![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 34, 31891-31896, August 24, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve
University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4935
Received for publication, June 1, 2001
Amino acid residues in region 2 of
RNA synthesis in prokaryotes is carried out by a multi-subunit RNA
polymerase commonly referred to as the core enzyme
(E).1 For
promoter recognition, a sigma (initiation) factor is required; it
interacts with the core polymerase to yield the holoenzyme (E The predominant sigma factor in Escherichia coli, which
enables recognition of promoters of housekeeping genes, is referred to
as In this paper we demonstrate that alanine substitutions at the
positions of Tyr430 and Trp433 lead to
different effects on the interaction of E Materials
Oligonucleotides (oligos) were synthesized by Life Technologies,
Inc. or Genset. Nonradioactive NTPs and dNTPs were purchased from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals. CpA was from Sigma. [ Methods
Deoxyoligonucleotide Labeling and Annealing--
5' end-labeled
DNA oligonucleotides were generated by incubation with
[
Wild type and mutant Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA)--
In experiments
to determine the kobs for heparin resistant
(open) complex formation, we used a template in which the
Interaction of E DNase I Footprinting--
DNase I footprinting experiments were
carried out as described (11) on DNA fragments with wt sequence, for
which the observed footprint is at the PR promoter. The DNA
substrates were obtained by polymerase chain reaction using
5'-33P labeled primers and purified on a 6% native
polyacrylamide gel. RNA polymerase was incubated with labeled promoter
DNA in 20 µl of HEPES buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. At the
conclusion of the incubation period, heparin was added to a final
concentration of 100 µg/ml. After the MgCl2 concentration
was adjusted to 10 mM the DNA was cut with 0.4 units of
DNase I (Ambion) for 30 s at 37 °C. The reactions were
terminated and analyzed on denaturing gels as described previously
(11).
Abortive Initiation--
Abortive initiation assays were
done essentially as described (19). For analysis of open complex
formation at the The With the exception of
Different Roles for Basic and Aromatic Amino Acids in Conserved
Region 2 of Escherichia coli
70 in the
Nucleation and Maintenance of the Single-stranded DNA Bubble in Open
RNA Polymerase-Promoter Complexes*
,
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
70 have been shown to play an important role in
the strand separation step that is necessary for formation of the
functional or open RNA polymerase-promoter complex. Here we present a
comparison of the roles of basic and aromatic amino acids in the
accomplishment of this process, using RNA polymerase bearing alanine
substitutions for both types of amino acids in region 2. We determined
the effects of the substitutions on the kinetics of open complex
formation, as well as on the ability of the RNA polymerase to form
complexes with single-stranded DNA, and with forked DNA duplexes
carrying a single-stranded overhang consisting of bases in the
10
region. We concluded that two basic amino acids
(Lys414 and Lys418) are important for
promoter binding and demonstrated distinct roles, at a subsequent step,
for two aromatic amino acids (Tyr430 and
Trp433). It is likely that these four amino acids, which
are close to each other in the structure of
70, together
are involved in the nucleation of the strand separation process.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
), which is able to form an initiation-competent
complex at promoter sequences in a multistep process involving
conformational changes in both the protein and the DNA (1-3). A
striking feature of such a complex is a region of strand separation
that spans about 14 base pairs from the upstream edge of the conserved
10 promoter element to just beyond the start site of transcription initiation (4). It is thought that, kinetically, strand separation initiates in the
10 region and proceeds in a downstream direction. Measurement of the size and location of the region of strand separation as a function of temperature shows that at low temperatures a small
single-stranded region can be detected that, as the temperature is
increased, expands toward the start site (3, 5-7). In addition, the
introduction of nicks and mismatches in the
10 region is more
effective in the acceleration of open complex formation than if such
distortions are introduced at a more downstream position (8, 9).
