![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 34, 32016-32021, August 24, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 22, 2001, and in revised form, May 10, 2001
The efficiency of cell-cell fusion mediated
by heterologously expressed vesicular stomatitis virus G-protein has
previously been shown to be affected by mutating its transmembrane
segment. Here, we show that a synthetic peptide modeled after this
transmembrane segment drives liposome-liposome fusion. Addition of
millimolar Ca2+ concentrations strongly potentiated
the effect of the peptides suggesting that
Ca2+-mediated liposome aggregation supports the activity of
the peptide. Peptide-driven fusion was suppressed by lysolipid, an
established inhibitor of natural membrane fusion, and involved inner
and outer leaflets of the liposomal bilayer. Thus, transmembrane
segment peptide-driven liposome fusion exhibits important hallmarks
characteristic of natural membrane fusion. Importantly, the mutations
previously shown to attenuate the function of full-length G-protein in
cell-cell fusion also attenuated the fusogenicity of the peptide,
albeit in a less pronounced fashion. Therefore, the function of the
peptide mimic is dependent on its primary structure, similar to
full-length G-protein. Together, our data suggest that the G-protein
transmembrane segment is an autonomous functional domain. We propose
that it acts at a late step in membrane fusion elicited by vesicular
stomatitis virus.
Biological membrane fusion involves a restructuring of lipid
bilayers brought into close proximity by membrane-anchored fusion proteins. To date, the most thoroughly characterized fusion proteins are those which mediate fusion of viral envelopes with cellular membranes (1). These viral fusion proteins consist of an ectodomain harboring an amphipathic fusion peptide, a single transmembrane segment
(TMS),1 and a cytoplasmic
domain. All these domains appear to cooperate in fusion protein
function (2, 3). In the case of influenza hemagglutinin (HA), a
pH-driven global conformational change of the ectodomain is thought to
eject the fusion peptide toward the target bilayer to establish initial
contact between both membranes (4). Synthetic versions of many of these
soluble fusion peptides drive liposome-liposome fusion in
vitro. Furthermore, the fusogenic function of some synthetic
fusion peptides is sensitive to point mutations in a similar fashion as
the corresponding full-length fusion proteins (2, 5, 6). Therefore,
they appear to be partially independent functional domains whose
interaction with target membranes is an early event initiating fusion.
A late role in fusion protein function has been ascribed to the TMSs.
For example, upon replacement of the TMS by a
glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchor (7, 8) or by
mutating (9) its TMS, it was initially reported that influenza HA
looses its ability to mediate complete bilayer fusion but retains
hemifusion, i.e. lipid mixing of the contacting monolayers
(7). More recently, lipid-anchored HA was found to induce an aqueous
continuity between fusion compartments which, however, formed less
efficiently and did not enlarge substantially compared with wild-type
(wt) HA. Consequently, the HA TMS was suggested to favor pore formation
and growth (10). Similar results were obtained with a point mutant
(11). In another study, shortening the HA TMS reduced its ability to
support the hemifusion to fusion transition whereas point mutations
were without effect (12). Furthermore, the function of other fusion
proteins derived from the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope
glycoprotein (13) or the Moloney murine leukemia virus (14) was
compromized by mutations within the TMSs.
The trimeric vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G-protein is a fusion
protein that is functionally and structurally related to influenza HA.
Replacement of the VSV G-protein TMS by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor rendered this protein non-fusogenic, suggesting that its function requires membrane anchoring by a hydrophobic peptide sequence
(15). Similarly, a 6-residue deletion or point mutations within the TMS
attenuated the fusogenicity of VSV G-protein as indicated by reduced
transfer of cytoplasmic contents between fusing cells. However, the
mutant proteins were shown to retain hemifusion activity since lipid
probes within the external leaflets of the reacting membranes mixed
(16). Similar to the case of influenza HA, the TMS of VSV G-protein is
therefore thought to act at a late step in membrane fusion.
Here, we demonstrate that incorporation of a synthetic peptide
corresponding to the VSV G-protein TMS into liposomal membranes dramatically increases their ability to fuse. Interestingly, those mutations previously shown to affect full-length VSV G-protein function
in HeLa cells also attenuated TMS-peptide-induced liposome-liposome fusion. Thus, the TMS-peptide exhibits sequence-specific fusogenicity in the absence of the ectodomains and thus appears to be an independent functional domain.
