![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 35, 32743-32749, August 31, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, June 8, 2001
Elongator is a histone acetyltransferase complex
that associates with the elongating form of RNA polymerase II. We
purified Elongator to virtual homogeneity via a rapid three-step
procedure based largely on affinity chromatography. The purified
factor, holo-Elongator, is a labile six-subunit factor composed of two discrete subcomplexes: one comprised of the previously identified Elp1,
Elp2, and Elp3 proteins and another comprised of three novel polypeptides, termed Elp4, Elp5, and Elp6. Disruption of the yeast genes encoding the new Elongator proteins confers phenotypes
indistinguishable from those previously described for the other
elp mutants, and concomitant disruption of genes encoding
proteins in either subcomplex does not confer new phenotypes. Taken
together, our results indicate that holo-Elongator is a functional
entity in vitro as well as in vivo. Metazoan
homologues of Elp1 and Elp3 have previously been reported. We
cloned the human homologue of yeast ELP4 and show that this
gene is ubiquitously expressed in human tissues.
The form of RNA polymerase II
(RNAPII)1 responsible for
transcript elongation is fundamentally different from the form that enters a promoter to form a preinitiation complex (1, 2). During
initiation, RNAPII is hypo-phosphorylated and associated with the
functionally conserved Mediator complex, a multisubunit factor required
for regulation of transcription (3, 4). The association of RNAPII with
Mediator and the general transcription factors is severed during
promoter clearance, triggered by TFIIH-mediated hyperphosphorylation of
the carboxyl-terminal repeat domain (CTD) of the largest RNAPII subunit
(5-7). During elongation, hyperphosphorylated yeast RNAPII is
associated with the Elongator complex. Elongator binds directly to
RNAPII, at least partly via the CTD, and the interaction is stabilized
by CTD hyperphosphorylation (8).
Elongator was biochemically isolated as a component of elongating
RNAPII from salt-stable chromatin but can also be isolated as a
discrete, three-subunit complex when starting from the DNA-free soluble
fraction of a whole cell extract (8). The genes encoding the Elongator
subunits have been identified and shown to play a role in transcription
elongation in vivo: ELP1 encodes a protein without discernable motifs (8), whereas Elp2 has multiple WD40 repeats
(9), and Elp3 has histone acetyltransferase (HAT) motifs (10). The
identification of a highly conserved HAT associated with elongating
RNAPII suggests a mechanism for modification and remodeling of
chromatin during transcript elongation. Recombinant Elp3 indeed has HAT
activity in a gel-based HAT assay, and mutations in the sequence
encoding the predicted acetyl-CoA binding pocket of the protein
significantly reduce this activity (11). Importantly, when the same
point mutations are introduced in yeast, they confer phenotypes that
are virtually identical to those resulting from deletion of either of
the ELP genes, indicating that the catalytic activity of the
Elp3 protein is essential for Elongator function. The in
vivo function of Elp3 is overlapping with that of the prototype HAT, Gcn5, the catalytic subunit of SAGA/ADA (12). In the absence of
both Elongator and SAGA HAT activity, cells are sick and unable to grow
under a large variety of conditions. These phenotypes can be suppressed
by concomitantly deleting the genes encoding two histone deacetylases
(HDACs), indicating functional redundancy between HDACs as well and
supporting the notion that maintenance of a certain overall acetylation
level in a cell may be important for cell viability and growth (11).
Elongator function, such as HAT activity, is required for normal
activation of a number of genes, indicating that Elongator is involved
in creating a chromatin structure that is amenable to efficient
transcription (8, 10).
To further our understanding of Elongator function, we isolated the
complex from extracts of yeast cells in which the gene encoding Elp1
had been modified to express a double affinity-tagged version of the
protein. This tag made it possible to rapidly purify Elongator to
virtual homogeneity under mild conditions. Here we show that the
purified factor is a six-subunit complex, comprised of two discrete,
three subunit subcomplexes that easily dissociate. We have identified
the three novel proteins of the complex, as well as a human homologue
of one of the encoding genes, and provide evidence that holo-Elongator
is the functional entity of Elongator in vivo.
