physical association with STAT3, suggesting a possible mechanism
of STAT3 inhibition requiring PIAS3 as a co-regulator modulating the
cross-talk between ER and STAT3. These data directly demonstrate STAT3
to be a molecular participant in ER inhibition of the IL-6 signaling
pathway in human MM cells and provides the molecular basis for the
potential use of estrogenic ligands in the treatment of MM or other
tumors where IL-6 has an autocrine or paracrine role.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSSION
REFERENCES
-Estradiol did not block JAK2 activation or STAT3 phosphorylation.
However, STAT3 electrophoretic mobility shift assay and gene reporter
assays were abolished. Activated ER did not associate directly with
STAT3. 17
-Estradiol induced mRNA expression and protein
association of the specific STAT3 inhibitor PIAS3. We propose that a
major molecular locus of estrogenic compounds on MM growth is the
repression of the IL-6 signal pathway via STAT3 inhibition by
PIAS3.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSSION
REFERENCES
-estradiol (E2) was obtained from Sigma, and
ICI 182,780 was from TOCRIS (Ballwin, MO). Tissue culture materials
were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. IL-6 was obtained from
PeproTech (Rock Hill, NJ). JAK2, STAT3, phospho-STAT3, estrogen
receptor
and
and monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine antibodies were
purchased from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). The PIAS1 and
PIAS3 antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
-estradiol and stimulated with 2 ng/ml of IL-6 as described in figure legends. Cell pellets were frozen at
70 °C. In experiments with
17
-estradiol, MM cells were cultured in phenol red-free RPMI 1640 medium. This was done because phenol red has been shown to act as a
weak estrogen agonist (23).
-estradiol
or/and ICI 182,780, pulsed for the remaining 4 h of the assay with
[3H]thymidine (0.5 µCi/200 µl), and harvested onto
glass fiber filters. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was
analyzed by liquid scintillation counting.
-JAK2,
-STAT3 for 2 h at 4 °C. The antibodies were captured by
incubating for 30 min with protein A-Sepharose beads. Precipitated
material was eluted by boiling in SDS sample buffer and
subjected to 7.5% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. All proteins
were transferred to Immobilion-P (polyvinylidene difluoride) membrane.
Western blotting was performed by monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine,
-JAK2,
-STAT3, or
-ER antibodies that were diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer.
-estradiol or indicated
for 16 h. Cell extracts were prepared using the reporter lysis
buffer and measured by a luminometer (Monolight 3010; PharMingen). To correct for variations in transfection efficiencies, the luciferase values were normalized against protein concentration (25).
-PIAS3,
-PIAS1, or
-ER
antibodies that were diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer as described
(25).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSSION
REFERENCES
and ER
(18, 19). To determine
which type of ER is expressed on IL-6-dependent MM cell
lines, we used KAS6/1 and ANBL6 as model systems. These cell lines are
all IL-6-responsive and therefore are phenotypically representative of
freshly isolated tumor cells. As seen in Fig.
1, Western blotting showed that KAS6/1
and ANBL6 MM cells dominantly expressed ER-
rather than ER-
.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
MM cells expression of ER
but not ER
MM cells KAS6/1 and ANBL6
were treated with 200 nM E2 at
37 °C for 2 h and then stimulated with 2 ng/ml IL-6 at 37 °C for 10 min. The cells
were lysed and separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane, and immunoblotted with anti-ER
or
anti-ER
.
-estradiol in a dose-dependent manner. Similar effects
were observed in another MM cell line KAS6/1 (data not shown). We next
determined whether an estrogen antagonist could restore the inhibition
of estrogen on the proliferation of MM cells lines. The cells were
cultured with ICI 182,780 (20 µM), a pure estrogen
antagonist (30), and 17
-estradiol (200 nM). The results
showed that ICI 182,780 could reverse the estrogen inhibition of
IL-6-mediated MM cell proliferation (Fig. 2B). These
findings suggest estrogen is a potent inhibitor of IL-6-mediated
proliferation in MM cells.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effects of ER ligands on IL-6-induced cell
proliferation on MM cells. A, 17
-estradiol inhibits
proliferation of the IL-6-dependent MM cell in a
dose-dependent manner. Proliferation of quiescent ANBL6
cells (50 × 103/well) was examined following
treatment without (0 nM E2) or increasing concentrations of
E2 (abscissa) for 16 h at 37 °C in the presence
(filled bars) or absence of 2 ng/ml IL-6 (hatched
bar). The cells were then pulsed with [3H]thymidine
(0.5 µCi/200 µl) for 4 h, and incorporation of radiolabeled
probe plotted on the ordinate was expressed as total cpm
(n = 6). B, ICI 182,780 restored the E2
inhibition on IL-6-mediated MM cell proliferation. Proliferation of
quiescent ANBL6 cells was examined following treatment with 200 nM E2 or/and 20 µM ICI 182,780 for 16 h
at 37 °C in the presence (filled bars) or absence of 2 ng/ml IL-6 (hatched bar). The cells were then pulsed with
[3H]thymidine (0.5 µCi/200 µl) for 4 h, and
incorporation of radiolabeled probe plotted on the ordinate
was expressed as total cpm (n = 6).
(IL-6R
)
and
chain (gp130) (31-34). For this analysis, total mRNA was
isolated from two different sets of control or 17
-estradiol-treated
cells and hybridized against 33P-labeled receptor probes
(Fig. 3). RNase-protected probes were electrophoretically separated by PAGE, dried, and subjected to autoradiography. Receptor message for non-E2-treated control cells (lane a for KAS6/1 cells and lane c for ANBL6
cells) and E2-treated cells (lane b for KAS6/1 cells and
lane d for ANBL6 cells) failed to show a significant change
in IL-6R
and gp130 mRNA expression compared with the control
housekeeping gene L32 and GAPDH. From these data it could be concluded
that blockade of IL-6-mediated cell growth by estrogen was not due to a
loss of IL-6R expression and suggested that a site of action was distal
to the receptor.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Estrogen does not alter mRNA expression
of IL-6 receptor. Ribonuclease protection assay of E2 treated MM
cells does not alter mRNA expression of IL-6R subunits. cDNA
was generated from freshly isolated mRNA obtained from two sets of
KAS6/1 and ANBL6 cells (see "Experimental Procedures") treated in
the absence (lanes a and c) or presence
(lanes b and d) of 200 nM E2 for
2 h at 37 °C. MM cells mRNA was then hybridized with
33P-labeled RNA probes corresponding to transcripts for
individual human IL-6R
and gp130 (hCR-2) according to PharMingen
protocol (see "Experimental Procedures"). The autoradiograph of the
RNase protected fragments separated on 5% PAGE is shown.
-Estradiol
did not inhibit JAK2 and STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation in either
KAS6/1 (lane d) or ANBL6 cells (lane h).
Immunoblotting of JAK2 and STAT3 (indicated beneath phosphorylation
blots) verified equivalent loading and no loss of protein expression.
These data suggest that the activated ER did not affect IL-6-induced
JAK2 and STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
17
-Estradiol does
not inhibit IL-2-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK2 and
STAT3. MM cells were treated with 200 nM E2 for 2 h at 37 °C and then stimulated with 2 ng/ml IL-6 at 37 °C for 10 min. The cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated (IP) with
either anti-JAK2 or anti-STAT3 antibodies and separated by
SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and
immunoblotted with antiphosphotyrosine (top panel) or
reprobed with
JAK2, or
STAT3 (indicated beneath phosphorylation
blots). The arrow indicates migration location of either
JAK2 or STAT3.
-estradiol for
different time periods. When cells were treated with E2 just prior to
IL-6 (lanes f and g), the STAT3 binding was not
affected by 17
-estradiol treatment. However, when cells were treated
with 17
-estradiol for 2 h (lane i), the
IL-6-inducible STAT3 binding was significantly decreased. Furthermore,
the inhibition was progressively increased with time prolonged of
17
-estradiol treatment (lanes h and i). A
similar effect was observed in another MM cell line KAS6/1 (data not
shown). The above findings suggest that ER activated by 17
-estradiol can inhibit IL-6-induced STAT3 DNA binding activity.

View larger version (93K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
17
-Estradiol
inhibits IL-6-induced STAT3 DNA binding. ANBL6 cells were treated
with E2 (lanes b nd f-i) or without (lanes
a and c-e) at 37 °C for different time periods and
then stimulated with medium (
) or 2 ng/ml IL-6 (+) for 10 min.
Nuclear extracts corresponding to 5 µg of protein were incubated in
the absence of antibody (lanes a-c and f-i),
-STAT3 (lane d), or normal rabbit serum (lane
e) in combination with a 32P-labeled STAT3
oligonucleotide probe corresponding to the SIE gene promoter. The
arrow indicates migrational location of each
nonsupershifted STAT3-DNA complex or free probe.
-estradiol blocked the
transactivation potential of STAT3 in MM cells as compared with control
samples, we utilized the STAT3-luciferase reporter gene construct to
quantitatively assess the effect of the 17
-estradiol on
IL-6-stimulated transcriptional activation. As shown in Fig. 6, STAT3 luciferase activity of
IL-6-stimulated ANBL6 cells was substantially reduced in
17
-estradiol-treated samples as compared with untreated controls
also transfected with the luciferase reporter. Moreover, the estrogen
antagonist, ICI 182,780 (Fig. 6, ICI), can overcome the
inhibitory effect of 17
-estradiol. These observations suggest that
17
-estradiol inhibits STAT3 DNA binding and subsequent transcriptional activity.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
17
-Estradiol
inhibits IL-6-induced STAT3 transactivation in cultured ANBL6
cells. ANBL6 cells were transfected with a 3× STAT3 binding
element-pGL3 promoter-luciferase construct. The cells were then
pretreated in the absence or presence of E2 (200 nM) for
2 h and then incubated with or without IL-6 (2 ng/ml) for 16 h. Luciferase activity of lysed cells was measured and normalized
against protein concentration.
on IL-6/STAT3 signal pathway, we
utilized a co-immunoprecipitation experiment to test for complex
formation between ER and IL-6-induced STAT3. ANBL6 cells were treated
with 17
-estradiol and stimulated by IL-6. Cell extracts were
prepared and immunoprecipitated with an ER
-specific antibody;
immunoprecipitates were developed on Western blots with a
phospho-STAT3-specific antibody. As shown in Fig.
7, the phospho-STAT3 can be
co-precipitated with ER
in cells induced by IL-6 (lane
e). These data indicate that a direct physical protein-protein
interaction occurs between nuclear receptor ER
and activated
transcription factor STAT3. However, the phospho-STAT3 association with
the ligand-activated ER was markedly decreased in the presence of
17
-estradiol (lane d). This suggested that the ER ligand
could disassociate the ER interaction with IL-6-induced STAT3 in MM
cells. Based on the above observation, inhibition of ligand-activated
ER on IL-6/STAT3 signaling may be not directly achieved by the physical
interaction between ER and STAT3.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Phospho-STAT3 co-immunoprecipitates with ER
in response to IL-6 in ANBL6 cells. The cells were treated with or
without E2 (200 nM) for 2 h and then stimulated with
IL-6 as indicated for 10 min before lysing. Western blotting
(WB) analysis with either anti-phospho-STAT3 (upper
panel) or anti-ER (lower panel) was performed on
anti-ER immunoprecipitates (IP) or anti-IgG
immunoprecipitates (negative control).
-estradiol. Fig.
8A shows the expression level
of PIAS3 from the ANBL6 cells after 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h of
stimulation. 17
-Estradiol led to an increased synthesis of PIAS3 as
early as 1 h after treated. The level of mRNA was compared
with the constitutive GAPDH mRNA in the same polymerase chain
reactions. This suggested that estrogen could induce the expression of
PIAS3. Moreover, this effect was in parallel to the inhibition of
17
-estradiol on IL-6-induced STAT3 DNA binding activity. Second,
ANBL6 cell extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated with a
phospho-STAT3-specific antibody; immunoprecipitates were developed on
Western blots with a PIAS3-specific antibody. As shown in Fig.
8B, the PIAS3 but not PIAS1 could be co-precipitated with
phospho-STAT3 induced by IL-6. Moreover, the ER ligand,
17
-estradiol, could significantly increase this association between
PIAS3 and IL-6-inducible phospho-STAT3. These data demonstrated that
PIAS3 is physically associated with IL-6-activated STAT3 and functions as a co-regulator for modulating the molecular cross-talk between ligand-activated ER and IL-6-induced STAT3.

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
A, 17
-estradiol induces PIAS3
expression on MM cells analyzed by RT-PCR. The ANBL6 cells were treated
with E2 (200 nM) for different times as indicated. Total
RNA was isolated from the cells and subjected to RT-PCR analysis using
PIAS3 (upper panel) and GAPDH (lower panel)
primers. RT-PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose gel. The PCR
products of PIAS3 and GAPDH are indicated. B, phospho-STAT3
co-immunoprecipitates with PIAS3 in response to IL-6 in ANBL6 cells.
The cells were treated as indicated before lysing. Western blotting
analysis with anti-PIAS3 (top panel), anti-PIAS1
(middle panel), or anti-phospho-STAT3 (bottom
panel) was performed on anti-phospho-STAT3 immunoprecipitates or
anti-IgG immunoprecipitates (negative control).
![]()
DISCUSSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSSION
REFERENCES
type but not
type ER at high levels, suggesting ER
may involve the regulation of cell growth of MM cells. Furthermore, we
provided evidence that ER agonist 17
-estradiol potently blocks
IL-6-mediated cell proliferation in the above human MM cells. By
contrast, the specific anti-estrogen ICI 182,780 overcomes the
inhibition of 17
-estradiol on IL-6-mediated MM cell growth signaling.
and gp130, a transmembrane
protein, which results in the formation of high affinity IL-6-binding
sites through its association with IL-6R
. After receptor
stimulation, both JAKs and STATs become phosphorylated on tyrosine
residues and rapidly trigger DNA binding and transcription of the STATs
(34-36). To identify the signaling molecule responsible for the
estrogen inhibition of myeloma cell responses to IL-6, we investigated
the effect of ER ligands on the IL-6/IL-6R triggered JAK/STAT3
signaling pathway. We found that estrogen markedly inhibited STAT3 DNA
binding (Fig. 5) and transactivation (Fig. 6) rather than activation of
JAK2 (Fig. 4) or IL-6 receptor chains (Fig. 3). These results indicated
that STAT3 is a molecular target for ER ligands blocking IL-6-induced
cell growth and IL-6-initiated signaling pathway in MM cells. STAT3 is
the main member of STATs family, which is activated by IL-6 family of
cytokines (37). STAT3 has also been described as the acute phase
response factor for its role in activating transcription of
IL-6-responsive genes. Importantly, STAT3 also functions as an oncogene
(49) and either is required for transformation, enhances
transformation, or blocks apoptosis. Bromberg et al. (49)
reported that substitution of two cysteine residues within the
C-terminal loop of the SH2 domain of STAT3 produces a molecule that
dimerizes spontaneously, binds to DNA and activates transcription. The
STAT3-C molecule in immortalized fibroblasts causes cellular
transformation scored by colony formation in soft agar and tumor
formation in nude mice. Catlett-Falcone et al. (50) reported
that STAT3 is constitutively activated in bone marrow mononuclear cells
from patients with multiple myeloma and in the
IL-6-dependent human myeloma cell line U266. Moreover, U266
cells are inherently resistant to Fas-mediated apoptosis and express
high levels of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL. Blocking IL-6 receptor
signaling from Janus kinases to the STAT3 protein inhibits Bcl-xL
expression and induces apoptosis, demonstrating that STAT3 signaling is
essential for the survival of myeloma tumor cells. Thus, blockade of
STAT3 is a key step for estrogen inhibition of human multiple myeloma
cell growth signaling.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
-estradiol;
SIE, Sis-inducible enhancer;
IL, interleukin;
JAK, Janus kinase;
RT, reverse transcriptase;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PIAS3, protein inhibitor of activated STAT3;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
IL-6R
, IL-6
receptor
.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Seiden, M. V.,
and Anderson, K. C.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Oncol.
6,
41-49
2.
Reece, D. E.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Hematol.
5,
460-464
3.
Sjak-Shie, N. N.,
Vescio, R. A.,
and Berenson, J. R.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Hematol.
7,
241-246
4.
Anderson, K.
(1999)
Semin. Oncol.
26,
10-22
5.
Hallek, M.,
Bergsagel, P. L.,
and Anderson, K. C.
(1998)
Blood
91,
3-21
6.
Varterasian, M. L.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Oncol.
11,
3-8
7.
Kastrinakis, N. G.,
Gorgoulis, V. G.,
Foukas, P. G.,
Dimopoulos, M. A.,
and Kittas, C.
(2000)
Ann. Oncol.
11,
1217-1228
8.
Klein, B.,
Zhang, X. G.,
Lu, Z. Y.,
and Bataille, R.
(1995)
Blood
85,
863-872
9.
Treon, S. P.,
and Anderson, K. C.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Hematol.
5,
42-48
10.
Gado, K.,
Domjan, G.,
Hegyesi, H.,
and Falus, A.
(2000)
Cell Biol. Int.
24,
195-209
11.
Chen, Y. H.,
Shiao, R. T.,
Labayog, J. M.,
Modi, S.,
and Lavelle, D.
(1997)
Leuk. Lymphoma.
27,
11-23
12.
Dankbar, B.,
Padro, T.,
Leo, R.,
Feldmann, B.,
Kropff, M.,
Mesters, R. M.,
Serve, H.,
Berdel, W. E.,
and Kienast, J.
(2000)
Blood
95,
2630-2636
13.
Bataille, R.,
Jourdan, M.,
Zhang, X. G.,
and Klein, B.
(1989)
J. Clin. Invest.
84,
2008-2011
14.
Westendorf, J. J.,
Ahmann, G. J.,
Greipp, P. R.,
Witzig, T. E.,
Lust, J. A.,
and Jelinek, D. F.
(1996)
Leukemia
10,
866-876
15.
Chiu, J. J.,
Sgagias, M. K.,
and Cowan, K. H.
(1996)
Clin. Cancer Res.
2,
215-221
16.
Treon, S. P.,
Raje, N.,
and Anderson, K. C.
(2000)
Semin. Oncol.
27,
598-613
17.
Cooke, P. S.,
Buchanan, D. L.,
Lubahn, D. B.,
and Cunha, G. R.
(1998)
Biol. Reprod.
59,
470-475
18.
Cowley, S. M.,
and Parker, M. G.
(1999)
J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
69,
165-175
19.
Paech, K.,
Webb, P.,
Kuiper, G. G.,
Nilsson, S.,
Gustafsson, J.,
Kushner, P. J.,
and Scanlan, T. S.
(1997)
Science
277,
1508-1510
20.
Yamamoto, T.,
Matsuda, T.,
Junicho, A.,
Kishi, H.,
Saatcioglu, F.,
and Muraguchi, A.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
486,
143-148
21.
Otsuki, T.,
Yamada, O.,
Kurebayashi, J.,
Moriya, T.,
Sakaguchi, H.,
Kunisue, H.,
Yata, K.,
Uno, M.,
Yawata, Y.,
and Ueki, A.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
1434-1441
22.
Treon, S. P.,
Teoh, G.,
Urashima, M.,
Ogata, A.,
Chauhan, D.,
Webb, I. J.,
and Anderson, K. C.
(1998)
Blood
92,
1749-1757
23.
Berthois, Y.,
Katzenellenbogen, J. A.,
and Katzenellenbogen, B. S.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
2496-2500
24.
Wang, L. H.,
Kirken, R. A.,
Erwin, R. A., Yu, C. R.,
and Farrar, W. L.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
3897-3904
25.
Wang, L. H.,
Yang, X. Y.,
Kirken, R. A.,
Resau, J. H.,
and Farrar, W. L.
(2000)
Blood
95,
1249-1257
26.
Yang, X. Y.,
Wang, L. H.,
Chen, T.,
Hodge, D. R.,
Resau, J. H.,
DaSilva, L.,
and Farrar, W. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
4541-4544
27.
Wagner, B. J.,
Hayes, T. H.,
Hoban, C. J.,
and Cochran, B. H.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
4477-4484
28.
Sadowski, H. B.,
Shuai, K.,
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
and Gilman, M. Z.
(1993)
Science
261,
1739-1744
29.
Ueki, N.,
Seki, N.,
Yano, K.,
Saito, T.,
Masuho, Y.,
and Muramatsu, M.
(1999)
J. Hum. Genet.
44,
193-196
30.
Kurebayashi, J.,
Otsuki, T.,
Yamamoto, S.,
Kurosumi, M.,
Nakata, T.,
Akinaga, S.,
and Sonoo, H.
(1998)
Oncology
55 (Suppl. 1),
23-34
31.
Ihle, J. N.,
Witthuhn, B. A.,
Quelle, F. W.,
Yamamoto, K.,
and Silvennoinen, O.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
13,
369-398
32.
Fukada, T.,
Hibi, M.,
Yamanaka, Y.,
Takahashi-Tezuka, M.,
Fujitani, Y.,
Yamaguchi, T.,
Nakajima, K.,
and Hirano, T.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
449-460
33.
Rebouissou, C.,
Wijdenes, J.,
Autissier, P.,
Tarte, K.,
Costes, V.,
Liautard, J.,
Rossi, J. F.,
Brochier, J.,
and Klein, B.
(1998)
Blood
91,
4727-4737
34.
Barille, S.,
Thabard, W.,
Robillard, N.,
Moreau, P.,
Pineau, D.,
Harousseau, J. L.,
Bataille, R.,
and Amiot, M.
(1999)
Br. J. Haematol.
106,
532-535
35.
Duhé, R. J.,
Wang, L. H.,
and Farrar, W. L.
(2001)
Cell Biochem. Biophys.
34,
17-59
36.
Liu, K. D.,
Gaffen, S. L.,
and Goldsmith, M. A.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
10,
271-278
37.
Leonard, W. J.,
and O'Shea, J. J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
16,
293-322
38.
Zhong, Z.,
Wen, Z.,
and Darnell, J. E.
(1994)
Science
264,
95-98
39.
Darnell, J. E.
(1997)
Science
277,
1630-1635
40.
McKenna, N. J.,
Lanz, R. B.,
and O'Malley, B. W.
(1999)
Endocr. Rev.
20,
321-344
41.
Glass, C. K.,
and Rosenfeld, M. G.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
121-141
42.
Shuai, K.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2638-2644
43.
Kotaja, N.,
Aittomaki, S.,
Silvennoinen, O.,
Palvimo, J. J.,
and Janne, O. A.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
1986-2000
44.
Rodel, B.,
Tavassoli, K.,
Karsunky, H.,
Schmidt, T.,
Bachmann, M.,
Schaper, F.,
Heinrich, P.,
Shuai, K.,
Elsasser, H. P.,
and Moroy, T.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
5845-5855
45.
Nilsson, K.,
Jernberg, H.,
and Pettersson, M.
(1990)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
166,
3-12
46.
Xu, F. H.,
Sharma, S.,
Gardner, A.,
Tu, Y.,
Raitano, A.,
Sawyers, C.,
and Lichtenstein, A.
(1998)
Blood
92,
241-251
47.
Stein, B.,
and Yang, M. X.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4971-4979
48.
Pottratz, S. T.,
Bellido, T.,
Mocharla, H.,
Crabb, D.,
and Manolagas, S. C.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
93,
944-950
49.
Bromberg, J. F.,
Wrzeszczynska, M. H.,
Devgan, G.,
Zhao, Y.,
Pestell, R. G.,
Albanese, C.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1999)
Cell
98,
295-303
50.
Catlett-Falcone, R.,
Landowski, T. H.,
Oshiro, M. M.,
Turkson, J.,
Levitzki, A.,
Savino, R.,
Ciliberto, G.,
Moscinski, L.,
Fernandez-Luna, J. L.,
Nunez, G.,
Dalton, W. S.,
and Jove, R.
(1999)
Immunity
10,
105-115
51.
Govind, A. P.,
and Thampan, R. V.
(2001)
J. Cell. Biochem.
80,
571-579
52.
Zhang, Z.,
Jones, S.,
Hagood, J. S.,
Fuentes, N. L.,
and Fuller, G. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30607-30610
53.
Tan, J.,
Hall, S. H.,
Hamil, K. G.,
Grossman, G.,
Petrusz, P.,
Liao, J.,
Shuai, K.,
and French, F. S.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
14-26
54.
Chung, C. D.,
Liao, J.,
Liu, B.,
Rao, X.,
Jay, P.,
Berta, P.,
and Shuai, K.
(1997)
Science
278,
1803-1805
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Carreras, S. Turner, V. Paharkova-Vatchkova, A. Mao, C. Dascher, and S. Kovats Estradiol Acts Directly on Bone Marrow Myeloid Progenitors to Differentially Regulate GM-CSF or Flt3 Ligand-Mediated Dendritic Cell Differentiation J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 727 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Wang, X. Y. Yang, X. Zhang, and W. L. Farrar Inhibition of adhesive interaction between multiple myeloma and bone marrow stromal cells by PPAR{gamma} cross talk with NF-{kappa}B and C/EBP Blood, December 15, 2007; 110(13): 4373 - 4384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Kristinsson, O. Landgren, P. W. Dickman, A. R. Derolf, and M. Bjorkholm Patterns of Survival in Multiple Myeloma: A Population-Based Study of Patients Diagnosed in Sweden From 1973 to 2003 J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2007; 25(15): 1993 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Landgren, Y. Zhang, S. H. Zahm, P. Inskip, T. Zheng, and D. Baris Risk of Multiple Myeloma following Medication Use and Medical Conditions: A Case-Control Study in Connecticut Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2342 - 2347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Liu, Q. Shi, and C. D. Sigmund Interleukin-1{beta} Attenuates Renin Gene Expression Via a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3-Dependent Mechanism in As4.1 Cells Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 6011 - 6018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Imoto, K. Sugiyama, R. Muromoto, N. Sato, T. Yamamoto, and T. Matsuda Regulation of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling by Protein Inhibitor of Activated STAT, PIASy through Smad3 J. Biol. Chem., September 5, 2003; 278(36): 34253 - 34258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ciana, S. Ghisletti, P. Mussi, I. Eberini, E. Vegeto, and A. Maggi Estrogen Receptor {alpha}, a Molecular Switch Converting Transforming Growth Factor-{alpha}-mediated Proliferation into Differentiation in Neuroblastoma Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2003; 278(34): 31737 - 31744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Wang, X. Y. Yang, X. Zhang, K. Mihalic, W. Xiao, and W. L. Farrar The cis Decoy against the Estrogen Response Element Suppresses Breast Cancer Cells via Target Disrupting c-fos not Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Activity Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 63(9): 2046 - 2051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Curtis Hewitt, E. H. Goulding, E.M. Eddy, and K. S. Korach Studies Using the Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Knockout Uterus Demonstrate That Implantation but Not Decidualization-Associated Signaling Is Estrogen Dependent Biol Reprod, October 1, 2002; 67(4): 1268 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chauhan, L. Catley, T. Hideshima, G. Li, R. Leblanc, D. Gupta, M. Sattler, P. Richardson, R. L. Schlossman, K. Podar, et al. 2-Methoxyestradiol overcomes drug resistance in multiple myeloma cells Blood, August 28, 2002; 100(6): 2187 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Buettner, L. B. Mora, and R. Jove Activated STAT Signaling in Human Tumors Provides Novel Molecular Targets for Therapeutic Intervention Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 8(4): 945 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|