Peptide Synthesis--
Peptides were synthesized by the standard
Fmoc (N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl) solid-phase method on
an Abimed AMS422 multiple peptide synthesizer. The peptide-resing
conjugates were cleaved with trifluoroacetic acid. Upon dilution in
formic acid and 10-fold dilution with water, peptides were purified by
high pressure liquid chromatography on a YMC ODS-H80 reverse phase
column using a 40-95% (w/v) gradient of 80% (v/v) acetonitrile
including 1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid for elution. The identities of
the peptides were confirmed by mass spectrometry using a Finnigan-MAT
Vision 2000. Peptide concentrations were determined
spectrophotometrically via tryptophan absorbance at 280 nm in a 1:1
(v/v) mixture of trifluoroethanol and dimethyl sulfoxide using an
extinction coefficient of 5600 M Preparation of Small Unilamellar Liposomes--
Liposomes were
prepared from mixtures of egg PC/brain PE/brain PS (Sigma or Avanti
Polar Lipids) at a ratio of 6:2:2 (w/w/w) with or without 0.8% (w/w)
of NBD-PE and Rh-PE (Molecular Probes). Lipid solutions in chloroform,
with or without TMS peptides previously dissolved in trifluoroethanol,
were dried under a stream of nitrogen as a thin film, evacuated for at
least 3 h, and rehydrated by shaking at 37 °C with fusion
buffer (25 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 mM dithiothreitol). Liposomes were
formed by sonication (Bransonic Sonifier 250 microtip) under external ice cooling for 2 min and centrifuged at 16,000 × g
for 20 min to remove lipid aggregates (generally less than 10% of
total lipid as judged from the loss of initial NBD-PE fluorescence). To
extinguish NBD fluorescence in the outer leaflet, liposomes were
incubated with 20 mM sodium dithionite on ice for 30 min
and excess sodium dithionite was removed on Sepharose G-50 spin
columns. Where indicated, egg LPC (Sigma) dissolved at 1.1 mg/ml in
fusion buffer was slowly pipetted to the liposomes while vortexing.
Determination of P/L Ratios--
The ratios of incorporated
peptides to liposomal lipids were determined upon separating unbound
peptides from proteoliposomes by density gradient centrifugation. 330 µl of the liposome preparations were mixed with 670 µl of 60%
(w/v) sucrose, and overlaid with 3 ml of 30% (w/v) sucrose followed by
0.5 ml of fusion buffer. Upon centrifugation (60,000 rpm, 20 h,
20 °C, Beckman SW60 rotor), >99% of the loaded lipids were found
in the top fraction whereas unbound peptide was shown to stay in the
bottom. The amounts of lipid-associated peptides were calculated from
the tryptophan fluorescence of the top fractions ( Fluorescence Spectroscopy--
Fluorescence spectra of
lipid-bound peptides were recorded from peptide-liposome complexes (P/L
ratio = 0.017-0.02) separated from free peptides by sucrose
density gradient centrifugation and corrected for spectra recorded from
pure liposomes. Solution spectra were recorded from peptides dissolved
in dimethyl sulfoxide at a concentration of 8 µM. Spectra
were recorded using a Shimadzu RF1501 spectrofluorimeter; excitation
wavelength was 290 nm, emission wavelengths ranged from 300 to 450 nm,
and a slit width of 10 nm was used.
Fusion Assay--
Fusion assays were done by a fluorescence
dequenching assay (18). Briefly, fluorescently labeled "donor" and
un-labeled "acceptor" liposomes (1.35 mg/ml phospholipid) were
mixed at a ratio of 1:4 (v/v) on ice, transferred to 96-well microtiter
plates (white NUNC non-binding plates with translucent bottoms), heated for 2 min by floating the plates on a 37 °C water bath, and NBD fluorescence was immediately assayed at 1-min intervals for 60 min at
37 °C using excitation and emission wavelengths of 460 and 530 nm,
respectively (BMG Lab Technologies FluoStar). The values were corrected
for drifts due to instrument response and liposome binding to the
plastic surface as determined by the kinetics of NBD-fluorescence of
donor liposomes in separate wells. Where indicated, a calcium
chloride solution in fusion buffer was injected after the first minute.
