![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 35, 32806-32813, August 31, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, August 30, 2000, and in revised form, May 23, 2001
Recent evidence supports a role for proteoglycans
in polycation-mediated gene delivery. Therefore, the interaction of
glycosaminoglycans with cationic lipid-DNA complexes (CLDCs) has been
characterized using a combination of biophysical approaches. At low
ionic strength, CLDCs bind to heparin-derivatized Sepharose particles,
with the ratio of cationic lipid to DNA controlling the binding.
Incorporation of the helper lipids cholesterol or
1,2-dioleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine increases the amount of bound
CLDC. Heparin also induces the aggregation of CLDCs, with cholesterol
reducing this effect. Isothermal titration calorimetry demonstrates an
endothermic heat for the binding of heparin to CLDCs at low ionic
strength, whereas circular dichroism studies suggest a
heparin-stimulated release of DNA from CLDCs at a greater than 20-fold
charge excess. Increasing the ionic strength to 0.11 reduces CLDC
binding to heparin beads, and greatly enhances the release of DNA from
CLDCs by heparin. The ability of the cell surface glycosaminoglycan
heparan sulfate to release DNA from CLDCs is more sensitive than
heparin to the incorporation of the cholesterol or
1,2-dioleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine. Titration calorimetry reveals an
exothermic heat for the interaction glycosaminoglycans with CLDCs at
higher ionic strength. These results are consistent with the
direct involvement of proteoglycans in transfection.
Complexes of DNA and various polymers such as cationic lipids,
polypeptides, amino-dendrimers, and polyethyleneimine are able to
transfect cells and are currently being evaluated as gene delivery vehicles for various clinical indications. The mechanism by which such
complexes enter cells is, however, unclear. These agents are able to
efficiently deliver DNA to a variety of very different cell types (1).
This suggests a general entry mechanism rather than one requiring
highly specific membrane receptors. Recent evidence suggests cell
surface proteoglycans have a significant impact on polycation-mediated
gene delivery. Proteoglycans are a diverse class of molecules
consisting of a protein core and one or more anionic glycosaminoglycan
chains, which include heparan, dermatan and chondroitin sulfates (2).
They can exist as both integral and
GPI1-linked membrane proteins
at the cell surface. Proteoglycans are fundamental components of
basement membranes and the extracellular matrix, playing important
roles in cell proliferation and differentiation (3). Their physical and
chemical composition is highly dependent upon cell type, stage of
differentiation, and cell cycle phase (2). More provocatively from the
perspective of this work, they also appear to act as receptors or
co-receptors for several viruses such as herpes simplex virus-2 (4),
adenoassociated virus-2 (5), human immunodeficiency virus-1 (6), and
adenovirus (7), all of which have been employed as efficient gene
delivery vehicles.
Several roles for proteoglycans in nonviral gene delivery have been
suggested. Recent studies have found that the alteration of
proteoglycans on the cell surface by inhibition of polysaccharide sulfation with chlorate, their enzymatic removal, or the use of genetically altered cells that possess reduced cell surface GAGs, greatly reduced transfection efficiency (either in terms of number of
cells transfected or amount of protein expressed) for both cationic
polymer (8) and lipid-based delivery complexes (8, 9). Furthermore, the
presence of HSPGs and GAGs in the extracellular media has been shown to
decrease the transfection efficiency of cationic polymer and lipid-DNA
complexes in vitro (10, 11). In addition to the proposed
role for cell surface HSPGs as nonspecific "receptors" for
polycation/DNA complexes, Belting and Petersson (12) have provided
evidence that proteoglycans may also play a protective role in nonviral
gene delivery by sequestering cationic lipids and possibly other
polycations, thereby reducing their cytotoxicity. These results provide
indirect but compelling evidence that HSPGs play a significant role in
nonviral gene delivery, the precise role of which is yet to be determined.
Several studies have examined the effect of polyanions on the physical
properties of polycation-DNA complexes. Szoka and colleagues (13-15)
have demonstrated that several polyanions, including anionic liposomes
and the GAG, heparin, can release DNA from its association with
cationic lipid, as demonstrated by the reversal of fluorescent dye
exclusion from DNA. Subsequently, several authors have described similar results for a variety of polyanions as well as several polycations using related fluorescence-based assays (10, 16). Wong
et al. and Koltover et al. have described the
binding of CLDCs to anionic surfaces of latex beads (17) and giant
unilamellar vesicles (18), respectively. With such considerations in
mind, we have conducted an analysis of the interaction of two GAGs, heparin and heparan sulfate with CLDCs, in an effort to characterize the physical nature of the interaction as well as the influence of CLDC
composition on any observed complexation. Studies were conducted at two
different ionic strengths to further define the interaction.
Materials--
Plasmid DNA (pMB113, 9.1 kilobase pairs, >95%
supercoiled) was provided by Valentis, Inc. (Burlingame, CA). DOTAP,
DOPE, cholesterol, and Rh-DOPE were purchased from Avanti (Alabaster,
AL). Heparin (H3393, Sigma) and heparan sulfate (H9637, Sigma)
were used as supplied. Heparin-Sepharose beads, "heparin beads,"
having an average diameter of 90 µm were purchased from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech. All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma.
Liposome Preparation--
DOTAP or a 1:1 mixture of DOTAP and
the helper lipids cholesterol or DOPE (1:1 mole ratio) was deposited as
a thin film on the walls of a glass vial by evaporation of the
chloroform solvent under nitrogen. The dried film was stored under
vacuum for at least 2 h prior to hydration with 10 mM
Tris, pH 7.4, containing either 0 or 100 mM NaCl. After
brief vortexing to obtain a lipid suspension, the sample was extruded
10 times through a 100-nm polycarbonate filter
(Nuclepore®; Whatman, Clifton, NJ). The resulting
liposomes were stored at 4 °C until use. Liposomes used for the
heparin bead binding studies were labeled with 0.25 mol% Rh-DOPE.
Typically, the liposomes had an average effective diameter of 120 nm as
measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) (see below).
CLDC Preparation--
Various amounts of DNA and lipid were
prepared in equal volumes of 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing
either 0 or 100 mM NaCl. Depending on the desired ratio of
lipid to DNA, the substance of lesser quantity was rapidly added to the
other, with stirring. All ratios are given as the ratio of the positive
charge of the lipids to the negative charge of the DNA phosphates. The
complexes were allowed to equilibrate for 30 min prior to use.
Heparin Bead Binding Isotherms--
Samples were prepared in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing either 0 or 100 mM
NaCl by adding increasing amounts of liposomes or CLDCs to a solution
containing 1.25% v/v heparin beads in 2-ml polypropylene
microcentrifuge tubes. The molar concentration of heparin negative
charge (150 µM) was determined, given that there are 2 mg
of heparin for every 1 ml of drained gel, the average molecular weight
of the repeating disaccharide unit is 535 Da, and there are an average
of 2.4 sulfates and 1 carboxylate per disaccharide. The samples were
placed on a rotating mixer (~5 rpm) for 1 h and then centrifuged
at 2,300 × g for 2 min in a microcentrifuge.
Supernatant (250 µl) was then assayed for unbound lipid and DNA.
Lipid was separated from DNA based on a previously reported
modification (19) of the Bligh and Dwyer extraction. Briefly, an
aliquot of concentrated NaCl solution was added to the supernatant to a
final concentration of 200 mM. Methanol and chloroform were
added sequentially, to a final volume ratio of 5:4:3
water:methanol:chloroform. The mixtures were equilibrated for 2.5 h on a rotating mixer before centrifugation at 11,300 × g to facilitate complete phase separation. Rh-DOPE in the
organic phase was assayed by monitoring fluorescence intensity at 575 nm upon excitation at 560 nm. Concentration was determined from a
standard curve over a range of 0.5-600 µM DOTAP. DNA in
the aqueous phase was assayed by measuring the UV absorbance at 260 nm,
employing an experimentally determined extinction coefficient of 0.0032 µM Dynamic Light Scattering--
Samples were prepared in Tris
buffer, pH 7.4, containing either 0 or 100 mM NaCl that had
been filtered through 0.2-µm polysulfone filters (Gelman Science).
All glassware was exhaustively washed with distilled and deionized
water that had been similarly filtered. Samples contained CLDC to which
various amounts of GAGs were added. Measurements were taken at various
time points using a light scattering instrument (Brookhaven Instruments
Corp., Holtszille, NY) employing a 50-milliwatt helium-neon diode laser
(532 nm) incident upon the sample cell immersed in a bath of decalin.
The scattered light was monitored by a PMT (EMI 9863) at 90° to the
incident beam, and the autocorrelation function was generated via a
digital correlator (BI-9000AT). Data was collected continuously for
three 1-min intervals, for each sample. The autocorrelation function
was fit by the method of cumulants to yield the average diffusion
coefficient of the complexes (20). Data are reported for a quadratic
fit. The effective hydrodynamic diameter was obtained from the
diffusion coefficient by the Stokes-Einstein equation (21). GAGs by
themselves scatter light poorly, and the measured scattering intensity
at these concentrations is not significantly different from that of
Tris buffer alone.
Phase Analysis Light Scattering--
The colloidal properties of
complexes of heparin with CLDCs were characterized by measuring their
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry--
All solutions were
prepared in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing either 0 or 100 mM NaCl, and degassed under vacuum. CLDCs were prepared as
described above and placed in the sample cell. All CLDC solutions were
prepared at a concentration of 1.54 mM DOTAP. For
titrations of GAGs into liposomes alone, at high ionic strength the
DOTAP concentration was 3.1 mM to obtain a good signal.
Discrete amounts of a GAG solution (typically 5 or 10 µl) were
titrated into the sample cell at 300-s intervals at 25 °C. The
resulting thermograms were integrated for each peak and corrected for
mixing heats by subtracting the heat evolved from titrating GAGs into Tris buffer.
Circular Dichroism--
Samples were prepared by adding various
amounts of heparin to the CLDCs, and measurements were taken 2 h
after heparin addition. CD spectra were recorded with a Jasco 720 spectrapolarimeter (Jasco, Easton, MD) using a 0.1-cm quartz cuvette.
Spectra were obtained from 350 to 200 nm, employing a scan rate of 20 nm/min at a resolution of 0.5 nm. Three spectra were acquired and
averaged for each sample.
Each spectrum was processed by subtracting a blank, buffer spectrum
from the sample spectrum, and the noise reduction function of the Jasco
software was employed. Molar ellipticity was calculated in terms of
molar base concentration based on an average molecular mass of 324.5 Da. The molar ellipticity at 275 nm was used to estimate the amount of
DNA released from the CLDCs upon addition of heparin. The fraction of
DNA released was calculated from the following equation.
CLDCs Bind to Heparin Covalently Attached to a Surface at Low Ionic
Strength--
Understanding the interaction of CLDCs with cell
surface-associated GAGs is of great importance to the implementation of
polycation-mediated gene transfer. Thus, a model surface was desired
that would allow for more quantitative assessment of CLDC binding than
cells in culture. The use of heparin gel affinity media to measure the binding of proteins and viruses to heparin has been described previously (4, 23-25). To simulate the binding of CLDCs to a cell
surface, increasing amounts of CLDCs were added to heparin beads and
binding isotherms generated (Fig. 1). The
binding of lipid vesicles and CLDCs resulted in complete binding after
0.5 h and remained constant for 2 h (data not shown). At low
ionic strength (e.g. 10 mM Tris), DOTAP
liposomes alone bound to the beads and showed a maximum binding of 0.13 mol of lipid/mol of heparin negative charge (data not shown). 1:1 DOTAP
CLDC bound to heparin beads with ~0.17 mol of both DNA and lipid
binding/mol of negative charge of heparin (Fig. 1A). In the
case of a 2:1 DOTAP CLDC (Fig. 1B), somewhat greater binding
was seen when complexes were added up to a DNA concentration of 75 µM phosphate, with roughly 0.23 mol of DNA and DOTAP
bound/mol of heparin negative charge. Above this level, however, the
amount of DNA bound to the heparin beads began to decrease, while the
amount of DOTAP bound manifested additional binding with a maximum of
0.4 mol/mol of negative charge of heparin bound at higher CLDC
concentrations.
Since the incorporation of cholesterol or DOPE into DOTAP CLDCs has
often been shown to increase transfection efficiency, the effect of
these helper lipids on the binding of DOTAP CLDCs to heparin beads was
also examined (Fig. 1, C and D). For 2:1 DOTAP:cholesterol CLDCs, binding of the DNA to the beads saturated at
0.13 mol/mol of heparin negative charge (Fig. 1C). The lipid manifested saturation binding with 0.5 mol of DOTAP bound/mol of
heparin negative charge. For 2:1 DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs, DNA binding saturated at ~0.25 mol/mol of negative charge of heparin (Fig. 1D). The amount of lipid bound was similar to the amount of
DNA bound in the low concentration region of the isotherm. Above 75 µM DNA phosphate added, however, the amount of lipid
bound increased and did not appear to show saturation within the CLDC
concentration range studied.
Increased Ionic Strength Reduced CLDC Binding to Heparin
Beads--
The influence of ionic strength on the binding of CLDCs to
a model heparin surface is an important aspect of such interactions. Unfortunately, the study of this interaction using the techniques employed in this investigation at physiological ionic strength (e.g. 150 mM NaCl) is quite difficult due to the
colloidal instability of CLDCs at the atypically high concentrations
necessary for these studies. Additionally, colloidal instability of the
complexes at this higher ionic strength prevented the study of CLDCs at charge ratios greater than 1:1. Thus, the interaction was studied by
increasing the ionic strength of the solution by the addition of 100 mM NaCl to explore trends in ionic strength effects. When the ionic strength was increased, binding of 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs to heparin
beads was reduced by about one-fourth to 0.04 mol of DNA or DOTAP/mol
of heparin negative charge (Fig.
2A). Incorporation of
cholesterol into the CLDC doubled the amount of DNA and lipid bound
(0.08 mol of DNA or DOTAP/mol of heparin negative charge; Fig.
2B). Incorporation of DOPE into the CLDCs also resulted in an increase in CLDC binding to the beads with no apparent saturation in
binding apparent over the concentration range studied (Fig. 2C).
Heparin Caused Aggregation of CLDCs at Low Ionic
Strength--
Given the ability of CLDCs to bind to heparin covalently
attached to a surface, further studies were conducted with GAGs free in
solution. DLS and PALS were used to examine the colloidal properties of
CLDCs in the presence of unconjugated heparin in solution. Since the
interaction between CLDCs and heparin appeared to be dominated by
electrostatics, the ratios of heparin to CLDC are presented in terms of
the total negative charge (as contributed by both heparin and DNA)
versus the total positive charge from the lipid. This value
increased with increasing heparin concentration. In contrast, the CLDCs
are described by the inverse ratio (e.g. ±).
When heparin was titrated into 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs at low ionic strength, a
gradual increase in the apparent hydrodynamic size was observed from
165 to 185 nm (Fig. 3B). PALS
data indicate that these CLDCs have a negative
The helper lipid-containing DOTAP CLDCs were somewhat larger than the
2:1 DOTAP CLDCs (250 nm (DOPE) and 270 nm (cholesterol) versus 200 nm, Fig. 3A). In the case of
cholesterol containing CLDCs, the relative increase in size when
heparin was added in charge excess was considerably less that that seen
with either 2:1 DOTAP or DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs. 2:1 DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs showed
a similar trend to that of 2:1 DOTAP CLDCs. Complexes containing
cholesterol or DOPE also manifested a positive Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) Revealed an Entropically
Driven Association of Heparin with CLDCs at Low Ionic
Strength--
The thermodynamic parameters of the interaction of
heparin with CLDCs were studied by ITC. Fig.
4A shows the apparent enthalpy of interaction ( Release of DNA from CLDCs at Low Ionic Strength--
Circular
dichroism was used to follow the changes in the packing of DNA in the
CLDCs upon titration with heparin at low ionic strength. Representative
CD spectra of DNA, CLDCs, and CLDCs in the presence of a large excess
of heparin are shown in Fig. 5. The
spectrum of the plasmid alone is consistent with that of the canonical
B-form, containing positive peaks at 275, 222, and 190 nm (the latter
peak not shown) along with negative troughs at 245 and 210 nm. The
spectra below ~230 nm of CLDCs complexed with heparin is largely due
to the signal from the N-acetyl moiety of heparin, which
displays negative ellipticity at 210 nm and a positive signal below 200 nm (26).
As DOTAP was complexed to DNA at a 2:1 charge ratio, a decrease in the
intensity and an apparent red-shift in all of the peaks and troughs was
observed. The trough at 245 nm increased in magnitude while the peak at
275 nm was shifted upward 10 nm and the intensity was reduced by
approximately half. Upon addition of a large excess of heparin, the
original shape and intensity of the peak at 275 and trough at 245 nm
was almost completely restored to that of DNA alone. Similar results
were observed for DOTAP CLDCs containing cholesterol and DOPE (data not shown).
Fig. 6A illustrates
quantitatively the changes seen in the molar ellipticity at 275 nm as
increasing amounts of heparin were added to the CLDCs. Up to a 5-fold
excess of negative charge, the molar ellipticity decreased, with the
extent of this decrease dependent on the composition of the cationic
vesicles used to prepare the CLDCs. Cholesterol-containing CLDCs showed
the largest decrease. This decrease was also accompanied by a further
red shift in the peak, which primarily accounts for the decrease in the
intensity at a fixed wavelength. This shift may be due, in part, to
absorption flattening phenomena as the size of the particles dramatically increases over this range of heparin concentration (see
Fig. 3A). Above this charge ratio, the spectra began to
return to that of the unperturbed B-form. This presumably reflects the release of DNA from the CLDCs. IC50 values suggest that,
although DOTAP CLDCs require only a ~20-fold charge excess of heparin
to release the DNA from the complex, CLDCs containing the helper lipids
cholesterol and DOPE require ~30-fold heparin charge excess for 50%
release.
Increased Ionic Strength Facilitates Heparin-mediated DNA Release
from CLDCs--
Light scattering revealed that CLDCs were larger in
higher ionic strength media and carried a reduced
In ITC experiments, titration of heparin into DOTAP liposomes at high
ionic strength revealed an endothermic heat of binding, with the
titration end point occurring when only 40% of DOTAP was neutralized
by the negative charge of heparin (Fig. 4B). The overall
CD experiments found that heparin released DNA from 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs
with an IC50 of 1.4 (Fig. 6B), corresponding to
that where the maximum size is observed by light scattering. Again,
incorporation of cholesterol and DOPE into CLDCs resulted in an
increased amount of heparin necessary for release of the DNA with
IC50 values at 1.8 and 1.9 observed for 1:1
DOTAP:cholesterol and DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs, respectively.
The Interaction of Heparan Sulfate with CLDCs Differed from That of
Heparin--
Dynamic light scattering revealed a similar profile when
the cell-surface GAG heparan sulfate was titrated into 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs
at high ionic strength compared with heparin (Fig. 3, compare C with B). The
Calorimetry experiments at higher ionic strength demonstrated several
differences in the interaction of heparan sulfate with DOTAP liposomes
and 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs compared with heparin (Fig. 4, B and
C). Binding to DOTAP liposomes resulted in an endothermic heat of binding with an overall
Circular dichroism measurements suggest that heparan sulfate also
caused the release of DNA from 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs at the higher ionic
strength (Fig. 6C). When the helper lipids cholesterol and DOPE were incorporated into the CLDCs, however, the ability of heparan
sulfate to release DNA from the complex was greatly diminished. The
IC50 value for DNA release from 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs was 1.8, whereas no appreciable heparan sulfate-induced release of DNA from
helper lipid-containing CLDCs was observed up to a 50-fold charge excess.
The mechanism by which nonviral gene delivery vehicles enter cells
remains controversial. Several previous studies have addressed a
potential role for HSPGs and GAGs in nonviral gene delivery (8-12).
Although these studies show an increase in transfection efficiency when
HSPGs are present on the cell surface and a corresponding decrease when
HSPGs are added to the cell culture medium, whether this involves a
direct interaction between cell-surface HSPGs and nonviral gene
delivery vehicles is unknown. This study presents the first attempt to
quantitatively describe the interaction of CLDCs with GAGs bound to a
surface and free in solution. Although this is very much a model study,
the use of such a well defined system permits the quantitation of
physical interaction to be directly addressed. The inherent
heterogeneity of these CLDCs, however, makes a more detailed
interpretation of results difficult. Instead, a global average
description of the interaction is reported. By examining this
interaction under a variety of solution conditions and using several
analytical approaches, however, we are able to directly demonstrate the
interaction of cationic lipid-DNA complexes with model proteoglycans
and three major aspects of this interaction: 1) the ionic strength
dependence of the interaction, 2) the effect of helper lipids on the
interaction, and 3) the effect of glycosaminoglycan structure on the interaction.
Effect of Ionic Strength on the Interaction of GAGs with
CLDCs--
Variations in ionic strength are expected to have
significant effects on interactions that are primarily electrostatic in nature. Unfortunately, the actual ionic strength at any cell surface is
poorly defined. Since we are dealing with highly charged surfaces, the
"apparent" ionic strength of the surface is much higher than the
bulk media. For instance, if we assume the surface has a
In studying the binding of CLDCs to a model heparin-derivatized
surface, increasing the ionic strength 11-fold from 0.01 to 0.11 results in a 4-fold decrease in the amount of DOTAP CLDC bound (compare
Figs. 1 and 2). Both lipid and DNA components of CLDC at a 1:1 charge
ratio, which possesses a negative
At low ionic strength (10 mM Tris buffer), binding
isotherms of 2:1 DOTAP CLDCs suggest the presence of multiple species
of complexes, as indicated by the differences in the relative amount of
lipid and DNA bound when added above or below 75 µM DNA
phosphate. Xu et al. (30) have demonstrated by sucrose
density gradient centrifugation that a 2:1 DOTAP CLDC is composed of at
least two different species. Complexes at 11% (w/v) sucrose presumably
represent lipid-rich and those at 18% DNA-rich species. Our results
suggest that, when 2:1 DOTAP CLDCs are added to the beads at relatively low concentrations, the DNA-rich species dominates the interaction. At
higher CLDC concentrations, the less abundant lipid-containing species,
possessing a greater affinity for the beads, occupies the majority of
the heparin binding sites. As CLDCs represent a heterogeneous
population of particles, further studies are necessary to more
accurately define the apparent dichotomy observed in complex binding to
a heparin surface.
Although binding of CLDCs to HSPGs at the cell surface may be the major
interaction necessary for transfection, association of CLDCs with
heparin free in solution may also be important in terms of release of
the DNA from the CLDC either in the extracellular space or upon cell
internalization. Results regarding the interaction of soluble heparin
with CLDCs suggest a significant shift in the relative "affinity"
of DNA for DOTAP as compared with that of heparin upon increasing ionic
strength. Light scattering measurements demonstrate a heparin-induced
aggregation of the DOTAP CLDCs at low ionic strength based on the
observed increase in the apparent size of the complexes (Fig. 3). For
positively charged CLDCs, precipitation occurs when heparin is added to
the point of complete charge neutrality (Fig. 3, A and
D), whereas all CLDCs showed a lesser degree of aggregation
in the presence of excess heparin at low ionic strength (Fig. 3,
B and E). Similar trends are not observed at
higher ionic strength. The return of the apparent size to a value
smaller than that observed for CLDC alone in the presence of excess
heparin suggests complex disassembly (Fig. 3C). Circular
dichroism, which can be used to measure the packaging of DNA in CLDCs,
suggests that heparin can release DNA from CLDCs, with much greater
amounts of heparin required to cause release at low compared with
higher ionic strength (Fig. 6).
Further insight into the nature of the interaction between CLDCs and
heparin in solution is obtained by ITC. Given the spontaneity of this
interaction, its entropic nature is apparent from the unfavorable
endothermic heats observed when heparin is titrated into DOTAP CLDCs at
low ionic strength (Fig. 4A). This favorable entropic
signature is consistent with an electrostatic character to the
interaction (31, 32). Additional entropic contributions from apolar
interactions (e.g. membrane fusion) may be present but are
not readily separable. The ~10-fold lower
Effect of Helper Lipids on the Interaction of CLDCs with a Model
GAG--
Thus far, the role of helper lipids has mainly been defined
in terms of the fusogenic properties of the helper lipids (34). Although it appears that this helper lipid-associated property is
important for endosomal release of DNA, protection of the DNA and
association of DNA in CLDCs with the cell surface could also be
important properties as well. Incorporation of helper lipids into CLDCs
results in enhanced heparin-bead binding at both ionic strengths
studied (Figs. 1 and 2). Consistent with this observation, incorporation of DOPE up to a 3:2 ratio with cationic lipid has been
shown to enhance cellular association of DNA over that of cationic
lipid alone (35). This enhancement presumably reflects the structural
differences between CLDCs with and without helper lipids
(e.g. size, relative amount of DNA per particle, etc.).
In solution, helper lipid containing CLDCs show trends similar to DOTAP
CLDCs in heparin-dependent aggregation at both ionic strengths studied (Fig. 3). Circular dichroism studies reveal that by
incorporating DOPE or cholesterol into CLDCs, a greater amount of
heparin is required to release 50% of the DNA from these complexes
(roughly 1.5 times more heparin for both ionic strengths studied).
Thus, incorporation of helper lipids into CLDCs may have significant
roles in transfection beyond that of facilitating endosomal release of DNA.
Influence of GAG Structure on the Interaction with
CLDCs--
Since heparan sulfate is more representative of cell
surface GAGs than heparin, we also examined its interaction with CLDCs. Although both polysaccharides possess similar carbohydrate backbone structures and broad size distributions in the range of 4-20 kDa, they
differ considerably in their distribution of sulfate groups along the
polymer. Heparin is more highly sulfated (2.4 sulfate groups/disaccharide unit) with a considerably greater fraction of
N-sulfated glucosamine monomers, whereas heparan sulfate
possesses fewer sulfates per disaccharide (1.2) and a greater fraction
of N-acetylglucosamine monomers (36). It is apparent that
these two polymers interact quantitatively differently with CLDCs. In the case of 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs, DLS and CD measurements suggest that heparan sulfate facilitates DNA release as well as heparin. Calorimetry experiments demonstrate that heparan sulfate binding to 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs
is also exothermic as a result of DNA release from the CLDC. Titration
of 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs with heparan sulfate, however, does not yield
results that closely resemble the simple additivity of interactions of
heparan sulfate and DNA with DOTAP, suggesting that there may be
additional processes involved in the interaction of heparan sulfate
with CLDCs. In contrast to heparin, incorporation of helper lipids into
the CLDC greatly reduces DNA release from the complex by heparan sulfate.
These studies have provided quantitative insight into the interaction
of model proteoglycans with CLDCs. Information is reported regarding
the effect of ionic strength on the interaction as well as discovery of
additional potential roles for helper lipids in CLDC-cell interactions.
Additionally, results from these studies suggest that differences in
GAG expression can significantly affect the interaction as indicated by
the comparison between heparin and heparan sulfate above. Although it
is now clear that the anionic nature of HSPGs can facilitate
significant CLDC association with cells, studies of CLDC interaction
with GAGs upon internalization may elucidate further roles for
proteoglycans in CLDC-mediated gene delivery.
We thank Rodney Pearlman for valuable discussion.
*
This work was supported by the Higuchi Biosciences Center
and Valentis, Inc.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, 2095 Constant Ave.,
Lawrence, KS 66047. E-mail: middaugh@ukans.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 6, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M007940200
The abbreviations used are:
GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol;
GAG, glycosaminoglycan;
HSPG, heparan
sulfate proteoglycan;
DOTAP, 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium propane;
DOPE, 1,2-dioleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine;
Rh-DOPE, rhodamine-lissamine-1,2-dioleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine;
DLS, dynamic
light scattering;
PALS, phase analysis light scattering;
ITC, isothermal titration calorimetry;
CD, circular dichroism,
The Potential Role of Proteoglycans in Cationic Lipid-mediated
Gene Delivery
STUDIES OF THE INTERACTION OF CATIONIC LIPID-DNA COMPLEXES WITH
MODEL GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS*
,
¶
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry,
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 and § Valentis,
Inc., Burlingame, California 94010
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 cm
1 based on the
concentration prior to extraction. Nonspecific binding from adsorption
to microcentrifuge tubes was subtracted by performing analogous
experiments in the absence of heparin beads.
-potential employing a ZetaPALS instrument (Brookhaven Instruments
Corp., Holtsville, NY). Using the Smoluchowski approximation (22), the
-potential was calculated from the measured electrophoretic mobility
using software provided by the manufacturer. The samples prepared for DLS measurements were subsequently used for the determination of
-potential. Samples were placed in a 3.5-ml polystyrene cell, and an
oscillating electric field was applied to the sample by a set of
electrodes. The phase shift in scattered light, relative to laser light
not passed through the sample, was measured. Software optimization of
the frequency of electric field inversion was based on the measured
conductivity of the samples. The electric field strength was typically
between 14 and 16 V/cm. Ten cycles were collected for each experiment,
with three runs performed and averaged for each sample.
(Eq. 1)
obs is the molar ellipticity of CLDC in the
presence of a given amount of heparin,
CLDC is the molar
ellipticity of the CLDC, and
DNA is the measured molar
ellipticity of the DNA alone.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Binding isotherms for CLDCs of various
compositions to heparin beads at low ionic strength. Heparin beads
were present at 1.25% (v/v) corresponding to 150 µM
negative charge. A, 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs; B, 2:1 DOTAP
CLDCs; C, 2:1 DOTAP:cholesterol CLDCs; D, 2:1
DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs. The x axis corresponds to the
concentration of the DNA phosphate from the CLDCs added to the beads.
The moles of DOTAP bound per mole of heparin negative charge are
represented by closed circles, and the moles of
DNA phosphate bound per mole of heparin negative charge are represented
by open circles. The S.E. for three experiments
was typically less than 10% for all data points but is not shown for
visual clarity.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Binding isotherms for CLDCs to heparin beads
at high ionic strength. Heparin beads were present at 1.25% (v/v)
corresponding to 150 µM negative charge. A,
1:1 DOTAP CLDCs; B, 1:1 DOTAP:cholesterol CLDCs;
C, 1:1 DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs. The x axis corresponds
to the concentration of the DNA phosphate from the CLDCs added to the
beads. The moles of DOTAP bound per mole of heparin negative charge are
represented by closed circles, and the moles of
DNA phosphate bound per mole of heparin negative charge are represented
by open circles. The S.E. for three experiments
was typically less than 10%.
-potential near
55
mV (Fig. 3E). Surprisingly, no significant change in the
-potential was observed when increasing amounts of heparin were
added to these complexes. In the case of 2:1 DOTAP CLDCs (Fig.
3A), complex size increased dramatically from an initial
value of 200 nm to particles greater than 1 µm (too large to be
measured by DLS) with phase separation occurring as heparin was added
to the point of complete neutralization of the excess DOTAP present in
the CLDC. When heparin was added in charge excess, the size immediately
dropped to 220 nm as heparin coated the surface of the CLDCs. When more
heparin was added, the size showed a further increase. PALS analysis of these positively charged CLDCs revealed a rapid decrease in the
-potential from the initial value of +50 mV, as charge neutrality approached
60 mV when heparin was added in charge excess (Fig. 3D).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Light scattering analyses of CLDCs in
the presence of various amounts of heparin or heparan sulfate.
Panels A-C represent the effective hydrodynamic
diameter determined by DLS, and panels D and
E represent the
-potential of the same complexes. The
x axis represents the ratio of the total negative charge
from both heparin and DNA in the sample to the positive charge from the
DOTAP. A and D, low ionic strength, titration
with heparin; 2:1 DOTAP CLDCs (open circles), 2:1
DOTAP:cholesterol CLDCs (open squares), and 2:1
DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs (open triangles). B
and E, titration with heparin; 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs at low ionic
strength (closed circles), 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs at
high ionic strength (closed diamonds), 1:1
DOTAP:cholesterol CLDCs) at high ionic strength (closed
squares), 1:1 DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs) at high ionic strength
(closed triangles). C and
F, high ionic strength, titration with heparan sulfate; 1:1
DOTAP CLDCs (closed diamonds), 1:1
DOTAP:cholesterol CLDCs (closed squares), 1:1
DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs (closed triangles). S.E. values
were less than 5% for all data and are not illustrated to reduce
visual clutter.
-potential, the value
of which is not significantly different than that of 2:1 DOTAP CLDCs
(Fig. 3D). Again, the same charge reversal that was observed
for the DOTAP CLDCs was seen when of the helper lipids cholesterol and DOPE were included in the complex.
Happ) for the titration of
heparin into DOTAP CLDCs at various charge ratios. The apparent
titration end point for each curve correlated well with the point at
which complexes became electrically neutral and precipitate from
solution (arrows, Fig. 4A).
Happ taken at this end point was endothermic
and found to be similar for 2:1 and 4:1 DOTAP CLDCs (1.1 ± 0.07 and 1.2 ± 0.05 kJ/mol of DOTAP, respectively).
Happ was significantly lower when heparin was
titrated into DOTAP liposomes alone (0.8 ± 0.01 kJ/mol of
DOTAP).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Representative ITC titrations of heparin or
heparan sulfate into DOTAP CLDCs. The plots represent the
cumulative
Happ as a function of GAG
concentration. A, titration of heparin into DOTAP CLDCs at
low ionic strength. All lipid concentrations are 1.5 mM;
DOTAP liposomes (open diamonds), 4:1 DOTAP CLDCs
(open squares), 2:1 DOTAP CLDCs (open
triangles). Black arrows represent the
point of calculated charge neutrality. B, titration of GAGs
into DOTAP liposomes at different ionic strengths: titration of heparin
at low ionic strength (open diamonds), titration
of heparin at high ionic strength (closed
diamonds), titration of heparan sulfate at high ionic
strength (closed squares). Black
arrows represent titration end points. C,
titration of GAGs into 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs at different ionic strengths;
titration of heparin at low ionic strength (open
circles), titration of heparin at high ionic strength
(closed circles), and titration of heparan
sulfate at high ionic strength (closed
triangles).

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Representative CD spectra of DNA in 2:1 DOTAP
CLDCs (open circles), DNA alone
(closed circles), and 2:1 DOTAP CLDCs in
the presence of 50-fold excess of heparin (black
line). Note that the spectrum of CLDCs in the
presence of a large excess of heparin is off-scale below 230 nm since
the spectrum in this region is dominated by the signal from
heparin.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Fraction of DNA released by GAGs.
Increasing amounts of GAGs were added to CLDCs, and the molar
ellipticity at 275 nm was monitored. The fraction of DNA released was
calculated as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Panel A, titration with heparin at low ionic
strength; 2:1 DOTAP CLDCs (circles), 2:1 DOTAP:cholesterol
CLDCs (triangles), and 2:1 DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs
(squares). Panel B, titration with
heparin at high ionic strength; 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs (circles),
1:1 DOTAP:cholesterol CLDCs (triangles), and 1:1 DOTAP:DOPE
CLDCs (squares). Panel C, titration
with heparan sulfate at high ionic strength; 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs
(circles), 1:1 DOTAP:cholesterol CLDCs
(triangles), and 1:1 DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs (squares).
The x axis represents the ratio of the total negative charge
from both GAG and DNA in the sample versus the positive
charge from the DOTAP.
-potential
compared with complexes at low ionic strength (Fig. 3, B and
E). Titration of 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs with heparin found a
maximum in the effective diameter around an overall charge ratio of 1.4 (
/+), decreasing at higher heparin concentrations. 1:1
DOTAP:cholesterol CLDCs produced a similar trend, whereas 1:1
DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs showed a maximum at a charge ratio of 2 (
/+). The
-potential did not change significantly at any concentration of
heparin (Fig. 3E).
Happ was still endothermic but was half the
value for a similar titration at lower ionic strength (0.4 ± 0.01 kJ/mol of DOTAP versus 0.8 ± 0.01 kJ/mol of DOTAP).
This is in agreement with the inability to neutralize all of the DOTAP.
Titration of heparin into 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs at low ionic strength
resulted in endothermic heat of binding (0.3 ± 0.03 kJ/mol of
DOTAP, Fig. 4C). Heparin titration into 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs at
high ionic strength produced an exothermic heat of interaction, which
saturated at a ratio of heparin negative charge to DOTAP positive
charge near unity (Fig. 4C). An overall
Happ of
2.4 ± 0.2 kJ/mol of DOTAP was observed.
-potential of the CLDCs showed
a slight decrease in magnitude upon addition of heparan sulfate.
Titration of 1:1 DOTAP:cholesterol and DOTAP:DOPE CLDCs with heparan
sulfate resulted in a significant increase in the effective size, which
does not decrease over the concentration range studied. The
-potential of either of these complexes does not differ
significantly over this range of heparan sulfate concentrations (Fig.
3F).
Happ of
0.3 ± 0.02 kJ/mol of DOTAP. The stoichiometric end point of the
titration occurred when 20% of the DOTAP was neutralized by heparan
sulfate. Titration of heparan sulfate into 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs again
produced an exothermic heat of interaction, however considerably less
in magnitude than that observed for heparin (
0.3 ± 0.01 versus
2.4 ± 0.2 kJ/mol DOTAP, Fig. 4C).
Additionally, the relative affinity of this interaction appeared
visually to be significantly less than that for heparin, as indicated
by the sharpness of the breakpoint (Fig. 4C,
arrows). The observed stoichiometry of the interaction
suggests that heparan sulfate neutralized ~50% of the DOTAP in the
CLDC.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-potential of
25 mV, then the ionic strength at the surface would by 0.17 for a
bulk ionic strength of 0.11 (e.g. these experiments) from a
simple Boltzmann calculation. Thus, using lower ionic strength media
(e.g. I = 0.11) to characterize the
interaction of charged surfaces (e.g. cell surfaces and the
surface of a cationic lipid-DNA complex) might, in fact, be fairly
representative of physiologic ionic strength. Due to the uncertainty in
defining the actual ionic strength at the cell surface, we studied the
interaction between CLDCs and model proteoglycan systems at two ionic
strengths. Although these studies could not be performed at
physiological ionic strength (i.e. 150 mM NaCl)
due to the instability of the CLDCs at the high concentrations
necessary for biophysical analysis, clear trends are apparent upon
increasing the ionic strength from 0.01 to 0.11.
-potential, bind equally to the
heparin surface at both ionic strengths, suggesting the complex remains
intact. At either ionic strength, complete neutralization of heparin
negative charge is not observed, probably due to steric constraint of
the immobilized species along with steric packing limitations of CLDCs
at the surface. If the amount of lipid bound to the beads is converted
from moles of lipid to moles of a single CLDC (see Ref. 27), however,
roughly 6 × 106 CLDCs bind a single heparin bead at
low ionic strength whereas 1.5 × 106 CLDCs bind to a
single bead at higher ionic strength, suggesting a significant capacity
for complexes on the heparin surface. This result is comparable to the
number of copies of CLDC plasmid described previously with HeLa cells
(28). Additional calculations based on the scaled particle theory of
Cotter (29) lend support for an enhanced association of CLDCs with cell
surface HSPGs, based on the fact that such CLDCs would have activity
coefficients between 10 and 100 as a consequence of excluded volume
effects of the highly concentrated proteoglycans at the cell surface
(data not shown).
Happ of binding seen for the interaction of
heparin with DOTAP compared with the interaction of DNA with the same
lipid (32) suggests distinct roles for the charge density, molecular
weight, and chemical nature of the polyanion involved in the
interaction. At increased ionic strength, the
Happ of binding of heparin to liposomes alone
is decreased and
Happ of binding of heparin
to 1:1 DOTAP CLDCs switches from endothermic to exothermic. Although
the heat of binding for heparin to DOTAP is +0.4 kJ/mol DOTAP, that of
DNA binding to DOTAP is ~+3 kJ/mol DOTAP (33). Assuming that 1 mol of
polyanion negative charge interacts/1 mol of DOTAP positive charge,
additivity of the enthalpies of binding of heparin and release of DNA
(+0.4
(+3) kJ/mol of DOTAP) would result in an exothermic heat
of
2.6 kJ/mol DOTAP, which is within experimental error of the heat observed in the calorimetric titration (
2.4 kJ/mol DOTAP, Fig. 4C). Thus, at physiologically relevant ionic strength, a
significant concentration of free GAGs would be expected to facilitate
release of DNA from CLDCs.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
Happ, apparent enthalpy of interaction;
CLDC, cationic lipid-DNA complex.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Ledley, F. D.
(1995)
Hum. Gene Ther.
6,
1129-1144
2.
Yanagishita, M.,
and Hascall, V. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9451-9454
3.
Iozzo, R. V.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
609-652
4.
Herold, B. C.,
WuDunn, D.,
Soltys, N.,
and Spear, P. G.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
1090-1098
5.
Summerford, C.,
and Samulski, R. J.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
1438-1445
6.
Patel, M.,
Yanagishita, M.,
Roderiquez, G.,
Bou-Habib, D. C.,
Oravecz, T.,
Hascall, V. C.,
and Norcross, M. A.
(1993)
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
9,
167-174
7.
Dechecchi, M. C.,
Tamanini, A.,
Bonizzato, A.,
and Cabrini, G.
(2000)
Virology
268,
382-390
8.
Mislick, K. A.,
and Baldeschwieler, J. D.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
12349-12354
9.
Mounkes, L. C.,
Zhong, W.,
Cipres-Palacin, G.,
Heath, T. D.,
and Debs, R. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
26164-26170
10.
Ruponen, M.,
Yla-Herttuala, S.,
and Urtti, A.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1415,
331-341
11.
Belting, M.,
and Petersson, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
19375-19382
12.
Belting, M.,
and Petersson, P.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
342,
281-286
13.
Xu, Y.,
and Szoka, F. C., Jr.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
5616-5623
14.
Zelphati, O.,
and Szoka, F. C., Jr.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
11493-11498
15.
Zelphati, O.,
Uyechi, L. S.,
Barron, L. G.,
and Szoka, F. C., Jr.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1390,
119-133
16.
Trubetskoy, V. S.,
Loomis, A.,
Slattum, P. M.,
Hagstrom, J. E.,
Budker, V. G.,
and Wolff, J. A.
(1999)
Bioconjugate Chem.
10,
624-628
17.
Wong, F. M.,
Bally, M. B.,
and Brooks, D. E.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
366,
31-39
18.
Koltover, I.,
Salditt, T.,
Radler, J. O.,
and Safinya, C. R.
(1998)
Science
281,
78-81
19.
Smith, J. G.,
Wedeking, T.,
Vernachio, J. H.,
Way, H.,
and Niven, R. W.
(1998)
Pharm. Res.
15,
1356-1363
20.
Koppel, D. E.
(1972)
J. Chem. Phys.
57,
4814
21.
Chu, B.
(1974)
Laser Light Scattering
, pp. 201-253, Academic Press, New York
22.
Hunter, R. J.
(1993)
Introduction to Modern Colloid Science
, Oxford University Press, New York
23.
Olson, S. T.,
Halvorson, H. R.,
and Bjork, I.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
6342-6352
24.
Mohri, H.,
and Ohkubo, T.
(1993)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys
303,
27-31
25.
Chung, C. S.,
Hsiao, J. C.,
Chang, Y. S.,
and Chang, W.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
1577-1585
26.
Chakrabarti, B.,
and Park, J. W.
(1980)
CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem.
8,
225-313
27.
Lasic, D. D.
(1997)
Liposomes in Gene Delivery
, pp. 295-260, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
28.
Tseng, W. C.,
Haselton, F. R.,
and Giorgio, T. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25641-25647
29.
Cotter, M. A.
(1977)
J. Chem. Phys.
66,
1098-1106
30.
Xu, Y.,
Hui, S. W.,
Frederik, P.,
and Szoka, F. C., Jr.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
77,
341-353
31.
Kennedy, M. T.,
Pozharski, E. V.,
Rakhmanova, V. A.,
and MacDonald, R. C.
(2000)
Biophys. J.
78,
1620-1633
32.
Lobo, B. A.,
Rogers, S. A.,
Wiethoff, C. M.,
Choosakoonkriang, S.,
and Middaugh, C. R.
(2000)
Methods Mol. Med.
65,
319-348
33.
Lobo, B. A.,
Smith, A.,
Koe, G. S.,
Smith, J. G.,
and Middaugh, C. R.
(2001)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
386,
95-105
34.
Farhood, H.,
Serbina, N.,
and Huang, L.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1235,
289-295
35.
Fasbender, A.,
Marshall, J.,
Moninger, T. O.,
Grunst, T.,
Cheng, S.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1997)
Gene Ther.
4,
716-725
36.
Conrad, H. E.
(1998)
Heparin-binding Proteins
, pp. 7-50, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ziegler and J. Seelig Binding and Clustering of Glycosaminoglycans: A Common Property of Mono- and Multivalent Cell-Penetrating Compounds Biophys. J., March 15, 2008; 94(6): 2142 - 2149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Braun, M. T. Fisher, D. A. Tomalia, G. S. Koe, J. G. Koe, and C. R. Middaugh A Stopped-Flow Kinetic Study of the Assembly of Nonviral Gene Delivery Complexes Biophys. J., June 1, 2005; 88(6): 4146 - 4158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Jones, B. Yazzie, and C. R. Middaugh Polyanions and the Proteome Mol. Cell. Proteomics, August 1, 2004; 3(8): 746 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Wiethoff, M. L. Gill, G. S. Koe, J. G. Koe, and C. R. Middaugh The Structural Organization of Cationic Lipid-DNA Complexes J. Biol. Chem., November 15, 2002; 277(47): 44980 - 44987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sandgren, F. Cheng, and M. Belting Nuclear Targeting of Macromolecular Polyanions by an HIV-Tat Derived Peptide. ROLE FOR CELL-SURFACE PROTEOGLYCANS J. Biol. Chem., October 4, 2002; 277(41): 38877 - 38883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Goldberg, D. Septier, O. Rapoport, M. Young, and L. Ameye Biglycan is a Repressor of Amelogenin Expression and Enamel Formation: An Emerging Hypothesis J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2002; 81(8): 520 - 524. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||