70. Sequence comparison has shown that a large group
of sigma factors shows significant homology to
70. Four
regions of sequence conservation have been identified, of which some
have been subdivided to reflect the most extensive sequence
conservation (10). A large body of data has implicated region 2.3 of
the main sigma factors of E. coli, Bacillus
subtilis, and other prokaryotes in the nucleation of the strand
separation. This process eventually results in the formation of the
active or open complex, possibly by facilitating base flipping of the highly conserved A at
11 of the nontemplate strand. The supporting experimental evidence has been derived from analysis of the effects of
alanine substitution for aromatic amino acids on open complex formation
(5, 11) and on the ability of RNA polymerase to interact with model
substrates such as single-stranded DNA (12, 13) and duplexes carrying
regions of unpaired DNA (14), also referred to as forked templates
(15). The former are thought to model the unpaired regions of the
strand-separated bubble, the latter the junction between double- and
single-stranded DNA of the bubble. Based on the use of forked
templates, Gralla and co-workers (14) have concluded that
Tyr430 and Trp433 of region 2.3, which jut out
of the body of the protein (16), are particularly important for the
initiation of the strand separation process.
70
with forked DNA. We provide new results in support of the idea that
multiple aromatic amino acids jointly interact with single-stranded DNA
downstream of the region where strand separation is initiated. Our
results allow us to single out two basic amino acid residues in region
2 (lysines 414 and 418) as being particularly important for the
interaction of RNA polymerase with DNA. Finally, we demonstrate that
the substitutions of alanines for basic amino acids in region 2 have
effects that are fundamentally different from those of substitutions
for aromatic amino acids in the same region.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-33P]ATP,
[
-32P]ATP, and [
-32P]UTP were from
PerkinElmer Life Sciences. DNA-modifying enzymes were
purchased from either New England Biolabs or Roche Molecular Biochemicals. E
70 core enzyme was prepared as
described (17) or purchased from Epicentre.
-33P]- or [
-32P]ATP and T4
polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) using established
procedures. The two strands of forked DNA templates were re-annealed at
concentrations of 100 nM (5' end-labeled nontemplate strand) and 150 nM (unlabeled template strand) in a buffer
containing 25 mM Tris (pH 7.9 at 25 °C) and 50 mM NaCl by heating to 90 °C and slow cooling.
70 Mutagenesis and Purification--
All
manipulations of the
70 coding region were performed on
the pLHN12-His expression plasmid, an
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside-inducible version of Pet11a vector from Novagen exactly as previously described (11). Site-directed single mutations were introduced using the QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) and the appropriate primers according to the manufacturer's instructions. The
mutagenized fragments were subcloned into the wild type pLHN12-His expression vector using the PstI and BamHI
restriction enzymes, and the recombinant plasmids were resequenced
(Molecular Biology core facility at Case Western Reserve University) to
verify the lack of undesired mutations in the entire subcloned DNA.
Successful clones were transformed into E. coli strain DH5a
for maintenance and BL21(DE3) for over-expression.
70 bearing an amino-terminal (his)6
tag were purified from E. coli BL21(DE3) host expression
cells containing pLHN12-His vectors with recombinant rpoD
genes as described previously (11). For all experiments described here,
RNA polymerase holoenzymes were reconstituted in storage buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 0.5 M NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 50% glycerol) from purified E. coli core enzyme (Epicentre) and purified
70 in a molar ratio of 1:5 at 4 °C for 1 h.
Proper interaction with core was verified by a gel mobility shift assay
(11, 18).
PR promoter was inactivated by two mutations in its
35
region, whereas the
PRM promoter had an "up"
mutation in its
10 region (TAGATT to TAGAAT). The experiments were
carried out as described previously (11). Briefly, about 2-5
nM 32P-labeled DNA fragments (obtained by
polymerase chain reaction and polyacrylamide gel purification) were
incubated with 200 nM E
70 at 37 or 20 °C in 20 ml HEPES buffer (30 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol), containing 50 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, for various amounts of time. Each
reaction was challenged with heparin to 100 µg/ml for 1 min prior to
the addition of the loading solution and loading onto a 4%
nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel (29:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) run at
room temperature. Frozen gels were autoradiographed and quantified by
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). The radioactivity in each band, as
the percentage of the total in the lane, was plotted versus
the time of incubation with the E
70. The
kobs for the wild type and mutant RNA
polymerases were determined by fitting the data to the equation
y = Yf * (1
exp(
t × kobs)) + Yo, where
y = the percent of open complexes formed,
t = time of DNA/E
70
incubation, Yf and Yo are the limiting values for
y, and kobs is the pseudo-first order
rate constant.