For calibration, the initial fluorescence intensity of donor liposomes
was taken as 0% fusion and the maximal fluorescence seen upon addition
of 0.5% (w/v, final concentration) Triton X-100 was taken as 100%
fusion. Initial rates of fusion were calculated by drawing tangents at
the steepest (initial) parts of the curves (19). All values were
corrected for detergent quenching. The peptide-independent, spontaneous
fusion of pure liposomes was routinely determined in parallel and
subtracted from the values obtained with peptide-containing liposomes.
The mean P/L ratio was 0.018 unless specified otherwise.
A Synthetic VSV G-protein TMS Drives Liposome-Liposome
Fusion--
Synthetic peptides harboring the central 15 residues from
the predicted TMS of VSV G-protein and a number of mutant sequences were synthesized by solid-phase chemistry. The hydrophobic residues are
bordered by 3 lysine residues at both termini to enhance solubility and
correct membrane integration (20, 21). A tryptophan residue was
included for photometric quantitation (Fig.
1). The peptides were successfully
incorporated into liposomal membranes by sonication as previously
demonstrated for a number of other hydrophobic peptides (21, 22).
Routinely, a mixture of egg phosphatidylcholine (PC), brain
phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and brain phosphatidylserine (PS) (at a
6:2:2 weight ratio) was used. This lipid composition had previously
been found to optimally support the fusogenicity of TMS-peptides
derived from SNARE (soluble NSF (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor) proteins while exhibiting low spontaneous fusion in the absence
of the peptides.2 To
determine the actual P/L ratios present in the fusion experiments, peptide-liposome complexes were separated from the free peptides, which
are more dense, by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. The amounts
of co-fractionating peptides and lipids were determined and the P/L
ratios calculated (see "Experimental Procedures"). Integration of
the peptides into membranes is supported by the fluorescence of the
marker tryptophan residue. Depending on the identity of the peptide,
fluorescence emission maxima ranged from 335 to 340 nm in the
relatively hydrophilic solvent dimethyl sulfoxide and from 317 to 326 nm in peptide-liposome complexes (data not shown). These blue shifts
(14 to 22 nm) indicate that the marker tryptophan residues of the
peptides, and by implication, their hydrophobic sequence, are embedded
within the hydrocarbon phase of the membranes (23).
The ability of the liposomes to fuse to each other was examined
upon rapidly shifting the temperature to 37 °C by a standard fluorescence dequenching assay (18). This assay is based upon fluorescence resonance energy transfer from
N-(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (NBD-PE) to N-(lissamine rhodamin B sulfonyl)dioleoyl
phosphatidylethanolamine (Rh-PE) being present at quenching
concentrations in donor liposomes. Upon fusion of donor liposomes to
unlabeled acceptor liposomes, the average distance between the
lipid-bound fluorophores increases; this results in an increase of
NBD-fluorescence over time which is taken as a measure of lipid mixing.
As shown in Fig. 2, incorporation of the
VSV wt TMS-peptide strongly increased the ability of liposomal
membranes to fuse as compared with spontaneous background fusion
observed with pure liposomes. Extents of fusion, seen after 1 h,
and initial fusion rates were similar regardless of whether donor and
acceptor liposomes contained peptide (VSV/VSV) or whether
peptide-containing acceptor liposomes were fused to pure donor
liposomes (VSV/pure).
TMS-Peptide-mediated Fusion Is Sensitive to Lysolipid and Involves
Both Membrane Leaflets--
Biological membrane fusion is thought to
proceed through a state termed hemifusion, an intermediate where the
outer, but not inner, membrane leaflets mix to form a stalk structure
(1, 2, 24, 25). Hemifusion is associated with negative curvature of the
outer membrane leaflet. Hence, it is disfavored upon integration of
lysolipids into the outer leaflet since lysolipids stabilize positive
curvature due to their inverted cone shape (24). Accordingly, lysolipids have been established as potent and reversible inhibitors of
different types of natural fusion reactions at a step preceding membrane merger (25). Here, we assessed whether VSV G-protein TMS-peptide-mediated fusion is inhibited by adding LPC micelles to the
preformed liposomes. Indeed, LPC efficiently inhibited TMS-peptide-mediated liposome fusion depending on the applied ratio of
diacyl-lipids to LPC (Fig.
3A). This is consistent with transient formation of a hemifusion intermediate in the absence of
LPC.
To show that fusion involved both membrane leaflets rather than being
arrested at hemifusion, we extinguished the fluorescence of the NBD
moiety present in the outer leaflet by dithionite treatment (19).