Expression of Tagged Elp1--
A sequence encoding a
(His)10-HA epitope tag followed by a transcription
termination signal was created by polymerase chain reaction using
primers
5'-AGCTGACTAGTCATCACCATCACCATCACCATCACCATCACTATCCATGTTCCTGACTATGCCTAATTCCGGGCGAATTTCTTATG-3' and 5'-GTTCTGAGCTCTTACGCCAAGCTTGCATGCCGGT-3' and plasmid pAS2-1 (CLONTECH) as a template. The resulting sequence
was inserted between the SpeI and SacI sites of
pRS304 (13) to yield vector pSE.HISHA-304. Part of the ELP1
open-reading frame was amplified using primers
5'-GCTACACTCGAGACAAGATAATGAGCCTTTACGCCG-3' and
5'-TGTGACACTAGTAAAATCAACAATATGACTCTTAGGG-3' and cloned into
pSE.HISHA-304 using the XhoI and SpeI sites
yielding plasmid pELP1-HISHA-304. After transformation of the
protease-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain BJ2168
(Table I), a TRP+
clone was isolated in which the 3'-end of the ELP1 gene was
replaced, resulting in expression of an Elp1-(His)10-HA
fusion protein (Elp1-HisHA; strain JSY549). To ensure that the
(His)10-HA epitope tag did not interfere with Elp1
function, the same integration was performed in the W303 strain
background, making it possible to do phenotypic analysis and comparison
with wild type and elp1 Protein Purification--
DNA-free soluble whole cell extract
(typically from 0.8-1.0 kg of yeast paste) was prepared from strain
JSY549 and subjected to cation-exchange chromatography on Bio-Rex 70 (Bio-Rad) essentially as described previously (8). Protein was stepwise
eluted with buffer A (40 mM Hepes-KOH pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 20% (v/v)
glycerol) containing 150 mM, 300 mM, 600 mM, and 1200 mM KOAc. The vast majority of
Elongator eluted in the fraction containing 600 mM KOAc.
Typically, 50 ml of this fraction was incubated with 0.8 ml of protein
A-Sepharose CL4B-12CA5 monoclonal antibody resin (1-3 mg of
antibody/ml of resin) overnight at 4 °C. The resin was collected by
gravity flow in a column holder and washed extensively with buffer A
containing 600 mM KOAc and equilibrated in A containing 300 mM KOAc. Bound proteins were then eluted in three washes
with 1 ml of buffer A containing 300 mM KOAc and 2 mg/ml HA
peptide (KKKRILKMYPYDVPDYARIL) for 15 min at 30 °C. These fractions
were pooled and diluted with an equal volume of buffer (40 mM Hepes-KOH pH 7.6, 300 mM KOAc, 20% (v/v) glycerol) and allowed to bind to 0.4 ml Ni2+-NTA-agarose
(Qiagen) at 4 °C overnight with mixing. The resin was collected in a
column holder and washed with 2 ml of buffer A containing 300 mM KOAc. After washing with 2 ml of the same buffer
containing 300 mM KOAc and 10 mM imidazole,
bound protein was eluted in 1 ml of the same buffer containing 300 mM imidazole. Fractions were dialyzed against buffer A
containing 100 mM KOAc and stored in small aliquots at
Gel filtration was carried out on a SMART chromatography system
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). A portion of the eluate from the anti-HA
immunoaffinity column was applied via a 25-µl sample loop onto a
Superose 6 PC1.6/30 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) collecting
50-µl fractions. Aliquots (1 and 5 µl, respectively) were analyzed
by immunoblotting and staining with silver nitrate. Different Elongator
(sub)complexes were obtained by anion-exchange chromatography using an
ÄKTA-FPLC (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Anti-HA eluate fractions
1-3 were pooled (~2 ml), diluted with buffer B (25 mM
Tris-HAc, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 20% glycerol) to a final concentration of 150 mM KOAc and loaded onto a Mono Q HR5/5 FPLC column
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was washed with 2 volumes of
buffer B containing 150 mM KOAc and developed with a
10-column volume linear gradient from 150 to 1500 mM KOAc
collecting 0.35-ml fractions. Elongator subcomplexes eluted between
1000 and 1450 mM KOAc. Aliquots were analyzed by
immunoblotting (1 µl) and staining with silver nitrate (5 µl).
Protein Identification--
Gel-fractionated proteins were
digested with trypsin, and the mixtures were fractionated on a Poros 50 R2 RP microtip (14). Resulting peptide pools were then analyzed by
matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization reflectron time-of-flight
(MALDI-reTOF) MS using a Reflex III instrument (Brüker Franzen;
Bremen, Germany) and by electrospray ionization (ESI) MS/MS on an API
300 triple quadrupole instrument (PE-SCIEX; Thornhill, Canada),
modified with an ultrafine ionization source (15). Selected mass values from the MALDI-TOF experiments were taken to search a S. cerevisiae subset of the protein non-redundant data base (NR;
NCBI, Bethesda, MD) using the PeptideSearch (16) algorithm. MS/MS
spectra were inspected for y" ion series to compare with the
computer-generated fragment ion series of the predicted tryptic peptides.
Preparation of Antibodies--
To produce antibodies recognizing
Elp4, Elp5/Iki1, and Elp6, peptides encompassing an amino-terminal
cysteine residue followed by the final carboxyl-terminal 19 amino acids
of the corresponding predicted open-reading frames were synthesized.
Each of these peptides was coupled via its amino-terminal cysteine
residue to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (Calbiochem) by
m-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester
(Pierce) cross-linking and used to immunize rabbits (Murex). For
immunoblotting, the anti-Elp4, -Elp5, and -Elp6 antibodies and their
respective prebleeds were used at a final dilution of 1:1000.
Yeast Strains and Phenotypic Analysis--
All S. cerevisiae stains used for genetic analysis (Table I) were
congenic with strain W303 and grown and manipulated as described
previously (8, 10). To analyze killer toxin sensitivity, yeast strains
were transformed with plasmid pNW064 encoding the killer toxin
Expression Analysis of Human Elp4--
A full-length human Elp4
cDNA clone was obtained from the NEDO sequencing project (clone
KAT08960, GenBankTM accession number AK000505). The entire
open-reading frame of human Elp4 was amplified by polymerase chain
reaction using primers p123 5'-GAAGATCTCCATGGCGGCAGTGGCAACCTG-3'
and p124 5'-GAAGATCTCTAGAAGTCCAGGTGCTTCTTGCC-3' and radiolabeled with
random hexamers. This probe was hybridized to a human multiple tissue
Northern blot according to the manufacturer's guidelines
(CLONTECH). As a control, the blot was probed with a human Purification of Elongator from Soluble Whole Cell
Extracts--
Previously, we purified the Elongator complex from the
DNA-free, soluble fraction of a whole cell extract through five to six
conventional chromatography steps (8). To facilitate the purification
of Elongator and the subsequent analysis of its composition and
enzymatic activities, we constructed a haploid S. cerevisiae strain expressing a tagged version of the gene encoding the largest subunit of Elongator, ELP1. The endogenous chromosomal copy
was replaced with a gene encoding full-length Elp1 fused to a
carboxyl-terminal decahistidine stretch and a HA epitope tag (Fig.
1A). After verification that
the tag did not interfere with Elp1 function in vivo (data not shown), we purified Elongator using an efficient three step procedure including two high affinity chromatography steps (Fig. 1B). First, soluble whole cell extract was loaded onto
Bio-Rex 70 cation-exchange resin. Bound proteins were eluted with
buffer containing 300 mM, 600 mM, and 1200 mM potassium acetate (KOAc), respectively. Essentially all
Elongator was collected in the 600 mM KOAc eluate and
subsequently applied onto anti-HA immunoaffinity resin. Analysis by
immunoblotting showed that virtually all Elp1-HisHA from the Bio-Rex 70 fraction bound to this column and could be eluted by competition with
excess peptide containing the HA epitope (Fig. 1C).
Interestingly, protein silver staining showed that, in addition to
Elp1, Elp2, and Elp3, three additional proteins with apparent molecular
weights of 50, 35, and 30 kDa eluted from the immunoaffinity column
(Fig. 1D). These three proteins did not bind to the
immunoaffinity resin in the absence of tagged Elp1 (data not shown),
indicating that they interact specifically with Elp1. Moreover, when
the eluates from the anti-HA immunoaffinity resin were subjected to
Ni2+-agarose affinity chromatography, the three additional
proteins also co-eluted with the previously defined Elongator subunits, providing further evidence that the interaction is specific (Fig. 1D). We designated these putative novel Elongator subunits
Elp4, Elp5, and Elp6, respectively.
Identification of Three Novel Elongator Subunits Elp4, Elp5, and
Elp6--
Peptide mass fingerprinting using MALDI-reTOF mass
spectrometry (14, 16, 18) was used to identify the 50-, 35-, and 30-kDa
protein bands. We identified the 50-kDa band as the product of the
previously defined open-reading frame YPL101W on chromosome XVI
(predicted molecular weight Mr 51.2) and
named this gene ELP4. The p35/Elp5 protein was identified as
the product of open-reading frame YHR187W (chromosome VIII, predicted
molecular weight Mr 35.2). Interestingly, this
gene was previously identified as the insensitive to
killer toxin 1 gene, IKI1, which was identified in the same genetic screen as ELP1/IKI3 and whose
inactivation renders yeast cells insensitive to pGKL killer toxin (19).
Finally, the 30-kDa protein band was found to correspond to the
open-reading frame YMR312W on chromosome XIII (predicted molecular
weight Mr 30.6), which we termed
ELP6. The predicted molecular weights of the identified
open-reading frames correspond well with the apparent molecular masses
in all three cases. Analysis of the three amino acid sequences by data
base searching did not reveal any obvious domain structure or homology
to proteins with known function.
To verify the identity of the 50-, 35-, and 30-kDa protein bands,
polyclonal rabbit antibodies directed against the carboxyl-terminal 19 amino acids of Elp4, Elp5, and Elp6 were generated and tested for
reactivity toward purified Elongator by immunoblotting. These antibodies, but not the corresponding preimmune sera, specifically recognized p50/Elp4, p35/Elp5, and p30/Elp6, respectively, in the
Elongator preparation, confirming the identification of these proteins
as components of the complex (Fig.
2A).
To establish that Elp4, Elp5, and Elp6 are bona fide
subunits of Elongator, the purified complex was analyzed by gel
filtration chromatography. All six Elongator proteins exactly co-eluted
from this resin as judged by protein silver staining and immunoblot analysis using antibodies directed against Elp1, Elp3, Elp4, Elp5, and
Elp6 (Fig. 2B). This experiment shows that Elp4, Elp5, and Elp6 are indeed subunits of Elongator and indicates that Elongator is a
stoichiometric complex composed of six subunits.
Elongator Is Composed of Two Subcomplexes--
Previously, we
identified Elongator as a three-subunit complex (8). Careful analysis
of protein fractions obtained from these earlier purifications showed
that proteins with apparent molecular weights corresponding to Elp4,
Elp5, and Elp6 eluted from Mono Q slightly later than Elp1, Elp2, and
Elp3 (data not shown). We reasoned that Elongator complex might be
disrupted by anion-exchange chromatography on Mono Q, or by high salt
concentration. Indeed, when affinity-purified six subunit Elongator was
loaded onto Mono Q and eluted with increasing salt, three different
forms of the complex could be identified (Fig.
3). First, six subunit holo-Elongator
eluted at <1100 mM KOAc. Second, the previously identified
form of Elongator composed of Elp1, Elp2, and Elp3 (core Elongator) was
detected, and, finally, fractions highly enriched in Elp4, Elp5, and
Elp6 were obtained. We also observed that Elongator was disrupted in
the presence of 2 M NaCl (data not shown). We conclude that
Mono Q chromatography and/or high salt concentration can disrupt the
Elongator complex, explaining our failure to previously identify the
three smallest subunits. These findings indicate that Elongator is
composed of two subcomplexes: one comprising the three largest
subunits, and the second composed of the three newly identified
proteins, Elp4, Elp5, and Elp6.
Disruption of ELP4, ELP5, and ELP6 Genes Results in Typical Elp
Phenotypes--
To analyze the role of ELP4,
ELP5, and ELP6 in vivo, we disrupted one copy of
the respective entire open-reading frames in diploid yeast cells, which
were subsequently induced to sporulate. After dissection of the
resulting tetrads, we noted the appearance of small colonies, which
occurred in a 2:2 ratio and co-segregated with the marker used (data
not shown). This is reminiscent of the phenotype we previously observed
in elp1
Other phenotypes we observed for elp4 Identification of Elp4 Homologues in Higher
Eukaryotes--
Further data base searching using the predicted
amino acid sequence of ELP4 as a query identified
significant homology with several open-reading frames from a variety of
higher eukaryotes, including human and mouse (Fig.
6A). No clear domain structure could be identified on the basis of these homologies. Interestingly, however, the putative human and mouse Elp4 proteins are encoded by the
human and mouse PAXNEB gene, respectively, which is
localized on human chromosome 11p13 (mouse chromosome 2), a region
implicated with human disease (20). PAXNEB is expressed in a
variety of human tissues as determined by Northern blot analysis (Fig.
6B) and indicated by the presence of multiple expressed
sequence tags (ESTs) derived from different tissues in the data base.
The ubiquitous expression pattern suggests a general role for Elp4 in
higher eukaryotic cells. In addition, the identification of human and other higher eukaryotic homologues of Elp4 further supports the notion
that Elongator is structurally conserved from yeast to man.
In the present study we isolated Elongator complex by utilizing a
rapid purification procedure based largely on affinity chromatography. Our findings can be summarized as follows: Elongator consists of six
subunits; the three identified previously, and a novel discrete
subcomplex composed of three proteins, termed Elp4, Elp5, and Elp6. We
have named the novel factor holo-Elongator, to distinguish it from the
core-factor (Elp1, Elp2, and Elp3) that we isolated previously.
holo-Elongator is a labile complex that can be dissociated into its two
three-subunit subcomplexes by treatment with high salt or by anionic
chromatography. We have identified the genes encoding the three new
subunits and shown by genetic analysis that strains lacking any one of
these genes have phenotypes that are indistinguishable from those of
the previously characterized elp strains. Finally, we have
cloned the human homologue of yeast ELP4 and shown that it
is ubiquitously transcribed.
holo-Elongator Is a Functional Unit--
In vivo, two
of the proteins in the Elp4/Elp5/Elp6 module, Elp5 and Elp6 have been
shown to interact in a large scale two-hybrid screen (21). We found
that deletion of any gene encoding a component of holo-Elongator
results in similar phenotypes and that concomitant deletion of more
ELP genes fails to confer a new phenotype. In this respect,
Elongator seems fundamentally different from other transcription-related multisubunit complexes, such as Mediator, Swi/Snf, Rsc, ADA, and SAGA. Mutation of genes encoding subunits of
these complexes often confer very different phenotypes, indicating that
these factors are at least partly composed of subcomplexes or
components with different specialized (gene-specific) functions. Additionally, some of the components of these factors, such as Gcn5 (a
component of both ADA and SAGA) and Arp7/9 (components of both Swi/Snf
and Rsc) perform functions in more than one factor, which likely
contributes to diversified phenotypes (12, 22). Based on these
observations and the above-mentioned fundamental difference between
Elongator and other multisubunit factors, it may be argued that the
products of the ELP genes are likely to only exert their
function together, in the context of Elongator. In agreement with this,
we have failed to observe other proteins than the six holo-Elongator
subunits after affinity purification from a strain expressing
epitope-tagged Elp4 (TP and JQS, data not shown). It may also be
significant that a point mutation resulting in loss of Elp3 HAT
activity also confers the full elp phenotype. This indicates
that the most important function of holo-Elongator lies in its capacity
as a HAT.