70 with Single-stranded and
Forked DNAs--
All reactions were performed in HEPES buffer (see
above). Binding to single-stranded (ss) DNA was studied by incubating
5' 32P-labeled DNA oligo (10 nM) and
E
70 (65 nM) for 30 min at
25 °C followed by the addition of loading solution and loading onto
a 5% nondenaturing gel, which was run at 4 °C (13). The intensity
of bands corresponding to free and E
70-bound
oligo was determined by PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). Binding to
forked templates was determined similarly, except that the reactions
were subjected to a 10-min challenge with 100 µg/ml heparin prior to
loading onto the gel at 25 °C (15). To determine the stability of
E
70-forked DNA complexes, 40-µl solutions
were prepared containing 10 nM 32P-labeled
forked DNA template and 65 nM E
70
in HEPES buffer. After a 30-min incubation at 25 °C, heparin was
added to 100 µg/ml, and at regular time intervals 4.5-ml aliquots were removed for analysis on a 5% nondenaturing gel as described above.
PR promoter, the unlabeled DNA fragment
(2-5 nM) (obtained by polymerase chain reaction) and
E
70 (200 nM) were incubated in
transcription buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. After the incubation
period heparin was added to a final concentration of 100 µg/ml, and
reactions were further incubated for 5 min. To initiate transcription,
CpA and 32P-labeled UTP were added (providing final
concentrations of 0.5 mM CpA, 50 µM UTP, and
10 µCi of [
-32P]UTP). The reactions were incubated
for 15 min at 37 °C after which 5 ml of transcription stop solution
(7 M urea, 0.1 M EDTA, 0.4% (w/v) SDS, 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5% bromphenol blue, and
0.5% xylene cyanol FF) was added. The CpApU was separated from the
substrates on a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Gels were frozen
and exposed to film for 2-3 h. The intensities of the bands
corresponding to UTP and CpApU were determined by densitometry.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
70 mutant set used in this study is shown in
Fig. 1a. It consists of
alanine substitutions for basic and aromatic amino acids and one
nonpolar residue (I435A; also I435L). All basic amino acids in region
2.3 as well as two residues in regions 2.2 and one in 2.4 are included.
The aromatic amino acids (described in Ref. 11) are all in region 2.3;
only the buried residue Phe419 and residue
Tyr421 from this region were not substituted. Studies from
Gralla and co-workers (14) have made use of an overlapping set of
substitutions extending from Tyr425 in the C-terminal
direction through Ile452. The results presented here extend
those of the latter two studies.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Sequences of the
70 variants and the DNAs used in this
study. a, the sites of single alanine substitutions in
70 are indicated. b, ssDNA oligos. Both
oligos have the sequence of the non-template strand of the
PR' promoter, except in the
10 sequences
(underlined), where the consensus oligo has the TATAAT
sequence, whereas the
11C oligo has CATAAT. c, forked
templates. The sequences are based on that of the PR'
promoter of bacteriophage
. The positions of the
10 and
35
elements are indicated by boxes. The short fork has just the
overhanging A at position
11; the long fork has an entire consensus
10 sequence in the overhang.
70 with alanine or leucine
substitutions for Ile435, all were able to bind core as
determined by a gel mobility shift assay (data not shown), which was
carried out exactly as described (11). The Ile435 residue
is highly conserved, probably for structural reasons, as it is buried
in the
70 structure. Even a conservative substitution of
this residue with leucine apparently leads to major structural defects
that interfere with
70 core interactions. DNase I
footprinting of complexes of the E
70
holoenzyme, reconstituted with wt
70 or
70 containing substitutions in basic amino acids of
region 2 (see Fig. 1), and the PR promoter is shown in Fig.
2. The E
70 and
the promoter were incubated for 30 min prior to a heparin challenge for
1 min and exposure to DNase I for 30 s. With the exception of
E
70 reconstituted with K414A
70, all holoenzymes afforded complete protection over a
region of DNA between
50 and +20. At 37 °C, for the PR
promoter, such an extended footprint is characteristic of the open RNA
polymerase-promoter complex. Holoenzyme containing the
Lys414
70 afforded only partial protection,
consistent with the observation that this mutant
E
70 forms open complexes with only about 25%
of the DNA even after long incubation times, as compared with over 60%
for the others (data not shown). No evidence was obtained for a
heparin-sensitive complex with a "short" footprint, characteristic
of a closed complex, with any of the E
70
tested bearing alanine substitutions for basic amino acids.