Application of 20 mM dithionite eliminated an average of
66% of total NBD fluorescence after 30 min on ice and the kinetics of
bleaching slowed down considerably beyond this period (Fig. 3B,
inset, and data not shown). This suggests preferential bleaching of NBD present in the outer monolayer which accounts for Addition of Ca2+ Enhances Peptide-mediated
Membrane Fusion--
The observation that the TMS-peptides induce
liposome fusion is unexpected since membrane fusion mediated by
full-length fusion proteins is regulated by interaction of their
ectodomains with the target membranes. This interaction is thought to
bring the membranes into close proximity thus lowering the energy
barrier that normally prevents fusion. Since our TMS-peptides lack
ectodomains, peptide-mediated fusion must depend on random collisions
between the liposomes. To examine whether aggregating the liposomes
would enhance the fusogenic action of TMS-peptides, we added
Ca2+ ions, which are known to aggregate negatively charged
liposomes before fusing them (26, 27). Upon correction for
Ca2+-enhanced background fusion as determined in parallel
using pure liposomes, millimolar concentrations of Ca2+
ions were indeed found to strongly increase both initial rate and
extent of peptide-induced fusion in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig.
4). Therefore, juxtaposition of
the membranes, mediated here by random collisions of the liposomes and
potentiated by their Ca2+-mediated aggregation, appears to
be a rate-limiting step in liposome-liposome fusion driven by VSV
G-protein TMS-peptide.
Mutations Attenuate the Fusogenicity of the TMS-Peptide--
Based
on studies using eukaryotic cells, it was previously found that point
mutations in the TMS affect fusogenicity of the expressed full-length
VSV G-protein. Specifically, mutating the glycine residues individually
to alanine reduced cytoplasmic contents mixing by
Here, we tested whether mutant forms of the TMS peptides mimic this
sequence specificity of G-protein function. Thus, we compared the
fusogenicity of the wt peptide to that of mutant sequences where both
glycines were either singly exchanged to alanine or doubly exchanged to
alanine, leucine, or valine. Fig.
5A displays the dependence of
the mean extent of fusion, as seen after 1 h, on the
experimentally determined P/L ratios. In order to better visualize the
differences determined at the lower P/L ratios, the mean values
obtained for the mutant forms were normalized to the values seen with
the wt peptide (=100%). With the single mutations (G6A, G10A) the mean
extent of fusion appeared to be only moderately reduced (by 21 to 35%)
and only at the lower P/L ratios. For the double mutants
(G6A,G10A; G6L,G10L; G6V,G10V) the extent of fusion was
decreased by
Taken together, the glycine mutations affected the
fusogenicity of the TMS-peptides in a fashion similar to that of
full-length VSV G-protein (16), albeit less strongly. Thus, our results indicate that the TMS-peptides, at least partially, reproduce the
sequence specificity of VSV G-protein function.
Our results demonstrate that incorporation of synthetic peptides
modeled after the TMS of VSV G-protein into the membranes of synthetic
liposomes strongly increases their ability to fuse. These peptides
represent the central hydrophobic part of the predicted TMS which is
located between lysine 462 and arginine 483. Since the hydrophobicity
of our peptides is rather symmetrically distributed, we assume that
they fully insert as This in vitro fusion system consisting only of lipids and
TMS-peptides appears to display characteristic hallmarks of biological membrane fusion. First, its sensitivity to lysolipid is consistent with
the transient existence of a hemifusion state, which is thought to
precede complete bilayer merger (2, 24). Second, TMS-peptide-driven fusion involves both bilayer leaflets as shown upon bleaching the NBD
fluorophore of the outer leaflet by dithionite. Third, both extent and
initial rate of fusion are enhanced by Ca2+-mediated
liposome aggregation, thus suggesting that fusion promotion by the
peptides is potentiated by membrane proximity.
Importantly, mutating the glycine residues within the TMS-peptide
attenuated its fusogenicity to various degrees depending on the number
of exchanges made, the type of introduced residue, and the P/L ratio of
the proteoliposomes. Since glycine mutations had previously been shown
to affect cell-cell fusion mediated by full-length VSV G-protein (16),
our liposome-based in vitro approach appears to reflect, at
least in part, the sequence specificity of full-length fusion protein function.
