![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 35, 32854-32859, August 31, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of Surgery and Biochemistry, The
University of Texas Health Science Center,
San Antonio, Texas 78229
Received for publication, May 2, 2001, and in revised form, June 28, 2001
We have previously reported that Sp3 acts as a
transcriptional repressor of transforming growth factor- TGF- One of the vital roles of TGF- The promoters for RI and RII have been characterized (17, 18). RI and
RII promoters lack distinct TATA boxes, are highly GC-rich, and depend
on Sp1 transcription factor for the initiation of transcription.
Whereas the RI promoter contains four consensus and several putative
Sp1 sites, the RII promoter contains two Sp1 sites. Within the Sp gene
family of transcription factors, Sp1, Sp2, and Sp4 are known to be
activators of gene transcription, whereas Sp3 is generally considered
to be a repressor (19). Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors recognize the
same DNA element and have similar binding affinities. Sp3 has been
shown to repress Sp1-mediated trans-activation of several genes
(20-22).
Recent studies indicated DNA methylation as a mode of inactivation of
several genes, including some that are involved in cell cycle control.
DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, 5-aza cytidine (5-azaC) and 5-aza-2'
deoxycytidine are the most commonly used DNA demethylating agents to
reverse methylation and reactivate the expression of these genes (23).
MCF-7L and GEO cells are resistant to growth inhibition by TGF- Cell Culture--
MCF-7L cells were grown in McCoy's 5A medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma), amino acids,
antibiotics, pyruvate, and vitamins (Life Technologies, Inc.). GEO
colon cancer cells were grown in serum-free medium as previously
described (10). Cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified
atmosphere of 5% CO2. 5-AzaC was added to growth medium in
two 24-h pulses on days 2 and 5. On day 6, 5-azaC-containing medium was
replaced with fresh medium, and the cells were grown for another 2 days in the absence of 5-azaC. Cells were used on day 8 for RNA
determinations, isolation of nuclear extracts for electrophoretic
mobility shift assays (EMSAs), and Western blots.
Western Immunoblot Analysis of Sp3--
Nuclear extracts (5 µg) were obtained from control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L breast and
GEO colon carcinoma cells, and Western analysis was performed as
described previously (14). Rabbit anti-human Sp3 and c-Jun polyclonal
antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
EMSA--
The consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide was end-labeled
using [ Southwestern Blotting--
Southwestern analysis was performed
as described previously (22). Briefly, nuclear extracts were resolved
by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred to a
nitrocellulose membrane. Following transfer, the membrane was blocked
overnight with 2.5% (w/v) nonfat dried milk in 25 mM
HEPES, pH 8.0, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10% (v/v)
glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA. The
membrane was then incubated with [ RT-PCR--
Total RNA from control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and
GEO cells was reverse-transcribed into cDNA. PCR analysis was then
performed to determine the RI, RII, and Sp3 expression levels in
control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells using the respective
cDNAs as templates. Primers for actin were used as controls to
determine the RI, RII, and Sp3 expression levels. RT-PCR analysis is a
rough estimate of the changes in RNA levels following 5-azaC treatment. A total of 30 cycles of amplification were performed. Primers for RI
generate a 865-bp fragment as follows: sense primers, TTG TGG
CAC GGT GAG AGT GT; antisense primers, TGC TCC TGG GCT ATT GAA TCA.
Primers for RII generate a 1003-bp fragment as follows: sense primers,
GCC AAC AAC ATC AAC CAC AAC ACA; antisense primers, TAG TGT TTA GGG AGC
CGT CTT CAG. Primers for actin generate a 621-bp fragment as follows:
sense primers, ACA CTG TGC CCA TCT ACG AGG; antisense primers, AGG GGC
CGG ACT CGT CAT ACT. Primers for Sp3 generate a 450-bp fragment as
follows: sense primers, AGG TTC AGG GAG TTG CAA TT; antisense primers,
TCT GTG CCT GTG TCT CTT CA.
Nuclear Run-on Assay--
Isolation of nuclei and nuclear run-on
assays were performed as described previously (16). Briefly, control
and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells were lysed, and the nuclei were
pelleted by brief centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in 200 µl of reaction buffer (150 mM potassium acetate; 10 mM MgCl2; 0.1 mM dithiothreitol; 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0); 10% glycerol; 0.5 mM each
of ATP, CTP, and GTP; 13 µM UTP; and 100 µCi of
[ Stable Transfections--
The CMV-Sp3 cDNA vector or the CMV
control vector without Sp3 cDNA was stably transfected into MCF-7L
cells using the Fugene 6 chemical method (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals). The control vector-transfected cells are referred
to as MCF-7L Neo, and Sp3 transfectants are referred to as MCF-7L Sp3 cells.