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
DNase I footprinting analysis of
E
70-DNA complexes formed
using holoenzymes reconstituted with wild type and mutant
70. The DNA was labeled with
33P at the 5' end of the template strand. The outer
lanes contained no added E
70 (No
RNAP, no RNA polymerase); the nature of the sigma factor used is
indicated above the other lanes.
In Fig. 3, the rate of open complex
formation at PRM
10up for
E
70 containing substitutions in basic amino
acids is compared with the rates previously reported for
E
70-bearing substitutions in aromatic amino
acids (data from Ref. 11; note that YW bears alanine substitutions at
positions 430 and 433; YYW, at 425, 430, and 433; FYW at 427, 430, and 433; and FYWW, at 427, 430, 433, and 434). Just as with the
aromatic amino acids (5, 20, 21), the E
70
bearing Ala substitutions at basic amino acid residues
Arg422, Arg423, Lys426, and
Arg436 confer cold sensitivity compared with
E
70 reconstituted with wt
70.
However, at 37 °C these same four substitutions have relatively minor effects on E
70 function. In contrast,
substitutions at Lys414 and Lys418 lead, even
at 37 °C, to very slow formation of open complexes. The W433A
substitution has an equally large effect. Only the
E
70 reconstituted with triply or quadruply
substituted
70 had lower rates of formation of open
complexes (this pattern is confirmed by abortive initiation data shown
in Fig. 4; see below). Because of the low
precision in the data for K414A, we were unable to assess whether the
temperature dependence data obtained for this substitution were
reliable.
|
|
Analogous results were obtained in experiments in which the formation
of E
70-promoter complexes, competent for
formation of the first phosphodiester bond, was monitored by
determination of the synthesis of the trinucleotide CpApU from CpA and
UTP. In these experiments, E
70 and promoter
DNA are incubated for 30 min prior to a 1-min heparin challenge and
addition of the RNA synthesis substrates. The amount of trinucleotide
synthesis reflects the formation, during the 30-min incubation period,
of complexes that were competent to initiate RNA synthesis. The ranking
of the mutant E
70 in this experiment roughly
mirrors that established by their relative kobs
of open complex formation, with K414A and K418A each being about as
detrimental as multiple substitutions for aromatic amino acid residues.
However, in contrast to the data shown in Fig. 3, here the K418A
substitution is significantly less damaging than K414A. The lack of
observed effects of the R422A and R436A substitutions in this
experiment stands in contrast to their effect on the rate of open
complex formation (Fig. 3). This likely reflects the relatively long
preincubation between E
70 and the DNA in the
abortive initiation experiments, which permits detection of only severe effects.
To better pinpoint the nature of the defects in the substituted sigma
factors that are responsible for their impaired function, we employed
the model templates shown in Fig. 1, b and c. To
assess the extent to which the substitutions might impede the ability of E
70 to interact with the single-stranded
DNA, and thereby render it less competent in propagating strand
separation during open complex formation, we determined the ability of
the mutant E
70 to interact with ssDNA. It had
been shown previously that E
70 holoenzyme,
but not free
70 or core enzyme, is able to
sequence-specifically interact with single-stranded DNA spanning the
10 promoter element and having the sequence of the non-template
strand of promoter DNA (12, 13, 22). Two oligos were employed, bearing
either the consensus TATAAT
10 sequence or a non-consensus variant,
CATAAT (Fig. 1b). The results are shown in Fig.
5. Core, while not showing any sequence specificity, does have a relatively high affinity for both oligos in
accordance with previous observations of its high affinity for ssDNA
(23). Thus, the departure from such behavior, as observed with all of
the reconstituted E
70 tested here,
constitutes independent verification that the mutated
70s indeed bind to core under the conditions of the
experiment. All E
70 variants bind better to
the consensus oligo, demonstrating that the assay was indeed detecting
sequence-specific binding. The salient finding here is the poor binding
that is observed with the E
70 bearing the Ala
substitutions for positive amino acids in
70 (K414A,
K418A, R423A, and K426A), establishing an interaction of the DNA with
amino acids residues on
70 that extend beyond region 2.3 (Lys414) and are contained on both the nearly parallel
helices 13 and 14. In addition, the Y425A substitution as
well as triple and quadruple substitutions of alanine for aromatic
amino acids are detrimental. The effect of the Y425A substitution (also
seen for the equivalent amino acid in
A (24)) is
especially interesting as it is far removed on the structure from the
location of residue Gln437, thought to interact with the
T at position
12. It serves to define a potential path of the
ssDNA on
70 in an open complex.
|
Guo and Gralla (15) have established "forked" DNAs, modeling
the junction between double- and single-stranded regions, as particularly useful model templates, able to form heparin-resistant complexes with E
70. We have employed here the
"short fork" containing a minimal ss region consisting of just the
A at
11, as well as the "long fork," where the ss extension
covers the entire
10 sequence (see Fig. 1c). The results
are shown in Fig. 6.
E
70 containing
70 with the
Y430A and K418A single substitutions, as well as those containing
multiple substitutions including Y430A, are particularly deficient in
their ability to bind the short fork. On the other hand, the Y425A,
R422A, and K426A substitutions, which drastically affect the ability of
E
70 to bind ssDNA, have very small effects,
if at all, as compared with the wt
70. All
E
70 variants bind the long fork more tightly
than the short fork, in most cases so tightly that the ability to
discriminate differences in binding affinities is likely to be outside
the useful window of this experiment. However, with the long fork, the
multiply substituted
70 variants could be
differentiated; the extent of binding decreases in the order YW > YYW > FYW > FYWW, indicating that substitutions at
positions 425-434 affect the interaction of the long fork with E
70. The binding of the short fork may have
reached the other extreme (background) with the
E
70 containing the multiple substitutions.
Thus it is not possible to conclude that the multiple substitutions do
not affect the binding of the short fork and to infer from these data
alone that, for the long fork, these substitutions mostly affect the
interaction with the ssDNA tail downstream of
11A. However the
data for the interaction of E
70 with
single-stranded DNA (Fig. 5), where the binding affinity decreased in a
similar order, YW > YYW > FYW
FYWW, would seem to
lend support to such a conclusion.
|
We also determined the stabilities of the heparin-resistant complexes
formed with E
70 containing the wt and mutant
sigma factors. We show
elsewhere2 that formation of
a stable complex between E
70 and the short
fork DNA proceeds kinetically through a heparin-sensitive intermediate.
At equilibrium, a substantial fraction of the heparin-sensitive complexes persist; upon addition of heparin these complexes dissociate with a rate that is too fast to measure by the manual mixing methods employed here.2 Our experiments address the stability of
the fraction of the complexes that dissociate with a slower rate. All
substitutions that were assayed in the course of this study affect the
stability of these complexes (see Fig.
7); the half-lives for the complexes formed with the variant E
70 are less than
half of those for wt E
70, which is remarkably
stable, with a half-life of over 100 min. The complex of Y430A
E
70 with the short fork has a half-life of
about 15 min, and substitutions of alanine for additional aromatic
amino acids other than Tyr430, are not found to
further destabilize the complex. The next most labile complexes were
those formed with E
70 containing singly
substituted
70 K425A and F427A, which had half-lives of
about 30 min and thus were twice as stable.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The experiments presented here were carried out to study
nucleation of strand separation as orchestrated by region 2 of E. coli
70. From the findings we conclude that both
basic and aromatic residues are important for open complex formation:
All basic residues examined, with the possible exception of
Arg422, play a role in open complex formation, as is most
evident at 20 °C, but substitutions for Lys414 and
Lys418 have the most prominent effects. Substitutions at
Lys414, Arg423, Lys426, and
Arg436 affect ssDNA binding and at Lys414 and
Lys418 formation of a heparin-resistant complex with forked
DNA. We previously established the involvement of Tyr425,
Phe427, Tyr430, and Trp433 in open
complex formation. Here we show that Tyr425,
Phe427, and Tyr430 are important for
interaction with ssDNA, Phe427, Tyr430, and
Trp433 for formation of a heparin-resistant complex with
forked DNA and Tyr430 for its stabilization. Because
Phe427 is buried (16), the effects of its substitution
could be indirect. Trp334 may be involved in forked DNA
binding (Ref. 14; see also Fig. 6) but we have insufficient data for
this residue. Together with the data from Gralla's group (14), we
conclude that residues of
70 from 414 to 452, thus including helix 13 (16), the connecting loop, and helix 14, are
involved in formation of an open complex.