In analogy to results obtained with influenza HA TMS mutants (9), the
VSV G-protein TMS has previously been shown to function late in the
fusion process (16). This late step appears to correspond to the
conversion of the hemifusion intermediate to fully fused bilayers and
is thought to be facilitated by the TMS. It should be noted that the
extent of fluorescence dequenching seen here with pure liposomes,
i.e. without added peptide, was reduced to an average of
60% upon outer leaflet
bleaching.3 This suggests that
a substantial fraction of peptide-independent spontaneous liposome
fusion does not proceed beyond hemifusion. We speculate, therefore,
that the hemifusion diaphragm may form spontaneously from randomly
colliding liposomes. Its transition to full fusion, however, appears to
be facilitated by the TMS-peptides.
What is the characteristic feature of the TMS which drives this
transition and which is required for optimal fusion protein function? The TMSs of fusion proteins are expected to be inserted as
On the other hand, it should be noted that the fusogenic function of
VSV G-protein (15), influenza HA (9), or the human immunodeficiency
virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein (35) was maintained upon replacement
of the respective TMS by unrelated TMSs (9, 15). This is an apparent
contradiction to the effects of TMS point mutations as discussed above.
The data may be reconciled, however, if one assumes that the structural
feature(s) rendering a TMS compatible with fusion protein function are
shared by certain unrelated TMSs which would be inactive in their
normal contexts (2, 14).
The fusogenic capacity of synthetic TMSs appears not to be restricted
to the VSV G-protein. In another study,2 we found that
peptides modeled after the TMSs of SNARE proteins also drive
liposome-liposome fusion in a sequence-specific fashion. As SNARE
proteins are essential for membrane fusion in the secretory pathway of
eukaryotic cells (36), functional autonomy of TMSs may be a phenomenon
relevant for both viral and cellular fusion proteins.
We thank Drs. A. Herrmann and J. Trotter for critical reading of the manuscript, W. B. Huttner for
continuous support, and M. Koch for expert help with peptide synthesis.
*
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Grant La699/7-1, the Heisenberg program, and the Fonds der
Chemischen Industrie.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institut für
Neurobiologie, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Tel.: 06221-548696; Fax: 06221-544496; E-mail: Langosch@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 19, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102579200
2
Langosch, D., Crane, J. M., Brosig, B.,
Tamm, L. K., and Reed, J., J. Mol. Biol., in press.
3
D. Langosch and B. Brosig, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
TMS, transmembrane
segment;
HA, hemagglutinin;
NBD-PE, N-(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine;
P/L, peptide/lipid;
PC, phosphatidylcholine;
PE, phosphatidylethanolamine;
PS, phosphatidylserine;
Rh-PE, N-(lissamine rhodamin B
sulfonyl)dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine;
SNARE, soluble
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein
receptor;
VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus;
wt, wild-type;
LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine.
Peptide Mimics of the Vesicular Stomatitis Virus G-protein
Transmembrane Segment Drive Membrane Fusion in Vitro*
§,
, and
Department of Neurobiology,
Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, D-69120
Heidelberg, Germany and the ¶ German Cancer Research Center, Im
Neuenheimer Feld 364, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1
cm
1.
ex = 290 nm) using known amounts of added peptides as internal standards.
The fluorescence spectra were corrected by subtraction of spectra run
with pure control liposomes. Lipid concentrations were quantitated as
described (17) and related to peptide concentrations to obtain the P/L ratios given. All P/L ratios were finally corrected for the dependence of tryptophan fluorescence on the hydrophobicity of the environment. To
this end, the fluorescence of liposomal peptides and added standards
was compared upon detergent lysis where all peptides are expected to
reside within detergent micelles.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Amino acid sequences of the peptides used in
this study. Dots represent wt residues. The residue
numbering system used by Cleverley and Lenard (16) was adopted.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Fusogenic activity of wt VSV G-protein
TMS-peptide. A, typical fusion kinetics reveal that
peptide-containing donor and acceptor liposomes (VSV/VSV) fuse with
similar efficiency as pure donor liposomes fuse to peptide-containing
acceptor liposomes (VSV/pure). Spontaneous fusion of pure control
liposomes (pure/pure) proceeds much less efficiently. B,
mean (±S.E., n = six to nine independent experiments)
extents of fusion, as seen after 1 h, and initial fusion rates are
similar regardless of whether the peptide was present in donor and
acceptor liposomes or only in acceptor liposomes. Both parameters were
corrected for spontaneous fusion.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Properties of liposome fusion induced by wt
TMS-peptide. A, the inhibitory effect of LPC (given as
total LPC concentrations in the assay volume) is similar regardless of
whether the peptide was present in donor and acceptor liposomes
(squares and circles) or only in acceptor
liposomes (diamonds and triangles). For better
comparison, mean extents of fusion were normalized (0 mg/ml LPC = 100%). The experiment was done at two different liposome
concentrations (diacyl-lipid concentration was 1.35 mg/ml,
squares and diamonds, or 0.45 mg/ml,
circles and triangles). Accordingly, the ratio of
diacyl-lipids to LPC ranged from 8 to 75. B, inner leaflet
mixing after outer leaflet bleaching. Either both, donor and acceptor,
liposomes, or only acceptor liposomes contained TMS-peptide. The
extents of fusion, as determined by NBD dequenching, were similar with
(+) or without (
) prior dithionite treatment. This indicates fusion
of both membrane leaflets. For better comparison, mean extents of
fusion were normalized (
dithionite = 100%). Inset,
mean initial NBD fluorescence of donor liposomes was reduced by 66%
upon dithionite treatment; this indicates preferential bleaching of the
outer leaflet (see text). All values were corrected for spontaneous
fusion seen with pure liposomes in parallel experiments. The number of
independent experiments was three to four.
64% of
total lipid of unilamellar liposomes with mean diameters of
30 nm
previously determined by electron microscopy.2 Importantly,
the kinetics of TMS-peptide-mediated NBD fluorescence dequenching was
indistinguishable with or without prior outer leaflet bleaching (Fig.
3B). This indicates that inner and outer membrane leaflets
fused with similar efficiency.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Stimulation of wt TMS-peptide-mediated
membrane fusion by calcium. A, typical fusion kinetics
observed upon addition of 1 to 5 mM calcium chloride to
mixtures of pure acceptor and peptide-containing donor liposomes shows
that calcium strongly increases initial rate and extent of fusion.
B, dependence of mean (±S.E., n = 3) extent
of fusion on calcium concentration. C, dependence of mean
(±S.E., n = 3) initial rate of fusion on calcium
concentration. All values were corrected for spontaneous fusion seen
with pure liposomes in parallel experiments. Error bars are
not shown if smaller than the symbols.
40% to 50%,
whereas double mutations to alanine or leucine resulted in reductions
of >90% (16).
50% at the lower P/L ratios and for 13 to 37% at the
highest P/L ratios. We also tested mutants where residues other than
the glycines were exchanged. Fusion elicited by peptide A3, where 3 residues in the vicinity of the glycines were mutated to alanine (see:
Fig. 1), was reduced by 13 to 30%, depending on the P/L ratio. Strong
reduction (71 to 91%) was observed for the L5 peptide where 5 exchanges to leucine had been made. A similarly weak fusogenicity was
found for an oligoleucine sequence (L16(W)) which was previously shown
to function as an artificial TMS (28). The degree of fluorescence
dequenching elicited by the mutant peptides was similar with or without
prior bleaching of the NBD chromophore of the outer membrane leaflet with dithionite. Thus, fusion elicited by the mutant peptides did not
result from hemifusion but involved both membrane leaflets as seen for
the wt peptide (see above).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Dependence of fusion on TMS peptide
sequence. Extents of fusion were determined for wt
TMS-peptide, several mutants (see: Fig. 1), and an oligo-leucine
(L16(W)) peptide. A, a plot of the mean values (±S.E.,
n = 2 to 10) against the experimentally determined mean
P/L ratios shows that the extents of fusion increase with the P/L
ratios. Importantly, most mutant peptides are less fusogenic than the
wild-type. The data points were fitted by linear regression analysis.