Effect of 5-AzaC on RI and RII Expression--
RT-PCR analysis
using RI and RII primers was performed on total RNA from control and
5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells to determine whether treatment with
the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza cytidine leads to RI and RII
expression. RI and RII transcripts were induced in the 5-azaC-treated
MCF-7L and GEO cells (Fig. 1). Actin,
which was used as a control, was not affected, thus confirming the
selectivity of 5-azaC effects on RI and RII expression.
5-AzaC Effects on Sp3 Protein--
We have previously reported
that Sp3 acts as a transcriptional repressor of RI and RII in MCF-7L
and GEO cells (24). To determine whether 5-azaC-mediated Sp3
down-regulation is leading to RI and RII expression in MCF-7L and GEO
cells, Western immunoblot analysis using Sp3 antibody was performed on
the control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells. Sp3 antibody
recognizes a doublet at 115 kDa and two 68-70-kDa species. The Sp3
protein doublet at 115 kDa may be the result of differential
posttranslational modification, as seen in the case of Sp1 (14). The
68-70-kDa species are the result of differential internal translation
initiation (25). Only the 115-kDa species has been reported to be
biologically active. 5-AzaC treatment reduced the expression of all the
Sp3 isoforms, whereas there was no difference in the c-Jun levels, indicating selectivity of Sp3 modulation (Fig.
2).
EMSAs--
EMSAs were performed using control and 5-azaC-treated
nuclear extracts with 32P-labeled consensus Sp1
oligonucleotide to determine the DNA binding activities of Sp3. One
high mobility complex and one low mobility complex were detected in the
control MCF-7L and GEO nuclear extracts (Fig.
3a, lanes 2 and 7).
Preincubation of the control nuclear extracts with Sp3 antibody prior
to the addition of 32P-labeled oligonucleotide completely
depleted the high mobility complex and a major portion of the low
mobility complex, indicating that those complexes contain Sp3 protein
(Fig. 3a, lanes 3 and 8). 5-AzaC-treated MCF-7L
and GEO nuclear extracts either with or without Sp3 antibody
preincubation show loss of binding of the high mobility complex but not
the low mobility complex (Fig. 3a, lanes 4, 5, 9, and
10). Sp1 and Sp3 proteins recognize the same GC element and
have similar DNA binding affinities (19). We have previously reported
that 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO nuclear extracts show enhanced Sp1
binding to radiolabeled Sp1 oligonucleotide (14, 16). To determine
whether the low mobility complex in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO
nuclear extracts contains Sp1, we have preincubated the 5-azaC-treated
MCF-7L and GEO nuclear extracts with Sp1 antibody prior to the addition
of 32P-labeled Sp1 oligonucleotide. The data indicate
depletion of low mobility complex in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO
nuclear extracts (Fig. 3a, lanes 6 and 11), thus
confirming the presence of Sp1 in the complex. Consequently,
5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO nuclear extracts show decreased Sp3
binding but enhanced Sp1 binding to the radiolabeled Sp1
oligonucleotide. Preincubation of the control MCF-7L and GEO nuclear
extracts with Sp1 antibody prior to the addition of
32P-labeled Sp1 oligonucleotide did not deplete the high
mobility complex and depleted only a minor portion of the low mobility complex (Fig. 3b, lanes 3 and 5). These complexes
were depleted when preincubated with Sp3 antibody (Fig. 3a, lanes
3 and 8), which indicates the specificity of the Sp1
and Sp3 antibodies used.
Effect of 5-AzaC on Sp3 Binding to RI and RII Promoters--
We
have previously reported that Sp3 binding to RI and RII promoters
is a contributor to RI and RII repression in MCF-7L breast and
GEO colon cancer cells (24). Southwestern analysis using radiolabeled
RI and RII promoters was carried out to determine whether the decreased
Sp3 binding to RI and RII promoters was contributing to RI and RII
induction in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells. The data indicate
a significant loss of Sp3 binding to RI promoter (Fig.
4) and RII promoter (Fig.
5) in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO
cells. We observed the binding of 95-100-kDa protein species to RI and
RII promoters in the control and 5-azaC-treated cells. However, these
protein species were not influenced by 5-azaC treatment.
Effect of 5-AzaC on Sp3 Expression--
We carried out RT-PCR
analysis using Sp3 primers on the total RNA from control and
5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells to determine whether the
5-azaC-mediated decrease in Sp3 protein levels (Fig. 2) was due to
decreased Sp3 mRNA expression. The Sp3 message was down-regulated
in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells (Fig.
6). Actin expression levels were not
affected, thus confirming the selectivity of 5-azaC effects on Sp3.
Transcriptional analyses of Sp3 using nuclear run-on assays were
performed to determine whether 5-azaC was affecting Sp3 transcription,
resulting in down-regulation of Sp3 mRNA. The data show repression
of Sp3 transcription in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells (Fig. 7). Transcription of actin, which was
used as a control, was not affected, thus confirming the selectivity of
5-azaC effects on Sp3 transcription.
Effect of 5-AzaC on RI and RII Expression in MCF-7L Neo and MCF-7L
Sp3 Cells--
5-AzaC treatment of MCF-7L cells led to TGF 5-AzaC Effects on Ectopic Sp3 Protein--
Western analysis using
Sp3 antibody was carried out to determine whether lack of ectopic Sp3
down-regulation following 5-azaC treatment was blocking TGF- Effect of 5-AzaC on Ectopic Sp3 Binding Affinities--
EMSAs were
performed using MCF-7L Neo and MCF-7L Sp3 nuclear extracts with
32P-labeled consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide to determine the
DNA binding activities of Sp3. One high mobility complex and one low
mobility complex were detected in the MCF-7L Neo and MCF-7L Sp3 cells
(Fig. 10, a, lane 1, and
b, lane 1). Preincubation of the MCF-7L Neo nuclear extracts
with Sp3 antibody prior to the addition of 32P-labeled
oligonucleotide completely depleted the high mobility complex and a
major portion of the low mobility complex, indicating that both
complexes contain Sp3 protein (Fig. 10a, lane 2).
5-AzaC-treated MCF-7L Neo nuclear extracts either with or without Sp3
antibody preincubation showed loss of binding of the high mobility
complex but not the low mobility complex, indicating that only the high mobility complex contains Sp3 protein (Fig. 10a, lanes 3 and
4). Preincubation of the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L Neo nuclear
extracts with Sp1 antibody showed depletion of the low mobility
complex, indicating that the complex contains Sp1 (Fig. 10a, lane
5). In contrast, preincubation of 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L Sp3
nuclear extracts with Sp1 antibody showed only minor loss of binding of
the low mobility complex, indicating that this complex contains low
amounts of Sp1 protein (Fig. 10b, lane 3). However,
preincubation of the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L Sp3 nuclear extracts with
Sp3 antibody led to the depletion of the high mobility complex and a
major portion of the low mobility complex, indicating that both
complexes contain Sp3 protein (Fig. 10b, lane 4).
Consequently, 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L Neo nuclear extracts showed
decreased Sp3 binding but enhanced Sp1 binding leading to TGF- TGF- The RI and RII promoters lack distinct TATA boxes. However, they
contain multiple GC boxes and depend upon Sp1 for the initiation of
transcription (17, 18). MCF-7L and GEO cells are resistant to growth
inhibition by TGF- EMSA analyses using Sp3 antibody on the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO
nuclear extracts indicated the depletion of a high mobility complex but
not the low mobility complex (Fig. 3a, lanes 5 and 10). However, this low mobility complex was depleted when
preincubated with Sp1 antibody (Fig. 3a, lanes 6 and
11). Consequently, 5-azaC treatment of MCF-7L and GEO cells
leads to enhanced Sp1 activity but decreased Sp3 activity. We have
previously reported that Sp3 binds to RI and RII promoters and acts as
a transcriptional repressor in MCF-7L and GEO cells (24). The decreased
Sp3 activity in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells was also
reflected in the Southwestern analysis, in which decreased Sp3 binding
to native RI and RII promoters was observed (Figs. 4 and 5). This
resulted in enhanced RI and RII expression (Fig. 1). We observed the
binding of 95-100-kDa protein species to RI and RII promoters in the
control and 5-azaC-treated cells. However, these protein species were not influenced by 5-azaC treatment, thus suggesting the selectivity of
5-azaC effects on Sp3. Sp3 was also reported to repress the Sp1-mediated transcription of several genes (19-22). However, Sp3 was
able to trans-activate c-fos and c-myc promoters
(28). Consequently, availability of specific co-activators,
co-repressors, or other transcription factors may determine whether Sp3
activates or inhibits transcription of a specific gene. It was
previously reported that Sp3 could repress the activity of multiple Sp1
sites contained in the dihydrofolate reductase promoter but not the
single Sp1 site contained in the thymidine kinase promoter (21). Thus, Sp3 effects may also depend on the context and/or the number of Sp1
binding sites.
5-AzaC treatment of MCF-7L and GEO cells increased Sp1 protein levels
as a result of increased Sp1 protein stability. However, it did not
affect Sp1 transcription because the Sp1 mRNA levels remained the
same in control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells (14, 16). In
contrast, the Sp3 mRNA levels were down-regulated in the
5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells (Fig. 6). The actin mRNA levels
were not affected, thus confirming the selectivity of 5-azaC effects on
Sp3. The decreased Sp3 mRNA levels in the 5-azaC-treated cells was
a result of decreased Sp3 transcription in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L
and GEO cells (Fig. 7). The inhibition of DNA methylation following
5-azaC treatment is generally associated with enhanced expression of
target genes. However, it is interesting to note that we have observed
a down-regulation of Sp3 expression in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and
GEO cells. We would expect to see an increase in the Sp3 expression
levels if the 5-azaC was directly affecting Sp3 promoter or enhancing
the activity of a transcription factor required for Sp3 transcription.
In contrast, if 5-azaC activates the transcription of a repressor
molecule of Sp3 promoter, we would expect to see the down-regulation of Sp3 mRNA levels. The Sp3 promoter, like the Sp1 promoter, has not
been cloned and hence is not available to characterize the 5-azaC
affects on Sp3 promoter. Overall, the previous and present 5-azaC
studies on MCF-7L breast and GEO colon cancer cells suggest that 5-azaC
treatment increases Sp1 protein levels (14, 16) but decreases Sp3
protein levels (Fig. 2), leading to RI and RII transcription in these
cells. The constitutive Sp3 expression under the control of a CMV
promoter (CMV-Sp3 cDNA) blocked the 5-azaC-mediated RI and RII
induction in MCF-7L cells (Fig. 8). This indicated that 5-azaC could
affect the endogenous Sp3 expression but not ectopic Sp3 expression,
which was under the control of a CMV promoter (Fig. 9). Moreover, the
data further confirm that 5-azaC-mediated Sp3 down-regulation is
required for RI and RII induction in MCF-7L cells. Consequently,
transcriptional control of TGF- We thank Dr. Guntram Suske for kindly
providing the CMV-Sp3 cDNA plasmid.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants CA 38173, CA 50457, and CA 72001.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 6, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103951200
The abbreviations used are:
TGF-
5-AzaC Treatment Enhances Expression of Transforming Growth
Factor-
Receptors through Down-regulation of Sp3*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
receptors
type I (RI) and type II (RII). We now present data suggesting that
treatment of MCF-7L breast and GEO colon cancer cells with 5-aza
cytidine (5-azaC) leads to down-regulation of Sp3 and the
concomitant induction of RI and RII. Western blot and gel shift
analyses on 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO nuclear extracts indicated
reduced Sp3 protein levels and decreased binding of Sp3 protein to
radiolabeled consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide. Southwestern analysis
detected decreased binding of Sp3 to RI and RII promoters in
5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells, suggesting a correlation between
decreased Sp3 binding and enhanced RI and RII expression in these
cells. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and
nuclear run-on data from 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells indicated
down-regulation of Sp3 mRNA as a result of decreased transcription
of Sp3. We reported earlier that 5-azaC treatment induces RI and RII
expression through increased Sp1 protein levels/activities in these
cells. These studies demonstrate that the effect of 5-azaC
involves a combination of effects on Sp1 and Sp3.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 plays an
important role in the regulation of cell proliferation,
differentiation, and extracellular matrix remodeling in different cell
types (1, 2). TGF-
exerts its effects through high affinity cell
surface receptors, which are referred to as types I (RI), II (RII), and
III. RI and RII are serine/threonine kinases, and an active receptor
complex consists of two molecules each of RI and RII, which are
essential for TGF-
signal transduction and inhibition of cell growth
(3-6). Recent studies indicate that following TGF-
binding and
subsequent activation of RI by RII, RI phosphorylates smad 2 and/or smad 3, which can then associate with smad 4 and translocate to
the nucleus, where binding to the target DNA or other DNA-binding
proteins occurs. In contrast, smad 7 was found to antagonize the
TGF-
signaling pathway by binding to RI, thereby preventing the
activation of smad 2 and smad 3 (7).
is the growth inhibition of normal
epithelial cells, as well as some cancer cells. Because RI and RII are
important for TGF-
-mediated growth inhibition, a loss of either
receptor contributes to TGF-
resistance and subsequent tumor
formation and progression (8-10). TGF-
resistance due to a mutation
of the RII gene in gastric and colon carcinoma cells (9, 11, 12) or
transcriptional repression of RII due to decreased binding of nuclear
proteins to the RII promoter in keratinocytes and breast cancer cells
was reported (13, 14). TGF-
resistance due to DNA methylation of the
RI promoter or RI promoter repression by Sp1 deficiency was reported in
a subset of gastric and colon cancer cells (15, 16). RI and RII
replacement in cells that lack or show reduced levels of TGF-
receptors led to restoration of TGF-
response and subsequent
reversal of malignancy, as seen in breast and colon cancer cells (8,
10).
because of the reduced expression of RI and RII (8, 10). We have
previously reported that treatment of these cells with 5-azaC induced
RI, RII mRNA levels and consequently increased the expression of
cell-surface RI and RII (14, 16). Significantly, increased RI and RII
expression resulted in the restoration of TGF-
response, as
evidenced by the enhanced activity of a TGF-
-responsive plasminogen
activator inhibitor promoter-luciferase reporter in the 5-azaC-treated
cells (14, 16). However, Southern analysis following 5-azaC treatment ruled out the demethylation of RI and RII genes as a contributor to RI
and RII expression (14, 16). We have shown that MCF-7L and GEO cells
were Sp1-deficient and that 5-azaC treatment increased Sp1 protein
levels as a result of increased Sp1 protein stability, leading to RI
and RII expression (14, 16). Furthermore, we have demonstrated that
MCF-7L and GEO cells express high levels of Sp3 protein, which acts as
a transcriptional repressor of RI and RII (24). This raises the
question of how methyltransferase inhibition affects Sp3 as well as
Sp1. We now report that 5-azaC treatment of MCF-7L breast and GEO colon
cancer cells decreases Sp3 protein levels and hence results in
decreased binding to RI and RII promoters. This decreased Sp3 binding
contributes to enhanced RI and RII expression in these cells. Taken
together, the previous and present studies on MCF-7L breast and GEO
colon cancer cells indicate that the demethylation-enhanced expression
of TGF-
receptors is due to a combination of effects on Sp1 and Sp3.
Moreover, whereas modulation of Sp1 was shown to be
posttranscriptional, Sp3 repression occurs through decreased
transcription of the Sp3 gene.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP, and electrophoretic mobility shift
assays were performed as described previously (14). Whenever Sp1 and
Sp3 antibodies were used, the nuclear extracts were incubated with 2 µg of Sp1 or Sp3 antibody (anti-rabbit, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for
15 min on ice prior to the addition of 32P-labeled oligonucleotide.
-32P]dCTP-labeled RI
(-618 bp to the start site) and RII (-274 bp to the start site)
promoter probes and poly(dI·dC) as a competitor for nonspecific
binding for 4 h. Later, the membrane was washed with wash buffer
(10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol), dried, and autoradiographed.
-32P]UTP ([3000 Ci/mmol), PerkinElmer Life
Sciences) and incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. The
32P-labeled RNA was isolated by cesium gradient
centrifugation, and an equal amount of radioactivity in 5 ml of
hybridization buffer was added to each filter and incubated for 2 days
at 45 °C. Filters were prepared using the Schleicher and Schuell
slot blot system. Each slot was loaded with 10 µg of linearized,
alkali-denatured plasmid and then washed with 1 M ammonium
acetate. The Sp3 plasmid contained a 3.14-kilobase linearized
NotI cDNA fragment. The actin plasmid with a
1.6-kilobase linearized BamHI-HindIII cDNA
fragment and vector without Sp3 insert were used as controls. The
plasmid DNA was immobilized on nitrocellulose filters by baking at
80 °C for 1.5 h in a vacuum oven. After hybridization, filters
were washed twice in 2× SSPE (sodium chloride, sodium phosphate, and EDTA) solution at 45 °C for a total of 60 min and then transferred to 2× SSPE solution containing RNase A (10 µg/ml), incubated for 20 min at 37 °C, air-dried, and exposed to Kodak XAR-5 film with intensifying screens.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
5-AzaC induces RI and RII expression.
Total RNA from control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells was
reverse-transcribed into cDNA, and PCR analysis was performed using
primers for RI, RII, and actin as described under "Experimental
Procedures."

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Western immunoblot analysis of Sp3.
Nuclear extracts (5 µg) from control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and
GEO cells were resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a
nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with rabbit anti-human Sp3 and
c-Jun antibodies. The Sp3 antibody recognizes a doublet at 115 kDa and
68-70-kDa species. The 68-70-kDa species result from differential
internal translational initiation.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
EMSA. EMSA was performed using
32P-labeled consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide and nuclear
extracts from control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells. Whenever
Sp1 and Sp3 antibodies were used, the nuclear extracts were
preincubated with 2 µg of either Sp1 or Sp3 antibody prior to the
addition of 32P-labeled oligonucleotide.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Detection of Sp3 binding to RI promoter.
Southwestern analysis was performed by resolving control and
5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO nuclear extracts using 7.5% SDS-PAGE and
probing the nitrocellulose membrane following protein transfer with
radiolabeled RI promoter probe.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Detection of Sp3 binding to RII
promoter. Southwestern analysis was performed by resolving control
and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO nuclear extracts using 7.5% SDS-PAGE
and probing the nitrocellulose membrane following protein transfer with
radiolabeled RII promoter probe.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
5-AzaC decreases Sp3 mRNA levels.
Total RNA from control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells was
reverse-transcribed into cDNA, and PCR analysis was performed using
primers for Sp3 and actin as described under "Experimental
Procedures."

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of 5-azaC on Sp3 transcription.
Sp3 transcriptional analyses were performed in control and
5-azaC-treated MCF-7L and GEO cells using nuclear run-on assays as
described under "Experimental Procedures."
receptor
induction through a combination of increased Sp1 protein
levels/activities (14) and decreased Sp3 protein levels/activities
(Figs. 2 and 3a). To further confirm that 5-azaC-mediated
Sp3 down-regulation is required for the TGF-
receptor induction in
MCF-7L cells, we stably expressed Sp3 cDNA under the control of a
CMV promoter in MCF-7L cells and analyzed the 5-azaC effects on TGF-
receptor induction in MCF-7L Neo and MCF-7L Sp3 cells. If
5-azaC-mediated Sp3 down-regulation was contributing to TGF-
receptor induction in MCF-7L cells, we would expect to see the TGF-
receptor induction in MCF-7L cells but not in MCF-7L Sp3 cells, because
the ectopic Sp3 expression was under the control of a CMV promoter.
5-AzaC does not affect the CMV promoter activity (14, 16). RT-PCR analysis using RI and RII primers was performed on total RNA from MCF-7L Neo and ectopic Sp3 expressing MCF-7L cells (MCF-7L Sp3) to
determine whether treatment with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor
5-aza cytidine leads to RI and RII expression. RI and RII transcripts
were induced in the 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L Neo cells but not in MCF-7L
Sp3 cells (Fig. 8). These data indicate that ectopic Sp3 was blocking 5-azaC-mediated TGF-
receptor
induction in MCF-7L cells. Actin, which was used as a control, was not
affected, thus confirming the selectivity of 5-azaC effects on RI and
RII expression.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
5-AzaC effect on RI and RII expression in
MCF-7L neo and MCF-7L Sp3 cells. Total RNA from control and
5-azaC-treated MCF-7L Neo and MCF-7L Sp3 cells was reverse-transcribed
into cDNA, and PCR analysis was performed using primers for RI,
RII, and actin as described under "Experimental Procedures."
receptor induction in MCF-7L Sp3 cells. Whereas the endogenous Sp3
protein levels were decreased following 5-azaC treatment in the MCF-7L
Neo control cells, ectopic Sp3 protein levels were not affected by
5-azaC treatment in the MCF-7L Sp3 cells (Fig.
9). These data confirm that
5-azaC-mediated Sp3 down-regulation is required for TGF-
receptor
induction in MCF-7L cells. There was no difference in the c-Jun levels,
indicating the selectivity of Sp3 modulation.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Effect of 5-azaC on ectopic Sp3 protein
levels. Nuclear extracts from control and 5-azaC-treated MCF-7L
Neo and MCF-7L Sp3 cells were resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred
to a nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with rabbit anti-human Sp3 and
c-Jun antibodies.
receptor expression. In contrast, ectopic Sp3 expressing MCF-7L Sp3
cells did not show loss of Sp3 binding or TGF-
receptor expression
following 5-azaC treatment, indicating continued presence of Sp3
as a cause for the blockade of TGF-
receptor induction in MCF-7L Sp3
cells.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
5-AzaC effects on ectopic Sp3 DNA binding
affinities. EMSAs were performed using 32P-labeled
consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide and nuclear extracts from control and
5-azaC-treated MCF-7L Neo or MCF-7L Sp3 cells. Whenever Sp1 and Sp3
antibodies were used, the nuclear extracts were preincubated with 2 µg of either Sp1 or Sp3 antibody prior to the addition of
32P-labeled oligonucleotide.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
receptors RI and RII are key players in the
TGF-
-mediated growth suppression of normal epithelial cells, as well
as some cancer cells. Loss of expression of either RI or RII has been
associated with TGF-
resistance, leading to tumor formation and
progression (8, 9, 10, 12, 26, 27). GEO colon and MCF-7L breast cancer
cells show reduced levels of RI and RII (14, 16). Ectopic TGF-
receptor expression in these cells reduced tumorigenicity in athymic
nude mice, thus suggesting the role of TGF-
receptors as tumor
suppressors (8, 10). We have previously reported the induction of RI
and RII expression in GEO and MCF-7L cells through increased Sp1
protein levels/activities by the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza
cytidine (14, 16). Furthermore, we have shown that another member of
the Sp gene family, Sp3, acts as a transcriptional repressor of RI and
RII in these cells (24). We now report that in addition to increased Sp1, 5-azaC treatment down-regulates Sp3 expression, thus contributing to RI and RII induction in MCF-7L and GEO cells. These studies demonstrate that the effect of 5-azaC involves a combination of effects
on Sp1 and Sp3.
because of the reduced expression of RI and RII
(8, 10). We have previously reported that treatment of these cells with
5-azaC induced TGF-
receptor mRNA levels and consequently
increased the expression of cell-surface RI and RII (14, 16).
Significantly, increased RI and RII expression resulted in the
restoration of TGF-
response as evidenced by the enhanced activity
of a TGF-
-responsive plasminogen activator inhibitor
promoter-luciferase reporter in the 5-azaC-treated cells (14, 16).
However, Southern analysis following 5-azaC treatment ruled out the
demethylation of RI and RII genes as a contributor to RI and RII
expression (14, 16). We have shown that MCF-7L and GEO cells were
Sp1-deficient and that 5-azaC treatment increased Sp1 protein levels as
a result of increased Sp1 protein stability, leading to RI and RII
expression (14, 16). However, 5-azaC treatment also decreased Sp3
protein levels in MCF-7L and GEO cells (Fig. 2). The Sp3 protein
doublet at 115 kDa may be the result of differential posttranslational
modification as seen in the case of Sp1 (14). The 115-kDa Sp3 protein
is the biologically active form, and the inactive 68-70-kDa species
arises as a result of differential internal translational initiation
(25). However, as opposed to direct promoter repression, Sp3-derived
68-70-kDa species can bind GC elements and thus act as inhibitors of
Sp1-mediated gene activation (25).
receptor expression is dependent
upon the Sp1/Sp3 protein levels/activities and cancer cells can gain a
growth advantage by favoring receptor repression through a combination
of reduced Sp1 and elevated Sp3 expression.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology
and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton
Sts., Buffalo, NY 14263. Tel.: 716-845-8224; Fax:
716-845-4437.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
, transforming growth factor-
;
RI, TGF-
receptor type I;
RII, TGF-
receptor type II;
RT, reverse transcription;
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
5-azaC, 5-aza cytidine;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
bp, base pair(s).
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Massague, J.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
6,
597-641
2.
Roberts, A. B.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1991)
in
Peptide Growth Factors and Their Receptors
(Sporn, M. B.
, and Roberts, A. B., eds)
, pp. 419-472, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
3.
Lin, H. Y.,
Wang, X.-F.,
Ng-Eaton, E.,
Weinberg, R. A.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1992)
Cell
68,
775-785
4.
Wrana, J. L.,
Attisano, L.,
Carcamo, J.,
Zentella, A.,
Doody, J.,
Laiho, M.,
Wang, X.-F.,
and Massague, J.
(1992)
Cell
71,
1003-1014
5.
Franzen, P.,
ten Dijke, P.,
Ichijo, H.,
Yamashita, H.,
Schultz, P.,
Helden, C.-H.,
and Miyazono, K.
(1993)
Cell
75,
681-692
6.
Wrana, J. L.,
Attisano, L.,
Weiser, R.,
Ventura, F.,
and Massague, J.
(1994)
Nature
370,
341-347
7.
Massague, J.,
and Chen, Y. G.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
627-644
8.
Sun, L.-Z.,
Wu, G.,
Willson, J. K. V.,
Zborowska, E.,
Yang, J.,
Rajakarunanayake, I.,
Wang, J.,
Gentry, L. E.,
Wang, X.-F.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26449-26455
9.
Wang, J.,
Sun, L.,
Myeroff, L.,
Wang, X.-F.,
Gentry, L. E.,
Yang, J.,
Liang, J.,
Zborowska, E.,
Markowitz, S.,
Willson, J. K. V.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
22044-22049
10.
Wang, J.,
Han, W.,
Zborowska, E.,
Liang, J.,
Wang, X.-F.,
Willson, J. K. V.,
Sun, L.-Z.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17366-17371
11.