Elongator As a Putative Target for K. lactis Killer
Toxin--
ELP1 is identical to IKI3, and the
newly identified ELP5 gene is identical to IKI1.
We found that the interesting and intriguing insensitivity to
expression of the K. lactis killer Elongator Is Conserved among Eukaryotes--
Human homologues of
ELP1 and ELP3 have been identified by searching
the data bases (8, 10). In support of the notion that the structure and
function of holo-Elongator is highly conserved among eukaryotes, we
identified a human homologue of the yeast ELP4 gene, which
has previously been submitted to the data bases and named
PAXNEB. This gene is ubiquitously expressed, and is located
in a region on chromosome 11 that has been implicated in human disease.
Heterozygous deletion of the 11p13 region gives rise to WAGR
syndrome: Wilm's tumor, Aniridia,
Genitourinary abnormalities, and mental
Retardation. Most of these abnormalities are due to deletion of the well studied disease genes, PAX6 and
WT1, but the cause(s) of the mental retardation remains to
be identified. Other disease-related loci, such as those associated
with loss of heterozygosity in breast and bladder cancers, also map to
this region (Ref. 20 and references therein). We are presently
isolating human Elongator with the aim to explore the molecular
structure and function of Elongator in metazoans.
We thank the Imperial Cancer Research
Fund service facilities, especially fermentation services and photography.
*
This project was supported by grants from the Imperial
Cancer Research Fund and the Human Frontier Science Project (to
J. Q. S.), by an EMBO Long Term Fellowship (to G. S. W.), by a
Carlsberg Foundation Fellowship, by a grant from The Danish Medical
Research Council (to S. E.), and by NCI Core Grant P30 CA08748 (to
P. T.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 2, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105303200
The abbreviations used are:
RNAPII, RNA
polymerase II;
CTD, carboxyl-terminal repeat domain;
HA, hemagglutinin;
FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography;
MALDI-reTOF, matrix-assisted
laser desorption/ionization reflectron time-of-flight;
NTA, nitrilotriacetic acid;
HAT, histone acetyltransferase.
RNA Polymerase II Elongator Holoenzyme Is Composed of Two
Discrete Subcomplexes*
,
,
,
Mechanisms of Gene Transcription Laboratory,
Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Clare Hall Laboratories, Blanche Lane,
South Mimms, Herts, EN6 3LD, United Kingdom, § Applied and
Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University,
1-21-24 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan, and the ¶ Molecular
Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New
York 10021
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
cells.
List of yeast strains used
80 °C.
-subunit under control of the inducible Gal1-10 promoter
(17). Dilutions of the indicated yeast strains were spotted onto SD
(
ura
trp) medium containing 2% glucose or galactose as indicated.
-actin cDNA (CLONTECH).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Purification of Elongator complex.
A, schematic diagram of tagged Elp1 consisting of
full-length Elp1 fused to a decahistidine stretch and an HA epitope
tag. B, diagram of the purification scheme. C,
immunoblot analysis of fractions from the anti-HA immunoaffinity
column. Elp1 protein was detected using rat monoclonal antibody 3F10
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) recognizing the HA epitope.
D, protein staining with silver nitrate of
Elongator-containing fractions from the anti-HA immunoaffinity resin
and the Ni2+-NTA-agarose column. Elp proteins are
indicated. Numbers on the left indicate the positions of the
molecular size markers.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Identification of the Elp4, Elp5, and Elp6
proteins by immunoblotting, and analysis of purified Elongator complex
by gel filtration. A, protein staining with silver
nitrate and immunoblot analysis of purified Elongator using antibodies
directed against the carboxyl termini of Elp4, Elp5, and Elp6,
respectively. B, fractions from the anti-HA immunoaffinity
column were subjected to Superose 6 gel filtration chromatography.
Fractions were analyzed by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
and stained with silver nitrate (top panel) or antibodies
directed against Elongator proteins (bottom panels). Numbers
on the right of the silver stained gel indicate the
positions of the molecular size protein markers. Numbers at the
bottom of the figure indicate the migration of globular
molecular size markers during gel filtration.

View larger version (74K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Resolution of different forms of Elongator by
Mono Q anion-exchange chromatography. Fractions from the anti-HA
immunoaffinity column were loaded onto a Mono Q FPLC column and eluted
with a linear salt gradient. Fractions were analyzed by 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and stained with silver nitrate
(top panel) or detected by antibodies directed against
Elongator proteins (bottom panels).
, elp2
, and elp3
cells
(8-10). The identification of two genes encoding Elongator components,
ELP1/IKI3 and ELP5/IKI1, as genes
whose inactivation cause insensitivity to pGKL killer toxin (19),
prompted us to investigate whether disruption of the remaining four
ELP genes also render cells insensitive to the killer toxin
derived from the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis.
Therefore, we conditionally expressed the
killer toxin subunit
intracellularly using a galactose-inducible promoter (17). As shown in
Fig. 4A, all elp
mutant strains grew normally on medium containing glucose where the
killer toxin was not expressed. However, upon expression of killer
toxin on galactose-containing medium, wild type cells were unable to
grow, whereas all elp
mutants were insensitive to killer
toxin. The mechanism of killer toxin depends on the histone
acetyltransferase activity of Elongator, as inactivation of the complex
in an elp3 strain carrying a point mutation in a residue
important for the catalytic activity of Elp3 also resulted in
insensitivity to killer toxin.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Phenotypic analysis of
elp4
,
elp5
, and elp6
yeast cells. A, all elp mutants are
insensitive to K. lactis killer toxin. Cells carried plasmid
pNW064 (17) containing the killer toxin
subunit gene under control
of a galactose-inducible promoter. Serial dilutions of the indicated
mutant cells were plated on SD (
ura
trp) medium containing 2%
glucose or galactose as indicated and allowed to grow for 2-3 days at
30 °C. B, temperature sensitivity. Cells were grown on
YPD for 2-4 days at the indicated temperature. C,
sensitivity to high salt concentration. Serial dilutions of the
indicated mutant cells were dropped onto YPD or YPD containing 1 M NaCl and grown for 2-3 days at 30 °C.
,
elp5
, and elp6
cells were an inability
to grow at 39 °C (Fig. 4B) and salt sensitivity (Fig.
4C), which were previously observed for elp1
,
elp2
, and elp3
mutants (8-10). In
addition, elp1
elp4
double mutants cells
displayed phenotypes virtually identical to those of the single
mutants, such as growth rate, and sensitivity to elevated temperature
and high salt (Fig. 5 and data not
shown), as previously observed for all combinations of
elp1
, elp2
, and elp3
mutations (9). Taken together, these results indicate that
ELP1 through ELP6 are all non-essential genes
whose products also form a functional entity in vivo.

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Phenotypic analysis of elp1 elp4
double mutant cells. A, temperature sensitivity.
Wild type, single, and double mutant cells were grown on YPD for 2-4
days at 30 °C, 37 °C, or 39 °C. B, sensitivity to
high salt. Serial dilutions of the indicated mutant cells were dropped
onto YPD or YPD containing 1 M NaCl and grown for 2 days
(YPD) or 3 days (YPD+1 M NaCl).

View larger version (76K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
ELP4 is a ubiquitously expressed gene whose
product is conserved in higher eukaryotes. A, predicted
amino acid sequence of the protein encoded by ELP4 and
alignment with sequences from various species using ClustalX (24).
M.m., Mus musculus, Q9ER73; H.s.,
Homo sapiens, Q9NX11; D.m., Drosophila
melanogaster, Q9VMQ7; C.e., Caenorhabditis
elegans, Q18195; S.p., Schizosaccharomyces
pombe, Q9USP1; S.c., S. cerevisiae.
Conserved residues are shaded in light gray, identical
residues in dark gray, and residues identical in all species
are highlighted. Yeast Elp4 is 26% identical/41% similar
to human Elp4 (PAXNEB) over the entire sequence. Otherwise, homology
between these proteins range from 21% identical and 41% similar (S.c.
and D.m.) to 26%/43% (S.c. and S.p.) and 30%/49% (D.m. and H.s.).
B, expression pattern of human ELP4 (PAXNEB) in the
indicated tissues as determined by Northern blot analysis in comparison
with the actin control.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-toxin is a phenotype
shared by all the elp strains. While this work was in
progress, Frohloff et al.(23) reported the identification of mutants from a killer toxin screen virtually identical to the IKI screen and named their isolated mutants TOT
(for toxin target). From this screen,
TOT1, 2, and 3 were found to be
identical to ELP1, ELP2, and ELP3,
respectively. The authors also found that the protein product of
IKI1/TOT5, as well as the product of a gene isolated in
another killer toxin screen, KTI12/TOT4 (killer toxin
insensitive 12), could be co-immunoprecipitated with
Elongator proteins, indicating that all the gene products isolated so
far as intracellular effectors of the killer toxin interact. Our
identification of Iki1/Tot5 as a component of holo-Elongator (Elp5)
provides an explanation for the Iki1/Tot5-Elongator interaction
observed by Frohloff et al. (23). By contrast, extensive
analysis by mass spectrometry did not provide any evidence for the
presence of Kti12 in highly purified Elongator preparations. Because
the kti12/tot4 mutant was shown to have phenotypes
strikingly similar to those of elp mutants (23), however, it
is likely that this protein plays a role in Elongator function.
Importantly, expression of KTI12/TOT4 from multicopy
plasmids, but not similar overexpression of ELP1/TOT1,
ELP2/TOT2, ELP3/TOT3, or ELP5/TOT5,
confers
-toxin resistance (23). Taken together, these findings thus
suggest that Kti12/Tot4 is not a component of Elongator, but rather
influences its activity. This possibility is presently under investigation.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 44 207 269 3801; E-mail: j.svejstrup@icrf.icnet.uk.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Dahmus, M. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19009-19012
2.
Svejstrup, J. Q.,
Vichi, P.,
and Egly, J. M.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
346-350
3.
Malik, S.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(2000)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
25,
277-283
4.
Myers, L. C.,
and Kornberg, R. D.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
69,
729-749
5.
Usheva, A.,
Maldonado, E.,
Goldring, A.,
Lu, H.,
Houbavi, C.,
Reinberg, D.,
and Aloni, Y.
(1992)
Cell
69,
871-881
6.
Svejstrup, J. Q.,
Li, Y.,
Fellows, J.,
Gnatt, A.,
Bjorklund, S.,
and Kornberg, R. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
6075-6078
7.
Yudkovsky, N.,
Ranish, J. A.,
and Hahn, S.
(2000)
Nature
408,
225-229
8.
Otero, G.,
Fellows, J.,
Li, Y.,
de Bizemont, T.,
Dirac, A. M. G.,
Gustafsson, C. M.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
and Svejstrup, J. Q.
(1999)
Mol. Cell.
3,
109-118
9.
Fellows, J.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
and Svejstrup, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
12896-12899
10.
Wittschieben, B. O.,
Otero, G.,
de Bizemont, T.,
Fellows, J.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Ohba, R.,
Li, Y.,
Allis, C. D.,
Tempst, P.,
and Svejstrup, J. Q.
(1999)
Mol. Cell.
4,
123-128
11.
Wittschieben, B. O.,
Fellows, J.,
Du, W.,
Stillman, D. J.,
and Svejstrup, J. Q.
(2000)
EMBO Journal
19,
3060-3068
12.
Grant, P. A.,
Duggan, L.,
Cote, J.,
Roberts, S. M.,
Brownell, J. E.,
Candau, R.,
Ohba, R.,
Owen-Hughes, T.,
Allis, C. D.,
Winston, F.,
Berger, S. L.,
and Workman, J. L.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1640-1650
13.
Sikorski, R. S.,
and Hieter, P.
(1989)
Genetics
122,
19-27
14.
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Lui, M.,
Lacomis, L.,
Grewal, A.,
Annan, R. S.,
Carr, S. A.,
and Tempst, P.
(1998)
J. Chromatogr. A.
826,
167-181
15.
Geromanos, S.,
Freckleton, G.,
and Tempst, P.
(2000)
Anal. Chem.
72,
777-790
16.
Mann, M.,
Hojrup, P.,
and Roepstorff, P.
(1993)
Biol. Mass. Spectrom.
22,
338-345
17.
Tokunaga, M.,
Kawamura, A.,
and Hishinuma, F.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
3435-3446
18.
Lui, M.,
Tempst, P.,
and Erdjument-Bromage, H.
(1996)
Anal. Biochem.
241,
156-166
19.
Yajima, H.,
Tokunaga, M.,
Nakayama-Murayama, A.,
and Hishinuma, F.
(1997)
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
61,
704-709
20.
Miles, C.,
Elgar, G.,
Coles, E.,
Kleinjan, D. J.,
van Heyningen, V.,
and Hastie, N.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13068-13072
21.
Uetz, P.,
Giot, L.,
Cagney, G.,
Mansfield, T. A.,
Judson, R. S.,
Knight, J. R.,
Lockshon, D.,
Narayan, V.,
Srinivasan, M.,
Pochart, P.,
Qureshi-Emili, A.,
Li, Y.,
Godwin, B.,
Conover, D.,
Kalbfleisch, T.,
Vijayadamodar, G.,
Yang, M.,
Johnston, M.,
Fields, S.,
and Rothberg, J. M.
(2000)
Nature
403,
623-627
22.
Cairns, B. R.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
Winston, F.,
and Kornberg, R. D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
2,
639-651
23.
Frohloff, F.,
Fichtner, L.,
Jablonowski, D.,
Breunig, K. D.,
and Schaffrath, R.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
1993-2003
24.
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680
25.
Thomas, B. J.,
and Rothstein, R.
(1989)
Cell
56,
619-630
26.
Jones, E. W.
(1977)
Genetics
85,
23-33
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Huang, J. Lu, and A. S. Bystrom A genome-wide screen identifies genes required for formation of the wobble nucleoside 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA, October 1, 2008; 14(10): 2183 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Collins, P. Kemmeren, X.-C. Zhao, J. F. Greenblatt, F. Spencer, F. C. P. Holstege, J. S. Weissman, and N. J. Krogan Toward a Comprehensive Atlas of the Physical Interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Cell. Proteomics, March 1, 2007; 6(3): 439 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Chen, H. Zhang, D. Jablonowski, X. Zhou, X. Ren, X. Hong, R. Schaffrath, J.-K. Zhu, and Z. Gong Mutations in ABO1/ELO2, a Subunit of Holo-Elongator, Increase Abscisic Acid Sensitivity and Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(18): 6902 - 6912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kimura, K. Matsubara, and M. Horikoshi A Decade of Histone Acetylation: Marking Eukaryotic Chromosomes with Specific Codes J. Biochem., December 1, 2005; 138(6): 647 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Petrakis, T. M. M. Sogaard, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and J. Q. Svejstrup Physical and Functional Interaction between Elongator and the Chromatin-associated Kti12 Protein J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 19454 - 19460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zink, C. Mehlgarten, H. K. Kitamoto, J. Nagase, D. Jablonowski, R. C. Dickson, M. J. R. Stark, and R. Schaffrath Mannosyl-Diinositolphospho-Ceramide, the Major Yeast Plasma Membrane Sphingolipid, Governs Toxicity of Kluyveromyces lactis Zymocin Eukaryot. Cell, May 1, 2005; 4(5): 879 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. HUANG, M. J.O. JOHANSSON, and A. S. BYSTROM An early step in wobble uridine tRNA modification requires the Elongator complex RNA, April 1, 2005; 11(4): 424 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Kong, M. S. Kobor, N. J. Krogan, B. P. Somesh, T. M. M. Sogaard, J. F. Greenblatt, and J. Q. Svejstrup Interaction of Fcp1 Phosphatase with Elongating RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme, Enzymatic Mechanism of Action, and Genetic Interaction with Elongator J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4299 - 4306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Petrakis, B. O. Wittschieben, and J. Q. Svejstrup Molecular Architecture, Structure-Function Relationship, and Importance of the Elp3 Subunit for the RNA Binding of Holo-Elongator J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32087 - 32092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jablonowski, L. Fichtner, M. J.R. Stark, and R. Schaffrath The Yeast Elongator Histone Acetylase Requires Sit4-dependent Dephosphorylation for Toxin-Target Capacity Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2004; 15(3): 1459 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Goehring, D. M. Rivers, and G. F. Sprague Jr. Urmylation: A Ubiquitin-like Pathway that Functions during Invasive Growth and Budding in Yeast Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2003; 14(11): 4329 - 4341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nelissen, J. H. Clarke, M. De Block, S. De Block, R. Vanderhaeghen, R. E. Zielinski, T. Dyer, S. Lust, D. Inze, and M. Van Lijsebettens DRL1, a Homolog of the Yeast TOT4/KTI12 Protein, Has a Function in Meristem Activity and Organ Growth in Plants PLANT CELL, March 1, 2003; 15(3): 639 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Creton, J. Q. Svejstrup, and M. A. Collart The NC2 alpha and beta subunits play different roles in vivo Genes & Dev., December 15, 2002; 16(24): 3265 - 3276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Ponting Novel domains and orthologues of eukaryotic transcription elongation factors Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2002; 30(17): 3643 - 3652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jablonowski and R. Schaffrath Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA Polymerase II Is Affected by Kluyveromyces lactis Zymocin J. Biol. Chem., July 12, 2002; 277(29): 26276 - 26280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Winkler, A. Kristjuhan, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and J. Q. Svejstrup Elongator is a histone H3 and H4 acetyltransferase important for normal histone acetylation levels in vivo PNAS, March 19, 2002; 99(6): 3517 - 3522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Balasubramanian, M. G. Pray-Grant, W. Selleck, P. A. Grant, and S. Tan Role of the Ada2 and Ada3 Transcriptional Coactivators in Histone Acetylation J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 7989 - 7995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Kim, W. S. Lane, and D. Reinberg Human Elongator facilitates RNA polymerase II transcription through chromatin PNAS, January 24, 2002; (2002) 251672198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Hawkes, G. Otero, G. S. Winkler, N. Marshall, M. E. Dahmus, D. Krappmann, C. Scheidereit, C. L. Thomas, G. Schiavo, H. Erdjument-Bromage, et al. Purification and Characterization of the Human Elongator Complex J. Biol. Chem., January 18, 2002; 277(4): 3047 - 3052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Kim, W. S. Lane, and D. Reinberg Human Elongator facilitates RNA polymerase II transcription through chromatin PNAS, February 5, 2002; 99(3): 1241 - 1246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||