For the sake of clarity, the data for peptides G6A, G10A, and A3 were
not fitted. All values were corrected for spontaneous fusion seen with
pure liposomes in parallel experiments. Error bars are not
shown when smaller than the symbols. B, the mean fusion
extents determined for the mutant peptides were normalized to those of
the wild-type (=100%). This reveals that the differences in
fusogenicity between mutants and wild-type tended to be larger at the
lower P/L ratios. The designations of the peptides are given next to
the data points obtained at the highest P/L ratio.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helices into liposomal membranes. This is
supported by previous studies where the ability of other lysine-bordered hydrophobic peptides to incorporate into lipid bilayers
was tested. Huschilt et al. (20) found that a
KKGL16KK peptide inserted as an
-helix at a
perpendicular angle into dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine
membranes. Furthermore, Webb et al. (29) established that a
hydrophobic peptide core of 17 residues fully incorporated into a
membrane composed of lipids with C18 acyl chains. The
efficiency of these relatively short peptides to integrate into
membranes is ascribed to the flexibility of the hydrophobic part of the
bordering lysine side chains. This flexibility allows the charged
termini to "snorkel up" toward the lipid head group regions. In a
previous model study, the lysine termini bordering 17 hydrophobic
residues adopting an
-helical conformation have been calculated to
extend up to 1.9 nm from the bilayer center (22). By analogy to these
model systems, our TMS peptides containing 16 hydrophobic amino acids
are likely to span the hydrophobic core of liposomal membranes that are
composed of natural lipids which contain mostly C18 lipid
acyl chains.
-helices at orientations close to the membrane normal as
demonstrated for the influenza HA TMS (30). A comparison of the
amino acid composition of fusogenic and non-fusogenic viral membrane
protein TMSs revealed that glycine residues are strongly
over-represented in the former (16). It was therefore speculated that
the functionally relevant glycines of the VSV G-protein might allow for
bending of the TMS helices during the fusion process (16). Indeed,
glycine residues have previously been shown to destabilize
-helical
hydrophobic peptides in membrane-mimetic environments (31). On the
other hand, isoleucine was the single other residue type that was also significantly overrepresented in fusogenic TMSs (16). Interestingly, in
our A3 or L5 peptide mutants, two or four isoleucines were exchanged
for alanine or leucine, respectively, and this resulted in a marked
decrease of fusogenicity despite the continued presence of both glycine
residues. Isoleucine ranks among those residues with the highest
propensities to form
-sheet structures (32, 33). This property was
ascribed to steric interference of its
-branched side chain with the
local polypeptide backbone which may destabilize the
-helical
conformation (33). Although isoleucine has been reported not to
interfere with
-helix formation in hydrophobic environments (23,
34), it is tempting to speculate that not only glycine, but also
isoleucine or other residues with
-branched side chains, impart
structural flexibility to fusogenic TMS helices. Thus, local
deformation or even transient unfolding of these helices may facilitate
the restructuring of the lipid bilayer in fusion. It might be relevant
in this context that the
-helical synthetic peptide corresponding to
the influenza HA TMS increased the acyl chain order of a lipid bilayer
(30).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Hernandez, L. D.,
Hoffman, L. R.,
Wolfsberg, T. G.,
and White, J. M.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
12,
627-661
2.
Lentz, B. R.,
Malinin, V.,
Haque, M. E.,
and Evans, K.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
10,
607-615
3.
Kozerski, C.,
Ponimaskin, E.,
Schroth-Diez, B.,
Schmidt, M. F. G.,
and Herrmann, A.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
395-404
4.
Bullough, P. A.,
Hughson, F. M.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1994)
Nature
371,
37-43
5.
Durell, S. R.,
Martin, I.,
Ruysschaert, J.-M.,
Shai, Y.,
and Blumenthal, R.
(1997)
Mol. Mem. Biol.
14,
97-112
6.
Pecheur, E. I.,
Sainte-Marie, J.,
Bienvene, A.,
and Hoekstra, D.
(1999)
J. Membr. Biol.
167,
1-17
7.
Kemble, G. W.,
Danieli, T.,
and White, J. M.
(1994)
Cell
76,
383-391
8.
Nüssler, F.,
Clague, M. J.,
and Herrmann, A.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
2280-2291
9.
Melikyan, G. B.,
Lin, S. S.,
Roth, M. G.,
and Cohen, F. S.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
1821-1836
10.
Markosyan, R. M.,
Cohen, F. S.,
and Melikyan, G. B.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
1143-1152
11.
Melikyan, G. B.,
Markosyan, R. M.,
Roth, M. G.,
and Cohen, F. S.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
3765-3775
12.
Armstrong, R. T.,
Kushnir, A. S.,
and White, J. M.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
151,
425-437
13.
Owens, R. J.,
Burke, C.,
and Rose, J. K.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
570-574
14.
Taylor, G. M.,
and Sanders, D. A.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
2803-2815
15.
Odell, D.,
Wanas, E.,
Yan, J.,
and Ghosh, H. P.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
7996-8000
16.
Cleverley, D. Z.,
and Lenard, J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
3425-3430
17.
Böttcher, C. J. F.,
VanGent, C. M.,
and Pries, C.
(1961)
Anal. Chim. Acta
24,
203-204
18.
Struck, D. K.,
Hoekstra, D.,
and Pagano, R. E.
(1981)
Biochemistry
20,
4093-4099
19.
Hoekstra, D.,
and Düzgünes, N.
(1993)
Methods Enzymol.
220,
15-32
20.
Huschilt, J. C.,
Millman, B. M.,
and Davis, J. H.
(1989)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
979,
139-141
21.
Liu, L. P.,
and Deber, C. M.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
5476-5482
22.
de Planque, M. R.,
Kruijtzer, J. A.,
Liskamp, R. M.,
Marsh, D.,
Greathouse, D. V.,
Koeppe, R. E., 2nd,
de Kruijff, B.,
and Killian, J. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20839-20846
23.
Li, S. C.,
and Deber, C. M.
(1994)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
1,
368-373
24.
Chernomordik, L.,
Kozlov, M. M.,
and Zimmerberg, J.
(1995)
J. Membr. Biol.
146,
1-14
25.
Chernomordik, L. V.,
Vogel, S. S.,
Sokoloff, A.,
Onaran, H. O.,
Leikina, E. A.,
and Zimmerberg, J.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
318,
71-76
26.
Papahadjopoulos, D.,
Nir, S.,
and Düzgünes, N.
(1990)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
22,
157-179
27.
Düzgünes, N.,
Allen, T. M.,
Fedor, J.,
and Papahadjopoulos, D.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
8435-8442
28.
Gurezka, R.,
Laage, R.,
Brosig, B.,
and Langosch, D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9265-9270
29.
Webb, R. J.,
East, M.,
Sharma, R. P.,
and Lee, A. G.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
673-679
30.
Tatulian, S. A.,
and Tamm, L. K.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
496-507
31.
Li, S. C.,
and Deber, C. M.
(1992)
Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
40,
243-248
32.
Smith, C. K.,
Withka, J. M.,
and Regan, L.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
5510-5517
33.
Street, A. G.,
and Mayo, S. L.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
9074-9076
34.
Liu, L.-P.,
and Deber, C. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23645-23648
35.
Wilk, T.,
Pfeiffer, T.,
Bukovsky, A.,
Moldenhauser, G.,
and Bosch, V.
(1996)
Virology
76,
539-553
36.
Jahn, R.,
and Südhof, T. C.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68,
863-911
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Stelzer, B. C. Poschner, H. Stalz, A. J. Heck, and D. Langosch Sequence-Specific Conformational Flexibility of SNARE Transmembrane Helices Probed by Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Biophys. J., August 1, 2008; 95(3): 1326 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lorin, B. Charloteaux, Y. Fridmann-Sirkis, A. Thomas, Y. Shai, and R. Brasseur Mode of Membrane Interaction and Fusogenic Properties of a de Novo Transmembrane Model Peptide Depend on the Length of the Hydrophobic Core J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2007; 282(25): 18388 - 18396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Siegel, V. Cherezov, D. V. Greathouse, R. E. Koeppe II, J. A. Killian, and M. Caffrey Transmembrane Peptides Stabilize Inverted Cubic Phases in a Biphasic Length-Dependent Manner: Implications for Protein-Induced Membrane Fusion Biophys. J., January 1, 2006; 90(1): 200 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ungermann and D. Langosch Functions of SNAREs in intracellular membrane fusion and lipid bilayer mixing J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2005; 118(17): 3819 - 3828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Hofmann, K. Weise, J. Ollesch, P. Agrawal, H. Stalz, W. Stelzer, F. Hulsbergen, H. de Groot, K. Gerwert, J. Reed, et al. De novo design of conformationally flexible transmembrane peptides driving membrane fusion PNAS, October 12, 2004; 101(41): 14776 - 14781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pallavi and R. Nagaraj Palmitoylated Peptides from the Cysteine-rich Domain of SNAP-23 Cause Membrane Fusion Depending on Peptide Length, Position of Cysteines, and Extent of Palmitoylation J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 12737 - 12744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rohde, L. Dietrich, D. Langosch, and C. Ungermann The Transmembrane Domain of Vam3 Affects the Composition of cis- and trans-SNARE Complexes to Promote Homotypic Vacuole Fusion J. Biol. Chem., January 10, 2003; 278(3): 1656 - 1662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |