![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 35, 33093-33100, August 31, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,
,
,
,
From the
Center for Research in Neuroscience,
McGill University and the Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1A4 and the ¶ Section of
Hematology-Oncology Research, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts
University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02135
Received for publication, June 21, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The neurofibromatosis type 2 gene
(NF2) is involved in the pathogenesis of benign
tumors of the human nervous system. The NF2 protein, called schwannomin
or merlin, is inactivated in virtually all schwannomas and meningiomas.
The molecular mechanisms by which schwannomin functions as a tumor
suppressor is unknown but believed to involve plasma
membrane-cytoskeletal interactions. Two major alternatively spliced
isoforms of schwannomin differing in their C termini have been
reported. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we have identified
syntenin as a binding partner for schwannomin isoform-1 (sch-1).
Syntenin is an adapter protein that couples transmembrane proteoglycans
to cytoskeletal components and is involved in intracellular vesicle
transport. The C terminus 25 amino acids of sch-1 and the two PDZ
domains of syntenin mediate their binding, and mutations introduced
within the VAFFEEL region of sch-1 defined a sequence crucial for
syntenin recognition. We have showed that the two proteins interacted
in vitro and in vivo and localized underneath
the plasma membrane. Fibroblast cells expressing heterologous antisense
syntenin display alterations in the subcellular distribution of sch-1.
Together, these results provide the first functional clue to the
existence of schwannomin isoforms and could unravel novel pathways for
the transport and subcellular localization of schwannomin in
vivo.
Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)1 is an autosomal
dominant disorder that leads to the development of schwannomas,
meningiomas, ependymomas, and other tumors of the central nervous
system (1, 2). Inactivating mutations of the NF2 gene resulting in loss of function of its protein product causes the disease. The
NF2 gene product is referred to as NF2 protein or
schwannomin or merlin. We will use the nomenclature schwannomin-1
(sch-1) throughout the text. Tumors from patients with inherited
disease (3, 4), as well as sporadic schwannomas and meningiomas, show
loss of heterozygosity of the NF2 gene region on chromosome
22 and inactivating mutations on the second NF2 allele,
strongly suggesting that schwannomin functions as a tumor suppressor
protein (5, 6). Schwannomin bears a striking similarity to ERM proteins
(ezrin, radixin, and moesin) that
are members of the protein 4.1 superfamily. ERM proteins function as
molecular adaptors linking integral membrane proteins to the
cytoskeleton (7). Members from this family modulate cell shape and
membrane specializations by regulating the distribution of adhesion
molecules on the cell surface (8, 9). The amino-terminal end of ERM
proteins, termed as the FERM domain, has been shown to interact with
the plasma membrane proteins such as CD43, CD44, intercellular adhesion
molecule-1, and intercellular adhesion molecule-2. ERM proteins also
contain actin-binding sites mapped to the carboxyl-terminal domains (8,
10-12). This actin-binding site is highly conserved, but the
corresponding site in schwannomin is partially divergent, indicating a
slightly different function. Schwannomin is localized to actin-rich
plasma membrane processes (3, 4, 13) and also binds microtubules
(14). Schwannomin has also been shown to interact with numerous
membrane-associated proteins such as CD44 (15), NHERF (EBP50)
(16), Several alternatively spliced transcripts of schwannomin have been
identified. The two most prevalent isoforms differ by the presence
(isoform-1 or sch-1) or the absence (isoform-2 or sch-2) of exon 16 (19, 20). Human sch-1 codes for 595 amino acids whereas shorter sch-2
consists of 590 amino acids. Both the primary structure and the tissue
distribution of each isoform are conserved among many species. In
addition, these two transcripts show distinct tissue specificity and
temporal expression during rat development (19). These features
underscore the importance of distinct schwannomin C termini in cellular
function. Moreover in mouse NIH-3T3 or in rat schwannoma cell lines,
the heterologous expression of sch-1 but not of sch-2 decreases the
growth rate (21-23), stressing the importance of the C termini of
sch-1 in the protein tumor suppressor activity (6).
Based of these observations, we set out to search for proteins that
specifically interact with the carboxyl-terminal end of sch-1. Here we
report the identification of syntenin, an adapter protein with two
tandem PDZ domains, as a novel binding partner that specifically
interacts with the C terminus of sch-1. Syntenin is known to bind to
several proteins including the cytoplasmic domains of cell surface
syndecans (24), EphA7 of ephrin receptor tyrosine kinases (25), and the
C termini B class ephrin ligands (26). In addition, syntenin plays a
role in the targeting and maturation processes of proTGF- Yeast Two-hybrid Screening and Cloning of Syntenin--
Two
constructs of human sch-1 were engineered; one consists of the
carboxyl-terminal 30 amino acids (C30-1), and the other consists of
the carboxyl-terminal 125 amino acids (C125-1). These respective
cDNA clones were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and
cloned into the EcoRI-XhoI sites of the
pEG202LexA (Origene Technologies, Inc.) fusion plasmid vector.
pEG202LexA-C30-1 insert was generated with primers
5'-AAGTTCTCGAGCTCCCACGGAAACCCCCAGCCA-3' and
5'-ACAATGAATTCTCCGACAGGGGTGGCAGCAGCAAGCAC-3'.
pEG202LexA-C125-1 insert was generated with primers
5'-AAGTTCTCGAGCTCCCACGGAAACCCCCAGCCA-3' and
5'-AGCGAGAATTCAAGCAA AGCTCCTGGAGATTGCCACC-3'. Using the
same set of primers as used for pEG202LexA-C30-1 construct, the
cDNA for human schwannomin isoform-2 (clone 767295;
GenBankTM accession number AA418421) was amplified.
This construct, designated as pEG202LexA-C25-2, encodes the
carboxyl-terminal 25 amino acids of sch-2 (C25-2). The human fetal
kidney cDNA library cloned into vector pJG4-5 was screened (2 × 107 primary transformants) in yeast strain EGY48. The
insert from one of the selected clones, syntenin (120), was
completely sequenced. A BLAST search identified I.M.A.G.E. clones 33203 and 566968 as coding for the full-length cDNA (2,193 base
pairs) of syntenin, which were purchased from Research Genetics, Inc.
Recombinant cDNA Constructs--
Different LexA-syntenin
fusion proteins containing defined regions of syntenin were made by PCR
amplification and cloned into EcoRI-XhoI
restriction sites of pJG4-5 vector. For confocal microscopy studies,
peGFP-C1 or peGFP-C2 vectors (CLONTECH) were used
to fuse different regions of schwannomin or syntenin coding sequences to the carboxyl-terminal end of enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP). The carboxyl-terminal end of sch-1 (peG202LexA-C30-1 or peG202LexA-C125-1) and the coding region of syntenin consisting of two
PDZ domains (120) were subcloned in frame as an
EcoRI-XhoI fragment into peGFP-C2 vector.
Full-length syntenin fused to the eGFP was constructed by subcloning a
BamHI-XhoI fragment from pGEX-5X-1-syntenin (see
below) into BglII-SalI sites of pEGFP-C2. Full-length human sch-1 fused to eGFP was constructed by PCR
amplification and introduction of restriction sites
BamHI-EcoRI and cloning into
BglII-EcoRI of pEGFP-C1 expression vector. The
antisense syntenin cDNA was cloned into pTRE expression vector for
use in the tetracycline-regulated expression system
(CLONTECH). Full-length syntenin cDNA
(I.M.A.G.E. clone 566968 constructed in pBS-SK Northern Blotting--
Multiple tissue northern blot was
purchased from CLONTECH Inc. A single-stranded
full-length human syntenin cDNA probe was prepared, and
hybridization was performed according the manufacturer's recommendations.
Expression and Purification of GST-Syntenin Fusion
Proteins--
Full-length syntenin was amplified by PCR
(5'-TCGGATCCCCATGTCTCTCTATCCATCTC TCGAAG-3' and
5'-CCGCTCGAGTTAAACCTCAGGAATGGTGTGG-3') and cloned into
BamHI-XhoI restriction sites of plasmid pGEX-5X-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The syntenin coding region containing both PDZ domains, syntenin (120), was subcloned as an
EcoRI-XhoI fragment into pGEX-5X-1 expression
vector. The Escherichia coli BL21 strain and bulk GST
purification module (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were used for
expression and purification of GST fusion proteins. Purified fusion
proteins GST-syntenin (FL) and GST-syntenin (120) were
confirmed by Western blot using immunoaffinity-purified anti-syntenin-N
and anti-syntenin-C antibodies.
In Vitro Binding Assays--
For pull-down experiments, the
interaction between syntenin and schwannomin was examined by incubation
of purified GST-syntenin fusion protein (1 µg) and biotinylated sch-1
peptide (0.1 µg) in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline containing 75 mM NaCl on ice for 1 h. Immunopure immobilized
streptavidin beads (50 µl of 50% agarose slurry from Pierce) was
added, and incubation was continued for another hour on ice. Beads were
washed four times with phosphate-buffered saline containing 75 mM NaCl, boiled for 5 min in 50 µl of SDS sample buffer,
and resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blot analysis using
an anti-syntenin-C antibody. For blot overlay assays, purified GST
protein and GST-syntenin (FL) fusion proteins (1 µg each) were
resolved by SDS-PAGE (10%) and transferred onto a
nitrocellulose membrane. The transferred protein were visualized
using Ponceau S, and the membranes were blocked in buffer containing
6% casein, 1% polyvinyl pyrrolidone-40, 10 mM EDTA
in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. Blots were incubated overnight at
4 °C with biotinylated peptide corresponding to the 16 amino acids
carboxyl-terminal of sch-1 (biotin-LTLQSAKSRVAFFEEL) at a concentration
of 2 µg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline containing 75 mM
NaCl. The blots were washed three times for 10 min with PBS containing 75 mM NaCl, before incubation for
1 h at room temperature with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase
(Pierce; 1:1500). After rinsing with PBS containing 75 mM
NaCl, the presence of the biotinylated peptide was tested using ECL
Western blotting detection reagent (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Binding of Native Schwannomin with the GST-Syntenin Fusion
Protein--
Glutathione-Sepharose beads coupled to GST alone, or
GST-syntenin (FL) was blocked with 0.5% bovine serum albumin in
binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM
KCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). This step was followed by incubation
either at 4 °C overnight or at 23 °C for 90 min with native
schwannomin protein (4.8 µg) purified from human erythrocyte membranes (29). After incubation, the beads were washed three times
with the binding buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40 detergent and once
with the binding buffer without Nonidet P-40 detergent. Proteins were
resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane.
Blots were blocked with blocking buffer (6% casein, 1% polyvinyl
pyrrolidone-40, 10 mM EDTA in PBS, pH 7.4) and incubated with anti-schwannomin-1 antibody (C-18; SC-332; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer for 2 h at room
temperature. After incubation, the blots were washed with buffer
containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl,
and 0.1% Tween 20. Finally blots were incubated for 1 h with goat
anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidase and visualized using ECL
detection reagent.
Production of Antibodies Against the Carboxyl- and Amino-terminal
Segments of Syntenin--
A peptide corresponding to 30 amino acids
from the amino-terminal end of syntenin, NH2-MSLYPSLEDLK
VDKVIQAQTAFSANPANPA-COOH, was used to produce anti-syntenin-N. A second
peptide corresponding to 30 amino acids from the carboxyl-terminal end
of syntenin, NH2-IMPAFIFEHIIKR MAPSIMKSLMDHTIPEV-COOH, was
used to produce anti-syntenin-C. Both antibodies were produced in
rabbits, and in both cases the serum was immunopurified using their
respective immobilized immunogen before their uses in experiments.
Coimmunoprecipitation of Syntenin and Schwannomin--
HeLa
cells (1 × 106) were lysed in 1 ml of
immunoprecipitation buffer (IB) (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA), 1% Nonidet P-40, and
protease inhibitors and centrifuged for 1 h at 4 °C. Proteins
from the supernatant (500 µg) were incubated with immunopurified
anti-syntenin-N (2 µg) and protein A/G-Sepharose beads (50 µl of
50% slurry solution; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) overnight at 4 °C.
The immunoprecipitated material was washed four times with IB buffer
containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40 before the bound proteins were eluted by
boiling in SDS sample buffer. Finally the samples were resolved on a
7.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a nitrocellulose filter (Schleicher & Schuell), and immunoblotted at 4 °C overnight with polyclonal
anti-sch-1 (C-18; SC-332; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, 1:5000).
Detection for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish
peroxydase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1:5000) followed and ECL
detection reagent (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) was used to detect bound
antibodies on Western blots.
Cell Culture, Transfection, and Fluorescence
Microscopy--
HeLa cells were cultured in complete Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.
Stable tet-off cell lines (3T3-L1) were established according to
the manufacturer's recommendations (CLONTECH
Inc.). Stable tet-off cells (3T3-L1) were grown in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum with 2 µg/ml of doxycycline and 200 µg/ml of hygromycin for 24 h. For
the inductions the cells were washed with Hanks' balanced salt
solution and then transferred in medium without doxycycline for
5 days. During induction tet system-approved fetal bovine serum
(CLONTECH Inc.) was used. For immunocytochemistry,
the cells were fixed (3% formaldehyde, 1× PBS) and permeabilized
(0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 15 min at room temperature. This was
followed by a blocking step with 10% goat serum for 1 h at room
temperature and then incubation overnight at 4 °C with polyclonal
anti-sch-1 (C-18; 0.4 µg/ml). After this the cells were rinsed and
incubated first with biotinylated anti-rabbit antibody (1:750 dilution)
and then with streptavidin-DTAF (1:500 dilution) for 1 h at
room temperature (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories Inc.). Slides
were finally mounted and viewed with a polyvar fluorescent microscope.
For confocal microscopy studies, glass coverslips were seeded with
2 × 105 HeLa cells per well. After incubation at
37 °C for 18 h, cells were transfected and allowed to recover
for 24 h. Transfected HeLa cells were fixed (3% formaldehyde in
PBS) at room temperature for 15 min and assessed for localization of
green fluorescent protein using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica).
Syntenin Interacts with the C Terminus of Schwannomin
Isoform-1--
We performed a yeast two-hybrid screen using the
carboxyl-terminal 30 amino acids of sch-1 as bait
(NH2-SDRGGSSKHNTI KKLTLQSAKSRVAFFEEL-COOH, pEG202LexA-sch-C30-1) to screen an oligo(dT)-primed human kidney cDNA library (30). It is noteworthy that a second screen was also
attempted using a longer segment of sch-1 as bait (125 amino acids;
pEGF202LexA-sch-C125-1) but was abandoned because of the invariable
self-activation of this longer bait. Nonetheless the screen using the
carboxyl-terminal 30 amino acids resulted in the isolation of eight
clones specifically interacting with sch-C30-1 but not with LexA or an
unrelated protein. Subsequent sequencing of those clones showed that
they all encompassed the coding sequence of a protein known as syntenin
or mda-9 (24, 27). Full-length cDNA for syntenin (2,193 base pairs)
was then obtained from Integrated Molecular Analysis of the human
genome and its expression (I.M.A.G.E.). Syntenin cDNA encodes a
298-amino acid protein containing two PDZ domains in tandem. These two
domains span amino acids 113 to 193 (PDZ1) and 198 to 273 (PDZ2),
respectively (Fig. 1A). All eight clones isolated from the screen lacked the first 119 amino terminus residues of syntenin, but they all contained the two complete
PDZ domains. To make sure that the observed syntenin-schwannomin interaction was indeed specific to isoform-1, we fused LexA to the last
25 amino acids from sch-2 (SDRGGSSKHNTIKKPQAQGRRPICI-COOH; pEG202LexA-sch-C25-2) and observed no interaction with the PDZ domains
present in a syntenin (120) (see below for details). A search in
the BLAST data base for expressed sequence tags yielded syntenin-matching sequence tags in many fetal and adult human tissue
cDNA libraries suggesting widespread expression of syntenin at
the mRNA level. To determine the tissue distribution of
syntenin, a multiple tissue RNA blot (CLONTECH) was
probed with a complete syntenin cDNA probe. The results indicate
that syntenin is present as a single species of 2.4 kilobases
with strongest expression observed in pancreas, skeletal muscle,
placenta, and heart with limited expression seen in brain, lung, liver,
and kidney (data not shown).
Both PDZ Domains of Syntenin Are Required for Interaction with
Schwannomin Isoform-1--
Sequences derived from all previously
obtained clones showed that the region upstream to the first PDZ
domains of syntenin is not involved in the association with sch-1. We
used the vector pJG4-5 to subclone regions of syntenin downstream from
the beginning of the first PDZ domain and narrow down the region
necessary for maintaining the association between syntenin and the
carboxyl-terminal end of sch-1 (Fig. 1B). First we tested a
construct, syntenin (120), where both the upstream and downstream
sequences to the PDZ domains were missing. The loss of the downstream
sequences flanking the PDZ domains of syntenin dramatically weakened
its interaction with sch-1. To test whether the presence of both PDZ domains was essential for the interaction with sch-1 to occur, two
separate constructs were prepared. One construct, syntenin 113-193,
contained only the first PDZ domain whereas the syntenin 198-273
construct contained only the second PDZ domain. The results from the
interactions using these single PDZ domain constructs indicated that
they do not sustain the association with schwannomin. Additional
constructs were engineered, syntenin (1) and syntenin (172),
so that each one of the PDZ domains was complemented by partial
flanking sequences from the second PDZ domain. These partially complemented PDZ domains constructs of syntenin were used to test whether they could rescued the interaction of with sch-1, and both
showed that no interactions between their product and sch-1 occurred
(Fig. 1B). Finally, we examined the requirement of the last
25 amino acids of syntenin for binding to sch-1. A new construct of
syntenin was made, syntenin (1), lacking only the last 42 amino acids, also failed to interact with sch-1. In fact, absolutely no
interaction between the product from this construct and schwannomin was
observed. By comparison, an interaction between the product from the
syntenin (120) construct and schwannomin was observed, although it
was weaker when compared with the interactions observed between
schwannomin and either syntenin (FL) or syntenin (120) products
(Fig. 1B). Therefore, the 21 amino acids residues located between positions 257 and 273 are necessary for the interaction between
syntenin and sch-1 to occur as their removal completely prevented the
interaction between the two proteins.
Schwannomin-Syntenin Interaction Is Mediated by the VAFFEEL Segment
of Schwannomin Isoform-1--
By generating a series of alanine
substitutions within the last 30 amino acids sch-1, we further analyzed
the interactions between syntenin and sch-1. These interactions were
again measured using the yeast two-hybrid system (Fig. 1C).
These modified amino acids within the VAFFEEL domain showed that
substitutions of both phenylalanine residues at positions In Vitro Interaction between Syntenin and Schwannomin Isoform-1 by
Pull-down and Blot Overlay Assays--
Both to confirm the true nature
of the interaction between syntenin and sch-1 and to further
investigate the role of the VAFFEEL domain, we tested it in
vitro. To do this we used a biotinylated sch-1 peptide containing
the VAFFEEL domain (biotin-LTLQSAKS RVAFFEEL) and both full-length
syntenin or syntenin (120) GST fusion proteins. These GST fusion
proteins were independently incubated in the presence of the sch-1
biotinylated peptide (Fig. 2A,
lanes 1-9) so that the peptide-protein complexes could be
pulled down using streptavidin beads. Before loading the proteins were
boiled for 5 min in 50 µl of SDS sample buffer so that the complexes
would be disrupted. Before any pull-down, a single syntenin band
corresponding to either GST-syntenin (FL) or GST-syntenin (120)
was detected when using both the anti-GST antibody (Fig. 2A,
lanes 2 and 3) and the anti-syntenin-C antibody
(Fig. 2A, lanes 5 and 6). When the
streptavidin bead pull-down was performed (Fig. 2A,
lanes 7-9), and the proteins were detected using the same
anti-syntenin-C antibody (Fig. 2A, lanes 8 and
9), the detected bands matched exactly with the bands
detected before the pull-down. This was true for both syntenin (FL)
(Fig. 2A, lanes 3, 6, and
9) and syntenin (120) (Fig. 2A, lanes
2, 5, and 8). The biotinylated sch-1 peptide did not interact with the GST alone (Fig. 2A, lane
7).
The in vitro interaction between syntenin and schwannomin
was further tested using a blot overlay assays. This method allows for
the detection of interactions between a biotinylated sch-1 peptide and
GST-syntenin (FL) fusion proteins immobilized on nitrocellulose. Binding of biotinylated sch-1 peptide is detected using the
streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase and the ECL Western blotting
detection reagent (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The location and quality
of the GST fusion proteins was first established by the Ponceau S
staining (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and 2).
Specific binding resulting from the interaction between two proteins
was observed in the lane containing GST-syntenin (Fig. 2B,
lane 4). Purified GST control did not show any detectable binding with the biotinylated peptide (Fig. 2B, lane
3). This result was further investigated using another blot
overlay assay where the nitrocellulose membrane containing full-length
GST-syntenin was incubated with native schwannomin isolated from human
erythrocyte membranes (Fig.
3A). Binding was examined
under two different incubation conditions, 4 °C overnight or
23 °C for 90 min. Native schwannomin specifically bound to the
GST-syntenin but did not interact with GST alone (Fig. 3A,
lane 2 and 4). The schwannomin-syntenin interaction was significantly stronger at 23 (Fig. 3A,
lane 3 and 5) than at 4 °C. Together, these
results indicate that schwannomin specifically interacts with syntenin
in vitro.
Syntenin Associates with Schwannomin In Vivo--
To determine
whether the interaction observed in vitro using both the
yeast two-hybrid system and the pull-down assays occurs in
vivo, we performed a coimmunoprecipitation experiment. A purified anti-syntenin-N antibody directed against the amino-terminal segment of
syntenin was used to immunoprecipitate the potential complex to be
formed by endogenous schwannomin and syntenin in 3T3L1 cells. The
coimmunoprecipitated material was boiled in SDS sample buffer and
loaded on SDS-PAGE gels detected with anti-sch-1 C-18. The pull-down of
the syntenin and its bound partners by anti-syntenin-N did reveal the
presence of schwannomin (Fig. 3B, lane 2).
Although the coimmunoprecipitated sch-1 band was relatively weak it
migrated to the exact same position as the sch-1 band from total 3T3L1 cell lysate (Fig. 3B, lane 1). In view of our
previous in vitro demonstration of the interaction between
syntenin and sch-1, this in vivo result suggest that
syntenin may form a complex with schwannomin in the living cell.
The Carboxyl-terminal End of Schwannomin Isoform-1 Is Sufficient
for Its Localization to the Plasma Membrane--
Wild type schwannomin
is mainly concentrated at the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane,
in close association with the actin cytoskeleton (14). Schwannomin is
also found around the membrane-ruffling region and in as yet
uncharacterized granules/vesicles at the perinuclear region (4). To
verify whether syntenin is localized to similar structures, we
transfected HeLa cells with various constructs of both schwannomin and
syntenin eGFP fusion proteins (Fig. 4).
We initially tested and confirmed that HeLa cells do express endogenous
syntenin (data not shown). HeLa cells transfected with the pEGFP-C1
vector alone showed green fluorescence uniformly in the cytoplasm but
not specifically underneath the plasma membrane (Fig. 4A).
When HeLa cells were transfected with the sch-C30-1-GFP construct that
expresses the last 30 amino acids of sch-1 (Fig. 4B),
fluorescence was observed at the plasma membrane, as well as in some
cytoplasmic punctate structures/vesicles of unknown identity. When a
longer segment of sch-1 (sch-C125-1-GFP) encoding the
carboxyl-terminal 125 amino acids was expressed, the majority of the
signal was observed at the plasma membrane with some fluorescence
visible in the punctate granular vesicle-like structures (Fig.
4C). Finally, when a full-length construct of sch-1 tagged
to GFP was expressed in the same cells, the fluorescence signal was
largely granular and located at the cytoplasmic face of the plasma
membrane and throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 4D). Overall
these results demonstrate that the carboxyl-terminal segment of sch-1
is sufficient for mediating its localization underneath the plasma
membrane and to punctate/vesicular structures. It is noteworthy that
although a relatively weaker signal was observed under the plasma
membrane with the shorter sch-C30-GFP construct, in comparison with the
signal from the sch-C125-GFP construct, it was nonetheless sufficient
to direct a portion of this sch-1 peptide to this location. HeLa cells
were also transfected with syntenin (FL)-GFP and with a syntenin
(120)-GFP. Both syntenin fusion proteins were also partially
localized to the plasma membrane and in the case of syntenin (FL)-GFP
to what appears to be punctate/intracellular vesicular structures (Fig.
4, E and F). The subcellular localization of
sch-1 and syntenin (FL) was observed under the plasma membrane and in
punctate structures, which suggests that these two compartments could
be the ones providing a suitable environment for those protein to
functionally associate with each other in vivo.
Down-regulation of Syntenin Causes Mislocalization of Schwannomin
Isoform-1--
We wanted to assess the biological significance of the
syntenin-schwannomin interaction in living cells and hypothesized that syntenin might be involved in the trafficking of sch-1 to the cytoplasmic membrane. Therefore, we anticipated a disruption of sch-1
localization if down-regulation of syntenin was to occur in cells. To
test this hypothesis, we established a tet-inducible system to control
the expression of an antisense cDNA of human syntenin in a mouse
fibroblast 3T3-L1 tet-off cell line (CLONTECH). Before any localization studies were performed, Western blot detections using anti-syntenin-C were prepared from different 3T3-L1 tet-off transfectant cell lines to verify the efficiency of the syntenin antisense expression by looking at the level of syntenin protein detectable (Fig. 5). A 3T3-L1 tet-off
cell line transfected with the pTRE vector alone (line V1C11) shows a
normal level of syntenin expression (Fig. 5, lane 1). In
contrast, two 3T3-L1 tet-off-derived cell lines (A1C1 and A1C3)
transfected with the pTRE vector encoding for the conditional
expression of antisense syntenin upon doxycycline removal showed
significant suppression of syntenin protein (Fig. 5, lanes 2 and 3).
A full week after the removal of doxycycline from the culture
medium of cell lines V1C11, A1C1, and A1C3, the cells were
examined for any change in sch-1 localization. This was observed
through fluorescent microscopy with the anti-sch-1 antibody described earlier. In both the V1C11 cell line (where the syntenin antisense expression is not possible) (Fig.
6A) and in the A1C3 cell lines where doxycycline was not removed (Fig. 6B), sch-1
distribution was observed both in the cytoplasm and underneath the
plasma membrane with some signal visible in the filopodia extension. In
sharp contrast to this, cell lines A1C3 (Fig. 6, C,
D, and E) and A1C1 (Fig. 6F)
expressing antisense syntenin displayed a more flattened morphology,
and more importantly, sch-1 signal was largely granular, localizing
predominantly within the cytoplasm with much less signal detectable at
the cytoplasmic face of plasma membrane. Together, these results
support the hypothesis that the syntenin-schwannomin interaction plays
a critical role in the subcellular trafficking and targeting of the
schwannomin isoform-1 to the plasma membrane.
Schwannomin (also called merlin/NF2 protein) is a member of the
ERM family of proteins that are believed to play important roles in the
reorganization of cortical cytoskeleton (14, 23). Over the last two
decades, extensive biochemical studies on erythrocyte protein 4.1, the
prototypical member of the ERM superfamily, laid the foundation for the
function of this family of proteins as linkers of membrane-cytoskeleton
(31). Schwannomin contains an amino-terminal FERM domain preceding an
To gain further insights into the functional significance of
schwannomin isoform diversity, we used the carboxyl-terminal 30 amino
acids of sch-1 as bait in a yeast two-hybrid assay to search for
interacting proteins in the human fetal kidney cDNA library. The
yeast two-hybrid screen resulted in the identification of syntenin as a
new binding partner for sch-1 (Fig. 1). Syntenin is a 30-kDa cytosolic
adaptor protein that contains a tandem repeat of PDZ domains, which
bind directly the cytoplasmic domains of syndecans receptors (37).
Syndecans are a family of transmembrane cell-surface heparin sulfate
proteoglycans that participate in multiple cellular functions (38).
Interestingly, the cytoplasmic domain of syndecan-2 could also bind to
the PDZ domain of human CASK/LIN-2 that in turn associates with
the FERM domain of protein 4.1 thus providing a coupling mechanism
between the extracellular matrix and the actin cytoskeleton (39). More
recent evidence indicates that syntenin could serve as a marker protein
for the apical-basolateral polarity in the MDCK epithelial cells thus suggesting a functional role of syntenin in the intracellular trafficking and targeting of receptors to the plasma membrane (28).
The two PDZ domains of syntenin, encompassing two thirds of the
protein, are crucial for its intracellular scaffolding function linking
transmembrane receptors to signaling components or cytoskeleton (40,
41). In general, the PDZ domains bind to the C termini of numerous
proteins/or internal peptides of defined sequence, dimerize with other
PDZ domains, and interact with other protein domains such as SH3, GUK
(guanylate kinase-like), FERM, and leucine zipper motifs (42-44). The PDZ domain-seeded multimeric protein complexes are involved in the organization, positioning, and clustering of receptors (Wingless, Notch, proTGF- The PDZ domains are classified into two subclasses based on the
sequence of peptides with which they bind. Class I PDZ domains tend to
prefer the carboxyl-terminal sequence (S/T)XV. In
contrast, class II PDZ domains preferentially bind
(F/Y)X(F/V/A) (48). Based on previously published studies,
the PDZ domains of syntenin have been classified as class II PDZ
domains with preference for bulky hydrophobic residues at positions 0 and Although the existence of the two splice variants of schwannomin has
been known for some time, the functional basis of their distinguishing
feature at the C termini remains poorly understood. The present study
provides the first evidence demonstrating direct interaction between
the C terminus of sch-1 and the two PDZ domains of syntenin. The lack
of binding between the C terminus of sch-2 and syntenin may begin to
shed light on the intriguing observation that only sch-1 functions as a
growth suppressor protein (22). Syntenin was originally localized to
both plasma membrane and early secretory structures of MDCK cells (24,
27), and our results also show punctate vesicular staining of syntenin
within the cytoplasm of HeLa cells. The proposed role of syntenin in the intracellular trafficking pathways may be relevant to the function
of sch-1 in vivo. sch-1 is generally localized to the plasma
membrane, but the mechanism of its delivery to the cell periphery
remains unknown. Our results demonstrate that the exogenous sch-1 is
predominantly localized to the plasma membrane consistent with the
partial localization of syntenin to the plasma membrane. Indeed, the
down-regulation of syntenin by antisense cDNA expression leads to
punctate/vesicular accumulation of sch-1 in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6)
implying that the syntenin and sch-1 interaction may be critical for
some of the subcellular targeting functions in vivo.
Considering the vast number of protein-protein interactions afforded by
the PDZ domains of syntenin, and the presence of open/close conformational switch in sch-1, our findings may provide a framework for the trafficking and subcellular targeting of large protein complexes necessary for the efficient mode of signal transduction in vivo.
Our results indicate that the adhesion properties of 3T3L1 cells are
also affected, as evident by their flattened morphology, when the
expression of syntenin is suppressed and the membrane localization of
sch-1 is altered (Fig. 6, C and D). This
observation is consistent with the previous reports showing that some
mutant, and rare isoforms of schwannomin lead to weakened cell surface adhesion properties (23, 52, 53), and some isoforms of schwannomin are
colocalized with
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
II-spectrin (17), and
1-integrin (18). These
observations suggest that schwannomin exerts its tumor suppressor
effects presumably by modulating some aspects of the
receptor-cytoskeletal linkage critical for cell growth and adhesion pathways.
from early compartments of the secretory pathway to the cell surface
(27). More recently, syntenin has been localized to the apical
recycling compartment of MDCK epithelial cells suggesting a role
in the intracellular trafficking and targeting pathways (28). Direct
and specific association between syntenin and schwannomin isoform-1
begins to suggest a functional role for the differentially spliced
isoforms of schwannomin and may have implications in the assembly of
cytoskeletal complexes, trafficking, and subcellular targeting events
necessary for the regulation of cell growth and adhesion processes.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
) and pTRE
vector were digested with the restriction enzymes XhoI and
SacII, respectively. After blunt ending with T4 DNA
polymerase, both plasmids were digested with EcoRI. In the
case of syntenin, because of an internal restriction site, partial
EcoRI digestion was carried out to isolate full-length
syntenin cDNA for cloning into pTRE (pTRE-syntenin (AS)).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, amino acid sequence of human syntenin
isolated during the screen for sch-1 interacting partners. The human
fetal kidney library constructed in vector pJG4-5, which was used for
the yeast two-hybrid screen, generated clones with sequences coding for
residues located between position 120 and 298. The complete sequence
was obtained from the cDNA clone 566968 at I.M.A.G.E. The
gray boxes indicate the two distinct PDZ domains within the
protein; PDZ domain 1 is underlined once, and PDZ domain 2 is underlined twice. B, details of the syntenin
constructs used to analyze the interaction between syntenin and sch-1.
In this section and in C, the extent of the interaction is
expressed as
-galactosidase (-gal) activity and growth on
Leu
plates. +, interaction detected; ±, interaction
substantially lower than + detected;
, interaction not detected.
C, association between syntenin and the products of sch-1
constructs where specific amino acids located within the VAFFEEL region
alanine were independently substituted for alanine. The sequence shows
the amino acid residues forming the carboxyl-terminal portion of
schwannomin isoform-1. The amino acid residues specific to sch-1 are
underlined.
3 and
4
for alanine can completely abrogate the interaction with syntenin. Not
all substitution within the VAFFEEL completely abrogated the
interaction. Alanine substitution of either valine or glutamic acid
residues at respective positions
6 and
1 of sch-1 simply weakened
it as seen by the completed absence of blue from the
-galactosidase
reporter gene in combination with weaker growth over Leu
plates. The last alanine substitutions within the VAFFEEL of both the
leucine and glutamic acid residues at positions 0 and
2,
respectively, had no effect on the interaction between syntenin sch-1.
The interactions between syntenin and any of the products from sch-1
constructs where either one of the remaining 23 amino acids (located
outside of the VAFFEEL region) were substituted for alanine were all
tested and found to be positives (data not shown). All together, these
results indicate that there is a specific signature sequence at the C
terminus of sch-1, which is crucial for its recognition by the PDZ
domains of syntenin.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
In Vitro interaction between GST-syntenin
fusion proteins and a biotinylated sch-1 peptide. A,
purified GST-syntenin (FL) and GST-syntenin (120) fusion proteins
were independently incubated in the presence of biotinylated sch-1
peptides (lanes 1-9). On the third gel
(lanes 7-9) a streptavidin bead pull-down was performed on
the combined proteins. The material was loaded on SDS-PAGE gels,
transferred, and detected using specific antibodies. When no pull-down
was performed (lanes 1-6), the fusion proteins were
detected with anti-GST (lanes 1-3) and anti-syntenin-C
antibodies (lanes 4-6). In the case where the combined
proteins were pulled down they were detected using an anti-syntenin-C
antibody (lanes 7-9). B, blot overlay
interaction assay between immobilized GST-syntenin (FL) and a
biotinylated sch-1 peptide. Purified GST protein alone and GST-syntenin
(FL) fusion proteins were resolved on a SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to
a nitrocellulose membrane. Before incubation of the membrane with the
biotinylated peptide, the membrane was treated with Ponceau S to reveal
all proteins (lane 1 and 2). The same membrane
was incubated, overnight at 4 °C, in the presence of a biotinylated
sch-1 peptide, and the interaction with the fusion protein was detected
with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase and ECL Western blotting
detection reagent (lane 3 and 4).

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
In Vitro interaction between purified
GST-syntenin (FL) and native schwannomin protein derived from human
erythrocyte. A, glutathione-Sepharose beads coupled to
GST alone (lanes 2 and 4) or GST-syntenin (FL)
(lanes 3 and 5) were blocked with 0.5% bovine
serum albumin in binding buffer and then incubated with native
schwannomin protein purified from human erythrocyte membranes. The
incubation was done either overnight at 4 °C (lanes 2 and
3) or for 90 min at 23 °C (lanes 4 and
5). After these incubations, a GST pull-down using
glutathione-Sepharose beads was performed before the products were
resolved on SDS-PAGE gels, transferred, and detected using anti-sch-1.
The schwannomin from the erythrocyte extract migrates in parallel to
the schwannomin obtained from the GST pull-down material (lane
1). B, an anti-syntenin-N polyclonal antibody was used
to coimmunoprecipitate schwannomin from 3T3-L1 tet-off cells extracts.
The immunoprecipitated protein (lane 2) was resolved on an
SDS-PAGE gel, transferred, and detected using a commercial anti-sch-1
(C-18) antibody. The positive and negative controls were, respectively,
total cell extract (lane 1) and protein A/G-seahorse alone
(lane 3).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Subcellular localization of syntenin and
schwannomin-1 in HeLa cells. The cells were separately
transfected with specific syntenin and schwannomin-eGFP fusion
protein, and 18 h later the fluorescence signal was directly
observed using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica). Pictures
taken from HeLa cells expressing, in order, the following:
A, the vector pEGFP-C1 alone; B,
schwannomin-C30-1-GFP; C, schwannomin-C125-1-GFP;
D, full-length schwannomin-GFP; E, syntenin
(120)-GFP; and F, syntenin (FL)-GFP.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Down-regulation of syntenin and the effect on
schwannomin isoform-1 localization. Stable clones of 3T3-L1
tet-off cells were obtained from transfections with either a pTRE
vector with the cDNA for antisense syntenin or with the pTRE vector
alone. Following doxycycline removal to activate the antisense
expression, total proteins were extracted from the cell lines. The
proteins were resolved on an SDS-PAGE gel transferred and detected
using an anti-syntenin-C antibody. The endogenous level of syntenin
expression in the 3T3-L1-tet-off cell line V1C11 that expresses the
control pTRE vector is shown in lane 1. After doxycycline
removal, the endogenous syntenin level from two of 3T3-L1 tet-off cell
lines that express the syntenin antisense was also verified, A1C1
(lane 2) and A1C3 (lane 3).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Schwannomin subcellular distribution in
3T3-L1 tet-off cell transfectants 1 week after doxycycline
removal. The localization of sch-1 was observed by
immunocytochemistry using an anti-sch-1 antibody (C-18). Pictures were
taken from A, V1C11 pTRE vector control cell line; B, A1C3
cell line before doxycycline was removed from the media;
C-F, cell lines A1C3 (C, D, and
E) and A1C1 (F) after doxycycline removal to
induce the syntenin antisense expression.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helical stretch interrupted by a proline-rich region and ends with
a charged C terminus. The two most abundant isoforms of schwannomin
lack residues corresponding to either exon 16 (sch-1) or exon 17 (sch-2), and therefore the last 16 amino acids of sch-1 differentiate
these two isoforms (3, 6). More importantly, only sch-1 has been shown
to suppress cell growth suggesting that the last 16 amino acids of
sch-1 are essential for its tumor suppressor function in
vivo (21). Like other ERM proteins, sch-1 can form intramolecular
interactions between its amino and carboxyl termini thus creating a
"closed" conformation that must be disrupted to produce an
"open" conformation of sch-1 (32). In contrast, sch-2 does not
undergo intramolecular interactions and therefore remains locked in
open conformation, permitting constitutive and perhaps
unregulated interactions with actin and other cytoplasmic proteins
(33). For example, sch-2 associates tightly with the
II-spectrin
through its C terminus whereas the association between sch-1 and
II-spectrin is significantly weaker (17). It is believed that the
weaker binding of sch-1 could be a consequence of the masking of the
ligand-binding site because of its closed conformation. The open
conformation of sch-1 is also a prerequisite for its interactions with
the hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate and
EBP50, respectively (34). Similarly, the carboxyl-terminal residues of
sch-1 are known to participate in the homotypic interaction between
sch-1 molecules and also in the heterotypic interaction with either ezrin and sch-2 (35, 36). Together, these observations indicate that
the C terminus of sch-1 participates in the formation of both homo- and
heterotypic associations thus permitting the assembly of large protein
complexes in vivo.
) and in the recruitment of
cytosolic proteins (GTPase-activating protein and guanine nucleotide exchange factor) to the plasma membrane (45). Our yeast two-hybrid and
the GST pull-down results indicate that the carboxyl-terminal peptide
of sch-1 binds to the region overlapping the two PDZ domains of
syntenin (Figs. 2 and 3). This observation is consistent with the
earlier demonstration that both PDZ domains of syntenin are required
for the binding of syntenin to syndecans and proTGF-
(24,
27). In contrast, the neurofascin adhesion receptor binds exclusively
to the PDZ2 domain of syntenin indicating the complexity of PDZ
domain-mediated interactions within a single molecule (46). The last 25 amino acids of syntenin, presumably located outside its PDZ2 domain,
are also important in strengthening its interaction with sch-1, or they
might be required for proper folding of the two PDZ domains. In
contrast, sch-2 failed to bind to syntenin indicating that the
carboxyl-terminal sequence of sch-1 plays a critical role in this
interaction. The in vitro association between sch-1 and
syntenin was confirmed in vivo by coimmunoprecipitation and
colocalization studies (Figs. 3 and 4). The relatively weak in
vivo interaction between syntenin and sch-1 could be a consequence of factors such as intra- and intermolecular associations of sch-1, undefined cell culture conditions such as cell density, serum growth
factor, adhesion substrate, and cell shape (47), and the
phosphorylation status of sch-1. Future studies investigating the
effects of these factors on syntenin and sch-1 interaction may provide
answers to these questions.
2 of the binding peptide (48, 49). A close inspection of the last
16 amino acids of sch-1 reveals an intriguing internal sequence, SRV,
that may fold into a
-hairpin "finger," allowing its interaction
with the class I PDZ domains (50). Whether this internal SRV motif of
sch-1 binds to the class II PDZ domains of syntenin remains to be
established. The very C terminus of sch-1 is likely to provide the
binding interface for the peptide binding pockets of class II PDZ
domains of syntenin. Interestingly, mutagenesis of the Glu-593 residue
at the
2 position in sch-1 does not affect its binding to syntenin
whereas the replacement of Phe-592 located at the
3 position
completely abolished the binding (Fig. 1C). This result is
consistent with published studies demonstrating that a variety of amino
acids (except Pro and Lys) could replace the Thr residue at the
2
position without disrupting the interaction of proTGF-
with syntenin
(27). These observations suggest that one or both PDZ domains of
syntenin may display a unique and relaxed specificity at the
2
position consistent with the observed specificity of other class II PDZ
domains (27). Alternatively, the direct interaction between syntenin
and sch-1 as reported here may unravel a new mode of sequence motif of
carboxyl-terminal peptides recognized by the PDZ domains of syntenin.
Future structural studies of peptide-bound PDZ domains may provide
clues to some of these questions.
1-integrin (18). Moreover, one of the binding
partners of syntenin, syndecan-4, signals in a
Rho-dependent manner with
1-integrin thus modulating the
assembly of focal adhesions and microfilaments (51). Together, the PDZ
domain-mediated interaction between syntenin and sch-1 could
rationalize the existence of a large protein complex with syndecan-4,
proTGF-
, ephrin ligands, and neurofascin, and the regulation of this
multimeric complex is likely to underlie the molecular basis of growth
suppression by sch-1 in brain tumors.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by funds from the National Cancer Institute. G. A. R. was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. M. J. was the recipient of a Neuroscience Foundation fellowship. National Institutes of Health Grants CA66263 and HL60755 provided support for A. H. C.
§ Present address: Dept. of Neurobiology and Behavior, Laboratories of Molecular Neuropatho-genesis and Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, 1109 Gillespie Neuroscience Research Facility, Irvine, CA 92697-4545.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 514-937-6011 (ext. 4235); E-mail: mi32@musica.mcgill.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105792200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: NF2, neurofibromatosis type 2; sch, schwannomin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; eGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; FL, full-length.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Thomas, G., Merel, P., Sanson, M., Hoang-Xuan, K., Zucman, J., Desmaze, C., Melot, T., Aurias, A., and Delattre, O. (1994) Eur. J. Cancer 30A, 1981-1987 |
| 2. | Louis, D. N., Ramesh, V., and Gusella, J. F. (1995) Brain Pathol. 5, 163-172 |
| 3. | Rouleau, G. A., Merel, P., Lutchman, M., Sanson, M., Zucman, J., Marineau, C., Hoang-Xuan, K., Demczuk, S., Desmaze, C., Plougastel, B., Pulst, S. M., Lenoir, G., Bijlsma, E., Fashold, R., Dumanski, J., de Jong, P., Parry, D., Eldridge, R., Aurias, A., Delattre, O., and Thomas, G. (1993) Nature 363, 515-521 |
| 4. | Trofatter, J. A., MacCollin, M. M., Rutter, J. L., Murrell, J. R., Duyao, M. P., Parry, D. M., Eldridge, R., Kley, N., Menon, A. G., and Pulaski, K. (1993) Cell 72, 791-800 |
| 5. | Knudson, A. G., Jr. (1971) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 68, 820-823 |
| 6. | Bianchi, A. B., Hara, T., Ramesh, V., Gao, J., Klein-Szanto, A. J., Morin, F., Menon, A. G., Trofatter, J. A., Gusella, J. F., and Seizinger, B. R. (1994) Nat. Genet. 6, 185-192 |
| 7. | Tsukita, S., Oishi, K., Sato, N., Sagara, J., Kawai, A., and Tsukita, S. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 391-401 |
| 8. | Vaheri, A., Carpen, O., Heiska, L., Helander, T. S., Jaaskelainen, J., Majander-Nordenswan, P., Sainio, M., Timonen, T., and Turunen, O. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 659-666 |
| 9. | Lamb, R. F., Ozanne, B. W., Roy, C., McGarry, L., Stipp, C., Mangeat, P., and Jay, D. G. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 682-688 |
| 10. | Hirao, M., Sato, N., Kondo, T., Yonemura, S., Monden, M., Sasaki, T., Takai, Y., Tsukita, S., and Tsukita, S. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 37-51 |
| 11. | Yonemura, S., Hirao, M., Doi, Y., Takahashi, N., Kondo, T., and Tsukita, S. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 140, 885-895 |
| 12. | Bretscher, A. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 109-116 |
| 13. | Gonzalez-Agosti, C., Xu, L., Pinney, D., Beauchamp, R., Hobbs, W., Gusella, J., and Ramesh, V. (1996) Oncogene 13, 1239-1247 |
| 14. | Xu, H. M., and Gutmann, D. H. (1998) J. Neurosci. Res. 51, 403-415 |
| 15. | Sainio, M., Zhao, F., Heiska, L., Turunen, O., den Bakker, M., Zwarthoff, E., Lutchman, M., Rouleau, G. A., Jaaskelainen, J., Vaheri, A., and Carpen, O. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 2249-2260 |
| 16. | Reczek, D., Berryman, M., and Bretscher, A. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 169-179 |
| 17. | Scoles, D. R., Huynh, D. P., Morcos, P. A., Coulsell, E. R., Robinson, N. G., Tamanoi, F., and Pulst, S. M. (1998) Nat. Genet. 18, 354-359 |
| 18. | Obremski, V. J., Hall, A. M., and Fernandez-Valle, C. (1998) J. Neurobiol. 37, 487-501 |
| 19. | Gutmann, D. H., Wright, D. E., Geist, R. T., and Snider, W. D. (1995) Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 471-478 |
| 20. | Pykett, M. J., Murphy, M., Harnish, P. R., and George, D. L. (1994) Hum. Mol. Genet. 3, 559-564 |
| 21. | Lutchman, M., and Rouleau, G. A. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 2270-2274 |
| 22. | Sherman, L., Xu, H.-M., Geist, R. T., Saporito-Irwin, S., Howells, N., Ponta, H., Herrlich, P., and Gutmann, D. H. (1997) Oncogene 15, 2505-2509 |
| 23. | Gutmann, D. H., Sherman, L., Seftor, L., Haipek, C., Hoang Lu, K., and Hendrix, M. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 267-275 |
| 24. | Grootjans, J. J., Zimmermann, P., Reekmans, G., Smets, A., Degeest, G., Durr, J., and David, G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13683-13678 |
| 25. | Torres, R., Firestein, B. L., Dong, H., Staudinger, J., Olson, E. N., Huganir, R. L., Bredt, D. S., Gale, N. W., and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1998) Neuron 21, 1453-1463 |
| 26. | Lin, D., Gish, G. D., Songyang, Z., and Pawson, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3726-3733 |
| 27. | Fernandez-Larrea, J., Merlos-Suarez, A., Urena, J. M., Baselga, J., and Arribas, J. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 423-433 |
| 28. | Fialka, I., Steinlein, P., Ahorn, H., Bock, G., Burbelo, P. D., Haberfellner, M., Lottspeich, F., Paiha, K., Pasquali, C., and Huber, L. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26233-22239 |
| 29. | Jindal, H. K., Lutchman, M., Marfatia, S. M., Peters, L. L., Hanspal, M., Liu, S. C., Jannatipour, M., Rouleau, G. A., and Chishti, A. H. (1998) American Society of Hematology Meeting Abstracts, November 15, 1998 , p. 6a, W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia |
| 30. | Fields, S., and Song, O. (1989) Nature 340, 245-246 |
| 31. | Arpin, M., Algrain, M., and Louvard, D. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 6, 136-141 |
| 32. | Pearson, M. A., Reczek, D., Bretscher, A., and Karplus, A. (2000) Cell 101, 259-270 |
| 33. | Brault, E., Gautreau, A., Lamarine, M., Callebaut, I., and Thomas, G. (2001) J. Cell Sci. 114, 1901-1912 |
| 34. | Bretscher, A., Chambers, D., Nguyen, R., and Reczec, D. (2000) Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 113-143 |
| 35. | Grönholm, M., Sainio, M., Zhao, F., Heiska, L., Vaheri, A., and Carpen, O. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 895-904 |
| 36. | Meng, J.-J., Lowrie, D. J., Sun, H., Dorsey, E., Pelton, P. D., Bashour, A.-M., Groden, J., Ratner, N., and Ip, W. (2000) J. Neurosci. Res. 62, 491-502 |
| 37. | Ponting, C. P., Phillips, C., Davies, K. E., and Blake, D. J. (1997) Bioessays 19, 469-479 |
| 38. | Grootjans, J. J., Zimmermann, P., Reekmans, G., Smets, A., Degeest, G., Durr, J., and David, G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13683-13688 |
| 39. | Cohen, A. R., Woods, D. F., Marfatia, S. M., Walther, Z., Chishti, A. H., Anderson, J. M., and Woods, D. F. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 129-138 |
| 40. | Kachinsky, A. M., Froehner, S. C., and Milgram, S. L. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 145, 391-402 |
| 41. | Fanning, A. S., and Anderson, J. M. (1998) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 228, 209-233 |
| 42. | Cowburn, D. (1997) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 835-838 |
| 43. | Dobrosotskaya, I., Guy, R. K., and James, G. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31589-31597 |
| 44. | Maekawa, K., Imagawa, N., Naito, A., Harada, S., Yoshie, O., and Takagi, S. (1999) Biochem. J. 337, 179-184 |
| 45. | Fanning, A. S., and Anderson, J. M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 1385-1388 |
| 46. | Koroll, M., Rathjen, F. G., and Volkmer, H. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 10646-10654 |
| 47. | Shaw, R. J., McClatchey, A. I., and Jacks, T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7757-7764 |
| 48. | Daniels, D. L., Cohen, A. R., Anderson, J. M., and Brunger, A. T. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 317-325 |
| 49. | Songyang, Z., Fanning, A. S., Fu, C., Xu, J., Marfatia, S. M., Chishti, A. H., Crompton, A., Chan, A. C., Anderson, J. M., and Cantley, L. C. (1997) Science 275, 73-77 |
| 50. | Hillier, B. J., Christopherson, K. S., Prehoda, K. E., Bredt, D. S., and Lim, W. A. (1999) Science 284, 812-815 |
| 51. | Saoncella, S., Echtermeyer, F., Denhez, F., Nowlen, J. K., Mosher, D. F., Robinson, S. D., Hynes, R. O., and Goetinck, P. F. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 2805-2810 |
| 52. | Huynh, D. P., and Pulst, S. M. (1996) Oncogene 13, 73-84 |
| 53. | Scherer, S. S., and Gutmann, D. H. (1996) J. Neurosci. Res. 46, 595-605 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Sarkar, H. Boukerche, Z.-z. Su, and P. B. Fisher mda-9/Syntenin: More than Just a Simple Adapter Protein When It Comes to Cancer Metastasis Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 68(9): 3087 - 3093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Beekman and P. J. Coffer The ins and outs of syntenin, a multifunctional intracellular adaptor protein J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2008; 121(9): 1349 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Chatterjee, J. Stegmuller, P. Schatzle, K. Karram, M. Koroll, H. B. Werner, K.-A. Nave, and J. Trotter Interaction of Syntenin-1 and the NG2 Proteoglycan in Migratory Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2008; 283(13): 8310 - 8317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Latysheva, G. Muratov, S. Rajesh, M. Padgett, N. A. Hotchin, M. Overduin, and F. Berditchevski Syntenin-1 Is a New Component of Tetraspanin-Enriched Microdomains: Mechanisms and Consequences of the Interaction of Syntenin-1 with CD63 Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2006; 26(20): 7707 - 7718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||