We attempted to correlate the deficiency in either ssDNA binding or
formation of a heparin-resistant E
70-forked
complex, with the kobs of open complex
formation. No significant correlation was observed between the fraction
of ssDNA bound (Fig. 5) and kobs (Fig. 3)
(R2 = 0.03). However, in searching for a
correlation between kobs for the various mutant
E
70 and their ability to form a
heparin-resistant complex with the short fork, a peculiar but striking
difference in the behavior of E
70 bearing
alanine substitutions for basic and aromatic amino acids in region 2 came to light, as shown in Fig. 8. If the
entire data set is considered, a reasonable (R2 = 0.7) correlation is observed between the kobs
and the % forked DNA bound in a heparin-resistant complex. However,
the correlation was much better (R2 = 0.94) when
only substitutions of alanine for basic residues were considered; the
corresponding linear least squares fit is displayed in Fig. 8. The
aromatic residues are clearly off the line. The points for Y433A,
F427A, and Y425A (e, f, and g, respectively) lie
above the plot (i.e. compared with the substitutions for
basic amino acids, they bind better to the forked DNA than expected based on their value of kobs for open complex
formation). The points for the multiply substituted sigma factors
(a, b, and c) as well as for Y430A (d)
show the opposite behavior. There was no a priori reason for
expecting a correlation between the kinetic data for open complex
formation at promoters and the equilibrium data for the extent of short
fork binding. However, the fact that one is observed indicates that the
differences in dissociation rates (or half-lives) we observe for the
forked DNAs (see Fig. 7) might be small compared with the differences
that exist in the association rate constants. Then the fork binding
data would essentially reflect relative rates of formation of
complexes.
|
Some time ago, Record and colleagues (2) as well as Buc and
McClure (1) showed that formation of an open complex proceeds through
at least two intermediates.
|
|
70 may have undergone a
conformational change and the nucleation of strand separation may have
taken place, perhaps by the flipping of the
11A out of the helix
(14). We interpret our results in terms of the basic and aromatic
residues being involved in the different steps of Scheme 1. We have
shown previously that the aromatic amino acids of
70
region 2.3 were probably involved in the second step of Scheme 1, the
interconversion between R·Pc1 and R·Pc2
(11). In agreement with this interpretation, the results obtained here
show that E
70, bearing multiple substitutions
for aromatic amino acids, is deficient in binding ss and short fork DNA
as well as in stabilizing E
70-short fork
complexes. Based on the results presented here, we conclude that the
basic amino acid residues would facilitate the formation of
R·Pc1. This conclusion is supported by the comparison of
affinities with which E
70 bearing alanine
substitutions for these residues bound short fork DNA.2 It
also is consistent with the failure to observe a heparin-sensitive short footprint for these mutant E
70 (data
not shown) as was observed for the YYW and FYW
E
70 (11).
Residues Lys414, Lys418, Tyr430,
and Trp433 appear particularly important for progressing
through the individual steps shown in Scheme 1. Our results indicate
that Lys414, Lys418, and Tyr430 are
vital in the formation of heparin-resistant
E
70-forked DNA complexes; in addition,
Tyr430 plays a crucial role in the stabilization of these
complexes. The effects of alanine substitutions for Lys414,
Lys418, and Trp433 on open complex formation
are evident at both 20 and 37 °C, whereas the effect of
substitution for Tyr430 apparently can be masked partially
at 37 °C but not at 20 °C. These four amino acid residues are
close to each other in
70; they are located within a
sphere with a radius of about 5 Å in the structure of
70 (16). We propose that, together, they participate in
the nucleation of strand separation. The roles of the two basic amino
acids would be to hold the promoter DNA in the proper orientation and
allow the aromatic amino acids to nucleate the strand separation
process, likely by flipping the
11A out of the helix by a mechanism
that is not yet fully understood. It has been proposed that the
aromatic rings of residues 430 and 433 would sandwich the
11A in
between them (14). This model is unlikely to be entirely correct, as our findings clearly indicate that alanine substitutions for the two
residues do not behave similarly in all assays. The substitution for
Tyr430 has a much more pronounced effect on forked DNA
binding to E
70, whereas substitution for
Trp433 has a greater effect on
kobs for open complex formation at 37 °C.
Also, it is evident from the results presented in Fig. 8 that Y430A
behaves differently from the other single substitutions for aromatic
amino acids we examined. One possibility for reconciling the findings
is that Trp433 participates in "forcing" the flipped
base out of a DNA duplex, whereas Tyr430 would interact
with the flipped out base as provided either by the forked DNA or
subsequent to the action of Trp433 on duplex DNA.
It is also unlikely that three electron-rich rings, such as those of
Tyr430,
11A, and Trp433, would engage
in the formation of a sandwich. Such a sandwich has been proposed for
the human 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase (25), but the DNA base
in that case is alkylated and electron-deficient. It is more likely
that the putatively flipped out
11A would partially overlap one of
the aromatic residues, perhaps the tyrosine at 430, so that
electron-deficient regions of one would be over the electron cloud of
the other. This would also be more consistent with the structural and
mutagenesis data that have been reported for flipped out bases, which
are found in close proximity to just one aromatic amino acid residue.
This is a tryptophan in the case of the E. coli repair
enzyme AlkA (26) and the Tn5 transposon (27), a tyrosine for human
3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase and B. subtilis DNA
polymerase I (25, 28), and a phenylalanine for N6-adenine DNA
methyltransferase (29) and E. coli and human uracil DNA
glycosylase (30, 31). Another aromatic residue could be
involved in the above mentioned forcing out of the flipped base
or could be interacting edge-on with it, like tyrosines 162 and
159, respectively, of human 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase (25) and here possibly Trp433 and/or
Trp334.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM 31808 (to P. L. dH.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The first two authors contributed equally to this work.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106-4935; Tel.: 216-368-3684; Fax: 216-368-4544; E-mail: pld2@po.cwru.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 6, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105027200
2 L. Tsujikawa, O. Tsodikov, and P. L. deHaseth, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
E, RNA
polymerase core enzyme;
E
, RNA polymerase holoenzyme;
E
70, RNA polymerase holoenzyme reconstituted
from core and purified
70;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
oligo, oligodeoxyribonucleotide;
ss, single-stranded;
wt, wild type.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Buc, H., and McClure, W. R. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 2712-2723 |
| 2. | Roe, J. H., Burgess, R. R., and Record, M. T., Jr. (1984) J. Mol. Biol. 176, 495-521 |
| 3. | deHaseth, P. L., Zupancic, M., and Record, M. T., Jr. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 3019-3025 |
| 4. | Siebenlist, U., Simpson, R. B., and Gilbert, W. (1980) Cell 20, 269-281 |
| 5. | Helmann, J. D., and deHaseth, P. L. (1999) Biochemistry 37, 5959-5967 |
| 6. | Kirkegaard, K., Buc, H., Spassky, A., and Wang, J. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 2544-2548 |
| 7. | Zaychikov, E., Denissova, L., Meier, T., Gotte, M., and Heumann, H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2259-2267 |
| 8. | Roberts, C. W., and Roberts, J. W. (1996) Cell 86, 495-501 |
| 9. | Li, X.-Y., and McClure, W. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23558-23566 |
| 10. | Lonetto, M., Gribskov, M., and Gross, C. A. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 3843-3849 |
| 11. | Panaghie, G., Aiyar, S. E., Bobb, K. L., Hayward, R. S., and deHaseth, P. L. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 299, 1217-1230 |
| 12. | Callaci, S., and Heyduk, T. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3312-3320 |
| 13. | Marr, M. T., and Roberts, J. W. (1997) Science 276, 1258-1260 |
| 14. | Fenton, M. S., Lee, S. J., and Gralla, J. D. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 1130-1137 |
| 15. | Guo, Y., and Gralla, J. D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11655-11660 |
| 16. | Malhotra, A., Severinova, E., and Darst, S. A. (1996) Cell 87, 127-136 |
| 17. | Gonzales, N., Wiggs, J., and Chamberlin, M. J. (1977) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 182, 404-408 |
| 18. | Severinova, E., Severinov, K., and Darst, S. A. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 279, 9-18 |
| 19. | Gussin, G. (1996) Methods Enzymol. 273, 45-59 |
| 20. | Juang, Y.-L., and Helmann, J. D. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 235, 1470-1488 |
| 21. | Aiyar, S. E., Juang, Y.-L., Helmann, J. D., and deHaseth, P. L. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 11501-11507 |
| 22. | Fedoriw, A. M., Liu, H., Anderson, V. E., and deHaseth, P. L. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 11971-11979 |
| 23. | deHaseth, P. L., Lohman, T. M., Burgess, R. R., and Record, M. T., Jr. (1978) Biochemistry 17, 1612-1622 |
| 24. | Huang, X., Lopez de Saro, F. J., and Helmann, J. D. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 2603-2609 |
| 25. | Lau, A. Y., Scharer, O. D., Samson, L., Verdine, G. L., and Ellenberger, T. (1998) Cell 95, 249-258 |
| 26. | Hollis, T., Ichikawa, Y., and Ellenberger, T. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 758-766 |
| 27. | Davies, D. R., Goryshin, I. Y., Reznikoff, W. S., and Rayment, I. (2000) Science 289, 77-85 |
| 28. | Kiefer, J. R., Mao, C., Braman, J. C., and Breese, L. S. (1998) Nature 391, 304-307 |
| 29. | Pues, H., Bleimling, N., Holz, B., Wolcke, J., and Weinhold, E. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 1426-1434 |
| 30. | Slupphaug, G., Mol, G. D., Kavli, B., Arval, A. S., Krokan, H. E., and Tainer, J. A. (1996) Nature 384, 87-92 |
| 31. | Xiao, G., Tordova, M., Jagadeesh, J., Drohat, A. C., Stivers, J. T., and Gilliland, G. L. (1999) Proteins 35, 13-24 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Barinova, E. Zhilina, I. Bass, V. Nikiforov, and A. Kulbachinskiy Lineage-Specific Amino Acid Substitutions in Region 2 of the RNA Polymerase {sigma} Subunit Affect the Temperature of Promoter Opening J. Bacteriol., April 15, 2008; 190(8): 3088 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. V. Kourennaia and P. L. deHaseth Substitution of a Highly Conserved Histidine in the Escherichia coli Heat Shock Transcription Factor, {sigma}32, Affects Promoter Utilization In Vitro and Leads to Overexpression of the Biofilm-Associated Flu Protein In Vivo J. Bacteriol., December 1, 2007; 189(23): 8430 - 8436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sevostyanova, A. Feklistov, N. Barinova, E. Heyduk, I. Bass, S. Klimasauskas, T. Heyduk, and A. Kulbachinskiy Specific Recognition of the -10 Promoter Element by the Free RNA Polymerase {sigma} Subunit J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2007; 282(30): 22033 - 22039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Schroeder, A.-J. Choi, and P. L. deHaseth The -11A of promoter DNA and two conserved amino acids in the melting region of {sigma}70 both directly affect the rate limiting step in formation of the stable RNA polymerase-promoter complex, but they do not necessarily interact Nucleic Acids Res., June 12, 2007; (2007) gkm431v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Thakur, A. M. Joshi, and B. Gopal Structural and Biophysical Studies on Two Promoter Recognition Domains of the Extra-cytoplasmic Function {sigma} Factor {sigma}C from Mycobacterium tuberculosis J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4711 - 4718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Hook-Barnard, X. B. Johnson, and D. M. Hinton Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase Recognition of a {sigma}70-Dependent Promoter Requiring a -35 DNA Element and an Extended -10 TGn Motif J. Bacteriol., December 15, 2006; 188(24): 8352 - 8359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. V. Kourennaia, L. Tsujikawa, and P. L. deHaseth Mutational Analysis of Escherichia coli Heat Shock Transcription Factor Sigma 32 Reveals Similarities with Sigma 70 in Recognition of the -35 Promoter Element and Differences in Promoter DNA Melting and -10 Recognition J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2005; 187(19): 6762 - 6769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Schroeder and P. L. deHaseth Mechanistic Differences in Promoter DNA Melting by Thermus aquaticus and Escherichia coli RNA Polymerases J. Biol. Chem., April 29, 2005; 280(17): 17422 - 17429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Lee, H. M. Lim, and S. Adhya An Unsubstituted C2 Hydrogen of Adenine Is Critical and Sufficient at the -11 Position of a Promoter to Signal Base Pair Deformation J. Biol. Chem., April 23, 2004; 279(17): 16899 - 16902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|