Markowitz, S.,
Wang, J.,
Myeroff, L.,
Parsons, R.,
Sun, L.-Z.,
Lutterbaugh, J.,
Fan, R. S.,
Zborowska, E.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
Vogelstein, B.,
Brattain, M. G.,
and Willson, J. K. V.
(1995)
Science
268,
1336-1338
12.
Park, K.,
Kim, S.-J.,
Bang, Y. J.,
Park, J.-G.,
Kim, N. K.,
Roberts, A. B.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8772-8776
13.
Kim, D. H.,
Chang, J. H.,
Lee, K. H.,
Lee, H. Y.,
and Kim, S.-J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
688-694
14.
Ammanamanchi, S.,
Kim, S.-J.,
Sun, L.-Z.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16527-16534
15.
Kang, S. H.,
Bang, Y.-J.,
Im, Y.-H.,
Yang, H.-K.,
Lee, D. A.,
Lee, Y. H.,
Lee, H. S.,
Kim, N. K.,
and Kim, S.-J.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
7280-7286
16.
Periyasamy, S.,
Ammanamanchi, S.,
Tillekeratne, M. P. M.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
4660-4667
17.
Bloom, B. B.,
Humphries, D. E.,
Kuang, P. P.,
Fine,
and Goldstein, R. H.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1312,
243-248
18.
Bae, H. W.,
Geiser, A. G.,
Kim, D. H.,
Chung, M. T.,
Burmester, J. K.,
Sporn, M. B.,
and Kim, S.-J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29460-29468
19.
Suske, G.
(1999)
Gene
238,
291-300
20.
Hagen, G.,
Muller, S.,
Beato, M.,
and Suske, G.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3843-3851
21.
Birnbaum, M. J.,
van Wijnen, A. J.,
Odgren, P. R.,
Last, T. J.,
Suske, G.,
Stein, G. S.,
and Stein, J. L.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
16503-16508
22.
Kumar, A. P.,
and Butler, A. P.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
2012-2019
23.
Robertson, K. D.,
and Jones, P. A.
(2000)
Carcinogenesis
21,
461-467
24.
Ammanamanchi, S.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
3348-3352
25.
Kennet, S. B.,
Udvadia, A. J.,
and Horowitz, J. M.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3110-3117
26.
Inagaki, M.,
Moustaka, A.,
Lin, Y. H.,
Lodish, H. F.,
and Carr, B. I.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5359-5363
27.
Kalkhoven, E.,
Roelen, B. A. J.,
de Winter, J. P.,
Mummery, C. L.,
Van den Eijnden-Van Raiij, A. J. M.,
Van der Saag, P. T.,
and Van der Burg, B.
(1995)
Cell Growth Differ.
6,
1151-1161
28.
Udvadia, A.-J.,
Templeton, D. J.,
and Horowitz, J. M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
3953-3957
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Hinshelwood, L. I. Huschtscha, J. Melki, C. Stirzaker, A. Abdipranoto, B. Vissel, T. Ravasi, C. A. Wells, D. A. Hume, R. R. Reddel, et al. Concordant Epigenetic Silencing of Transforming Growth Factor- Signaling Pathway Genes Occurs Early in Breast Carcinogenesis Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 67(24): 11517 - 11527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, N. Fatima, and M. L. Dufau Coordinated Changes in DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications Regulate Silencing/Derepression of Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Gene Transcription Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2005; 25(18): 7929 - 7939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Lou, S. O'Reilly, H. Liang, V. M. Maher, S. D. Sleight, and J. J. McCormick Down-Regulation of Overexpressed Sp1 Protein in Human Fibrosarcoma Cell Lines Inhibits Tumor Formation Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 1007 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ammanamanchi and M. G. Brattain Restoration of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling through Receptor RI Induction by Histone Deacetylase Activity Inhibition in Breast Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32620 - 32625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Milutinovic, S. E. Brown, Q. Zhuang, and M. Szyf DNA Methyltransferase 1 Knock Down Induces Gene Expression by a Mechanism Independent of DNA Methylation and Histone Deacetylation J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 27915 - 27927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T.-K. Pang, L. T.-O. Lee, S. S.-M. Ng, W.-H. Yung, and B. K.-C. Chow CpG Methylation and Transcription Factors Sp1 and Sp3 Regulate the Expression of the Human Secretin Receptor Gene Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2004; 18(2): 471 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ammanamanchi, J. W. Freeman, and M. G. Brattain Acetylated Sp3 Is a Transcriptional Activator J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 35775 - 35780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bakker, X. Lin, and W. G. Nelson Methyl-CpG Binding Domain Protein 2 Represses Transcription from Hypermethylated pi -Class Glutathione S-Transferase Gene Promoters in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 14, 2002; 277(25): 22573 - 22580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |